Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Prepared for Safety and Chemical Engineering Education (SACHE) by: Dennis C. Hendershot Rohm and Haas Company, retired ©American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2006 1 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design What is inherently safer design? - “existing in something as a permanent and inseparable element...” Eliminate or minimize hazards rather than control hazards Safety based on physical and chemical properties of the system, not “add-on” safety devices and systems “Safer” – not “Safe” Inherent 2 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Why Inherently Safer Design? Flixborough, UK, 1974 Bhopal, India, 1984 3 Pasadena, TX, 1989 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design A subset of Green Engineering Inherently Safer Design Green Chemistry and Engineering 4 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design History of inherently safer design really a new concept – elimination of hazards has a long history Second half of 20th Century chemical industry – increased hazards from huge, world scale petrochemical plants Not –Concern about cost and reliability of traditional “add on” safety systems –Trevor Kletz – ICI (1977) – Is there a better way? Eliminate or dramatically reduce hazards 5 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Hazard An inherent physical or chemical characteristic that has the potential for causing harm to people, the environment, or property (CCPS, 1992). Hazards are intrinsic to a material, or its conditions of use. Examples – Phosgene - toxic by inhalation – Acetone - flammable – High pressure steam - potential energy due to pressure, high temperature 6 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design To eliminate hazards: Eliminate the material Change the material Change the conditions of use 7 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Chemical Process Safety Strategies Inherent Passive Active Procedural 8 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Inherent Eliminate or reduce the hazard by changing the process or materials which are nonhazardous or less hazardous Integral to the product, process, or plant cannot be easily defeated or changed without fundamentally altering the process or plant design EXAMPLE – Substituting water for a flammable solvent (latex paints compared to oil base paints) 9 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Passive Minimize hazard using process or equipment design features which reduce frequency or consequence without the active functioning of any device EXAMPLE –Containment dike around a hazardous material storage tank 10 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Active Controls, safety interlocks, automatic shut down systems Multiple active elements – Sensor - detect hazardous condition – Logic device - decide what to do – Control element - implement action Prevent incidents, or mitigate the consequences of incidents EXAMPLES – High level alarm in a tank shuts automatic feed valve – A sprinkler system which extinguishes a fire 11 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Procedural Standard operating procedures, safety rules and standard procedures, emergency response procedures, training EXAMPLE –Confined space entry procedures 12 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Human Reliability Available Response Time (minutes) 1 10 20 30 60 Probability of incorrect diagnosis – single control room event ~1.0 0.5 0.1 0.01 0.001 Source: Swain, A.D., Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis, August 1983, NUREG/CR-1278-F, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 13 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Batch Chemical Reactor Example of concern – runaway reaction causing high temperature and pressure and potential reactor rupture Example – Morton International, Paterson, NJ runaway reaction in 1998, injured 9 people Hazard 14 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Inherent Develop chemistry which is not exothermic, or mildly exothermic –Maximum adiabatic reactor temperature < boiling point of all ingredients and onset temperature of any decomposition or other reactions, and no gaseous products are generated by the reaction –The reaction does not generate any pressure, either from confined gas products or from boiling of the reactor contents 15 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Inherent VENT REACTANT FEEDS PI COOLING TI 16 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Passive Maximum adiabatic pressure for reaction determined to be 150 psig –From vapor pressure of reactor contents or generation of gaseous products Run reaction in a 250 psig design reactor Hazard (pressure) still exists, but passively contained by the pressure vessel 17 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Passive VENT REACTANT FEEDS PRV PI TI COOLING 18 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Active Maximum adiabatic pressure for 100% reaction is 150 psig, reactor design pressure is 50 psig Gradually add limiting reactant with temperature control to limit potential energy from reaction Use high temperature and pressure interlocks to stop feed and apply emergency cooling Provide emergency relief system 19 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Active VENT RUPTURE DISK WITH DISCHARGE TO SAFE PLACE REACTANT FEEDS PA H SAFETY SYSTEM LOGIC ELEMENT TA H COOLING 20 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Procedural Maximum adiabatic pressure for 100% reaction is 150 psig, reactor design pressure is 50 psig Gradually add limiting reactant with temperature control to limit potential energy from reaction Train operator to observe temperature, stop feeds and apply cooling if temperature exceeds critical operating limit 21 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Procedural VENT RUPTURE DISK WITH DISCHARGE TO SAFE PLACE REACTANT FEEDS PA H TA H COOLING 22 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Which strategy should we use? Generally, in order of robustness and reliability: –Inherent –Passive –Active –Procedural But - there is a place and need for ALL of these strategies in a complete safety program 23 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Layers of Protection COMMUNITY EMERGENCY REPSONSE PLANT EMERGENCY REPSONSE PHYSICAL PROTECTION (DIKES) PHYSICAL PROTECTION (RELIEF DEVICES) AUTOMATIC ACTION SIS OR ESD CRITICAL ALARMS, OPERATOR SUPERVISION, AND M ANUAL INTERVENTION BASIC CONTROLS, PROCESS ALARMS, AND OPERATOR SUPERVISION PROCESS DESIGN I LAH 1 24 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Multiple Layers of Protection Potential Incidents Layers of Protection Actual Risk 25 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Degraded Layers of Protection Potential Incidents Degraded Higher Actual Risk Layers of Protection Degraded 26 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design “Inherently Safe” Process No additional layers of protection needed Probably not possible if you consider ALL potential hazards But, we can be “Inherently Safer” PROCESS DESIGN I LAH 1 27 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Inherently Safer Process Risk Potential Incidents No Layers of Protection Needed Actual Risk 28 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Managing multiple hazards – Process Option No. 1 Toxicity Explosion Fire ….. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY REPSONSE PLANT EMERGENCY REPSONSE PHYSICAL PROTECTION (DIKES) PHYSICAL PROTECTION (RELIEF DEVICES) AUTOMATIC ACTION SIS OR ESD PROCESS DESIGN I CRITICAL ALARMS, OPERATOR SUPERVISION, AND MANUAL INTERVENTION BASIC CONTROLS, PROCESS ALARMS, AND OPERATOR SUPERVISION LAH 1 PROCESS DESIGN AUTOMATIC ACTION SIS OR ESD CRITICAL ALARMS, OPERATOR SUPERVISION, AND MANUAL INTERVENTION BASIC CONTROLS, PROCESS ALARMS, AND OPERATOR SUPERVISION PROCESS DESIGN I I LAH 1 Hazard 1 Inherent Hazard 2 – Passive, Active, Procedures LAH 1 Hazard 3 – … Passive, Active, Procedures Hazard n – ???? 29 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Managing multiple hazards – Process Option No. 2 Toxicity Explosion Fire ….. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY REPSONSE PLANT EMERGENCY REPSONSE PHYSICAL PROTECTION (DIKES) AUTOMATIC ACTION SIS OR ESD CRITICAL ALARMS, OPERATOR SUPERVISION, AND MANUAL INTERVENTION BASIC CONTROLS, PROCESS ALARMS, AND OPERATOR SUPERVISION PHYSICAL PROTECTION (RELIEF DEVICES) AUTOMATIC ACTION SIS OR ESD CRITICAL ALARMS, OPERATOR SUPERVISION, AND MANUAL INTERVENTION BASIC CONTROLS, PROCESS ALARMS, AND OPERATOR SUPERVISION PROCESS DESIGN I I LAH 1 Hazard 3 – Passive, Active, Procedures PROCESS DESIGN I PROCESS DESIGN LAH 1 LAH 1 Hazard 2 – Passive, Active, Procedures … Hazard 1 Inherent Hazard n – ???? 30 Inherently Safer Design Strategies 31 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Inherently Safer Design Strategies Minimize Moderate Substitute Simplify 32 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Minimize Use small quantities of hazardous substances or energy –Storage –Intermediate storage –Piping –Process equipment “Process Intensification” 33 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Benefits Reduced consequence of incident (explosion, fire, toxic material release) Improved effectiveness and feasibility of other protective systems – for example: –Secondary containment –Reactor dump or quench systems 34 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Opportunities for process intensification in reactors Understand what controls chemical reaction to design equipment to optimize the reaction –Heat removal –Mass transfer Mixing Between phases/across surfaces –Chemical equilibrium –Molecular processes 35 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Generic Nitration Reaction Organic substrate (X-H) + HNO3 H2SO4 Solvent Nitrated Product (X-NO2) + H2O Reaction is highly exothermic Usually 2 liquid phases – an aqueous/acid phase and an organic/solvent phase 36 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Semi-batch nitration process Catalyst (usually sulfuric acid) feed or pre-charge Nitric acid gradual addition Organic Substrate and solvents pre-charge Batch Reactor ~6000 gallons 37 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design What controls the rate of this reaction? – bringing reactants into contact with each other Mass transfer – from acid/aqueous phase (nitric acid) to organic phase (organic substrate) Heat removal Mixing 38 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design CSTR Nitration Process Raw Material Feeds Organic substrate Catalyst Nitric Acid Reactor ~ 100 gallons Product 39 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Can you do this reaction in a tubular reactor? Raw Cooled continuous Material mixer/reactor Feeds Organic substrate Catalyst Nitric Acid 40 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design “Semi-Batch” solution polymerization Solvent Additives Initial Monomer "Heel" Large (several thousand gallons) batch reactor Monomer and Initiator gradually added to minimize inventory of unreacted material 41 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design What controls this reaction Contacting of monomer reactants and polymerization initiators Heat removal –Temperature control important for molecular weight control 42 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Tubular Reactor Initiator Static mixer pipe reactor (several inches diameter, several feet long, cooling water jacket) Monomer, solvent, additives Product Storage Tank 43 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Substitute Replace a hazardous material with a less hazardous alternative Substitute a less hazardous reaction chemistry 44 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Substitute materials Water based coatings and paints in place of solvent based alternatives –Reduce fire hazard –Less toxic –Less odor –More environmentally friendly –Reduce hazards for end user and also for the manufacturer 45 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Substitute Reaction Chemistry Acrylic Esters Reppe Process Ni(CO )4 CH CH + CO + ROH CH 2 = CHCO2 R HCl Acetylene - flammable, reactive Carbon monoxide - toxic, flammable Nickel carbonyl - toxic, environmental hazard (heavy metals), carcinogenic Anhydrous HCl - toxic, corrosive Product - a monomer with reactivity (polymerization) hazards 46 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Alternate chemistry Propylene Oxidation Process 3 Catalyst CH 2 = CHCO2 H + H 2 O CH 2 = CHCH 3 + O2 2 CH 2 = CHCO2 H + ROH H+ CH 2 = CHCO2 R + H 2 O Inherently safe? No, but inherently safer. Hazards are primarily flammability, corrosivity from sulfuric acid catalyst for the esterification step, small amounts of acrolein as a transient intermediate in the oxidation step, reactivity hazard for the monomer product. 47 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Moderate Dilution Refrigeration Less severe processing conditions 48 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Dilution Aqueous ammonia instead of anhydrous Aqueous HCl in place of anhydrous HCl Sulfuric acid in place of oleum Wet benzoyl peroxide in place of dry Dynamite instead of nitroglycerine 49 Ce Conc 28% Aqueous Ammonia Introduction to Inherently Safer Design 0 0 Distance, Miles 5 Effect of dilution Centerline Ammonia Concentration, mole ppm 20,000 (B) - Release Scenario: 2 inch transfer pipe failure 10,000 Anhydrous Ammonia 28% Aqueous Ammonia 0 0 Distance, Miles 1 50 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Impact of refrigeration Monomethylamine Storage Temperature (°C) 10 3 -6 Distance to ERPG-3 (500 ppm) Concentration, km 1.9 1.1 0.6 51 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Less severe processing conditions Ammonia manufacture – 1930s - pressures up to 600 bar – 1950s - typically 300-350 bar – 1980s - plants operating at pressures of 100-150 bar were being built Result of understanding and improving the process Lower pressure plants are cheaper, more efficient, as well as safer 52 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Simplify Eliminate unnecessary complexity to reduce risk of human error –QUESTION ALL COMPLEXITY! Is it really necessary? 53 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Simplify - eliminate equipment Reactive distillation methyl acetate process (Eastman Chemical) Which is simpler? Acetic Acid Methyl Acetate Methanol Catalyst Methyl Acetate Acetic Acid Methanol Recovery Reactor Solvent Recovery Splitter Sulfuric Acid Methanol Extractive Distillaton Water Reactor Column Impurity Removal Columns Decanter Extractor Heavies Color Column Azeo Column Flash Column Water Heavies 54 Flash Column Water Water Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Modified methyl acetate process Fewer vessels Fewer pumps Fewer flanges Fewer instruments Fewer valves Less piping ...... 55 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design But, it isn’t simpler in every way Reactive distillation column itself is more complex Multiple unit operations occur within one vessel More complex to design More difficult to control and operate 56 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Single, complex batch reactor Large Rupture Disk A B C Condenser D E Distillate Receiver Steam Refrigerated Brine Water Return Water Supply 57 Condensate Introduction to Inherently Safer Design A sequence of simpler batch reactors for the same process A B C Large Rupture Disk Refrigerated Brine D Water Return Water Supply Condenser E Distillate Receiver Steam Condensate 58 Inherent Safety Considerations through the Process Life Cycle (Use manufacture of acrylate esters as an example) 59 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Research Basic technology –Reppe process –Propylene oxidation followed by esterification –Other alternatives propane based Others - ???? 60 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Process Development Implementation of selected technology – Oxidation catalyst options Temperature Pressure Selectivity Impurities Catalyst hazards – Esterification catalyst options Sulfuric acid Ion exchange resins or other immobilized acid functionality catalysts 61 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Preliminary Plant Design Plant location –Plant site options –Plant layout on selected site Consider –People –Property –Environmentally sensitive locations 62 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Detailed Plant Design Equipment size Inventory of raw materials Inventory of process intermediates One large train vs. multiple smaller trains Specific equipment location … 63 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Detailed Equipment Design Inventory of hazardous material in each equipment item Heat transfer media (temperature, pressure, fluid) Pipe size, length, construction (flanged, welded, screwed pipe) …… 64 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Operation “User friendly” operating procedures Management of change –Consider inherently safer options when making modifications –Identify opportunities for improving inherent safety based on operating experience, improvements in technology and knowledge 65 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design When to consider Inherent Safety? Start early in process research and development NEVER STOP looking for inherently safer design and operating improvements 66 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Questions designers should ask when they have identified a hazard Ask, in this order: 1. Can I eliminate this hazard? 2. If not, can I reduce the magnitude of the hazard? 3. Do the alternatives identified in questions 1 and 2 increase the magnitude of any other hazards, or create new hazards? (If so, consider all hazards in selecting the best alternative.) 4. At this point, what technical and management systems are required to manage the hazards which inevitably will remain? 67 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Inherently Safer Design and Regulations Contra Costa County, CA Industrial Safety Ordinance (1999) – Requires evaluation of inherently safer technologies – Reviewed by enforcement agencies – Allows consideration of feasibility and economics New Jersey Department of the Environment (2005) – Facilities covered by the New Jersey Toxic Catastrophe Prevention Act (TCPA) must review the practicality of adopting inherently safer technology as an approach to reducing the potential impact of a terrorist attack United States Federal requirements – Several “chemical security” bills which include requirements for consideration of inherently safer design have been introduced in Congress, but, as of June 2006 none of these have been enacted. 68 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Resources Kletz, T. A., Process Plants - A Handbook for Inherently Safer Design, Taylor and Francis, London, 1998. Inherently Safer Chemical Processes - A Life Cycle Approach, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1996. – Note: A second edition is being written in 2006. 69 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Resources Guidelines for Engineering Design for Process Safety, Chapter 2 “Inherently Safer Plants.” American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1993. Guidelines for Design Solutions for Process Equipment Failures, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1998. 70 Introduction to Inherently Safer Design Resources INSIDE Project and INSET Toolkit, Commission of the European Community, 1997 - available for download from: http://www.aeat-safety-andrisk.com/html/inset.html Extensive journal and conference proceedings literature 71