1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
c/o 117 E. Louisa Street
Seattle 98102-3203
Washington State, USA
In Propria Persona and
In Forma Pauperis
All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)
District Court of the United States
Judicial District of Washington
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [sic], )
Plaintiff [sic],
)
v.
)
JOSEPH RUBEN HILL [sic] et al.
)
---------------------------------)
United States ex rel.
)
Paul Andrew Mitchell,
)
Private Attorney General.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
_________________________________)
Case No. MJ-14-00030 (JPD)
Re: 14-CR-27-F (DWY)
(incorporated by reference)
PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF,
FOIA ENFORCEMENT, AND
VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT,
ON INFORMATION:
5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B);
18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 912, 1512,
1513, 1962, 1964;
42 U.S.C. 1985, 1986;
44 U.S.C. 3512; 28 U.S.C. 1345,
1691; FREV 201(c)(2).
36
37
Comes now the United States ex rel. Paul Andrew Mitchell, Citizen of
38
Washington
39
General, to petition this Honorable DCUS for all relief stated supra,
40
and for all other relief which this Court deems just and proper under
41
the circumstances which occasion the instant Petition.
42
43
The
State,
United
qualified
States
Federal
hereby
Witness,
formally
and
charges
Private
the
individuals with violating all laws cited infra:
44
Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief, FOIA Enforcement, and
Verified Criminal Complaint, on Information: Page 1 of 6
Attorney
following
1
Christopher A. Crofts has violated:
2
18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 912, 1512, 1513, 1962(d);
3
42 U.S.C. 1985, 1986;
4
see 28 U.S.C. 544;
5
44 U.S.C. 3512;
5 U.S.C. 3331, 3332, 3333;
L. Robert Murray has violated:
6
18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 912, 1512, 1513, 1962(d);
7
42 U.S.C. 1985, 1986;
8
see 28 U.S.C. 544;
9
44 U.S.C. 3512;
5 U.S.C. 3331, 3332, 3333;
and,
James Marcy has violated:
10
18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 912, 1512, 1513, 1962(d);
11
42 U.S.C. 1985, 1986;
12
see 27 CFR 26.11, Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, fn 23.
13
Petitioner
44 U.S.C. 3512;
incorporates
lodged
against
the
James
VERIFIED
Marcy
in
CRIMINAL
14
previously
Wyoming
15
Cheyenne, as if same were set forth fully here.
16
Credit Clause, U.S. Const.
State
COMPLAINT
court,
at
See Full Faith and
17
Petitioner also incorporates Mr. Mitchell’s prior FOIA Requests
18
for copies of valid credentials required by law of Messrs. Crofts,
19
Murray and Marcy.
20
re:
21
Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS.
OMB
control
See 5 U.S.C. 2903, 2906, 3331;
number
required
to
be
duly
and, 44 U.S.C. 3512
displayed
on
all
OPM
22
Petitioner charges all 3 named individuals with attending and/or
23
conducting hearings in a grand jury room without having valid SF-61
24
credentials, which necessarily resulted in multiple acts of FRAUD upon
25
a
26
unconstitutional Jury Selection and Service Act.
27
et seq., 1865!
panel
of
federal
citizens
assembled
under
color
of
an
Cf. 28 U.S.C. 1861
Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief, FOIA Enforcement, and
Verified Criminal Complaint, on Information: Page 2 of 6
1
Mr.
Mitchell
is
prosecution,
now
grievously
2
malicious
3
individuals, and probably more!
4
5
6
(1)
(2)
the
3
and
above-named
granting leave to Mr. Mitchell to amend the instant Petition to
proper
form
and
include
all
relevant
documentary
evidence;
(3)
12
14
least
ARREST
proper Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus to consider immediate
satisfy
10
13
at
FALSE
release of Mr. Mitchell back to unfetterd liberty;
9
11
by
by
REMEDIES REQUESTED
7
8
instigated
damaged
issuing a briefing schedule with a proper sequence of issues to
review in correct order;
(4)
and,
any and all other relief which this honorable DCUS deems just and
proper.
15
16
Paramount Authorities:
Art. VI, Sec. 3, U.S. Const.;
17
U.S. v. Pignatiello, 582 F.Supp. 251 (1984) (ON POINT!!)
18
19
Respectfully submitted,
20
Signed:
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Relator on behalf of the
United States ex rel. (“ex relatione”),
and qualified Federal Witness, 18 U.S.C. 1512, 1513
Dated:
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
January 29, 2014 A.D.
(mailing delayed due to witness intimidation, retaliation)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
(cf. UCC 1-308)
Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief, FOIA Enforcement, and
Verified Criminal Complaint, on Information: Page 3 of 6
1
VERIFICATION
2
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Sui Juris, Citizen of Washington
3
State, (expressly not a “federal citizen”), also a qualified Federal
4
Witness, and Private Attorney General, hereby verify under penalty of
5
perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the
6
United
7
facts
8
information, knowledge and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28
9
U.S.C. 1746.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
States
and
(“federal
laws
is
true
government”),
and
that
correct,
to
Dated:
January 29, 2014 A.D.
Signed:
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
the
the
above
best
statement
of
my
of
current
Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.,
Relator on behalf of the United States ex relatione
(“ex rel.”)
p.s.
See also Rotella v. Wood (re: “private attorneys general”);
Miranda
22
v. Arizona (re: rights secured by the Constitution);
23
Management
24
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Acker;
25
(Rules
26
already conferred by Act of Congress), in pari materia with 18 U.S.C.
27
3231 (re: DCUS, not USDC).
of
and
Court
Recognition
may
not
expand
System
or
Termination
restrict
Performance
Act
(1993);
Willy v. Coastal Corp.
original
jurisdiction
28
Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief, FOIA Enforcement, and
Verified Criminal Complaint, on Information: Page 4 of 6
1
Appendix “A”
2
ACTUAL NOTICE:
Whenever personnel in the Clerk’s Office of any
3
U.S. District Court do not have legal custody of their own U.S. Office
4
of
5
AFFIDAVITS,
6
defective
7
paragraph citing 5 U.S.C. 2903 and/or no authority to administer),
8
such a Court cannot issue any “process” that satisfies 28 U.S.C. 1691.
9
That law requires both a clerk’s authorized signature and the Court’s
Personnel
Management
or
for
whenever
any
(“OPM”)
those
reason
Standard
Standard
(e.g.
no
10
official seal;
11
no subsequent amendments whatsoever.
Form
Forms
OMB
control
61
61
APPOINTMENT
(“SF-61”)
number
and/or
are
no
and, that law was first enacted on June 25, 1948, with
12
See, in particular, signatures of Mr. Donohue on “Search Warrant”
13
(circa June 11, 2013), on “Arrest Warrant” (circa January 28, 2014),
14
on “Detention Order” (circa January 28, 2014), and on “Appointment of
15
Federal Public Defender” (circa January 28, 2014), latter expressly
16
refused
17
Relator’s
18
visiting the USDC Clerk’s Office in Seattle specifically for that
19
purpose.
20
to remedy).
21
22
by
Relator
request
because
that
she
lady
Federal
request
the
Public
missing
Defender
credentials
refused
–-
by
Here see 42 U.S.C. 1986, 1985 (neglect to prevent / failure
See Johnson v. Zerbst (Court was thereby ousted of jurisdiction);
Sixth Amendment!
23
Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief, FOIA Enforcement, and
Verified Criminal Complaint, on Information: Page 5 of 6
1
Appendix “B”
2
DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE DISQUALIFICATION
3
AND RECUSAL, IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE
4
Mr. Donohue,
5
For more than six (6) months, no one has produced any of your
6
credentials.
7
the USDC lacks all jurisdiction in the matter of Case No. 14-CR-27-F
8
(DWY) –- incorporated here by reference –- and, said USDC lacks all
9
jurisdiction to proceed at all.
10
As such, you have no authority to sit on the bench, and
See Johnson v. Zerbst here, for
example.
11
Come down off that bench immediately, Sir, because your missing
12
and/or defective credentials call for the reasonable conclusion that
13
you are impersonating an officer of the United States, in violation of
14
18
15
consequential
16
itemized at 18 U.S.C. 1961.
U.S.C.
912,
in
crime
addition
statutes
to
e.g.
violation
see
all
of
RICO
numerous
other
“predicate
acts”
17
Your acts as such are void, chiefly by failing –or- refusing to
18
produce any evidence of the OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required
19
by 5 U.S.C. 2903, 2906, 3331, 3332, 3333, which clearly do implement
20
the
21
Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully amended.
22
See also 5 U.S.C. 2104, 3332, 3333, 5507;
23
751, 951, 1691;
24
1985, 1986;
Oath
of
Office
Clause
at
18 U.S.C. 1504;
Article
VI,
Section
3,
in
the
28 U.S.C. 453, 544, 631(g),
and, 44 U.S.C. 3512;
Gillespie v. Civiletti (9th Cir.)
Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief, FOIA Enforcement, and
Verified Criminal Complaint, on Information: Page 6 of 6
42 U.S.C.