References: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Single-subject Experimental Designs (SSEDs)
Webcast Sponsored by the NCDDR December 4, 2008
Ralf Schlosser, PhD and Oliver Wendt, PhD
Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the
effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199-210.
Beretvas, N.S., & Chung, H. (2008). An evaluation of modified R2-change effect size indices for singlesubject experimental designs. Evidence-based Communication Assessment and Intervention,
2(3), 120-128.
Chalmers, I., Hedges, L., & Cooper, H. (2002). A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation and the
Health Professions, 25, 12-37.
Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. (Eds.)(1994). The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Russell Sage
Foundation.
EPPI-Centre (2007). EPPI-Centre Methods for Conducting Systematic Reviews. London: EPPI-Centre,
Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
Gast, D. L., & Wolery, M. (1988). Parallel treatments design: A nested single-subject design for
comparing instructional procedures. Education and Treatment of Children, 11, 270-285.
Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
Guyatt, G., & Rennie, D. (2002). Users’ guides to the medical literature. Essentials of evidence-based
clinical practice. Chicago, IL: AMA Press.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
Horner, R.H., Carr, E.G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject
research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2),
165-179.
Huitma, B. E., & McKean, J. W. (2000). Design specification issues in time-series intervention models.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(1), 38-58.
Kazdin, A. E., & Hartmann, D. P. (1978). The simultaneous treatment design. Behavior Therapy, 9, 912922.
Kennedy, C.H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Lipsey, M.W., and Wilson, D.B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McCauley, R.J., & Hargrove, P. (2004). A clinician’s introduction to systematic reviews in communication
disorders: The course review paper with muscle. Contemporary issues in communication science
and disorders, 31, 173-181.
McReynolds, L. V., & Kearns, K. P. (1983). Single-subject experimental designs in communication
disorders. Baltimore: University Park Press.
1
Pennington, L. (2005). Book Review. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders,
40(1), 99-102.
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide.
Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Reimers, T. M., & Wacker, D. P. (1988). Parents’ ratings of the acceptability of behavioral treatment
recommendations made in outpatient clinic: A preliminary analysis of the influence of treatment
effectiveness. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 7-15.
Rotholz, D., Berkowitz, S., & Burberry, J. (1989). Functionality of two modes of communication in the
community by students with developmental disabilities: A comparison of signing and
communication books. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 227233.
Schlosser, R. (2005). Reply to Pennington: Meta-analysis of single-subject research: How should it be
done? International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40(3), 375-378.
Schlosser, R. W. (1999). Comparative efficacy of interventions in augmentative and alternative
communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 56-68.
Schlosser, R. W. (2002). On the importance of being earnest about treatment integrity. Augmentative
and Alternative Communication, 18, 36-44.
Schlosser, R. W. (2003). The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidencebased practice. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Schlosser, R. W. (2004, June 22). Evidence-based practice in AAC: 10 points to consider. The ASHA
Leader, pp. 6-7, 10-11.
Schlosser, R. W., & O’Neil-Pirozzi, T. (2006). Problem formulation in evidence-based practice and
systematic reviews. Contemporary Issues in Communication Sciences and Disorders, 33, 5-10.
Schlosser, R. W., & Raghavendra, P. (2004). Evidence-based practice in augmentative and alternative
communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 1-21.
Schlosser, R. W., Sigafoos, J., Eysenbach, G., & Dowden, P. (2007). EVIDAAC: A database of appraised
evidence in augmentative and alternative communication. U.S. Department of Education,
National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, CFDA 84.133G-2 Field-Initiated
Development.
Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., Angermeier, K., & Shetty, M. (2005). Searching for and finding evidence in
augmentative and alternative communication: Navigating a scattered literature. Augmentative
and Alternative Communication, 21, 233-255.
Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., Bhavnani, S., & Nail-Chiwetalu, B. J. (2006). The use of information seeking
strategies in evidence-based practice: The case of pearl growing. International Journal of
Language and Communication Disorders, 41, 567-582.
Schlosser, R.W., & Sigafoos, J. (2008). Meta-analysis of single-subject experimental designs: Why now?
Evidence-based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2(3), 117-119.
2
Schlosser, R.W., & Wendt, O. (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication
intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American
Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(3), 212-230.
Schlosser, R.W., Lee, D.L., & Wendt, O. (2008). Application of the percentage of non-overlapping data in
systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of reporting characteristics.
Evidence-based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2(3), 163-187.
Schlosser, R.W., Wendt, O., & Beretvas, S.N. (in progress). The effects of the Picture Exchange
Communication System (PECS) on prelinguistic behaviors, speech production, and expressive
social regulation and communicative functions in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD).
Schulz, K. F., Chalmers, I., Hayes, R., & Altman, D. G. (1995). Empirical evidence of bias: Dimensions of
methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA,
273, 408-412.
Simeonsson, R., & Bailey, D. (1991). Evaluating programme impact: Levels of certainty. In D. Mitchell &
R. Brown (Eds.), Early intervention studies for young children with special needs (pp. 280-296).
London: Chapman and Hall.
Sindelar, P. T., Rosenberg, M. S., & Wilson, R. J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for
instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67-76.
Straus, S. E. (2007). Evidence-based health care: Challenges and limitations. Evidence-based
Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1(1), 48-51.
Tate, R. L., McDonald, S., Perdices, M., Togher, L., Schultz, R., & Savage, S. (2008). Rating the
methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the single-case
experimental design (SCED) scale. Neurophysiological Rehabilitation, 18(4), 385-401.
Torgerson, C. (2003). Systematic Reviews. London, UK: Continuum.
Van den Noortgarte, W., & Onghena, P. (2003a). Combining single-case experimental data using
hierarchical linear models. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 325-346.
Van den Noortgarte, W., & Onghena, P. (2003b). Hierarchical linear models for the quantitative
integration of effect sizes in single-case research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and
Computers, 35(1), 1-10.
Wendt, O. (2007). The effectiveness of augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with
autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis (Doctoral dissertation,
Purdue University, 2006). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A: Humanities and Social
Sciences, 68(2), 526-A.
Wendt, O. (in progress). A statistical comparison of non-regression-based effect size metrics for singlesubject experimental designs.
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement, or how applied behavior
analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.
Young, K., Ashby, D. Boaz, A., & Grayson, L. (2002). Social science and the evidence-based policy
movement. Social Policy and Society, 1, 215-24
3