Table of Contents Introductory Notes 3 How to Use this Booklet 14 1:1-4:49 Counting 16 5:1-10:10 Consecrating 21 2 Introductory Notes Introductory Notes I don't remember being in a church listening to a sermon series on the book of Numbers. In my childhood years, most of the sermons I heard were textual (based on one particular text rather than a passage) or topical. In my teenage years that changed. Many of the sermons I heard were expository, where the preacher systematically worked through book of the Bible – but I don't remember any of them tackling Numbers. In my early married years, I heard a mixture of textual, topical and expository sermons – but again I don't remember Numbers being tackled. From then on, I've been largely responsible for the sermon series preached and I haven't tackled Numbers. What's the reason for that? Is it that Numbers isn't really part of God's word? Is it that Numbers is a less important part of God's word? Is Numbers perhaps no longer relevant? Hopefully, the answers to those questions are obvious. Yet, it's worth asking the questions – for I suspect that my experience in hearing and preaching sermons also reflects the experience of many Christians in actually reading Numbers. And if we aren't reading it, then, in effect, we're treating it as if it isn't part of God's word to us. And it seems to me that's a sub-Christian place to be (a nice way of saying it's wrong). Now, some parts of Numbers are quite well known – the narratives of the 12 spies, the bronze serpent and of Balaam and his talking donkey. They tend to make the Sunday School curricula. But much of the rest of it is not well known. Yet, Paul writes of this period to the church in Corinth (1 Corinthians 10:1-13): For I do not want you to be ignorant of the fact, brothers, that our forefathers were all under the cloud and that they all passed through the sea. They were all baptised into Moses in the cloud and in the sea. They all ate the same spiritual food and drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank from the spiritual rock that 3 Introductory Notes accompanied them, and that rock was Christ. Nevertheless, God was not pleased with most of them; their bodies were scattered over the desert. Now these things occurred as examples to keep us from setting our hearts on evil things as they did. Do not be idolaters, as some of them were; as it is written: "The people sat down to eat and drink and got up to indulge in pagan revelry." We should not commit sexual immorality, as some of them did – and in one day twenty-three thousand of them died. We should not test the Lord, as some of them did – and were killed by snakes. And do not grumble, as some of them did – and were killed by the destroying angel. These things happened to them as examples and were written down as warnings for us, on whom the fulfillment of the ages has come. So, if you think you are standing firm, be careful that you don’t fall! No temptation has seized you except what is common to man. And God is faithful; He will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear. But when you are tempted, He will also provide a way out so that you can stand up under it. And the writer of Hebrews warns us (Hebrews 3:12-4:2): See to it, brothers, that none of you has a sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God. But encourage one another daily, as long as it is called Today, so that none of you may be hardened by sin's deceitfulness. We have come to share in Christ if we hold firmly till the end the confidence we had at first. As has just been said: "Today, if you hear His voice, do not harden your hearts as you did in the rebellion." Who were they who heard and rebelled? Were they not all those Moses led out of Egypt? And with whom was He angry for forty years? Was it not with those who sinned, whose bodies fell in the desert? And to whom did God swear that they would never enter His rest if not to those who disobeyed? So we see that they were not able to enter, because of their unbelief. Therefore, since the promise of entering His rest still stands, let us be careful that none of you be found to have fallen short of it. For 4 Introductory Notes we also have had the gospel preached to us, just as they did; but the message they heard was of no value to them, because those who heard did not combine it with faith. They're serious warnings – and they relate very much to incidents in Numbers. How will we understand the warnings properly if we don't understand Numbers? And how will we ensure that we've appropriately paid attention to the warnings if we don't really know what they're about? The Important Question As we come to the book of 1 Samuel, there's a crucial question that we need to consider. How do we read narrative texts in the Bible – the stories that we find in the Old Testament, the gospels and the book of Acts? When we come to a statement in one of Paul's letters, such as: Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but also to the interests of others. Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus. (Philippians 2:4-5) it's relatively easy to understand what it means and to work out how it applies in our modern-day situations. When we come to a story, it's usually still relatively easy to understand the details of the story – but how do we work out what the story was intended to teach both then and now. The stories of the Bible are not like Aesop's Fables such that they each conclude with a moral. Rather, they're records of historical events that relate to us what happened in the past. Because they're part of God's word, we rightly believe that they're also supposed to teach us something that's relevant to our current lives – either in terms of how we think or the way we live. Yet, how do we go about finding what that "something" is? Some people read them as examples of teaching that's found elsewhere in the Bible. For example, the story of David and Bathsheba (2 Samuel 11-12) shows us David acting as a bad example for us. David clearly breaks the law – the law about adultery, the law about deception and the law about murder. The consequences of his sin are that he suffers the loss of the child and ongoing civil war in the rest of his family. The 5 Introductory Notes moral is drawn: Don't be like David – sin doesn't pay (at least, it doesn't pay good things). The story even has the prophet Nathan present to tell us that David's done the wrong thing – just in case we hadn't realised that for ourselves. Yet, what do you do with a story like Ehud (Judges 3:12-30)? Here's a guy who uses guile and deception to assassinate the leader of a nation whom God was using to punish His people. Quite clearly, the story presents Ehud as the hero. Yet, should we follow Ehud's example? Is it all right to lie in certain circumstances? Is it OK to assassinate evil rulers? The text of the story doesn't answer these questions because that's not why the story has been put in the Bible. The story is about God providing a saviour when His people cry to Him for relief. While it is OK to see the Bible's stories as providing examples of godly and ungodly behaviour, I think it's important to realise this is not their main function. We have straightforward teaching about godliness and ungodliness (right and wrong) in other parts of the Bible – for example, the Old Testament law and the New Testament letters. God's will is declared clearly in those places. The stories, on the other hand, tell us what God's doing in the world to achieve His purposes of salvation. That's their main focus. They're part of how God gets from rebellion in the Garden of Eden to His kingdom at the end of Revelation. To simply read the stories as examples is to find their teaching elsewhere and to import that into the story. Other people read the Bible's narratives as allegories. An allegory is where each part of the story represents something else so that while the story appears to be about wheat-seed and different types of soil it's really about God's word and different types of people. Now, it's quite true that there are stories with allegorical elements in the Bible. Nathan tells David a story about a poor man with one little lamb (2 Samuel 12:1-12). His story, however, is not really about sheep – it's an allegory. The real point has to do with David and how he's treated Uriah. In this case, the text of the Bible makes it quite plain that Nathan's story is an allegory. 6 Introductory Notes There are those who treat all the stories of the Bible in this way. For example, some treat the story of David and Goliath as a lesson on Christian discipleship. Goliath represents the sinful struggles we have in our lives – lust, pride, telling lies, anger, being unkind, etc. How do we beat sin in our lives? We need the fives stones that David had for his sling – obedience, service, Bible reading, prayer and fellowship. That's how we can slay the various "Goliaths" that would destroy our fellowship with God! The question is: how do you know that's what the story is all about? There's nothing in the Bible's text to indicate that. It's something that's brought in from outside the text – from the vivid imagination of the reader. This method can be used to make a text say anything that the reader wants it to say. It's not proper interpretation of the Bible. Are you beginning to get a feel for some of the difficulties? Gordon Fee and Douglas Stuart, in their excellent book How to Read the Bible for all its Worth, propose ten principles for interpreting narratives. 1. An Old Testament narrative usually does not directly teach a doctrine. 2. An Old Testament narrative usually illustrates a doctrine or doctrines taught propositionally elsewhere. 3. Narratives record what happened – not necessarily what should have happened or what ought to happen every time. Therefore, not every narrative has an individual identifiable moral of the story. 4. What people do in narratives is not necessarily a good example for us. Frequently, it is just the opposite. 5. Most of the characters in Old Testament narratives are far from perfect and their actions are, too. 6. We are not always told at the end of a narrative whether what happened was good or bad. We are expected to be able to judge that on the basis of what God has taught us directly and categorically elsewhere in the Scripture. 7. All narratives are selective and incomplete. Not all the relevant details are always given (cf. John 21:25). What does appear in the narrative is everything that the inspired author thought important for us to know. 7 Introductory Notes 8. Narratives are not written to answer all our theological questions. They have particular, specific limited purposes and deal with certain issues, leaving others to be dealt with elsewhere, in other ways. 9. Narratives may teach either explicitly (by clearly stating something) or implicitly (by clearly implying something without actually stating it). 