Attachment A c/o PRRM Building , 56 Mo. Ignacia Ave., cor Sct.Lazcano St, Quezon City, Philippines Phone – 372-4989 FAX – 372-4995 Email: gfp@lists.riseup.net URL: http://www.yonip.com/gfp PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT (prep for Women 2004) Prepared by Cora Fabros for the Philippine Reader on US Bases Outline/Reference for the Powerpoint Presentation (with reference notes): 1. Introduction: Brief History of US Military Bases & Presence in the Phils.and Asia. For almost a century the United States bases in the Philippines have been the hub of American Military operations in Asia and the Pacific when the first US Visiting Forces trampled on Philippine soil in 1899, they undermined the freedom and sovereignty of our newly born Republic, waged a war of conquest and colonized the country to gain a market and military stronghold in Asia. The bloody US conquest in 1899 caused the death of more than 600,000 Filipinos, mostly civilians, or one-sixth of our population then. Historians have called that era of the Philippine-American War as "America's First Vietnam in Asia." The biggest US military facilities, staging area for US WARS OF AGGRESSION – China, Korea, Vietnam, Iran-Iraq War Regional center for the CIA's covert operations against Indonesia and against the national liberation movements in Indochina as storage, fueling, maintenance, training and communications stations 2. Factual Data on US Military Bases and Installations prior to 1992 Military Aid, military presence, Treaties and Agreements, etc Before 1992, the United States occupies and maintains seven military facilities in the Philippines of which Clark Air base and Subic Naval Base are considered the largest and the most strategic in terms of function and geographical location Name of the Base 1. John Hay Air Station Total Area 695 Hectares 4. San Miguel Naval Communications Stations 5. O’Donnel Transmitter Station 6. Subic Naval Base Location Baguio City, Benguet San Fernando, La Union Capas, Tarlac San Antonio, Zambales Capas. tarlac Subic Bay 7. Clark Air Base Pampanga 4,440 Hectares 2. Camp Wallace Air Station 3. US Naval Radio Station 202 Hectares Function Communications, Training, Rest & Recreation Training, Communications 356 Hectares 1,112 Hectares Communications, Training Communications 1,756 Hectares 6,658 Hectares Communications, Training Weapons Depot, Training, Communications, SRF, Navy Weapons Depot, Training, Commnunication, Airforce Clark - Spread across the provinces of Pampanga and Tarlac, about the size of Singapore. Largest US military installation in Asia. With capacity to store petroleum, oil and lubricants of 25 million gallons and a 200,000 square meter storage for ammunition for the US Air Force. Subic Bay - a deep-water harbor, formed by volcanic activity. Developed as a naval station in 1884 by the Spaniards, it was eventually taken over by the Americans in 1904 and made it into a naval reservation where a modern ship repair facility was developed in 1906. At the height of its operation by US Navy, it was the largest naval supply depot in the world, handling 1 million barrels of fuel each month. The US armed forces prided itself as the biggest fuel depot ever that can supply even for a hundred wars. It also served as a major ship repair facility for all US combat ships in the Asian region Connecting the two bases is a 40-kilometer underground fuel pipeline, which traverses rugged mountainous areas, farms and heavily populated towns and cities PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 2 3. Impacts and Implications of US military bases and presence: On local communities - toxic contamination, noise pollution, damage to property - TOXIC LEGACY IN THE FORMER US BASE On the economy – highly dependent on the economy servicing US military presence: entertainment, service providers on and off base Women, children, Amerasians: prostitution, rape, sexual abuse, unrecognized & neglected children out of casual sex, injustice Indigenous Peoples – ancestral lands expropriated unjustly Foreign policy, sovereignty – subservience to US interest Human rights, Crimes of servicemen – Not a single US soldier was tried in Phil. Court under Phil. Laws On people’s security – source of people’s insecurity – “BASES of our Insecurity” - - Prof. Roland Simbulan On the environment – the Toxic Legacy of US presence in the Phililippines “I can recall, as commanding officer of an aircraft carrier in 1970, being closely monitored in the US ports to insure proper control and disposal of waste material. This increased caution was not evident to me here in Subic Bay in 1971 where ships, our aircraft and our industrial facilities were spewing polluted materials into the air, water and soil with no regards for the short-term or longterm effects… When one adds the long-term effects of the discharge of untreated sewage, leakage and escape of PCB from electrical generators, it is beyond doubt that Subic Bay is contaminated in many ways which threaten the long-term health and safety of local residents.” (Admiral Eugene Carrol Jr., retired, US Navy, former Commander of US Aircraft Carrier Midway in “US Military Bases and the Environment,” 1996 International Forum on US Military Toxics and Bases Clean-up, Manila, Philippines. Sponsored by the People’s Task Force for Bases Clean-up & the Nuclear-Free Philippines Coalition.) Toxic Legacy in the Former Bases After the pullout of American personnel from the military bases in Subic Bay, it was noticed that there was high incidence of rare ailments among communities in and around rivers and tributaries into and out of the naval base. Meanwhile, at CABCOM, the settlers noted this odd taste and oily sheen in their drinking water. People got sick and this was where People’s Task Force for Bases Clean Up (then a program under the Nuclear Free Philippines Coalition) began its work of closely monitoring PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 3 health cases. When high incidence of documented cases became apparent, environmental as well as health research, calling on toxicologists, epidemiologists, and other organizations to provide the needed expertise was imperative in its lobby and information work to call for US responsibility. Like all human beings, the residents of these communities needed water. The river tributaries of Subic Bay provided the people with a place to bathe, swim, and play in, a source of livelihood, and groundwater. In Cabcom, 203 shallow pump wells were installed as source of water for the settlers. The settlers did not know they were located on what used to be a motor pool, a place where the Americans’ engines were serviced and maintained. The toxic wastes did not strike through water alone. According to studies, water, air and soil-borne toxic materials were present in dangerous amounts at both Clark and Subic bases. Ironically, the report that triggered further investigation and studies on the former military bases was revealed by the US government itself. In 1992, the US General Accounting Office reported contaminated sites in Clark and Subic. The report revealed that that US did not comply with its own environmental laws in the operation of the bases in the Philippines. It likewise acknowledged that the cost of the cleanup could approach Superfund proportions. Following the GAO report were studies done by: 1) the World Health Organization (WHO), which identified water pollutants present in the bases in 1993; 2) the Philippine Department of Health (DOH) in 1995, which found oil and grease in water samples taken from wells in Clark; 3) Canadian epidemiologist Rosalie Bertell, which in 1998 noted “startlingly high” levels of kidney diseases in 13 communities around Clark; 4) Woodward-Clyde in 1996, which was commissioned by the Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority; 5) Weston International, commissioned by the Clark Devt. Authority, which identified 22 contaminated sites in Clark in 1997; 6) The Philippine Commission on Human Rights, which in 1999 started supporting the victims. 7) Another DOH study in 1999 to determine the extent of health impact of toxic contamination in Clark alone. The studies identified 27 contaminated sites at Clark and 19 at Subic. The WHO Mission Report, particularly, said that landfills on site were used for dumping all kinds of waste, including toxic and hazardous waste materials; and that industrial waste waters, untreated sewage and polluted storm water drains were all directly discharged to Subic Bay, PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 4 mostly without treatment. They revealed that heavy metals and contaminants ranging from oil and petroleum lubricants, pesticides such as aldrin, dieldrin and DDT to PCBs, lead, mercury, arsenic, asbestos and others were found in various levels exceeding Philippine National Standards The study conducted by Woodward-Clyde International noted that the pipeline connecting the two bases is a “potential source of leaks and spills.” It corroborated GAO Report that the pipeline did not have leakdetection facilities for almost 100 years that they had been using it. The studies gave credence to earlier reports, including that of the Philippines Center for Investigative Journalism in 1992, which featured a US Navy veteran from Subic who claimed that the Navy incessantly produced industrial toxic chemicals and discarded them without regard. He recalled how the US routinely flushed and left behind a trail of waste and toxic materials in the process of ship repair (Admiral Eugene Carrol, Jr. US Navy ret.). The Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances, 1985-1986, states that mercury has been known to cause birth defects such as several cerebral palsy, mental retardation, spontaneous abortion, neurological effects, among others. A People’s Task Force for Bases Clean-up study, reveals that mercury was detected in some of the sediments of Subic Bay. Benzene, toluene, and xylene are all found in gasoline especially jet fuel, industrial solvents, degreasers, adhesives, explosives, asphalt, pesticides, dyes, paint remover, and vehicle emissions. Benzene causes leukemia, aplastic anemia, chromosomal aberrations and bone marrow defects. Toluene damages the kidney and liver and destroys the fetus. Xylene destroys the kidney and causes central nervous system disorder. Greenpeace Toxics Patrol also documented the existence of a transformer in Mabalacat containing PCB, which had been internationally banned for any new use by OECD countries in 1987. In February 2000, it was reported that the transformer, which had already contaminated surrounding soil, was disassembled and drained by residents without appropriate protective gear. PCB (polychlorinated biphenyl), used in power transformers, has immediate and long-term effects on health and environment in both small and high concentrations. It interferes with reproduction, decreased birth weight, reduced head circumference, and premature birth, decreased intellectual performance, suppresses the immune system and induces liver enzymes. Chronic exposure causes skin disorders, promotes tumors in experimental animals and may be carcinogenic in humans. PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 5 Appeal for Justice and International Solidarity Today, the victims’ situation is critical. Death stares them in the eye. Everyday, the families deal with disease and/or death in their midst. The situation is getting to be desperate everyday and it leaves one with a feeling of helplessness and anger. This problem of toxic contamination is not only apparent in the Philippines. It is as well a problem in other parts of the world where the United States used to have or presently have their military facilities. We are also aware of victims of environmental injustice in Guam, Korea, Okinawa, Japan, Puerto Rico, Panama and in the United States itself. Your support and solidarity will go a long way in advancing their struggle for justice. The Historic Senate Rejection of a new Bases Treaty: A Senate that said NO! and the Anti-Bases Movement in the Phils. Philippine Senate’s rejection of new bases treaty (Sept. 16, 1991) Magnificent 12 led by Sen. Wigberto Tanada Legal basis, Freedom from nuclear weapons, Phil. Constitution Philippine Constitution: “ Art. II Sec. 2: The Philippines renounces War as an instrument of national policy, adopts the generally accepted principles of international law as part of the law of the land and adheres to the POLICY OF PEACE, EQUALITY, JUSTICE, FREEDOM, COOPERATION AND AMITY WITH ALL NATIONS Art. II Sec.7: The State shall pursue an INDEPENDENT FOREIGN POLICY Art. II Sec 8: the Philippines, consistent with the national interest, adopts and purses a policy of FREEDOM FROM NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN ITS TERRITORY.” Art. XVIII Sec 25: After the expiration in 1991 of the Agreement between the Republic of the Philippines and the United States of America concerning the Military Bases, foreign military bases, troops or facilities shall not be allowed in the Philippines except under a treaty duly concurred in by the Senate . . and recognized as a treaty by the other contracting State” The US armed forces pulled out of the two bases on Nov. 24, 1992 coinciding with the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo. In the aftermath of the Mt. Pinatubo eruption, some residents of Pampanga were given temporary PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 6 shelters at a 12-hectare site at the Clark Air Base Communications Center or CABCOM. From 1991 to 1999, an estimated 20,000 families were resettled temporarily in CABCOM. The families stayed there for three to five years before they were relocated in different resettlement areas provided by the government Post-independence security agreements like the 1947 Military Bases Agreement which was terminated in 1991, the Military Assistance Agreement of 1947 (later amended as the Mutual Defense Assistance Agreement of 1953) and the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty allowed the United States to control the external defenses of the country while leaving to the Philippine Army and Philippine Constabulary the job of suppressing Filipino revolutionaries. The Visiting Forces Agreement of 1999 restored US troop activities in the Philippines after the rejection of the bases treaty in 1991. Various small and large-scale military exercises have since then been undertaken to justify the restoration of US military presence in the Philippines. These exercises are the following: 1) Carat - a specific amphibious exercise between the US Pacific Fleet and the Philippine Navy involving use of frigates, landing ships, helicopters and P-3C Orion aircraft. Training includes lectures, demonstrations and shipboard tours during port training and highlighted by amphibious exercises between the two navies. 