The Children’s Rights and
Business Principles
Initiative
Draft Principles
Consultation Feedback Analysis & Report
August 2011
August 2011
Page 1 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
Table of Contents
1.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 3
2.
METHODOLOGY.......................................................................................................... 3
3.
SUMMARY OF FEEDBACK ........................................................................................... 5
3.1 SCOPE........................................................................................................................ 5
3.2 AUDIENCE / SUBJECT OF THE PRINCIPLES ......................................................................... 7
3.3 INCLUSIONS/EXCLUSIONS .............................................................................................. 9
3.4 LANGUAGE ............................................................................................................... 10
3.5 PREAMBLE ................................................................................................................ 11
3.6 PRINCIPLE 1 .............................................................................................................. 11
3.7 PRINCIPLE 2 .............................................................................................................. 12
3.8 PRINCIPLE 3 .............................................................................................................. 12
3.9 PRINCIPLE 4 .............................................................................................................. 13
3.10 PRINCIPLE 5 .......................................................................................................... 13
3.11 PRINCIPLE 6 .......................................................................................................... 14
3.12 PRINCIPLE 7 .......................................................................................................... 14
3.13 UTILITY OF PRINCIPLES ............................................................................................ 15
3.14 COMMENTARY AND DOCUMENTATION ...................................................................... 15
3.15 NEXT STEPS .......................................................................................................... 16
3.16 SIGN-ON MECHANISM ........................................................................................... 17
ANNEXURE 1 – LIST OF RESPONDENTS (PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY) .............................. 18
August 2011
Page 2 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
1. Executive Summary
The Children’s Rights and Business Principles Initiative (‘CRBPI’) led by UNICEF, the UN
Global Compact and Save the Children has formulated a set of draft Principles (the
‘Principles’) aimed at respecting and supporting children’s rights while advancing
business and promoting a sustainable development agenda. During the period 6 May
2011 to 15 July 2011, the draft Principles were open for consultation to various
stakeholder groups (see Section 1.2). This report summarizes the key comments and
insights derived from the feedback received during this consultation process.
2. Methodology
The consultation process comprised several key modes of engagement and feedback.
The various methods of providing feedback included online (via Zoomerang), online (via
Word Questionnaire), in-country consultations, an Expert Reference Group and an
Internal Reference Group. Just under 200 participated in the Online Questionnaires
while over 400 participated in consultation meetings across several cities across the
world including Beijing, Belgrade, Buenos Aires, Copenhagen, Dubai, Geneva, Istanbul,
London, Nairobi, New Delhi, and Shanghai. In addition, outreach efforts through the
partner organizations and the Business and Human Rights Resource Center children’s
rights portal have reached thousands more with the draft Principles. Consultations with
children were conducted by Save the Children. These results are summarized in a
separate document. Additionally, several thousand people were reached in the
Initiative’s efforts to build awareness of the Principles in advance of their official launch.
There were a total of 218 Respondents who provided written feedback. Of these, 168
(77%) provided feedback through a formal Online Questionnaire (‘Group 1’). These
stakeholders came from several different sectors including business and the private
sector (41%), civil society/academia/non-governmental organizations/trade unions
(40%), United Nations (2%), government (3%), and other stakeholders (14%). In
addition, a small number provided input via email without completing the
questionnaire.
August 2011
Page 3 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
Figure 1: Online Respondent Sectors
Government
3%
UN
2%
Other
14%
Business / Private
Sector
41%
Civil society /
Academia / NGOs /
Trade unions
40%
The remaining 50 respondents (23%) (‘Group 2’) provided feedback via In-country
Consultations, as members of the Expert Reference Group (‘ERG’), and as members of
an Internal Reference Group (‘IRG’). Similarly, these Respondents came from business
and the private sector, civil society, academia, non-governmental organizations, trade
unions, United Nations, and government. A full list of the individuals and organizations
that participated is attached in Annexure 1.
Data was collected via a different method from the two groups of Respondents. While
the Online Questionnaire sought to solicit data that could be represented statistically,
the data obtained from the Group Consultations (In-Country, IRG, ERG) consists largely
of free-form comments relating to the text of the Principles themselves. As such,
Sections 3.4 to 3.12 of this report represent data predominantly from the Group
Consultations (23% of Respondents), while Sections 3.1-3.3 and 3.13-3.17 represent
data derived from the Online Questionnaire (77% of Respondents). Each of the sections
below specifies from which group(s) the feedback derives.
