FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY College of Arts and Sciences Department of Nursing I. LOCATOR INFORMATION Semester: Course: Course Credit: Class Meets: Course Coordinators: Office Location: Office Hours: Office Phone: Email: Spring 2015 NURS 400 – Nursing Research and Theory 3 Semester Hours Online Online FSU Policy on Electronic Mail: Fayetteville State University provides to each student, free of charge, an electronic mail account (username@uncfsu.edu) that is easily accessible via the Internet. The university has established FSU email as the primary mode of correspondence between university officials and enrolled students. Inquiries and requests from students pertaining to academic records, grades, bills, financial aid, and other matters of a confidential nature must be submitted via FSU email. Inquiries or requests from personal email accounts are not assured a response. The university maintains open-use computer laboratories throughout the campus that can be used to access electronic mail. Rules and regulations governing the use of FSU email may be found at http://www.uncfsu.edu/PDFs/EmailPolicyFinal.pdf II. COURSE DESCRIPTION Course Description: This course focuses on the cognitive and professional skills of nursing research and theory. The cognitive skills emphasized include critical thinking, problem solving, research critique, and theory utilization in professional nursing practice. The professional skills include valuing research as a basis for professional nursing practice. PREREQUISITE OR COREQUISITE: 300-level nursing courses. III. Disabled Student Services: In accordance with Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, if you have a disability or think you have a disability to please contact the Center for Personal Development in the Spaulding Building, Room 155 (1st Floor); 910-672-1203. IV. Title IX – Sexual Misconduct Fayetteville State University (University) is committed to fostering a safe campus environment where sexual misconduct — including sexual harassment, domestic and dating violence, sexual Revised January, 2015 1 assault, and stalking - is unacceptable and is not tolerated. The University encourages students who may have experienced sexual misconduct to speak with someone at the University so that the University can provide the support that is needed and respond appropriately. The Sexual Misconduct policy can be found at the following link: http://www.uncfsu.edu/Documents/Policy/students/SexualMisconduct.pdf Consulting with a Health Care Professional - A student who wishes to confidentially speak about an incident of sexual misconduct should contact either of the following individuals who are required to maintain confidentiality: Ms. Pamela C. Fisher Licensed Professional Counselor Spaulding Building, Room 165 (910) 672-387 psmith@uncfsu.edu Ms. Linda Melvin Director, Student Health Services Spaulding Building, Room 121 (910) 672-1454 lmelvi10@uncfsu.edu Reporting an Incident of Sexual Misconduct - The University encourages students to report incidents of sexual misconduct. A student who wishes to report sexual misconduct or has questions about University policies and procedures regarding sexual misconduct should contact the following individual: Ms. Victoria Ratliff Deputy Title IX Coordinator for Students Spaulding Building, Room 155 (910) 672-1222 vratliff@uncfsu.edu Unlike the Licensed Professional Counselor or the Director of Student Health Services, the Deputy Title IX Coordinator is legally obligated to investigate reports of sexual misconduct, and therefore cannot guarantee confidentiality, but a request for confidentiality will be considered and respected to the extent possible. Students are also encouraged to report incidents of sexual misconduct to the University’s Police and Public Safety Department at (910) 672-1911. V. REQUIRED TEXTBOOK American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author Schmidt, N., & Brown, J. (2012). Evidence-based practice for nurses (2nd ed). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Revised January, 2015 2 VI. STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to: 1. Differentiate various research approaches and methodologies used to discover and validate knowledge. 2. Describe the research process structural components. 3. Discuss ways to apply the major concepts of selected nursing theories to research. 4. Identify client situations that are open to investigation by nurses. 5. Critique selected research articles to determine ways in which inform nursing practice. 6. Analyze the relationship of nursing research to nursing theory and nursing practice. 7. Examine ways to communicate and apply research findings when teaching consumes and clients. 8. Explore ways to participate and collaborate in research endeavors. 9. Explain the accountability and responsibility of a professional nurse researcher to facilitate change in nursing profession and/or health system. 