PSYS Psychiatric Solutions Risks Opportunities Strong management Growing business- aging population could be bought out very specialized makes easy growth model government laws growth might already be in stock price focus only on inpatients lack of knowledge of company Not focused on stock value mainly paid by govt in insurance (shift in govt) too many acquisition complicated revenue generation government laws 1. What are the government laws that may affect PSYS both positively and negatively? Consider all possible situations. The mental health parity act (1996) it requires employers that employ more than 50 workers and offer group health insurance to offer coverage for mental illness equal to the lifetime and annual caps set for physical illnesses. The law took effect in 1998, but it has a number of loopholes and is described differently from state to state (today 33 states enforce this law). Loopholes: a. the federal law covers only lifetime and annual limits b. number of inpatient days and outpatient treatments do not have to equal coverage for physical medical needs c. federal legislation does not cover substance abuse/chemical dependency d. If employers believe it will push insurance costs over 1 percent they can be exempt. e. the law only applies to groups health plans that already offer mental health benefits. OPPORTUNITY - more Americans are covered by a behavioral managed health care plan and so there is a rise in demand for PSYS' services RISK: it might nont be able to keep up with this demand and it can only provide inpatient services (this might limit it). 2. How much do the economics conditions affect PSYS and the industry? And what are the affects of extreme situations? (i.e. recessions) PSYS's performance seems to be consistent with economic conditions. Therefore, in the case of a recession, both the industry and PSYS would suffer. 3. What makes PSYS different from its competitors? The biggest difference between PSYS and its competitors is that PSYS is almost entirely focused on inpatient behavioral health services, whereas its competitors provide a more diversified range of services. It's the leader in inpatient behavioral managed health care. 4. What does management focus on? (i.e. finance) Currently, management is focusing on expanding revenues through intense marketing/promotion fo the facilties. It also wants to increase profitabilty by increasing operating efficiency. They hope to increase operating efficiency by bringing facilities into a group-purchasing cooperative and attempting to optimize staff ratios and total compensation expenses. 5. What is PSYS's source of revenue? Please give percentages? 94.8% of revenue: inpatient behavioral healthcare facilities division; 5.2% of revenue: inpatient management contract division 6. What is PSYS's market share of inpatient, outpatient, others, etc.? It has 18% of national market share in the inpatient behavioral health services industry 7. What is PSYS's acquisition growth vs. organic growth? Give percentage of each. I cannot find exact percentages of PSYS's acquisition growth vs. organic growth but it's website does inidicate that it prioritizes organic growth over acquisitions: "PSI's strategies for consolidating the industry depend first on producing organic growth in the facilities the company already owns and operates...our second channel for industry consolidation is through the selective acquisition of both single and multi-facility operations". However, it did not state how much of its growth was attributable to acquisitions/organic growth. NCMI National CineMedia Risks Opportunities 90% revenue in risky Movie advertisement increasing industry advertiser’s contract new market depend on film industry growing revenue from advertisements What are the actual vested interests of its What contracts does NCMI have from parent companies AMC and Regal? advertising companies? (i.e. Coca-Cola) NCMI’s founding members hold 55.2% NCMI has several multi-year contracts of the company and are contracted in 30with leading media companies to provide year agreements to receive advertising original content to feature in NCMI’s material solely from NCMI. Thus, the First Look entertainment package that it founding partners are financially invested provides theaters with to play before in NCMI and also depend on the films. This content typically consists of services that NCMI provides. NCMI and behind-the-scenes interviews or segments its founding members’ interests are relating to the making of upcoming films aligned in that both aim to garner as or television shows. Under the terms of many viewers as possible to the theater, these contracts, our content partners but NCMI relies on the theaters itself to make available to us original content accomplish this and thus has little direct segments and make long term control over the audience it can provide commitments to buy a portion of our to advertisers. advertising inventory.. Current partners include Discovery Communications, Inc., Please give a breakdown of revenues. (i.e. NBC Universal, Sony Pictures from advertisements in lobbies and on Entertainment, Turner Broadcasting screen) System Inc., and Universal City Studios. NCMI’s agreements with content Under their contracts with AMC, Regal, providers and from concession and Cinemark, these founding members advertisements for First Look amounted to are obligated to purchase the last 90 34.4% of total revenue for 2006. 90.7% of seconds of First Look to satisfy their onrevenue was derived from advertisements, screen advertising; these are used to including the content included in First advertise each theater’s beverage Look, concession advertisements, and all concessionaire. national and regional advertisements both in lobbies and on screen. Revenue from Additionally, NCMI sells advertisements CineMeetings and digital events form most both nationally and locally. 77.2% of of the remaining 9.3% of NCMI’s revenue. advertising revenue comes from national accounts across a variety of industries, Please give examples of some other including apparel / accessories, companies with similar business model. automotive, confectionary, credit card, How cyclical are those companies and the entertainment, personal care, retail, industry? telecommunications and video games, as NCMI’s main competitors, Screenvision well as branches of the armed forces. It and Unique Screens follow a similar model, works both with companies directly and but are not publicly traded and are thus through advertising agencies. The names difficult to assess. However, as an of individual advertisers are not advertisement company, NCMI itself disclosed. admits that its revenue tends to be cyclical. According to NCMI’s 10k, revenue is How dedicated is NCMI to expanding? typically lowest in the first quarter of the NCMI realizes the potential for growth calendar year as advertising clients scale through expanding its network of theaters, back their advertising budgets following and plans on expanding its reach and the year-end holiday season, and revenue is geographic coverage through new theaters highest during the summer and the holiday added to its current clients and through season when theatre attendance is normally additional network affiliate agreements highest. However, a weak advertising with other theatre circuits. The mainly aim market, the poor performance of films to attract larger regional circuits in more released in a given quarter or a disruption metropolitan areas or in geographic areas in the release schedule of films could affect where NCMI does not have significant results for the entire fiscal year and market coverage. For example, in March significantly affect quarter-to-quarter 2007, NCMI signed a network affiliate results. Because results vary widely from agreement with Goodrich Quality quarter to quarter and may be Theatres, a theatre operator with 269 unpredictable, our financial results for one screens in Michigan, Indiana and Illinois. quarter cannot necessarily be compared to another quarter and may not be indicative What comprises of the deal with AMC and of financial performance in subsequent Regal? Be specific. quarters. These variations in our financial NCMI has long-term service agreements results could contribute to volatility in with AMC, Cinemark and Regal, and NCMI’s stock price. multi-year agreements with several other theatre operators. The agreements with other theater operators grant NCMI exclusive rights to sell advertising on their theatre screens. The agreements with AMC, Cinemark, and Regal grant exclusive rights to NCMI to sell advertising and meeting services and distribute entertainment programming in these theatres. These agreements consist of a 30year term, beginning after NCMI’s IPO in 2007. What are the affects of its recent contract with Loew's? AMC and Loew’s theaters announced a merger in 2005 that would go into affect into 2006, in which Loew’s theaters would adopt the AMC name. At the time of the merger, Loews operated 198 theaters with 2,235 screens, which were brought into the NCMI network after the merger. For accounting