Terms of Reference Performance Improvement Framework Self-review <Agency name> Status: <> Author: <> Date: <> Version: <> Introduction The <Agency name> will undertake a Performance Improvement Framework (PIF) Selfreview. The review will be in three parts: Part 1 Using the PIF Agency Model the review will consider the current state of the agency and how well placed it is to deal with the issues that confront it in the medium-term future. Part 2 Based on the Part 1 draft report the <senior leadership team> will then ask and answer two critical questions: What is the contribution New Zealand needs from this agency and, therefore, what is the future performance challenge? If the agency is to be successful at meeting the future performance challenge, what would success look like in four years? Part 3 Having answered the Part 2 questions the <senior leadership team> will then propose areas where the agency needs to do the most work to make itself fit-for-purpose and fit-for-thefuture. That proposal is the agency’s next stage of performance improvement. TERMS OF REFERENCE - PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT FRAMEWORK - SELF-REVIEW <AGENCY NAME> 1 Process The review is designed to identify and access relevant material in relation to this matter, and interview the relevant people, if necessary. All PIF reviews are integrated, deep, fast reviews based on available information. This PIF Self-review will take no longer than <x> days. Approach A PIF Self-review is not an audit, scientific evaluation, investigation of compliance or an accreditation process. Like the PIF Review, the method of enquiry is a mix of quantitative and qualitative analyses. The approach is appreciative (Cooperrider and Srivastva, 1997). A PIF Self-review: starts from a principle that by and large the agency works well and the primary role of the review is to discover, describe and explain why the agency works well is interested in the agency’s potential, thus the review will cover both past and future performance in the context of the challenges in the near future involves conversations that are strategic and provocative; a PIF Self-review is a way for an agency to find a way to become more than it is at the moment, and in doing so learn how to take public ownership for its own performance improvement journey must be collaborative; there is an inseparable relationship between the process, approach, content and outcome of the review. Reporting It is envisaged that an interim report covering the matters reviewed in Part 1 will be available to the <senior leadership team> on <date>. The <senior leadership team> determines the communication and distribution of any reports relating to the review, including the final report, which is made up of Parts 1, 2 and 3. 2 TERMS OF REFERENCE - PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT FRAMEWORK - SELF-REVIEW <AGENCY NAME> Deliverables and Timeframes A PIF Self-review commences when the terms of reference are signed and the <senior leadership team>, formally announces the review to the agency. Table One: Indicative deliverables and timeframes Benefits Realisation Delivery Planning Initiation Phase Purpose Description Duration or Completion Date Setting the Self-review up for success The Terms of Reference and Project Plan are signed by all parties. Self-review team identified and trained. Completed no later than <Day, Date> Ensure the project itself is broken down into component or increments that help deal with scale, complexity and uncertainty. Necessary logistics support and documents are provided to the team. Completed no later than <Day, Date> Analysis A period of desk analysis and interviews undertaken by the Self-review team. <Start Date – End Date> Part 1 draft findings Team synthesis and present draft report for <senior leadership team> consideration. Completed no later than <Day, Date> SLT discussion Accept or not the draft report. If not, consider peer review or independent moderation. Answer Part 2 and Part 3 questions. Completed no later than <Day, Date> Agency Response or Agency Performance Improvement Plan Agree priority areas for improvement. Completed no later than <Day, Date> Review Agency Performance Improvement Plan Review progress. Part 2 and Part 3 findings Training sessions on the PIF Agency Model. Agreement on the Government Priorities and Core Business Areas to be reviewed. Publish. TERMS OF REFERENCE - PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT FRAMEWORK - SELF-REVIEW <AGENCY NAME> Completed no later than <Day, Date> 3 Project team roles and responsibilities Table Two: Indicative roles and responsibilities for a PIF Self-review team Role Responsibility Sponsor The Self-review Sponsor is either the chief executive or a second tier manager. This role provides oversight, promotes the review across the agency and works to remove barriers if they arise. PIF Self-review Project Manager The Self-review Project Manager plans the review, schedules the activities, organises, trains and leads the Self-review team. They also monitor progress. Often they also edit the penultimate draft. PIF Self-review team Self-review team members undertake document analysis, conduct interviews and write up draft findings for the areas they are allocated. The review team as a group finalises the draft report, providing challenge and consistency across the overall review. Some agencies use large teams. Others use one or two advisors. Peer reviewer Peer review is critical. Peer review ensures the report is robust and fair across the different areas covered. Most agencies invite advisors who have not been part of the Self-review team to provide peer review. Some agencies have used their risk and assurance committees. Others have invited sector colleagues to provide peer review. <Senior Leadership Team> The agency <senior leadership team> accepts – or not – the Self-review. If it accepts the review they then develop a response. If they do not accept the review they might consider further peer review or independent moderation. Agreement to the Terms of Reference I am satisfied that the approach outlined in the Terms of Reference will achieve the stated objectives of this review. ______________________________________ <Agency CE Name> Chief Executive, Agency Date 4 TERMS OF REFERENCE - PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT FRAMEWORK - SELF-REVIEW <AGENCY NAME>