10. Develop a research proposal that focuses on ways to reduce health disparities. Revised January, 2015 3 VII. Course Requirements and Evaluation Criteria Assignment Discussion Board Activities Article Critique Possible Points 20 30 Evidence Based Practice PowerPoint Presentation (Group Project) 25 Quizzes 25 Revised January, 2015 Description Designed to assist you with mastering course content and to receive additional support in challenging concepts, discussion board exercises are required. Please note that the Discussion Board assignments coincide with the weekly topics. Discussion board participation is interactive and a dynamic process. See Discussion Board Rubric in syllabus (7 Discussion Boards) 1 Quantitative Article Critique See schedule in syllabus for due date See syllabus for grading criteria See schedule in syllabus for due date. See syllabus for PowerPoint Presentation Rubric Quizzes are designed to help you understand the major objectives/concepts for the weekly topics. (5 quizzes) 4 A = 93-100 B = 85-92 C = 78 -84 D = 70-77 P= Passing Grading Scale for the Department of Nursing F=< 69 I = Incomplete W = Withdrawal from a class WN = Withdrawal due to non attendance F = Failure PAPERS AND EXAMINATIONS Students are expected to submit required work on time. Examinations are to be taken when scheduled. Unexcused absence from a test will result in a zero (0). A make-up test, if given, will be based on the original test objectives, but the items will be different. Late Papers will not be accepted and will be awarded a grade of “0”. Plagiarism, misrepresentation, fabrication of information, and abetting any of the above. Plagiarism in particular presents pitfalls to be avoided: any failure to document any words, ideas, or other contributions that do not originate with the author constitutes plagiarism. Widespread use of the World Wide Web (Internet) requires particular attention to proper documentation practices. Individual course syllabi offer additional clarification about requirements for proper documentation. See FSU Student handbook at http://www.uncfsu.edu/handbook/pdf/Web%20pdf/Codeofconduct.pdf . Actions outlined in the Fayetteville State University Student Handbook under Disciplinary System and Procedures will be followed for incidents of academic misconduct. See: http://www.uncfsu.edu/handbook/index.htm Preparation of written work should contribute to clear communication. All work should be typewritten, following guidelines of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edition). A cover page and reference page should be included. References should include journals and books other than the ones listed in nursing course textbooks. Only professional Journals should be used. If you question whether your journal is a professional journal do not hesitate to contact me. Good writing is an art and craft. Correct grammar facilitates clear communication. Ideas should be developed clearly and logically. Papers with numerous grammatical errors, poor sentence structure, and improper documentation can lose points. A writing center is available on campus if a student needs assistance. All work is expected to be turned in on time. See website: http://www.uncfsu.edu/handbook/index.htm MISSING ASSIGNMENTS It is the responsibility of each student to complete all work and meet all objectives as required. Students ARE responsible for maintaining a paper copy of all work submitted. Overall, competencies for this program are outlined in the Student Handbook. Students are asked to relate any comments/concerns to the instructor promptly. Revised January, 2015 5 NURSING DISCLAIMER This syllabus is not an unchangeable contract, but instead, an announcement of present course requirements and policies only. Implicit in each student’s enrollment is an agreement to comply with the course requirements and policies, which the professor may modify to exercise properly his/her educational responsibility. ON-LINE ACCESS: If problems arise with accessing On-line courses, please contact Internet Technical Services (ITS) at: 910-672-2085. ONLINE NETIQUETTE: 1. Never divulge your user name or password to others. 2. Immediately delete email with attachments from senders you do not recognize. 3. It is most likely "spam". Do not click open web links in messages from unknown sources. 4. Never run an executable file (e.g., .exe) from an email. The university has security precautions in place for most of these situations, but computer hackers are getting more sophisticated all the time. 5. Do not forward personal email without the author's knowledge and permission. 6. Do not forward chain letters. Delete them. 7. Keep acronyms to a minimum. They can be confusing to your readers. 8. Delete unwanted messages to conserve space. 9. Never answer "spam". Your response will confirm your email address. Delete the message instead. 10. Please do not forward virus hoaxes. Contact your instructor if you have a question. 11. Do not use all capital text (CAPS LOCK); it is perceived as shouting. 12. Golden Rule: "Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You." “Netiquette” is important and you are expected to follow the rules. You are entitled to express your opinion. You are entitled to an audience. You are expected to learn. You are expected to teach. You have a right to disagree. You have a right to respond. It is your privilege to change your mind. It is your privilege to remain silent. Responsibility on all sides will ensure that the forums will not be subject to improper censorship. The hosts of the forum will also make sure that coarse language or any form of racist, ageist, sexist or homophobic language is banned from the online discussions. “Netiquette” adapted from Yale University Library BLACKBOARD LEARNING SYSTEM: 1. Each student is expected to access the Black-Board Learning System for announcements, other assignments, and other pertinent communication. 2. Each student is expected to participate in the “Discussion Board” as required by instructor. 3. Grades will be affected if these directions are not implemented and maintain Revised January, 2015 6 4. The FSU Blackboard will be used as an important mode of communication between faculty and students in this course. Please enroll using your e-mail. 5. Class grades and other faculty/student feedback will be posted using this medium. OFFICE HOURS AND INSTRUCTOR AVAILABILITY Virtual Office hours and instructor availability will be arranged according to the student’s needs and as announced. Faculty is also available by e-mail, fax, and phone voice mail. The student is encouraged to initiate an appointment for instructor/student conferences when issues arise. The instructor will also utilize Blackboard as a communication tool. VIII. Academic Support Resources Academic support resources are available in this class. Use of Supplemental Instructions/Content Mastery, Smarthinking, Criterion, University College of Learning. CLASS FORMAT: The class week begins on Tuesday and ends on Monday at 11:59 pm. Your weekly discussions will be graded and posted by Wednesday. Feedback will be provided on an individual basis to the student. Policies See Appendices D and E and/or Refer to Student Handbook Class attendance policy Missed Examination Policy Class Behavior Policy/Homework Policy FSU Policy on Disruptive Behavior Honor Code All students are expected to maintain high ethical and moral standards. A very important component of this is the Honor Code. All students are expected to support the following statement in all written work, quizzes, and examinations. “On my honor, I pledge to do work to the best of my ability with NO assistance on graded assignments or tests. I also pledge to report any breach of the honor code to the appropriate faculty member.” Progression and Retention There is no guarantee that this course will be offered again if you are unsuccessful. If you should fail this course, you will not be able to progress to another course. Revised January, 2015 7 TOPICAL OUTLINE Week One: Introduction to Nursing Research Chapters 1 & 2 A. Development of Nursing Research B. Development of Evidence-Based Practice C. Ethics in Nursing Research D. Identify what is informed consent E. Identify ethical issues in nursing Quiz 1 of Chapters 1&2 (10 questions worth 10pts each, multiple attempts) Week Two: Identify Research Questions, Review of the Literature, and nursing theory Chapters 3, 4, 5, A. Identify the purpose of a literature review B. Differentiate between a primary and secondary source C. Different Nursing Theories D. Identifying Nursing Research Problems E. Be able to differentiate between the problem and purpose of a study F. Differentiate between independent and dependant variables Week Three Quantitative Research Chapters 6&7 A. Quantitative Research Designs B. Define what is quantitative research Week Four Qualitative Research Chapter 8 A. Qualitative Research Designs B. Define what is qualitative research Evidence Based Practice Project Due Week Five: Obtaining Study Participants and Collection of Data Chapters 9, 10 A. Define Populations and Samples B. Define Measurement and Collection of Data C. Differentiate between various Data-Collection Methods Week Six: Upload Quantitative Article Week Seven: Critique of Quantitative Research Article Due Week Eight: Course Evaluation VII. COURSE OUTLINE AND ASSIGNMENT SCHEDULE Revised January, 2015 8 *Additional readings will be assigned to facilitate chapter readings and enhance class discussions. All readings will be placed in Course Information WEEK/DATE WEEK 1 January 10th-17th ASSIGNMENTS Schmidt & Brown Chapters 1 & 2 Post Introduction 2 Discussion Board Questions DB W1 Q1 Refer to situation in Critical Thinking exercise (Box 2-3 pg. 57). Consider a pediatric/adolescent population as research subjects. Assume the role of an organizational IRB. Use the ANA Guidelines for Protecting the Rights of Human Subjects (Table 2-4 pg. 51) and the Components and Areas of Concern Appraised by IRB (Table 2-5 pg 5455) to determine: What are the components and concerns that the IRB should appraise to protect the human subjects’ rights of this population? How does a nurse act as an advocate for the pediatric/adolescent population? DB W1 Q2 Pick one of the articles posted under Week One Articles that addresses evidence-based research and discuss the main concepts of the article and whether you agree or disagree with the research authors. In addition, please post your opinion on what you think evidenced-based practice is and if it has any place in nursing. Please respond to at least one peer! Remember to cite you source using APA 6th edition. Quiz 1 You will have multiple times to complete the 10 item quiz and the highest grade will be recorded. Revised January, 2015 9 WEEK 2 January 18th – 24th Schmidt & Brown Chapters 3, 4, & 5 2 Discussion Board Questions DB W2 Q1 Pick a Quantitative Research Article (you may use one already listed in this course or find one on EBSCO Host). I have placed a list of peer reviewed nursing journals under the course documents tab. Once you have picked a quantitative article you need to complete the following: Cite the article in APA formation. Identify the research purpose/problem Identify the hypotheses Identify the variables and what type of variables they are. Remember you are not graded for getting these answers correct but rather for completing this exercise! You do not have to respond to your peers for this post! DB W2 Q2 Pick one of the literature reviews in the folder named (literature reviews). Evaluate the literature review looking for the following components. Revised January, 2015 The literature review relies primarily on studies conducted in the last 5 years The theoretical or conceptual framework is described. The review provides support for the importance of the study. The authors have used primary, rather than secondary sources. 