IGERT Colloquim Series, Department of Geography, SUNY Bufallo, February 2007 Understanding Land Change in Amazonia: A Multidisciplinary Research Challenge Gilberto Câmara Director National Institute for Space Research Brazil INPE - brief description National Institute for Space Research main civilian organization for space activities in Brazil staff of 1,800 ( 800 Ms.C. and Ph.D.) Areas: Space Science, Earth Observation, Meteorology and Space Engineering Environmental activities at INPE Numerical Weather Prediction Centre medium-range LANDSAT/SPOT Receiving and Processing Station in operation since 1974 China-Brazil Earth Resources Satellite 5 forecast and climate studies bands (3 visible, 1 IR) at 20 m resol. Research Activities in Remote Sensing 300 MsC and PhD graduates ONU-funded Center for Africa and S. America The Future of Brazilian Amazon Why is this an multidisciplinary research challenge? Amazonia is a key environmental resource Many different concerns Environment and biodiversity conservation Economic development Native population Can we avoid that this…. Source: Carlos Nobre (INPE) Fire... ….becomes this? Source: Carlos Nobre (INPE) Amazonia at a glance ... The Natural System Almost 6 million km2 of contiguous tropical forests Perhaps 1/3 of the planet's biodiversity Abundant rainfall (2.2 m annually) 18% of freshwater input into the global oceans (220,000 m3/s) Over 100 G ton C stored in vegetation and soil A multitude of ecosystems, biological and ethnic diversity Source: Carlos Nobre (INPE) We might know the past…. Estimativa do Desmatamento da Amazônia (INPE) What’s coming next? Source: Carlos N Deforestation... Environmental Modelling in Brasil GEOMA: “Rede Cooperativa de Modelagem Ambiental” Cooperative Network for Environmental Modelling Established by Ministry of Science and Technology Long-term objectives Develop models to predict the spatial dynamics of ecological and socio-economic systems at different geographic scales, Support policy decision making at local, regional and national levels, by providing decision makers with qualified analytical tools. Modelling Complex Problems Application of multidisciplinary knowledge to produce a model. If (... ? ) then ... Desforestation? What is Computational Modelling? Design and implementation of computational enviroments for modelling Requires a formal and stable description Implementation allow experimentation Rôle of computer representation Bring together expertise in different field Make the different conceptions explicit Make sure these conceptions are represented in the information system Public Policy Issues What are the acceptable limits to land cover change activities in the tropical regions in the Americas? What are the future scenarios of land use? How can food production be made more efficient and productive? How can our biodiversity be known and the benefits arising from its use be shared fairly? How can we manage our water resources to sustain our expected growth in urban population? Modelling Land Change in Amazonia How much deforestation is caused by: Soybeans? Cattle ranching? Small-scale setllers? Wood loggers? Land speculators? A mixture of the above? Challenge: How do people use space? Soybeans Loggers Competition for Space Small-scale Farming Source: Dan Nepstad (Woods Hole) Ranchers What Drives Tropical Deforestation? % of the cases 5% 10% 50% Underlying Factors driving proximate causes Causative interlinkages at proximate/underlying levels Internal drivers *If less than 5%of cases, not depicted here. source:Geist &Lambin Different agents, different motivations Intensive agriculture (soybeans) export-based responsive to commodity prices, productivity and transportation logistics Extensive cattle-ranching local + export responsive to land prices, sanitary controls and commodity prices photo source: Edson Sano (EMBRAPA) Large-Scale Agriculture Agricultural Areas (ha) 1970 Legal Amazonia Brazil 1995/1996 % 5,375,165 32,932,158 513 33,038,027 99,485,580 203 Source: IBGE - Agrarian Census photo source: Edson Sano (EMBRAPA) Cattle in Amazonia and Brazil Unidade Amazônia Legal Brasil Fonte: PAM - IBGE 1992 29915799 154,229,303 2001 51689061 176,388,726 % 72,78% 14,36% Cattle in Amazonia and Brazil Unidade Amazônia Legal Brasil 1992 2001 % 29,915,799 51,689,061 72,78% 154,229,303 176,388,726 14,36% Different agents, different motivations Small-scale settlers Associated to social movements (MST, Church) Responsive to capital availability, land ownership, and land productivity Can small-scale economy be sustainable? Wood loggers Primarily local market Responsive to prime wood availability, official permits, transportation logistics Land speculators Appropriation of public lands Responsive to land registry controls, law enforcement Altamira (Pará) – LANDSAT Image – 22 August 2003 Altamira (Pará) – MODIS Image – 07 May 2004 Imagem Modis de 2004-05-21, com excesso de nuvens Altamira (Pará) – MODIS Image – 21 May 2004 Altamira (Pará) – MODIS Image – 07 June 2004 Altamira (Pará) – MODIS Image – 22 June 2004 6.000 hectares deforested in one month! Altamira (Pará) – LANDSAT Image – 07 July 2004 Modelling Land Change in Amazonia Territory (Geography) Money (Economy) Modelling (GIScience) Culture (Antropology) “Current and future development