Chabot College
Program Review Report
2014 -2015
Year Two of
Program Review Cycle
Submitted on [11/1/2013]
Contact:
[Nursing Faculty]
Final Forms, 1/18/13
Table of Contents
Section A: What Progress Have We Made? ............................... 1
Section B: What Changes Do We Suggest? ................................ 2
Required Appendices:
A: Budget History .........................................................................................3
B1: Course Learning Outcomes Assessment Schedule .................................4
B2: “Closing the Loop” Assessment Reflections ...........................................5
C: Program Learning Outcomes....................................................................9
D: A Few Questions ....................................................................................11
E: New Initiatives .......................................................................................12
F1: New Faculty Requests ..........................................................................13
F2: Classified Staffing Requests ...................................................................14
F3: FTEF Requests ......................................................................................15
F4: Academic Learning Support Requests ..................................................16
F5: Supplies and Services Requests ............................................................17
F6: Conference/Travel Requests ................................................................18
F7: Technology and Other Equipment Requests ........................................19
F8: Facilities Requests ................................................................................20
A. What Progress Have We Made?
Complete Appendices A (Budget History), B1 and B2 (CLO's), C (PLO's), and D (A few questions) prior to writing your
narrative. You should alsoreview your most recent success, equity, course sequence, and enrollment data at
http://www.chabotcollege.edu/ProgramReview/Data2013.cfm.
In year one, you established goals and action plans for program improvement. This section asks you to reflect
on the progress you have made toward those goals. This analysis will be used by the PRBC and Budget
Committee to assess progress toward achievement of our Strategic Plan and to inform future budget
decisions. It will also be used by the SLOAC and Basic Skills committees as input to their priority-setting
process. In your narrative of two or less pages, address the following questions:





What were your year one Program Review goals?
Did you achieve those goals? Specifically describe your progress on the goals you set for student
learning, program learning, and Strategic Plan achievement.
What are you most proud of?
What challenges did you face that may have prevented achieving your goals?
Cite relevant data in your narrative (e.g., efficiency, persistence, success, FT/PT faculty ratios, CLO/PLO
assessment results, external accreditation demands, etc.).
What were your year one Program Review goals?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Increase student retention
Review at-risk students
Replace Maternity Instructor
Evaluate and update the merit admission criteria
Evaluate existing curriculum-transfer to CSUEB streamlined
Open house and BBQ for new students
Use simulation lab as part of a community outreach for the hospitals and get funds to maintain
equipment
8. Provide counseling hours for students experiencing high levels of stress
Did you achieve those goals? Specifically describe your progress on the goals you set for student learning,
program learning, and Strategic Plan achievement.
Goal 1: For the graduating class of 2012 we started with 61 students and graduated 37 for a 61%
graduation rate. During this time we also admitted 5 LVN’s and 7 readmits (2 nd time through program)
for a final rate of 49 or 80%. Still need to work on this goal.
Goal 2: At-risk students are now referred to E. Victoria (counseling) as case manager hired with grant
money. He provides counseling within a 5 day referral time to our students. This is for help due to
stress, or family/personal issues. This is working well and instructors referred 7 students last semester.
Goal 3: We did replace the maternity instructor position. At this time, the nursing faculty is still short
one Medical-Surgical Instructor. This position is still posted on the HR website.
1
Goal 4: The first Merit Based students were admitted in the fall of 2012. For ethnic groups the class has
28% of students identifying themselves as White and the other 72% identify as other races. We notice
a high number of male students 15/50 or 33%. The class started with 50 students and at this time
seven have withdrawn; due in part to family issues, clinical experience, and one student for failure of
the math exam. We will continue to evaluate the criteria.
Goal 5: A roadmap for transfer to CSUEB was developed and is posted on our website to streamline
this process for students. We have a great interest in this program and over 50% of last year’s class has
enrolled in the CSUEB program. A speaker from CSUEB has met with the freshman class last October to
promote this great opportunity to get a BSN in one year after graduation.
Goal 6: The Open House/BBQ has been held for the past 2 years and has been paid for with part of
grant and co-curricular funds. We see positive evaluations from students for this event.
Goal 7: Simulation is up and running well in each large course in the program. We have hired a
simulation technician and simulation helper to run the manikins and write scenarios. This is all paid for
with grant money. Student evaluations of this experience are very positive and reflect that this clinical
practicum is a critical part of their nursing education. There is a concern if the grant funding is not
renewed the college will not have the resources to maintain the lab personal required to effectively
‘run’ a simulation.
