California Department of Education
District Name: Beardsley School District
CD Code: 15-63339
LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY PLAN ADDENDUM TEMPLATE
The Elementary Secondary Education Act, codified as No Child Left Behind (NCLB, Section 1116(c)(7)(A) requires that
local educational agencies (LEAs) identified for Program Improvement (PI) shall, not later than three months after being
identified, develop or revise an LEA Plan, in consultation with parents, school staff, and others. Rather than completely
rewriting the existing LEA Plan, we recommend using this Plan Addendum template to address the items below. Type your
responses in the expandable text boxes.
Please submit your completed Addendum by e-mail to LEAP@cde.ca.gov and indicate in the subject line of the e-mail: 1) the name
of your LEA; 2) the Program Improvement Year; and 3) the name of the document attached (i.e., ZZZ Unified School District; PI
Year 1; LEA Plan Addendum). If your LEA is also identified for Title III Year 2, please also note this in the subject line.
The Beardsley School District was identified for district Program Improvement Year 1 in December of 2010. The District moved into
Year 2 PI in September of 2011. The District froze in PI Year 2 for 2012/13 due to Safe Harbor. The District moved into Year 3 PI in
September of 2013. This addendum to the Local Educational Plan (LEAP) has been developed and written in response to being
identified. The district has four schools: (Beardsley Junior High, San Lauren Elementary, North Beardsley School and Beardsley
Elementary). Two of our schools have been identified for program improvement Year 4: Beardsley Elementary, Year 5 North
Beardsley). The district was originally identified for program improvement year 2 due to missing Language Arts/mathematics AYP
Targets. The district safe harbored in Year 2 for 2012/13.


Language Arts
Mathematics
When developing this Addendum, input from a range of stakeholders was collected. The District Advisory Committee (DAC),
composed of parents, teachers, administrators, Students, Community Members and others were consulted.
The focus of this addendum is to improve the achievement of all of Beardsley Students, but particularly of the aforementioned
subgroups above that have not made adequate growth as defined by NCLB. It is believed that the goals and objectives contained in
this document may help Beardsley meet the goals delineated by NCLB. The district will establish the required steps to support these
goals as well as implement a monitoring system to evaluate the level of implementation at each of our four schools. A high priority
will be give to successful implementation of the newly formed common core standards with a rigor, as well as developing a priority
standards based benchmarking system.
Last Updates: 1/26/11, 4/1/11, 5/5/11 Updated based on recommendations on feedback letter dated March 22, 2011. Updated in November of 2011 and resubmitted to
CAC, Board of Trustees in 2011/12. Plan updated in December of 2012, to Board of Trustees on December 11, 2012. Plan updated in December of 2013, to Board of
Trustees on December 10, 2013.
1. Address the fundamental teaching and learning needs in the schools of the LEA and the specific academic
problems of low-achieving students, including a determination of why the prior LEA Plan failed to bring
about increased student achievement.
Please describe how you will address student learning
needs, based on an analysis of data for why the prior LEA
Plan was not successful. (First determine whether the LEA Plan
Persons
Involved/Timeline
Related
Expenditures
Estimated
Cost
Funding
Source
was fully implemented as written. For assistance, please use the State
Assessment Tools to help you with your analysis, review and/or revision.
These tools are available on the CDE State Assessment Tools Web
page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ti/stateassesspi.asp.)
Although two schools within the LEA did not meet Annual
Measurable Achievement Objectives set forth by NCLB,
they did make progress toward the goals. Reasons vary by
group for the unsuccessful nature of the LEA plan because
it did not address the need to transition to the new common
core standards and the attention these new standards
would receive. These needs will be addressed district wide
as follows:

Asst.
Superintendent,
Principals, Assistant
Principals, KCSOS,
instructional tutors,
Title 1 RTI Teachers
2013-14 School
Year. Ongoing PDD
held throughout the
year at Point Loma
The District will provide staff development and
University:
teacher training in Rigorous Curriculum
Development. The Leadership and Learning Center Minimum Days
will provide Training to teachers at each grade level scheduled on Jan.
and administration in the area of math and language 30, Feb. 27, and
arts. Grade level meetings held throughout the year March 27. Assistant
Superintendent,
to disseminate information and plan for
Principals,
implementation in 2014-15.
Teachers.
Professional
Development
Costs,.
payment to
Teachers for
two full PDD
Days.
Payment to
vendor, Data
Works, Inc
$ 83,500
Approx.
PI Title 1,
Required
10% Set
Aside,
Common
Core
allocation