Please note that each section also lists ‘Key Contributors’ and ‘Key Sectors’ providing the
relevant feedback. ‘Key Contributors’ were listed based on both industry profile and the
quantity of feedback provided. ‘Key Sectors’ are those sectors from which the majority
of Respondents originated for that particular element of feedback.
August 2011
Page 4 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
3. Summary of Feedback
Feedback from Respondents is summarized below according to key thematic areas as
well as comments specific to the Principles themselves. Each area includes a table
illustrating the frequency at which such comments were made, by which key
contributors, and across what sectors. Respondents were also asked to share one or
more examples of a policy, practice or initiative that their organization is involved in
relevant to the Principles and the topic of business and children. As such, case studies
are also illustrated where Respondents have provided examples of the implementation
of a Principle.
3.1
Scope
Online respondents were asked to comment on the scope of the Principles
and whether they believed that all necessary topics and pertinent themes
were included. At a high level, 63% agreed with the scope of the Principles,
10% did not and 27% did not respond (see chart below).
Figure 2: Scope of Principles
No Response
27%
Don't Agree
10%
Agree
63%
Overall there were several key themes that emerged from the comments and
feedback with respect to the Scope of the Principles, including, beginning
with those most frequently mentioned:
 Integration with existing Framework - Make it clear this is not a stand
alone initiative and clarify their scope and ensure consistency with other
existing Conventions, initiatives, frameworks and Principles such as:
o UN Global Compact
o ILO Conventions
o OECD Guidelines
o Convention on the Rights of the Child
August 2011
Page 5 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results










August 2011
o UN Protect-Respect-Remedy Framework and UN Guiding
Principles on Business and Human Rights
o Millennium Development Goals
Scope of Rights - Broaden their scope to extend more strongly to:
o Cultural rights, particularly for indigenous children
o Right to education
o Right to land
o Right to food, nutrition
Additional Grounds of Vulnerability - Provide specific protections to those
children most vulnerable such as :
o Ethnic, cultural or religious minorities
o Indigenous peoples
o Children with disabilities
Length - Make the Principles shorter and more succinct to encourage
readership.
Nature of Responsibility – Make it clear whether the Principles align to
the ‘corporate responsibility to respect’ under the UN Protect-RespectRemedy Framework or extend beyond this to a duty to the commitment
to support/promote;
Methodology and terminology – strive for consistency with the UN
Framework;
Strength of Responsibility - Some Respondents believed that the
Principles were currently too broad and lacking in specificity and that the
language should be made stronger and more mandatory in nature. Some
believed that the draft Principles were ambitious in scope and
expectation, which may make it difficult for some companies to sign on
to;
Definitions - Distinguish between:
o Working children (who may still be receiving an education);
o Child laborers (who are working full time at the expense of an
education); and
o Children of stateless parents (who as a result may not have access
to education and whose parents are unable to work legally);
Training – Include commitments to train children as future active citizens
who know their rights, their personal history, and that of their
surroundings as a means to solidify their identity.
Products & Services –Refer to the fact that products or services of a given
company may have a deliberate impact on children s rights to survival or
development and ensure that businesses refrain from engaging in
marketing and advertising that promotes the use of products that place
children at risk.
Suppliers/Indirect Business Partners – ensure the Principles extend to
ensuring compliance for these stakeholders also;
Page 6 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
 Industry Focus – Address different industries, such as agriculture and
extractive industries as specific case studies;
 Business Size – On the one hand, some Respondents were eager for it to
be made more clear that the Principles apply equally to small, medium
and large size business enterprises. By contrast, other Respondents,
particularly from the private sector, believed that there is a need to
distinguish between small, medium and large businesses in terms of their
capacity to implement the Principles and the speed at which they might
do so.
 Due Diligence – Include guidance on due diligence (policy, impact
assessment, implementation / management, performance tracking &
reporting) in the field of children’s rights;
 Monitoring – The Principles should ask companies to commit to actively
monitoring their operations and activities for risks to children including
child labor, abuse etc and to providing a public commitment to act in
cases where they see it. Also training and awareness for staff to spot
these issues in the workplace is important too.