10. In the final analysis, God is the hero of all biblical narratives.1 After looking at a couple of examples, they conclude with the following cautions. Why is it that people so often find things in Bible narratives that are not really there – read into the Bible their own notions rather than read out of the Bible what God wants them to know? There are three main reasons. First, they are desperate – desperate for information that will help them, that will be of personal value, that will apply to their own situation. Second, they are impatient; they want their answers now, from this book from this chapter. Third, they wrongly expect that everything in the Bible applies directly as instruction for their own individual lives. The Bible is a great resource. It contains all that a Christian really needs in terms of guidance from God for living. But it does not always contain answers as specific and personal as some people would wish, and it does not contain all its information in every chapter of every book! Too impatient to find God's will from the Bible as a whole, people make mistakes – they allow themselves to misinterpret individual parts of the Scriptures. So that you might avoid this tendency, we list here eight of the most common errors of interpretation that people commit in looking for answers from parts of the Bible. While all of these apply to narratives, they are not limited to them. 1. Allegorizing. Instead of concentrating on the clear meaning, people relegate the text to merely reflecting another meaning beyond the text. There are allegorical portions of Scripture (eg, Ezekiel 23 or parts of Revelation) but none of the scriptural allegories is simple narrative. 1 G.D.Fee & D.Stuart, How to Read the Bible for all its Worth (Michigan: Zondervan, 1993) 83-84 8 Introductory Notes 2. Decontextualizing. Ignoring the full historical and literary contexts, and often the individual narrative, people concentrate on small units only and thus miss interpretational clues. If you decontextualize enough, you can make almost any part of Scripture say anything you want it to. 3. Selectivity. This is analogous to decontextualizing. It involves picking and choosing specific words and phrases to concentrate on, ignoring the others, and ignoring the overall sweep of the passage being studied. Instead of balancing the parts and the whole, it ignores some of the parts and the whole entirely. 4. False Combination. This approach combines elements from here and there in a passage and makes a point out of their combination, even though the elements themselves are not directly connected in the passage itself. An extreme example of this all too common interpretational error would be the conclusion that one's real enemies are in the church rather than outside the church because in Psalm 23 David says that he will dwell in God's house forever, and that God has prepared him a table in the presence of his enemies. (The enemies must therefore be in God's house along with David, or else he could not be in their presence.) 5. Redefinition. When the plain meaning of the text leaves people cold, producing no immediate spiritual delight or saying something they do not want to hear, they are often tempted to redefine it to mean something else. For example, they take Jesus' words, "Woe to you who are rich ..." and '"Woe to you when all people speak well of you ..." (Luke 6:24, 26) and redefine them from their plain meaning to "Woe to you who love money so much you have renounced your faith in God" and "Woe to you who have become atheists in order to have cheap praise from worldly infidels." That is, these sayings are redefined in such a way that they are narrow enough no longer to be a threat to the people doing the redefinition. 6. Extracanonical authority. By using some sort of special external key to the Scriptures, usually a set of doctrines or a book that claims to reveal scriptural truths not otherwise knowable, people suppose that they can unlock the mysteries of the Bible. Cults usually operate on the basis of an extracanonical authority, 9 Introductory Notes treating the Bible somewhat like a series of riddles needing a special knowledge to solve. 7. Moralizing. This is the assumption that principles for living can be derived from all passages. The moralizing reader in effect asks the question, "What is the moral of this story?" at the end of every individual narrative. An example would be, "What can we learn about handling adversity from how the Israelites endured their years as slaves in Egypt?" The fallacy of this approach is that it ignores the fact that the narratives were written to show the progress of God's history of redemption, not to illustrate principles. They are historical narratives, not illustrative narratives. 