Goal 8: Counseling with Ernesto Victoria (case manager) will continue with grant funding as long as
possible.
What are you most proud of?
As the nursing program director I am most proud of the Merit Based Admission Criteria (we continue to review
this process and will make modifications), the Roadmap to CSUEB and the simulation lab. All these items allow
Chabot College to have a 96 to 100% pass rate on the State licensing exams this past year.
What challenges did you face that may have prevented achieving your goals?
Currently we are short one full time nursing instructor. Our program has(7) full time and (9) part time
instructors. The nursing program has mandated staffing levels by the Board of Registered Nursing who will
visit in 2014. This will most likely be an area of noncompliance if it is not addressed. Our pediatric instructor
will go on semi-retirement in the spring of 2014. This will create another half time position.
The programs administrative assistant is currently an 11 month position and needs to be moved to a 12 month
position. In the summer we teach Nursing 85 which is a Nurse Refresher course. Also hospitals want all nursing
students’ paperwork 6 weeks before the start of clinical. The Administrative Assistant must complete all this
paperwork in the summer. The Merit Application process is now completed by the program office not A&R.
With grant money we have been able to staff nursing clinical rotations with a second adjunct instructor for 2
hours each day to assist with medication administration. This has been extremely successful in allowing more
students to administer medication which is a large part of the RN’s job.
2
Many hospitals are now requiring that we have 8 instead of 10 students in each clinical group. We no longer
have an acute care pediatric clinical site. It is becoming difficult to find acute care sites as hospitals are having
financial difficulties, implementing the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and are running transition programs
for new staff. The Board of Registered Nursing in their 2012 School Report states, “Reasons for lack of access
to clinical space vary by program, although the predominant reason among all program levels remains
competition from the increased number of nursing students. Staff nurse overload/insufficient qualified staff
and a decrease in patient census was also a frequently cited reason.”
We continue to teleconference all theory courses to our Livermore extended campus site. The nursing
program has had updated teleconferencing equipment installed in Hayward and Livermore. We continue to
have technical issues with our equipment.
Our relationship with ValleyCare Medical Center continues to work extremely well and they hire many of our
graduates. They have for two years reduced the number of students from 20 to 10. The funds from Valley
Care Medical Center have also been decreased by 50%.
The BRN 2012 School Report states,“Between 8/1/11 and 7/31/12, 128 of California’s 132 nursing schools
reported using clinical simulations.” We are currently running the simulation lab with grant funding that will
run out over the next school year. I hope to secure more grant money as we need to keep the simulation lab
running efficiently.
In the future, the nursing program will need to purchase some type of electronic medical record to allow
students to practice how to document on the computer chart while here on campus performing nursing skills.
To conclude we are using the over $700,000 in grant funds to increase our student retention, pay for
simulation lab employees, provide a case manager for our struggling students, along with seven medication
pass instructors and two tutors. We desperately need to replace the one full time nursing instructor as soon
as possible to continue to run the program. Although we have posted this position we have been unsuccessful
in finding a qualified applicant.
B. What Changes Do We Suggest?
Review the Strategic Plan goal and key strategiesat
http://www.chabotcollege.edu/prbc/StrategicPlan/SPforPR.pdfprior to completing your narrative. Please
complete Appendices E (New Initiatives) and F1-8 (Resources Requested) to further detail your narrative. Limit
your narrative to two pages, and be very specific about what you hope to achieve, why, and how.
Given your experiences and student achievement results over the past year, what changes do you suggest to
your course/program improvement plan? What new initiatives might you begin to support the achievement
of our Strategic Plan goal? Do you have new ideas to improve student learning? What are your specific,
measurable goals? How will you achieve them? Would any of these require collaboration with other
disciplines or areas of the college? How will make that collaboration occur?
Given your experiences and student achievement results over the past year, what changes do you suggest
to your course/program improvement plan?
In reviewing our 2010-2011 Two Year Class Success Study for our 4 core nursing courses (N55,N60A, N59 and
N60B) we have had an retention rate of 85-96.4 percent in these courses. This seems like we are losing
3
students pretty equally across the courses. We need to continue to have the medication pass instructors in the
clinical area for 2 hours of the busy times on the shift. This is working extremely well per instructor and
student feedback.
What new initiatives might you begin to support the achievement of our Strategic Plan goal? Do you have
new ideas to improve student learning?