purposes, NCMI’s operating and pro forma results from this period do not include the payments made by AMC to NCMI for integration of these screens; these payments would have amounted to $9.6 million in 2006. The Loews/AMC merger has expanded NCMI’s theater network significantly. How interest is NCMI in its financial structure? NCMI’s founding partners hold 55.2% of the outstanding common membership units of the company, while the other 44.8% is publicly traded, following NCMI’s IPO in February. Who are customers and what are the long contracts? Advertisers: addressed in question 1. Theaters: addressed in question 4. HCP Health Care Property Investors Risks Large size confines growth REIT has limited cash having to give away 90% litigation back out? Why? how much can grow REIT bubble? Opportunities board and management focuses on financials trust acquisition structure geographic diversity- 42 states established company- dodge barriers conservative balance sheet safer REIT b/c of healthcare as opposed to others 1. What were the events that led to $42 high a month ago? Last month, the firm reached its 52-week high of $42 due to the payment of a dividend of $0.45 to shareholders. This dividend beat expectations as well as the one from 2006. This increased consumer confidence and resulted in the surge in price. Additionally, previously the firm had been selling assets from their portfolio, which resulted in large profits, thus fueling the increase in stock price. 2. Why is the company having such large growth? What is fueling it and where does it plan on going in the future? The company is experiencing such large growth due to its aggressive investment strategy. Before the increase in stock price, the firm had been selling off assets. Currently, the firm is aggressively acquiring assets totaling to $449 million by March 31, 2007. HCP's offer to purchase Sunrise is also an indication of its strategy to acquire properties as well as other REITS. For the future, HCP will be continuing with its expansion nationwide in healthcare facilities. Their main goal appears that they would like to acquire more properties in order to gain greater market share within the industry as well as to diversify their portfolio even more. By acquiring successful REITs, HCP will have a greater opportunity to acquire properties as well as firms that manage them well. Thus for the future, their strategy is to expand outward and to expand quickly. With their expertise and experience in the industry, they have the capabilities to utlize this expansion. Currently, the price is around $34 due to the recent announcement of a lawsuit by Ventas. I feel that this drop in price is merely a reaction to the news, but the target price of around $40 will be reached in the long run. The lawsuit does not carry much merit and is more of a reaction from Ventas against Sunrise as well for the premium paid on the acquisition. GSK GlaxoSmithKline Risks Opportunities Loss of Advair end of ‘07 HPV Vaccine Goldman Sachs downgrade No drug comprises of more than 15% of Revenue Investing in R & D. R & D growth: from 871 million to 980 million in latest P/E ratio (cheap) quarter Profit margin has been increasing Impending patent expirations for GSK: - Imitrex (migraine) 6/28/07 - Advair and Serevent (asthma) 2/12/08 - Lamictal (epilepsy, bipolar disorder) 7/22/08 Both Imitrex and Advair will be replaced; Lamictal will not be an issue for another year. No other pending patent expirations. “New Advair” in clinical trials – positive results so far Their pipeline is significant, with 158 projects in clinical development at the end of February 2007. Investing in R & D. R & D growth: from 871 million to 980 million in latest quarter No major impending lawsuits. GSK PE Ratio Industry 15.15 S&P 500 24.70 20.41 The P/E ratio is at a very comfortable level. The stockholder is paying less for GSK’s earnings. This has been a trend for the past few years. FLO Flowers Foods Risks Seems to be at the peek of price chart and might not go up 20% sales with wal-mart In-put prices affect stock, corn prices might go up Possibilities for negative health trends (anti-carb) Is FLO trying to diversify its suppliers? Investment Risk/Neutral: Looking at FLO’s most recent Annual Report, I have not found evidence that the company is trying to diversify its suppliers. That said, looking at the 10K’s of FLO’s competitors, it emerges that it is quite common for a large retailer, such as Wal-Mart, to account for 15-20% of a food retailer’s sales. For example, Wal-mart accounted for nearly 16% of Sara Lee’s sales in fiscal 2006. It accounted for over 13% of sales for Interstate Bakeries and 14% of sales for Campbell Soup Co. in 2006. FLO is right in this range as well, as Wal-Mart accounted for 18.9% of sales in 2006. Opportunities Historically well positioned Pick up on trends quickly Keep local brands Do well addressing Natures Own: Organic trend How are the contracts with large suppliers? i.e. Wal-mart Investment Opportunity: Typically, the relationships between bakeries and large retailers are largely dependent on price, product quality, and customer service performance. Specifically, the relationship between FLO and Wal-Mart is positive. It is important to consider the inconsistency and risk of some of FLO’s competitors. Given the recent bankruptcies (Interstate Bakeries) and consumer demand problems (Sara Lee) of several of FLO’s competitors, even a slight increase in FLO’s price would not make it a wise business move for Wal-Mart to switch to a less consistent supplier for a slight decrease in price. Thus, in sum, it seems FLO’s relationship with Wal-Mart is fairly standard for the industry, and furthermore, because of the unreliability of several of its competitors, FLO enjoys an advantage in maintaining a strong relationship with Wal-Mart, its biggest customer. CMCSA Comcast Corporation Risks Times Warner is better 30% restriction Shifting to satellite Opportunities Name Recognition Switching technology in Chicago from Analog to Digital 1. What is going on with the 30% law? Back in the early 90s, a regulation was placed by the FCC that limited the number of subscribers that a single cable company could serve. Nevertheless, a federal court overturned this regulation in 2001, telling the FCC to come up with new regulations for cable companies. The FCC has been operating unofficially with this 30% cap since then, until it devises new guidelines. In February, Comcast, which has about 27% of all cable subscribers, challenged the unofficial regulation, citing new developments such as the Internet, cellular phones, P2P networks, satellite, and on-demand services as signals that the market has changed and such caps are unnecessary these days. The FCC is considering reinstating the cap, but even the National Cable Television Association is against it since AT&T and Verizon are beginning to enter the market for video services and the FCC had allowed large mergers in the telecom industry. (-) If the new cap is put into place, Comcast would be unable to acquire or merge with large companies in the industry and would even have to turn down subscribers if it bordered the cap. As of right now, it is unclear whether or not the FCC will pursue this cap. (+) Considering the fact that a federal court asked the FCC to come up with new regulations and the markets do seem to be changing, it seems unlikely that this route will be fully pursued. 2. More Metrics (updated original ones as well) Ratio Price to Earnings Forward P/E Price to Sales Price to Book EBITDA Market Cap EV/EBITDA PEG Ratio (5 yr expctd.) Return on Equity CMCSA 32.12 24.58 3.11 1.99 9.97B 84.92B 10.942 2.59 6.44% TWC 38.31 23.86 3.01 1.50 4.45B 36.14B 11.19 2.32 4.26% Industry 23.80 2.80 2.20 - S&P 500 20.25 2.87 4.06 - (+) With lower P/E and EV/EBITDA ratios compared to TWC, it may be that Comcast is slightly undervalued compared to TWC. (-) Nevertheless, TWC has lower Price to Sales, Price to Book, and PEG Ratios compared to Comcast, obscuring the valuations of the two companies. (+) Both of them nevertheless have higher ratios compared to the industry and the S&P 500, which illustrates that investors are willing to pay a high premium for the companies. (+) The return on equity, which measures a company’s profitability in terms of how much money the company has made with the money shareholders have invested, is higher for Comcast than for TWC, however, illustrating the profitability of Comcast over TWC. (+) Although Comcast has a much higher market cap than TWC, it also has a higher EBITDA, which illustrates profitability of the company without taking into account the potentially distorting financial and accounting decisions made by the companies. Comcast’s large size in its particular industry is a particular advantage. 