Governance Innovation for Security and Development
Interim Program Report - Summary Version
29 December, 2013
Karen Guttieri, Principal Investigator
I. INTRODUCTION
This Interim Program Report provides information on the initiation and progress of the
Governance Innovation for Security and Development project.1 This research project is
performed by Naval Postgraduate School researchers and colleagues for the Special
Operations Command and the US Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School
(JFKSWCS). The sponsor point of contact is the new Institute for Military Support to
Governance (IMSG) at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, directed by BG Hugh Van Roosen. The
research team completed the first quarter of work, from project start 30 September through
31 December 2013. Due to a gap in project funding and emerging IMSG requirements, the
research team adjusted the focus and schedule to accommodate additional interim program
review (IPR) meetings and acceleration of research for recommendations regarding civil
sector certifications for a new military occupational specialty for Civil Affairs – 38G.
Section I of this report provides introduction, approach, and context and objectives for this
project, preliminary issues for the development of 38G Certification, as well as management
information (project progress and budget). Section II reports on the organization of the team
and the Quarter 1 (Q1) project work initiation and capacity-building. Section III comprises
summary interim reports by major sectors under study. A glossary of acronyms and list of
references are provided at the end of this interim report.
A. APPROACH
The project supports the US Special Warfare Center and School initiatives to address gaps for
Special Operations and the wider Civil Affairs community. The project team will consider
throughout the changing environment and information communications technologies that
present both hazards and opportunities for practitioners. The Principal Investigator leads a
cross-disciplinary team including experts from academic institutions in analysis and academic
writing on military support to governance. The research team is conducting analysis of the
following civil sector areas: safe and secure environment, rule of law, sustainable economic
development, social well-being, effective governance, and homeland integration. The project
examines the requirements for civil affairs expertise, particularly during theater security
cooperation, support to civil authority and transitional military authority missions. This
research supports deliberations regarding the classifications, qualifications and certifications
for 38G personnel. Additional research areas proposed include analysis of human behavior,
technological enablers, and strategic planning and strategy for military support to
governance.
1
Originally proposed under the title Military Support to Governance Research Project.
1
B. CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES
Civil Affairs comprises “the vanguard of DoD’s support to U.S. government efforts to assist
partner governments in the fields of rule of law, economic stability, governance, public
health and welfare, infrastructure, and public education and information” (2010 Quadrennial
Defense Review Report). CA professionals have historically played critical roles in conflict
prevention and post-conflict transformation. However, Civil Affairs have also historically been
under-valued as strategic assets - commanders tend to perceive Civil Affairs (CA) primarily in
terms of maneuver support elements rather than as strategic assets.
A study by the Center for Strategic and International Security in 2009 concluded “it is not
clear that the current system of classifying and managing functional specialists within the civil
affairs community is optimized for accessing specialized skills at the appropriate level,”
(pp.43-44) and recommended that the Army “require civil affairs personnel with identified
functional specialties to take appropriate civil sector competency tests to validate and
classify the level of functional skills” and “create a direct commission authority” to bring
individuals with advanced functional skills into the force structure as needed (Hicks and
Wormuth, “Future of Civil Affairs,” p. vi).
Assistant Secretary of the Army for Reserve and Manpower Affairs (ASA-M&RA) Thomas R.
Lamont addressed these deficits in June 2011 with a memorandum stating his intention to
establish a new “… branch proponent that supports the Army’s total force, with common
standards for active and reserve CA forces” (Lamont, 2011). One important response to ASA
Lamont’s concerns was the 2013 establishment of the Institute for Military Support to
Governance (IMSG) to guide the professionalization of the Civil Affairs force structure. In
particular, the IMSG is leading the development of a new military occupational specialty
(MOS) titled “military support to governance specialists,” or 38G.
Figure 1: Concept representation of the research project focus, reflecting both the policy
and practical needs of the Sponsor and the linkages of research outcomes to education and
specification for 38G.
2
C. 38G CERTIFICATION: Initial issues and questions
The research team accelerated the direct focus on the 38G at the request of the Sponsor, in
addition to the overall research work of the civil sector project inquiries. This work has
benefited considerably from early efforts by MAJ Tony Vacha and others for the IMSG,
extensive initial consultation with CA practitioners and other experts and with academic
researchers who study employment classifications. There are a number of research
questions/issues to address:
 What are strengths and limits of the various ‘functional’ approaches to specify 38G
categories? What are alternatives for relevant skill sets?
 Are the Guiding Principles End States the 38G ASIs or do the elements listed above
under each End State become the ASIs?
 How to handle elements that have impact across the continuum of end states?
 There are general “cross cutting” elements not shown such as maintenance of
physical infrastructure, communications, information, etc.
 What issues to recruit experienced people with the commensurate civilian experience
in times of peace?
 Will new recruits have the needed Mil background to be able to write Joint Strategic
Plans, understand Mil culture, Mil systems (CPOF, etc.)?
 Do we take an existing 38A who has been through ILE and educate/train them on
strategic thought, contacts, planning? For example, will a person with an economic
background deep enough to write plans to rebuild an economy a) be willing to leave
their careers for an extended period of time for training/deployment (pay cut, etc.),
and b) who is responsible for recruiting or finding them?
 How do 38G relate to 38A in principle and also in practice? What implications for skill
sets and training for 38A?
Figure 2: Conceptual map of 38 G specification
3
D. PROJECT MANAGEMENT: SCHEDULE AND COST STATUS
1. Project Tasks and Milestones
Internal management of the research project makes use of standard Gantt chart tools to
identify the major tasks, sub-tasks, milestone dates, deliverables, and key project meetings.
These can be available on request, and will change as necessary to align with growing
understanding of project requirements, evolving challenges, and unforeseen constraints.
2. Status of Funds
Through pay period ending 14 December 2013, the project team has expended 15.5% of
project funds. Table 1 summarizes cumulative expenditures to date. Figure 3 illustrates
expenditures to date, with respect to a linear spend plan over the period of performance of
the project. This spend plan will likely be adjusted as we progress toward award of a contract
providing additional technical contributions to the project.
Table 1. Cumulative Project Expenditures through 14 December 2013.
Category
Labor
Travel
Honoraria
Equipment/Supplies
Indirect Cost
Total
Expenditure
$108,455
$16,554
$2,500
$0
$27,237
$154,746
Figure 3. Project Expenditures through 14 December 2013.2
3. Contracting
The project team is preparing a contractual package to announce for competitive bid. The
contract statement of work calls for academic research to address technical challenges of the
MSG project. The package is expected to be ready for contract office evaluation in January
2014, to be announced for bid by February 2014, with award by May 2014.
2
Note: spending is on target. This image does not account for contracting to be obligated.
4
II. PROJECT INITIATION AND CAPACITY-BUILDING
This section provides an overview of project initiation activities through the first quarter of
project performance, including capacity-building, organizational meetings and briefings, and
initial work undertaken. The project schedule overall was modified because of the impact of
sequestration and also additional consultation with the Sponsor.
A. TEAM ORGANIZATION AND INITIATION OF WORK
Project Launch
The project launched on 30 September 2013 with agenda planning and website
development. The research team leaders and staff along with ISMG colleagues hold weekly
conference calls for ongoing coordination and progress reporting. The six civil sector project
leads meet with their research teams conducted interviews and meetings to set direction and
scope for technical activities. A major Q1 activity has been to form the project team leads for
major sectors of study:






Rule of Law: Melanne Civic, Department of State
Governance: Karen Guttieri, Naval Postgraduate School
Social Well-Being: Marc Ventresca, Naval Postgraduate School
Economy/Sustainable Development: Maria Pineda, Naval Postgraduate School
Security: Jon Czarnecki, Naval War College
Homeland Integration: Paula Philbin, Naval Postgraduate School
Program meetings
Several ISMG sponsor and research team meetings were conducted during Q1:
 Design Meeting conducted 17 October by VTC at 351 CACOM and Fort Bragg, along
with research team only follow-up meeting 18 October at Stanford University
 Interim Program Review (IPR) with IMSG conducted 5-6 November 2013 at Fort
Bragg*
 IPR conducted 16-19 December 2013 at NPS and Stanford *
*additional beyond statement of work
At the Fort Bragg IPR, a review of military governance, development of a field laboratory, and
38G classification activities were added to the research effort. The IMSG developed a
modified mission statement, which the research team has implemented.
Q1 work culminated in a project IPR at the Naval Postgraduate School and Stanford
University during the week of 16 December 2013 with focus on technical discussions, project
integration, and consultation with the Sponsor. The meetings were constructive and
necessary to integrate sector project work to date, to forge understanding, and to integrate
the diverse challenges of the assignments.
The PI made two project-focused travels in Q1:
 Travel to Washington DC to participate in the Civil-Military working group at USIP on
25 November 2013, and held additional meetings with the Office of The Judge
Advocate General of the US Army, National Defense University, George Mason
University, Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute, and US Military Academy.
5


Travel to Fort Bragg during the first week of December 2013 for meetings with Notre
Dame faculty, a presentation with IMSG team for the 95th Civil Affairs Brigade and
David Kilcullen of Cereus Associates, and meetings with the Civil Affairs Qualifications
Course team and with BG Van Roosen.
Many additional contacts have been made by team members (see full report and
power point presentation)
Planning for PSOTEW 2014, a multi-partner Workshop on stability operations
A major opportunity to bring the issues of this project to the CA and partner communities is
through participation in the Peace and Stability Operations Training and Education Workshop
(PSOTEW), scheduled for March 24-27 at George Mason University (GMU) in Arlington, VA.
The GSID research team will host two full days of panels on this research project, as one of
three official Working Groups (WG) approved by the Workshop conveners and based on a
proposal submitted by the PI. This is a remarkable opportunity to bring initial findings into
discussion with colleagues, partner agencies, and the sponsor community. An initial call for
papers for participation in the working group session is in preparation for dissemination in
early January 2014. PSOTEW is sponsored by the Director, Force Readiness and Training,
Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Readiness), together with GMU, the U.S.
Army War College’s Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute (PKSOI), and other
stakeholders. The workshop brings together several hundreds of trainers, practitioners,
planners, and educators from U.S. and international governmental and military organizations,
non-governmental organizations, peace and stability training centers, and academic
institutes.
Upcoming Activities/IPR Schedule
Activities underway on the project include work and schedule planning, statement of work
crafting for identified needs, project and sector team budgeting, and establishment of budget
and schedule tracking procedures.