The single goal for PRBC to” Increase the number of students that achieve their educational goal in a
reasonable time frame…” is met in the nursing program as our students complete in 2 years. It would be
helpful if the students did follow a path for the prerequisites. Some take years to complete this and this could
be streamlined. We have developed a roadmap to the BSN along with CSUEB. It is attached to this document.
If students follow this path they can have a BSN in nursing in 5 years.
What are your specific, measurable goals?
The comprehensive goal for the nursing program is the passing of the NCLEX-RN exam after graduation. The
students that graduated in 2013 have had a 960% pass rate for all first time takers. This is well above the
average for California of 85% for first time takers. After each course in the program students take a
computerized exam developed by Assessment Technology Institute. This exam is compared to all programs
across the US. Our students must pass each exam with a score of level 2 (competent) or they must do a
remediation exam. Scores in our program have been increasing with many students scoring level 2 or 3.
How will you achieve them?
See above.
Would any of these require collaboration with other disciplines or areas of the college?
I think it would be great if nursing faculty got together with the other instructors that teach the prerequisite
courses annually to discuss what could be improved or deleted.
How will make that collaboration occur?
An annual meeting where a representative from science, English and Math came to a nursing faculty meeting
to discuss best practices/student concerns.
Appendix A: Budget History and Impact
Audience: Budget Committee, PRBC,and Administrators
Purpose: This analysis describes your history of budget requests from the previous two years and the impacts of
funds received and needs that were not met. This history of documented need can both support your narrative
in Section A and provide additional information for Budget Committee recommendations.
Instructions: Please provide the requested information, and fully explain the impact of the budget decisions.
Category
Classified Staffing (# of
positions)
2012-13
Budget
Requested
$12,000
2012-13
Budget
Received
0
4
2013-14
Budget
Requested
$15,000
2013-14 Budget Received
0
Classified Staffing (# of
positions)

2 part-time simulation
helpers and tutors
 Administrative Assistant
for one extra month
Supplies & Services
Medication Pass instructors (6)
Technology/Equipment
Computer testing room for 60
students
Other
TOTAL
$52,000
0
$52,000
0
$30,000
0
$30,000
0
$94,000
0
$97,000
0
1. How has your investment of the budget monies you did receive improved student learning? When you requested
the funding, you provided a rationale. In this section, assess if the anticipated positive impacts you projected have,
in fact, been realized.
We have yet to receive money from the college and continue to use our grant funds. The grant funds will run out in June
2014. The use of the simulation lab helps us meet the hospital standards of 8 out of 10 students in a clinical group. The
use of the simulation lab enhances student learning, critical thinking and improves student abilities to respond in
emergency or critical situations and provides safe competent nursing care on the clinical unit. Although the college did
not fund the medication pass instructors, these were funded through grant monies. The clinical instructors were able to
increase patient safety during bedside care and provided more individualized attention to each student. Because we are
anticipating grant funds depleting, the college should absorb the cost to maintain the level of safety and care for our
clients in the community.
2. What has been the impact of not receiving some of your requested funding? How has student learning been
impacted, or safety compromised, or enrollment or retention negatively impacted?
The nursing program has received grant money to provide the medication pass instructor for 2 additional hours during
the clinical rotations. We have this additional help in 5 out of 8 clinical groups at this time. The medication pass
instructor provides a direct 1 to 1 instruction for patient safety. It allows the instructor to provide individualized
evaluations of students to meet Joint Commission standards. Without the grant money we will not be able to continue
our high level of training in nursing education and will not be able to meet BRN standards.
Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Reporting Schedule
I.
Course-Level Student Learning Outcomes & Assessment Reporting (CLO-Closing the
Loop).
A. Check One of the Following:

No CLO-CTL forms were completed during this PR year. No Appendix B2 needs to be submitted
with this Year’s Program Review. Note: All courses must be assessed once at least once every three
years.
5

Yes, CLO-CTL were completed for one or more courses during the current Year’s Program Review.
Complete Appendix B2 (CLO-CTL Form) for each course assessed this year and include in this
Program Review.

ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE:
Spring
Fall
Spring
Fall
Spring
Fall
Spring
Fall
Spring
2013
2013
2014
2014
2015
2015
2016
2016
2017
Courses: N60A/B/C N55/
N60A/B/C N55/
N60A/B/C N55/
N60A/B/C N55/
N60A/B/C
N59/
N59/
N59/
N59/
N69/N60A
N69/N60A
N69/N60A
N69/N60A
Group 1: Full
Discuss
Report
Full
Discuss
Report
Assmt
results
Results
Assmt
results
Results
Group 2:
Full Assmt
Group 3:
Group 4:
Discuss
results &
report
Full
Assmt
Discuss
results
Report
Results
Full Assmt
Discuss
results &
report
B. Calendar Instructions:
List all courses considered in this program review and indicate which year each course Closing The Loop form
was submitted in Program Review by marking submitted in the correct column.
