Subhlksha founder's home,
office searched by CBI
Chenna4Aug.3
c Central Bureau of Investigation conducted
searches at the residence and office of R.
Subramanian, Founder Managing Director of the
discaunt retail chain Subhiksha Trading Services. Calls
and messages to Subramanian's mobile did not elicit a
response, nor was there any official confirmation from
the CRI. However, accordingto CRI sources, the search
operations were in response to a complaint lodged by one
of the public sector banks alleging diversionof funds, The
company had borrowed close to Rs 800 crore from a
consortium ofbanks for expansion, buthad failed to
service the loan as it went bankrupt in 2008-2009.
-
Our Bureau
Thugs pose
as CBI men to
NEW DELHI: Six persons, who
allegedly got inspired by a
recent hollywood movie,
30. The group had adopted the
modus operandi of the conmen from the movie, posing as
dupe trader
During the interrogation,
Praveen told the police about
their involvement in the cheat-
posed as Central Bureau of
Investigation (CBI) officials to
extort money from shopkeep-
Income Thx sleuths and robbing
a businessman of l.5 crore on
ers in
north Delhi. Their performance was cut short by the
additional commissioner
of
weeiting for them atDeepak
Kumar's house at Sanjay Park
in Shakarpun
crime branch which arrested
them on Saturday.
"The businessman was identified as Raghvendra Bansal.
During the probe, an input was
already been distributed among
received that Praveen, Deepak
and Sudhir, all residents of
confessed that he had received
45 lakh as his share, while
Ghaziabad, were involved in
the robber3ç" said Yadav.
Deepak Bhati got
The accused were identified
as Sudhir Bhati, 26, Praveen
Kumar, 32, Deepak Bhati, 26,
Devender Tiwari, 38, Deepak
Kuma
35, and Jitender Negi,
July 18, said Ravindra Yadav,
police (crime).
incident. ile also disclosed
that three of his other associates
ing
"The robbed
money
had
the four main accused. Praveen
Yadav said.
3O
lakh7
HTC
Ishrat case: Order on Pandey's
advance ball pea reserved
Ahmedabad, Aug. 3: The
special court tor CBI cases
here on Saturday reserved
its order on the anticipatory ball plea of additional
director general of police
Prithvi
Pal Pandey,
an
in Ishrat Jahan
accused
case, till August 6.
The court is hearing his
application afresh on the
directions of the Gujarat
140 which has restrained
081 from arresting Ute IPS
officer till August 6.
Judge Gita Gopi is likely
to pass the order on
Tuesday. Earlier, Pandey's
lawyer argued "CBI has
been chasing Pandey and
wanted
to
send
hirn
behind the bars by hook or
by
crook....Despite
the
high
Court directing CRI
not to arrest Pandey till
August 6, the agency ffled
an application seeking his
judicial custody"
Frl
-
UPA using CBI for political motive: BJP
BANGALORE, DHNS: Senior
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
leaderand Rajya Sabha member
ing charges against lB officials
for their alleged involvement
Cong mismanaged T-issue: Naidu
Venkaiah Naidu said here
on Saturday that his party
Senior BJP
would take on the Congress at
the next Parliament session by
hood."The
raising the issue
of the Centre
keeping the Central Bu-
three states without bloodshed during our regime, creating
Jharkhand, Uttaranchal (now Uttarakhand) and Chhattis-
of Investigation (CBI) unpolitical control, and the
garh," he
still
reau
der
leader Venkaiah
Naidu on Saturday blamed the
Congress for its mismanagement of
separate
the Telangana stateCongress acted very linmaturely while providing
statehood to Telangana.Look at us. we carved out
said,
reports DHNS from Bangalore.
with the Intelligence
Centre was trying to "harass"
Even there the CBI is targeting
the BJP leadership in Gujarat
and Rajasthan.
the BJP leadership,"
Alliance
(UPA)
regime for putting the national
"First they pointed fingers
CBI against the lB in the Ishrat
Shah, and now they
are trying to attack the Gujarat
Chief Minister (Narendra
Jahan case, Naidu said the
Modi). Look at Rajasthan.
security at risk by pitting the
It was even headed by a member from the Congress. The
JSC recommendations
Bureau (IB).
Blaming the United Progressive
autonomy to the CBI was discussed, it was referred to a
joint select commiuee (JSC).
were
even agreed upon by the Cabinet and passed. However,
rising conflict between the
agency
in the IshratJahan case.
"When the issue of giving
at Amit
said
now the government has said
that it will set up a Group of
Naidu.