2) Masurvex -this deals with RP-US maritime patrol, surface detection, tracking, reporting and training. It involves the use of maritime surveillance aircraft and P-3C Orion from the US Navy. Activities for this exercise may include day/night surveillance, search and rescue exercise, anti-smuggling operations and maintenance lectures. 3) Palah - this exercise is conducted between US Navy Seals teams and the Philippine Navy Special Warfare Group (SWAG) teams to improve individual and team skills as well as enhance "interoperability" on a vast range of naval special warfare and skills common to maritime special operations forces of both countries. 4) Teak Piston - an airforce-to-airforce exercise which covers instructions on aircraft maintenance on areas such as corrosion control, airframe/sheet metal repair and aerospace ground equipment repair, sea search and rescue, special tactics training, air crew training and on jet engine instrument test equipment procedures. 5) Balance Piston - an infantry exercise dealing with special operations. 6) Handa Series - a Philippine-US bilateral table war game conceived to enhance higher level command and staff interaction between the PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 7 AFP and the US Armed Forces to strengthen military-to-military cooperation and enhance links between the game and future exercises. 7) Flash Piston - this is a navy-to-navy exercise similar to the Palah exercise using a 16-man US Navy Seal team and a Philippine Navy SWAG team. Exercise includes training in the areas of underwater demolition, weapons familiarization, sniper training, direct actions and a field training exercise (FTX) to cap the training. 8) EODX - specialized inter-operability training between the demolition and ordnance experts of the two armed forces. Exercise includes lectures and drills on day/night LIMPET and Improvised Explosive Devise (IED), underwater ordnance, demolition training and VIP protection. 9) Salvex - this is a navy exercise designed to improve Philippine and US skills in ship salvage operations, usually requiring actual operations on sunken ships The MLSA An unconstitutional, one-sided and perilous treaty kept secret from the Filipino people A series of one-sided military agreements: 1) RP-US Military Bases Agreement of 1947 (abrogated Sept. 16, 1991) 2) RP-US Military Assistance Agreement of 1947 o Logistics assistance (surplus war equipment) o US military education and training o Military Advisory Group (JUSMAG) o Disclosure and exchange of classified equipment and operations o AFP tied to US foreign and military policy 3) RP-US Mutual Defense Treaty of 1951 o Outlines general measures in cases of armed external attack on either parties o Strengthened one-sided RP-US relations (especially w/ regard to bases, troops, facilities) o Mutual Defense Board formed in 1958 o Considered the “mother treaty” of the VFA and MLSA 4) RP-US Visiting Forces Agreement of 1999 o Allows unlimited entry of US troops, war vessels and other war materiel and access to military installations and other services in RP o For use during joint military exercises and “other activities” o US troops granted immunity from prosecution in RP courts PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 8 o Opens door for entry of banned nuclear, chemical and biological weapons o Exempts US from taxes, fees, charges o In reality, VFA is a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), a legal cover to bring in troops, vessels and war materiel despite a Constitutional ban and the 1991 bases treaty rejection RP-US Mutual Logistics and Support Agreement of 2002 VFA + MSLA = de facto US bases•An entirely new treaty •A reversal of the 1991 senate decision •A gross violation of the Philippine Constitution •A violation of national sovereignty and territorial integrity Part and parcel of US-led war of aggression and imperialist plunder masquerading as war vs.terrorism 1. The MLSA covers basic elements of an operational base•Supplies – food, water, petroleum, lubricants, clothing, ammunition, parts & components •Support services – billeting, transportation, medical services, operations support (including construction of structures), training services, repair and maintenance, calibration services, storage services, port services •Use of vehicles, other non-lethal equipment •Open access to all ports and military facilities nationwide •RP pays for hosting and servicing US forces 2. The MLSA covers all kinds of overt and covert activities •Military trainings and exercises •Operations and other deployments under the MDT, VFA, MAA •Humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, rescue operations, maritime anti-pollution operations in or out of RP territory participated in by either or both parties 3. MLSA gives military officials power to determine foreign policy •For all its consequences, the MLSA is an agreement between RP and US defense departments •Future “implementing arrangements” will be negotiated and signed by officials of the US Pacific Command (USPACOM) and the AFP •No international body or third party (i.e. UN, ICJ, ICC) is allowed to help resolve disagreements or problems arising from the MLSA 4. MLSA opens door to more US armed intervention and ties RP tighter to US-led war of terror PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 9 •With MLSA in place, RP will most likely be used as launching pad for US war on Iraq and other US designated “enemies” •MLSA makes RP the center of US military operations in Southeast Asia, the 2nd front of Operation Enduring Freedom With ASG, CPP-NPA, possibly MILF, declared as foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs), US has more excuses to militarily intervene in RPMutual Logistics Support Agreement (MLSA) is the Pentagon's logical follow-up to the 1999 Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA). The MLSA is not just about logistics and other military hardware that the US wants to stockpile in the Philippines for use by American forces. It is also about the setting up of facilities, structures and infrastructure to "house" US war materiel in the Philippines. For the Philippine government, this is a necessary document to enable it to comply with the constitutional provision requiring an agreement to allow foreign military "facilities." The VFA had already given the go-signal for the entry of "foreign military troops" under the guise of joint military exercises. All these point to the full restoration of US military presence in the Philippines, but this time using the entire country as one big military base! Under the former Philippine-US Military Bases Agreement (MBA), US troops and facilities could only be stationed or installed inside the bases which were limited in scope and area, all in Luzon island. Now the VFA and the proposed MLSA would cover the ENTIRE Philippines, including southern Mindanao, noted for its close proximity to Indonesia and Malaysia. While it is true that the MLSA does not specifically designate certain basing areas for use by US forces, it offers, like the VFA, the entire Philippines, all its islands, air space and territorial land and water to the US Armed Forces for use in the same functions as bases, namely: training, refueling, replenishment, resupply and possibly even the repair of US naval vessels. But more important is the use of the Philippines once again as a staging area for US interventionist actions in Asia and other parts of the world, as springboard for unilateral actions of a superpower that is behaving like a mad dog after Sept. 11. All our ports and airfields nationwide in all the islands can now be used by the US armed forces. And if the Philippines and the US have stretched the interpretation of the 1999 VFA to include all kinds of military activities on Philippine territory, including actual counter-insurgency missions for US forces, you can imagine what they would do with a document like the MLSA in place. Resisting the Return of U.S. military presence: Post September 11 PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 10 US all out War Against Terror Philippines its "second front" next to Afghanistan in US campaign against terrorism. Philippine Govt. US unconditional support, including the restoration of US military facilities and bases. A good location to restore its military forces in Southeast Asia in the light of threats from Islamic fundamentalist groups especially from Indonesia and Malaysia where the US finds it dangerous to deploy US forces PGMA’s all out War in Mindanao and the Anti-Terrorism campaign in the Philippines - Balikatan Exercises in Mindanao – US special forces deployment in combat areas in Mindanao in the guise of combating terrorism Basilan/Mindanao: the Second Afghanistan The current large-scale Balikatan exercises in the Philippines started in 1991 as a navy-to-navy exercise sponsored by the US CINCPAC (US Pacific Command). The Visiting Forces Agreement (1999) may have succeeded in reversing what the Senate did in 1991. Philippine courts cannot, under the VFA even assume jurisdiction over U.S. soldiers and try them for such crimes as rape, murder, or homicide, committed against Filipinos right here in our own country. Under Art. 5 of the VFA, any offense committed by US soldiers or personnel, no matter how grave or heinous, may be considered "official acts" provided the US commander issues a "military duty" certificate. This was how the US gave immunity to thousands of accused American soldiers from 1947 until Sept. 16, 1991 for their criminal acts on Philippine soil. Although Balikatan military exercises have been going on since 1991, these were temporarily stopped after the Senate rejected the proposed bases treaty. The proposed Military Bases Agreement which was rejected in 1991, covered transient US forces undergoing training. This was, however, resumed after the ratification of the 1999 Visiting Forces Agreement. A shift in the orientation and implementation of Balikatan exercises, however, has occurred after Sept. 11, 2002. Balikatan in early 2002 was intentionally conducted in the Basilan and Zamboanga war zones, this time with live targets in actual military operations, during what former National Security Adviser Roilo Golez calls "on-the-job training." This shift in Balikatan only refers to the open and publicly acknowledged role of the war exercise in current AFP counter-insurgency campaigns. In a TOP SECRET Memorandum to former President Joseph Estrada dated May 9, 2000, of the TASK FORCE BLACK CRESCENT PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 11 which analyzed the TOP SECRET OPLAN MINDANAO II/BLACK RAIN operations against the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), the TF Black Crescent headed by former Secretary of National Defense Fortunato Abat referred to the "Conduct of military advance training on anti-guerrilla warfare under the guise of 'Balikatan 2000' RP-US military training exercises, in consonance with the ratified Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) (p.5); "the arming of the Alliance of Christian Vigilantes for Muslim-Free Mindanao and the Spiritual Soldiers of God in Mindanao to whom 20,763 units consisting of M14s and M16s had already secretly been distributed."