+
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
GROVE STREET STATION CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT & STATION MODERNIZATION
GWB Roadway Upper Level LED Lighting
Upgrade
Final Report
Prepared By
AWA Lighting Designers
On-Board Engineering
Engineering Department
STAGE I REPORT
PANYNJ · ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT · DESIGN DIVISION
PRE-FINAL SUBMISSION
(DRAFT FOR REVIEW BY PANYNJ)
February 17, 2015
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The report was prepared by
AWA Lighting Designers - 61 Greenpoint Ave Suite 603
Brooklyn, NY 11222
On Board Engineering -
50 Millstone Road
Building 300 Suite 110
E. Windsor, NJ 08520
PID Number:
08470000
Charge Code:
C415B04243048
Contract Number:
GWB-244.048
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
1
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part A
Part B
Feasibility of using LED Luminaires for Roadway Lighting on a Bridge ........... 19
Section 3
Strategies for Vibration Mitigation for Luminaires ......................................................... 20
Section 4
Specifications for New Poles ........................................................................................................ 23
Section 5
Required Illumination Levels for Roadways ...................................................................... 25
Section 6
Manufacturer Evaluations ............................................................................................................ 35
Executive Summary............................................................................................................................. 3
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 6
B.1
Project Introduction ............................................................................................................... 6
B.2
Scope of Work ........................................................................................................................... 9
B.3
Lighting Terminology ........................................................................................................ 10
Part C
Section 1
Section 2
Lighting Precedents .......................................................................................................................... 11
6.1
Shortlisted Manufacturers’ Information .................................................................. 35
1.1
Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 11
6.2
Summary of Shortlisted Manufacturers’ Data ...................................................... 36
1.2
Precedents ................................................................................................................................ 12
6.2.1 Light Level Calculation Summary ............................................................... 36
1.2.1 East Span Replacement - Oakland Bay Bridge, USA ....................................... 12
6.2.2 Luminaire Performance Summary .............................................................. 37
1.2.2 Moulay El Hassan Bridge, Morocco ...................................................................... 13
6.2.3 LED/Chip Performance Summary ............................................................... 38
1.2.3 Machado & Salles Bridge, Brazil ........................................................................... 14
6.2.4 Additional Information Summary ............................................................... 39
1.2.4 Kuokkala Bridge, Finland ........................................................................................ 15
6.3
Evaluation of Shortlisted Manufacturers’ Data ................................................... 40
1.2.5 Alzhai Bridge, China ................................................................................................. 16
Section 7
Specifications Requirements for LED Luminaires for Roadway .............................. 26
Section 8
Design Criteria .................................................................................................................................... 27
1.2.6 Saint Gervais Bridge, France.................................................................................. 17
1.3
2
Summary ................................................................................................................................. 18
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
8.1
Project Design Criteria ...................................................................................................... 27
C.1
Submitted Light Level Calculation ............................................................................ 57
8.2
Standards & Practices ....................................................................................................... 31
C.2
Submitted Luminaire Data ............................................................................................ 59
8.3
BUG Rating System ............................................................................................................. 32
Appendix D Shortlisted Manufacturer 4 - LSI .............................................................................................. 62
Section 9
D.1
Field Test Criteria ............................................................................................................................. 41
Submitted
Light
Level
Calculation
62
9.1
Recommendations for Testing of Selected Manufacturer ................................ 41
D.2
9.2
Calculation Grid for Testing of Light Levels ......................................................... 42
9.3
Pass/Fail Evaluation Criteria ...................................................................................... 44
Submitted
Luminaire
Data
63
Appendix E Shortlisted Manufacturer 5 - MAGNIFLOOD ...................................................................... 65
Part D
E.1
Submitted Light Level Calculation ............................................................................ 65
E.2
Submitted Luminaire Data ............................................................................................ 66
Appendix A Shortlisted Manufacturer 1 - CREE ....................................................................................... 46
A.1
Submitted
Light
Level
Calculation
46
A.2
Submitted
Luminaire
Data
47
Appendix B Shortlisted Manufacturer 2 - ELUMEN ................................................................................. 51
B.1
Submitted Light Level Calculation ............................................................................ 51
B.2
Submitted Luminaire Data............................................................................................ 53
Appendix C Shortlisted Manufacturer 3 - LED Roadway Lighting .................................................. 57
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
3
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
PART A
o
5 Shortlisted manufacturers have provided LED luminaire specifications
light level calculations to confirm their ability to meet the light levels
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
required.
o
shortlisted manufacturers’ data.
The PANYNJ plans to perform a rope replacement at the George Washington Bridge and, as
part of the project, replace the upper level roadway lighting with state of the art LEDs
o
luminaires. The LEDs will need to provide average light level to meet the PANYNJ
standard of 2.5fc across the entire bridge. Since the LEDs will be on a bridge road surface
that has a very high traffic volume, vibration mitigation is a serious concern and must be
a high-priority design consideration. Additionally, the lighting design must be highly
efficient, be economically attractive on a life cycle cost basis, and provide a superior
Refer to Part C Section 8.2 for the summary of the three (or five)
Refer to Appendices (A – E) for copies of submitted data from each
manufacturer.
5. Provide recommendations, design criteria (types of luminaires, mounting height,
illumination levels, etc.), and alternatives to upgrade roadway lighting.
o
The following lighting criteria were used for selection of the LED Lighting
for the GWB:
quality of light with high color rendering:
To determine the feasibility of this replacement project the following steps have been
undertaken:
1. LED Luminaires
A. General Requirements
B. Design Requirements
1. Research and Highlight other similar roadway and bridges internationally,
especially the ones that use LED lighting for the roadway
o
D. Optical System and Lenses
LED Roadway lighting has been installed and proved to be an efficient
E. Luminaire Body and Dimensions
and reliable replacement of the standard lighting technologies such as
F. Gasketting (If Gasketting Is Utilized)
Metal Halide and High Pressure Sodium.
G. LED Module & Relamping
2. Research and Highlight the feasibility of LED lighting for roadway lighting on
the bridge.
o
o
H. Power Supply
I.
LED Luminaire Performance Requirements
Reliable international roadway lighting manufacturers have provided
J. Life & Lumen Depreciation
calculations and data to confirm the feasibility of LED Lighting for
K. Single Point Failure
roadway lighting on the bridge.
L. Correlated Color Temperature & Color Rendering Index
Refer to Part C Section 8 for summary of results confirming the
M. Conformance to Standards
feasibility.
N. Acceptable Diode Manufacturers
3. Research
and
Highlight
the
strategies
used
for
vibration
mitigation
of
luminaires to conform with project requirement of handling 6G of Vibration.
o
C. Vibration Dampening
O. Color Consistency of LED's
P. Glare Control
5 Shortlisted manufacturers have been confirmed their ability to design
Q. LED & Luminaire Temperature
and manufacture for a vibration level of 6G over the warranted life of
o
the unit.
2. Poles and Standards
Refer to Part C Section 3 for research results for vibration mitigation
3. Finishes
strategies.
4. Research and Specify LED luminaires to achieve 2.5 Foot-Candles at 90’ spacing
5. Lenses, Louvers and Diffusers
and 30’ mounting height.
4
4. Reflectors
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
6. Luminaire Mounting
7. To ensure that the proposed light will satisfy the PA requirements, the following
7. Installation
testing is recommended for the selected manufacturer
8. Adjust and Clean
o
of six poles (5% of the total poles on the bridge) for a period of six months.
9. Field Quality Control
o
10. Installation - LED's and Other Special Luminaires
The purpose of this test is to ensure that the selected luminaire meets the
design requirements outlined in Part C Section 7, and is performing at
11. Luminaire Installation
same levels as the calculated performance provided by manufacturers
outlined in Part C Section 8.
12. Shade and Glass
o
The selected manufacturer will be required to provide a test installation
o
The following standards and practices were used for selection of the LED
light levels
Lighting for the GWB:
o
1. American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
2. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
Refer to Part C Section 9.2 for details on the calculation grid testing of
Refer to Part C Section 9.3 for details on the pass/fail evaluation criteria.
Conclusion:
3. CIE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON ILLUMINATION
Based on the criteria listed above, we are recommending the selection of the following
4. Energy Policy Act of 2005
three (or five) manufacturers:
1. CREE
5. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA)
2. ELUMEN
6. Ingress Protection (IP) Code
3. LED ROADWAY LIGHTING
4. LSI
7. National Equipment Manufacturers Association (NEMA)
5. MAGNIFLOOD
8. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
One out of these five manufacturers may be selected for a field test, by the contracts and
9. Occupation Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
10. The Energy Policy Act of 1992: Lamp Efficiency Labeling and
procurement department of PANYNJ.
Standards
11. Underwriters Laboratories (UL)
o
Refer to Part C Section 7 for full details of design criteria
6. Select three (or five) manufacturers for LED luminaires and poles that meet the
lighting levels, vibration mitigation and maintenance requirements.
o
Based on results, three (or five) manufacturers have been selected that can
provide the required LED Luminaires and poles to meet the projects
requirements.
o
Refer to Part C Section 8.3 for a list of the three (or five) manufacturers
and conclusions on why they were selected.
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
5
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
George Washington Bridge
6
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
PART B
INTRODUCTION
B.1 Project Introduction
GEORGE WASHINGTON BRIDGE: EXISTING LIGHTING

