Economics 514

advertisement

Economics 514

Homework 3

Practice Problems

1.

Demand and Credibility Shocks

The aggregate expenditure curve represents the output gap as a linear function of the difference between the real interest rate and the long-term level,

Output Gap t a d

 r t r

where a t

is an expenditure shock and d is the interest sensitivity of demand. The monetary policy reaction function is r t r b 

  TGT

The supply curve is given by Output Gap t f 

  t

 t

E

where f is the inflation

. sensitivity of supply. Assume that d is 2 and f is 1. The inflation target is 2% (i.e.

TGT =.02) and the long-term interest rate is r = .04

. a.

Assume that inflation expectations are co-ordinated around the target,

 t

E   TGT

.

Write inflation and the output gap as a function of a t

. Assume a 1% positive demand shock, i.e. a t

= .01

. Solve inflation and the output gap when b = .1

and b = 1000 . Which policy results in a smaller shift in inflation? Which policy results in a smaller shift in the output gap? Demonstrate your results on a graph.

We combine the expenditure curve and the monetary policy curve to get the aggregate demand curve. Output Gap t a t d b 

  t

 TGT a t

2 b

  t

.02

Given coordinated expectations the supply curve is Output Gap t f 

  t

 TGT    t

.02

.

The equilibrium inflation sets supply equal to demand a t

2 b

  t

.02

   t

.02

  a t

{2 b 1}

  t

.02

 t

.02

{2 a t

1}

.02

{2

.01

1}

Output Gap t

{2

 t a t

1} {2

.01

1}

Output Gap b=.1 .02833 b=1000 .020005

.00833

.00005

 t

E

AD b=.1 q

P

AS

 TGT

AD b=1000 q

b.

Set a t

= 0, but assume that inflation expectations are suddenly shifted upward,

 t

E  

TGT  c t

.

Write inflation and the output gap as a function of c t

. Assume a 1% positive expectation shock, i.e. c t

= .01

. Solve inflation and the output gap when b = .1

and b = 1000 . Which policy results in a smaller shift in inflation? Which policy results in a smaller shift in the output gap?

The aggregate supply curve is Output Gap t f 

  t

 TGT    t

.02

  c t

. Then we could see an aggregate demand curve

Output Gap t d b

 

TGT 2 b

  t

.02

This could be solved for

  t

.02

 c t

2 b

  t

.02

   t

.02

2

Output Gap t

2 c t

1 2

2

 b

1 c t

 t

Output Gap c t

1 b=.1 .02833 .0016666 b=1000 .020005

.00999

AD b=.1

AS

 E

 TGT

+c

 E

 TGT

AD b=1000 q

2.

Expectations and Monetary Policy Shocks

Aggregate demand is given by: q t

  t

   r )

Output is given by q

ˆ t

1 f

 t

  t

E

(1.1)

(1.2) where

E is the growth rate of wages which is given by the expectation of the inflation t rate. Monetary policy is given by

Monetary policy shocks r t

  t

 b

 t

follow persistent AR(1) processes. t

 t

  t

1

  t

M where the innovation terms are white noise, E t

1

(

 t

M

)

0 , so

E t

1

   t

1

(1.3)

Consider that at time 0 there is a shock to monetary policy, raising interest rates temporarily,

M

0

0 but in all future periods

 t

M 

0 for all future periods t= 1,2,.3, …..

Also assume no demand shocks

 

0 Solve for the path of the output gap and the t inflation rate in period 0 through 2 as a function of

0

M , under two scenarios, A)

Adaptive expectations,

E

 t

 t

1

; , B) Rational expectations,

 t

E

Assume

1

E t

0.

Simplify by calibrating d = b = f = 1 and

=1/2 .