(p.8). This TOP SECRET document WHICH I HAVE DECLASSIFIED for us all, clearly shows the wanton use of vigilantism against so-called terrorism in Mindanao, now reinforced by the rewards system for bounty hunters. Foreign policy under GMA The current large-scale Balikatan exercises in the Philippines started in 1991 as a navy-to-navy exercise sponsored by the US CINCPAC (US Pacific Command). The Visiting Forces Agreement (1999) may have succeeded in reversing what the Senate did in 1991. Philippine courts cannot, under the VFA even assume jurisdiction over U.S. soldiers and try them for such crimes as rape, murder, or homicide, committed against Filipinos right here in our own country. Under Art. 5 of the VFA, any offense committed by US soldiers or personnel, no matter how grave or heinous, may be considered "official acts" provided the US commander issues a "military duty" certificate. This was how the US gave immunity to thousands of accused American soldiers from 1947 until Sept. 16, 1991 for their criminal acts on Philippine soil. As stated earlier, next to Afghanistan, the Philippines has become the second front in the war against international terrorism, including the deployment of the elite U.S. Special Operations Forces which is a composite force and command by itself. SOF operations are described as "direct action" (small-scale strikes), unconventional or irregular warfare, civil affairs and psychological operations (psy-ops to influence public opinion), foreign internal defense (arming and training paramilitary forces), and counter-terrorism training. SOFs, together with CIA special hit teams, have also been known to specialize in political assassinations. The deployment of SOFs in the Philippines shows that in recent Pentagon strategy, the Philippines serves not only as the second front in the war against international terrorism, it also serves as a springboard for renewed US drive for geopolitical hegemony in Southeast Asia, against Philippine home-grown guerrillas (NPA, MNLF, MILF) and other Asian people's mass movements. PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 12 6. The people’s anti-bases and anti-nuclear movement and lessons learned (Refer to the Philippine Reader on US Bases) and the continuing struggle for an independent Philippine Foreign Policy Closing Ranks Against the Borderless US Military The past victories of Asian anti-colonial struggles, including those for self-determination in Vietnam and elsewhere, the democratic movements against pro-US dictatorships, as in the anti-Marcos dictatorship struggle and the dismantling of the formidable US bases in 1991 in the Philippines, demonstrate the desire of the people of Asia to live in freedom, to run their country their own way, without foreign dictation. In the Philippines, even after the dismantling of the US bases in 1991, we continue to block any attempt to re-establish US military presence through the proposed MLSA. This is being done by defending and giving substance to the anti-militarist, pro-peace and anti-nuclear provisions of the 1987 Philippine Constitution. We are also seeking the abrogation of the Cold War relics - the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty and the 1947 Military Assistance Agreement, as well as the 1999 Visiting Forces Agreement. Our experience in people's struggles against foreign aggressors and dictatorships shows us that only by closing ranks and forging a broad united front can we defeat our militarist adversaries both in the Philippines and Asia. 8. People’s Responses: The Nuclear Free Philippines Coalition (Anti-nuclear and anti-bases campaigns) Nuclear Free Philippines Coalition – An alliance of multi-sectoral, interfaith, civic and people’s organizations nationwide that served as the Secretariat to Stop the building and Operation of the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (the first and only built in the Philippines during the Marcos dictatorial regime) from 1981 – 1998). It also served as the Secretariat for the campaign to reject the new Military Bases Agreement with the United States (1987-1992). Initiated the organization of the People’s Task Force for Bases Clean Up after the bases withdrawal to campaign for U.S. responsility for the Toxic wastes they left behind. In March 2003 in Okinawa, together with organizations and networks working on military toxics and bases clean up issues from Japan, Okinawa, Korea, Vietnam, Philippines, and the United States, the PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 13 Coalition is one of the convenors of the International Network on Military Activities and Environmental Justice (INME) The birth of Gathering for Peace in the Philippines and the Asian Peace Alliance in Asia. Gathering for Peace in the Philippines (GFP) is a coalition of 51 Non-government organizations, people’s organizations, political blocs and individuals promoting peace, tolerance and national sovereignty and opposing US military intervention in the Philippines. It is a loose, broad, centrally coordinated activist campaign center. It is a response to post Sept 11 escalation of US military presence in the Philippines, the invasion of Afghanistan and the eventual invasion of Iraq. In April 2004, GFP together with FOCUS on the Global South and Institute of Popular Democracy, initiated the formation of Iraq Solidarity Campaign in the Philippines to call for the end of US invasion of Iraq and for the Philippine Government to withdraw its membership in the coalition of the willing and withdraw the Philippine troops in Iraq. 7. Towards a Global Anti-Bases Campaign: International Conference on US Bases at the World Social Forum in Mumbai, India Nuclear Free Philippines Coalition Website: www.nfpc.nonukesasiaforum.org Gathering for Peace-Philippines Website: www.yonip.com.main/gfp Asian Peace Alliance Website: www.yonip.com/apa and www.asianpeace.net PTFBC Website: http://www.yonip.com/toxicwaste/taskforce.html International Network on Military Activities and Environmental Justice: kaorinsuna@mvd.biglobe.ne.jp PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 14 Attachment B “HUMAN COST OF ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE CAUSED BY U.S. BASES” Prepared by the People’s Task Force for Bases Clean Up - Philippines 1) Brief History of US Bases in the Philippines The Philippines was host to the US Air Force in Clark Air Base in the province of Pampanga in the Philippines and to the US Navy in Subic Naval Base in Olongapo, in the northern part of the Philippines. Clark Air Base occupied an area of 158,277 acres of land, about the size of the whole island of Singapore. Clark Air Base became the homebase of the US “Fighting” 13th Air Force. It became a training ground and refueling station for the US fleet used in the Korean war in the 1950s, the Vietnam war in the late 1960s, and in the Gulf war in 1990. Subic Naval Base was the largest naval supply depot of the US Naval force in the world. Like Clark Air Base, Subic was also used by the US during the Korean war in the 1950s, the Vietnam war in the late 1960s, and in the Gulf war in 1990. If they were not forced to leave the Philippines in 1991, Clark and Subic would have been used also in the Afghanistan war. 2) Reports of Deaths Due to Toxic Waste Contamination Soon after the withdrawal of the US Air Force and Navy in November 1991 and 1992, respectively, the nightmare of toxic contamination began to surface. In June 1991, roughly 20,000 poor families were relocated by Philippine government inside Clark Air Base in a place called CABCOM, or Clark Air Base Command. These 20,000 poor families were temporarily placed there because they were displaced by strong volcanic eruption of Mt. Pinatubo. While in Cabcom, these families were given by Philippine government more than 100 pump wells to be installed on the Cabcom grounds where they would draw their daily water needs for drinking, cooking, milk of their children, bathing, laundry, and other daily water requirements. PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 15 A few months later, many of these poor families began complaining of stomach problems, skin disorders, and vomiting. Soon pregnant women began to experience spontaneous abortions, still births, birth defects and deformities. Many young children and old persons have died of various aliments including leukemia, cancer, heart ailments, lung problems, kidney problems, among others. By September 2000, our group (People’s Task Force For Bases Clean-Up) has documented more than 100 deceased victims and more 300 living victims suffering from neurological disorders, heart ailments, leukemia, and kidney problems, among many others. In the light of the reported deaths and illnesses, the Philippine Senate Committees on Health and Environment called for a senate investigation on the issue. And on 16 May 2000, these Senate Committees released its Senate Report No. 237 stating that there is strong and conclusive evidence that there is substantial environmental contamination in Clark and Subic. Moreover, the Senate Report stated categorically that the US Government has knowledge of the existence and location of these “known and potentially” contaminated sites in Clark and Subic. The Senate Report also said that the United States has the corresponding duty and obligation to the Philippines and the Filipino people to repair and compensate for the environmental damage and the human victims. Notwithstanding this Senate Committee Report, and despite all the previous studies and surveys conducted in the areas by different groups, the US government and the Philippine government denied any responsibility or liability therefor. Hence, our group, together with all the victims we were able to document from Clark and Subic, prepared for the filing of the legal cases in court against the US and Philippine governments. 3) Filing Of Legal Suits Against U.S. and Philippine Governments We filed the toxic suits on 18 September 2000. The victims of the toxic suit were classified into three categories, namely: (1) the human victims who suffered deaths and serious ailments due to toxic chemical contamination; (2) the Philippine environment; and (3) the Filipino people, both the present and future generations, being the beneficiaries of the Philippine environment. PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 16 As to the venue for the filing of our legal case, we decided to file it in a Philippine Court, with the hope of filing a counterpart case in a US Federal Court. We have found several legal grounds for our case against the US government. The first was Article 23 of the 1947 Military Bases Agreement between the US and Philippines. Under said Article 23, the US agreed and committed to pay compensation to death, personal injury, damage or loss of property by Philippine citizens when the same was caused by the non-combat activities by US forces. On this basis alone, the liability or responsibility of the US government to human and environmental victims in Clark and Subic is quite clearly established. In addition to that, under certain principles of International Law, particularly under Principle 21 of the 1972 Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment and the 1992 UN Convention on the Rio Declaration of Environment & Development, the US government like any other States has the duty not to cause environmental damage to the environment of other states. As to the legal grounds for our case against the Philippine government, there are a lot of Philippine law under which we can hold the Philippine government liable. Also, under the Precautionary Principle (Principle 15, UN Convention in Rio Declaration on Environment & Development) in International Law, the Philippine government is liable since it is citing the lack of scientific studies and the lack of full scientific certainty as reason or pretext in postponing or preventing the implementation of measures that would protect further environmental damage in the identified contaminated areas. Under Philippine jurisprudence, where the government itself violates its own laws, the Philippine government can be sued directly by the aggrieved party. 4) Present Status Of Legal Suits Against US & Phil. Governments Unfortunately, the US government completely disregarded the case and did not respond at all to the court orders requiring it to file an Answer. It was a case of complete snub, a case of complete lack of respect to Philippine judiciary, since the US government could have filed a Motion To Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. But the US government chose to snub the Philippine judiciary completely. Equally unfortunate, the Philippine court dismissed our case in 2001. Today, our toxic suits in the Philippines remain on appeal, although we believe that the Philippine court will reject our appeal, PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 17 considering that our very own very President is a die-hard supporter of US President George W. Bush. Concluding Remarks: Our struggle against the US military bases from the Philippine soil is far from over. The effects of US military bases on our environment have affected the health and lives of our people residing in the nearby areas of Clark and Subic. Due to the heavy extent of environmental damage in Clark and Subic, If the US Government will not admit responsibility for the environmental damage in Clark and Subic, if the US Government will not clean up the contaminated areas in Clark and Subic – we can all expect that there will be children who will be born 10 years, or maybe even 20 years from now, suffering from deformities or defects caused by toxic chemicals dumped irresponsibly by US Navy in Subic and US Air Force in Clark. If the US government and the Philippine government will not face up to their moral, social and legal responsibilities of cleaning the contaminated areas in Clark and Subic, more people especially women and children will continue to suffer with various health problems. PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 18 Attachment C MINDANAO: LAND RAPED AND PLUNDERED Prepared by KAISA KA for the Philippine Working Group (PWG) International Meeting on Human Security and Development Manila, Philippines November 22-27, 2004 Mindanao is the 19th biggest island in the world. Its land area is about 101,998 square kilometers or 34 percent of the total land area of the Philippines. Mindanao is blessed with an abundance of minerals. Metallic mineral reserves are placed at some 3.6 million tons and non-metallic mineral at 8.6 billion tons. Potential coal reserves is estimated at 37.5 million metric tons and or 18.2 percent of the national reserves. The island produces 50 percent of all the corn and coconut, 20 percent of all the rice, 50 percent of all the fish, 40 percent of all the cattle, almost 100 percent of all the banana and pineapple exports, 89 percent of the nickel and cobalt, 90 percent of the iron ore, 62 percent of the limestone, and almost 100 percent of the aluminum ore in the Philippines. Bonanza of profits have been made over a half of century from lumber and timber, which also cleared the lands eventually occupied by the agribusiness corporations. The “paradise of tobacco, hemp and coffee plantations” visualized by Harper in 1900 has taken the shape of rubber, sugar, pineapple, banana, palm oil and lately, asparagus and the Lumads. All of them have been pushed off from the land. By the early 1980’s, the multinationals together with local grown landlords were making plans of raising livestock on thousands of hectares of pasture lands. Ancestral lands belonging to the Manobo tribal people have been grabbed by cattle ranchers. Later on, the contested lands were sold to the Bukidnon Sugar Corporation. A number of dams were constructed to generate hydroelectric power for the new industries. These projects have inundated hundreds of thousands of hectares