1 NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY PHYSICS DEPARTMENT Physics 253 – Fundamental Physics Mechanics Lab #11 Rolling Meet in FR 233. Sections A, B, C, G: Tuesday Nov. 8; Sections D, E, T: Thursday Nov. 10. Read Giancoli: Chapter 10 Lab Write-up due Tue. Nov. 15 (Sections A, B, C, G); Thur. Nov. 17 (Sections D, T) Apparatus In this experiment a wheel of radius R is rolled down an inclined plane with a raised guide to keep the wheel on the track. The wheel is hollow and has partitions to hold four steel balls. The balls can be relocated in different parts of the wheel to change the rotational inertia I while keeping the mass m of the wheel constant. Two photogates are positioned over the track and can measure the time, t, when the wheel passes through the beam at each photogate. The times can be read from the computer attached to the photogates. The photogates only record the elapsed time between the start and stop of the beam. The experimenter must determine the width d of the wheel at the beam to determine the velocity through each gate. Theory Velocity is the time rate of change of position of an object. If the width d of an object and the time t it takes to pass a point are both known, the velocity is given by v d t (1) Angular velocity is the time rate of change of the angular position of a rotating object, measured in radians per second (rad/s). For an object that rolls without slipping its linear velocity as the angular velocity is related to v d R Rt (2) When an object is acted upon by a force, the mass of the object provides resistance to the force. That resistance is called inertia. When a force causes an object to with the lever arm (the distance away from the axis of rotate, that force, combined rotation that the force acts) and the direction of the force yields a torque. Resistance to torque is not only due to mass, but also how far the mass is away from the axis of 2 rotation. The resistance to rotation is called the rotational inertia. For an object of radius R with all the mass m equally distant from an axis through the center of mass, the rotational inertia is ICM mR2 , where ICM is the rotational inertia about that axis through its center of mass. For objects with the same mass distributed throughout that radius, the rotational inertia is less. The more mass that is closer to the axis of rotation, the smaller the rotational inertia is. Objects in motion possess kinetic energy K. If the object is rolling it has kinetic energy due to both the forward motion of its center of mass, KCM, and to its rotation, Krot. 1 Translational kinetic energy depends on the mass and velocity, KCM mv 2 . Rotational 2 kinetic energy about the center of mass depends on the rotational inertia and angular 1 velocity, K rot ICM 2 . The total kinetic energy is thus 2 1 1 K mv 2 Icm 2 . 2 2 (3) Equation (2) can be used to convert velocity in the first term to angular velocity. 22 + ½I 2 = ½(I + mR2)2 = ½ I2. K = ½mR CM CM (4) Notice that we have derived the parallel-axis theorem: I ICM md 2 where, in this case the disk is rolling about an axis through the point where it touches the ground, thus d=R. As a wheel rolls down a slope its potential energy due to gravity, Ug=mgh, is converted into kinetic energy and overcomes the work done by friction, WFk. Rolling friction is relatively small, so we shall neglect it. If the initial and final angular velocities are i and f , then the change in kinetic energy is K K f K i . The relation between these different forms of energy is Ug = ½ I (f2 – i2). (5) This equation [and using Eq. (4)] can be rearranged to solve for the rotational inertia about the center of mass, ICM: 2U ICM 2 g 2 mR2 . (6) f i Data Collection You must show all your calculations in the Analysis section (parts 1-6) below to your TA before you leave the lab. This includes propagation of error calculations. Your TA will give you the equations that relate the errors in your measured quantities to the errors in your calculated quantities. 3 (1) Open the disk and measure the mass and diameter of each ball, and measure the mass of the empty plastic disk and the screw and fastener. Place the four steel balls in the innermost position in the disk (closest to the center). Measure the distance of the balls from the center of the disk. Close the disk, and measure and record the mass m of the disk-ball system and diameter of the disk. Also record the uncertainties in all of these numbers. (2) Measure the height of the track at each photogate and take the difference to get the height h and its uncertainty. (3) Check that the computer is running the LoggerPro program. (4) Place the wheel at the upper photogate so it just begins to interrupt the beam, as indicated by the red light. (5) Place a ruler at the base of the wheel along the track and push the wheel through the gate, recording the distance di (and its uncertainty) until the wheel no longer interrupts the beam. (6) Repeat steps 4 and 5 for the lower photogate and record the distance df (and its uncertainty). (7) Start the program, release the wheel from a start position close to the first photogate, and record the times from the computer, ti and tf (8) Repeat the measurement from the same starting point a total of ten times. Find the average initial and final times, t i and t f , and determine their uncertainties by calculating the standard deviation of the mean. (9) Repeat steps 7 and 8 using a starting point far from the first photogate. (10) Open the wheel and move the balls to the outer positions. (11) Repeat steps 7 through 9 with the second arrangement of balls. Analysis (1) Use the mass and radius from Step (1) to calculate mR2 and its uncertainty. (2) Use the height from Step (2) to find the potential energy Ug=mgh and its uncertainty. (3) Use the average times from Step (8) and Eq. (2) to determine the initial angular velocity i and final angular velocity f and their uncertainties. 4 (4) Calculate the rotational inertia and its uncertainty from Equation 6. (5) Calculate the rotational inertia and its uncertainty for the higher starting position done in Step (9). (6) Calculate the rotational inertia and its uncertainty for the second arrangement of balls and for the two starting positions. (7) What are the sources of experimental error in the measurements? Which one(s) is most important? (8) Do the rotational inertias measured for the same ball arrangement but different starting positions agree to within the experimental error (that is, to within their uncertainties)? Make this comparison for the two different ball arrangements. (9) Was the assumption about the insignificance of friction sound? What results might point to the occurrence of friction? (10) From your measurements in Step (1), estimate what ICM should be for the disk-ball system (make liberal use of the parallel-axis theorem for spheres, and use the rotational inertia tables in the textbook). How does this compare to your measured quantities for the two different ball orientations inside the disk? What is the experimental difference between these two quantities? Estimate the amount of energy converted to heat (assuming the discrepancy is all due to frictional losses).