8. Personalizing. Also known as individualizing, this is reading Scripture in a way that supposes that any or all parts apply to you or your group in a way that they do not apply to everyone else. People tend to be self-centred, even when reading the Bible. When the big picture of God's redemptive history fails to satisfy, they may fall prey to the temptation to look for something that will satisfy their personal needs, cravings, or problems. They can forget that all parts of the Bible are intended for everyone, not just them. Examples of personalizing would be, "The story of Balaam's talking donkey reminds me that I talk too much." Or, "The story of the building of the temple is God's way of telling us that we have to construct a new church building." Perhaps the single most useful bit of caution we can give you about reading and learning from narratives is this: Do not be a monkey-seemonkey-do reader of the Bible. No Bible narrative was written specifically about you. The Joseph narrative is about Joseph, specifically how God did things through him – it is not a narrative directly about you. The Ruth narrative glorifies God's protection and benefit for Ruth and the Bethlehemites – not you. You can always learn a great deal from these narratives, and from all the Bible's narratives, but you can never assume that God expects you to do exactly the same thing that Bible characters did, or to have the same things happen to you that happened to them. For further discussion on this point, see chapter 6. 10 Introductory Notes Bible characters are sometimes good, sometimes evil, sometimes wise, and sometimes foolish. They are sometimes punished, sometimes shown mercy, sometimes well off, and sometimes miserable. Your task is to learn God's word from the narratives about them, not to try to do everything that was done in the Bible. Just because someone in a Bible story did something, that does not mean that you have either permission or obligation to do it too. What you can and should do is to obey what God actually calls you to do in the Scripture. Narratives are precious to us because they so vividly demonstrate God's involvement in the world and illustrate his principles and calling. They thus teach us a lot – but what they directly teach us does not systematically include personal ethics. For that area of life, we must turn elsewhere in the Scriptures, to the various places where personal ethics are actually taught categorically and explicitly. The richness and variety of the Scriptures must be understood as our ally – a welcome resource, never a complicated burden.2 More positively, we can highlight five elements of Hebrew narrative that may help us come to an understanding of what the Bible teaches us through these Old Testament stories. The first element is the plot. Each story has an orientation (the setting of the story), a complication (a problem that arises – without this there would be no real story) and a resolution (how the problem is solved). The Bible's overall story-line can be summarised as follows: Orientation: the creation of humanity to rule over this world under God's direction. Complication: humanity's declaration of independence – refusal to rule under God's direction. Resolution: the kingdom of God where humanity is seen both living and ruling under God's direction. The same thing can be done with each of the stories in the Bible. Sometimes plots become complex (as with the overall story-line of the 2 G.D.Fee & D.Stuart, How to Read the Bible for all its Worth (Michigan: Zondervan, 1993) 90-93 11 Introductory Notes Bible) because further complications arise in the process of resolving the first complication. The second element is characters. If a story is to unfold, it needs characters to drive it. It's the characters who work towards the resolution of the plot. In our Western novels, we tend to find an emphasis on detailed characterisation and an encouragement to learn from novels in terms of psychoanalysing the various characters. On most occasions, that's not the purpose of the Bible's stories – though it should be noted that some people still treat them that way (that's part of our culture – not the Bible's). In reading Biblical narratives, it should be noted that God is usually one of the characters involved in the story. A third element is scene – the place/s where the action of the story takes place. Each story will have one or more scenes. The scene changes when the location changes or when the characters change. Noting and analysing the various scenes in a story can help the reader focus on the way the plot develops. A shift in scene indicates the development of the next stage of the plot. In the Bible's narratives, we do not usually get detailed descriptions of the scene – that's not important to why the Bible writers tell the story. Dialogue is the fourth element. In the Bible's stories, dialogue very often functions to develop the story – both in terms of showing us the characters and moving the plot forward. Sometimes dialogue is used to introduce the story's complication. It should be noted that prayer is also a form of dialogue. The final element is the narrator. This is the person who tells the story. He/she controls and shapes the story world that is before us. The narrator tells us what he/she wants us to know. Sometimes a narrator can speak from within the story (for example, parts of Nehemiah are told in the first person); more often in the Bible the narrator speaks from outside the story and the story is told in the third person. Since the narrator has chosen to tell the story and has shaped the narrative towards a specific purpose, in trying to understand the story we are concerned with the narrator's point of view. Thus, we should pay particular attention to any direct comments that the narrator intrudes into the story. 