SIM University
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This project would not have been possible without the guidance of my
supervisor Dr. Jiang Fan from Singapore Polytechnic.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Jiang Fan for his
excellent guidance, valuable suggestions and enthusiastic
encouragement throughout the project.
Dr. Jiang’s experience in the research on PV solar cell has been very
beneficial in compiling of the project.
Prepared by Maung Maung
1
SIM University
ABSTRACT
This project is to study and analyze the Performance of Solar PV
Systems in terms of efficiency and performance ratio, installed on HDB
rooftops in Singapore. The efficiency and performance ratio are
manipulated base on the measured value and calculated value.
Solar irradiation data available from Singapore, NASA (National
Aeronautics and Space Agency) and of University of Massachusetts
Lowell are also discussed.
Besides that, PV market from past to present and the future are also
highlighted.
Lastly, the essential aspect and fundamental electronics of PV solar cell
and modules are also described in brief.
Prepared by Maung Maung
2
SIM University
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................. 1
ABSTRACT ................................................................................ 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................ 3
LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................... 5
LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................ 6
CHAPTER 1 ............................................................................... 7
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 7
1.1 Project Background and Motivation ................................. 8
1.2 Project Objective ............................................................. 8
1.3 Project Scope................................................................... 8
1.4 Project Plan ..................................................................... 9
CHAPTER 2 ............................................................................. 10
REVIEWS ON PV HISTORY ................................................... 10
2.1 History of Photo voltaic ................................................. 11
CHAPTER 3 ............................................................................. 13
SUN and LIGHT .................................................................... 13
3.1 Properties of Sun and Light Energy ............................... 14
3.1.1 The Sun .................................................................................................. 14
3.1.2 Nature of Light .................................................................................... 15
3.1.3 Energy of Photon ................................................................................ 15
3.1.4 Photon Flux ........................................................................................... 15
3.2 Solar Radiation .............................................................. 16
3.2.1 Solar Radiation at Earth’s surface ............................................... 16
3.2.2 Atmospheric Effects ........................................................................... 17
3.2.3 Direct and Diffuse Radiation .......................................................... 17
3.2.4 Air mass ................................................................................................. 18
CHAPTER 4 ............................................................................. 20
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND of PHOTO-VOLTAIC ................ 20
4.1 How Photovoltaic Works ................................................ 21
4.1.1 Intrinsic Semiconductor ................................................................... 21
4.1.2 Extrinsic Semiconductor .................................................................. 22
4.1.3 p-n junction Diode ............................................................................. 23
4.1.4 The Potential Barrier in Action ...................................................... 24
4.1.5 Solar Cell Structure ........................................................................... 25
4.1.6 Light Generated Current .................................................................. 26
Prepared by Maung Maung
3
SIM University
4.1.8 Shot circuit Current ........................................................................... 29
4.2 Types of Semiconductors ............................................... 30
4.2.1 Single Crystalline Silicon ................................................................. 31
4.2.2 Multi-crystalline or poly-crystalline Silicon............................... 31
4.2.3 Thin Film ................................................................................................ 32
4.3 Solar Cell Efficiency ....................................................... 33
4.3.1 Optical loses ......................................................................................... 33
4.3.2 Recombination Losses ...................................................................... 35
4.3.3 Resistance loses .................................................................................. 35
CHAPTER 5 ............................................................................. 37
ANALYSIS OF SOLAR PV MODULE on HDB ROOFTOP ............ 37
5.1 Singapore weather at a glance ...................................... 38
5.2 Brief description of installed PV modules....................... 39
5.2.1 PV module description and technical specification ................ 40
5.2.2 PV module images on HDB roof top............................................ 41
5.2.3 Data collection ..................................................................................... 42
5.2.4 Problems encountered ...................................................................... 44
5.3 Measurement of solar Irradiance ................................... 50
5.3.1 Analysis on solar Irradiance ........................................................... 50
5.4.1 Analysis on Performance Ratio ..................................................... 53
5.4.2 Comparison of Performance Ratio by month .......................... 54
5.4.3 Analysis on Efficiency ....................................................................... 59
5.4.4 Comparison on Efficiency by month ........................................... 60
5.4.5 Comparison on Power(kWh) by month ...................................... 64
CHAPTER 6 ............................................................................. 68
PV MODULES and ARRAYS ................................................... 68
6.1 PV Modules and Arrays .................................................. 69
6.2 Module structure ........................................................... 69
6.3 Modules interconnection ................................................ 70
6.3.1 Series connection ............................................................................... 71
6.3.2 Mismatch Effects in series connection ....................................... 71
6.3.3 Parallel connection ............................................................................. 72
6.3.4 Mismatch Effects in parallel connection .................................... 72
6.3.5 Hot-Spot Heating ................................................................................ 73
CHAPTER 7 ............................................................................. 74
PV MARKET .......................................................................... 74
7.1 Solar PV market and Potential ....................................... 75
7.2 Challenges for PV market growth in South-East Asia ..... 80
7.3 Recommendations for growth of PV Market in Southeast
Asia ..................................................................................... 80
Prepared by Maung Maung
4
SIM University
CHAPTER 8 ............................................................................. 82
CONCLUSION and RECOMMENDATION ................................. 82
REFERENCES ........................................................................... 85
APPENDIXES .......................................................................... 87
1. PV module technical specification.................................... 87
2. Measurement data for individual block ............................ 88
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3.1 the interior of the Sun ................................................. 14
Figure 3.2.1 Amount of solar radiation outside the Earth's atmosphere
against that reaching the Earth itself. ........................................... 16
Figure 3.3.2 Atmospheric affect on solar radiation ......................... 17
Figure 3.4.3 Direct and diffuse radiation ....................................... 18
Figure 3.5.4 Measurement of Air Mass ......................................... 19
Figure 4.1 An ingot of silicon ........................................................ 21
Figure 4.1.1 Diamond Cubic Crystal Structure, Silicon unit cell ......... 21
Figure 4.1.1 (a) Covalent bond in silicon crystal lattice and the Energy
band diagram ............................................................................ 22
Figure 4.1.2 (a) P-type silicon and the Energy band diagram ........... 23
Figure 4.1.3 forming of p-n junction ............................................. 23
Figure 4.1.4 potential barrier in Action .......................................... 24
Figure 4.1.5 solar cell structure .................................................... 26
Figure 4.1.6 Photo current generation ........................................... 26
Figure 4.1.6 ............................................................................... 27
Figure 4.1.7 I-V Curve characteristic ............................................. 28
Figure 4.1.8 (a) I-V curve showing short circuit current................... 29
Figure 4.1.8 (b) IV curve showing open circuit voltage .................... 29
Figure 4.2.1 silicon solar cell and top of Czochralski ingot ............... 31
Figure 4.2.2 Slab of multi-crystalline silicon after growth and textured
wafer surface ............................................................................. 31
Figure 4.3.1 Optical loses in solar cell .......................................... 34
Figure 4.3.2 surface texturing to reduce reflection ......................... 34
Figure 5.2.3 Data logger ............................................................ 42
Figure 5.3 shows the pyrheliometer & pyranometer ....................... 50
Figure 5.4.2 (a) Performance ratio for Blk 508A ............................ 54
Figure 5.4.2 (b) Performance ratio for Blk 508B ............................ 54
Figure 5.4.2 (c) Performance ratio for Blk 508C............................. 55
Figure 5.4.2 (c) Performance ratio for Blk 509A............................. 56
Figure 5.4.2 (e) Performance ratio for Blk 509B ............................ 56
Prepared by Maung Maung
5
SIM University
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
5.4.2 (f) Performance ratio for Blk 510A ............................. 57
5.4.2 (g) Performance ratio for Blk 510B ............................ 57
5.4.2 (h) Performance ratio for car park ............................. 58
5.4.4 (a) Efficiency for Blk 508A ........................................ 60
5.4.4 (b) Efficiency for Blk 508B ........................................ 60
5.4.4 (c) Efficiency for Blk 508C ........................................ 61
5.4.4 (d) Efficiency for Blk 509A ........................................ 61
5.4.4 (e) Efficiency for Blk 509B ........................................ 62
5.4.4 (f) Efficiency for Blk 510A ......................................... 62
5.4.4 (g) Efficiency for Blk 510B ........................................ 63
5.4.4 (h) Efficiency for car park ......................................... 63
5.4.5 (a) power out put for BLK 508A ................................. 64
5.4.5 (b) power out put for BLK 508B................................. 65
5.4.5 (c) power out put for BLK 508C ................................. 65
5.4.5 (d) power out put for BLK 509A................................. 65
5.4.5 (e) power out put for BLK 5089b ............................... 66
5.4.5 (f) power out put for BLK 510A ................................. 66
5.4.5 (g) power out put for BLK 510B................................. 67
5.4.5 (h) power out put for car park ................................... 67
6.1 PV modules and Arrays ................................................ 69
6.2 schematic of module construction ................................. 70
6.3.1 series connection of cells and I-V characteristic ............ 71
6.3.3 Parallel connection of cells and I-V characteristic .......... 72
6.3.5 shows the shaded cell ............................................... 73
6.3.5 (a) shows the crack cell due to the hot spot ................. 73
7.1 PV market growth in Asia Pacific region.......................... 76
7.1(a) APAC represent 20% of worldwide market ................. 77
7.1(b) shows forecast of PV installed in Singapore ................ 78
7.1 (c)24.3 MWp solar park in Dong Yang Sinan of S.Korea ... 78
7.1 (d) 1.3 MWp solar plant in Saba, Malaysia ...................... 79
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.2 (a) shows various type of crystalline silicon ..................... 30
Table 4.2 (b) Module and cell efficiencies ...................................... 30
Table 5.2.1 Technical specification of PV........................................ 40
Table 5.2.3 Irradiation data from RI and SNGS .............................. 43
Table 5.2.4 (a) Out put data form PV module in csv format. ............ 45
Table 5.2.4 (b) Sorted data ......................................................... 46
Table 5.2.4 (c) Solar irradiation data of Raffles Institution, September
30th 2009, 4:05 pm to 6:45 pm ................................................... 48
Table 5.2.4 (d) Monthly irradiation data comparison ....................... 49
Table 5.3.1 shows the comparison of irradiation data ...................... 51
Table 7.1 past and prediction of future PV installation ..................... 75
Prepared by Maung Maung
6
SIM University
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Prepared by Maung Maung
7
SIM University
1.1 Project Background and Motivation
Ever-increasing oil and gas prices and improving support in the
research for solar power and energy are driving solar photovoltaic (PV)
cell market. Other drivers include increasing popularity of "green"
energy, rising electricity costs and emergence of more efficient solar
PV technologies.
To be able to compete in the global clean market that grows rapidly,
Singapore has identified Clean Energy, especially solar energy, as a
new emerging industry and R&D area and aims to develop the country
as a global clean energy hub. Since last year, the government has set
aside various funding for applications of solar photovoltaic(PV). As
more PV systems are installed in the country, it is important to
investigate the performance of the installed PV systems under the
tropical region.
1.2 Project Objective
This project is to study and analyze the Performance of Solar PV
Systems Installed on HDB rooftops in Singapore (Sembawan).
The procedures are to collect the data of a few installed PV systems,
and to conduct the analysis on the energy yield and performance ratio
of different systems in a long period. The analytical results will help
new installer or owner of a PV system to estimate the energy yield of
PV system and understand the factors that impact the system
operation.
The educational purpose of this project is to develop the skills in the
mixture of research, analysis, project management and problem
solving skills.
1.3 Project Scope
The project scope are:
1. data collection from PV systems form Feb to September 2009,
2. working out on AC and DC out put power from the collected data,
3. data collection of solar radiation from several junior colleges and
primary schools,
Prepared by Maung Maung
8
SIM University
4. analysis on the performance ratio and efficiency base on the
collected and measured data.
1.4 Project Plan
project proposal and approval
literature review
project initial report
meeting w ith supervisor
review project plan
study Building Integrated PV solar systems
study installation of PC on HDB roof tops
meeting w ith supervisor
review project plan
assess project progress by supervisor
gathering of information for report w riting
meeting w ith supervisor
completion of final report
oral Presentation
Completed
Remaining
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
Figure 1.4 project plan
Prepared by Maung Maung
9
44
46
48
50
SIM University
CHAPTER 2
REVIEWS ON PV HISTORY
Prepared by Maung Maung
10
SIM University
2.1 History of Photo voltaic
The power of the sun is being harnessed for millennia since human
being inhabited this earth.
In 1760s, insulated rectangular box with a glass cover was built by
Horace de Saussure became the prototype for solar collectors used to
heat water.
In 1839, the first photovoltaic effect was discovered by a French
physicist Edmond Becquerel.
After thirty years later, in 1870, the PV effect was first studied in
solids, such as selenium by Engineer Willoughby Smith.
In the late 1890s, The first commercial solar water heaters were sold
in the U.S. and such devices are continue to be used for pool and other
water heating.
In 1904 the physical explanation of light was given by Albert Einstein.
Only in 1954 modern PV began with the invention of the silicon solar
cell (first silicon solar cell) at Bell Laboratories by Chapin, Fuller and
Pearson with a 4% efficiency. Bell Lab bettered this to 6% efficiency
which was soon increased to 11%.
In 1958, the U.S. Vanguard space satellite used a small(less than onewatt) array of cells to power its radio.
In 1961, the first fundamental theory was explained by Shockley and
Queisser based on detailed balance.
During 1970s, advances in solar cell design and technology brought
prices down and led to their widely use in domestic and industrial
applications. PV cells start to involve in real life applications such as to
power lighthouses, railroad crossings and offshore gas and oil rigs.
In 1977, studying of solar energy was greatly impressive when the
U.S. Department of Energy created the Solar Energy Research
Institute. Later on it was renamed as the National Renewable Energy
Laboratory (NREL). Its scope expanded not only on solar energy but
also included research on other renewable energy sources. NREL
continues to research and develop solar energy technology until today.
Prepared by Maung Maung
11
SIM University
Development in solar energy technologies and government including
private research have led to continuing innovation over the last 30
years. The conversion efficiency of PV cells ,meaning, the amount of
sunlight (in percentage) hitting the surface of the cell that is converted
to electricity has been improving. Cell efficiencies almost approaching
to 20 percent.
The global PV market has been growing by an average of 30 percent
annually since past 15 years. Thus, the cost of electricity generated
from PV modules has also fallen drastically, from more than 45 cents
per kilowatt hour (kWh) in 1990 to about 23 cents per kWh in 2006. In
2006 and 2007, a shortage of silicon (a primary component of
crystalline silicon PV systems) momentarily increased PV module costs,
but prices are expected to lower again between 2008 and 2011, when
silicon plants currently under construction are completed.
Prepared by Maung Maung
12
SIM University
CHAPTER 3
SUN and LIGHT
Prepared by Maung Maung
13
SIM University
3.1 Properties of Sun and Light Energy
3.1.1 The Sun
The sun is most probably the source of all available energy on earth.
It is an average star at the center of the Solar System with inner
temperature over 20 million degrees Kelvin because of the nuclear
fusion reactions at its core which convert hydrogen to helium. A layer
of hydrogen atoms closer to its surface absorbs the radiation from the
inner core and hence it is not visible.
Heat is transferred through this layer by convection, meaning it is
transferred in a gas or liquid by the circulation of currents from one
region to another. The surface of the sun is called the photosphere and
the temperature is about 6000K , precisely, 5762 ± 50 K and very
much approximates a blackbody.
The total power emitted by the sun is given as 9.5 x 1025 W.
Figure 3.2 the interior of the Sun
Prepared by Maung Maung
14
SIM University
3.1.2 Nature of Light
The light incident on the earth is in fact only a fraction of the total
energy emitted by the sun. Sunlight is a form of "electromagnetic
radiation" and the visible light which is about about 400–700 nm, or
perhaps 380–750 nm is only a small part of the electromagnetic.
Today, scientists have accepted that light as both wave nature and the
particle nature with the explanation of quantum-mechanics.
3.1.3 Energy of Photon
A photon is characterized by either a wavelength, λ or energy, E. The
energy of a photon (E) is inversely related with the wavelength of the
light (λ) and given by the equation
E=hc/λ
h is Planck's constant, and c is the speed of light.
A commonly used unit of energy is the electron-volt (eV) rather than
the joule (J) so long as photons or electrons are concerned. An
electron volt is the energy required to raise an electron through 1 volt,
and there fore
1 eV = 1.602 x 10-19 J.
3.1.4 Photon Flux
The photon flux is defined as the number of photons per second per
unit area:
The photon flux determines the number of electrons which are
generated, and hence the current produced from a solar cell. The
photon flux does not provide the information of neither the energy nor
wavelength of the photons. Hence the energy or wavelength of the
photons in the light source must also be specified.
The power density of photons at a given wavelength can be calculated
by multiplying the photon flux and the energy of a single photon.
Prepared by Maung Maung
15
SIM University
3.2 Solar Radiation
3.2.1 Solar Radiation at Earth’s surface
The power output per second is 3.86 x 1020 megawatts (MW) that is
about power of 1.37 kW/m2.
Not all of the total power emitted by the sun reaches the earth and it
is about 30% reduced as it passes through the atmosphere. Gasses,
dust and aerosols are the main absorber that absorb the incident
photons. Almost all of the X-rays are attenuated before reaching the
surface of our earth. Like wise relative amount of ultraviolet radiation
is also filtered out by the atmosphere. Some sort of rays are reflected
back into space.
Wave length of 0.3μ, which is short wave length of high energy or
below are strongly absorbed by ozone, O3. Wave length of 1μ are
absorbed by water vapor H2O and longer wave length of about 1.5 –
2μ are absorbed by CO2
Figure 3.3.1 Amount of solar radiation outside the Earth's atmosphere
against that reaching the Earth itself.
Prepared by Maung Maung
16
SIM University
3.2.2 Atmospheric Effects
The atmosphere has several impact on the solar radiation at earth’s
surface and the main effects are absorption, scattering and reflection.
Figure 3.4.2 Atmospheric affect on solar radiation
3.2.3 Direct and Diffuse Radiation
The solar radiation reaching the earth is removed by several means
mainly scattering or absorption. The radiation which is not reflected or
scattered and reaches the earth’s surface directly is called direct or
beam radiation. The scattered radiation when reaches the ground is
called diffuse radiation. Some may reach the receive or solar module
after reflection from the ground is called albedo.
Prepared by Maung Maung
17
SIM University
Figure 3.5.3 Direct and diffuse radiation
3.2.4 Air mass
It is a quantity or air mass (AM) of atmosphere is a path length
through which the sun light must pass through. This can be
approximated by
Radiation at the surface of the earth is measured against that reaching
the fringes of atmosphere where there is no air or air mass is zero.
The intensity of sunlight at ground weaken for sun angle measured at
horizon where as the nigh noon sun passes through the air mass of
one.
Prepared by Maung Maung
18
SIM University
Figure 3.6.4 Measurement of Air Mass
When θ=0, the air mass is one or AM1 whereas air mass of 1.5 is
measured when the sun angle of 48.2˚ and this is the standard for
photovoltaic work.
Prepared by Maung Maung
19
SIM University
CHAPTER 4
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND of PHOTO-VOLTAIC
Prepared by Maung Maung
20
SIM University
4.1 How Photovoltaic Works
Solar cells are photovoltaic devices that convert incident light energy
into electrical energy. In fact it is a large piece of p-n junction diode
joined together.
The properties of semiconductor materials is the back bone of
photovoltaic devices. The basic of the physical structure is used to
explain the operation of a p-n junction, which is the basis of the solar
cells.
Figure 4.7 An ingot of silicon
4.1.1 Intrinsic Semiconductor
Intrinsic semiconductor is a perfect crystal of material like Si, with no
impurities. These atoms bonded together like in a diamond lattice as
shown below.
Figure 4.8.1 Diamond Cubic Crystal Structure, Silicon unit cell
In Si lattice, four outer electrons from each Si atom forms a covalent
bond with a corresponding electrons of a neighbouring Si atom.
Electrons are immobile and cannot contribute to electrical conduction
Prepared by Maung Maung
21
SIM University
when present in the valence band. When excited or present in the
conduction band, the electron contributes to electrical conduction
Figure 4.9.1 (a) Covalent bond in silicon crystal lattice and the Energy
band diagram
4.1.2 Extrinsic Semiconductor
n-type
Figure 4.1.2 N-type silicon and the Energy band diagram
n-type semiconductor is formed by doping the Group V elements like
As or P in a small quantities as impurities. The Group V element take
up its position in the lattice and 4 of its valence electrons bond with
the respective Si atoms and the fifth electron left un-bonded. Thus it is
wondering in the lattice and ready to conduct electricity. Dopants are
ionized positive charges & does not move.
Prepared by Maung Maung
22
SIM University
p-type
Figure 4.10.2 (a) P-type silicon and the Energy band diagram
P-type semiconductor is formed by doping the element of Group III
like B, as impurity. Boron has only 3 valence electrons and when it
replace for a Si atom, one of its bonds has an electron missing and
thus creating a hole in a lattice. It is ready to accept to an electron.