10 Studies are critically examined and reported objectively. The review is organized so that a logical unfolding of ideas is apparent that supports the need for the research. The review ends with a summary of the most important knowledge. The discussion should at least be a good paragraph stating if the information is contained in the article. (cite the source in APA format) Quiz 2 You will have multiple times to complete the 10 item quiz and the highest grade will be recorded. WEEK 3 January 25th – 31st Schmidt & Brown Chapter 6 & 7 1 Discussion Board Questions DB W3 Q1 Please find a quantitative article you would like to use for the article critique assignment. (Make sure it is Quantitative!!!) Make sure it is from a nursing journal! This is nursing research and all article critiques must be nursing specific. Make sure your article is not older than 5years. Review the article and provide a brief summary of the article. Discuss whether you think the article is true experimental, quasi experimental, or non-experimental. You must also state what type of quantitative design (descriptive, correlational, cross over, etc.) Cite the article in 6th edition APA format. After you complete your article please comment on at least 1 other students Revised January, 2015 11 evaluation of their article and state whether you agree or disagree with their findings. Remember you are not graded on whether you got this assignment correct but rather that you completed it! Good luck! Quiz 3 You will have multiple times to complete the 10 item quiz and the highest grade will be recorded. WEEK 4 February 1st – 7th Project due February 7th at 11:59! Evidenced Based Practice group project (Due February 7th) Quiz 4 You will have multiple times to complete the 10 item quiz and the highest grade will be recorded. Week 5 February 8th – 14th Schmidt & Brown Chapters 9 & 10 1Discussion Question DB W5 Q1 Find a quantitative article (it would help if you had the article you are using for the critique)! Appraise the data collection method used in the study. Elaborate on the following questions. Where was the setting of the study? What are the variables being measured? What data collection methods were used? What is the intervention? What was the instrument used to collect the data? Was the instrument valid and reliable? If so, how do you know? Cite your source in APA format There is no need to respond to your peers for this discussion board. Quiz 5 You will have multiple times to complete the 10 item quiz and the highest grade will be recorded. Revised January, 2015 12 WEEK 6 February 15th – 21st Attach your Quantitative article to this week’s discussion board. It must be an article that you have selected. It must be a quantitative article that has been published within the last five years and it must be from a nursing journal. Please reference your article in APA format. Please read another peers article and provide feedback on the article. Make sure to answer if the article is quantitative, if the article is from a peer reviewed nursing journal and if the article has been published within the last five years. WEEK 7 February 22nd – 28th February 25th Critique Due March 4th is the final day of class. Please make sure to evaluate the course. WEEK 8 March 1st –4th IX. Critique of Quantitative Research Article Due February 25th by 11: 59pm Teaching Strategies Lecture Reading Assignments Discussion Presentations Revised January, 2015 13 Grading Criteria for Critique of Research Article This is the actual layout of the critique. This is to be in APA format with a cover page. Please review APA format in your APA manual. Each section of the grading rubric should serve as a header in your paper. This will ensure that you meet the entire criterion. Each section = 5 points except as noted. Total points possible = 100 Content/Elements Title: Does it identify the general idea of the study? Identify the qualifications of the authors? Was there information provided to determine if the authors were qualified to study the topic? Abstract: Is it clear and concise? Does it give you a good summary of the study? What elements of the study did the abstract address? Problem: Is the problem statement clear? Is the problem sufficiently narrow in scope without being trivial? Is the problem significant? Is the purpose defined? Is the project significant, feasible, and researchable? Literature Review and Theoretical Framework: Are the references current, pertinent and representative of the issues? Are the sources for the literature review mostly primary, secondary or anecdotal? Was a theoretical framework utilized? Did the authors provide enough information to readers to see how the framework related to the study? Research Design Elements: What is the research design? Was the hypothesis clearly stated or implied? What was the hypothesis for the study? What are the dependant and independent variables of the study? Study setting and instruments: Where did data collection occur? Did they provide information on the validity and reliability of the instruments used? Is this the best way to get the information? Does the setting reflect the real world? Protection of Human Subjects: Did they obtain approval from the appropriate institutional review board(s). Did they conduct the research in an ethical manner? Sample: Identify sampling plan (probability or non-probability, how many subjects were in the study? Based on the study did the sampling method and number of subjects seem appropriate? What is the target population? Is the sample representative of this target population? Replication: Is the procedure clear enough to enable replication? Descriptive: Examine the description of the subjects. Are they used to describe the sample and/or the study? What do they indicate? Are they clear? Study Results: Were the statistical