12 Introductory Notes Having identified these five elements and realising that we can analyse each of them separately, it's important to state that our final goal is to understand the story as a whole. These various elements need to be brought together in an effort to understand the story as it now stands before us. Now, that's been a fairly lengthy and somewhat complex introduction. At this point you may be feeling somewhat daunted. Indeed, you may now be too scared to read the Bible's narratives – perhaps you've decided to stick to the plain teaching of the New Testament letters! Yet, the narratives are a big part of God's word. It's not right that we ignore them – or that we put them in the too-hard basket. Some take the approach of allowing everyone to find their own Spiritled interpretation of the Bible's stories. "That's what you think the story means – I think it means this other thing – I guess God's using that one story to teach us different and even opposing things." That sounds very tolerant and it fits in very nicely with our post-modern age – perhaps it even sounds spiritual – but ultimately it turns the Bible to plasticine (it can be shaped whatever way I want to shape it!). God's word does have objective meaning. Our job is to get as close to that meaning as we can – and to conform our lives to it. This introduction is designed to help you understand why people come up with different interpretations of these stories – namely, because they have different approaches to how they try to interpret them. This introduction is also designed to help you towards a proper approach towards the interpretation of the Bible's narratives. 13 Introductory Notes How to Use this Booklet During these next two terms, as a church, we will be studying Numbers. The sermons on Sunday mornings will cover a section at a time – taking ten talks to cover these chapters (the sermons will alternate with sermons on Mark 1-8). This booklet has been produced to help us with our understanding of this part of the Bible. The layout of this booklet tries to reflect the nature of narrative material. There are not daily readings and daily questions. One of the reasons for this is that the stories need to be understood as a whole – not broken up into little parts which are not intended to make sense on their own. You will still be encouraged to analyse the different parts of each story (including the different scenes), but not in a way where you'll be looking for a personal application from each little section. There are three parts to each study: Some explanatory notes – these notes explain matters in the text that are not immediately obvious to modern readers (for example, geographical elements, differences in customs and culture, relevant matters from earlier parts of the Bible's story). Sometimes, attention is drawn to matters that are debated by some within the church. Sometimes there are clues about the direction the story's headed (sorry, I couldn't help myself!). Remember that these notes do not carry the authority of the Bible. Analysing the story – these are questions that draw attention to the five main elements of narrative mentioned above. You are asked to analyse the story in terms of those elements. The questions in this section remain basically the same for each study (sorry to those who insist on variety). The meaning of the story – these questions are designed to help you express your understanding of what the story teaches us and how that's relevant for us today. It's important not to jump to this section before you've analysed the story. Sometimes, questions are included that reflect meanings that have been "discovered" in the text by other readers – and you are asked to consider whether these "discoveries" are legitimate. One aim of this study is to get 14 Introductory Notes you thinking about how you read the Bible – and how others read it. How you use the studies is up to you. You may find it helpful to set aside a couple of hours to complete the study in one go. On the other hand, you may find it helpful to spread it out over several sessions (for example, one session to read and meditate on the passage, a second session to do the questions dealing with the analysis of the passage, a third session to look at the explanatory note alongside the Bible's text, and a fourth session to think about the meaning of the text). You can probably come up with other possible permutations. There's no one right or wrong way. The important thing is to study and understand the Bible. There are no questions specifically for the group. If everyone's done the study before the group meets, the analysis type questions could be dealt with fairly quickly and most group time spent on the questions dealing with meaning and application. I would expect that sometimes there will be questions arising from personal study that people will wish to bring to the group. Each group will decide what works best for them in helping each person come to a greater under-standing of this part of the Bible. As you do these studies, ask that God will give you an understanding of His message in Numbers – and how He works out His purposes in the world. Even more than that, ask that God will grant you the grace to enable your life to conform to what He reveals about His purposes in this part of His word. 15 Numbers 1:1-4:49 Counting Numbers 1:1-4:49 Summarising Some Aspects of the Text Some people will find it helpful to have some of the material in these four chapters put in table form. In chapters 1 and 2, we find lists of tribes. The order they're listed is different each time. Chapter 1 Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Reuben Reuben Judah Simeon Simeon Issachar Judah Gad Zebulun Issachar Judah Reuben Zebulun Issachar Simeon Ephraim Zebulun Gad Manasseh Ephraim Ephraim Benjamin Manasseh Manasseh Dan Benjamin Benjamin Asher Dan Dan Gad Asher Asher Naphtali Naphtali Naphtali We also find names of leaders within each tribe. The leaders listed are the same. Leader (chapter 2) Tribe Census Helper Reuben Elizur Elizur (10) Simeon Shelumiel Shelumiel (12) Judah Nahshon Nahshon (3) Issachar Nethanel Nethanel (5) Zebulun Eliab Eliab (7) Ephraim Elishama Elishama (18) Manasseh Gamaliel Gamaliel (20) Benjamin Abidan Abidan (22) Dan Ahiezer Ahiezer (25) Asher Pagiel Pagiel (27) Gad Eliasaph Eliasaph (14) Naphtali Ahira Ahira (29) 16 Numbers 1:1-4:49 The census figures for each tribe (men aged 20 and over) are also the same in each chapter, although they're organised in different ways to suit the purpose of the chapters: Tribe No. Tribe No. Reuben 46,500 Judah 74,600 Simeon 59,300 Issachar 54,400 Gad 45,650 Zebulun 57,400 Judah 74,600 186,400 Issachar 54,400 Reuben 46,500 Zebulun 57,400 Simeon 59,300 Ephraim 40,500 Gad 45,650 Manasseh 32,200 151,450 Benjamin 35,400 Ephraim 40,500 Dan 62,700 Manasseh 32,200 Asher 41,500 Benjamin 35,400 Naphtali 53,400 108,100 603,550 Dan 62,700 Asher 41,500 Naphtali 53,400 157,600 603,550 The following diagram shows the organisation of the camp:3 3 Gordon Wenham, Numbers (Tyndale; Leicester: IVP, 1981) 67. 17 Numbers 1:1-4:49 The numbers of the Levite males listed in chapters 3 and 4 are: Clan Over 1 mth 30-50 Kohathites 7,500 2,750 Gershonites 8,600 2,630 Merarites 6,200 3,200 22,300 8,580 The following diagram summarises the work of the different Levite clans:4 Analysing the Narrative Where does this narrative fit in the Bible's overall story-line? How does this narrative relate to Exodus and Leviticus (note they arrived in the Desert of Sinai in Exodus 19:1)? How would you analyse the scenes of Numbers 1-4? Identify the different scenes that form part of this narrative. How do these scenes relate to one another? How does the narrator shape the story? 4 Gordon Wenham, Numbers (Tyndale; Leicester: IVP, 1981) 72. 18 Numbers 1:1-4:49 Who are the main characters in the narrative? What do we know about each of them? How important is each to the development of the narrative? Does the text encourage you to psychoanalyse any of the characters? What's the narrative's plot? What is the main complication? How do you know this is the main complication? How is this complication resolved? Are there any further complications that are introduced on the way? How many tribes are in Israel? The Meaning of the Narrative What do you think is the main point of this narrative? What did the narrator intend to teach Israel through this narrative? How is this lesson relevant to Christians today? What's the purpose of the census at this time (1:1-4)? What do you therefore expect to come next? How does this relate to the fulfilment of God's promises? Why aren't the Levites counted in the initial census? What role does God give them? Why does this preclude them from the upcoming role of the other tribes? What does this tell us about God? Does this remain relevant for us today? What order are the tribes listed in chapter 1? Is there any significance to the tribes being listed in a different order in chapter 2? Who's given the prominent place in chapter 1? Who's given the prominent place in chapter 2? Why does the narrator refer to Nadab and Abihu in 3:2-4? Are they directly relevant to what follows? What point does he wish to drive home by referring to them? 19 Numbers 1:1-4:49 What's the purpose for counting the Levites in chapter 3 (refer especially 3:11-13 and Exodus 12-13)? Why was this important? Does it have any ongoing relevance? Why were people who approached the sanctuary to be put to death (3:38)? What message did this give Israel? What relevance does this have for you? The heading for 4:4-20 is the work of the Kohathites. Yet, much of what's described is actually done by the priests. What's the significance of this? Why could the Kohathites not touch certain things? Why could they not look at certain things? What did this teach Israel? Do we need to learn the same lesson? If so, how is it driven home to us today? Note the conclusion of each section – 1:54; 2:34; 3:39, 42, 49-51 and 4:49. What is driven home again and again? Why does the narrator consider this important? What implications does it have for us? What do these chapters teach us about Jesus? 20 Numbers 5:1-10:10 Consecrating Numbers 5:1-10:10 Some Aspects of the Text It's worth noting several things as we come to this section. First, although we've broken these opening ten chapters into two different studies, they all take place at the one location – the Desert of Sinai (1:1). The people don't move camp until 10:11. So, it could be argued that this material should be covered in one study. Secondly, it would make total sense to move straight from the census to the journey to Canaan. The army is counted. The order is established. Surely the next step is for the army to march on Canaan. Why is this other material inserted here? Thirdly, not everything is in chronological order in these chapters. 