Each elementary school will implement a district
wide key standards based benchmarking system
complete with three benchmark tests to assess
mastery of priority standards in ELA and Math. It is
a goal of this LEA for all students to be proficient in
the new CCSS. Edusoft will be utilized to analyze
the results of the benchmarking system. Results of
the district benchmarks to be shared with staff after
each administration period utilizing the district’s data
program, Edusoft. The benchmarking system will be
managed/monitored by the assistant
superintendent’s office. Each site principal is
responsible for meeting w/ staff on benchmark
results. District to pursue the purchase of a
repository of data bank questions via the Edusoft
Corporation to foster student mastery of content
standards.
2010/11, 12 School
Year. Principals,
Asst. Principals,
Assistant
Superintendent,
Teachers. Dates
Administered:
2010/11:11/15, 2/14,
5/9. 2011/12: 11/11,
2/12, and 5/12
Provide professional development early out days to
provide time to analyze local and state data and
adjust instruction to drive student achievement and
mastery of content standards. Principals and
Assistant Principals to provide framework for data
driven early out days. Early out day on 2/2 to
provide training on how to motivate difficult students
with support of Kern County Superintendent of
Schools (Training requested in CAC Meeting). .
Principals, Assist,
Principals, Assistant
Superintendent, and
Teachers. 1/30,
2/27, 3/27
Various Costs
to manage
the system
$ 5,000
Title
1/District /
Common
Core
2013-14 These tests
are in the process of
being updated with
new CCSS.
Early Out
PDD Days
NA
No costs

Implement a district wide (K-6) Tiered Response to
Intervention program to target students in need of
remediation in Language Arts. System managed by
Assistant Superintendent’s Office. Assessment for
inclusion to occur for all students three times per
year. Students in RTI program are assessed weekly
on Dibels for growth, and to assess continued
participation in the RTI Program. Students exited
based on grade level fluency and ability to function
in regular education setting without RTI support. A
multiple measures RTI spreadsheet is maintained
on each student by the district’s RTI Coordinator,
providing detailed information CST, STAR GE (4x
per year), Dibels benchmarking, HM Theme Tests
Scores (Average, Theme Grade), Teacher
Recommendation, Teacher Grade in Language
Arts.
2013-14 School
Year. Assistant
Superintendent,
Principals, Assistant
Principals, RTI
Coordinator, Gen ed
teachers, RTI
Credentialed
Teachers,
Instructional Tutors.
Assist
Superintende
nt, Principals,
Assistant
Principals,
RTI
Coordinator,
Teachers,
Instructional
Tutors
$ 270,000
Approx.
Title 1

Continue the implementation of the district’s new
state adopted math series. District revised pacing
guide/chart for all grade levels to assist teachers
with instruction on CCSS and to maintain fidelity to
the text book.
Responsible Parties:
Assistant
Superintendent,
Principals, Assistant
Principals,
Teachers.
Purchase of
Math Series
NA
NA

The district will provide a data analysis
program/system to facilitate targeting of instruction.
All Administrators will utilize Edusoft as a data
analysis tool district wide. Edusoft will be utilized to
support the district’s standards based benchmarking
system. (Updated 4/1/11, 11/11, 12/12, 12/13).
2013-14 School
Year. Responsible
Parties: Asst.
Superintendent,
Principals, Assistant
Principals,
Teachers.
Edusoft: Data
Analysis Tool
$ 10,000
Approx. Cost
of Edusoft
License.
Title 1
2. Include specific measurable achievement goals and targets for student groups consistent with Adequate Yearly
Progress (AYP).
Please describe academic goals and targets for student
Persons
Related
Estimated
Funding
achievement, participation, growth on the API, and
Involved/Timeline
Expenditures
Cost
Source
graduation rate, if applicable. (Refer to the CDE AYP Reports
Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/aypreports.asp.)