3. How are the acquisition of Fandango and Patriot Media going to affect CMCSA? (+) The acquisition of Fandango.com, a website that sells movie tickets, will enhance the new website Comcast will have, Fancast.com. On this entertainment website, users will be able to search for TV shows, movies, actors, actresses as well as watch the available video content. This will allows users to find out when different shows are playing on TV or on-demand. By adding Fandango the services offered by Fancast, users will have a more complete media/entertainment website. The deal is purportedly priced at $200 million. (+) Patriot Media is a cable company based in Princeton, New Jersey. The area is primarily upper class, and Comcast will be paying a sizeable premium for its acquisition of the company. Ultimately, the customers that are served by Patriot Media tend to be upper class, which is explains the premium: Comcast hopes that these new subscribers will purchase some of its higher-end service packages, allowing them to bring in higher revenues. The deal is priced at $483 million, making each customer worth about $6,000 compared to the average $4,000 per customer of other cable companies. 4. Where is the future of cable? (+) While the media offerings available on the Internet and the entry of large telecom companies in the industry appear to be signaling the end of cable, the industry nevertheless seems to be robust with a lot of opportunity for growth. As long as cable companies continue to pursue the triple play strategy – perhaps even add wireless/mobile services in the mix as well – and look to enhance its HDTV services, the industry can continue to keep growing. The emergence of different video outlets also emphasizes the different places to which cable companies can add their content. These different outlets further provide various opportunities for advertising, generating more revenues. As a result, the end of cable does not necessarily appear in sight, and the industry seems poised for further growth and development. (-) Nevertheless, because of new technology, users may not necessarily need to use cable anymore, instead relying on the companies that produce the shows themselves to broadcast the shows on the Internet or on a program such as iTunes. CHL China Mobile Limited Risks Opportunities Risk of state owned company Potential to build Churn rate No competition Falling revenue per subscriber Social affect of cell What are the specific of customer's Size contracts that causes such a high churn Government protection rate? [Risk] Favorable metrics I believe the high churn rate is partly due to the 2008 Olympics fact that China Mobile includes prepaid High penetration rate subscribers in its numbers. These prepaid Growing middle class subscribers are typically foreigners traveling How will CHL respond to changing abroad or conducting short term business, so technology? [Opportunity] they terminate services often. However, I have 3G networks are the nearest foreseeable been unable to find specific information about change in technology that CHL must the contents of China Mobile's subscriber respond to. According to an interview from contracts. Both China Mobile and China 2006 with CHL's CEO, China Mobile plans Unicom focus on obtaining customers versus to upgrade to 3G networks for the 2008 returning a profit. (Why? See question IV.) Olympics, and to control capital expenditures, the company "will build out iv. Exactly to what extent will the state3G in some places where there is demand ownership of CHL affect the company for high-speed wireless data". The financial and comprehensively in the company does not yet foresee a need to short and long run? upgrade entirely to 3G since not all [Risk] customers will want or need 3G services. Those who upgrade to 3G need only In China, "only state-backed companies have change their handsets, not their SIMM the connections with state-owned banks to get cards or phone numbers. the investment needed for new projects", and to keep these loans coming, CHL places a greater focus on its number of users instead of on turning a profit. This leads to deflation despite a minimally competitive market. CHL is 76% owned by the state. In the short run, CHL will no doubt continue to return profits simply because of volume, but there is some uncertainty about CHL's stock price, particularly if investors are skeptical about CHL's priorities. (Of course, it's also important to keep in mind that the government wants to own profitable companies as well.) iii. What are the specifics of the 2008 Beijing Olympics deal? [Opportunity/risk] China Mobile is the sole mobile communication service partner of the Olympics. China Mobile will build TD-SCDMA networks in Beijing, as well as Olympic-co-sponsoring cities Tianjin, Shanghai, Qingdao, Qinghuangdao, Shenyang and Hong Kong. In addition, China Mobile "will provide all mobile communications networks and services to the Beijing Olympic Games, 2008 Paralympic Games, the Beijing Organizing Committee for the 2008 Olympic Games (BOCOG), and the Chinese Olympic Committee". China Mobile is also testing wireless local area networks (WLAN) for the Beijing Olympics. Tests revealed that "the current WLAN technology 802.11i has big security loopholes and is easy to attack"; China Mobile would be expected to assume some responsibility if Olympic stories and media were stolen as a result. It is unclear what China Mobile is doing to correct these security loopholes, however "Intel and IWNCOMM, a private Chinese company, have separately developed 802.11i and WAPI to remedy safety defects." ADI Analogue Devices Risks Opportunities Competitive nature of semiconductor Huge market share in 3G phones Taken advantage of many pros and Large company and devotion might be factored in the industry semiconductors High barriers to entry to 1. Why cashflow is going down at certain points? Elaborate. The cash flow dip comes from increased stock-based compensation, and a $254 million distribution from the company's deferred compensation plan. 2. How are sells expanded in Asia ? Analog Devices is a company entering China later than several of its competitors, but now nearly half of its sales come from Asia. The company is harvesting the benefits from using the local design and support team. Innovation is something related to culture. China is now a more open society, and this transition is also bringing more creativity to the surface. 3. More information on the cyclical pattern of stocks. The cyclical pattern of the semiconductor industry is inevitable. The semiconductor industry is highly sensitive to the business cycle and a semiconductor company’s period of economic prosperity is characterized by higher revenues and its downturns and contractions will involve lower revenues. Any semiconductor company demonstrates this cyclical pattern. According to El Segundo, California-based market research firm iSuppli, 2007 will see the peak of the semiconductor industry’s growth cycle and double-digit growth is expected. 4. Is the industry slowing in long run? Although the Semiconductor Industry Association said that it seemed that the semiconductor industry has slowed down, there is still an on-going for semiconductors. The off-shoring to Asia is a great opportunity for growth. China is the third largest country market in the world today for semiconductors, and enjoys the world’s highest growth rate. By 2010, China is predicted to be the world’s second largest country market for semiconductors, behind only the United States. Semiconductors are the second largest U.S. export to China and China’s number one import. The World Semiconductor Trade Statistics foresees a continuously growing demand for electronic products such as PCs, digital consumer appliances and mobile communications, enhanced by the increase of semiconductor content per installed system. The bad news despite tremendous growth expected in 2007, the semiconductor industry this year will only grow 10.6 percent due to changing dynamics of business—below historical market peaks. 5. Do you expect continual growth in long run? Yes, there is increased demand for electronic entertainment. The company’s signal processors bridge the so-called “expectational gap” between what we see and touch and thus, electronic entertainment demand for this fuller experience will continue to rise. Experts do acknowledge that growth will be slightly below average, but in general the semiconductor industry has seen balanced growth in the past few years and this is expected to continue. The following is research from In-Stat research firm. The computer segment will account for 42% of the worldwide semiconductor market through 2011. Higher-than-average growth is expected in the automotive and consumer markets, reaching 8.7% and 18.4% of total semiconductor revenue by 2011, respectively. The communications segment is expected to grow at above-average rates and maintain its second place ranking. 