1:1 is the first day of the second month. 7:1 is the consecration of the tabernacle – which is the first day of the first month (Exodus 40:2). This suggests Moses grouped some things together for other reasons. What are those reasons? What clues can we discover that may reveal those reasons? At first glance, these chapters appear somewhat haphazard. We find a mixture of moral laws, various rituals, strange-sounding ordeals and other things. You may even have the impression that they're a bunch of bits that Moses didn't know what to do with and so he shoved them all in here (which may be easy to do when you cut-and-paste on a computer, but not so easy to do when you write on a scroll. The leftover bits would go at the end!). The assumption should be that they've been put here for a purpose. And so the question is: Why have they been arranged together? How do they fit in the narrative (assuming they are part of a narrative)? Summarising Some Aspects of the Text Gordon Wenham helpfully summarises the events that are recorded in these two months of the second year after the exodus:5 5 Wenham, 91. 21 Numbers 5:1-10:10 Month 1 Day 1 Day 8 Day 12 Day 14 Month 2 Day 1 Day 14 Day 20 Tabernacle erected Laws from tabernacle begin Ordination of priests begins Offerings for altar begin Ordination completed Death of Nadab and Abihu Blasphemer dies Offerings for altar end Appointment of Levites Celebrate the Passover Ex.40:2; Num.7:1 Lev.1:1 Lev.8:1 Num.7:3 Lev.9:1 Lev.10:1-3 Lev.24:10-23 Num.7:78 Num.8:5 Num.9:2 Census begins Delayed Passover Israelites move Num.1:1 Num.9:11 Num.10:11 Ronald Allen summarises the gifts presented by the leader of each tribe (these are the same leaders as recorded in chapters 1 and 2 and appear in the order of chapter 2) at the dedication of the altar (Numbers 7):6 one silver platter weighing about 1.5 kilograms one silver sprinkling bowl weighing about 0.8 kilogram one gold ladle weighing about 110 grams the plate and bowl contained flour mixed with oil for a grain offering the ladle was filled with incense one young bull, one ram, and one male lamb for a burnt offering one buck goat for a sin offering two oxen, five rams, five buck goats, and five male lambs for a fellowship offering Analysing the Narrative Where does this narrative fit in the Bible's overall story-line? How does this narrative relate to Numbers 1-4? 6 Ronald B.Allen, "Numbers", Expositor's Bible Commentary, electronic version. 22 Numbers 5:1-10:10 How would you analyse the scenes of Numbers 5:1-10:10? Identify the different scenes that form part of this narrative. How do these scenes relate to one another? How does the narrator shape the story? Who are the main characters in the narrative? What do we know about each of them? How important is each to the development of the narrative? Does the text encourage you to psychoanalyse any of the characters? What's the narrative's plot? What is the main complication? How do you know this is the main complication? How is this complication resolved? Are there any further complications that are introduced on the way? The Meaning of the Narrative What do you think is the main point of this narrative? What did the narrator intend to teach Israel through this narrative? How is this lesson relevant to Christians today? The first four topics in these chapters are introduced in the same way: The LORD said to Moses: Say to the Israelites. 5:1 5:5 5:11 6:1 Does this suggest these four topics belong together? What do they have in common? Why are these things important at this stage in Israel's journey? Are these things also important for Christians today? Are other topics in these chapters also introduced in the same way? What's the purpose of "the test for an unfaithful wife"? Do you think this is fair? Why is it in God's word? Does it have any relevance for Christians? What's the purpose of the Nazirite vow? Is it fair that the person must start again if someone dies in their presence? Why was a sin offering 23 Numbers 5:1-10:10 required in this case? Do you think God is being unreasonable in this? If so, what does this tell you about yourself? Does the Nazirite vow have any relevance for Christians today? Why do we get so much repetition in chapter 7? What lessons are being driven home? Why do we react against this repetition? Compare the consecration of the Levites with that of the priests (Leviticus 8). What things are similar? What things are different? Why was it important to have a public ceremony? What was the significance of celebrating the Passover (refer also to Exodus 12:1-30, 43-49)? Some are unclean at the time of the Passover and are thus excluded. Provision is made for them to celebrate one month later (9:11-12). Why can a person not simply make their own choice to celebrate it at this later time (9:13)? Why is this considered sin? What does it mean for God to remember His people (10:9)? Someone has suggested summarising these chapters: cleansing; committing; and celebrating. Do you agree? What do these chapters teach about the relationship between God and His people? What do these chapters teach us about Jesus? 24