 Remedy – Include steps a company can take when discovering an
infringement of the Principles;
 Enforcement – Include incentives and/or sanctions for failure to comply;
 Periodic Review - Include a provision with respect to periodic review of
the Principles themselves.
3.2
Audience / Subject of the Principles
Respondents were asked to comment on the fact that the Principles are
currently addressed to a business audience and were asked whether they
should remain this way or be broadened to address other types of
organizations (e.g. governments, civil society, etc). At a high level, 27% of
Respondents believed that the draft Principles should remain addressed to
business, 69% believed that they should be expanded to address
organizations more generally, and 4% did not respond (see chart below).
August 2011
Page 7 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
Figure 3: Principles' Target Audience
No Response
4%
Business
27%
Other
Organizations
69%
The proportion of private and public sector Respondents in each of these two
response pools was fairly even. Of those Respondents who believed that the
Principles should stay addressed to businesses, 17 were from the private
sector and 18 from the public sector. Similarly, of those Respondents who
felt that the Principles should be broadened to include other organizations
51 were from the private sector and 47 were from civil
society/NGOs/academia/trade unions.
Several key additional comments emerged from Respondents on this issue.
First, the primary concerns of those Respondents who believed that the
Principles should remain addressed to business were that addressing them to
a broader audience may:
 Decrease accountability (9);
 Dilute the effect of the Principles (9); and
 Diminish their efficacy and relevance because they could no longer
be tailored solely to the concerns of the private sector (11).
Second, the primary concerns of those Respondents who felt that the
Principles should be addressed to organizations more broadly were:
 The Principles and the responsibilities and commitments that they
set out are universally applicable across all sectors (24); and
 Every sector needs to uphold child rights and support businesses in
implementing the principles (31).
August 2011
Page 8 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
3.3
Inclusions/Exclusions
Respondents were asked to comment on whether they believed the
Principles should distinguish more clearly between what things businesses
‘must do’ and what things are merely ‘nice to have’. At a high level, 54% of
Respondents answered ‘Yes’, 37% answered ‘No’, and 9% did not respond
(see chart below).
Figure 4: Inclusions / Exclusions
No Response
9%
No
37%
Yes
54%
The key comments and recommendations provided by those Respondents
who answered ‘Yes’ included the need to:
 Organize and lay out the principles according to levels of responsibility –
whether a business must respect, support or fulfill a right.
 Clarify which principles must be followed if a business does not want to
be in violation of national, regional or international law (as opposed to
those which are in line with or forward non-legally binding human rights
principles).
 Identify minimum levels of responsibility (fundamental principles) vs.
suggested levels of responsibility (voluntary principles).
Where Respondents answered ‘No’, they commented that the Principles
should serve more as a best practice guide and catalyst for knowledge
sharing rather than a strict mandatory framework and that adopting this less
formalized approach will ensure more businesses sign on.
August 2011
Page 9 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
3.4
Language
A large number of Respondents commented on the Language used in the
text of the Principles. Recommendations regarding the language and text of
the Principles focused around four major issues:
1. The use of strong and concise language;
2. Consistency with other international conventions and existing
frameworks and definitions;
3. The use of business-accessible language and structure; and
4. Translation and cultural applicability.
Some respondents (17) noted that strong, concise language must be used in
presenting the Principles and making recommendations, so as to encourage
businesses to take child rights seriously and remedy existing problems in the
workplace. Of these 17 Respondents, 5 were from civil
society/academia/non-governmental organizations/trade unions and 3 were
from the private sector. The remaining 9 Respondents were from the IRG,
ERG, or in-country consultations.
Other Respondents (15) discussed the importance of basing the Principles off
existing frameworks, including the Guiding Principles and the UN ‘Protect,
Respect, Remedy’ Framework, as well as other UN Conventions. In addition,
many of these respondents noted that universal definitions—including those
already defined by existing frameworks and the international community—
should be explained and used in the Principles. Of these Respondents, 8 were
from the private sector, 2 from the public sector, including government, and
3 from in-country consultations.
Respondents cited key words and concepts that should be defined or
clarified, including:
 “child,” “child labor,” “decent work opportunities,” “emergency
situations,” “supportive measures,” “fair taxation,” “excessively low
margins,” and “supervision,” among others.
 “value chain” - this was seen as problematic in so far as its inconsistency
with the Guiding Principles which use the terms ‘business operations or
activities’ and ‘supply chain’.
