THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST Board Paper - Cover Sheet Date: 24th February 2016 Lead Director Report Title: Clinical Assurance Toolkit (CAT) Agenda Item A5(iv) Nursing & Patient Services Director Report Author Helen Lamont, Nursing and Patient Services Director Elizabeth Harris, Head of Nursing RVI Classification NHS Unclassified / NHS Protect / NHS Confidential Purpose (Tick one only) Approval Links to Strategic Objectives Links to CQC Domains/ Fundamental Standard(s) Identified Risk? (If yes, risk reference) Resource Implications Legal implications and equality and diversity assessment Discussion For Information To put patients and carers at the centre of all we do and to provide care of the highest standard in terms of both safety and quality To continue to be recognised as a first-class teaching hospital, counted amongst the top 10 in the country, which promotes a culture of excellence, in all that we do Regulation 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18 None No additional resource implications Failure to assure high quality and safe care may lead to patient harm, litigation against the Trust and loss of reputation. There are no specific equality and diversity implications from this paper. Benefit to patients and the public Assuring patient safety Report History This is a regular monthly update to the Board on the results from the Clinical Assurance Toolkit (CAT) and to provide assurance of the progress and priorities attaches to a range of patient safety and quality issues. To read, discuss and note this paper Next steps Agenda item A5(iv) THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST CLINICAL ASSURANCE TOOLKIT (CAT) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This paper provides the regular monthly report to support Nursing and clinical quality assurance. The Board is aware that the Clinical Assurance Toolkit (CAT) is a monthly selfassessment process undertaken by Sisters/Charge Nurses, regarding clinical standards at Ward and Department level, as well as environmental cleanliness checks by the Matrons (in the acute setting) which are peer reviewed quarterly. This month’s report contains the following: Trend information on the overall CAT score, continues to be above 96% in January, following a number of months between 94% and 95%. Clinical staff will be consulted during February on question changes, which will take effect from April. Each month an aspect of CAT is analysed in more detail. This month the focus is on the Nursing assessment documentation, at a Trust level. Scores for these questions are high overall, which demonstrates that the documentation is completed appropriately and risk assessments are carried out. An overview of the areas with red scores for two months that have been escalated to Matrons. These were 4 areas in January, demonstrating an improvement on previous months (6 in December). Cleanliness checks were not red in any areas for the two months ending January, which reflects high standards from the Matron peer review checks. Details on the progress in the Acknowledging Continuous Excellence (ACE) Awards. Four applications for an ACE Award are currently in progress. RECOMMENDATION To (i) note the content of this report (ii) comment accordingly. Mrs Helen Lamont Nursing & Patient Services Director Mrs Elizabeth Harris Deputy Director of Nursing & Patient Services (RVI) 8th February 2016 THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST CLINICAL ASSURANCE TOOLKIT (CAT) 1. INTRODUCTION This is the third monthly report since the updating of questions in the October 2015 CAT survey. 2. CAT REPORT SUMMARY 2.1 Scores & Trends The table below demonstrates the trends within CAT over a period of six months. Scores by Directorate can be found in Appendix 1. Staff Knowledge scores continue to be ‘red’ at Trust level, due to a combination of issues, which have been previously explained to Board, although gradual and continued progress is noted. The scores from Environmental Cleanliness continue to demonstrate high standards across the Trust. Staff value the importance of high environmental standards and are proud of these. The CQC Inspectors commented upon the ‘spotlessly clean’ hospitals following their visit in January. 2.2 Nursing Assessment Documentation This month, the focus and analysis in this section is on Nursing assessment documentation. Many of the questions on CAT in this section relate to the risk assessments undertaken for patients on admission to the Trust. The purpose of having these questions in CAT is to ensure that these preventative risk assessments have taken place at the appropriate time. Overall, 362 patients had their risk assessment documentation reviewed as part of CAT in January. Of these, 100% had a complete skin or wound assessment, 99% had a falls risk assessment, 95% had a nutrition assessment, 100% had a moving and handling assessment, 98% had a depression screening, and 100% had an infection prevention and control assessment. These results are in line with previous months, although the checks for moving and handling, depression screening and IPC assessments were only introduced to the CAT in October 2015. 