Approaches in Psychology Source: Simply Psychology (Home page http://www.simplypsychology.org/) Psychology Perspectives http://www.simplypsychology.org/perspective.html There are various different approaches in contemporary psychology. An approach is a perspective (i.e. view) that involves certain assumptions (i.e. beliefs) about human behavior: the way they function, which aspects of them are worthy of study and what research methods are appropriate for undertaking this study. There may be several different theories within an approach, but they all share these common assumptions. You may wonder why there are so many different psychology perspectives and whether one approach is correct and others wrong. Most psychologists would agree that no one perspective is correct, although in the past, in the early days of psychology, the behaviorist would have said their perspective was the only truly scientific one. Each perspective has its strengths and weaknesses, and brings something different to our understanding of human behavior. For this reasons, it is important that psychology does have different perspectives to the understanding and study of human and animal behavior. Therefore, in conclusion, there are so many different perspectives to psychology to explain the different types of behavior and give different angles. No one perspective has explanatory powers over the rest. Only with all the different types of psychology which sometimes contradict one another (nature-nurture debate), overlap with each other (e.g. psychoanalysis and child psychology) or build upon one another (biological and health psychologist) can we understand and create effective solutions when problems arise so we have a healthy body and healthy mind. The fact that there are different perspectives represents the complexity and richness of human (and animal) behavior. A scientific approach, such as behaviorism or cognitive psychology, tends to ignore the subjective (i.e. personal) experiences that people have. The humanistic perspective does recognize human experience, but largely at the expense of being non-scientific in its methods and ability to provide evidence. The psychodynamic perspective concentrates too much on the unconscious mind and childhood. As such it tends to lose sight of the role of socialization (which is different in each country) and the possibility of free will. The biological perspective reduces humans to a set of mechanisms and physical structures that are clearly essential and important (e.g. genes). However, it fails to account for consciousness and the influence of the environment on behavior. Page 1 of 6 Approaches in Psychology Behaviorism Approach Summary Key Features Methodology Stimulus - Response Classical Conditioning & Operant Conditioning Reinforcement & Punishment (Skinner) Objective Measurement Social Learning Theory (Bandura) Nomothetic Reductionism Basic Assumptions Areas of Application Psychology should be seen as a science, to be studied in a scientific manner (usually in a laboratory) Behaviorism is primarily concerned with observable behavior, as opposed to internal events like thinking and emotion Behavior is the result of stimulus – response (i.e. all behavior, no matter how complex, can be reduced to a simple stimulus – response association) Behavior is determined by the environment (e.g. conditioning) Gender Role Development Behavior Therapies (e.g. Flooding) Phobias Addictions (Aversion Therapy) Scientific Methods Relationships Language Moral Development Strengths Lab Experiments Little Albert Edward Thorndike (the cat in a puzzle box) Skinner box (rats & pigeons) Pavlov’s Dogs Bandura Bobo Doll Experiment Ethical Considerations Weaknesses Scientific Highly applicable (e.g. therapy) Emphasizes objective measurement Many experiments to support theories Identified comparisons between animals (Pavlov) and humans (Watson & Rayner Little Albert) Page 2 of 6 Ignores mediational processes Ignores biology (e.g. testosterone) Too deterministic (little free-will) Experiments – low ecological validity Humanism – can’t compare animals to humans Humanism - rejects scientific method (low ecological validity) Reductionist Approaches in Psychology Humanism Approach Summary Key Concepts Methodology Qualitative Research Idiographic Approach Congruence The Self (e.g. self-worth, self-image, self actualization) Holism (e.g. study to whole person) Hierarchy of needs Maslow Free Will Basic Assumptions Areas of Application Humans have free will; not all behavior is determined. All individuals are unique and have an innate (inborn) drive to achieve their maximum potential A proper understanding of human behavior can only be achieved by studying humans not animals. Psychology should study the individual case (idiographic) rather than the average performance of groups (nomothetic). Strengths Qualitative Methods Case Studies Informal Interviews Q-Sort Method (Stephenson, 1953) Problems with Qualitative Data Open-ended Questionnaires Inter-rater/coder reliability Person Centered Therapy Qualitative Methods Abnormal Behavior (incongruent, low selfworth) Education Gender Role Development Weaknesses Shifted