The district will meet the AYP participation criterion
by testing at least 95% of all students in all
significant subgroups on the California Standards
Tests in ELA and Math.
Asst.
Superintendent, Site
Administration,
Teachers, Students,
Parents
NA
NA
No funding
needed

The district will attempt to Increase the percent of
proficient students in all significant subgroups by at
least 1% in ELA and 1 % in math for the 2013-14
school year. The district will utilize a variety of
strategies to increase student mastery of common
core standards including the following: Three early
out days for teachers, utilizing Common Core with a
priority standards based benchmarking system,
Edusoft Data Analysis tool, Daily Classroom
Observations, RTI Program (K-6), extra instructional
support via carryover monies, Implementation of the
LEA Addendum, IIP extended day and others.
Continuous during
the 2013-14 School
Year.
Assistant
Superintendent,
Principals, Assistant
Principals,
Teachers,
Instructional Tutors.
Various, See
Cost Details
in goal 1.
Various, See
Cost Detail
above in
Goal 1.
Title 1, EIA:
SCE, LEA,
DistrictUnrestricted
.


The district and all schools will attempt to meet or
exceed their API growth targets school wide and in
all subsequent years. The district will utilize a
variety of strategies to increase student mastery of
common core standards including the following:
Three early out days for teachers, utilizing Common
Core with a priority standards based benchmarking
system, Edusoft Data Analysis tool, Daily
Classroom Observations, RTI Program (K-6), extra
instructional support via carryover monies,
Implementation of the LEA Addendum, IIP extended
day and others.
2013-14 School
Year. Assistant
Superintendent,
Principals, Assistant
Principals,
Teachers,
instructional tutors.
Various, See
Cost Details
in goal 1.
Various, See
Cost Details
in goal 1.
Title 1, EIA:
SCE, LEA.
District

The Assistant Superintendent will continue to
annually update the LEA Plan and Addendum and
ensure that all Single School Plans are written in
alignment with the LEA goals and objectives. Both
the LEA and School Plans will be amended during
the school year to adjust to changing conditions and
input from stakeholders.
Staff Time,
Salaries
Unknown
Various

The LEA Plan and addendum will be disseminated
in the following meetings: DELAC, DAC, SSC, and
ELAC Meetings so that all stakeholders know the
content of the plans. The LEA Addendum will be
utilized as a vehicle to attempt to increase mastery
of content standards.
Continuous during
the 2013-14 School
Year. Assistant
Superintendent,
Principals, Asst.
Principals, DAC,
DELAC, SCC, ELAC
Committees.
Continuous during
the 2013-14 School
Year. Assistant
Superintendent,
Principals, Assistant
Principals,
Teachers, Parents.
Staff Time,
Salaries
Unknown
Various
3. Incorporate scientifically based research strategies that strengthen the core academic program in schools served by
the LEA.
Please describe the specific strategies that the district will
Persons
Related
Estimated
Funding
use and how those strategies will be used to strengthen the
Involved/Timeline
Expenditures
Cost
Source
core academic program.

A Priority Standards Based Data Bank/Benchmark
System will be developed district wide (K-6) based
on priority standards. Three benchmark tests will be
developed to test these key standards, K-6 grades.
Proficiency level to be set at 70 percent correct for
70 percent of the students. Edusoft will be utilized
to analyze the results of the benchmarking system.
Results of the district benchmarks to be shared with
staff after each administration period utilizing the
district’s data program, Edusoft. The benchmarking
system will be managed/monitored by the assistant
superintendent’s office. Each site principal is
responsible for meeting w/ staff on benchmark
results.
Asst.
Superintendent,
Principals, Asst.
Principals,
Teachers.
Costs to
administrate/
maintain
system.
$ 3, 000
Title 1
District wide (K-6) Dibels research based system will be
 Employed in Response to Intervention Programs
(RTI) at each elementary school site. Assessment
for inclusion in the RTI program to occur for all
students three times per year. Students in RTI
program are assessed weekly on Dibels for growth,
and to assess continued participation in the RTI
Program. Students exited based on grade level
fluency and ability to function in regular education
setting without RTI Support. A multiple measures
RTI spreadsheet is maintained on each student by
the districts RTI Coordinator, providing detailed
information CST, STAR GE (4x per year), Dibels
benchmarking, HM Theme Tests Scores (Average,
Theme Grade), Teacher Recommendation, Teacher
Grade in Language Arts.

Research based Explicit Direct Instructional
Techniques will be employed in all classrooms.
Staff development was provided in the area of
Explicit Direct Instructional techniques during the
2011-12 school year. School sites to monitor
implementation with daily classroom observations.
Site principals to provide training to all teachers
during staff meetings in Rigorous Curriculum Design
provided by key staff.
RTI Teachers,
Tutors.
Purchase of
License for
Dibels
Principals, Asst.
Principals,
Teachers,
Instructional Tutors.
2013-14 School
Years
Presenters:
Site Principals
$ 1,500
N/A
Title 1
Use of adopted core materials with fidelity district wide. The
District issues pacing guides in all content areas. Site
Administrators to monitor adherence and fidelity to the
pacing guides and state adopted text books.