Course
*List one course per line. Add
more rows as needed.
This Year’s Program
Review
*CTL forms must be
included with this PR.
Last Year’s Program
Review
2-Years Prior
*Note: These courses must be
assessed in the next PR year.
6
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
Nursing Program Core Courses
2
5 (2012) 6(2010-2011)
5
100%
7
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this Program Review.
These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all sections assessed
in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: N55
100%
86%
Application of the nursing process and evidence based practice
in the care of adults experiencing selected conditions requiring
treatment in medical-surgical and psychiatric care settings.
100%
92%
(CLO) 3: N59
100%
97%
100%
90%
100%
100%
Demonstration of fundamental concepts and practices
utilizing the nursing process across the life span.
(CLO) 2: N60A
Application of the nursing process and evidence based practice
in the nursing care of the childbearing and child rearing
families.
(CLO) 4: N60B
Application and analysis of the nursing process utilizing
evidence based practice for groups of clients in the
medical-surgical and critical care setting.
(CLO) 5: N60C
Application, synthesis, delegation, critical thinking and
analysis of the nursing process utilizing evidence based
practice for groups of clients in the medical-surgical and
critical care setting.
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
7
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this CLO? (Example:
75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen data collected in
this assessment cycle?
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
A. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome?
Theory must be passed at 73%. 86% score at or above 73%. We are satisfied with this rate as some
students leave the program for various personal reasons.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions
with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
NA
Although we have lost 14% over the past two year, we understand some students do not
have the dedication to complete the rigors for the program. Some students discover the
profession of nursing does not meet their personal expectations and conflict with
unexpected life events.
B. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome?
Excellent at 97%.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions
with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
We will continue to utilize the course methodology in teaching this course and enhancing
the student learning. We conduct a content review as required by the Board of Registered
Nursing.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome?
Very good at 92%
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions
with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Continued enhancement of student clinical experiences including open lab time,
simulations and tutoring. Utilize medication passing instructors to individualize the
education of students
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome?
8
Very good at 90%.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions
with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
This is the final core course in the nursing program requiring the culmination of all nursing
program education. It is the most rigorous course offered and the last step to their
individual preceptorship. It is a predicator for the success of our students in taking and
passing their licensing exam (NLCEX). Last year 100% of the students who passed this class
also passed the NCLEX. Over the past five years the program has had a first time pass rate
of 96% -100%. The California Board of Registered Nursing requires nursing programs to
have a pass rate of 85% for accreditation. We exceed these standards.
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: N60C ADULT HEALTH III.PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND
FUTURE PLANS
1. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior Closing the Loop
reflections and other faculty discussions?
Outstanding at 100%
2. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic strengths have the
assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline determined might be taken as a result of
your reflections, discussions, and insights?
Last year 96% of the students who passed this class also passed the NCLEX. Over the past five years the
program has had a first time pass rate of 96% -100%. The California Board of Registered Nursing requires
nursing programs to have a pass rate of 85% for accreditation. We exceed these standards.
Preceptorships are becoming extremely difficult to arrange. In the future we may need to increase
simulation experiences and as a substitute for preceptorships. This will require a enlargement of our
simulation lab to accommodate the 40-50 students along with a simulation director. Other possibilities in
clinical health care are being explored.
3. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
Yes Pedagogical
Yes Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 XXXOther:_simulation____________________________________________
9
Appendix C: Program Learning Outcomes
Considering your feedback, findings, and/or information that has arisen from the course level discussions,
please reflect on each of your Program Level Outcomes.
Program: Nursing Program
PLO #1:Incorporate the core of knowledge unique to the nursing profession in the delivery of health care in
acute, chronic, or community health settings;
PLO#2: Utilize the nursing process to provide care for clients, families and significant others with diverse
health needs and practices;
PLO #3: Respond to the demands of rapidly changing information technology by incorporating computer
literacy in health care delivery and utilizing the internet for research;
PLO#4: Use critical thinking skills in decisions related to managing care for groups of clients;
PLO#5: Practice within the profession‘s ethical and legal framework;
PLO#6: Respond to the unique health needs of the culturally diverse and aging population.