Dopants are ionized negative charges & does not move.
4.1.3 p-n junction Diode
P-n junction diodes form the basis of solar cells, with the process of
recombination, generation, diffusion and drifting. p-n junction is
formed by joining the p-type and n-type semiconductor material
together as shown below.
Figure 4.11.3 forming of p-n junction
Prepared by Maung Maung
23
SIM University
If we create a Si material which is n-type in one region & p-type in an
adjacent region, with an abrupt discontinuity from n to p, we call it an
abrupt pn junction.
Immobile charges remain in tact. An internal field is created by the
immobile charges which opposes electron and hole flow. A potential
barrier exists for electrical conduction. The electron and hole flow
ultimately stops, leaving with a depletion region of immobile charges
around M.
4.1.4 The Potential Barrier in Action
Assuming light strikes the PV cell. The light has enough energy to free
an electron from a bond in the silicon crystal and create an electron
hole pair, i.e. a free electron and a free hole. Now, we assume further
that electron-hole pair is generated on p-side of the junction. Since ptype silicon side is having numerous holes, the created free electron is
very likely to combine with one of the holes in a very short time. If it is
combined with a hole, the electron will lose its energy as heat which is
undesirable for PV cell. Thus, the electron has only a relatively short
time during it is free.
p-type
Idiffusion
n-type
Idrift.
EC
EC
EF
EF
EV
EV
Depletion region
Figure 4.12.4 potential barrier in Action
Prepared by Maung Maung
24
SIM University
However, solar cells are designed in such a way that the electron will
has a possibility of wandering around the crystal and come across the
junction before it has the chance to combine with a hole. Once the free
electron is entering the field of the junction, it is accelerated across the
barrier into the n-type side of the silicon due to barrier's charge
imbalance.
The accelerated electron, which just entered to n-side, is not in a great
danger of recombining with hole as n-type silicon is having very few
holes compare to p-type. Furthermore, repulsion of the junction's field
makes the electron not to return back to p-side of the junction.
Electron usually doesn’t have high energy to overcome the repulsion
force.
The hole created together with electron due to light in the earlier part
of the topic however, remains on the p-type side of the junction. This
is because the barrier at the junction repels the hole. As there are
already a predominance of holes on the p-type side, it is not in danger
of recombining as well. A similar situation occurs when the electronhole pairs are generated by light on the n-type side of the junction.
This time the barrier repels the free electrons and makes them remain
at the n-side. In the meantime, most of the holes cross the junction
and accelerated into p-side before chancing to recombine.
As there are very few free electrons available to fill the holes in psides, the holes move around freely. Charge imbalance exists in the
cell due to the presence of uncombined excess negative charges on
the n-type side and excess holes on the p-type which is caused by
illumination and charge separation.
4.1.5 Solar Cell Structure
A solar cell is a thin pn junction and it is constructed as light shines on
the n-side. Depletion width extends mainly on the lightly-doped p-side.
There is a built-in potential and hence a built-in electric field Eo.
Contacts are made to both n- and p-side. The contact on n-side is a
finger electrode array which is design to be as thin as possible to allow
light to enter. n-side has anti-reflection coating, which is to minimize
reflection and maximize transmission.
Prepared by Maung Maung
25
SIM University
Figure 4.13.5 solar cell structure
4.1.6 Light Generated Current
Photon or light energy that hit the solar cell must be larger than the
band gap in order to promote an electron to the conduction band to
conduct electricity, else they will be drifted. EHPs are formed when
light is illuminated on the device. n-side is made thin, so that
maximum light is transmitted and absorbed in the depletion region.
Built-in field separates the EHPs and electrons drift to n-side and holes
to p-side. An open circuit voltage is developed across the ends of the
pn junction, with p-side more positive. If we connect an external load,
the excess electrons and holes will flow through the load causing a
current. This current is due to the incident light that was made
available.
Figure 4.14.6 Photo current generation
Prepared by Maung Maung
26
SIM University
The current flow due to the photo-generated carriers in the external
load is called photocurrent Iph. Note that, there was no external voltage
applied. An open circuit voltage is generated in response to an incident
light. Photo-generation of EHPs that contribute to photovoltaic effect
occurs with in a volume covering Lh + W + Le as shown in fig 2.1.6.
EHPs generated outside of this region are lost by normal recombination.
If the terminals of device is shorted, the excess electrons in n-side flow
out through external circuit to neutralize the holes. Current Iph is
generated.
Light
I = Id
Isc = Iph
I
Iph
I
V
Iph V = 0
R
(a)
d
V
Iph
R
(b)
(c)
Figure 4.15.6
(a) solar cell connected in series with external load R
(b) the solar cell in short circuit, the current is Iph
(c) the solar cell driving an external load R and I-V is generated.
With the voltage across the junction acts as a normal diode and thus
there is a diode current and the net diode current is
I=Id-Iph
Prepared by Maung Maung
27
SIM University
Short circuit current
Isc = -Iph = -K.L,
where L is the light intensity.
Id is due to normal diode behaviour:
Total current is therefore
Typical open circuit voltage ranges from 0.5 – 0.7 V
4.1.7 I-V curve
Figure 4.16.7 I-V Curve characteristic
As Isc = -Iph, the graph is shifted down by the light and the photo
voltaic operation is always in negative current region. External bias
voltage is required for positive current. The diode law become,
where IL = light generated current.
Prepared by Maung Maung
28
SIM University
4.1.8 Shot circuit Current
This is the maximum current when the solar cell is short circuited.
Short circuit current is measured when the voltage across it is zero
and it is directly proportional to the sunlight.
Figure 4.17.8 (a) I-V curve showing short circuit current
4.1.9 Open circuit Voltage
This is the maximum voltage occur at zero current. Open circuit
voltage is directly proportional to amount of forward bias voltage and
the I-V curve is shown below
Figure 4.18.8 (b) IV curve showing open circuit voltage
Prepared by Maung Maung
29
SIM University
4.2 Types of Semiconductors
The most critical parts of a PV system are the cells which form the
basic building blocks of the unit, collecting the sun’s light. Modules are
formed by bringing together large numbers of cells into a unit. The
photovoltaic module forms the PV system and determines the
performance, cost and reliability. The 50%– 55% of the overall
installed cost of a PV system goes to the module. Because of the
significance of the impact of the module on the system, research and
study are intensively carried out to increase the module performance,
reduce costs, and increase reliability.
Semiconductor material used for solar cell can be crystalline, multi
crystalline, poly crystalline and micro crystalline or amorphous.
Table 4.1 (a) shows various type of crystalline silicon
Ref: http://pvcdrom.pveducation.org/
Table 4.2 (b) Module and cell efficiencies
Ref: Solar Generation V – 2008
Solar electricity for over one billion people
and two million jobs by 2020
Prepared by Maung Maung
30
SIM University
4.2.1 Single Crystalline Silicon
A single crystal refers to a grain boundary free mono-crystalline solid.
It has an ordered structure with each atoms ideally arranged in a
regular pattern. The most expensive type of silicon, due to the
sophisticated manufacturing process is required, manufactured using
the Czochralski process. Figure below shows the single crystalline
silicon solar cell, which is grown as a large cylindrical ingot producing
circular or semi-square shape. Crystalline silicon is still the mainstay of
most PV modules, with more than 90% of market in United State.
Since volumes of crystalline silicon product sales have grown and as
well as the technology’s performance has advanced, the c-Si
technologies have continued to show steady improvement in cost.
Figure 4.19.1 silicon solar cell and top of Czochralski ingot
4.2.2 Multi-crystalline or poly-crystalline Silicon
Figure 4.20.2 Slab of multi-crystalline silicon after growth and
textured wafer surface
Solar cells manufactured from this multi or poly-crystalline silicon have
an advantage over c-silicon in terms of cost reduction. Production of
these silicon are more simple and cheaper, than those required for
single crystal material. Nevertheless, the quality of material is lower
than that of single crystalline material due to the presence of grain
boundaries. Due to the grains of different orientation show up as light
and dark, wafer has been textured. Grain boundaries introduce
Prepared by Maung Maung
31
SIM University
chances of high recombination due to the extra defect energy levels
into the band gap, thus reducing the overall minority carrier lifetime
from the material. Besides that, grain boundaries reduce solar cell
performance.
4.2.3 Thin Film
This is a cost efficient technology depositing extremely thin layers of
photosensitive materials of about less than 1 micrometers in thickness.
It uses large substrates of several square meters of continuous sheets,
glass, stainless steel or even plastic. They could be both flexible and
rigid. These are the advantages of exploiting thin film over crystalline
silicon and a temporary shortage of silicon has also offered the
opportunity of manufacturing thin film technology . Over the long
terms, manufacturing cost of thin films could be significantly lower
than those of c-Si technologies.
There are basically three types of thin film modules which are
commercially available in the market.
1) amorphous silicon (a-Si),
2) copper indium diselenide (CIS, CIGS) and
3) cadmium telluride (CdTe).
Among the three commercially available thin film technologies, a-Si is
the most important in terms of production and installation.
Prepared by Maung Maung
32
SIM University
4.3 Solar Cell Efficiency
It is possible to produce the solar cell with the efficiency of about 24%
in laboratory but typical efficiencies are 10-15%. Efficiency is
commonly used to compare the performance of solar cell. It is defined
as the ratio of energy output from the solar cell to the input energy
from the sun. The efficiency of a solar cell is the fraction of incident
power which is converted to electricity and is defined as:
Voc - the open-circuit voltage;
Isc - the short-circuit current;
FF - the fill factor
η - the efficiency.
The major factors that limit cell efficiencies are
Optical loses
Recombination loses
Resistance loses
4.3.1 Optical loses
Optical losses consist of a) the light is reflected from the front surface,
or b) because it is not absorbed in the solar cell. Basically, the
following happen when light entering solar cell
a) it go straight through
b) it is absorbed and generating heat
c) it separate an electron from its bond and producing EHPs
d) it produce an EHPs but becoming heat as excess of energy
Prepared by Maung Maung
33
SIM University
Figure 4.21.1 Optical loses in solar cell
Several ways to reduce the optical losses:
1) minimizing the top contact coverage of the cell surface.
2) using the Anti-reflection coatings on the top surface of the cell.
Anti-reflection coatings consist of a thin layer of dielectric material,
with a specially chosen thickness.
3) surface texturing to reduce reflection.
Any "roughening" of the surface reduces reflection by bouncing back
onto the surface, rather than out to the surrounding air.
Figure 4.22.2 surface texturing to reduce reflection
Prepared by Maung Maung
34
SIM University
4) thicker p side of the cell to increase absorption
To capture these long wavelengths, the p-side must be thick and Le
(electron diffusion length) large.
4.3.2 Recombination Losses
Fundamental conditions required for such current collection are:
1) The carrier has to be generated within a diffusion length near the
junction, such that it will be able to diffuse to the junction before
recombining.
2) the quantity of minority carriers at the junction edge. The number
of minority carriers injected from the each of the opposite side is
simply the number of minority carriers in equilibrium multiplied by an
exponential factor. Thus minimizing the equilibrium minority carrier
concentration reduces recombination. This is achieved by increasing
the doping.
3) To minimize recombination and achieve a high voltage, a high
diffusion length is required. The diffusion length depends on the types
of material, the processing history of the cell and the doping
concentration. High doping reduces the diffusion length, thus
introducing a trade-off between maintaining a high diffusion length
(which affects both the current and voltage) and achieving a high
voltage.
4) High recombination occur at the top surface has an impact on the
short-circuit current because top surface also corresponds to the
highest generation region of carriers in the solar cell. This can be
achieved by growing a "passivating" layer (usually silicon dioxide) on
the top surface to lower the high top surface recombination.
4.3.3 Resistance loses
Resistance loses in solar cell happen normally in three places
1) In the bulk of the base material
2) In the narrow top surface layer
3) At the interface between the cell and the electric contacts.
Prepared by Maung Maung
35
SIM University
This can be prevented by highly doping into the cell and having the
numerous free carrier to conduct electric current. However there are
some constraints associated with doping.
Prepared by Maung Maung
36
SIM University
CHAPTER 5
ANALYSIS OF SOLAR PV MODULE on HDB ROOFTOP
Prepared by Maung Maung
37
SIM University
5.1 Singapore weather at a glance
Singapore is 8 hours advance the GMT and it is situated at the latitude
of 1 degrees 18' north and longitude of 103 degrees 50' east of
equator. The precise location is 96 km north of the equator, between
longitude 103 degrees 36' East and 104 degrees 25' East.
Singapore is a small, developed, island city-state in Southeast Asia,
located at the southern tip of the Malayan Peninsula between Malaysia
and Indonesia.
Singapore's climate is classified as equatorial with no true distinct
seasons. Because of its geographical location and maritime exposure,
its has uniform temperature and pressure, high humidity and abundant
rainfall. Rain fall is throughout the year with more consistent rain
during the monsoon season from November to January. Showers are
usually sudden and heavy, but brief and refreshing.
The temperature ranging from a minimum of 23 °C and a maximum of
34 °C. June is the hottest month of the year in Singapore, followed by
May. This is due to light winds and strong sunshine during those
months. But so long as the photovoltaic solar application is concerned,
high temperature is not preferable. However, in Singapore the year
round availability of solar radiation is reasonably good for solar cell
application.
Relative humidity is around 60% in the mid-afternoon, but does go
below 50% at times. In May 2009, the average relative humidity was
83%, an increase over the figure of 79.1% in May 2008. Relative
humidity often reaches 100% during prolonged heavy rain. Generally,
there is more rainfall on the western side of the island than that of
eastern portion of Singapore, owing to a rain shadow effect. Thus, the
eastern side of Singapore is much drier and slightly hotter than that of
west. Although it is small size, there may be sunshine on one side
while there is rain on the other.
Prepared by Maung Maung
38
SIM University
5.2 Brief description of installed PV modules
In this project, the measured output of eight photovoltaic systems,
seven 10 kW PV modules including one 3.3 kW are compared.
Consisting the same hardware installed on 8 HDB (BLK 508A/B/C,
509A/B, 510A/B and multistory car park) rooftop at Wellington circle,
Sembawan, north of Singapore. The 3.3 kW module is installed at
multistory car park.
There are altogether 69 modules per HDB block and the total power
out put (Watt peak) is 10 kW peak except the 3.3 kW peak which is
form 23 modules. Three inverters are responsible for converting from
DC to AC values. Monthly data is downloaded from sunny web box or
data logger that store the out put data from the three inverters. The
data used for analysis is from Feb, 2009 to September 31, 2009.
PV power output have been measured in each month and efficiency
and performance has been investigated based on the experimental
data.
Prepared by Maung Maung
39
SIM University
5.2.1 PV module description and technical specification
Module description
72 highly efficient single crystal silicon solar cells are used in this
project. The solar cells have an anti reflection surface coating to
increasing the optical efficiency.
The solar cells are wired together in three strings, each of which is
protected with a by pass diode against damage through hot spots.
The module is design to protects the solar cells against moisture, gives
UV stability and allows for thermal expansion. The front covering is
made of top quality tempered solar glazing. The solar glazing and the
solar cell laminate are joined together into a unit and mounted in a
torsion resistant frame, made of anodized aluminum.
Technical specification
Technical Specification
AS150
AS160
AS170
Rated power, Pmax
[Wp]
150
160
170
Rate current, IMPP
[A]
4,4
4,6
4,82
Rate voltage, UMPP
[V]
34
35
35,2
Short circuit current, Ik
[A]
4,8
5,3
5,35
Open circuit voltage, UL
[V]
43,4
43,5
44,1
System voltage
[V]
800
800
800
Length
[mm]
1618
1618
1618
Width
[mm]
814
814
814
Height
[mm]
35
35
35
Height (with box)
[mm]
35
35
35
Weight
[kg]
14.5
14.5
14.5
Table 3.2.1 Technical specification of PV
http://www.sunsetsolar.de/en/catalog/stand_alone_systems/solar_generators/details/as_
150_as_160_as_170.html?tx_ttnews[backPid]=86&cHash=3e3662190
f
Output Power (max)
*100
Module Area * Solar irradiation(kWh)
150
modules efficiency(%)=
*100
(814 *10 3 )(1618*10 3 )1*103
modules efficiency(%)=
modules efficiency(%)=11.39%
Prepared by Maung Maung
40
SIM University
5.2.2 PV module images on HDB roof top
Prepared by Maung Maung
41
SIM University
5.2.3 Data collection
a) Collection of data from PV modules
Data collection has been started since February 2009 and end at
September 2009.
Alarm and notification are always sent to the company, who monitor
the performance of the PV systems during the data collection. The
purpose is to ensure that the whole system including the data logger is
not unnecessarily disturbed. Therefore, it is necessary to contact the
company to ensure that they are aware of that the data collection is
ongoing.
Daily and monthly out put data from PV modules are stored in the
memory of the data logger. In fact the data logger suppose to be able
to store for a least two to three months of data. Data were collected at
each block by downloading from the data logger to laptop.
At the beginning of the project, the data collection was carried out
once in every two months. It is observed that some data are missing,
meaning it is not complete for one whole month or only a few hours of
data for certain days are available. So, starting for May, data collection
is made once in a month and still found that it is not complete of data.
The missing data is due to some setting at the data logger but the
company is not willing to correct it for certain reasons. Eventually,
starting from the month of July, data collection is carried out twice in
every month and it is quite satisfactory.
Figure 5.23.3 Data logger
Prepared by Maung Maung
42
SIM University
b) Collection of Solar Irradiation data
While collecting the data from PV modules, collection of solar
irradiation data of Singapore was also carried out. From the web site
(provide by NTU, Nangyan Technological University)
http://nwsp.ntu.edu.sg/weather/new_portal_intro.htm
irradiation data were collected.
Several weather stations are installed at some junior colleges and
primary schools in Singapore for the purpose of introducing the study
of solar energy.
Solar irradiation data was collected from
1) St. Nicholas Girl school
2) Raffles Institution
3) Beatty Secondary School
4) GuangYang Primary School
However, it is observed that the up to date data are no longer
available for most of the institutions close to the project site. Only
Raffles institution, which is in Bishan is available for downloading the
weather data until the point of writing this report.
The table below shows the irradiation data from RI and SNGS of
Singapore. Since the daily irradiation data are relatively low, it result a
very high efficiency and performance ratio compared to the irradiation
data from University of Massachusetts Lowell and it is quite impossible
for our project.
Table 4.2.3 Irradiation data from RI and SNGS
Prepared by Maung Maung
43
SIM University
5.2.4 Problems encountered
Accessing the HDB rooftop
In Singapore, HDB roof tops are not easily accessible to anyone.
Therefore, authorize personnel are required to be there whenever data
downloading is carried out. Thus it is always necessary to request
someone from the PV company to escort me whenever I need to
download the data. But, those staffs are not only responsible for
monitoring these PV modules, but also need to carried out their daily
work. Hence it is not always possible for them to accompany me
whenever I need to access to data logger.
This is a kind of barrier to access the PV modules.
Another important point is the location, Sembawan, where the PV
modules are installed is lightning prone area. So always need to be
cautious when there is raining.
Missing data
As mention above, the data loggers are not able store more than a
month or two of data and some time not even a month. Example of
missing data can be seen from table 3.2.4, where the data start from
morning 11:30 am instead of 7:30 or 8 am. So it is necessary to
access the HDB roof top twice a month in order to collect the complete
data for one whole month. This is unnecessarily time consuming and
require to calibrate with those staffs from PV company for their
available timing.
Prepared by Maung Maung
44
SIM University
Data manipulating, PV
This is the most tedious and time consuming process since the
downloaded data is in raw, csv format and the interval of 15 minutes
daily as shown. The date is not stated there but the file name itself is
the date and the block ID is also not known. Extra cautious is
necessary not to mess up the data.
Table 5.2.4 (a) Out put data form PV module in csv format.
Prepared by Maung Maung
45
SIM University
This raw data has to be sorted in order to get a readable one as below.
Table 6.2.4 (b) Sorted data
This is the data belong to block 510B of February 8th, 2009, from one
of the three inverters. The data date is the name of the file.
From the sorted data, AC and DC power in terms of daily KWh/day is
calculated as
P
V *I 1
*
1000 4
Prepared by Maung Maung
46
SIM University
From the daily kWh/day, monthly average, Average kWh/Month is
calculated.
Likewise, efficiency and performance ratio are also calculated. Data
handling need to be vigilant as the individual data file is too huge.
Data manipulating, solar Irradiation data
Solar irradiation data able to retrieve in Singapore was most like to
use for the calculation of efficiency and performance ratio. If the data
is reliable and reasonable, it would be much precise than using the
global data as there are several weather stations near the project site.
The data is downloaded from
http://nwsp.ntu.edu.sg/weather/new_portal_intro.htm.
After carefully review these data, it is found that the individual data is
too low and results a very high efficiency and performance ratio, which
is not possible.
The worst case is that the data are in 5 minutes interval and there is
no option to choose the time interval. That is extremely large and need
sort out into daily from that of 5 minutes interval, and then to monthly
data.