the focus of behavior to the individual / whole person rather than the unconscious mind, genes, observable behavior etc. Humanistic psychology satisfies most people's idea of what being human means because it values personal ideals and selffulfillment. Qualitative data gives genuine insight (and more holistic information) into behavior. Highlights the value of more individualistic and idiographic methods of study Page 3 of 6 Unscientific – subjective concepts E.g. cannot objectively measure selfactualization Humanism ignores the unconscious mind Behaviorism – human and animal behavior can be compared Qualitative data is difficult to compare Ethnocentric (biased towards Western culture) Their belief in free will is in opposition to the deterministic laws of science. Approaches in Psychology Cognitive Psychology Summary Key Concepts Methodology Mediational Processes (process between stimulus and response) Information Processing Approach Computer Analogy Introspection (Wundt) Nomothetic (studies the group) Schema Machine Reductionism Basic Assumptions Areas of Application Cognitive psychology is a pure science, based mainly on laboratory experiments. Behavior can be largely explained in terms of how the mind operates, i.e. the information processing approach. The mind works in a way similar to a computer: inputting, storing and retrieving data. Mediational processes occur between stimulus and response. Strengths Gender Role Development Eyewitness Testimony / Cognitive Interview Memory, Attention, Perception etc. Child Development (Piaget) Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Learning Styles (Kolb) Moral Development (Piaget) Weaknesses Lab Experiments Introspection (Wundt) Memory (Jacobs Digit Span) Interviews (Kohlberg, Piaget) Case Studies (KF, HM ) Observations (Piaget) Computer Modeling Scientific Highly applicable (e.g. therapy, EWT) Combines easily with approaches: Behaviorism + Cog = Social Learning Biology + Cog = Evolutionary Psychology Many empirical studies to support theories Page 4 of 6 Ignores biology (e.g. testosterone) Experiments - low ecological validity Humanism - rejects scientific method Behaviorism - can’t objectively study unobservable behavior Introspection is subjective Machine reductionism Approaches in Psychology Biological Approach Summary Key Concepts Methodology Natural Selection / Evolution Adaptation Heredity / Genetics Nomothetic (studies the group) Reductionist Instincts / Sociobiology Comparative Psychology Lab Experiments Correlation studies Twin research Naturalistic observations (Kettlewell) Ethical Considerations Reliability and validity of research Basic Assumptions Areas of Application Psychology should be seen as a science, to be studied in a scientific manner (usually in a laboratory). Behavior can be largely explained in terms of biology (e.g. genes/hormones) Human genes have evolved over millions of years to adapt behavior to the environment. Therefore, most behavior will have an adaptive / evolutionary purpose. Gender Role Development Abnormal Behavior IQ Relationships Therapy Stress (SRRS) Strengths Weaknesses Very Scientific Highly application to other areas: Biology + Cog = Evolutionary Psychology Helped develop comparative psychology Strong counter argument to the nurture side of the debate Many empirical studies to support theories Page 5 of 6 Experiments – Low Ecological Validity Humanism: too deterministic – little room for free-will Doesn’t recognize cognitive processes Reductionist Biopsychological theories often oversimplify the huge complexity of physical systems and their interaction with the environment. Approaches in Psychology Psychodynamic Approach Summary Key Features Methodology Collective Unconscious (Jung) Psychosexual Development (Freud) Unconscious Mind (Freud) Tripartite Personality Defense Mechanisms (Freud) Psychosocial Development (Erikson) Basic Assumptions Areas of Application The major causes of behavior have their origin in the unconscious Psychic determinism: all behavior has a cause/reason Behavior is motivated by instinctual drives (eros & thanatos) Different parts of the unconscious mind are in constant struggle Our behavior and feelings as adults (including psychological problems) are rooted in our childhood experiences. Strengths Gender Role Development Therapy (Psychoanalysis) Attachment (Bowlby) Moral Development (super-ego) Aggression (Displacement / Thanatos) Personality (Erikson, Freud) Weaknesses Case Studies (Little Hans) Dream Analysis Free Association Projective Tests (TAT, Rorschach) Slips of the Tongue (parapraxes) Hypnosis Made the Case Study method popular in psychology Defense Mechanisms Free association Projective Tests (TAT, Rorschach) Highlighted the importance of Childhood Highlighted the importance of the unconscious mind Dream analysis Page 6 of 6 Case Studies - Subjective / Cannot generalize results Unscientific (lacks empirical support) Too Deterministic (little free-will) Biased Sample (e.g. middle aged women from Vienna) Ignores Mediational Processes (e.g. thinking, memory) Rejects Free will (e.g. Humanism believe free will exists) Unfalsifiable (difficult to prove wrong)