1 In addition to the above checks, the recording of pain scores and documentation of patient property are undertaken in Emergency Department RVI and Emergency Admissions Suite Freeman. Of the eight patients checked for pain scores, seven had a pain score recorded and six out of seven had property checks completed. In Radiology Departments, equipment is checked before clinics every morning. These checks had been documented in 100% of departments in January. Checks on the identity of the patient and the need for the procedure being undertaken are also important – these checks mitigate the risk that patients may be unnecessarily exposed to radiation if they are misidentified. Of the 33 patients reviewed in January, 100% had undergone an identity check before their procedure and 100% had been checked to ensure that the procedure was required. January’s results relating to Nursing assessment documentation are consistent with previous months and demonstrate high levels of compliance with documentation. As eRecord develops to include such assessment documentation, the CAT scores will retrieve information from eRecord about compliance. This will save Sisters/Charge Nurses some time but will also ensure that all patients are audited, rather than a sample of five per area. Next month the focus will be on NEWS documentation. 2.3 Escalation of ‘Red’ Areas Any area that receives a red score (less than 91%) for the whole of the CAT over two consecutive months will appear on the escalation report. There were four areas with an overall red score for two consecutive months in January, compared with 6 in December. This reduction is promising, although it is worth nothing that any changes made to CAT questions from April are likely to have an impact on the number of areas receiving a red score, as we have seen in previous question changes. CAT users will be consulted in February to mitigate the chances of red scores resulting from a lack of understanding or clarity about the questions. Only one of those with two months of red scores in January appeared on the escalation report in December, which demonstrates improvements in the other areas which had previously been red. Ward 1A RVI appeared on this month’s and last month’s report. An additional Senior Nurse has been moved to the Ward and all staff are aware of the issues and working hard to address. The same process for two months of consecutive red scores applies to the Matrons’ cleanliness checks. There were no areas with an overall red score for two consecutive months in January. This was a peer review month for the Matron checks. 2.4 ACE Awards The Acknowledging Continuous Excellence (ACE) awards continue to be high priority, and the Corporate Patient Services, and the Patient Experience Teams, are working together to develop the application process further and continue to highlight the fantastic work that underpins this process. Any clinical area which maintains high CAT scores for four out of six months is eligible to apply. Almost all 2 areas completing CAT are eligible to apply for their Environmental Cleanliness ACE award due to the high standard across the Trust. There are four applications for awards pending and discussions are ongoing with two other Directorates to determine the eligibility of their Wards and encourage applications. 3. CAT USER GROUP The first meeting of the CAT User Group will take place in February. This group was established to encourage engagement from clinical staff, following an extensive piece of research work to assess the extent of inconsistent practices among those collecting data for CAT. New guidance and training has been developed and put in place but this group will help to ensure that discussions are ongoing about how Sisters/Charges Nurses and other Clinical Leaders can get the most out of the CAT process. Meetings will be quarterly and will give staff a chance to have their say about the future development of CAT, as well as sharing best practice (for example, about the correct way to select samples of patients in order to answer the questions in the tool each month). The number of red scores tends to increase after each sixmonthly change in the questions, but having a high level of input from those who use the tool will ensure that scores are a true reflection of compliance, rather than a lack of clarity about what is being asked. 4. RISKS AND RISK MITIGATION The key focus of CAT is to mitigate risks through the monitoring of a range of patient safety issues. Ward Sisters/Charge Nurses and other Clinical Leaders are encouraged to view their results alongside other assurance data, such as the results of other audits and their Care Summary reports, in order to build a complete picture of their area’s strengths and weaknesses. Monitoring Nursing assessment documentation is one way of mitigating risk by ensuring that preventative measures are taken, whether this is identifying patients at risk of falling or ensuring that the correct patient has arrived for a Radiology procedure. The Board has previously been made aware of the escalation process which highlights issues within clinical areas. No major issues or risks were identified from the red scores. 5. SUMMARY The CAT continues to be viewed as a positive assurance method. Continued involvement from clinical staff in the development of the CAT ensures that the tool provides relevant assurance across a range of clinical settings. The focus of this month’s paper demonstrated the importance of Nursing assessment 3 documentation, ensuring that everything possible can be done to keep our patients safe. 6. RECOMMENDATION To note the contents of this report and comment accordingly. 7. KEY Main CAT Measures Less than 91% Between 91% and 97.9% 98% or more Mrs Helen Lamont Nursing & Patient Services Director Mrs Elizabeth Harris Deputy Director of Nursing & Patient Services (RVI) 8th February 2016 4