Six respondents, mostly from the in-country consultations, recommended
that the Principles use clear, business-friendly language and structure so that
they can be easily understood and absorbed by the private sector.
Five respondents, including in-country consultations in Beijing, Shanghai,
Dubai, and Buenos Aires, recommended that special attention be paid to
translation and cultural applicability. They were especially concerned that
August 2011
Page 10 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
certain key concepts should be translatable from English to other languages
so that they can be universally understood.
3.5
Preamble
A common theme among respondents was the need to better situate the
Principles within existing framework, making reference to CEDAW, the UN
’Protect, Respect, Remedy’ framework, etc. Additionally, it was mentioned
that a clear linkage must be made between the Principles and the UN Global
Compact. Thus, the preamble must clearly explain the scope and offer a
clarification of the function of the Principles. More specifically, careful
definitions of what is meant by a ‘child’ and ‘children’s rights’ should be
included. Finally, some businesses worried that the preamble is not directed
enough to them.
3.6
Principle 1
The key themes that emerged from Respondents with respect to Principle 1
included the need for:
 A clear definition of ‘stakeholders’ and who they represent (a
recurring comment) (5);
 Greater alignment with the UN ‘Protect, Respect, Remedy’
Framework (3);
Other points or suggestions that were mentioned, but not recurring included
the need for:
 More introductory statements for businesses to whom this is new
concept;
 A statement reiterating the importance of maintaining open dialogue
with consumers and community, working with other stakeholders
and drawing on their expertise;
 A commitment to install participation mechanisms for children to be
consulted in management decisions affecting them (child
participation);
 A key requirement that the business incorporate the Principles into
their company policies;
 A mandatory vs. voluntary obligation on businesses;
 An additional clause addressing a remedy for abuses suffered
(grievance mechanisms);
 Clarification of how to track progress;
August 2011
Page 11 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
Please refer to the Source Data Matrix for the comments and proposed
changes with respect to the text of the Principle itself.
3.7
Principle 2
The primary theme that emerged from comments with respect to Principle 2
concerned child labor and a minimum working age. Concerns were raised
about the national working age being below 18 in many countries. Use of the
ILO Convention on Minimum Age was suggested (6 Respondents). Similarly,
the need to be very clear in defining child labor with reference to
international standards was raised. 2 Respondents specifically thought that
forced labor needed to be mentioned.
Other comments that arose with less frequency included:
 Whether there were certain work opportunities there were/weren’t
appropriate for the minimum work age;
 Concern that the Principle could be used to justify child labor, and that
the language needed to be worded more carefully to guard against this;
 The need to include samples of verifications mechanisms to test and
measure compliance;
 There may be too much detail in regards to how the Principle would be
implemented rather than the underlying values it seeks to instill; and
 It may not be realistic for workers who work with youth to have
children’s rights training.
For specific proposals with respect to the text of the Principle itself, please
refer to the Source Data Matrix.
3.8
Principle 3
The primary concerns raised by Respondents with respect to Principle 3
included:
o How and when a business can be sure that their products and services to
which children may be exposed are safe and that testing and researching
is conducted in the best interests of the child?;
o How to determine whether a product is essential to a child’s survival; and
o The question of the affordability of essential services, especially to those
who are most vulnerable;
For specific proposals with respect to the text of the Principle itself, please
refer to the Source Data Matrix.
August 2011
Page 12 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
3.9
Principle 4
In relation to Principle 4, 15 Respondents provided comments, 8 of which
were from the Private Sector, 3 from Civil Society / Academia / NonGovernmental Organization / Trade Union, 3 from the United Nations, 1 from
the IRG, and 1 from the ERG. Several of the suggestions focused on the need
for more details and clarity, including:
 Rephrasing the title; 1 suggested using the word “uphold” in place of
“advance” so as to clarify the responsibilities of the business (2);
 Including social media as a form of marketing and advertising (2);
 Emphasizing responsible marketing through schools (1); and
 Emphasizing responsible marketing of breast-milk substitutes (2).
For specific proposals with respect to the text of the Principle itself, please
refer to the Source Data Matrix.