Prepared by Maung Maung
47
SIM University
Table 7.2.4 (c) Solar irradiation data of Raffles Institution, September
30th 2009, 4:05 pm to 6:45 pm
It can be seen from the above table 3.2.4b, Solar irradiation data of
Raffles Institution, September 30th 2009, 4:05 pm to 6:45 pm only.
That illustrates only the data of 2 hours and 40 minutes, which is only
about one fourth of daily data. Therefore, it can be imagine how huge
is the monthly irradiation data to be manipulated.
Table below show the example of calculated monthly irradiation data
of Raffles Institution, St. Nicolas Girl School and Beatty Secondary
school. But they are not useful in this project.
Prepared by Maung Maung
48
SIM University
Table 8.2.4 (d) Monthly irradiation data comparison
Therefore, it is recommended to use certain program to carry out all
these time consuming process.
Prepared by Maung Maung
49
SIM University
5.3 Measurement of solar Irradiance
The amount of sunlight available at a specific location where the PV
modules are installed is the most critical information for PV system
design.
Solar radiance or radiation is an instantaneous power density in the
units of kW/m2. The solar radiance varies from 0 kW/m2 at night to a
maximum of about 1 kW/m2. It depends on the location and weather.
A pyranometer is used to measure the global radiation and a
pyrheliometer, which meant for measuring direct radiation. At some of
the well established locations, the irradiance data has been collected
for more than twenty years.
Figure 5.24 shows the pyrheliometer & pyranometer
5.3.1 Analysis on solar Irradiance
Pyranometer provide the most accurate measurements of solar
radiation data placed at a location for a number of years. It measure
the radiation for every few minutes. However, the data generated by
this technique is enormous and it is impractical and unnecessary to
provide the full data set for each location.
The most common theoretically method of reducing the data set is to
average the data over the measuring period. This will be in the format
of average daily, monthly or yearly radiation data.
In this project, the irradiation data used is from University of
Massachusetts Lowell (yellow background at the below table).
Prepared by Maung Maung
50
SIM University
Table 9.3.1 shows the comparison of irradiation data
JC- Junior College
RI-Raffles Institution
SNGS- Saint Nicolas Girl School
NASA-National Aeronautics and Space Agency
UMass Lowell- University of Massachusetts Lowell
From the table above, the data in green background is collected form
Raffle’s Institution and Saint Nicolas Girl School of Singapore.
However, it is observed that the up to date data are no longer
available for most of the institutions close to the project site. Only
Raffles institution, which is in Bishan is available for downloading the
weather data until at the point of writing this report. Although data are
still available from RI, it gives a low irradiation data which result a
very high efficiency and performance ratio, which is not possible.
The web URL for downloading the weather data in Singapore is
http://nwsp.ntu.edu.sg/weather/new_portal_intro.htm
The data with yellow background is collected from University of
Massachusetts Lowell, Solar Irradiation Database. The data provided is
in two formats, one is in 1 year average and the other is in 15 years
average format. Besides that, it also provides the average standard
deviation of about 0.4.
The web URL for downloading the global weather data is
http://energy.caeds.eng.uml.edu/fpdb/irrdata.asp
The last two rows of data is belong to NASA, dated from 1/1/1983
through 12/31/2005, which is the average of 22 years. It is noticed
Prepared by Maung Maung
51
SIM University
that the irradiation data of UMass (15 years average) and NASA (22
years average) are reasonably closed.
URL of NASA Surface meteorology and Solar Energy: SolarSizer Data
http://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/cgiBin/sse/sizer.cgi?email=maungmaung41%40gmail.com&step=1&lat=1
.18&lon=103.50&ms=1&ds=1&ys=1983&me=12&de=31&ye=2005&d
aily=swv_dwn&submit=Submit
NASA Log in page:
http://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/sse/global.cgi?email=
Prepared by Maung Maung
52
SIM University
5.4.1 Analysis on Performance Ratio
Performance ratio is the relationship between the actual returns and
hypothetically potential energy returns of a Photovoltaic system. The
quality of the plant configuration can be determined by the
performance ratio, because all components and their interaction are
included in the calculation of the performance ratio.
In this project, performance ratio is calculated as monthly average,
Out put Power in kWhr (monthly average)
installed kW peak
PR=
Solar Irradiation (monthly average) * {(cos 7 * 0.6)  0.4}
1 kW / m 2
In fact, tons of work has been carried out in order to estimate the PR.
Although the formula given above is in terms of monthly average, the
actual computation is base on daily PV out put value. Monthly average
is then derived based on the daily result.
It is observed that the performance ratio for all 8 blocks shows
average of 70% and above. The higher the performance ratio is, the
better the system uses its potential. Low PR value indicates production
losses due to technical or design problems. The analysis of the
systems performance ratio shows that the range of PR is not so wide,
which reflect the proper operation of a system from the technical point
of view. In reality, the only observation of performance ratio cannot
provide a significant image of the system operation.
Prepared by Maung Maung
53
SIM University
5.4.2 Comparison of Performance Ratio by month
85.00
130.00
106.07
91.40
97.42
109.90
101.60
90.00
111.58
115.85
Performance ratio for Blk 508A
110.00
Performance ratio
70.00
80.00
65.00
Feb
86.05
76.89
30.00
10.00
71.25
75.90
77.44
83.20
82.34
76.94
73.54
67.46
70.00
73.05
75.00
81.49
85.31
50.00
75.19
Performance ratio
90.00
-10.00
-30.00
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Aug
Sep
Months
Performance Ratio
Performance Ratio(-stdv)
Performance Ratio-(RI)
Figure 5.25.2 (a) Performance ratio for Blk 508A
109.70
96.96
86.84
88.29
90.00
105.58
101.24
106.86
95.00
110.91
Performance ratio for Blk 508B
130.00
110.00
90.00
88.99
50.00
79.52
72.67
78.98
68.17
74.36
80.34
73.24
81.21
72.79
64.63
70.45
65.00
71.99
70.00
73.91
79.10
75.00
30.00
Performance ratio
70.00
80.00
81.67
Performance ratio
85.00
10.00
-10.00
60.00
-30.00
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
M onths
Performance Ratio
Performance Ratio(-stdv)
Performance Ratio-(RI)
Figure 5.26.2 (b) Performance ratio for Blk 508B
Prepared by Maung Maung
54
SIM University
93.88
90.00
70.00
81.83
30.00
73.12
69.65
70.36
76.47
79.49
83.23
77.77
80.43
72.47
10.00
-10.00
63.85
65.00
72.10
74.10
70.00
50.00
Performance ratio
81.34
87.36
110.00
75.00
67.97
Performance ratio
80.00
100.87
130.00
110.59
85.00
100.27
112.38
Performance ratio for Blk 508C
60.00
-30.00
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Performance Ratio
Performance Ratio-stdv
Performance Ratio-RI
Figure 5.27.2 (c) Performance ratio for Blk 508C
111.34
89.73
110.00
90.00
70.00
80.00
89.20
50.00
73.09
67.25
73.48
68.66
75.86
84.89
30.00
81.32
76.62
71.42
65.00
74.81
70.00
71.59
79.68
75.00
10.00
Performance ratio
86.46
98.03
130.00
85.00
68.62
Performance ratio
90.00
101.80
99.34
95.00
113.45
Performance ratio for Blk 509A
-10.00
-30.00
60.00
-50.00
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Performance Ratio
Prepared by Maung Maung
Performance Ratio(-stdv)
Performance Ratio-(RI)
55
SIM University
Figure 5.28.2 (c) Performance ratio for Blk 509A
113.55
95.63
93.11
91.47
130.00
110.00
90.00
75.00
70.00
86.57
77.36
77.90
71.67
79.64
74.42
83.23
75.88
71.90
82.18
73.66
65.96
50.00
62.85
55.00
57.66
60.00
75.08
65.00
85.18
70.00
50.00
30.00
10.00
Performance ratio
Performance ratio
80.00
108.95
85.00
102.45
95.32
90.00
115.68
Performance ratio for Blk 509B
-10.00
45.00
40.00
-30.00
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Performance Ratio
Performance Ratio(-stdv)
Performance Ratio-(RI)
Figure 5.29.2 (e) Performance ratio for Blk 509B
Prepared by Maung Maung
56
SIM University
118.44
98.43
90.00
103.92
93.09
105.33
109.27
114.70
95.00
120.43
Performance ratio for Blk 510A
130.00
110.00
90.30
80.69
80.17
85.39
79.79
84.70
77.22
79.27
78.56
30.00
10.00
73.77
65.00
74.07
69.38
70.00
75.63
75.00
87.65
88.68
50.00
Performance ratio
70.00
80.00
78.16
Performance ratio
90.00
85.00
-10.00
60.00
-30.00
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Performance Ratio
Performance Ratio(-stdv)
Performance Ratio-(RI)
Figure 5.30.2 (f) Performance ratio for Blk 510A
118.23
100.23
90.00
98.54
96.00
114.80
106.28
111.99
95.00
119.80
Performance ratio for Blk 510B
130.00
110.00
90.14
80.55
75.12
81.65
83.75
78.26
87.36
79.64
75.76
76.41
69.50
67.74
65.00
73.84
70.00
85.25
88.27
50.00
75.00
30.00
Performance ratio
70.00
80.00
77.80
Performance ratio
90.00
85.00
10.00
-10.00
60.00
-30.00
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Performance Ratio
Performance Ratio(-stdv)
Performance Ratio-(RI)
Figure 5.31.2 (g) Performance ratio for Blk 510B
Prepared by Maung Maung
57
SIM University
95.00
96.91
110.00
90.00
70.00
85.00
98.89
50.00
78.62
70.25
76.18
78.29
90.83
90.16
70.09
65.00
30.00
71.77
70.00
83.69
75.00
84.87
80.00
60.00
Performance ratio
90.00
75.02
Performance ratio
93.52
91.43
100.00
130.00
108.68
104.34
105.00
120.68
Performance ratio for Car Park
10.00
-10.00
-30.00
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Performance Ratio
Performance Ratio(-stdv)
Performance Ratio-(RI)
Figure 5.32.2 (h) Performance ratio for car park
Prepared by Maung Maung
58
SIM University
5.4.3 Analysis on Efficiency
The efficiency of the whole system is considered as all component of a
photovoltaic system. It provide the information between the ratio of
the useful electrical power produced by a photovoltaic system at any
instant to the power of the sunlight striking the solar array. It is the
ratio of output power (or energy) to input power (or energy)
expressed in percentage. In Photovoltaic a criterion to measure the
quality of the PV-system or PV-component.
Efficiency in this project is calculated in terms of monthly average.
Efficiency=
Out put power in kWhr (monthly average)
Solar irradiation(monthly average) * total mod ule area *{(cos 7 * 0.6)  0.4}
Efficiency is actually calculated based on daily data and then it was
expressed in terms of monthly average. The reason behind this is the
volume of data generated will be too huge if daily data has to be
presented.
Converted
It is observed that the efficiency conversion is just 8% and some time
it reaches 9% for all the 8 blocks, which mean the conversion of the
available solar energy into usable electricity is 8-9%. This is an
acceptable conversion so long as PV is concerned today.
Prepared by Maung Maung
59
SIM University
5.4.4 Comparison on Efficiency by month
Efficiency for Blk 508A
12.20
10.67
9.56
9.70
11.62
12.94
11.10
9.00
20.00
12.21
9.50
15.00
10.00
0.00
8.00
6.50
8.75
8.69
8.89
7.50
8.00
8.18
8.84
8.05
8.17
8.74
9.20
7.75
7.11
7.00
8.60
8.99
7.50
-5.00
-10.00
Efficiency
5.00
7.92
Efficiency
8.50
-15.00
-20.00
-25.00
6.00
-30.00
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Efficiency
Efficiency (- stdv)
Efficiency (RI)
Figure 5.33.4 (a) Efficiency for Blk 508A
Efficiency for Blk 508B
12.20
10.67
9.56
9.70
11.62
12.94
11.10
9.00
20.00
12.21
9.50
15.00
10.00
0.00
8.00
6.50
8.75
8.69
8.89
7.50
8.00
8.18
8.84
8.05
8.17
7.75
8.74
9.20
-5.00
7.11
7.00
8.60
8.99
7.50
-10.00
Efficiency
5.00
7.92
Efficiency
8.50
-15.00
-20.00
-25.00
6.00
-30.00
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Efficiency
Efficiency (- stdv)
Efficiency (RI)
Figure 5.34.4 (b) Efficiency for Blk 508B
Prepared by Maung Maung
60
SIM University
Efficiency for Blk 508C
11.22
10.33
10.00
9.00
9.60
11.03
12.17
20.00
13.61
9.50
15.00
10.00
0.00
6.50
9.00
8.05
7.74
-10.00
-15.00
-20.00
7.03
7.66
7.9
8.41
8.75
9.16
7.48
7.00
-5.00
8.56
7.50
8.60
9.20
8.00
Efficiency
5.00
8.15
Efficiency
8.50
-25.00
6.00
-30.00
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Efficiency
Efficiency (- stdv)
Efficiency (RI)
Figure 5.35.4 (c) Efficiency for Blk 508C
11.64
9.87
9.51
10.70
11.20
10.90
11.00
13.74
Efficiency for Blk 509A
20.00
10.00
10.00
0.00
9.82
9.34
8.35
8.04
7.40
8.07
8.90
8.43
7.88
9.12
-20.00
7.40
6.00
7.55
7.00
8.5
8.00
Efficiency
-10.00
8.23
Efficiency
9.00
-30.00
-40.00
5.00
-50.00
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Efficiency
Efficiency (- stdv)
Efficiency (RI)
Figure 5.36.4 (d) Efficiency for Blk 509A
Prepared by Maung Maung
61
SIM University
11.87
10.52
10.31
10.06
11.99
11.20
11.55
9.50
10.00
9.00
5.00
8.50
0.00
8.00
9.53
8.51
7.89
8.57
8.09
8.83
9.16
8.30
8.43
9.02
9.37
7.00
6.00
5.50
-10.00
-15.00
-20.00
6.34
6.92
6.50
8.70
9.40
-5.00
7.50
8.26
Efficiency
15.00
Efficiency
10.00
12.72
Efficiency for Blk 509B
-25.00
5.00
-30.00
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Efficiency
Efficiency (- stdv)
Efficiency (RI)
Figure 5.37.4 (e) Efficiency for Blk 509B
12.38
10.83
11.06
10.24
12.02
10.00
11.59
20.00
14.30
10.50
13.25
PEfficiency for Blk 510A
15.00
10.00
0.00
9.00
9.94
8.88
8.82
-10.00
-15.00
-20.00
8.12
8.40
8.72
8.15
8.68
9.32
9.47
10.03
9.30
7.63
7.50
8.32
8.00
9.76
8.50
-5.00
Efficiency
5.00
8.60
Efficiency
9.50
-25.00
7.00
-30.00
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Efficiency
Efficiency (- stdv)
Efficiency (RI)
Figure 5.38.4 (f) Efficiency for Blk 510A
Prepared by Maung Maung
62
SIM University
Efficiency for Blk 510B
12.36
11.03
10.84
10.00
10.24
11.60
12.63
20.00
13.56
13.19
10.50
15.00
10.00
0.00
9.00
9.92
8.86
8.27
8.51
-10.00
-15.00
-20.00
-25.00
7.45
7.50
8.98
9.29
9.32
8.70
8.13
8.56
8.00
8.88
9.10
9.51
9.76
-5.00
8.50
Efficiency
5.00
9.71
Efficiency
9.50
7.00
-30.00
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Efficiency
Efficiency (- stdv)
Efficiency (RI)
Figure 5.39.4 (g) Efficiency for Blk 510B
11.04
10.41
11.00
10.65
20.00
12.38
11.50
11.88
12.00
13.74
Efficiency for Car Park
15.00
10.00
10.50
8.95
8.00
8.60
7.98
8.17
7.00
8.54
7.50
9.53
8.00
-10.00
8.92
8.50
11.26
-5.00
10.27
9.00
10.34
0.00
9.67
Efficiency
9.50
Efficiency
5.00
10.00
-15.00
-20.00
-25.00
6.50
6.00
-30.00
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Efficiency
Efficiency (- stdv)
Efficiency (RI)
Figure 5.40.4 (h) Efficiency for car park
Prepared by Maung Maung
63
SIM University
5.4.5 Comparison on Power(kWh) by month
3.45
3.11
3.166
3.29
3.37
3.33
40.00
3.66
Power generation for blk 508A
4.00
35.00
0.00
30.00
-8.00
34.52
31.07
31.66
20.00
32.85
33.67
33.31
25.00
36.60
Power
-4.00
-12.00
15.00
-16.00
10.00
-20.00
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Aug
Sep
Months
Power (Monthly Avg)
Power (KWhr/KWp)
Figure 5.41.5 (a) power out put for BLK 508A
3.57
3.17
2.93
3.06
3.16
3.36
3.19
40.00
3.50
Power generation for blk 508B
4.00
35.00
0.00
30.00
35.70
31.69
29.32
30.55
31.56
33.55
20.00
31.91
25.00
35.04
Power
-4.00
-8.00
-12.00
15.00
-16.00
10.00
-20.00
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Power (Monthly Avg)
Prepared by Maung Maung
Power (KWhr/KWp)
64
SIM University
Figure 5.42.5 (b) power out put for BLK 508B
3.28
3.07
2.75
3.02
3.31
3.32
40.00
3.36
Power generation for blk 508C
4.00
35.00
0.00
-4.00
32.83
30.68
27.46
30.23
33.06
20.00
33.23
25.00
33.56
Power
30.00
-8.00
-12.00
15.00
-16.00
10.00
-20.00
Mar
Apr
May
Power (Monthly Avg)
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Power (KWhr/KWp)
Figure 5.43.5 (c) power out put for BLK 508C
3.41
2.93
2.92
3.39
3.04
3.29
40.00
3.28
Power generation for blk 509A
4.00
35.00
0.00
30.00
34.06
29.32
29.19
33.92
30.43
20.00
32.92
25.00
33.88
Power
-4.00
-8.00
-12.00
15.00
-16.00
10.00
-20.00
Mar
Apr
May
Power (Monthly Avg)
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Power (KWhr/KWp)
Figure 5.44.5 (d) power out put for BLK 509A
Prepared by Maung Maung
65
SIM University
3.47
3.20
3.16
3.17
3.26
3.40
2.85
3.65
Power generation for blk 509B
40.00
4.00
35.00
0.00
30.00
-8.00
34.73
31.25
31.64
31.65
32.57
20.00
33.95
28.47
25.00
36.55
Power
-4.00
-12.00
15.00
-16.00
10.00
-20.00
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Power (Monthly Avg)
Power (KWhr/KWp)
Figure 5.45.5 (e) power out put for BLK 5089b
3.62
3.21
3.39
3.22
3.15
3.62
3.43
40.00
3.80
Power generation for blk 510A
6.00
2.00
35.00
-2.00
-6.00
36.23
32.16
33.92
32.21
20.00
31.49
36.21
34.26
-10.00
25.00
38.05
Power
30.00
-14.00
-18.00
-22.00
15.00
-26.00
10.00
-30.00
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Power (Monthly Avg)
Power (KWhr/KWp)
Figure 5.46.5 (f) power out put for BLK 510A
Prepared by Maung Maung
66
SIM University
3.33
3.28
3.33
3.322
3.43
3.52
3.34
40.00
3.79
Power generation for blk 510B
5.00
0.00
35.00
-5.00
30.00
33.26
32.76
33.26
34.32
35.22
-15.00
33.22
20.00
33.45
25.00
37.87
Power
-10.00
-20.00
-25.00
15.00
-30.00
-35.00
10.00
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Months
Power (Monthly Avg)
Power (KWhr/KWp)
Figure 5.47.5 (g) power out put for BLK 510B
Power generation for Car Park
5.00
3.76
3.15
3.00
Power
15
2.77
4.00
2.97
3.61
20
3.46
25
2.00
Jun
10.41
May
9.14
12.41
Apr
9.79
11.91
5
11.41
10
Jul
Aug
Sep
1.00
0.00
0
Months
Power (Monthly Avg)
Power (KWhr/KWp)
Figure 5.48.5 (h) power out put for car park
Prepared by Maung Maung
67
SIM University
CHAPTER 6
PV MODULES and ARRAYS
Prepared by Maung Maung
68
SIM University
6.1 PV Modules and Arrays
Figure 6.49 PV modules and Arrays
A PV module consists of individual solar cells, which are connected
electrically to increase their power output. In order to protect the
modules from environment in which they operate they are packaged
and the user is also protected from electrical shock. It is a matter of
concern how solar cells are encapsulated into PV modules and the
issues arises as a result of interconnection and encapsulation. Then
the module is used alone or electrically connected with similar modules
to form a photovoltaic array. A number of modules can be connected
in a series strings to increase the voltage and in parallel to increase
the current.