1

[

 t

];

A) Adaptive Expectations

π t

Period 0 1 2 q t

B) Rational Expectations

π t

Period 0 q t

1 2

q t

  r r t t

  

; q t t q t

  t

  t

1

;

  t

  t t

  t

  t

1

  t

 

1

2

 t

1

2

 t

1

; q

ˆ t

1

2

 t

 

1

2

 t

1

(1.4)

π

 t t q t

Rational Expectations

Period 0

0

M

1

2

0

M

1

2

0

M

1

1

2

 M

0

1

2

0

M

1

4

0

M

2

1

4

0

M

3

8

0

M

1

8

0

M q

ˆ t

 t

  t

E

(1.5)

ˆ t

 

; t t

   t

; q t t

  t t q t

 t

E t

1

[

 t

] ;

E t

1

[ q

ˆ t

]

  

E t

1

[

 t

]

E t

1

[

 t

]

 q t

 t

 

1

2

 t

1

 

 t

1

2

 t

1

1

2

 t

1

E t

1

[

 t

]

E t

1

[

 t

]

  t t

  t

 q t

{

1

2

 t

1

 

1

2 t

M

 t

1

4

 t

1

1

2

 t

M

}

1 { 1

2 2

1

2 t

M

 t

1

  t

M

}

1

4

 t

1

 

1

2

 t

M

1

2

 t

1

4

 t

1

1

2

 t

1

1 { 1

2 2

 t

1

  t

M

}

1

4

 t

1 q t

 t

π t

Period 0

0

M

1

2

0

M

1

2

0

M

1

1

2

M

0

1

2

0

M

0

2

1

4

0

M

1

4

0

M

0

3.

Monetary Policy

Aggregate demand is given by: q t

  t

   t r ) (1.6)

Output is given by q

ˆ t

 f

1 

 t

E t

1

(1.7) where

E is the growth rate of wages which is given by the expectation of the inflation t rate. Monetary policy is given by r t

  b (

 t o  

TGT ) (1.8)

Where

 o

is the inflation observed by the central bank. Inflation is observed imperfectly t by the policy maker:

 t o   t

  t

.

Consider

 t

to be an error in measuring inflation.

Treat this as a white noise shock.

Examine the effect of monetary policy when the central bank makes mistakes in measuring inflation. Simplify by assuming f =d = 1 and

 t

= 0. Assume that the central bank overestimates inflation by 1% at time 0:

0

= .01. Consider the impact if b = .1

and b = 1000.

A) Rational Expectations

Period b = .1

π t  

11

 t q t  

11

 t

ˆ t d ( r t r ) d b (

 t o  

TGT

) q t

1 f

 t

E t

1

 

 t

E t

1

E t

1

E t

1 b=1000

1000

1001

  t

1000

1001

  t b (

 t

  t

)

E t

1

  b E t

1

(

 t

  t

)

 q t

  t b (

 t

  t

) (1 b )

 t b

 t

 t

  b

(1

 b )

 t q

ˆ t

4.

Monetary Policy Shocks in the New Keynesian Model

Aggregate demand is given by:

ˆ t

 r t

N   t t

ˆ t

Output is given by

 t

  q

ˆ t

 

E t

  t

1

Monetary policy is given by

Monetary policy shocks r t

 r N   t

 b

 t

 t

follow persistent AR(1) processes.

 t

  t

1

  t

M where the innovation terms are white noise, E t

1

(

 t

M )

0 , so

E t

1

   t

1

Consider that at time 0 there is a shock to monetary policy, raising interest rates temporarily,

M

0

0 but in all future periods

Simplify by calibrating θ = 1 and

=1/2.

 t

M 

0 for all future periods t= 1,2,3,…

π t q t t

Period 0

2

2

0

M

4

0

M

4 b

 

4 b

0

M

1

1

2

2

2

0

M

2

2

4 b

4 b

0

M

0

M

2

1

2

2

4

0

M

1

4 b

0

M

1

 

2

4 b

0

M q t

  t

 b

 t

 t

    t

 b

 t

1

2 q t

2

  t

 b

 t

;

(1.9)

(1.10)

(1.11)

 t

  t

E t

 t

1

  t

ˆ t 2 t

2

2

  q

ˆ t q t

ˆ t

2

 t

2

 b

2

2

  q

ˆ t

2

   

4 b

  t

2

 

4 b q t

2

4

4 b

 t

2

 t

Output is given by

 t

  q

ˆ t

 

E t

  t

1

Monetary policy is given by

Monetary policy shocks r t

 r

N   t

 b

 t

follow persistent AR(1) processes. t

 t

  t

1

  t

M

(1.12)

(1.13)

(1.14)

5.

Keynesian Consumption Function from Permanent Income Hypothesis.