6. What are the risks of ADI's increased interest in China ? China, in general is among 10 countries/regions with the lowest investment risks. Although Analog Devices’ products are used regularly in China’s mobile phones, and the Chinese government is closely involved in China’s biggest mobile phone company, China Mobile, the country in general is becoming more open to investments. The country, thus, is pretty low risk. 7. Are there any plans to expand in other continents? In Europe, Analog Devices accounts for about one fifth of the company’s worldwide revenues and worldwide work force. The company has a manufacturing facility in Limerick, Ireland, and seven design centers in Denmark, England, Scotland, Ireland and Spain. European client references include main telecom manufacturers Alcatel, Ericsson, Nokia, Sagem and Siemens, automotive equipment manufacturers such as Autoliv, Bosch Automotive and Siemens VDO, as well as consumer references such as Harman and Philips, and a variety of industrial clients including ABB, Agilent Technologies and Rhode & Schwarz. (from analog.com) CVS CVS/Caremark Corporation Risks The impact in one year Affected by litigations and regulations Opportunities Positioning in OTC pharmacy with aging baby boomers New rewards initiative Regarding Wal-Mart, I think CVS is a much safer bet, though I do like Wal-Mart as a stock. As its clientele is mostly lowermiddle income, rising oil prices and concerns about the housing market are more likely to affect sales at Wal-Mart than they are to hurt sales at CVS, which derives 95% of its revenue from retail pharmacy. Wal-Mart faces the additional risk of litigation, much more so than CVS, as it’s such a big target- note the recent news about possible surveillance operations. Moreover, Wal-Mart has come under fire for paying its employees low wages and not offering adequate healthcare coverage- one big risk for WalMart is unionization. Finally, Wal-Mart’s same-store sales in the U.S. have been very poor of late, and as Wal-Mart already has a very large market presence, its opportunities for store expansion are limited. While I do think management has made motions to address this issue of U.S. sales growth, it is still a concern. On the plus side, Wal-Mart has been seeing great growth in the international sector, which has really compensated for the poor U.S. growth. However, this international expansion is not without its risks; Wal-Mart’s attempts to expand into South Korea and Germany were both disastrous. To back up my claim about CVS’ past good performance in mergers & acquisitions, I would point to two specific events. The first was the 1997 acquisition of RevCo D.S. for $2.8B. The acquisition added more than 2500 stores to the chain- the largest acquisition in the history of the U.S. retail pharmacy industry. The second was the 2004 acquisition of 1268 Eckerd Stores and Eckerd Health Services, a PBM and mail-order pharmacy business, from J.C. Penney for $2.15B. CVS’ stock was at 21.32 after the announcement that the Eckerd acquisition was complete and the stock steadily climbed afterwards (as shown below). While this is on a lesser scale than the merger with Caremark, it shows CVS was capable in the past of integrating another PBM and mail order pharmacy business. Additionally, there have been many other smaller acquisitions that CVS has successfully executed in order to become a dominant figure in the industry. As to existing store locations, CVS has 6.208 stores as of March 31, 2007, located in 38 states. Florida has the most stores, with 668, followed by Texas with 476, New York with 426, California with 376, Pennsylvania with 362, and Massachusetts with 329. The company, initially confined to the Northeast, has grown through acquisitions into a national chain. Most recently, CVS acquired Osco Drug and Sav-On Drugs in 2006, giving the company a bigger presence in the Midwest (an area formerly controlled by Walgreens, which is based outside of Chicago) and in the southwest, particularly in fast-growing southern California. In 2004, the acquisition of Eckerd drug stores gave CVS a greater presence in Florida and Texas. CVS has this to say about site selection, “We look for highly visible locations in a high traffic area that is easily accessible and is in a trade area of at least 18,000 people. We prefer sites that can support a freestanding store with drive-thru capability, between 1.5 to 2 acres, with parking for at least 80 vehicles.” In 2007, CVS plans to open 275 new or relocated stores, adding 3% to its total retail square footage. Walgreens has a total of 5,693 stores located in 48 states and Puerto Rico. Of these, 711 are in Florida, 567 in texas, 519 in Illinois, and 454 in California. In fiscal 2007, it plans to open a net increase of 400 stores. It plans to expand into California, Texas, North Carolina, New York, and Florida. CVS engages in the mail order pharmacy business both through PharmaCare, its pre-established PBM, and now, Caremark. Through its PharmaCare subsidiary, CVS operates strong mail order, specialty pharmacy, and pharmacy benefits management businesses. In fact, PharmaCare generated $3.7 billion in revenue in 2006, a 25 percent increase over the previous year. PharmaCare's mail order business continued to thrive in 2006, with prescription volumes up nearly 10 percent. Caremark operates 7 large automated mail service pharmacies in the country, with 21 smaller mail service pharmacies devoted to dispensing specialty medications used to treat chronic or genetic diseases. In 2004, mail service made up 31.07% of total revenues; in 2005, 35.14%; and in 2006, 34.15%. Mail service revenues increased 44.6% from 2004 to 2005 and 8.2% from 2005 to 2006. Claims processed by mail service increased 24% from 2005 to 2006. Significantly, in 2006, revenue per claim processed was $198.86 for mail and only $44.17 for retail. As the numbers show, the mail order pharmacy is very lucrative, especially in terms of specialty pharmacy, which dispenses a smaller number of more expensive medications. BABY Natus Medical Risks Opportunities Slow growth Might be acquired 1. Why is management so good? They've Income was negative for that last two years 1. Why is BABY public when everyone only been there for 1-4 years. else is private? One of the reasons that BABY is public when everyone else is private is the nature of the sector it is in. With high costs (associated with regulation and legal factors) and a relatively limited market for companies that are not yet well established, barriers to entry in the market are high for the medical appliances and equipment sector1. The push for exciting and efficient new products also means that R&D efforts are crucial and the costs are likely to be continuously large. Some companies, such as Welch Allyn, choose to deal with that by remaining private, other companies try to grow and then attract the attention of some larger company that holds a wider range of products. While this puts Natus in a prime position for taking advantage of the needs of its niche markets, it does also mean that as the company grows it is still in danger of being undercut by other larger companies (such as Viasys, Medtronic, or even GE) if it does not continually produce innovative and safe new technologies. More information about acquisitions in the past. BABY’s most recent acquisitions include Biologic (diagnostic hearing and EEG products for $66 million), DELTAMED SA (EEG products to deal with sleep disorder and neurological dysfunction diagnostics in the European market for $4 million), and Olympic Medical (NICU One of the reasons the management is strong and expected to do well with this company is experience in the healthcare field, especially in terms of working with a smaller company looking to grow in a steady and productive way. For example, Jim Hawkins, the current CEO, worked with Invivo from 1985 to 2004. Invivo (under the name Intermagnetics) started as a small company focusing on MRI products to one of the leading manufacturers of MRI systems and related monitoring devices sold directly to hospitals. In 2006, Invivo was acquired by Philips Medical as part of the Philips Electronics empire3. Similarly, while Dr. Christopher Chung, MD (Vice President Medical Affairs, R&D, Engineering) has only worked in his current capacity with Natus since 2003, he consulted for the company since 2000. Before that he worked in the clinical setting of a hospital and as an engineer at Nellcor, another medical device manufacturer4. Thus, he is familiar with all aspects of his job position. While other members of the management team may not have worked only in the health care field, they all have experience with medical device companies in their backgrounds. Furthermore, the management team is often cited by analysts as being so strong because of their commitment to a conservative financial policy which includes measures to keep costs down as much as possible5. Thus, they are trusted to make decisions that in the end will not Prohibitive Barriers to Entry. Standard & Poor’s Industry Survey / Healthcare: Products and Supplies. February 22, 2007. “Philips to Acquire Intermagnetics (Invivo).” About Us. http://www.igc.com/invivo/about%20us.aspx?NewsID=27. 4 Biography. Investor Relations. http://investor.natus.