Business Studies HSC Course Topic 4: Employment Relations Section 4.5: Industrial Conflict Section Overview: 4.5.1 Definition and causes — wage demands, working conditions, management policy, political goals and social issues 4.5.2 Perspectives on conflict — unitary, pluralist, radical 4.5.3 Types of industrial action – overt — lockouts, pickets, strikes, bans, work-to-rule – covert — absenteeism, sabotage, turnover, exclusion from decision-making in business 4.5.4 Roles of stakeholders in resolving disputes 4.5.5 Dispute resolution processes — conciliation, arbitration, grievance procedures, negotiation, mediation, common law action, business/division closure 4.5.6 Costs and benefits of industrial conflict – financial, personal, social, political, international 1 Section 4.5 Industrial Conflict 4.5.1 Definition and Causes — Wage Demands, Working Conditions, Management Policy, Political Goals and Social Issues INDUSTRIAL CONFLICT is caused by a clash between employers and employees. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) defines an industrial dispute as a withdrawal from work by a group of employees, or a refusal by an employer to allow workers to work. Generally, the causes of industrial conflict fall into categories such as wage demands, working conditions, management policies, political disputes and social concerns. A) Wage Demands Wage rates are a cost to employers but are income for employees. For this reason they are an obvious source of conflict. There are a number of main reasons why unions and employees may fight for wage increases. i) ii) If a business is achieving a high profit (i.e. Qantas) at the expense of employees, then unions could agitate for a pay rise. Also, employees may argue that a wage increase is fair if executive salaries have increased faster than employee wage levels. At a minimum, employees and unions are keen to see wages keeping pace with inflation so that their real living standards are maintained. B) Working Conditions Disputes under this category include those concerning issues such as protective clothing, first-aid services, uncomfortable working conditions, shortage or condition of equipment, lack of amenities, new production methods and equipment, and arduous physical tasks. Depending on the industry, it is the responsibility of management to ensure that workers are provided with safe and reasonably comfortable working conditions. An industrial dispute may arise if workers feel that management is neglecting the safety of employees, or if they feel that their working conditions are generally substandard and uncomfortable. 2 Section 4.5 C) Industrial Conflict Management Policies Managerial policy decisions have become the major cause of industrial disputes in recent years. Management decisions can create industrial conflict, especially when major changes to the business’s structure or operations are announced without consultation with employees. For Example: as firms restructure to increase productivity or efficiency, conflict often occurs when managers handle retrenchments poorly and leave the remaining staff with increased workloads. Management can reduce the potential for industrial conflict by ensuring that staff are notified of any changes in policy that will affect their working conditions. An even better solution is to consult staff before making changes to policy. D) Political Disputes & Social Concerns Unions have become directly involved in non-industrial issues, that is, political and social issues. This involvement has been controversial both within the union movement and in the general community. Issues range from conscription, apartheid, rainforest conservation and support of indigenous people. These disputes are targeted towards people or situations other than the employer/employee relationship. 4.5.2 Perspectives on Conflict – Unitary, Pluralist, Radical People involved in employment relations may differ in their beliefs about conflict: how it is caused, who is involved, and how it should be resolved. This has resulted in the following views or perspectives on conflict: Unitary, Pluralist or Radical. A) Unitary The unitary view of conflict likens a business to a team or unit. It assumes that all employees within the business share the goals of the business as defined by senior management. Conflict within the team or unit is seen as disloyalty – the work of stirrers or agitators. Human Resource Management, with its focus on improving the management of employment relations, has close ties with this unitary perspective on conflict. 3 Section 4.5 B) Industrial Conflict Pluralist Pluralists take the view that organisations are complex, are made of many parts and have a number of different stakeholders. As a result, everyone will not share identical interests. From this perspective, conflict is to be expected. It is even viewed as positive by the pluralists. The challenge for managers is to develop an effective system of communications that allows employees to express their views and to resolve them without damaging the organisation and its performance. C) Radical The radical left view of conflict was influenced by the writings of Karl Marx. It focuses on the imbalance of power between employers and employees. This imbalance is believed to be so great that employees feel they have to overthrow their employers, whom they see as their masters. Those with a radical perspective on conflict see the employment relationship as part of a social structure of classes. Conflict is caused by the class war in capitalist economies between workers and business owners. Government is seen to be on the side of business and thus unable to resolve conflict. A total change in the economic system and social structure is required. 