CORE Prototype Assessment Module Cover Sheet Content Area Title Grade Level Problem Type Anchor Standards English Rhetorical Analysis of Patrick Henry’s “Speech to the Second Virginia Convention” 9th grade Constructed Response Items, Performance Task Reading #1: Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text. Reading #2: Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summarize the key supporting details and ideas. Reading #4: Interpret words and phrases as they are used in a text, including determining technical, connotative, and figurative meanings. Reading #5: Analyze the structure of texts, including how specific sentences, p paragraphs, and larger portions of the text (e.g., a section, chapter, scene, or stanza) relate to each other and the whole. Reading #8: Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence. Writing #2: Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content. Writing #4: Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience. Writing #9: Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis SBAC Assessment Claims Claim #1: Students can read closely and analytically to comprehend a range of increasingly complex literary and informational texts. Claim #2: Students can produce effective and well-grounded writing for a range of purposes and audiences. Claim #3: Students can employ effective speaking and listening skills for a range of purposes and audiences Common Core Standards RI9.1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. RI9.2: Determine a central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text. RI9.4: Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings RI9.5: Analyze in detail how an author’s ideas or claims are developed and refined by particular sentences, paragraphs, or larger portions of a text (e.g., a section or chapter). RI9.6: Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how an author uses rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose RI9.8: Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; identify false statements and fallacious reasoning. RI9.9: Analyze seminal U.S. documents of historical and literary significance RL9.9: Analyze how an author draws on and transforms source material in a specific work (e.g., how Shakespeare treats a theme or topic from Ovid or the Bible or how a later author draws on a play by Shakespeare). W 9.2: Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content. o a. Introduce a topic; organize complex ideas, concepts, and information to make important connections and distinctions; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., figures, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension. o b. Develop the topic with well-chosen, relevant, and sufficient facts, extended definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples appropriate to the audience’s knowledge of the topic. o c. Use appropriate and varied transitions to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships among complex ideas and concepts. o d. Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to manage the complexity of the topic. o e. Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing. o f. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the information or explanation presented (e.g., articulating implications or the significance of the topic). W9.4: Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience. W9.9: Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. SL9.1: Initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 9–10 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively. o a. Come to discussions prepared, having read and researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence from texts and other research on the topic or issue to stimulate a thoughtful, well-reasoned exchange of ideas. o b. Work with peers to set rules for collegial discussions and decision-making (e.g., informal consensus, taking votes on key issues, presentation of alternate views), clear goals and deadlines, and individual roles as needed. o c. Propel conversations by posing and responding to questions that relate the current discussion to broader themes or larger ideas; actively incorporate others into the discussion; and clarify, verify, or challenge ideas and conclusions. Task Description Module Components o d. Respond thoughtfully to diverse perspectives, summarize points of agreement and disagreement, and, when warranted, qualify or justify their own views and understanding and make new connections in light of the evidence and reasoning presented. SL 9.3: Evaluate a speaker’s point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric, identifying any fallacious reasoning or exaggerated or distorted evidence. SL9.4: Present information, findings, and supporting evidence clearly, concisely, and logically such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning and the organization, development, substance, and style are appropriate to purpose, audience, and task. L9.1: Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking. L9.2: Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English capitalization, punctuation, and spelling when writing. L9.4: Determine or clarify the meaning of unknown and multiplemeaning words and phrases based on grades 9-10 