results significant or not. Where was the p value of the study set prior to collecting data? What was the p value they found? What do the results of the p-value mean in this study? Understanding: Are the statistics reported clearly and understandably? Discuss the statistical significance of the results as compare to the clinical significance of the results. Conclusions: Are they logically related to the hypotheses? Will the findings generalize to the target population? Are the results consistent with prior findings, new or contradictory? Limitations: Are limitations identified? Are there others, which are not identified? Revised January, 2015 Points 14 What are they? Are there suggestions for further study? Confidence: How confidant can you be that the results are valid and useable? Are the implications for practice logical? What influenced your opinion Existing Knowledge: Did they compare the results found back to existing knowledge they identified in the review of the literature? Professionalism in developing and presenting the critique. Clarity of writing style in the critique. Proper use of grammar (10 points possible on this element) Format of paper: margins, references, font type, and font size according to APA (10 points possible on this element) Late submission: 5 point deduction in points for each business day paper is late Helpful hints for the article critique! Make sure the journal is a nursing journal Make sure the article is quantitative Make sure you have received approval to use the article Make sure the article is no older than 5 years Make sure to use APA format (title page, double space, reference page) Make sure each section of the rubric has at least a paragraph written for each subheading Make sure to spell check!!! Have someone read over your critique before you turn it in Make sure you follow the guidelines and you will do great! Revised January, 2015 15 Evaluation Criteria Evidence-based Practice Presentation to Peers Criteria Summary of practice problem or issue Summary of findings from literature review (must include at least 5 related articles) Summary of information available from Research Reviews Summary of information available from guidelines Student's recommendation to address practice issue Summary of factors to consider to implement recommendation Professionalism in presentation--grammar, completeness of ideas, ability to communicate ideas Reference list, complete, APA style Late deduction 5 points for each 24 hour period project is late Revised January, 2015 Possible Points Earned Points 15 10 10 10 15 15 15 10 16 Discussion Board Grading Rubric Each question is worth 10 pts. Please ensure that you address each question and all the parts that you are asked to address. Each question will state whether you need to respond to your peers or whether you just need to have an initial posting. If you are to respond to a peer you will need to post more than just “I agree or good idea”. Your comments will need to be thoughtful and contain pertinent information relevant to the discussion posting. Your postings need to contain thought, detail and critical thinking. 0 points 2 Point 4 Points 6 Points 8 Points 10 Points No response to discussion question(s) Content: Undeveloped responses that do not address the question(s) only include personal comments, or off topic comments. Content: Undeveloped responses that only address some aspects of the question(s) and include limited comments that simply quote the text. Content: Responses that address only some aspects of the question(s), recall information from the text, demonstrates limited knowledge of major ideas (i.e. list or label, stated ideas)does notbuild on application of relevant concepts in addressing the question(s) and/or responses to classmates Content: Responses that address all aspects of the question(s), reflect an understanding of course content, application of relevant course concepts, building on relevant concepts in addressing the question(s) and responses to classmates. Content: Responses that address all aspects of the question (s), reflect an understanding of course content, application of relevant course concepts, building on relevant concepts in addressing the question(s) and responses to classmates and encourages responses from classmates. or Posted after due date or No participation in weekly discussion Format: Intext citations and reference list included in correct APA Revised January, 2015 Format: Intext citations and reference list Format: Intext citations Format: In- 17 format. 2 point will be deducted if references are not listed 1 point if incorrect APA format included in correct APA format. 2 point will be deducted if references are not listed 1 point if incorrect APA format Format: Intext citations and reference list included in correct APA format. and reference list included in correct APA format. 2 point will be deducted if 2 point will be references deducted if are references not listed 1 1 point is are point if deducted if not listed 1 incorrect APA there is not a 1 point is point if format substantive deducted if incorrect response to there is not a APA format 1 point is classmate’s substantive deducted if post when response to 1 point is there is not a stated. classmate’s deducted if substantive post when there is not a response to stated. substantive classmate’s response to post when classmate’s stated. post when stated. Revised January, 2015 text citations and reference list included in correct APA format. 2 point will be deducted if references are not listed 1 point if incorrect APA format 1 point is deducted if there is not a substantive response to classmate’s post when stated. 18