farmed by the Moros and Lumads. They were also PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 19 intended to create new canals that were to carry water to the sites of corporate farming and agribusiness corporations. Scores of Lumads and Christian settler communities have also been dislocated by the logging operations in northern and southern Mindanao. As in the past, war is still pursued in the name of profit. The 10,000 hectares in Matanog which used to be Camp Abubakar is being eyed to be converted to a special economic zone. The war in Maguindanao was to clear the area surrounding the six towns to pave way for the $262 M sugar plantation (Moroland Sugar Corporation). It is where the former Camp Omar was located. The war in Pikit was pursued to facilitate the NAPOCOR and multinational corporations to start the exploration and eventually the exploitation of the natural gas within the Liguasan marsh. Thus, the US and the Philippine government’s disposition and use of military power through war has been and is always connected to the control and exploitation of the remaining vital resources in the island. The US in collaboration with the government of the Philippines also create or exploit the context of conflict to sustain and ensure the benefits from the war. Brief Historical Background US interests in the Philippines goes back to 1898 when the US “helped” Philippine forces win independence from Spain. Upon its defeat, Spain surrendered to the US rather than to the Philippines, and ceded the Philippines to the US for $20 million. On December 21, 1898, US President William Mckinley issued his “Benevolent Assimilation Proclamation” and instructed American military commanders to extend the sovereignty of the US over the entire Philippine archipelago, by force if necessary. The basic interest for annexation was economic. In a January 9, 1900 speech to the US Senate arguing for colonization, Indiana Senator Albert Beveridge asked “where shall we turn for consumers of our surplus?” His answer “china is our natural customer. The Philippines will give us a base at the door of all the East. No land in America surpasses in fertility the plains and valleys of Luzon … The wood of the Philippines can supply the furniture of the world for a century to come.” In the book by Howard Zinn, A People’s History of the United States (1995), the same senator was quoted again. “The Philippines are PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 20 ours forever … And just beyond the Philippines are China’s illimitable market … The Pacific is our ocean.” Gen. Arthur McArthur was the head of the colonial pacification campaign in 1901. In his assessment on the Philippines to the US Senate, he said that the “Philippines constituted the finest group of islands in the world. Its strategic position is unexcelled by that of any other position on the globe. The China Sea, which separates it by something like 750 miles from the continent, is nothing more or less than a safety moat. It lies on the flank of what might be called a position of several thousand miles of coastlines, it is in the center of that position. It is therefore relatively better placed than Japan, which is on a flank, and therefore remote from the other extremity; likewise India, on another flank. It affords a means of protecting American interests which with the very least output of physical power, has the effect of a commanding position in itself to retard hostile action.” There was widespread armed resistance against the American presence during the first fifteen years, despite compromises by their leaders, notably the Sultan of Sulu, Datu Piang of Maguindanao and Datu Mandi of Zamboanga. Between 1903 to 1936, Americans estimated that between 15,000 to 20,000 Moro lives were lost from the fighting. In the words of an American officer, “no one dreamed that the Constabulary was to engage in hundreds of ‘cotta forst’ (fort) fights and to quell twenty-six uprisings of sufficient seriousness to be listed as campaigns before it turned over the task of establishing laws and order, still uncompleted, to the Philippine Army in 1936.” Endless bloodshed and destruction became the order of the day because the situation seemed so skillfully woven to neutralize the Moros right in their own backyard. The Alangkat Movement in 1926-27 in Cotabato valley was the initial response to this. At the height of the war with Japan, a series of massacres fueled by agrarian disputes. In Cotabato alone, about 1,000 people on both sides were brutally hacked to pieces in the towns of Buluan, Tacurong, Midsayap and Pigkawayan. The marketplace in Pigkawayan was enclosed in barbed wire and the Moros inside were sorted out and slaughtered en masse. About 200 men, women and children perished in this slaughter. Another corollary result of this phenomena, the colonial contradiction between Filipino and Americans was obscured by the more visible religious Muslim-Christian contradiction, expressed in bloody conflict over agricultural land. PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 21 By 1950, an estimated 8,300 families had been brought to government settlements in Mindanao, 1,500 more arrived between 1950 and 1954. By 1963, the National Resettlement and Rehabilitation Administration was administering colonies, including over 25,000 families and 695,000 hectares. Following the fashion set by the state, legions came on their own. The movement speeded up dramatically under the Marcos regime – more than three million Christians are estimated to have settled in Mindanao between 1966 and 1976. The consequences were simply devastating. According to official statistics, the population of the island stood at 2.5 million in 1948; by 1976, it had risen to 8.7 million. Moros, who formed 98 percent of the island’s population in 1913, accounted for only 40 percent by 1976. They owned all the land in Mindanao on the eve of colonization. Today, they own less than 17 percent. Over 80 percent of Moros are now landless tenants. The American capitalists intensified their spoliation in Mindanao. In 1957, Firestone Tire and Rubber Company was awarded 1,000 hectares of land in Makilala, North Cotabato for a rubber plantation. In 1963, Dole Philippines, subsidiary of the Castle and Cook Company acquired vast tracts of land in Tupi and Polomolok, Cotabato for its pineapple plantations. In 1966, Weyerhaueser Corporation obtained 72,000 hectares of forest lands in Mindanao for its logging operation. The opportunities for profits were and remain endless. Bernard Wideman reported in mid-1970’s: “The foreign corporations would earn profits of $1,785 per hectare a year, but the laborer actually cultivating the one hectare would earn annual wages of only $240.” Conditions were even worse for certain whole categories of workers. “In banana plantation, where combined Stanfilco (a subsidiary of Dole), Philpak (Del Monte) and Tadeco (United Fruit) account for 77.96 percent of production, the average annual profit in the late 1970s reached $9,700 per hectare. The corporations paid between $35 and $70 per hectare per year to the farmer from whom they leased the land. In 1972-73, some 156 logging operations in Mindanao obtained a total concession areas of almost five million hectares, 13 percent of which were held by four US timber companies. In 1971, a Senate committee noted the military’s extensive participation in perpetration of outright violence to gain possession of lands. Not only were the logging concerns responsible for evicting the Moro people from millions of hectares, they also destroyed forests at a rate nine times higher than the rate of reforestation. The coming of capital to Mindanao is the most PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 22 literal sense, a war not only against the inhabitants but also against the land itself. Essentially, the settling of Mindanao meant the grabbing of the ancestral lands for conversion into homesteads, plantations, infrastructure and industrial enclaves for foreign investors. The future full-scale wars in the island are in many ways the logical extension of the process started by the American conquest of the Moro homelands at the beginning of the century. The war began 1968-1969 with the rise of Christian terror squads that were supported by the PC and AFP. Ilagas, the largest group was led by seven municipal mayors and three provincial governors. In 1975, their strength was estimated at 35,000. Reports indicated that they were financed largely by timber merchants who sought Moro lands for their logging operations. The AFP conducted elaborate “search and destroy” missions in coordination with the terrorists. For the first two years, the war was confined to areas where the overwhelming majority of the population was Christian. Its sole objective was to evict the remaining Moros. Obviously, the Moros neither wanted the war nor were prepared for it. The Sulu Moros, who later came to dominate the leadership of the MNLF, did not participate in the war until early 1972. A decisive counteroffensive began to take place only with the spontaneous uprising in Marawi on October 21, 1972, one month after Marcos declared martial law. Between 1972 and 1976, the first two years of war, annual military expenditures rose from 518 million to 3.5 billion, or by almost 700 percent. By May, 1979, the Marcos regime was spending $137,000 a day on the war. Meanwhile the AFP personnel rose from 60,000 to 250,000. In the late 1975, at the height of the war, three-fourths of th troops were deployed in Mindanao. Abdurasad Asani, a south-filipino Muslim, had drawn the following balance for the London-based magazine, Impact: 50,000 killed, two million refugees (one out of every three or four Muslims had become refugees), 200,000 houses burned, 535 mosques and 200 schools demolished, 35 cities and towns wholly destroyed. In less than a decade, the Muslims have vacated over a million hectares of land. Cong. Eduardo Ermita, the current head of the GRP panel disclosed in 1996 that “over a period of 26 years since 1970, more PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 23 than 100,000 persons were killed … the AFP has spent about P73 billion in connection with the Mindanao conflict since 1970.” Casualties of War in Mindanao (1970-1996) 100,000+ persons have been killed 30% government casualties 50% rebels 20% civilians 18 people were slain everyday 55,000 were injured not counting the rebel side AFP SPENDING ON WAR 1970 – 1996 (never-ending conflict) * 73 billion pesos (26-year period) or an average 40% of its annual budget Cost of Peace Negotiation with MNLF less than 60 million pesos It was the low intensity conflict (LIC) during the Aquino regime, Proponents of the LIC called for rethinking of traditional tactics and implementing “total war” on economic, social, political and psychological fronts. One feature of this was the putting up of civil defense structures where civilians are armed and organized into right-wing paramilitary outlets. This is to “enhance local peace and order5 situations and involve civilians in the defense of their own communities, thus freeing up soldiers to take the offensive against the revolutionary forces. Of the 77 major formation of the vigilantes nationwide, 17 were found in Mindanao. A PNF report, on April 6, 1987 stated that “a CIA branch of 70 agents were recently established in Mindanao, the reportedly frequent visits of USIS official William Parker to Lt. Col. Franco Calida, in Davao City and President Reagan’s recent authorization of $10 million and twelve new agents for CIA covert operations in the Philippines.” PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 24 Just a month after the government and the MNLF signed the 1996 peace agreement on September 2, 1996, guns were firing in Mindanao. On October 18, 1996, the military moved against an MILF encampment in Baiwas, Sumisip, Basilan. The fighting spilled over two other municipalities and by October 24, a full-scale war had erupted again. What are the “new” reasons for the continuing war? War is again unleashed to facilitate the entry of Mindanao into the world capitalist system. Government flagship projects dubbed “Philippines 2000,” Mindanao 2000” and “ARMM 200” are being pursued. A component of the rush to global competitiveness is the development of one’s comparative advantage. In the case of Lanao, the government has interpreted this to mean opening up vast tracts of land for contract growing and other extractive industries. Roads, power plants, port and other infrastructure projects are proceeding. Agroindustrial processing plants are being built. Who poses hindrance to these projects? It is the MILF. And the government has pursued an every three-year war in Mindanao to get rid of the MILF. On June 16, 1997, the AFP wanted to drive the MILF out from the region’s largest and most valuable natural gas deposit in Liguasan marsh. The war started in Pikit, North Cotabato after the reported MILF harassment against an oil exploration team of the National Power Corp. Estrada declared an all-out war in 2000 under the pretext of giving “not an inch will be ceded. Essentially, his objective was to clear the common boundary of Lanao del Sur and Maguindanao from MILF’s political influence. Estrada and Arroyo are hell-bent on dismantling the ten major camps and at least 25 sub-camps or training camps across 13 provinces. Later, Camp Abubakar was disclosed to be converted into a special economic zone. Erap All-Out war (2000) P6 billion was spent on war or a billion peso higher than what the government spent on building schools nationwide. Cost of one 105mm howitzer – 7,300 pesos (2000 price) or an equivalent of a chair and table set for at least 36 students in Grade 1 and 2. PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 25 Cost of one 105mm howitzer fired to Buliok Complex is 730,000 or an equivalent to 1,123 bags of certified rice seeds at P650 per bag. Paving the way for the American capital to operate meant further marginalization of the Moro people and the Lumads. Items (outlay or losses) Monetary value (in pesos) 3-mos AFP military operations P900M – P1.8B (PDI) P50M per day or P7.5 M (UNDP/AFRIM) Assistance to evacuees (partial) P32M Damage to crops, livestock, fisheries maguindanao.AFRIM) (partial) P23M (DA- Damage to roads, irrigation systems, Post-harvest facilities and other infra P202M (CDRC) Foregone tourism P62.1 M (CDRC) Burned houses and lost possessions (including looted belongings) in 8 brgys in Maguindanao and Lanao del Sur P15.7 M AFRIM) Total P1,436,800,000 – P8,036,800,000 Or approx. P1.436B – P8.037B (source: PDI – Philippine Daily Inquirer; UNDP – United Nations Development Program; DA – Department of Agriculture; AFRIM – Alternative forum for Research in Mindanao; CDRC – Center for Disaster Relief and Cooperation. Note: US$1 is approximately equivalent to 53 pesos) What triggered the February 11, 2002 declaration of war by Arroyo? The Memorandum of Instructions from Arroyo to her defense secretary dated February 11, 2003. It was an order to totally implement the OPLAN GREENBASE. Oplan Greenbase was to capture and occupy simultaneously within one week the Buliok complex fronting the Liguasan marsh. This complex comprise the Kabasalan island complex, the Rajamuda complex and the PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 26 Buliok complex. Once the objective is achieved, the AFP must clear the Liguasan marsh of all MILF structures – military, political and social and lawless elements and relocate the civilians living in the marsh. The same memorandum instructed the DoE to revive the geophysical survey and exploration contract between Petronas Carigali and the Philippine National Oil Company Exploration Corporation. It also ordered the NEDA Dreirector-General to implement the muchdelayed 25-year Liguasan Marsh Development Framework Plan and to reconstitute the Liguasan Marsh Development Task Forces soon as the AFP takes full control of the marsh from the MILF. The same memorandum also reminded that the high-value target of the plan was to capture Salama Hashim dead or alive. The neutralization of Tahir Alonto will only be effected after the MILF leaers are arrested, jailed or killed. An incomplete comparison between the social cost of war in 2000 and 2003 is as follows: Partial cost of war in Midnanao in 2000 and 2003 _________________________________________________________________ Items (outlays or losses) Mindanao 3-month war One month war in Minda –03 monetary value – ’00 (Feb-March 2003) (mid-April – mid-July) assistance to evacuees/ P32M -P18.4M (DSWD-P13.3M estimated total refugees 500,000 refugees LGUs – 1.7M; Private-P3.3M (partial) - P1.6M from Libya - P30.6M relief and rehab of 15 brgys of Pikit “peace zones” Total: P50.6M 200,000 refugees damage to crops, livestock, P124.76M fisheries/ P75.3M rehab budget damage to infrastructure P202M power pylons repair damage to equipment in 1 bombing – P5M P46.8M/P30.68M P50M – partial total – P75M PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 27 The data on the increasing cost of war is presented below: Increase cost of insecurity since February 2003 Item Cost Additional 7,000 soldiers fro ’03 P800,000,000 Mindanao peace &Devt Fund (from Mindanao Legislators/OP) P500,000,000 Baliktanan Exercises P96,300,000 2-yr contract with Washington-based Rhoads Macguire and PR partner Weber Shandwick ending Dec. ’03 to promote AFP modernization P37,000,000 ($684,500) MIAA purchased brand new hi-tech security Equipment from Germany P20,000,000 Cost of 16 bomb suits for EOD experts P1,700,000 Rent of US body armor for RP soldiers P270,000 ($5,000) Reward for information on Davao airport Bombers Total Housing target for Mindanao in ’04 Approximate cost of housing Cost of insecurity equivalent (15% of goal) II. P600,000 P1,445,870,000 P40,000 P250,000 P5,823 houses ESCALATING THE US WAR OF AGGRESSION What were the US preparations for a stronger power projection in Southeast Asia? US preparations preceded Bush’s “Operation Enduring Freedom” by several years. It was successful in forging with the Estrada government the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) and pursued the construction of a USAID-funded airfield in General Santos City. PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 28 As early as 2000, the RAND Corporation had recommended to Pentagon that “… access to the Philippines and Vietnam would help establish air superiority over the sealanes of the South China Sea.” Kalilzad, the current US envoy in Kabul advocated “a robust security assistance program to allies in the region particularly the Philippines. Angel Rabasa, another RAND’s senior policy analyst,c alled the Philippines “a frontline state in the war of terrorism.” How does the US justify its continuing presence in the island? US found a convenient excuse for accelerating its campaign for a stronger military presence in the country by linking the Abu Sayyaf (certainly a Central Intelligence Agency creation) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front to the Al Qaeda and the Jemaah Islamiyah. This became the basis for escalating its armed presence in Midnanao. In other words, bringing in more US troops and offering virtual basing rights to US forces. What is the logical consequences of the US presence in Mindanao? It transforms the whole of Mindanao as the focus in the second front in US-led “anti-terrorist” war, which is a de facto war of intervention in the Philippines and aggression in Southeast Asia. This war of aggression ensure that Mindanao will be a springboard for a deeper and wider US military presence in South east Asia that will entrench US military domination in the region. Why is unchallenged US military might necessary in the region? First, it is necessary to protect the US strategic and economic interests in the region. With nearly 525 million people, Southeast Asia has a combined gross national product of US$ 700 billion and is America’s fifth largest trading partner. Its direct investment in 1998 was $35 billion. Second, to ensure that India (with a current population of I billion) and China (with a current population of 1.3 billion) will eventually become new markets for US capital and commodities. US current crisis is brought by overproduction of commodities and surplus capital on one side and constricting market on the other side. The world will begin running out of oil in less than fifty years. Within the same period, the current supply will not be able to produce enough oil to meet the needs especially the level of consumption of the First World. Energy from oil runs the technology and machines, lights and cool homes, runs transportation and generates electricity. With this PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 29 scenario, the giant US oil conglomerates seek to grab the remaining sources of oil in the globe and dictate its use. What is the data on the oil reserve in the region? The South China Sea has a proven oil reserve estimated at 7.5 billion barrels. A 1994 Geological Survey estimates that the total sum of undiscovered reserves in Spratlys and paracel islands is around 28 billion barrels. Other estimates by China say the total potential of this area could be as high as 213 billion barrels. How does Minsupala fare on this profile? Mindanao, Sulu and Palawan (Minsupala) are now “confirmed oil country”. Discoveries of oil and gas in Palawan and Cotabato reinforced the satellite findings of the National Space Agency that the largest deposits of oil and gas in Asia could lie in the area covered by Minsupala. Minsupala is often referred to as the “Middle East” of the near future. It is also in the Philippine deep (eastern coast of Mindanao) where an inexhaustible deposit of deuterium is found. Deuterium is heavy water used in the production of liquefied hydrogen gas used as fuel for cars and jet planes and in its solidified state, as fuel for spacecrafts. It is described by Jules Verne in 1874 as the “fuel in the future.” What other resources are found in the country? The Philippines is the world’s second largest producer of geothermal power. The country is also reputed to have 2.8 trillion cubic feet of proven natural gas reserves. Liguasan marsh alone has 1.3 trillion cubic feet. A report by Nash Maulana said Sultan sa Barongis, a town in Maguindanao and near Liguasan marsh has been chosen as the site of natural gas exploration project of the Philippine National Oil Company jointly with the Petronas Carigali Malaysian consortium. But Petronas has pulled out in favor of an American company. What are the scenarios concomitant with the escalating US war of aggression in the island? The aerial bombardment of the island will most likely follow the operations manual for the aerial bombardment of Iraq written in a book by former military officers Harlan K. Ullman and James Wade, Shock and Awe: Achieving Rapid Dominance, published by the National Defense University in 1996. PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 30 The authors say that their aims can be summed up as: “Paralyze, shock unnerve, deny, destroy through very selective, utterly brutal and ruthless and rapid application of force to intimidate.” The intended effect would be like the nuclear bombing of Japan in 1945. “Shutting the country down would entail both the physical destruction of appropriate infrastructure and the shutdown and control of the flow of all vital information and associated commerce so rapidly as to achieve a level of national shock akin to the effect that dropping nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had on the Japanese. Simultaneously, Iraq’s armed forces would be paralyzed with the neutralization or destruction of its capabilities.” (The Internationalist, March 28, 2003 Special Issue, p.5) There are already countries that have been subjected to bombings. In 1999, Yugoslavia was subjected to 78 days of round-the-clock bombings, transforming a relatively advanced country into virtually a third world country. Afghanistan was bombarded with US’ AGM-86D cruise missiles, their AGM-130 missiles, their 15, 000 pound “daisy cutter” bombs, their depleted uranium and their cluster bombs. III. CONCLUSION War in Mindanao is basically a war to ensure US continuing rape and plunder of the island’s remaining resource base as well as ensuring that Mindanao play its role to the fullest in maintaining US world hegemony in part of the world. The White House issued a document last September, 2002 which states, ‘it is to reaffirm the essential role of American military strength in order to dissuade future military competition. We must be strong enough to dissuade potential adversaries from pursuing or equaling the power of the United States.” War in Mindanao has also been misrepresented as a matter of incorrect priorities. History shows that it is not a matter of national priority. It is the semi-colonial status of the system that produces war over and over again. The costs of the war is deliberately justified as result of religious conflicts between the Moro people and the Christians. Because of this, the political and economic content of their war escapes most of the combatants themselves. Of course, it is to the interest of the US and its puppets that the war in Mindanao be conducted on religious grounds, for this allows the government to present itself as an arbiter of disputes between two religion, and hence, an entity above both. PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 31 More importantly, the multinationals operating in Mindanao also benefit when the war is viewed in religious terms because the communal conflicts obstructs the growth of an anti-imperialist movement in the island. The position of the corporations at the top is remote from the everyday Moro consciousness. V. WHAT IS TO BE DONE? The long-term objective of the escalating US war of aggression is to decisively wipe out the growing armed resistance of the revolutionary forces in Mindanao. Equally, it also intends to crush people’s legitimate movements that continue to assert the Mindanaoans’ in particular, and in general, the Filipino people’s democratic and nationalist interests and resist the continuing plunder of island’s resources. There is an overwhelming need to fight the war on correct grounds. We cannot stop the war by pleading with the US and the government for peace. The only way to put an end to the endless wars is to bring down the system that produces war over and over. It is an urgent and necessary to build a Mindanao-based broad coalition of all nationalist, patriotic, progressive and anti-US led war of aggression individuals, groups, political forces, institutions and nongovernment organizations. This broad formation can significantly help in frustrating the escalating ear of aggression by bringing into the forefront the collective strength and the resolve of all Mindanaoans nurtured, steeled and buttressed by their long and common historical resistance against any foreign invader. The coalition should work for the development of an anti-Us led war movement in order to frustrate the escalating US led war of aggression in the island. It should coordinate the emerging independent initiatives and local protests of people’s organizations and movements, and political groups in the whole island against the war. It should also pursue the all-sided political exposure of the Arroyo government whose brazen puppetry to US imperialism has wreck havoc on the lives of Mindanaoans. PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 32 REFERENCES: MANDATE IN MOROLAND BY Peter Gordon Growing. THE MUSLIM FILIPINOS Their History, Society and Contemporary Problems, edited by Peter G. Growing and Robert D. McAmis. ROGUE STATE by William Blum. THE CIA A Forgotten History by William Blum. REBELS, WARLORDS and ULAMA ( A Reader on Muslim Separatims and the War in Southern Philippines. BANGSAMORO A Nation Under Endless Tyranny by Salah Jubair. MUSLIM SEPARATISM. The Moros of Southern Philippines and the Malays of Southern Thailang by W.K. Che Man. UNMASKING THE WAR ON TERROR US Imperialist Hegemony and Crisis by Center for Anti-Imperialist Studies. MUSLIMS IN THE PHILIPPINES by Cesar Adib Majul. THE MINORITIZATION OF THE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES OF MINDANAO AND THE SULU ARCHIPELAGO by B.R. Rodil MAKING MINDANAO Cotabato and Davao in the Formation of the Philippine Nation State by Patricio N. Abinales. RIGHT WING VIGILANTES AND US INVOLVEMENT Report of a USPhilippine Fact-finding Mission to the Philippines, May 20-30,1987. THE INTERNATIONALIST Special Issue March 28, 2003. WORKERS VANGUARD NO. 803. May 9, 2003. WORKERS VANGUARD NO. 804 May 23, 2003. MUSLIM RULERS AND REBELS Everyday Politics and Armed Separatism in the Southern Mindanao by Thomas M. Mckenna. UNDER CRESCENT MOON: REBELLION IN MINDANAO by Marites Danguilan Vitug and Glenda M. Gloria. REFERENDUM Peaceful, Civilized, Diplomatic and Democratic means of Solving the Mindanao Conflict by Chairman Salamat Hasim. WAR COSTS AND BENEFITS The Nexus of Peace and Development in Conflict Societies of Southeast Asia by Miriam Coronel Ferrer. WHAT REALLY CAUSED THE WAR? By Rony Elusfa, TODAY Correspondent. IS THERE HOPE FOR MINDANAO’S DEVELOPMENT? By Dr. Lourdes S. Adriano and Dr. Fermin D. Adriano. BLACK FIRE by Nelson Perry. THE COST OF INTERNAL WAR Ibon Facts and Figures Vol. 15, no. 16 August 31, 1992. THE US MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX Ibon Facts and Figures Vol. 25, nos. 7 and 8 April 15 and 30, 2002. NEXUS Magazine, December 2001-January 2002. EDUCATION FOR DEVELOPMENT Vol. 1, No. 2 February 2002. EDUCATION FOR DEVELOPMENT Vol. 1, No. 3 March 2002. PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 33 400 YEARS WAR-MORO STRUGGLE IN THE PHILIPPINES A Reprint of Southeast Asia Chronicle Issue No. 82, February 1982. HISTORY OF THE WAR IN THE PHILIPPINES by Harper. THE MORO ISLAMIC CHALLENGE Constitutional Rethinking for the Mindanao Peacve Process by Soliman M. Santos, Jr. PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 34 Attachment D WOMEN, POVERTY AND HEALTH WomanHealth Philippines The Philippine Working Group (PWG) Paper Prepared for the 5th International Meeting “HUMAN SECURITY AND DEVELOPMENT” November 21-28, 2004 Manila, Philippines Organized by the East Asia-US-Puerto Rico Women’s Network Against Militarism and The Philippine Working Group (PWG) ******************** “The greatest risk of getting breast cancer tomorrow is being born today in a developing country. And the greatest risk of not surviving breast cancer today is being a woman in the Philippines.” -- Rosa Meneses1 This statement is a harsh indictment of this country, but perhaps true not only of the Philippines but of similar poor developing countries where gender inequality thrives. Philippine society is steeped in a tradition marked by strong social inequities, where women are generally regarded as second best, after the men. This is a country where women have to work doubly hard in order to make her mark, and be considered a co-equal in the home, in the workplace, in the community, in the nation. The Philippines faces a serious fiscal and debt crisis. - Poverty is not simply the lack of resources. It is also the absence of capabilities, opportunities, and power that will allow an individual to fully assume her/his role as a member of the community. It is the social exclusion, or marginalization of people seen to be less capable, and therefore cut off from the mainstream of everyday cultural, political and economic life. It is therefore not simply a poverty of resources, but a poverty where people become powerless and voiceless in society.2 The present poverty situation in the Philippines is the result of a complex of factors: colonial legacy, corruption, cronyism, misgovernance, structural adjustment policies, neoliberal globalization—all of which have led to the country’s increasing poverty and indebtedness.The government’s prioritization of debt payments over other expenditures have favored corporate and financial interests at the expense of people’s needs. Going by the Department of Finance (DOF) data, total public debt stood at P5.9 trillion as of February 2004. The Philippines has sunk into a vicious cycle of borrowing to pay off its debts and keep the government afloat. In 2002, while the budget for debt service was P185.8 billion, actual 21 Rosa Meneses is a woman activist who died of breast cancer in 2000. She organized the Philippine Breast Cancer Network. 2 The National Anti-Poverty Action Agenda, 2000 PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 35 cash disbursements on debt service expenditures reached P1.3 trillion (COA Annual Financial Report).3 That same year, the national budget was P 742 billion. Social services are given the least prioritization in the allocation of left-over funds, yet these are the services that benefit the people most. During the May 2004 elections, the Chief Executive, the incumbent president at the time, was generally suspected of draining the national treasury to fund her reelection campaign, leaving the poor more marginalized. The Catholic Church remains the single major obstacle to women’s reproductive rights. Allowing only the natural family method, the Catholic Church equates all other methods as abortifacients. It has obstructed all attempts to legislate a sensible population policy or a reproductive health care policy, demonizing legislators who support these measures, and threatening them with electoral reprisals. Government has backtracked on its commitments to women’s reproductive health. - The huge irony is that under two woman presidents, reproductive rights of Filipinos, especially lower income class women, have been deliberately ignored and, thus, violated.4 The population management policies under both the administrations of Corazon Aquino and Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo have played along the Catholic Church’s opposition to the use of artificial contraceptives and modern methods in fertility management and family planning. Expansion of access to reproductive services has become a more elusive goal under the Arroyo government. In a speech on the occasion of the International Women’s Day on March 8, 2002, President Arroyo defined her policy:--Since majority of families are Roman Catholic and majority of the mothers do not use birth control, there is a need to promote natural family planning, which involves very little costs, is scientific, practical, and 99% effective. Subsequently, the President instructed the National Commission on the Role of Filipino Women (NCRFW) to delete all references to reproductive rights in the government’s medium-term development plan for women. The Arroyo government’s population policy (if it can be called one) is anti-poor women.5 The Department of Health (DOH) is quoted as proclaiming that the national government has no responsibility for the provision of family planning services.6 Data further asserts that the proportion of women using modern family planning methods was lower in 2003 than in the previous year - a reversal in the trend that showed successive increases since 1998.7 Government policy rhetoric is couched in words like “moral choice”, “attuned to the Filipino culture” and the “freedom of couples to choose the family planning or reproductive methods they desire to attain the number of children they want.”8 But in reality, there is a mismatch between “The MDGs: Opportunities and Challenges for Civil Society” by Prof. Leonor Magtolis Briones (paper read at the SWP National Consultation, 3-4 March 2004. 4 A.M.R Nemenzo, interviewed in Persevera Razon, Unpublished paper, 25 February 2004. 6 “Health News and Views,” The Manila Standard, 22 October 2004. 7 Razon, op.cit. 8 Ibid. 3 PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 36 rhetoric and actual implementation because by promoting only one method (and which is the one advocated by religious fundamentalists), the policy practically denies poor women and their families access to the scientifically effective methods of family planning and the means of preventing unwanted pregnancies.9 The many deaths of women due to pregnancy and childbirthrelated causes have been described as “tragic, unnecessary and preventable”.10 Other outright violations of the current government against the right to family planning and other reproductive services include: the diversion of funds (to the tune of over P70 million) allocated by the previous government for the purchase of contraceptives to other health expenses; and the banning of a previously legal fertility regulating drug, Postinor, upon the petition of ultraconservative Catholic organizations, and without consultation with women’s groups and other service providers. Although it has not been proven to be contrary to law, Postinor remains banned to this time. Current government response to address the sustainability of family planning supplies is the Contraceptive Self-Reliance Strategy (formerly known as the Contraceptive Interdependence Initiative). The strategy consists of, among others, (1) the market segmentation of family planning supplies to ensure that poor clients are prioritized for contraceptive support, and (2) tapping community volunteers to see to it that government subsidies are well-channeled. While this response can be commended as attempts to ensure that meager government family planning supplies are properly channeled to the poor, they are nonetheless attempts to sidestep the main problem: the incumbent government’s unwillingness to promote other forms of family planning outside of NFP. President Arroyo has advised local government units to implement the family planning program according to their own beliefs. Condoms and pills had been “left to rot and expire” because there was “no demand” for the supplies – this according to the DOH Secretary himself. He said that because there was no demand, government refrained from buying condoms and pills for mass distribution nationwide. This runs contrary to NDHS result which states that 12.5 million women had “unmet reproductive health needs”. The NDHS study shows that most women desire to have two to three children; in reality they give birth to more than three, even five children due to lack of access to contraceptives. Local Government Units were unprepared for the added responsibility. Health care delivery of services now became dependent on the attitudes, priorities, whims and caprices, not to mention financial resources at the disposal of local chief executives. On the whole, local health services delivery has been hampered by such problems as the lack of technical skills, equipment and resources, and an inadequate health referral system. Phasing out of contraceptive assistance by the U.S. shifts the burden elsewhere. Interestingly, the government realizes the dilemma which it had, itself, created when it refused to fill in the resource gap brought about by the phase out of contraceptive support of the USAID. Because of this, “sustainable funding for contraceptive supplies and related RH/FP programs has to be secured so that access, especially by the poor …. To do this, the Philippine government will turn to the NGOs, private health service facilities, business, people’s organizations (POs), and 9 Ibid. Mercy Fabros, quoted in Rina Jimenez-David’s column on World Population Day 2004, PDI. 10 PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 37 grassroots groups to provide for contraceptive supplies to married couples of reproductive age particularly those with unmet FP needs.”11 Government will now turn to the private sector, including those sectors with minimal resources such as the NGOs and POs, to do its job. The privatization of health services further endangers women’s health. - In 1997 the World Bank advocated that governments give the people only the health services that they can afford to give. Cash-strapped governments interpreted this as the provision of only basic health care services and selected interventions. Sexual and reproductive health services are not seen to be part of the basic healthcare package. In effect health has come to be viewed as a consumer demand and not as a basic human right. Health care and good health become privileges of those who can afford them. In the recent National Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS), the lack of funds has been cited by 67% of the population as a cause of the inability to access medical treatment. The privatization of health services will make health more inaccessible to the poor. The resurgence of militarization has caused societal distress. - The current military operations against insurgents, particularly in Mindanao, and the growing reliance of President Gloria Arroyo’s administration on the Philippine military provides a fertile ground for the full return of anti-democratic and militarist forces akin to those that supported martial law under President Ferdinand Marcos. In addition, President Arroyo’s prompt support for and adherence to U.S. President Bush’s “war on terror” policy have put the lives of thousands of Filipino workers in Iraq and the Middle East in danger. Through the Visiting Forces Agreement, President Arroyo has extended the “war on terror” policy to the homefront. U.S. military forces have been allowed to go after local terrorist groups in Mindanao, thus affecting the Muslim population, a proud and fiercely independent people who had succeeded in resisting American colonial rule. Militarization has caused massive displacement of populations, and this massive displacement has in turn aggravated the marginalization and vulnerability of women. Each year countless women, men and children are displaced from their homes due to violent armed conflict, natural disasters, and human rights violations; approximately 80% are women.12 12Militarization has made them extremely vulnerable to persecution, to discrimination, and to the physical discomfort, insecurity, and illnesses that result from being uprooted, evicted from their established zones of comfort. What are the impacts of poverty and militarization on women? Hunger statistics. In mid-2004, the Asian Development Bank reported that about 12 million Filipinos were trapped in extreme poverty and surviving on less than P56 per day. The incidence of extreme poverty in the country was lower than the regional average of 21.4%. But it was the highest in Southeast Asia after Laos’ 30.4% and Cambodia’s 34.2%.13 The August 2004 Social Weather Stations survey reveals grim hunger statistics: nationwide, 1 out of every 7 (15.1%) male household heads surveyed said his family had nothing to eat at least once in the last 3 months, triple the number the previous year. Government responded to this sad phenomena by issuing hunger coupons – an indication of how unprepared it is to address pressing social and economic issues. NEDA & UNDP, “Philippine Progress Report on the Millennium Development Goals” 2003. Women’s Commission for Refugee Women and Children at http://www.unhcr.org, 17 November 2003. 13 PDI research, “Hunger stalks 15% of Pinoy households” – headline, Philippine Daily Inquirer, Oct. 5, 2004 11 12 PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 38 Health is not a priority of the current administration. The current health budget for the current fiscal year, at only P10.723 billion, or just P0.35 per day, has deteriorated over the years. This is very low, compared to the daily per capita outlay for health services of Asian neighbors: Japan, P343.94; Singapore, P103.96; Thailand, P17.17; Malaysia and Indonesia, P12.41. Mortality rates. Infant mortality rate is 36 deaths per 1000 live births; maternal mortality rate is 172 deaths for every 100,000 live births. Ten women die every 24 hours of pregnancyand childbirth-related causes. Under-5 mortality figures show that 38 out of 100 children die of curable diseases. Although there is no direct association, woman’s status has been found to influence infant and child mortality rates through women’s ability to control resources and make decision”.14 Nutrition statistics.. Food and Nutrition Research Institute (FNRI) estimates that 3.7 million preschool children are underweight because of acute or present malnutrition; 3.8 million have stunted growth failure; and 0.7 million are wasted. Around 49% of the total population of infants and 26% of the total population of children with ages ranging from 1-6 years old suffer from iron deficiency anemia.15 According to the World Bank, the Philippines has the highest prevalence of goiter due to iodine deficiency in Southeast Asia.16 Impact on access to water. The Philippines has a low ranking for development, based on internationally accepted indicators of well-being (such as access to potable water, sanitary toilets). Data shows that 17.7 million Filipinos (21.5%) have no potable water; 15.8 million (19.15%) have no access to sanitary toilet facilities.17 “The consequences of having inadequate or no access to water are devastating, especially for women and children. When water is not readily available it is particularly the women and the children who have to spend a large amount of time fetching water, and this has detrimental impact on their health, security and education.”18 The rise in unemployment & preference for overseas employment. NSO data shows that there were 5 million unemployed and 6 million underemployed as of April 2004 (or almost 1 out of 3 members of the labor force as unemployed or underemployed). Unemployment rate stands at 13.7%, and is one of the highest in Asia and in the world. The ranks of the unemployed continue to swell by the year, as the labor force keeps growing. The NSO reported that 1.87 million people were added to the labor force in April 2004.19 The Population Commission estimates that an average of 2,500 Filipinos leave the country daily in order to work abroad, with or without proper documentation. There are 8 million Filipino migrants (nearly 10 percent of the population) who are in 97 countries worldwide, only 42% of whom are documented; more than half are women. The foremost reason why Filipinos, 14 National Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS), 2003, p. 111 Ong, Ted Aldwin, “ Population and the state of health services, Sun Star, 22 October 2004. 16 Herrin, Alejandro, et al. Health Sector Review: Philippines, Health Financial Development Project No. 3, National Statistical Coordination Bureau, 1993. 17 Ong, op.cit. 18 Miloon Kothari, “Privatising Human Rights – The Impact of Globalization on Access to Adequate Housing, Water and Sanitation”, in Anti-Poverty or Anti-Poor, The Millennium Development Goals and the Eradication of Extreme poverty and Hunger, December 2003. 19 Ecop urges major reforms to address unemployment” Philippine Daily Inquirer, 21 August 2004. 15 PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 39 especially women, seek work abroad-- whether or not they are adequately paid or treated with fairness in the workplace-- is to provide for the needs of the family. Prostitution and the erosion of women’s self-esteem. Poverty has made Philippine women and children vulnerable to trafficking. There are about five million child laborers and more than 1.5 million street children in the country and 60,000 prostituted children. Their numbers are increasing by 3,266 annually making the Philippines the fourth country with the most number of prostituted children.20 Children, aged 11 to 15, in prostitution said relatives introduced them to prostitution, or they were recruited by friends. The increase in the exploitation of prostituted children is attributed to the fear of HIV/AIDS. The sex trade in children is so well established because of the influx of sex tourists and the existence of sex tours catering to Japanese, European and other Caucasian tourists.21 The ratification of the Visiting Forces Agreement between the Philippines and the United States has deepened the sexual exploitation of poor women and children. For many decades, a huge prostitution system was organized and regulated to service US military stationed in several bases for purposes of R&R (rest and recreation) of US armed personnel. 22 In its aftermath the US bases left countless of illegitimate children, Amerasians denied of financial support. This number of prostituted women and children is predicted to increase with the re-opening of 22 ports of the country to the United States for joint military exercises under the Visiting Forces Agreement.23 The long U.S. military presence in the former base areas has left behind a legacy of prostitution that was passed on from generation to generation of prostituted women, lured into the flesh trade by easy money and the hopeful prospect of landing an American husband who would turn them into “decent women”. Another by-product of this unsavory tradition has been recently uncovered, this time in the form of internet sex which has cropped up just recently in raids in Angeles City. In the TV interviews, the women said they did it to help finance their families – but at what cost? Poverty in other parts of the country has also spawned cybersex and led to greater abuse and degradation of women and young girls. Rising incidence of abortion. On abortion, it is estimated that there are about 400,000 cases annually with teenagers accounting for 17%. 1994 data from the Department of Health show that 12% of all maternal deaths were due to complications arising from abortion. Abortion in fact is the fourth leading cause of death in the country affecting poor women, regardless of marital status. The most often cited reason for abortion is economic difficulty. The escalating gender violence brought about by militarization. Violence against civilian populations, and acts of gender-based and sexual violence against women and girls (including mass rape), that have become common features of war and conflict leave profound physical and psychological consequences for the women victims, their families and the future 20 Ong, op.cit. Sol F. Juvida, “Philippines – Children: Scourge of Child Prostitution,” IPS, 12 October 1997. 22 CATW-Asia Pacific, Trafficking in Women and Prostitution in the Asia Pacific. 23 Diana Mendoza, “RP has 400,000 prostitutes, ” Today, 25 February 1998. 21 PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 40 generations. Rape has gained notoriety as a weapon of war and genocide; it has become endemic in such situations. This is very true in areas where there are severe security threats, or that are extremely remote and prevent sufficient humanitarian intervention. Sexual violence targeted at refugee women has been evidenced in the wars in the former Yugoslavia, in ethnic wards in Rwanda, even in the war zones in Mindanao. Whether these be in relocation centers, refugee camps, military bases, militarization has produced countless women, men and children with broken self images. There is hunger, desolation, and disease. There is physical, emotional, and psychological displacement which may give rise to a rootlessness that will eventually destroy a culture or a society. Internal strife has also caused a steep rise in religious and ethnic fundamentalism, either as a means for self-preservation, or as an expression of resistance to the dominant forces. HOW DO WE MOVE ON? Poverty has has indeed made the Filipino woman more vulnerable and defenseless. The government has made so many commitments to improve the quality of life of its people, and yet it has consistently failed to deliver. What can civil society do to push government into implementing its constitutional duty “to adopt an integrated and comprehensive approach to health development which shall endeavor to make essential goods and other social services available to all the people at affordable cost” (Article XV, Sec.1 of the Philippine Constitution), and to make good its international commitments for the promotion of a better quality of life for its people? A forward-looking civil society agenda and strategy must be pushed for the promotion of maternal health and access to reproductive health services: continue to define and popularize the notion of comprehensive health in their communities; participate in community efforts at building bases for comprehensive women’s care; assert their right to health through adequate and appropriate health services for women and girls; monitor the delivery of health and family planning services in their communities; document abuses committed against women and girls by the medical establishment and the general health care system; actively struggle against violence against women and children. On the national level women’s groups and other civil society organizations should pressure government to: increase the budget and resource allocation for health care; decrease military expenditures and foreign debt payments; stop the privatization and commodification of health care; regulate the costs of medicine; promote indigenous healing practices (e.g. herbal medicine) through research and development; develop a health care system that provides affordable, women-sensitive and humane services; stop the promotion of unsafe contraception; enforce strict regulations of clinical trials, especially of contraceptive methods, conducted in the country; PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 41 institute mechanisms for women’s active participation in planning, monitoring and evaluation of health programs and services; respect women’s right to work and labor benefits; develop and provide measures that protect girls and women from violence against women (VAW), and services that support survivors of VAW; ensure educational opportunities and livelihood to poor women; provide a housing program and a healthy environment for the poor; enact stricter measures to protect sources of food and water. Specific strategies have been raised to address the welfare of women in resettlement areas: Minimize the incidence of gender-specific violence suffered by internally displaced women (IDP), camps and settlements should be designed with a view to protection concerns. Involve women in the planning of assistance programmes and camp management. Provide direct assistance to women for their basic needs in order to avoid situations that would lead to sexual oppression, such as exchanging sexual favors for basic needs and resources. Ensure the equitable distribution of food in settlement areas, in recognition of the fact that displaced women and girls have often been found to receive less than their full ration of food, to eat last and eat less. Ensure that women health care providers are employed in IDP settings to address women-specific health needs. Provide medical treatment and psycho-social counseling to women who have been raped or subjected to other serious sexual or physical abuse. In addition to treating the after-effects of sexual violence, greater attention must be paid to preventing its occurrence. Ensure women’s equal access to education, skills training and meaningful income generating activities. In support of their entrepreneurial skills, women should be provided equal access to credit opportunities. Deprived of any means to earn sufficient income to sustain their families, women will remain dependent on relief, long beyond the emergency phase. Encourage the formation of organizations of internally displaced women, or strengthen those already in existence. On the whole this conference calls the attention of governments throughout the world to act on the violence that militarization continues to sow in the lives of women: Stop the violence against women and children. Stop the war on terrorism and policies that threaten genuine human security. Guarantee self-determination and genuine security. Ensure a safe, clean environment. Hold the U.S. government and the national governments that host the U.S. military accountable for the human costs of militarization. PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 42 Attachment E