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=129675&p=irol-govBio&ID=93167 5 Natus Medical vs. Under Armour: Natus Medical. http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2007/03/16/natus-medical-vsunder-armour-natus-medical.aspx 1 3 products for $16.6 million). The company’s other major acquisition, Fischer-Zoth, was completed in the fall of 2004 to expand its hearing diagnostic systems, especially in the European markets. It produced a small dip in the company’s stock price, but its relatively low impact on the balance sheet (charges of about $1 million) meant that the company quickly recovered from the purchase. While this is the first time the company has made acquisitions of this magnitude, this is also the first time that the company has had the capabilities to do so, posting record revenues since shortly after its first major acquisition. destroy the company’s chances for survival or growth. (This strategy has been called into question recently and is discussed above in question 3). More information of BABY products and synergies. As stated in the stock pitch, BABY’s five major product categories are Newborn Hearing Screening, Diagnostic Hearing Assessment, Monitoring Systems for Neurology, Diagnostic Sleep Analysis and Newborn Care. Many of their products are very specific to the newborn or child patients, such as their Save the Gonads shields which are meant to protect a baby’s Regarding the recent stock price drop reproductive organs during frequent x-rays6. As the company has expanded however, some of these products have been modified to be utilized Following the company’s first quarter earnings rd for a variety of patients. For example, their report released on Thursday, May 3 , the Papoose Board line7 is a series of immobilizers company faced a significant drop in its stock price down to about $15.37 as of the closing bell to help keep agitated patients in place during exams and procedures that now comes in a on Tuesday, May 8th2. Analysts attribute this variety of sizes to fit all patients from the infant drop to the fact that the company increased stage right through adulthood. costs and also missed its EPS estimates for the One of the areas where the company has quarter by 1 cent ($.07 instead of $.08). While seen the most success and growth is in the this is some cause for concern, the drop seems to be leveling off and certain factors suggest that Diagnostic Hearing Assessment category. Not this may be soon overcome by the company for only does the company produce a variety of diagnostic tools, it has also expanded to create the following reasons: data transfer and data management programs8 for the computer to directly link to these tools. II. Costs were going up for good reasons. Thus, not only can doctors diagnose a potential Much of the increase had to do with hearing problem, they can also monitor its growing R&D costs. Considering the company’s recent acquisitions and the fact progress and store data on that progress. Similar systems exist in their Neurology Diagnostic that new products are the lifeblood of the Systems and may be the basis for further sector’s profits, these rising costs may expansion of monitoring technologies for a signal strong progress for the company in variety of ailments. the near future. When making acquisitions, BABY looks III. While the EPS estimate was off by 1 cent, for companies with solid product lines that may it was still positive and made a huge jump Yahoo Finance. Pediatric and Newborn Care. http://www.natus.com/index.cfm?page=products_1&crid=40 7 Papoose Boards: Pediatric and Newborn Care. http://www.natus.com/index.cfm?page=products_1&crid=109&contentid=202. 8 Hearing Screening. http://www.natus.com/index.cfm?page=products_1&crid=17 2 6 from the negative $.25 EPS for the same quarter of the previous year. Thus, the company seems to be climbing out of its financial instabilities from its series of acquisitions in the previous year. IV. Other than its EPS, the company posted a healthy set of financial information. Revenues were listed as $27.1 million, marking a 40% increase from the same quarter of the previous year ($19.4 million). Profits, as stated before, were positive for the quarter at $1.5 million. Revenue guidance for the year ahead was also raised to $117.5 million to $119 million with EPS increasing from $.49 to $.52. V. Considering the small size of the company and the minimal miss of the EPS estimates, BABY’s management team could have easily had its accounting department use some extra parameters to have the EPS hit the mark. Instead, they chose to be honest and announce the actual outcome even though it was less than ideal. This speaks to the integrity of the management team and the confidence they have that this is a temporary setback for Natus. expand the specific areas of usage (or even regions) for their products while still sticking to the main focus of newborns and younger patients. Its newest acquisition, Olympic Medical, focuses on creating products of the neonatal intensive care unit of hospitals (NICU). While expanding Natus into new areas of patient care (intensive care), this acquisition still provides services geared at the newborn patient sector. Thus, when the acquisition was completed Natus was able to leave Olympic’s product lines, operations, and R&D prospects in place and more easily integrate the company as yet another set of product lines within BABY.9 While I could not find specific information on how much of the company’s revenue comes from acquisitions and how much from its core businesses, the deep level of integration between the company and its acquisitions suggests that any discrepancies become unimportant rather quickly. Furthermore, the high level of R&D spending that BABY is doing suggests that it continues to develop its product lines and expand its technologies within all of its product categories, original and acquired. How are the growths in niche markets? The medical product and supplies industry in general (which includes the equipment and appliances sector) has been doing fairly well and is expected to improve in the remainder of 2007 as patient populations increase. Niche expansion in particular seems to have started picking up speed in 2006 and looks to continue in 2007. Some of the growth has been due to specialized niche companies joining forces10 (much like BABY’s last few acquisitions) in order to more actively compete with some of the industry giants. Furthermore, such expansion into foreign economies (as Natus as been doing Natus Medical to Acquire Olympic Medical. October 16, 2006. http://investor.natus.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=129675&p=irolnewsArticle&ID=916403&highlight= 10 M&A May Focus on Niche Players. Standard & Poor’s Industry Survey / Healthcare: Products and Supplies. February 22, 2007. 9 with its acquisitions in Europe) is also expected to bode well for the industry, especially in terms of high tech products like the ones that BABY creates for diagnostic and monitoring purposes11. Finally, the fact that BABY is successfully negotiating long-term contracts for its specific niche products means that the company will have guaranteed demand for its niche products (and new off-shoots of these products) in an industry that is marked by large-scale contracts instead of individual purchasing by physicians and medical specialists. Medical technology has a global market. Standard & Poor’s Industry Survey / Healthcare: Products and Supplies. February 22, 2007. 11 AXP American Express Risks Is American express has strict Revenue growth decreases Not accepted everything Reacts to economy Opportunities Expanding from high income to low income markets New protection act Brand name and long history AMERICAN EXPRESS Revenues The Company has four operating segments: Global Network & Merchant Services, U.S. Card Services, International Card & Global Commercial Services and Corporate & Other. The bulk of its revenues comes from its card services. For this reason, its biggest competitors are other card services such as MasterCard, Discover, and Visa. For the three months ending March 31 2007, American Express Company's revenues rose 14% to $7.63B. Net income from continuing operations rose 22% to $1.07B. Revenues reflect an increase in discount income, higher travel commissions & fees, an increase in securitization income and higher other income. Net income also reflects promotion, rewards & card member expenses and lower international banking & other provision for losses. Revenue drivers, such as card accounts and spending volume, should remain robust in an expanding economy with an increasing volume of consumer spending. Competition and Comparative Advantage American Express has a successful competitive advantage over other card service providers in the form of its "closed-loop" structure. This means that it executes each stage of a card payment transaction. In this way, American Express has a better image of its consumer’s spending behavior. This allows the company to provide better value for merchants, issuers, and higher end consumers throughout transaction processes. For this reason, American Express can drive a higher spending volume growth over its competitors. MasterCard, Discover, and Visa perform the “open-loop” structure, not allowing for superior