A household lives for 20 periods. The real interest rate is 5%. The household’s income grows at a constant rate, g , in every period. The household begins with 1000 in financial wealth. We do not know the current income level, Y

0

. Assuming the permanent income hypothesis holds (i.e (1+r) ×β =1 ), we can write the current consumption in the

Keynesian form, C

0

= A

0

+ mpc×Y

0

where A

0 is proportional to financial wealth, A

0

= mpcw∙FW

0

.

a. Solve for mpcw.

The households financial and human wealth is equal to

W

F

0

 

0

Y

1

1

 r

Y

2

1

 r

2

Y

T

1

 r

T

With a constant income growth rate g, we can write Y t

= (1+g) t Y

0

.

W

F

0

Y

(1

1

 g Y r

0

(1

1

 g Y r

)

2

2

2

(1

 T g Y

T

1

 r

T

. Define z

(1

 g )

1

 r

. Then

W

F

0

Y

0

(1 z z

2   z

T

...

) . When z = 1 (i.e. g = r ), this is equal to

W

F

0

( T Y

0

Y

0

. When z < 1 , this is equal to W

F

0

1

 z

T

1

1

 z

The present value of consumption is C

0

1

C

1

 r

C

2

1

 r

2

C

T

1

 r

T

Y

0

. Assuming the permanent income hypothesis C t

= C

0

, C

0

C

0

1

 r

C

0

1

 r

2

C

0

1

 r

T

. Define x

C

C

0

0

1

1

1

1

 r x

T

, then the present value of consumption is

1

1

1

 x x x

T

1

. If the present value of consumption equals total wealth, then

W

1

1

 x x

T

1

F

0

1

1

 x x

T

1

1

1

 z

T

1 z

Y

0

C

0

∙ (1 + x + x 2

+ x

3

+ ….+ x

T

) =

1

. So if C = A + mpc Y , then A =

1

 x x

T

1 and mpc =

1

1

1

 x x

T

1

1

 x x

T

1

1

1

0.074282007

 z

T z

1

. When r = .05

, then x =

1

1.05

, if T = 20

, so if F

0

= 1000 , then A = 74.28200678

.

, then

When g = 0 , then x = z , so mpc = 1.

F

0 b.

Solve for mpc when g = .05

. Solve for mpc when the growth rate of income is zero ( g = 0 ). Explain the difference.

If r = g , then mpc =

1

 x

( T

1) = 1.559922142.

1

 x

T

1

6.

MPCW and Consumption Elasticity

A household lives for periods 0 through T = 19 and begins period 0 with financial wealth normalized to FW

0

= 1 and has income in any period, Y t

= 0. The household has a utility function of the form

U

 t

T 

0

( t

) ( t

)

C t

1

 1

1

1

1

Note that the subjective discount factor is set equal to β=1. The household’s wealth follows the following dynamic B

0

=FW

0

–C

0 for period 0 and B t

= (1+r)B t-1

–C t

for period t>0 . Therefore the household has a budget constraint of the form t

T 

0

(1

C t

 r ) t

FW

0 a.

Write the first order conditions of the household optimization problem. Show that we can write the Euler equation of the form C t+1

= (1+r)

γ

C t

. Solve for γ.

First order condition is

C t

 1

 t

 1

1

C t

1

  r )

 

C t b.

Since the above means that we can write C t

= [(1+r)

γ

] t

C

0

. Show that we can

 t

T 

0 write the household budget constraint in the form FW

0

= Г∙C

0 where the parameter

Г

is a function of 1+r and γ.

(1

(1

 r r

)

)

 t t

C

0

 t

T 

0

(1

 r )

 

1 t

C

0

FW

0 c.

Solve for Г when r = 0 . When r = 0, Г = T+1 so mpcw = 1/T+1 = 1/20 = .05

d.

Now, solve for

Г when r = .1 and

ψ = .5, 0, and 2

. What is the impact of a rise in the interest rate on the marginal propensity to consume out of wealth at the different intertemporal elasticity of substitutions.

Define x as x

 

(1

 r )

 

1

. Then we write,

 t

T 

0

  t

. When ψ = 1, x = 1. so Г =

20 and mpcw = 1/20 = .5. Under uuit intertemporal elasticity of substitution, the interest rate has no effect on consumption or mpcw.

Otherwise

 

1

1

 x

20 x

Download