BRIDGE INFO:
LOCATION: New York, US
ARCHITECT: Othmar Ammann
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Suspension
TOTAL SPAN: 4,760’
ROADWAY WIDTH: 119’

LIGHTING SYSTEM INFO:
MANUFACTURER: Magniflood
LAMP TYPE: Metal Halide
LAMP WATTAGE: 400W ED-27 lamp
DISTRIBUTION: Type III
MOUNTING TYPE: Pole
UPGRADE YEAR: 2000

LIGHTING POLE INFO:
MOUNTING HEIGHT: 30’
ARM LENGTH: Varies (Max.: 6’)
6
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
LENS: Type III Glass Lens

ADDITIONAL INFO:

Customized poles due to interaction with main suspension cables

Poles mounted onto concrete barrier pads, approximately 4’7” above
the roadway level
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
7
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
GEORGE WASHINGTON BRIDGE: EXISTING LIGHTING
8
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
GEORGE WASHINGTON BRIDGE: NEW POLE LOCATION (from PANYNJ Preliminary Design Report)
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
9
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
B.2 Scope of Work
1. RESEARCH
AND
HIGHLIGHT
OTHER
SIMILAR
BRIDGES
(CABLE-HUNG) INTERNATIONALLY, ESPECIALLY THE ONES
THAT USE LED LIGHTING FOR ROADWAY. Refer Part C Section
1
2. RESEARCH
AND
HIGHLIGHT
THE
FEASIBILITY
OF
LED
LIGHTING FOR ROADWAY LIGHTING ON A BRIDGE. Refer Part
C Section 2
3. RESEARCH AND HIGHLIGHT THE STRATEGIES USED FOR
VIBRATION MITIGATION OF LUMINAIRES (6G OF VIBRATION).
WE WILL INTERVIEW THREE OR MORE MANUFACTURERS FOR
THE SAME. Refer Part C Section 3
4. ANALYZE IF EXISTING POLES CAN BE RE-USED. IF NOT,
DEVELOP SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW POLES. Refer Part C
Section 4
5. RESEARCH AND SPECIFY LED LUMINAIRES TO ACHIEVE 2.5
FOOT-CANDLES AT 90’ SPACING AND 30’ MOUNTING HEIGHT.
Refer Part C Section 5
6. PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS, DESIGN CRITERIA (TYPES OF
LUMINAIRES,
MOUNTING
ETC.),
ALTERNATIVES
AND
HEIGHT,
ILLUMINATION
TO
UPGRADE
LEVELS,
ROADWAY
LIGHTING. Refer Part C Section 7
7. SELECT
THREE
MANUFACTURERS
FOR
LED
LUMINAIRES
(AND POLES, IF NECESSARY) THAT MEET THE LIGHTING
LEVELS,
VIBRATION
MITIGATION
AND
MAINTENANCE
REQUIREMENTS. Refer Part C Section 8
8. PROVIDE LIGHTING CALCULATIONS FOR ROADWAY LIGHTING.
Refer Appendices A through E
10
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
B.3 LIGHTING TERMINOLOGY
Lumina
ire
The following terminology will be used throughout this report when
referring to the different parts of the lighting system that will be
Mounting
Arm
installed to illuminate the roadway. The diagram to the right is
intended for clarification
1. Luminaire – The light fixture (with LED lamp)
2. Mounting Arm – The structure which connects the luminaire to
the pole
3. Pole – The vertical structure which connects to the pedestrian
walkway and supports the mounting arm and the luminaire.
Pole
Top of Pedestrian
Walkway
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
11
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
PART C
SECTION 1: LIGHTING PRECEDENTS
1.1 INTRODUCTION
AWA has researched other bridges and roadways to see what lighting
systems are being used internationally. The intent of this research was
to document existing precedents of LED luminaires being used on
roadways for bridges. The following pages provide a selection of
projects from that research highlighting the different LED technologies
being used.
12
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
1.2 PRECEDENTS
1.2.1 EAST SPAN REPLACEMENT - OAKLAND BAY BRIDGE

BRIDGE INFO:
LOCATION: Oakland, CA
ENGINEER: Moffatt & Nichol
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Suspension
TOTAL SPAN: 10,176’
ROADWAY WIDTH: 57.5’

LIGHTING SYSTEM INFO:
MANUFACTURER: Musco Sports
LAMP TYPE: LED
LAMP WATTAGE: Varies
DISTRIBUTION: Varies
MOUNTING TYPE: Poles and Spots
UPGRADE YEAR: 2013

LIGHTING POLE INFO:
MOUNTING HEIGHT: 23’-65’ range
MANUFACTURER: Valmont Industries
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
13
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE

ADDITIONAL INFO:

Light is projected in the direction of travel to avoid glare.

Poles are used outside the cable portion, while spots which are
mounted on top of the cables are used inside the cabled portion of the
bridge.

Each pole has a ‘canister’ dampening system near the top.

New LED Luminaires use 50% less energy than the luminaires on the
existing bridge.
14
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
1.2.2 MOULAY EL HASSAN BRIDGE

BRIDGE INFO:
LOCATION: Rabat, Morocco
ARCHITECT: Marc and Mimram
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Beam & Girder
TOTAL SPAN: 3,928’
ROADWAY WIDTH: 150’

LIGHTING SYSTEM INFO:
MANUFACTURER: GE
LAMP TYPE: LED
LAMP WATTAGE: 63W
DISTRIBUTION: Asymmetric
MOUNTING TYPE: Pole
UPGRADE YEAR: 2012

LIGHTING POLE INFO:
MOUNTING HEIGHT: 36’
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
15
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE

ADDITIONAL INFO:

This bridge uses the Iberia luminaire from GE.
1.2.3 MACHADO & SALLES BRIDGE

BRIDGE INFO:
LOCATION: Florianopolis, Brazil
ENGINEER: Machado Colombo Salles
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Beam & Girder
TOTAL SPAN: 4,025’
ROADWAY WIDTH: 4 Lanes per Bridge
16
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE

LIGHTING SYSTEM INFO:
MANUFACTURER: GE
LAMP TYPE: LED
LAMP WATTAGE: 54W
DISTRIBUTION: Asymmetric
MOUNTING TYPE: Pole
UPGRADE YEAR: 2013

LIGHTING POLE INFO:
MOUNTING HEIGHT: 30’

ADDITIONAL INFO:

This bridge uses the ERS2 luminaire from GE.