maintenance and management of their card sector. Below, you can see revenues and net income exceeding its competitors. DIRECT COMPETITOR COMPARISON Market Cap: AXP 75.16B Pvt1 N/A MA 18.51B Pvt2 N/A Industry 749.70M Employees: Revenue (ttm): EBITDA (ttm): Oper Margins (ttm): Net Income (ttm): EPS (ttm): 65,400 27.98B 9.43B 30.34% 3.92B 3.174 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4,600 3.50B 899.83M 22.87% 138.35M 1.016 6,0001 1.16B1 N/A N/A 83.20M1 N/A 788 342.47M 117.66M 32.08% 30.87M 1.03 Pvt1 = Discover Financial Services LLC (privately held) MA = Mastercard Incorporated Pvt2 = Visa International (privately held) Industry = Credit Services 1 = As of 2005 America Express Earnings Growth In-Depth Earnings Estimates Current Quarter Jun 07 Average Estimate Number of Analysts High Estimate Next Current Year Quarter Feb 07 Sep 07 Next Year Feb 08 $0.86 $0.86 $3.45 $3.85 14 13 16 13 $0.90 $0.88 $3.56 $4.00 Low Estimate $0.78 $0.77 $3.21 $3.56 Year Ago EPS $0.78 $0.76 $3.00 $3.45 10% 13.05% 14.93% 11.68% Growth Rate Morgan Stanley Discover spin-off The decision to pursue a Discover Card spin off reflects the company's attempt to be an integrated securities firm and to create networking to provide growth opportunity. This, however, does not seem to pose as a threat to American Express, having partnerships with various firms including Citigroup, and having a uniquely diversified product and rewards offerings. INFY Infosys Technologies Risks Highly competitive industry Opportunities Strong company Strong brand name Global delivery model Economies of scale Market leader 1. More information on management of INFY. Inofsys is headed by CEO and co-founder Kris Gopalakrishnan. Kris holds a Masters of Science in Physics and a Masters of Technology in Computer Science from the Indian Institute of Technology. All members of the management team are completely competent and most have degrees in Computer Science. Many are members of the founding team and have a strong entrepreneurial drive. The team also puts a focus on bringing in fresh new ideas for the company. A former CEO was known to not let anyone over the age of 25 into planning and brainstorming meetings. Detailed profiles for all members of the management can be found here: http://www.infosys.com/about/management_profiles.asp This is a plus for investors 2. What are the affects of headquartering in India? Give an analysis of the Rupee. Over the past year, there have been large fluctuations in the dollar-rupee exchange rate. The rupee has been steadily gaining in value in comparison to the dollar. This is a downside to investing in any Indian firm. However, as history has shown, the company has been well able to weather rupee fluctuations in the past year and has managed to make above expected profits despite them. Estimates show that about half of the revenue of Indian software companies comes form the United States. Therefore, even if the rupee appreciates, the companies still have a steady reliable source of income. 3. Why did the stock price drop in the past three some as compared to competitors? I was still not really able to find any information on this. I looked at some of the older news articles from the period but none offered any insight. I don't know where else to go for answers. 4. If the industry undergoing consolidation, what are the affects on INFY? This is good for INFY. Since the company is already well established and diversified, it will be easier for it to make acquisitions of smaller companies while at the same time holding on to its current customers. The S&P industry report for the software industry predicts that larger, well established companies, like Infosys, will have an advantage. 5. What is the difference between custom, enterprise, open-source software and relationship to each other? from Wikipedia: custom : a type of software developed either for a specific organization or function that differs from other already available software (also called off the shelf software). It is generally not targeted to the mass market but usually created for companies, business entities, and organizations. Allows for closer relationship between manufacturer and customer but also incurs higher cost and time of production enterprise: is software that solves an enterprise problem (rather than a departmental problem) and usually enterprise software is written using Enterprise Software Architecture. Due to the cost of building what is often proprietary software only large organizations attempt to build software that models the entire business enterprise and is the core system of governing the enterprise and the core of business communications within the enterprise.Enterprise level software is software which provides business logic support functionality for an organization, typically in commercial organizations, which aims to improve the organization's productivity and efficiency. This market seems to have already matured and is largely dominated by a few giants, like SAP and Oracle. open-source: is computer software whose source code is available under. Software Licenses grant rights to users which would otherwise be prohibited by copyright. a license (or arrangement such as the public domain) that permits users to study, change, and improve the software, and to redistribute it in modified or unmodified form. Open sourcing is often done off the internet because of it's ease. There is also on demand software that can be delivered via the internet. 6. What is the health of open-source software as a competitor? This is obviously a disadvantage because if open source software grows to such an extent that custom software like INFY provides is also open-sourced, then these software companies will have trouble retaining their customers and making profits. However, this is VERY unlikely to be a serious risk, especially for custom software vendors like INFY. The definition of custom software is that it is made specifically for a certain organization to solve a certain problem. Thus, open-sourcing the software doesn't make sense since there aren't that many users and since it is for a specific customer. Open sourcing happens so that customers can help add to the functionality of the software and creativity from many different sources can be funneled in. This is unnecessary and doesn't make sense in the case of custom software so really, open sourcing in the case of INFY should not be viewed as a serious risk. 7. More valuation info on competitors. Wipro and INFY have similar P/E ratios, but Satyam has a ratio that is approximately six points lower. This indicates that Satyam may be a profitable stock, but it's low P/E ratio is probably due to the fact that it is still a much smaller and newer company than either Infosys or Wipro. It's market cap is 3-4 times as small as those of the other two. Looking at the EPS, those of INFY, at 1.50, are by far higher than those of Wipro and Satyam, which is .50 and .89 respectively. Furthermore, over the last year, INFY has seen the most growth in the industry. That having been said however, I would like to reiterate the point I made that the Indian software industry as a whole right now seems to be a very profitable place to invest. I predict that all of there companies will make profits in the upcoming year. It was a hard choice, but in the end, I chose INFY because it had the healthiest financials of all these companies. It didn't have any irregularities or big jumps in numbers that were difficult to explain. It seemed to be well established with expansion plans for the future and so it seemed like a good buy. TEVA Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Risks Opportunities Litigations Good presence in all of the markets (diverse) New CEO How does Wal-Mart and other buyers of Demand going up with expiring patents generic drugs figure into the industry and Strength of pipeline the company? Buffett bought Wal-Mart recently instituted a $4 generic Counter-cyclical (diversify) drug program in which they would be Baby-boomer growth forcing down the prices of 300 generics Competence of management in financials to $4, regardless of whether or not the individuals had insurance. This could potentially hurt Teva, in that, if their drugs are on the list, the prices of the products would be forced down. If Teva is on the list, the now cheaper drugs would be more attractive to consumers, increasing competition. However, the effect is going to be contained at least for awhile, in that the program will only be instituted in 65 stores in the Tampa area. Though it may spread to all of Florida by the end of 2007, it will take awhile for this program to go national. Key Risk or Opportunity? Risk What are the effects of having an Israeli headquarter? Any effect that an Israeli headquarter could possibly have on Teva is minimized by its very wide global presence and headquarters in numerous other countries. Teva's global operations are conducted throughout North America, Europe, Latin America, Asia and Israel. Teva has direct operations in more than 50 countries, as well as 36 pharmaceutical manufacturing sites in 16 countries, 17 generic research and development centers operating mostly within certain manufacturing sites and 18 API manufacturing sites around the world. During the year ended December 31, 2006, Teva generated approximately 60% of its sales in North America, 24% in Western Europe (including Hungary) and 16% in other regions (primarily Latin America, including Mexico, Israel and Central and Eastern Europe). (From Reuters) Further, Teva in Israel can be likened to the strongest of the blue-chip companies in America. Key Risk or Opportunity? Neither Risk Nor Opportunity What are the pipelines of competitors, and how they are structured? Novo Nordisk Compound/indication Phase 1 Levemir® (Insulin detemir) Type 1 and 2 diabetes NovoMix® 50 and 70 Type 1 and 2 diabetes Activelle® low dose Hormone replacement therapy Liraglutide (NN2211) Type 2 diabetes AERx® iDMS Type 1 and 2 diabetes NovoNorm®/Metformin Fixed Combo Type 2 diabetes NovoSeven®, Line extension: Trauma Bleeding in emergencies, Trauma Vagifem® Hormone replacement therapy NovoSeven® in prophylactic treatment Haemophilia patients with inhibitors NovoSeven®, Line extension: Cardiac surgery Elective Surgery, Cardiac Surgery NovoSeven®, Line extension: Spinal surgery Spinal surgery NovoSeven®, Line extension: traumatic brain injury Bleeding in emergencies, Traumatic brain injury Norditropin® in dialysis Phase 2 Phase 3 Filed patients Adults Patients in Chronic Dialysis IL-21 Malignant Melanoma Malignant melanoma, Cancer IL-21 Renal Cell Carcinoma Renal Cell Carcinoma, Cancer IL-21 Colorectal Cancer Colorectal Cancer Liraglutide as antiobesity agent Obese, non-diabetic people NN344 Type 1 and 2 diabetes NN5401 Type 1 and 2 diabetes rFXIII, Cardiac surgery Elective Surgery, Cardiac Surgery rFVIIa analogue Haemostatic agent Anti-KIR Acute myeloid leukaemia, Cancer Worldwide Prescription Products Schering-Plough ScheringPlough Corporation 2000 Galloping Hill Road Kenilworth, NJ 07033-0530 February 2007 Phase II Adenosine 2a Receptor Antagonist Parkinson's Disease ►CXCR2 COPD PDE 5 Inhibitor Erectile Dysfunction Pleconaril Common Cold and Asthma Exacerbations NOXAFIL I.V. Formulation ►Pradefovir Hepatitis B Protease Inhibitor Hepatitis C SARASAR Breast Cancer Variety of Solid Tumors TEMODAR Brain Metastases I.V. Formulation Variety of Solid Tumors Thrombin Receptor Antagonist Arterial Thrombosis Vicriviroc HIV Infection ►Phase advance ►Indication advance 1 International rights only 2 J.V. with Merck 3 North American rights only Phase III (Value Adding Projects) ASMANEX Asthma (Japan) ►CAELYX Multiple Myeloma INTEGRILIN Early Acute Coronary Syndrome NASONEX Rhinosinusitis Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (Japan) PEG-INTRON Malignant Melanoma REMICADE1 Pediatric Crohn's SUBUTEX1 Rapid Dissolving Tablet TEMODAR Metastatic Melanoma VYTORIN - Outcomes Trials2 SEAS - Aortic Stenosis SHARP - Renal Disease ENHANCE - High Risk Hypercholesterolemia IMPROVE-IT - Acute Coronary Syndrome Phase III (New Entities) CLARITIN/Singulair2 Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Golimumab (CNTO 148)1 Inflammatory Diseases Mometasone/Formoterol Combination Asthma ►COPD SARASAR Myelodysplastic Syndrome ►Sublingual Tablet-Based Immunotherapy3 Grass Pollen Allergies Regulatory Application Filed Garenoxacin Variety of Gram+/GramBacterial Infections (EU) NASONEX ►Unscented (EU) NOXAFIL Serious Fungal Infections (U.S.) ZETIA Lipid Lowering (Monotherapy) (Japan) Key Risk or Opportunity? Neutral. Pipelines of competitors do not appear to directly compete with that of Teva. What are the Litigation Risks? Most of Teva’s litigation risks are occurred when Teva is on the “offensive,” challenging patents. Failed challenges can mean loss in legal fees. There is only one significant litigation risk at this point in time with ProNeuron. Teva is currently involved in a trial after ProNeuron accused it of executing clinical trials of a molecule for neurodegenerative diseases that were not suitable according to scientific standards. The case has yet to be developed, and does not appear to be significant as there is no coverage on it to date since the initial announcement. Key Risk or Opportunity? Neutral Additional Information: Update Teva recently released its first quarter profits, beating the Street’s expectations, and estimates. It now expects to earn between $2.20 and $2.30 per share in 2007, compared with an earlier forecast of $2.07 to $2.19, and sales are expected to exceed $9 billion in 2007. Teva earned 42 cents per share compared with 37 cents a year ago, and the expected 39 cents a share that was estimated by analysts ETFC E-Trade Risks Branches only in 14 states Highly correlation with the economy Bank’s increasing presence in the market Opportunities More diversified business Diversified products More people trading Better trading price Good platform and technology in online trading E*TRADE (ETFC) Additional Information What are the revenues from branches, online, and phone? Give a breakdown and are there any upcoming changes? o They have 24 branches across 14 states o I couldn’t find a breakdown between internet, phone and branch revenue, but I think that is because the vast majority of revenues come from online trades. The branches make up only a tiny portion of what E*TRADE does. Also, the tools that E*TRADE provides are online, so even if a transaction takes place over the phone, it is most likely based on information that the client received via the website’s tools. o I would classify the fact that most revenue stems from the internet as an OPPORTUNITY because it represents the lowest cost to E*TRADE (as opposed to the branches and the phone services, which need labor to run) What are the growth/prospects of the industry: how will these trends affect E-trade? o The industry as a whole would suffer during an economic downturn because of reduced trading activity (RISK). However, E*TRADE’s revenue from transactions as a percentage of total revenue has fallen drastically since the economic downturn when the dot-com bubble burst, making it less likely to suffer if the economy stumbles (OPPORTUNITY). o Additionally, the potential for a merger between E*TRADE and TD Ameritrade represents a large OPPORTUNITY for investors because it would create economies of scale. According to Deutsche Bank, a merger could – ‘result in 1/3rd EPS accretion with 1/3rd cost savings, resulting in an exceptional pretax margin of 65%. We estimate roughly every 10% in incremental cost reductions would increase EPS for the combined company by about 15 cents (10%). Our base case scenario assumes a 1/3rd decline in combined expenses and a 5% reduction in combined revenue, resulting in 1/3rd EPS accretion for TD Ameritrade.’ What are the comparisons of revenues and demographics across the industry? o They all target roughly the same demographic o The revenues are shown in the chart and in the graph below. Thousands $ AMTD ETFC SCHW 2006 2005 2004 $1,803,531 $1,003,153 $921,974 $2,420,321 $2,537,025 $2,083,254 $4,988,000 $5,151,000 $4,479,000 Revenues $6,000,000 Revenues in Thousands $5,000,000 $4,000,000 2006 2005 2004 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 AMTD ETFC SCHW Company Explain the GARP report and the assumptions behind the projection. o The following, from the intro to the GARP report, sums up the basic assumptions that lead to the report’s estimates: “We do not believe that E*Trade or Ameritrade has ceded any meaningful share as a result of the free-trade offers from banking stalwarts Wells Fargo or Bank of America. Sophisticated retail investors, in our view, should wonder about the quality, or ulterior profit motives, of any product or service that is widely advertised as “free.” We also note that some of these offers require that minimum balances be held in a deposit account. Bank of America, for instance, requires a 25,000 minimum deposit account balance. However, should the free-trade offers take meaningful share from traditional online brokers, we believe it could accelerate a round of consolidation in the online brokerage space. Unless brokerage is a core competency, we believe it is difficult for large financial services firms to scale their brokerage operations as efficiently as traditional online brokers such as E*Trade and Ameritrade. In our view, large investments in both technology and customer service are required to gain critical mass in the retail brokerage space. To underscore the importance of service, both Ameritrade and E*Trade have announced major investments to enhance the customer service experience, which each company believes will lead to a larger share of their clients’ wallet. Ameritrade, for example, has earmarked an incremental spend of $100 million annually to boost sales and service. After being plagued by poor service levels in the past, Ameritrade and E*Trade both realized that customer service is critical to be successful in the long-term investor space. This highlights the transformation that is underway as the online brokers shift to being more of a relationship-oriented business and not just an anonymous web-based toll collector.” What's the target demographic? o The target demographic is self-directed investors who want to manage their own money What's the account minimum? o For the “ETRADE Complete Investment Account”, there is a minimum of $1000. If you have under $50,000 in the account and make less than 30 trades per quarter, you are charged $12.99 per trade. If you have over $50,000 in the accounts or make more than 30 trades per quarter, you are charged $6.99-9.99 per trade, depending on the number of trades you make per quarter Charts on minimum to trade, cost, and volume per day? o ETRADE: see above, for Darts see below o TD Ameritrade: no minimum and $9.99 per trade over the internet o Charles Schwab: $1000 minimum and $9.95-12.95 per trade depending on the number of trades per year. o Info on DARTS (daily average revenue trades) is below Interest changed after dotcom to net interest. What is the meaning of this to investors? o The increase in net operating interest income was due primarily to growth in enterprise interest-earning assets coupled with an increase in enterprise net interest spread. The growth in enterprise interest-earning assets was driven by increases in both loans, net and margin receivables. The increase in enterprise net interest spread was driven by changes in our mix of lending and funding sources. Average loans, net and margin receivables as a percentage of average enterprise interest-earning assets increased 8% to 64% for 2006 compared to 2005. Average retail deposits and free credits as a percentage of average enterprise interest-bearing liabilities increased 9% to 62% in 2006 compared to 2005. DARTS: DARTS 2006 2005 2004 AMTD ETFC SCHW 250,000 159,348 234,400 256,500 97,740 197,900 248,500 82,643 156,400 DARTS 300,000 250,000 200,000 2006 2005 2004 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 AMTD ETFC SCHW Publicis Groupe Risks Dependence on market Clients can terminate contracts easily Fluctuation in stocks dependent on economy Growth seems to be slow 4. How is PUB integrating its acquisitions? Con: - PUB consolidates spending while trying to revamp the infrastructure of its acquisitions to match the Publicis model. Opportunities Management Global presence Strong client base and longevity Diverse client base Big customers that could last economic downturns Strong acquisition history P/E ratio compared to competitors 1. What is the average retention rate for industry? Pro:+45 years is the average retention rate for PUB. Industry is around 30 years, (averaging retention rates from other competitors). 2. What is the future of the advertising industry? Pro: + The Economist says in a recent article that the advertising industry is coming out of a recent slump. In the future, advertising companies will be able to inexpensively use the web to connect with customers at a lower cost for both the advertising agency and for its clients. 3. How is PUB addressing new media? Pro:+ PUB is at the forefront of new media, and is preparing advertising packages for clients that include digital technology, cellular phone advertising, and online content. COH Coach Risks economic factors as a luxury good competitors (more luxurious brands) have taken over the Asian market there are the areas of growth Counterfeit Market Curbside purveyors of counterfeit goods offer a greater proportion of European designer name brand handbags and leather goods (e.g. Louis Vuitton, Gucci, Fendi) than they do of the more affordable luxury goods because consumers tend to regard counterfeit European handbags, which usually retail for $1000 or more, as a bigger steal than if they purchased a counterfeit Coach bag for a price that is closer to that of a real Coach bag. As a result, Coach lawsuits targeting counterfeiting have not been as widespread or powerful as those of Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton (LVMH) and Fendi, though Coach has sued Target, who is not a licensed distributor of Coach items, for selling Coach counterfeits, marking it as the first time Coach has sued a major retailer for counterfeiting. In October 2006, a bag purchased from a Florida Target store was found to be an “exact replica of a genuine Coach handbag” bearing at least one Coach trademark. In the past, Coach has also accused Target of lifting signature Coach designs for bags of their Isaac Mizrahi and Cherokee lines. Dependence on Economy and Mid-2006 Dip Opportunities Strong brand In an economic downturn, more affordable price might keep it in demand Liz Claiborne Until Liz Claiborne’s (LIZ) acquisition of Kate Spade in 2006, Neiman Marcus had maintained a 56% stake in Kate Spade since 1999. At the time of the acquisition, Liz Claiborne said that the acquisition would reduce its earnings slightly in 2007, suggesting that Kate Spade would not be a very profitable acquisition. Liz Claiborne’s brands also include Axcess, Bora Bora, C & C California, City Unltd., Claiborne, Crazy Horse, Curve, Dana Buchman, Elisabeth, Ellen Tracy, Emma James, Enyce, First Issue, Intuitions, J.H. Collectibles, Juicy Couture, Kenzie, Kenziegirl, Laundry by Shelli Segal, LIZ, Liz Claiborne, Lucky Brand Jeans, Mac & Jac, Mambo, Marvella, Mexx, Monet, Monet 2, Prana, Realities, Sigrid Olsen, Soul by Curve, Spark, Stamp 10, Tapemeasure, Tint, Trifari, Villager and Yzza. For fiscal year 2006, Kate Spade garnered sales of $84 million, whereas as Coach had net sales of 2.1 billion. Five-year Expansion Plan, Markets of Future Growth This year’s openings, including two March openings in Riverside and San Bernardino are part of an expansion plan announced in 2005 that will add 100 stores over a four to five-year span. This is in addition to their 300 existing U.S. stores and 200 international stores. Aside from opening new stores in the U.S., Coach is also targeting newly rich countries, especially Asian countries such as China, and also has two Legacy stores slated for the fall. Dependence on Economy and Mid-2006 Dip While Coach’s niche market is not sensitive to highly fluctuating markets such as those for energy, that does not make Coach resistant to all fluctuations. As seen in the summer months of 2006, the major retail companies Polo Ralph Lauren (RL), Philips-Van Heusen (PVH), and Liz Claiborne (LIZ) all experienced a dip in sync with that of Coach. As a mode of comparison, the S&P500 also experienced something of a dip, albeit a much smaller one. This indicates that Coach is not exempt from any industry-wide influences on price, though Coach still sustained a higher price than the other major retailers during this time. Target Price While investments in stocks coming from decidedly niche markets tend are often good investments, the problem inherent to this situation is that there is relatively few, if any, comparable stocks to which one can compare and create a reliable target price. A 40.86 fair valuation price was determined earlier, but to base one’s investment on this figure would be misleading and even irresponsible, and to create an arbitrary target price above that would be even more so. DIS Disney Risks No major online presence Slow growth (large company) There was a decrease in capital expenditure mostly resulting from lower investment at Hong Kong Disneyland because of substantial completion of the park prior to its opening in September and lower expenditure at domestic theme parks in preparation for Disney’s 50th anniversary. There was a large drop in cash from financing activities. The cash used for financing activities in 2006 included share repurchases and payment of dividends to shareholders. Opportunities Innovative technology i.e. online TV shows ESPN monopoly on sports Creativity Cheap Revenue has steadily increased over the past year from 31,944 million to 34,285 million in 2006 for a 7% increase. In addition there was a 33% increase in Gross Profit to 5,478 million. Disney has a quick ratio of 1.05 which is higher than both the industry (.80) and sector (.84) demonstrating the company’s good liquidity and its ability to meet obligations. It has a debt to equity ratio of .38 in comparison with the industry (.68) and sector (.99) indicating that it is less risky. It has a return on equity of 15.01 and return on assets of 7.87 which both fair well in comparison to the industry and sector implying that the company/management is good at generating returns. 2007 Pipeline (movies, shows, etc.) Upcoming film releases Pirates: At World’s End- May 25th Ratatouille- June 29th Underdog- August 3rd Enchanted- November 21st National Treasure- Book of Secrets Coming to DVD: Over 20 films including Pirates of the Caribbean- the original in high definition!! Bridge To Terabithia- June 19th The Many Adventures of Winnie The Pooh: The Friendship Edition- June 19th Hannah Montana: Pop Star- June 26th Disney Baby Einstein Discovering Shapes— Circles, Squares and More The Jungle Book 40th Anniversary Platinum Edition Online games: Pirates of the Caribbean Online game- Spring 2007 Shows: High School Musical-Opens on Broadway June 26th Little Mermaid opens on Broadway- August 23rd 2007