What questions or investigations arose as a result of these reflections or discussions?
Explain: The nursing program is pleased with the current PLO’s
What program-level strengths have the assessment reflections revealed?
Strengths revealed: At this time the Chabot Nursing program is one of top 10 nursing programs in
California with a 100% pass rate on the licensing exam (NCLEX). Fall 2013, we have received over
600 applications for the 50 spaces available.
What actions has your discipline determined might be taken to enhance the learning of students completing
your program?
Actions planned: Continued use of case manager through counseling, additional tutors, medication
pass instructors and increased hours in the skills lab using adjunct instructors all paid through grant
funds. The grant funds are through June 2013. We are looking to replace one full time instructors
we no longer have in medical surgical to meet Board of Registered Nursing full time instructor
requirements.
Appendix D: A Few Questions
Please answer the following questions with "yes" or "no". For any questions answered "no", please provide an
explanation. No explanation is required for "yes" answers :-)
1. Have all of your course outlines been updated within the past five years?YES
10
2
Have all of your courses been offered within the past five years? If no, why should those courses remain in our
college catalog?NO, we are not offering foreign trained nursing individual courses due to lack of available full
time instructors and clinical placements.
3
Do all of your courses have the required number of CLOs completed, with corresponding rubrics? If no, identify
the CLO work you still need to complete, and your timeline for completing that work this semesterYes, on our
core nursing program courses
4. Have you assessed all of your courses and completed "closing the loop" forms for all of your courses within the
past three years? If no, identify which courses still require this work, and your timeline for completing that work
this semester.Yes
5. Have you developed and assessed PLOs for all of your programs? If no, identify programs which still require this
work, and your timeline to complete that work this semester.Yes
6. If you have course sequences, is success in the first course a good predictor of success in the subsequent
course(s)?Yes
7. Does successful completion of College-level Math and/or English correlate positively with success in your
courses? If not, explain why you think this may be.Yes
11
Appendix E: Proposal for New Initiatives (Complete for each new initiative)
Audience: Deans/Unit Administrators, PRBC, Foundation, Grants Committee, College Budget Committee
Purpose: A “New Initiative” is a new project or expansion of a current project that supports our Strategic
Plan. The project will require the support of additional and/or outside funding. The information you
provide will facilitate and focus the research and development process for finding both internal and
external funding.
How does your initiative address the college's Strategic Plan goal, or significantly improve student
learning?
The nursing program needs a designated computer lab that will be available for testing (all courses use
Blackboard for exams), electronic charting, and student learning activities (60 computers)
What is your specific goal and measurable outcome?
Enhance and maintain student learning, virtual clinical experiences and achieve student individual
educational goals.
Measureable outcomes are to include but are not limited to passing ATI computerized assessments at
the end of each course with a composite score of level 2 or above. NCLEX exam is a computerized test
and data suggests that each student should do at least 6000 computerized practice questions to be
successful.
What is your action plan to achieve your goal?
Target
Completion
Date
August
2014
Activity (brief description)
Rewire room 2256 with a new internet server.
Request combining room 2256 and 2254 to a large computer August
room for nursing, dental and medical assisting students. Place 2015
a door between rooms or remove wall. The rooms could then
be used by other depts..
Required Budget (Split out
personnel, supplies, other
categories)
Approximately $50,000
wiring and server
Additional 40 computers
=$45,000
Tables = $ 85,000
Construction = $50,000
How will you manage the personnel needs?
New Hires:
X
Faculty # of positions 1 month extra for adm assistant
Classified staff # of positions
Reassigning existing employee(s) to the project; employee(s) current workload will be:
Covered by overload or part-time employee(s)
Covered by hiring temporary replacement(s)
X
Other, explain This is equipment and construction costs
12
At the end of the project period, the proposed project will:
X
Be completed (onetime only effort)
X Require additional funding to continue and/or institutionalize the project
(obtained by/from):
Will the proposed project require facility modifications, additional space, or program relocation?
No
X Yes, explain: See above
Will the proposed project involve subcontractors, collaborative partners, or cooperative agreements?
No
X
Construction work
Do you know of any grant funding sources that would meet the needs of the proposed project?
