Ethics and Leadership Outline Moral Development Freudian Theory Kohlberg’s and Gilligan’s Levels Social Learning Theory Psychodynamic Theory Sigmund Freud: Three part construction of personality Id Ego Home of primitive animalistic energy and subconscious drives such as hunger and sex. The conscious, rational aspect of personality which mediates between the demands of the id and the behavioral expectations of the world. The ego exercises reason and sanity, evaluates consequences, and determines a course of action. Superego Develops between ages 3-5 – one’s conscience. An internalized sense of morality learned from one’s parents. Yields guilt when disobeyed. Critical Assessment of Freudian Theory On what evidence is Freudian theory based? Freud’s experience was largely limited to troubled, wealthy women. He never worked with children. There is no empirical evidence supporting many of his theoretical constructs Lacking empirical verification, many of his theories are not clearly defined or explained. Kohlberg’s Levels • Kohlberg’s theory has 3 levels (6 stages) of moral development Focuses primarily on moral values such as fairness, justice, equity, and human dignity Assessing development level Heinz dilemma It is the reasoning of their responses, not the answer itself. Heinz’s Dilemma In Europe, a woman was near death from a special kind of cancer. There was one drug that the doctors thought might save her. It was a form of radium that a druggist in the same town had recently discovered. The drug was expensive to make, but the druggist was charging ten times what the drug cost him to make. He paid $200 for the radium and charged $2,000 for a small dose of the drug. The sick woman's husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow the money, but he could only get together about $ 1,000 which is half of what it cost. He told the druggist that his wife was dying and asked him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the druggist said: "No, I discovered the drug and I'm going to make money from it." So Heinz got desperate and broke into the man's store to steal the drug for his wife. Should the husband have done that? Kohlberg’s Levels Postconventional level Morality of abstract principles: to affirm agreed-upon rights and personal ethical principles Conventional level Morality of law and social rules: to gain approval or avoid disapproval Preconventional level Morality of self-interest: to avoid punishment or gain concrete rewards Kohlbergs Theory Level I: Preconventional Morality externally controlledpunishment = bad reward=good Stage I: Punishment and obedience orientation…. obey due to superior power and rules Fear of authority and avoid punishment Ignore peoples intentions –can not see two points of view Level I Kohlberg Stage II: Individualism, Instrumental purpose, and exchange… Immediate interest; what is good brings good results Reciprocity beginning—equal exchange of favors Start to understand that people can have different perspectives in a dilemma Kohlberg’s Theory Level II-Conventional Morality Preserving societal order---sustaining relationships STAGE 3: Interpersonal Expectations and Conformity “good boy/bad girl” maintain affection and approval of significant individuals Promotion of social harmony Begin to understand idea behind the golden rule—ideal reciprocity Level II Kohlberg STAGE 4: Social-order Maintenance Moral actions are defined by larger social groups—fulfill selfdefined duties and uphold laws Societal laws taken into consideration and can not be broken for any reason Kohlberg’s Theory Level III: Post Conventional Morality More abstract principles rather than rules that apply to many situations STAGE 5: Social Contract Imagine alternatives to social order, rules are a contract that can be changed—free and willing participation Laws need to be consistent with human rights Level III Kohlberg STAGE 6: Universal Ethical Principles Self-chosen ethics –system of values and principles— respect for the worth of individuals Respect for worth and dignity of each individual Moral Development Evaluating Kohlberg’s Theory Cross-cultural validity Non-western cultures rarely above stage 4 Socialist people and the Heinz dilemma Buddhist monks Family influences Family plays an important role (ignored in Kohlberg’s model) Study of parents talking to children about dilemmas Gender and Kohlberg’s scale When Kohlberg’s instrument was administered on a large scale, it was discovered that females often scored a full stage below their male counterparts. The moral reasoning of women and girls was more likely to value looking for a solution that preserved connections. This often looked like the “good girl” orientation, Level 2. Gilligan’s argument Men: justice and fairness Women: responsibility to show care and avoid harm Differences between Men’s Moral Voices and Women’s Moral Voices Men Justice Rights Treating everyone fairly and the same Apply rules impartially to everyone Responsibility toward abstract codes of conduct Women Care Responsibility Caring about everyone’s suffering Preserve emotional connectedness Responsibility toward real individuals Differences between Men’s and Women’s View of the Self Men Autonomy Freedom Independence Separateness Hierarchy Rules guide interactions Roles establish places in the hierarchy Women Relatedness Interdependence Emotional connectedness Responsiveness to needs of others Web of relationships Empathy & connectedness guide interactions Roles are secondary to connections Gilligan Social Learning Theory Perspective Modeling and Positive Discipline Reinforcement (positive discipline): Model characteristics that promote imitation Our parents teach us that it is good to be helpful-- we are rewarded for helping and punished for not helping warmth and responsiveness competence and power consistency between assertions and behavior Positive discipline helps children acquire positive behavior Punishment Promotes only momentary compliance Undesirable side effects: Adult models of aggression Learn to avoid the punishing adult Offers immediate relief to parents (reinforced for using coercive discipline), so that parent is more likely to punish with greater frequency over time (can spiral into serious abuse) Social Learning Theory: Example The Salvation Army Santa Claus study: When a confederate walked out of a store in front of a SS and gave a dollar to Santa Claus, the SS was more likely to give a dollar himself than when there was no confederate Social Learning Theory: Example Rushton & Campbell, 1977: SS and confederate interacted in the lab Left the study together and passed a blood donation booth 2 conditions: Confederate volunteered to give blood or not Results: Model = 67% agreed to donate--33% followed through No model = 25% agreed to donate-- 0% followed through Discussion How do these theories of moral development relate to the study of leadership? Be sure to address both the leader and the follower in your discussion