Eratosthenes Measure of the Earth's Circumference Solution

advertisement
Eratosthenes Measure of the Earth’s Circumference
Solution Commentary:
Solution of Main Problems:
1. Because of Eratosthenes’s assumption that the sun’s rays were parallel, we
know the intercepted angle at the center of the earth is also 1/50th of a circle or
7o12สน. Thus, the distance of 5040 stadia between Alexandria and Syene must
equal 1/50th the circumference of the earth. The circumference can then be
calculated by this proportion:
th
1
circumference
5040 stadia
= 50
.
x stadia
Earth' s circumference
Or, the earth’s circumference x = 252,000 stadia.
2. If Eratosthenes used the Egyptian stade equal to 0.157 kilometers, 252,000
statia ≈ 39,564 kilometers ≈ 24,585 miles. This value is quite close to the
modern value of 24,859.8 miles, with about 1% error.
3. Repeating the original process but using 1/48th circumference, x = 241,920
stadia ≈ 37,981 kilometers ≈ 23,601 miles (or about 5% error). Repeating the
original calculation but adding 2000 stadia, x = 254,000 stadia ≈ 39,878
kilometers ≈ 24,778 miles (or about 0.3% error). Repeating the original
process but using the Olympic stade, x = 252,000 stadia ≈ 46,620 kilometers ≈
28,968 miles (or more than 16% error).
Extension 1: Some possible sources of error in assumptions and methods:
• Choice of stadion used, though this would be accounted for by using a
common unit to determine the distance from Syene to Alexandria;
• Syene actually lies about 22 miles north of, not on, the Tropic of Cancer
• Alexandria is not directly north of Syene;
• The precision of the measurement of the inclination angle (Note: The
actual difference in latitude between Alexandria and Syene 7.1o, not
the 7°2o determined by Eratosthenes);
• The method used to determine the distance between Alexandria and
Syene, as it is not a straight line walk along the Nile (Note: Lore has it
that Eratosthenes trained a soldier to take equal paces, then used him
to walk the distance, counting his steps.)
An excellent resource is the new text by Nicastro (2008), complemented by
http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/History_of_geodesy and
http://www.metrum.org/measures/measurements.htm.
Extension 2: The number of time zones (NY – LA) is 3. The distance (NY – LA) is
3000 miles, implying each time zone has about 1000 miles. Since there are 24 time
zones (one for each hour in the day), the earth’s circumference is about 24,000
miles. (Problem source is http://rainbow.ldeo.columbia.edu/courses/v1001/fermi.html)
Extension 3: Though this problem has nothing to do with Eratosthenes and his
experiment, it is a problem that all students should face because of the surprise
awaiting them. Let r = radius of earth in feet, making its circumference C = 2 π r,
which also is the length of the original wire circle. Once the 40 foot length is spliced
in, the new length of the wire circle is 2 π r + 40. But, this implies that the radius of the
new circle is [2 π r + 40]/[2 π ] = r + [40]/[ 2 π ] ≈ r + 6 feet 4 inches. Thus, most people
would be able to walk under the wire normally. And, since the general term r was
used as the radius, this result is independent of the radius of the planet involved
(even if it was the size of a baseball.
Open-Ended Exploration: Experiments will vary. Encourage students to participate in
international efforts to combine data in this calculation effort. One example is the
Noon Day Project (http://www.ciese.org/noonday/), which occurs twice each year.
Teacher Commentary:
Though the mathematics in these explorations is not difficult, emphasize that
Eratosthenes was accomplishing this feat in 240 B.C. Also, raise the issues of
precision, approximation, experimental error, significant digits, and choice of
measurement units.
A video offers an interesting video of Carl Sagan demonstrating Eratosthenes
experiment. His use of paper models clarifies issues such as the role of curvature
and the use of shadows. The video is available at many sources such as
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JHEqBLG650, http://video.aol.com/videodetail/carl-sagan-eratosthenes-and-the-circumference-of-theearth/2305843010845213437/?icid=VIDURVHOV01, or
http://berto-meister.blogspot.com/2008/05/eratosthenes-and-circumference-ofearth.html.
As a good source of writing projects, students can explore any of the following ideas
relative to Eratosthenes and his determination of the earth’s circumference:
• Investigate and document the history of efforts to determine the circumference
of the eath. For example, in his On the Heavens II, Aristotle noted that those
mathematikoi (i.e. Pythagoreans or followers of Chaldean mathematical
sciences) who try “to calculate the circumference by proportional calculations”
end up with a circumference equal to 400,000 stadia. While Plato also
“guessed” the circumference to be 400,000 stadia, Archimedes estimated the
value to be 300,000 stadia. Nicastro (2008) is a good resource.
• Investigate the relationship between the historical development of astronomy
and that of mathematics. Was one more of a driving force that impacted the
other? Consider all ancient civilizations, including China, Japan, and India.
Two contrasting resources are Joseph (2000) and Kline (1959, Chapter 7),
while Dreyer (1953) takes a more even approach.
•
•
Investigate and document the history of the development of the circumference
and area formulas for circles. For example, Nicastro (2008, pp. 166-167)
claims that Aryabhata, an Indian mathematician (476 – 550), established the
special between the circumference of a circle and its diameter. Do you agree?
Eratosthenes is well known for his “sieve” that found prime numbers.
Determine the strengths and weaknesses of the process used in his sieve.
Also, explore variations on Eratosthenes that have been suggested by others,
using resources such as Harman (2007), Cox (2008), Quesada (1997), or
Fisher (1929).
Additional References:
Cox, D. (2008). “Visualizing the sieve of Eratosthenes.” Notices of the AMS. Vol.
55#5, pp. 579-595.
Dreyer, J, (1953). A History of Astronomy From Thales to Kepler. Dover Publications.
Fisher, R. (1929). “The sieve of Eratosthenes.” Mathematical Gazette, Vol. 14, pp.
546-566.
Harman, G. (2007). Prime-Detecting Sieves. Princeton University Press.
Joseph, G.C. (2000). The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of
Mathematics. Princeton University Press.
Kline, M. (1959). “The dimensions of the Heavenly spheres.” Mathematics and the
Physical World. Thomas Y Crowell Company.
Nicastro, N. (2008). Circumference: Eratosthenes and the Ancient Quest to Measure
the Globe. St. Martin’s Press.
Quesada, A. (1997). “Recent improvements to the sieve of Eratosthenes,”
Mathematics Teacher. Vol. 90#4, pp. 304-307.
Download