6.2 Module structure
The modules used in this project are 72 interconnected individual solar
cells. They are interconnected and encapsulated into a single, longlasting, stable unit. The main purpose is to protect them and their
interconnecting wires from the environment. Since they are relatively
thin and are prone to mechanical damage unless protected. Moreover,
the metal grid on the top surface and the wires interconnecting the
individual solar cells may be corroded by water or water vapor. So the
two main reasons of encapsulation are to prevent from mechanical
damage and to prevent from water or water vapor from corroding the
electrical contacts. There are several types of PV modules and solar
cells and the structure is often different for different applications. For
instance, bulk silicon solar cells are usually rigid with glass front
surfaces whereas amorphous silicon solar cells are encapsulated into a
Prepared by Maung Maung
69
SIM University
flexible array. Module lifetimes and warranties on PV modules are
often about 20 years. The figure below shows typical schematic of
module construction for solar cell.
Figure 6.50 schematic of module construction
As shown in the above figure, PV modules consist of a) a transparent
top surface, which is usually glass, b) an encapsulant, which is EVA
(ethyl vinyl acetate) and c) a rear layer and a frame around the outer
edge, which is Tedlar.
Tedlar has flammability-lowering property and mainly used in interior
coating of airplane and photovoltaic module back sheets. It is also
used in things like raincoats, and metal sheeting.
EVA has little or no odor and is comparable with vinyl and rubber
products in many electrical applications.
6.3 Modules interconnection
In order to provide the required output power a number of cells have
to be electrically interconnected. There are two basic connection
modes, series connection and parallel connection. In series connection,
the top contact of each cell is connected to the back contact of next
cell. In parallel connection, all the top contacts are connected together
and are all the bottom contacts.
Prepared by Maung Maung
70
SIM University
6.3.1 Series connection
Figure 4.3.1 shows the series connection of three cells and the
resultant group of connected cells is usually referred as a series string.
The output current is equivalent to that of a single cell but the voltage
is increased in the factor of 3 X V(of individual cell).
Figure 6.51.1 series connection of cells and I-V characteristic
6.3.2 Mismatch Effects in series connection
Miss match loss arises when there is a difference in the maximum out
put of the cells and the actual out put.
The possible root course of having mismatch losses are1) Interconnection of solar cells or
2) Modules which do not have identical properties or
2) Module experience different conditions from one another.
Exactly the same effects and graph will exhibit in modules when using
the cells having that mismatch effects.
It is important to have cells well match in series string especially in
terms of current. Under worst-case conditions the output of the entire
Prepared by Maung Maung
71
SIM University
PV module is determined by the solar cell with the lowest output. For
instance, in a module when one of the solar cells is shaded, then the
string will operate at their lower current level and the remaining cell
will not be operating at their maximum power point. performance cell
rather than powering the load. This could happen due to the partial
shading.
6.3.3 Parallel connection
Figure below shows the parallel connection of 3 solar cells. Current is
equivalent to the addition of the current of each cell 3 X I (of individual
cell), while the voltage is same as that of a single cell.
Figure 6.52.3 Parallel connection of cells and I-V characteristic
6.3.4 Mismatch Effects in parallel connection
In parallel connection, voltage is the important parameter since all the
cells must have the same operating voltage. It is important to have
the cells well matched in order to generate the maximum power out
put. Voltage mismatch in parallel connection, the affected cell actually
reduces Voc below that for good cell by itself.
Prepared by Maung Maung
72
SIM University
6.3.5 Hot-Spot Heating
Hot-spot heating happens when there is one low current solar cell in a
string as shown in the figure below.
Figure 6.53.5 shows the shaded cell
When a large number of series connected cells cause a large reverse
bias across the shaded cell will result in a large power dissipation in
the poor cell. This "hot-spots", will cause cell or glass cracking, melting
of solder and degradation of the solar cell.
Figure 6.54.5 (a) shows the crack cell due to the hot spot
Prepared by Maung Maung
73
SIM University
CHAPTER 7
PV MARKET
Prepared by Maung Maung
74
SIM University
7.1 Solar PV market and Potential
The market for electricity generation from solar is booming. A world
wide shortage of solar grade silicon in 2007 becomes constrain for PV
market. However, the market still continues to grow in terms of
capacity as well as production and it grows more than 30% yearly.
Worldwide cumulative install capacity of solar PV system had reached
more than 9200MW in the end of year 2007. In 2000, the cumulative
installed capacity was only 1200 MW.
First edition of electricity generation from PV was published in 2001.
Since then, the global market for PV has continued to develop more
than forecast rate. Figure below shows the forecast for solar
generation.
Table 7.1.10past and prediction of future PV installation
Development on solar PV has exceeded expectation in some countries.
However, there are still some countries whose development rate on PV
is slower than the forecast. One of the top countries which consistently
perform at its projected rate is Germany. Other countries in Asia
Pacific regions such as China, Australia, India, Japan and South Korea
are also showing their determination to develop the solar power
generation. Even though growing solar market in OECD, organization
for Economic Co-operation and Development nations & Asia pacific
region, the solar market in South-east Asia countries is still yet to be
developed.
Prepared by Maung Maung
75
SIM University
Figure below shows the snapshot of PV market growth in Asia Pacific
region.
Figure 7.55 PV market growth in Asia Pacific region
Prepared by Maung Maung
76
SIM University
Figure 7.56(a) APAC represent 20% of worldwide market
APAC represent 20% of worldwide market as shown above.
Prepared by Maung Maung
77
SIM University
Figure below shows the forecast of annual installed PV capacity in
Singapore. It is expected the market will grow significantly.
Figure 7.57(b) shows forecast of PV installed in Singapore
Figure 7.58 (c)24.3 MWp solar park in Dong Yang Sinan of S.Korea
Prepared by Maung Maung
78
SIM University
Figure 7.59 (d) 1.3 MWp solar plant in Saba, Malaysia
Ref: Conergy APAC & ME, semi
Prepared by Maung Maung
79
SIM University
7.2 Challenges for PV market growth in South-East Asia
In this section, we are going to discuss the challenges for growth of PV
market in Southeast Asia in all aspects such as financial, political and
educational.
Financial Aspect
Solar electricity has become cost competitive in some stand alone
applications where no access to public grid is available. However,
compare to public grid electricity, electricity generation cost for PV is
still higher in general as the capital cost of PV is relatively high.
Political Aspect
There is no private market for solar PV and all the projects are solely
driven by government. On top of this, bureaucratic barrier such as
lengthy and un-transparent tender process are also some of the
challenges for PV market.
Educational Aspect
One of the major issues for electricity generation with PV is lack of
educational components. In many rural electrification projects,
shortage of education component is the main drawback factor.
Moreover, rural users often abuse the system as they don’t have
sufficient knowledge on PV. Imperfect or not following the best
practice for installation procedure and design are also the challenge for
PV system.
7.3 Recommendations for growth of PV Market in Southeast
Asia






Financial support in order to develop a strong PV industry.
Continuous development and technical innovations such as PV
systems’ lifetime extensions to reduce the cost of PV production.
Eliminate taxing on solar related equipments and offer an
opportunity for private market to invest in PV projects.
Reduce bureaucratic barrier by shortening the project tender
process.
Provide sufficient educational components in rural PV projects
and make sure that stakeholders run these projects not rural
user.
Ensure to follow the best practice as long as PV project is
concern and make the guide book available.
Prepared by Maung Maung
80
SIM University

Make an opportunity to improve local economy with solar PV
projects and create jobs
Prepared by Maung Maung
81
SIM University
CHAPTER 8
CONCLUSION and RECOMMENDATION
Prepared by Maung Maung
82
SIM University
Advantage of solar energy is that it converts the source energy into
usable energy in only one step although it has lower conversion
efficiency compared to the other energy conversions. Other forms of
energy conversion for instance, fossil fuel power plants, first need to
convert chemical energy stored in coal into thermal energy, heat, then
convert this into mechanical energy such as turning a turbine, then, to
electrical energy. Same thing goes to automobile where chemical
energy is stored in gasoline and then converted to mechanical energy,
which is about 25%.
This process of energy conversion in several steps can make the
overall conversion efficiency much lower. Other advantage of solar
energy systems is that they produce electricity without any pollution
and also no moving parts to wear out, break down and easy to
replace.
Analysis shows that individual systems perform consistently, but often
not as predicted, some of the PV systems shows quite different from
each other for certain months. It is admittedly imperfect.
It is observed that the efficiency conversion is just 8% and some time
it reaches 9% for all the 8 blocks, which mean the conversion of the
available solar energy into usable electricity is 8-9%. This is an
acceptable conversion so long as PV is concerned today.
For the performance ratio, all 8 blocks shows average of 70% and
above. The higher the performance ratio is, the better the system uses
its potential. Low PR value indicates production losses due to technical
or design problems. The analysis of the systems performance ratio
shows that the range of PR is not so wide, which reflect the proper
operation of a system from the technical point of view (such as
component degradation or low components efficiency).
Although all the blocks show reasonably good data, it is observed that
both efficiency and performance ratio for all blocks during March in
relatively low compared to the rest. Since data from the rest of the
moths are good, it can confirm that PV modules are working fine. After
investigation, it is found that there is a problem in data transmission
for that month of March for all the blocks. Thus we did not received
good data.
To increase the public awareness, Singapore should put more attention
on solar energy such as installing weather stations with more accurate
measuring devices, public demonstration projects.
Prepared by Maung Maung
83
SIM University
In reality, the only observation of performance ratio cannot provide a
significant image of the system operation, it is required to find out
more factors to have a better analysis. Therefore, improve the process
of data manipulation, it is highly recommended to use a software or
program to minimize the processing time and maximize the accuracy.
Prepared by Maung Maung
84
SIM University
REFERENCES
[1] Stuart R Wenham, Martin A Green, Muriel E. Watt and Richard
Corkish, Applied Photovoltaics, second edition
[2] Basic Photovoltaic Principles and Methods, Solar Energy Research
Institute
[3] S.O. Kasap, Principle of Electronics Materials and Devices, Third
edition.
[4] Building and Construction Authority, Singapore, Green handbook
for Photovoltaic (PV) systems in buildings, 2008.
[5] Tomas Markvart, Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conversion, 2002
[6] Solar Energy International, Photovoltaics: Design and Installation
Manual, 2004.
[7] Energie, Solar City Guide, 2001
[8] Energy Market Authority, Singapore, Handbook for Photovoltaic
(PV) systems, fourth edition.
[9] Florida Solar Energy Center, Installing Photovoltaic Systems, May
1999
[10] Florida Solar Energy Center, Procedures for Photovoltaic System
Design Review and Approval, May 2005
[11] Tomas Markvart, Solar Electricity
[12] Richard J. Komp, Ph.D., Practical Photovoltaics, Electricity from
Solar Cells
[13] Photovoltaics CDROM; http://pvcdrom.pveducation.org/
[14] WRDC Data Access ; http://wrdc-mgo.nrel.gov/html/get_dataap.html
[15] NASA Surface meteorology and Solar Energy:
SolarSizer Data; http://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/cgibin/sse/sizer.cgi?email=maungmaung41%40gmail.com&step=1&lat=1
Prepared by Maung Maung
85
SIM University
+30&lon=103+50&ms=1&ds=1&ys=1983&me=12&de=31&ye=2005&
daily=swv_dwn&submit=Submit
[16] NASA Surface meteorology and Solar Energy: Log In / Register;
http://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/sse/global.cgi?email=
[17] Solar cell; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell
[18] NASA home page; http://www.nasa.gov/
[19] Solar Irradiation Database;
http://energy.caeds.eng.uml.edu/fpdb/Irrdata.asp
[20] Solar Energy Industries Association http://www.seia.org/
[21] Solar Generation V – 2008;
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/press/reports/solargeneration-v-2008#
[22] National Weather Study Project;
http://nwsp.ntu.edu.sg/weather/new_portal_intro.htm
[23] IEA Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme; http://www.ieapvps.org/
[25] Photovoltaic lexicon;
http://www.solarone.de/photovoltaic_lexicon.html
[26] solar energy technologies
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/pdfs/set_myp_20072011_proof_1.pdf
[27]Issues and Challenges for PV Market Development
www.semiconsingapore.org/.../cms/groups/.../ctr_029937.pdf
Prepared by Maung Maung
86
SIM University
APPENDIXES
1. PV module technical specification
Prepared by Maung Maung
87
SIM University
2. Measurement data for individual block
Daily power out put, performance ratio and efficiency for individual
block from February 2009 to September 2009 are shown below.
For efficiency and performance ratio, there are two graphs for each
block for every month, one is using the monthly irradiation data and
the other is monthly irradiation minus standard deviation.
Prepared by Maung Maung
88
SIM University
Power in kWh(Daily) for BLK 508A Feb 2009
50.00
46.79
46.72
48.74
42.32 42.81
39.96
40.00
39.46
36.47
30.05
30.00
27.83
26.51
24.96
23.21
20.00
10.00
2/28/2009
2/27/2009
2/26/2009
2/25/2009
2/24/2009
2/23/2009
2/22/2009
2/21/2009
2/20/2009
2/19/2009
2/18/2009
2/17/2009
2/16/2009
2/15/2009
0.00
Power in KWh(Daily) for Blk 508A Feb 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508A Feb 2009
12.50
11.98
12.00
11.02
10.56
10.58
10.85
10.98
10.25
9.57
10.12
9.68
9.35
9.03
8.92
8.24
7.71
6.40
5.95
28-Feb
27-Feb
5.25
25-Feb
23-Feb
22-Feb
21-Feb
20-Feb
19-Feb
18-Feb
5.64
17-Feb
16-Feb
15-Feb
6.79
6.29
5.99
26-Feb
7.14
6.80
Efficiency (Daily) for Blk 508A Feb 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
89
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508A Feb 2009
113.60
109.06
108.88
100.12
95.97
99.78
98.63
96.13
93.14
91.96
87.95
86.94
84.99
82.09
81.06
74.91
70.03
64.87
61.79
61.73
58.17
57.18
54.46
54.10
51.27
28-Feb
27-Feb
26-Feb
25-Feb
23-Feb
22-Feb
21-Feb
20-Feb
19-Feb
18-Feb
17-Feb
16-Feb
15-Feb
47.68
Performance ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508A Feb 2009
Pow er in KWh (daily) for Blk 508B Feb 2009
48.87
47.08
50.00
42.63
39.23
40.00
40.55
40.14
37.01
35.49
33.6033.60
31.24
KWhr
42.9543.20
41.49
31.05
28.58
25.95
30.00
23.66
22.19
20.00
12.31
10.00
2/28/2009
2/27/2009
2/26/2009
2/25/2009
2/24/2009
2/23/2009
2/22/2009
2/21/2009
2/20/2009
