1 −a2 + b2 + c2 + 1 a2 − b2 + c2 + 1 a2 + b2

advertisement

J87. Prove that for any acute triangle ABC , the following inequality holds:

1

− a 2 + b 2 + c 2

+ a 2

1

− b 2 + c 2

+ a 2

1

+ b 2

− c 2

1

2 Rr

.

Proposed by Mircea Becheanu, Bucharest, Romania

First solution by Brian Bradie, VA, USA

Using the Law of Cosines and the formula

R = abc

4 rs

, we can rewrite the original inequality as a cos α b

+ cos β c

+ cos γ

≥ 4 s = 2( a + b + c ) , (1) where α , β and γ are the acute angles in the triangle. Using the Law of Sines, we can write c = a sin γ sin α and b = a sin β sin α

.

Substituting into (1) yields tan α + tan β + tan γ ≥ 2(sin α + sin β + sin γ ) .

(2)

On (0 ,

π

2

), tan inequality that x is convex and sin x is concave; it therefore follows from Jensen’s tan α + tan β + tan γ ≥ 3 tan sin α + sin β + sin γ ≤ 3 sin

α + β + γ

3

α + β + γ

3

= 3 tan

π

3

= 3 sin

π

3

= 3

3 , and

=

3

3

.

2

Hence, (2) holds with equality if and only if α = β = γ . Thus, the original inequality holds with equality if and only if the triangle is an equilateral triangle.

Second solution by Mihai Miculita, Oradea, Romania

Because 2 Rr = 2

S p

· abc

4 S

= abc

2 p

= abc a + b + c

, the given inequality is equivalent to b 2

1

+ c 2

− a 2

+ a 2

1

+ c 2

− b 2

+ a 2

1

+ b 2

− c 2

≥ abc a + b + c

.

(1)

Mathematical Reflections 3 (2008) 5

Let us observe that since ABC is an acute triangle the following is true b

2

+ c

2

− a

2

> 0 ⇒ 2( b − c )

2

( b

2

+ c

2

− a

2

) ≥ 0

⇔ ( b − c )

2

(2 b

2

+ 2 c

2

− 2 a

2

) ≥ 0

⇔ ( b − c )

2

⇔ ( b

2

− c

2

[(

)

2 b + c )

2

+ ( b − c )

2

+ ( b − c )

4

− 2 a

2

− 2 a

2

]

( b − c )

2

0

0

⇔ ( b − c )

4

⇔ [ a

2

− ( b

2 c ) a

2

2

( b − c )

]

2

≥ ( a

2

2

+ a

+ b

2

4

≥ a

4

− c

2

)( a

2

( b

+

2 c

2 c

2

)

2 b

2

)

⇔ a

2

− ( b − c )

2

≥ p

( a 2 + b 2

− c 2 )( a 2 + c 2

− b 2 )

⇔ ( a + b − c )( a + c − b ) ≥ p

( a 2 + b 2

− c 2 )( a 2 + c 2

− b 2 ) .

(2)

Thus, using the AM-GM inequality and using the result in (2) we have that:

1

2 b 2

1

+ c 2

− a 2

+ a 2

1

+ c 2

− b 2

1 p ( b 2 + c 2

− a 2 )( a 2 + c 2

− b 2 )

1

( b + c − a )( a + c − b )

.

(3)

Summing up inequality (3) and the two obtained by a circular permutation of the letters we obtain b 2

1

+ c 2

− a 2

+

+

≥ a

1

2

2 + c b 2

1

2

− b 2

1

1

+

+ c 2

− a 2 a 2

+

+ b a 2

1

( b + c − a )( a + c − b )

1

2

+

1

( c b

2

=

+ b 2

− c

+ c

2

1

2

+ a b 2

1

)(

1

2

+ c a +

1 a

2 b

2

+

+

( a + c − b )( a + b − c ) a + b + c

=

( b + c − a )( a + c − b )( a + b − c ) b 2 + c

1

2

1

− a 2

+ a 2 + a + b + c c 2

− b 2

+ a 2

1

.

