SOC 101 Chapter 10 Sex and Gender Chapter Questions... Why are some cultures more sexist? Why do men and women take on the roles that they do? How and why do women’s movements emerge? Theoretical Approaches Interactionist – Concerned with social i________ and in_____ Functionalist – Asks “how is gender f______ for society and its members?” Conflict (including feminist) – Suggests that conflict always occurs over M_____ and P_____ Guttentag: Sex Ratios & Sex Roles Imagine if one gender outnumbers the other in the age groups when marriage and having children take place – We might assume, based on the laws of supply and demand, that the gender that is in short supply has an advantage... E.g. if women outnumber men, then they must compete with one another for a man’s attention – They may feel pressure to adhere to traditional sex roles in order to “get their man” – Thus, they are “forced” into traditional sex roles when they outnumber men Guttentag & Secord’s theory, however, predicts the opposite – Women are much more subject to traditional sex roles in societies where men outnumber women Sex Ratios and Power Dependency Athens and Sparta are prototypical cases for understanding the sex ratio thesis – Where women in the prime marrying ages are scarce (as in Athens) they are romanticized & treated as precious property but without rights of their own “respectable” women were isolated by protective sexual norms (virginity and chastity were expected) – Where women in the prime marrying ages are in excess (as in Sparta) there is much less gender inequality Women are less romanticized, less expectation for virginity and chastity – However, men are less likely to be dependable as spouses and lovers To understand why we need to link micro and macro levels of analysis The Micro Level At the micro level there is an exchange theory premised upon the rational choice assumption – “Individuals seek to maximize benefits while minimizing costs” – The gender in short supply possesses “dyadic power” – Thus if women possess dyadic power, they should be able to dictate terms to men – Yet, this isn’t the case…. WHY NOT? The Macro Level Need a macro level explanation to explain why G&S suggest that we need to look at who controls the institutions in society – e.g. law, politics, business, religious orders, etc. They argue, using conflict theory, that men use these institutions to serve their interests – Thus, men create norms to counteract women’s dyadic power E.g. brides should be virgins, etc. We are all socialized to accept these norms without questioning them, they appear “natural” When both structural and dyadic power favors men, they will exploit their advantages to the fullest – Men will discard partners more readily, give little to the relationship, etc. – Eventually, norms valuing virginity and chastity disappear so that men can more easily “play the field” Patriarchy We call societies “patriarchical” if the cultural, political, and economic systems within that society are dominated by men Is the U.S. a patriarchy? Patriarchy & the Cultural System Language is part of culture Often ignores women by using the masculine form to refer to humans in general – Chairman, Fireman, Mankind, etc. – Dear Sir Children learn at an early age that men and women are different and should do different things There is great concern for the marital status of women – Miss, Mrs. Can be symbolically degrading toward women – Compare these pairs of opposites Master/Mistress Lord/Madam – Consider the words we use for men and women who are sexually promiscuous Cultural Practices – Men sign on top line of marriage certificate & legal documents – Women take men’s last name – Treatment by car salesmen or mechanics Patriarchy & the Political System During the 1998 election, women were 52% of the population, but: – 22% of the U.S. Supreme – – – – Court 6% of State Governors 18% of State Senators 23% of State Representatives 20% of “Big City” Mayors Patriarchy & the Political System In 2013, women were approximately 51% of the population, but: – – – – – 33.3% of the U.S. Supreme Court 22.4% of State Governors 20% of State Senators 18.2% of State Representatives 12% of “Big City” Mayors Patriarchy & the Economic System Gender Segregated Work – Men dominate in the areas of: Auto Mechanics (99%) Carpentry (99%) Engineering (92%) Architecture (83%) Law (81%) – Women dominate in the areas of: Secretarial (99%) Nursing (95%) Elementary Education (86%) Library Science (83%) Women hold most of the “pink-collar” jobs – Non-manual, semiskilled positions like day care, checkout clerk, cashier, wait person, etc. Women, on average, make less than men – Socialized to major in fields that don’t pay as well – The “mommy track” – The “glass ceiling” (Women often stereotyped as better at “support” and steered into areas not rewarded) Women’s Movements in the U.S. G&S predict that when men have structural and dyadic power, women make an attempt to restructure society and sex roles – Do this through social movements Thus, women’s movements occur when women outnumber men – The Woman Movement (1848) – The Suffragist Movement (1910) – The Feminist Movement (1920) Year 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1900 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 Whites 103.8 104.0 104.0 103.2 103.8 104.5 105.2 104.9 102.9 101.2 98.9 97.3 95.3 94.8 95.3 African-Americans ------------103.4 100.3 99.4 99.1 98.6 97.0 95.0 94.3 93.3 90.8 89.6 89.5 Conclusion If men outnumber women: – Men romanticize women and treat them as precious property Men are more likely to be dependable as spouses and lovers – They attempt to offset their lack of dyadic power by creating norms and language that keep women from gaining power in society If women outnumber men: – There is much less gender inequality However, men are less likely to be dependable as spouses and lovers – Women’s movements are more likely to appear