3.10 Principle 5
The primary recommendations posed by Respondents with respect to
Principle 5 included:
 Sub-section (a) should include the special situation of indigenous children
as well as add "forest" after "water" at the end;
 Sub-section (b) should be re-located to fall under Principle 6;
 Sub-section (s) is already covered by several other frameworks and
should be removed.
 Under sub-section (a), consideration should be given to the peculiarities
of children (body structure, organ and immune system development
level, metabolic rate, etc.) to ensure awareness; and Reference
international environmental quality standards, like those developed by
WHO, as well as sector relevant best practices in places where national
legislation and standards are clearly failing to protect children.
For specific proposals with respect to the text of the Principle itself, please
refer to the Source Data Matrix.
August 2011
Page 13 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
3.11 Principle 6
The primary recommendations posed by Respondents with respect to
Principle 6 included:
 Include reference to the fundamental right of proper shelter, nutrition,
and access to medical treatment (including vaccinations). The above
elements are part of principle 2, 5, and 6;
 Include reference to most vulnerable groups such as refugees and
migrants, indigenous people, victims of environmental conflicts as well as
victims of discrimination and racism;
 Consider different impact on boys and girls;
 Ensuring that the Principle creates realistic obligations for business and
do not extend the role of businesses to that of NGOs;
For specific proposals with respect to the text of the Principle itself, please
refer to the Source Data Matrix.
3.12 Principle 7
In relation to Principle 7, there were 14 Respondents, 3 of which were from
the private sector, 3 from Civil Society / Academia / Non-Governmental
Organization / Trade Union, 1 government body, 3 from the in-country
consultations, 3 from the IRG, and 1 from the ERG. Several of the comments
focused on the need for more details and clarity:
 3 respondents, all from the private sector, thought that Principle 7
was out of the scope of the Children’s Principles and that reporting
should be integrated into the GRI and other reporting mechanisms;
 2 respondents noted that the principles should further emphasize
shared accountability between businesses, governments, and other
organizations;
 2 respondents suggested integrating with other government
initiatives and existing guidelines.
For specific proposals with respect to the text of the Principle itself, please
refer to the Source Data Matrix.
August 2011
Page 14 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
3.13 Utility of Principles
Respondents were also asked to comment on how the envisaged the
Principles may be useful to them and their organization. Various comments
provided by Respondents to this effect included that the Principles would:
 Clarify definitions & standards;
 Increase awareness and commitment by business;
 Help businesses recognize a need to commit to the UN Global
Compact;
 Enable businesses to validate their communications to clients and
suppliers;
 Support humanitarian work;
 Help to identify areas of improvement and foster our understanding
that we are on track;
 Help expand the approach to child focused issues;
 Provide input to future advocacy campaigns around ethical business
practices;
 Enable NGOs to easily identify the responsibility that business have in
relation to children rights and therefore making it easier to engage;
3.14 Commentary and Documentation
Respondents were also asked to comment on what supporting commentary
and documentation they thought would be helpful to accompany the final
version of the Principles. Respondents were provided with a list of
suggestions including case studies / good practice examples, the Business
Case for the Principles, Assessment Tools to measure progress, facts and
figures, and a Glossary of Terms. Respondents were also asked to provide
other items they thought relevant. The results are summarized in the chart
below:
August 2011
Page 15 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
Figure 5: Commentary and Documentation
Glossary of
Terms
14%
Case Studies /
Good Practice
Examples
25%
Facts & Figures
18%
Assessment
Tools to Measure
Progress
24%
The Business
Case for the
Principles
19%
*Note: The percentages above represent the portion of the overall Online
Respondent pool (168 Respondents) that considered a given option helpful.
That is, the percentages are unrelated to one another.
3.15 Next Steps
Respondents were asked to comment on what they believed the appropriate
next steps were with regard to the Principles once finalized. Respondents
were provided with 4 potential next steps as well as the option to provide
recommendations of their own. The results are summarized in the chart
below.
August 2011
Page 16 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
*Note: The percentages above represent the portion of the overall Online
Respondent pool (168 Respondents) that considered a given option helpful.
That is, the percentages are unrelated to one another.
3.16 Sign-On Mechanism
Respondents were asked to comment on whether they thought there should
be a sign-on mechanism or Statement of Support for the Principles that
businesses could be encouraged to sign. At a high level, 73% of Respondents
answered ‘Yes’, 15% answered ‘No’ and 12% did not respond (see chart
below).