2/19/2009
2/18/2009
2/17/2009
2/16/2009
2/15/2009
2/14/2009
2/13/2009
2/12/2009
2/11/2009
2/10/2009
2/9/2009
2/8/2009
2/7/2009
0.00
Power in KWh(Daily) for Blk 508B Feb 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
90
SIM University
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Feb 2009
12.53
12.07
11.05
10.93
10.64
10.40
10.06
9.64
9.71
9.38
8.87
8.62
11.08
11.02
10.64
9.17
9.10
8.02
8.37
7.96
7.60
7.33
7.06
7.02
6.66
6.46
6.07
5.87
5.69
5.35
5.02
3.16
2.78
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Feb 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Feb 2009
113.89
109.72
100.38
99.36
96.70
96.71
94.51
91.44
87.57
85.23
80.60
78.32
100.11 100.69
88.23
82.46
76.03
72.90
72.38
69.03
66.61
64.18
63.79
58.71
60.49
55.15
53.32
51.72
48.61
45.58
28.69
25.29
Performance ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Feb 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
91
28-Feb
27-Feb
26-Feb
25-Feb
24-Feb
23-Feb
22-Feb
21-Feb
20-Feb
19-Feb
18-Feb
17-Feb
16-Feb
14-Feb
13-Feb
12-Feb
11-Feb
10-Feb
9-Feb
24.39
21.50
8-Feb
7-Feb
86.27
83.30
82.71
78.32
72.82
69.03
93.56
88.75
28-Feb
27-Feb
26-Feb
25-Feb
24-Feb
23-Feb
22-Feb
21-Feb
20-Feb
19-Feb
18-Feb
17-Feb
16-Feb
14-Feb
13-Feb
12-Feb
11-Feb
10-Feb
9-Feb
2.68
2.37
8-Feb
7-Feb
9.49
9.07
8.62
8.01
7.60
10.30
9.77
SIM University
Power in kWh (Daily) for BLK 509B FEB 2009
47.93
50.00
47.33
49.19
42.91 43.27
41.14
40.25
40.00
39.87
36.64
35.20
33.04
30.67
30.27
27.98
27.64
30.00
25.03
22.97
20.00
10.00
2/28/2009
2/27/2009
2/26/2009
2/25/2009
2/24/2009
2/23/2009
2/22/2009
2/21/2009
2/20/2009
2/19/2009
2/18/2009
2/17/2009
2/16/2009
2/15/2009
2/14/2009
2/13/2009
2/12/2009
2/11/2009
0.00
Power in KWh(Daily) for Blk 509B Feb 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk509B Feb 2009
12.29
12.14
10.83
10.70
10.32
12.62
11.12
11.01
9.70
9.10
11.10
10.55
9.78
9.30
9.03
8.47
7.96
7.76
5.89
5.19
26-Feb
20-Feb
19-Feb
18-Feb
17-Feb
16-Feb
15-Feb
14-Feb
13-Feb
12-Feb
11-Feb
6.42
5.66
25-Feb
6.32
6.25
6.84
23-Feb
7.17
7.09
22-Feb
7.47
21-Feb
7.86
6.93
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509B Feb 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
92
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509B Feb 2009
111.70
110.30
98.45
93.81
114.64
101.05
97.22
88.15
70.54
58.33
51.41
53.52
47.18
25-Feb
23-Feb
21-Feb
20-Feb
19-Feb
18-Feb
17-Feb
16-Feb
15-Feb
14-Feb
62.18
22-Feb
65.20
57.47
64.41
56.77
13-Feb
11-Feb
84.51
82.03
72.30
67.88
12-Feb
71.47
63.00
95.88
88.89
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509B Feb 2009
Power in kWh (Daily) for BLK 510A FEB 2009
52.31
49.68
50.00
49.54
51.03
45.21
45.03 44.97
43.22
40.28
40.00
37.57
35.70
32.68
30.69
29.63
32.30
27.44
30.00
25.85
20.00
11.77
10.00
2/28/2009
2/27/2009
2/26/2009
2/25/2009
2/24/2009
2/23/2009
2/22/2009
2/21/2009
2/20/2009
2/19/2009
2/18/2009
2/17/2009
2/16/2009
2/15/2009
2/14/2009
2/13/2009
2/12/2009
2/11/2009
2/10/2009
2/9/2009
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 510A Feb 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
93
26-Feb
82.68
77.02
100.86
100.01
SIM University
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Feb 2009
13.41
12.74
11.82
11.59
10.33
13.09
12.70
11.23
11.54
11.20
11.55
10.22
10.18
8.38
11.08
10.17
9.77
9.63
9.15
9.10
11.53
8.49
8.07
8.28
7.87
7.60
7.39
7.30
6.94
6.70
7.04
6.63
6.20
5.84
3.02
2.66
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Feb 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Feb 2009
121.91
115.79
107.45
105.37
93.88
115.46
102.05
101.76
118.94
104.84
92.87
104.94
92.49
104.81
100.73
92.38
88.78
87.56
83.20
82.74
76.16
77.17
73.33
71.53
69.06
67.13
63.05
60.87
75.27
66.35
63.95
60.26
56.36
53.11
27.42
24.17
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Feb 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
94
27-Feb
26-Feb
25-Feb
24-Feb
23-Feb
22-Feb
21-Feb
20-Feb
19-Feb
18-Feb
17-Feb
16-Feb
15-Feb
14-Feb
13-Feb
12-Feb
11-Feb
10-Feb
9-Feb
0.000.00
27-Feb
26-Feb
25-Feb
24-Feb
23-Feb
22-Feb
21-Feb
20-Feb
19-Feb
18-Feb
17-Feb
16-Feb
15-Feb
14-Feb
13-Feb
12-Feb
11-Feb
10-Feb
9-Feb
0.000.00
SIM University
Power in kWh (Daily) for BLK 510B 2009 Feb 2009
52.40
50.79
49.15
50.00
48.74
44.69
43.60
39.74
44.57
42.76
41.85
39.74
40.00
38.21
36.82
34.78
32.33
32.02
30.00
29.50
30.00
27.02
24.99
20.00
11.59
10.00
2/28/2009
2/27/2009
2/26/2009
2/25/2009
2/24/2009
2/23/2009
2/22/2009
2/21/2009
2/20/2009
2/19/2009
2/18/2009
2/17/2009
2/16/2009
2/15/2009
2/14/2009
2/13/2009
2/12/2009
2/11/2009
2/10/2009
2/9/2009
2/8/2009
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 510B Feb 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510B Feb 2009
13.44
13.03
12.61
12.50
11.85
11.18
10.19
8.98
10.19
9.86
8.98
11.11
11.02
11.48
11.46
10.10
11.43
10.97
10.08
10.73
9.66
9.44
9.46
8.92
8.29
8.32
7.86
7.69
7.57
7.31
6.78
6.67
9.80
8.64
8.21
7.24
6.93
6.41
5.65
6.11
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510B Feb 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
95
28-Feb
27-Feb
26-Feb
25-Feb
24-Feb
23-Feb
22-Feb
21-Feb
20-Feb
19-Feb
18-Feb
17-Feb
16-Feb
15-Feb
14-Feb
13-Feb
12-Feb
11-Feb
10-Feb
9-Feb
8-Feb
2.97
2.62
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510B Feb 2009
122.14
118.37
114.56
113.59
107.65
101.63
92.62
81.64
92.62
100.97
104.33
104.15 103.89
91.80
89.57
81.64
100.12
99.65
91.56
97.55
87.83
85.82
89.05
85.98
81.07
75.36
75.64
71.45
78.49
74.63
69.92
68.76
66.42
61.62
60.61
65.78
62.98
58.24
51.33
55.51
28-Feb
27-Feb
26-Feb
25-Feb
24-Feb
23-Feb
22-Feb
21-Feb
20-Feb
19-Feb
18-Feb
17-Feb
16-Feb
15-Feb
14-Feb
13-Feb
12-Feb
11-Feb
10-Feb
9-Feb
8-Feb
27.02
23.82
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510B Feb 2009
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508A, March 2009
54.57
52.71
49.62
50.00
46.09
41.29
38.96
40.00
37.26
36.67
35.28
33.79
33.47
31.18
30.27
30.00
26.60
KWhr
28.42
26.61
25.59
25.07
22.24
20.51
20.00
17.29
15.23
14.56
10.00
3/26/2009
3/25/2009
3/24/2009
3/23/2009
3/22/2009
3/21/2009
3/20/2009
3/19/2009
3/18/2009
3/17/2009
3/16/2009
3/15/2009
3/14/2009
Dates
3/13/2009
3/12/2009
3/11/2009
3/10/2009
3/9/2009
3/8/2009
3/7/2009
3/6/2009
3/5/2009
3/4/2009
3/3/2009
3/2/2009
3/1/2009
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508A Mar 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
96
SIM University
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Mar 2009
13.63
13.26
12.51
12.16
11.75
12.05
11.20
11.06
10.27
6.22
5.70
6.90
6.33
6.46
5.93
6.09
5.59
3.70
3.39
24-Mar
23-Mar
21-Mar
20-Mar
19-Mar
18-Mar
17-Mar
16-Mar
15-Mar
3.54
3.24
14-Mar
13-Mar
4.20
3.85
12-Mar
10-Mar
8-Mar
4.98
4.57
7-Mar
6-Mar
5-Mar
4-Mar
2-Mar
8.21
7.35 7.53
6.75
25-Mar
6.46
5.93
5.40
4.96
1-Mar
10.03
9.20
8.91
8.17
22-Mar
9.05
8.30
11-Mar
8.57
8.13 7.86
7.58 7.46
6.95
9.46
8.68
26-Mar
12.80
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Mar 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Mar 2009
123.90
120.47
113.65
110.51
109.54
101.76
100.48
93.35
74.59
66.83 68.43
62.74
61.30
58.75
57.55
53.89
55.35
50.77
23-Mar
22-Mar
21-Mar
20-Mar
18-Mar
17-Mar
16-Mar
15-Mar
24-Mar
33.63
30.85
32.14
29.48
14-Mar
13-Mar
38.17
35.02
12-Mar
10-Mar
45.28
41.54
8-Mar
7-Mar
6-Mar
80.97
74.27
56.51
51.84
49.11
45.05
11-Mar
58.72
53.86
91.15
83.61
19-Mar
82.26
75.46
5-Mar
4-Mar
2-Mar
1-Mar
77.89
73.90
68.84 67.79 71.45
63.15
86.01
78.90
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Mar 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
97
26-Mar
106.74
25-Mar
116.36
SIM University
Power in kWh (Daily) for BLK 508C MAR 2009
54.73
52.82
49.14
50.00
45.84
39.17
38.80
40.00
37.14
35.78
33.49
30.00 26.28
26.05
33.53
29.81
28.21
26.38
25.10
21.72
26.83
20.29
20.00
16.86
14.20
10.00
3/26/2009
3/25/2009
3/24/2009
3/23/2009
3/22/2009
3/21/2009
3/20/2009
3/19/2009
3/18/2009
3/17/2009
3/16/2009
3/15/2009
3/14/2009
3/13/2009
3/12/2009
3/11/2009
3/10/2009
3/9/2009
3/8/2009
3/7/2009
3/6/2009
3/5/2009
3/4/2009
3/3/2009
3/2/2009
3/1/2009
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508C Mar 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508C Mar 2009
13.66
13.29
12.83
12.53
12.20
11.77
11.94
11.14
10.95
10.21
8.14
7.24 7.47
6.64
6.85
6.29
6.52
5.98
6.41
5.88
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508C Mar 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
98
26-Mar
23-Mar
22-Mar
21-Mar
20-Mar
19-Mar
18-Mar
17-Mar
16-Mar
15-Mar
3.45
3.16
14-Mar
13-Mar
4.10
3.76
12-Mar
11-Mar
10-Mar
4.93
4.52
8-Mar
7-Mar
9.02
8.28
6.10
5.59
5.28
4.84
6-Mar
5-Mar
4-Mar
6.33
5.80
2-Mar
1-Mar
6.39
5.86
9.52
8.73
9.43
8.65
8.69
8.14 7.97
7.46
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508C Mar 2009
124.18
120.82
113.91
110.83
108.50
101.19
92.83
74.02
65.80 67.90
60.36
62.28
57.13
59.23
54.33
58.24
53.43
22-Mar
21-Mar
20-Mar
19-Mar
18-Mar
17-Mar
16-Mar
15-Mar
31.35
28.76
14-Mar
13-Mar
37.22
34.14
12-Mar
11-Mar
10-Mar
8-Mar
44.79
41.09
7-Mar
6-Mar
82.01
75.23
55.41
50.83
47.95
43.99
5-Mar
4-Mar
57.50
52.75
2-Mar
1-Mar
58.03
53.23
86.48
79.33
85.66
78.58
78.99
73.95 72.46
67.83
99.53
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508C Mar 2009
Power in kWh (Daily) for BLK 509A Mar 2009
53.82
52.05
50.13
47.95
50.00
40.00
33.37
30.85
36.44 38.22
35.28
30.00
33.53
29.76
27.60
26.48
25.74
21.52
20.11
20.00
13.16
10.00
3/26/2009
3/25/2009
3/24/2009
3/23/2009
3/22/2009
3/21/2009
3/20/2009
3/19/2009
3/18/2009
3/17/2009
3/16/2009
3/15/2009
3/14/2009
3/13/2009
3/12/2009
3/11/2009
3/10/2009
3/9/2009
3/8/2009
3/7/2009
3/6/2009
3/5/2009
3/4/2009
3/3/2009
3/2/2009
3/1/2009
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 509A Mar 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
99
26-Mar
106.97
23-Mar
116.61
SIM University
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509A Mar 2009
13.07
12.64
11.60
9.29
8.52
8.85
8.12
8.57
7.86
6.25
5.74
5.23
4.80
8.15
7.47
6.70
6.15
6.43
5.90
22-Mar
8.11
7.44
11.65
10.69
11.17
21-Mar
7.49
6.88
12.18
11.99
7.23
6.63
4.89
4.48
26-Mar
23-Mar
20-Mar
18-Mar
13-Mar
12-Mar
11-Mar
10-Mar
8-Mar
7-Mar
6-Mar
5-Mar
4-Mar
2-Mar
1-Mar
2.933.20
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509A Mar 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509A Mar 2009
118.82
108.99
114.91
105.41
77.88
73.68 71.44
68.11 67.59
62.48
110.66
101.52
84.38
77.41
80.45
73.80
105.87
97.11
74.03
67.91
65.71
60.28
60.93
58.45
55.89
53.62
56.83
52.13
47.52
43.59
44.41
40.74
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509A Mar 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
100
26-Mar
23-Mar
22-Mar
21-Mar
20-Mar
18-Mar
13-Mar
12-Mar
11-Mar
10-Mar
8-Mar
7-Mar
6-Mar
5-Mar
4-Mar
2-Mar
1-Mar
29.05
26.65
SIM University
Power in kWh (Daily) for BLK 509B MAR 2009
50.00
47.50
46.08
41.08
38.92
40.00
32.19 32.83
32.60
31.52
34.34
30.87
28.14
25.61
23.58
22.66
30.00
23.10
20.85
18.28
20.00
23.30
17.20
14.37
12.80
10.00
3/1/2009
3/2/2009
3/3/2009
3/4/2009
3/5/2009
3/6/2009
3/7/2009
3/8/2009
3/9/2009
3/10/2009
3/11/2009
3/12/2009
3/13/2009
3/14/2009
3/15/2009
3/16/2009
3/17/2009
3/18/2009
3/19/2009
3/20/2009
3/21/2009
3/22/2009
3/23/2009
3/24/2009
3/25/2009
3/26/2009
3/27/2009
3/28/2009
3/29/2009
3/30/2009
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 509B Mar 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509B Mar 2009
11.54
10.59
11.20
10.27
9.98
9.16
9.46
8.67
5.61
5.15
5.66
5.19
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509B Mar 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
101
26-Mar
25-Mar
23-Mar
22-Mar
21-Mar
20-Mar
19-Mar
18-Mar
17-Mar
3.11
2.85
14-Mar
13-Mar
3.49
3.20
12-Mar
11-Mar
10-Mar
6.84
6.226.27
5.71
5.73 5.50
5.26 5.05
5.06
4.65
4.18
3.83
8-Mar
7-Mar
6-Mar
2-Mar
1-Mar
4.44
4.07
8.34
7.65
7.50
6.88
24-Mar
7.97
7.32
7.82
7.17
15-Mar
7.66 7.92
7.02 7.26
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509B Mar 2009
104.88
101.74
96.21
93.33
90.70
85.92
78.82
51.00
46.79
51.45
47.19
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509B Mar 2009
Power in kWh (Daily) for BLK 510A MAR 2009
52.35
48.75
50.00
43.74
42.25
39.58
39.36
40.00
39.11
36.20
36.17
33.57
36.15
32.87
29.29
30.00
30.57
29.05
28.13
24.31
23.04
19.81
20.00
17.66
16.90
8.98
10.00
8.69
3/26/2009
3/25/2009
3/24/2009
3/23/2009
3/22/2009
3/21/2009
3/20/2009
3/19/2009
3/18/2009
3/17/2009
3/16/2009
3/15/2009
3/14/2009
3/13/2009
3/12/2009
3/11/2009
3/10/2009
3/9/2009
3/8/2009
3/7/2009
3/6/2009
3/5/2009
3/4/2009
3/3/2009
3/2/2009
3/1/2009
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 510A Mar 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
102
26-Mar
25-Mar
23-Mar
22-Mar
21-Mar
20-Mar
19-Mar
18-Mar
17-Mar
28.26
25.92
14-Mar
13-Mar
12-Mar
31.73
29.11
11-Mar
10-Mar
62.14
56.5457.00
52.07 50.02
51.87
47.76 45.89
46.03
42.22
37.98
34.84
8-Mar
7-Mar
6-Mar
2-Mar
1-Mar
40.36
37.02
75.80
69.54
68.14
62.51
24-Mar
72.47
66.48
71.07
65.20
15-Mar
71.96
69.59
63.84 66.02
83.20
SIM University
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Mar 2009
14.45
14.24
13.62
13.25
13.06
12.72
12.49
11.84
11.67
10.86
10.63
10.26
9.62
9.56
8.82
8.77
8.78
7.98 8.06
5.60
5.13
4.81
4.41
7.06
6.47
4.29
3.93
4.11
3.77
25-Mar
24-Mar
23-Mar
22-Mar
21-Mar
20-Mar
19-Mar
18-Mar
17-Mar
16-Mar
15-Mar
14-Mar
13-Mar
12-Mar
11-Mar
10-Mar
9-Mar
8-Mar
7-Mar
6-Mar
5-Mar
2.11
1.94
4-Mar
3-Mar
7.43
6.81
6.83
6.27
2.18
2.00
2-Mar
8.06
7.32
7.12
6.53
5.91
5.42
1-Mar
8.79
8.72
26-Mar
8.79
8.16 8.07
7.48
9.75
9.50
9.42
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Mar 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Mar 2009
131.30
129.38
123.76
120.44
118.68
115.58
113.53
107.63
106.02
98.74
96.57
93.27
87.38
86.89
74.1173.31
67.99
79.80
62.10
56.97
50.86
46.66
38.98
35.76
37.31
34.22
25-Mar
24-Mar
23-Mar
22-Mar
21-Mar
20-Mar
19-Mar
18-Mar
17-Mar
16-Mar
15-Mar
14-Mar
13-Mar
12-Mar
11-Mar
10-Mar
9-Mar
8-Mar
7-Mar
6-Mar
5-Mar
19.19
17.60
4-Mar
3-Mar
43.73
40.11
73.20
67.48
64.13
61.91
58.83
66.56
64.66
59.32
19.83
18.19
2-Mar
79.85
79.21
72.5673.25
53.67
49.24
1-Mar
86.34
85.56
80.16
79.71
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Mar 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
103
26-Mar
79.92
88.59
SIM University
Power in kWh (Daily) for BLK 510B MAR 2009
54.71
50.93
50.00
47.45
38.45
40.00
42.54
41.24
39.95
38.42
35.50
35.31
32.89
33.20
32.34
28.71
30.00
29.71 28.66
27.48
23.58
22.67
19.45
20.00
17.53
16.64
8.57
8.18
10.00
3/26/2009
3/25/2009
3/24/2009
3/23/2009
3/22/2009
3/21/2009
3/20/2009
3/19/2009
3/18/2009
3/17/2009
3/16/2009
3/15/2009
3/14/2009
3/13/2009
3/12/2009
3/11/2009
3/10/2009
3/9/2009
3/8/2009
3/7/2009
3/6/2009
3/5/2009
3/4/2009
3/3/2009
3/2/2009
3/1/2009
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 510B Mar 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Mar 2009
14.18
13.88
13.29
13.00
12.73
12.37
12.19
11.53
11.35
10.57
9.34
8.57
5.51
5.05
4.73
4.33
8.06
7.40
7.22 6.96
6.62 6.39
4.26
3.91
4.04
3.71
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510B Mar 2009
Efficiency (Monthly Average) for Blk 510B Mar 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
104
26-Mar
25-Mar
24-Mar
23-Mar
22-Mar
21-Mar
20-Mar
19-Mar
18-Mar
17-Mar
16-Mar
14-Mar
13-Mar
12-Mar
11-Mar
10-Mar
8-Mar
7-Mar
6-Mar
5-Mar
9-Mar
2.08
1.91
4-Mar
3-Mar
8.63
7.86 7.91
7.21
6.68
6.12
1.99
1.82
2-Mar
9.19
6.97
6.40
5.73
5.26
1-Mar
9.48
9.33
8.56
15-Mar
8.58
7.99 7.87
7.33
10.33
10.02
9.71
8.90
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510B Mar 2009
128.84
126.15
120.80
118.19
115.72
112.44
110.81
104.75
103.15
96.09
84.88
80.92
77.87
60.67
55.66
50.04
45.91
38.71
35.51
36.74
33.70
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510B Mar 2009
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508A May 2009
50.00
46.39
45.27
43.37
45.00
38.83 38.50
40.00
39.72
36.99 36.82
35.77
35.65
33.46
35.00
38.39
36.05
31.82
30.00
KWh
38.38
41.51
27.03
30.55
26.40
27.97
23.44
25.00
21.21
20.00
15.00
8.88
10.00
6.04
5.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508A May 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
105
26-May
25-May
24-May
23-May
22-May
21-May
20-May
19-May
18-May
17-May
16-May
15-May
14-May
13-May
12-May
11-May
10-May
9-May
8-May
7-May
6-May
5-May
4-May
3-May
0.00
26-Mar
25-Mar
24-Mar
23-Mar
22-Mar
21-Mar
20-Mar
19-Mar
18-Mar
16-Mar
17-Mar
14-Mar
13-Mar
12-Mar
11-Mar
10-Mar
9-Mar
8-Mar
7-Mar
6-Mar
5-Mar
4-Mar
3-Mar
42.94
39.39
73.29
67.23
18.92
17.35
18.06
16.56
2-Mar
78.39
71.4071.91
65.58
65.50
63.27
60.16 58.04
77.81
63.38
58.14
52.06
47.76
1-Mar
86.15
84.82
83.52
15-Mar
77.97
72.6171.52
66.60
93.92
91.04
88.21
SIM University
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508A May 2009
12.85
12.01
12.54
11.72
9.88
9.23
11.00
10.63
10.28
9.93
10.76 10.67
9.9110.05 9.97
9.26
9.27
8.66
8.81
8.24
7.49
7.00
6.49
6.07
12.02
11.23
10.64
10.25 10.20
9.94
9.58 9.53
11.50
10.75
9.99
9.33
8.46
7.91
7.75
7.31 7.24
6.84
5.88
5.49
2.46
2.30
26-May
25-May
24-May
23-May
22-May
21-May
20-May
19-May
18-May
17-May
16-May
15-May
14-May
13-May
12-May
11-May
10-May
9-May
8-May
7-May
6-May
5-May
4-May
3-May
1.67
1.56
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508A May 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508A May 2009
116.26
113.46
108.70
108.64
106.02
104.04
99.55
96.18
93.03
89.88
97.32 96.50
90.94
90.17
89.66
89.36
83.86
78.36
83.50
101.57
96.22
97.22
92.72 92.27
89.91
86.64 86.22
83.78
90.35
84.43
79.75
74.52
76.58
71.56
70.10
66.1765.50
61.83
67.75
63.30
58.76
54.90
53.15
49.67
22.26
20.80
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508A May 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
106
26-May
25-May
24-May
23-May
22-May
21-May
20-May
19-May
18-May
17-May
16-May
15-May
14-May
13-May
12-May
11-May
10-May
9-May
8-May
7-May
6-May
5-May
4-May
3-May
15.13
14.13
SIM University
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508B May 2009
50.00
46.75
45.23
45.00
40.51
40.02
38.35
40.00
38.07
37.58 37.79
34.97
35.00
33.19
33.16
29.98
KWh
30.00
25.87
29.65 29.61
27.31
25.00
22.25
20.00 17.87
15.00
12.77
10.26
10.00
5.00
31-May-09
30-May-09
29-May-09
28-May-09
27-May-09
26-May-09
25-May-09
24-May-09
23-May-09
22-May-09
21-May-09
20-May-09
19-May-09
18-May-09
17-May-09
16-May-09
15-May-09
14-May-09
13-May-09
12-May-09
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508B May 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508B May 2009
12.95
12.53
12.10
11.71
11.22
11.09
10.62
10.55
10.41 10.4710.49
10.36
9.93
9.73
9.86
9.78
9.69
9.19
9.19
9.05
8.59
8.31
7.76
7.57
7.17 7.07
6.70
8.21
8.20
7.68
7.67
8.59
6.16
5.76
4.95
4.63
3.54
3.31
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508B May 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
107
31-May-09
30-May-09
29-May-09
28-May-09
27-May-09
26-May-09
25-May-09
24-May-09
23-May-09
22-May-09
21-May-09
20-May-09
19-May-09
18-May-09
17-May-09
16-May-09
15-May-09
14-May-09
13-May-09
12-May-09
2.84
2.66
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508B May 2009
100.29
93.72
96.12
89.82
117.17
109.48
113.35
105.92
101.53
94.18 94.72 94.87
88.01 88.51
83.17
77.72
95.42
89.16
87.63
81.89
75.15
70.22
68.45
64.83 63.97
60.58
74.31 74.22
69.44 69.35
83.12
77.67
55.76
52.10
44.80
41.86
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508B May 2009
Power in KWh (Daily) for BLK508C MAY 2009
50.00
45.31
45.00
40.00
46.09
43.46
41.96
39.75
41.26
38.53
38.47
39.11
38.04
38.30
36.86
36.54
35.79
35.00
30.00
33.09
32.48
29.71
29.54
25.00
29.44
27.82
27.75
26.65
26.48
KWh
36.08
34.54
33.28
23.19
21.62
20.00
15.00
12.09
8.58
10.00
5.00
30-May-09
29-May-09
28-May-09
27-May-09
26-May-09
25-May-09
24-May-09
23-May-09
22-May-09
21-May-09
20-May-09
19-May-09
18-May-09
17-May-09
16-May-09
15-May-09
14-May-09
13-May-09
12-May-09
11-May-09
9-May-09
10-May-09
8-May-09
7-May-09
6-May-09
5-May-09
4-May-09
3-May-09
2-May-09
1-May-09
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508C May 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
108
31-May-09
30-May-09
29-May-09
28-May-09
27-May-09
25-May-09
24-May-09
23-May-09
22-May-09
21-May-09
20-May-09
19-May-09
18-May-09
17-May-09
16-May-09
15-May-09
14-May-09
13-May-09
12-May-09
26-May-09
32.00
29.90
25.71
24.03
Prepared by Maung Maung
20.19
21.61
62.29
66.66
10-May-09
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508C May 2009
109
30-May-09
29-May-09
77.84
83.31
65.45
70.04
69.25
74.11
30-May-09
8.94
28-May-09
81.26
86.96
29-May-09
8.41
27-May-09
28.43
30.43
28-May-09
27-May-09
26-May-09
7.18
26-May-09
69.89
74.80
84.88
90.84
25-May-09
24-May-09
7.69
25-May-09
24-May-09
23-May-09
102.23
109.40
23-May-09
22-May-09
21-May-09
7.65
22-May-09
90.09
96.41
85.97
92.00
20-May-09
21-May-09
86.72
92.80
20-May-09
19-May-09
9.54 9.46
19-May-09
18-May-09
97.07
103.88
18-May-09
17-May-09
10.12
9.85
50.86
54.43
65.27
69.85
16-May-09
16-May-09
9.27
17-May-09
62.69
67.09
6.90
15-May-09
15-May-09
14-May-09
6.85
76.40
81.77
92.00
98.46
13-May-09
13-May-09
8.61
14-May-09
89.50
95.78
12-May-09
12-May-09
11-May-09
10-May-09
9-May-09
8-May-09
7-May-09
6-May-09
5-May-09
4-May-09
3-May-09
2-May-09
9.97 9.96
11-May-09
90.49
96.84
9-May-09
108.42
116.03
90.64
97.00
84.21
90.12
78.28
83.77
106.59
114.07
98.71
105.64
93.52
100.09
1-May-09
10.86
10.29
8-May-09
7-May-09
54.54
58.37
69.49
74.37
11.73
6-May-09
5-May-09
4-May-09
3-May-09
2-May-09
1-May-09
SIM University
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508C May 2009
11.93
10.68
11.25
9.91
9.34
8.57
7.62
7.20
6.00
5.60
3.13
2.22
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508C May 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508C May 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
2.23
2.39
5.34
5.71
6.80
7.28
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509A May 2009
110
30-May
29-May
28-May
27-May
26-May
25-May
24-May
23-May
22-May
21-May
20-May
19-May
3.04
3.25
7.05
7.55
8.39
8.98
7.48
8.00
8.90
9.52
7.71
8.25
9.16
9.81
10.97
11.74
9.71
10.39
9.36
10.02
9.10
9.74
10.42
11.15
29-May
27-May
25-May
23-May
21-May
19-May
17-May
15-May
13-May
8.62
10.00
18-May
7.09
7.58
6.71
7.18
8.37
8.95
9.98
10.68
11-May
9-May
11.75
20.62
27.24
34.38
32.41
28.88
35.40
37.50
36.17
45.66
42.39
40.23
38.56
37.56
35.17
32.31
29.77
27.37
25.93
26.26
38.23
37.97
45.00
17-May
16-May
15-May
14-May
13-May
12-May
9.72
10.40
9.83
10.52
10-May
35.49
31.64
28.19
26.06
40.00
11-May
9.90
10.59
7-May
5-May
13.98
50.00
9-May
9.19
9.83
11.82
12.65
3-May
24.69
22.54
35.00
8-May
7-May
8.19
8.77
7.30
7.81
1-May
15.00
6-May
5-May
3.62
3.87
KWh
25.00
6.75
7.22
6.39
6.84
5.83
6.24
30.00
4-May
3-May
2-May
1-May
SIM University
Power in KWh (Daily) for BLK509A MAY
20.00
5.00
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 509A May 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509A May 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
21.40
30.25
28.11
26.95
33.23
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 509B May 2009
111
30-May
29-May
28-May
27-May
26-May
25-May
24-May
23-May
22-May
21-May
27.88
35.26
33.39
29.79
36.49
38.56
47.02
43.74
41.58
39.59
38.70
39.25
38.32
37.06
0.00
20-May
12.26
15.00
37.43
20.00
19-May
8.82
10.00
18-May
17-May
16-May
15-May
14-May
13-May
12-May
27.06
30.00
11-May
10-May
9-May
36.70
40.00
8-May
7-May
33.87
35.00
6-May
46.16
42.73
40.36
50.00
5-May
23.85
25.00
4-May
3-May
5.00
1.25
45.00
2-May
1-May
KWh
30-May
29-May
28-May
27-May
26-May
25-May
24-May
23-May
22-May
21-May
20-May
19-May
18-May
17-May
16-May
15-May
14-May
13-May
12-May
11-May
10-May
9-May
8-May
7-May
6-May
5-May
4-May
3-May
2-May
1-May
27.63
29.57
20.28
21.70
32.89
35.20
48.51
51.92
80.88
86.55
76.25
81.61
99.73
106.73
88.21
94.40
85.09
91.06
83.28
89.12
67.94
72.71
64.08
68.58
94.65
101.29
82.74
88.55
70.04
74.95
107.42
114.96
90.71
97.07
88.35
94.55
89.32
95.59
76.02
81.35
64.39
68.91
60.99
65.27
61.79
66.12
89.93
96.24
83.48
89.34
74.44
79.67
66.32
70.97
61.30
65.60
58.08
62.15
53.02
56.74
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509A May 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509A May 2009
Power in KWh(Daily) for BLK509B MAY 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
20.75
22.20
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509B May 2009
112
30-May
29-May
28-May
27-May
26-May
25-May
24-May
23-May
22-May
21-May
28.84
30.86
78.54
84.05
65.59
70.19
70.07
74.99
82.94
88.76
71.16
76.15
85.84
91.87
102.89
110.11
90.71
97.08
87.20
93.31
20-May
97.83
104.69
88.05
94.23
50.36
53.89
66.13
70.77
63.39
67.84
78.17
83.66
19-May
18-May
17-May
16-May
15-May
14-May
93.14
99.68
13-May
92.34
98.82
110.61
118.37
108.60
116.22
90.16
96.48
86.34
92.40
79.68
85.27
63.66
68.13
56.12
60.06
100.52
107.57
94.95
101.62
91.03
97.42
2.94
3.15
12-May
11-May
10-May
9-May
8-May
7-May
6-May
5-May
4-May
3-May
2-May
1-May
30-May
29-May
28-May
27-May
26-May
25-May
24-May
23-May
22-May
21-May
20-May
19-May
18-May
17-May
16-May
15-May
14-May
13-May
12-May
11-May
10-May
9-May
8-May
7-May
6-May
5-May
4-May
3-May
2-May
1-May
0.32
0.35
3.17
3.40
2.28
2.44
5.54
5.93
9.13
9.77
9.45
10.11
11.32
12.12
9.98
10.68
9.59
10.27
8.64
9.25
7.71
8.25
7.22
7.72
10.76
11.52
9.69
10.37
8.60
9.21
12.17
13.03
11.95
12.79
10.25
10.97
10.02
10.72
10.16
10.87
9.92
10.62
9.50
10.17
8.77
9.38
7.83
8.38
7.28
7.79
6.98
7.46
7.00
7.50
6.18
6.61
11.06
11.84
10.45
11.18
SIM University
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509B May 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509B May 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509B May 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
2.82
3.02
5.97
6.39
7.50
8.02
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510A May 2009
113
28-May
27-May
26-May
25-May
24-May
23-May
3.67
3.93
7.77
8.31
9.70
10.38
8.52
9.11
9.77
10.46
11.74
12.56
10.53
11.26
21-May
22-May
10.31
11.03
20-May
11.39
12.19
10.34
11.07
7.96
8.52
7.45
7.97
9.16
9.81
10.89
11.66
19-May
18-May
17-May
16-May
15-May
14-May
13-May
12-May
10.63
11.38
10.60
11.34
10-May
11-May
10.82
11.58
9-May
9.89
10.59
12.73
13.62
28-May
26-May
24-May
22-May
20-May
18-May
16-May
14-May
12-May
10-May
8-May
6-May
4-May
2-May
14.19
10.90
15.32
KWh
23.06
30.00
40.66
39.82
37.46
45.34
43.99
39.95
37.76
35.40
42.08
41.06
40.95
49.18
48.64
44.88
41.79
38.22
36.57
32.90
30.76
28.77
28.96
25.99
40.00
8-May
9.47
10.13
12.59
13.47
20.00
7-May
6.73
7.20
11.62
12.43
30.00
6-May
3.96
4.24
50.00
5-May
4-May
3-May
2-May
SIM University
Power in KWh (Daily) for BLK510A MAY 2009
60.00
10.00
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 510 May 2009
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 510A May 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 510B May 2009
114
29-May
14.26
10.80
20.00
27-May
25-May
23-May
21-May
19-May
17-May
15-May
13-May
22.99
29.44
34.79
31.65
36.16
38.21
39.99
38.37
44.40
42.79
47.95
45.30
40.90
40.13
39.75
40.51
38.48
34.48
32.10
29.62
28.64
28.52
30.00
11-May
9-May
36.84
38.96
50.00
7-May
5-May
21.21
36.16
34.68
31.39
40.00
3-May
1-May
KWh
10.00
0.00
28-May
27-May
26-May
25-May
24-May
23-May
70.57
75.52
88.13
94.32
77.39
82.82
88.83
95.06
106.66
114.14
95.66
102.37
54.25
58.05
103.49
110.75
93.99
100.58
83.28
89.12
98.99
105.94
96.59
103.37
96.33
103.09
21-May
22-May
115.69
123.81
114.42
122.45
98.31
105.21
89.91
96.22
86.03
92.06
72.37
77.45
67.68
72.43
68.12
72.90
61.15
65.44
105.57
112.98
93.67
100.25
33.39
35.73
25.65
27.45
36.03
38.56
20-May
19-May
18-May
17-May
16-May
15-May
14-May
13-May
12-May
11-May
10-May
9-May
8-May
7-May
6-May
5-May
4-May
3-May
2-May
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510A May 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510A May 2009
Power in KWh (Daily) for BLK 510B MAY 2009
60.00
Prepared by Maung Maung
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510B May 2009
115
28-May
27-May
26-May
25-May
24-May
23-May
33.39
35.73
70.57
75.52
88.13
94.32
77.39
82.82
88.83
95.06
21-May
106.66
114.14
95.66
102.37
103.49
110.75
93.67
100.25
54.25
58.05
83.28
89.12
98.99
105.94
96.59
103.37
96.33
103.09
20-May
22-May
115.69
123.81
114.42
122.45
98.31
105.21
89.91
96.22
86.03
92.06
72.37
77.45
67.68
72.43
68.12
72.90
61.15
65.44
105.57
112.98
93.99
100.58
25.65
27.45
36.03
38.56
19-May
18-May
17-May
16-May
15-May
14-May
13-May
12-May
11-May
10-May
9-May
8-May
7-May
6-May
5-May
4-May
3-May
2-May
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510B May 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510B May 2009
30-May
29-May
28-May
27-May
26-May
25-May
24-May
23-May
22-May
21-May
20-May
19-May
18-May
17-May
16-May
15-May
14-May
13-May
12-May
11-May
10-May
9-May
8-May
7-May
6-May
5-May
4-May
3-May
2-May
1-May
3.69
3.95
2.80
2.99
5.95
6.37
5.49
5.88
9.01
9.64
8.19
8.77
7.62
8.16
9.89
10.59
9.36
10.02
8.31
8.89
11.49
12.30
10.35
11.08
9.93
10.63
9.96
10.66
11.08
11.85
10.59
11.33
10.39
11.12
10.29
11.01
8.93
9.55
7.67
8.21
7.41
7.93
7.38
7.90
10.49
11.22
9.54
10.21
12.41
13.28
11.73
12.55
10.08
10.79
9.36
10.02
8.98
9.61
8.13
8.70
SIM University
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 510B May 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508B July 2009
116
31-Jul
30-Jul
29-Jul
28-Jul
27-Jul
26-Jul
25-Jul
24-Jul
23-Jul
22-Jul
21-Jul
19-Jul
18-Jul
17-Jul
16-Jul
15-Jul
14-Jul
13-Jul
12-Jul
11-Jul
10-Jul
9-Jul
8-Jul
7-Jul
6-Jul
5-Jul
4-Jul
3-Jul
2-Jul
1-Jul
0.76
0.83
2.67
2.92
4.03
4.40
4.63
5.05
5.88
6.41
7.43
8.10
8.94
12.05
13.02
12.09
11.93
11.08
10.77
11.05
12.49
12.29
11.45
10.26
11.19
9.88
9.75
10.12
9.55
11.27
10.02
10.93
9.27
8.75
10.89
10.57
11.53
9.98
9.28
8.99
8.51
8.24
7.34
8.00
6.56
7.15
5.73
6.26
5.15
5.61
5.87
6.40
5.60
6.11
4.71
5.14
5.62
6.14
4.63
5.05
30-Jul
29-Jul
28-Jul
27-Jul
26-Jul
25-Jul
24-Jul
23-Jul
22-Jul
21-Jul
19-Jul
18-Jul
17-Jul
16-Jul
15-Jul
14-Jul
13-Jul
12-Jul
11-Jul
10-Jul
9-Jul
8-Jul
7-Jul
6-Jul
5-Jul
4-Jul
3-Jul
2-Jul
1-Jul
2.96
10.45
15.75
18.09
22.97
29.02
39.14
38.60
34.92
43.30
46.64
43.18
44.74
44.03
41.29
39.02
36.24
34.20
33.25
32.22
28.68
25.62
22.41
20.11
22.93
21.90
18.42
21.98
18.08
KWh
SIM University
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508B July 2009
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508B July 2009
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 508B July 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508C July 2009
117
9.72
35.06
37.09
36.24
41.33
41.82
44.45
41.61
42.61
45.56
21.73
25.62
28.68
32.00
32.01
30-Jul
14.78
17.62
23.14
22.41
19.57
22.20
23.96
38.33
45.56
7.07
7.27
5.35
12.66
20.81
25.35
KWh
29-Jul
28-Jul
27-Jul
26-Jul
25-Jul
24-Jul
23-Jul
22-Jul
21-Jul
20-Jul
19-Jul
18-Jul
17-Jul
16-Jul
15-Jul
14-Jul
13-Jul
12-Jul
11-Jul
10-Jul
9-Jul
8-Jul
7-Jul
6-Jul
5-Jul
4-Jul
3-Jul
2-Jul
1-Jul
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508B July 2009
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508C July 2009
31-Jul
30-Jul
29-Jul
28-Jul
27-Jul
26-Jul
25-Jul
24-Jul
23-Jul
22-Jul
21-Jul
19-Jul
18-Jul
17-Jul
16-Jul
15-Jul
14-Jul
13-Jul
12-Jul
11-Jul
10-Jul
9-Jul
8-Jul
7-Jul
6-Jul
5-Jul
4-Jul
3-Jul
2-Jul
1-Jul
6.88
7.51
24.30
26.51
36.63
39.96
53.42
58.27
42.06
45.88
93.22
101.69
100.69
109.84
108.45
118.30
100.40
109.53
104.04
113.50
102.38
111.68
89.75
97.90
81.20
88.58
67.48
73.62
84.27
91.93
79.52
86.75
77.32
84.35
91.02
99.29
96.01
104.74
90.74
98.98
74.93
81.74
66.68
72.74
59.58
64.99
52.11
56.85
46.76
51.02
53.32
58.16
50.93
55.56
42.82
46.72
51.11
55.76
42.04
45.86
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508B July 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508C July 2009
118
30-Jul
29-Jul
28-Jul
27-Jul
26-Jul
25-Jul
24-Jul
23-Jul
22-Jul
21-Jul
20-Jul
19-Jul
18-Jul
17-Jul
16-Jul
15-Jul
14-Jul
13-Jul
12-Jul
11-Jul
10-Jul
9-Jul
8-Jul
7-Jul
6-Jul
5-Jul
4-Jul
3-Jul
2-Jul
1-Jul
16.44
17.94
84.27
91.93
50.53
55.13
40.97
44.69
96.10
104.84
105.95
115.58
105.95
115.58
81.52
88.93
97.25
106.09
103.35
112.74
96.75
105.55
86.24
94.08
66.68
72.74
52.11
56.85
59.58
64.99
53.81
58.71
74.41
81.17
99.07
108.08
89.13
97.24
74.42
81.19
55.70
60.77
51.62
56.32
45.51
49.65
34.37
37.50
12.43
13.56
22.60
24.66
16.89
18.43
29.45
32.12
58.94
64.30
48.38
52.78
11.66
12.72
10.57
11.54
10.70
11.67
8.97
9.79
11.37
12.41
9.49
10.35
10.65
11.61
30-Jul
3.78
4.13
5.56
6.07
4.51
4.92
6.56
7.15
5.73
6.26
10.90
11.89
9.27
10.12
8.19
8.93
8.19
8.93
7.34
8.00
5.92
6.46
5.01
5.46
5.68
6.20
6.13
6.69
9.81
10.70
11.66
12.72
1.81
1.97
1.86
2.03
2.49
2.71
1.37
1.49
3.24
3.53
5.32
5.81
6.49
7.08
29-Jul
28-Jul
27-Jul
26-Jul
25-Jul
24-Jul
23-Jul
22-Jul
21-Jul
20-Jul
19-Jul
18-Jul
17-Jul
16-Jul
15-Jul
14-Jul
13-Jul
12-Jul
11-Jul
10-Jul
9-Jul
8-Jul
7-Jul
6-Jul
5-Jul
4-Jul
3-Jul
2-Jul
1-Jul
SIM University
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 508C July 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508C July 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508C July 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509A July 2009
119
30-Jul
29-Jul
28-Jul
27-Jul
26-Jul
25-Jul
24-Jul
23-Jul
3.76
4.10
5.55
6.06
11.28
12.30
10.57
11.53
11.43
12.47
10.28
11.21
10.58
11.54
8.89
9.70
8.08
8.82
10.94
11.93
30-Jul
29-Jul
28-Jul
27-Jul
26-Jul
25-Jul
24-Jul
23-Jul
15-Jul
14-Jul
13-Jul
12-Jul
11-Jul
8.13
14.69
21.70
19.38
21.82
25.34
34.74
31.58
31.63
41.32
44.67
40.16
41.33
44.08
42.74
38.67
40.16
38.70
50.00
15-Jul
14-Jul
13-Jul
8.09
8.83
9.90
10.80
10-Jul
9-Jul
8-Jul
11.89
0.00
7-Jul
5.00
12.46
35.00
12-Jul
11-Jul
10-Jul
4.96
5.41
5.58
6.09
6.48
7.07
10.00
6-Jul
17.10
30.00
9-Jul
2.08
2.27
3.04
3.32
7-Jul
5-Jul
15.00
8-Jul
3.19
3.48
6-Jul
19.82
23.20
40.00
4-Jul
3-Jul
2-Jul
1-Jul
Kwh
45.00
5-Jul
4.38
4.77
10.27
11.21
9.90
10.80
20.00
4-Jul
5.07
5.53
5.94
6.48
25.00
3-Jul
2-Jul
1-Jul
SIM University
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 509A July 2009
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 509A July 2009
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 509A July 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 509B July 2009
120
30-Jul
29-Jul
28-Jul
27-Jul
26-Jul
25-Jul
24-Jul
15.09
17.83
22.22
37.49
43.50
42.51
41.78
42.18
46.34
45.30
42.04
39.60
36.83
35.71
32.29
32.33
29.00
25.96
22.65
23.59
19.93
22.48
26.10
24.20
31.48
50.00
23-Jul
22-Jul
21-Jul
20-Jul
19-Jul
18-Jul
17-Jul
16-Jul
15-Jul
14-Jul
13-Jul
12-Jul
11-Jul
10-Jul
9-Jul
8-Jul
7-Jul
17.51
35.00
6-Jul
20.00
5-Jul
41.07
39.37
45.00
4-Jul
25.00
21.03
40.00
3-Jul
25.62
30.00
2-Jul
1-Jul
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509A July2009
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 509B July 2009
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
30-Jul
29-Jul
28-Jul
27-Jul
26-Jul
25-Jul
24-Jul
23-Jul
15-Jul
14-Jul
13-Jul
12-Jul
11-Jul
10-Jul
9-Jul
8-Jul
7-Jul
6-Jul
5-Jul
4-Jul
3-Jul
2-Jul
1-Jul
19.13
20.47
51.32
54.93
51.06
54.64
97.21
104.03
105.08
112.46
94.48
101.11
97.24
104.06
103.69
110.96
100.54
107.60
90.98
97.37
94.47
101.10
91.05
97.43
81.73
87.47
74.30
79.51
74.42
79.64
59.61
63.80
45.59
48.79
34.55
36.98
27.96
29.92
29.31
31.37
40.23
43.05
46.63
49.90
54.57
58.40
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509A July 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509B July 2009
121
30-Jul
29-Jul
28-Jul
27-Jul
26-Jul
25-Jul
24-Jul
23-Jul
22-Jul
21-Jul
20-Jul
19-Jul
18-Jul
17-Jul
16-Jul
15-Jul
14-Jul
13-Jul
12-Jul
11-Jul
10-Jul
9-Jul
8-Jul
7-Jul
6-Jul
5-Jul
4-Jul
3-Jul
2-Jul
1-Jul
52.89
56.60
52.28
55.95
41.93
44.88
61.07
65.36
53.28
57.02
100.01
107.03
109.01
116.66
98.29
105.19
99.22
106.19
106.57
114.05
88.21
94.40
98.91
105.85
86.64
92.72
84.00
89.89
68.22
73.00
55.50
59.39
75.96
81.30
102.34
109.52
93.15
99.69
96.61
103.39
92.61
99.11
76.05
81.39
61.41
65.72
46.89
50.18
35.51
38.00
74.05
79.24
56.93
60.93
41.20
44.10
49.48
52.96
60.26
64.49
30-Jul
29-Jul
28-Jul
27-Jul
26-Jul
25-Jul
24-Jul
23-Jul
22-Jul
21-Jul
20-Jul
19-Jul
18-Jul
17-Jul
16-Jul
15-Jul
14-Jul
13-Jul
12-Jul
11-Jul
10-Jul
9-Jul
8-Jul
7-Jul
6-Jul
5-Jul
4-Jul
3-Jul
2-Jul
1-Jul
3.86
4.21
5.69
6.20
4.56
4.98
6.64
7.25
5.80
6.32
11.13
12.14
10.13
11.05
10.51
11.46
10.07
10.99
10.88
11.87
11.86
12.93
10.69
11.66
10.79
11.77
9.14
9.97
11.59
12.64
9.59
10.47
10.76
11.74
9.42
10.28
8.26
9.01
8.27
9.02
7.42
8.09
6.04
6.58
5.10
5.56
8.05
8.79
6.68
7.29
6.19
6.76
5.75
6.28
4.48
4.89
5.38
5.87
6.55
7.15
SIM University
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 509B July 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509B July 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509B July 2009
2.73
2.98
8.81
9.62
Prepared by Maung Maung
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510A July 2009
122
31-Jul
30-Jul
29-Jul
4.48
4.89
6.32
6.89
5.62
6.13
6.34
6.92
10.96
11.95
11.41
12.44
12.36
13.48
11.08
12.09
11.48
12.52
9.63
10.51
11.98
13.07
10.84
11.83
8.94
9.75
7.27
7.93
31-Jul
30-Jul
29-Jul
28-Jul
27-Jul
26-Jul
25-Jul
24-Jul
13-Jul
12-Jul
11-Jul
10-Jul
9-Jul
8-Jul
7-Jul
1.07
2.48
2.84
2.64
2.47
2.20
1.75
2.00
28-Jul
27-Jul
26-Jul
25-Jul
24-Jul
13-Jul
12-Jul
11-Jul
10-Jul
9-Jul
8-Jul
6-Jul
5-Jul
4-Jul
3-Jul
2.31
2.82
4.37
4.28
4.28
4.46
4.83
4.33
4.48
4.68
4.24
3.76
3.49
3.44
4.00
7-Jul
6-Jul
6.75
7.37
11.18
12.20
4-Jul
2-Jul
1-Jul
5.00
5-Jul
10.95
11.94
3-Jul
5.91
6.45
7.22
7.87
3.00
2-Jul
1-Jul
SIM University
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 510A July 2009
6.00
1.00
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 510A July 2009
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 510A July 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
21.89
24.36
31.01
34.09
28.02
26.51
45.14
41.30
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 510B July 2009
123
31-Jul-09
30-Jul-09
29-Jul-09
28-Jul-09
27-Jul-09
17.26
41.41
43.52
47.25
42.72
43.45
0.00
26-Jul-09
5.00
43.45
10.00
25-Jul-09
14.36
15.00
24-Jul-09
14-Jul-09
13-Jul-09
12-Jul-09
11-Jul-09
10-Jul-09
9-Jul-09
8-Jul-09
7-Jul-09
33.37
40.00
6-Jul-09
19.02
20.00
5-Jul-09
42.75
41.14
50.00
4-Jul-09
25.00
22.58
45.00
3-Jul-09
30.00
27.22
35.00
2-Jul-09
1-Jul-09
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510A July 2009
Power in KWh (Daily) for BLK510B July 2009
31-Jul
30-Jul
29-Jul
28-Jul
27-Jul
26-Jul
25-Jul
24-Jul
13-Jul
12-Jul
11-Jul
10-Jul
9-Jul
8-Jul
7-Jul
6-Jul
5-Jul
4-Jul
3-Jul
2-Jul
1-Jul
25.08
26.84
41.21
44.10
58.10
62.17
51.70
55.33
58.29
62.38
102.79
110.00
100.66
107.72
110.18
117.91
100.74
107.81
104.87
112.23
113.62
121.59
101.88
109.03
105.51
112.91
88.55
94.77
82.20
87.97
99.66
106.66
81.04
86.73
66.84
71.53
62.09
66.45
54.33
58.14
66.34
70.99
SIM University
Performance (Daily Average) for Blk 510A July 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510B July 2009
124
31-Jul-09
30-Jul-09
29-Jul-09
28-Jul-09
27-Jul-09
40.60
43.45
97.41
104.24
102.39
109.58
111.16
118.97
100.50
107.55
102.22
109.40
26-Jul-09
72.95
78.07
106.19
113.64
97.16
103.97
102.22
109.40
33.78
36.15
51.51
55.12
80.20
85.83
65.92
70.55
100.57
107.63
96.77
103.56
78.49
84.00
62.36
66.74
57.32
61.34
44.74
47.88
53.13
56.86
64.04
68.53
25-Jul-09
24-Jul-09
14-Jul-09
13-Jul-09
12-Jul-09
11-Jul-09
10-Jul-09
9-Jul-09
8-Jul-09
7-Jul-09
6-Jul-09
5-Jul-09
4-Jul-09
3-Jul-09
2-Jul-09
1-Jul-09
11.55
12.60
31-Jul-09
30-Jul-09
29-Jul-09
28-Jul-09
27-Jul-09
4.42
4.82
10.59
11.56
11.14
12.15
12.09
13.19
10.93
11.92
11.12
12.13
7.93
8.66
8.72
9.52
10.57
11.53
26-Jul-09
5.60
6.11
10.94
11.93
10.53
11.48
11.12
12.13
3.67
4.01
8.54
9.31
7.17
7.82
6.78
7.40
6.23
6.80
4.87
5.31
5.78
6.30
6.97
7.60
25-Jul-09
24-Jul-09
14-Jul-09
13-Jul-09
12-Jul-09
11-Jul-09
10-Jul-09
9-Jul-09
8-Jul-09
7-Jul-09
6-Jul-09
5-Jul-09
4-Jul-09
3-Jul-09
2-Jul-09
1-Jul-09
SIM University
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 510B July 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510B July 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510B July 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508A Aug 2009
125
2.41
4.85
5.18
5.48
5.03
7.84
7.33
6.75
8.03
9.70
9.59
9.34
10.84
11.83
11.90
11.19
10.78
9-Aug
30-Aug
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
14-Aug
13-Aug
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
9.57
10.00
30-Aug
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
5.28
5.21
6.53
8-Aug
19.21
20.53
21.73
19.93
20.94
20.65
20.25
31.83
31.08
29.03
26.75
25.88
27.43
23.74
31.90
38.43
38.00
37.00
42.94
46.86
47.17
44.34
42.70
40.80
39.89
37.42
41.33
40.04
50.00
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
14-Aug
13-Aug
12-Aug
5.11
7-Aug
6-Aug
15.48
30.00
11-Aug
10-Aug
6.92
10.30
5-Aug
4-Aug
25.00
9-Aug
8-Aug
5.99
10.07
3-Aug
2-Aug
20.00
7-Aug
3.91
1-Aug
40.00
6-Aug
5-Aug
9.44
10.43
10.10
KWh
45.00
4-Aug
8.05
35.00
3-Aug
2-Aug
1-Aug
SIM University
Power in KWh (Daily) for BLK508A Aug 2009
15.00
5.00
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508A Aug 2009
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 508A Aug 2009
0.00
Prepared by Maung Maung
24.84
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508B Aug 2009
126
30-Aug
42.10
30-Aug
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
87.15
29-Aug
31.24
26-Aug
25-Aug
73.00
28-Aug
20.65
20.04
43.15
24-Aug
49.84
27-Aug
29.66
23-Aug
45.72
26-Aug
21.09
22-Aug
101.69
97.92
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
44.32
21-Aug
108.18
22-Aug
20.34
20-Aug
48.02
21-Aug
25.69
19-Aug
18-Aug
59.36
20-Aug
40.75
50.00
48.57
17-Aug
62.91
19-Aug
21.26
84.86
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
47.37
16-Aug
85.82
15-Aug
15-Aug
14-Aug
46.44
38.08
42.19
31.37
13-Aug
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
9-Aug
8-Aug
7-Aug
6-Aug
73.15
14-Aug
13-Aug
27.11
42.83
20.97
20.89
28.73
42.40
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
9-Aug
8-Aug
7-Aug
40.76
39.17
91.50
6-Aug
5-Aug
5-Aug
4-Aug
3-Aug
2-Aug
1-Aug
94.79
91.82
4-Aug
41.21
10.00
3-Aug
10.24
20.00
17.00
30.00
42.08
31.86
40.00
2-Aug
1-Aug
KWh
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508A Aug 2009
107.48
93.57
98.47
88.13
66.58
71.28
61.36
54.44
47.09
44.05
35.49
21.94
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508A Aug 2009
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508B Aug 2009
60.00
Prepared by Maung Maung
25.52
42.38
61.91
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Aug 2009
127
30-Aug
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
14-Aug
49.96
51.46
52.56
50.71
53.00
77.86
73.93
64.05
78.18
121.07
104.93
107.56
110.47
101.57
94.93
105.16
13-Aug
67.57
106.76
52.28
52.06
71.61
105.69
101.59
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
9-Aug
8-Aug
7-Aug
6-Aug
5-Aug
97.63
102.72
3-Aug
4-Aug
104.89
79.42
2-Aug
1-Aug
8/30
8/29
8/28
8/27
8/26
8/25
8/24
8/23
8/22
8/21
8/20
8/19
8/18
8/17
8/16
8/15
8/14
2.809
5.497
5.663
5.784
5.580
5.832
7.048
8.603
8.568
8.135
13.322
11.547
11.836
12.156
11.177
10.446
11.571
7.436
7.880
11.631
8/13
5.752
5.728
6.812
11.179
10.743
11.304
11.542
11.748
4.663
8.740
8/12
8/11
8/10
8/9
8/8
8/7
8/6
8/5
8/4
8/3
8/2
8/1
SIM University
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Aug 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Aug 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Aug 2009
4.00
2.99
6.00
2.00
0.00
Prepared by Maung Maung
7.94
5.91
10.78
Series1
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508C Aug 2009
128
5.51
5.87
6.08
5.59
8.98
8.22
13.26
13.69
12.39
11.10
10.85
30-Aug
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
10.24
15.00
30-Aug
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
6.05
15-Aug
14-Aug
13-Aug
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
18.87
20.11
20.80
19.15
20.71
20.25
20.13
31.13
30.75
28.15
25.91
25.71
27.19
23.43
37.99
37.14
36.90
42.41
45.39
46.87
43.42
43.03
40.68
39.62
37.21
40.78
39.92
50.00
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
7.57
9.10
12.69
13-Aug
14-Aug
12.57
7.51
14.00
12-Aug
11-Aug
5.88
9-Aug
8-Aug
7-Aug
15.09
30.00
10-Aug
9-Aug
11.88
6-Aug
5-Aug
25.00
8-Aug
7-Aug
11.57
4-Aug
3-Aug
20.00
6-Aug
5-Aug
10.87
31.35
40.00
2-Aug
1-Aug
45.00
4-Aug
11.91
6.84
8.00
3-Aug
12.00
11.66
4.41
10.00
9.16
35.00
2-Aug
1-Aug
KWh
SIM University
Power in KWh (Daily) for BLK 508C Aug 2009
10.00
5.00
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508C Aug 2009
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 508C Aug 2009
16.00
Prepared by Maung Maung
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 509A Aug 2009
129
36.11
36.14
42.47
44.47
45.83
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
14-Aug
13-Aug
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
9-Aug
8-Aug
7-Aug
6-Aug
5-Aug
23.22
34.21
53.12
30-Aug
42.79
45.60
47.16
43.42
46.96
45.91
45.65
70.60
69.74
63.82
58.76
58.31
61.65
86.15
84.21
83.67
96.16
102.93
106.27
98.47
97.58
92.24
89.85
84.37
92.47
3-Aug
4-Aug
90.52
71.10
2-Aug
1-Aug
29-Aug
5.00
9.56
10.00
30-Aug
15.00
28-Aug
30.92
27.49
30.98
42.89
42.06
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 509A Aug 2009
9.00
19.00
20.38
20.77
18.90
24.76
25.11
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508C Aug 2009
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
20.52
20.28
20.09
40.18
38.95
36.67
50.00
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
14-Aug
13-Aug
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
26.88
30.00
9-Aug
8-Aug
23.14
25.00
7-Aug
6-Aug
15.14
20.00
5-Aug
4-Aug
40.48
39.26
45.00
3-Aug
35.00
31.21
40.00
2-Aug
1-Aug
KWh
SIM University
Performance Ratio(Daily Average) for Blk 508C Aug 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509A Aug 2009
130
20.64
21.92
29-Aug
30-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
82.88
43.57
46.74
47.63
43.36
47.06
70.92
63.05
56.79
82.83
97.40
101.99
105.10
4.424
5.925
5.867
7.334
9.049
7.852
6.760
10.556
11.738
11.379
10.712
11.824
11.470
2.629
2.792
29-Aug
30-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
14-Aug
5.550
5.954
6.067
5.522
9.033
8.031
7.234
5.995
10.550
12.407
12.991
13.387
12.530
0.000
12.286
2.000
12-Aug
4.000
13-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
9-Aug
8-Aug
7-Aug
6-Aug
5-Aug
9.119
14.000
14-Aug
98.37
71.04
13-Aug
57.58
96.45
46.52
46.06
92.15
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
61.64
53.07
89.33
3-Aug
4-Aug
8.000
9-Aug
8-Aug
34.73
1-Aug
2-Aug
6.000
7-Aug
6-Aug
5-Aug
84.09
92.83
90.05
12.000
4-Aug
71.59
10.000
3-Aug
2-Aug
1-Aug
SIM University
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 509A Aug 2009
16.000
Series1
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509A Aug 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509A Aug 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
2.99
9.23
10.93
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509B Aug 2009
131
30-Aug
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
5.62
6.01
6.38
5.86
9.16
8.57
7.83
11.35
11.22
12.61
13.75
13.92
10.24
25.77
31.60
37.41
41.14
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 509B Aug 2009
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 509B Aug 2009
30-Aug
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
14-Aug
19.25
20.56
21.83
20.08
21.26
31.34
29.34
26.81
47.08
47.64
43.17
38.85
38.40
43.20
20.69
20.55
27.45
23.68
39.91
37.82
41.38
40.27
13-Aug
0.00
43.55
10.00
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
9-Aug
8-Aug
7-Aug
15.38
31.90
50.00
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
6.21
12.62
13-Aug
14-Aug
12.72
7.53
12-Aug
6.04
6.00
8.02
12.02
6-Aug
5-Aug
4-Aug
3-Aug
2-Aug
1-Aug
KWh
30.00
11-Aug
10-Aug
9-Aug
8-Aug
6.92
11.66
11.05
12.09
11.76
20.00
7-Aug
4.49
9.32
40.00
6-Aug
5-Aug
4-Aug
3-Aug
2-Aug
1-Aug
SIM University
Power in KWh (Daily) for BLK 509B Aug 2009
60.00
Prepared by Maung Maung
22.59
28.20
30.06
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 510A Aug 2009
132
30-Aug
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
14-Aug
39.40
10.24
22.92
21.12
31.34
31.05
28.36
24.14
22.09
22.74
38.85
40.45
45.50
48.88
49.49
45.99
11.67
22.44
33.76
42.42
39.71
13-Aug
0.00
46.13
10.00
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
9-Aug
8-Aug
26.20
30.00
7-Aug
6-Aug
17.57
20.00
5-Aug
4-Aug
44.02
42.83
50.00
3-Aug
34.76
40.00
2-Aug
1-Aug
KWh
30-Aug
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
14-Aug
13-Aug
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
9-Aug
8-Aug
7-Aug
6-Aug
5-Aug
4-Aug
3-Aug
2-Aug
1-Aug
25.52
51.25
54.42
50.04
53.00
51.57
78.76
78.12
73.14
66.82
64.23
68.41
59.03
51.24
47.98
38.32
79.51
96.84
95.72
93.25
107.62
117.36
118.74
107.68
108.56
102.56
99.48
94.28
103.14
100.37
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509B Aug 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509B Aug 2009
Power in KWh (Daily) for BLK510A Aug 2009
60.00
Prepared by Maung Maung
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Aug 2009
133
30-Aug
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
14-Aug
51.81
23.48
48.43
52.56
55.36
50.66
52.16
71.88
71.20
65.04
90.37
89.10
92.77
104.36
112.09
113.49
105.48
64.68
68.94
77.43
13-Aug
26.77
51.47
60.08
97.28
91.08
100.95
98.24
105.81
40.30
79.73
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
9-Aug
8-Aug
7-Aug
6-Aug
5-Aug
4-Aug
3-Aug
2-Aug
1-Aug
30-Aug
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
14-Aug
13-Aug
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
9-Aug
8-Aug
7-Aug
6-Aug
5-Aug
4-Aug
3-Aug
2-Aug
1-Aug
2.81
3.20
4.82
5.79
6.29
6.62
6.06
6.24
6.20
6.16
8.25
9.26
8.60
8.52
7.78
7.74
7.19
9.53
12.07
10.66
11.09
10.81
12.48
13.41
13.57
12.61
12.65
11.63
10.89
11.75
SIM University
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Aug 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Aug 2009
Performance Ratio(Daily Average) for Blk 510A Aug 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510B Aug 2009
134
30-Aug
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
2.90
5.31
5.64
5.89
5.49
5.76
8.39
7.69
7.02
8.46
9.85
10.16
10.02
11.18
11.95
12.31
30-Aug
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
14-Aug
13-Aug
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
9-Aug
8-Aug
7-Aug
6-Aug
5-Aug
4-Aug
11.47
21.05
22.35
23.35
33.26
30.46
27.83
33.53
29.31
27.51
22.83
22.29
21.93
25.55
21.75
17.14
33.91
47.35
48.76
40.26
44.30
39.68
39.05
45.61
45.24
42.37
41.35
39.05
42.67
41.49
50.00
14-Aug
11.51
13-Aug
6.94
11.42
5.62
5.53
7.40
10.69
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
6.45
10.44
3-Aug
2-Aug
1-Aug
KWh
30.00
9-Aug
8-Aug
4.33
9.85
10.77
10.47
20.00
7-Aug
6-Aug
5-Aug
4-Aug
8.56
40.00
3-Aug
2-Aug
1-Aug
SIM University
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 510B Aug 2009
60.00
10.00
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 510B Aug 2009
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 510B Aug 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
23.97
30.45
46.98
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508A Sep 2009
135
42.37
9/29/2009
40.01
42.54
9/28/2009
9/30/2009
47.79
45.60
41.72
37.97
32.93
29.23
37.02
38.06
36.07
40.38
42.17
40.98
15.58
27.92
27.05
33.02
45.71
44.05
40.93
0.00
9/27/2009
10.00
9/26/2009
9/25/2009
9/24/2009
9/23/2009
9/22/2009
9/21/2009
9/20/2009
9/19/2009
9/18/2009
9/17/2009
9/16/2009
9/15/2009
9/14/2009
13.99
15.30
31.25
27.35
40.00
9/13/2009
9/12/2009
9/11/2009
9/10/2009
9/9/2009
9/8/2009
9/7/2009
9/6/2009
9/5/2009
9/4/2009
30.00
9/3/2009
20.00
17.31
50.00
9/2/2009
9/1/2009
30-Aug
29-Aug
28-Aug
27-Aug
26-Aug
25-Aug
24-Aug
23-Aug
22-Aug
21-Aug
20-Aug
19-Aug
18-Aug
17-Aug
16-Aug
15-Aug
14-Aug
13-Aug
12-Aug
11-Aug
10-Aug
9-Aug
8-Aug
7-Aug
6-Aug
5-Aug
4-Aug
3-Aug
2-Aug
1-Aug
26.31
39.31
48.28
51.25
53.55
49.88
52.36
51.11
50.29
67.23
76.89
76.28
69.85
63.82
63.10
58.59
77.77
97.86
92.34
91.01
89.55
101.59
108.58
111.82
104.61
103.75
97.16
94.83
89.56
95.15
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510B Aug 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510B Aug 2009
Power in kWh (Daily) for BLK 508A SEP 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
101.81
113.93
92.92
103.99
101.56
113.66
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508A Sep 2009
136
89.11
99.73
94.38
105.62
29-Sep
30-Sep
94.75
106.03
91.27
102.14
27-Sep
28-Sep
91.16
102.01
84.56
94.63
67.83
75.91
73.35
82.09
65.11
72.86
53.40
59.76
26-Sep
25-Sep
24-Sep
23-Sep
22-Sep
21-Sep
20-Sep
19-Sep
18-Sep
17-Sep
82.45
92.27
16-Sep
104.65
117.11
106.44
119.12
89.94
100.66
93.93
105.11
80.34
89.91
62.18
69.58
60.24
67.41
73.54
82.30
69.60
77.89
60.91
68.16
98.11
109.80
84.77
94.87
34.71
38.84
31.17
34.88
34.07
38.13
38.55
43.15
15-Sep
14-Sep
13-Sep
12-Sep
11-Sep
10-Sep
9-Sep
8-Sep
7-Sep
6-Sep
5-Sep
4-Sep
3-Sep
2-Sep
1-Sep
30-Sep
29-Sep
28-Sep
27-Sep
26-Sep
25-Sep
24-Sep
23-Sep
22-Sep
21-Sep
20-Sep
19-Sep
18-Sep
17-Sep
16-Sep
15-Sep
14-Sep
13-Sep
12-Sep
11-Sep
10-Sep
9-Sep
8-Sep
7-Sep
6-Sep
5-Sep
4-Sep
3-Sep
2-Sep
1-Sep
3.82
4.27
3.43
3.84
3.75
4.20
4.24
4.75
8.35
11.44
9.81
11.62
10.97
10.39
11.67
11.24
10.43
10.04
11.23
10.41
10.23
12.89
13.11
12.51
11.52
11.18
10.15
10.03
9.31
9.03
9.07
10.44
9.89
11.71
11.08
11.57
12.54
12.08
11.20
10.34
9.90
9.33
8.84
8.07
8.02
7.46
7.16
5.88
6.58
6.84
7.66
6.63
7.42
9.06
8.57
8.09
7.66
6.70
7.50
10.80
SIM University
Efficiency (Daily Average) for BLK 508A SEP 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508A Sep 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for BLK 508A SEP 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Sep 2009
137
30-Sep
29-Sep
28-Sep
27-Sep
26-Sep
25-Sep
24-Sep
23-Sep
22-Sep
21-Sep
20-Sep
19-Sep
18-Sep
17-Sep
16-Sep
15-Sep
14-Sep
13-Sep
12-Sep
11-Sep
10-Sep
9-Sep
4.00
4.47
3.54
3.96
3.91
4.38
9.26
11.66
13.05
13.30
10.33
11.56
9.42
10.54
10.16
11.37
10.21
11.43
10.59
11.86
10.50
11.75
9.95
11.13
11.32
12.67
10.36
10.54
10.12
9.42
9.04
11.89
10.48
11.73
10.06
11.26
7.27
8.13
8.18
9.16
7.56
8.46
6.05
6.77
7.02
7.86
6.84
7.65
8.28
9.26
9/30/2009
9/29/2009
9/28/2009
9/27/2009
9/26/2009
9/25/2009
9/24/2009
9/23/2009
9/22/2009
9/21/2009
9/20/2009
9/19/2009
9/18/2009
9/17/2009
9/16/2009
9/15/2009
9/14/2009
9/13/2009
9/12/2009
9/11/2009
9/10/2009
9/9/2009
9/8/2009
9/7/2009
9/6/2009
9/5/2009
9/4/2009
9/3/2009
16.31
14.46
15.96
20.00
8-Sep
7-Sep
6-Sep
11.35
12.70
9/2/2009
9/1/2009
30.84
46.19
40.58
42.85
43.22
41.66
41.44
38.42
42.15
37.76
48.50
47.59
42.76
38.43
36.88
33.38
29.65
24.70
28.64
27.90
33.77
46.32
44.28
41.04
35.95
31.80
27.68
30.00
5-Sep
9.86
10.85
12.14
50.00
4-Sep
6.78
7.59
7.79
8.72
8.81
40.00
3-Sep
2-Sep
1-Sep
SIM University
Power in kWh (Daily) for BLK 508B SEP 2009
10.00
0.00
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508B Sep 2009
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Aug 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
9/9/2009
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 508C Sep 2009
138
9/30/2009
39.54
30-Sep
29-Sep
28-Sep
26-Sep
25-Sep
24-Sep
23-Sep
42.05
0.00
9/29/2009
10.00
9/28/2009
Power in kWh (Daily) for BLK 508C SEP 2009
27-Sep
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Sep 2009
42.51
40.45
40.48
37.50
41.53
22-Sep
21-Sep
20-Sep
19-Sep
74.36
68.68
76.86
83.21
73.90
61.57
93.89
9/27/2009
30.09
32.57
45.18
40.65
94.13
95.79
91.92
96.27
95.43
92.78
92.30
90.38
85.57
115.13
101.15
106.80
107.74
103.83
103.29
95.77
120.89
118.62
105.07
102.88
9/25/2009
9/26/2009
9/24/2009
9/23/2009
9/22/2009
28.51
23.57
18-Sep
85.59
84.11
9/21/2009
9/20/2009
9/19/2009
27.50
71.39
63.79
9/18/2009
15.35
17-Sep
16-Sep
15-Sep
14-Sep
32.20
9/17/2009
36.99
37.10
46.63
13-Sep
36.03
102.29
106.59
115.45
110.37
108.02 106.00
9/15/2009
9/16/2009
35.98
47.78
12-Sep
11-Sep
62.15
82.14
9/14/2009
9/13/2009
13.54
41.80
69.55
84.17
95.25
91.40
9/12/2009
9/11/2009
0.53
9-Sep
10-Sep
35.55
9/10/2009
26.77
39.79
61.64
8-Sep
7-Sep
103.16
9/8/2009
40.00
32.45
45.29
6-Sep
79.26
75.21
9/7/2009
14.96
29.98
5-Sep
68.99
70.83
9/5/2009
9/6/2009
9/4/2009
30.00
26.75
4-Sep
3-Sep
80.08
9/3/2009
50.00
44.43
2-Sep
89.62
98.62
9/2/2009
9/1/2009
20.00
17.08
1-Sep
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508B Sep 2009
66.03
55.01
36.32
Prepared by Maung Maung
103.87
116.24
92.51
103.53
100.63
112.62
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508C Sep 2009
139
88.07
98.56
93.66
104.81
29-Sep
30-Sep
94.69
105.97
90.17
100.91
27-Sep
28-Sep
90.09
100.82
83.52
93.47
67.02
75.00
72.55
81.20
63.49
71.06
52.50
58.75
26-Sep
25-Sep
24-Sep
23-Sep
22-Sep
21-Sep
20-Sep
19-Sep
18-Sep
17-Sep
82.40
92.21
61.26
68.55
80.13
89.68
106.43
119.11
93.10
104.19
100.87
112.88
98.95
110.74
16-Sep
34.19
38.26
30.16
33.76
59.63
66.74
72.28
80.89
66.78
74.73
59.59
66.69
82.63
92.47
1.17
1.31
33.31
37.28
38.05
42.58
15-Sep
14-Sep
13-Sep
12-Sep
11-Sep
10-Sep
9-Sep
8-Sep
7-Sep
6-Sep
5-Sep
4-Sep
3-Sep
2-Sep
1-Sep
30-Sep
29-Sep
28-Sep
27-Sep
26-Sep
25-Sep
24-Sep
23-Sep
22-Sep
21-Sep
20-Sep
19-Sep
18-Sep
17-Sep
16-Sep
15-Sep
14-Sep
13-Sep
12-Sep
11-Sep
10-Sep
9-Sep
8-Sep
7-Sep
6-Sep
5-Sep
4-Sep
3-Sep
2-Sep
1-Sep
0.13
0.14
3.76
4.21
3.32
3.71
3.67
4.10
4.19
4.69
9.07
11.10
11.71 13.11
10.42
11.66
10.3111.53
9.69
10.85
10.29
9.91
11.09
9.92 11.10
10.1811.39
11.07
12.39
11.43 12.79
10.18
10.15
9.19
12.42
10.8912.19
10.2511.47
9.87
9.09
8.82
6.99
7.82
7.98
8.93
7.37
8.25
5.78
6.47
6.74
7.54
6.56
7.34
7.958.90
6.56
7.34
7.358.22
SIM University
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508C Seo 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 508C Sep 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 508C Sep 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509A Sep 2009
140
30-Sep
29-Sep
28-Sep
27-Sep
26-Sep
25-Sep
24-Sep
23-Sep
22-Sep
21-Sep
20-Sep
19-Sep
18-Sep
17-Sep
16-Sep
15-Sep
14-Sep
13-Sep
12-Sep
11-Sep
10-Sep
9-Sep
8-Sep
7-Sep
3.77
4.22
3.41
3.81
3.74
4.19
11.07
12.39
10.28
11.51
9.17
10.26
9.96
11.14
9.91
11.09
10.28
11.50
10.27
11.50
9.65
10.80
6.99
7.82
7.99
8.94
7.41
8.29
5.83
6.53
6.53
7.31
9.21
10.30
9.00
10.07
11.44
12.80
11.57
12.95
10.24
11.46
9.78
10.94
8.79
9.83
7.60
8.50
6.60
7.39
30.22
45.17
46.66
40.43
40.63
37.39
41.95
36.70
32.61
28.51
23.80
26.65
37.57
47.21
41.79
39.88
35.85
31.00
26.94
45.16
43.42
39.36
41.92
15.38
13.89
15.26
30.90
26.43
9/29/2009
9/30/2009
0.00
41.93
10.00
9/28/2009
9/26/2009
9/27/2009
9/25/2009
9/23/2009
9/24/2009
9/22/2009
9/20/2009
9/21/2009
9/19/2009
9/17/2009
9/18/2009
9/16/2009
9/14/2009
9/15/2009
9/13/2009
9/11/2009
9/12/2009
9/10/2009
9/8/2009
9/9/2009
9/7/2009
9/5/2009
9/6/2009
9/4/2009
17.09
40.00
6-Sep
11.07
12.39
9/2/2009
9/3/2009
9/1/2009
30.00
5-Sep
6.48
7.25
7.57
8.48
10.64
11.91
50.00
4-Sep
4.19
4.69
20.00
3-Sep
2-Sep
1-Sep
SIM University
Power in kWh (Daily) for BLK 509A SEP 2009
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 509A Sep 2009
Effciency (Daily Average) for Blk 509A Sep 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
28.03
36.62
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 509B Sep 2009
141
9/30/2009
39.98
30-Sep
29-Sep
28-Sep
42.64
9/29/2009
26-Sep
25-Sep
24-Sep
23-Sep
22-Sep
21-Sep
20-Sep
19-Sep
18-Sep
17-Sep
16-Sep
15-Sep
14-Sep
13-Sep
12-Sep
11-Sep
10-Sep
9-Sep
8-Sep
7-Sep
6-Sep
5-Sep
4-Sep
3-Sep
2-Sep
27-Sep
Power in kWh (Daily) for BLK 509B SEP 2009
42.82
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509A Sep 2009
9/28/2009
41.10
9/27/2009
37.93
42.51
45.88
41.22
30.86
33.22
28.98
24.15
9/26/2009
9/25/2009
9/24/2009
9/23/2009
9/22/2009
9/21/2009
9/20/2009
9/19/2009
9/18/2009
9/17/2009
47.52
48.29
42.55
45.96
44.59
40.56
37.58
15.71
14.12
33.08
27.36
9/16/2009
0.00
37.78
10.00
9/15/2009
9/14/2009
9/13/2009
9/12/2009
9/11/2009
9/10/2009
9/9/2009
9/8/2009
15.43
31.00
40.00
9/7/2009
9/6/2009
9/5/2009
9/4/2009
26.99
30.00
9/3/2009
20.00
17.48
50.00
9/2/2009
9/1/2009
1-Sep
34.26
38.34
30.94
34.63
33.99
38.04
100.58
112.56
96.70
108.22
59.37
66.44
103.92
116.30
63.49
71.06
72.63
81.28
67.31
75.33
93.44
104.57
83.29
93.21
90.49
101.26
90.06
100.79
93.40
104.52
93.36
104.48
87.67
98.11
100.60
112.59
83.68
93.64
81.75
91.49
79.84
89.35
105.14
117.67
93.08
104.17
88.84
99.42
69.06
77.28
60.01
67.15
58.86
65.87
68.82
77.02
53.01
59.33
38.06
42.59
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509A Sep 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
94.69
105.97
102.20
114.37
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509B Sep 2009
142
89.06
99.67
94.98
106.29
29-Sep
30-Sep
95.37
106.73
91.54
102.44
27-Sep
28-Sep
91.81
102.74
84.48
94.55
68.75
76.93
74.00
82.82
64.55
72.24
53.80
60.21
26-Sep
25-Sep
24-Sep
23-Sep
22-Sep
21-Sep
20-Sep
19-Sep
18-Sep
17-Sep
83.71
93.68
16-Sep
105.83
118.44
107.55
120.36
90.35
101.11
94.77
106.05
102.37
114.56
81.56
91.28
62.44
69.87
60.94
68.20
73.67
82.44
69.04
77.26
60.12
67.29
99.32
111.15
84.15
94.18
34.99
39.16
31.44
35.19
34.37
38.47
38.93
43.56
15-Sep
14-Sep
13-Sep
12-Sep
11-Sep
10-Sep
9-Sep
8-Sep
7-Sep
6-Sep
5-Sep
4-Sep
3-Sep
2-Sep
1-Sep
6.87
7.69
30-Sep
29-Sep
28-Sep
27-Sep
26-Sep
25-Sep
24-Sep
23-Sep
9.11
9.80
11.70
10.97
10.45
11.74
11.27
10.49
10.07
11.66
11.31
10.40
10.42
13.03
13.24
12.59
11.65
11.25
10.31
10.10
9.30
8.47
22-Sep
7.56
8.14
21-Sep
5.92
6.63
7.10
7.95
20-Sep
19-Sep
18-Sep
17-Sep
16-Sep
10.36
10.04
11.83
11.13
11.67
12.61
12.23
11.26
10.93
10.43
9.94
9.21
8.98
9.07
15-Sep
3.85
4.31
3.46
3.87
6.71
7.50
9.26
14-Sep
13-Sep
12-Sep
11-Sep
10-Sep
9-Sep
8-Sep
7-Sep
6-Sep
8.50
8.11
4-Sep
5-Sep
7.60
3-Sep
3.78
4.23
4.28
4.79
6.62
7.40
2-Sep
1-Sep
SIM University
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509B Sep 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 509B Sep 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 509B Sep 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
7.41
8.29
7.98
8.93
25-Sep
10.66
11.93
10.9812.28
29-Sep
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Sep 2009
143
30-Sep
28-Sep
27-Sep
10.8012.09
9.97
11.15
10.6711.94
11.80
13.20
26-Sep
24-Sep
7.71
8.63
8.639.66
6.45
7.22
23-Sep
22-Sep
21-Sep
20-Sep
19-Sep
10.99
9.82
18-Sep
12.1513.60
11.10
9.46
10.59
12.3213.79
10.90
12.20
10.5611.82
17-Sep
4.36
4.88
3.99
4.47
7.21
8.07
8.72
9.76
9.92
16-Sep
15-Sep
14-Sep
13-Sep
12-Sep
11-Sep
10-Sep
9-Sep
4.27
4.78
11.9013.32
9/29/2009
9/30/2009
9/28/2009
9/26/2009
9/27/2009
44.07
43.50
44.78
40.67
43.52
35.20
32.57
49.58
50.27
48.13
40.47
40.08
38.60
9/24/2009
9/25/2009
26.33
30.23
44.46
48.57
46.39
46.39
43.10
35.57
29.44
9/23/2009
17.78
16.29
17.41
33.57
28.96
31.46
9/21/2009
9/22/2009
9/19/2009
9/20/2009
9/18/2009
9/16/2009
9/17/2009
9/14/2009
9/15/2009
9/13/2009
9/11/2009
9/12/2009
9/9/2009
9/10/2009
9/8/2009
9/6/2009
9/7/2009
9/4/2009
9/5/2009
19.73
9/3/2009
40.00
8-Sep
7-Sep
6-Sep
7.10
7.94
8.23
9.21
0.00
19.73
10.00
9/1/2009
9/2/2009
20.00
11.37
12.72
11.37
12.72
30.00
5-Sep
4.84
5.41
4.84
5.41
50.00
4-Sep
3-Sep
2-Sep
1-Sep
SIM University
Power in kWh (Daily) for BLK 510A SEP 2009
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 510A Sep 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Sep 2009
20.00
Prepared by Maung Maung
29.78
Power in KWh (Daily) for Blk 510B Sep 2009
144
41.89
44.16
9/29/2009
9/30/2009
44.03
9/28/2009
42.53
9/27/2009
39.73
43.70
47.19
42.90
32.45
34.77
30.51
26.04
48.56
49.34
9/26/2009
9/25/2009
9/24/2009
9/23/2009
9/22/2009
9/21/2009
9/20/2009
9/19/2009
9/18/2009
9/17/2009
39.26
9/16/2009
38.17
41.92
43.60
39.30
17.58
16.08
29.24
47.41
45.71
9/15/2009
9/14/2009
9/13/2009
9/12/2009
9/11/2009
9/10/2009
9/9/2009
9/8/2009
34.89
40.00
9/7/2009
9/6/2009
9/5/2009
28.74
0.00
9/4/2009
10.00
28.74
30.00
9/3/2009
17.28
19.39
50.00
9/2/2009
9/1/2009
98.15
109.84
107.21
119.98
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Sep 2009
Power in kWh (Daily) for BLK 510B SEP 2009
30-Sep
99.75
111.63
96.89
108.43
29-Sep
90.58
101.36
72.55
81.19
78.41
87.75
70.08
78.42
58.65
65.63
89.26
99.89
90.14
100.88
110.44
123.59
111.98
125.31
96.00
107.43
99.04
110.83
108.19
121.07
85.97
96.20
67.32
75.34
65.56
73.37
79.23
88.66
74.78
83.69
64.50
72.18
103.32
115.62
103.32
115.62
96.94
108.48
39.60
44.32
36.28
40.60
38.79
43.41
43.94
49.18
43.94
49.18
28-Sep
27-Sep
26-Sep
25-Sep
24-Sep
23-Sep
22-Sep
21-Sep
20-Sep
19-Sep
18-Sep
17-Sep
16-Sep
15-Sep
14-Sep
13-Sep
12-Sep
11-Sep
10-Sep
9-Sep
8-Sep
7-Sep
6-Sep
5-Sep
4-Sep
3-Sep
2-Sep
1-Sep
SIM University
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510A Sep 2009
Prepared by Maung Maung
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510B Aug 2009
145
30-Sep
29-Sep
28-Sep
94.72
27-Sep
93.30
110.07
109.76
104.41
98.36
98.07
106.00
106.93
95.55
108.93
26-Sep
97.34
88.50
99.04
72.28
80.89
77.43
86.66
67.96
76.05
105.10
117.62
25-Sep
24-Sep
23-Sep
22-Sep
21-Sep
20-Sep
19-Sep
18-Sep
57.99
64.90
87.44
97.85
66.34
74.24
109.91
123.00
108.16
121.04
16-Sep
17-Sep
108.68
104.50
85.02
95.14
93.38
97.11
87.53
97.96
39.16
43.82
35.83
40.09
65.13
72.89
105.59
118.16
101.80
113.92
15-Sep
14-Sep
13-Sep
12-Sep
11-Sep
10-Sep
9-Sep
8-Sep
7-Sep
6-Sep
77.71
86.97
64.01
71.64
4-Sep
5-Sep
64.01
71.64
38.48
43.07
43.19
48.34
3-Sep
2-Sep
1-Sep
30-Sep
29-Sep
28-Sep
27-Sep
26-Sep
25-Sep
24-Sep
23-Sep
22-Sep
21-Sep
20-Sep
19-Sep
18-Sep
17-Sep
16-Sep
15-Sep
14-Sep
13-Sep
12-Sep
11-Sep
10-Sep
9-Sep
8-Sep
7-Sep
6-Sep
4.31
4.82
3.94
4.41
9.54
10.78
10.27
11.49
10.82
12.11
10.79
12.08
10.42
11.66
10.51
11.77
10.90
10.71
11.99
11.57
13.32
12.94
11.90
10.77
9.74
7.95
8.90
8.52
9.62
9.63
10.47
12.09
13.53
13.00
10.69
11.96
11.62
11.20
12.54
10.28
11.50
9.36
7.48
8.37
6.38
7.14
7.30
8.17
7.17
8.02
8.55
9.57
7.04
7.88
4-Sep
5-Sep
7.04
7.88
4.23
4.74
4.75
5.32
3-Sep
2-Sep
1-Sep
SIM University
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510B Sep 2009
Efficiency (Daily Average) for Blk 510B Sep 2009
Performance Ratio (Daily Average) for Blk 510B Sep 2009
SIM University
Prepared by Maung Maung
146