X2
No
Yes, list potential funding sources:
Appendix F1: Full-Time Faculty/Adjunct Staffing Request(s) [Acct. Category
1000]
Audience: Faculty Prioritization Committeeand Administrators
Purpose: Providing explanation and justification for new and replacement positions for full-time faculty
and adjuncts
Instructions: Please justify the need for your request. Discussanticipated improvements in student
learning and contribution to the Strategic Plangoal. Cite evidence and data to support your request,
including enrollment management data (EM Summary by Term) for the most recent three years, student
success and retention data , and any other pertinent information. Data is available at
http://www.chabotcollege.edu/ProgramReview/Data2013.cfm.
1. Number of new faculty requested in this discipline: ___2
STAFFING REQUESTS (1000) FACULTY
PLEASE LIST IN
RANK ORDER
2.
Position
Full time tenure
tract faculty
Part time tenure
tract faculty
Description
Medical-Surgical
Instructor
Pediatric instructor
Faculty (1000)
Program/Unit
Full time tenure tract
faculty
Part time tenure tract
faculty
Division/Area
Medical-Surgical Instructor
Pediatric instructor
3. Rationale for your proposal. Please use the enrollment management data. Data that will strengthen
your rationale include FTES trends over the last 5 years,FT/PT faculty ratios,recent retirements in your
division, total number of full time and part-time faculty in the division, total number of students served
by your division, FTEF in your division, CLO and PLO assessment results and external accreditation
demands.
We are short the M/S position since the resignation of the MS instructor in spring 2012. The Pediatric
instructor will go on semi-retirement in the spring 2014.
13

Statements about the alignment with the strategic plan and your student learning goals are
required. Indicate here any information from advisory committees or outside accreditation
reviews that is pertinent to the proposal.
Program must meet BRN requirements to maintain accreditation. Program is currently in non-compliance with
this mandate. A scheduled BRN visit is to occur in March 2014.
14
Appendix F2: Classified Staffing Request(s) including Student Assistants [Acct.
Category 2000]
Audience: Administrators, PRBC
Purpose: Providing explanation and justification for new and replacement positions for full-time and
part-time regular (permanent) classified professional positions(new, augmented and replacement
positions).Remember, student assistants are not to replace Classified Professional staff.
Instructions: Please justify the need for your request. Discuss anticipated improvements in student
learning and contribution to the Strategic Plan goal, safety, mandates, and accreditation issues. Please
cite any evidence or data to support your request. If this position is categorically funded, include and
designate the funding source of new categorically-funded position where continuation is contingent
upon available funding.
1. Number of positions requested: _3____
STAFFING REQUESTS (2000) CLASSIFIED PROFESSIONALS
Position
1. Simulation lab technician-8
hours/week
2.Simulation lab helper-8
hours/week
3.Administrative Assistant (12
month position)
Classified Professional Staff (2000)
Description
Program/Unit
Simulation lab technician
Nursing
Simulation lab helper
Nursing
Administrative Assistant
Nursing
PLEASE LIST IN
ORDER
Division/Area
Applied Tech
Applied Tech
Applied Tech
STAFFING REQUESTS (2000) STUDENT ASSISTANTS
Position
Description
Student Assistants (2000)
Program/Unit
2. Rationale for your proposal.
1. This position is necessary to run and maintain the manikins in the simulation lab. It is currently
funded with grant monies for only 8 hours per week. This limits the use of the simulation lab.
2. This position would require an RN license and medical knowledge to create and implement
nursing simulation scenarios.
3. Extra month for Adm. Assistant is currently an 11 month position. Nursing Program is very busy
in the summer need to add the month of July.
3. Statements about the alignment with the strategic plan and program review are required. Indicate
here any information from advisory committees or outside accreditation reviews that is pertinent to
the proposal.
15
PLEASE LIST
ORDER
Division/Area
Advisory committee members from area hospitals have advised the program that alternative clinical sites will be required in the fu
number of nursing students per unit. Simulation lab will be a viable/acceptable alternative as per BRN guidelines.
16
Appendix F3: FTEF Requests
Audience: Administrators, CEMC, PRBC
Purpose: To recommend changes in FTEF allocations for subsequent academic year and guide Deans and
CEMC in the allocation of FTEF to disciplines. For more information, see Article 29 (CEMC) of the Faculty
Contract.
Instructions: In the area below, please list your requested changes in course offerings (and
corresponding request in FTEF) and provide your rationale for these changes. Be sure to analyze
enrollment trends and other relevant data
athttp://www.chabotcollege.edu/ProgramReview/Data2013.cfm.