Figure 7: Sign-On Mechanism
No Response
12%
No
15%
Yes
73%
August 2011
Page 17 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
Annexure 1 – List of Respondents (Professional Capacity)
The following is a list of those Respondents who consented to have their name, title and
organization disclosed. Please note that this is not a complete list of all Respondents.
Name
Title
Organization:
Capacity
Stanford Edwards
Manager
Professional / Official
Nadia Bernaz
Programme Leader MA Human
Rights and Business
-
SGS-Social Responsibility
Solutions
Middlesex University
Federation of Women
Entrepreneurs & Industry
Trelleborg AB
Professional / Official
Catholic Relief Services
Professional / Official
UNICEF
Professional / Official
Mousumi Islam
Viktoria Bergman
Brenda Schuster
Koenraad
Vanormelingen
Dr Geoffrey Williams
Senior Vice President Corporate
Communications
Technical Advisor for HIV and
Youth
Representative Angola
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Chief Executive Officer
OWW Consulting
Professional / Official
Millicent Bogert
Manager
Voice of the Children
Professional / Official
Camilla bostrom wikner
Group marketing coordinator
Permobil
Professional / Official
Lionel Bodin
Senior Manager
Professional / Official
Niina Niemi
Programme coordinator,
Corporate Partnerships
Community Investment
Accenture Development
Partnerships
Plan Finland Foundation
ING
Professional / Official
Fleur Hudig & Maarten
de Jongh
Professional / Official
Dr. Brekau
Corporate Social Responsibility
Bayer CropScience AG
Professional / Official
Kathrine Löfberg
Head of Communication
Löfbergs Lila AB
Professional / Official
Servee Palmans
Director School Operations
GEMS Education
Professional / Official
Gabriella Patriziano
Human Rights Officer
Professional / Official
Tsuyoshi Endo / Yukiko
Suzuki
Manager / Assistant Manager,
Corporate & Individual Donor
Relations
Policy Director
VIS - Volontariato
Internazionale per lo
Sviluppo
Japan Committee for
UNICEF
International Baby Food
Action Network
U.S. Fund for UNICEF
Professional / Official
World Vision International
Professional / Official
Patti Rundall
Melissa Madzel
Professional / Official
Corina Villacorta
Manager, Corporate
Philanthropy
Executive Advisor, Child Rights
Gonzalo Sales
Social Innovation Director
Fundación SERES
Professional / Official
Mariana Ahualli
Consultor en RSE
UNICEF
Professional / Official
Cecilia Barbón
Directora ejecutiva
Fundación Acindar
Professional / Official
Laura Miedziak
Gerente RRHH
Mimo & Co
Professional / Official
Maria Elena M arc
Presidente
Professional / Official
Sebastián Vettorello
Manager RR.HH.
Argentina Cultural y
Edicativa
S&L Consultores
María del Carmen
Navarro de Acosta
Jefe de programas
Professional / Official
Silvia
Directivo Institucion Educativa
Indicadores y centro de
proyectos para el
desarrollo
-
Ivana
Directora
Marketeen
Professional / Official
August 2011
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Page 18 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
JOSE ALBERTO
MIGLIO
Mirta
PRESIDENTE
ASOCIACION CIVIL
COOPERAR
Fundación
Professional / Official
Monica
Socia - RRII
Professional / Official
Docente
MHR Recursos
Estrataegicos SRL
Ipem nº 285
rebeca acedo
marcelo moyental
Coordinador
Municipalidad de moreno
Professional / Official
Carlos Fabian Vega
Owner
Vega Eventos
Professional / Official
Carlos Aragón
Jefe de Agencia de Extensión
Rural Aguilares
Director
Professional / Official
Coordinadora
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Armando de la Plata
Guanco
CEO
Luis Fernando
Presidente
Instituto Nacional de
Tecnología Agropecuaria
CyS Capacitaciobn y
Servicios Empresariales,
C.A.