4.5.3 Types of Industrial Action - Overt — Lockouts, Pickets, Strikes, Bans, Work-to-rule - Covert — Absenteeism, Sabotage, Turnover, Exclusion from Decisions Many disputes that arise in the workplace can be resolved through negotiation between the employees and employers. Sometimes, however, communications between workers and management break down and either party may resort to industrial action, such as strikes, lockouts or absenteeism. Employees may protest against the actions of an employer if they feel they are being treated unfairly. Employers may take action if they believe employees are not acting in the interests of the business. Either way, industrial action is a sign of poor employment relations. Generally, industrial action can be divided into two groups: OVERT and COVERT. 4 Section 4.5 A) Industrial Conflict Overt Forms of Industrial Action Overt Industrial Action refers to open, obvious industrial action taken by workers or management including strikes, work bans, pickets, lockouts and work-to-rule. i) Strikes The most publicised type of industrial action is the strike. A strike involves the withdrawal from work of a group of employees to disrupt business operations as a means of expressing dissatisfaction with some aspect of employment relations. Strikes are also used to draw community attention to the employees grievances and thereby place greater pressure on management (although sometimes strikes can annoy the public and reduce sympathy for workers). ii) Pickets Pickets are protests that occur outside or at the gates of a workplace, and are generally associated with strike action. Union members and other workers form a picket line to prevent other workers or supplies from entering the building in an attempt to disrupt business. Pickets are therefore another dramatic way for workers to express their dissatisfaction with management and can cause significant production losses for a business if prolonged. iii) Work bans A work ban is a situation where workers refuse to perform some task that is usually not specified in their legal contracts. The most common form of work ban is the refusal to do overtime. Other types of ban include the black ban, which prevents workers from using equipment or performing a task that has been banned. This may be due to safety concerns or because there is a dispute over pay quotas or the introduction of new technology that displaces workers. iv) Lockouts A lockout is an extreme measure where employers physically prevent their employees from working by locking the gates to the work premises. By denying access to the building, managers effectively cut off the workers’ source of income and thereby force them to accept a management decision, negotiate or face a drawn-out dispute and financial difficulties. 5 Section 4.5 v) Industrial Conflict Work-to-rule Working to rule is quite similar to a work ban and involves workers following the strict terms of their employment contract. During a period of work-torule, employees will not perform any task that is not specified within the terms of their employment, which tends to decrease productivity. Again, this aims to put pressure on management to listen to workers’ grievances. B) Covert Forms of Industrial Action Covert Industrial Action refers to actions by workers or management which are not immediately obvious such absenteeism, sabotage, turnover or exclusion from business decision-making. i) Absenteeism Absenteeism can be defined as the percentage of employees, on an average day, who are away from work or on sick leave without leave being approved in advance. The level of absenteeism in a workplace can act as a guide to how satisfied workers feel in their jobs. If employees are unhappy with their work conditions or their employers, they are more likely to take days off work. Businesses with effective employment relations usually experience lower levels of absenteeism among their employees. ii) Sabotage Sabotage is the deliberate damaging of physical items such as machinery and deliberate interference with products, systems and procedures. An employee with a grievance may be tempted to carry out an act of sabotage. Sabotage can cost businesses millions of dollars in lost revenue, production and reputation. iii) Turnover Like high levels of absenteeism, high voluntary labour turnover (resignations) often indicate poor staff morale or conflict in the workplace. Unskilled workers whose jobs offer little variety or interest are far more likely to resign; management might want to take steps to increase job satisfaction. iv) Exclusion from Decisions Making decisions about what will happen in a business is an important issue for both employers and employees in that business. Decisions have to be made on a wide range of issues. Conflict can certainly result when employees believe that they have not been given the opportunity to have their say. 6 Section 4.5 Industrial Conflict 4.5.4 Roles of Stakeholders in Resolving Disputes The main stakeholders involved in a dispute are workers and management. In Australia, a strong emphasis has been given to the role of representative bodies such as trade unions and employer associations. However, over recent years, declining union membership and a decline in industrial conflict has increased the role of individual employees and employers in resolving disputes quickly at the workplace. Many disputes can be resolved at the workplace without the need for intervention by unions or industrial tribunals. This is becoming more common as employers and employees gain experience at resolving disputes. Efficient dispute resolution has the benefit of being less costly to both employee and employer. Many businesses are recognising this and have formal grievance procedures. When a dispute becomes more serious, employees often use unions to represent their interests in meetings with employers or in industrial tribunals. The union’s role is to represent employees in conciliation or arbitration in the industrial tribunal. Employer associations are rarely as involved as unions in industrial disputes. Only once conciliation and arbitration procedures are initiated do employer associations become involved. It is their role to represent employers in the industrial tribunal. Otherwise, employer associations tend to provide general assistance to employers in handling workplace conflict. Several government organisations can play a role in resolving industrial disputes. Traditionally, the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) – a body set up by the Federal Government – has played a very important role. However, it’s role has been reduced in recent years. Most of the recent laws passed by the government have been aimed at decreasing the role of ‘third parties’ in industrial disputes. A number of other bodies have also been established by the government to resolve disputes: The Employment Advocate provides information to employees and employers about their rights and responsibilities under employment contracts. The Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission (at the federal level) and The Anti-Discrimination Board (at the state level) are involved in resolving disputes that involve discrimination. Courts are also playing an increasingly important role in industrial disputes as they enforce some aspects of the Workplace Relations Act. 7 Section 4.5 Industrial Conflict 4.5.5 Dispute Resolution Processes — Conciliation, Arbitration, Grievance Procedures, Negotiation, Mediation, Common Law Action, Business/Division Closure Having examined the role of each of the stakeholders in the resolution of disputes, we now must look at the procedures that are usually followed to resolve disputes. In Section 4.3.2, grievance procedures were discussed as they were the first formal level of dispute resolution. In Australia, a comprehensive system has been developed to deal with disputes that cannot be solved by workplace grievance procedures. A) Negotiation Many of the issues that cause conflict in the workplace are part of the employment contract – the Award, a Certified Agreement or Australian Workplace Agreement. Disputes usually arise when such contracts are being renegotiated. Once a dispute arises, a number of steps may be taken to resolve a dispute. B) Mediation If the parties in a dispute are unable to reach an agreement through negotiation on their own, mediation may be the next step. MEDIATION is the intervention into a dispute by a neutral third party such as an employment relations specialist or a lawyer. The mediator’s role is simply to encourage the parties to come together to reach common ground, and neither party is bound by the mediator’s suggestions. C) Conciliation CONCILIATION is the same as mediation except that it is the AIRC (an INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL) who acts as the mediator. If the conciliation meetings fail to bring about an agreement, then the parties will enter the final stage of arbitration. D) Arbitration ARBITRATION is the process that occurs when an industrial commissioner evaluates the arguments of both parties and comes to a decision which is legally binding. The decision made can be appealed. 8 Section 4.5 E) Industrial Conflict Common Law Action Where there is no federal or state legislation about a particular employment matter, the common law will apply. This means that certain disputes may be settled by court action. F) Business/Division Closure If a dispute is impossible to resolve it may result in the business or the division closing altogether. Disputes cost businesses money in lost working time and legal expenses. Obviously, if a business is not producing its goods and services, eventually it cannot afford to pay its bills. Prolonged disputes can force business closure for financial reasons. 4.5.6 Costs and Benefits of Industrial Conflict – Financial, Personal, Social, Political, International Industrial conflict has the potential to be very costly for both employees and employers. Effective employment relations is crucial to avoiding conflict in the first place, and ensuring that any disputes are resolved quickly and inexpensively. It is important however, to consider the financial, personal, social, political and international costs and benefits of industrial conflict. A) Financial The primary cost of conflict is the financial damage to both employees and employers. Conflict can result in lost production, increased costs of production, lost revenue and reduced profits. The employees will forego pay and reduce their job security if they go on strike. B) Personal Personal costs are more difficult to identify and almost impossible to measure. Any level of industrial conflict must increase the level of tension within the workplace. This tension is experienced by workers and management alike, and could lead to further breakdowns in communication. Low morale is a very real problem and a major result (and cause) of conflict. 9 Section 4.5 C) Industrial Conflict Social Personal costs could lead to social problems that, at first, seem totally unrelated. Tension and dissatisfaction at the workplace could be expressed in the home through increased family breakdown, and even domestic violence. These problems could be heightened if workers are not being paid for long periods of time. D) Political Political costs of disputes can range from the matter of challenged or damaged political reputations to internal political party disagreement. Public opinion of political parties could be damaged by the mishandling of a dispute. E) International The international costs of industrial conflict largely relate to the lost markets and lost market share because the business and the country gains a reputation as an unreliable supplier. In the past, disputes on the waterfront, for example, have held up shipments of exports, causing foreign buyers to question their future dependence on Australian supplies. Furthermore, when employees and employers are caught up in industrial conflict, their productivity falls and financial costs are increased. Australian businesses then become less competitive internationally, compared to efficient businesses overseas. Benefits It must be remembered that industrial conflict can bring a variety of benefits. These include: It provides an opportunity for workers to express their dissatisfaction. Workers can bring issues to the attention of management before any long-term damage is done. New methods of doing things, whether this involves the decision-making process or changes in production techniques, can be introduced during negotiations. Productivity can be increased through changes in work and management practices. New communication lines can be opened between workers and management. Health and safety issues can be addressed. The overall effect of improving communication and discussing grievances leads to improved employee morale, and reduced labour turnover and absenteeism. By using industrial conflict positively, an organisation can increase productivity, efficiency and competitiveness. 10 Section 4.5 Industrial Conflict DEFINITIONS: Arbitration The process that occurs when an industrial commissioner evaluates the arguments of both parties and comes to a decision which is legally binding. Conciliation A form of mediation ordered by an industrial tribunal. Covert Industrial Action Actions by workers or management which are not immediately obvious such as go slows, sabotage, absenteeism or exclusion from business decision-making. Industrial Conflict A clash between employers and employees. Industrial Tribunal A body established to settle certain types of dispute, in this case industrial disputes. Mediation A voluntary negotiation process where a neutral third party assists the parties to try and find a way to resolve their dispute. Overt Industrial Action Open, obvious industrial action taken by workers or management including strikes, bans, pickets and lockouts. 11 Section 4.5 Industrial Conflict HOMEWORK ACTIVITIES: Activity 1: Complete the Activities Questions 1 – 3 on the bottom of P.356 of the text. Activity 2: “There’s no way we’re ever going to make a deal with these thugs. The only way to get a fair deal for our workers is to show the bosses the power of a united workforce – and to fight, fight, fight!” Explain whether this reflects a unitary, pluralist or radical view of industrial conflict. Activity 3: Complete the Activities Questions 1 – 3 on P.364 of the text. Activity 4: What is the difference between overt and covert industrial action? Illustrate your answer with examples of each type of action. Activity 5: Complete the Activities Questions 1 & 2 on P.370/371 of the text. Activity 6: What is the difference between the conciliation and arbitration of a dispute? Activity 7: Which method is more likely to achieve a result that is acceptable to both parties – negotiation, conciliation or arbitration? Justify your answer. Activity 8: ‘It may be costly, but sometimes a strike is a good thing.’ Describe what benefits may come about from industrial disputes. Activity 9: Read the Case Study: “The 1999 – 2000 BHP Pilbara Dispute” on P.374 – 376 of the text and complete Questions 1 – 4, & 6. 12