The current planned schedule for major upcoming meetings is as follows (refer to Section III
for the overall project plan of action and milestones):
Interim Program Review* 14-15 January 2014: Rule of Law / Gov (DC)
PSOTEW* DoD + Conference 24-28 March 2014: (GMU)
Sector Reviews
 29-30 March 2014: Social Well-Being / Economy (DC)
 13-15 May 2014: Security (West Point)
 17-18 June 2014: Homeland Integration (NPS or DC)
 3-5 June 2014: Rule of Law (NPS) **
 8-10 July 2013: Governance (UCLA)**
*additional beyond statement of work
**proposed to coincide with civil affairs certificate course
6
III. THEMATIC RESEARCH
Sector Project Theme 1. GOVERNANCE
Although the civil dimension of military operations is well-known to be vital to mission
success in locales as diverse as Afghanistan, the Balkans, Iraq, and the Horn of Africa, it
remains little understood. Military support to governance and dedicated civil affairs elements
in particular have suffered neglect due to several factors: the policy and military communities
– despite specific responsibilities under international law and US DoD policy - are skittish
about the appearance of “occupation” and wary of “military government” responsibilities
that stem from it; the literature on governance is largely crafted by civilians with little
attention to, or understanding of, military norms and rules; the literature on military
operations is generally focused on kinetic missions with little attention to, or understanding
of, civil domain factors. In short, the literatures that are available do not effectively speak to
one another. Moreover, the subject area is extremely complex, as state-society relations and
expectations vary from place to place, and technological developments including new roles
for social media in civic participation and empowerment, and new ways of monitoring
political governance are constantly being developed and/or refined.
Governance embraces provision of security, rule of law, basic needs and economic regulation
and is therefore the umbrella concept for all sectors.
1. Preliminary Literature Review / Bibliography
The US military has with few exceptions failed to prepare effectively for civilian obligations in
war. Once boots are on the ground, two themes characterize the military’s approach to
transition. The first is civilianization – military efforts to handoff civilian responsibilities to
civilian agencies. The second is indirect rule - a local authority that will enable US troops to
depart, ideally leaving a reformed state with legitimate authority to govern. Today indirect
rule is remade in the form of host nation or partner capacity building. These themes persist
into the recent era, when US policy-makers naively believed that the invasions of Afghanistan
and Iraq would not require occupations, federal policy put the Department of State in the
lead for stability operations, and diplomats and commanders sought reliable host-nation
partners to assume the mantle of governance.
The history of American civil affairs and military government shows that while many of the
patterns, such as debates about military or civilian roles, are recurring, there has also been
change over time. New agencies, new norms emerged. The civil affairs function shifted from
keeping civilians out of the way to providing for their relief, to addressing the civilian
population as the center of gravity. Another, much larger body of literature addresses
governance more broadly, and a subset of this literature addresses challenges of governance
in fragile states or transitional societies.
This project is building a literature review based on 20 academic books and over 100 research
articles. The topics include civil affairs and military government, supporting stable
governance, provision of essential services, stewardship of state resources, civil participation,
and political moderation and accountability, with strong focus on both civilian and military
literatures.
7
2. Stakeholder Analysis
In the design meeting on September 18, the team explored the question “who is the client”?
A humanitarian assistance perspective might name the host nation civilian as the client;
however, the civil affairs are needed because military force has been used in as an expression
of foreign policy. This point to the conceptualization of policy and force set out by Carl von
Clausewitz. Clausewitz described war as a continuation of policy by other means. The
decision to use military force implies a transition in which a mode of policy gives way to a
mode of force. Policy implies a general direction for state action. In war the state takes up
arms and military as opposed to civilian instruments are the locus of movement. Post-conflict
military operations are concerned with a return transition, in which the mode of force gives
way to a mode of policy. The transition from force to policy can be understood in this light as
the natural reciprocal of the transition from policy to force.
Based on these issues, the design meeting grappled with the stakeholders, political and
military, foreign and domestic, with many perspectives: national, organizational,
humanitarian. We recognized the political purposes of the use of force. We developed the
following goals:
 sustainable peace
 protection/resilience
 security and development
 consistent with US foreign policy goals
Photo 1: GSID PI NPS professor Karen Guttieri depicts policy and force in Clausewitz with
implications for civil affairs. Stakeholder analysis at the Dec 2013 IPR at Stanford University
with research team and sponsors, including BG Van Roosen.
8
3. Key Participants / Points of Contact
BG Cosentino, National War College, National Defense University
James Fishkin, Stanford University
Francis Fukuyama, Stanford University
Clare Lockhart, Institute for State Effectiveness
4. December IPR Report-out
While the topic of governance came up throughout all the reports and discussion at the
December IPR, the session in which Stanford Communication Professor James Fishkin spoke
on deliberative democracy provoked an especially thoughtful discussion on what military
support to governance would involve.
5. Preliminary Planning: Sector IPR and PSOTEW
The next steps for the governance team involves both desk research and outreach. The
stakeholder analysis identified many organizations relevant to the research effort. During the
January IPR we will reach out to stakeholders at NDU and elsewhere in Washington.
The governance IPR is currently scheduled to take place at NPS in February. That is too soon.
Recognizing that governance is the umbrella competency, this should be the final topic.
The PSOTEW will include a governance panel. Several governance questions are in the
PSOTEW call for papers, for example, How can governance innovation support resiliency?
What is the role of gender in governance practices?
6. Enabling Technologies
Governance is one of the richest areas for enabling technologies. Social media, data storage,
web portals, communications technologies and mapping all provide tools for administration
of governance, mobilization of peace constituencies, and articulation of interest.
9
Sector Project Theme 2: RULE OF LAW
1. Preliminary Literature Review / Bibliography
Please see RoL appendix
2. Stakeholder Analysis and 3. Key Participants / Points of Contact
The RoL sector team has a score of relevant researchers, policy experts, and practitioners
relevant to the issues. (note: for some offices, more than one name is listed (e.g., Director
and operational experts), but we anticipate only one or possibly two will attend). Several
invitees are from areas beyond Washington DC, including internationals. If possible, an
unclassified video conference capability may be set up for remote participants (e.g., NDU can
accommodate this – it has been done for previous conferences, linking in participants from
Geneva, Germany, Brussels, Haiti, etc.).
3. Key Participants
Please see RoL appendix
4. December IPR Report-out
Civic presented a summary history of more than a century of civil responses in rule of law,
and facilitated a discussion on the range of approaches taken by the USG civilian and military
organizations, bilateral partners, multilateral organizations and intergovernmental
organizations. Civic briefed on the transition from the Civilian Response Corps to the Civilian
Response Network, and the “network of networks” approach reaching beyond the USG. Civic
invited Kelly Uribe (seconded to USAID from DOD/OSD) to brief on the Civilian Expeditionary
Workforce (CEW) civil response model, and its status and reorganization. Urube also
provided a brief introduction to NATO’s initiative on civil response and rule of law. In a premeeting, Victoria Walker of the International Security Sector Advisory Team (ISSAT), briefed
on its community of experts in Security Sector Reform and Disarmament Demobilization and
Reintegration, and challenges in certifying experts as field advisors.
5. Preliminary Planning: Sector IPR and PSOTEW
Civic followed up with consultation with Chuck Tucker, Major General (Ret.); Executive
Director World Enterprise Institute; retired Major General in the United States Air Force,
responsible for developing training and exercise policies and programs to ensure the
readiness of joint units of the National Guard in homeland defense and homeland security
missions, particularly in rule of law. Civic also consulted with Chris Holshek, Colonel, U.S.
Army Civil Affairs (Ret.), International Civil-Military Peace & Security Consultant. Civic is
conducting additional outreach to private sector civil society rule of law experts and scholar
practitioners in rule of law in preparation for the IPR and PSOTEW.
Next Steps – Informal exploratory working group January 14-15 (one and a half days devoted
to Rule of Law) at National Defense University – a series of Informal panels with two to four
discussion facilitators introducing the topic, providing insights, and triggering plenary
discussions.
Day 1: Panel I: Introduce the 38G initiative, in particular highlighting the rule of law
component.
Panel II: Review past and current/ ongoing civilian surge approaches that affirmatively map
out sector competencies/ core capabilities, focusing on the lessons learned as applicable to
the 38Gs program. Refer to the competencies developed by the CRC, FEMA, NATO and
others, and to the Essential Task Matrix and MPICE.
10
Panel III: Illuminate good practices in rule of law civilian surge, identifying broad
competencies and innovations in Rule of Law approaches.
Break-out Groups – Identify specialties and sub-specialties
Day 2: start with break-out reports, and proceed to mapping out recommendations for the
38G rule of law specialties and sub-specialties
6. Enabling Technologies
No progress in this area at this time.
11
Sector Project Theme 3. SECURITY – SAFE and SECURE ENVIRONMENT
The initial work for this sector has generated several core questions that need to be
addressed. These include:
What constitutes a safe and secure environment?
How does a safe and secure environment mesh with the other sectors?
Who are experts for safe and secure environments? (don’t assume military primacy)
What would comprise a graduate level curriculum for safe & secure environments?
1. Preliminary Literature Review / Bibliography
Safe and secure environments are a subset of the Civil Security discipline. Homeland
integration considers the domestic side of safe and secure environments. Here, safe and
secure environments will focus on the international aspects. The literature on safe and
secure environments is both vast and vague: it appears to be considered more an assumption
of military risk than a topic of necessary thought, theory and study. For example, consider
the USIP organization: much disciplinary focus on conflict management/prevention and rule
of law – nothing on safe and secure environments. See also UN doctrine and publications.
2. Stakeholder Analysis and 3. Key Participants / Points of Contact
Concurrent with the literature problem, experts are both everywhere and nowhere. It would
appear that anyone who has thought/wrote about/acted in post-hostilities operations is an
expert. This is a problem that has affected strategic planning: anyone who plans considers
himself/herself a strategic planner – but, of course, this is a false logic. The challenge is
identify true safe and secure environment expertise.
4. December IPR Report-out
Safe and secure environments are sine qua non for the other sectors to work.
Safe and secure environments transcend post-hostilities phases of operations; they are
necessary for all stabilization (US doctrinal definition) operations as well as requisite phases
of homeland defense, strategic, and major combat (US doctrinal definitions) operations.
A safe and secure environment is the critical challenge for so-called hybrid/complex
operations characteristic of so-called Irregular/Unconventional/Fourth Generation warfare.
Nothing will work if this sector fails.
5. Preliminary Planning: Sector IPR and PSOTEW
The greatest challenge is obtaining the necessary focus for the safe and secure environment
sector to be addressed in any meaningful way.
 Complete bibliography and literature review
Cast a wide net to identify interested and true experts. The proposed sector workshop for
May, 2014 may be the best venue for this. Prior to that, the PSOTEW meeting provides an
opportunity to gather papers/presentations.
Develop course syllabus after the sector workshop, by June 2014. This product is empirically
based on what developed from the prior two efforts. Note well here: there is no existing
theory base for development of a course of instruction in this subject, just a hodgepodge of
material from a diverse set of disciplines and organizations. What is necessary is both a
substantive and pedagogical theory foundation to support instruction on safe and secure
environments.