Centro Quimico de
Riesgos Industriales
Toxicologia Investigacion
F/S
Goticas de Paz
Daniel Enrique Capece
Director Ejecutivo
Treball Consulting
Professional / Official
Graciela Cristina Gomez
Abogaday Escribana
-
Professional / Official
Savone Miguel Angel
Oresidente
Professional / Official
María R Figueroa
Gerente
Biblioteca Popular Hugo
Marcelo Berbel
Hotel Legado Mítico Salta
Aldo Ramon Fernandez
Secretario
Professional / Official
Lic.Patricia Ines
Benedetti
Titula Catedra ‘Psicologia
Institucional’
Asociacion Para la
Asistencia a la Comunidad
APACO
Universidad de Moron
Gustavo Sinner
Socio
AG Sustentable
Professional / Official
Maria Rosa Gastellu
Secretaria
Professional / Official
Andres Saenz
Director Ejecutivo
Asociación Civil Nueva
Mirada
Valos
Marvin Valverde, Dr.
Planificador
Municipalidad de Moravia
Professional / Official
Pablo Rodríguez
Canfranc
Andreza Ortigoza
Jefe de Relaciones
Institucionales
Directora Social
Fundación Telefónica
Professional / Official
Fundacion Dequeni
Professional / Official
Carolina López
Gte RRHH
Professional / Official
Maria Marta Balboa
Nadal, María Inés
Asesor en Sistema de Calidad
ISO 9001:2008
Directora Ejecutiva
Cormorán S.A. Servicio
Mayorista
Gamsur SEM
Fundación Guido Badaloni
Professional / Official
Roberto E Escardo
-
-
Professional / Official
Carolina Paula Mospan
Directora
Big Bang
Professional / Official
Marinely Oviedo
Docente Universitario
UNEXPO
Professional / Official
Rosa Tort Martí
Dirección RSE
Tecnibat y AC Tecnibat
Professional / Official
Victoria Gordillo
Encargada de Área de
Desarrollo Institucional
Directores
Fundación Inclusión Social
Professional / Official
Jardines maternales
Diálogos
Professional / Official
Carla Crosa Rivarola
-
Professional / Official
Claudio Edgardo
Moreno
Graciela Salazar
Jefe de Responsabilidad Social
Empresaria
Presidenta
R.I 3 Corrales 1329 c/
Rivarola Matto
Transportadora de Gas del
Norte
Cooperativa Generar Lda.
Carlos Carignano
Gerente -- Consejal
Cooperativa Agricola
Ganadera-Municipio
Professional / Official
Yanet Rodriguez
Elias Halperín - Gabriela
Gamallo
August 2011
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Page 19 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
-
-
Professional / Official
Julio Sotelo
Gerente de Relaciones y
Comunicaciones
Consultor
Rio Uruguay Coop. de
Seguros Ltda.
SanCor Cooperativas
Unidas Ltda.
AG Sustentable
Sergio Montiel
Julieta Prada
Encargada de RSE
Grupo RHUO
Professional / Official
Lidia Mabel Iglesias
Responsable Gestión Integrada
LINSER SACIS
Professional / Official
Sara Josefina Gonzalez
Referente de Comunicacion
Professional / Official
Lourdes Rios
Director Ejeutivo
Perla Flores
Vicepresidente
Rosario Rosa
Directora Ejecutiva
Barri Abdlhy
Rommani
Red Latinoamericanana de
Acogimineto Familiar
(RELAF)
ONG Escuela de
Emprendedores
Sociedad de Fomento de
Millamapu
Centro de Investigación y
Documentación Santa
Cruz
Rabat
Brana Lisic
Sustainable Development &
Internal Communication
Manager
Consultant
Credit Agricole Serbia
Professional / Official
Development Close-Up
Professional / Official
EIRIS
Professional / Official
Barbara Küppers
Head of Consumer Goods and
US Teams
-
Professional / Official
Dushiyant Gunatilake
Coordinating Secretary
Sabine Loetscher-Ehrler
Elsa Costanzo
Project Manager Corporate
Responsibility
-
Terre des Hommes
Germany
Association of Religious
Liberty of Sri Lanka
Kuoni Travel Holding Ltd.
Nutriset (Organization)
Professional / Official
Patrick Geary
Legal Coordinator
Professional / Official
Louiza Kabiru et al.
