AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE FOR CRIMINAL TRESSPASS

advertisement
----------- The Affidavit ----------STATE OF FLORIDA
)
)
ss COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
)
AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE FOR CRIMINAL TRESSPASS AND GRAND THEFT
COMES NOW, _____________ being duly sworn upon his oath deposes and
sats as follows:
Affiant files this affidavit because he has probable cause to believe
that a crime has been committed against the people of the state of
Florida and particularly against ____________ by the following persons
individually and acting in concert.
a). As to _____________, On or about ________ 1995, at approximately
8:00 A.M., an agent of the Internal Revenue Service known as Revenue
Officer ___________ entered upon the property of affiant without
permission of affiant, against his will, and over his objections,
without a court order or other authority whatsoever, thereby comitting
the crime of tresspass.
Once she unlawfully gained access to the property, __________ proceeded
to commit the felony of Grand Theft and Conversion by removing from the
premises the following described property: a __________ automobile, VIN
No. ___________.
b). As to __________, Deputy Sheriff ___________ and Sgt. __________ on
or about _______ 1995, at 8:00 A.M. at the direction of Internal
Revenue Service Revenue Officer ____________ , together and
individually, and at her request but without any court order and
without permission of the affiant entered upon the property of affiant,
against his will and over his objections, thereby comitting the crime
of tresspass.
Once Deputy Sheriff _________ and Sgt. __________ gained access to the
property, they individually and in concert with Revenue Officer
____________ proceeded to commit the felony of Grand Theft and
Conversion by removing from the premises the automobile of affiant with
particularity described as one __________ automobile, VIN No.
_________________.
c). On _________ 1995, at about 8:00 A.M., an agent and employee of
________ Towing, Inc. (_______ Last name unknown) entered upon the
property and individually, without affiant's permission, against his
will, and over his objections, without a court order or other authority
whatsoever, thereby committing the crime of tresspass.
Once he unlawfully gained access to the property, he proceeded to
commit the felony of Grand Theft and Conversion by removing from the
premises the following described property: a __________ automobile, VIN
No. _________________.
d). On _______ 1995, at approximately 1:00 P.M. _________ Supervisor of
_________ , refused to release my property and admitted that she
authorized __________ 's actions when ______ entered upon the property
of affiant without permission of affiant, against his will, and over
his objections, without a court order or other authority whatsoever,
thereby comitting the crime of tresspass and ______ was in agreement
with them and a co-conspirator in the action. Further, when asked for
her delegation of authority, she failed to properly display same.
Now, therefore, the Sheriffs of the State of Florida are directed to
take the above named persons into custody forthwith.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT
__________________
(__________)
Before me, the undersigned authority, did personally appear
____________, personally known to be the person described above who
acknowledged that he did in fact prepare the foregoing document under
his own free will this _______________ 1995.
__________________________________
Notary Public, State of Florida at Large
My Commission Expires: _____________
----------- End of Affidavit ----------Return of the Vehicle
It took the plaintiff seven days to put together a 10-page Criminal Complaint as well as the above
Affidavit, and to deliver the Affidavit to the various parties concerned, including the State Attorney,
the Internal Security Division of the IRS, and the Captain of the Sheriff's Department. The car was
returned in less than three days after the delivery of the Affidavit. (This would probably have
happened sooner if the Affidavit had been delivered to the Criminal Investigation Division of the
IRS, instead of the Internal Security Division.)
The plaintiff reports that the sheriffs routinely operated on the basis that they believed the IRS
agents had obtained the necessary court orders before seizing or confiscating property. Because
the plaintiff regards the sheriffs and towing company people as relatively innocent parties to the
crimes, he decided to not proceed against them.
However, the plaintiff is awaiting an "Administrative Settlement" from the IRS. In the absence of a
satisfactory settlement, he intends to insist that the IRS agents be arrested and prosecuted for
their crimes. (In this case, if the sheriffs were to fail to arrest the IRS agents, a Criminal Complaint
could be filed against them for failing to perform their duties.)
Other Possible Charges
Prior to the automobile theft, the plaintiff received some "threatening communications" from the
IRS. Not being a "taxpayer subject to IRS jurisdiction," may constitute attempted extortion by the
IRS which could be actionable.
The plaintiff could also file suit under Title 18 for "Deprivation of Rights" or under Title 42 for
"Violation of Civil Rights."
Very interestingly, an IRS attorney called the towing company owner and asked him if the car had
been taken from the driveway or street, or from the car port. The answer was, "From the car port."
Then the attorney asked if the car port was attached to the plaintiff's house or under a common
roof. The answer was, "Yes."
"Oh no!" said the attorney, apparently alarmed. The concern of the IRS attorney was probably
because the action of the IRS agents could also be construed as 'breaking-and-entering'."
The significance of this is that the Affidavit could have been broadened to include the fact that the
thieves and their accomplices committed or were parties to the felony of 'breaking-and-entering.'
In any case, the plaintiff has the option to add 'breaking-and-entering' to the charges against the
IRS terrocrats.
A further possibility is to ask IRS terrocrats whether they are representatives or employees of the
U.S. Federal Govenment. If they say "yes," they could possibly be criminally charged for
fraudulently impersonating government officials - see next article.
Steps to Consider
1. IRS terrocrat(s) and accomplices arrive at your home to plunder your property. Ask them if they
have a court order and demand to see it. Then ask them for their names and ID #s. If they don't
have a court order, demand that they leave your property: "Leave my property right now; you're
trespassing." Tell them that you object to their violation of your rights and theft of your property.
2. Draw up a Criminal Complaint, with legal or paralegal assistance, if necessary, and get it
notarized.
3. Draw up an Affidavit and get it notarized. Also consider filing it with the County Recorder.
4. File criminal charges with the police against the thieves and their accomplices.
5. Decide whether you want to let the criminals off easy or go after them seriously. If you decide
to go easy on them, make deals such as, "If you provide such and such a written undertaking, I'll
drop the charges."
6. If you decide to go after them seriously, draw up a 'Notice and Demand' in which you set out
your claims for damages and restitution against each offender, get it notarized, and file it with the
County Recorder. (Give them 30 days to pay.)
7. Deliver copies of the Affidavit and Notice of Demand to all the offenders.
8. If they haven't paid after 30 days, file Commercial Liens against all the offenders.
9. Use the Commercial Liens to pay off mortgages, or sell them to a "Commercial Lien
Discounter."
As an alternative to Step 6, you may also consider filing a Title 18 (deprivation of rights) suit, or a
Title 42 (civil rights violation) suit.
Conclusion In America, right now, there are almost certainly more than 10,000 people - possibly
more than 100,000 - who adopt the attitude of the above plaintiff and who take the kind of actions
the plaintiff did, when being criminally victimized by terrocrats. This number is probably growing
rapidly.
At the same time, the legal means to defend yourself, your earnings, your property and assets is
improving all the time and becoming more accessible via Internet, computer bulletin boards, and
from patriot organizations that specialize in this area.
It's for such reasons that the terrocrat tyranny is gradually losing its power. However, some
creatures are most dangerous when experiencing their last death throes - so, beware!
Feedback: What did you think of this article? We'd like to hear your thoughts. (Please mention
the name of the article to which you are responding.)
Download