Provide board approved protected early out days to
give teachers time to collaborate to strengthen the
common core academic program. Provide staff
meetings time to analyze local and state data and
adjust instruction to drive student achievement and
mastery of content standards. Principals and
Assistant Principals to provide framework for data
driven meetings.
Asst.
Superintendent, Site
Administrators,
Teachers.
Ongoing
through out
school year.
NA
NA
Assist
Superintendent, Site
Administrators,
Teachers.
Ongoing
through out
school year.
NA
NA
4. Identify actions that have the greatest likelihood of improving student achievement in meeting state
standards.
Please identify actions and how they will be supported. (See
full implementation statements in the Academic Program Survey [APS]
and the District Assistance Survey [DAS] on the CDE State Assessment
Tools Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ti/stateassesspi.asp.)
Persons
Involved/Timeline
Related
Expenditures
Estimated
Cost
Funding
Source

A system targeting the priority standards K-6. The
system will include developing a benchmarking
system to determine/target standards that have not
been mastered. The benchmarks will be
administered three times during the school year.
Teachers will be provided with a classroom
spreadsheet showing their students
performance/mastery of each key standard tested
on each benchmark (See details in Goal # 1).
Asst.
Superintendent,
Principals, Asst.
Principals,
Teachers.
Developed during
2013-14 and
implemented in
2014-15
Data Bank
Development
Team, District
$ 3,000
Title 1

Training in Explicit Direct Instruction will serve to
increase student achievement by increasing the
effectiveness of instructional delivery. Provide follow
up with in classroom model lesson training to select
School(s)
2013-14 Asst.
Superintendent,
Principals, Asst.
Principals, Teachers
Presenters:
Site Principals
No costs
NA

Teacher collaboration time provided by the district
will allow time to collect and review data, conduct
data analysis, and provide time to evaluate best
practices. Principals and Assistant Principals to
provide framework for data driven meetings.
Ongoing.
NA
NA
NA

Multiple Measures Data Sheets. Each teacher (K-6)
will maintain a multiple measures sheet that will
contain a variety of local assessments designed to
better target student needs and/or weaknesses. The
MMS will facilitate the targeting of instruction on a
child by child basis. Weaknesses will be identified
and remediated based on the data derived from the
MMS Sheets.
2013-14: Principals,
Asst. Principals,
Asst.
Superintendent,
Teachers.
Time of
teachers to
collect and
record data
NA
NA

A district level spread sheet will be maintained in
the Assistant Superintendents Office. The
spreadsheet contains a wide variety of student data,
including both local and standardized testing data.
The data will be utilized to target instruction.
2013-14 Ongoing.
Categorical Program
Manager, Assistant
Superintendent, Site
Administration.
Time of
Categorical
Program
Manager.
Unknown
T1,
unrestricted
sources.

Implement a district wide (K-6) Tiered Response to
Intervention program to target students in need of
remediation in Language Arts. System managed by
Assistant Superintendent’s Office. Assessment for
inclusion to occur for all students three times per
year. Students in RTI program are assessed weekly
on Dibels for growth, and to assess continued
participation in the RTI Program. Students exited
based on grade level fluency and ability to function
in regular education setting without RTI Support. A
multiple measures RTI spreadsheet is maintained
on each student by the districts RTI Coordinator,
providing detailed information CST, STAR GE (4x
per year), Dibels benchmarking, HM Theme Tests
Scores (Average, Theme Grade), Teacher
Recommendation, Teacher Grade in Language
Arts.
2011/2012 12/13
School Year.
Assistant
Superintendent,
Principals, Assistant
Principals, RTI
Coordinator, RTI
Credentialed
Teachers, General
Ed Teachers,
Instructional Tutors
Salaries of
Part Time
Credentialed
Teachers,
Instructional
Tutors.
$ 270,000
Approx. Cost
Title 1
5. Address the professional development needs of the instructional staff that will support the strategies and
recommendations described above.
Please explain how the LEA identified professional
Persons
Related
Estimated
development needs of instructional staff and LEA plans to
Involved/Timeline
Expenditures
Cost
support professional development. (See full implementation
Funding
Source
statements in the APS and the DAS located on the CDE State
Assessment Tools Web page at
http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ti/stateassesspi.asp.)
All certificated staff (K-8), will be included in the following
Professional Development opportunities:

All Beardsley Teachers will be trained in Rigorous
Curriculum Design.
2014 PDD Days, On
going in 2013-14, at
sites.
Cost For
three PDD
Days
See Above`
NA

Three board approved staff development/early out
days were scheduled for 2014. These days will be
focused on data analysis, improving/targeting
instruction, and motivating students. Three days are
scheduled for 1/30, 2/27, and 3/27..
K-8th Grade
Teachers:
Materials and
Supplies
NA
NA

The district Response to Intervention Coordinator
will coordinate the district’s training to support
student growth and development. The RTI
Coordinator will report directly to the Assistant
Superintendent.
RTI Coordinator, on
Going during the
school year.
Continue in 2013-14
Cost of
Stipend for
RTI
Coordinator
$ 4,000
Title 1,
District
Support
6. English Learners
Title I Program Improvement Status Only: Include specific academic achievement and English Language Proficiency
goals, targets and strategies for English Learners consistent with Goal 1 and Goal 2 of NCLB. (See Title III Accountability
Report Information Guide available on the CDE Title III Accountability Technical Assistance Web page at
http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/el/t3/acct.asp).
Please describe those goals and targets.
Persons
Involved/Timeline
Related
Expenditures
Estimated
Cost
Funding
Source
Implement the district’s English language development
master plan for EL Learners by:

Instructional Materials: Purchase and provide
training for state adopted/Approved EL materials
district wide K-6 (California Treasures).
EL Teachers,
Spring/Fall of 2010
Costs for EL
approved
materials
$ 1000
Concentrati
on grant

Develop a n EL pullout program at each school site
K-6 designed to service all English learners. EL
Teacher Training: Provide Teacher Training on
State Approved EL Materials, California Treasures.
EL Teachers/Tutors,
Assistant
Superintendent
Teacher
Salaries
$50,000
Supp grant

ELD Time Block: Provide a minimum of 30 minutes Assistant
Superintendent,
a day, 5 days a week, of targeted ELD instruction
for EL students in grades K-8.
Materials and
Supplies
INC

Para Professional Training: Monitor tutor usage via
a district developed monitoring tool. Assistant
Superintendent to provide training on logs and other
items on February 18th (ELAC Request).
Assistant
Superintendent,
Para Professionals
NA
NA
NA

Continue with district EL master spreadsheet to
effectively track all EL students progress and LEP
status
Asst.
Superintendent, EL
Tutors
Tutor Salaries
$ 184, 365
approx.
Supp grant

Assistant Superintendent provided instructional
tutors for primary EL student assistance. Tutors to
work directly with students 85 percent of their time
with fidelity.
Asst.
Superintendent,
Principals, Asst.
Principals,
Teachers,
Instructional Tutors
NA
NA

Attempt to meet the AYP target for Language Arts,
and Mathematics on the next administration of the
CST.
School Year: Site
Administrators,
Teachers, Asst.
Superintendent.
NA
NA
No funding
required

Attempt to reach API Goals for the English
Language Learner Sub Group.
See above
NA
NA
No funding
required

Site Administrators,
Classroom Visitations: District and site personnel
Assistant
will participate in routine visits to classrooms to
Superintendent.
observe ELA Instruction; verify differentiated,
research based instruction for ELs through universal
access; verify degree of implementation and fidelity
to SBE-approved materials.
N/A
NA
No funding
required


Data Analysis: District and site staff will analyze
STAR, CELDT, and ELA benchmark data at the
student, teacher, school, and district level to identify
EL learning needs and to implement appropriate
instructional responses.
Ongoing. Site
Administration,
Assistant
Superintendent,
Teachers.
Access to ELD and ELA Standards: Teachers
provide all EL’s with access to both ELD and ELA
standards.
Teachers, Site
Administrators.
NA
NA
No funding
required
NA
NA
No funding
required
7. Incorporate, as appropriate, activities before school, after school, during the summer, and during an
extension of the school year.
Please describe those activities and how the LEA will
incorporate them.
Persons
Involved/Timeline
Related
Expenditures
Estimated
Cost
Funding
Source
Appropriate activities include:

After School IIP tutoring may be offered (K-8)
district to provide extra support for students.
School Years, On
Going: Teachers,
Principals, Asst.
Principals, Asst.
Superintendent
Teacher
Costs/Extra
Time
To be
Determined
Supp grant