This sector should prove a vital and fruitful area for research and publication in the postproject timeframe. The IMSG can become a critical organization for the promotion of such
research, and the integration of results from that research into its curriculum.
12
Sector Project Theme 4. ECONOMY / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
During the first quarter of the project, the Economy / Sustainable Development sector team
has engaged in meetings with the military sponsor team and MSG project team members to
work on mission details, assess competencies and interrelationships among themes, and
coordinate expected outcomes and timeframes with sponsor, and for project design and
interim program reviews. The team prepared for the December IPR and has started
preparations for the March PSOTEW community launch.
1. Preliminary Literature Review / Bibliography
For the literature review, the sector team has scanned and pre-selected bibliographic items,
established content categories, relevance and annotation of anchor literature. Work
included preparation and literature review of main debates, work on annotated bibliography
(update, evaluate, select, read, review, incorporate feedback), and sketching an initial
category selection: General background on economy; business economics, development
economics, expeditionary economics (including conflict economics, peace economics, and
security economics), finance and macroeconomics, economics of gender, infrastructure and
redevelopment, risk and resilience, institutional economics, social economy, urban and
regional planning, and political economy of development. The sources include over 45 books
and 130 journal articles. We have coordinated and trained on integrated and shared
bibliographic software, conducted individual and theme research of original content,
identified potential concepts for academic journal placement, and scanned current
literature, critiques, debates, conferences, and other media to identify gaps and relevance
and salience of content.
2. Stakeholder Analysis and 4. December IPR Report-out
The sector team has initiated stakeholder identification and its dynamic relations (as
presented in the December 2013 IPR), identifying current debates in the following areas:
development, risks and resilience; energy-water-food nexus; regional and urban
development tensions and dependencies; and transformations and challenges.
3. Key Participants / Points of Contact
The sector team established working contact with the following organizations/individuals:
 Atlantic council- Matt Burrows (NIC report)
 Notre Dame - Viva Bartkus (Business on the Front Lines)
 World Economic Forum- Andrew Bishop (Global Risk Report)
 CNA- Resilience work-team
 University of Geneva- David Esposito, Remi Baudoui- Security studies, Alexander
Hedjazi- Environmental regimes
 Geneva Center for Security Policy- Selmo Cikotic (former MOD Bosnia)
 DCAF- A.Torres-Gender studies and economic impact
 French Development Agency: Patrick Willot
 US-EBI- Andrew Paterson –energy and environment expert
ILO, WTO, SDBC, USAID, USDOE
5. Preliminary Planning: Sector IPR and PSOTEW
The sector team has started to enlist specialists for Economy/Social panels, select potential
locations, and prepare for economic sustainability/social well-being work session. We have
started to interview and discuss topics with pre-selected potential experts for thematic
panels and area specialists.
13
Sector Project Theme 5: SOCIAL WELL-BEING (SWB)
1. Preliminary Literature Review / Bibliography
SWB includes a broad concern with well-being and quality of life, and specific focus on
several institutional domains including education, health, and refugee resettlement. The
challenge is to review the broad debates occurring in the component domains about specific
questions of expertise, capacity, modes of delivery, to understand how to couple CA current
and potential capacity with sector needs. Literatures range from case studies of specific
country systems and situations, to cross-national comparative studies, to institutional sector
analysis. There are a variety of analytic and policy approaches, looking at the changing
linkages between and among the relevant policy and institutional ‘systems’, and impact of
broad state and polity structure on services provision and population expectations.
2. Stakeholder Analysis and 3. Key participants/points of contact
We have initiated stakeholder identification within the Civil Affairs community, with relevant
research and policy colleagues and with lead partner agencies that are fundamental to
mission accomplishment and desired end states. The stakeholder focus introduces sever
research considerations: 1) Differences of language and meaning across practitioner
communities, 2) challenge to reconcile near-term and long-term intervention standards and
strategies, and 3) persisting effects of cross-sector coordination experiences. Contacts:
Civil affairs professionals with substantial experience in the field
 Research academics including Deborah Gibbons (NPS), Susan Hocevar (NPS), Peter
Walker (Tufts), as well as research staff at major University Centers and also research
agencies like RAND that have considerable policy research expertise to contribute
 Individuals with professional expertise in relevant domains, who also have prior CA
professional experience (e.g., James Sosnicky, SEAF).
4. December IPR Report-out
The December IPR was notable and valuable. We acquired a much better sense of the
capacity needs to deliver on the project. We engaged in two sustained work periods, in
midst the other activities and sessions: 1) variety of standards and intervention modes used
by different stakeholders to evaluate social well-being, and specifically to consider resource
minimums to support minimal human well-being; 2) issues in SWB material to applications
like systems thinking, building organizational systems for delivery, ‘theories’ of action and
practice communities, frameworks and models from technology and social innovation.
5. Preliminary Planning: Sector IPR and PSOTEW
We have settled on early April dates for the IPR, following the sessions at the PSOTEW. Our
work is in parallel with the Economic development/Sustainability project theme, and we will
likely coordinate for both the briefing session and the PSOTEW, pending conference
approvals. For PSOTEW, we have identified themes of ‘translational research’, that is
research that explores and codifies research insights for policy and practitioner use.
6. Enabling Technologies
The work of the social well-being domain is one of the most vibrant enabling technologies - in
mobile health, education technology, and the broad space around refugees and
humanitarian/disaster responses. The self-reinforcing design tools that our GSID team
colleagues have introduced are relevant. There are also many other options to use mapping
and other crowd source-based tools to improve mission effectiveness.
14
Sector Project Theme 6. HOMELAND INTEGRATION
1. Preliminary Literature Review / Bibliography
Homeland integration is critical issues for US and other military, in the context of civilian
control. The landscape of homeland defense integration ranges from the obvious--visible
operations during situations such as Katrina and Rita- to the unimaginable-how to distribute
food/medicine during a quarantine, or after a cyber-attack that renders the infrastructure
that supports “just in time” delivery inoperable for a significant amount of time. The US
experience until recently had few cases of homeland ‘defense’. More directly, the issues are
complexly intertwined with now standard issues of homeland ‘security’. The Q1 work yields
two surprising findings: (1) a noticeably thin contemporary literature about the conception
of the military’s role in homeland defense; and (2) a plural understanding of what ‘homeland
defense’ is /might possibly be. The scholarly efforts to develop these issues is scattered and
various. This may be one result of the prevailing view that “Posse Comitatus begins with
‘No’”, when indeed, there are 26 exceptions to PC in existing law. The deliverable is to
develop the outlines of this sixth of the sector project themes incorporating strategic
communications - managing crisis and political challenge, and military response in complex
catastrophes (or “beyond Katrina”). The end result would be a substantial multi-topic
annotated bibliography, as well as a policy paper outlining the way ahead for the IMSG to
think about homeland defense in contemporary policy and practice.
2. Stakeholder Analysis
Key stakeholders for the Homeland Integration sector include:
FEMA; Department of Homeland Security; State, Local County and Tribal Governments;
Department of Justice
Additional components of the National Response Plan as needed
3. Key Participants / Points of Contact
Key points of contact for this sector to date include:
 MG Peter Aylward (Ret) USANG
 Col. Thomas Womble, US Army National Guard National Security Affairs
Fellow Hoover Institute Stanford University
 Lt Col Jeffrey Voice
 BG Michael McDaniel (ret) Professor at Cooley Law School
 Lt Gen Chipman
 Dr. Larry Morgan, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
 Jeanne Lin, DHS
 Senator John W Warner
4. December IPR Report-out
The December IPR was a direct opportunity for contributors to this sector theme to convene.
I was able to speak directly and substantively with ISMG leadership, consult with other leads,
and have very valuable input from serving CA officers. The December sessions helped to
consolidate the initial wide reading and interviews we have completed.
5. Preliminary Planning: Sector IPR and PSOTEW
Going forward, the sector focus will be to develop initial findings into specific debates and a
research agenda. The focus of the work will to continue to interview practitioners-at both
the strategic and operational levels-as well as scholars. This project theme has different
needs to develop as a research and policy focus.
15
Glossary of Acronyms
APAN
ARCIC
All Partners Access Network
Army Capabilities Integration Center
ASI
Additional Skill Identifier
BDE
Brigade
CA
Civil Affairs
CCDR
Combatant Commander
CDDRL Center on Democracy, Development, and Rule of Law
COIN
Counter-Insurgency
CPOF
Command Post of the Future
DOD
Department of Defense
HN
Host Nation
ILE
Instructional Learning Environment
IPR
Interim Program Review
IMSG
Institute for Military Support to Governance
MSG
Military Support to Governance
NPS
Naval Postgraduate School
PI
Principal Investigator
PKSOI
Peace Keeping and Stability Operations Institute
PSOTEW
Peace and Stability Operations Training and Education Workshop
RoL
Rule of Law
SE
Stable Economy
SG
Stable Governance
SSE
Safe and Secure Environment
SWB
Social Well-Being
US
United States
USAID
United States Agency for International Development
USASOC
United States Army Special Operations Command
USIP
United States Institute of Peace
16
References and Bibliography
Governance: Selected Bibliography
Abed, George T. and Sanjeev Gupta. 2002. Governance, Corruption, and Economic
Performance.
Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
Abed, George T. and Sanjeev Gupta. Governance, Corruption, and Economic Performance.
Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 2002.
Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot. International Practices. Cambridge Studies in
International Relations. Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Anderson, Lisa. Transitions to Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.
Army Service Schools U.S. War Department, Military Aid to the Civil Power (Fort
Leavenworth, Kansas: The General Service Schools Press, 1925
Bain, William. Between Anarchy and Society: Trusteeship and the Obligations of
Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Bebber, Robert J. "TheRole ofProvincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) in Counterinsurgency
Operations:Khost Province, Afghanistan". Small Wars Journal. Retrieved 28 December
2013
Bekkers, Victor, Geske Dijkstra, Arthur Edwards, and Menno Fenger. 2007. Governance and
the Democratic Deficit: Assessing the Democratic Legitimacy of Governance Practices.
Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.
Bekkers, Victor, Geske Dijkstra, Arthur Edwards, and Menno Fenger. Governance and the
Democratic Deficit: Assessing the Democratic Legitimacy of Governance Practices.
Burlington: Ashgate Publishing, 2007.
Beris, Jonathan V. Defining Stability, Security, Transition, and Reconstruction (SSTR)
Operations Requirements for Future Department of the Navy Training and Analytical
Models and Simulations [Electronic Resource].
Bickel, Keith B. Mars Learning: The Marine Corps Development of Small Wars Doctrine, 19151940. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2001.
Binnendijk, Hans and Patrick M. Cronin Civilian Surge: Key to
Complex Operations, edited by. 165-94. Washington, DC: National Defense University
Press, 2009
Binswanger-Mkhize, Hans P., Jacomina P. de Regt, and Stephen Spector. 2010. Local and
Community Driven Development: Moving to Scale in Theory and Practice.Washington,
D.C.: The World Bank.
Binswanger-Mkhize, Hans P., Jacomina P. de Regt, and Stephen Spector. Local and
Community Driven Development: Moving to Scalein Theory and Practice. Washington,
D.C.: The World Bank, 2010.
Birkhimer, William E. Military Government and Martial Law, 2nd Revised ed. (Kansas City,
MO: Franklin Hudson Publishing Company, 1898; 1904).
Bride, Frank “The Gendarmerie d’Haiti,” Marine Corps Gazette, vol. 3, no. 4 (Dec. 1918), pp.
297-298
17
Bridges, Brian and Lok Sang Ho. 2010. Public Governance in Asia and the Limits of Electoral
Democracy. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bridges, Brian and Lok Sang Ho. Public Governance in Asia and the Limits of Electoral
Democracy. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.
Caplan, R. (2004). Partner or patron? international civil administration and local capacitybuilding. International Peacekeeping,11(2), 229-247. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/228047605?accountid=12702
Coles, Harry L., and Albert K. Weinberg. Civil Affairs:Soldiers Become Governors, United
States Army in World War Ii. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Chief of Military
History, Department of the Army, 1964. Fishel, John T. Civil Military Operations in the
New World. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1997.
CONVENTION (IV) RESPECTING THE LAWS AND CUSTOMS OF WAR ON LAND Signed at The
Hague, 18 October 1907. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 26 January 1910
gopher://gopher.law.cornell.edu/00/foreign/fletcher/HA07-IV.txt
Corrigan, Philip and Derek Sayer, The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural
Revolution, (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985) Davidson, Janine. Lifting the Fog of Peace :
How Americans Learned to Fight Modern War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan
Press, 2010.
de Ferranti, David, Justin Jacinto, Anthony, J. Ody, and Graeme Ramshaw. 2009. How to
Improve Governance: A New Framework for Analysis and Action. Washington,D.C.:
Brookings Institution Press.
Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. New York,: H. Holt and Company, 1927.
Doyle, Michael “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, part 1” Philosophy and Public
Affairs Vol. 12, No. 3 (Summer 1983) and “Kant, Liberal
Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, part 2” Philosophy
and Public Affairs Vol. 12, No. 4
(Fall 1983)
Dunne, Timothy “Liberalism” in John Baylis and Steve Smith (Eds.) The Globalization of World
Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 147-163
Estrella, Marisol and Nina Iszatt. 2004. Beyond Good
Governance: Participatory Democracy in the Philippines. Quezon City: Institute for
Popular Democracy.
Estrella, Marisol and Nina Iszatt. Beyond Good Governance: Participatory Democracy in the
Philippines. Quezon City: Institute for Popular Democracy, 2004.
Ferguson, Yale H., and R. J. Barry Jones. Political Space : Frontiers of Change and Governance
in a Globalizing World. Suny Series in Global Politics. Albany: State University of New
York Press, 2002.
Fischer, William D. Untapped Air Force Resources for Stabilization and Reconstruction
Operations [Electronic Resource].
Fisher, Julie. "Local and Global: International Governance and Civil Society." Journal of
International Affairs 57, no. 1 (Fall 2003, 2003): 19.
Ford, Jess T. Foreign Affairs [Electronic Resource] : Effective Stewardship of Resources
Essential to Efficient Operations at State Department, USAID.
18
Fukuyama, Francis “The End of History?” The National Interest Vol. 16 (Summer 1989), pp.316
Fukuyama, Francis. State-Building : Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. Ithaca,
N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2004.
Ghani, Ashraf, and Clare Lockhart. Fixing Failed States : A Framework for Rebuilding a
Fractured World. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Gilley, Bruce. The Right to Rule : How States Win and Lose Legitimacy. New York: Columbia
University Press, 2009.
Governance and International Legal Theory [Electronic Resource]. Nova Et Vetera Iuris
Gentium. Series A, Modern International Law ; no. 2-3.
Gray, John Liberalism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986)
Guiding Principles for Stabilization and Reconstruction. United States Institute of Peace and
United States Army Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute, 2009.
Guttieri, Karen Military Government and Civil Affairs: Lost Lessons
in the American Way of War and Peace Draft m.s.
Guttieri, Karen, and Jessica Piombo. Interim Governments : Institutional Bridges to Peace and
Democracy? Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2007.
Guttieri, Karen. "Civil-Military Relations in Peacebuilding." Sicherheitspolitik und
Friedensforschung 2 (2004):79-85.
Guttieri, Karen. "Gaps at the Seams of the Dayton Accord: A Role Play Scenario." In Case 279
Pew Case Studies in International Affairs. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of
Diplomacy, Georgetown University, 2005.
Guttieri, Karen. "Professional Military Education in Democracies." In Who Guards the
Guardians and How?: Democratic Civil-Military Relations, edited by Thomas Bruneau
and Scott Tollefson. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006.
Guttieri, Karen. "Stuck in the Moment: Prospects for United States Stability Operations in
Iraq." In The Dilemmas of American Strategic Primacy: Implications for the Future of
Canadian-American Cooperation, edited by David S. McDonough and Douglas A. Ross.
141-61. Toronto: Royal Canadian Military Institute, 2005.
Guttieri, Karen. "The Civil Dimension of Strategy." In Humanizing ur Global Order, edited by
Obiora Chinedu Okafor and Obijiofor Aginam. 87-111. Toronto: University of Toronto
Press, 2003.
Guttieri, Karen. "Unlearning War: U.S. Military Experience with Stability Operations." In
Organizational Learning in the Global Context, edited by Michael Kenney Leann
Brown, Michael Zarkin. London: Ashgate, 2006.
Guttieri, Toward a Usable Peace Phd Dissertation, 1999.
Guttieri,Karen “Making Might Right: The Legitimation of Occupation,” 45th International
Studies Association Convention, Montreal Quebec 2004.
Held, David. Models of Democracy. 3rd ed. Cambridge, UK ; Malden, MA: Polity, 2006.
Hicks, Kathleen H., Christine E. Wormuth, and Eric Ridge. The Future of U.S. Civil Affairs
Forces Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2009.
19
Holshek, Christopher. "Civil-Military Power and the Future of Civil Affairs." The Officer 83, no.
4 (May 2007, 2007): 45-48.
Holsti, Kalevi J. The State, War, and the State of War Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Hull, Cordell, The Memoirs of Cordell Hull, New York: Macmillan, 1948, Vol. 2.
Hull, William I. The Two Hague Conferences and Their Contribution to International Law
(Boston; New York: Ginn and Company; Kraus Reprint Company, 1908; 1970).: 467.
Irvine, Cynthia E. Roundhouse : A Security Architecture for Active Networks.
Kalyvas, Stathis N., Ian Shapiro, and Tarek E. Masoud. Order, Conflict, and
Violence. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Keller, James Cliff. Fixing the Whole-of-Government Approach in Failed States-a Model for
Security Force Assistance [Electronic Resource].
Kelsen, Hans General Theory of Law and State, Anders Wedberg trans. New York: Russell and
Russell, 1961; discussion in Brad R. Roth, Governmental Illegitimacy in International
Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.
Kennedy, Harold. "Pentagon Broadens Duties for its Civil Affairs Teams." National Defense 87,
no. 591 (Feb 2003, 2003): 36-39.
Kettl, Donald F., author. System Under Stress : The Challenge to 21st Century Governance.
Public Affairs and Policy Administration Series.
Kooiman, Jan. 2003. Governing as Governance. Thousand Oaks:SAGE Publications.
Kooiman, Jan. Governing as Governance. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2003.
Kraft, Michael E., and Scott R. Furlong. Public Policy : Politics, Analysis, andAlternatives. 4th
ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2013.
Kumar, Krishna. "After the Elections: Consequences for Democratization." In Postconflict
Elections, Democratization, and International Assistance, editedby Krishna Kumar.
215-28. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1998.
Lambert, Alexandre. "From Civil-Military Relations Towards Security Sector Governance."
European Political Science: EPS 10, no. 2 (Jun 2011, 2011): 157-166.
Levi-Faur, David. "From "Big Government" to "Big Governance"?" In Oxford Handbook of
Governance, edited by Levi-Faur, David, 3. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Levi-Faur, David. 2012. "From "Big Government" to "Big Governance"?" In Oxford
Handbook of Governance, by David Levi-Faur, 3-18. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy. New Haven and London: Yale University
Press, 1999.
Lipset, S.M. Political Man, The Social Basis of Politics New York: Doubleday, 1959.
Lovan, W. Robert, Michael Murray, and Ron Shaffer. 2004. ParticipatoryGovernance:
Planning, Conflict Mediation, and Public Decision-Making in Civil Society. Burlington:
Ashgate Publishing.
20
Lovan, W. Robert, Michael Murray, and Ron Shaffer. Participatory Governance: Planning,
Conflict Mediation, and Public Decision-Making in Civil Society. Burlington: Ashgate
Publishing, 2004.
Malesky, Edmund. "Straight Ahead on Red: How Foreign Direct Investment Empowers
Subnational Leaders." The Journal of Politics 70, no. 1 (2008): 97.
Malesky, Edmund. 2008. "Straight Ahead on Red: How Foreign Direct Investment
Empowers Subnational Leaders." The Journal of Politics 70 (1): 97-119.
Malik, Sarita. "The Army Civil Affairs Officer Educational Pipeline a Supply and Demand
Analysis." Naval Postgraduate School, 2008.
Malik, Sarita. The Army Civil Affairs Officer Educational Pipeline [Electronic Resource] : A
Supply and Demand Analysis.
March, James G., Martin Schulz, and Hsü eh-kuang Chou. The Dynamics of Rules : Change in
Written Organizational Codes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000.
Martin, Gail , PBS Newshour Iraq in Transition “Iraq: Key Players” date unknown
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/indepth_coverage/middle_east/iraq/keyplayers/garner.h
tml
McCloy, John J. “US Military Governor and High Commissioner for Germany, 1949-1952” in
Moore, Kenneth H.,Jr. "Strategic Civil Affairs for the Long War." The Officer 84, no. 2
(Feb/Mar 2008, 2008): 51-54.
Moore, Mark Harrison. Creating Public Value. 1st Replica Books ed. Bridgewater, NJ: Replica
Books, 1997.
Mostovicz, E. Isaac, Nada K. Kakabadse, and Andrew P. Kakabadse. "Self- Or Rule-Based
Governance: Analysis of Choice-Making Behaviour." Corporate Governance 10, no. 4
(2010): 541-557.
Norris, Pippa. 2008. Driving Democracy: Do Power Sharing Institutions Work? New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Pippa. Making Democratic Governance Work: How Regimes Shape Prosperity,
Welfare, and Peace. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Norris, Pippa. Electoral Engineering [Electronic Resource] : Voting Rules and Political
Behavior.
