Project Milestone Meeting City of Gresham, Oregon May 30, 2014 IT AIRE DATA CENTER COOLING SYSTEM EVALUATION & RESULTS Babak Lajevardi, Ph.D. Candidate Joseph F. Junker, P.E. Karl R. Haapala, Ph.D. Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Project Objective and Timeline 2 Objective: To compare the energy efficiency and performance of City of Gresham data center before and post installation of IT Aire cooling system. Timeline Summer 2013: Monitoring system implementation Fall 2013-Spring 2014: Monitoring of cooling systems Winter 2014-Spring 2014: Analysis of results Spring 2014: Technical article and white paper Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Data Center Energy Consumption 3 Worldwide data center energy use [EPA, 2010] About 240 billion kWh annually Roughly 1.3% of the world total U.S. data center energy use [EPA, 2010] About 80 billion kWh annually Roughly 2% of the U.S. total Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Data Center Energy Consumption 4 Total energy use (kWh) 300 US Datacenters 250 Wordwide Datacenters 200 150 100 50 0 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 Year Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Strategies for Data Center Energy Reduction 5 Technology development and implementation Optimized rack layout Hot aisle-cold aisle containment New cooling system equipment solutions Energy and thermal measurement and monitoring Allows evaluation of energy efficiency performance Gives insight to thermal management inefficiencies Gives insight into strategic investment for cost reduction Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Data Center Air Flow 6 Partition Q, T, RH (return) Q, T, RH (exit) Hot Aisle IT Rack Q, T, RH (intake) Cold Aisle Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Q, T, RH (supply) Data Center Monitoring 7 Gresham City Hall wireless monitoring network AC unit power Outdoor air AC unit Rack Node Dry bulb temperature Relative humidity (RH) Current transducers Roof Receiver Cold aisle Supply air/Rack intake air Data loggers Record with interval of one minute Save a copy to an OSU FTP address every 24 hours Rack power Rack power Rack exit air Energy Efficiency Center & Return air Data room Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Hot aisle Outdoor Temperature Old System Week avg. 41.55°F Week st. dev. 3.86°F 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 IT Aire System Week avg. 42.07°F Week st. dev. 4.61°F Saturday Friday Thursday Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Wednesday Tuesday Monday Sunday Saturday Friday Thursday Wednesday Tuesday Monday Sunday Outdoor Temperature (°F) 8 Outdoor Relative Humidity IT Aires System Week avg. 77.58% Week st. dev. 8.45% Old System Week avg. 78.21% Week st. dev. 7.42% 100 80 60 40 20 0 Saturday Friday Thursday Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Wednesday Tuesday Monday Sunday Saturday Friday Thursday Wednesday Tuesday Monday Sunday Outdoor Relative Humidity (%) 9 Current Data Center Efficiency Metrics 10 Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) [The Green Grid, 2007] Pinf. +PIT PUE= PIT 3 Uptime Institute PUE 2.5 EPA 2 Digital Reality Trust 1.5 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Trendline Linear (Series5) 1 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Power Use Effectiveness (PUE) 11 Old System Week avg. 1.25 Week st. dev. 0.06 1.5 IT Aire System Week avg. 1.05 Week st. dev. 0.03 1.4 PUE 1.3 1.26 1.25 1.2 1.26 1.25 1.24 1.26 1.24 1.1 1.07 1.07 1.02 1.05 1.01 1.06 1 Saturday Friday Thursday Wednesday Tuesday Monday Sunday Saturday Friday Thursday Wednesday Tuesday Monday Sunday Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering 1.06 PUE as a Function of Wet Bulb Temperature 12 Old system 1.50 ITAire PUE 1.40 1.39 1.30 1.25 1.26 1.25 1.20 1.29 1.33 1.24 1.14 1.10 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.34 