LED Luminaires reduce energy consumption by 50%
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
17
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
1.2.4 KUOKKALA BRIDGE
LOCATION: Jyväskylä, Finland
LIGHTING DESIGNER: LITE-design
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Beam & Girder
TOTAL SPAN: 1,570’
ROADWAY WIDTH: 51’

LIGHTING SYSTEM INFO:
MANUFACTURER: Elkamet
LAMP TYPE: LED
LAMP WATTAGE: 30 W
DISTRIBUTION: Symmetric
MOUNTING TYPE: Pole
UPGRADE YEAR: 2013

LIGHTING POLE INFO:
MOUNTING HEIGHT: 30’
LENS: Globe


18
ADDITIONAL INFO:

Existing poles were retrofitted with Valopaa Oy LED Chips.

Globes are manufactured by Elkamet

There are 4 globes per pole.

LED Luminaires reduce energy consumption by 74%

Achieved 1.5 cd/m2 with 3000K LED chips
BRIDGE INFO:
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
19
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
1.2.5 ALZHAI BRIDGE

BRIDGE INFO:
LOCATION: Hunan Province, China
ARCHITECT: Not Disclosed
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Suspension
TOTAL SPAN: 3858’
ROADWAY WIDTH: 80’

LIGHTING SYSTEM INFO:
MANUFACTURER: Schreder
LAMP TYPE: LED
LAMP WATTAGE: 150 W
DISTRIBUTION: Asymmetric
MOUNTING TYPE: Built-in
UPGRADE YEAR: 2011

LIGHTING POLE INFO:
MOUNTING HEIGHT: 2.6’
LENS: Flat tempered glass

ADDITIONAL INFO:

20
FINAL REPORT
This bridge uses the Corus LED luminaire by Schreder
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE

Luminaires are built-into the guard rails.
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
21
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
1.2.6 SAINT-GERVAIS BRIDGE

BRIDGE INFO:
LOCATION: Saint-Gervais, France
ARCHITECT: Strates
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Truss
TOTAL SPAN: 787’
ROADWAY WIDTH: 40’

LIGHTING SYSTEM INFO:
MANUFACTURER: LEC
LAMP TYPE: LED
LAMP WATTAGE: Not Disclosed
DISTRIBUTION: Pro-Beam
MOUNTING TYPE: Built-in
UPGRADE YEAR: 2012

LIGHTING POLE INFO:
MOUNTING HEIGHT: 5’
LENS: Flat frosted

ADDITIONAL INFO:

22
FINAL REPORT
This bridge uses the 5630 Beval luminaire by LEC,
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE


Luminaires are mounted in the guardrail to eliminate the need for
A
visible luminaires.
A
A
15lx minimum levels across roadway was required
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
1.3 Summary
With Life Expectancy of LED’s extending the time between luminaire
replacements to over 10 years, LED luminaires provide an energy efficient,
mercury-free solution helping to preserve the environment, while delivering
more flexible and longer lasting lighting than traditional lighting
technologies.
LED luminaries are being used on the majority of bridge projects around the
world. LED luminaires have been used to upgrade older technologies such as
High Pressure Sodium and Metal Halide luminaries.
A
Ea
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
A
FINAL REPORT
23
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
A
24
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
SECTION 2: FEASIBILITY OF USING LED LUMINAIRES FOR ROADWAY LIGHTING ON A BRIDGE
As a worldwide trend, LED technology has been exponentially improving in
efficiency and economy. Solid State Lighting (SSL) will comprise 70% of the
global lighting market by 2020.
The luminous efficacy of LED technology is increasing at a rapid pace while
the existing technologies are grown at a much slower pace. The chart below
which gives you the comparison the different lamp technologies and their
rates of growth over the last 140 years.
With the increased demand and increased understanding of LED technology
the cost greatly decreases. The chart on the bottom right of this page shows
you the project package cost of the manufacturing costs for LED lighting
applications. This reduction in manufacturing costs has a direct impact on
the cost of the technology to the end user.
Comparison of Different Lamp Technologies’ Luminous Efficacy*
LED luminaires are also lighter in weight than a traditional Metal Halide
*Schreder Lighting 2011
or High Pressure Sodium light source with their ballast. This helps
substantially in mitigating vibrations in the luminaire. It should also be
duly noted that since LED lamps do not have a filament in a traditional
sense, they are naturally pre-disposed to being used in high vibration
settings.
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
25
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
SECTION 3: STRATEGIES FOR VIBRATION MITIGATION FOR LUMINAIRES
EXISTING TESTING METHOD FOR VIBRATION -ANSI C136.31
These standards were designed to simulate what could be encountered in
normal installations and are not intended to cover natural / catastrophic
disasters
Some of the details:

Special vibration tables are required

Mount accelerometer @ luminaire center of gravity

Test to the levels per vibration tables in the x, y and z planes

Luminaire shall be capable of withstanding the described vibration for
100,000 cycles in each plane

A major change in frequency or displacement indicates failure

There should be no damage to, loosening of any part of the luminaire or
any changes that could result in a safety problem
ANSI C136.31-2001 Bridge & Overpass Applications
26
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
Vibration Test Levels- Bridge/overpass
applications
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
27
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
VIBRATION DAMPING METHOD
POLE TOP:
The images below highlight a vibration mitigation strategy that can be used within the pole system.
28
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
VIBRATION DAMPING METHOD
POLE BASE:
The images below highlight a vibration mitigation strategy that can be used for the base of the pole.
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
29
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
30
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
SECTION 4: SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW POLES
Top of
Pedestrian
Walkway
Existing Pole Design
As part of the overall project, the roadway barrier is being replaced. Due to this
change the existing poles will need to be relocated to the top of the sidewalk level.
Refer to Part C Section 2 for PANYNJ proposed new pole location information.
The existing poles have no true historic connection to the design of the roadway as
they were part of a renovation done on the bridge and not part of the original
design.
Since the poles are not historic originals and need to be relocated, the design of the
pole was discussed. Three options have been reviewed as part of this discussion for
what to do with the poles for the roadway lighting.
1. Reuse of existing poles
2. Procurement of new poles that match existing pole design
3. Procurement of new poles with a new design
Option 1 – Reuse of Existing Poles
PROS:
1. Low material costs
CONS:
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
31
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
1. Mounting height of luminaires above the roadway would be lower by
approximately 4’, which will have an impact on the light levels and
uniformity of the light on the roadway
2. The wear and tear on the existing poles will have to be determined to
examine them for damage.
3. Existing custom poles will need to be replaced as the profile of the custom
design will need to be redesigned in relation to the new pole base location
and its intersection with the cable.
4. Limited and generic aesthetic connection to the historic design of the bridge
Option 2 – Procurement of new poles that match existing pole design
PROS:
1. Eliminates any likelihood of possible failure due to damage and wear on
existing poles
2. Minimal change in appearance on bridge
CONS:
1. With new location, exact visual replacement cannot be maintained
2. Increased impact on mounting arm as longer arm is required for new
location
32
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
Final Location for
Top of
Base of Pole to be
Pedestrian
Confirmed by
Walkway
Structural
Engineering
Department Prior to
29’-0”
Bid
(Approximately)
Total Pole Height = 30’ (Approximately)
for
Height
Mounting
Pole
Roadway to Luminaire = 30’
All
Types
=
Design for Possible Curved Pole Option
Option 3 – Procurement of new poles with a new design
PROS:
1. The curvature of the pole will provide increased vibration dampening and
reduce damage due to vibrations.
2. Reduce the need for an additional vibration dampening system that would
be required in the standard pole
3. Reduction in the impact from vibration on the pole will increase the life of
the pole
4. Provides a unique design aesthetic to the bridge roadway experience
5. Has a visual connection to the curvature of the bridges iconic suspension
cables.
CONS:
1. Increased Hardware Cost
Summary:
1. The use of the existing poles is not recommended.
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
33
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
2. If minimal change is the primary requirement from the pole, then the use of
a new pole that visually matches the existing is a viable option.
3. The required relocation of the pole is an opportunity to connect the
beautiful design of the bridge to the visual aesthetic created by the poles
across the bridges span. A new pole design with an aesthetic connection to
the design of the bridge is the recommended option.
4. The budgetary estimate from one of the shortlisted manufacturers for a
standard pole that meets 6G requirements is $2500.
5. The budgetary estimate from one of the shortlisted manufacturers for a
curved pole that meets 6G requirements is $4000.
34
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
SECTION 5: REQUIRED ILLUMINATION LEVEL FOR ROADWAYS
The following are the standards for the recommended illumination levels
for roadways

Illuminance Uniformity Ratio (Eavg/Emin) = 3 to 1

Maximum Veiling Luminance Ratio (Lvmax/Lavg) = 0.3 to 1
Roadway is:
A. Freeway: A divided major roadway with full control of access and with

no crossings at grade. This definition applies to toll as well as nontoll
roads as follows:
Average Maintained Illuminance Value (Eavg) = 2.5 fc
Conclusion:
Freeway A: Roadways with visual complexity and high traffic
Based on the above classifications the Manufacturer must meet the following
volumes. Usually this type of freeway is found in major
light level requirements:
metropolitan areas in or near the central core and operates through
much of the early evening hours of darkness at or near capacity
Freeway B: All other divided roadway with full control of access
o
Average Maintained Illuminance Value (Eavg) = 0.9 fc
The PANYNJ recommended maintained illuminance values for GWB
The relevant IESNA roadway classification definitions:
o

where lighting is needed

Average Maintained Illuminance Value (Eavg) = 2.5 fc

Illuminance Uniformity Ratio (Eavg/Emin) = 3 to 1

Maximum Veiling Luminance Ratio (Lvmax/Lavg) = 0.3 to 1
 Expressway: A divided major roadway for through traffic with partial
control of access and generally with interchanges at major crossroads.
Expressways for noncommercial traffic within park areas are generally
known as parkways.
The relevant IESNA road surface classifications are:
B. Class R3
o
Mean luminance coefficient = 0.07
o
Description: Asphalt road surface (regular and carpet seal) with
dark aggregates (e.g., trap rock, blast furnace slag); rough texture
after some months of use (typical highways).
Mode of reflectance: Slightly Specular
o
C. Class R4
o
Mean luminance coefficient = 0.08
o
Description: Asphalt road surface with very smooth texture.
o
Mode of reflectance: Mostly Specular
Based on above definitions the GWB Roadway classifications are:

Roadway Classification: Freeway A

Road Surface Classification: R3
The IESNA recommended maintained luminance and illuminance values
for a R3 Freeway A classification are:
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
35
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
SECTION 6: SHORTLISTED MANUFACTURER EVALUATIONS
6.1 Shortlisted Manufacturers’ Information
#
1
2
Manufacturer
CREE
Elumen
4600 Silicon Drive
Location
Durham, North
Carolina 27703
7451 Transcanada
Hwy Suite 100 StLaurent, Quebec H4T
1T3
514-876-1010
3
4
5
LSI Industries
MagniFlood Inc.
115 Chain Lake Drive
10000 Alliance Road
7200 New Horizon
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Cincinnati, OH USA
Blvd. North Amityville,
Canada B3S 1B3
45242
NY USA 11714
902-450-2222
513-793-3200
631-226-1000
902-450-0675
513-984-1335
631-226-4444
Jason Greene
LED Roadway
Lighting
Phone Number
919-313-5300
Fax Number
919-313-5558
Contact Person
David Yassell
Nick
Chris Gilly
David Yassell
Contact Person Phone Number
347-239-8002
718-784-9281
914-438-8773
347-239-8002
Manufacturer
Contact Information
36
FINAL REPORT
631-226-1000
ext#103
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
6.2 Summary of Manufacturer’ Data
6.2.1 Light Level Calculation Summary
#
1
2
Manufacturer
CREE
Elumen
2.58
2.60
4.84
3
4
5
LSI Industries
MagniFlood Inc.
2.46
2.58
2.49
4.99
4.0
4.47
3.30
1.70
0.85
0.9
1.28
1.30
1.52
3.1
2.73
2.02
1.92
0.18
0.15
0.29
0.18
0.34
LED Roadway
Lighting
Average
(Footcandles)
[PANYNJ Required = 2.5 fc]
Maximum
(Footcandles)
Calculation Results
Minimum
(Footcandles)
Avg / Min
(Uniformity)
[IESNA Recommended Max = 3]
Average Veiling Luminance
(cd/m²)
[IESNA Recommended Max = 0.3]
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
37
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
6.2.2 Luminaire Performance Summary
#
1
2
Manufacturer
CREE
Elumen
Wattage of Each Fixture
153
146
Total Luminaire Output (Lumens)
17,893
4
5
LSI Industries
MagniFlood Inc.
200
177
180
14248
15500
16,518
28,000
117
98
78
104
90
Optical Distribution
Type 3
Type 2 Short
Type 2
Type 3
Type 3
LLF (calculated)
0.91
0.9
0.87
0.8
0.9
Software Used
AGi32
Acuity Visual 12
AGi32
AGi32
AGi32
Total Luminaire Efficiency
(Lumens /Watt)
3
LED Roadway
Lighting
Performance Details
38
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
6.2.3 LED/Chip Performance Summary
#
1
2
Manufacturer
CREE
Elumen
LED Manufacturer
CREE
Seoul Semiconductor
LED Chip Model #
MD-A
Not Disclosed
LED Chip/Module
Lumen Efficacy of LED
Details
(Lumens per Watt)
TM-21 Life
(Hours)
Luminaire Life
(Hours)
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
>100,000
4
5
LSI Industries
MagniFlood Inc.
Nichia
Osram
Toyoda Gosei
MJT 4040
NS6L183A-H3
Osion Square
COB V6
130
143
131
150
157000
150,000
671000
>100,000
157,000
112,000
625,000
60,000 (@105˚C)
FINAL REPORT
3
LED Roadway
Lighting
39
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
6.2.4 Additional Information Summary
#
1
2
Manufacturer
CREE
Elumen
3
LED Roadway
Lighting
Yes. Currently have
Can Manufacturer Provide 6G
Rating?
Yes. Can do testing
seen 8G in basic
Yes. Can do testing
to achieve 6G for
testing but Can do
to achieve 6G for
Luminaire
testing to achieve 6G
Luminaire
for entire Luminaire
Can Manufacturer Provide Curved
Poles for Standard Pole?
4
5
LSI Industries
MagniFlood Inc.
Currently do not test
for 6G. Currently
only 3G Rated per
ANSI C136.31 Code.
Yes.
Has done testing for
up to 10G
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
B3-U1-G3
B3-U0-G3
B2-U3-G2
BG2-U0-G2
B5-U0-G5
Additional
Information
Can Manufacturer Provide
Custom Poles?
Can Luminaire be Removed from
Pole for Maintenance?
BUG Rating
40
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
a. Calculations Details
6.3 Evaluation of Shortlisted Manufacturers' Data
i. Provide full numeric summary of light level
Reliable infrastructure lighting manufacturers were contacted to determine
calculations showing illuminance (fc) levels as per
their capability of achieving the goals and the feasibility of the project as
design requirements listed in point 1 above
b. Performance Details
outlined in the executive summary in Part A of this report.
i. Connected load of luminaire
ii. Luminaire efficiency
The following information request was provided to the manufacturers listed
iii. Optical distribution
in Part C Section 8.1:
iv. LLF used for calculations (suggested LLF is 0.7)
v. Software used to generate calculations
The Port Authority of NY/NJ has decided the George Washington Bridge
c.
Roadway lighting shall be re-lit using LED luminaires. The George
LED Chip/Module Details
i. Manufacturer of LED chip/module
Washington Bridge is currently lit utilizing 400W Metal Halide lamps.
ii. Lumen efficacy
d. Projected lumen maintenance of LED chip over 5 years, 7
As a first step in this process of selecting an appropriate luminaire, the
years, and 10 years
following is a list of current conditions, objectives, and information
required from the short listed manufacturers:
1. Objectives: Please Run Calculations for 900-1000 Feet of
4. Vibration Dampening
Roadway (1 side) with 10 Luminaires. (Provide Full Numeric
a. What would be your company’s strategies for vibration
Summary)
mitigation of luminaires (6G of Vibration)
a. Design Requirements
b. Maintained Average Horizontal Illuminance Level – 2.5 fc
5. Pole Customization
@ L80
c.
a. Approximately 10% of the poles on the project will require
Uniformity Ratio – 3.0 (Eavg/Emin)
customization where bridge suspension cables interfere.
d. Veiling Luminance Ratio – 0.3 (Lvmax/Lavg)
b. Please confirm your company can provide a custom pole
that includes vibration mitigation where required.
2. Roadway Conditions
a. Pole Mounting Height = 30’ (bottom of luminaire to
The 5 manufacturers have provided a detailed response which is
roadway surface)
summarized in Part C Sections 8.2.1 to 8.2.4. Their additional submitted
b. Pole Spacing = 90’ (On Center)
c.
materials (light levels calculations and luminaire data) can be found in
Roadway Width = 42’
Part D (Appendix A to E) of this report.
d. Poles located on 1 side of roadway only
e.
Tail side of luminaire head to align with roadway edge
f.
Roadway Classification R3 – slightly specular asphalt
g.
Luminaire will run on 277V Operation
The following is a brief summary of the main points from results:
3. Calculation Deliverables
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
41
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
1. Average Illumination Level: 5 manufacturers can provide
5. Vibration Protection: Currently only Magniflood is able to provide a
illuminance that almost meets or exceeds the PANYNJ required level
luminaire which can handle a vibration level of 6G over the
i.e. 2.5 footcandles
warranted life of the unit. CREE, Elumen, LED Roadway Lighting
have indicated they can test their luminaires to achieve this rating
2. Uniformity Ratio (Eavg/Emin): 4 out of 5 manufacturers are able to
when selected for the project. LSI Industries has indicated they do not
provide light levels that are within the prescribed limit of uniformity
test to see whether it would meet 6G
by IESNA i.e. 3. The exception is Elumen which is just above the
uniformity ratio at 3.1.
Conclusion based on the summary of the results:
3. Efficacy: All manufacturers have provided high efficacy luminaire.
1. 4 out of the 5 shortlisted manufacturers are able to provide LED
CREE has the highest lumen efficacy of 117 (lumen/watt).
luminaires and poles that meet the project requirements.
4. Luminaire life: All manufacturers have provided L70 life beyond the
prescribed requirement of 50,000 hours.
42
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
SECTION 7: SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS FOR LED LUMINAIRES FOR ROADWAY
The following specification requirements must apply to luminaires that are
furnished by the Manufacturer:
1. All LED luminaires supplied must be warranted for 10 years.
The
Manufacturer must replace any LED luminaire that exhibits failure due to
workmanship or material defect, or does not meet the minimum light
output specified without any additional cost to PANYNJ.
2. The Manufacturer must supply only new Equipment, packaged in original,
unbroken containers as shipped from the manufacturer (except where
needed to provide specified quantities). All Equipment will be subject to the
warranty in the PO(s).
Refer to PANYNJ contract for minimum required
warranty after handover. Contractor to provide the manufacturer’s standard
warranty period but shall not be less than the duration stipulated in
contract. RETROFIT KITS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
3. All Equipment and all electrical devices and packaged equipment must
conform to IP, ANSI, Department of Energy (DOE) codes, IES LM-79-08 and
IEEE standards, where applicable, and must meet UL Laboratory standards,
where possible.
4. All LED's must be “InGaN” Gallium Nitride technology and rated for
50,000 hours @ 25 deg C and 350mA.
5. Luminaires must be RoHS compliant and lead-free, including power
supplies, drivers, diodes, housings, circuit boards, soldering, mounting
plates, channels, hardware, etc.
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
43
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
continuous
SECTION 8: DESIGN CRITERIA
must
Efficiency-
Total
Luminaire
Efficiency
must
to
discharge
any
condensate
A weep hole
or
similar
gas exposure.
be
have
to
accommodate
individual
solid
state
installation
and
G.LED Module & Relamping
1. LED module within the luminaire must all be replaceable for
addressable device inside for control.
must
provided
to
cracking, or disintegration caused by ultraviolet radiation or ozone
MINIMUM 70%
3. Luminaire
be
interior,
2. All gaskets used must be silicone and must be resistant to checking,
A. Design Requirements
may
luminaire
accumulation of moisture.
1. LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) LUMINAIRES:
2. Luminaire
environment for the
prevent the entry of dust, grit and water intrusion.
8.1 Project Design Criteria
1. Luminaire
sealed
be
designed
for
ease
of
future upgrades / replacement without damaging the luminaire.
H.Power Supply
replacement.
1. Operating life of power supplies must be a minimum of 50,000
4. Tool-less access for replacement of luminaire is required.
hours.
5. Luminaires along with their means of support must be capable of
2. The power supply must provide a power factor of 0.90 or greater.
being installed or maintained by no more than two people.
3. The power supply must have a total harmonic distortion remain
6. Exterior LED Luminaires housing must be rated for IP65 and above
below 20%.
& LED modules within the luminaire housing must be IP67 rated.
4. The compartment housing of the power supply must be waterproof
and IP-67 rated, and must provide appropriate heat sinking such
B. Vibration Dampening
that life of driver is not adversely impacted. All wiring connections
C. 1. The luminaire must be designed to be able to handle a vibration
between luminaires as well as power supplies must be watertight.
level of 6G over the warranted life of the unit.
D.
I. LED Luminaire Performance Requirements:
Optical System And Lenses
1. Manufacturer to provide light level calculations for conformance to
1. The optical system should provide adequate light distribution and
the following light level requirements:
minimize disabling glare.
a. Maintained Average Horizontal Illuminance Level – 2.5 fc @
E. Luminaire Body & Dimensions
1.
L80)
Exterior luminaires must be constructed in conformance to
b. Uniformity Ratio – 3.0 (Eavg/Emin)
industry standards for aluminum extrusions or stainless steel with
c. Veiling Luminance Ratio – 0.3 (Lvmax/Lavg)
all appurtenances protected against corrosion.
2. The following is the Roadway conditions to be used in light level
2. Exterior Luminaires must be completely sealed and gasketed and
calculations:
constructed with power supplies mounted external to the luminaire
a. Pole Mounting Height = 30’ (bottom of luminaire to roadway
in the existing node pockets for ease of maintenance.
surface)
b. Pole Spacing = 90’ (On Center)
F. Gasketting (If Gasketting is Utilized)
c. Roadway Width = 42’
1. The assembly must be contoured so as to provide a continuous
d. Poles located on 1 side of roadway only for calculation
molded field-replaceable compressible silicone gasket which must
e. Tail side of luminaire head to align with roadway edge
upon the application of appropriate door-latch pressure, provide a
44
f. Roadway Classification R3 – slightly specular asphalt
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
g. Luminaire will run on 277V Operation
2. As in the case of other new technologies, it is possible that
3. Manufacturer's to provide calculations for the luminaires total LLF
replacement products may not be available in the long term since
with results that must be broken down into the following Light Loss
technological advances may render older designs obsolete. Therefore,
Factors, and all percentages / assumptions are to be listed:
it is essential that the manufacturer guarantees availability of same
a. Driver Loss
or relatively similar products over at least a ten-year period.
b. Surface Dirt Depreciation
P. Glare Control:
c. Lamp Lumen Deprecation
pattern of light emitted through the 90° (horizontal) plane and 0°
d. Luminaire Dirt Depreciation
(vertical) plane. In general, luminaire must provide a reduction in
J. Life & Lumen Depreciation: Lumen depreciation data must be provided
luminous intensity in the 70° to 90° vertical angles to avoid glare.
by approved LED chip manufacturer till 50% lumen depreciation.
K. LED Chip Failure:
Polar plots given in photometric reports depict the
Q. LED & Luminaire Temperature:
provided by manufacturer.
The luminaires to be designed so that individual
temperature
a loss of the one damaged LED only and not the entire luminaire.
photodiode are controlled by use of an appropriately sized heat sink.
have a Color Rendering Index of 80+.
temperature of 4000°K + nominal.
the
It is very important that the ambient
LED's are wired so that a catastrophic failure of one LED will result in
L. Correlated Color Temperature & Color Rendering Index: All LED's Must
and
Information and Data must be
temperature
at
the
p-n
junction
of
the
2. POLES AND STANDARDS:
All LED's must have a color
A. General: Provide poles of the types and heights indicated.
Luminaires consisting of diodes
Provide
internal raceway for power supply, with luminaire support poles
with major varying degrees of color temperature must not be accepted.
base indicated. Provide poles that will carry the indicated supports,
M. Conformance to Standards
luminaires and appurtenances, at the required heights above grade,
1. The luminaire must be designed to meet all design criteria
without excessive deflection or whipping of the luminaire, when
2. The LEDs & Luminaire system must confirm with all standards and
subjected to PANYNJ specified winds and gust factors.
codes required as references listed below in Part C Section 7.2
B. Aluminum Poles: Poles must be constructed of one seamless round
N. Acceptable Diode Manufacturers: The following manufacturers of
diodes
shall
be
considered
acceptable
provided
that
the
extruded aluminum tube of alloy 6063-T6, welded to top and
LED
bottom of aluminum base casting of alloy 356.
luminaires are properly designed (i.e. correct drive currents and
1.
voltages are maintained, proper heat sinking is used, etc.)
The pole shaft must be a one-piece aluminum element.
The
lowest section of the shaft, which fits into the base, must be
a.
Lumiled
fabricated in such a manner that the shaft columns and base
b.
Cree
are interchangeable.
c.
Osram / Sylvania
must be perfectly straight and true.
d.
Nichia
have dimensions to permit attachment to the top mounted
e.
Seoul Semiconductor
luminaire.
2.
O. Color Consistency of LED's
The top of the shaft must
The base must have a two piece cast aluminum full cover of
319 alloy, secured by stainless steel screws. A flush-sided cast
1. All manufacturers must confirm that all supplied LEDs fall within
aluminum pole cap must be provided for side-arm mounted
a 2-step MacAdam Ellipse, as per LM-79 & LM-80 of IESNA.
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
The shaft, when fitted into the pedestal,
luminaires.
FINAL REPORT
45
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
3.
Provide adequately sized handholes (at least 15-square inch)
f.
at 18" up from base, with a gasketted cover and ground lug.
Two part aliphatic urethane with a 4 to 1 ratio and
absolute minimum of 70 percent solid content.
Poles with a 3C" O.D. must include a handhole reinforcement
casting welded in place. For each pole indicated, provide four
C. Vibration Dampening
galvanized anchor bolts, complete with eight nuts, eight flat
washers, and a presswood template.
1. The poles must be designed to be able to handle a vibration level
All bolts, nuts, washers,
of 6G over the warranted life of the unit.
and screws used in the assembly of the lampposts must be of
3. FINISHES
stainless steel, 300 series, or equivalent.
4.
Finish must include a super TGIC thermoset polyester powder
coat paint applied over a chromate conversion coating.
A. General:
The
(Hunter Green
or its
equivalent
as
resistance
to
ultra-violet
light,
road
salt
degrees
High impact resistance forward and reverse to withstand
Resist flame or high temperature to 205 degrees Celsius.
g.
Must be suitable for brush, roll or spray application to
given a five stage phosphate treatment or other acceptable base bonding
treatment before final painting and after fabrication.
E. Unpainted non-reflecting surfaces must be satin finished and coated
achieve high quality, general-purpose usage, exceptional
with
speadability and adhesion.
6.
lacquer
to
preserve
the
finish.
Where
an anodized coating of not less than 7 mg. per square inch, of a color
retention.
46
clear
F. Unpainted aluminum surfaces: Finish interior aluminum trims with
Pre-darkened pigments to insure long term floss and color
No more than 20% Oxal Hexel, 17%
baked-on
lacquer coating may be omitted.
the following chemical requirements:
b.
a
aluminum surfaces are treated with an anodic process, the clear
Chemical Composition of Paint - All paint must conform with
a.
photochemically
D. Undercoat: Except for stainless steel all ferrous metal surfaces must be
cracking.
f.
or
luminaire finishes must be semi-gloss polyester powder coat enamel.
Bend over 180 degree and 3.75 mm mandrel without
Suitable for applications in below freezing temperatures.
catalytically
must be as selected by PANYNJ. Unless otherwise indicated, all
Display a water transmission rate of less than .00000005
e.
minimum,
C. Selection: Unless otherwise indicated, all external luminaire finishes
PERMS.
d.
Fahrenheit
polymerized after application.
992kPa directly without cracking, chipping, or peeling.
c.
mounting
polyester or polyurethane base, light stabilized, baked on at 350
compounds, and industrial chemical fumes.
b.
luminaire
B. Painted surfaces must be synthetic enamel with acrylic, alkyd, epoxy,
following characteristics:
Exceptional
metal
the luminaire to provide the required light distribution.
Paint Characteristics - The protective coating must exhibit the
a.
resistant
action at contact points. Provide mounting that will correctly position
per Landscape
Architect/Engineer).
5.
corrosion
compatible with the poles and luminaires that will not cause galvanic
paint used must be anti-graffiti, corrosion resisting, semi-gloss
paint
Provide
and surface finish as selected by the Lighting Designer. Finish exterior
Butyl Acetate, 3%
Xylol.
aluminum and aluminum trims with an anodized coating of not less
c.
Maximum of 40% volatile by volume.
than 35 mg. per square inch of a color and surface finish as selected by
d.
Maximum of 425 degrees Celsius flashpoint.
the Lighting Designer.
e.
Formulated with air-out additives for flowability.
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
G. Metal finishes: Provide finishes of the color and type indicated and
responsible for insuring that all safety chains are securely
having the following properties:
1.
fastened to housing and shielding device.
Protection of metal from corrosion - 5-year warranty against
B. Lenses: Plastic
perforation of erosion of the finish from weathering.
2.
1. Unless otherwise indicated or otherwise authorized, all plastic
Color retention - 5-year warranty against fading, staining, or
shielding, lenses and diffusers must be white opal clear 100% UV
chalking from weathering including solar radiation.
3.
stabilized
Uniformity - Provide finish of uniform thickness and color,
virgin
polycarbonate (lexan).
free from streaks, stains or orange peel texture.
or
in
special
cases
high
impact
Use of polycarbonate lenses must be
restricted to those areas outlined in the National Electric Code
(latest Bulletin).
Use of polystyrene components is absolutely
prohibited.
4. REFLECTORS
2. Plastic for lenses and diffusers must be formed of colorless 100%
A. Reflectors, cones or baffles must be absolutely free of spinning lines,
virgin acrylic as manufactured by Rohm & Haas, DuPont, G.E. or
stains, ripples or any marks or indentations caused by riveting to other
assembly techniques.
acrylic
equally acceptable manufacturers.
No rivets, springs or other hardware must be
material must meet American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM)
visible after installation.
standards, as tested by an independent test laboratory.
Acrylic
plastic lenses and diffusers must be properly cast, molded or
B. Where modification of standard luminaires is specified, luminaires
extruded as specified and must remain free of any dimensional
must be modified as required with lamp sockets positioned to provide
instability,
desired photometric performance.
discoloration,
embrittlement
or
loss
of
light
transmittance for at least 15 years.
C. All luminaires with removable reflectors, louvers or baffles must be
supplied with safety chains.
The quality of the raw
C. Lenses: Glass
Contractor must be responsible for
1. Unless otherwise indicated or authorized all glass shielding,
insuring that all safety chains are securely fastened to reflector and
diffusers or lenses must be clear tempered borosilicate glass. Soda
housing.
lime glass material shall not be acceptable.
Submit samples of
glass elements upon request.
2. For exterior luminaires use tempered borosilicate glass, Corning
5. LENSES, LOUVERS AND DIFFUSERS
No. 7740 or equal.
A. Lenses / Louvers: General:
elements and aimed above the horizontal with a radiant energy
1. All lenses, diffusers, and shielding media must be properly and
securely mounted within luminaire assemblies.
lenses and louvers must not be acceptable.
of 4.16 watts per square inch or greater, use Corning Vycor glass
Lay in type
or equal.
All shielding
3. Where optical lenses are used, they must be free from spherical or
materials must be tightly fitted with no loose panels or parts and
chromatic
must show no visible light leaks of unintentional or unscheduled
aberrations
and
other imperfections, which
may
hinder the functional performance of the lenses.
light.
4. Mechanical: All lenses, louvers or other light diffusing elements
2. All luminaires with removable cones, louvers or other shielding
must be removable but positively held so that hinging or other
devices must be supplied with safety chains. Contractor must be
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
For luminaires directly exposed to the
normal motion will not cause them to drop out.
FINAL REPORT
47
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
connected to a metal other than copper, provide specially treated or
6. LUMINAIRE MOUNTING
A. General:
Provide
corrosion
resistant
metal
luminaire
lined connectors suitable for this purpose.
mounting
compatible with the poles and luminaires that will not cause galvanic
F. Installation of luminaire locations must be in strict accordance with
action at contact points. Provide mounting that will correctly position
the intent of the contract drawings and approved shop, specifications
the luminaire to provide the required light distribution.
and drawings.
G. Luminaire locations: Do not scale electrical drawings for exact location
B. Mast Arms: Provide steel mast arm, fabricated from 2-inch pipe with
span
and
rise
as
indicated,
and
continuously
welded
to
of the luminaires.
pole
locations of luminaires, unless otherwise noted on architectural plans.
attachment plate. Finish to match pole or luminaire.
C. Brackets:
Final luminaire location to be flagged by Lighting Designer.
Provide [corrosion resistant steel] brackets, cantilevered and
H. Unless otherwise shown on the Contract Drawings, luminaires and/or
without underbrace of the sizes, styles and finishes indicated with
luminaire outlet boxes must be provided with hangers to adequately
straight tubular and section to accommodate the luminaire.
support the complete weight of the luminaire.
D. Pole-Top Tenon: Provide [corrosion resistant steel] tenon securely
Drawings, or herein specified, must be submitted to the Lighting
support the luminaire to be mounted thereon.
Designer for approval.
I. The Contractor must provide all hangers, rods, mounting brackets,
7. INSTALLATION
supports, frames, earthquake clips and other equipment normally
required for the proper, safe and distortion-free installation.
A. The Contractor must furnish and install luminaires as noted on the
Luminaires must be completely wired and lamps installed
J. Instructions:
and must be in perfect operating condition at the time of completion.
B. Setting and Securing: The Contractor must set luminaires plumb,
square,
and
level
with
roadway,
in
alignment
with
Obtain approval of the exact mounting for luminaires on
in
strict
showing
packaged
how
conformance
to
with
with
complete
install.
Install
manufacturer's
L. The Contractor must replace blemished, damaged, or unsatisfactory
luminaires as directed by the Owners' representative.
D. Coordination: The installing Contractor must communicate with other
8. ADJUST AND CLEAN
trades as appropriate to properly interface, schedule and coordinate
installation of luminaires with other work.
48
luminaires
instructions
be
voltage conditions to which they are subjected.
Mounting heights specified or indicated are to bottom of
A. Clean:
Clean luminaires of dirt and debris upon completion of
installation.
The Contractor must ground noncurrent carrying parts of
electrical equipment.
and
must
nut" type mechanical connectors, suitable for the temperature and
the job before installation is commenced.
E. Grounding:
illustration
luminaire
K. Splices in internal wiring must be made with approved insulated "wire
and approved shop drawings. Conform to the requirements of NFPA 70.
luminaire.
Each
recommendations and instructions.
adjacent
luminaires, and secure in accordance with manufacturers' directions
C. Mounting:
The design of hangers
and the method of fastening other than what is shown on the Contract
fastened to the top of the pole shaft fabricated to accept and rigidly
drawings.
In general, the lighting plans indicate the proper
Where the copper grounding conductor is
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
B. Protection:
Protect
installed
luminaires
from
damage
during
C. Support: Fasten luminaires securely to indicated structural supports;
remainder of construction period.
and check to ensure that the required degree of freedom is provided to
allow alignment or aiming of the luminaires for indicated light
distribution.
D. Condition: Clean luminaires of dirt and debris upon completion of
installation. Do not damage finishes or lens or refractor surfaces.
9. FIELD QUALITY CONTROL
E. Grounding: Provide equipment grounding connections using branch
A. Tests: Upon completion of installation of luminaires, and after building
circuit equipment and connected.
circuits have been energized, apply electrical energy to demonstrate
capability and compliance with requirements.
Where possible, correct
12. SHADES AND GLASS
malfunctioning units at site, then retest to demonstrate compliance;
A. Clean existing lens in warm water and mild soap solution and degrease
otherwise, remove and replace with new units, and proceed with
with Windex.
retesting.
B. Remove varnish coatings from glass by mechanical means wherever
possible.
10. INSTALLATION - LED'S AND OTHER SPECIAL LUMINAIRES
A. Install
luminaires
after
other
Work
in
the
respective
area
Use solvents if mechanical methods begin to damage glass.
Clean residue with appropriate solvents.
is
substantially complete. Handle luminaires with soft "white gloves"
8.2 Standards & Practices
B. Installation of luminaires must be performed by the Contractor under
A.
the direct supervision of luminaire Manufacturer.
C. Install luminaires accurately in required locations, plumb and level,
American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
ANSI C 2
National Electrical Safety Code
ANSI C78.377-2008
Specifications for the Chromaticity of Solid
and connect to comply with relevant sections.
State Lighting products
ANSI C82.77-2002
D. Polish luminaires with a soft rag to remove dust and fingerprints, and
Harmonic Emission Limits – Related Power
Quality Requirements for Lighting
cover with cotton cloth bags or sheets tied around luminaires.
C136.37-2011
Solid State Light Sources Used in Roadway
and Area Lighting
11. LUMINAIRE INSTALLATION
A. Install
luminaires
after
B.
other
work
in
the
respective
area
B 429
is
Standard Specification for extruded steel structural pipe
and tube.
substantially complete. Handle luminaires with soft "white gloves"
C.
B. General: Install luminaires at locations and heights as indicated, in
CIE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON ILLUMINATION
CIE 13.3-1995
accordance with the manufacturer's written instructions, applicable
Method
of
Measuring
and
Specifying
Color
Rendering Properties of Light Sources.
requirements of NFPA 70, ANSI C2 and with recognized industry
practices to ensure that lighting installation fulfills requirements.
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
FINAL REPORT
CIE 15:2004
Colorimetry, Third
CIE 127:2007
Measurements of LEDs
49
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
CIE 177-2007
Color
Rendering
of
White
LED
Light
LM-82-12:
Sources
lamps for electrical and photometric properties as a
CIE S 009/E:2002
Photobiological Safety of Lamps and Lamp
function of temperature:
Systems
- Similar to LM-79, except includes light engines and
excludes luminaires, and requires testing at more than a
D. Energy Policy Act of 2005
E.
single standardized temperature.
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA)
G-2-10:
Characterization of led light engines and led
Guideline for the application of general illumination
(“white”) Light-Emitting Diode (led) technologies:
F.
Ingress Protection (IP) Code
G.
National Equipment Manufacturers Association (NEMA)
- Provides lighting professionals with a general
NEMA WD6
understanding of LED lamps and luminaires and their
NEMA LE4
use for interior and exterior applications.
NEMA FA 1
NEMA OD 3
TM-16-05:
LED sources and systems:
Wiring devices - Dimensional requirements
Recessed luminaires: ceiling compatibility
Outdoor floodlighting equipment
Physical
and
electrical
interchangeability
of
photo control devices and mating receptacles
- General description of LED devices and systems
NEMA SSL-1-2010
Electronic Drivers for LED Devices, Arrays,
or Systems
TM-21-11:
Projecting long term lumen maintenance of LED
NEMA SSL-3-2010
light sources:
General Illumination
- Establishes a method for projecting lumen
NEMA SH 5
maintenance from LM-80 data
LM- 79-08:
High-Power
White
LED
Binning
for
Tubular steel poles
H. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
Approved Method: Electrical and Photometric
Testing of Solid-State Lighting Devices:
- Describes the procedures for performing standardized
measurements of the power, light output, and color
characteristics of SSL products.
NFPA 70-2011
National Electric Code
NFPA 101
Life Safety Code
I.
Occupation Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
J.
The Energy Policy Act of 1992: Lamp Efficiency Labeling and
Standards
LM- 80-08:
Approved method for measuring lumen
K.
maintenance of LED light sources:
- Specifies procedures for determining lumen
maintenance of LEDs and LED modules [not luminaires]
related to effective useful life of the product
Underwriters Laboratories (UL)
UL 57
Electric Luminaires
UL 924
Emergency Lighting and Power Equipment
UL 1598
Luminaires
UL 8750
Standard
for
Light
Emitting
Diode
(LED)
Equipment for Use in Lighting Products
UL 8754
Holders, Bases, and Connectors for Solid-State
(LED) Light Engines and Arrays
50
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
51
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
8.3 BUG Rating System
This section outlines the IESNA Backlight, Uplight, and Glare (BUG)
Rating System as outlined in IESNA TM-15
52
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
53
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
54
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
SECTION 9: FIELD TEST CRITERIA
9.1 Recommendations for Testing of Selected Manufacturer
Measurement methods and testing protocols for evaluating the performance
of LED systems is essential.
The selected manufacturer must be required to provide a test installation of
6 foisted for a period of 6 months. The purpose of this test is to ensure that
the selected luminaire meets the design requirements outlined in Part C
Section 7.1, and is performing at same levels as the calculated performance
provided by that manufacturer outlined in Part C Section 8.2 of this report.
Testing of the light levels must be done on the first day the installation has
been installed and turned on, and on the last day of the testing period.
Please refer to Part C Sections 6.2 for details of the testing layout and the
light level testing grid required.
At the end of the testing period the LED system must be reviewed and
evaluated based on the pass/fail evaluation criteria the test installation
needs to meet. Please refer to Part C Section 9.3 for the complete pass/fail
evaluation criteria.
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
55
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
9.2 Calculation Grid for Testing Light Levels
Overall Layout for 6 Month Test Installation of Luminaires from Selected Manufacturer
56
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
57
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
Details of Calculation Grid for Testing of Light Levels During 6 Month Test Installation of Luminaire from Selected Manufacturer
58
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
9.3 Pass/Fail Evaluation Criteria
All answers to questions in evaluation criteria must be answered as a “Y”
for the selected manufacturer to be confirmed as having passed the field test.
If any of the answers in the evaluation criteria receive a “N” then the
selected manufacturer would have failed the criteria
PANYNJ is to determine action required if selected manufacturer does not
pass test installation.
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
59
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR 6 MONTH FIELD TEST INSTALLATION OF 6 POLES FROM SELECTED MANUFACTURER
MEASUREMENT 1: UNDERTAKEN ON DAY 1
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
MEASUREMENT 2: UNDERTAKEN ON DAY 180
Report Section
Evaluation
Fixture Requirement Evaluation Criteria
Point
Date Tested
Reviewer
Criteria Met
(Y/N)
DID THE INSTALLATION PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AVERAGE ILLUMINANCE LEVELS
(2.5fc)?
1.1
(Average Illuminance is calculated by taking light level reading at each grid point
outlined in Part C Section 9.2. Adding these points together and dividing by 224 [total
number of calculation points])
DID THE INSTALLATION MEET OR EXCEED THE IESNA RECOMMENDED UNIFORMITY
PART C
SECTION 7.1-1I:
1.2
RATIO (AVG/MIN) OF 3?
(Uniformity Ratio is calculated by taking average light level calculated (evaluation point
1.1 above) divided by the minimum light level reading taken at 1 specific grid point)
LIGHT LEVEL
DID THE INSTALLATION MEET OR EXCEED THE IESNA RECOMMENDED AVERAGE
PERFORMANCE
VEILING LUMINANCE (cd/m²) OF 0.3?
(Veiling Luminance is calculated computed along a single row of calculation points
1.3
directly in front of the observer position. By default, the distance of the observer to the first
lateral row of computation points in the grid is 2.75 x (mounting ht - 1.5) meters and 1/4
road width from the curb line. 0.5 - 1.5 degrees below horizontal, depending on the
distance to the points.)
1.4
PART C
SECTION 7.1:
BETWEEN MEASUREMENT 1 (ON DAY 1) AND MEASUREMENT 2 (ON DAY 180)?
2.1
DID ANY OF THE LUMINAIRES FAIL AS A COMPLETE UNIT DURING TESTING?
2.2
DID ANY OF THE LED MODULES WITHIN THE LUMINAIRES FAIL DURING TESTING?
2.3
LED LUMINAIRE
PERFORMANCE
IS THERE A REDUCTION IN AVERAGE ILLUMINANCE LEVELS ON THE ROADWAY
2.4
IS THERE ANY DAMAGE TO THE LUMINAIRE DUE TO THE 6G VIBRATION IMPACT
DURING TESTING?
IS THERE ANY DAMAGE TO THE LUMINAIRE DUE TO WEATHER CONDITIONS DURING
TESTING?
DID THE LUMINAIRE CREATE ANY UNEXPECTED GLARE FOR DRIVERS / PEDESTRIANS
2.5
DURING TESTING?
(This is a subjective response based on the observers visual acuity)
2.6
2.7
IS THE LUMINAIRE PROVIDED WITH 4000ºK + CCT LED CHIP?
IS THE LUMINAIRE ABLE TO WORK EFFICIENTLY IN A HUMID ENVIRONMENT (TO
HANDLE 95% RELATIVE HUMIDITY)? (Signs of condensation within the sealed lens?)
DID THE LUMINAIRE ABLE TO HANDLE TEMPERATURE CHANGE FROM -40ºC TO
2.8
+55ºC?
(Signs of damage or expansion and contraction due to varying changes in the
temperature?)
PART C
60
SECTION 7.1-2C:
POLE
PERFORMANCE
3.1
3.2
IS THERE ANY DAMAGE TO THE POLE DUE TO THE 6G VIBRATION IMPACT DURING
TESTING?
FINAL REPORT
IS THERE ANY DAMAGE TO THE POLE DUE TO WEATHER CONDITIONS DURING
TESTING?
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
PART D
APPENDIX A: SHORTLISTED MANUFACTURER 1 - CREE
A.1 Submitted Light Level Calculation
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
61
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
A.2 Submitted Luminaire Data
62
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
63
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
64
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
65
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
APPENDIX B: SHORTLISTED MANUFACTURER 2 - ELUMEN
B.1 Submitted Light Level Calculation
66
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
67
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
B.2 Submitted Luminaire Data
68
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
69
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
70
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
71
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
APPENDIX C: SHORTLISTED MANUFACTURER 3 - LED ROADWAY LIGHTING
C.1 Submitted Light Level Calculation
i. Photometry Calculation: Day 1
72
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
ii. Photometry Calculation: After 10 Years
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
73
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
C.2 Submitted Luminaire Data
74
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
75
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
76
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
APPENDIX D: SHORTLISTED MANUFACTURER 4 - LSI
D.1 Submitted Light Level Calculation
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
77
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
D.2 Submitted Luminaire Data
78
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
79
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
APPENDIX E: SHORTLISTED MANUFACTURER 5 - MAGNIFLOOD
E.1 Submitted Light Level Calculation
80
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
E.2 Submitted Luminaire Data
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS
FINAL REPORT
81
GWB ROADWAY UPPER LEVEL LED LIGHTING UPGRADE
82
FINAL REPORT
AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS