Na základe vzťahov možno definovať pravdepodobnosť doručenia správy v čase t t 0 Ide zrejme o určenie maximálneho počtu retransmisií a následne o súčet pravdepodobnosti pre prípady žiadnej, jednej, dvoch až x retransmisií. Matematicky vyjadrené: B i 1 i q 1 q B1 Pd t t0 1 i i 0 x Po dosadení a úprave dostaneme: B2 B1 S 1 s 1 , kde x mRb 1 Pb D m r n1 Rb t p m r Štýly A1 – Kodčík (alt+p) A2 – Kodčík (alt+o) A3 – Kodčík (alt+i) A1 A1This memo is a status report on the parameters (i.e., numbers and keywords) used in protocols in the Internet community. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. A2 We expect that various readers will notice specific items that should be corrected. Please send any specific corrections via email to <iana@isi.edu>. A3 Network Working Group Request for Comments: 1700 J. Reynolds J. Postel STD: 2 Obsoletes RFCs: 1340, 1060, 1010, 990, 960, 943, 923, 900, 870, 820, 790, 776, 770, 762, 758,755, 750, 739, 604, 503, 433, 349 Obsoletes IENs: 127, 117, 93 Category: Standards Track ASSIGNED NUMBERS Status of this Memo This memo is a status report on the parameters (i.e., numbers and keywords) used in protocols in the Internet community. Distribution ISI October 1994 of this memo is unlimited. This RFC is a snapshot of the ongoing process of the assignment of protocol parameters for the Internet protocol suite. To make the current information readily available the assignments are kept uptodate in a set of online text files. This RFC has been assembled by catinating these files together with a minimum of formatting "glue". OVERVIEW The authors appologize for the somewhat rougher formatting and style than is typical of most RFCs. We expect that various readers will notice specific items that should be corrected. Please send any specific corrections via email to <iana@isi.edu>. Reynolds & Postel RFC 1700 [Page 1] Assigned Numbers October 1994 INTRODUCTION The files in this directory document the currently assigned values for several series of numbers used in network protocol implementations. ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is the central coordinator for the assignment of unique parameter values for Internet protocols. The IANA is chartered by the Internet Society (ISOC) and the Federal Network Council (FNC) to act as the clearinghouse to assign and coordinate the use of numerous Internet protocol parameters. The Internet protocol suite, as defined by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and its steering group (the IESG), contains numerous parameters, such as internet addresses, domain names, autonomous system numbers (used in some routing protocols), protocol numbers, port numbers, management information base object identifiers, including private enterprise numbers, and many others. The common use of the Internet protocols by the Internet community requires that the particular values used in these parameter fields be assigned uniquely. It is the task of the IANA to make those unique assignments as requested and to maintain a registry of the currently assigned values. Requests for parameter assignments (protocols, ports, etc.) should be sent to <iana@isi.edu>. Requests for SNMP network management private enterprise number assignments should be sent to <iana-mib@isi.edu>. The IANA is located at and operated by the Information Sciences Institute (ISI) of the University of Southern California (USC). If you are developing a protocol or application that will require the use of a link, socket, port, protocol, etc., please contact the IANA to receive a number assignment. Joyce K. Reynolds Internet Assigned Numbers Authority USC - Information Sciences Institute 4676 Admiralty Way Marina del Rey, California 90292-6695 Electronic mail: IANA@ISI.EDU Phone: +1 310-822-1511 Reynolds & Postel [Page 2] RFC 1700 Assigned Numbers October 1994 Most of the protocols are documented in the RFC series of notes. Some of the items listed are undocumented. Further information on protocols can be found in the memo, "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1). Data Notations The convention in the documentation of Internet Protocols is to express numbers in decimal and to picture data in "big-endian" order [COHEN]. That is, fields are described left to right, with the most significant octet on the left and the least significant octet on the right. The order of transmission of the header and data described in this document is resolved to the octet level. Whenever a diagram shows a group of octets, the order of transmission of those octets is the normal order in which they are read in English. For example, in the following diagram the octets are transmitted in the order they are numbered. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Transmission Order of Bytes Whenever an octet represents a numeric quantity the left most bit in the diagram is the high order or most significant bit. That is, the bit labeled 0 is the most significant bit. For example, the following diagram represents the value 170 (decimal). 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Significance of Bits Similarly, whenever a multi-octet field represents a numeric quantity the left most bit of the whole field is the most significant bit. When Reynolds & Postel [Page 3] RFC 1700 Assigned Numbers October 1994 a multi-octet quantity is transmitted the most significant octet is transmitted first. Special Addresses There are five classes of IP addresses: Class A through Class E. Of these, Classes A, B, and C are used for unicast addresses, Class D is used for multicast addresses, and Class E addresses are reserved for future use. With the advent of classless addressing [CIDR1, CIDR2], the network-number part of an address may be of any length, and the whole notion of address classes becomes less important. There are certain special cases for IP addresses. These special cases can be concisely summarized using the earlier notation for an IP address: IP-address ::= { <Network-number>, <Host-number> } or IP-address ::= { <Network-number>, <Subnet-number>, <Host-number> } if we also use the notation "-1" to mean the field contains all 1 bits. Some common special cases are as follows: (a) {0, 0} This host on this network. address (see note later). (b) Can only be used as a source {0, <Host-number>} Specified host on this network. source address. (c) Can only be used as a { -1, -1} Limited broadcast. Can only be used as a destination address, and a datagram with this address must never be forwarded outside the (sub-)net of the source. (d) {<Network-number>, -1} Directed broadcast to specified network. as a destination address. Reynolds & Postel Can only be used [Page 4] RFC 1700 Assigned Numbers (e) October 1994 {<Network-number>, <Subnet-number>, -1} Directed broadcast to specified subnet. a destination address. (f) Can only be used as {<Network-number>, -1, -1} Directed broadcast to all subnets of specified subnetted network. Can only be used as a destination address. (g) {127, <any>} Internal host loopback address. a host. Should never appear outside REFERENCES [COHEN] Cohen, D., "On Holy Wars and a Plea for Peace", IEEE Computer Magazine, October 1981. [CIDR1] Fuller, V., T. Li, J. Yu, and K. Varadhan, "Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): an Address Assignment and Aggregation Strategy", RFC 1519, September 1993. [CIDR2] Rekhter, Y., and T. Li, "An Architecture for IP Address Allocation with CIDR", RFC 1518, September 1993. [] URL = ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/introduction Reynolds & Postel [Page 5] RFC 1700 Assigned Numbers October 1994 VERSION NUMBERS In the Internet Protocol (IP) [RFC791] there is a field to identify the version of the internetwork general protocol. This field is 4 bits in size. Assigned Internet Version Numbers Decimal ------0 1-3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10-14 15 Keyword ------IP ST SIP TP/IX PIP TUBA Version ------Reserved Unassigned Internet Protocol ST Datagram Mode Simple Internet Protocol TP/IX: The Next Internet The P Internet Protocol TUBA Unassigned Reserved References ---------[JBP] [JBP] [RFC791,JBP] [RFC1190,JWF] [RH6] [RXU] [PXF] [RXC] [JBP] [JBP] REFERENCES [RFC791] Postel, J., ed., "Internet Protocol - DARPA Internet Program Protocol Specification", STD 5, RFC 791, USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981. [RFC1190] Topolcic, C., Editor, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)", RFC 1190, CIP Working Group, October 1990. PEOPLE [JPB] Jon Postel <postel@isi.edu> [JWF] Jim Forgie <FORGIE@XN.LL.MIT.ED> [RH6] Robert Hinden <Hinden@ENG.SUN.COM> [RXU] Robert Ullmann <ariel@world.std.com> [PXF] Paul Francis <francis@cactus.ntt.jp> [RXC] Ross Callon <callon@wellfleet.com> [] Reynolds & Postel [Page 6] RFC 1700 Assigned Numbers October 1994 URL = ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/version-numbers Reynolds & Postel [Page 7] RFC 1700 Assigned Numbers October 1994 PROTOCOL NUMBERS In the Internet Protocol (IP) [DDN], [RFC791] there is a field, called Protocol, to identify the next level protocol. This is an 8 bit field. Assigned Internet Protocol Numbers Decimal ------0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Keyword ------- Protocol References ----------------Reserved [JBP] ICMP Internet Control Message [RFC792,JBP] IGMP Internet Group Management [RFC1112,JBP] GGP Gateway-to-Gateway [RFC823,MB] IP IP in IP (encasulation) [JBP] ST Stream [RFC1190,IEN119,JWF] TCP Transmission Control [RFC793,JBP] UCL UCL [PK] EGP Exterior Gateway Protocol [RFC888,DLM1] IGP any private interior gateway [JBP] BBN-RCC-MON BBN RCC Monitoring [SGC] NVP-II Network Voice Protocol [RFC741,SC3] PUP PUP [PUP,XEROX] ARGUS ARGUS [RWS4] EMCON EMCON [BN7] XNET Cross Net Debugger [IEN158,JFH2] CHAOS Chaos [NC3] UDP User Datagram [RFC768,JBP] MUX Multiplexing [IEN90,JBP] DCN-MEAS DCN Measurement Subsystems [DLM1] HMP Host Monitoring [RFC869,RH6] PRM Packet Radio Measurement [ZSU] XNS-IDP XEROX NS IDP [ETHERNET,XEROX] TRUNK-1 Trunk-1 [BWB6] TRUNK-2 Trunk-2 [BWB6] LEAF-1 Leaf-1 [BWB6] LEAF-2 Leaf-2 [BWB6] RDP Reliable Data Protocol [RFC908,RH6] IRTP Internet Reliable Transaction [RFC938,TXM] ISO-TP4 ISO Transport Protocol Class 4 [RFC905,RC77] NETBLT Bulk Data Transfer Protocol [RFC969,DDC1] MFE-NSP MFE Network Services Protocol [MFENET,BCH2] MERIT-INP MERIT Internodal Protocol [HWB] SEP Sequential Exchange Protocol [JC120] 3PC Third Party Connect Protocol [SAF3] IDPR Inter-Domain Policy Routing Protocol [MXS1] Reynolds & Postel [Page 8] RFC 1700 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55-60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 Assigned Numbers October 1994 XTP DDP IDPR-CMTP TP++ IL SIP SDRP SIP-SR SIP-FRAG IDRP RSVP GRE MHRP BNA SIPP-ESP SIPP-AH I-NLSP SWIPE NHRP XTP [GXC] Datagram Delivery Protocol [WXC] IDPR Control Message Transport Proto [MXS1] TP++ Transport Protocol [DXF] IL Transport Protocol [DXP2] Simple Internet Protocol [SXD] Source Demand Routing Protocol [DXE1] SIP Source Route [SXD] SIP Fragment [SXD] Inter-Domain Routing Protocol [Sue Hares] Reservation Protocol [Bob Braden] General Routing Encapsulation [Tony Li] Mobile Host Routing Protocol[David Johnson] BNA [Gary Salamon] SIPP Encap Security Payload [Steve Deering] SIPP Authentication Header [Steve Deering] Integrated Net Layer Security TUBA [GLENN] IP with Encryption [JI6] NBMA Next Hop Resolution Protocol Unassigned [JBP] any host internal protocol [JBP] CFTP CFTP [CFTP,HCF2] any local network [JBP] SAT-EXPAK SATNET and Backroom EXPAK [SHB] KRYPTOLAN Kryptolan [PXL1] RVD MIT Remote Virtual Disk Protocol [MBG] IPPC Internet Pluribus Packet Core [SHB] any distributed file system [JBP] SAT-MON SATNET Monitoring [SHB] VISA VISA Protocol [GXT1] IPCV Internet Packet Core Utility [SHB] CPNX Computer Protocol Network Executive [DXM2] CPHB Computer Protocol Heart Beat [DXM2] WSN Wang Span Network [VXD] PVP Packet Video Protocol [SC3] BR-SAT-MON Backroom SATNET Monitoring [SHB] SUN-ND SUN ND PROTOCOL-Temporary [WM3] WB-MON WIDEBAND Monitoring [SHB] WB-EXPAK WIDEBAND EXPAK [SHB] ISO-IP ISO Internet Protocol [MTR] VMTP VMTP [DRC3] SECURE-VMTP SECURE-VMTP [DRC3] VINES VINES [BXH] TTP TTP [JXS] NSFNET-IGP NSFNET-IGP [HWB] DGP Dissimilar Gateway Protocol [DGP,ML109] TCF TCF [GAL5] IGRP IGRP [CISCO,GXS] Reynolds & Postel [Page 9]