Sylabus – przedmiot: Prawo Kościelne i Wyznaniowe

advertisement

3.

4.

5.

6.

1.

2.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

Freedom of Religion in the US Supreme Court Jurisprudence syllabus

Syllabus elements

Course title

Faculty

Subject code

Subject language

Subject type

Academic year, semester

Lecturer

Type

Number of hours

ECTS points

Prerequisites

Assessment method

Description

Literature

Description

Freedom of Religion in the US Supreme Court Jurisprudence

Law and Administration, Chair of Roman Law, classes at

Olszewskiego Street 2

WPA-00.P-0000

English optional

1st-5th year students

2010/2011 summer semester dr hab. Franciszek Longchamps de Berier, prof. UJ f.lb@uj.edu.pl lecture

30

5

No prerequisites, 50 participants only

Classes held once a week for 90 minutes are skills oriented. Therefore presence (three absences allowed only) and active participation in class discussion are essential to complete the course successfully, although a written exam, i.e. a short essay, will be necessary to get a final grade.

The course is designed as an introduction to common law. The very first freedom of the First Amendment to the US Constitutions, i.e. freedom to exercise religion and no establishment clause, gives an occasion to discuss the jurisprudence and methods of the US Supreme

Court.

1. The Ten Commandments on state grounds permissible ( Van Orden v. Perry , 2005) or not ( McCrearyCounty v. ACLU , 2005)?

2. The first questions on the meaning of the First Amendment freedom to believe and to act ( Cantwell v. Connecticut , 1940, and

Murdock v. Pennsylvania , 1943).

3. Worship of a graven image – to overturn a precedence ( Minersville

School District v. Gobitis , 1940, and West Virginia State Board of

Education v. Barnette , 1943).

4. Parochial schools saga begins ( Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of Ewing , 1947).

5. To avoid political division along religious lines – the Lemon test

(1973).

6. The wall of separation? – the Earl Warren’s Court.

7. The line of precedence or the bunch of contradictory decisions?

( Aguilar v. Felton , 1985).

8. From permissible accommodation to impermissible establishment

( Board of Education of Kiryas Joel School District v. Grumet , 1994).

9. “ Aguilar is no longer good law.” Remarks on the doctrine of stare decisis ( Agostini v. Felton , 1997).

10. The crèche and the endorsement test of Justice O’Connor ( Lynch v. Donnelly , 1984).

11. Christmas tree and menorah. The coercion test of Justice Kennedy

( County of Allegheny v. ACLU , 1989).

12. School prayer policy ( Lee v. Weisman , 1992).

13. Keeping holy the Sabbath – Sunday closing laws ( Sherbert v.

Verner , 1963).

14. Freedom to exercise: consuming peyote ( People v. Woody , 1964)

15. New perspectives of the Roberts’ Court

Handout with cases of the US Supreme Court and articles related to them.

1

Download