Early release days will be scheduled for teachers to
collaborate. Principals, Assistant Principals, and key
teaching staff to provide framework for RCD early
out days. Early out day on Jan 30, Feb. 27, and
March 27 provided training on RCD
Teachers,
Principals, Asst.
Principals, teachers
NA
NA
No funding
required

Summer School may be offered during the summer.
The focus was remediation in English Language
Arts. Summer School for 2014 availability will be
based on budget.
Summer of 2010/11,
12:Teachers, Tutors,
Principals
Teacher
Salaries,
Principal
Salary, Tutor
Salaries
$ 50,000
Supp grant
8. Include strategies to promote effective parental involvement in the schools.
Please describe parental involvement strategies and how
Persons
Related
the LEA will support them across the LEA.
Involved/Timeline
Expenditures
Efforts to involve parents include the following:

Offer Parent Project for all interested parents. All
school sites elected, via their school site councils, to
allocate their pro rata share of parent involvement
set asides for Parent Project. One 7 week sessions
will be offered.
Parent Project
Trainers, Safe
Schools Director,
Psychologist, Asst.
Superintendent
Costs for
Presenters,
Materials,
Food Items
Estimated
Cost
$7,000
Funding
Source
Title 1 Req.
Parent Part.
Set Aside

The parents of EL students will be encouraged to
participate on the districts DELAC Committee. The
sites will make every effort to encourage ELAC
parents from the individual sites to participate in the
district’s DELAC.
School Year. Asst.
Superintendent,
Principals, Parents,
Other district
employees
NA
NA
No Funding
Required.

Parents from the sites School Site Council will be
encouraged to participate in the District Advisory
Committee (DAC).
Principals, Parent,
Teachers.
NA
NA
No Funding
Required.

Parents will be encouraged to participate in Open
House, Back to School, and Title 1 parent nights
throughout the school year.
Principals, Asst.
Principals,
Teachers, Parents
NA
NA
NA

Parent/teacher conferences will be offered at all
school sites, K-8th Grades.
Principals, Asst.
Principals,
Teachers, Other
Staff, Parents,
Students
NA
NA
No Funding
Required.

The districts Parent Involvement Policy will be
updated and approved by the Board of Trustees.
Asst.
Superintendent,
DAC, DELAC,SSC,
ELAC.
Paper
Nominal
Unrestricted

EL annual parent surveys will be sent out and
analyzed by the Assistant Superintendent.
Asst.
Superintendent,
Parents.
Paper
Nominal
Unrestricted

School Site Council, English Language Advisory
Committee, and Parent Teacher Organizations will
all be utilized to involve parents in all levels of
school planning and organization.
Ongoing. Site
Administrators,
teachers, parents.
NA
NA
No funding
required

The districts/individual web sites will continue to
disseminate information and encourage parent
participation in district and school site events.
Tech Department
Tech
department
time
Unknown
Unrestricted
Page 1 of 1
LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY (LEA) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT PLAN
ASSURANCE PAGE
LEA Plan Information:
Beardsley School District
Name of Local Educational Agency: Beardsley School District
County District Code: 15-63339
Date of Local Governing Board Approval: 12/13/11
District Superintendent: Paul Miller
Address: 1001 Roberts Lane
City: Bakersfield
Zip Code: 93308
Phone: (661) 393-8550
FAX: 661 399-9279
E-mail:
pamiller@beardsley.k12.
ca.us
Signatures:
On behalf of LEAs, participants included in the preparation of this Program Improvement Plan
addendum:
12/10/13
Signature of Superintendent
Printed Name of Superintendent
Date
Signature of Board President
Printed Name of Board President
12/10/13
Date
By submission of the local board approved LEA addendum (in lieu of the original signature assurance page in hard
copy), the LEA certifies that the plan has been locally adopted and original signed copies of the assurances are on
file in the LEA. The certification reads:
Certification: I hereby certify that all of the applicable state and federal rules and regulations will be observed by this
LEA and that, to the best of my knowledge, information contained in this Plan is correct and complete. Legal
assurances for all programs are accepted as the basic legal condition for the operation of selected projects and
programs and copies of assurances are retained onsite. I certify that we accept all general and program specific
assurances for Titles I, II, and/or III as appropriate, except for those for which a waiver has been obtained. A copy of
all waivers will remain on file. I certify that actual ink signatures for this LEA Plan/Plan Addendum/Action Plan are on
file, including signatures of any required external providers, i.e., Title III regional lead.