Pierre, Jon. Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy. New York: Oxford
University Press, 2000.
Pirnie, Bruce. Counterinsurgency in Iraq (2003-2006) [Electronic Resource]. Rand
Counterinsurgency Study ; v. 2.
Ramos, Jennifer. Changing Norms through Actions : The Evolution of Sovereignty. New York:
Oxford University Press, 2013.
Regner, Tobias, Javier A. Barria, Jeremy V. Pitt, and Brendan Neville. "Governance of Digital
Content in the Era of Mass Participation." Electronic Commerce Research 10, no. 1
(Mar 2010, 2010): 99-110.
21
Reynolds, Andrew. The Architecture of Democracy : Constitutional Design, Conflict
Management, and Democracy. Oxford Studies in Democratization. Oxford, UK; New
York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Rose, Richard. What is Governing? : Purpose and Policy in Washington.
Rothstein, Bo. 2012. "Good Governance." In Oxford Handbook of Governance, by David LeviFaur, 143-154. New York: Oxford University Press.
Russett, Bruce Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World
(Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1993).
Sahni, Nikhil R., Maxwell Wessel, and Clayton M. Christensen. 2013. "Unleashing
Breakthrough in Innovation in Government." Stanford Social Innovation Review,
Summer: 26-31.
Sahni, Nikhil, Maxwell Wessel, and Clayton M. Christensen. "Unleashing Breakthrough in
Innovation in Government." Stanford Social Innovation Review no. Summer (2013):
26.
Sandler, Stanley. Glad to See Them Come and Sorry to See Them Go: A History of U.S. Army
Tactical Civil Affairs/Military Government, 1775-1991. Fort Bragg, NC: US Special
Operations Command, 1998.
Sassen, Saskia. Territory, Authority, Rights : From Medieval to Global
Assemblages. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2006.
Schwenk, Edmund H. "Legislative Power of the Military Occupant under Article 43, Hague
Regulations," Yale Law Journal (1945) Vol. 54: 93-416
Sellers, Cameron S., and Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Provincial Reconstruction Teams:
Improving Effectiveness (Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School, 2007).
Sikkink, Kathryn. The Justice Cascade : How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World
Politics. 1st ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 2011.
Snyder, Jack L. From Voting to Violence : Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. 1st
ed. New York: Norton, 2000.
St Laurent, J.,A. (2013). Building partner capacity: Key practices to effectively manage
department of defense efforts to promote security cooperation United States
Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1373466303?accountid=12702
Suri, Jeremi, Liberty’s Surest Guardian: American Nation-Building From the Founders to
Obama. New York: Free Press, 2011.
TheFuture of S/CRS – What’s in a Name? Journal of International Peace Operations Volume 6,
Number 5 –March-April, 2011. Posted by Heather Price.
Tilly, Charles, Coercion, Capital, and European States: A.D. 990 -1990 (Cambridge, MA: Basil
Blackwell, 1990).
Ubaldi,John, Jose Piedra, and Mark Kline. "Reorganize Marine Corps Civil Affairs: Being
Prepared for Contingencies." Marine Corps Gazette 92, no. 10 (Oct 2008, 2008): 6265.
Understanding Counterinsurgency : Doctrine, Operations and Challenges. Cass Military
Studies.
22
United States Army, F.M. 27-5 Military Government (1940).
United States Department of Defense. "QDR Execution Roadmap Building Partnership
Capacity." 22 May 2006.
United States. "National Security Presidential Directive / Npsd-44." White House, Washington
DC: Reprinted by Federation of American Scientists, December 7, 2005 United States.
Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. Stabilization and Reconstruction :
Building Peace in a Hostile Environment : Hearing before the Committee on Foreign
Relations, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, First Session, June 16,
2005. S. Hrg. ; 109-236.
United States. General Accounting Office. Issues in Implementing International Peace
Operations [Electronic Resource].
United States. Government Accountability Office. Legal Services Corporation [Electronic
Resource] : Governance and Accountability Practices Need to be Modernized and
Strengthened : Report to Congressional Requesters.
United States Joint Chiefs of Staff. "JP 3-57 Civil Military Operations." Washington DC, 11
September 2013.
Wells, Donald A. The Laws of Land Warfare : A Guide to the U.S. Army Manuals (Westport,
Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1992)
Wolfe, Robert. Americans as Proconsuls : United States Military Government in Germany and
Japan, 1944-1952. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1984.
Wuestner, Scott G., and Army War College (U.S.). Building Partner Capacity/Security Force
Assistance : A New Structural Paradigm. The Letort Papers. Carlisle, PA: Strategic
Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 2009.
Yates, Lawrence A. The U.S. Military's Experience in Stability Operations, 1789-2005. Fort
Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute Press, 2006.
Yossi Shain and Juan J. Linz, Between States: Interim Governments and Democratic
Transitions Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995
Ziemke, Earl F. The U.S. Army in the Occupation of Germany 1944-1946, Army Historical
Series (Washington, D.C.: Center of Military History, 1975; 1990)
23
Rule of Law: Selective Bibliography
A Field Guide for USAID Democracy and Governance Officers: Assistance to Civilian Law
Enforcement in Developing Countries (2011)
Brian Z. Tamanaha, On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory (2004)
Charles E. Tucker, Charting a New Course for the Rule of Law Industry: For the Times they are
a-Changin
Civilian Capabilities in Multidimensional Crisis Management (2013)
Erik Jensen and Thomas Heller, Beyond Common Knowledge: Empirical Approaches to the
Rule of Law (2005)
Foreign Police Assistance, Lessons from the Field (2011)
http://www.academia.edu/4954847/Chapter_17_TWO_SIDES_OF_THE_COIN_Integrating_Ci
vilian_and_Military_Surge_Capacity_for_Stability_Operations
http://www.usip.org/events/foreign-police-assistance-lessons-the-field
https://www.academia.edu/5480253/Charting_a_New_Course_for_the_Rule_of_Law_Indust
ry_-_For_the_Times_They_Are_A-Changin)
Jane Stromseth, David Wippman, Rosa Brooks, Can Might Make Rights?: Building the Rule of
Law after Military Interventions (2006)
Joint Forces Command Rule of Law-Security Sector Reform Handbook (2011)
(http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/doctrine/jwfc_pam.htm.)
Melanne Civic and Michael Miklaucic, Monopoly of Force: The Nexus of Disarmament,
Demobilization and Integration and Security Sector Reform (2011)
Melanne Civic, Two Sides of the Coin: Integrating Civilian and Military Surge Capacity for
Stability Operations, in Strategic Realities in Irregular Conflict (2013)
Nathan J. Brown, The Rule of Law in the Arab World: Courts in Egypt and the Gulf (2007)
Rachel Kleinfeld, Advancing the Rule of Law Abroad: Next Generation Reform, (2012)
Rule of Law Handbook: A Practitioner’s Guide for Judge Advocates (2011)
Strengthening and coordinating United Nations Rule of Law activities, Report of the
Secretary-General (2013)
Thomas Carothers, Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge ((2006)
Tom Ginsburg, Tamir Moustafa, Rule By Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes
(2008)
USAID/ USIP, Afghanistan Rule of Law Project: Field Study of Informal and Customary Justice
in Afghanistan and Recommendations on Improving Access to Justice and Relations
between Formal Courts and Informal Bodies (2005)
24
Sustainable Economic Development: Selective Bibliography
GENERAL BACKGROUND
Collier, Paul "Natural Resources, Development and Conflict: Channels of Causation and Policy
Interventions," (Washington: World Bank, 2003)
Bobbitt, The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace, and the Course of History, (NewYork: Anchor,
2002)
___________, Terror and Conscent: The wars of the 21 century
Diamond, Jared. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies, (NewYork: W.W.
Norton & Co., 1999)
____________, Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed: Revised Edition, (New
York: Penguin Group, NY, 2005)
____________, The World Until Yesterday: What Can we Learn from Traditional Societies,
(New York: Penguin Group, NY, 2012)
Kaldor, Mary; Karl, Terry Lynn; Said, Yahia, eds, Oil Wars, (London: Pluto Press, 2007)
Karl, Terry Lynn The Paradox of Plenty, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997)
Michael Lewis, Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game, (New York: W.W. Norton,
2003)
Niall Ferguson, The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World, (New York: Penguin
Books, 2008)
Perkins, John, Confesions of an Economic Hit Man, (San Francisco: Berret-Koehler, 2004)
Ross, M. L.,"The political economy of the resource curse". World Politics 51 (2): 297–322.
Ross, Michael (2006). "A Closer Look at Oil, Diamonds, and Civil War". Annual Review of
Political Science 9: 265–300
Thucydides, Robert B. Strassler Ed., The Landmark Thucydides: A Comprehensive Guide to
the Peloponnesian War, (New York: Touchstone, 1998)
BUSINESS ECONOMICS
Acs, Zoltan J. “Small Business Economics: A Global Perspective.” Challenge 35, no. 6 (1992):
38–44.
Davis, Steven J., John Haltiwanger, and Scott Schuh. “Small Business and Job Creation:
Dissecting the Myth and Reassessing the Facts.” Business Economics 29 (1994): 13–13.
Porter, Michael E. “The Adam Smith Address: Location, Clusters, and the‘ New’
Microeconomics of Competition.” Business Economics 33, no. 1 (1998): 7–13.
Schwartz, Hugh. Rationality Gone Awry?: Decision Making Inconsistent with Economic and
Financial Theory, 1999. http://nabe-web.com/publib/be/990393.pdf.
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
Bardhan, Pranab. Land, Labor, and Rural Poverty: Essays in Development Economics.
Columbia University Press, 1984.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=kokSfD1Y5v4C&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=d
evelopment+economics&ots=av195pFwyf&sig=RODyPiOdFooM-ydirhn9NBKISOY.
Hirschman, Albert O. “The Rise and Decline of Development Economics.” Essays in
Trespassing: Economics to Politics and Beyond 1 (1981): 24.
Lal, Deepak. The Poverty of Development Economics. mit Press, 2000.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=pYxw96EHDpEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&d
q=development+economics&ots=ch5pjgqueC&sig=VjO6ZlZwSWWSvOkhzsVDSBYnq14
.
Meier, Gerald M. “Leading Issues in Development Economics.” Leading Issues in Development
Economics. (1964). http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19651802210.html.
25
Pearce, David William, Edward B. Barbier, and Anil Markandya. Sustainable Development:
Economics and Environment in the Third Wordl. Earthscan, 1990.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=03NeLzVsC8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=development+economics&ots=I2ybNiP1tW&sig=132Mb0T7s
6gXYczGCWzz7PVNAYI.
Rao, Pinninti K. Sustainable Development: Economics and Policy. Blackwell Publishers, 2000.
http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/20001807469.html.