COURSE
CURRENT
FTEF
(2013-14)
ADDITIONAL
FTEF
NEEDED
CURRENT
SECTIONS
17
ADDITIONAL
SECTIONS
NEEDED
CURRENT
STUDENT #
SERVED
ADDITIONAL
STUDENT #
SERVED
Appendix F4: Academic Learning Support Requests [Acct. Category 2000]
Audience: Administrators, PRBC, Learning Connection
Purpose: Providing explanation and justification for new and replacement student assistants (tutors, learning assistants, lab assistants,
supplemental instruction, etc.).
Instructions: Please justify the need for your request. Discuss anticipated improvements in student learning and contribution to the Strategic Plan
goal. Please cite any evidence or data to support your request. If this position is categorically funded, include and designate the funding source of
new categorically-funded position where continuation is contingent upon available funding.
1. Number of positions requested: _1_____
2. If you are requesting more than one position, please rank order the positions.
Position
Description
1. Counseling part-time
Case manager for retention grant
2.
3.
4.
3. Rationale for your proposal based on your program review conclusions. Include anticipated impact on student learning outcomes and
alignment with the strategic plan goal. Indicate if this request is for the same, more, or fewer academic learning support positions.
Due to the high stress nature of the nursing program we need a case manager to support student success. This is the plan to increase retention
and decrease attrition. Currently this is funded with grant monies.
Appendix F5: Supplies & Services Requests [Acct. Category 4000 and 5000]
Audience: Administrators, Budget Committee, PRBC
Purpose: To request funding for supplies and service, and to guide the Budget Committee in allocation of funds.
Instructions: In the area below, please list both your current and requested budgets for categories 4000 and 5000 in priority order. Do NOT
include conferences and travel, which are submitted on Appendix M6. Justify your request and explain in detail any requested funds beyond
those you received this year. Please also look for opportunities to reduce spending, as funds are very limited.
Supplies Requests [Acct. Category 4000]
Instructions:
18
1.
2.
There should be a separate line item for supplies needed and an amount.
For items purchased in bulk, list the unit cost and provide the total in the "Amount" column.
Make sure you include the cost of tax and shipping for items purchased.
Priority 1: Are criticalrequests required to sustain a program (if not acquired, program may be in peril) or to meet mandated requirements of local,
state or federal regulations or those regulations of a accrediting body for a program.
Priority 2: Are needed requests that will enhance a program but are not so critical as to jeopardize the life of a program if not
received in the requested academic year.
Priority 3: Are requests that are enhancements, non-critical resource requeststhat would be nice to have and would bring additional benefit to the program.
2013-14
Request
201415
Reques
t
Requested Receiv
ed
1000.00
0
Amoun
t
Vendor
Division/Unit
Priority
#1
1000
na
Applied
Tech/Nursing
X
3,500
na
1500
Staples
Applied
Tech/Nursing
Applied
Tech/Nursing
4000.0
0
McKesson
Applied
Tech/Nursing
needed totals in all areas
Description
Centralized Clinical
Placement Services (CCPS)
ATI TEAS V incoming
students
General Office Supplies
Skills lab/Simulation lab
Supplies
$3,500
($35/stud
ent X 100)
1500.00
0
4000.00
0
0
Priority
#2
X
X
x
Contracts and Services Requests [Acct. Category 5000]
Instructions:
1. There should be a separate line item for each contract or service.
2. Travel costs should be broken out and then totaled (e.g., airfare, mileage, hotel, etc.)
Program Review Nursing 2014
Priority #3
Priority 1: Are criticalrequests required to sustain a program (if not acquired, program may be in peril) or to meet mandated
requirements of local,
state or federal regulations or those regulations of a accrediting body for a program.
Priority 2: Are needed requests that will enhance a program but are not so critical as to jeopardize the life of a program if not received in
the requested academic year.
Priority 3: Are requests that are enhancements, non-critical resource requeststhat would be nice to have and would bring additional
benefit to the program.
augmentations only
Description
Amount
Vendor
Division/Unit
Program Review Nursing 2014
Priority #1
Priority #2
Priority #3
Appendix F6: Conference and Travel Requests [ Acct. Category 5000]
Audience: Staff Development Committee,Administrators, Budget Committee, PRBC
Purpose: To request funding for conference attendance, and to guide the Budget and Staff Development Committees in allocation of funds.
Instructions:Please list specific conferences/training programs, including specific information on the name of the conference and location. Note
that the Staff Development Committee currently has no budget, so this data is primarily intended to identify areas of need that could perhaps be
fulfilled on campus, and to establish a historical record of need. Your rationale should discuss student learning goals and/or connection to the
Strategic Plan goal.