axes” BR-174 Transamazônica BR-230 Belém/Brasília BR-319 CuiabáSantarém BR-163 Cuiabá-Porto Velho BR-364 Current roads Planned roads Prodes 2003/2004 (INPE, 2005) Estudos Avançados nº 53 (Théry, H.; 2005) Dynamic areas (current and future) New Frontiers INPE 2003/2004: Intense Pressure Future expansion Deforestation Forest Non-forest Clouds/no data Amazonian new frontier hypothesis (Becker) “The actual frontiers are different from the 60’s and the 70’s In the past it was induced by Brazilian government to expand regional economy and population, aiming to integrate Amazônia with the whole country. Today, induced mostly by private economic interests and concentrated on focus areas in different regions. Integrated Land Use and Land Cover Change Modeling in Pará http://www.geoma.lncc.br Land use and Land Cover Dynamics in São Félix do Xingu-Iriri (PA) Iriri River S. F Xingu Novo Progresso Xingu River Transamazônica Accumulated Deforestation Evolução do Desmatamento Rio Iriri 3500 3000 Rio Xingu Km2 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Rio Iriri 0 1997 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Ano Reservas Indígenas Desmatamento acumulado Taxa Anual Annual rate 800 700 600 500 taxa anual 400 300 200 100 0 1997/2000* 2000/2001 2001/2002 2002/2003 2003/2004 Escada et al, 2005 – Estudos Avançados , Nº 54 Land Appropriation Model Araújo (2004) Escada et al (2005) Primary occupation Land permits Smallmedium farms Violent Expropriation Illegal registration Large farms Illegal money Legal money Cattle ranching and deforestation Source: DePará, 2005 Amount of cattle head Accumulated Deforestation Desmatamento Acumulado - km 2 14000 12000 10000 Água Azul do Norte Marabá 8000 Ourilândia do Norte Redenção 6000 São Félix do Xingu Tucumã Xinguara 4000 2000 0 Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi e Embrapa Oriental 1997 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Escada et al, 2005 – Estudos Avançados , Nº 54 Cattle Ranching Model F F+R Forest Forest + Relief P PD Pasture P+R Pasture + Relief Degraded Pasture RP Recovered Pasture Agents in Terra do Meio T T G G G, M - Large, Medium Grandes Toca do Sapo G L. Jaba P G Cutia G Branquinho L. Caraíba T . F. Cheiro P P Primavera 10 km Tibornea G G T R - Riverside Ribeirinhos Área em disputa (CPT, 2004) G P P - Small Pequenos e Médios G G P P, M Population Flux: seasonality Rain season flux Dry season flux Analysis of public policy: Conservation units in Pará RESEX Riozinho do Anfrísio ESEC Terra do Meio Parque Nacional da Serra do Pardo - 5% df Flona de Altamira 0 Escada et al, 2005 50 km Prodes 2004 (INPE, 2005) Sample of results Test 2: Without demand or regression regionalization; Test 8: With demand and regression regionalization (one model for fine scale partition – Arco, Central and Occidental); Test 13: With demand and regression regionalization (Arco regression model used at Central partition). Statistics: Humans as clouds MODEL 7: Variables R² = .86 PORC3_AR Description Percentage of large farms, in terms of area LOG_DENS Population density (log 10) PRECIPIT stb p-level 0,27 0,00 0,38 0,00 -0,32 0,00 LOG_NR1 Avarege precipitation Percentage of small farms, in terms of number (log 10) 0,29 0,00 DIST_EST Distance to roads -0,10 0,00 LOG2_FER Percentage of medium fertility soil (log 10) -0,06 0,01 PORC1_UC Percantage of Indigenous land -0,06 0,01 Statistical analysis of deforestation Land Change Model (1997-2015) Projected hot spots of deforestation 1997- 2015: Federative States Regionalizing the demand improves pressure on Central area, but Central area regressions emphasizes proximity to ports and rivers, due to historical process in the area, and not connectivity to the rest of the country. Roads Percentage of change in forest cover from 1997 to 2015: 0% -> 100% Impact of the proposed Manaus-Porto Velho road Rede Temática GEOMA Setembro, 2006 Área de estudo – ALAP BR 319 e entorno new road ALAP BR 319 Estradas pavimentadas em 2010 Estradas não pavimentadas Rios principais Portos BASELINE SCENARIO – Hot spots of change (1997 a 2020) % mudança 1997 a 2020: ALAP BR 319 Estradas pavimentadas em 2010 Estradas não pavimentadas Rios principais 0.0 – 0.1 0.1 – 0.2 0.2 – 0.3 0.3 – 0.4 0.4 – 0.5 0.5 – 0.6 0.6 – 0.7 0.7 – 0.8 0.8 – 0.9 0.9 – 1.0 GOVERNANCE SCENARIO – Differences from baseline scenario ALAP BR 319 Estradas pavimentadas em 2010 Estradas não pavimentadas Rios principais Protection areas Sustainable areas Differences: Less: More: 0.0 -0.50 0.0 0.10 GIScience and change Modelling change is essential in our world We need a vision for extending GIScience to have a research agenda for modeling change Global Land Project • What are the drivers and dynamics of variability and change in terrestrial humanenvironment systems? • How is the provision of environmental goods and services affected by changes in terrestrial humanenvironment systems? • What are the characteristics and dynamics of vulnerability in terrestrial humanenvironment systems? Uncertainty on basic equations Limits for Models Social and Economic Systems Quantum Gravity Particle Physics Living Systems Global Change Chemical Reactions Hydrological Models Solar System Dynamics Meteorology Complexity of the phenomenon source: John Barrow (after David Ruelle)