Ray, Debraj. Development Economics. Princeton University Press, 1998.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GKr5RxWT4uAC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq
=development+economics&ots=r4oLDo_qhs&sig=NHU286cedUwcrIOAWIZ_1KoWOM.
EXPEDITIONARY ECONOMICS (conflict economics, peace economics, and security economics)
Karam, Azza. “Expeditionary Economics: Enabling Stabilization and Growth or Risking Cultural
Collateral Damage?” In Conference on Expeditionary Economics: Towards and
Doctrine for Enabling Stabilization and Growth, West Point, February, 15–17, 2011.
http://relooney.fatcow.com/NS4053e/Kauffman-Expeditionary_11.pdf.
Looney, Robert. “Entrepreneurship and the Process of Development: A Framework for
Applied Expeditionary Economics in Pakistan.” Available at SSRN 2027512 (2012).
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2027512.
Patterson, Rebecca, and Jonathan Robinson. “The Commander as Investor: Changing CERP
Practices.” PRISM 2, no. 2 (2011): 115–125.
Patterson, Rebecca, and Dane Stangler. Building Expeditionary Economics: Understanding the
Field and Setting Forth a Research Agenda. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation,
2010. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1710010.
Peterson, Jeff, and Mark Crow. “Expeditionary Economics: Towards a Doctrine for Enabling
Stabilization and Growth.” In Conference on Expeditionary Economics: Towards and
Doctrine for Enabling Stabilization and Growth, West Point, February, 15–17, 2011.
http://relooney.fatcow.com/NS4053e/Kauffman-Expeditionary_8.pdf.
Riegg, Nicholas H. “Implementing Expeditionary and Entrepreneural Economics: Iraq and
Afghanistan.” Entrepreneurship and Expeditionary Economics: Towards a New
Approach to Economic Growth Following Conflict or Disaster (2010).
Schake, Kori. “Operationalizing Expeditionary Economics.” Entrepreneurship and
Expeditionary Economics: Towards a New Approach to Economic Growth Following
Conflict or Disaster (2010). http://www.relooney.info/SI_Expeditionary/0Expeditionary_2.pdf#page=201.
Schramm, Carl J. “Expeditionary Economics: Spurring Growth after Conflicts and Disasters.”
Foreign Aff. 89 (2010): 89.
FINANCE AND MACRO-ECONOMICS
Alesina, Alberto, Enrico Spolaore, and Romain Wacziarg. Economic Integration and Political
Disintegration. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1997.
http://www.nber.org/papers/w6163.
Ffrench-Davis, Ricardo. Reforming the Reforms in Latin America: Macroeconomics, Trade,
Finance. Macmillan, 2000.
http://www.networkideas.org/featart/may2002/Latin_America.pdf.
Krugman, Paul. “How Did Economists Get It so Wrong?” New York Times 2, no. 9 (2009):
2009.
Rodrik, Dani. Trade, Social Insurance, and the Limits to Globalization. National Bureau of
Economic Research, 1997. http://www.nber.org/papers/w5905.pdf.
26
———. Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? National Bureau of
Economic Research, 1996. http://www.nber.org/papers/w5537.
GENDER ECONOMICS
Benería, Lourdes. “Toward a Greater Integration of Gender in Economics.” World
Development 23, no. 11 (1995): 1839–1850.
Benería, Lourdes, Günseli Berik, and Maria Floro. Gender, Development, and Globalization:
Economics as If All People Mattered. Routledge New York, 2003.
http://orton.catie.ac.cr/cgibin/wxis.exe/?IsisScript=SIBE01.xis&method=post&formato=2&cantidad=1&expresio
n=mfn=032097.
Elson, Diane. “Gender-Aware Analysis and Development Economics.” Journal of International
Development 5, no. 2 (1993): 237–247.
Jacobsen, Joyce P. The Economics of Gender. Vol. 631207279. Blackwell Malden, MA, 1998.
http://www.lavoisier.fr/livre/notice.asp?ouvrage=1787966.
Mackintosh, Maureen. “Gender and Economics: The Sexual Division of Labour and the
Subordination of Women.” (1981). http://www.popline.org/node/425964.
Nussbaum, Martha C., and Jonathan Glover. Women, Culture, and Development: A Study of
Human Capabilities: A Study of Human Capabilities. Oxford University Press, 1995.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=jhLgdK84Ll8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=G
ender+economics&ots=GbJiHfpJFe&sig=A4I6TaiExL_lEgz2GWrrr1XBKTw.
INFRASTRUCTURE AND RECONSTRUCTION
Berke, Philip R., and Thomas J. Campanella. “Planning for Postdisaster Resiliency.” The Annals
of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604, no. 1 (2006): 192–207.
Chang, Stephanie E., and Nobuoto Nojima. “Measuring Post-Disaster Transportation System
Performance: The 1995 Kobe Earthquake in Comparative Perspective.” Transportation
Research Part A: Policy and Practice 35, no. 6 (2001): 475–494.
Davidson, Colin H., Cassidy Johnson, Gonzalo Lizarralde, Nese Dikmen, and Alicia Sliwinski.
“Truths and Myths about Community Participation in Post-Disaster Housing Projects.”
Habitat International 31, no. 1 (2007): 100–115.
Ingram, Jane C., Guillermo Franco, Cristina Rumbaitis-del Rio, and Bjian Khazai. “Post-Disaster
Recovery Dilemmas: Challenges in Balancing Short-Term and Long-Term Needs for
Vulnerability Reduction.” Environmental Science & Policy 9, no. 7 (2006): 607–613.
Johnson, Cassidy. “Strategic Planning for Post-Disaster Temporary Housing.” Disasters 31, no.
4 (2007): 435–458.
Leitmann, Josef. “Cities and Calamities: Learning from Post-Disaster Response in Indonesia.”
Journal of Urban Health 84, no. 1 (2007): 144–153.
Munnell, Alicia H., and Leah M. Cook. “How Does Public Infrastructure Affect Regional
Economic Performance?” In Is There a Shortfall in Public Capital Investment?
Proceedings of a Conference, 1990. http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=839830.
North, Carol S., Betty Pfefferbaum, Pushpa Narayanan, Samuel Thielman, GRETCHEN McCOY,
Cedric Dumont, Aya Kawasaki, Natsuko Ryosho, and Edward L. Spitznagel.
“Comparison of Post-Disaster Psychiatric Disorders after Terrorist Bombings in Nairobi
and Oklahoma City.” The British Journal of Psychiatry 186, no. 6 (2005): 487–493.
Oliver-Smith, Anthony. “Successes and Failures in Post-Disaster Resettlement.” Disasters 15,
no. 1 (1991): 12–23.
INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS
Coase, Ronald. “The New Institutional Economics.” The American Economic Review 88, no. 2
(1998): 72–74.
27
Coase, Ronald H. “The New Institutional Economics.” Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte
Staatswissenschaft/Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 140, no. 1
(1984): 229–231.
Commons, John R. “Institutional Economics.” The American Economic Review (1931): 648–
657.
Furubotn, Eirik G., and Rudolf Richter. Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of
the New Institutional Economics. University of Michigan Press, 2005.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=fYgfNXezQN8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=i
nstitutional+economics&ots=D2W2AmDjxN&sig=-e7mJ1EUuPqqTXUiIZOVtjmg4Rg.
Harriss, John, Janet Hunter, and Colin Lewis. The New Institutional Economics and Third
World Development. Routledge, 2003.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=OXM0omA15WQC&oi=fnd&pg=PR8&
dq=institutional+economics&ots=-fAs6zuWva&sig=g1mr7w3II_tYRb6n5i-EH2pQ27A.
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “The Approach of Institutional Economics.” Journal of Economic
Literature 36, no. 1 (1998): 166–192.
Langlois, Richard. Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics. CUP
Archive, 1989. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=7c8AAAAIAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=institutional+economics&ots=mie8iS2koA&sig=B_
PDLORmVLSCUs4ygd0PRBm38Xk.
North, Douglass C. “The New Institutional Economics.” Journal of Institutional and
Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 142, no.
1 (1986): 230–237.
———. “The New Institutional Economics and Development.” EconWPA Economic History no.
9309002 (1993).
http://www.deu.edu.tr/userweb/sedef.akgungor/Current%20topics%20in%20Turkish
%20Economy/north.pdf.
Williamson, Oliver E. “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead.”
Journal of Economic Literature 38, no. 3 (2000): 595–613.
POLITICAL ECONOMY OF DEVELOPMENT
Bardhan, Pranab. “The Political Economy of Development in India: Expanded Edition with an
Epilogue on the Political Economy of Reform in India.” OUP Catalogue (1999).
http://ideas.repec.org/b/oxp/obooks/9780195647709.html.
Bates, Robert H. Toward a Political Economy of Development: A National Choice Perspective.
Vol. 14. University of California Pr, 1988.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=d4X_c883LSwC&oi=fnd&pg=PR10&dq
=political+economy+and+development&ots=XIZ4YTx92M&sig=ehXgugoCvsNsZUstcIF
6AT9_OoI.
Cumings, Bruce. “The Origins and Development of the Northeast Asian Political Economy:
Industrial Sectors, Product Cycles, and Political Consequences.” International
Organization (1984): 1–40.
Dasgupta, Biplab. Structural Adjustment, Global Trade and the New Political Economy of
Development. Vol. 378. Zed books London, 1998.
http://www.getcited.org/pub/100406589.
Gibson, Clark C., Krister Andersson, Elinor Ostrom, and Sujai Shivakumar. The Samaritan’s
Dilemma: The Political Economy of Development Aid. Oxford University Press Oxford,
2005.
http://www.dandelon.com/servlet/download/attachments/dandelon/ids/CH0015827
293148A143BAC12571180051A143.pdf.
28
Hart, Keith. The Political Economy of West African Agriculture. Cambridge University Press,
1982. http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19836747808.html.
Hoogvelt, Ankie. Globalization and the Postcolonial World: The New Political Economy of
Development. JHU Press, 2001.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=856I7i5x9iQC&oi=fnd&pg=PR10&dq=
political+economy+and+development&ots=QzL5rbIF_w&sig=CYOGOydXkZXsWk_FAC
axdtr9uFE.
Kiely, Ray. The New Political Economy of Development: Globalization, Imperialism,
Hegemony. Palgrave macmillan, 2007.
Rai, Shirin M. Gender and the Political Economy of Development. Polity Press, 2002.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=j7cEwoFy4nwC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1969&
dq=political+economy+and+development&ots=zeRrKTpksR&sig=YKhAyAtgI1ve3TCGd
OOics8V5pE.
RISK AND RESILIENCE
Alexander, David. “Globalization of Disaster: Trends, Problems and Dilemmas.” Journal of
International Affairs-Columbia University 59, no. 2 (2006): 1.
Allenby, Brad, and Jonathan Fink. “Toward Inherently Secure and Resilient Societies.” Science
309, no. 5737 (2005): 1034–1036.