reading and content, choosing flexibly from a range of strategies. o c. Consult general and specialized reference materials (e.g., dictionaries, glossaries, thesauruses), both print and digital, to find the pronunciation of a word or determine or clarify its precise meaning, its part of speech, or its etymology L9.6: Acquire and use accurately general academic and domainspecific words and phrases, sufficient for reading, writing, speaking, and listening at the college and career readiness level; demonstrate independence in gathering vocabulary knowledge when considering a word or phrase important to comprehension or expression. The assessment task will be completed in three parts. The prewriting/planning in part one involves multiple readings and note-taking. Part two involves speaking and listening and constructed response items. Lastly in part three, students will be asked to draft an informative/explanatory text. 1) “The Speech to the Virginia Convention” by Patrick Henry, 2) Teacher Directions, 3) Student Performance Task Sheet 4) Graphic Organizer #1, 5) Graphic Organizer #2, 6) Graphic Organizer #3, 7) Six-Point Formative Rubric, 8) Four-Point Summative Rubric Henry, Patrick. “Speech to the Second Virginia Convention.” (1775) 1 MR. PRESIDENT1: No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do, opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments 5 freely, and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offence, I should 10 consider myself as guilty of treason2 towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings. Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts3. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those 15 who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not4, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it. I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided; and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the 20 conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years, to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves, and the House? Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss5. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports6 with these war-like preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a 25 work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled, that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask, gentlemen, sir, what means this martial7 array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the 1 Mr. President: Peyton Randolph (1721-1775), president of the Virginia Convention 2 Treason: the offense of acting to overthrow one’s government 3 Listen…beasts: In Greek mythology, the sirens are sea maidens whose seductive singing lures men to wreck their boats on coastal rocks. In the Odyssey, Circe, an enchanter, transforms Odysseus’s men into swine after they arrive at her island home. Henry’s allusion combines these two stories (Ody. Books 10 and 12) 4 Are we disposed…temporal salvation: This alludes to Ezekiel 12:2, which says, “Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, which have eyes to see, and see not; they have ears to hear, and hear not; for they are a rebellious house” (1769 Oxford King James Bible) 5 Suffer…kiss: This alludes to Luke 22:47-48, which says, “And while he yet spake, behold a multitude, and he that was called Judas, one of the twelve, went before them, and drew near unto Jesus to kill him. But Jesus said unto him, Judas, betrayest thou the Son of man with a kiss?” (1769 Oxford King James Bible) 6 Comports v.: to be in agreement, harmony, or conformity 7 Martial: inclined or disposed to war: warlike 30 world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us; they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. 35 Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done, to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition8 to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our 40 remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned9, with contempt, from the foot of the throne. In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond10 hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free - if we mean to preserve inviolate11 those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending - if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long 45 engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained, we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left us! They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a 50 British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance, by lying supinely on our backs, and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. Three millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are 55 invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations; and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be 60 heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come. It is in vain, sir, to extenuate12 the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains 65 and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death! 8 Interposition: n.: intervention; stepping in to try to solve the problem. 9 Spurned: v: rejected 10 Fond: adj.: foolishly optimistic 11 Inviolate: adj: uncorrupted 12 Extenuate: v.: weaken ELA Grade Performance Task Prototype Directions to Teacher Text: “The Speech to the Second Virginia Convention” by Patrick Henry Materials: - The Speech - Graphic Organizers #1, #2, & #3 - Highlighters - Writing Task - Lined Paper for Writing Day 1-2 1. Reading #1: Teacher, or audio recording, reads the speech aloud to the class, focusing on fluency and emphasis. Be sure to instruct students to note the footnotes. 2. Note-taking & Reading #2: (RI 9.1, 9.2, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6, 9.9; RL 9.9; & L 9.4c) Handout the Graphic Organizer #1 and implement a close-read of the speech (i.e. wholeclass, small groups, pairs, or a combination of the three, as appropriate based on the needs of the students). They will complete it one section at a time. Day 3 3. Foundation Skills for Reading #1 (Mini-Lesson): (RI 9.8 & SL 9.3) Teacher introduces and models the analysis of the three rhetorical appeals, ethos, logos, pathos. 4. Reading #3 & Annotation of the Text: (RI 9.8 & SL 9.3) In small groups or pairs, students reread and discuss the speech for a third time, highlighting and labeling the uses of each of the three rhetorical appeals (SUGGESTION: use a different color highlighter for each appeal) Day 4 5. Foundation Skills for Reading #2 (Mini-Lesson): (RI 9.8 & SL 9.3) Teacher introduces and models the analysis of logical fallacies, such as a. ad hominem (personal attack), b. begging the question (circular reasoning), c. false dilemma (either/or simplification) d. loaded words, e. non-sequitor (conclusion does not follow the premises), f. post hoc ergo propter hoc (false cause), g. slippery slope Reading #4 & Annotation of the Text: (RI 9.8 & SL 9.3) In small groups or pairs, students reread and discuss the speech for a fourth time, underlining and labeling the uses of any logical fallacies. NOTE: Students need to be reminded that this step moves them from analysis to evaluation of the appeals that they already highlighted. They will evaluate the validity of the argument, so it is very likely that they will be underlining some parts that they have already highlighted the previous day. Day 5 6. Note-taking #2 (Pre-Writing Preparation): (RI 9.8) Individually, students will complete Graphic Organizer #2. 7. Oral Rehearsal: (SL 9.1 & 9.4) In small groups, using Graphic Organizer #2, students will discuss which arguments were the most valid and effective. Students should discuss the extent to which they agree or disagree with the group members’ findings. Students can add to or modify their responses based on this discussion. Day 6-7 8. Analysis, Evaluation & Writing: (W 9.4, 9.9) Individually, students will complete Graphic Organizer #3 in order to begin to organize the evidence that they will use in their essays. (NOTE: Even though there are only four sections on this organizer, it does not mean that there will only be four paragraphs in the essay. Some of these sections may require multiple paragraphs.) 9. Performance Task (Writing Prompt): Writing Prompt (CCSS: W 9.2, 9.4, 9.9 & L 9.1, 9.2, 9.6) After reading Patrick Henry’s “Speech to the Second Virginia Convention,” identify his argument and analyze the validity of his reasoning: Determine Henry’s argument. (Graphic Organizer #1) Delineate and evaluate his specific claims. (Graphic Organizer #1) Assess the extent to which these claims are valid. (Graphic Organizer #2) Identify any false statements and fallacious reasoning. (Graphic Organizer #2) Which rhetorical techniques does Henry utilize that make his call to action so powerful? (Graphic Organizer #2) Be Sure To: Introduce the topic by including a thesis statement. Include relevant facts, definitions, concrete details, quotes or other information Use appropriate transitions. Use precise language and vocabulary to inform or explain your topic. Establish and maintain a formal style. Provide a concluding section that follows form and supports your explanation. Constructed Response Graphic Organizer #1 Directions: Students read through each chunk of the text and discuss the text-based questions. Once they have developed an adequate analysis, they record it into the “Analysis Commentary” section. (Teacher discretion: whole-class, small group, or pairs) Text Under Discussion Text-Based Questions Analysis Commentary PARAGRAPH 1: Lines 1-11 1. “Mr. President: No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House” (Henry lines 1-2). 1. Besides the President, to whom else is Patrick Henry addressing? 1. 2. “But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do, opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely, and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is on of awful moment to this country” (Henry 2-6) 2. How does Henry plan to present his argument? 2. 3. “Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offence, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings” (Henry 9-11). 3. What reason does Henry give for speaking his mind? Paragraph 2: Lines 12-17 4. “Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts” (Henry 12-13). 5. “Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it” (Henry 14-17). 4. Why does he use the “song of the siren” as an example of the “illusions of hope”? 4. 5a. What does Henry say people usually do when faced with a painful truth? 