1.17 1.19 1.08 1.01 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 66-70 Wet Bulb Temperature (°F) Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering PUE as a Function of Wet Bulb Temperature Humidity Ratio (Pounds of moisture/Pounds of dry air) 13 IT Aire: 1.1-1.2 Old System: 1.3-1.4 IT Aire: 1.0-1.1 Old System: 1.2-1.3 ASHRAE Envelope Dry Bulb Temperature °F Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Current Data Center Efficiency Metrics 14 Rack Cooling Index (RCI) [M. K. Herrlin, 2005] ( ) ( ) é å Tintake -Tmax-rec ù Tintake >Tmax-rec ú ´100% RCI HI = ê1(Tmax-all -Tmax-rec )n ê ú ë û é å Tmin-rec -Tintake ù Tintake <Tmax-rec ú ´ 100% RCI LO = ê1(Tmin-rec -Tmin-all )n ê ú ë û ASHRAE Guideline [ASHRAE, 2011] Recommended: Allowable: 64°F < Tintake< 77°F 59°F < Tintake< 90°F Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Rack Cooling Index (ASHRAE Guideline) 15 Intake Temperature (°F) 100 ITAire System Old System Allowable 90 80 Recommended 70 60 Old System RCIHI=100% RCILO=92.5% 50 IT Aire RCIHI=100% RCILO=100% 40 0 2000 4000 6000 Rack Intake Number Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering 8000 10000 Data Center Air Flow 16 Air recirculation Q, T, RH (supply) Q, T, RH (return) Q, T, RH (exit) Hot Aisle Q, T, RH (intake) Air bypass Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Cold Aisle Current Data Center Efficiency Metrics 17 Return Temperature Index (RTI) [Herrlin, 2007] ( é T -TSupply Return RTI= ê DTRack ê ë ) ùú ú û Supply and Return Heat Indices (SHI, RHI) [Sharma and Bash, 2002] SHI= Tintake -TSupply Texit -TSupply RHI= Treturn -TSupply Texit -TSupply Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Return Temperature Index (RTI) 18 120% Old System Week avg. dev. 63% IT Aire System Week avg. dev. 35% 100% Saturday Friday Thursday Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Wednesday Tuesday Monday Sunday Saturday Friday Thursday Wednesday Tuesday 80% Monday 90% Sunday RTI 110% Supply Heat Index (SHI) 19 1 Old System IT Aire SHI 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Lower SHI, Less recirculation 0 Saturday Friday Thursday Wednesday Tuesday Monday Sunday Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Return Heat Index (RHI) 20 Higher RHI, Less by pass air 1 RHI 0.8 0.6 Old System 0.4 IT Aire 0.2 0 Saturday Friday Thursday Wednesday Tuesday Monday Sunday Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Cooling Energy (IT Aire vs. Old System) 21 W e e k 100 91.5 Energy (kWh) 80 86.6 85.4 85.2 a v g . 60 40 IT Aire 22.3 20 0 Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Old 20.0 Saturday 4 23.2 Friday Thursday Average energy saving of 67.2 kWh Wednesday Monday Sunday s t d e v . 23.6 22.9 20.6 18.6 Tuesday 4 1 . 5 5 ° F W e e k 93.3 92.0 87.8 Cooling Energy Reduction (IT Aire vs. Old System) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% W e e k a v g . 78.6% Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Saturday 4 Friday Thursday Average energy reduction of 75.7% 74.8% 73.1% Wednesday Tuesday s t d e v . Monday 4 1 . 5 5 ° F W e e k 78.6% 73.3% 75.9% 75.6% Sunday Cooling System Energy Reduction 22 Next Steps 23 Continued system monitoring (Until Spring 15) Elucidate seasonal variation effects Large data repository for higher resolution of PUE prediction Enables statistical models for efficiency improvements Provides in-depth insights into performance Upcoming milestones Presentation at IIE ISERC, May 31-June 4, 2014 Presentation at SME NAMRC, June 9-13, 2014 Whitepaper, June 30, 2014 (draft mid-June for review) Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering PUE as a Function of Wet Bulb Temperature Humidity Ratio (Pounds of moisture/Pounds of dry air) 24 IT Aire: 1.1-1.2 Old System: 1.3-1.4 IT Aire: 1.0-1.1 Old System: 1.2-1.3 ASHRAE Envelope Dry Bulb Temperature °F Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering 25 Acknowledgments We gratefully acknowledge the funding support of this project from Portland Development Commission (PDC), Oregon Best, and Energy Trust through Oregon Best Commercialization Program. We wish to express our appreciation from the assistance we received from the City of Gresham and IT Aire. References 26 R. Sharma, C. Bash, and C. Patel, “Dimensionless Parameters for Evaluation of Thermal Design and Performance of Large-scale Data Centers,” in 8th AIAA/ASME Joint Thermophysics and Heat Transfer Conference, 2002, pp. 1–11. R. Brown, “United States Environmental Protection Agency Energy Star Program, Report to congress on server and data center energy efficiency, public law, 109-431,” 2008. Y. Joshi and P. Kumar, Energy efficient thermal management of data centers. Springer, 2012. “The green grids opportunity: decreasing data center and other IT energy usage patterns,” The Green Grids, Technical Report, 2007. L. Stahl and C. Belady, “Designing an alternative to conventional room cooling,” presented at the IEE conference publication, 2001, pp. 109–115. B. Kenneth, “Heat Density Trends in Data Processing, Computer Systems, and Telecommunications Equipment,” UpTime Institute, White paper, 2005. C. Bash, C. D. Patel, and R. K. Sharma, “Dynamic thermal management of air cooled data centers,” presented at the Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronics Systems, 2006, pp. 445–452. G. Koutitas and P. Demestichas, “Challenges for Energy Efficiency in Local and Regional Data Centers,” Journal of Green Engineering, vol. 1, p. 32. W. Tschudi, E. Mills, S. Greenberg, and P. Rumsey, “Measuring and Managing-Data Center Energy Use,” Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley NationalLaboratory, Berkeley, CA (US), 2005. S. Law, “Gresham startup says it can slash energy costs at power-thirsty server farms,” Portland Tribune, 2013. Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering References 27 V. Avelar, Azevedo, and A. French, “PUETM: A comprehensive examination of the metric,” The Green Grid, White paper 49, 2012. J. Bruschi, P. Rumsey, R. Anliker, L. Chu, and S. Gregson, “Best practices guide for energy-efficient data center design,” U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, Federal Energy Management Program, [Washington, DC], 2010. M. K. Herrlin, “Rack cooling effectiveness in data centers and telecom central offices: The rack cooling index (RCI),” TransactionsAmerican Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air conditioning Engineers, vol. 111, p. 725, 2005. T. ASHRAE, “9.9 (2011) Thermal guidelines for data processing environments–expanded data center classes and usage guidance,” Whitepaper prepared by ASHRAE technical committee (TC), vol. 9, 2011. M. K. Herrlin, “Improved data center energy efficiency and thermal performance by advanced airflow analysis,” presented at the Digital Power Forum, 2007, pp. 10–12. M. K. Herrlin, “Airflow and cooling performance of data centers: two performance metrics,” ASHRAE transactions, vol. 114, no. Part 2, 2008. M. K. Patterson, “Energy efficiency metrics,” in Energy Efficient Thermal Management of Data Centers, Springer, 2012, pp. 237– 271. A. Vijayaraghavan and D. Dornfeld, “Automated energy monitoring of machine tools,” CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 21–24, 2010. J. W. Gardner and V. K. Varadan, Microsensors, MEMS and smart devices. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001. C.-Y. Chong and S. P. Kumar, “Sensor networks: evolution, opportunities, and challenges,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 1247–1256, 2003. J. Yick, B. Mukherjee, and D. Ghosal, “Wireless sensor network survey,” Computer networks, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 2292–2330, 2008. Energy Efficiency Center & Industrial Sustainability Laboratory School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering