Supporting Table 1; Molecular size and characteristics of uridine diphosphate glucose 4-epimerse purified from various sources Resource References Molecular size of Cofactor subunit* (kDa#) required Characteristics Escherichia coli 1 79 none NAD+ contained Kluyveromyces 2 125 none NAD+ contained 3 183 none NAD+ contained Wheat germ 4 60 NAD+ -- Bovine 5 60 NAD+ -- Porcine 6 88 NAD+ -- fragilis Saccharomyces cerevisiae * All the enzymes are composed of two identical subunits. # kilodaltons. 1. Wilson DB & Hogness DS (1964) The enzymes of the galactose operon in Escherichia coli. I. Purification and characterization of uridine diphohosphogalactose 4-epimerase. J. Biol. Chem. 239: 2469-2481. 2. Darrow RA & Rodstrom R (1968) Purification and characterization of uridine diphosphate galactose 4-epimerase from yeast. Biochemistry 7: 1645-1654. 3. Fukasawa T, Obonai K, Segawa T & Nogi Y (1980) The enzymes of the galactose cluster in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. II. Purification and characterization of uridine diphosphoglucose 4-epimerase. J Biol Chem. 255: 2705-2707. 4. Fan DF & Feingold DS (1969) Nucleoside diphosphate-sugar 4-epimerases I. Uridine diphosphate 4-epimerase from wheat germ. Plant Physiol. 44: 599-604. 5. Tsai CM, Holmberg N & Ebner KE (1970) Purification, stabilization, and properties of bovine mammary UDP-galactose 4-epimerase. Arch. Biochem. Piophys. 136: 233-244. 6. Piller F, Hanlon MH & Hill RL (1983) Co-purification and characterization of UDP-glucose 4-epimerase and UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 4-epimerase from porcine submaxillary glands. J. Biol. Chem. 258: 10774-10778. Supporting Figure 1. Construction of Gal4p-dependent expression plasmid for Gal10p in Kluyveromyces lactis. Kl-ars stands for automatically replicating sequence of K. lactis and is derived from plasmid KARS101 (Irene et al., 2004). TRP1 is derived from an S. cerevisiae plasmid pJJ246 (Jones & Prakash, 1990). The promoter region including UASG and GAL1p (upstream activating sequence and the transcription initiation site, respectively) is derived from p4XX (Mumberg et al., 1994). ADH1t is derived from pVT102U (Vernet et al., 1987), which encompasses the transcription termination site. Shaded region at the N-terminus of GAL10 represents histidine-tag containing the target peptide of protease Factor Xa (in red), which comes from the cloning/expression region of pET16b (Novagen Co.). The amino acid sequence is shown in the uppermost area. Supporting Figure 2. Restriction map of Kluyveromyces lactis GAL10 and its deletions. The restriction sites of GAL10 are deduced from the published sequence in the database (http://cbi.labri.fr/Genolevures/). The introduction of deletion covering both epimerase and mutarotase domains were carried out by three steps: 1) The GAL10 gene, PCR-cloned from K. lactis KA5-6C (MATa ade his leu) DNA, was inserted to pBluescript SK(+) between XhoI and HindIII (pBlue-KlGAL10). 2) The hisG-URA3-hisG region excised from pNK51 (Alani et al., 1987) with BglII and BamHI was inserted in pBluescript SK(+) at the BamHI site (pBluePO-URA3). 3) The BglII-SalI region of pBlue-KlGAL10 was replaced with the XhoI and BamHI fragment from pBluePO-URA3. 4) The XhoI-PvuII fragment of the resultant plasmid, pBlueKl-gal10::PO-URA3, was used for transformation of JA6 (MATa, ade1-600 trp1-11 ura3-12) to select Ura+ colonies. Successful disruption of GAL10 was confirmed by galactose-negative phenotype of transformants, from which 5-fluoroorotic acid-resistant clones were selected to create JA6gal10. Introduction of deletion to the mutarotase domain was carried out by removing the PstI-HpaI fragment from GAL10; precisely, the cloned GAL10 was cleaved first with PstI, end-blunted with T4 DNA polymerase, and with HpaI. The resultant ends in GAL10 were ligated to yield pK411. Supporting Figure 3. Linearity of polarometric assay of mutarotase a) Linearity vs. time 0.300 log(0-e)/(t-e) 0.250 No enzyme gal80Dgal10D 100 mcL gal80D 25 mcL gal80D 50 mcL gal80D100 mcL 0.200 0.150 0.100 0.050 0.000 0 2 4 6 8 10 Time in minute b) Linearity vs. amount of enzyme used 0.040 0.035 Rate constant 0.030 0.025 0.020 0.015 0.010 0.005 0.000 0 20 40 60 80 100 Amount of enzyme in microliter a) The enzyme sample used was the same crude extracts described in Table 1 in the text, which was prepared from Kluyveromyces lactis strain JA6gal80gal80D) and JA6gal80gal10 (gal80Dgal10D) grown on glucose. b) The rate constant was calculated from the slope of log (0-e)/(t-e) for the crude extract of JA6gal80 in a), where 0, e and t are rotation at 0-time, equilibrium and time t, respectively. mcL stands for microliter. 1 y = 0,2326x + 0,1908 2 R = 0,9841 1/V (min mg dry weight nmol-1) 0,8 0,6 HGT1 GAL2 0,4 0,2 y = 0,2331x + 0,1622 2 R = 0,982 0 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -0,2 1/S (mM [1-14C]D-galactose-1) Supporting Figure 4. Lineweaver-Burk plot showing galactose uptake in the strain 2359lac12hgt1 (Baruffini et al., 2006) transformed with either KCp491-HGT1 (black line and squares) or KCp491-GAL2 (grey line and squares). Galactose uptake was measured as previously reported (Baruffini et al., 2006), except that uptake activity was measured after 10 s of incubation with [1-14C]-D-galactose at final concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 10 mM. For each concentration, the value comes from the subtraction of the uptake activity of the involved strain with the background uptake activity of strain 2359lac12hgt1 transformed with KCp491. Values are means of three independent uptake experiments. Supporting Figure 5. GAL10-independent mutarotase activity in concentrated crude extracts and ammonium sulfate precipitates from JAgal10gal80 Absorbance at 340nm 0.5 0.4 0.3 Crude extract 55% ppt 0.2 80% ppt 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 Time in minute The assay was carried out according to Bouffard et al. (1994). Reaction was started by the addition of -glucose solution, which is prepared immediately before each assay. The absorbance of the no enzyme control was subtracted automatically by setting a reference cuvette without sample in a dual beam spectrophotometer (Hitchi). The protein concentration of crude extracts, ammonium sulfate precipitates at 0% to 55% (55%ppt), and 55% to 80% (80% ppt) was 7.1 mg/ml, 4.7 mg/ml, and 2.5 mg/ml, respectively. The amount of enzyme used is 10 l each of crude extract, 10-times diluted 55% ppt, and 10-times diluted 80% ppt. References for Supporting Information Baruffini E, Goffrini P, Donnini C & Lodi T (2006) Galactose transport in Kluyveromyces lactis: major role of the glucose permease Hgt1. FEMS Yeast Res. 6: 1235-1242. Bouffard GG, Rudd, KE & Adhya, SL (1994) Dependence of lactose metabolism upon mutarotase encoded in the gal operon in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 244: 269-278. Irene C, Maciariello C, Cioci F, Camilloni G, Newlon CS & Fabiani L (2004) Identification of the sequences required for chromosomal replicator function in Kluyveromyces lactis. Molec Microbiolog 51: 1413–1423. Jones JS & Prakash L (1990) Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae selectable markers in pUC18 polylinkers. Yeast 6: 363-366. Mumberg D, Mueller R, & Fink M (1994) Regulatable promoters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: comparison of transcriptional activity and their use for heterologous expression. Nucleic Acids Research: 22, 5767-5768. Vernet T, Dignard D & Thomas DY (1987) A family of yeast expression vectors containing the phage f1 intergenic region. Gene 52: 225-233.