5b.What does he say that he is willing to do if faced with a painful truth? 5a. 5b. Text Under Discussion Text-Based Questions Analysis Commentary Paragraph 3: Lines 18-27 6. “I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided; and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years, to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves, and the House?” (Henry 18-21). 7. “Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with these war-like preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled, that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort” (Henry 21-27). 6. What does Henry hope to accomplish by using the metaphor of “the lamp of experience”? 6. 7a. What examples does Henry give to show that the British are using “implements of war”? 7b.What does Henry say the result will be if the House does not pay attention to these implements? 7a. 8. What message is Henry sending when he uses the metaphor “to bind and rivet upon us those chains…”? 8. 7b. Paragraph 4: Lines 28-47 8. “I ask, gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us; they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging” (Henry 28-32) 9. “And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves” (Henry 32-36). 9. For what purpose does Henry ask these questions? What is he trying to get his audience to understand? Text Under Discussion 10. “Sir, we have done everything that could be done, to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne. In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope” (Henry 36-42). 11. “If we wish to be free - if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending - if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained, we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left us!” (Henry 42-47). Text-Based Questions 10a. Consult a dictionary to define the following words. Check that your definition matches the meaning of Henry’s argument. 10b. What was the result of these actions? 11. How does Henry redefine what he means by the word “free”? Analysis Commentary 10a. Petitioned (v.): Remonstrated (v.): Supplicated (v.): Prostrated (v.): Implored (v.): 10b. 11. Paragraph 5: Lines 48-60 12. “They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance, by lying supinely on our backs, and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. Three millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations; and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us” (Henry 48-55). 12. What 12. reasons does Henry provide for the urgency in his call to action? Text Under Discussion 13. “The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come” (Henry 57-60). Text-Based Questions 13. Henry claims that “war is inevitable”. What will be the result if they do not act? Analysis Commentary 13. Paragraph 6: Lines 61-66 “It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?” (Henry 61-65). 14 a. What does he mean when he says, “It is in vain, sir to extenuate the matter”? 14b.What evidence does Henry provide to prove that “It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter?” 14a. “I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!” (Henry 65-66). 15. What in its structure makes this last line so memorable? 15. 14b. Constructed Response Graphic Organizer #2 Directions: Reviewing your highlighted speech, select quotes that show Henry’s use of rhetoric. Record these quotes into the “Textual Evidence of his Claims” section. Then identify the appeal that he uses in that quote and determine whether the quote is valid or fallacious. Lastly, complete the two “Commentary” sections by addressing the questions in each box. Textual Evidence of his Claims Example: “No man thinks more highly that I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House” (Henry lines 1-2). Example: “For my own part I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery” (Henry lines 6-7). Appeal Ethos Pathos Valid Fallacious Commentary: Explain why this is an example of indicated rhetorical appeal. This is an example of ethos because his is considerate of his audience. He knows that his audience will be more likely to agree with him when he is complimentary of their opinions than if he is insulting or combative. He is establishing his credibility by appearing trustworthy to them. √ √ This is an example of pathos because he is appealing to his audiences’ emotions by using the loaded word “slavery”. There is a very negative connotation in that word because no one would want to be forced into submission against their will. This made the audience feel worried of that result. Commentary: Explain to what extent this example is a valid or fallacious argument. This is a valid argument because he is setting the tone for his argument. He wants them to agree with his argument, so he has to establish a preface of credibility. If they realize that he is only attacking the controversy, and not attacking the House members personally, then he is more likely to persuade them to agree with him. This is a fallacious argument because he has created a false dilemma. He has oversimplified the issue by limiting the results of the situation to only two choices, even though there might be more. He has created an either/or scenario which has forced his audience to agree with the less threatening option of freedom. Constructed Response Graphic Organizer #2 Directions: Reviewing your highlighted speech, select quotes that show Henry’s use of rhetoric. Record these quotes into the “Textual Evidence of his Claims” section. Then identify the appeal that he uses in that quote and determine whether the quote is valid or fallacious. Lastly, complete the two “Commentary” sections by addressing the questions in each box. Textual Evidence of his Claims Appeal Valid Fallacious Commentary: Explain why this is an example of indicated rhetorical appeal. Commentary: Explain to what extent this example is a valid or fallacious argument. Pre-Writing Graphic Organizer #3 Directions: Using Graphic Organizers #1 & #2, identify and organize the evidence that you will use in your essay. Determine Henry’s argument (Graphic Organizer #1) by mentioning his purpose, main idea(s), and specific claims. Delineate and evaluate his specific claims. (Graphic Organizer #1) Assess the extent to which these claims are valid. (Graphic Organizer #2) Identify any false statements and fallacious reasoning. (Graphic Organizer #2) Which rhetorical techniques does Henry utilize that make his call to action so powerful? (Graphic Organizer #2) ELA Grade Performance Task Writing Task Student Name ______________________ Directions: Please respond to the prompt below in writing. You may use your graphic organizer and/ or constructed response questions to inform your writing. You may take notes on this paper but you should write your entire response on the lined paper provided by your teacher. Writing Prompt (CCSS: W 9.2, 9.4, 9.9 & L 9.1, 9.2, 9.6) After reading Patrick Henry’s “Speech to the Second Virginia Convention,” identify his argument and analyze the validity of his reasoning: Determine Henry’s argument. (Graphic Organizer #1) Delineate and evaluate his specific claims. (Graphic Organizer #1) Assess the extent to which these claims are valid. (Graphic Organizer #2) Identify any false statements and fallacious reasoning. (Graphic Organizer #2) Which rhetorical techniques does Henry utilize that make his call to action so powerful? (Graphic Organizer #2) Be Sure To: Introduce the topic by including a thesis statement. Include relevant facts, definitions, concrete details, quotes or other information. Use appropriate transitions. Use precise language and vocabulary to inform or explain your topic. Establish and maintain a formal style. Provide a concluding section that follows form and supports your explanation. 6 Point Formative Rubric for Explanatory Writing/Grade 9 Writing 6 • Sets purpose of Content • Word choice enhances specificity • Voice is appropriate for topic, purpose, and audience • All major points supported with specific evidence from the text • Provides deep insight and creates meaningful interpretation of the text • Analysis of text, specific to the prompt, drives the discussion of literary elements 5 • Position/issue is clearly • Most major points identified by an opening developed by specific statement (may be detail; a few may be general) general • Maintains position/logic • Word choice may throughout enhance specificity • Uses precise language • Voice is appropriate for and domain-specific topic, purpose, and vocabulary to inform the audience reader • Provides insight and • Has concluding interpretation of the text statement • Analysis of text, specific to the prompt, drives most of the discussion of literary elements 4 • Writer may launch into • Some major points topic without providing developed by specific an opening statement detail • Sufficient support to • Some support may be maintain subject general • May have minor focus • Voice is present but not drift or lapses in logic consistent • Uses some precise • Provides some insight, language and domainbut not always at a level of specific vocabulary appropriate depth occasionally to inform the • Analysis of text reader occasionally drifts from • May lack closing or end prompt requirements abruptly composition through thematic introduction • Maintains position/logic throughout • Uses clear and precise language and domainspecific vocabulary consistently to inform and engage the reader • Effective concluding statement (may be restatement of points in the introduction) Organization Overall Coherence • Structure is clear • Major points are appropriately paragraphed • Coherence and cohesion demonstrated with effective devices (e.g., transitions, pronouns, etc.) • Varied sentence structure produces cohesion • Fully-developed topic for grade level • Clear and purposeful focus; in-depth, balanced support; lines of reasoning identified and developed coherently and cohesively throughout the composition • Structure is evident • Most major points are appropriately paragraphed • Coherence and cohesion demonstrated with most transitional devices appropriate; few transitional devices may be redundant • Some varied sentence structure produces cohesion • Developed topic for grade level • All features are developed throughout the composition, although they may not be equally or as welldeveloped. • Structure is evident • Many major points are appropriately paragraphed • Some evidence of coherence (paragraph to paragraph) and cohesion (sentence to sentence), but may depend on