A brief history of Tito’s Yugoslavia Lecture Outline This module discusses Yugoslavia’s geopolitical position in the Cold War and its role in allowing Yugoslavia to maintain its internal cohesion and suppress nationalistic attempts by the constituting nationalities Tito’s leadership and his ability to borrow extensively from the West, which allowed him to keep Yugoslavia’s economic problems under check for decades The role of the economic crises and international changes in the early 90s in accelerating the nationalistic forces in the country and bringing the end of the Yugoslav state Yugoslavia was… A Socialist country that existed between 1943 and 1991 Made up of six Republics (Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia, Montenegro, and Serbia) and two autonomous provinces (Kosovo and Vojvodina) Was ruled by Josip Broz Tito from 1953 until his death in 1980 Yugoslavia’s Role in the Cold War The U.S. and the USSR formed competing blocs— NATO and the Warsaw pact to balance each other and exert control over their half of Europe Yugoslavia’s geographic position enabled it to serve as a buffer between the two blocs Yugoslavia was a socialist state, but was neutral and did not side with either superpower It maintained its role as an independent socialist state Tito’s leadership Yugoslavia was able to maintain its independence from the Soviet influence and reap the benefits of the fierce competition between the two blocks due to the political acumen and popularity of Marshall Bros Tito, Yugoslavia’s leader Tito’s rhetoric about the creation of a supranational Yugoslav identity through “Brotherhood and Unity” was accepted by the West that saw socialist Yugoslavia as a prosperous state and as an antidote to the “evil” Soviet empire Tito-Stalin Split Tito with Stalin and Molotov Having defied Stalin in 1948, Tito became the first communist leader to openly stand against the dictator and the fearful empire he had created. Tito rejected Stalin’s desire of controlling Yugoslavia and made it clear that he wanted to create a neutral and independent country, which, despite its ideological closeness to the Soviets, would retain its sovereignty Tito’s Credibility in the eyes of the Westerners Tito’s courageous defiance of Stalin and the creation of the consequent Yugoslav type of socialism Nikita Khrushchev came to visit Yugoslavia in 1955 and approached the Yugoslav leadership with conciliatory rhetoric Tito’s meeting with Nikita Khrushchev, first secretary of the Soviet Communist Party, 1955 Geographic Location Yugoslavia served as a buffer zone between the Western bloc and the USSR Tito realized the geopolitical importance of Yugoslavia in preventing the USSR from reaching the Mediterranean Yugoslavia’s ethnic diversity Yugoslavia’s location and its geopolitical realities played an even more important role in the country’s domestic politics. The fierce competition between the U.S. and the USSR, with Tito keeping a distance from both, allowed the leader of Yugoslavia to draw from virtually unlimited “amounts” of external threat, and use it to put a check on ethnic struggles. Ethnic struggles in Yugoslavia Tito’s strategy to assuage the ethnic struggles was to mythologize the fact that every ethnic group had contributed to the liberation war against the fascists during the World War II The new enthusiasm that followed the end of World War II faded and Tito’s myth of a unified Yugoslavia became less appealing The new generation together with the disillusioned communists became increasingly more demanding of reforms, most often advocated along ethnic lines Croatian protest against the Yugoslav state http://www.flickr.com/photos/69226252@N05/6551163563/ Opposition voices against Yugoslav policies became loud, especially in the fall of Rankovic, the head of the secret service, in 1966 Student organizations (e.g. Croatia’s Praxis), intellectuals, and members of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia began criticizing the federal economic and cultural policies The Croatian opposition The Croatian opposition was led by both the communists and the intellectuals, referred as the Croatian Spring, was a period of student protests, inflammatory nationalistic rhetoric and political crisis in the country Tito and his collaborators realized the real danger the renewed Croatian nationalism posed for the stability and the unity of Yugoslavia The External Threat from Soviets The Yugoslav people were prone to believe that the potential weakening of Yugoslavia, which might invite a Soviet invasion, could be far more debilitating effects on their regions Tito used the external and exaggerated threat to dissuade regional leaders from pushing for major reforms along nationalistic lines Tito’s last attempt to satisfy all the nationalities After the alarming crisis of the 1960s had been partially resolved, Tito and his cabinet produced a new constitution for Yugoslavia The new constitution was the fourth one produced in less than thirty years and it made extensive provisions for local self-management to the six republics The content of this constitution made Yugoslavia a defunct confederation of six republics and two provinces unified by the effect of the external threat posed by the Soviet Union The U.S. support for Yugoslavia According to Warren Zimmerman(1996), the U.S. ambassador to Yugoslavia, the U.S. supported Yugoslavia in order to encourage and promote socialist countries to maintain their independence and develop alternative nonSoviet models of socialism Foreign Borrowing The key role that Yugoslavia played during the Cold war enabled both its federal and its republican leaders to borrow extensively from foreign banks and international monetary organizations The U.S. controlled International Monetary Fund and the World Bank were more than happy to assist Yugoslavia in its modernization with extremely favorable loans The extensive borrowing had the intended effect in the short-run as it ameliorated the internal economic crisis, which was deepening by the time the oil shock occurred in 1973 due to wrong economic policies, ineffective bureaucracy and decreasing productivity The borrowing had devastating long-term economic and political effects The Debt Crisis With Tito’s death, Yugoslavia lost its respected leader and the brand name that had provided the country with much credibility The crisis was deepened because the republics had borrowed individually and uncontrollably from abroad after gaining significant control over their regions from the 1974 constitution From the total amount borrowed, the central government had borrowed only 35 percent while the six republics and the two autonomous provinces had borrowed the remaining 65 percent The Debt Crisis cont’d The richer republics of Slovenia and Croatia, due to the disproportionate contributions they were obliged to make for servicing the debt, became increasingly nationalistic As the gap between the richer and poorer regions increased, richer ones also refused to make transfers to poorer republics and provicnces By the end of the 1980s, the economic crisis had become so serious that living standards had fallen by 40 percent inflation reached at one point 2000 percent in 1989 The cheap loans that Tito provided helped ameliorate the domestic interethnic tensions, but the failure of repaying them gave rise to nationalist and chauvinist forces Other major changes were occurring in Europe as the political and economic crises of the 1980s were worsening in Yugoslavia Socialist regimes were falling one after the other and Europe was swept by nonviolent revolutions Gorbachev made it clear that the USSR was not going to intervene in any of the Warsaw Pact members’ international affairs, thus removing the threat that had helped to keep Yugoslavia united Yugoslavia and the international system in flux As a result of the developments in the international context, Yugoslavia lost its special international position as a buffer zone between the two blocks Slovenia and Croatia, which had grown extremely nationalist during the 1980s were convinced that their dreams for independent republics had a real chance in post-Cold War Europe Yugoslavia, thus, could not count on the two greatest contributors to its internal stability—the external threat and the financial support of the U.S. The U.S. shifted its interest away from the region and passed its watchdog role to the European Union, which had a confusing strategy towards Yugoslavia The end of Yugoslavia Both Croatia and Slovenia were the first to declare their independence in 1991 Macedonia followed months later and finally Bosnia These changes marked the end of Yugoslavia and the beginning of the worst bloodshed in post-World War II Europe Montenegro declared independence in 2006 and lastly Kosovo in 2008