(4)

( b + c − a )( a + c − b )( a + b − c )

+ b 2

− c 2 a c c

2

1

)

2

+

− a b 2

2 + c 2

+

1 a 2

− b 2

1

+ b 2

− c 2

It is known that p

( b + c − a )( a + c − b ) ≤

( b + c − a ) + ( a + c − b )

2

= c.

Multiplying the above inequality with its respective ones obtained by circular permutation of letters we obtain

( b + c − a )( a + c − b )( a + b − c ) ≤ abc.

(5)

Mathematical Reflections 3 (2008) 6

Using (4) and (5) we readily obtain the desired inequality (1).

Third solution by Ovidiu Furdui, Cluj, Romania

We will use the following standard trigonometric formulae s = 4 R cos

A

2 cos

B

2 cos

C

2 and r = 4 R sin

A

2 sin

B

2 sin

C

,

2 where s denotes the semiperimeter of triangle ABC . It is simply to check, by using the preceding formulas that 4 sRr = abc .

Let f : (0 , that

π

2

) → R be the function defined by f ( x ) = f ′′ ( x ) = x + x sin 2 x + sin(2 x ) cos 3 x x cos x

> 0 ,

. A calculation shows and hence, f is a convex function. Using the Law of Cosines combined with

Jensen’s inequality for convex functions we get that

− a 2

1

+ b 2 + c 2

+ a 2

1

− b 2 + c 2

+

1 a 2 + b 2

− c 2

X

1

= cyclic

2 bc cos A

1

2 abc

· 3 · cos a + b + c

3

A + B + C

3

=

2 s abc

=

1

2 Rr

,

=

1

X a

2 abc cyclic cos A and the problem is solved.

Fourth solution by Tarik Adnan Moon, Kushtia, Bangladesh

X cyc

− a 2

1

+ b 2 + c 2

1

2 Rr

We know that, − a

2

+ b

2

+ c

2

= 2 bc · cos A . So,we need to prove that,

X cyc

1

2 bc · cos A

1

2 Rr

Lemma 1: We know that, [ ABC ] = sr = abc

4 R

= ⇒ 4 sr =

After multiplying by 2 abc we get, abc

R

X a cos A

≥ cyc abc

=

Rr

4 sr

= 4 s r

By Cauchy-Schwarz inequaltiy we get,

X a · cos A cyc

!

X cyc a cos A

!

X a

!

2 cyc

= 4 s

2

...

(1)

Mathematical Reflections 3 (2008) 7

Lemma 2: We know that,

X a · cos A cyc

!

=

2 sr

R

So, it is left to prove that,

X a · cos A cyc

!

=

2 sr

R

≤ s ⇔ R ≥ 2 r

And we are done.

Some words about the lemmas:

Lemma 1: Straightforward, just need to use extended law of sines.

Lemma 2: We know that, a cos A = 2 R sin A · cos A = R · sin 2 A

Then,we use the identity, P sin 2 A = 4 Q sin A and using the extended law of sines we obtain, 4 R

2

Q sin A = bc sin A = 2[ ABC ]

From these three we obtain, P a cos A =

2[ ABC ]

R

=

2 sr

R

Also solved by Andrea Munaro, Italy; Arkady Alt, San Jose, California, USA;

Daniel Campos Salas, Costa Rica; Daniel Lasaosa, Universidad Publica de

Navarra, Spain; G.R.A.20 Math Problems Group, Roma, Italy; Ivanov Andrey, Chisinau, Moldova; Athanasios Magkos, Kozani, Greece; Michel Bataille,

France; Ricardo Barroso Campos, Spain; Roberto Bosch Cabrera, Cuba; Samin

Riasat, Notre Dame College, Dhaka, Bangladesh; Vicente Vicario Garcia, Huelva,

Spain.

Mathematical Reflections 3 (2008) 8

Download