Published in final edited form as:
Methods Mol Biol. 2012 ; 814: 23–45. doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-452-0_3.
Nancy Ann Oberheim , Steven A. Goldman , and Maiken Nedergaard
Astrocytes participate in all essential CNS functions, including blood flow regulation, energy metabolism, ion and water homeostasis, immune defence, neurotransmission, and adult neurogenesis. It is thus not surprising that astrocytic morphology and function differ between regions, and that different subclasses of astrocytes exist within the same brain region. Recent lines of work also show that the complexity of protoplasmic astrocytes increases during evolution.
Human astrocytes are structurally more complex, larger, and propagate calcium signals significantly faster than rodent astrocytes. In this chapter, we review the diversity of astrocytic form and function, while considering the markedly expanded roles of astrocytes with phylogenetic evolution. We also define major challenges for the future, which include determining how astrocytic functions are locally specified, defining the molecular controls upon astrocytic fate and physiology and establishing how evolutionary changes in astrocytes contribute to higher cognitive functions.
Keywords
Astrocyte; NG2 cell; Glia; Glia progenitor; Potassium buffering; Epilepsy; Calcium signaling;
Purinergic receptors
Rudolf Virchow first proposed that neuroglia comprised the connective tissue of the brain and was composed of cellular elements in 1858 (1) . Just over a decade later, Camillo Golgi visualized astrocytes within the nervous system, and further advanced the concept that these cells comprised the “glue” of the brain (2) . Yet the term “astrocyte,” which referred to the stellate morphology of these cells, was first used only in 1893, by Michael von Lenhossek
(3) . These cells were soon subdivided into fibrous and protoplasmic astrocytes by Kolliker and Andriezen (4, 5). Yet not until Ramón y Cajal, whose drawings first revealed the extraordinary pleomorphism of astrocytes, was their diversity first appreciated (6) (Fig. 1).
Based on his histological studies, Cajal and others postulated several roles for this diverse class of cells, including maintaining brain architecture, homeostasis, and nutrition ( 7) . Since then, numerous studies have further revealed the morphologic and functional diversity of astrocytes. In addition, more recent studies have revealed inter-species differences in astrocytic form and function, which together highlight the potential importance of astrocytic function in complex brain processing (8, 9).
In the nineteenth century, two classes of central astrocytes were first described using a nomenclature that largely survives today: fibrous astrocytes of the white matter, and protoplasmic astrocytes of the grey matter (4, 5). Their distinct morphological differences were first appreciated by Golgi staining, which revealed that protoplasmic astrocytes are complex cells with numerous fine processes, while fibrous astrocytes are less complex, with

Oberheim et al.
Page 2 fewer branching processes. Whereas protoplasmic astrocytes appear distributed relatively uniformly within cortical gray matter, fibrous astrocytes are organized along white matter tracts, within which they are oriented longitudinally in the plane of the fibre bundles. In addition to these two classes of astrocytes, specialized astrocytes within different areas of the brain were also defined in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries; these included the Bergmann glia of the cerebellum, and the Muller glia of the retina ( 7). It was not until 1919 that oligodendrocytes and microglia were first recognized as separate cell types ( 7) , observations that led to our current conception of central glia, as comprised of three major cellular classes that include microglia, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes. More recently, a number of groups have pointed out that parenchymal glial progenitor cells, typically noted as either oligodendrocyte progenitor cells or as NG2 cells based upon their expression of the NG2 chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, may comprise a fourth category of central glia (10).
Astrocytes have not yet been associated with a canonical molecular signature that specifically and selectively defines their phenotype; their morphological features and relationships with both neurons and capillaries define their phenotype more so than any single molecular marker. Nonetheless, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), an intermediate filament protein expressed in astrocytes, is typically used to distinguish and identify astrocytes within the central nervous system (11). Yet, even though this marker has been used for over 30 years as a standard for the definition of an astrocyte, it has become clear that not all astrocytes express GFAP and not all cells in the CNS that express GFAP are astrocytes (12, 13). For instance, neural stem cells of the subventricular zone express GFAP
(14), but do not otherwise meet the criteria for phenotypic assignment as astrocytes (15).
Indeed, although a number of proteins have been reported as selectively expressed by astrocytes, none have proven to be entirely specific for, ubiquitously expressed by, and absolutely restricted to, astrocytes. Rather, studies of astrocytic biology have revealed the great diversity of these cells, in such features as their developmental lineage, mitotic control, ion channel expression, receptor expression, gap junction connectivity, electrophysiological and calcium signaling properties (16). These studies have revealed a remarkable heterogeneity among astrocytes, the elucidation of which is ongoing.
One group recently attempted to define classes of astrocytes within the rodent CNS using a combination of GFAP-driven GFP expression, GFAP protein expression, and S100ß immunostaining. Using this combinatorial approach to empiric classification, Emsley and
Macklis defined nine different classes of astrocytes, that included Bergmann glia, ependymal glia, fibrous astrocytes, marginal glia, perivascular glia, protoplasmic astrocytes, radial glia, tanycytes, and velate glia (17). These authors reported differences in astrocytic density among different brain regions, as well as in the morphologies thereof, and confirmed that astrocytic phenotype is in part a function of both local cytoarchitecture and regionspecified functional demands.
Although astrocytes are thought of as star-like based upon both Golgi staining and GFAP immunolabeling, it has become clear that astrocytes are much larger than their silver stain or
GFAP-defined profiles might suggest, as they have numerous fine processes that are GFAPnegative. In fact, it has been estimated that GFAP immunostaining reveals at best 15% of the total astrocytic volume in rodents, in which protoplasmic astrocytes reveal manifestly spongi-form morphologies (18). In addition, the conception of protoplasmic astrocytes as geometrically ovoid was challenged by dye injection studies, which revealed a variety of fusiform morphologies that allowed astrocytes to penetrate otherwise dense areas of neuropil
(18, 19). Furthermore, the longstanding concept that astrocytic processes interdigitate to
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 3 create a scaffold for neuronal organization was also challenged, following dye injection studies that revealed minimal overlap – less than 5% of total astrocytic volume – between neighboring hippocampal astrocytes (18, 19). Instead, these studies and others revealed that hippocampal astrocytes are organized in distinct, nonoverlapping domains, with little interaction between adjacent cells. Since then, other groups have revealed that this domain organization is also found in the rodent cortex (20–22).
The significance of the domain organization is unclear. The many fine processes of protoplasmic astrocytes penetrate all areas of the local neuropil, encompassing synapses and the microvasculature alike. It has been estimated that within the domain of a single hippocampal astrocyte, there are approximately 140,000 synapses (18). Thus, single astrocytes contact and may control large sets of contiguous synapses as well as the vascular bed regulating blood flow to those synapses. This architecture places the astrocyte in a prime position to coordinate synaptic activity and blood flow, potentially independent of neuronal metabolic activity.
The domain organization may also play a role in pathology. Studies examining gliosis have shown that the domain organization is lost in reactive astrocytes in several experimental models of epilepsy, but maintained in reactive astrocytes in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease (Fig. 2) (22). In all models of epilepsy studied, including acute and chronic cortical iron injection, kainate injection, and genetic epileptic mice (SWXL mice), cortical astrocytes manifested severe reactive changes. Concurrently with an increase in cellular diameter, process hypertrophy, and upregulated GFAP, the reactive astrocytes of these epileptic models lost their domain organization and displayed on average a >15-fold increase in process overlap between neighboring cells. Reactive astrogliosis and loss of domain organization in the epileptic brains were paralleled by changes in neuronal structure, including a reduction in spine density and dendritic morphology. Interestingly, astrocytic domain organization was in part preserved if the frequency of seizures was reduced by valproate (22). Moreover, astrocytes in a transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease exhibited an increase in GFAP, but maintained the domain organization at an age of 12–14 months
(22, 23), suggesting that reactive astrocytosis per se was insufficient to abrogate domain architecture. Thus, while the significance of domain organization is not well understood, it seems likely that the preservation of this astrocytic architecture may be critical to normal brain physiology and function.
Traditionally, astrocytes were considered as contributing primarily to the structural organization of the brain, since they are not electrically excitable; they do not conduct action potentials like their neuronal counterparts. Yet astrocytes sustain a very low resting potential, typically −85 to −90 mV, by virtue of their dense expression of potassium channels (24). Most are also highly coupled by gap junctions, composed primarily of connexin 43, which confers a low input resistance upon cells within the astrocytic synctium
(25). When depolarized, astrocytes respond with a linear current–voltage relationship and are thus not electrically excitable (26, 27). Yet the more detailed electrophysiological characteristics of astrocytes are not all the same: recent studies have determined that astrocytes within different brain regions can express different levels and types of ion channels and may thus have subtle differences in electrophysiological properties, including in their resting membrane potentials. For instance, astrocytes may vary substantially with respect to their expression of inwardly rectifying potassium channels (K ir
) (28). This large family of channels is expressed by protoplasmic astrocytes, fibrous astrocytes, hippocampal astrocytes, and both Muller and Bergmann glia and is also differentially expressed during development (28–32). Yet despite its ubiquitous expression as a class, the levels and specific
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 4 subtypes of K ir
channels can vary among astrocytic populations as a function of region and cellular relationships. For instance, in the spinal cord, astrocytes in the ventral horn express high levels of K ir
4.1, while those in the apex of the dorsal horn express low levels, resulting in intraseg-mental gradients in the rate of potassium buffering, and hence in local thresholds for synaptic transmission (32). Additionally, expression of K ir
4.1 changes during development: In the hippocampus, K ir
4.1 is down regulated within 10 days after birth, concurrently with a fourfold decrease in astrocytic inward current density (29). Bergmann glia also exhibit developmental changes in K
+
channel expression; delayed outward and inward rectifying K
+
currents predominate during the first post-natal week, while mature
Bergmann glial cells display both voltage and time independence currents (33).
Regional differences notwithstanding, the electrophysiological properties of different subclasses of astrocytes are largely similar, including across regions (14). As a group, they are readily distinguished from the only other electrically polarized glial phenotype, the NG2 cell, also referred to as the oligodendrocyte or glial progenitor cell (34, 35), or polydendrocyte (36). NG2 cells may be viewed as a separate class of glial cells and are characterized by a lack of gap junction coupling, high input resistance, and voltagedependent sodium and potassium conductances (36). NG2 glial progenitor cells are themselves a heterogenous group (37, 38) and have been found to express AMPA, NMDA, and GABA receptors in different brain regions, and form synapses with neurons in both grey and white matter, even participating in forms of LTP (39–43). Furthermore, NG2 cells have differing expression of glutamine synthetase in the hippocampus and have been shown to have differing morphologies and electrophysiological properties based on brain region (44,
45). Although still under intense study, the fate of NG2 cells also appears to be varied. In culture, NG2
+
glial progenitor cells are readily bipotential for astrocytes and oligodendrocytes (35, 46–48), and under serum-free culture, conditions can generate neurons as well as glia, with a fraction revealing neural stem cell potential (37). In vivo though, fate mapping studies have revealed a more restricted phenotypic potential, by which endogenous NG2 cells can generate oligodendrocytes in both brain and spinal cord, and protoplasmic astrocytes in the gray matter of the ventral forebrain and spinal cord (49–52).
Yet in these studies, no white matter fibrous astrocytes were derived from NG2 cells. Other studies using similar cell fate mapping strategy based upon the expression of PDGF
α identified derived oligodendrocytes and additional NG2 cells, as well as small numbers of pyriform neurons, yet failed to see astrocytes in grey or white matter (53). Therefore, while it seems likely that the oligodendrocyte lineage is derived from NG2 cells, the generation of astrocytes from these cells–both in normal physiology and in reactive states–remains controversial.
One of the major functions of astrocytes within the CNS is glutamate uptake, which influences excitatory neurotransmission and prevents excitotoxicity. Astrocytes accomplish this through expression of glutamate transporter proteins, predominantly GLAST and GLT-1
(EAAT2) (54). It is now known through transgenic studies in which the fluorescent protein
DsRed was placed under the control of the GLAST promoter, and GFP under the GLT-1 promoter, that there is heterogenous expression of these important proteins in different areas of the CNS as well as during development (Fig. 3) (55). GLAST is expressed primarily in radial glia as well as cortical astrocytes during development, but does persist in the adult
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 5 brain in the Bergmann glial cells of the cerebellum, fibrous astrocytes of the ventral white matter tracts of the spinal cord, as well as several niches in the forebrain such as the progenitor cells of the subgranular layer of the dentate gyrus. GLT-1 is the predominant gluta-mate transporter expressed in the adult brain and is highly active in both protoplasmic and fibrous astrocytes accounting for 90% of glutamate uptake in the CNS (56, 57).
However, in the spinal cord, there is tenfold less expression of GLT-1 compared to brain, which is correlated with decreased glutamate uptake (55). Additionally, a splice variant of the type 2 excitatory amino acid transporter, exon 9 skipping EAAT2/GLT1, is highly expressed in fibrous astrocytes of the white matter and only expressed weakly in subsets of protoplasmic astrocytes and radial glia (58). Protoplasmic and fibrous astrocytes may thus differ substantially in their glutamate uptake capabilities and capacity.
Unlike their neuronal counterparts, astrocytes are not electrically excitable; rather they are a chemically excitable system. It was first observed in the early 1990's that cultured astrocytes could respond to stimuli such as glutamate by increasing intracellular calcium and initiate calcium wave propagation between neighboring cultured astrocytes (59). Recently, it was observed that astrocytes can increase their intracellular calcium in small volume compartments, near membranes in the fine astrocytic processes as well as in the cell somata
(60). It is now recognized that astrocytes express numerous metabotropic receptors coupled to second messenger systems; in slice preparations, these have been shown to increase intracellular calcium in a phospholipase C (PLC) and inositol (1, 4, 5)-trisphosphatedependent fashion, in response to neurotransmitters that include glutamate, ATP, GABA, adenosine, and norepinephrine, acetylcholine, prostaglandins, and endocannabinoids (59,
61–67). Additionally, it has been shown that astrocytes have the capability to increase intracellular calcium intrinsically, without the influence of neuronal activity (68–71).
Interestingly, it has been shown that astrocytes within different areas of the central nervous system respond to different collections of neurotransmitters. Because the in vitro environment can artifactually alter astrocytic receptor expression, the work highlighted here derives from in vivo and in situ studies. In the cortex, astrocytes respond to glutamate and norepinephrine with increases in calcium (72–74), while hippocampal astrocytes exhibit calcium responses to ATP, GABA, glutamate, acetylcholine, prostaglandins and endocannabinoids (64, 75–80). Studies of brain slices from the cerebellum show that astrocytes in this region respond to ATP, norepinephrine, glutamate, and nitric oxide (81–
84). Astrocytes in the olfactory bulb have also been shown in brain slice preparations to respond to ATP and glutamate and in the retina to ATP (85, 86). The physiologic responses in most cases have been correlated with neurotransmitter receptor expression, highlighting the heterogeneity of astrocytes within different brain regions.
Astrocytes also vary in their calcium responses. There are two major types of whole-cell calcium signals in astrocytes that include intrinsic calcium oscillations within single cells and calcium waves propagated from one cell to others. Both forms of calcium signaling can occur both independent of neuronal activity, as well as in response to neurotransmitters as described above (68–71). Spontaneous calcium oscillations differ in different layers of the somatosensory cortex. In live anesthetized rats, astrocytes in layer 1 display mostly asynchronous calcium oscillations that are more than twice as frequent as those of astrocytes in layers 2/3, which display more synchronized calcium responses (87). In addition, the downstream effects of astrocytic Ca
2+
signalling are context and phenotype-dependent, so that activation of different receptors can mediate fundamentally different responses. For example, activation of either P2Y
1
or PAR-1 receptors can increase cytosolic Ca
2+
in hippocampal astrocytes, yet only PAR-1 receptor activation triggered astrocytic glutamate
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 6 release, as detected by NMDA receptor-mediated slow inward currents in nearby neurons
(88).
Calcium waves also differ by astrocytic class and location. Calcium waves in gray matter protoplasmic astrocytes rely on gap junction coupling to propagate. In slice preparation of connexin 43-deficient mice, the principal gap junction protein expressed in astrocytes, there was no calcium wave propagation (89). In contrast, fibrous astrocytes of the white matter in the corpus callosum can propagate calcium waves without gap junction coupling and are instead dependent on ATP release. This was demonstrated by calcium wave propagation in the connexin 43 knockout mice, as well as by the sensitivity of calcium wave transmission in the corpus callosum to purinergic receptor blockers, but not to gap junction blockers (89,
90). Thus, different classes of astrocytes may utilize both different moieties and modalities of communication within the glial synctium.
Since astrocytes exhibit diverse responses to a variety of neurotransmitters, it follows that astrocytes may tap a diverse collection of gliotransmitters by which to communicate with their neighbours. Increases in astrocytic intracellular calcium have been shown to trigger the release of several gliotransmitters, including glutamate, ATP, adenosine, d-serine, TNF-
α
, and eicosanoids, which then can modulate the activity of surrounding cells including other astrocytes, neurons, microglia, and the vasculature (91–95). Astrocytes in the cortex and hippocampus have been shown to release ATP and glutamate leading both to excitation and inhibition of neuronal activity (69, 79). Numerous studies on hippocampal astrocytes demonstrate the astrocytic release of glutamate, ATP/adenosine,
D
-serine and TNF alpha with effects ranging from increased excitatory as well as inhibitory post-synaptic currents to modulation of LTP and synaptic scaling (64, 78, 96–102). In the cerebellum, astrocytes have been shown to release ATP and adenosine, resulting in depression of spontaneous excitatory post-synaptic currents (103). Additionally, Bergmann glia have also been shown to release
GABA through bestrophin 1 channels, as a mechanism of tonic synaptic inhibition (104).
Astrocytes within the olfactory bulb can release both glutamate and GABA modulation slow inward and outward currents, respectively, and those in the retina release glutamate, ATP/ adenosine, and d-serine leading to modulation of light-evoked neuronal activity (105–107).
It is important to note that it remains unclear whether gliotransmitter release is a normally occurring physiological event. Gliotransmitter release has only reliably been demonstrated in vitro and has been shown to play a role in synaptic plasticity in situ only under nonphysiological conditions. One characteristic shared by all gliotransmitters is that they are present within the cytosol of astrocytes in mM concentrations. Since gliotransmitter release has been studied in slice preparations using manipulations (e.g., high frequency stimulation,
UV photolysis) that potentially can lead to the opening of channels (volume-sensitive channels or Cx-hemichannels), with an inner pore diameter large enough to allow efflux of glutamate, ATP, or
D
-serine, it is possible that gliotransmitter release is fundamentally nonphysiological. In other words, the experimental manipulations may activate signaling pathways that are not operational under normal conditions. In support of this concept, several recent reports have documented that agonist-induced Ca
2+
signaling in astrocytes is not linked to gliotransmitter release (108–110)
Traditionally, astrocytes are thought to be highly coupled cells through the expression of connexins (Cx), mainly Cx43 and Cx30 (111). However, different astrocyte classes have
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 7 different degrees of coupling. Additionally, depending on anatomic location, the extent and organization of coupling can differ. Finally, studies have shown that age may also play a part in the level of astrocytic coupling.
Protoplasmic astrocytes of the cortex are highly coupled cells. After a single cell injection of biocytin, a gap junction-permeable dye, an average of 94 cells spanning a radius of approximately 400
μ m can be visualized and hence appear networked through gap junctions
(89). In contrast, it is now thought that fibrous astrocytes within the major white matter tracts are not highly coupled. Using the same technique as in cortex, Haas et al. were only able to visualize 1–2 cells labeled with biocytin and never a network as observed in protoplasmic astrocytes (89). These data suggest that protoplasmic and fibrous astrocytes have very different degrees of coupling, which has significant implications in regard to their respective calcium wave signals, resting membrane potentials, potassium buffering, and glutamate metabolism, as well as to their respective abilities to exchange second messengers, metabolites and other signal intermediates between cells.
As a higher-order level complexity, the organization of gap junction coupling can be dependent on anatomic localization within the cortex. Protoplasmic astrocytes in both the cortex and hippocampus are highly coupled. However, it is now thought that not all astrocyte networks are circular in nature. In the cortex, in layers 1 and 2/3, gap junction networks have been shown to be in parallel with the surface of the cortex (112). In the deeper layers, 4 and 5, astrocytic networks through gap junctions were shown to be more circular. This was also the case in the hippocampus where astrocytes near the pyramidal cell layer have networks that remain in parallel to this anatomic structure, yet astrocytes in the stratum radiatum have circular networks (112). In more specialized areas of the cortex, such as the barrel cortex of rodents, astrocyte networks were shown to be more oval in shape within a barrel field compared to circular networks in areas outside the barrel fields in layer
IV (113). Additionally, gap junction communication is restricted to within a barrel due to little gap junction coupling of astrocytes within the septa between the barrel fields (113). In the Bergmann glia of the cerebellum, which are also highly coupled by Cx 43, the shape of the network is perpendicular to the parallel fibres, forming long strings of coupled cells unlike the circular or oval networks seen in the cortex and hippocampus (114). Therefore, anatomic localization as well as cellular class plays a role in the shape of the networks in which astrocytes are coupled.
Age may also play a role in the degree of astrocytic coupling. When astrocytes in the hippocampus are injection with the gap junction-permeable dye biocytin, there was a much smaller network of coupled cells observed compared to early postnatal rodents (16).
Therefore, age, cell type and anatomic localization all play a part in the determinate of gap junction coupling of astrocytes which has implications for variations of cellular properties and functions. Despite the implied importance of gap junction coupling in astrocyte function, knockout mice of Cx43 as well as double knockout mice of Cx43 and Cx30 have been generated (115–117). Surprisingly, other than some changes in potassium homeostasis, there is little phenotype in both of these knockout mice, suggesting that either there is compensatory upregulation of other connexins or pannexin molecules in these animals, or perhaps coupling may not be as integral as once thought to astrocyte function (117).
In addition to gap junction coupling, the expression of Cx43 is also thought to have an important role in formation of hemichannels, or an unopposed half of a gap junction.
Hemichannels can open during a variety of both physiologic and pathologic conditions and can lead to release of several gliotransmitters including ATP and glutamate (111, 118–120).
At this point, it is unclear whether any heterogeneity exists with regard to the number of functional Cx43 hemichannels within the different classes of astrocytes.
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 8
The heterogeneity of astrocytes could arise due to separate astrocyte lineages, plasticity of differentiated cells, or a combination of both phenomena (121). It is well-known that mature astrocytes can exhibit forms of plasticity, most notably after injury when astrocytes become reactive, upregulate GFAP and other intermediate filament proteins, become larger, and in some pathologies loss of the domain organization of the protoplasmic astrocytes (22, 122,
123). Another example of plasticity of the mature astrocyte is astrocyte motility. Time lapse studies of astrocytes in acute slice and slice culture have shown that astrocyte processes act much like dendritic spines; they are frequently motile and contact active synapses (124,
125). One role of this motility may be in synaptic remodeling, in that direct contact of astrocytic processes has been shown to be necessary for dendritic spine maturation (126).
Additionally, this plasticity may be involved in regulating synaptic strength (127). In the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system, lactation determines the amount of astrocytic coverage of synapses. During lactation, astrocytic processes retract from active synapses, distancing glutamate transporters and therefore increasing the glutamate concentration within the synaptic cleft (127). This in turn activates inhibitory interneurons leading to homo and heterosynaptic depression of neurotransmitter release and is thought to be important for the regulation of lactation (127, 128). Therefore, mature astrocyte plasticity may be critical for modulating neuronal activity and important for the development of astrocyte heterogeneity.
The diversity of astrocytes may reflect the underlying diversity of glial progenitor cells.
Gliogenesis occurs perinatally in the germinal niches of the CNS, the ventricular and subventricular zones (129). There are several distinct pools of progenitors within the VZ/
SVZ that may give rise to astrocytes, which include both radial cells of the ventricular zone and glial progenitor cells of the subventricular zone. Initial lineage tracing studies in birds revealed that radial cells are multipotential (130, 131), and later studies confirmed the multilineage competence of radial cells in mammals as well. Yet other studies have pointed out that some radial cells may directly give rise to a subset of cortical astrocytes (132), and that such radial cell astrocytic progenitors persist postnatally (133). In addition, some cortical and white matter astrocytes are derived from distal-less homeobox 2 (Dlx2) migratory progenitors from the dorsolateral subventricular zone, which are distinct from radial glia (134). In addition, some astrocytes may be generated locally from glial progenitor cells after their migration into the marginal zone (135). Furthermore, protoplasmic astrocytes may also be generated postnatally from NG2
+
glial progenitor cells arising from the SVZ of the ganglionic eminences and later ventral striatum (51). Importantly, NG2
+
glial progenitors may not contribute significantly to either fibrous astrocytes of the white matter or protoplasmic astrocytes in the dorsal telencephalon, in which locally generated, dorsally derived Dlx-2+ progenitors may give rise to mature astrocytes. In this regard, cell fate studies of Olig2+ glial progenitors have shown that these cells in the SVZ/VZ may give rise to astrocytes of the dorsal pallium (136). Thus, astrocytes may derive from different cells of origin, suggesting an ontogenetic basis for their mature heterogeneity.
This also seems to be the case in the development of astrocytes within the spinal cord. Cell lineage tracing studies have found that astrocytes (in addition to motor neurons and oligodendrocytes) at the ventral surface of the spinal cord are produced from Olig2+ progenitors in a subset of the ventral ventricular zone of the spinal cord named the pMN domain (137–139). Astrocytes in the spinal cord are also derived from cells outside the pMN domain in the ventral ventricular zone in a position-dependant manner. Recent studies have demonstrated three distinct domains of the ventral ventricular zone, which give rise to distinct white matter astrocyte subpopulations in the spinal cord (140). These subtypes of fibrous astrocytes can be distinguished through the combinatorial expression of reelin and
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 9 slit1, while their positional identities may be defined by the expression of the homeodomain transcription factors Pax6 and Nkx6.1. Thus, in the spinal cord as well as in the forebrain, considerable heterogeneity may be observed in astrocytic lineage and phenotype.
In addition to the functional heterogeneity of astrocytes within the rodent cortex, it is now clear that significant inter-species heterogeneity exists among glial cells. In particular, human and primate cortical astrocytes are substantially larger and more complex than their rodent counterparts (9). Furthermore, there are more subtypes of cortical astrocytes found in primates and humans compared to other mammals (Fig. 4). A recent study made a direct comparison between cortical astrocyte found in human, primate, and rodent brains (8).
Compared to the rodent cortex, primates harbor two novel astrocyte subclasses: interlaminar astrocytes and varicose projection astrocytes (5, 8, 141–143) (Fig. 5). Varicose projection astrocytes which have hitherto been observed only in humans and chimpanzees are GFAP
+ cells that reside in layers 5–6 (8). They are characterized by the shorter straighter main processes compared to protoplasmic astrocytes and the striking extension of one to five long processes of up to 1 mm in length. These long processes are notable for evenly spaced varicosities approximately every 10
μ m. The long processes terminate in the neuropil or along the vasculature. Human varicose projection astrocytes are more complicated and larger than those observed in the chimpanzee brain. The function of these cells specific to higher-order primates remains to be determined.
Interlaminar astrocytes abundantly populate cortical layer 1 in both humans and primates. In humans, they are characterized by spheroid cell bodies close to the pial surface and extend several short processes that contribute to the pial glial limitans, creating a thick network of
GFAP fibres (8, 141–143). Additionally, they extend one to two processes from layer 1, terminating in layers 2–4 of the cortex, resulting in numerous millimetre-long processes radiating through the outer cortical layers in a columnar manner. Human interlaminar astrocytes are distinct in that primate inter-laminar astrocytes have oblong cell bodies directly opposed to the glial limitans and are less numerous than seen in the human cortex.
Both in humans and other primates, the millimetre-long processes of interlaminar astrocytes are tortuous and terminate in the neuropil or on the vasculature. Their function remains unknown, but the long processes have been shown to be able to support calcium wave propagation in humans (8).
Protoplasmic astrocytes in humans are manifestly distinct from those of rodents (Fig. 6).
They are 2.6-fold greater in diameter, with >10-fold more abundant GFAP-defined processes (8). Like their counterparts in rodents, human astrocytes are also organized into domains, but with significantly more overlap in proportion to their increased diameter. In the rodent, one astrocytic domain may encompass 20,000–120,000 synapses (8). Yet in accord with the increased size of protoplasmic astrocytes in humans, and the high synaptic density of the human cortex, the domain of one human protoplasmic astrocyte may encompass
270,000 to 2 million synapses (8, 9). Furthermore, protoplasmic astrocytes from human brain are able to propagate calcium waves far more rapidly than their rodent counterparts, with a speed of 36
μ m/s, approximately four to tenfold that seen in rodents (8). Similarly, fibrous astrocytes of the white matter in humans are similarly larger and more complex than those of rodents (8). Overall then, human astrocytes are both morphologically and functionally distinct from those of infraprimate mammals, exhibiting larger size, far greater architectural complexity and pleomorphism, and more rapid syncytial calcium signalling than their murine counterparts (8, 9, 144). As such, the unique aspects of astrocytes in
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 10 humans may provide a cellular substrate for many of the distinct neurological capabilities and increased functional competencies of the human brain. Indeed, better understanding of how the evolution of astrocytes might contribute to human neural processing, and hence the species-specific capabilities intrinsic to human cognition, is a key question for the future.
Work described in the authors'labs was supported by grants from NINDS, as well as from the Adelson Medical
Research Foundation, the Mathers Charitable foundation, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, the Department of Defence, and the New York State Stem Cell Research Program (NYSTEM).
1. Virchow, RLK. Die cellularpathologie in ihrer begründung auf physiologische und pathologische gewebelehre. A. Hirschwald; Berlin: 1858.
2. Golgi, C. Contribuzione alla fina Anatomia degli organi centrali del sistema nervosos. Rivista clinica di Bologna; Bologna: 1871.
3. Lenhossek, M. Der feinere Bau des Nervensystems im Lichte neuester Forschung. Fischer's
Medicinische Buchhandlung; Berlin: 1893.
4. Kölliker, A. Handbuch der gewebelehre des menschen. 1889. p. 6umgearb. aufl. ed., n.p
5. Andriezen WL. The neuroglia elements of the brain. BMJ. 1893; 2:227–230.
6. Cajal, R. Histology of the Nervous System of Man and Vertebrates. Oxford University Press;
Oxford: 1897.
7. Kettenmann H, Verkhratsky A. Neuroglia: the 150 years after. Trends Neurosci. 2008; 31:653–659.
[PubMed: 18945498]
8. Oberheim NA, Takano T, Han X, He W, Lin JH, Wang F, Xu Q, Wyatt JD, Pilcher W, Ojemann JG,
Ransom BR, Goldman SA, Nedergaard M. Uniquely hominid features of adult human astrocytes. J
Neurosci. 2009; 29:3276–3287. [PubMed: 19279265]
9. Oberheim NA, Wang X, Goldman S, Nedergaard M. Astrocytic complexity distinguishes the human brain. Trends Neurosci. 2006; 29:547–553. [PubMed: 16938356]
10. Nishiyama A, Watanabe M, Yang Z, Bu J. Identity, distribution, and development of polydendrocytes: NG2-expressing glial cells. J Neurocytol. 2002; 31:437–455. [PubMed:
14501215]
11. Eng LF. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP): the major protein of glial intermediate filaments in differentiated astrocytes. J Neuroimmunol. 1985; 8:203–214. [PubMed: 2409105]
12. Kimelberg HK. The problem of astrocyte identity. Neurochem Int. 2004; 45:191–202. [PubMed:
15145537]
13. Mishima T, Hirase H. In vivo intracellular recording suggests that gray matter astrocytes in mature cerebral cortex and hippocampus are electrophysiologically homo geneous. J Neurosci. 2010;
30:3093–3100. [PubMed: 20181606]
14. Doetsch F, Caille I, Lim DA, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Alvarez-Buylla A. Subventricular zone astrocytes are neural stem cells in the adult mammalian brain. Cell. 1999; 97:703–716. [PubMed:
10380923]
15. Chojnacki AK, Mak GK, Weiss S. Identity crisis for adult periventricular neural stem cells: subventricular zone astrocytes, ependymal cells or both? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10:153–163.
[PubMed: 19153578]
16. Matyash V, Kettenmann H. Heterogeneity in astrocyte morphology and physiology. Brain Res
Rev. 2009
17. Emsley JG, Macklis JD. Astroglial heterogeneity closely reflects the neuronal-defined anatomy of the adult murine CNS. Neuron Glia Biol. 2006; 2:175–186. [PubMed: 17356684]
18. Bushong EA, Martone ME, Jones YZ, Ellisman MH. Protoplasmic astrocytes in CA1 stratum radiatum occupy separate anatomical domains. J Neurosci. 2002; 22:183–192. [PubMed:
11756501]
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 11
19. Ogata K, Kosaka T. Structural and quantitative analysis of astrocytes in the mouse hippocampus.
Neuroscience. 2002; 113:221–233. [PubMed: 12123700]
20. Livet J, Weissman TA, Kang H, Draft RW, Lu J, Bennis RA, Sanes JR, Lichtman JW. Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system. Nature.
2007; 450:56–62. [PubMed: 17972876]
21. Halassa MM, Fellin T, Takano H, Dong JH, Haydon PG. Synaptic islands defined by the territory of a single astrocyte. J Neurosci. 2007; 27:6473–6477. [PubMed: 17567808]
22. Oberheim NA, Tian GF, Han X, Peng W, Takano T, Ransom B, Nedergaard M. Loss of astrocytic domain organization in the epileptic brain. J Neurosci. 2008; 28:3264–3276. [PubMed: 18367594]
23. Hsiao K, Chapman P, Nilsen S, Eckman C, Harigaya Y, Younkin S, Yang F, Cole G. Correlative memory deficits, Abeta elevation, and amyloid plaques in transgenic mice. Science. 1996; 274:99–
102. [PubMed: 8810256]
24. Ransom BR, Sontheimer H. The neurophysiology of glial cells. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992; 9:224–
251. [PubMed: 1375603]
25. Lin SC, Bergles DE. Synaptic signaling between neurons and glia. Glia. 2004; 47:290–298.
[PubMed: 15252819]
26. Kuffler SW, Nicholls JG, Orkand RK. Physiological properties of glial cells in the central nervous system of amphibia. J Neurophysiol. 1966; 29:768–787. [PubMed: 5966434]
27. Orkand RK, Nicholls JG, Kuffler SW. Effect of nerve impulses on the membrane potential of glial cells in the central nervous system of amphibia. J Neurophysiol. 1966; 29:788–806. [PubMed:
5966435]
28. Butt AM, Kalsi A. Inwardly rectifying potassium channels (Kir) in central nervous system glia: a special role for Kir4.1 in glial functions. J Cell Mol Med. 2006; 10:33–44. [PubMed: 16563220]
29. Seifert G, Huttmann K, Binder DK, Hartmann C, Wyczynski A, Neusch C, Steinhauser C.
Analysis of astroglial K+ channel expression in the developing hippocampus reveals a predominant role of the Kir4.1 subunit. J Neurosci. 2009; 29:7474–7488. [PubMed: 19515915]
30. Kofuji P, Ceelen P, Zahs KR, Surbeck LW, Lester HA, Newman EA. Genetic inactivation of an inwardly rectifying potassium channel (Kir4.1 subunit) in mice: phenotypic impact in retina. J
Neurosci. 2000; 20:5733–5740. [PubMed: 10908613]
31. Neusch C, Papadopoulos N, Muller M, Maletzki I, Winter SM, Hirrlinger J, Handschuh M, Bahr
M, Richter DW, Kirchhoff F, Hulsmann S. Lack of the Kir4.1 channel subunit abolishes K+ buffering properties of astrocytes in the ventral respiratory group: impact on extracellular K+ regulation. J Neurophysiol. 2006; 95:1843–1852. [PubMed: 16306174]
32. Olsen ML, Campbell SL, Sontheimer H. Differential distribution of Kir4.1 in spinal cord astrocytes suggests regional differences in K+ homeostasis. J Neurophysiol. 2007; 98:786–793.
[PubMed: 17581847]
33. Muller T, Fritschy JM, Grosche J, Pratt GD, Mohler H, Kettenmann H. Developmental regulation of voltagegated K+ channel and GABAA receptor expression in Bergmann glial cells. J Neurosci.
1994; 14:2503–2514. [PubMed: 8182424]
34. Nishiyama A, Lin XH, Giese N, Heldin CH, Stallcup WB. Co-localization of NG2 proteoglycan and PDGF alpha-receptor on O2A progenitor cells in the developing rat brain. J Neurosci Res.
1996; 43:299–314. [PubMed: 8714519]
35. Roy NS, Wang S, Harrison-Restelli C, Benraiss A, Fraser RA, Gravel M, Braun PE, Goldman SA.
Identification, isolation, and promoter-defined separation of mitotic oligodendrocyte progenitor cells from the adult human subcortical white matter. J Neurosci. 1999; 19:9986–9995. [PubMed:
10559406]
36. Nishiyama A, Komitova M, Suzuki R, Zhu X. Polydendrocytes (NG2 cells): multifunctional cells with lineage plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10:9–22. [PubMed: 19096367]
37. Nunes MC, Roy NS, Keyoung HM, Goodman RR, McKhann G, Jiang L, Kang J, Nedergaard M,
Goldman SA. Identification and isolation of multipotential neural progenitor cells from the subcortical white matter of the adult human brain. Nature Medicine. 2003; 9:439–447.
38. Sim FJ, McClain CR, Schanz SJ, Protack TL, Windrem MS, Goldman SA. CD140a identifies a population of highly myelinogenic, migration-competent and efficiently engrafting human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. Nature biotechnology. 2011; 29:934–941.
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 12
39. Kukley M, Capetillo-Zarate E, Dietrich D. Vesicular glutamate release from axons in white matter.
Nat Neurosci. 2007; 10:311–320. [PubMed: 17293860]
40. Bergles DE, Roberts JD, Somogyi P, Jahr CE. Glutamatergic synapses on oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the hippocampus. Nature. 2000; 405:187–191. [PubMed: 10821275]
41. Ge WP, Yang XJ, Zhang Z, Wang HK, Shen W, Deng QD, Duan S. Long-term potentiation of neuron-glia synapses mediated by Ca2+–permeable AMPA receptors. Science. 2006; 312:1533–
1537. [PubMed: 16763153]
42. Ziskin JL, Nishiyama A, Rubio M, Fukaya M, Bergles DE. Vesicular release of glutamate from unmyelinated axons in white matter. Nat Neurosci. 2007; 10:321–330. [PubMed: 17293857]
43. Karadottir R, Hamilton NB, Bakiri Y, Attwell D. Spiking and nonspiking classes of oligodendrocyte precursor glia in CNS white matter. Nat Neurosci. 2008; 11:450–456. [PubMed:
18311136]
44. Chittajallu R, Aguirre A, Gallo V. NG2-positive cells in the mouse white and grey matter display distinct physiological properties. J Physiol. 2004; 561:109–122. [PubMed: 15358811]
45. Karram K, Goebbels S, Schwab M, Jennissen K, Seifert G, Steinhauser C, Nave KA, Trotter J.
NG2-expressing cells in the nervous system revealed by the NG2-EYFP-knockin mouse. Genesis.
2008; 46:743–757. [PubMed: 18924152]
46. Sim F, Lang J, Waldau B, Roy N, Schwartz T, Chandross K, Natesan S, Merrill J, Goldman SA.
Complementary patterns of gene expression by adult human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells and their white matter environment. Ann. Neurology. 2006; 59:763–779.
47. Sim FJ, Windrem MS, Goldman SA. Fate determination of adult human glial progenitor cells.
Neuron Glia Biol. 2009; 5:45–55. [PubMed: 19807941]
48. Windrem MS, Nunes MC, Rashbaum WK, Schwartz TH, Goodman RA, McKhann G, Roy NS,
Goldman SA. Fetal and adult human oligodendrocyte progenitor cell isolates myelinate the congenitally dysmyelinated brain. Nature Medicine. 2004; 10:93–97.
49. Dimou L, Simon C, Kirchhoff F, Takebayashi H, Gotz M. Progeny of Olig2-expressing progenitors in the gray and white matter of the adult mouse cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 2008;
28:10434–10442. [PubMed: 18842903]
50. Guo F, Ma J, McCauley E, Bannerman P, Pleasure D. Early postnatal proteolipid promoterexpressing progenitors produce multilineage cells in vivo. J Neurosci. 2009; 29:7256–7270.
[PubMed: 19494148]
51. Zhu X, Bergles DE, Nishiyama A. NG2 cells generate both oligodendrocytes and gray matter astrocytes. Development. 2008; 135:145–157. [PubMed: 18045844]
52. Zhu X, Hill RA, Nishiyama A. NG2 cells generate oligodendrocytes and gray matter astrocytes in the spinal cord. Neuron Glia Biol. 2008; 4:19–26. [PubMed: 19006598]
53. Rivers LE, Young KM, Rizzi M, Jamen F, Psachoulia K, Wade A, Kessaris N, Richardson WD.
PDGFRA/NG2 glia generate myelinating oligodendrocytes and piriform projection neurons in adult mice. Nat Neurosci. 2008; 11:1392–1401. [PubMed: 18849983]
54. Nedergaard M, Takano T, Hansen AJ. Beyond the role of glutamate as a neurotransmitter. Nat Rev
Neurosci. 2002; 3:748–755. [PubMed: 12209123]
55. Regan MR, Huang YH, Kim YS, Dykes-Hoberg MI, Jin L, Watkins AM, Bergles DE, Rothstein
JD. Variations in promoter activity reveal a differential expression and physiology of glutamate transporters by glia in the developing and mature CNS. J Neurosci. 2007; 27:6607–6619.
[PubMed: 17581948]
56. Rothstein JD, Dykes-Hoberg M, Pardo CA, Bristol LA, Jin L, Kuncl RW, Kanai Y, Hediger MA,
Wang Y, Schielke JP, Welty DF. Knockout of glutamate transporters reveals a major role for astroglial transport in excitotoxicity and clearance of glutamate. Neuron. 1996; 16:675–686.
[PubMed: 8785064]
57. Tanaka K, Watase K, Manabe T, Yamada K, Watanabe M, Takahashi K, Iwama H, Nishikawa T,
Ichihara N, Kikuchi T, Okuyama S, Kawashima N, Hori S, Takimoto M, Wada K. Epilepsy and exacerbation of brain injury in mice lacking the glutamate transporter GLT-1. Science. 1997;
276:1699–1702. [PubMed: 9180080]
58. Macnab LT, Pow DV. Expression of the exon 9-skipping form of EAAT2 in astrocytes of rats.
Neuroscience. 2007; 150:705–711. [PubMed: 17981401]
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 13
59. Cornell-Bell AH, Finkbeiner SM, Cooper MS, Smith SJ. Glutamate induces calcium waves in cultured astrocytes: long-range glial signaling. Science. 1990; 247:470–473. [PubMed: 1967852]
60. Shigetomi E, Kracun S, Sofroniew MV, Khakh BS. A genetically targeted optical sensor to monitor calcium signals in astrocyte processes. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13:759–766. [PubMed:
20495558]
61. Cotrina ML, Lin JH, Alves-Rodrigues A, Liu S, Li J, Azmi-Ghadimi H, Kang J, Naus CC,
Nedergaard M. Connexins regulate calcium signaling by controlling ATP release. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA. 1998; 95:15735–15740. [PubMed: 9861039]
62. Kimelberg HK, Anderson E, Kettenmann H. Swelling-induced changes in electrophysiological properties of cultured astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. II. Whole-cell currents. Brain Res. 1990;
529:262–268. [PubMed: 2282496]
63. Porter JT, McCarthy KD. Adenosine receptors modulate [Ca2+]i in hippocampal astrocytes in situ.
J Neurochem. 1995; 65:1515–1523. [PubMed: 7561845]
64. Kang J, Jiang L, Goldman SA, Nedergaard M. Astrocyte-mediated potentiation of inhibitory synaptic transmission. Nat Neurosci. 1998; 1:683–692. [PubMed: 10196584]
65. Duffy S, MacVicar BA. Adrenergic calcium signaling in astrocyte networks within the hippocampal slice. J Neurosci. 1995; 15:5535–5550. [PubMed: 7643199]
66. Cotrina ML, Lin JH, Lopez-Garcia JC, Naus CC, Nedergaard M. ATP-mediated glia signaling. J
Neurosci. 2000; 20:2835–2844. [PubMed: 10751435]
67. Porter JT, McCarthy KD. GFAP-positive hippocampal astrocytes in situ respond to glutamatergic neuroligands with increases in [Ca2+]i. Glia. 1995; 13:101–112. [PubMed: 7544323]
68. Parri HR, Crunelli V. The role of Ca2+ in the generation of spontaneous astrocytic Ca2+ oscillations. Neuroscience. 2003; 120:979–992. [PubMed: 12927204]
69. Parri HR, Gould TM, Crunelli V. Spontaneous astrocytic Ca2+ oscillations in situ drive NMDARmediated neuronal excitation. Nat Neurosci. 2001; 4:803–812. [PubMed: 11477426]
70. Nett WJ, Oloff SH, McCarthy KD. Hippocampal astrocytes in situ exhibit calcium oscillations that occur independent of neuronal activity. J Neurophysiol. 2002; 87:528–537. [PubMed: 11784768]
71. Zur Nieden R, Deitmer JW. The role of metabotropic glutamate receptors for the generation of calcium oscillations in rat hippocampal astrocytes in situ. Cereb Cortex. 2006; 16:676–687.
[PubMed: 16079243]
72. Bekar LK, He W, Nedergaard M. Locus coeruleus alpha-adrenergic-mediated activation of cortical astrocytes in vivo. Cereb Cortex. 2008; 18:2789–2795. [PubMed: 18372288]
73. Wang X, Lou N, Xu Q, Tian GF, Peng WG, Han X, Kang J, Takano T, Nedergaard M. Astrocytic
Ca2+ signaling evoked by sensory stimulation in vivo. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 9:816–823. [PubMed:
16699507]
74. Schummers J, Yu H, Sur M. Tuned responses of astrocytes and their influence on hemodynamic signals in the visual cortex. Science. 2008; 320:1638–1643. [PubMed: 18566287]
75. Araque A, Martin ED, Perea G, Arellano JI, Buno W. Synaptically released acetylcholine evokes
Ca2+ elevations in astrocytes in hippocampal slices. J Neurosci. 2002; 22:2443–2450. [PubMed:
11923408]
76. Bezzi P, Carmignoto G, Pasti L, Vesce S, Rossi D, Rizzini BL, Pozzan T, Volterra A.
Prostaglandins stimulate calcium-dependent glutamate release in astrocytes. Nature. 1998;
391:281–285. [PubMed: 9440691]
77. Bowser DN, Khakh BS. ATP excites interneurons and astrocytes to increase synaptic inhibition in neuronal networks. J Neurosci. 2004; 24:8606–8620. [PubMed: 15456834]
78. Perea G, Araque A. Properties of synaptically evoked astrocyte calcium signal reveal synaptic information processing by astrocytes. J Neurosci. 2005; 25:2192–2203. [PubMed: 15745945]
79. Navarrete M, Araque A. Endocannabinoids mediate neuron-astrocyte communication. Neuron.
2008; 57:883–893. [PubMed: 18367089]
80. Porter JT, McCarthy KD. Hippocampal astrocytes in situ respond to glutamate released from synaptic terminals. J Neurosci. 1996; 16:5073–5081. [PubMed: 8756437]
81. Piet R, Jahr CE. Glutamatergic and purinergic receptor-mediated calcium transients in Bergmann glial cells. J Neurosci. 2007; 27:4027–4035. [PubMed: 17428980]
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 14
82. Beierlein M, Regehr WG. Brief bursts of parallel fiber activity trigger calcium signals in bergmann glia. J Neurosci. 2006; 26:6958–6967. [PubMed: 16807325]
83. Matyash V, Filippov V, Mohrhagen K, Kettenmann H. Nitric oxide signals parallel fiber activity to
Bergmann glial cells in the mouse cerebellar slice. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2001; 18:664–670.
[PubMed: 11749041]
84. Kulik A, Haentzsch A, Luckermann M, Reichelt W, Ballanyi K. Neuronglia signaling via alpha(1) adrenoceptor-mediated Ca(2+) release in Bergmann glial cells in situ. J Neurosci. 1999; 19:8401–
8408. [PubMed: 10493741]
85. Newman EA. Calcium increases in retinal glial cells evoked by light-induced neuronal activity. J
Neurosci. 2005; 25:5502–5510. [PubMed: 15944378]
86. Rieger A, Deitmer JW, Lohr C. Axon-glia communication evokes calcium signaling in olfactory ensheathing cells of the developing olfactory bulb. Glia. 2007; 55:352–359. [PubMed: 17136772]
87. Takata N, Hirase H. Cortical layer 1 and layer 2/3 astrocytes exhibit distinct calcium dynamics in vivo. PLoS One. 2008; 3:e2525. [PubMed: 18575586]
88. Shigetomi E, Bowser DN, Sofroniew MV, Khakh BS. Two forms of astrocyte calcium excitability have distinct effects on NMDA receptor-mediated slow inward currents in pyramidal neurons. J
Neurosci. 2008; 28:6659–6663. [PubMed: 18579739]
89. Haas B, Schipke CG, Peters O, Sohl G, Willecke K, Kettenmann H. Activity-dependent ATPwaves in the mouse neocortex are independent from astrocytic calcium waves. Cereb Cortex.
2006; 16:237–246. [PubMed: 15930372]
90. Schipke CG, Boucsein C, Ohlemeyer C, Kirchhoff F, Kettenmann H. Astrocyte Ca2+ waves trigger responses in microglial cells in brain slices. FASEB J. 2002; 16:255–257. [PubMed:
11772946]
91. Beattie EC, Stellwagen D, Morishita W, Bresnahan JC, Ha BK, Von Zastrow M, Beattie MS,
Malenka RC. Control of synaptic strength by glial TNFalpha. Science. 2002; 295:2282–2285.
[PubMed: 11910117]
92. Cotrina ML, Lin JH, Nedergaard M. Cytoskeletal assembly and ATP release regulate astrocytic calcium signaling. J Neurosci. 1998; 18:8794–8804. [PubMed: 9786986]
93. Parpura V, Basarsky TA, Liu F, Jeftinija K, Jeftinija S, Haydon PG. Glutamate-mediated astrocyteneuron signalling. Nature. 1994; 369:744–747. [PubMed: 7911978]
94. Zonta M, Angulo MC, Gobbo S, Rosengarten B, Hossmann KA, Pozzan T, Carmignoto G.
Neuron-to-astrocyte signaling is central to the dynamic control of brain microcirculation. Nat
Neurosci. 2003; 6:43–50. [PubMed: 12469126]
95. Schell MJ, Molliver ME, Snyder SH. D-serine, an endogenous synaptic modulator: localization to astrocytes and glutamate-stimulated release. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995; 92:3948–3952.
[PubMed: 7732010]
96. Stellwagen D, Malenka RC. Synaptic scaling mediated by glial TNF-alpha. Nature. 2006;
440:1054–1059. [PubMed: 16547515]
97. Pascual O, Casper KB, Kubera C, Zhang J, Revilla-Sanchez R, Sul JY, Takano H, Moss SJ,
McCarthy K, Haydon PG. Astrocytic purinergic signaling coordinates synaptic networks. Science.
2005; 310:113–116. [PubMed: 16210541]
98. Henneberger C, Papouin T, Oliet SH, Rusakov DA. Long-term potentiation depends on release of
D-serine from astrocytes. Nature. 2010; 463:232–236. [PubMed: 20075918]
99. Tian GF, Azmi H, Takano T, Xu Q, Peng W, Lin J, Oberheim N, Lou N, Wang X, Zielke HR,
Kang J, Nedergaard M. An astrocytic basis of epilepsy. Nat Med. 2005; 11:973–981. [PubMed:
16116433]
100. Jourdain P, Bergersen LH, Bhaukaurally K, Bezzi P, Santello M, Domercq M, Matute C, Tonello
F, Gundersen V, Volterra A. Glutamate exocytosis from astrocytes controls synaptic strength.
Nat Neurosci. 2007; 10:331–339. [PubMed: 17310248]
101. Liu QS, Xu Q, Kang J, Nedergaard M. Astrocyte activation of presynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptors modulates hippocampal inhibitory synaptic transmission. Neuron Glia Biol.
2004; 1:307–316. [PubMed: 16755304]
102. Liu QS, Xu Q, Arcuino G, Kang J, Nedergaard M. Astrocyte-mediated activation of neuronal kainate receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101:3172–3177. [PubMed: 14766987]
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 15
103. Brockhaus J, Deitmer JW. Long-lasting modulation of synaptic input to Purkinje neurons by
Bergmann glia stimulation in rat brain slices. J Physiol. 2002; 545:581–593. [PubMed:
12456836]
104. Lee S, Yoon BE, Berglund K, Oh SJ, Park H, Shin HS, Augustine GJ, Lee CJ. Channel-mediated tonic GABA release from glia. Science. 2010; 330:790–796. [PubMed: 20929730]
105. Kozlov AS, Angulo MC, Audinat E, Charpak S. Target cell-specific modulation of neuronal activity by astrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103:10058–10063. [PubMed: 16782808]
106. Newman EA, Zahs KR. Modulation of neuronal activity by glial cells in the retina. J Neurosci.
1998; 18:4022–4028. [PubMed: 9592083]
107. Newman EA. Glial cell inhibition of neurons by release of ATP. J Neurosci. 2003; 23:1659–1666.
[PubMed: 12629170]
108. Agulhon C, Fiacco TA, McCarthy KD. Hippocampal short- and long-term plasticity are not modulated by astrocyte Ca2+ signaling. Science. 2010; 327:1250–1254. [PubMed: 20203048]
109. Fiacco TA, Agulhon C, Taves SR, Petravicz J, Casper KB, Dong X, Chen J, McCarthy KD.
Selective stimulation of astrocyte calcium in situ does not affect neuronal excitatory synaptic activity. Neuron. 2007; 54:611–626. [PubMed: 17521573]
110. Petravicz J, Fiacco TA, McCarthy KD. Loss of IP3 receptor-dependent Ca2+ increases in hippocampal astrocytes does not affect baseline CA1 pyramidal neuron synaptic activity. J
Neurosci. 2008; 28:4967–4973. [PubMed: 18463250]
111. Rouach N, Avignone E, Meme W, Koulakoff A, Venance L, Blomstrand F, Giaume C. Gap junctions and connexin expression in the normal and pathological central nervous system. Biol
Cell. 2002; 94:457–475. [PubMed: 12566220]
112. Houades V, Rouach N, Ezan P, Kirchhoff F, Koulakoff A, Giaume C. Shapes of astrocyte networks in the juvenile brain. Neuron Glia Biol. 2006; 2:3–14. [PubMed: 18634587]
113. Houades V, Koulakoff A, Ezan P, Seif I, Giaume C. Gap junction-mediated astrocytic networks in the mouse barrel cortex. J Neurosci. 2008; 28:5207–5217. [PubMed: 18480277]
114. Muller T, Moller T, Neuhaus J, Kettenmann H. Electrical coupling among Bergmann glial cells and its modulation by glutamate receptor activation. Glia. 1996; 17:274–284. [PubMed:
8856324]
115. Wiencken-Barger AE, Djukic B, Casper KB, McCarthy KD. A role for Connexin43 during neurodevelopment. Glia. 2007; 55:675–686. [PubMed: 17311295]
116. Theis M, Jauch R, Zhuo L, Speidel D, Wallraff A, Doring B, Frisch C, Sohl G, Teubner B,
Euwens C, Huston J, Steinhauser C, Messing A, Heinemann U, Willecke K. Accelerated hippocampal spreading depression and enhanced locomotory activity in mice with astrocytedirected inactivation of connexin43. J Neurosci. 2003; 23:766–776. [PubMed: 12574405]
117. Wallraff A, Kohling R, Heinemann U, Theis M, Willecke K, Steinhauser C. The impact of astrocytic gap junctional coupling on potassium buffering in the hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2006;
26:5438–5447. [PubMed: 16707796]
118. Takano T, Kang J, Jaiswal JK, Simon SM, Lin JH, Yu Y, Li Y, Yang J, Dienel G, Zielke HR,
Nedergaard M. Receptor-mediated glutamate release from volume sensitive channels in astrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102:16466–16471. [PubMed: 16254051]
119. Ye ZC, Oberheim N, Kettenmann H, Ransom BR. Pharmacological “cross-inhibition” of connexin hemichannels and swelling activated anion channels. Glia. 2009; 57:258–269.
[PubMed: 18837047]
120. Ye ZC, Wyeth MS, Baltan-Tekkok S, Ransom BR. Functional hemichannels in astrocytes: a novel mechanism of glutamate release. J Neurosci. 2003; 23:3588–3596. [PubMed: 12736329]
121. Hewett JA. Determinants of regional and local diversity within the astroglial lineage of the normal central nervous system. J Neurochem. 2009; 110:1717–1736. [PubMed: 19627442]
122. Silver J, Miller JH. Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004; 5:146–156.
[PubMed: 14735117]
123. Pekny M, Nilsson M. Astrocyte activation and reactive gliosis. Glia. 2005; 50:427–434.
[PubMed: 15846805]
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 16
124. Benediktsson AM, Schachtele SJ, Green SH, Dailey ME. Ballistic labeling and dynamic imaging of astrocytes in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. J Neurosci Methods. 2005; 141:41–53.
[PubMed: 15585287]
125. Hirrlinger J, Hulsmann S, Kirchhoff F. Astroglial processes show spontaneous motility at active synaptic terminals in situ. Eur J Neurosci. 2004; 20:2235–2239. [PubMed: 15450103]
126. Nishida H, Okabe S. Direct astrocytic contacts regulate local maturation of dendritic spines. J
Neurosci. 2007; 27:331–340. [PubMed: 17215394]
127. Oliet SH, Piet R, Poulain DA. Control of glutamate clearance and synaptic efficacy by glial coverage of neurons. Science. 2001; 292:923–926. [PubMed: 11340204]
128. Piet R, Vargova L, Sykova E, Poulain DA, Oliet SH. Physiological contribution of the astrocytic environment of neurons to intersynaptic crosstalk. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101:2151–
2155. [PubMed: 14766975]
129. Levison SW, Young GM, Goldman JE. Cycling cells in the adult rat neocortex preferentially generate oligodendroglia. J Neurosci Res. 1999; 57:435–446. [PubMed: 10440893]
130. Goldman SA, Zukhar A, Barami K, Mikawa T, Niedzwiecki D. Ependymal/subependymal zone cells of postnatal and adult songbird brain generate both neurons and nonneuronal siblings in vitro and in vivo. J Neurobiol. 1996; 30:505–520. [PubMed: 8844514]
131. Gray G, Sanes J. Lineage of radial glia in the chicken optic tectum. Development. 1992; 114:271–
283. [PubMed: 1576964]
132. Malatesta P, Hack MA, Hartfuss E, Kettenmann H, Klinkert W, Kirchhoff F, Gotz M. Neuronal or glial progeny: regional differences in radial glia fate. Neuron. 2003; 37:751–764. [PubMed:
12628166]
133. Goldman JE. Lineage, migration, and fate determination of postnatal subventricular zone cells in the mammalian CNS. J Neurooncol. 1995; 24:61–64. [PubMed: 8523077]
134. Marshall CA, Goldman JE. Subpallial dlx2-expressing cells give rise to astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in the cerebral cortex and white matter. J Neurosci. 2002; 22:9821–9830.
[PubMed: 12427838]
135. Beckervordersandforth R, Tripathi P, Ninkovic J, Bayam E, Lepier A, Stempfhuber B, Kirchhoff
F, Hirrlinger J, Haslinger A, Lie DC, Beckers J, Yoder B, Irmler M, Gotz M. In vivo fate mapping and expression analysis reveals molecular hallmarks of prospectively isolated adult neural stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2010; 7:744–758. [PubMed: 21112568]
136. Ono K, Takebayashi H, Ikeda K, Furusho M, Nishizawa T, Watanabe K, Ikenaka K. Regionaland temporal-dependent changes in the differentiation of Olig2 progenitors in the forebrain, and the impact on astrocyte development in the dorsal pallium. Dev Biol. 2008; 320:456–468.
[PubMed: 18582453]
137. Zhou Q, Anderson DJ. The bHLH transcription factors OLIG2 and OLIG1 couple neuronal and glial subtype specification. Cell. 2002; 109:61–73. [PubMed: 11955447]
138. Zhou Q, Wang S, Anderson DJ. Identification of a novel family of oligodendrocyte lineagespecific basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors. Neuron. 2000; 25:331–343. [PubMed:
10719889]
139. Masahira N, Takebayashi H, Ono K, Watanabe K, Ding L, Furusho M, Ogawa Y, Nabeshima Y,
Alvarez-Buylla A, Shimizu K, Ikenaka K. Olig2-positive progenitors in the embryonic spinal cord give rise not only to motoneurons and oligodendrocytes, but also to a subset of astrocytes and ependymal cells. Dev Biol. 2006; 293:358–369. [PubMed: 16581057]
140. Hochstim C, Deneen B, Lukaszewicz A, Zhou Q, Anderson DJ. Identification of positionally distinct astrocyte subtypes whose identities are specified by a homeodomain code. Cell. 2008;
133:510–522. [PubMed: 18455991]
141. Retzius G. Die neuroglia des Gehirns beim Menschen und bei Saeugethieren. Biol
Untersuchungen. 1894; 6:1–28.
142. Colombo JA, Reisin HD. Interlaminar astroglia of the cerebral cortex: a marker of the primate brain. Brain Res. 2004; 1006:126–131. [PubMed: 15047031]
143. Colombo JA, Yanez A, Puissant V, Lipina S. Long, interlaminar astroglial cell processes in the cortex of adult monkeys. J Neurosci Res. 1995; 40:551–556. [PubMed: 7616615]
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 17
144. Colombo JA. Interlaminar astroglial processes in the cerebral cortex of adult monkeys but not of adult rats. Acta Anat (Basel). 1996; 155:57–62. [PubMed: 8811116]
145. Garcia-Marin V, Garcia-Lopez P, Freire M. Cajal's contributions to glia research. Trends
Neurosci. 2007; 30:479–487. [PubMed: 17765327]
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 18
Fig. 1.
Prototypical astrocytic morphologies. (a) Cajal's drawing of astrocytes (indicated by “A”) in the pyramidal layer of the human hippocampus (indicated by “D”), twin astrocytes
(indicated by “B”) and a satellite cell called the “third element” by Cajal (indicated by “a”).
Sublimated gold chloride method. (b) Different astrocytes (indicated by “A,” “B,” “C” and
“D”) surrounding neuronal somas in the pyramidal layer of the human hippocampus. (c)
Cajal's drawing of fi brous astrocytes of human cerebral cortex surrounding a blood vessel.
Reproduced from (145).
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 19
Fig. 2.
Astrocytic domain organization varies with pathology. The domain organization of protoplasmic astrocytes is lost in epileptic brains, but maintained in neurodegeneration. (a)
Reactive astrocytes 1 week post-iron injection lose the domain organization. Diolistic labelling of the cortex of a GFAP-GFP mouse 1 week post-iron injection near injection site.
Two adjacent GFP positive astrocytes are labeled with DiI and DiD. DAPI, blue, GFP, green, DiI, red, DiD, white. (b–e) High power of yellow box in (a). area of overlap delineated in grey, red line is border of the domain of the red cell, green line is the border of the domain of the white cell. (g–h) Yellow lines indicate the processes of the cell that pass into the domain of the adjacent cell's domain represented by the dotted line. (f) Cortical astrocytes in an Alzheimer disease model Tg2576 become reactive, but do not lose the domain organization. Diolistic labelling of cortical astrocytes in Tg2576 mouse. (g–j) High power of blue box in (f) showing limited overlap between adjacent cells. (k–n) Adjacent control astrocytes demonstrating the domain organization. Scale: (a) 20
μ
m; (g–h) 10
μ
m.
From (22).
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 20
Fig. 3.
Astrocytic expression of glutamate transporters varies in different areas of the CNS. Doubletransgenic mice expressing fl orescent proteins under the GLAST and GLT-1 promoters were used to study the expression of GLAST and GLT-1 during development of the CNS.
All images are sagittal sections from GLAST–DsRed/GLT-1–eGFP double-transgenic mice.
(a) Composite fluorescent image showing the expression of DsRed (GLAST) ( red) and eGFP (GLT-1) ( green) in the brain at P1. (b) Composite image showing the expression of
DsRed (GLAST) and eGFP (GLT-1) in the P24 brain. (c–e) Fluorescent images of the cerebellum at P1 (c) and P24 (d, e). Both GLAST and GLT-1 promoters were active in
Bergmann glia (Bg) ( yellow arrows in (e)), although neither promoter was active in Purkinje neurons ( white arrows in (e)). (f–h) Fluorescent images of the cortex from P1 (f) and P24 (g,
h). Layer 4 is shown at higher magnification in (h). (i–k) Fluorescent images of the hippocampus from a P1 (i) or P24 (j, k). Both DsRed (GLAST) and eGFP (GLT-1) were expressed by radial glia in the dentate gyrus ( yellow arrows in (k)). (l–n) Fluorescent images of spinal cord from a P1 (l) or P24 (m, n). gm gray matter; wm white matter. A region of the
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 21 ventral white matter is shown at a higher magnification in (n). Scale: (a–b) 2 mm; (c, d) 300
μ
m; (e) 50
μ
m; (f, g) 300
μ
m; (h) 50
μ
m; (i, j), 300
μ
m; (k) 50
μ
m; (l, m) 300
μ
m; (n)
50
μ
m. From (55).
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 22
Fig. 4.
Four major classes of GFAP
+
cells coreside within the human neocortex. Human brains were immunolabeled with GFAP and analyzed throughout all layers of the cortex to determine subclasses of human astrocytes. Layer 1 is composed of the cell bodies of interlaminar astrocytes, whose processes extend over millimetre lengths through layers 2–4 and are characterized by their tortuous morphology. Protoplasmic astrocytes, the most common, reside in layers 2–6. Polarized astrocytes are found only in humans and are seen sparsely in layers 5–6. They extend millimetre-long processes that are characterized by varicosities. Fibrous astrocytes are found in the white matter and contain numerous overlapping processes.
Yellow lines indicate areas in which the different classes of astrocytes reside. Scale = 150
μ m. Reproduced from (8).
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 23
Fig. 5.
Hominid-specific astrocytic phenotypes pervade the human brain. (a) Varicose projection astrocytes reside in layers 5–6 and extend long processes characterized by evenly spaced varicosities. GFAP, white, MAP2,red, DAPI,blue.Yellow arrowheads indicate numerous long processes. (b) Pial surface and layers 1–2 of human cortex. GFAP, white,
DAPI, blue.Yellow line indicates border between layers I and II. (c) Process from a varicose projection astrocyte. GFAP, white. (d) Interlaminar astrocyte processes characterized by their tortuousity. GFAP, white. Scale: (a,b) 100
μ m; (c,d) = 10
μ m. Reproduced from (8).
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.

Oberheim et al.
Page 24
Fig. 6.
Human astrocytes are larger and more complex than rodent and other primates. Mouse,
Rhesus Monkey, and Human astrocytes are compared by GFAP staining ( white). Scale = 20
μ m.
Methods Mol Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 26.