Description
AND Director/Faculty
Conference (5)
Amount
$500 per
faculty X 5 =
$2,500
Vendor
Associate Degree
Directors in CA
Priority Priority Priority
Division/Dept
#1
#2
#3
Applied
Tech/Nursing
x
Magic in Teaching (5)
$500 per
faculty=
$2500
Bay Area Simulation
Collaborative
Applied
Tech/Nursing
x
Directors conferences (2)
$1500
Travel Expenses
Preceptorships/clinical site
review
$500
Associate Degree
Directors in CA
Applied
Tech/Nursing
x
Applied
Tech/Nursing
x
Program Review Nursing 2014
Notes
Appendix F7: Technology and Other Equipment Requests [Acct. Category 6000]
Audience: Budget Committee, Technology Committee, Administrators
Purpose: To be read and responded to by Budget Committee and to inform priorities of the Technology Committee.
Instructions: Please fill in the following as needed to justify your requests.If you're requesting classroom technology, see
http://www.chabotcollege.edu/audiovisual/Chabot%20College%20Standard.pdf for the brands/model numbers that are our current standards.
If requesting multiple pieces of equipment, please rank order those requests. Include shipping cost and taxes in your request.
Instructions:
1. For each piece of equipment, there should be a separate line item for each piece and
an amount. Please note: Equipment requests are for equipment whose unit cost exceeds $200.
Items which are less expensive should be requested as supplies. Software licenses should also be
requested as supplies.
2.
For bulk items, list the unit cost and provide the total in the "Amount" column.
Make sure you include the cost of tax and shipping for items purchased.
Priority 1: Are critical requests required to sustain a program (if not acquired, program may be
in peril) or to meet mandated requirements of local,
state or federal regulations or those regulations of a accrediting body for a program.
Priority 2: Are needed requests that will enhance a program but are not so critical as to
jeopardize the life of a program if not received in the requested academic year.
Priority 3: Are requests that are enhancements, non-critical resource requests that would be
nice to have and would bring additional benefit to the program.
Description
Amount
Vendor
Division/Unit
Tables and Chairs 2254 into a computer
room
Computers (40) and workstations room
2254
Internet server replaced room 2254
$85,000.00 KI
Applied Tech/Nursing
$45,000.00 HP
Applied Tech/Nursing
$50,000
Applied Tech/Nursing
Priority #1
Priority
#2
X
X
Program Review Nursing 2014
X
Priority
#3
Appendix F8: Facilities Requests
Audience: Facilities Committee, Administrators
Purpose: To be read and responded to by Facilities Committee.
Background: Following the completion of the 2012 Chabot College Facility Master Plan, the Facilities Committee (FC) has begun the task of reprioritizing Measure B Bond budgets to better align with current needs. The FC has identified approximately $18M in budgets to be used to meet
capital improvement needs on the Chabot College campus. Discussion in the FC includes holding some funds for a year or two to be used as match
if and when the State again funds capital projects, and to fund smaller projects that will directly assist our strategic goal. The FC has determined
that although some of the college's greatest needs involving new facilities cannot be met with this limited amount of funding, there are many
smaller pressing needs that could be addressed. The kinds of projects that can be legally funded with bond dollars include the "repairing,
constructing, acquiring, equipping of classrooms, labs, sites and facilities." Do NOT use this form for equipment or supply requests.
Instructions: Please fill in the following as needed to justify your requests.If requesting more than one facilities project, please rank order your
requests.
Brief Title of Request (Project Name): Remodel 2256 and 2254 2nd floor
Building/Location: 2200
Description of the facility project. Please be as specific as possible.
Revision of room 2256 and 2254 into a computer lab that will accommodate 65 students.
Also update the nursing workroom with new cabinets and counter tops
What educational programs or institutional purposes does this equipment support?
Nursing program, dental and medical assisting program students and other courses that need a computer lab for blackboard
testing. Allows for better item analysis of testing, immediate feedback for test results and review for students. We currently test
at two different locations (sometimes three). Allowing students to combine our extended campus (20) with home campus (40)
for more active interaction with each other.
Briefly describe how your request relates specifically to meeting the Strategic Plan Goal and to enhancing student learning?
Increase the number of students that will achieve their educational goal within a reasonable time.
Please see the roadmap for our students to transfer to CSUEB.
Program Review Nursing 2014