Alternative Governance Plan Template
Alternative Governance Plan for _________________________________School
Date of Alternative Governance Plan: ___________________
Program Improvement Year: _____
Once a school is identified as PI Year 4, the school district must develop a plan for
alternative governance or major restructuring for that school. If the school fails to meet
the criteria for AYP during PI Year 4, the plan goes into effect the following year.
Contact Person:
Position:
____________________________________________School District
The District Governing Board approved this Alternative Governance Plan on
___________________.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part I:
Process for Determination of Alternative Governance
Part II:
Student Achievement Data Summary and Conclusions and
Other Data Evidence Considered
Part III: Summary and Conclusions of Analysis of Previous Changes Made in
Governance/Structure
Part IV: Rationale for Alternative Governance Selection
Part V: Action Plan for Alternative Governance
Part VI: Plan for Monitoring the Effectiveness of the Alternative Governance Plan
Part V: Alternative Governance Action Plan for ________________________________School
The District School Liaison Team (DSLT) has analyzed the academic performance of all student groups and has considered the effectiveness of key elements of the
instructional program for students failing to meet API and AYP growth targets. As a result, it has adopted the following school goals, related actions, and expenditures
to raise the academic performance of student groups not meeting state standards:
SCHOOL GOAL # __
(Based on conclusions from Analysis of Program Components and Student Data pages)
Student groups and grade levels to participate in this goal:
Anticipated annual performance growth for each group:
Means of evaluating progress toward this goal:
Group data to be collected to measure academic gains:
Actions to be Taken to Reach This Goal
Consider all appropriate dimensions (e.g., Teaching and Learning,
Staffing and Professional Development)
Guide to the Single Plan for Student Achievement
Start Date
Completion
Date
Person(s)
Responsible
Proposed Expenditures
2
Estimated
Cost
Funding
Source
Alternative Governance Plan Part II, Table A: Student Achievement Data -- Academic Performance Index
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) DATA BY GROUPS
All Students
API
B
a
s
e
2005-2006
2006-2007
2007-2008
Conclusions indicated by the data:
1.
2.
3.
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
h
a
n
g
e
B
a
s
e
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
h
a
n
g
e
B
a
s
e
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
h
a
n
g
e
B
a
s
e
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
h
a
n
g
e
B
a
s
e
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
h
a
n
g
e
B
a
s
e
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
h
a
n
g
e
B
a
s
e
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
h
a
n
g
e
Alternative Governance Plan Part II, Table B: Student Achievement Data -- English-Language Arts Adequate
Yearly Progress (AYP)
AYP
PROFICIENCY
LEVEL
ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTS PERFORMANCE DATA BY STUDENT GROUP
All Students
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Participatio
n
Rate
Percent
At or
Above
Proficient
Percent
Below
Basic and
Far Below
Basic
AYP Target
Met AYP
Criteria
Conclusions indicated by the data:
1.
2.
3.
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Alternative Governance Plan Part II, Table C: Student Achievement Data-- Mathematics Adequate Yearly Progress
(AYP)
MATHEMATICS PERFORMANCE DATA BY STUDENT GROUP
AYP
PROFICIENCY
LEVEL
All Students
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Participation
Rate
Percent
At or Above
Proficient
Percent
Below Basic
and Far
Below Basic
AYP Target
Met AYP
Criteria
Conclusions indicated by the data:
1.
2.
3.
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Alternative Governance Plan Part II, Table D: Student Data -- Multi-Purpose Form
Academic, Demographic, Grade Span, or Program Area: ___________________________
DATA BY __________________
Level Achieved
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Conclusions indicated by the data:
1.
2.
3.
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
Alternative Governance Plan Part II: Table E -- California English Language Development (CELDT) Data
California English Language Development Test (CELDT) Results
Grade
Spans
Advanced
#
Early Advanced
%
#
%
Intermediate
#
Early Intermediate
%
#
%
Beginning
#
Number Tested
%
#
*K-2
3-5
6-8
9-12
Total
Additional CELDT data for analysis:
Review skill areas (listening/speaking, reading, writing) to determine whether grade spans are performing at the same proficiency level in all three areas.
If there are gaps between skill areas, what conclusions might be made in regard to instructional design and curriculum?
Conclusions indicated by the data:
1.
2.
3.