Minister (GoM) to look into
He said the tWA regime was
trying to defame its political
the matter. This shows that
the Congress still wants to
opponents by using
the
and compromising the nation-
keep the CBI under political
control," said the former BJP
al security of the country by lll
president.
CBI
-_ _*
*
'w
~
ft
3fl
t
izt
ttii t
~
t394,c-,fi,t
Ml1
a
3tTUR1PTfl IIo.BI
tqj
Pii&
~
z
ti *kr
k
*ui
fWn 1i
n
tnt
ft
wit
k
iM
ET*!Ra*ncM
~~
'i'ç~
L~
&*
i?:;
-
lU4IrlCI
lTMTIflr
!1lfttI
I
(*)
f
ti
ti*w
_1*
4q,K1ft
t!jt *1
k
*
*
fl
311t
*
ft
t% 4tta
~
'iieI1
1
iiiicpi
iR17lt,1c1i4
fli
*1731
NUaTTRT'4flkI
lift ciiIIwi
II!
cvhiIii$
W9111
T 31UT
3111W
'a M
fiu
jH4M
q
4Thft
~
alit
*ft
4I
i
*
17
__
thi uthiQIà5
45?Rn ?lZftkl'
I
__ _ _ _
_
al64tIU
It3VI511S1flZUV
iiti
4i
aI%w
',iP'
3ttW
twrl
Lil
?ç
____
\stP
I
TS1R3IT7
*m
1'.
-
S.
r
ti
'cut'I
*q$Tuw
n
O
"
$ tiai'1Rim gl
4,
tikiiflm
q
41'
iatu1wnr
-
gigp
fl
wi,
fltt
4
,Mi'flt aitt aib'flh
4
V
"4
W
"d!*3Tt
391 ~t
zt%w
14M
14'fli'
a,
t
4', iiit
pmr
/___________
/ fl?tttIr
4.
1982
t
__
s'g
I9D5n2I ji4tu, sTiSi ~T
art
(N
tw,'ñ
ueid
RtI?(
32
'
I
9cI1t
ik'ifli 3FR1TQ1T
nimhñx
-tgjg
I1
-
LL
t,
klycI
S
'
f4!ii f4
-id*g,
ii
uiu1iai
iJIUIMU
(q11):
*aiitftftq arjjM
t
1T1t
flT*Ift .iPdhn
ftm
f'n
311k!1
VT
.
fm*athui
pim
fl
-qigleig
*
_
_
jqq
—
1
ftftigict?irq
4$ntina1
favit. q?t
flivi&tki
3PMRi
TZITtTT Tft?I1 T?M
a:nki iuftj
9"I1qIt
dlIj4jI&kl
-
ttifl4q
__
api
uc
w
PcWt*
W
"
M7
c
.Jø*jt\
*
I.
'ug
cLg
w
a':
I'W3ft grri,nt*
_
*SnnI?I
ttv;:h
'q
WT9T
*
kisifl%Tfltui"
ii'itq&7ffls1flT
*tlPItk1!
'z&
(wNmm
aiii'*i
wta4'tt
viviii
*
.qqiriq
iiu
*MTl"-.
eildlaM
*
aaiie
WTt«fl)
44MM
ti u@fl IWtaifl flStfi
t
~
'm
wd4 !ifw
ftflreqfri
gfta
'ififly
Judge took bribes in many other cases: CBI
much bigger cash bribes,
leedly received by Ms.
al[
Tat
giving'
According to the Cs!,
Chander
in
2006 she quashed an FIR,
filed under Criminal Proce
Suta Dogra
„
th
CHANDIGARI4: Last week,
specialCentralßureauofln
dure Code Section 482, in
a
and received
murder case
vestigation court here di
rected
that
charges
be
Rs. 50 lakh as bribe.
These details are there in
the report of the CE! SP, who
framed
investigated
(retd.)
against
Justice
Nirmaj Yadav,
who is
better known as the "cash in
the bar judge of the Punjab
and
Haryana
High
Court.
The CBI had filed a charge
the judge in
sheet against
the
matter.
were brought to the
court's notice by the agen-,
They
cy's Special Public Prosecu-
tor Anupam Gupta
arguments
charges.
on
during
framing
nf
of the re
port, which was kept under
tion Act,
brought to the notice of the
At first, the
agency sought
to prosecute Justice Yadav
for allegedly receiving Rs. 15
laith in 2008 (which was tie
livered by mistake to anoth
er judge's residence), but
during
it
says
further investigation
it
uncovered
more shocking
2008 case
Ravinder
even
of
details
Singh, the SP's
report says, told the CBI that
towards the end of 2005, at
the instance of Mr. Bansal,
he requested Justice Yadav
The contents
till now,
were
also
former Chief Justice of In
dia,
S.H. Kapadia,
who
in
tional
Haryana
The
addi-
general
ot
the CBI says it
uncovered
dence
additional
evi-
against the judge.
agency told the court
that the other alleged kick-
2010 sanctioned the prose
backs
cution
Yadav were not included in
the charge sheet because it
of Justice Yadav in
the 2008 case,
While interrogating Ra
vinder Singh -a Delhi hote
Justice
by
received
could not corroborate Mr.
Singh's disclosures. In other
her who reportedly arranged
words, the CBI restricted it-
for the money to be deliver
self to investigatijig only the
land dispute relating to a valuable property in }Tissar. In
laich for giving a favourable
order in the matter of Gu-
2007,
rudwara
Ravinder Singh told
the CBJ, Mr. Bansal asked
him to use his influence over
Justice Yadav to get an ongo-
spondents.
case for the premises,
which was being fought for
Justice
murder of BabaAzad
by the Hissar district admini-
residence.
Rewari. Within days of the
stration,
charge sheet being listed for
CBI probe revealed that the
relief in the court of Justice
Yadav, she threw it out with-
company
withdrawn.
property was bought
owned
by
The
by a
Ttajiv
Dera
Killeywwala
in Rajpura in which Mr. Bansal was counsel for the re-
ing
out
-
advocate
to quash the FIR against Mahant Chand Nath for the
Nath in
then an
Sanjiv Bansal,
2011 and is all set to prose
cute her under Section 11 of
the Prevention of Corrup
wraps
Nirmal Yadav
ed to Justice Yadav's resi
dence through his friend
The money was
reportedly handed
The
Yadav
CM's
over to
her
at
report states
that the evidence uncovered
during the course of investigation
raises
legitimate
Gupta, an associate of Mr.
Bansal, and the tatter had
for Rs. SQ lakh that Mr.Singh
in
tion admitted to being a director in-the company. For
this, Mr Bansal allegedly of
fered Its. one crore to Justice
Yadav, who told Mr. Singh to
months
The CBI prosecutor, in his
were some 239 calls between
Justice Yadav and Ravinder
gave to Justice Yadav at
official
residence
Chandigarh.
-
her
during custodial
interroga-
arguments before court, reto the cases mentioned hi the report
as "very
keep the money ready. When
ferred
the
serious and suspicious."
matter was decided in
Mr. Bonsal's favour, the first
presumption
a
even mentioning that
the charge sheet was filed. In
return, Mr. Bansal arranged
cused
der
that
the
ac-
(Justice Yadav, RavinSingh
Sanjeev
and
Bansal) committed criminal
conspiracy.
Indeed,
phone
records show that in the six
and
between Febniary 1
August 16, 2008 there
Singh including, 136 calls on
a mobile Mr. Singh gave to
These, he argued, needed
instalment of Rs. 50 lalch was
delivered at her residence,
to be investigated independ-
while the judge purportedly
calls
ently as the CBI did not have
collected the second instal-
personal
the permission to prosecute
Udaivir Singh, and Ravinder
these
ment of another Rs. 50 lakh
herself in November 2007.
is that of a
Then again, in 2008, the
judge allçgedly took Its .10
JuMice
Yadav
for
matters.
One
iuch case
her. There were another 200
between the judge's
Singh,
security
officer,
which indicates the
level of proximity between
them
_
_ _
*
yrtimi
siuu*ii
uuuuc.fl*1çff}m
tiqrn
cu'u'ut
*
HI44rl
ft twr
~
nuRi
ta
itftrk
'
t9'(gclgIi'
frt
tI
3TI
z-94ic
*
iir1
aivI thtt
**
r1
4t
34ugul
ft 'flsçici'
~
it fiktnw
~
wriiI
ttt fri
*'nwtttt
~
t
cicb4ul %Iit
.iir1
!fl1flfl9TT*fr¬t
t
PSVIIW)$Ma
9&'
r1
prgt
m
*
fc n
mit
a
tii
t*4'rii 'It
TIiM
*
ai
'n'ftwigciu
ft 1967
tiucI q
tw*tt anntc
iun
*
tit¶r Mlur1Cb fl
ntwr
nfllfr
25BTfl
T*k*9*-*
flqu4gt*' .ir
ft'
'aithiIt nflwi
~atftii*! flTw
ufl ft
*t3I1W1ft
ggj
T 'siflqu
*flt
iwr!
g'tugi
ra
i
earn
'
*
*
w*t
t'tt'*'tR' M(g1
ft ig1tcii
Hici
*
'in*tik*t HIQ1 *t 'ft'i*uiI
'
i
1è44wrn %fl91TMflgk* fljg1g
ar
tiq
ffii9nTtfl
gi'i5i cMègi
4t9
i a*nw
1ft3T3PffZ*flTUk~TW
'it!
i*
ti'
'* m
tzn'q
ii4
T$ amiwntnnn
bu? win
25
wniwti4 e?
i aM
*
t'
T
is
Pit un4Irii* mnt
!rflt fri
q*ci
frwrftnnfrf n*
'ciiçt4
t
'a 'k*
nTWTp1Ttffi
'IG
winfltr wucuI
tcg
iuguci'
)tciii 'uparc1-MurqgI-cqigiI44j'
*
ii1t
jiü
tathn*wf*
Mk)4U4r1B1
ARigti
TjT
r4$*'
it 3ltflfllci
Th$
gui'cj
lift?
P.*qntt
t
*t lci1td 'irM M4
Wif
PflTw*thtflTmr'9n,
T*r acbl.l
uiurquu 3fli
ffi4TRT rntiQ
gf vi
rnfl4'flT'*'5cUM(e'**flff...
*it'iui
WThff(t un4lri*n*$t*t
____fl W
'ft flki
HUlI
*
gqui
a*
1r ffl* 'ft 1&ii
ritk*
ittr*t?u flfi*34
*iftuR'm
rt*n
ItT
taftrn (Iar
v1,lig 31TT*M1R
aiiiq *$
ti Hre1 klglocl 'qIgl(lg
44a
*
n
*
''u*fi3eTn%ft
ttt*'1111k4H
1T 'J1C1ukVTt11TttS
'xrul
"qwThg *sn#-an%
fliceit4ciçi
*ftiw
www.facebook.contledltorashwlnlkumar
Ishral: Order on Pandey's bail plea reserved
press
trust of India
AHMEDABAD, 3 AUG: The specia! court for CR1 cases here
today reserved its order on the
bail plea of
Additional Director General of
Police Prithvi Pal Pandey, an
accused in the lshratJahan fake
anticipatory
encounter killing
case, till 6
pplication afresh
filed an application seeking his
Earlier, Mr Pandey's lawyer.
Nikupañi Nháati áried "the
has been chasing Pandey
wanted to send him
behind bars by hook or by
CR1
and
uook...Despite
High
the
Court directing the CR1 not to
arrest Pandeytill 6 August, the
central investigation agency
error or mistake. It is a deliber-
sion of names of Intelligence
officials
Rajinder
and
Kumar
the
then
ate design
Ahmedabad
so as
to
deprive
"The CBI does not want
to humiliate only my client
(alone) but they want to humil-
Police:
Commissioner K It Kaushik in
th charge-sheet. Contending
that thert was no -material
against Mr Pandey, Mr Nanavati
The Clii's branding of Ms
client as a proclaimed abscon-
said he was acting on lB inputs
and if i
iripuS were to be
questioned, there may be a
serious law and order problem
der (in the charge-sheet of
ed
itt the country.
High
Court
which
has
restrained the CR! from arresting the senior IPS officer till 6
iliesday.
Bureau
iate thçentire police brass of
the Gujarat," he added.
"Why have they not proceed-
judicial custody."
August. Ms Judge Gita Gopi is
likely to pass the order on
orders of the Supreme Court,
Mr Nanavati said. "It is not an
said.
on the directions of Gujarat
-
have more erious allegations
their name?" Mr
against
Nanavati said referring to omis-
Pandey of any discretionary
order from seeking justice," he
August. The special court Is
hearing his
lshSt case) was .totally illegal
as Pandey appeared before the
concerned court as per the
against
those officials who
I
2
e3TTft *ii
i.'ttl
f11514,1
fl
Cll4iS %W
'SIl'Cl":
t'mT erl
w
t_
n4llistlMa?tl
fri iS ft*aii
RT
*Nir
dTt4*3tR
fllHhltl9Tt
3llf
3MlRtii
ttflf%lT
*nii4tas
t!lw
atSwi'fttMg*'
m
na
izuti.
w
*
ii