-
Shirin Aumeeruddy Cziffra
Mai Oldgard
Ombudsperson for Children
Child Rights Information
Network (CRIN)
Kenya National
Commission on Human
Rights
Ombudsperson for
Children’s Office
Telenor Group
Maaike van Adrichem
Gender Rights & Equality
Officer
Rebecca Spratt, Richard
Geeves, Jarnah Montersino
UNICEF
Professional / Official
-
Professional / Official
Francisco Jonet Ferreira
Dos Santos
Administrator
Grupo JFS
Professional / Official
Liliana Claudia Alza
(Spanish)
-
Funcionaria Poder judicial
Suprema Corte de Justicia
de la Provincia de Bs. As.,
Juzgado de
responsabilidad Penal
Juvenil Departamento
Judicial de La Matanza///
Colaboradora de ANUA
( Pro Naciones Unidas) ////
Miembro Honoraria de
Cámara de Profesionales y
Empresarias Mujeres de
La Matanza( CAMUPEM)
//// Profesora Universidad
Nacional de La Matanza
Professional / Official
Lotte Ladegaard
Dawn McLaren
Childfund Australia, Plan
International Australia,
Save the Children
Australia
August 2011
Maroc
Vice President and Head of CR
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Page 20 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
Michael Feigelson
Programme Director
Bernard van Leer
Foundation
-
Professional / Official
Companies Commission
of Malaysia (Norhaslinda
Salleh)
-
Marie Busck
Louise Meincke
Director, Social and Human
Rights
Advocacy Director
LEGO System A/S
Professional / Official
Consortium for Street
Children
BASF The Chemical
Enterprise
Merck
Professional / Official
Katja Gehne
Dr. iur.
Kris Natarajan
Ursula Hartenberger
Director, Global Health
Partnerships
Manager, Corporate
Partnerships
Coordinación nacional e
internacional en temas de
responsabilidad social
Global Head of Sustainability
US Fund for UNICEF
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Partnerships Officer
IRAM (Instituto Argentino
de Normalización y
Certificación)
Royal Institution of
Chartered Surveyors
(RICS), London SW1P
3AD
UNICEF Mozambique
Emidio Machiana
Filipe Manolate
CEO
KPMG
Professional / Official
Rachel Davis
Research Fellow, Corporate
Social Responsibility Initiative,
Senior Analyst, Head of Social
and Corporate Governance
-
Harvard Kennedy School
Professional / Official
Norges Bank Investment
Management (NBIM)
-
Professional / Official
Sri Lanka
Professional / Official
Faustina Pereira
Former Ministry of Health
Official
-
BRAC
Professional / Official
Olivia Boles
-
IBLF
Professional / Official
Simon Zadek
-
-
Professional / Official
Claudio M. Giomi
ARCOR Foundation,
Argentina
IKEA
Professional / Official
Marianne Barner
Corporate Sustainability
Manager
Head of IKEA Social Initiative
Nachiket Mor
Chairman of the Board
Sughavazhvu Health Care
Professional / Official
Constance Thomas (see
futher comments in
external document)
Director
IPEC (International
Programme on the
Elimination of Child
Labour)
Professional / Official
Raji Harrar
Chief Sustainability and
Compliance Officer
Chief Researcher, Office for
Social Responsibility
(CSC9000T),
Secretariat Coordinator
Aramex International
Professional / Official
China National Textile and
Apparel Council
Professional / Official
Code of Conduct for the
Protection of Children from
Sexual Exploitation in
Travel and Tourism
[ECPAT/UNICEF/UNWTO]
CRBPI
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Colleen Galbraith
Adriana Rosenfeld
(Spanish)
Magdalena Kettis
Scott Jerbi
Harendra de Silva
Xiaohui Liang
Camelia Tepelus
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Gilles and Marie
Concordel
Marta Santos Pais
Co-Chairs
Marta Santos Pais
-
UN Secretary-General on
Violence against Children
-
Anthony Davis
-
SCUK
Professional / Official
Neel Gammelgaard
-
SC Denmark
Professional / Official
August 2011
Special Representative
Professional / Official
Professional / Official
Page 21 of 22
Draft Principles – Consultation Results
Britta Ostram
-
CSR Centre, China
Professional / Official
UNICEF
-
LAM Office
Professional / Official
Carlos Lopez
Senior Legal Advisor
International Commission
of Jurists
Professional / Official
Graciela B. de Oto
(Spanish)
President
Asociación Mujeres de
Negocios y Profesionales
BPW Buenos Aires
Como profesional o
funcionario
Martin Coria (Spanish)
Coordinador Regional para
America Latina y el Caribe
Church World Service
Como profesional o
funcionario
August 2011
Page 22 of 22