Britton, Neil R., and Gerard J. Clark. “From Response to Resilience: Emergency Management
Reform in New Zealand.” Natural Hazards Review 1, no. 3 (2000): 145–150.
Coaffee, Jon. “Risk, Resilience, and Environmentally Sustainable Cities.” Energy Policy 36, no.
12 (2008): 4633–4638.
Coaffee, Jon, and David Murakami Wood. “Security Is Coming Home: Rethinking Scale and
Constructing Resilience in the Global Urban Response to Terrorist Risk.” International
Relations 20, no. 4 (2006): 503–517.
Flynn, Stephen E. “America the Resilient: Defying Terrorism and Mitigating Natural
Disasters.” Foreign Affairs (2008): 2–8.
Furedi, Frank. “Fear and Security: A Vulnerability-Led Policy Response.” Social Policy &
Administration 42, no. 6 (2008): 645–661.
Killian, Beverley. “Risk and Resilience.” A Generation at Risk (2004): 40.
McAdam-Crisp, Jacqueline L. “Factors That Can Enhance and Limit Resilience for Children of
War.” Childhood 13, no. 4 (2006): 459–477.
Pei-Jun, Shi. “Theory and Practice on Disaster System Research in a Fourth Time [J].” Journal
of Natural Disasters 6 (2005): 000.
Renn, Ortwin, and Katherine D. Walker. Global Risk Governance: Concept and Practice Using
the IRGC Framework. Vol. 1. Springer, 2007.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Z3IN309cLAC&oi=fnd&pg=PR15&dq=risk+and+resilience+in+civil+affairs&ots=U3OdyDd5A&sig=1P8bvnd0Kw_ajH6s52E8vTmDFcc.
Schoon, Ingrid. Risk and Resilience: Adaptations in Changing Times. Cambridge University
Press, 2006.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=rJhwdkcJPBwC&oi=fnd&pg=PR10&dq
=risk+and+resilience+in+civil+affairs&ots=pqWeV0TEwO&sig=voRoRGzP8YaUZhlldUu
LnVDOZh0.
Smith, Denis, and Moira Fischbacher. “The Changing Nature of Risk and Risk Management:
The Challenge of Borders, Uncertainty and Resilience.” Risk Management 11, no. 1
(2009): 1–12.
29
Tanner, Thomas, Tom Mitchell, Emily Polack, and Bruce Guenther. “Urban Governance for
Adaptation: Assessing Climate Change Resilience in Ten Asian Cities.” IDS Working
Papers 2009, no. 315 (2009): 01–47.
Tidball, Keith G., and Marianne E. Krasny. “From Risk to Resilience: What Role for Community
Greening and Civic Ecology in Cities.” Social Learning towards a More Sustainable
World (2007): 149–64.
SOCIAL ECONOMY
Borzaga, Carlo, and Jacques Defourny. The Emergence of Social Enterprise. Routledge, 2001.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GMu4fLkMV4wC&oi=fnd&pg=PR8&d
q=social+economy&ots=6_qNxLL1Tq&sig=uCsQB7fqbLOzibcaWCtTIwiHW5I.
Bowen, Howard Rothmann. Toward Social Economy. Southern Illinois University Press, 1977.
http://www.getcited.org/pub/101688886.
Defourny, Jacques, and Patrick Develtere. “The Social Economy: The Worldwide Making of a
Third Sector.” Social Economy North and South (1999): 17–47.
Kay, Alan. “Social Capital, the Social Economy and Community Development.” Community
Development Journal 41, no. 2 (2006): 160–173.
Kotz, David M., Terrence McDonough, and Michael Reich. Social Structures of Accumulation:
The Political Economy of Growth and Crisis. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=EMAiVs23XBcC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=
social+economy&ots=WbkxWdxIkN&sig=SwqQB8iJ65CoXKPs7gPiraGZMrM.
Moulaert, Frank, and Oana Ailenei. “Social Economy, Third Sector and Solidarity Relations: A
Conceptual Synthesis from History to Present.” Urban Studies 42, no. 11 (2005):
2037–2053.
Procacci, Giovanna. “Social Economy and the Government of Poverty.” The Foucault Effect:
Studies in Governmentality (1991): 151–168.
Razavi, Shahra. “The Political and Social Economy of Care in a Development Context.” Gender
and Development Programme Paper no. 3 (2007).
http://graduateinstitute.ch/webdav/site/developpement/shared/developpement/co
urs/E763/Razavi_Care.pdf.
Rifkin, Jeremy, and Ellen Kruger. The End of Work. Jeremy P. Tarcher, 1996.
http://www.foet.org/press/interviews/Spiegel-%20August%203%202005.pdf.
Sayer, Andrew, and Richard Walker. The New Social Economy: Reworking the Division of
Labor. Blackwell Cambridge, MA, 1992.
http://www.lavoisier.fr/livre/notice.asp?id=RAAWLSAX3SOOWQ.
Scott, Allen J. Social Economy of the Metropolis: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the Global
Resurgence of Cities: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the Global Resurgence of
Cities. Oxford University Press, 2008.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TCUaDf41HIC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=social+economy&ots=CJ1z6_N4AB&sig=icfWzX3Qj92YJy
JzbQdDZi7LrDQ.
Van Til, Jon, and Foundation Center. Mapping the Third Sector: Voluntarism in a Changing
Social Economy. Foundation Center New York, 1988.
http://www.getcited.org/pub/102688299.
Wagner, Richard E. Mind, Society, and Human Action: Time and Knowledge in a Theory of
Social-Economy. Vol. 29. Routledge, 2010.
URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING
Agyeman, Julian, Robert Doyle Bullard, and Bob Evans. Just Sustainabilities: Development in
an Unequal World. The MIT Press, 2003.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=I7QBbofQGu4C&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=
30
Urban+and+Regional+Development+for+Civil+Affairs&ots=If2_KoquTc&sig=ttaQFmb
GiwXTIorPkjxmY1FgVk0.
Bayat, Asef. “Un-Civil Society: The Politics of The’informal People’.” Third World Quarterly 18,
no. 1 (1997): 53–72.
Esser, Josef, and Joachim Hirsch. “The Crisis of Fordism and the Dimensions of a
‘postfordist’regional and Urban Structure.” International Journal of Urban and
Regional Research 13, no. 3 (1989): 417–437.
Hall, Peter, and Mark Tewdwr-Jones. Urban and Regional Planning. Routledge, 2010.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=LFLydtcQf54C&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=U
rban+and+Regional+Development+for+Civil+Affairs&ots=f1UAscI4sT&sig=Xw8bwLYSs
Lr6GwfclW-SsyJmKGQ.
Keating, Michael. “Regions and International Affairs: Motives, Opportunities and Strategies.”
Regional & Federal Studies 9, no. 1 (1999): 1–16.
MacLeod, Gordon, and Mark Goodwin. “Reconstructing an Urban and Regional Political
Economy: On the State, Politics, Scale, and Explanation.” Political Geography 18, no. 6
(1999): 697–730.
———. “Space, Scale and State Strategy: Rethinking Urban and Regional Governance.”
Progress in Human Geography 23, no. 4 (1999): 503–527.
Malecki, Edward. “Jockeying for Position: What It Means and Why It Matters to Regional
Development Policy When Places Compete.” Regional Studies 38, no. 9 (2004): 1101–
1120.
McLoughlin, J. Brian. “Urban & Regional Planning: A Systems Approach” (1969).
http://documents.irevues.inist.fr/handle/2042/30156.
Pierre, Jon. Partnerships in Urban Governance: European and American Experience. Palgrave
Macmillan, 1998.
Purcell, Mark. “Urban Democracy and the Local Trap.” Urban Studies 43, no. 11 (2006): 1921–
1941.
Satterthwaite, David, and Cecilia Tacoli. The Urban Part of Rural Development: The Role of
Small and Intermediate Urban Centres in Rural and Regional Development and
Poverty Reduction. Vol. 9. IIED, 2003.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ywHHMUGzwv8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&d
q=Urban+and+Regional+Development+for+Civil+Affairs&ots=Umri7xNHcL&sig=u5H5OTKFXrV7yxEVgdO-njt7NU.
Stock, Robert. Africa South of the Sahara: A Geographical Interpretation. Guilford Press,
2012.
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=VYae4_3VI2wC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=
Urban+and+Regional+Development+for+Civil+Affairs&ots=dsRcEIDZGg&sig=JGCVuzw
DYGmUi3f5Nb2NPn9ZtRA.
Waddell, Paul. “UrbanSim: Modeling Urban Development for Land Use, Transportation, and
Environmental Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 68, no. 3
(2002): 297–314.
Other bibliographies include: conflict economics, environmental economics, resource curse,
and collapse, change (De Soto, Castells, etc.).
31
Key Agencies/Points of Contact: Governance
Provision of Essential Services
•
•
•
•
Program on Poverty and Governance, CDDRL (Stanford
University).http://governance.stanford.edu
Center for Effective Global Action (UC Berkeley). http://cega.berkeley.edu
Development Impact Lab (UC Berkeley). http://dil.berkeley.edu
Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation & Development (Afghanistan). http://mrrd.gov.af/en
Stewardship of State Resources
•
Center for Global Development (Washington, DC). http://www.cgdev.org
·
Governance Project, CDDRL (Stanford University).
http://governanceproject.stanford.edu
Political Moderation and Accountability









Center on International Conflict and Negotiation (Stanford University)
http://www.law.stanford.edu/organizations/programs-and-centers/stanford-centeron-international-conflict-and-negotiation-scicn
Center for Deliberative Democracy (Stanford University). http://cdd.stanford.edu/
Quality of Government Institute (University of Gothenburg, Sweden).
http://www.qog.pol.gu.se
Department of Social Welfare & Development (Philippines). http://www.dswd.gov.ph
National Solidarity Programme (Afghanistan). http://www.nspafghanistan.org
Participatory Budgeting Project (Brooklyn). http://www.participatorybudgeting.org/
Carter Center (Atlanta). http://www.cartercenter.org
Democracy International (Bethesda). http://democracyinternational.com
World Bank Institute: Governance. http://wbi.worldbank.org/wbi/topic/governance
Civic Participation and Empowerment
•
Freedom House (Washington, DC). http://www.freedomhouse.org
General Governance
Academic Institutions (US)
Center on Democracy, Development, and Rule of Law (Stanford University).
http://cddrl.stanford.edu
Center for International Security and Cooperation (Stanford University).
http://cisac.stanford.edu
Program in Democracy and Governance (Georgetown University).
http://government.georgetown.edu/cdacs
Government Organizations (US)
US Agency for International Development (Washington, DC)
http://www.usaid.gov/what-we-do/democracy-human-rights-and-governance
US Department of State: Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
(Washington, DC). http://www.state.gov/j/drl/index.htm
National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (Washington, DC)
http://www.ndi.org
Government Organizations (Non-US)
Australian Agency for International Development (Australia).