formulaic structure • Transitions may be simplistic • Bare-bones-developed composition for grade level • Simple, clear, presenting nothing more than the essentials 3 • Position/issue may be prompt dependent (rely on reader’s familiarity with prompt) • May have more than one position without a unifying umbrella statement • Lacks sufficiency to demonstrate a developed focus • Insufficient use of precise language 2 • Position/issue is limited or unclear • Unrelated ideas or major drift from focus • Off-mode response NOT serving expository purpose • May be insufficient writing to determine that the position/issue can be sustained • Lacks any use of precise language and domainspecific vocabulary 1 • Position/issue is absent or confusing • Insufficient writing to show that criteria are met • Most Support may be general • Lacks sufficiency to demonstrate developed support • Voice shifts or disappears • Lacks consistent analysis of text, specific to the prompt • Support is undeveloped, limited, or unclear • May be list of unrelated specifics • May be insufficient writing to determine that support can be maintained • No evidence of suitable voice • Lacks any insight and meaningful interpretations of text • Support is absent or confusing • Insufficient writing to show that criteria are met • Noticeable structure, but the reader may have to infer it • May have some inappropriate paragraphing • May include inappropriate transitions that disrupt progression of ideas • Lacks sufficiency to demonstrate developed organization • Structure is attempted; may be off-mode (NOT serving expository purpose) • Little evidence of appropriate paragraphing • Little structure within paragraphs (e.g., lacks purposeful ordering of sentences) • May be insufficient writing to determine that Organization can be sustained • Partially –developed topic • Some (or one) of the features may not be sufficiently formed, but all are present • Inference is usually required • May be insufficient • Attempts to address assignment, but only rudiments of techniques for forming Focus, • Support, and Organization can be detected • Some confusion and/or disjointedness • Lacks appropriate expository structure • May be insufficient writing to determine that features can be maintained • Confusing; little or no • Does not fulfill the attempt to structure assignment; barely deals • Little or no evidence of with the topic; does not appropriate present most or all of the paragraphing features • Insufficient writing to • Insufficient writing to show that criteria are met show that criteria are met Conventions Rubric Score 3 2 1 Description Strong knowledge of conventions is demonstrated Standards of punctuation, capitalization and spelling May have minor errors of usage and sentence formation A variety of sentence structure is evident Partial knowledge of conventions is evident Severity and density of errors constitute a noticeable pattern Little attempt at a variety of sentence structure Little or no discernible knowledge of conventions Severity and density of errors is such that it distracts from the meaning Sentence structure is simplistic or in error 4 Point Summative Writing Rubric (Derived from SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium) Points 4 Description 3 2 1 Maintains clear, consistent focus on the topic and has selected relevant details. Has a logical organizational pattern and conveys a sense of wholeness and completeness. Provides transitions which clearly serve to connect ideas. Uses language effectively by exhibiting word choices that are engaging and appropriate for intended audience and purpose. Includes sentences and phrases, where appropriate, of varied length and structure. Allows the reader a sense of the person behind the words. Maintains adequate focus on the topic and has adequate supporting details. Has a logical organizational pattern and conveys a sense of wholeness and completeness, although some lapses may occur. Provides adequate transitions in an effort to connect ideas. Includes sentences and phrases, where appropriate, that are somewhat varied length and structure. Uses adequate language and appropriate word choices for intended audience and purpose. Provides the reader with some sense of the person behind the words. Demonstrates an inconsistent focus and includes some supporting details, but may include extraneous or loosely related material. Shows an attempt at an organizational pattern, but exhibits little sense of wholeness and completeness. Provides transitions that are weak or inconsistent. Has limited and predictable vocabulary which may not be appropriate for the intended audience or purpose. Shows limited variety in sentence length and structure. Attempts to provide the reader with some sense of the person behind the words. Demonstrates little or no focus on the topic and few supporting details which are inconsistent or interfere with the meaning of the text. Has limited evidence of an organizational pattern and does not exhibit a sense of wholeness or completeness. Provides transitions that are weak, or no transitions at all. Has a limited or inappropriate vocabulary for the intended audience or purpose. Has no variety in sentence length or structure. Provides the reader with little sense of the person behind the words.