CHAPTER 18: PRE-INDUSTRIAL SOUTHERN AFRICA IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY KEY POINTS State-building and conflict: the mfecane/difaqane and its effects The ‘myth’ of the mfecane The mfecane east of the Drakensberg Shaka and the rise of the Zulu kingdom The end of Shaka’s reign The difaqane on the highveld Moshoeshoe and the rise of the Sotho kingdom The difaqane on the western highveld Mzilikazi and the founding of the Ndebele kingdom The British at the Cape Economic expansion Labour The eastern Cape frontier and the conflict with the Xhosa The Boer Trek and African resistance The Boer Trek The impact of the Boer Trek and African resistance Southern Africa in 1870 State-building and conflict: the mfecane/difaqane and its effects o Mfecane = ‘the crushing’ (Nguni of south-eastern lowveld) o Difaqane = ‘the scattering’ (Sotho-Tswana of highveld) o Both terms refer to the period 1816-1840 The ‘myth’ of the mfecane Traditional interpretation: violent ‘tribal conflict’ initiated by the rise of Shaka’s Zulu kingdom created ‘vacant land’ in both lowveld and highveld into which Boers migrated in the late 1830s This interpretation persistent in apartheid South Africa’s schools, even into 1980s From 1880s some historians argued the whole mfecane concept was a myth, invented to justify colonial occupation But the extreme version had already been under revision elsewhere in southern Africa Nevertheless, the 1980s challenge has prompted much greater research and attention to the evidence, and further revisions have taken place There still was conflict, but there was also nation-building and ‘vacant land’ was indeed a myth [For historiographical debate see “THE Mfecane DEBATE” in Additional Debate for Chapter 18, p.263] The mfecane east of the Drakensberg Roots of conflict: increased competition for limited resources (grazing, hunting, trading) Formation of three main kingdoms: Mthethwa, Ndwandwe, Ngwane Initiation age-regiments: militarised Regiments brought under direct control of kings, small chiefdoms sought protection of powerful Crisis of drought (1802-04), largely caused by military conflict 1816-18: Sobhuza’s Ngwane expelled to north of Pongola; Ndwandwe defeat Mthethwa in major battle (Dingiswayo killed) Shaka (Zulu chief), commander in Dingiswayo’s army, rallied Mthethwa forces and defeated Ndwandwe, driving them northwards out of region Shaka and the rise of the Zulu kingdom By 1819, Shaka ruler of powerful ‘Zulu’ kingdom between Tugela and Pongola Expanded kingdom during 1820s, south through modern Kwa-Zulu Natal and east through Drakensberg foothills Military innovations for intensive warfare: disciplined, speed, short spear Ngoni and Ndebele took this north into central Africa Centralised government: chiefs replaced by indunas, all regiments subject to king Male regiments tended royal herds and hunted ivory Female regiments cultivated royal fields Marriage and independent homesteads only allowed after regiments disbanded Regimental system weakened regional identity – everyone became ‘Zulu’ North of Zulu: Sobhuza’s Ngwane become Swazi kingdom Ndwandwe offshoots: Soshangane founded Gaza state (southern Mozambique); others become Ngoni of central Africa [Chapter 17, pp. 254-6] Zulu kingdom extended south towards Umzimkulu River, though not ‘depopulated’ here as claimed 1821-2: Zulu raids push Matiwane’s Ngwane and Hlubi across Drakensberg onto highveld The end of Shaka’s reign 1828 Shaka assassinated by his brother Dingane Inherent weakness of kingdom: built upon state of perpetual warfare bringing in booty Dingane’s greatest problem: invasion by Boers from Cape Colony [see below] The difaqane on the highveld Numerous small chieftaincies, concentration in Caledon valley Regimental cattle raiding common but not hugely destructive 1821-2: Hlubi and Ngwane - more destructive raids Coincided with worse raids from south by Griqua and Kora with guns and horses, taking captives for slavery in Cape Colony Difaqane (‘the scattering’), also involved nation-building Boers from Cape in late 1830s caused most destruction Moshoeshoe and the rise of the Sotho kingdom 1821-3: Moshoeshoe (successful cattle-raider) took advantage of disruption to gather chiefdoms of Caledon valley into defensive kingdom Mountain-top capital, Thaba-Bosiu Loose federation of hereditary chiefdoms Moshoeshoe used royal marriage to build complex system of alliances Raided cattle from weaker neighbours and sent tribute to powerful ones (Matiwane’s Ngwane, Zulu and Ndebele) Threat from ex-Cape Griqua and Kora prompted Moshoeshoe to invite Christian missionaries – hoping to cement an alliance with powerful neighbour (Cape Colony) 1830s & 40s imports of horses and guns from Cape made Sotho powerful kingdom The difaqane on the western highveld Displaced Sotho attracted westwards to raid cattle of Tlhaping at Dithakong LMS missionary Robert Moffat got Griqua to defend Tlhaping (and the mission) 1823: battle of Dithakong, Griqua (with guns and horses) defeated Sotho raiders/refugees This battle enhanced prestige of missionaries among Tswana generally One of these groups of Sotho raided further north, becoming the Kololo under Sebetwane – ended by conquering Lozi kingdom on Zambezi {Ch.17, p. 251] Mzilikazi and the founding of the Ndebele kingdom 1822: Khumalo clan from Nguni lowveld, avoided submission to Zulu, by withdrawing onto highveld Become Ndebele under leadership of Mzilikazi Powerful, centralised, Zulu-style kingdom built on central highveld Absorbed Sotho-Tswana men and women and raided those who did not send tribute Raids for tribute were widespread 1837: suffered raids from Dingane’s Zulu and combined force of Boer/Griqua/Rolong 1838-40: withdrew northwards Overcame weakened Shona/Rozvi state Established powerful kingdom on western Zimbabwe plateau, absorbing local Shona The British at the Cape During European Napoleonic Wars, British seized Cape 1795, handed it back to Dutch 1803, retook it permanently 1806 Useful British naval base and refreshment station Introduced changes to make colony secure and profitable Economic expansion Large British garrison provided local food market British market: Cape wine farmers, trekboers increased Merino sheep (wool) and ivory hunting Labour British abolition of slave trade (1807) – no more importations ‘free’ labour restricted by pass laws (‘Hottentot Code’) Written labour contracts: labourers allowed access to courts Circuit courts enforcing labour laws opposed by frontier Boers British missionaries championed cause of oppressed Khoesan of Cape Mission influence: labour restrictions of ‘Hottentot Code’ suspended Abolition of slavery (1834) to create a free wage labour force in Colony Wealthy slave owners complained of poor compensation for freed slaves Denied access to free or coerced labour, some Boers consider northward migration The eastern Cape frontier and the conflict with the Xhosa Colonists of the eastern Cape felt strengthened against the independent Xhosa by presence of a British standing army in Cape Town The British introduced the concept of ‘total warfare’ (1811-12, 1818-19) to what had hitherto been raid and counter-raid on the eastern frontier 1834-5: British annexed Xhosa territory as far as River Kei British decided security of new province too expensive to maintain and handed the territory back to the Xhosa For eastern Cape Boers, eager for new land, this was final straw The Boer Trek and African resistance The Boer Trek Late 1830s several thousand Boer families from eastern Cape trekked north of Orange River and out of Cape Colony Afrikaner historians glorify this as ‘The Great Trek’ In practice it was a series of small, disunited treks Causes: British vigorous collection of rents; Boer ‘loan-farm’ system replaced by private property in land; Locally elected Boer officials replaced by British magistrates; Use of English in courts and education; British ‘free labour’ policies: Boer freedom to abuse labour curtailed; Abolition of slavery (1834); British failure to provide additional ‘vacant land’ from victory over Xhosa (1835) The impact of the Boer Trek and African resistance The Boer treks (late 1830s, early 40s) extended permanent white settlement beyond the Orange River Exactly where they settled was determined largely by patterns of African settlement and resistance Initially headed for southern highveld (south of Vaal) Helped by Rolong against the Ndebele kingdom (just north of middle Vaal) 1837: joint Boer, Griqua, Rolong force Ndebele to withdraw northwards Boers claim ‘right of conquest’ north of Vaal, settling at Potchefstroom and making taxation and labour demands of local Batswana Further Boer settlements north of Vaal: eastern highlands and northern Soutspansberg These latter two faced considerable African resistance Main aim of Boer trekkers: settle south-eastern lowveld, just south of Zulu heartland Zulu wiped out initial party, but were then defeated by disciplined Boer force (Battle of Ncome River, 1838) Boers founded ‘republic of Natalia’ south of Tugela Dingane killed in civil war (1840), his brother successor (Mpande) avoided further conflict with trekker ‘republic’ British annexed Natal (1843), but 1852 and 1854 agreed to recognise independence of Boer republic north of Orange and Vaal Rivers 1850s and 60s: Basotho fought series of wars against Boer encroachment into Caledon valley Moshoeshoe accepted British ‘protection’ in 1868, to save remnants of Basotho kingdom – most productive part of kingdom already lost to Boer settlement Southern Africa in 1870 [see Map 18.4] 1840s-50s: British Cape Colony extended through Xhosa territory to Kei River System of ‘reserves’ – British unable to expel all Xhosa from their land ‘Reserves’ inadequate for full subsistence, need for wage labour Best land sold to whites for Merino sheep Natal: African/white ratio: 15/1. Africans ‘reserved’ 15 per cent Absentee landlords, Africans allowed to remain as rentiers or sharecroppers In Boer republics of highveld: Africans forced to provide unpaid labour services Across most of southern Africa black and white people lived from mix of herding, small-scale cultivation and hunting Besides wool, main profitable export was hunting produce Balance between independent black states and white colonies and republics African importing guns and holding their against further land encroachment Mineral discoveries of 1870s and 80s would change all that © Kevin Shillington, 2012