http://aid.dfat.gov.au
32
Non-Governmental Organizations (US)
Asia Foundation (San Francisco). http://asiafoundation.org
Urban Institute Center on International Development and Governance
(Washington, DC). http://www.urban.org/center/idg
Non-Governmental Organizations (Non-US)
Transparency International (Germany). http://www.transparency.org
Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy (Netherlands).
http://www.nimd.org
International Organizations
United Nations: Department of Political Affairs.
http://www.un.org/wcm/content/site/undpa
United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
http://www.unrisd.org
United Nations Development Programme: Democratic Governance.
http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourwork/democraticgovernanc
e/overview.html
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. http://www.osce.org
33
Rule of Law: Key Points of Contact
USG:
 Jane Stromseth, Deputy Office of Global Criminal Justice, Department of State; coauthor of Can Might Make Rights: Building the Rule of Law after Military Interventions
StromsethJE@state.gov
 Robert Vasquez, JAG Officer on assignment to State Department’s Office of Global
Criminal Justice
Vasquezrp@state.gov
 Kelly Uribe (USAID-DOD/OSD; transitional police)
Kelly.Uribe@osd.mil
 Andrew Solomon, Rule of Law expert; former Brookings, American Society of
International Law
asolomon@usaid.gov
andrewsolomon@gmail.com
 COL Eric Haaland (DOD/OSD CEW)
Eric.Haaland@osd.mil
 Rod Fabrycky, DOD/OSD – NATO; transitional police
Rodney.Fabrycky@osd.mil
 Julie Blanks, DOD/OSD (CEW)
Julie.Blanks@osd.mil
 Eric Rosand, Senior Advisor, Department of State Counterterrorism
RosandEA@state.gov
 Michele Greenstein, Director (Acting) INL CAP, Department of State
GreensteinMA@state.gov
 Walter Redman, Senior Police Advisor, Department of State, INL/CAP
RedmanW@state.gov
Jenny Murphy, Senior Justice Advisor MurphyJW@state.gov
 Robert Kravinsky, DOD/OSD robert.kravinksy@osd.mil
 Merry Archer, Department of State Political Military Bureau
ArcherMA@state.gov
 Faye Ehrenstamm, Director (Acting) OPDAT, DOJ
Faye.S.Ehrenstamm@usdoj.gov
 R. Carr Trevillian IV, Director ICITAP, DOJ
robert.trevillian@usdoj.gov
 Thomas L. Dorwin, Justice and Security Legal Advisor DOJ OPDAT (and former JAG)
Thomas.Dorwin@usdoj.gov
 J. Terry Bartlett, DOJ-ICITAP, 29 years of experience in Corrections
terry.bartlett@usdoj.go
BartlettJt@state.gov
 Denver Fleming, Assistant director special Operations at DOJ-ICITAP
Denver.Fleming@usdoj.gov
 George Huber, Justice and Security Legal Advisor; former Deputy Chief of Staff, United
Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK); former Head of the
Political Coordination and Reporting Office, United Nations Interim Administration
Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK)
george.huber@usdoj.gov
34

John Buchanan (Police advisor USAID and DOJ), Deputy Director of Operations for
DOJ/ICITAP
John.Buchanan@usdoj.gov (look for updated email)
 Terry Bartlett (Corrections), ICITAP, former CRC
Terry.bartlett@usdoj.gov
BartlettJT@state.gov
 Stuart Bowen, former Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR)
stuartbowen2@yahoo.com
 John Kelly, NDU, Professor of National Security Studies, ACSS; Associate Dean
Emeritus; retired Colonel, U.S. Army Reserves
John.Kelly@ndu.edu
 Dr. David Tretle, NDU- National War College Acting Dean
tretlerd@ndu.edu
 Ambassador James Foley, National War College Interim Commandant; former State
Department Senior Coordinator for Iraqi Refugee; U.S. Deputy Permanent
Representative to the United Nations in Geneva; and Deputy Director of the Private
Office of the NATO Secretary General in Brussels
James.Foley@ndu.edu
 William (Bill) Aseltine, Defense Institute of International Legal Studies (DIILS)
aseltinew@diils.dsca.mil
 Chris Hartley and Helen Bowman, JAG Postgraduate School/ Rule of Law Handbook
Christopher.m.hartley.mil@mail.mil
Helen.e.bowman2.fm@mail.mil
International/ Multilateral/ Intergovernmental
 Kurt Muller, NDU/CCO (former CRC-A)
kemuller@verizon.net
 Sheelagh Stewart, Director, UNDP Governance and Rule of Law
sheelagh.stewart@undp.org (New York)
 Robert Pulver, Chief UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, Criminal Law and
Judicial Advisory Service, Office for Rule of Law and Security Institutions
 Pulverr@un.org
 Mark Downes/ Victoria Walker, International Security Sector Advisory Team (ISSAT) of
the Geneva Center for the Democratic Control of the Armed Forces (Geneva)
v.walker@dcaf.ch mdownes@dcaf.ch
 NATO: James Appathurali, Appathurali.james@hq.nato.int (Brussels)
 NATO: Claus Hoeegh-Huldberg
hoeegh-guldberg.claus@hq.nato.int (Brussels –phone in)
 Marcos Nicoli mnicoli@worldbank.org
 Andrea Testa atesta@worldbank.org
 Christina Biebesheimer, CBiebesheimer@worldbank.org
 Varun Gauri, Economist-Rule of Law overlap; judicial rulings on human rights,
grievance redress in basic service delivery vgauri@worldbank.org
 Alexander-Louis Berg lb262@georgetown.edu aberg2@worldbank.org
 Andras Vamos-Goldman, Director, Justice Rapid Response (JRR)
a.vamos-goldman@justicerapidresponse.org (Geneva)
Civil Society/ Private Sector/ Academia
 Franklin Kramer fdkramer@aol.com
 Colette Rausch, Director Rule of Law Center of Innovation, USIP
35













crausch@usip.org
Louis Aucoin, Professor Tufts University; former Program Officer in the Rule of Law
Program, United States Institute of Peace (2000-2003); founder of The Mekong Delta
Regional Law Center promoting judicial collaboration; former Deputy Special
Representative in Rule of Law for Liberia and Legal Advisor to Haiti’s Minister for
Justice Louis.Aucoin@tufts.edu
Rachel Kleinfeld, founding CEO and President of the Truman Security Project and
author of Advancing Rule of Law Reform Abroad rkleinfeld@ceip.org
Michelle Hughes, Chief, Global Strategy at The Internet Bar Organization, former
Senior Policy and Program Advisor, Rule of Law and Security Sector Reform, J7, and
former Senior Advisor - Rule of Law and Security Sector Reform, NATO Training
Mission - Afghanistan michelle.hughes@cox.net
Rosa Brooks, Georgetown University School of Law Professor , former Counselor to
the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and Special Coordinator for Rule of Law
and Humanitarian Policy Brooks.rosa@gmail.com
Michael Dziedzic, Independent Consultant at Deloitte; former Police Program advisor
USIP michaeldz71@gmail.com
Paul LaRose, Executive Director, CANADEM
paul.larose-edwards@canadem.ca
Dennis Kenney, scholar-practitioner, Professor, John Jay College of Law (City
University of New York), formerly with Florida police, and Director of Research and
Planning in Savannah, Georgia; conducted research on security in Yemen and Albany;
evaluated US sponsored training of police in Ukraine; World Bank Consultant advising
on combating organized crime and corruption in Mexico, Peru, Colombia and El
Salvador. dkenney@jjay.cuny.edu
Paul Williams, President and co-founder of the Public International Law & Policy
Group (PILPG) pwilliams@pilpg.org
Rob Boone, Director of the American Bar Association Rule of Law Imitative (ABA ROLI)
Rob.Boone@americanbar.org
Robert Buergenthal, Sr. Director at Thomson Reuters; formerly Chief Program Officer
at Landesa Rural Development Institute; Director, Programs Management
Department at International Development Law Organization (IDLO); Senior Counsel,
Justice Sector Reform, World Bank; Head of Unit-Rule of Law Adviser, OSCE Office
for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights
(ODIHR)Robert.Buergenthal@thomsonreuters.com
Chuck Tucker, Major General (Ret.); Executive Director World Enterprise Institute;
former Program Director International Development Law Organization (IDLO)
ctucker@weinstitute.org, ctucker417@yahoo.com
Allen S. Weiner, Stanford University Law Professor; former Department of State
Assistant Legal Advisor
aweiner@stanford.edu
Thomas Umberg, private sector attorney and former California State legislator;
Colonel in the Army Reserve; former Co-Chair of the State Department’s Public
Private Partnership for Justice Reform in Afghanistan; Chief, Anti-Corruption, North
Atlantic Treaty Organization Training Mission–Afghanistan (NTM–A)/Combined
Security Transition Command–Afghanistan
tumberg@kruzlaw.gov
36










Eric Jensen, Director, Rule of Law Program and Affiliated Faculty Member at
the Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) at the
Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University
(FSI)
egjensen@stanford.edu
Susan Farbstein, Harvard Human Rights Law Clinic, Transitional Justice and Rule of
Law expert sfarbstein@law.harvard.edu
Sandra Hodgkinson, Vice President, Chief of Staff of DRS Technologies; former
director of the Office of Human Rights and Transitional Justice, Coalition Provisional
Authority in Iraq Sandra.lynn.hodgkinson@gmail.com
David Gordon, Principal Subject Matter Expert Rule of Law at General Dynamics
Information Technology; former Rule of Law Program Director, US Army Civil Affairs
and Psychological Operations Command
David.Gordon@gdit.com
David Crane, Professor Syracuse University College of Law and Maxwell School;
former Chief Prosecutor of the Special Court for Sierra Leone
dmcrane0617@yahoo.com; dmcrane@law.syr.edu
Col. (ret.) Christopher Holshek, Senior Fellow, Alliance for Peacebuilding and Director,
Civil Affairs Association, holshek@hotmail.com
John Ferejohn, Professor on Rule of Law (law and political science); Islamic Law, NYU,
Yale University and Stanford University
John.ferejohn@nyu.edu
Brita Madsen, Rule of Law- Gender – Human Rights expert, Project Coordinator, Rule
of Law Training Program at the Center for International Peace Operations (ZIF);
former Senior Expert on human rights and justice in the External Monitoring System
of the EU’s Development Cooperation in Asia, Latin America, Africa and the Caucasus;
former Project Coordinator for the establishment of the Office of Police Ombudsman
at the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) (Germany)
b.madsen@zif-berlin.org
Angelic Young, Institute for Inclusive Security, former DOS/INL Police Advisor
angelic_young@inclusivesecurity.org
Adam Zarazinski adam.zarazinski@gmail.com
37