CHAPTER 29: AFRICA SINCE INDEPENDENCE (1) KEY POINTS The political legacy of colonial rule Artificial boundaries and authoritarian rule One-party states The economic legacy of underdevelopment and dependence Raw material exports Neglect of food production Limited transport Restrictive policies The early drive for economic development Industrialisation for import substitution Indebtedness French neo-colonialism through the franc zone Ambitious projects - the Zambian example Collapse in commodity prices The role of the military in African politics The military inheritance The early coups Nigeria and Ghana Military downfalls Socialism and self-reliance: the Tanzanian course Origins of Nyerere’s ‘African socialism’ Ujama villages – implementation and failure Other experiences of socialism The political legacy of colonial rule The roots of many of Africa’s recurrent problems are to be found in her colonial legacy Representative, parliamentary democracy was only ever established on the eve of independence The real political legacy of colonial rule was dictatorship – authoritarian rule, established and maintained by force Artificial ‘nation states’ – arbitrary external boundaries cut across pre-colonial identities Each state (except Lesotho and Swaziland) was an amalgam of ethnic identities: Differences emphasised by imperial ‘divide and rule’ Maintaining the integrity of the state was thus a major problem Desire to maintain these new ‘nation states’: to be large and powerful enough to gain international recognition and respect Achievement: almost all state boundaries have been maintained; vast majority of countries have remained united and avoided civil war. One-party states Political parties at independence mostly ethnically-based One-party state therefore a practical alternative to strengthen national unity Some one-party leaders with integrity (e.g. Kaunda of Zambia, Nyerere of Tanzania) have allowed some democratic choice within one-party system Most: Nkrumah of Ghana, Banda of Malawi, + most from former French colonies abused power to suppress criticism Most of these succumbed to military takeover – the only way to change government The economic legacy of underdevelopment and dependency Legacy: export of unprocessed raw materials, import of manufactured consumer goods Prices of both controlled by industrialised world Widening gap between export and import prices (‘adverse terms of trade’) Cash-crop priority over food production = progressive poverty, decline in self-sufficiency Africa: net importer of food by 1950s Transport infrastructure geared towards exports of raw materials – from source to port Very poor internal transport or telecommunications infrastructure Poll tax: inherited and maintained in some countries for a while Marketing boards: used to tax small farmers by suppressing prices and destroying incentives Lack of education: 10% of tropical Africans literate at independence The early drive for economic development Temporary boom in Africa’s commodities disguised depth of problem Development modelled on perception of Western urban-centred industrialisation (advised by Western ‘experts’) Industrialise for import substitution: provide urban employment, replace imports with own manufactures, overcome ‘adverse terms of trade’ But: much industrialisation too ambitious, need to import materials, machinery and expertise – + expenditure to reach Western standards of health, education and transport – Rise in indebtedness = need to increase raw material exports to service debts ‘Adverse terms of trade’ got worse Western investment only in things that suited the industrial world, e.g. Ghana’s bauxite processing plant, American company used Ghanian subsidised electricity to process Jamaican bauxite Nkruma: ‘neo-colonialism’ – Western control of African economies Former French colonies – tied to France by French franc zone – financial stability for French investment, but kept African economies tied to France and her needs (in raw materials) French troops intervened to support their chosen regimes – Zaïre, Gabon, Chad, Central African Republic Prestigious investments, often on ‘expert advice’ – E.g. Ghana’ Akosombo hydroelectric dam (long term, but shortterm neglect of cocoa industry, former mainstay) – Urban elite dominate policy at expense of rural small-scale farmers Zambia: ‘copper spoon in its mouth’ – relied on dominance of copper production No attempt to diversify economy + (1970) nationalised copper mines, to avoid neo-colonialism Mines bought with foreign exchange reserves 1973 copper price collapse + international oil prices doubled twice that year Zambia in spiral of decline Late-colonial commodity-price boom ended mid-1960s Falling price of exports, as import prices rise – food shortages, political instability Authoritarian politicians lose credibility – military coups The role of the military in African politics 1960s: military takeover in most Francophone states (exc. Guinea, Senegal, Côte d’Ivoire) + Ghana and Nigeria (1966) By 1970s regarded as normal political option Military role, colonial period – (1) conquest; (2) internal use to enforce taxation, suppress rebellion Not needed for external role (except WW I) Coup d’état therefore = continuity Reaction against ineffective/unpopular/corrupt civilian regimes Military initially welcomed, to clear up civilian mess Nigeria exceptional: 1966: 2 coups amid ethnic distrust and massacres led to ‘Biafra’ secession and civil war (1967-70) After more coups, return to civilian government, 1979-83, But corruption – excuse for return of military (1983) – until 1998. Ghana: Nkrumah’s authoritarianism and economic problems – coup 1966 Purge of Nkrumah’s party and supporters Return to civilian rule 1969 – chronic economic problems: military return 1972 Corruption and incompetence, Rawlings coup to purge the military of corruption Civilian rule 1979-81 31 Dec. 1981: Return of Rawlings – ‘people’s revolution’ Used authoritarianism to impose harsh economic restructuring, in line with IMF demands 1979: overthrow of three brutal dictators: Amin of Uganda, Bokassa of Central African Republic, and civilian Nguéma of Equatorial Guinea Socialism and self-reliance: the Tanzanian course Nyerere (‘Arusha Declaration’- 1967) pledged to chart new direction, away from capitalist industrialisation To end ‘fattening of the elite’ Aim: self-reliant classless society: ‘African socialism’ Pre-colonial Africans practised ‘communalism’ in rural villages – needed no lessons from Marx Ujamaa ‘self-help’ villages set up for more effective co-operation and provision of services 1970s to early 1980s: people persuaded and then forced to move into villages – without proper consultation Ill-judged imposition from above (1) provoked opposition and resentment, (2) contradicted ‘self-help’ principle of ujamaa Ultimately failed because Africans were not innate communalists as Nyerere supposed 1980s: policy abandoned: Tanzania one of poorest countries, But: national unity, high rates of literacy and basic public health – More stable than prosperous neighbour Kenya Those that achieved independence through armed struggle promised ‘socialism’ Algeria, state used oil wealth to build steel mill and provide industrial base Angola and Mozambique – attempts to build socialism undermined by South African promotion of civil war Zimbabwe: rhetoric different from reality © Kevin Shillington, 2012