Media Release, 6 March 2009
TDR Annual Report – Call Targets Exceeded, More Members Needed
High Call Volumes and Complaint Types
The number of calls coming into the newly-developed Telecommunication Dispute
Resolution scheme has exceeded its target by nearly 40 per cent in the first year of its
operation.
The scheme released its Annual Report today, which includes information about how
many calls were received in its first year, and what the calls were about. TDR received
1396 calls, when it had projected there would be only 1000.
The majority were complaints about billing (34%). Most of these were about disputed
amounts and responsibility for payment. There were also complaints about data usage,
credit adjustment issues and account errors.
The next two most common types of complaint were about customer service (18%) and
faults (15%).
Over 38 percent of the year’s total number of calls were unable to be progressed
however, because the consumer hadn’t first made their complaint to their
telecommunication company – one of the requirements of using TDR.
The TDR service was implemented and is managed by Dispute Resolution Services
Ltd (DRSL). DRSL General Manager Neil McKellar said there had been a significant
increase in this type of call over the first year.
“This shows more consumers have become aware of the existence of TDR but not
necessarily the details of the Scheme,” he said.
1
TDR can only help with complaints where the telecommunication company is a
member of the TDR scheme, and where the consumer has already made the complaint
to the company involved. Scheme Members are responsible for promoting TDR to their
customers.
Systemic Issues
The TDR scheme is also tasked with identifying systemic issues in the
telecommunication industry. TDR results show there are four areas of concern;
complaint handling, contracts, damage to mobile phones and problems for customers
who are using more than one telecommunication provider.
Mr McKellar said it was clear from the calls received by the scheme showed that there
needed to be more information for consumers about what constitutes a complaint and
more consistency was needed across the industry regarding how complaints are
handled.
Council Chairman Comments
The TDR Council’s chairman, consumer advocate David Russell, said two aspects of
the scheme’s first year of operation had impressed him. One was the responsible
attitude the Scheme Members had taken to resolving disputes. The lack of cases that
made their way through the four-tier dispute resolution process made it clear that
Scheme Members’ internal complaint handling processes were working well.
Mr Russell also said he was impressed with the management of the Scheme. The
scheme agent, Dispute Resolution Services Ltd. (DRSL) was operating the scheme
efficiently and fairly he said, which was borne out by the very high ‘recommendation
rating’ – 92% of surveyed consumers said they would recommend TDR.
However Mr Russell expressed some concern about willingness of some
telecommunication companies to join the scheme.
“A lack of full industry acceptance of the Scheme is another matter to be tackled. Selfregulatory industry/consumer complaint handling schemes, when soundly based on an
equal partnership, are efficient, adaptable to change and very cost effective.
2
However, for self-regulatory schemes to work there needs to be participation of all
major companies in a sector, supported by a very high sign-up by smaller operators,”
he said.
The companies that have signed up to TDR account for more than 98% of the total
residential and small business telecommunication consumer market, but Mr Russell
said he was seriously concerned that those companies that had not joined were not
showing the commitment to customer service.
“Ideally we would like TDR to provide coverage to all residential and small business
telecommunication consumers”, he said.
Statistics

Majority of calls were from Auckland and Wellington.

94% of calls resolved within eight business hours

80% of calls answered within 20 seconds

Total cost to run TDR scheme for the year; $430,000
History & Operation
TDR is a free service, which can be used by any residential or small business
consumer whose telecommunications company is a member of the TDR scheme.
Consumers must have raised their complaint with their telecommunication company
first, and given the company a chance to respond. If the consumer is not happy with
the outcome or it has taken more than six weeks to resolve, TDR can get involved.
The service has been established by the Telecommunications Carriers’ Forum (TCF) –
a collective of telecommunication companies – along with leading consumer advocates
such as Consumers’ Institute, TUANZ and Citizens Advice Bureaux.
The TCF established the TDR Council, made up of half industry and half consumer
representatives, to provide the overall governance of the service.
A full copy of the quarterly report can be found on the TDR website www.tdr.org.nz.
Ends
3
Contacts:
For TDR
David Russell, Telecommunication Dispute Resolution Council Chair
Phone:
04–313144 or 027–449 4460
Email:
djkrussell@gmail.com
For the Telecommunication Carriers’ Forum (TCF)
Ralph Chivers, TCF CEO
Mobile:
021 576 424
For Dispute Resolution Services Ltd.
Neil McKellar, Dispute Resolution Services General Manager
Phone:
03–9629073
Mobile:
0274 999 949
Email:
neil.mckellar@drsl.co.nz
For a copy of the Annual Report on-line:
http://www.tdr.org.nz/about-scheme/news-and-publications
4
Scheme Members:
Airnet NZ Ltd
Communitel
Digital Island
Eziphone
Faxware International Limited t/a TNZ Group
Genesis – InfoGen
igrin Internet
Kordia
Orcon
Snap Internet
Telecom
Xtra
TelstraClear
Vodafone
WorldxChange
Websites:
Telecommunication Dispute Resolution
www.tdr.org.nz
Previous report and press releases
www.tdr.org.nz/about-scheme/news-and-publications
Telecommunication Carriers’ Forum
www.tcf.org.nz
Dispute Resolution Services Ltd.
www.drsl.co.nz
5
Background:
The TDR service was established by the Telecommunication Carriers’ Forum, and is
based on a Customer Complaints Code that has been agreed to by the TCF members.
Development of the Code began in May 2005, and it was formally endorsed by the TCF
late 2006. The TCF then established a Council to govern the Scheme and appoint a
company to implement the service.
The formal structure:
6