HUMAN RIGHTS: A CROSS CUTTING ISSUE IN PEACE AND CONFLICT SITUATION AND VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN Prepared by Jessica U. Soto Executive Director, Amnesty International Philippines International Meeting on Human Security and Development November 21-28, 2005 Introduction This paper is prepared and being presented as a discussion paper in Group 2 for workshops 1-3. Amnesty International as a response to stop violence against women and children in pre, during and post conflicts conducted researches in many countries and published reports. Reports that have been used as the basis for the campaigning of our membership and supporters in 150 countries. What are very evident in the reports are the violations of the basic civil and political rights as well as the fundamental economic social and cultural rights of many people in the said situations. Amnesty International is witness to the use of small arms to commit gross abuses of international human rights and humanitarian law-whether in war, armed conflict, crime, law enforcement, state repression, or violence in the home. And the three most important issue surrounding violence against women in the conflict are 1) lack of women’s security in situations where the rule of law has collapsed; 2) abuse of women by armed groups; 3) abuse of women by security or state personnel. Civilians, particularly women and children, account for the vast majority of those adversely affected by armed conflict, including as refugee, internally displaced persons and increasingly targeted by combatants and armed elements Women as caregivers, combined with higher levels of poverty, mean that the impact of war’s destruction weighs heavily on them. At the same time, women are the backbone of the community, their ideas, energy and involvement is essential to rebuilding society in the aftermath of any PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 43 conflict or war. These include rebuilding their confidence and capacity to ensure their security as human beings towards sustainable development. Our common framework is establishing and highlighting the commonalities of the violence that affects women regardless of the country they are in, while at the same time stressing the CONTINUUM of the violence against women, whether full scale armed conflict, a post conflict or where there is an arbitrary military presence. WHAT IS MILITARIZATION and SMALL ARMS? Militarization is the process where a society becomes increasingly dominated by military values, institutions and patterns of behavior dominating influence on the political, social, economic and external affairs of a society Militarization often begins long before the outbreak of fighting and its legacy remains long after the main hostilities have ended. It is a growing reality in societies all over the globe seen in the dramatic rise in global military expenditure and the subordination of human concerns to the “security” agenda of the states. It is reflected in the use of force to resolve international and internal disputes, foreign occupation, internal conflicts and the proliferation of arms. The uncontrolled global arms trade is both a manifestation of this trend and a contributory factor to increased conflict and aggression. Most of the armed violence that affects women, both in and out of conflict, is committed with small arms: guns or weapons that can be carried and used by one person. There are approximately 639 million small arms in the world today- once for every 10 people in the world -, produced by morethan1135 companies in at least 98 countries. Eight million weapons are produced every year. Nearly 60 percent of small arms are in civilian hands. At least 16 billion units of military ammunition were produced in 2001 alone – more than two military bullets for every man, woman and child on the planet2 The arms trade has rapidly expanded over the past few decades. Global military expenditures in the early 1990 were more than 60 percent higher in real terms in the 1970s and twice as high as in the 1960s3 The easy accessibility of small arms tends to increase the incidence of armed violence, prolong wars once they break out and enable grave and 2 3 Small Arms Survey 2002, op, cit., p 14 Ruth Leger Sivard, World Military and Social Expenditures 1991. World Priorities Inc, USA PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 44 widespread abuses of human rights. In some situations the escalating supply of arms, whether through legal or illegal means acts as trigger for conflict and further fuel to sustain a long-term conflict Arms shipments in Rwanda, principally from China, France, South Africa and Egypt in the tense months preceding the civil war in 1994, are widely considered to have encouraged and facilitated the eventual genocide, even though most atrocities were committed by people wielding agricultural tools.4 The importance of arms is greatest as fuel to sustain long-term conflict, responsible not so much for the initiation of wars, but for their continuation. Armed conflict cannot be sustained without the supply of arms or, where they are already abundant, without ammunition.5 In the Beijing Platform for Action, states committed themselves to reduce excessive military expenditure and control the availability of armaments, to permit the possible allocation of additional funds for social and economic development, in particular for the advancement of women.6 There are over 40 countries in varying conflict situations involving armed violence of varying intensity in the world. In virtually all of these conflicts, the forces involved – be they state forces or armed groups –are responsible for abusing international human rights and humanitarian laws. THE COST AND EFFECT OF VIOLENCE IN CONLICT AND BEYOND Violence in “peace time” While there are debates over the best way of ameliorating the culture of violence, that is often prevalent in societies that are crime–ridden, this basic concern cannot be ignored. Studies from developed countries consistently show a clear correlation between household gun ownership and death rates. The link is most clearly seen in the case of suicides and accidental deaths, especially among young people7.Sometimes it is police and other law-enforcement officials who commit armed crime and violate human rights. For example, In Brazil, police in many areas have been Rwanda: Arming the Perpetrators of the Genocide (AI Index AFR 02/014/1995) 5 Ed Cairns, Internal document on conflict resolution. 6 Beijing Platform of Action, Strategic Objective E2 para. 143b. 7 Peter Cummings, Thomas D. Koepsell, Does owning a firearm increase or decrease the risk of death? Controversies, 5 AGUST 1989. 4 PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 45 linked to “death squads” responsible for hundreds of killings, of children, which have long gone unpunished. Furthermore, in many societies, children have become targets in drug wars, in political and gang related killing and as victims of police brutality. In Honduras, at least 1817 street children have been killed over the last five years. Again, in many societies, the death and injury of large numbers of people, many were young, have profound consequences for development. It reduces the number of people entering the work force, diverting family and social resources into care of those disabled by gun violence and forcing governments to redirect funding from social services to public security. If at all the social services are well placed and delivered to the people. In non-conflict situations, a number of studies have suggested that the risk of being murdered by an intimate partner increase with the availability of firearms.8When they are readily available, firearms are the weapons of choice when men kill their partners. In the USA, 51 percent of female murder victims are shot , according to the Violence Policy Center in 1999., Consistent with other international studies, research by Gun Control Alliance in South Africa in 1999 suggests that more women are shot at home in acts of domestic violence than are shot by strangers on the streets or by intruders. Threatening behaviors are astonishingly similar across cultures; they include shooting the family dog as a warning, or getting out a gun and cleaning it during argument. A 10-month study in Northern Ireland showed that the increased availability of guns meant that more dangerous forms of violence were used against women in the home. In the Philippines…… Violence in conflict or war situation Following the logic of the previous paragraph, women living through conflict not only have to endure assaults or the threat of assaults by the other side, but they also faces increased levels of violence from within their families, at the same time as they are depended upon to rebuild their communities from the devastation of constant attacks during the conflict. 8 Gender and Small Arms, Wendy Cuckier, Small Arms Firearms Education and Research Network (SAFER-Net) PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 46 Since the intifada, Palestinian women, have been exposed to increased levels of violence-not only through the destruction of their homes and communities by Israeli forces, but also through increased domestic violence. A poll conducted by the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion in 2002 showed that “86 percent, which is up by 22 percent in the previous year, of respondents said violence against women had significantly or somewhat increased as a result of changing political, economic and social conditions of Palestinian women”.9 The examples above are a manifestation that instability and armed conflict lead to increase in all forms of violence including genocide, rape and sexual violence. During conflicts, violence against women is often used as a weapon of war, in order to dehumanize the women themselves, or to persecute the community to which they belong. Women are likely to form the greatest proportion of the adult civilian population killed in war and targeted for abuse. Refugees and internally displaced people Women and children are estimated to make up 80 percent of the refugees and internally displaced people forced to flee their homes for protection in other countries during armed conflict. They are fleeing violence only to end up finding more violence. This is the major reason why today, 40 million people worldwide are refugees or internally displaced within their own countries. At the end of 2002, around 22 million people cross the world were internally displaced. About 13 million were refugees and asylum seekers10. Estimates show that 4.3 million people were newly uprooted in 2002, the majority in Africa. In Sudan alone, more than four million people are displaced, 85 percent of the inhabitants of southern Sudan are thought to have been displaced at least once in the last 15 years. In Colombia, more than 250,000 people have been displaced each year for the last five years. It reaches an estimated 350,000 in 2003. The government of Colombia in 2003 reported that 36 percent of displaced women in the country have been forced to have sexual relations with men. 9 Domestic Violence against Palestinian Women rises, Middle East Times, 20 September 2002, based on reporting from Agence France-Presse. 10 World Refugee Survey 2003, US Committee for Refugees, May 2003. PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 47 However, sometimes people are forced to flee as an intentional strategy of war. This was the case for example, during the conflicts in Central America in the late 1970s and early 1980s; in the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s; in East Timor (now Timor Leste) in 1999, during the recent conflicts in Burundi and Angola; and in Western Sudan this year (2004). As they traveled, they faced military or civilian checkpoints and roadblocks, where they were humiliated, threatened, and forced to pay bribes or hand over food and other possessions. In other places, armed groups and governments put limits on people’s movement. Checkpoints prevent free passage, borders are closed, passes are required, civilians are “advised” when to travel. This restrictions bar access to food, work, basic commerce, education and medical attention. The right to move freely is particularly critical for pregnant women, and sick and injured people. Even refugees fleeing on foot from one camp to another had to pass so many checkpoints that they literally had no money or possessions left. In at least one incident, helicopter gunship flew low over a refugee camp and launched artillery close to the camp in Sierra Leone, resulting in civilian deaths and injuries, in attacks, which appeared to be an attempt to frighten the refugees into leaving11. Abduction and Hostage-taking Men women and children are abducted at gunpoint and forced to fight or work for their abductors. In Uganda, the Lord’s Resistance Army has abducted more than 20,000 children since 1986; children make up a very high proportion of LRA soldiers. Those caught trying to escape are summarily executed as a warning to others. China Keitetsi, a former girl child soldier wrote a book about her experiences as a child soldier in Uganda under the National Resistance Army (NRA). In one of her stories she has this to share; “We were bodyguards to our bosses, we cooked, and we looked after them, instead of them looking after us. We collected firewood, we carried weapons and for girls it was worse because… we were girlfriends to many different officers. Today, I can’t think how many officers slept with me, and at the end it became like I don’t own my 11 Guinea and Sierra Leone: No Place of Refuge, ?Amnesty International, October 2001, AI Index: AFR05/06/2001 PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 48 body, its their body. It was so hard to stay the 24 hours a day thinking which officer am I going to sleep with today” PHILIPPINE COUNTRY REPORT International Meeting on Human Development & Security November 22-27, 2004 / Manila, Philippines 49