Page 1
LEXSEE 401 U.S. 37
Caution
As of: Nov 29, 2009
YOUNGER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY v. HARRIS
ET AL.
No. 2
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
401 U.S. 37; 91 S. Ct. 746; 27 L. Ed. 2d 669; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
April 1, 1969, Argued
February 23, 1971, Decided
SUBSEQUENT HISTORY:
November 16, 1970.
Reargued April 29 and
PRIOR HISTORY: APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL
DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.
DISPOSITION:
281 F.Supp. 507, reversed.
CASE SUMMARY:
PROCEDURAL POSTURE: The prosecution appealed
from a decision of the United States District Court for
the Central District of California finding that the California Criminal Syndicalism Act, Cal. Penal Code ßß
11400 and 11401, was unconstitutionally vague and
overbroad.
OVERVIEW: The court reversed the trial court's judgment that a state law under which defendant had been
indicted was unconstitutionally vague. Because the case
was still pending, the court could not enjoin the proceedings. Plaintiffs who joined in the action out of fear that
their constitutional rights would be impaired did not have
standing because they had not been indicted themselves.
Although the statute may have challenged defendant's
U.S. Const. amend. I freedom of speech rights and its
enforcement might have a chilling effect on the speech of
other persons, the court could not review the statute on
its face. The limited circumstances under which a statute
threatened great and immediate irreparable injuries were
not present.
OUTCOME: The court reversed the finding of unconstitutionality, because plaintiffs lacked standing, the action
was pending in state court, and the threat to U.S. Const.
amend. I freedom of speech rights was not great enough
to warrant a facial challenge to the statute. The case was
remanded.
CORE TERMS: injunction, criminal prosecution, criminal syndicalism, irreparable injury, federalism, enjoin,
bad faith, harassment, indicted, chilling effect, antiinjunction, advocating, vague, criminal proceedings,
district attorney, stay proceedings, expressly authorized,
national government, declaratory, prosecuted, state law,
equitable relief, state statute, constitutional claims, constitutional rights, good faith, intimidation, prosecuting,
industrial, injunctive
LexisNexis(R) Headnotes
Page 2
401 U.S. 37, *; 91 S. Ct. 746, **;
27 L. Ed. 2d 669, ***; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
Criminal Law & Procedure > Criminal Offenses > Miscellaneous Offenses > Espionage & Treason > General
Overview
Criminal Law & Procedure > Scienter > Willfulness
[HN1] See Cal. Penal Code ß 11400.
Criminal Law & Procedure > Criminal Offenses > Miscellaneous Offenses > Espionage & Treason > General
Overview
[HN2] See Cal. Penal Code ß 11401.
Civil Procedure > Federal & State Interrelationships >
Anti-Injunction Acts > Anti-Injunction Act
[HN3] See 28 U.S.C.S. ß 2283.
Constitutional Law > The Judiciary > Case or Controversy > Standing > Third Party Standing
[HN4] Persons having no fears of state prosecution except those that are imaginary or speculative are not to be
accepted as appropriate plaintiffs in such cases.
Civil Procedure > Federal & State Interrelationships >
Anti-Injunction Acts > General Overview
Transportation Law > Interstate Commerce > State
Powers
[HN5] The normal thing to do when federal courts are
asked to enjoin pending proceedings in state courts is not
to issue such injunctions.
Civil Procedure > Remedies > Injunctions > Elements
> General Overview
[HN6] Irreparable injury is the traditional prerequisite to
obtaining an injunction. In addition, however, in view of
the fundamental policy against federal interference with
state criminal prosecutions, even irreparable injury is
insufficient unless it is both great and immediate. Certain
types of injury, in particular, the cost, anxiety, and inconvenience of having to defend against a single criminal prosecution, could not by themselves be considered
"irreparable" in the special legal sense of that term. Instead, the threat to the plaintiff's federally protected
rights must be one that cannot be eliminated by his defense against a single criminal prosecution.
U.S. Const. amend. I freedoms. But this sort of "chilling
effect" should not by itself justify federal intervention.
Constitutional Law > Bill of Rights > Fundamental
Freedoms > Freedom of Speech > Political Speech
Constitutional Law > Bill of Rights > Fundamental
Freedoms > Freedom of Speech > Scope of Freedom
[HN8] Where a statute does not directly abridge free
speech, but -- while regulating a subject within the state's
power -- tends to have the incidental effect of inhibiting
U.S. Const. amend. I rights, it is well settled that the statute can be upheld if the effect on speech is minor in relation to the need for control of the conduct and the lack of
alternative means for doing so. Just as the incidental
"chilling effect" of such statutes does not automatically
render them unconstitutional, so the chilling effect that
admittedly can result from the very existence of certain
laws on the statute books does not in itself justify prohibiting the state from carrying out the important and necessary task of enforcing these laws against socially harmful
conduct that the state believes in good faith to be punishable under its laws and the Constitution.
Civil Procedure > Judgments > Entry of Judgments >
Enforcement & Execution > General Overview
Constitutional Law > The Judiciary > Case or Controversy > Constitutional Questions > General Overview
Constitutional Law > Supremacy Clause > General
Overview
[HN9] Procedures for testing the constitutionality of a
statute "on its face" and for then enjoining all action to
enforce the statute until the state can obtain court approval for a modified version, are fundamentally at odds
with the function of the federal courts in the constitutional plan. The power and duty of the judiciary to declare
laws unconstitutional is in the final analysis derived from
its responsibility for resolving concrete disputes brought
before the courts for decision; a statute apparently governing a dispute cannot be applied by judges, consistently with their obligations under the Supremacy Clause,
when such an application of the statute would conflict
with the Constitution. But this vital responsibility, broad
as it is, does not amount to an unlimited power to survey
the statute books and pass judgment on laws before the
courts are called upon to enforce them.
SUMMARY:
Constitutional Law > Bill of Rights > Fundamental
Freedoms > Freedom of Speech > Political Speech
[HN7] A criminal prosecution under a statute regulating
expression usually involves imponderables and contingencies that themselves may inhibit the full exercise of
The plaintiff, having been indicted in a California
state court on charges of criminal syndicalism, requested
the United States District Court for the Central District of
California to grant injunctive relief against the state
criminal prosecution, on the grounds that the prosecution
and even the presence of the California criminal syndi-
Page 3
401 U.S. 37, *; 91 S. Ct. 746, **;
27 L. Ed. 2d 669, ***; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
calism statute violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments by inhibiting the plaintiff in the exercise of his
rights of free speech and press. A three-judge District
Court held the criminal syndicalism statute void for
vagueness and overbreadth in violation of the First and
Fourteenth Amendments and enjoined the further prosecution against the plaintiff of the pending state proceedings (281 F Supp 507).
On appeal, the United States Supreme Court reversed and remanded the case. In an opinion by Black, J.,
expressing the views of five members of the court, it was
held that the possible unconstitutionality of the state statute on its face did not in itself justify an injunction
against good-faith attempts to enforce it, and that since
the threat to the plaintiff's federal constitutional rights
could be eliminated by his defense against a single criminal prosecution, and the only injury which he faced in
connection with the state prosecution was that incidental
to every criminal proceeding brought lawfully and in
good faith, the District Court's injunction violated the
federal policy forbidding federal courts from enjoining
pending state criminal proceedings except under extraordinary circumstances where the danger of irreparable
injury is great and immediate.
Stewart, J., joined by Harlan, J., concurring, emphasized that the decision dealt only with the proper policy
to be followed by a federal court when asked to enjoin a
criminal prosecution which was contemporaneously
pending in a state court.
Brennan, J., joined by White and Marshall, JJ., concurring in the result, stated that since the plaintiff had not
alleged that the state prosecution was brought in bad
faith to harass, and since his constitutional contentions
could be adequately adjudicated in the state criminal
proceeding, federal intervention in the pending criminal
prosecution was improper.
Douglas, J., dissented on the ground that special circumstances warranting federal intervention in a state
criminal proceeding existed where the state statute being
enforced was unconstitutional on its face.
LAWYERS' EDITION HEADNOTES:
al District Court's judgment enjoining on federal constitutional grounds the prosecution of a pending state criminal proceeding, where (1) the accused has an opportunity to raise his constitutional claims in the pending state
proceeding, (2) there is no suggestion that the prosecution was brought in bad faith or was only one of a series
of repeated prosecutions to which the accused would be
subjected, and (3) the injury which the accused faces is
solely that incidental to every criminal proceeding
brought lawfully and in good faith.
[***LEdHN2]
DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS ß2
federal court -- pending state criminal proceedings -Headnote:[2A][2B]
In the absence of a showing that immediate irreparable damages would be suffered, it is improper for a Federal District Court to grant declaratory relief on federal
constitutional grounds when a criminal prosecution involving a challenged state statute is pending in a state
court at the time federal suit is initiated.
[***LEdHN3]
STATUTES ß37
who may attack -- criminal cases -Headnote:[3]
Persons having no fears of state criminal prosecution
except those that are imaginary or speculative cannot be
accepted as appropriate plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit to
stop a state court prosecution, and an allegation by various persons that they feel inhibited is not sufficient to
bring the equitable jurisdiction of the federal courts into
play to enjoin a pending state prosecution, where such
persons do not claim that they have ever been threatened
with prosecution, or that a prosecution is likely, or even
that a prosecution is remotely possible.
[***LEdHN4]
STATUTES ß37
who may attack -- criminal cases --
[***LEdHN1]
COURTS ß698
federal injunction -- pending state criminal proceedings -Headnote:[1A][1B]
The national policy forbidding federal courts to stay
or enjoin pending state court proceedings except under
special circumstances is violated by a three-judge Feder-
Headnote:[4]
A person who has been indicted, is being prosecuted
in a state court for a violation of a state statute, and thus
has an acute, live controversy with the state and its prosecutor, is a proper party in an action challenging the state
statute on federal constitutional grounds.
[***LEdHN5]
Page 4
401 U.S. 37, *; 91 S. Ct. 746, **;
27 L. Ed. 2d 669, ***; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
EQUITY ß9
A basic doctrine of equity jurisprudence is that
courts of equity should not act, and particularly should
not act to restrain a criminal prosecution, when the moving party has an adequate remedy at law and will not
suffer irreparable injury if denied equitable relief.
regulating a subject within a state's power, tends to have
the incidental effect of inhibiting First Amendment
rights, can be upheld if the effect on speech is minor in
relation to the need for control of the conduct and the
lack of alternative means for doing so; and just as the
incidental "chilling effect" of such statutes does not automatically render them unconstitutional, so the "chilling
effect" that admittedly can result from the very existence
of certain laws on the statute books does not in itself
justify prohibiting the state from carrying out the important and necessary task of enforcing these laws
against socially harmful conduct which the state believes
in good faith to be punishable under its laws and the
Constitution.
[***LEdHN6]
[***LEdHN9]
EQUITY ß42
EQUITY ß76
adequate remedy at law -- irreparable injury -- criminal prosecution -Headnote:[5]
COURTS ß698
federal injunction -- pending state criminal proceedings -Headnote:[6]
Federal courts cannot enjoin on federal constitutional grounds the prosecution of state criminal proceedings
in the absence of a showing that the danger of irreparable
injury is both great and immediate; the cost, anxiety, and
inconvenience of having to defend against a single criminal prosecution cannot by themselves be considered
irreparable; and the threat to the plaintiff's federally protected rights must be one that cannot be eliminated by his
defense against a single criminal prosecution.
[***LEdHN7]
COURTS ß683
federal intervention -- state proceedings -Headnote:[7]
Although a criminal prosecution under a statute regulating expression usually involves imponderables and
contingencies which themselves may inhibit the full exercise of First Amendment freedoms, this sort of chilling
effect should not by itself justify federal intervention in
state criminal proceedings.
[***LEdHN8]
INJUNCTION ß80
enforcement of statute -Headnote:[9]
Procedures for testing the constitutionality of a state
statute on its face and for then enjoining all action to
enforce the statute until the state can obtain court approval for a modified version are fundamentally at odds
with the function of the federal courts in our constitutional plan.
[***LEdHN10]
COURTS ß96
duty to declare unconstitutionality -Headnote:[10]
The power and duty of the federal judiciary to declare laws unconstitutional are in the final analysis derived from its responsibility for resolving concrete disputes brought before the courts for decision; a statute
apparently governing a dispute cannot be applied by
judges, consistently with their obligations under the Supremacy Clause, when such an application of the statute
would conflict with the Constitution; but this vital responsibility, broad as it is, does not amount to an unlimited power to survey the statute books and pass judgment
on laws before the courts are called upon to enforce
them.
LAW ß925
First Amendment rights -- chilling effect -Headnote:[8]
In the area of First Amendment rights, the existence
of a "chilling effect" does not constitute a sufficient basis, in and of itself, for prohibiting state action; a statute
which does not directly abridge free speech, but, while
[***LEdHN11]
COURTS ß762
proposed legislation -Headnote:[11]
Even when federal suits relating to the constitutionality of pending legislation involve a "case or controver-
Page 5
401 U.S. 37, *; 91 S. Ct. 746, **;
27 L. Ed. 2d 669, ***; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
sy" sufficient to satisfy the requirements of Art 3 of the
Constitution, the task of analyzing a proposed statute,
pinpointing its deficiencies, and requiring correction of
these deficiencies before the statute is put into effect, is
rarely if ever an appropriate task for the judiciary, and it
can seldom be appropriate for federal courts to exercise
any power of prior approval or veto over the legislative
process.
[***LEdHN12]
INJUNCTION ß80
which involved alleged bad-faith harassment and is factually distinguishable from this case, does not substantially broaden the availability of injunctions against state
criminal prosecutions. Pp. 43-54.
COUNSEL: Clifford K. Thompson, Jr., Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for appellant
on the second reargument. Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant on
the original argument and on the first reargument. With
them on the briefs were Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney
General, and Evelle J. Younger, pro se.
enforcement of statute -Headnote:[12]
A federal court cannot properly enjoin enforcement
of a state statute solely on the basis of a showing that the
statute on its face abridges First Amendment rights, and
the possible unconstitutionality of a state statute on its
face does not in itself justify a federal injunction against
good-faith attempts to enforce it.
SYLLABUS
Appellee Harris, who had been indicted for violating the California Criminal Syndicalism Act, sued in the
Federal District Court to enjoin appellant, the county
District Attorney, from prosecuting him, contending that
the Act is unconstitutional on its face and inhibits him in
exercising his free-speech rights. Appellees Dan and
Hirsch, claiming that the prosecution of Harris would
"inhibit" them from peacefully advocating the program
of the political party to which they belonged, and appellee Broslawsky, a college professor, claiming that the
prosecution made him "uncertain" as to whether his
teaching and reading practices would subject him to
prosecution, intervened as plaintiffs. All asserted that
they would suffer irreparable injury unless a federal injunction was issued. A three-judge court, relying on
Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479, held the Act void
for vagueness and overbreadth, and enjoined Harris'
prosecution. Held:
1. There is no basis for equitable jurisdiction based
on the allegations of appellees other than Harris, who
have not been indicted, arrested, or threatened with prosecution, and the normal course of a state criminal prosecution cannot be blocked on the basis of fears of prosecution that are merely speculative. Pp. 41-42.
2. Federal courts will not enjoin pending state criminal prosecutions except under extraordinary circumstances where the danger of irreparable loss is both great
and immediate in that (unlike the situation affecting Harris) there is a threat to the plaintiff's federally protected
rights that cannot be eliminated by his defense against a
single prosecution. The decision in Dombrowski, supra,
A. L. Wirin argued the cause for appellees on the rearguments. With him on the briefs were Fred Okrand and
Frank S. Pestana. Sam Rosenwein argued the cause for
appellees on the original argument. With him on the
brief was Mr. Pestana.
JUDGES: Black, J., delivered the opinion of the Court,
in which Burger, C. J., and Harlan, Stewart, and
Blackmun, JJ., joined. Stewart, J., filed a concurring
opinion, in which Harlan, J., joined, post, p. 54. Brennan, J., filed an opinion concurring in the result, in which
White and Marshall, JJ., joined, post, p. 56. Douglas, J.,
filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 58.
OPINION BY: BLACK
OPINION
[*38] [***672] [**747] MR. JUSTICE BLACK
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Appellee, John Harris, Jr., was indicted in a California state court, charged with violation of the California
Penal Code ßß 11400 and 11401, known as the California Criminal Syndicalism Act, set out below. 1 He then
filed [*39] a [**748] complaint in the Federal District
Court, asking [***673] that court to enjoin the appellant, Younger, the District Attorney of Los Angeles
County, from prosecuting him, and alleging that the
prosecution and even the presence of the Act inhibited
him in the exercise of his rights of free speech and press,
rights guaranteed him by the First and Fourteenth
Amendments. Appellees Jim Dan and Diane Hirsch intervened as plaintiffs in the suit, claiming that the prosecution of Harris would inhibit them as members of the
Progressive Labor Party from peacefully advocating the
program of their party, which was to replace capitalism
with socialism and to abolish the profit system of production in this country. Appellee Farrell Broslawsky, an
instructor in history at Los Angeles Valley College, also
intervened claiming that the prosecution of Harris made
him uncertain as to whether he could [*40] teach about
the doctrines of Karl Marx or read from the Communist
Page 6
401 U.S. 37, *; 91 S. Ct. 746, **;
27 L. Ed. 2d 669, ***; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
Manifesto as part of his classwork. All claimed that unless the United States court restrained the state prosecution of Harris each would suffer immediate and irreparable injury. A three-judge Federal District Court, convened pursuant to 28 U. S. C. ß 2284, held that it had
jurisdiction and power to restrain the District Attorney
from prosecuting, held that the State's Criminal Syndicalism Act was void for vagueness and overbreadth in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments, and accordingly restrained the District Attorney from "further
prosecution of the currently pending action against plaintiff Harris for alleged violation of the Act." 281 F.Supp.
507, 517 (1968).
1 [HN1] "ß 11400. Definition
"'Criminal syndicalism' as used in this article
means any doctrine or precept advocating, teaching or aiding and abetting the commission of
crime, sabotage (which word is hereby defined as
meaning wilful and malicious physical damage or
injury to physical property), or unlawful acts of
force and violence or unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of accomplishing a change in industrial ownership or control, or effecting any political change."
[HN2] "ß 11401. Offense; punishment
"Any person who:
"1. By spoken or written words or personal
conduct advocates, teaches or aids and abets
criminal syndicalism or the duty, necessity or
propriety of committing crime, sabotage, violence
or any unlawful method of terrorism as a means
of accomplishing a change in industrial ownership or control, or effecting any political change;
or
"2. Wilfully and deliberately by spoken or
written words justifies or attempts to justify criminal syndicalism or the commission or attempt to
commit crime, sabotage, violence or unlawful
methods of terrorism with intent to approve, advocate or further the doctrine of criminal syndicalism; or
"3. Prints, publishes, edits, issues or circulates or publicly displays any book, paper, pamphlet, document, poster or written or printed matter in any other form, containing or carrying written or printed advocacy, teaching, or aid and
abetment of, or advising, criminal syndicalism; or
"4. Organizes or assists in organizing, or is or
knowingly becomes a member of, any organization, society, group or assemblage of persons or-
ganized or assembled to advocate, teach or aid
and abet criminal syndicalism; or
"5. Wilfully by personal act or conduct, practices or commits any act advised, advocated,
taught or aided and abetted by the doctrine or
precept of criminal syndicalism, with intent to
accomplish a change in industrial ownership or
control, or effecting any political change;
"Is guilty of a felony and punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not less than one
nor more than 14 years."
[***LEdHR1A] [1A] [***LEdHR2A] [2A]
The case is before us on appeal by the State's District Attorney Younger, pursuant to 28 U. S. C. ß 1253.
In his notice of appeal and his jurisdictional statement
appellant presented two questions: (1) whether the decision of this Court in Whitney v. California, 274 U.S.
357, holding California's law constitutional in 1927 was
binding on the District Court and (2) whether the State's
law is constitutional on its face. In this Court the brief
for the State of California, filed at our request, also argues that only Harris, who was indicted, has standing to
challenge the State's law, and that issuance of the injunction was a violation of a longstanding judicial policy and
of 28 U. S. C. ß 2283, which provides:
[HN3] "A court of the United States may not grant
an injunction to stay proceedings in a State court except
as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where
necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments."
See, e. g., Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Engineers, 398
U.S. 281, 285-286 (1970). Without regard to the questions [*41] raised about Whitney v. California, supra,
since overruled by Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444
(1969), or the constitutionality of the state law, we have
concluded that the [***674] judgment of the District
Court, enjoining appellant Younger from prosecuting
under these California statutes, must be reversed as a
violation of the national policy forbidding federal courts
to stay or enjoin pending state court proceedings except
under special circumstances. 2 We express no view about
the circumstances under which federal courts may act
when there is no prosecution pending in state courts at
the time the federal proceeding is begun.
[***LEdHR2B] [2B]
2 Appellees did not explicitly ask for a declaratory judgment in their complaint. They did, however, ask the District Court to grant "such other
and further relief as to the Court may seem just
and proper," and the District Court in fact granted
Page 7
401 U.S. 37, *; 91 S. Ct. 746, **;
27 L. Ed. 2d 669, ***; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
a declaratory judgment. For the reasons stated in
our opinion today in Samuels v. Mackell, post, p.
66, we hold that declaratory relief is also improper when a prosecution involving the challenged
statute is pending in state court at the time the
federal suit is initiated.
I
[***LEdHR3] [3] [***LEdHR4] [4]Appellee
Harris has been indicted, and was actually being prosecuted by California for a violation of its Criminal Syndicalism Act at the time this suit was filed. He thus has an
acute, live controversy with the State and its prosecutor.
But none of the other parties plaintiff in the District
Court, Dan, Hirsch, or Broslawsky, has such a controversy. None has been indicted, arrested, or even threatened
by the prosecutor. About these three the three-judge
court said:
"Plaintiffs Dan and Hirsch allege that they are members
of the Progressive Labor Party, which advocates change
in industrial ownership and political change, and that
they feel inhibited in advocating [*42] the program of
their political party through peaceful, non-violent means,
because of the presence of the Act 'on the books,' and
because of the pending criminal prosecution against Harris. Plaintiff Broslawsky is a history instructor, and he
alleges that he is uncertain as to whether his normal practice of teaching his students about the doctrines of Karl
Marx and reading from the Communist Manifesto and
other revolutionary works may subject him to prosecution for violation of the Act." 281 F.Supp., at 509.
Whatever right Harris, who is being prosecuted under the
state syndicalism law may have, Dan, Hirsch, and
Broslawsky cannot share it with him. If these three had
alleged that they would be prosecuted for the conduct
they planned to engage in, and if the District Court had
found this allegation to be true -- either on the admission
of the State's district attorney or on any other evidence -then a genuine controversy might be said to exist. But
here appellees Dan, Hirsch, and Broslawsky do not claim
that they have ever been threatened with prosecution,
that a prosecution is likely, or even that a prosecution is
remotely possible. They claim the right to bring this suit
solely because, in the language of their complaint, they
"feel inhibited." We do not think this allegation, even if
true, is sufficient to bring the equitable jurisdiction of the
federal courts into play to enjoin a pending state prosecution. A federal lawsuit to stop a prosecution in a state
court is a serious matter. And [HN4] persons having no
fears of state prosecution except those that are imaginary
or speculative, are not to be accepted as appropriate
plaintiffs in such cases. See [**750] Golden v. Zwickler, 394 U.S. 103 [***675] (1969). Since Harris is actually being prosecuted under the challenged laws, however, we proceed with him as a proper party.
[*43] II
Since the beginning of this country's history Congress has, subject to few exceptions, manifested a desire
to permit state courts to try state cases free from interference by federal courts. In 1793 an Act unconditionally
provided: "Nor shall a writ of injunction be granted to
stay proceedings in any court of a state . . . ." 1 Stat. 335,
c. 22, ß 5. A comparison of the 1793 Act with 28 U. S.
C. ß 2283, its present-day successor, graphically illustrates how few and minor have been the exceptions
granted from the flat, prohibitory language of the old
Act. During all this lapse of years from 1793 to 1970 the
statutory exceptions to the 1793 congressional enactment
have been only three: (1) "except as expressly authorized
by Act of Congress"; (2) "where necessary in aid of its
jurisdiction"; and (3) "to protect or effectuate its judgments." In addition, a judicial exception to the longstanding policy evidenced by the statute has been made where
a person about to be prosecuted in a state court can show
that he will, if the proceeding in the state court is not
enjoined, suffer irreparable damages. See Ex parte
Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908). 3
3 For an interesting discussion of the history of
this congressional policy up to 1941, see Toucey
v. New York Life Ins. Co., 314 U.S. 118 (1941).
[***LEdHR5] [5]The precise reasons for this
longstanding public policy against federal court interference with state court proceedings have never been specifically identified but the primary sources of the policy
are plain. One is the basic doctrine of equity jurisprudence that courts of equity should not act, and particularly should not act to restrain a criminal prosecution, when
the moving party has an adequate remedy at law and will
not suffer irreparable [*44] injury if denied equitable
relief. The doctrine may originally have grown out of
circumstances peculiar to the English judicial system and
not applicable in this country, but its fundamental purpose of restraining equity jurisdiction within narrow limits is equally important under our Constitution, in order
to prevent erosion of the role of the jury and avoid a duplication of legal proceedings and legal sanctions where
a single suit would be adequate to protect the rights asserted. This underlying reason for restraining courts of
equity from interfering with criminal prosecutions is
reinforced by an even more vital consideration, the notion of "comity," that is, a proper respect for state functions, a recognition of the fact that the entire country is
made up of a Union of separate state governments, and a
Page 8
401 U.S. 37, *; 91 S. Ct. 746, **;
27 L. Ed. 2d 669, ***; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
continuance of the belief that the National Government
will fare best if the States and their institutions are left
free to perform their separate functions in their separate
ways. This, perhaps for lack of a better and clearer way
to describe it, is referred to by many as "Our Federalism," and one familiar with the profound debates that
ushered our Federal Constitution into existence is bound
to respect those who remain loyal to the ideals and
dreams of "Our Federalism." The concept does not mean
blind deference [***676] to "States' Rights" any more
than it means centralization of control over every important issue in our National Government and its courts.
The Framers rejected both these courses. What the concept does represent is a system in which there is sensitivity to the legitimate interests of both State and National
Governments, and in which the National Government,
anxious though it may be to vindicate and protect federal
rights and federal interests, always endeavors to do so in
ways that will not unduly interfere with the legitimate
activities of the [**751] States. It should never be forgotten that this slogan, "Our Federalism," born in the
early struggling days of [*45] our Union of States, occupies a highly important place in our Nation's history
and its future.
This brief discussion should be enough to suggest
some of the reasons why it has been perfectly natural for
our cases to repeat time and time again that [HN5] the
normal thing to do when federal courts are asked to enjoin pending proceedings in state courts is not to issue
such injunctions. In Fenner v. Boykin, 271 U.S. 240
(1926), suit had been brought in the Federal District
Court seeking to enjoin state prosecutions under a recently enacted state law that allegedly interfered with the free
flow of interstate commerce. The Court, in a unanimous
opinion made clear that such a suit, even with respect to
state criminal proceedings not yet formally instituted,
could be proper only under very special circumstances:
" Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, and following cases have established the doctrine that when absolutely
necessary for protection of constitutional rights courts of
the United States have power to enjoin state officers
from instituting criminal actions. But this may not be
done except under extraordinary circumstances where
the danger of irreparable loss is both great and immediate. Ordinarily, there should be no interference with
such officers; primarily, they are charged with the duty
of prosecuting offenders against the laws of the State and
must decide when and how this is to be done. The accused should first set up and rely upon his defense in the
state courts, even though this involves a challenge of the
validity of some statute, unless it plainly appears that this
course would not afford adequate protection." Id., at
243-244.
These principles, made clear in the Fenner case, have
been repeatedly followed and reaffirmed in other cases
involving threatened prosecutions. See, e. g., Spielman
Motor [*46] Sales Co. v. Dodge, 295 U.S. 89 (1935);
Beal v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 312 U.S. 45 (1941); Watson v. Buck, 313 U.S. 387 (1941); Williams v. Miller,
317 U.S. 599 (1942); Douglas v. City of Jeannette, 319
U.S. 157 (1943).
[***LEdHR6] [6]In all of these cases the Court
stressed the importance of showing [HN6] irreparable
injury, the traditional prerequisite to obtaining an injunction. In addition, however, the Court also made clear that
in view of the fundamental policy against federal interference with state criminal prosecutions, even irreparable
injury is insufficient unless it is "both great and immediate." Fenner, supra. Certain types of injury, in particular, the cost, anxiety, [***677] and inconvenience of
having to defend against a single criminal prosecution,
could not by themselves be considered "irreparable" in
the special legal sense of that term. Instead, the threat to
the plaintiff's federally protected rights must be one that
cannot be eliminated by his defense against a single
criminal prosecution. See, e. g., Ex parte Young, supra,
at 145-147. Thus, in the Buck case, supra, at 400, we
stressed:
"Federal injunctions against state criminal statutes,
either in their entirety or with respect to their separate
and distinct prohibitions, are not to be granted as a matter
of course, even if such statutes are unconstitutional. 'No
citizen or member of the community is immune from
prosecution, in good faith, for his alleged criminal acts.
The imminence of such a prosecution even though alleged to be unauthorized and hence unlawful is not alone
ground for relief in equity which exerts its extraordinary
powers only to prevent irreparable injury to the plaintiff
who seeks its aid.' Beal v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
Corp., 312 U.S. 45, 49."
[*47] [**752] And similarly, in Douglas, supra, we
made clear, after reaffirming this rule, that:
"It does not appear from the record that petitioners have
been threatened with any injury other than that incidental
to every criminal proceeding brought lawfully and in
good faith . . . ." 319 U.S., at 164.
This is where the law stood when the Court decided
Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479 (1965), and held
that an injunction against the enforcement of certain state
criminal statutes could properly issue under the circumstances presented in that case. 4 In Dombrowski, [*48]
unlike many of the earlier cases denying injunctions, the
complaint made substantial allegations that:
Page 9
401 U.S. 37, *; 91 S. Ct. 746, **;
27 L. Ed. 2d 669, ***; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
"the threats to enforce the statutes against appellants are
not made with any expectation of securing valid convictions, but rather are part of a plan to employ arrests, seizures, and threats of prosecution under color of the statutes to harass appellants and discourage them and their
supporters [***678] from asserting and attempting to
vindicate the constitutional rights of Negro citizens of
Louisiana." 380 U.S., at 482.
The appellants in Dombrowski had offered to prove that
their offices had been raided and all their files and records seized pursuant to search and arrest warrants that
were later summarily vacated by a state judge for lack of
probable cause. They also offered to prove that despite
the state court order quashing the warrants and suppressing the evidence seized, the prosecutor was continuing to
threaten to initiate new prosecutions of appellants under
the same statutes, was holding public hearings at which
photostatic copies of the illegally seized documents were
being used, and was threatening to use other copies of
the illegally seized documents to obtain grand jury indictments against the appellants on charges of violating
the same statutes. These circumstances, as viewed by the
Court sufficiently establish the kind of irreparable injury,
above and beyond that associated with the defense of a
single prosecution brought in good faith, that had always
been considered sufficient to justify federal intervention.
See, e. g., Beal, supra, at 50. Indeed, after quoting the
Court's statement in Douglas concerning the very restricted circumstances under which an injunction could
be justified, [**753] the Court in Dombrowski went on
to say:
"But the allegations in this complaint depict a situation in which defense of the State's criminal [*49] prosecution will not assure adequate vindication of constitutional rights. They suggest that a substantial loss of or
impairment of freedoms of expression will occur if appellants must await the state court's disposition and ultimate review in this Court of any adverse determination.
These allegations, if true, clearly show irreparable injury." 380 U.S., at 485-486.
And the Court made clear that even under these circumstances the District Court issuing the injunction would
have continuing power to lift it at any time and remit the
plaintiffs to the state courts if circumstances warranted.
380 U.S., at 491, 492. Similarly, in Cameron v. Johnson,
390 U.S. 611 (1968), a divided Court denied an injunction after finding that the record did not establish the
necessary bad faith and harassment; the dissenting Justices themselves stressed the very limited role to be allowed for federal injunctions against state criminal pros-
ecutions and differed with the Court only on the question
whether the particular facts of that case were sufficient to
show that the prosecution was brought in bad faith.
4 Neither the cases dealing with standing to
raise claims of vagueness or overbreadth, e. g.,
Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88 (1940), nor the
loyalty oath cases, e. g., Baggett v. Bullitt, 377
U.S. 360 (1964), changed the basic principles
governing the propriety of injunctions against
state criminal prosecutions. In the standing cases
we allowed attacks on overly broad or vague
statutes in the absence of any showing that the
defendant's conduct could not be regulated by
some properly drawn statute. But in each of
these cases the statute was not merely vague or
overly broad "on its face"; the statute was held to
be vague or overly broad as construed and applied to a particular defendant in a particular case.
If the statute had been too vague as written but
sufficiently narrow as applied, prosecutions and
convictions under it would ordinarily have been
permissible. See Dombrowski, supra, at 491 n.
7.
In Baggett and similar cases we enjoined
state officials from discharging employees who
failed to take certain loyalty oaths. We held that
the States were without power to exact the promises involved, with their vague and uncertain content concerning advocacy and political association, as a condition of employment. Apart from
the fact that any plaintiff discharged for exercising his constitutional right to refuse to take the
oath would have had no adequate remedy at law,
the relief sought was of course the kind that raises
no special problem -- an injunction against allegedly unconstitutional state action (discharging the
employees) that is not part of a criminal prosecution.
[***LEdHR1B] [1B]It is against the background of
these principles that we must judge the propriety of an
injunction under the circumstances of the present case.
Here a proceeding was already pending in the state court,
affording Harris an opportunity to raise his constitutional
claims. There is no suggestion that this single prosecution against Harris is brought in bad faith or is only one
of a series of repeated prosecutions to which he will be
subjected. In other words, the injury that Harris faces is
solely "that incidental to every criminal proceeding
brought lawfully and in good faith," Douglas, supra, and
therefore under the settled [***679] doctrine we have
already described he is not entitled to equitable relief
"even if such statutes are unconstitutional," Buck, supra.
Page 10
401 U.S. 37, *; 91 S. Ct. 746, **;
27 L. Ed. 2d 669, ***; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
[*50] [***LEdHR7] [7]The District Court, however, thought that the Dombrowski decision substantially
broadened the availability of injunctions against state
criminal prosecutions and that under that decision the
federal courts may give equitable relief, without regard
to any showing of bad faith or harassment, whenever a
state statute is found "on its face" to be vague or overly
broad, in violation of the First Amendment. We recognize that there are some statements in the Dombrowski
opinion that would seem to support this argument. But,
as we have already seen, such statements were unnecessary to the decision of that case, because the Court found
that the plaintiffs had alleged a basis for equitable relief
under the long-established standards. In addition, we do
not regard the reasons adduced to support this position as
sufficient to justify such a substantial departure from the
established doctrines regarding the availability of injunctive relief. It is undoubtedly true, as the Court stated in
Dombrowski, that [HN7] "[a] criminal prosecution under
a statute regulating expression usually involves imponderables and contingencies that themselves may inhibit
the full exercise of First Amendment freedoms." 380
U.S., at 486. But this sort of "chilling effect," as the
Court called it, should not by itself justify federal intervention. In the first place, the chilling effect cannot be
satisfactorily eliminated by federal injunctive relief. In
Dombrowski itself the Court stated that the injunction to
be issued there could be lifted if the State obtained an
"acceptable limiting construction" from the state courts.
The Court then made clear that once this was done, prosecutions could then be brought for conduct occurring
before the narrowing construction was made, and proper
convictions could stand so long as the defendants were
not deprived of fair warning. 380 U.S., at 491 n. 7. The
kind of relief granted in Dombrowski thus does [**754]
not effectively eliminate uncertainty as to the coverage
of the state [*51] statute and leaves most citizens with
virtually the same doubts as before regarding the danger
that their conduct might eventually be subjected to criminal sanctions. The chilling effect can, of course, be
eliminated by an injunction that would prohibit any prosecution whatever for conduct occurring prior to a satisfactory rewriting of the statute. But the States would
then be stripped of all power to prosecute even the socially dangerous and constitutionally unprotected conduct that had been covered by the statute, until a new
statute could be passed by the state legislature and approved by the federal courts in potentially lengthy trial
and appellate proceedings. Thus, in Dombrowski itself
the Court carefully reaffirmed the principle that even in
the direct prosecution in the State's own courts, a valid
narrowing construction can be applied to conduct occurring prior to the date when the narrowing construction
was made, in the absence of fair warning problems.
[***LEdHR8]
[8]Moreover, the existence of a
"chilling effect," even in the area of First Amendment
rights, has never been considered a sufficient basis, in
and of itself, for prohibiting state action. [HN8] Where a
statute does not directly abridge free speech, but -- while
regulating a subject within the State's power -- tends to
have [***680] the incidental effect of inhibiting First
Amendment rights, it is well settled that the statute can be
upheld if the effect on speech is minor in relation to the
need for control of the conduct and the lack of alternative
means for doing so. Schneider v. State, 308 U.S. 147
(1939); Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940);
Mine Workers v. Illinois Bar Assn., 389 U.S. 217
(1967).Just as the incidental "chilling effect" of such
statutes does not automatically render them unconstitutional, so the chilling effect that admittedly can result
from the very existence of certain laws on the statute
books does not in itself justify prohibiting the State from
carrying out the important [*52] and necessary task of
enforcing these laws against socially harmful conduct
that the State believes in good faith to be punishable under its laws and the Constitution.
[***LEdHR9]
[9]
[***LEdHR10]
[10]
[***LEdHR11] [11]Beyond all this is another, more
basic consideration. [HN9] Procedures for testing the
constitutionality of a statute "on its face" in the manner
apparently contemplated by Dombrowski, and for then
enjoining all action to enforce the statute until the State
can obtain court approval for a modified version, are
fundamentally at odds with the function of the federal
courts in our constitutional plan. The power and duty of
the judiciary to declare laws unconstitutional is in the
final analysis derived from its responsibility for resolving
concrete disputes brought before the courts for decision;
a statute apparently governing a dispute cannot be applied by judges, consistently with their obligations under
the Supremacy Clause, when such an application of the
statute would conflict with the Constitution. Marbury v.
Madison, 1 Cranch 137 (1803). But this vital responsibility, broad as it is, does not amount to an unlimited
power to survey the statute books and pass judgment on
laws before the courts are called upon to enforce them.
Ever since the Constitutional Convention rejected a proposal for having members of the Supreme Court render
advice concerning pending legislation 5 it has been clear
that, even when suits of this kind involve a "case or controversy" sufficient to satisfy the requirements of Article
III of the Constitution, the task of analyzing a proposed
statute, pinpointing its deficiencies, and requiring correction of these deficiencies before the statute is put into
effect, is rarely if ever an appropriate task for the judiciary. [*53] The combination of the relative remoteness
of the controversy, the impact on the legislative [**755]
process of the relief sought, and above all the speculative
Page 11
401 U.S. 37, *; 91 S. Ct. 746, **;
27 L. Ed. 2d 669, ***; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
and amorphous nature of the required line-by-line analysis of detailed statutes, see, e. g., Landry v. Daley, 280
F.Supp. 938 (ND Ill. 1968), rev'd sub nom. Boyle v.
Landry, post, p. 77, ordinarily results in a kind of case
that is wholly unsatisfactory for deciding constitutional
questions, whichever way they might be decided. In
light of this fundamental conception of the Framers as to
the proper place of the federal courts in the governmental
processes of passing and enforcing laws, it can seldom
be appropriate for these courts to exercise any such power of prior approval or veto over the legislative process.
The judgment of the District Court is reversed, and
the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
5 See 1 The Records of the Federal Convention
of 1787, p. 21 (Farrand ed. 1911).
* [This opinion applies also to No. 7, Samuels et
al. v. Mackell et al., and No. 9, Fernandez v.
Mackell et al., post, p. 66; No. 41, Dyson et al. v.
Stein, post, p. 200; and No. 83, Byrne et al. v.
Karalexis et al., post, p. 216.]
[***LEdHR12] [12]For these reasons, fundamental not only to our federal system [***681] but also to
the basic functions of the Judicial Branch of the National
Government under our Constitution, we hold that the
Dombrowski decision should not be regarded as having
upset the settled doctrines that have always confined
very narrowly the availability of injunctive relief against
state criminal prosecutions. We do not think that opinion
stands for the proposition that a federal court can properly enjoin enforcement of a statute solely on the basis of a
showing that the statute "on its face" abridges First
Amendment rights. There may, of course, be extraordinary circumstances in which the necessary irreparable
injury can be shown even in the absence of the usual
prerequisites of bad faith and harassment. For example,
as long ago as the Buck case, supra, we indicated:
"It is of course conceivable that a statute might be flagrantly and patently violative of express constitutional
prohibitions in every clause, sentence and paragraph, and
in whatever manner and against [*54] whomever an
effort might be made to apply it." 313 U.S., at 402.
Other unusual situations calling for federal intervention
might also arise, but there is no point in our attempting
now to specify what they might be. It is sufficient for
purposes of the present case to hold, as we do, that the
possible unconstitutionality of a statute "on its face" does
not in itself justify an injunction against good-faith attempts to enforce it, and that appellee Harris has failed to
make any showing of bad faith, harassment, or any other
unusual circumstance that would call for equitable relief.
Because our holding rests on the absence of the factors
necessary under equitable principles to justify federal
intervention, we have no occasion to consider whether 28
U. S. C. ß 2283, which prohibits an injunction against
state court proceedings "except as expressly authorized
by Act of Congress" would in and of itself be controlling
under the circumstances of this case.
Reversed.
CONCUR BY: STEWART; BRENNAN
CONCUR
MR. JUSTICE STEWART, with whom MR. JUSTICE HARLAN joins, concurring. *
The questions the Court decides today are important
ones. Perhaps as important, however, is a recognition of
the areas into which today's holdings do not necessarily
extend. In all of these cases, the Court deals only [*55]
with the proper policy to be followed by a federal court
when asked to intervene by injunction or declaratory
judgment in a criminal prosecution which is contemporaneously pending in a state court.
In basing its decisions on policy grounds, the Court
does not reach any questions concerning the independent
force of the federal anti-injunction statute, 28 U. S. C. ß
2283. Thus we do not decide whether the word "injunction" in ß 2283 should be interpreted to include a declaratory judgment, or whether an injunction [***682]
to stay proceedings in a state court is "expressly authorized" by ß 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, now 42 U.
S. C. ß 1983. 1 And since all these cases involve state
criminal prosecutions, we do not deal with the considerations that should govern a federal court when it is asked
to intervene in state civil proceedings, where, for various
reasons, the balance might be struck differently. 2 Finally, the Court today does not resolve the problems involved when a federal court is asked to give injunctive or
declaratory relief from future state criminal prosecutions.
1 See also Cameron v. Johnson, 390 U.S. 611,
613-614, n. 3; Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S.
479, 484 n. 2.
2
Courts of equity have traditionally shown
greater reluctance to intervene in criminal prosecutions than in civil cases. See ante, at 43-44;
Douglas v. City of Jeannette, 319 U.S. 157, 163164. The offense to state interests is likely to be
less in a civil proceeding. A State's decision to
classify conduct as criminal provides some indication of the importance it has ascribed to prompt
and unencumbered enforcement of its law. By
Page 12
401 U.S. 37, *; 91 S. Ct. 746, **;
27 L. Ed. 2d 669, ***; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
contrast, the State might not even be a party in a
proceeding under a civil statute.
Cf. Law Students Civil Rights Research
Council v. Wadmond, post, p. 154; Wisconsin v.
Constantineau, 400 U.S. 433; Rosado v. Wyman,
397 U.S. 397.
These considerations would not, to be sure,
support any distinction between civil and criminal proceedings should the ban of 28 U. S. C. ß
2283, which makes no such distinction, be held
unaffected by 42 U. S. C. ß 1983.
[*56] The Court confines itself to deciding the policy considerations that in our federal system must prevail
when federal courts are asked to interfere with pending
state prosecutions. Within this area, we hold that a federal court must not, save in exceptional and extremely
limited circumstances, intervene by way of either injunction or declaration in an existing state criminal prosecution. 3 Such circumstances exist only when there is a
threat of irreparable injury "both great and immediate."
A threat of this nature might be shown if the state criminal statute in question were patently and flagrantly unconstitutional on its face, ante, at 53-54; cf. Evers v.
Dwyer, 358 U.S. 202, or if there has been bad faith and
harassment -- official lawlessness -- in a statute's enforcement, ante, at 47-49. In such circumstances the
reasons of policy for deferring to state adjudication are
outweighed by the injury flowing from the very bringing
of the state proceedings, by the perversion of the very
process that is supposed to provide vindication, and by
the need for speedy and effective action to protect federal
rights. Cf. Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S. 780.
3 The negative pregnant in this sentence -- that a
federal court may, as a matter of policy, intervene
when such "exceptional and extremely limited
circumstances" are found -- is subject to any further limitations that may be placed on such intervention by 28 U. S. C. ß 2283.
MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, with whom MR. JUSTICE WHITE and MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL join,
concurring in the result.
I agree that the judgment of the District Court
should be reversed. Appellee Harris had been indicted
for violations of the California Criminal Syndicalism Act
before he sued in federal court. He has not alleged that
the prosecution was brought in bad faith to harass him.
His constitutional contentions may be adequately
[***683] adjudicated in [*57] the state criminal proceeding, and federal intervention at his instance was
therefore improper. *
*
The District Court erroneously interpreted
Zwickler v. Koota, 389 U.S. 241 (1967), as authorizing federal court consideration of a constitutional claim at issue in a pending state proceeding, whether or not the federal court plaintiff had
presented his claim to the state court. It suffices
here to note that in Zwickler no state proceeding
was pending at the time jurisdiction attached in
the federal court. The court below also thought it
significant that appellee Harris had raised his
constitutional claim in the state courts in a motion
to dismiss the indictment and in petitions in the
state appellate courts for a writ of prohibition. It
was questioned at oral argument whether constitutional issues could properly be raised by the
procedures invoked by Harris, and it was suggested that the denial of Harris' motions did not
necessarily involve rejection of his constitutional
claims. However, even if the California courts
had at that interlocutory stage rejected Harris'
constitutional arguments, that rejection would not
have provided a justification for intervening by
the District Court. Harris could have sought direct review of that rejection of his constitutional
claims or he could have renewed the claims in requests for instructions, and on direct review of
any conviction in the state courts and in this
Court. These were the proper modes for presentation and these the proper forums for consideration of the constitutional issues.
[**756] Appellees Hirsch and Dan have alleged
that they "feel inhibited" by the statute and the prosecution of Harris from advocating the program of the Progressive Labor Party. Appellee Broslawsky has alleged
that he "is uncertain" whether as an instructor in college
history he can under the statute give instruction relating
to the Communist Manifesto and similar revolutionary
works. None of these appellees has stated any ground
for a reasonable expectation that he will actually be prosecuted under the statute for taking the actions contemplated. The court below expressly declined to rely on
any finding "that . . . Dan, Hirsch or Broslawsky stand[s]
in any danger of prosecution by the [State], because of
the activities that they ascribed to themselves in the
complaint . . . ." [*58] 281 F.Supp. 507, 516. It is true,
as the court below pointed out, that "well-intentioned
prosecutors and judicial safeguards do not neutralize the
vice of a vague law," Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360,
373 (1964), but still there must be a live controversy
under Art. III. No threats of prosecution of these appellees are alleged. Although Dan and Hirsch have alleged
that they desire to advocate doctrines of the Progressive
Labor Party, they have not asserted that their advocacy
will be of the same genre as that which brought on the
prosecution of Harris. In short, there is no reason to
Page 13
401 U.S. 37, *; 91 S. Ct. 746, **;
27 L. Ed. 2d 669, ***; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
think that California has any ripe controversy with them.
See Golden v. Zwickler, 394 U.S. 103 (1969); Perez v.
Ledesma, post, p. 93 (BRENNAN, J., concurring and
dissenting).
DISSENT BY: DOUGLAS
DISSENT
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, dissenting. *
* [This opinion also applies to No. 4, Boyle,
Judge, et al. v. Landry et al., post, p. 77.]
The fact that we are in a period of history when
enormous extrajudicial sanctions are imposed on those
who assert their First Amendment rights in unpopular
causes emphasizes the wisdom of Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479. There we recognized that in times of
repression, when interests with powerful spokesmen
generate symbolic pogroms against nonconformists, the
federal judiciary, charged by Congress with special vigilance for protection of civil rights, has [***684] special
responsibilities to prevent an erosion of the individual's
constitutional rights.
Dombrowski represents an exception to the general
rule that federal courts should not interfere with state
criminal prosecutions. The exception does not arise
merely because prosecutions are threatened to which the
First Amendment will be the proffered defense. Dombrowski governs statutes which are a blunderbuss by
[*59] themselves or when used en masse -- those that
have an "overbroad" sweep. "If the rule were otherwise,
the contours of regulation would have to be hammered
out case by case -- and tested only by those hardy enough
to risk criminal prosecution to determine the proper
scope of regulation." Id., at 487. It was in the context of
overbroad state statutes that we spoke of the "chilling
effect upon the exercise of First Amendment rights"
caused by state prosecutions. Ibid.
As respects overbroad statutes we said at least as
early as 1940 that when dealing with First Amendment
rights we would insist on statutes "narrowly drawn to
prevent the supposed evil." Cantwell v. Connecticut,
310 U.S. 296, 307.
The special circumstances when federal intervention
in a state criminal proceeding is permissible are not restricted to bad faith on the part of state officials or the
threat of multiple prosecutions. They also exist where
for any reason the state statute being enforced is unconstitutional on its face. As Mr. Justice Butler, writing for
the Court, said in Terrace v. Thompson, 263 U.S. 197,
214:
"Equity jurisdiction will be exercised to enjoin the
threatened enforcement of a state law which contravenes
the Federal Constitution wherever it is essential in order
effectually to protect property rights and the rights of
persons against injuries otherwise irremediable; and in
such a case a person, who as an officer of the State is
clothed with the duty of enforcing its laws and who
threatens and is about to commence proceedings, either
civil or criminal, to enforce such a law against parties
affected, may be enjoined from such action by a federal
court of equity."
Our Dombrowski decision was only another facet of
the same problem.
[*60] In Younger, "criminal syndicalism" is defined
so broadly as to jeopardize "teaching" that socialism is
preferable to free enterprise.
Harris' "crime" was distributing leaflets advocating
change in industrial ownership through political action.
The statute under which he was indicted was the one
involved in Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357, a decision we overruled in Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S.
444, 449. 1
1 See Linde, "Clear and Present Danger" Reexamined: Dissonance in the Brandenburg Concerto, 22 Stan. L. Rev. 1163 (1970).
If the "advocacy" which Harris used was an attempt
at persuasion through the use of bullets, bombs, and arson, we would have a different case. But Harris is
charged only with distributing leaflets advocating political action toward his objective. He tried unsuccessfully
to have the state court dismiss the indictment on constitutional grounds. He resorted to the state appellate court
for writs of prohibition to prevent the trial, but to no
avail. He went to the federal court as a matter of last
resort in an effort to keep this [***685] unconstitutional
trial from being saddled on him.
The "anti-injunction" statute, 28 U. S. C. ß 2283, 2 is
not a bar to a federal injunction under these circumstances. That statute was adopted in 1793, ß 5, 1 Stat. 335, 3
and reflected the early view of the proper role of the federal courts within American federalism.
2 "A court of the United States may not grant an
injunction to stay proceedings in a State court except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress,
or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to
protect or effectuate its judgments." (Emphasis
added.)
3 In its initial form the "anti-injunction" Act
provided: "Nor shall a writ of injunction be
granted [by any court of the United States] to stay
proceedings in any court of a state." There were
Page 14
401 U.S. 37, *; 91 S. Ct. 746, **;
27 L. Ed. 2d 669, ***; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
no exceptions. In 1874 it was subsequently modified by an insertion of the Revisers to read: "The
writ of injunction shall not be granted by any
court of the United States to stay proceedings in
any court of a State, except in cases where such
injunction may be authorized by any law relating
to proceedings in bankruptcy." Rev. Stat. ß 720.
ritory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of
the United States or other person within the jurisdiction
thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be
liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress." (Emphasis
added.)
In Toucey v. New York Life Ins. Co., 314
U.S. 118, 133-134, in discussing the statutory exceptions to the "anti-injunction" Act we noted
that, while only bankruptcy was the explicit exception, there were others. (1) The "Removal
Acts qualify pro tanto the Act of 1793." (2) The
Act of 1851 limiting shipowners' liability "being
a 'subsequent statute' to the Act of 1793 . . . operates as an implied legislative amendment to it."
We also added (3) the Interpleader Act of 1926
and (4) the Frazier-Lemke Act, 47 Stat. 1473.
Toucey limited a line of cases dealing with nonstatutory exceptions to the "anti-injunction" Act.
Shortly thereafter the current language of ß 2283
was written into the Judicial Code. The Reviser's
Note states: "The revised section restores the
basic law as generally understood and interpreted
prior to the Toucey decision." Both pre-Toucey
and post-Toucey decisions recognize implied legislative exceptions to the "anti-injunction" Act.
See Porter v. Dicken, 328 U.S. 252; Leiter Minerals v. United States, 352 U.S. 220.
A state law enforcement officer is someone acting
under "color of law" even though he may be misusing his
authority. Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167. [***686]
And prosecution under a patently unconstitutional statute
is a "deprivation of . . . rights, privileges, or immunities
secured by the Constitution." "Suit[s] in equity" obviously includes injunctions. 5
[*61] Whatever the balance of the pressures of localism and nationalism prior to the Civil War, they were
fundamentally altered by the war. The Civil War
Amendments made civil rights a national concern.
Those Amendments, especially ß 5 of the Fourteenth
Amendment, cemented the change in American federalism brought on by the war. Congress immediately commenced to use its new powers to pass legislation. Just as
the first Judiciary Act, 1 Stat. 73, and the "antiinjunction" statute represented the early views of American federalism, the Reconstruction statutes, including the
enlargement of federal jurisdiction, 4 represent a later
view of American federalism.
4 What is now 28 U. S. C. ß 1343 (3) was added
in 1871, 17 Stat. 13, and the federal-question jurisdiction of 28 U. S. C. ß 1331 was added in
1875. 18 Stat. 470.
One of the jurisdiction-enlarging statutes passed during Reconstruction was the Act of April 20, 1871. 17
[*62] Stat. 13. Beyond its jurisdictional provision that
statute, now codified as 42 U. S. C. ß 1983, provides:
"Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Ter-
5 We have already held that ß 1983 requires no
exhaustion of state remedies. McNeese v. Board
of Education, 373 U.S. 668.
I hold to the view that ß 1983 is included in the
"expressly authorized" exception to ß 2283, 6 a point not
raised or considered in the much-discussed Douglas v.
City of Jeannette, 319 U.S. 157. There is no more good
reason for allowing a general statute dealing with federalism passed at the end of the 18th century to control
another statute also dealing with federalism, passed almost 80 years later, than to conclude that the early concepts of federalism were not changed by the Civil War.
6 In accord with the view are Honey v. Goodman, 432 F.2d 333 (CA6), and Cooper v.
Hutchinson, 184 F.2d 119 (CA3). Opposed are
Goss v. Illinois, 312 F.2d 257 (CA7), and Baines
v. City of Danville, 337 F.2d 579 (CA4).
And see Maraist, Federal Injunctive Relief
Against State Court Proceedings: The Significance of Dombrowski, 48 Tex. L. Rev. 535, 591
et seq. (1970).
[*63] That was the view of Judge Will in the Boyle
case, Landry v. Daley, 288 F.Supp. 200, 223. In speaking of the Civil War Amendments as "a constitutional
revolution in the nature of American federalism" he said:
"This revolution, in turn, represents a historical
judgment. It emphasizes the overwhelming concern of
the Reconstruction Congresses for the protection of the
newly won rights of freedmen. By interposing the federal government between the states and their inhabitants,
these Congresses sought to avoid the risk of nullification
of these rights by the states. With the subsequent passage of the Act of 1871, Congress sought to implement
this plan by expanding the federal judicial power. Section 1983 is, therefore, not only an expression of the importance of protecting federal rights from infringement
by the states but also, where necessary, the desire to
Page 15
401 U.S. 37, *; 91 S. Ct. 746, **;
27 L. Ed. 2d 669, ***; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
place the national government between the state and its
citizens." Ibid.
believe that the federal court acted in our finest tradition
when it issued the stay.
In Boyle the statute makes "intimidation" to "commit
any criminal offense" an offense. The three-judge court
said:
[*65] As the standards of certainty in statutes containing criminal sanctions are higher than those in statutes containing civil sanctions, so are the standards of
certainty touching on freedom of expression higher than
those in other areas. Winters v. New York, 333 U.S. 507,
515-516. "There must be ascertainable standards of guilt.
Men of common intelligence cannot be required to guess
at the meaning of the enactment. The vagueness may be
from uncertainty in regard to persons within the scope of
the act . . . or in regard to the applicable tests to ascertain
guilt."
"It . . . makes criminal threats such as the following: (1)
threats by dissentient groups to engage in disorderly
conduct, threats by residents of a high-crime neighborhood to carry concealed weapons for their own protection, and threats by mothers to block a dangerous state
highway to demonstrate the need for increased safety
measures. Indeed, the phrase 'commit any criminal offense' is so broad as to include threats to commit misdemeanors punishable by fine only. These evils are not so
substantial that the state's interest in prohibiting the
threat of them outweighs the public interest in giving
legitimate political discussion a wide berth." Landry v.
Daley, 280 F.Supp. 938, 964.
[*64] Landry and others brought a class action
challenging the constitutional validity of five sections of
the Illinois statutes. They alleged arrests under all but
two of the challenged sections. Just before trial they
abandoned their challenge of two of the five sections.
The District Court held one of the remaining sections
constitutional and the "mob action" and "intimidation"
sections unconstitutional. Appellants have not appealed
the determination that the [***687] "mob action" section of the Illinois statutes is unconstitutional.
The Court dismisses this case because there is no
showing of irreparable injury on what it describes as
"flimsy allegations." Post, at 81. The Court states:
"There is nothing contained in the allegations of the
complaint from which one could infer that any one or
more of the citizens who brought this suit is in any jeopardy of suffering irreparable injury if the State is left free
to prosecute under the intimidation statute in the normal
manner." Ibid. Landry and his associates, however, allege that appellants are using the intimidation section
along with several other sections to harass them, not to
prosecute them in the normal manner. They allege that
appellants are arresting them without warrants or probable cause, and detaining them on excessive bail. They
allege that the arrests are made during peaceful demonstrations and without any expectation of securing valid
convictions. In sum, Landry and his group allege that
the "intimidation" section is one of several statutes which
appellants are using en masse as part of a plan to harass
them and discourage their exercise of their First Amendment rights. There is thus a lively and existing case or
controversy concerning First Amendment rights. And I
Where freedom of expression is at stake these requirements must be more sedulously enforced.
In Younger there is a prosecution under an unconstitutional statute and relief is denied. In Boyle there is
harassment but as yet no prosecution. Allegations of a
prosecution or harassment under facially unconstitutional
statutes should be sufficient for the exercise of federal
equity powers.
Dombrowski and 42 U. S. C. ß 1983 indicate why in
Boyle federal intervention against enforcement of the
state laws is appropriate. The case of Younger is even
stronger. There the state statute challenged is the prototype of the one we held unconstitutional in Brandenburg
v. Ohio, supra.
The eternal temptation, of course, has been to arrest
the speaker rather than to correct the conditions about
which he complains. I see no reason why these appellees
should be made to walk the treacherous ground of these
statutes. They, like other citizens, need the umbrella of
the First Amendment as they study, analyze, discuss, and
debate the troubles of these days. When criminal prosecutions can be leveled against them because they express
unpopular views, the society of the dialogue is in danger.
REFERENCES
42 Am Jur 2d, Injunctions 232, 239, 240
11 Am Jur Pl & Pr Forms (Rev ed), Federal Practice and
Procedure, Forms 1991-1995
US L Ed Digest, Courts 698; Equity 76; Injunction 80
ALR Digests, Courts 310, 313, 314; Equity 77; Injunction 121, 122
L Ed Index to Anno, Courts; Injunction
ALR Quick Index, Injunctions
Federal Quick Index, Injunctions
Page 16
401 U.S. 37, *; 91 S. Ct. 746, **;
27 L. Ed. 2d 669, ***; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136
Annotation References:
The Supreme Court and the right of free speech and
press. 93 L Ed 1151, 2 L Ed 2d 1706, 11 L Ed 2d 1116,
16 L Ed 2d 1053, 21 L Ed 2d 976.
Necessity and propriety (under 28 USC 2281) of threejudge Federal District Court in suit to enjoin enforcement
of state statute or administrative order. 4 L Ed 2d 1931,
15 L Ed 2d 904.
Validity, construction, and application of criminal statutes or ordinances as proper subject for declaratory
judgment. 10 ALR3d 727.
Page 17
Copyright 2009 SHEPARD'S(R) - 9926 Citing references
Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S. Ct. 746, 27 L. Ed. 2d 669, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136 (1971)
Restrictions: Unrestricted
FOCUS(TM) Terms: No FOCUS terms
Print Format: FULL
Citing Ref. Signal: Hidden
SHEPARD'S SUMMARY
Unrestricted Shepard's Summary
No subsequent appellate
history. Prior history
available.
Citing References:
Cautionary Analyses: Criticized (2), Distinguished (802), Limited (4)
Positive Analyses:
Neutral Analyses:
Other Sources:
LexisNexis Headnotes:
Followed (1844), Concurring Opinion (57)
Conflict.Authority (2), Dissenting Op. (211), Explained (250), Harmonized (18), Quest.
Precedent (2)
Law Reviews (1343), Secondary Sources (1), Statutes (33), Treatises (143), Annotations
(8), Court Documents (1309)
HN1 (9), HN2 (6), HN3 (81), HN4 (94), HN5 (4021), HN6 (1204), HN7 (21), HN8
(194), HN9 (266)
PRIOR HISTORY ( 1 citing reference )
1.
Harris v. Younger, 281 F. Supp. 507, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8303 (C.D. Cal. 1968)
Reversed by (CITATION YOU ENTERED):
Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S. Ct. 746, 27 L. Ed. 2d 669, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 136 (1971)
CITING DECISIONS ( 7088 citing decisions )
U.S. SUPREME COURT
2.
Cited by:
Sinochem Int'l Co. v. Malay. Int'l Shipping Corp., 549 U.S. 422, 127 S. Ct. 1184, 167 L. Ed. 2d 15, 2007
U.S. LEXIS 2828, 75 U.S.L.W. 4126, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 104, 2007 A.M.C. 609 (2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
549 U.S. 422 p.431
127 S. Ct. 1184 p.1191
167 L. Ed. 2d 15 p.25
3.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Page 18
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 127 S. Ct. 1091, 166 L. Ed. 2d 973, 2007 U.S. LEXIS 2650, 75 U.S.L.W.
4107, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 88 (2007)
549 U.S. 384 p.399
127 S. Ct. 1091 p.1101
166 L. Ed. 2d 973 p.987
4.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557, 126 S. Ct. 2749, 165 L. Ed. 2d 723, 2006 U.S. LEXIS 5185, 19 Fla. L.
Weekly Fed. S 452 (2006)
548 U.S. 557 p.671
126 S. Ct. 2749 p.2819
165 L. Ed. 2d 723 p.802
5.
Cited by:
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp., 544 U.S. 280, 125 S. Ct. 1517, 161 L. Ed. 2d 454, 2005
U.S. LEXIS 2929, 73 U.S.L.W. 4266, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 206 (2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
544 U.S. 280 p.288
544 U.S. 280 p.292
125 S. Ct. 1517 p.1524
125 S. Ct. 1517 p.1527
161 L. Ed. 2d 454 p.464
161 L. Ed. 2d 454 p.467
6.
Cited by:
Tenet v. Doe, 544 U.S. 1, 125 S. Ct. 1230, 161 L. Ed. 2d 82, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 2202, 73 U.S.L.W. 4182, 18
Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 153 (2005)
544 U.S. 1 p.6
125 S. Ct. 1230 p.1235
161 L. Ed. 2d 82 p.90
7.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Kowalski v. Tesmer, 543 U.S. 125, 125 S. Ct. 564, 160 L. Ed. 2d 519, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 8273, 73 U.S.L.W.
4032, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 37 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
543 U.S. 125 p.133
125 S. Ct. 564 p.569
160 L. Ed. 2d 519 p.528
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
543 U.S. 125 p.144
125 S. Ct. 564 p.576
160 L. Ed. 2d 519 p.535
Cited by:
543 U.S. 125 p.128
125 S. Ct. 564 p.566
160 L. Ed. 2d 519 p.525
8.
Cited by:
Beard v. Banks, 542 U.S. 406, 124 S. Ct. 2504, 159 L. Ed. 2d 494, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 4572, 72 U.S.L.W.
Page 19
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4578, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 442 (2004)
542 U.S. 406 p.413
124 S. Ct. 2504 p.2511
159 L. Ed. 2d 494 p.503
9.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Elk Grove Unified Sch. Dist. v. Newdow, 542 U.S. 1, 124 S. Ct. 2301, 159 L. Ed. 2d 98, 2004 U.S. LEXIS
4178, 72 U.S.L.W. 4457, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 359 (2004)
542 U.S. 1 p.20
124 S. Ct. 2301 p.2313
159 L. Ed. 2d 98 p.114
10.
Cited by:
Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 U.S. 574, 119 S. Ct. 1563, 143 L. Ed. 2d 760, 1999 U.S. LEXIS
3170, 67 U.S.L.W. 4315, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 243, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3571, 1999 Colo. J.
C.A.R. 2707, 99 D.A.R. 4571 (1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
526 U.S. 574 p.585
119 S. Ct. 1563 p.1570
143 L. Ed. 2d 760 p.771
11.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm., 525 U.S. 471, 119 S. Ct. 936, 142 L. Ed. 2d 940, 1999
U.S. LEXIS 1514, 19 Immigr. Cas. Rep. A1-1, 67 U.S.L.W. 4133, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 101, 99 Cal.
Daily Op. Service 1388, 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 886, 99 D.A.R. 1749 (1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6,
HN8
525 U.S. 471 p.493
119 S. Ct. 936 p.948
142 L. Ed. 2d 940 p.959
12.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. Town of Harrison, 520 U.S. 564, 117 S. Ct. 1590, 137 L. Ed. 2d 852, 1997
U.S. LEXIS 3227, 65 U.S.L.W. 4337, 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 463, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3712, 97
D.A.R. 6299 (1997)
520 U.S. 564 p.612
117 S. Ct. 1590 p.1616
137 L. Ed. 2d 852 p.887
13.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins. Co., 517 U.S. 706, 116 S. Ct. 1712, 135 L. Ed. 2d 1, 1996 U.S. LEXIS 3609,
64 U.S.L.W. 4379, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 634, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3916, 96 D.A.R. 6389 (1996)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
517 U.S. 706 p.734
116 S. Ct. 1712 p.1729
135 L. Ed. 2d 1 p.22
Cited by:
517 U.S. 706 p.716
116 S. Ct. 1712 p.1721
135 L. Ed. 2d 1 p.13
Page 20
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
14.
Cited by:
United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 115 S. Ct. 1624, 131 L. Ed. 2d 626, 1995 U.S. LEXIS 3039, 63
U.S.L.W. 4343, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 752, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3074 (1995)
514 U.S. 549 p.578
115 S. Ct. 1624 p.1639
131 L. Ed. 2d 626 p.650
15.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 504 U.S. 689, 112 S. Ct. 2206, 119 L. Ed. 2d 468, 1992 U.S. LEXIS 3547, 60
U.S.L.W. 4532, 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 400, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4978, 92 D.A.R. 7953 (1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
504 U.S. 689 p.717
112 S. Ct. 2206 p.2221
112 S. Ct. 2206 p.2222
119 L. Ed. 2d 468 p.490
119 L. Ed. 2d 468 p.491
Cited by:
504 U.S. 689 p.692
112 S. Ct. 2206 p.2209
119 L. Ed. 2d 468 p.475
16.
Cited by:
Morales v. Trans World Airlines, 504 U.S. 374, 112 S. Ct. 2031, 119 L. Ed. 2d 157, 1992 U.S. LEXIS 3254,
60 U.S.L.W. 4444, 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 306, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4585, 92 D.A.R. 7347, 1992-1
Trade Cas. (CCH) P69828 (1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
504 U.S. 374 p.381
112 S. Ct. 2031 p.2035
119 L. Ed. 2d 157 p.165
17.
Cited by:
Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 502 U.S. 1023, 112 S. Ct. 855, 116 L. Ed. 2d 764, 1992 U.S. LEXIS 380, 60
U.S.L.W. 3475 (1992)
502 U.S. 1023 p.1023
112 S. Ct. 855 p.855
112 S. Ct. 855 p.856
116 L. Ed. 2d 764 p.764
18.
Cited by:
Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 111 S. Ct. 2546, 115 L. Ed. 2d 640, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 3640, 59
U.S.L.W. 4789, 91 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4800, 91 D.A.R. 7428 (1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
501 U.S. 722 p.746
111 S. Ct. 2546 p.2563
115 L. Ed. 2d 640 p.666
19.
Cited by:
Pennsylvania Dep't of Pub. Welfare v. Davenport, 495 U.S. 552, 110 S. Ct. 2126, 109 L. Ed. 2d 588, 1990
Page 21
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
U.S. LEXIS 2697, 58 U.S.L.W. 4610, 20 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 833, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P73382, 22
Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 1067 (1990)
495 U.S. 552 p.564
110 S. Ct. 2126 p.2133
109 L. Ed. 2d 588 p.599
20.
Distinguished by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc. v. Council of New Orleans, 491 U.S. 350, 109 S. Ct. 2506, 105 L. Ed. 2d 298,
1989 U.S. LEXIS 3043, 57 U.S.L.W. 4755, 103 Pub. Util. Rep. 4th (PUR) 49, Util. L. Rep. (CCH) P13519
(1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
Distinguished by:
491 U.S. 350 p.364
491 U.S. 350 p.373
109 S. Ct. 2506 p.2511
109 S. Ct. 2506 p.2515
109 S. Ct. 2506 p.2521
105 L. Ed. 2d 298 p.309
105 L. Ed. 2d 298 p.314
105 L. Ed. 2d 298 p.320
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
491 U.S. 350 p.374
109 S. Ct. 2506 p.2520
109 S. Ct. 2506 p.2521
105 L. Ed. 2d 298 p.320
105 L. Ed. 2d 298 p.321
Cited by:
491 U.S. 350 p.356
21.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co., 491 U.S. 1, 109 S. Ct. 2273, 105 L. Ed. 2d 1, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 2970, 57
U.S.L.W. 4662, 29 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1657, 19 Envtl. L. Rep. 20974 (1989) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
109 S. Ct. 2273 p.2289
Cited by:
491 U.S. 1 p.27
105 L. Ed. 2d 1 p.25
22.
Cited by:
Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 109 S. Ct. 1060, 103 L. Ed. 2d 334, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1043, 57 U.S.L.W.
4233 (1989)
489 U.S. 288 p.310
109 S. Ct. 1060 p.1075
103 L. Ed. 2d 334 p.355
23.
Cited by:
Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n, 486 U.S. 466, 108 S. Ct. 1916, 100 L. Ed. 2d 475, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 2585,
56 U.S.L.W. 4532, 1988-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P68063 (1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 22
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
486 U.S. 466 p.472
108 S. Ct. 1916 p.1921
100 L. Ed. 2d 475 p.483
24.
Explained by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Deakins v. Monaghan, 484 U.S. 193, 108 S. Ct. 523, 98 L. Ed. 2d 529, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 305, 56 U.S.L.W.
4060 (1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
484 U.S. 193 p.209
108 S. Ct. 523 p.532
98 L. Ed. 2d 529 p.544
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
484 U.S. 193 p.205
108 S. Ct. 523 p.531
98 L. Ed. 2d 529 p.542
Cited by:
484 U.S. 193 p.195
484 U.S. 193 p.202
108 S. Ct. 523 p.525
108 S. Ct. 523 p.529
98 L. Ed. 2d 529 p.535
98 L. Ed. 2d 529 p.540
25.
Cited by:
Houston v. Hill, 482 U.S. 451, 107 S. Ct. 2502, 96 L. Ed. 2d 398, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2617, 55 U.S.L.W.
4823 (1987)
482 U.S. 451 p.465
107 S. Ct. 2502 p.2512
96 L. Ed. 2d 398 p.414
26.
Followed by, Explained by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 481 U.S. 1, 107 S. Ct. 1519, 95 L. Ed. 2d 1, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 1515, 55
U.S.L.W. 4457 (1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN5, HN6
Followed by:
481 U.S. 1 p.7
107 S. Ct. 1519 p.1525
95 L. Ed. 2d 1 p.14
Explained by:
481 U.S. 1 p.19
481 U.S. 1 p.27
481 U.S. 1 p.30
107 S. Ct. 1519 p.1523
95 L. Ed. 2d 1 p.21
95 L. Ed. 2d 1 p.26
95 L. Ed. 2d 1 p.28
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
481 U.S. 1 p.23
95 L. Ed. 2d 1 p.22
Page 23
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
95 L. Ed. 2d 1 p.23
Cited by:
107 S. Ct. 1519 p.1526
95 L. Ed. 2d 1 p.13
27.
Cited by:
Kelly v. Robinson, 479 U.S. 36, 107 S. Ct. 353, 93 L. Ed. 2d 216, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 17, 55 U.S.L.W. 4011,
14 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1383, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P71475, 15 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 890, 15
Collier Bankr. Cas. (MB) 890 (1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
479 U.S. 36 p.47
107 S. Ct. 353 p.360
93 L. Ed. 2d 216 p.227
28.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Thompson, 478 U.S. 804, 106 S. Ct. 3229, 92 L. Ed. 2d 650, 1986
U.S. LEXIS 143, 54 U.S.L.W. 5088 (1986)
478 U.S. 804 p.829
106 S. Ct. 3229 p.3243
92 L. Ed. 2d 650 p.672
29.
Followed by, Explained by:
Ohio Civil Rights Comm'n v. Dayton Christian Sch., Inc., 477 U.S. 619, 106 S. Ct. 2718, 91 L. Ed. 2d 512,
1986 U.S. LEXIS 71, 54 U.S.L.W. 4860, 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P36195, 41 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas.
(BNA) 78 (1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
477 U.S. 619 p.622
477 U.S. 619 p.626
106 S. Ct. 2718 p.2720
106 S. Ct. 2718 p.2722
91 L. Ed. 2d 512 p.518
91 L. Ed. 2d 512 p.521
Explained by:
477 U.S. 619 p.633
106 S. Ct. 2718 p.2726
91 L. Ed. 2d 512 p.526
30.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Murray v. Carrier, 477 U.S. 478, 106 S. Ct. 2639, 91 L. Ed. 2d 397, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 66, 54 U.S.L.W.
4820 (1986)
477 U.S. 478 p.518
91 L. Ed. 2d 397 p.428
31.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Kuhlmann v. Wilson, 477 U.S. 436, 106 S. Ct. 2616, 91 L. Ed. 2d 364, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 65, 54 U.S.L.W.
4809 (1986)
477 U.S. 436 p.465
106 S. Ct. 2616 p.2633
91 L. Ed. 2d 364 p.388
Page 24
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
32.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Murray v. Carrier, 106 S. Ct. 2678 (U.S. 1986)
106 S. Ct. 2678 p.2679
33.
Cited by:
Diamond v. Charles, 476 U.S. 54, 106 S. Ct. 1697, 90 L. Ed. 2d 48, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 149, 54 U.S.L.W.
4418 (1986)
476 U.S. 54 p.64
106 S. Ct. 1697 p.1705
90 L. Ed. 2d 48 p.59
34.
Cited by:
Cabana v. Bullock, 474 U.S. 376, 106 S. Ct. 689, 88 L. Ed. 2d 704, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 46, 54 U.S.L.W. 4105
(1986)
474 U.S. 376 p.391
106 S. Ct. 689 p.699
88 L. Ed. 2d 704 p.719
35.
Cited by:
Green v. Mansour, 474 U.S. 64, 106 S. Ct. 423, 88 L. Ed. 2d 371, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 142, 54 U.S.L.W. 4011
(1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
474 U.S. 64 p.72
106 S. Ct. 423 p.428
88 L. Ed. 2d 371 p.380
36.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Pernsley v. Harris, 474 U.S. 965, 106 S. Ct. 331, 88 L. Ed. 2d 314, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 4327, 54 U.S.L.W.
3306 (1985)
474 U.S. 965 p.966
106 S. Ct. 331 p.331
88 L. Ed. 2d 314 p.315
37.
Explained by:
Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court, 471 U.S. 626, 105 S. Ct. 2265, 85 L. Ed. 2d
652, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 19, 17 Ohio B. 315, 53 U.S.L.W. 4587, 1985-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P66645 (1985)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
471 U.S. 626 p.639
105 S. Ct. 2265 p.2275
105 S. Ct. 2265 p.2276
85 L. Ed. 2d 652 p.664
38.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Garcia v. San Antonio Metro. Transit Auth., 469 U.S. 528, 105 S. Ct. 1005, 83 L. Ed. 2d 1016, 1985 U.S.
LEXIS 48, 53 U.S.L.W. 4135, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P34995, 102 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P34633, 27 Wage
& Hour Cas. (BNA) 65 (1985)
469 U.S. 528 p.581
105 S. Ct. 1005 p.1033
Page 25
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
105 S. Ct. 1005 p.1034
83 L. Ed. 2d 1016 p.1053
39.
Cited by:
Brown v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union Local 54, 468 U.S. 491, 104 S.
Ct. 3179, 82 L. Ed. 2d 373, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 142, 52 U.S.L.W. 5042, 5 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA)
1585, 116 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2921, 101 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11059 (1984)
468 U.S. 491 p.499
104 S. Ct. 3179 p.3185
82 L. Ed. 2d 373 p.381
40.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Secretary of Maryland v. Joseph H. Munson Co., 467 U.S. 947, 104 S. Ct. 2839, 81 L. Ed. 2d 786, 1984
U.S. LEXIS 123, 52 U.S.L.W. 4875 (1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
467 U.S. 947 p.976
104 S. Ct. 2839 p.2857
81 L. Ed. 2d 786 p.808
Cited by:
467 U.S. 947 p.973
104 S. Ct. 2839 p.2856
81 L. Ed. 2d 786 p.806
41.
Cited by:
Tower v. Glover, 467 U.S. 914, 104 S. Ct. 2820, 81 L. Ed. 2d 758, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 121, 52 U.S.L.W. 4866
(1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
467 U.S. 914 p.923
104 S. Ct. 2820 p.2826
81 L. Ed. 2d 758 p.766
42.
Explained by, Cited by:
Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229, 104 S. Ct. 2321, 81 L. Ed. 2d 186, 1984 U.S. LEXIS
94, 52 U.S.L.W. 4673, 14 Envtl. L. Rep. 20549 (1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
467 U.S. 229 p.236
104 S. Ct. 2321 p.2328
81 L. Ed. 2d 186 p.196
Cited by:
104 S. Ct. 2321 p.2327
81 L. Ed. 2d 186 p.194
43.
Cited by:
Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522, 104 S. Ct. 1970, 80 L. Ed. 2d 565, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 75, 52 U.S.L.W. 4525
(1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
466 U.S. 522 p.537
104 S. Ct. 1970 p.1979
80 L. Ed. 2d 565 p.576
Page 26
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
44.
Cited by:
Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. Lydon, 466 U.S. 294, 104 S. Ct. 1805, 80 L. Ed. 2d 311, 1984 U.S.
LEXIS 60, 52 U.S.L.W. 4460 (1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
466 U.S. 294 p.333
104 S. Ct. 1805 p.1826
80 L. Ed. 2d 311 p.341
45.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
McCarren v. Springfield, 464 U.S. 942, 104 S. Ct. 360, 78 L. Ed. 2d 322, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 2205, 52
U.S.L.W. 3338 (1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
464 U.S. 942 p.943
104 S. Ct. 360 p.361
78 L. Ed. 2d 322 p.323
46.
Followed by:
Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff, 463 U.S. 1323, 104 S. Ct. 7, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1426, 1983 U.S. LEXIS
912, 52 U.S.L.W. 3171 (1983)
463 U.S. 1323 p.1325
104 S. Ct. 7 p.9
77 L. Ed. 2d 1426 p.1428
47.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 103 S. Ct. 1660, 75 L. Ed. 2d 675, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 152, 51 U.S.L.W.
4424 (1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
461 U.S. 95 p.134
103 S. Ct. 1660 p.1682
75 L. Ed. 2d 675 p.705
Cited by:
461 U.S. 95 p.112
103 S. Ct. 1660 p.1670
75 L. Ed. 2d 675 p.691
48.
Cited by:
Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan, 458 U.S. 718, 102 S. Ct. 3331, 73 L. Ed. 2d 1090, 1982 U.S.
LEXIS 157, 50 U.S.L.W. 5068, 29 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P32868 (1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
458 U.S. 718 p.733
102 S. Ct. 3331 p.3341
73 L. Ed. 2d 1090 p.1104
49.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Etlin v. Robb, 458 U.S. 1112, 102 S. Ct. 3496, 73 L. Ed. 2d 1375, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 2861, 50 U.S.L.W.
3998 (1982)
458 U.S. 1112 p.1113
102 S. Ct. 3496 p.3497
73 L. Ed. 2d 1375 p.1376
Page 27
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
50.
Cited by:
Blum v. Yaretsky, 457 U.S. 991, 102 S. Ct. 2777, 73 L. Ed. 2d 534, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 141 (1982)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
457 U.S. 991 p.1000
102 S. Ct. 2777 p.2784
73 L. Ed. 2d 534 p.544
51.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Patsy v. Bd. of Regents, 457 U.S. 496, 102 S. Ct. 2557, 73 L. Ed. 2d 172, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 133, 50
U.S.L.W. 4731, 29 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P32821, 29 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 12 (1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
457 U.S. 496 p.533
102 S. Ct. 2557 p.2576
73 L. Ed. 2d 172 p.198
52.
Explained by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'n, 457 U.S. 423, 102 S. Ct. 2515, 73 L. Ed. 2d
116, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 2638, 50 U.S.L.W. 4712 (1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
457 U.S. 423 p.431
457 U.S. 423 p.438
102 S. Ct. 2515 p.2523
102 S. Ct. 2515 p.2524
73 L. Ed. 2d 116 p.126
73 L. Ed. 2d 116 p.128
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
73 L. Ed. 2d 116 p.129
Cited by:
457 U.S. 423 p.425
102 S. Ct. 2515 p.2518
102 S. Ct. 2515 p.2520
102 S. Ct. 2515 p.2521
73 L. Ed. 2d 116 p.120
73 L. Ed. 2d 116 p.122
73 L. Ed. 2d 116 p.124
53.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
FERC v. Mississippi, 456 U.S. 742, 102 S. Ct. 2126, 72 L. Ed. 2d 532, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 38, 50 U.S.L.W.
4566, 12 Envtl. L. Rep. 20896, 47 Pub. Util. Rep. 4th (PUR) 1, Util. L. Rep. (CCH) P12577 (1982)
456 U.S. 742 p.797
102 S. Ct. 2126 p.2157
72 L. Ed. 2d 532 p.571
54.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Fair Assessment in Real Estate Ass'n v. McNary, 454 U.S. 100, 102 S. Ct. 177, 70 L. Ed. 2d 271, 1981 U.S.
LEXIS 6, 50 U.S.L.W. 4017 (1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
454 U.S. 100 p.119
102 S. Ct. 177 p.187
Page 28
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
70 L. Ed. 2d 271 p.285
Cited by:
454 U.S. 100 p.112
102 S. Ct. 177 p.184
70 L. Ed. 2d 271 p.281
55.
Cited by:
Leeke v. Timmerman, 454 U.S. 83, 102 S. Ct. 69, 70 L. Ed. 2d 65, 1981 U.S. LEXIS 144, 50 U.S.L.W. 3399
(1981)
454 U.S. 83 p.85
102 S. Ct. 69 p.70
70 L. Ed. 2d 65 p.67
56.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
United Air Lines, Inc. v. Division of Industrial Safety etc., 454 U.S. 944, 102 S. Ct. 485, 70 L. Ed. 2d 255,
1981 U.S. LEXIS 4164, 50 U.S.L.W. 3298 (1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
454 U.S. 944 p.948
102 S. Ct. 485 p.488
70 L. Ed. 2d 255 p.256
57.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San Diego, 453 U.S. 490, 101 S. Ct. 2882, 69 L. Ed. 2d 800, 1981 U.S. LEXIS
50, 49 U.S.L.W. 4925, 16 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1057, 11 Envtl. L. Rep. 20600 (1981) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
453 U.S. 490 p.546
101 S. Ct. 2882 p.2912
69 L. Ed. 2d 800 p.839
58.
Cited by:
Webb v. Webb, 451 U.S. 493, 101 S. Ct. 1889, 68 L. Ed. 2d 392, 1981 U.S. LEXIS 97, 49 U.S.L.W. 4500
(1981)
451 U.S. 493 p.500
101 S. Ct. 1889 p.1893
68 L. Ed. 2d 392 p.399
59.
Cited by:
Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 101 S. Ct. 411, 66 L. Ed. 2d 308, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 156, 49 U.S.L.W. 4015
(1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
449 U.S. 90 p.94
101 S. Ct. 411 p.414
101 S. Ct. 411 p.415
66 L. Ed. 2d 308 p.313
66 L. Ed. 2d 308 p.314
60.
Explained by:
Willhauck v. Flanagan, 448 U.S. 1323, 101 S. Ct. 10, 65 L. Ed. 2d 1147, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 2521 (1980)
448 U.S. 1323 p.1324
101 S. Ct. 10 p.11
Page 29
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
65 L. Ed. 2d 1147 p.1149
61.
Cited by:
Supreme Court v. Consumers Union of United States, 446 U.S. 719, 100 S. Ct. 1967, 64 L. Ed. 2d 641, 1980
U.S. LEXIS 108 (1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
446 U.S. 719 p.736
100 S. Ct. 1967 p.1976
64 L. Ed. 2d 641 p.656
62.
Cited by:
Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 100 S. Ct. 1790, 64 L. Ed. 2d 440, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 100
(1980)
446 U.S. 478 p.492
100 S. Ct. 1790 p.1799
64 L. Ed. 2d 440 p.452
63.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Carlson v. Green, 446 U.S. 14, 100 S. Ct. 1468, 64 L. Ed. 2d 15, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 120 (1980)
446 U.S. 14 p.48
100 S. Ct. 1468 p.1487
64 L. Ed. 2d 15 p.43
64.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Davis v. Passman, 442 U.S. 228, 99 S. Ct. 2264, 60 L. Ed. 2d 846, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 127, 19 Empl. Prac.
Dec. (CCH) P9241, 19 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1390 (1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
442 U.S. 228 p.253
99 S. Ct. 2264 p.2281
60 L. Ed. 2d 846 p.867
65.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Columbus v. Leonard, 443 U.S. 905, 99 S. Ct. 3097, 61 L. Ed. 2d 872, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 2428, 20 Empl.
Prac. Dec. (CCH) P30040 (1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
443 U.S. 905 p.907
99 S. Ct. 3097 p.3099
61 L. Ed. 2d 872 p.874
66.
Cited by:
Rose v. Mitchell, 443 U.S. 545, 99 S. Ct. 2993, 61 L. Ed. 2d 739, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 146 (1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
443 U.S. 545 p.585
99 S. Ct. 2993 p.3015
61 L. Ed. 2d 739 p.768
67.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Moore v. Sims, 442 U.S. 415, 99 S. Ct. 2371, 60 L. Ed. 2d 994, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 110 (1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
Followed by:
442 U.S. 415 p.422
Page 30
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
99 S. Ct. 2371 p.2377
60 L. Ed. 2d 994 p.1003
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
442 U.S. 415 p.435
99 S. Ct. 2371 p.2383
60 L. Ed. 2d 994 p.1011
68.
Cited by:
Babbitt v. United Farm Workers Nat'l Union, 442 U.S. 289, 99 S. Ct. 2301, 60 L. Ed. 2d 895, 1979 U.S.
LEXIS 129, 101 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2428, 86 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P55200 (1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4,
HN6
442 U.S. 289 p.298
99 S. Ct. 2301 p.2309
60 L. Ed. 2d 895 p.906
69.
Cited by:
Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of Yakima Indian Nation, 439 U.S. 463, 99 S. Ct. 740, 58 L.
Ed. 2d 740, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 55 (1979)
439 U.S. 463 p.469
99 S. Ct. 740 p.745
58 L. Ed. 2d 740 p.748
70.
Cited by:
Leis v. Flynt, 439 U.S. 438, 99 S. Ct. 698, 58 L. Ed. 2d 717, 1979 U.S. LEXIS 52, 11 Ohio Op. 3d 302
(1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
439 U.S. 438 p.438
99 S. Ct. 698 p.699
58 L. Ed. 2d 717 p.720
71.
Cited by:
Swisher v. Brady, 438 U.S. 204, 98 S. Ct. 2699, 57 L. Ed. 2d 705, 1978 U.S. LEXIS 4, 25 Fed. R. Serv. 2d
(Callaghan) 1463 (1978) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
438 U.S. 204 p.213
98 S. Ct. 2699 p.2705
57 L. Ed. 2d 705 p.713
72.
Cited by:
Robertson v. Wegmann, 436 U.S. 584, 98 S. Ct. 1991, 56 L. Ed. 2d 554, 1978 U.S. LEXIS 31 (1978)
436 U.S. 584 p.586
98 S. Ct. 1991 p.1993
56 L. Ed. 2d 554 p.559
73.
Distinguished by:
Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374, 98 S. Ct. 673, 54 L. Ed. 2d 618, 1978 U.S. LEXIS 57, 24 Fed. R. Serv.
2d (Callaghan) 1313 (1978) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
434 U.S. 374 p.379
98 S. Ct. 673 p.677
54 L. Ed. 2d 618 p.626
Page 31
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
74.
Cited by:
Mincey v. Arizona, 434 U.S. 1343, 98 S. Ct. 23, 54 L. Ed. 2d 56, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 4373 (1977)
434 U.S. 1343 p.1344
98 S. Ct. 23 p.24
54 L. Ed. 2d 56 p.58
75.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
General Atomic Co. v. Felter, 434 U.S. 12, 98 S. Ct. 76, 54 L. Ed. 2d 199, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 152 (1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
434 U.S. 12 p.20
98 S. Ct. 76 p.80
54 L. Ed. 2d 199 p.205
76.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp., 433 U.S. 623, 97 S. Ct. 2881, 53 L. Ed. 2d 1009, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 25,
1977-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P61497 (1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
433 U.S. 623 p.664
97 S. Ct. 2881 p.2903
53 L. Ed. 2d 1009 p.1037
77.
Cited by:
Maher v. Doe, 432 U.S. 526, 97 S. Ct. 2474, 53 L. Ed. 2d 534, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 132 (1977)
432 U.S. 526 p.527
97 S. Ct. 2474 p.2475
53 L. Ed. 2d 534 p.536
78.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Moore v. East Cleveland, 431 U.S. 494, 97 S. Ct. 1932, 52 L. Ed. 2d 531, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 17 (1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
431 U.S. 494 p.530
97 S. Ct. 1932 p.1951
52 L. Ed. 2d 531 p.557
79.
Explained by, Cited by:
Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory, 431 U.S. 471, 97 S. Ct. 1898, 52 L. Ed. 2d 513, 1977 U.S.
LEXIS 97 (1977)
Explained by:
431 U.S. 471 p.477
97 S. Ct. 1898 p.1902
52 L. Ed. 2d 513 p.520
Cited by:
52 L. Ed. 2d 513 p.521
80.
Followed by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Trainor v. Hernandez, 431 U.S. 434, 97 S. Ct. 1911, 52 L. Ed. 2d 486, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 96 (1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Page 32
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Followed by:
431 U.S. 434 p.439
97 S. Ct. 1911 p.1915
97 S. Ct. 1911 p.1916
97 S. Ct. 1911 p.1917
52 L. Ed. 2d 486 p.492
52 L. Ed. 2d 486 p.493
52 L. Ed. 2d 486 p.494
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
431 U.S. 434 p.448
97 S. Ct. 1911 p.1920
52 L. Ed. 2d 486 p.498
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
431 U.S. 434 p.450
431 U.S. 434 p.460
97 S. Ct. 1911 p.1921
97 S. Ct. 1911 p.1926
52 L. Ed. 2d 486 p.499
52 L. Ed. 2d 486 p.506
81.
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705, 97 S. Ct. 1428, 51 L. Ed. 2d 752, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 75 (1977)
Distinguished by:
430 U.S. 705 p.710
97 S. Ct. 1428 p.1433
97 S. Ct. 1428 p.1434
51 L. Ed. 2d 752 p.759
51 L. Ed. 2d 752 p.760
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
430 U.S. 705 p.717
97 S. Ct. 1428 p.1437
51 L. Ed. 2d 752 p.764
82.
Followed by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Juidice v. Vail, 430 U.S. 327, 97 S. Ct. 1211, 51 L. Ed. 2d 376, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 61 (1977)
Followed by:
430 U.S. 327 p.330
430 U.S. 327 p.334
97 S. Ct. 1211 p.1215
97 S. Ct. 1211 p.1217
51 L. Ed. 2d 376 p.381
51 L. Ed. 2d 376 p.384
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
430 U.S. 327 p.339
97 S. Ct. 1211 p.1219
51 L. Ed. 2d 376 p.387
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
430 U.S. 327 p.341
Page 33
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
430 U.S. 327 p.348
97 S. Ct. 1211 p.1220
97 S. Ct. 1211 p.1223
51 L. Ed. 2d 376 p.388
51 L. Ed. 2d 376 p.392
83.
Cited by:
Lockport v. Citizens for Community Action at Local Level, Inc., 430 U.S. 259, 97 S. Ct. 1047, 51 L. Ed. 2d
313, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 55 (1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
430 U.S. 259 p.264
97 S. Ct. 1047 p.1051
51 L. Ed. 2d 313 p.319
84.
Cited by:
Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 96 S. Ct. 1236, 47 L. Ed. 2d 483,
1976 U.S. LEXIS 22, 9 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1016 (1976) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
424 U.S. 800 p.816
96 S. Ct. 1236 p.1245
47 L. Ed. 2d 483 p.497
85.
Cited by:
Bateman v. Arizona, 429 U.S. 1302, 97 S. Ct. 1, 50 L. Ed. 2d 32, 1976 U.S. LEXIS 3425 (1976)
429 U.S. 1302 p.1304
97 S. Ct. 1 p.2
50 L. Ed. 2d 32 p.35
86.
Cited by:
Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190, 97 S. Ct. 451, 50 L. Ed. 2d 397, 1976 U.S. LEXIS 183 (1976)
429 U.S. 190 p.196
97 S. Ct. 451 p.456
50 L. Ed. 2d 397 p.406
87.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 96 S. Ct. 3037, 49 L. Ed. 2d 1067, 1976 U.S. LEXIS 86 (1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
428 U.S. 465 p.513
96 S. Ct. 3037 p.3061
49 L. Ed. 2d 1067 p.1098
88.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Hynes v. Mayor & Council of Oradell, 425 U.S. 610, 96 S. Ct. 1755, 48 L. Ed. 2d 243, 1976 U.S. LEXIS
149 (1976)
425 U.S. 610 p.633
96 S. Ct. 1755 p.1767
48 L. Ed. 2d 243 p.260
89.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Francis v. Henderson, 425 U.S. 536, 96 S. Ct. 1708, 48 L. Ed. 2d 149, 1976 U.S. LEXIS 116 (1976)
Page 34
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
425 U.S. 536 p.551
96 S. Ct. 1708 p.1716
48 L. Ed. 2d 149 p.160
Cited by:
425 U.S. 536 p.542
96 S. Ct. 1708 p.1711
48 L. Ed. 2d 149 p.154
90.
Cited by:
Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of Flathead Reservation, 425 U.S. 463, 96 S. Ct. 1634, 48 L.
Ed. 2d 96, 1976 U.S. LEXIS 48 (1976) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
425 U.S. 463 p.468
96 S. Ct. 1634 p.1639
48 L. Ed. 2d 96 p.103
91.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469, 95 S. Ct. 1029, 43 L. Ed. 2d 328, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 139, 1
Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1819, 32 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1511 (1975)
420 U.S. 469 p.505
95 S. Ct. 1029 p.1051
43 L. Ed. 2d 328 p.355
92.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Sendak v. Nihiser, 423 U.S. 976, 96 S. Ct. 378, 46 L. Ed. 2d 291, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 3392 (1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
423 U.S. 976 p.978
96 S. Ct. 378 p.379
46 L. Ed. 2d 291 p.292
93.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc., 422 U.S. 922, 95 S. Ct. 2561, 45 L. Ed. 2d 648, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 86 (1975)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
422 U.S. 922 p.924
422 U.S. 922 p.929
95 S. Ct. 2561 p.2566
45 L. Ed. 2d 648 p.658
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
422 U.S. 922 p.934
95 S. Ct. 2561 p.2569
45 L. Ed. 2d 648 p.661
Cited by:
95 S. Ct. 2561 p.2564
45 L. Ed. 2d 648 p.655
Page 35
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
94.
Followed by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Roe v. Norton, 422 U.S. 391, 95 S. Ct. 2221, 45 L. Ed. 2d 268, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 74 (1975)
Followed by:
422 U.S. 391 p.393
422 U.S. 391 p.394
95 S. Ct. 2221 p.2222
45 L. Ed. 2d 268 p.271
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
95 S. Ct. 2221 p.2222
45 L. Ed. 2d 268 p.271
95.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Hicks v. Miranda, 422 U.S. 332, 95 S. Ct. 2281, 45 L. Ed. 2d 223, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 7 (1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
422 U.S. 332 p.353
95 S. Ct. 2281 p.2294
95 S. Ct. 2281 p.2295
45 L. Ed. 2d 223 p.241
45 L. Ed. 2d 223 p.243
Cited by:
422 U.S. 332 p.334
422 U.S. 332 p.340
95 S. Ct. 2281 p.2284
95 S. Ct. 2281 p.2287
95 S. Ct. 2281 p.2291
95 S. Ct. 2281 p.2292
45 L. Ed. 2d 223 p.230
45 L. Ed. 2d 223 p.234
45 L. Ed. 2d 223 p.238
96.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Marks v. Leis, 421 U.S. 940, 95 S. Ct. 1669, 44 L. Ed. 2d 96, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 1443 (1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
421 U.S. 940 p.941
95 S. Ct. 1669 p.1669
44 L. Ed. 2d 96 p.96
97.
Cited by:
Pitchess v. Davis, 421 U.S. 482, 95 S. Ct. 1748, 44 L. Ed. 2d 317, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 64, 20 Fed. R. Serv. 2d
(Callaghan) 276 (1975)
421 U.S. 482 p.485
95 S. Ct. 1748 p.1751
44 L. Ed. 2d 317 p.320
98.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Ellis v. Dyson, 421 U.S. 426, 95 S. Ct. 1691, 44 L. Ed. 2d 274, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 123 (1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4, HN6
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Page 36
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
421 U.S. 426 p.436
44 L. Ed. 2d 274 p.283
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
421 U.S. 426 p.437
95 S. Ct. 1691 p.1697
44 L. Ed. 2d 274 p.284
Cited by:
421 U.S. 426 p.430
95 S. Ct. 1691 p.1694
95 S. Ct. 1691 p.1695
95 S. Ct. 1691 p.1697
44 L. Ed. 2d 274 p.280
44 L. Ed. 2d 274 p.281
99.
100.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Johnson v. Mississippi, 421 U.S. 213, 95 S. Ct. 1591, 44 L. Ed. 2d 121, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 59 (1975)
421 U.S. 213 p.239
95 S. Ct. 1591 p.1605
44 L. Ed. 2d 121 p.139
Explained by, Cited by:
Kugler v. Helfant, 421 U.S. 117, 95 S. Ct. 1524, 44 L. Ed. 2d 15, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 57 (1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
Explained by:
421 U.S. 117 p.123
95 S. Ct. 1524 p.1530
44 L. Ed. 2d 15 p.23
Cited by:
421 U.S. 117 p.119
95 S. Ct. 1524 p.1528
44 L. Ed. 2d 15 p.21
101.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle, 421 U.S. 100, 95 S. Ct. 1538, 44 L. Ed. 2d 1, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 130, 52
Oil & Gas Rep. 155 (1975)
421 U.S. 100 p.115
95 S. Ct. 1538 p.1546
44 L. Ed. 2d 1 p.13
102.
Cited by:
McLucas v. De Champlain, 421 U.S. 21, 95 S. Ct. 1365, 43 L. Ed. 2d 699, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 55 (1975)
421 U.S. 21 p.33
95 S. Ct. 1365 p.1372
43 L. Ed. 2d 699 p.710
103.
Explained by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
MTM, Inc. v. Baxley, 420 U.S. 799, 95 S. Ct. 1278, 43 L. Ed. 2d 636, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 53 (1975)
Page 37
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
Explained by:
420 U.S. 799 p.801
95 S. Ct. 1278 p.1279
43 L. Ed. 2d 636 p.638
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
420 U.S. 799 p.805
95 S. Ct. 1278 p.1281
43 L. Ed. 2d 636 p.641
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
420 U.S. 799 p.808
95 S. Ct. 1278 p.1283
43 L. Ed. 2d 636 p.643
104.
Explained by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Schlesinger v. Councilman, 420 U.S. 738, 95 S. Ct. 1300, 43 L. Ed. 2d 591, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 51, 21 Fed.
R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1029 (1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Explained by:
420 U.S. 738 p.755
95 S. Ct. 1300 p.1312
43 L. Ed. 2d 591 p.608
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
420 U.S. 738 p.761
95 S. Ct. 1300 p.1315
43 L. Ed. 2d 591 p.611
Cited by:
420 U.S. 738 p.743
95 S. Ct. 1300 p.1306
43 L. Ed. 2d 591 p.600
105.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd., 420 U.S. 592, 95 S. Ct. 1200, 43 L. Ed. 2d 482, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 46 (1975)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
420 U.S. 592 p.594
95 S. Ct. 1200 p.1203
43 L. Ed. 2d 482 p.486
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
420 U.S. 592 p.613
420 U.S. 592 p.618
95 S. Ct. 1200 p.1212
95 S. Ct. 1200 p.1215
43 L. Ed. 2d 482 p.497
43 L. Ed. 2d 482 p.500
106.
Cited by:
Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 95 S. Ct. 854, 43 L. Ed. 2d 54, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 29, 19 Fed. R. Serv. 2d
Page 38
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
(Callaghan) 1499 (1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
420 U.S. 103 p.108
95 S. Ct. 854 p.860
43 L. Ed. 2d 54 p.61
107.
Cited by:
Sosna v. Iowa, 419 U.S. 393, 95 S. Ct. 553, 42 L. Ed. 2d 532, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 19, 19 Fed. R. Serv. 2d
(Callaghan) 925 (1975)
419 U.S. 393 p.396
95 S. Ct. 553 p.556
42 L. Ed. 2d 532 p.539
108.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 94 S. Ct. 2997, 41 L. Ed. 2d 789, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 88, 1 Media
L. Rep. (BNA) 1633 (1974)
418 U.S. 323 p.404
94 S. Ct. 2997 p.3038
41 L. Ed. 2d 789 p.841
109.
Explained by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Belle Terre v. Boraas, 416 U.S. 1, 94 S. Ct. 1536, 39 L. Ed. 2d 797, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 122, 6 Env't Rep.
Cas. (BNA) 1417, 4 Envtl. L. Rep. 20302 (1974)
Explained by:
416 U.S. 1 p.3
94 S. Ct. 1536 p.1538
39 L. Ed. 2d 797 p.800
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
416 U.S. 1 p.11
94 S. Ct. 1536 p.1542
39 L. Ed. 2d 797 p.806
110.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Gwathmey v. East Hampton, 418 U.S. 907, 94 S. Ct. 3197, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1154, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 2157
(1974)
Followed by:
418 U.S. 907 p.907
94 S. Ct. 3197 p.3197
41 L. Ed. 2d 1154 p.1154
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
418 U.S. 907 p.907
94 S. Ct. 3197 p.3197
41 L. Ed. 2d 1154 p.1154
111.
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Allee v. Medrano, 416 U.S. 802, 94 S. Ct. 2191, 40 L. Ed. 2d 566, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 144, 86 L.R.R.M.
(BNA) 2215, 74 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10030 (1974) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
Distinguished by:
416 U.S. 802 p.814
Page 39
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
94 S. Ct. 2191 p.2200
94 S. Ct. 2191 p.2201
40 L. Ed. 2d 566 p.580
40 L. Ed. 2d 566 p.581
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
416 U.S. 802 p.822
416 U.S. 802 p.832
416 U.S. 802 p.835
94 S. Ct. 2191 p.2204
94 S. Ct. 2191 p.2206
94 S. Ct. 2191 p.2208
94 S. Ct. 2191 p.2209
40 L. Ed. 2d 566 p.584
40 L. Ed. 2d 566 p.587
40 L. Ed. 2d 566 p.589
40 L. Ed. 2d 566 p.591
40 L. Ed. 2d 566 p.592
Cited by:
94 S. Ct. 2191 p.2203
40 L. Ed. 2d 566 p.583
112.
Cited by:
Pernell v. Southall Realty, 416 U.S. 363, 94 S. Ct. 1723, 40 L. Ed. 2d 198, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 130 (1974)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
416 U.S. 363 p.368
94 S. Ct. 1723 p.1726
40 L. Ed. 2d 198 p.205
113.
Followed by:
Sosna v. Iowa, 415 U.S. 911, 94 S. Ct. 1405, 39 L. Ed. 2d 465, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 1140 (1974)
415 U.S. 911 p.911
94 S. Ct. 1405 p.1405
39 L. Ed. 2d 465 p.466
114.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 94 S. Ct. 1372, 39 L. Ed. 2d 577, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 33 (1974)
415 U.S. 528 p.559
94 S. Ct. 1372 p.1390
39 L. Ed. 2d 577 p.600
115.
Distinguished by, Explained by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Steffel v. Thompson, 415 U.S. 452, 94 S. Ct. 1209, 39 L. Ed. 2d 505, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 112 (1974)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN5, HN6, HN9
Distinguished by:
415 U.S. 452 p.459
94 S. Ct. 1209 p.1215
39 L. Ed. 2d 505 p.514
Explained by:
Page 40
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
415 U.S. 452 p.479
94 S. Ct. 1209 p.1227
39 L. Ed. 2d 505 p.527
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
415 U.S. 452 p.476
94 S. Ct. 1209 p.1224
94 S. Ct. 1209 p.1226
39 L. Ed. 2d 505 p.524
39 L. Ed. 2d 505 p.526
Cited by:
415 U.S. 452 p.454
94 S. Ct. 1209 p.1213
94 S. Ct. 1209 p.1216
39 L. Ed. 2d 505 p.511
39 L. Ed. 2d 505 p.515
116.
Cited by:
Speight v. Slaton, 415 U.S. 333, 94 S. Ct. 1098, 39 L. Ed. 2d 367, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 106 (1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
415 U.S. 333 p.333
94 S. Ct. 1098 p.1098
39 L. Ed. 2d 367 p.368
117.
Cited by:
O'Shea v. Littleton, 414 U.S. 488, 94 S. Ct. 669, 38 L. Ed. 2d 674, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 41 (1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
414 U.S. 488 p.496
94 S. Ct. 669 p.676
94 S. Ct. 669 p.678
38 L. Ed. 2d 674 p.683
38 L. Ed. 2d 674 p.685
118.
Explained by:
Roe v. Wade, 93 S. Ct. 756 (U.S. 1973)
93 S. Ct. 756 p.756
119.
Cited by:
Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 93 S. Ct. 2908, 37 L. Ed. 2d 830, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 34 (1973)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
413 U.S. 601 p.611
93 S. Ct. 2908 p.2915
37 L. Ed. 2d 830 p.839
120.
Followed by:
Shoemaker v. Dwyer, 412 U.S. 902, 93 S. Ct. 2297, 36 L. Ed. 2d 967, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 2331 (1973)
36 L. Ed. 2d 967 p.967
Page 41
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
121.
Followed by:
Joiner v. Dallas, 412 U.S. 902, 93 S. Ct. 2286, 36 L. Ed. 2d 967, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 2333 (1973)
412 U.S. 902 p.902
93 S. Ct. 2286 p.2286
36 L. Ed. 2d 967 p.967
122.
Explained by, Cited by:
Gibson v. Berryhill, 411 U.S. 564, 93 S. Ct. 1689, 36 L. Ed. 2d 488, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 74 (1973)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN5, HN6
Explained by:
411 U.S. 564 p.574
93 S. Ct. 1689 p.1696
36 L. Ed. 2d 488 p.498
Cited by:
411 U.S. 564 p.570
93 S. Ct. 1689 p.1694
36 L. Ed. 2d 488 p.495
123.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 93 S. Ct. 1827, 36 L. Ed. 2d 439, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 72 (1973)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
411 U.S. 475 p.519
93 S. Ct. 1827 p.1851
36 L. Ed. 2d 439 p.467
Cited by:
411 U.S. 475 p.491
93 S. Ct. 1827 p.1837
36 L. Ed. 2d 439 p.451
124.
Cited by:
Lemon v. Kurtzman, 411 U.S. 192, 93 S. Ct. 1463, 36 L. Ed. 2d 151, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 85 (1973)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
411 U.S. 192 p.208
93 S. Ct. 1463 p.1473
36 L. Ed. 2d 151 p.166
125.
Cited by:
Linda R. S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 93 S. Ct. 1146, 35 L. Ed. 2d 536, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 99 (1973)
410 U.S. 614 p.619
93 S. Ct. 1146 p.1149
35 L. Ed. 2d 536 p.541
126.
Cited by:
Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484, 93 S. Ct. 1123, 35 L. Ed. 2d 443, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 17
(1973)
410 U.S. 484 p.491
93 S. Ct. 1123 p.1127
Page 42
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
35 L. Ed. 2d 443 p.450
127.
Explained by:
Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179, 93 S. Ct. 739, 35 L. Ed. 2d 201, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 112 (1973)
410 U.S. 179 p.209
128.
Distinguished by, Explained by:
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S. Ct. 705, 35 L. Ed. 2d 147, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 159 (1973)
Distinguished by:
410 U.S. 113 p.126
410 U.S. 113 p.166
93 S. Ct. 705 p.713
93 S. Ct. 705 p.714
93 S. Ct. 705 p.733
35 L. Ed. 2d 147 p.162
35 L. Ed. 2d 147 p.184
Explained by:
410 U.S. 113 p.126
93 S. Ct. 705 p.713
35 L. Ed. 2d 147 p.185
129.
Cited by:
Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 92 S. Ct. 2646, 33 L. Ed. 2d 626, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 132, 1 Media L.
Rep. (BNA) 2617, 24 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 2125 (1972) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
408 U.S. 665 p.707
92 S. Ct. 2646 p.2669
33 L. Ed. 2d 626 p.655
130.
Distinguished by:
Lake Carriers' Ass'n v. MacMullan, 406 U.S. 498, 92 S. Ct. 1749, 32 L. Ed. 2d 257, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 115,
4 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1129, 2 Envtl. L. Rep. 20283 (1972) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
406 U.S. 498 p.509
92 S. Ct. 1749 p.1757
32 L. Ed. 2d 257 p.268
131.
Explained by, Cited by:
Cousins v. Wigoda, 409 U.S. 1201, 92 S. Ct. 2610, 34 L. Ed. 2d 15, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 1868 (1972)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
409 U.S. 1201 p.1205
92 S. Ct. 2610 p.2614
34 L. Ed. 2d 15 p.20
Cited by:
34 L. Ed. 2d 15 p.19
132.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
California v. La Rue, 409 U.S. 109, 93 S. Ct. 390, 34 L. Ed. 2d 342, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 128 (1972)
Page 43
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
409 U.S. 109 p.124
93 S. Ct. 390 p.400
34 L. Ed. 2d 342 p.355
133.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225, 92 S. Ct. 2151, 32 L. Ed. 2d 705, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 104 (1972)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN5, HN6
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
407 U.S. 225 p.244
92 S. Ct. 2151 p.2163
32 L. Ed. 2d 705 p.718
Cited by:
407 U.S. 225 p.226
92 S. Ct. 2151 p.2154
32 L. Ed. 2d 705 p.708
134.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 92 S. Ct. 1983, 32 L. Ed. 2d 556, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 42, 10 U.C.C. Rep.
Serv. (CBC) 913 (1972) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
407 U.S. 67 p.98
92 S. Ct. 1983 p.2003
32 L. Ed. 2d 556 p.580
Cited by:
407 U.S. 67 p.71
92 S. Ct. 1983 p.1989
32 L. Ed. 2d 556 p.565
135.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Lynch v. Household Finance Corp., 405 U.S. 538, 92 S. Ct. 1113, 31 L. Ed. 2d 424, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 153
(1972) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
405 U.S. 538 p.560
92 S. Ct. 1113 p.1126
31 L. Ed. 2d 424 p.439
Cited by:
405 U.S. 538 p.556
92 S. Ct. 1113 p.1124
31 L. Ed. 2d 424 p.437
136.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Gooding v. Wilson, 405 U.S. 518, 92 S. Ct. 1103, 31 L. Ed. 2d 408, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 72 (1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN9
405 U.S. 518 p.531
92 S. Ct. 1103 p.1111
31 L. Ed. 2d 408 p.419
Page 44
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
137.
Cited by:
Le Clair v. O'Neil, 401 U.S. 984, 91 S. Ct. 1219, 28 L. Ed. 2d 524, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2558 (1971)
401 U.S. 984 p.984
138.
Cited by:
Hammond v. Brown, 404 U.S. 962, 92 S. Ct. 330, 30 L. Ed. 2d 282, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 412 (1971)
404 U.S. 962 p.962
92 S. Ct. 330 p.330
30 L. Ed. 2d 282 p.282
139.
Cited by:
United States v. Bass, 404 U.S. 336, 92 S. Ct. 515, 30 L. Ed. 2d 488, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 143 (1971)
404 U.S. 336 p.349
92 S. Ct. 515 p.523
30 L. Ed. 2d 488 p.497
140.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
NLRB v. Nash-Finch Co., 404 U.S. 138, 92 S. Ct. 373, 30 L. Ed. 2d 328, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 97, 78 L.R.R.M.
(BNA) 2967, 66 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P12253 (1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN5
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
404 U.S. 138 p.151
92 S. Ct. 373 p.381
30 L. Ed. 2d 328 p.337
Cited by:
404 U.S. 138 p.141
92 S. Ct. 373 p.376
30 L. Ed. 2d 328 p.332
141.
Cited by:
Hicks v. Pleasure House, Inc., 404 U.S. 1, 92 S. Ct. 5, 30 L. Ed. 2d 1, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 17 (1971)
404 U.S. 1 p.2
92 S. Ct. 5 p.6
30 L. Ed. 2d 1 p.3
142.
Followed by:
Van Hoomissen v. Hayse, 403 U.S. 927, 91 S. Ct. 2248, 29 L. Ed. 2d 705, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 1517 (1971)
403 U.S. 927 p.927
91 S. Ct. 2248 p.2248
29 L. Ed. 2d 705 p.705
143.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Palmer v. Thompson, 403 U.S. 217, 91 S. Ct. 1940, 29 L. Ed. 2d 438, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 27 (1971)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
403 U.S. 217 p.243
91 S. Ct. 1940 p.1954
29 L. Ed. 2d 438 p.455
Page 45
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
144.
Cited by:
Clark v. Ellenbogen, 402 U.S. 935, 91 S. Ct. 1615, 29 L. Ed. 2d 104, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2115 (1971)
402 U.S. 935 p.935
91 S. Ct. 1615 p.1615
29 L. Ed. 2d 104 p.104
145.
Followed by:
McCann v. Babbitz, 402 U.S. 903, 91 S. Ct. 1375, 28 L. Ed. 2d 643, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2344 (1971)
402 U.S. 903 p.903
91 S. Ct. 1375 p.1375
28 L. Ed. 2d 643 p.643
146.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
McGautha v. California, 402 U.S. 183, 91 S. Ct. 1454, 28 L. Ed. 2d 711, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 107, 58 Ohio
Op. 2d 243 (1971)
402 U.S. 183 p.259
91 S. Ct. 1454 p.1494
28 L. Ed. 2d 711 p.757
147.
Followed by:
Wright v. Montgomery, 401 U.S. 989, 91 S. Ct. 1218, 28 L. Ed. 2d 528, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2580 (1971)
401 U.S. 989 p.989
91 S. Ct. 1218 p.1218
28 L. Ed. 2d 528 p.528
148.
Followed by:
Embry v. Allen, 401 U.S. 989, 91 S. Ct. 1237, 28 L. Ed. 2d 528, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2581 (1971)
401 U.S. 989 p.989
91 S. Ct. 1237 p.1237
149.
Followed by:
Rollins v. Shannon, 401 U.S. 988, 91 S. Ct. 1235, 28 L. Ed. 2d 527, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2578 (1971)
91 S. Ct. 1235 p.1235
28 L. Ed. 2d 527 p.527
150.
Followed by:
ABC Books, Inc. v. Benson, 401 U.S. 988, 91 S. Ct. 1228, 28 L. Ed. 2d 525, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2575 (1971)
401 U.S. 988 p.988
91 S. Ct. 1228 p.1228
28 L. Ed. 2d 525 p.525
151.
Followed by:
Dyches v. Ryan, 401 U.S. 988, 91 S. Ct. 1235, 28 L. Ed. 2d 526, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2576 (1971)
401 U.S. 988 p.988
91 S. Ct. 1235 p.1235
Page 46
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
152.
Followed by:
Board of Public Instruction v. Banks, 401 U.S. 988, 91 S. Ct. 1223, 28 L. Ed. 2d 526, 1971 U.S. LEXIS
2577 (1971)
401 U.S. 988 p.988
28 L. Ed. 2d 526 p.526
153.
Followed by:
Shevin v. Lazarus, 401 U.S. 987, 91 S. Ct. 1218, 28 L. Ed. 2d 524, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2570 (1971)
401 U.S. 987 p.987
28 L. Ed. 2d 524 p.524
154.
Followed by:
Goodman v. Wheeler, 401 U.S. 987, 91 S. Ct. 1219, 28 L. Ed. 2d 524, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2571 (1971)
401 U.S. 987 p.987
28 L. Ed. 2d 524 p.524
155.
Followed by:
McGrew v. Jackson, 401 U.S. 987, 91 S. Ct. 1221, 28 L. Ed. 2d 525, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2572 (1971)
401 U.S. 987 p.987
91 S. Ct. 1221 p.1221
28 L. Ed. 2d 525 p.525
156.
Followed by:
Hosey v. Jackson, 401 U.S. 987, 91 S. Ct. 1221, 28 L. Ed. 2d 525, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2573 (1971)
401 U.S. 987 p.987
91 S. Ct. 1221 p.1221
28 L. Ed. 2d 525 p.525
157.
Followed by:
Barlow v. Gallant, 401 U.S. 986, 91 S. Ct. 1219, 28 L. Ed. 2d 524, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2569 (1971)
401 U.S. 986 p.986
91 S. Ct. 1219 p.1219
28 L. Ed. 2d 524 p.524
158.
Cited by:
Brown v. Fallis, 401 U.S. 985, 91 S. Ct. 1237, 28 L. Ed. 2d 528, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2564 (1971)
91 S. Ct. 1237 p.1237
159.
Followed by:
Johnnie Reb's Book & Card Shop v. Slaton, 401 U.S. 985, 91 S. Ct. 1220, 28 L. Ed. 2d 525, 1971 U.S.
LEXIS 2559 (1971)
401 U.S. 985 p.985
91 S. Ct. 1220 p.1220
28 L. Ed. 2d 525 p.525
160.
Followed by:
Porter v. Kimzey, 401 U.S. 985, 91 S. Ct. 1237, 28 L. Ed. 2d 525, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2560 (1971)
Page 47
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
401 U.S. 985 p.985
91 S. Ct. 1237 p.1237
28 L. Ed. 2d 525 p.525
161.
Followed by:
Geiger v. Jenkins, 401 U.S. 985, 91 S. Ct. 1236, 28 L. Ed. 2d 525, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2561 (1971)
401 U.S. 985 p.985
91 S. Ct. 1236 p.1236
28 L. Ed. 2d 525 p.525
162.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Florida State Board of Dentistry v. Mack, 401 U.S. 960, 91 S. Ct. 971, 28 L. Ed. 2d 245, 1971 U.S. LEXIS
2873 (1971)
401 U.S. 960 p.962
91 S. Ct. 971 p.972
28 L. Ed. 2d 245 p.246
163.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Kugler v. Karp, 401 U.S. 930, 91 S. Ct. 933, 28 L. Ed. 2d 210, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2905 (1971)
Followed by:
28 L. Ed. 2d 210 p.210
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
28 L. Ed. 2d 210 p.210
164.
Followed by:
Byrne v. Karalexis, 401 U.S. 216, 91 S. Ct. 777, 27 L. Ed. 2d 792, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 87 (1971)
401 U.S. 216 p.220
91 S. Ct. 777 p.780
27 L. Ed. 2d 792 p.795
165.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Dyson v. Stein, 401 U.S. 200, 91 S. Ct. 769, 27 L. Ed. 2d 781, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 86 (1971)
Followed by:
401 U.S. 200 p.203
91 S. Ct. 769 p.771
27 L. Ed. 2d 781 p.784
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
401 U.S. 200 p.210
401 U.S. 200 p.211
27 L. Ed. 2d 781 p.788
Cited by:
401 U.S. 200 p.200
166.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82, 91 S. Ct. 674, 27 L. Ed. 2d 701, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 137 (1971)
Followed by:
Page 48
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
401 U.S. 82 p.83
91 S. Ct. 674 p.676
27 L. Ed. 2d 701 p.704
27 L. Ed. 2d 701 p.705
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
401 U.S. 82 p.93
91 S. Ct. 674 p.681
27 L. Ed. 2d 701 p.710
167.
Followed by, Cited by:
Boyle v. Landry, 401 U.S. 77, 91 S. Ct. 758, 27 L. Ed. 2d 696, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 84 (1971)
Followed by:
401 U.S. 77 p.81
27 L. Ed. 2d 696 p.699
Cited by:
401 U.S. 77 p.77
168.
Followed by, Cited by:
Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 91 S. Ct. 764, 27 L. Ed. 2d 688, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 83 (1971)
Followed by:
401 U.S. 66 p.68
91 S. Ct. 764 p.766
27 L. Ed. 2d 688 p.691
Cited by:
401 U.S. 66 p.66
1ST CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
169.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Guillemard-Ginorio v. Contreras-Gomez, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23858 (1st Cir. P.R. Oct. 29, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23858
Followed by:
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23858
170.
Cited by:
Silva v. Massachusetts, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20287 (1st Cir. Mass. Sept. 11, 2009)
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20287
171.
Followed by, Cited by:
Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Medley, 572 F.3d 22, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14930, 13 Accom.
Disabilities Dec. (CCH) P13-254, 47 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1310 (1st Cir. Mass. 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
572 F.3d 22 p.26
Page 49
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cited by:
572 F.3d 22 p.24
172.
Explained by:
Coors Brewing Co. v. Mendez-Torres, 562 F.3d 3, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 6638 (1st Cir. P.R. 2009)
562 F.3d 3 p.16
173.
Cited by:
Fayard v. Northeast Vehicle Servs., LLC, 533 F.3d 42, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14886, 38 Envtl. L. Rep.
20167 (1st Cir. Mass. 2008)
533 F.3d 42 p.49
174.
Cited by:
Esso Std. Oil Co. v. Lopez-Freytes, 522 F.3d 136, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 7661, 38 Envtl. L. Rep. 20086
(1st Cir. P.R. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
522 F.3d 136 p.143
175.
Followed by:
Rossi v. Gemma, 489 F.3d 26, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12534 (1st Cir. R.I. 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
489 F.3d 26 p.34
176.
Cited by:
Ramirez v. Ramos, 438 F.3d 92, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 4048 (1st Cir. P.R. 2006)
438 F.3d 92 p.96
177.
Cited by:
Rivera-Feliciano v. Acevedo-Vila, 438 F.3d 50, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 3579 (1st Cir. P.R. 2006)
438 F.3d 50 p.56
178.
Cited by:
Guillemard-Ginorio v. Gomez, 161 Fed. Appx. 24, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 27256 (1st Cir. P.R. 2005)
161 Fed. Appx. 24 p.26
179.
Cited by:
Laffey v. Begin, 137 Fed. Appx. 362, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11501 (1st Cir. R.I. 2005)
137 Fed. Appx. 362 p.363
180.
Cited by:
Diva's Inc. v. City of Bangor, 411 F.3d 30, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10703 (1st Cir. Me. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN1, HN5
411 F.3d 30 p.37
181.
Cited by:
Page 50
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Sevigny v. Emplrs. Ins. of Wausau, 411 F.3d 24, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10708 (1st Cir. N.H. 2005)
411 F.3d 24 p.26
182.
Cited by:
Federacion de Maestros de P.R. v. Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo de P.R., 410 F.3d 17, 2005 U.S. App.
LEXIS 9748, 177 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2399, 151 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10488 (1st Cir. P.R. 2005)
410 F.3d 17 p.21
183.
Distinguished by:
Rio Grande Cmty. Health Ctr., Inc. v. Rullan, 397 F.3d 56, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2390 (1st Cir. P.R. 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
397 F.3d 56 p.60
184.
Cited by:
ESSO Std. Oil Co. (P.R.) v. Mujica Cotto, 389 F.3d 212, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 23894, 34 Envtl. L. Rep.
20139 (1st Cir. P.R. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
389 F.3d 212 p.213
185.
Cited by:
Local Union No. 12004, USW v. Massachusetts, 377 F.3d 64, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 15777, 175 L.R.R.M.
(BNA) 2385, 150 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10376 (1st Cir. Mass. 2004)
377 F.3d 64 p.71
186.
Cited by:
Colon-Rodriguez v. Lopez-Bonilla, 94 Fed. Appx. 847, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 7985 (1st Cir. P.R. 2004)
94 Fed. Appx. 847 p.848
187.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Maymo-Melendez v. Alvarez-Ramirez, 364 F.3d 27, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 7048 (1st Cir. P.R. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
364 F.3d 27 p.38
Cited by:
364 F.3d 27 p.31
364 F.3d 27 p.32
188.
Cited by:
Santiago v. Spencer, 346 F.3d 206, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 19615 (1st Cir. Mass. 2003)
346 F.3d 206 p.211
189.
Followed by:
Mandel v. Town of Orleans, 326 F.3d 267, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 7097 (1st Cir. Mass. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
326 F.3d 267 p.273
Page 51
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
190.
Cited by:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Rodriguez, 322 F.3d 747, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 5382 (1st Cir. P.R. 2003)
322 F.3d 747 p.748
191.
Cited by:
UPS v. Flores-Galarza, 318 F.3d 323, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 1930, 187 A.L.R. Fed. 739 (1st Cir. P.R.
2003)
318 F.3d 323 p.338
192.
Cited by:
Ford Motor Co. v. Meredith Motor Co., 257 F.3d 67, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 17390 (1st Cir. N.H. 2001)
257 F.3d 67 p.73
193.
Cited by:
Dunn v. Cometa, 238 F.3d 38, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 1065 (1st Cir. Me. 2001)
238 F.3d 38 p.43
194.
Cited by:
National Pharms. v. De Melecio, 221 F.3d 235, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18541 (1st Cir. P.R. 2000)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
221 F.3d 235 p.238
221 F.3d 235 p.240
195.
Followed by:
In re Justices of the Superior Court Dep't of the Mass. Trial Court , 218 F.3d 11, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS
15653 (1st Cir. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
218 F.3d 11 p.16
196.
Cited by:
McLeod v. State, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15060 (1st Cir. Me. June 28, 2000)
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15060
197.
Distinguished by:
United States v. Charles, 213 F.3d 10, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11606 (1st Cir. Mass. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
213 F.3d 10 p.23
198.
Cited by:
Cruz v. Melecio, 204 F.3d 14, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2292 (1st Cir. P.R. 2000)
204 F.3d 14 p.23
199.
Cited by:
Rhode Island Ass'n of Realtors v. Whitehouse, 199 F.3d 26, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 32451 (1st Cir. R.I.
1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
199 F.3d 26 p.30
Page 52
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
200.
Followed by:
Douglas v. New Hampshire Supreme Court Prof'l Conduct Comm., 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 32715 (1st Cir.
N.H. Dec. 29, 1998)
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 32715
201.
Cited by:
Roberts v. Holmes, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 9475 (1st Cir. Mass. May 7, 1998)
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 9475
202.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
DeMauro v. DeMauro, 115 F.3d 94, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13747, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide P9289 (1st Cir.
Mass. 1997)
Distinguished by:
115 F.3d 94 p.100
Cited by:
115 F.3d 94 p.99
203.
Cited by:
Brooks v. New Hampshire Supreme Court, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 26501 (1st Cir. N.H. Oct. 10, 1996)
204.
Cited by:
Lundborg v. Phoenix Leasing, 91 F.3d 265, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19195 (1st Cir. Me. 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
91 F.3d 265 p.273
205.
Followed by, Cited by:
Brooks v. New Hampshire Supreme Court, 80 F.3d 633, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6633 (1st Cir. N.H. 1996)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
Followed by:
80 F.3d 633 p.639
Cited by:
80 F.3d 633 p.636
206.
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Chaulk Servs. v. Massachusetts Comm'n Against Discrimination, 70 F.3d 1361, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS
33253, 69 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 473, 150 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2961 (1st Cir. Mass. 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
70 F.3d 1361 p.1371
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
70 F.3d 1361 p.1371
Cited by:
70 F.3d 1361 p.1362
70 F.3d 1361 p.1367
Page 53
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
207.
Cited by:
Ernst & Young v. Depositors Economic Protection Corp., 45 F.3d 530, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1387 (1st
Cir. R.I. 1995)
45 F.3d 530 p.534
208.
Cited by:
Cassell v. Osborn, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8991 (1st Cir. N.H. Apr. 26, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
209.
Followed by:
Casa Marie, Inc. v. Superior Court of Puerto Rico, 988 F.2d 252, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 4277, 1 Am.
Disabilities Dec. 710 (1st Cir. P.R. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN9
988 F.2d 252 p.262
210.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Rivera-Puig v. Garcia-Rosario, 983 F.2d 311, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 38448, 20 Media L. Rep. (BNA)
2242 (1st Cir. P.R. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
983 F.2d 311 p.320
Followed by:
983 F.2d 311 p.316
211.
Cited by:
Nwankwo v. Nwankwo, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 32222 (1st Cir. N.H. Dec. 9, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
212.
Cited by:
Kyricopoulos v. Orleans, 967 F.2d 14, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 13945 (1st Cir. Mass. 1992) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
967 F.2d 14 p.15
213.
Cited by:
United States v. Paleo, 967 F.2d 7, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 13472 (1st Cir. Mass. 1992) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
967 F.2d 7 p.12
214.
Cited by:
El Dia, Inc. v. Hernandez Colon, 963 F.2d 488, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 9859, 20 Media L. Rep. (BNA)
1210 (1st Cir. P.R. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
963 F.2d 488 p.496
963 F.2d 488 p.497
215.
Cited by:
SMA Life Assurance Co. v. Sanchez-Pica, 960 F.2d 274, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6193 (1st Cir. P.R. 1992)
960 F.2d 274 p.276
960 F.2d 274 p.277
Page 54
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
216.
Cited by:
Willhauck v. Halpin, 953 F.2d 689, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 29870 (1st Cir. Mass. 1991)
953 F.2d 689 p.711
217.
Cited by:
Burns v. Watler, 931 F.2d 140, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 7369 (1st Cir. Me. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
931 F.2d 140 p.145
218.
Cited by:
Hurlburt v. Dzialo, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2134 (1st Cir. Feb. 5, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
219.
Followed by:
Bettencourt v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 904 F.2d 772, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8722 (1st Cir.
Mass. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
904 F.2d 772 p.776
904 F.2d 772 p.777
904 F.2d 772 p.778
904 F.2d 772 p.785
220.
Followed by:
Duty Free Shop, Inc. v. Administracion de Terrenos, 889 F.2d 1181, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17386 (1st Cir.
P.R. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
889 F.2d 1181 p.1182
221.
Cited by:
Maine Ass'n of Interdependent Neighborhoods v. Commissioner, Maine Dep't of Human Services, 876 F.2d
1051, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7867 (1st Cir. Me. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
876 F.2d 1051 p.1055
222.
Cited by:
Planned Parenthood League v. Bellotti, 868 F.2d 459, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 1147 (1st Cir. Mass. 1989)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
868 F.2d 459 p.460
868 F.2d 459 p.462
223.
Distinguished by:
Bath Mem'l Hosp. v. Me. Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 853 F.2d 1007, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10695 (1st Cir.
Me. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
853 F.2d 1007 p.1013
224.
Cited by:
Hyde Park Partners, L.P. v. Connolly, 839 F.2d 837, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1492, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH)
P93619 (1st Cir. Mass. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
839 F.2d 837 p.841
225.
Distinguished by:
Page 55
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Guiney v. Roache, 833 F.2d 1079, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15754, 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1225 (1st Cir. Mass.
1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
833 F.2d 1079 p.1085
226.
Distinguished by:
Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Asso. v. Pfeiffer, 832 F.2d 240, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 14506 (1st
Cir. R.I. 1987)
832 F.2d 240 p.243
227.
Explained by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Kercado-Melendez v. Aponte-Roque, 829 F.2d 255, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12554 (1st Cir. P.R. 1987)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
829 F.2d 255 p.258
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
829 F.2d 255 p.267
228.
Explained by:
Shannon v. Telco Communications, Inc., 824 F.2d 150, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10134 (1st Cir. Mass. 1987)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
824 F.2d 150 p.151
229.
Distinguished by:
Oliveras v. Miranda Lopo, 800 F.2d 3, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 29216 (1st Cir. P.R. 1986)
800 F.2d 3 p.8
230.
Explained by:
Marcal Paper Mills, Inc. v. Ewing, 790 F.2d 195, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24985, 122 L.R.R.M. (BNA)
2828, 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1009 (1st Cir. Me. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
790 F.2d 195 p.195
231.
Followed by:
Malachowski v. Keene, 787 F.2d 704, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23647 (1st Cir. N.H. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
787 F.2d 704 p.708
232.
Distinguished by:
Bergeron v. Estate of Loeb, 777 F.2d 792, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 24099 (1st Cir. N.H. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
777 F.2d 792 p.798
233.
Followed by:
Doe v. Donovan, 747 F.2d 42, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17179 (1st Cir. Mass. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
747 F.2d 42 p.44
Page 56
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
234.
Explained by:
United Books, Inc. v. Conte, 739 F.2d 30, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20127 (1st Cir. Mass. 1984) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
739 F.2d 30 p.32
739 F.2d 30 p.33
739 F.2d 30 p.34
235.
Cited by:
Cloutier v. Epping, 714 F.2d 1184, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25136 (1st Cir. N.H. 1983)
714 F.2d 1184 p.1188
236.
Cited by:
Rushia v. Ashburnham, 701 F.2d 7, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30026 (1st Cir. Mass. 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
701 F.2d 7 p.9
237.
Cited by:
Lydon v. Justices of Boston Municipal Court, 698 F.2d 1, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 22929 (1st Cir. Mass.
1982)
698 F.2d 1 p.6
238.
Distinguished by:
In re Justices of Supreme Court, 695 F.2d 17, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 23453 (1st Cir. 1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
695 F.2d 17 p.26
239.
Cited by:
McCollester v. Keene, 668 F.2d 617, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 22679 (1st Cir. N.H. 1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4, HN6
668 F.2d 617 p.619
240.
Followed by:
Jackson v. Garcia, 665 F.2d 395, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16077 (1st Cir. P.R. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
665 F.2d 395 p.396
241.
Cited by:
Benson v. Superior Court Dep't of Trial Court, 663 F.2d 355, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16158 (1st Cir. Mass.
1981)
663 F.2d 355 p.359
242.
Explained by:
Landrigan v. Warwick, 628 F.2d 736, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14509 (1st Cir. R.I. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
628 F.2d 736 p.743
Page 57
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
243.
Cited by:
Shell Oil Co. v. Noel, 608 F.2d 208, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9374, 1980-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P63118 (1st
Cir. R.I. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN5
608 F.2d 208 p.213
244.
Cited by:
Kartell v. Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc., 592 F.2d 1191, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 17129, 1979-1 Trade
Cas. (CCH) P62481 (1st Cir. Mass. 1979)
592 F.2d 1191 p.1194
245.
Cited by:
Mulherin v. O'Brien, 588 F.2d 853, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 6664 (1st Cir. Mass. 1978)
588 F.2d 853 p.855
246.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Fernandez v. Trias Monge, 586 F.2d 848, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 8738 (1st Cir. P.R. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
586 F.2d 848 p.851
Cited by:
586 F.2d 848 p.849
247.
Explained by:
Gabrilowitz v. Newman, 582 F.2d 100, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10570 (1st Cir. R.I. 1978)
582 F.2d 100 p.102
248.
Followed by:
Diaz v. Stathis, 576 F.2d 9, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11054 (1st Cir. Mass. 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
576 F.2d 9 p.11
249.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Construction Aggregates Corp. v. Rivera de Vicenty, 573 F.2d 86, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12173 (1st Cir.
P.R. 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN5
Distinguished by:
573 F.2d 86 p.94
Cited by:
573 F.2d 86 p.89
250.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Jackson v. Justices of Superior Court, 549 F.2d 215, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 10523 (1st Cir. Mass. 1977)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
549 F.2d 215 p.220
Cited by:
Page 58
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
549 F.2d 215 p.216
251.
Cited by:
Diaz Gonzalez v. Colon Gonzalez, 536 F.2d 453, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 8802 (1st Cir. P.R. 1976)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
536 F.2d 453 p.458
252.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Kolios v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 532 F.2d 786, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12101 (1st Cir.
1976)
532 F.2d 786 p.791
253.
Explained by:
Puerto Rico International Airlines, Inc. v. Silva Recio, 520 F.2d 1342, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 13986, 22
Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 383 (1st Cir. P.R. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
520 F.2d 1342 p.1344
520 F.2d 1342 p.1345
254.
Followed by, Cited by:
Guerro v. Mulhearn, 498 F.2d 1249, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7968 (1st Cir. Mass. 1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
498 F.2d 1249 p.1251
Cited by:
498 F.2d 1249 p.1253
255.
Cited by:
Ad Hoc Committee on Judicial Administration v. Massachusetts, 488 F.2d 1241, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS
6342 (1st Cir. Mass. 1973)
488 F.2d 1241 p.1246
256.
Cited by:
Literature, Inc. v. Quinn, 482 F.2d 372, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8581 (1st Cir. Mass. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
482 F.2d 372 p.374
482 F.2d 372 p.375
482 F.2d 372 p.376
257.
Cited by:
Goguen v. Smith, 471 F.2d 88, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6273 (1st Cir. Mass. 1972)
471 F.2d 88 p.97
258.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Wulp v. Corcoran, 454 F.2d 826, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11884 (1st Cir. Mass. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4, HN6
Distinguished by:
Page 59
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
454 F.2d 826 p.829
454 F.2d 826 p.830
454 F.2d 826 p.831
Cited by:
454 F.2d 826 p.832
1ST CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
259.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Asociacion De Suscripcion Conjunta Del Seguro De Responsabilidad Obligatorio v. Juarbe-Jimenez, 642 F.
Supp. 2d 73, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64289 (D.P.R. 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
642 F. Supp. 2d 73 p.79
Cited by:
642 F. Supp. 2d 73 p.78
260.
Followed by:
Massachusetts v. Azubuko, 616 F. Supp. 2d 174, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43773 (D. Mass. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
616 F. Supp. 2d 174 p.177
261.
Cited by:
Mallinckrodt LLC v. Littell, 616 F. Supp. 2d 128, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43360 (D. Me. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
616 F. Supp. 2d 128 p.135
262.
Followed by:
Corporacion De Residentes De La Calle Carrion Court v. Sanchez-Ramos, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13708
(D.P.R. Feb. 23, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13708
263.
Followed by:
Proverb v. O'Mara, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16078 (D.N.H. Feb. 13, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16078
264.
Followed by:
United States v. Thompson, 595 F. Supp. 2d 143, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7312 (D. Me. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
595 F. Supp. 2d 143 p.148
265.
Followed by:
Kennedy v. Town of Billerica, 594 F. Supp. 2d 117, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6442 (D. Mass. 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
594 F. Supp. 2d 117 p.123
Page 60
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
266.
Cited by:
Gorelik v. Costin, 2008 DNH 217, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105581 (D.N.H. 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105581
267.
Followed by:
Coggeshall v. Mass. Bd. of Registration of Psychologists, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104608 (D. Mass. Dec.
23, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104608
268.
Cited by:
Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Medley, 584 F. Supp. 2d 368, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103850 (D. Mass.
2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
584 F. Supp. 2d 368 p.372
269.
Followed by:
Stratton v. Massachusetts, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74297 (D. Mass. Sept. 26, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74297
270.
Followed by:
Mojica v. Nogueras-Cartagena, 573 F. Supp. 2d 520, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68500 (D.P.R. 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
573 F. Supp. 2d 520 p.523
271.
Cited by:
Total Petroleum P.R. Corp. v. Colon-Colon, 577 F. Supp. 2d 537, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71603 (D.P.R.
2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
577 F. Supp. 2d 537 p.548
272.
Followed by, Cited by:
Rodriguez v. Vila, 565 F. Supp. 2d 328, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79315 (D.P.R. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
565 F. Supp. 2d 328 p.339
Cited by:
565 F. Supp. 2d 328 p.330
273.
Cited by:
Colassi v. Looper, 2008 DNH 106, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40628 (D.N.H. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40628
274.
Cited by:
City of Boston v. Bureau of Special Educ. Appeals, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39992 (D. Mass. Apr. 30, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39992
Page 61
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
275.
Followed by, Explained by:
Federacion de Maestros de P.R. v. Acevedo-Vila, 545 F. Supp. 2d 219, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48327
(D.P.R. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
545 F. Supp. 2d 219 p.225
Explained by:
545 F. Supp. 2d 219 p.226
276.
Cited by:
Sauve v. Dion, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22034 (D. Me. Feb. 26, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22034
277.
Followed by, Explained by:
Federacion de Maestros de Puerto Rico v. Acevedo-Vila, 545 F. Supp. 2d 207, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
32774 (D.P.R. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
545 F. Supp. 2d 207 p.210
Explained by:
545 F. Supp. 2d 207 p.214
278.
Followed by:
Hartford Enters. v. Coty, 529 F. Supp. 2d 95, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 532 (D. Me. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
529 F. Supp. 2d 95 p.97
279.
Followed by:
Safe Haven Sober Houses, LLC v. City of Boston, 517 F. Supp. 2d 557, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74129 (D.
Mass. 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
517 F. Supp. 2d 557 p.561
280.
Cited by:
Stefanik v. Reno, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96574 (D. Mass. Sept. 13, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96574
281.
Followed by:
Ferent v. Massachusetts, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66736 (D. Mass. Sept. 11, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66736
282.
Cited by:
Packard v. Hinden, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69379 (D. Mass. Sept. 7, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69379
283.
Cited by:
Page 62
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Castellanos-Bayouth v. P.R. Bar Ass'n, 508 F. Supp. 2d 146, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61808 (D.P.R. 2007)
508 F. Supp. 2d 146 p.148
284.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Partners Healthcare Sys. v. Sullivan, 497 F. Supp. 2d 29, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45712, 41 Employee
Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1155 (D. Mass. 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
497 F. Supp. 2d 29 p.40
Cited by:
497 F. Supp. 2d 29 p.33
285.
Followed by:
Peterson v. Fox, 488 F. Supp. 2d 14, 2007 DNH 67, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36736 (D.N.H. 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
488 F. Supp. 2d 14 p.17
286.
Followed by, Cited by:
Castellanos-Bayouth v. P.R. Bar Ass'n, 483 F. Supp. 2d 167, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26000 (D.P.R. 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
483 F. Supp. 2d 167 p.174
Cited by:
483 F. Supp. 2d 167 p.172
287.
Cited by:
Skynet Corp. v. Slattery, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18842 (D.N.H. Mar. 13, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18842
288.
Distinguished by:
United States v. Adams, 473 F. Supp. 2d 108, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9351 (D. Me. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
473 F. Supp. 2d 108 p.116
289.
Cited by:
Bourne v. Town of Madison, 2007 DNH 19, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9660 (D.N.H. 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9660
290.
Cited by:
Guzzi v. Thompson, 470 F. Supp. 2d 17, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5132 (D. Mass. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
470 F. Supp. 2d 17 p.21
291.
Followed by:
Munroe v. McGee, 478 F. Supp. 2d 110, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18366 (D. Mass. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Page 63
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
478 F. Supp. 2d 110 p.115
292.
Followed by, Cited by:
Peterson v. Fox, 488 F. Supp. 2d 14, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96653 (D.N.H. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN9
Followed by:
488 F. Supp. 2d 14 p.20
Cited by:
488 F. Supp. 2d 14 p.19
293.
Cited by:
Esso Std. Oil Co. (P.R.) v. Lopez Freytes, 467 F. Supp. 2d 156, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94364 (D.P.R. 2006)
467 F. Supp. 2d 156 p.158
294.
Followed by:
Ins. Comm'r of P.R. v. Doral Ins. Agency, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80333 (D.P.R. Oct. 31, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80333
295.
Followed by:
Murphy v. Maine, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69057 (D. Me. Sept. 25, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69057
296.
Cited by:
Clark v. Boscher, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97287 (D. Mass. Aug. 14, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97287
297.
Followed by:
R.I. Res. Recovery Corp. v. R.I. Dep't of Envtl. Mgmt., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56072 (D.R.I. July 26, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56072
298.
Cited by:
Reid v. Dowaliby, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62331 (D.R.I. June 23, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62331
299.
Cited by:
Hunt v. Dennehy, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41060 (D. Mass. June 19, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41060
300.
Cited by:
Transcon. Refrigerated Lines, Inc. v. State, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39398 (D. Me. June 7, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39398
Page 64
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
301.
Followed by:
Cesario v. Bergquist, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10141 (D.R.I. Mar. 10, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10141
302.
Followed by, Cited by:
Olson v. Fajardo-Velez, 419 F. Supp. 2d 32, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11765 (D.P.R. 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
419 F. Supp. 2d 32 p.37
Cited by:
419 F. Supp. 2d 32 p.35
303.
Cited by:
Rodriguez-Adorno v. Sanchez-Ramos, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8656 (D.P.R. Feb. 14, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8656
304.
Followed by:
Rossi v. Gemma, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44441 (D.R.I. Jan. 13, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44441
305.
Followed by:
Toro v. Wall, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36731 (D.R.I. Dec. 16, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36731
306.
Cited by:
E. Elec. Corp. v. FERD Constr., Inc., 2005 DNH 164, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33256 (D.N.H. 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33256
307.
Followed by:
Downeast Ventures, Ltd. v. Wash. County, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32649 (D. Me. Dec. 12, 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32649
308.
Followed by:
Silva v. Wall, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41119 (D.R.I. Nov. 29, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41119
309.
Followed by:
Silva v. Higgins, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41117 (D.R.I. Nov. 29, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41117
310.
Followed by, Cited by:
Ticket Ctr., Inc. v. Banco Popular De P.R., 399 F. Supp. 2d 79, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27228, 2006-1
Trade Cas. (CCH) P75095 (D.P.R. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Page 65
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Followed by:
399 F. Supp. 2d 79 p.84
Cited by:
399 F. Supp. 2d 79 p.82
311.
Followed by:
Int'l Fid. Ins. Co. v. Sanchez-Ramos, 397 F. Supp. 2d 327, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25807 (D.P.R. 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
397 F. Supp. 2d 327 p.331
312.
Followed by:
Olson v. Velez, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40862 (D.P.R. Sept. 26, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40862
313.
Distinguished by:
Rivera-Feliciano v. Acevedo-Vila, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33779 (D.P.R. Sept. 7, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33779
314.
Followed by:
Robles-Ortiz v. Toledo, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37903 (D.P.R. Sept. 2, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN1,
HN5, HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37903
315.
Followed by:
Adorno v. Ramos, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40820 (D.P.R. July 21, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40820
316.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Colassi v. Hillsborough County Superior Court, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16629 (D.N.H. July 14, 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16629
Followed by:
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16629
317.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Torres v. Carrion, 376 F. Supp. 2d 209, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13941 (D.P.R. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
Distinguished by:
376 F. Supp. 2d 209 p.212
Cited by:
376 F. Supp. 2d 209 p.210
318.
Cited by:
Page 66
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Alberty v. Ashford Presbyterian Cmty. Hosp., 356 F. Supp. 2d 83, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2372 (D.P.R.
2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
356 F. Supp. 2d 83 p.85
319.
Followed by:
Williams v. Me. Supreme Judicial Court Individual Justices, 366 F. Supp. 2d 96, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
2329 (D. Me. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
366 F. Supp. 2d 96 p.97
320.
Cited by:
Alliance of Auto. Mfrs. v. Gwadosky, 353 F. Supp. 2d 97, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1077 (D. Me. 2005)
353 F. Supp. 2d 97 p.109
321.
Cited by:
Williams v. Me. Supreme Judicial Court Individual Justices, 350 F. Supp. 2d 136, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
24462 (D. Me. 2004)
350 F. Supp. 2d 136 p.137
322.
Followed by:
Almeida v. Dias, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23375 (D.R.I. Oct. 27, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23375
323.
Cited by:
Cobb v. Supreme Judicial Court, 334 F. Supp. 2d 60, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17431 (D. Mass. 2004)
334 F. Supp. 2d 60 p.61
324.
Followed by, Cited by:
Cobb v. Supreme Judicial Court, 334 F. Supp. 2d 50, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17409 (D. Mass. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
334 F. Supp. 2d 50 p.52
Cited by:
334 F. Supp. 2d 50 p.51
325.
Cited by:
Palmer v. Wells, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16154 (D. Me. Aug. 11, 2004)
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16154
326.
Followed by, Cited by:
Esso Std. Oil Co. v. Mujica-Cotto, 327 F. Supp. 2d 110, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14576 (D.P.R. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Followed by:
327 F. Supp. 2d 110 p.124
Cited by:
327 F. Supp. 2d 110 p.118
Page 67
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
327.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
S. Union Co. v. Lynch, 321 F. Supp. 2d 328, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11239, 159 Oil & Gas Rep. 1199
(D.R.I. 2004)
Distinguished by:
321 F. Supp. 2d 328 p.337
Cited by:
321 F. Supp. 2d 328 p.335
328.
Distinguished by:
Gionorio v. Gomez, 322 F. Supp. 2d 153, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11747 (D.P.R. 2004)
322 F. Supp. 2d 153 p.158
329.
Followed by:
Johnson v. Bd. of Bar Overseers, 324 F. Supp. 2d 276, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9520 (D. Mass. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
324 F. Supp. 2d 276 p.282
330.
Distinguished by:
Rio Grand Cmty. Health Ctr., Inc. v. Rullan, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27619 (D.P.R. Apr. 29, 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27619
331.
Cited by:
Rio Grande Cmty. Health Ctr., Inc. v. Rullan, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27599 (D.P.R. Mar. 31, 2004)
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27599
332.
Followed by:
Rivera-Schatz v. Rodriguez, 310 F. Supp. 2d 405, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5357 (D.P.R. 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN1, HN5
310 F. Supp. 2d 405 p.409
333.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Ginorio v. Gomez, 301 F. Supp. 2d 122, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1713 (D.P.R. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN9
Distinguished by:
301 F. Supp. 2d 122 p.129
Followed by:
301 F. Supp. 2d 122 p.128
334.
Cited by:
Office of the Child Advocate v. Lindgren, 296 F. Supp. 2d 178, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116, 32 A.L.R. Fed.
2d 178 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
296 F. Supp. 2d 178 p.189
Page 68
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
335.
Cited by:
Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Banfield, 294 F. Supp. 2d 169, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20875 (D.R.I. 2003)
294 F. Supp. 2d 169 p.172
336.
Cited by:
King's Grant Inn v. Town of Gilford, 2003 DNH 185, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19347 (D.N.H. 2003)
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19347
337.
Followed by:
N.H. Fireworks, Inc. v. Comm'r, 2003 DNH 156, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16126 (D.N.H. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16126
338.
Cited by:
Chadwick v. Chadwick, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9957 (D. Me. June 12, 2003)
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9957
339.
Cited by:
Baldi v. Amadon, 2003 DNH 99, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9953 (D.N.H. 2003)
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9953
340.
Cited by:
Lewis v. Maine, 254 F. Supp. 2d 159, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3669 (D. Me. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
254 F. Supp. 2d 159 p.164
341.
Cited by:
Williams v. Individual Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, 245 F. Supp. 2d 221, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
2123 (D. Me. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
245 F. Supp. 2d 221 p.221
342.
Followed by:
Rosenfeld v. Egy, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1302 (D. Mass. Jan. 29, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1302
343.
Followed by:
Liberty Cablevision v. Municipality of Barceloneta, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27851 (D.P.R. Dec. 17, 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27851
344.
Cited by:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Rodriguez, 236 F. Supp. 2d 200, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24611 (D.P.R. 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
236 F. Supp. 2d 200 p.204
Page 69
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
345.
Cited by:
Bloomquist v. Town of Bridgton, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17505 (D. Me. Sept. 11, 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17505
346.
Cited by:
DAVIDSON v. WALL, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15394 (D.R.I. July 22, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
347.
Followed by:
Mitrano v. Martin, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1943 (D.N.H. Jan. 22, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1943
348.
Cited by:
Diva's, Inc. v. City of Bangor, 176 F. Supp. 2d 30, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21268 (D. Me. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
176 F. Supp. 2d 30 p.39
349.
Distinguished by:
Aponte v. Calderon, 176 F. Supp. 2d 135, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20190 (D.P.R. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
176 F. Supp. 2d 135 p.152
350.
Cited by:
Atl. Research Mktg. Sys. v. G.G.&G., L.L.C., 167 F. Supp. 2d 458, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17688 (D. Mass.
2001)
167 F. Supp. 2d 458 p.467
351.
Distinguished by:
Suarez Cestero v. Rosa, 167 F. Supp. 2d 173, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15497 (D.P.R. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
167 F. Supp. 2d 173 p.178
352.
Cited by:
United States v. Puerto Rico, 144 F. Supp. 2d 46, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8089 (D.P.R. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
144 F. Supp. 2d 46 p.53
353.
Cited by:
Tomaiolo v. Transamerica Corp., 131 F. Supp. 2d 280, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1906 (D.R.I. 2001)
131 F. Supp. 2d 280 p.289
354.
Followed by:
Giaimo v. MacKinnon, 2000 DNH 226, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16388 (D.N.H. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16388
Page 70
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
355.
Cited by:
Giaimo v. MacKinnon, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20904 (D.N.H. Sept. 22, 2000)
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20904
356.
Cited by:
Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co. v. Bonsey, 107 F. Supp. 2d 47, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6863, 50 Env't Rep.
Cas. (BNA) 1724 (D. Me. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
107 F. Supp. 2d 47 p.50
357.
Cited by:
Magee v. United States, 93 F. Supp. 2d 161, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5870 (D.R.I. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4
93 F. Supp. 2d 161 p.164
358.
Followed by:
Doyon v. Superintendent, Maine Correctional Ctr., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9696 (D. Me. Mar. 21, 2000)
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9696
359.
Distinguished by:
Coakley Landfill Group v. IT Corp., 116 F. Supp. 2d 244, 2000 DNH 46, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2631
(D.N.H. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
116 F. Supp. 2d 244 p.246
360.
Cited by:
Bach-Tuyet Tran v. Concannon, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2411 (D. Me. Jan. 6, 2000)
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2411
361.
Cited by:
Figueroa v. Chrysler Corp., 79 F. Supp. 2d 20, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19559 (D.P.R. 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
79 F. Supp. 2d 20 p.23
362.
Cited by:
Nowaczyk v. Shaheen, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19774 (D.N.H. Nov. 22, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN9
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19774
363.
Followed by:
Murphy v. City of Manchester, 70 F. Supp. 2d 62, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20324 (D.N.H. 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
70 F. Supp. 2d 62 p.64
364.
Distinguished by:
Indus. Communs. & Elecs., Inc. v. Town of Falmouth, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23128 (D. Me. June 10, 1999)
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23128
Page 71
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
365.
Cited by:
National Pharms., Inc. v. De Melecio, 51 F. Supp. 2d 45, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8171 (D.P.R. 1999)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
51 F. Supp. 2d 45 p.52
366.
Cited by:
Santiago v. Forman, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8115 (D. Mass. Feb. 9, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8115
367.
Cited by:
Huffmire v. Town of Boothbay, 35 F. Supp. 2d 122, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1198 (D. Me. 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
35 F. Supp. 2d 122 p.127
368.
Followed by, Cited by:
El Dia, Inc. v. Rossello, 30 F. Supp. 2d 160, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19026, 27 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1129
(D.P.R. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
30 F. Supp. 2d 160 p.177
Cited by:
30 F. Supp. 2d 160 p.164
369.
Cited by:
Hanscom's Truck Stop v. City of Portsmouth, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18059 (D.N.H. Nov. 10, 1998)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18059
370.
Cited by:
United States v. Charles, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5572 (D. Mass. Jan. 13, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5572
371.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Public Serv. Co. v. Patch, 962 F. Supp. 222, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11299 (D.N.H. 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
962 F. Supp. 222 p.241
Cited by:
962 F. Supp. 222 p.240
372.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Philip Morris Inc. v. Harshbarger, 946 F. Supp. 1067, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18438 (D. Mass. 1996)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
Distinguished by:
946 F. Supp. 1067 p.1078
Page 72
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cited by:
946 F. Supp. 1067 p.1071
946 F. Supp. 1067 p.1076
373.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
United States v. Lewis, 936 F. Supp. 1093, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13228 (D.R.I. 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
936 F. Supp. 1093 p.1108
Cited by:
936 F. Supp. 1093 p.1107
374.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Rojas v. Fitch, 928 F. Supp. 155, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8122 (D.R.I. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
928 F. Supp. 155 p.161
Cited by:
928 F. Supp. 155 p.160
375.
Followed by:
In re Rosa, 196 B.R. 231, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7654 (D.P.R. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
196 B.R. 231 p.234
376.
Cited by:
Converse Constr. Co. v. Massachusetts Bay Transp. Auth., 899 F. Supp. 753, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19932
(D. Mass. 1995)
899 F. Supp. 753 p.762
377.
Distinguished by:
Corporaction Insular De Seguros v. Munoz, 896 F. Supp. 233, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12459 (D.P.R. 1995)
896 F. Supp. 233 p.237
378.
Followed by, Cited by:
Iglecia v. Serrano, 882 F. Supp. 26, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5348 (D.P.R. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
882 F. Supp. 26 p.29
Cited by:
882 F. Supp. 26 p.28
379.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
South Boston Allied War Veterans Council v. City of Boston, 875 F. Supp. 891, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 709
(D. Mass. 1995)
Distinguished by:
Page 73
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
875 F. Supp. 891 p.903
Cited by:
875 F. Supp. 891 p.897
380.
Followed by:
Cioffi v. FDIC, 861 F. Supp. 3, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11695 (D.R.I. 1994)
861 F. Supp. 3 p.6
381.
Cited by:
Ernst & Young v. Depositors Economic Protection Corp., 862 F. Supp. 709, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12822
(D.R.I. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
862 F. Supp. 709 p.715
382.
Followed by, Cited by:
Scott v. Department of Labor & Indus. (In re Scott), 166 B.R. 779, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6130 (D. Mass.
1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
166 B.R. 779 p.782
Cited by:
166 B.R. 779 p.783
166 B.R. 779 p.784
166 B.R. 779 p.785
383.
Followed by, Cited by:
Westvaco Corp., Envelope Div. v. Campbell, 842 F. Supp. 1472, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5286 (D. Mass.
1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
842 F. Supp. 1472 p.1473
Cited by:
842 F. Supp. 1472 p.1475
842 F. Supp. 1472 p.1476
842 F. Supp. 1472 p.1477
384.
Distinguished by:
Fireside Nissan v. Fanning, 828 F. Supp. 989, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10800 (D.R.I. 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
828 F. Supp. 989 p.993
385.
Distinguished by:
Rubin v. Smith, 817 F. Supp. 995, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4401 (D.N.H. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
817 F. Supp. 995 p.999
386.
Cited by:
Radiology Inst., Inc. v. Padilla Rodriguez, 818 F. Supp. 477, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5374 (D.P.R. 1993)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 74
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
818 F. Supp. 477 p.478
387.
Distinguished by:
Rubin v. Smith, 817 F. Supp. 987, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4418 (D.N.H. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
817 F. Supp. 987 p.992
388.
Followed by:
South Boston Allied War Veterans Council v. Zobel, 830 F. Supp. 643, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3631 (D.
Mass. 1993)
830 F. Supp. 643 p.648
389.
Cited by:
Guglielmo v. Cunningham, 811 F. Supp. 31, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 924 (D.N.H. 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
811 F. Supp. 31 p.40
390.
Cited by:
Getty Petroleum Corp. v. Harshbarger, 807 F. Supp. 855, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19081 (D. Mass. 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
807 F. Supp. 855 p.857
391.
Cited by:
Tri-State Rubbish v. Waste Management, 803 F. Supp. 451, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14873, 1992-2 Trade
Cas. (CCH) P69984 (D. Me. 1992)
803 F. Supp. 451 p.463
392.
Cited by:
Bank of New England-Old Colony, N.A. v. Clark, 796 F. Supp. 633, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8825 (D.R.I.
1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
796 F. Supp. 633 p.637
393.
Followed by:
Smothers v. Benitez, 806 F. Supp. 299, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17890, 60 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 616
(D.P.R. 1992)
806 F. Supp. 299 p.302
394.
Distinguished by:
Rivera-Puig v. Garcia Rosario, 785 F. Supp. 278, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1978, 19 Media L. Rep. (BNA)
2011 (D.P.R. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
785 F. Supp. 278 p.286
395.
Cited by:
Rivera-Puig v. Rosario, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2011, 19 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2001 (D.P.R. Jan. 31, 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
396.
Explained by:
Page 75
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Colonial Courts Apartment Co. v. Paradis, 780 F. Supp. 88, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220 (D.R.I. 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
780 F. Supp. 88 p.90
397.
Cited by:
D'Amario v. Salisbury, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15923 (D.R.I. Sept. 27, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN8
398.
Distinguished by:
United States v. Puerto Rico, 764 F. Supp. 220, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6779 (D.P.R. 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
764 F. Supp. 220 p.226
399.
Followed by, Cited by:
H. P. Hood, Inc. v. Commissioner of Agriculture, Food & Rural Resources, 764 F. Supp. 662, 1991 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 6469 (D. Me. 1991)
Followed by:
764 F. Supp. 662 p.665
Cited by:
764 F. Supp. 662 p.672
764 F. Supp. 662 p.677
400.
Cited by:
United States v. Ferrara, 771 F. Supp. 1266, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16081 (D. Mass. 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
771 F. Supp. 1266 p.1282
401.
Cited by:
H. P. Hood, Inc. v. Commissioner of Agriculture, Food & Rural Resources, 764 F. Supp. 662, 1991 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 6580 (D. Me. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
402.
Cited by:
Irizarry Perez v. Mitsubishi Motors Corp., 758 F. Supp. 100, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2780 (D.P.R. 1991)
758 F. Supp. 100 p.101
403.
Distinguished by:
Casa Marie, Inc. v. Superior Court of Puerto Rico for Dist. of Arecibo, 752 F. Supp. 1152, 1990 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 16003 (D.P.R. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
752 F. Supp. 1152 p.1163
752 F. Supp. 1152 p.1164
404.
Cited by:
Van Doren v. Marion Conservation Com., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13421 (D. Mass. Oct. 1, 1990)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
405.
Distinguished by:
Lillios v. Justices of New Hampshire Dist. Court, 735 F. Supp. 43, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4130 (D.N.H.
1990)
Page 76
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
735 F. Supp. 43 p.45
406.
Followed by:
Robles-Pastrana v. Crespo Millian, 729 F. Supp. 1412, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 788 (D.P.R. 1990)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
729 F. Supp. 1412 p.1414
729 F. Supp. 1412 p.1415
407.
Cited by:
Lancellotti v. Fay, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15953 (D.R.I. Nov. 28, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
408.
Followed by:
Bettencourt v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 721 F. Supp. 382, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11774 (D.
Mass. 1989)
721 F. Supp. 382 p.384
409.
Cited by:
In re Roussin, 97 B.R. 130, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2895 (D.N.H. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
97 B.R. 130 p.132
410.
Followed by, Cited by:
Duty Free Shop, Inc. v. Administration de Terrenos, 708 F. Supp. 468, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2640 (D.P.R.
1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
708 F. Supp. 468 p.470
Cited by:
708 F. Supp. 468 p.469
411.
Cited by:
Huertas v. Cruz, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4866 (D.P.R. Feb. 16, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
412.
Cited by:
Neptune v. McCarthy, 706 F. Supp. 958, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1610 (D. Mass. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
706 F. Supp. 958 p.963
413.
Distinguished by:
Shepherd Intelligence Systems, Inc. v. Defense Technologies, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 365, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
16582, 1989-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P68466 (D. Mass. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
702 F. Supp. 365 p.367
414.
Cited by:
Gomez v. Consejo de Titulares de Condominio Cocomar, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11865 (D.P.R. Oct. 18,
1988)
415.
Cited by:
Torres v. Comision Estatal De Elecciones De Puerto Rico, 700 F. Supp. 613, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13007
Page 77
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
(D.P.R. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
700 F. Supp. 613 p.616
416.
Cited by:
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Massachusetts Com. against Discrimination, 695 F. Supp. 1321,
1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10839, 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P38366, 48 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 25 (D.
Mass. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
695 F. Supp. 1321 p.1322
417.
Cited by:
Skinner v. Boston Housing Authority, 690 F. Supp. 109, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7959 (D. Mass. 1988)
690 F. Supp. 109 p.110
418.
Cited by:
In re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation, 687 F. Supp. 716, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4603 (D.P.R.
1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
687 F. Supp. 716 p.725
419.
Distinguished by:
Corporacion Insular de Seguros v. Garcia, 680 F. Supp. 476, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1779 (D.P.R. 1988)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
680 F. Supp. 476 p.478
420.
Cited by:
Young v. Flanagan, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1722 (D. Mass. Feb. 24, 1988)
421.
Cited by:
Hyde Park Partners v. Connolly, 676 F. Supp. 391, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12468 (D. Mass. 1987)
676 F. Supp. 391 p.395
422.
Cited by:
New World Entertainment, Ltd. v. Connolly, 674 F. Supp. 1, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7511 (D. Mass. 1987)
674 F. Supp. 1 p.2
423.
Cited by:
Vega Arriaga v. J.C. Penney, Inc., 658 F. Supp. 117, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3236 (D.P.R. 1987)
658 F. Supp. 117 p.121
424.
Followed by:
Torres Torres v. Hernandez Colon, 656 F. Supp. 372, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2069 (D.P.R. 1987)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
656 F. Supp. 372 p.373
656 F. Supp. 372 p.378
425.
Cited by:
Fratiello v. Mancuso, 653 F. Supp. 775, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1017 (D.R.I. 1987)
Page 78
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
653 F. Supp. 775 p.785
426.
Cited by:
Govan v. Cambridge Housing Authority, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 378 (D. Mass. Jan. 13, 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
427.
Cited by:
Torres-Torres v. Hernandez-Colon, 647 F. Supp. 1212, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18363 (D.P.R. 1986)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
647 F. Supp. 1212 p.1212
428.
Followed by, Cited by:
Blount v. Redmond, 649 F. Supp. 319, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18737 (D. Me. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
649 F. Supp. 319 p.323
Cited by:
649 F. Supp. 319 p.324
649 F. Supp. 319 p.331
429.
Cited by:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. v. BELLOTTI, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
22919 (D. Mass. July 11, 1986)
430.
Cited by:
ROBINSON v. DEPARTMENT OF PUB. UTILS. of MASSACHUSETTS, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24072 (D.
Mass. June 17, 1986)
431.
Distinguished by:
Isla Petroleum Corp. v. Department of Consumer Affairs, 640 F. Supp. 474, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24663
(D.P.R. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
640 F. Supp. 474 p.500
640 F. Supp. 474 p.501
432.
Cited by:
De La Cruz Lachapel v. Chevere Ortiz, 637 F. Supp. 43, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25638 (D.P.R. 1986)
637 F. Supp. 43 p.45
433.
Cited by:
Puerto Rico v. Perez Casillas, 624 F. Supp. 822 (D.P.R. 1985)
624 F. Supp. 822 p.828
434.
Cited by:
Puerto Rico v. Casillas, 624 F. Supp. 822, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23784 (D.P.R. 1985)
435.
Explained by:
Perkins v. Penagaricano Soler, 610 F. Supp. 94, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19861 (D.P.R. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Page 79
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
610 F. Supp. 94 p.97
436.
Followed by:
Planned Parenthood League v. Bellotti, 608 F. Supp. 800, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22682 (D. Mass. 1985)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
608 F. Supp. 800 p.805
437.
Cited by:
LANGTON v. BOUCHER, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21927 (D. Mass. Nov. 16, 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
438.
Cited by:
Grado v. Gross, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24242, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P91660 (D. Mass. Aug. 20, 1984)
439.
Distinguished by:
Dionne v. Bouley, 583 F. Supp. 307, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18343 (D.R.I. 1984)
583 F. Supp. 307 p.311
440.
Cited by:
Coombs v. Ogunquit, 578 F. Supp. 1321, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20079 (D. Me. 1984)
578 F. Supp. 1321 p.1327
441.
Followed by:
Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. Norwood, 579 F. Supp. 108, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20111
(D. Mass. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
579 F. Supp. 108 p.112
442.
Cited by:
Stanton v. Brunswick School Dep't, 577 F. Supp. 1560, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20180 (D. Me. 1984)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
577 F. Supp. 1560 p.1566
443.
Cited by:
Bangor Baptist Church v. Maine, Dep't of Educational & Cultural Services, 576 F. Supp. 1299, 1983 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 10606 (D. Me. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
576 F. Supp. 1299 p.1330
444.
Cited by:
UNITED BOOKS, INC. v. CONTE, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13207 (D. Mass. Sept. 30, 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
445.
Cited by:
Sundel v. Justices of Superior Court, 570 F. Supp. 1131, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14418 (D.R.I. 1983)
570 F. Supp. 1131 p.1133
446.
Cited by:
Schneider v. Colegio de Abogados de Puerto Rico, 572 F. Supp. 957, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16008 (D.P.R.
Page 80
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
572 F. Supp. 957 p.960
447.
Cited by:
Gordon v. Crouchley, 554 F. Supp. 796, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17290 (D.R.I. 1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
554 F. Supp. 796 p.799
448.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Schneider v. Colegio de Abogados de Puerto Rico, 546 F. Supp. 1251, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15715
(D.P.R. 1982)
Distinguished by:
546 F. Supp. 1251 p.1274
Cited by:
546 F. Supp. 1251 p.1256
449.
Cited by:
RUSHIA v. TOWN OF ASHBURNHAM, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14828 (D. Mass. July 30, 1982)
450.
Followed by:
Harvey v. Board of Registration in Nursing, 544 F. Supp. 82, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13815 (D. Mass. 1982)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
544 F. Supp. 82 p.83
451.
Distinguished by:
Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Connolly, 542 F. Supp. 231, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12203, Fed. Sec. L. Rep.
(CCH) P98637 (D. Mass. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
542 F. Supp. 231 p.233
542 F. Supp. 231 p.234
452.
Cited by:
DOW CHEM. INTER-AMERICAN LTD. v. MATOS, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17781 (D.P.R. Mar. 17, 1982)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
453.
Cited by:
Santana v. Collazo, 533 F. Supp. 966, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10757 (D.P.R. 1982)
533 F. Supp. 966 p.972
454.
Cited by:
Sheck v. Baileyville School Committee, 530 F. Supp. 679, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10424 (D. Me. 1982)
530 F. Supp. 679 p.683
455.
Cited by:
Tedford v. Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, 522 F. Supp. 508, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14498 (D.
Mass. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
522 F. Supp. 508 p.511
Page 81
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
456.
Followed by:
Vazquez v. Bougal, 525 F. Supp. 976, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15715 (D.P.R. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
525 F. Supp. 976 p.978
457.
Explained by:
Benson v. Superior Court Dep't of Trial Court, 507 F. Supp. 975, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10838 (D. Mass.
1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
507 F. Supp. 975 p.977
458.
Distinguished by:
Chan v. Brookline, 484 F. Supp. 1283, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10194 (D. Mass. 1980)
484 F. Supp. 1283 p.1285
459.
Cited by:
In re Canarico Quarries, Inc., 466 F. Supp. 1333, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13903, 1 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d
(MB) 50 (D.P.R. 1979)
466 F. Supp. 1333 p.1337
460.
Followed by:
Figueroa v. Puerto Rico, 463 F. Supp. 1212, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14973 (D.P.R. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
463 F. Supp. 1212 p.1213
461.
Cited by:
Fisher v. Board of Selectmen, 453 F. Supp. 881, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16283 (D. Mass. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
453 F. Supp. 881 p.883
462.
Cited by:
Diaz v. Stathis, 440 F. Supp. 634, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13152 (D. Mass. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
440 F. Supp. 634 p.636
463.
Cited by:
Acevedo Montalvo v. Hernandez Colon, 440 F. Supp. 238, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17272 (D.P.R. 1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
440 F. Supp. 238 p.242
464.
Explained by:
Martinez v. Puerto Rico, 435 F. Supp. 1204, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14246 (D.P.R. 1977) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN8
435 F. Supp. 1204 p.1206
435 F. Supp. 1204 p.1207
Page 82
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
465.
Cited by:
Members of Jamestown School Committee v. Schmidt, 427 F. Supp. 1338, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17022
(D.R.I. 1977)
427 F. Supp. 1338 p.1344
466.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Anthony v. Massachusetts, 415 F. Supp. 485, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15869, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH)
P10991, 12 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 915 (D. Mass. 1976)
415 F. Supp. 485 p.502
467.
Cited by:
Ferrer Delgado v. Sylvia De Jesus, 440 F. Supp. 979, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12436 (D.P.R. 1976)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
440 F. Supp. 979 p.982
468.
Followed by:
Dones-Arroyo v. Trias-Monge, 430 F. Supp. 315, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13077 (D.P.R. 1976)
430 F. Supp. 315 p.317
469.
Explained by:
Four Unnamed Plaintiffs v. Hall, 424 F. Supp. 357, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11919 (D. Mass. 1976)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
424 F. Supp. 357 p.362
470.
Harmonized by:
Jackson v. Justices of Superior Court, 423 F. Supp. 50, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12391 (D. Mass. 1976)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
423 F. Supp. 50 p.52
471.
Distinguished by:
Abbott v. Laurie, 422 F. Supp. 976, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12407 (D.R.I. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
422 F. Supp. 976 p.977
472.
Cited by:
Woonsocket Prescription Center, Inc. v. Michaelson, 417 F. Supp. 1250, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13927
(D.R.I. 1976)
417 F. Supp. 1250 p.1255
473.
Distinguished by:
Pollard v. Panora, 411 F. Supp. 580, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15918 (D. Mass. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
411 F. Supp. 580 p.588
474.
Harmonized by:
Maynard v. Wooley, 406 F. Supp. 1381, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16770 (D.N.H. 1976) LexisNexis
Page 83
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5
406 F. Supp. 1381 p.1384
475.
Cited by:
McGarry v. Curvin, 406 F. Supp. 57, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17313 (D.R.I. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
406 F. Supp. 57 p.60
476.
Explained by, Cited by:
Puerto Rico International Airlines, Inc. v. Silva Recio, 432 F. Supp. 218, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14765
(D.P.R. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
432 F. Supp. 218 p.220
Cited by:
432 F. Supp. 218 p.219
477.
Followed by:
Estevez v. Caguas, 430 F. Supp. 266, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16357 (D.P.R. 1975)
430 F. Supp. 266 p.268
478.
Followed by:
Tapia-Tapia v. Division of Appeals of Superior Court, 429 F. Supp. 555, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15878
(D.P.R. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
429 F. Supp. 555 p.557
429 F. Supp. 555 p.558
479.
Cited by:
Puerto Rico International Airlines, Inc. v. Colon, 409 F. Supp. 960, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14903 (D.P.R.
1975)
409 F. Supp. 960 p.964
480.
Cited by:
Canal Nat'l Bank v. Mills, 405 F. Supp. 249, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14747 (D. Me. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4, HN9
405 F. Supp. 249 p.255
481.
Cited by:
Rodos v. Michaelson, 396 F. Supp. 768, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11971 (D.R.I. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
396 F. Supp. 768 p.777
396 F. Supp. 768 p.778
482.
Cited by:
Baird v. Bellotti, 393 F. Supp. 847, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12633 (D. Mass. 1975)
393 F. Supp. 847 p.852
Page 84
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
483.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Dempsey v. McQueeney, 387 F. Supp. 333, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14533 (D.R.I. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
387 F. Supp. 333 p.338
387 F. Supp. 333 p.339
Cited by:
387 F. Supp. 333 p.342
484.
Explained by:
Thames v. Justices of Superior Court, 383 F. Supp. 41, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6372 (D. Mass. 1974)
383 F. Supp. 41 p.45
485.
Cited by:
Gordils v. Maldonado, 377 F. Supp. 1349, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12220 (D.P.R. 1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
377 F. Supp. 1349 p.1350
486.
Limited by, Cited by:
Westcott v. Grice, 375 F. Supp. 569, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9198 (D. Mass. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Limited by:
375 F. Supp. 569 p.573
Cited by:
375 F. Supp. 569 p.572
487.
Cited by:
Almeida v. Lucey, 372 F. Supp. 109, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9508 (D. Mass. 1974)
372 F. Supp. 109 p.111
488.
Cited by:
Oquendo v. Ortiz, 372 F. Supp. 79, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11692 (D.P.R. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
372 F. Supp. 79 p.81
489.
Cited by:
Federacion de Cooperativas de Credito v. Burgos, 366 F. Supp. 1321, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11912
(D.P.R. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
366 F. Supp. 1321 p.1326
366 F. Supp. 1321 p.1328
490.
Distinguished by:
Glenwal Development Corp. v. Schmidt, 356 F. Supp. 67, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11109 (D.P.R. 1972)
356 F. Supp. 67 p.69
Page 85
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
491.
Cited by:
Martinez v. Puerto Rico, 343 F. Supp. 897, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15519 (D.P.R. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
343 F. Supp. 897 p.898
343 F. Supp. 897 p.902
343 F. Supp. 897 p.903
492.
Distinguished by:
People by Ford v. Doorley, 338 F. Supp. 574, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15167 (D.R.I. 1972)
338 F. Supp. 574 p.576
493.
Cited by:
McClellan v. University Heights, Inc., 338 F. Supp. 374, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15100 (D.R.I. 1972)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
338 F. Supp. 374 p.377
494.
Followed by:
Sierra Melendez v. Rivera Brenes, 331 F. Supp. 898, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11607 (D.P.R. 1971)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
331 F. Supp. 898 p.901
331 F. Supp. 898 p.902
495.
Cited by:
Rodriguez Rivera v. Maiz, 331 F. Supp. 713, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13746 (D.P.R. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
331 F. Supp. 713 p.716
496.
Distinguished by:
Consejo General Estudiantes Etc v. University of Puerto Rico, 325 F. Supp. 453, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
14153 (D.P.R. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
325 F. Supp. 453 p.456
325 F. Supp. 453 p.457
1ST CIRCUIT - U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURTS
497.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Explained by:
Mender v. Sosa (In re LR Builders, Inc.), 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 4270 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. Oct. 31, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
2007 Bankr. LEXIS 4270
Followed by:
2007 Bankr. LEXIS 4270
Explained by:
2007 Bankr. LEXIS 4270
Page 86
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
498.
Cited by:
In re Birchall, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 2309 (Bankr. D. Mass. July 3, 2007)
2007 Bankr. LEXIS 2309
499.
Cited by:
Zervoudis v. Massachusetts State Lottery Comm'n , 246 B.R. 470, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 362 (Bankr. D. Mass.
2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
246 B.R. 470 p.474
500.
Cited by:
In re Nashawaty, 119 B.R. 382, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2122, 20 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1795, Bankr. L. Rep.
(CCH) P73648 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
119 B.R. 382 p.385
501.
Followed by:
In re Alten, 108 B.R. 16, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 2132 (Bankr. D.R.I. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
108 B.R. 16 p.17
502.
Followed by:
In re Creative Media Productions, Inc., 108 B.R. 404, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 2129, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH)
P73144 (Bankr. D.R.I. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
108 B.R. 404 p.406
503.
Explained by, Cited by:
In re Roussin, 95 B.R. 270, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 2286, 20 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 691 (Bankr. D.N.H.
1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
95 B.R. 270 p.274
Cited by:
95 B.R. 270 p.272
504.
Cited by:
In re Milone, 73 B.R. 452, 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 691, 15 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1312, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH)
P71840, 16 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 1502 (Bankr. D.N.H. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
73 B.R. 452 p.456
2ND CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
505.
Distinguished by:
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hurlbut, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24163 (2d Cir. N.Y. Nov. 4, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24163
506.
Cited by:
Gunter v. Carrion, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14136 (2d Cir. N.Y. June 30, 2009)
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14136
Page 87
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
507.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
United States v. Fell, 571 F.3d 264, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13029 (2d Cir. 2009)
571 F.3d 264 p.268
508.
Followed by, Cited by:
Morpurgo v. Inc. Vill. of Sag Harbor, 327 Fed. Appx. 284, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 10452 (2d Cir. N.Y.
2009)
Followed by:
327 Fed. Appx. 284 p.286
Cited by:
327 Fed. Appx. 284 p.285
509.
Followed by:
Weinstein v. Bogacz, 320 Fed. Appx. 56, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 7355 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2009)
320 Fed. Appx. 56 p.57
510.
Cited by:
Arar v. Ashcroft, 532 F.3d 157, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13732 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
532 F.3d 157 p.172
511.
Cited by:
N.Y. Civil Liberties Union v. Grandeau, 528 F.3d 122, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 12083 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2008)
528 F.3d 122 p.127
512.
Cited by:
McLamb v. County of Suffolk, 280 Fed. Appx. 107, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 12078 (2d Cir. 2008)
280 Fed. Appx. 107 p.108
513.
Followed by, Cited by:
Beecher v. Dep't of Consumer Prot., 274 Fed. Appx. 88, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 8788 (2d Cir. 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
274 Fed. Appx. 88 p.90
Cited by:
274 Fed. Appx. 88 p.89
514.
Cited by:
DiSimone v. Phillips, 518 F.3d 124, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 4546 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
518 F.3d 124 p.127
515.
Cited by:
Page 88
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Batts v. Artuz, 254 Fed. Appx. 855, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 26177 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2007)
254 Fed. Appx. 855 p.858
516.
Followed by:
Pascazi v. Angello, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 23386 (2d Cir. N.Y. Oct. 4, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 23386
517.
Cited by:
Romero v. Pataki, 241 Fed. Appx. 764, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22405 (2d Cir. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
241 Fed. Appx. 764 p.765
518.
Cited by:
OneSimpleLoan v. United States Sec'y of Educ., 496 F.3d 197, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 17138 (2d Cir. N.Y.
2007)
496 F.3d 197 p.204
519.
Cited by:
Francis v. Pellegrino, 224 Fed. Appx. 107, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11974 (2d Cir. Conn. 2007)
224 Fed. Appx. 107 p.109
520.
Cited by:
Coastal Distrib., LLC v. Town of Babylon, 216 Fed. Appx. 97, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 3042 (2d Cir. N.Y.
2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
216 Fed. Appx. 97 p.101
521.
Cited by:
Affordable Hous. Found., Inc. v. Silva, 469 F.3d 219, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 28303, 25 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA)
583, 153 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P60304 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2006)
469 F.3d 219 p.237
522.
Cited by:
Kaufman v. Kaye, 466 F.3d 83, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 25351 (2d Cir. 2006)
466 F.3d 83 p.86
523.
Followed by:
Yoonessi v. N.Y. State Bd. for Prof'l Med. Conduct, 162 Fed. Appx. 63, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 959 (2d Cir.
N.Y. 2006)
162 Fed. Appx. 63 p.66
524.
Cited by:
Deters v. City of Poughkeepsie, 150 Fed. Appx. 10, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 20214 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
150 Fed. Appx. 10 p.11
Page 89
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
525.
Followed by:
Hindu Temple Soc'y of N. Am. v. Supreme Court of N.Y., 142 Fed. Appx. 492, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14875
(2d Cir. N.Y. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
142 Fed. Appx. 492 p.494
526.
Cited by:
Dairy Mart Convenience Stores, Inc. v. Nickel (In re Dairy Mart Convenience Stores, Inc.), 411 F.3d 367,
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11069, 44 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 244, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P80326, 54 Collier
Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 673, 60 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1666 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
411 F.3d 367 p.373
527.
Cited by:
Ret. Sys. v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 386 F.3d 419, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 21584, Fed. Sec. L. Rep.
(CCH) P93003 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2004)
386 F.3d 419 p.425
528.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Washington v. County of Rockland, 373 F.3d 310, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 12845 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
373 F.3d 310 p.319
Cited by:
373 F.3d 310 p.318
529.
Distinguished by:
Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino, 380 F.3d 83, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24206, 32 Media L. Rep. (BNA)
1801 (2d Cir. Conn. 2004)
380 F.3d 83 p.100
530.
Distinguished by:
Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino, 371 F.3d 49, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11206 (2d Cir. Conn. 2004)
371 F.3d 49 p.67
531.
Followed by, Cited by:
Spargo v. N.Y. State Comm'n on Judicial Conduct, 351 F.3d 65, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 24685 (2d Cir. N.Y.
2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8, HN9
Followed by:
351 F.3d 65 p.74
Cited by:
351 F.3d 65 p.68
351 F.3d 65 p.81
532.
Cited by:
Kern v. Clark, 331 F.3d 9, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10837 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
331 F.3d 9 p.10
Page 90
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
533.
Cited by:
Pathways, Inc. v. Dunne, 329 F.3d 108, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8690 (2d Cir. Conn. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
329 F.3d 108 p.112
534.
Cited by:
Peralta v. Leavitt, 56 Fed. Appx. 534, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 745 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
56 Fed. Appx. 534 p.535
535.
Cited by:
Rosen v. County of Suffolk, 53 Fed. Appx. 578, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 25875 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
53 Fed. Appx. 578 p.580
536.
Cited by:
Lawson v. City of Buffalo, 52 Fed. Appx. 562, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 25876 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2002)
52 Fed. Appx. 562 p.563
537.
Followed by:
Diamond "D" Constr. Corp. v. McGowan, 282 F.3d 191, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3298, 146 Lab. Cas.
(CCH) P59604, 7 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1164 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
282 F.3d 191 p.191
282 F.3d 191 p.197
538.
Followed by, Cited by:
Grieve v. Tamerin, 269 F.3d 149, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22504 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2001)
Followed by:
269 F.3d 149 p.153
Cited by:
269 F.3d 149 p.152
539.
Cited by:
Herrera v. Safir, 17 Fed. Appx. 41, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19254 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
17 Fed. Appx. 41 p.42
540.
Distinguished by:
Rivers v. McLeod, 252 F.3d 99, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 10993 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2001)
252 F.3d 99 p.101
541.
Cited by:
Mollica v. Volker, 229 F.3d 366, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 25141, 31 Envtl. L. Rep. 20167 (2d Cir. N.Y.
2000)
Page 91
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
229 F.3d 366 p.374
542.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Cited by:
Kirschner v. Klemons, 225 F.3d 227, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23793 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
225 F.3d 227 p.239
Followed by:
225 F.3d 227 p.235
Cited by:
225 F.3d 227 p.231
543.
Cited by:
Galvin v. New York, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15051 (2d Cir. N.Y. June 23, 2000)
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15051
544.
Cited by:
American Charities for Reasonable Fundraising Regulation, Inc. v. Shiffrin, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3463
(2d Cir. Feb. 25, 2000)
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3463
545.
Cited by:
Setlech v. United States, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 20150 (2d Cir. N.Y. Aug. 20, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 20150
546.
Cited by:
Jenkins v. Haubert, 179 F.3d 19, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 10780 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1999)
179 F.3d 19 p.22
547.
Cited by:
Village of Westfield v. Welch's, 170 F.3d 116, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3052, 29 Envtl. L. Rep. 21016 (2d
Cir. N.Y. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
170 F.3d 116 p.120
548.
Followed by, Cited by:
Schlagler v. Phillips, 166 F.3d 439, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1120 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
Followed by:
166 F.3d 439 p.442
Cited by:
166 F.3d 439 p.441
549.
Followed by:
Page 92
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Bey v. New York, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31700 (2d Cir. N.Y. Dec. 22, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31700
550.
Cited by:
Fleet Bank, N.A. v. Burke, 160 F.3d 883, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 28218 (2d Cir. Conn. 1998) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
160 F.3d 883 p.890
551.
Cited by:
Sei Young Choi v. Young Jin Kim, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 27987 (2d Cir. N.Y. Oct. 26, 1998)
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 27987
552.
Cited by:
Hachamovitch v. Debuono, 159 F.3d 687, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 24870 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1998) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
159 F.3d 687 p.696
553.
Cited by:
Dittmer v. County of Suffolk, 146 F.3d 113, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 11706, 28 Envtl. L. Rep. 21377 (2d Cir.
N.Y. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
146 F.3d 113 p.115
554.
Cited by:
Corsini v. Ross, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10450 (2d Cir. N.Y. May 11, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10450
555.
Distinguished by:
Philip Morris, Inc. v. Blumenthal, 123 F.3d 103, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23909, 1997-2 Trade Cas. (CCH)
P71924 (2d Cir. Conn. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
123 F.3d 103 p.105
556.
Cited by:
Hernandez v. City of New York, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13767 (2d Cir. N.Y. June 6, 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
557.
Cited by:
Davidson v. Garry, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 9839 (2d Cir. N.Y. May 2, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
558.
Cited by:
Sanitation & Recycling Indus. v. City of New York, 107 F.3d 985, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3600 (2d Cir.
N.Y. 1997)
107 F.3d 985 p.992
559.
Cited by:
Hernandez v. United States Family Court, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 184 (2d Cir. N.Y. Jan. 7, 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 184
Page 93
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
560.
Cited by:
Estes-El v. New York, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30740 (2d Cir. N.Y. Nov. 25, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
561.
Cited by:
Fighting Finest v. Bratton, 95 F.3d 224, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28748 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
95 F.3d 224 p.228
562.
Cited by:
Hernandez v. New York City Law Dep't Corp. Counsel, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20880 (2d Cir. Aug. 14,
1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
563.
Cited by:
In re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos Litig., 78 F.3d 764, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 2765, 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d
(Callaghan) 357 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
78 F.3d 764 p.775
564.
Cited by:
Slater v. Thomas, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 2902 (2d Cir. Conn. Feb. 20, 1996)
565.
Cited by:
Greenwich Citizens Comm. v. Counties of Warren & Washington Indus. Dev. Agency, 77 F.3d 26, 1996 U.S.
App. LEXIS 2512 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
77 F.3d 26 p.30
566.
Cited by:
Doe v. Connecticut Dep't of Health Servs., 75 F.3d 81, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 295, 5 Am. Disabilities Cas.
(BNA) 199, 14 Am. Disabilities Dec. 166 (2d Cir. Conn. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
75 F.3d 81 p.84
567.
Cited by:
Lebron v. AMTRAK, 69 F.3d 650, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 31016 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
69 F.3d 650 p.659
568.
Cited by:
Collins v. Morsillo, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 28879 (2d Cir. N.Y. Sept. 12, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
569.
Cited by:
Tribune Co. v. Abiola, 66 F.3d 12, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25726, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide P8891 (2d Cir.
N.Y. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
66 F.3d 12 p.15
570.
Followed by:
Hansel v. Town Court, 56 F.3d 391, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 13048 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1995) LexisNexis
Page 94
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5
56 F.3d 391 p.392
571.
Cited by:
Gentner v. Shulman, 55 F.3d 87, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 12297 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
55 F.3d 87 p.89
572.
Cited by:
Youell v. Exxon Corp., 48 F.3d 105, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 3625, 1995 A.M.C. 1147 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1995)
48 F.3d 105 p.109
573.
Distinguished by:
Williams v. Lambert, 46 F.3d 1275, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2196 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
46 F.3d 1275 p.1282
574.
Distinguished by:
Nosik v. Singe, 40 F.3d 592, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33129 (2d Cir. Conn. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN9
40 F.3d 592 p.595
575.
Cited by:
Cullen v. Fliegner, 18 F.3d 96, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3647 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
18 F.3d 96 p.103
576.
Cited by:
Washington v. James, 996 F.2d 1442, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 15990 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
996 F.2d 1442 p.1449
577.
Explained by:
In re "Agent Orange" Prod. Liab. Litig., 996 F.2d 1425, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 15365 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1993)
996 F.2d 1425 p.1432
578.
Cited by:
Bethphage Lutheran Service, Inc. v. Weicker, 965 F.2d 1239, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 13063, 37 Soc. Sec.
Rep. Service 458 (2d Cir. Conn. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
965 F.2d 1239 p.1242
579.
Cited by:
In re Pan American Corp., 950 F.2d 839, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28859, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P74377, 26
Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 20 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1991)
950 F.2d 839 p.846
Page 95
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
580.
Distinguished by:
City of Hartford v. Chase, 942 F.2d 130, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 18995, 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan)
995, 19 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1172 (2d Cir. Conn. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
942 F.2d 130 p.136
581.
Explained by:
Temple of Lost Sheep, Inc. v. Abrams, 930 F.2d 178, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5673 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1991)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
930 F.2d 178 p.182
582.
Followed by:
Mason v. Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Appellate Div. of Supreme Court, etc., 894 F.2d 512, 1990
U.S. App. LEXIS 627 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
894 F.2d 512 p.513
583.
Explained by:
Cecos Int'l, Inc. v. Jorling, 895 F.2d 66, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 296, 30 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1940, 20
Envtl. L. Rep. 20428 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
895 F.2d 66 p.70
584.
Cited by:
De Cisneros v. Younger, 871 F.2d 305, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4848 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
871 F.2d 305 p.307
585.
Followed by, Cited by:
Davis v. Lansing, 851 F.2d 72, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9176 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
851 F.2d 72 p.76
Cited by:
851 F.2d 72 p.73
851 F.2d 72 p.74
586.
Cited by:
University Club v. New York, 842 F.2d 37, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3491 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
842 F.2d 37 p.40
587.
Cited by:
American Disposal Services, Inc. v. O'Brien, 839 F.2d 84, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1805, 27 Env't Rep. Cas.
(BNA) 1468 (2d Cir. Conn. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
839 F.2d 84 p.87
588.
Cited by:
Page 96
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Christ the King Regional High School v. Culvert, 815 F.2d 219, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 4033, 124 L.R.R.M.
(BNA) 3193, 106 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P12347 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
815 F.2d 219 p.224
589.
Cited by:
Barr v. Abrams, 810 F.2d 358, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1541 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
810 F.2d 358 p.360
590.
Distinguished by:
Law Enforcement Ins. Co. v. Corcoran, 807 F.2d 38, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34900 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1986)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
807 F.2d 38 p.40
591.
Followed by, Cited by:
Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 784 F.2d 1133, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22524 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
784 F.2d 1133 p.1149
Cited by:
784 F.2d 1133 p.1140
784 F.2d 1133 p.1151
592.
Cited by:
Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health Care, 782 F.2d 24, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21448
(2d Cir. Conn. 1986)
782 F.2d 24 p.26
593.
Explained by:
Palmieri v. New York, 779 F.2d 861, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 25798, 4 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 283,
1986-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P66905 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
779 F.2d 861 p.865
594.
Cited by:
Berger v. Heckler, 771 F.2d 1556, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 22757 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4
771 F.2d 1556 p.1563
595.
Cited by:
Powers v. McGuigan, 769 F.2d 72, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20975 (2d Cir. Conn. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
769 F.2d 72 p.73
596.
Cited by:
Telesco v. Telesco Fuel & Masons' Materials, Inc., 765 F.2d 356, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 19982 (2d Cir.
Conn. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 97
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
765 F.2d 356 p.361
597.
Cited by:
Arkwright-Boston Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v. New York, 762 F.2d 205, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 31213, 3 Fed. R.
Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 467 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
762 F.2d 205 p.209
598.
Followed by:
Morano v. Dillon, 746 F.2d 942, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17521 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
746 F.2d 942 p.944
599.
Cited by:
Powers v. Coe, 728 F.2d 97, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25539 (2d Cir. Conn. 1984)
728 F.2d 97 p.98
600.
Cited by:
Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. Ilsley, 690 F.2d 323, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25153, 3 Employee
Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2141 (2d Cir. Conn. 1982)
690 F.2d 323 p.326
601.
Followed by, Cited by:
Brache v. County of Westchester, 658 F.2d 47, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18406 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1981)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
658 F.2d 47 p.51
Cited by:
658 F.2d 47 p.53
658 F.2d 47 p.54
602.
Cited by:
In re National Hospital & Institutional Builders Co., 658 F.2d 39, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18420, 8 Bankr.
Ct. Dec. (LRP) 236, 24 Collier Bankr. Cas. (MB) 520 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1981)
658 F.2d 39 p.43
603.
Followed by, Cited by:
Giulini v. Blessing, 654 F.2d 189, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11754 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1981)
Followed by:
654 F.2d 189 p.193
Cited by:
654 F.2d 189 p.192
604.
Cited by:
United Federation of Teachers Welfare Fund v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1310, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 13404,
26 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P31882, 31 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1788 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1981) LexisNexis
Page 98
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5
650 F.2d 1310 p.1311
605.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Levy v. Lewis, 635 F.2d 960, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 12351 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Distinguished by:
635 F.2d 960 p.969
Followed by:
635 F.2d 960 p.964
635 F.2d 960 p.965
606.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Singleton v. New York, 632 F.2d 185, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 13683 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1980)
632 F.2d 185 p.196
607.
Cited by:
Nash v. Califano, 613 F.2d 10, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 21567 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1980)
613 F.2d 10 p.14
608.
Cited by:
Star Distributors, Ltd. v. Marino, 613 F.2d 4, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 21697, 57 A.L.R. Fed. 494 (2d Cir.
N.Y. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
613 F.2d 4 p.8
613 F.2d 4 p.9
609.
Cited by:
St. Martin's Press, Inc. v. Carey, 605 F.2d 41, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 17701, 4 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1968
(2d Cir. N.Y. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
605 F.2d 41 p.44
610.
Followed by:
Leigh v. McGuire, 613 F.2d 380, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9513 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
613 F.2d 380 p.383
611.
Cited by:
Alma Soc. v. Mellon, 601 F.2d 1225, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13736 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1979)
601 F.2d 1225 p.1229
612.
Cited by:
Federman v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 597 F.2d 798, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 15712, 27 Fed. R. Serv.
2d (Callaghan) 48 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
597 F.2d 798 p.808
Page 99
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
613.
Cited by:
Heimbach v. Lyons, 597 F.2d 344, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 15126 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
597 F.2d 344 p.347
614.
Distinguished by:
Drayton v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 117, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 17890 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1979)
589 F.2d 117 p.121
615.
Cited by:
Schachter v. Whalen, 581 F.2d 35, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10049 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1978)
581 F.2d 35 p.36
616.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Turpin v. Mailet, 579 F.2d 152, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10868 (2d Cir. Conn. 1978)
579 F.2d 152 p.184
617.
Explained by:
Marshall v. Chase Manhattan Bank (Nat'l Asso.), 558 F.2d 680, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12333, 1 Employee
Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1796 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
558 F.2d 680 p.683
618.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Wright v. Chief of Transit Police, 558 F.2d 67, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13018, 2 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1980
(2d Cir. N.Y. 1977)
558 F.2d 67 p.73
619.
Distinguished by:
American Broadcasting Cos. v. Cuomo, 570 F.2d 1080, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11452 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
570 F.2d 1080 p.1084
620.
Distinguished by:
Image Carrier Corp. v. Beame, 567 F.2d 1197, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5396, 97 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2259, 83
Lab. Cas. (CCH) P55108 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
567 F.2d 1197 p.1201
621.
Cited by:
Friedman v. Beame, 558 F.2d 1107, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12352 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1977) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
558 F.2d 1107 p.1110
622.
Cited by:
Overmyer v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 554 F.2d 539, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13559 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1977)
554 F.2d 539 p.543
Page 100
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
623.
Cited by:
Person v. Association of Bar, 554 F.2d 534, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13598, 1977-1 Trade Cas. (CCH)
P61412 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1977)
554 F.2d 534 p.537
624.
Cited by:
Frankos v. LaVallee, 535 F.2d 1346, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12241 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
535 F.2d 1346 p.1347
625.
Followed by:
United States ex rel. Scranton v. New York, 532 F.2d 292, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12376 (2d Cir. N.Y.
1976)
532 F.2d 292 p.295
626.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Martin v. Merola, 532 F.2d 191, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12976 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1976)
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
532 F.2d 191 p.198
Cited by:
532 F.2d 191 p.195
627.
Followed by:
Gold v. Connecticut, 531 F.2d 91, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12681 (2d Cir. Conn. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
531 F.2d 91 p.92
628.
Cited by:
Mendez v. Heller, 530 F.2d 457, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12897 (2d Cir. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
530 F.2d 457 p.461
629.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Hagans v. Wyman, 527 F.2d 1151, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11527 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4
527 F.2d 1151 p.1155
630.
Cited by:
United States v. Bell, 524 F.2d 202, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12458 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1975)
524 F.2d 202 p.209
631.
Followed by:
McCune v. Frank, 521 F.2d 1152, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 13659, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P10317 (2d
Cir. N.Y. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
521 F.2d 1152 p.1157
Page 101
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
632.
Followed by, Explained by:
Wallace v. Kern, 520 F.2d 400, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 16783 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
520 F.2d 400 p.404
520 F.2d 400 p.407
Explained by:
520 F.2d 400 p.407
633.
Followed by:
Bedrosian v. Mintz, 518 F.2d 396, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14084 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
518 F.2d 396 p.399
518 F.2d 396 p.400
634.
Cited by:
J. v. Bar Asso. of Erie County, 515 F.2d 435, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15325 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1975)
515 F.2d 435 p.437
635.
Cited by:
Anonymous v. Association of the Bar, 515 F.2d 427, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15326 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1975)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
515 F.2d 427 p.430
515 F.2d 427 p.434
636.
Followed by:
Gwathmey v. East Hampton, 512 F.2d 1318, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15550 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1975)
512 F.2d 1318 p.1318
637.
Followed by, Explained by, Cited by:
Gajon Bar & Grill, Inc. v. Kelly, 508 F.2d 1317, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 5774 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1974)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
Followed by:
508 F.2d 1317 p.1319
508 F.2d 1317 p.1321
Explained by:
508 F.2d 1317 p.1323
Cited by:
508 F.2d 1317 p.1320
638.
Cited by:
Plano v. Baker, 504 F.2d 595, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6521 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
504 F.2d 595 p.597
Page 102
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
639.
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Salem Inn, Inc. v. Frank, 501 F.2d 18, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7955 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
501 F.2d 18 p.20
501 F.2d 18 p.22
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
501 F.2d 18 p.23
640.
Cited by:
Wallace v. Kern, 499 F.2d 1345, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7747 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1974)
499 F.2d 1345 p.1347
641.
Explained by, Cited by:
414 Theater Corp. v. Murphy, 499 F.2d 1155, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8568 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Explained by:
499 F.2d 1155 p.1156
Cited by:
499 F.2d 1155 p.1158
499 F.2d 1155 p.1160
499 F.2d 1155 p.1161
499 F.2d 1155 p.1162
642.
Explained by:
Blouin v. Dembitz, 489 F.2d 488, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6479 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
489 F.2d 488 p.489
643.
Followed by, Cited by:
Citizens for a Better Environment, Inc. v. Nassau County, 488 F.2d 1353, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7014 (2d
Cir. N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
488 F.2d 1353 p.1359
488 F.2d 1353 p.1361
Cited by:
488 F.2d 1353 p.1360
644.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Tang v. Appellate Div. of New York Supreme Court, First Dep't, 487 F.2d 138, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7428
(2d Cir. N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
487 F.2d 138 p.146
645.
Followed by:
Reilly v. Doyle, 483 F.2d 123, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8582 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 103
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN5
483 F.2d 123 p.127
646.
Cited by:
Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller, 477 F.2d 375, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10429 (2d Cir.
N.Y. 1973)
477 F.2d 375 p.378
647.
Cited by:
Boraas v. Belle Terre, 476 F.2d 806, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11422 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
476 F.2d 806 p.810
476 F.2d 806 p.811
648.
Distinguished by:
Thoms v. Heffernan, 473 F.2d 478, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 12267 (2d Cir. Conn. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN9
473 F.2d 478 p.482
473 F.2d 478 p.485
649.
Followed by:
Canal Theatres, Inc. v. Murphy, 473 F.2d 4, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11978 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
473 F.2d 4 p.6
650.
Harmonized by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Erdmann v. Stevens, 458 F.2d 1205, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10108 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Harmonized by:
458 F.2d 1205 p.1208
458 F.2d 1205 p.1210
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
458 F.2d 1205 p.1212
458 F.2d 1205 p.1213
Cited by:
458 F.2d 1205 p.1211
651.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Goodman v. Kehl, 456 F.2d 863, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10752 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1972)
456 F.2d 863 p.870
652.
Cited by:
Reid v. Board of Education, 453 F.2d 238, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6618 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN7
453 F.2d 238 p.240
Page 104
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
653.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller, 453 F.2d 12, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6822, 15 Fed. R.
Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 787 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
453 F.2d 12 p.26
Cited by:
453 F.2d 12 p.22
654.
Cited by:
Abele v. Markle, 452 F.2d 1121, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6636 (2d Cir. Conn. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
452 F.2d 1121 p.1124
452 F.2d 1121 p.1126
655.
Cited by:
Leslie v. Matzkin, 450 F.2d 310, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7329 (2d Cir. Conn. 1971)
450 F.2d 310 p.312
656.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Cortright v. Resor, 447 F.2d 245, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8419 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1971)
447 F.2d 245 p.258
657.
Distinguished by:
United States ex rel. Williams v. Zelker, 445 F.2d 451, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9140 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1971)
445 F.2d 451 p.455
658.
Cited by:
Hull v. Petrillo, 439 F.2d 1184, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11302 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
439 F.2d 1184 p.1186
2ND CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
659.
Cited by:
HSBC Bank USA v. New York City Comm'n on Human Rights, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110112 (S.D.N.Y.
Nov. 25, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110112
660.
Cited by:
Tucker v. R.V.C. Hous. Auth., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97424 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 18, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97424
661.
Cited by:
Langdell v. Marcoux, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96159 (D. Vt. Oct. 13, 2009)
Page 105
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96159
662.
Followed by:
MacPherson v. Town of Southampton, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91339 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91339
663.
Cited by:
Bloomfield v. Wursenberger, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95924 (N.D.N.Y Sept. 18, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95924
664.
Cited by:
Crowell v. Kirkpatrick, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105410 (D. Vt. Sept. 14, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105410
665.
Cited by:
Capponi v. Murphy, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83774 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 11, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83774
666.
Followed by:
Toriola v. N. Shore LIJ, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67385 (E.D.N.Y. July 29, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67385
667.
Cited by:
Bailey v. Pataki, 636 F. Supp. 2d 288, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59017 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
636 F. Supp. 2d 288 p.296
668.
Cited by:
Pratt v. Hogan, 631 F. Supp. 2d 192, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63086 (N.D.N.Y 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
631 F. Supp. 2d 192 p.195
669.
Cited by:
Aretakis v. Comm. on Prof'l Stds., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56138 (S.D.N.Y. July 1, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56138
670.
Distinguished by:
Chase Group Alliance LLC v. City of New York Dep't of Fin., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51248 (S.D.N.Y. May
27, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51248
671.
Cited by:
Glatzer v. Barone, 614 F. Supp. 2d 450, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50067 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)
Page 106
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
614 F. Supp. 2d 450 p.470
672.
Followed by, Cited by:
Glatzer v. Barone, 614 F. Supp. 2d 450, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37099 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
614 F. Supp. 2d 450 p.458
Cited by:
614 F. Supp. 2d 450 p.451
673.
Followed by:
Chandler v. Carroll, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37162 (D. Vt. Apr. 30, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37162
674.
Cited by:
Stone v. Patchett, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35049 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 23, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35049
675.
Followed by:
Harvey v. 320 Owners Corp., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61007 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 20, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61007
676.
Followed by:
Wilson v. Emond, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27521 (D. Conn. Apr. 1, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27521
677.
Cited by:
Glatzer v. Barone, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26315 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26315
678.
Cited by:
Langdell v. Marcoux, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26200 (D. Vt. Mar. 30, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26200
679.
Cited by:
Norton v. Town of Islip, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27565 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27565
680.
Distinguished by:
Rodriguez v. Diaz, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24960 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24960
Page 107
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
681.
Followed by:
Wenyi Wang v. City of New York, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20935 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20935
682.
Followed by:
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hurlbut, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23742 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23742
683.
Followed by:
Brown v. Comm'r of the Admin. for Children's Servs., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20144 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9,
2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20144
684.
Cited by:
Hines v. Gandham, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16783 (N.D.N.Y Mar. 3, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16783
685.
Followed by:
Garten v. Hochman, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7737 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 28, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7737
686.
Cited by:
Sullivan v. Hyland, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109727 (D. Conn. Nov. 21, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109727
687.
Distinguished by:
Finnan v. Ryan, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90824 (N.D.N.Y Nov. 6, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90824
688.
Followed by:
Arbitron Inc. v. Cuomo, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86573 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86573
689.
Cited by:
Jamaica Hosp. Med. Ctr., Inc. v. United Health Group, Inc., 584 F. Supp. 2d 489, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
106709 (E.D.N.Y. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
584 F. Supp. 2d 489 p.493
690.
Cited by:
Glatzer v. Enron Corp., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78696 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 29, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78696
691.
Followed by:
Page 108
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cuomo v. Dreamland Amusements, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71432 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 22, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71432
692.
Followed by:
333 E. 60th St., Inc. v. N.Y. State Liquor Auth., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67441 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 27, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67441
693.
Followed by:
Monaco v. Hogan, 576 F. Supp. 2d 335, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70510 (E.D.N.Y. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
576 F. Supp. 2d 335 p.355
694.
Followed by:
Gyadu v. Superior Court of Waterbury, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63546 (D. Conn. July 31, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63546
695.
Followed by:
O'Neill v. Tito Hernandez, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58452 (S.D.N.Y. July 31, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58452
696.
Followed by:
Hernandez v. Carbone, 567 F. Supp. 2d 320, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57264 (D. Conn. 2008)
567 F. Supp. 2d 320 p.332
697.
Distinguished by:
Henderson v. Heffler, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56701 (W.D.N.Y. July 24, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56701
698.
Followed by:
Miller v. Hourihane, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55031 (E.D.N.Y. July 17, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55031
699.
Distinguished by:
Crandall v. David, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54320 (N.D.N.Y July 16, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54320
700.
Cited by:
O'Neill v. Hernandez, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48269 (S.D.N.Y. June 24, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48269
701.
Followed by:
Page 109
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Bradley v. Lawlor, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43206 (D. Conn. June 2, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43206
702.
Cited by:
City of New York v. Milhelm Attea & Bros., Inc., 550 F. Supp. 2d 332, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35465
(E.D.N.Y. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
550 F. Supp. 2d 332 p.342
703.
Followed by:
Ray v. Paterson, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30834 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30834
704.
Followed by:
Krug v. County of Rennselaer, 559 F. Supp. 2d 223, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73651 (N.D.N.Y 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
559 F. Supp. 2d 223 p.248
705.
Cited by:
United States v. N.Y. State Supreme Court, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7705, 101 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 742, 2008-1
U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50192 (W.D.N.Y. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7705
706.
Followed by:
Wingate v. New York City, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109183 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109183
707.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Sierra v. City of New York, 528 F. Supp. 2d 465, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
528 F. Supp. 2d 465 p.469
Cited by:
528 F. Supp. 2d 465 p.467
708.
Followed by:
Hart v. Felder, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89915 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89915
709.
Distinguished by:
Akwesi v. Uptown Lube & C/W, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89605 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89605
710.
Followed by:
Page 110
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Mirka United, Inc. v. Cuomo, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87385 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 27, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87385
711.
Followed by:
Morpurgo v. Inc. Vill. of Sag Harbor, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83172 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 8, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83172
712.
Followed by:
Senior v. New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96750 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96750
713.
Cited by:
Morpurgo v. Inc. Vill. of Sag Harbor, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98835 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98835
714.
Followed by:
Houston v. Horn, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75335 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 9, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75335
715.
Cited by:
Schwartz v. Dennison, 518 F. Supp. 2d 560, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72564 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
518 F. Supp. 2d 560 p.568
716.
Followed by:
Myer v. Backus, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73794 (D. Vt. Sept. 28, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73794
717.
Followed by:
J. & W. Seligman & Co. v. Spitzer, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71881 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 26, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71881
718.
Cited by:
Green Mt. Chrysler Plymouth Dodge Jeep v. Crombie, 508 F. Supp. 2d 295, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67617,
66 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1157, 37 Envtl. L. Rep. 20232, 74 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 551 (D. Vt. 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
508 F. Supp. 2d 295 p.350
719.
Distinguished by:
Diabo v. Delisle, 500 F. Supp. 2d 159, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85393 (N.D.N.Y 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
500 F. Supp. 2d 159 p.170
Page 111
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
720.
Cited by:
Robinson v. Cusack, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50073 (E.D.N.Y. July 10, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50073
721.
Cited by:
Mathis v. United States, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47835 (E.D.N.Y. June 29, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47835
722.
Distinguished by:
Goldstein v. Pataki, 488 F. Supp. 2d 254, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41216 (E.D.N.Y. 2007)
488 F. Supp. 2d 254 p.278
723.
Cited by:
Harris v. Nassau County Police Dep't, Detective Div., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37902 (E.D.N.Y. May 22,
2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37902
724.
Cited by:
Gero v. Hofmann, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35012 (D. Vt. May 14, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35012
725.
Followed by:
Asirus Ma'At El v. Bronx Crim. Court, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30680 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 19, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30680
726.
Cited by:
Five Borough Bicycle Club v. City of New York, 483 F. Supp. 2d 351, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28269
(S.D.N.Y. 2007)
483 F. Supp. 2d 351 p.365
727.
Followed by:
Williams v. Bennett, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27104 (N.D.N.Y Apr. 12, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27104
728.
Cited by:
Murray v. Admin. for Children's Servs., 476 F. Supp. 2d 436, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17587 (S.D.N.Y.
2007)
476 F. Supp. 2d 436 p.438
729.
Distinguished by:
Goldstein v. Pataki, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44491 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 23, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44491
Page 112
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
730.
Distinguished by:
Abrahams v. Appellate Div. of the Supreme Court, 473 F. Supp. 2d 550, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9104
(S.D.N.Y. 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
473 F. Supp. 2d 550 p.558
731.
Cited by:
Murray v. Williams, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11321 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 7, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11321
732.
Followed by:
Rivers v. Immigration, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8449 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8449
733.
Distinguished by:
Wiesner v. Nardelli, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5801 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5801
734.
Followed by:
Harris v. Reilly, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4714 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4714
735.
Followed by:
Ponterio v. Kaye, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4105 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4105
736.
Followed by:
El v. Warden of Rikers Island, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95708 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95708
737.
Followed by:
Bhatia v. Conway, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91396 (D. Conn. Dec. 19, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91396
738.
Followed by, Cited by:
Miller v. County of Nassau, 467 F. Supp. 2d 308, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90329 (E.D.N.Y. 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
467 F. Supp. 2d 308 p.318
Cited by:
467 F. Supp. 2d 308 p.316
739.
Distinguished by:
Page 113
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Carroll v. Ragaglia, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89615 (D. Conn. Dec. 12, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89615
740.
Followed by, Cited by:
Bess v. Spitzer, 459 F. Supp. 2d 191, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83966 (E.D.N.Y. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
459 F. Supp. 2d 191 p.204
Cited by:
459 F. Supp. 2d 191 p.198
741.
Cited by:
Turedi v. Coca Cola Co., 460 F. Supp. 2d 507, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80591 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)
460 F. Supp. 2d 507 p.515
742.
Followed by:
Eleazer v. DA Suffolk County, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80193 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80193
743.
Followed by:
Chittenden v. Connors, 460 F. Supp. 2d 463, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80945 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)
460 F. Supp. 2d 463 p.468
744.
Distinguished by:
McLean-Katter, LLC v. Keegan, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76591 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 20, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76591
745.
Cited by:
Dorsett-Felicelli, Inc. v. County of Clinton, 498 F. Supp. 2d 515, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73362 (N.D.N.Y
2006)
498 F. Supp. 2d 515 p.516
746.
Cited by:
Anderson v. Chou, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65305 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 12, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65305
747.
Cited by:
Williams v. Horn, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64852 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 11, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64852
748.
Cited by:
Heelan v. Goord, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55846 (N.D.N.Y Aug. 10, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN9
Page 114
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55846
749.
Cited by:
Williams v. Horn, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56312 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 7, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56312
750.
Cited by:
Thompson v. City of New York, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50011 (E.D.N.Y. July 18, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50011
751.
Followed by:
Kennedy v. Kaplan, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44397 (D. Conn. June 29, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44397
752.
Cited by:
Van Aernam v. Nenno, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38402 (W.D.N.Y. June 9, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38402
753.
Followed by, Cited by:
McCulley v. N.Y.S. Dep't of Envtl. Conservation, 593 F. Supp. 2d 422, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33748
(N.D.N.Y 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
593 F. Supp. 2d 422 p.434
Cited by:
593 F. Supp. 2d 422 p.425
754.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
McCulley v. N.Y. State Dep't of Envtl. Conservation, 593 F. Supp. 2d 422, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98204
(N.D.N.Y 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
593 F. Supp. 2d 422 p.445
Cited by:
593 F. Supp. 2d 422 p.440
755.
Followed by:
Manculich v. Bucci, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22930 (N.D.N.Y Apr. 25, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22930
756.
Followed by:
Webster v. Nat'l Fuel Gas Supply Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18357 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 3, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18357
757.
Followed by:
Romero v. Pataki, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14276 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 115
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14276
758.
Followed by:
Gorelik v. Lippman, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18679 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 22, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18679
759.
Cited by:
Posr v. N.Y. State Court Officer, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13934 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 13, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13934
760.
Cited by:
Steinberg v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 418 F. Supp. 2d 215, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8593 (E.D.N.Y. 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
418 F. Supp. 2d 215 p.223
761.
Distinguished by:
Abrahams v. Appellate Div. of the Supreme Court, 473 F. Supp. 2d 550, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96095
(S.D.N.Y. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
473 F. Supp. 2d 550 p.565
762.
Criticized by, Cited by:
United States v. Hamburger, 414 F. Supp. 2d 219, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5343 (E.D.N.Y. 2006)
Criticized by:
414 F. Supp. 2d 219 p.223
Cited by:
414 F. Supp. 2d 219 p.222
763.
Distinguished by:
Coastal Distrib., LLC v. Town of Babylon, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8400 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8400
764.
Followed by:
Lomtevas v. Cardozo, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5820 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5820
765.
Cited by:
Smalls v. Doe # 1, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8426 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8426
766.
Cited by:
Spickerman v. Carr, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1540 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 17, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1540
Page 116
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
767.
Followed by:
Valdez v. Town of Brookhaven, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36713 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36713
768.
Cited by:
Dunbar v. McKirdy, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28334 (D. Conn. Nov. 3, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28334
769.
Cited by:
Gams v. Westchester County Dep't of Prob., 232 F.R.D. 202, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25913 (S.D.N.Y.
2005)
232 F.R.D. 202 p.205
770.
Cited by:
Larobina v. Comm'r of Transp., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44947 (D. Conn. Oct. 26, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44947
771.
Cited by:
New York Jets LLC v. Cablevision Sys. Corp., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23763, 2005-2 Trade Cas. (CCH)
P74970 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23763
772.
Followed by:
Wells v. Miriani, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23888 (D. Conn. Oct. 12, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23888
773.
Cited by:
Elfire, LLC v. Spray (Parcel 6) P'ship, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23886 (D. Conn. Oct. 11, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23886
774.
Followed by:
Greene v. Wright, 389 F. Supp. 2d 416, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27132 (D. Conn. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
389 F. Supp. 2d 416 p.423
775.
Cited by:
Lusk v. Village of Cold Spring, 418 F. Supp. 2d 314, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18021 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)
418 F. Supp. 2d 314 p.318
776.
Cited by:
Galland v. Margules, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17125 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17125
Page 117
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
777.
Distinguished by:
Remigio v. Kelly, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16789 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 2, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16789
778.
Cited by:
ECOR Solutions, Inc. v. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42993 (N.D.N.Y July 29, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42993
779.
Cited by:
Coastal Distrib., LLC v. Town of Babylon, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40795 (E.D.N.Y. July 15, 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40795
780.
Cited by:
Gams v. Westchester County Dep't of Prob., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14038 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14038
781.
Followed by:
Rolle v. McCarthy, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45764 (E.D.N.Y. June 21, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45764
782.
Cited by:
Dorsett-Felicelli, Inc. v. County of Clinton, 371 F. Supp. 2d 183, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10452 (N.D.N.Y
2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
371 F. Supp. 2d 183 p.189
783.
Followed by:
Ciszewski v. N.Y., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42505 (N.D.N.Y May 26, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42505
784.
Cited by:
Hunter v. Clark, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45144 (W.D.N.Y. May 4, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45144
785.
Followed by:
Does v. Mills, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6603 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 18, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6603
786.
Cited by:
Juvenile Matters Trial Lawyers Ass'n v. Judicial Dep't, 363 F. Supp. 2d 239, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5067
(D. Conn. 2005)
363 F. Supp. 2d 239 p.249
787.
Followed by:
Page 118
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Donangelo, Inc. v. Town of Northumberland, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4655 (N.D.N.Y Mar. 24, 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4655
788.
Followed by:
Mateo v. Phillips, 361 F. Supp. 2d 328, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4691 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
361 F. Supp. 2d 328 p.330
789.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Yoonessi v. New York State Bd. for Prof'l Med. Conduct, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40035 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 21,
2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
Distinguished by:
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40035
Followed by:
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40035
790.
Cited by:
Lennon v. Town of Old Saybrook, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4542 (D. Conn. Mar. 21, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4542
791.
Cited by:
Ebanks v. Torres, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3047 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3047
792.
Followed by:
Kunz v. New York State Comm'n on Judicial Conduct, 356 F. Supp. 2d 188, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2044
(N.D.N.Y 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
356 F. Supp. 2d 188 p.192
793.
Followed by:
Kalman v. Carre, 352 F. Supp. 2d 205, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 583 (D. Conn. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
352 F. Supp. 2d 205 p.210
794.
Distinguished by:
Faith Temple Church v. Town of Brighton, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8065 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8065
795.
Followed by:
Sullivan v. Stein, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P17347 (D. Conn. Jan. 4, 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179
796.
Cited by:
Page 119
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Velez v. Hayes, 346 F. Supp. 2d 557, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24005 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
346 F. Supp. 2d 557 p.559
797.
Cited by:
Greene v. Connecticut, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23809 (D. Conn. Nov. 22, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23809
798.
Followed by, Cited by:
Dorsett-Felicelli, Inc. v. County of Clinton, 349 F. Supp. 2d 355, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25080 (N.D.N.Y
2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
349 F. Supp. 2d 355 p.365
Cited by:
349 F. Supp. 2d 355 p.360
799.
Cited by:
Rohling v. New York, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27588 (N.D.N.Y Nov. 15, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27588
800.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Malapanis v. Regan, 340 F. Supp. 2d 184, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21101 (D. Conn. 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
340 F. Supp. 2d 184 p.189
Cited by:
340 F. Supp. 2d 184 p.188
801.
Followed by, Explained by, Cited by:
Hindu Temple Soc'y of N. Am. v. Supreme Court, 335 F. Supp. 2d 369, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19115
(E.D.N.Y. 2004)
Followed by:
335 F. Supp. 2d 369 p.375
Explained by:
335 F. Supp. 2d 369 p.374
Cited by:
335 F. Supp. 2d 369 p.372
802.
Cited by:
Malapanis v. Regan, 335 F. Supp. 2d 285, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18408 (D. Conn. 2004)
335 F. Supp. 2d 285 p.288
803.
Distinguished by:
Page 120
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Novello v. Manor Oak Skilled Nursing Facilities, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20892, 94 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA)
6225 (W.D.N.Y. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20892
804.
Cited by:
Roe v. Johnson, 334 F. Supp. 2d 415, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17483, 16 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 336
(S.D.N.Y. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
334 F. Supp. 2d 415 p.418
805.
Cited by:
Sica v. Connecticut, 331 F. Supp. 2d 82, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17024 (D. Conn. 2004)
331 F. Supp. 2d 82 p.86
806.
Cited by:
Diamond D Constr. Corp. v. N.Y. State DOL, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17198 (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2004)
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17198
807.
Followed by:
Ali v. Timmons, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14830 (W.D.N.Y. July 23, 2004)
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14830
808.
Cited by:
Ali v. Przbyl, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14795 (W.D.N.Y. July 23, 2004)
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14795
809.
Distinguished by:
County of Suffolk v. Amerada Hess Corp. (In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Prods. Liab. Litig.), 341 F.
Supp. 2d 351, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13135, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P17068, 59 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA)
1243, 164 Oil & Gas Rep. 1128 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
341 F. Supp. 2d 351 p.361
810.
Cited by:
Buttermilk v. Brado, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12940 (W.D.N.Y. July 6, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12940
811.
Cited by:
Beechwood Restorative Care Ctr. v. Leeds, 317 F. Supp. 2d 248, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8906 (W.D.N.Y.
2004)
317 F. Supp. 2d 248 p.261
812.
Distinguished by:
Ret. Sys. v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (In re WorldCom, Inc. Sec. Litig.), 315 F. Supp. 2d 527, 2004 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 6948 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
315 F. Supp. 2d 527 p.551
Page 121
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
813.
Cited by:
Lewis v. Gallivan, 315 F. Supp. 2d 313, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12187 (W.D.N.Y. 2004)
315 F. Supp. 2d 313 p.317
814.
Followed by:
Kern v. Clark, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8012 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 9, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6,
HN8
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8012
815.
Cited by:
Murray v. N.Y.P.D. 25th Precinct, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6021 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 8, 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6021
816.
Cited by:
Haselton v. Amestoy, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4525 (D. Vt. Mar. 16, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4525
817.
Cited by:
Rosen v. County of Suffolk, 305 F. Supp. 2d 229, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2686 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)
305 F. Supp. 2d 229 p.231
818.
Followed by:
J.C. Penny Corp. v. Carousel Ctr. Co., L.P., 306 F. Supp. 2d 274, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2474 (N.D.N.Y
2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
306 F. Supp. 2d 274 p.279
819.
Followed by:
Didden v. Vill. of Port Chester, 304 F. Supp. 2d 548, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1827 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
304 F. Supp. 2d 548 p.563
820.
Followed by:
Sastrom v. Berger, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1692 (D. Conn. Feb. 9, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1692
821.
Followed by:
DiPasquale v. Milin, 303 F. Supp. 2d 430, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1425 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)
303 F. Supp. 2d 430 p.432
822.
Distinguished by:
Bronx Dough, LLC v. Dunkin' Donuts, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 920 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 920
Page 122
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
823.
Cited by:
Ruiz v. Pedota, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2004)
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50
824.
Cited by:
Buric v. Kelly, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22824 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 18, 2003)
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22824
825.
Followed by:
Hip-Hop Summit Action Network v. N.Y. Temp. State Comm'n on Lobbying, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21229
(S.D.N.Y. Nov. 25, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21229
826.
Cited by:
Kraus v. United States, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23412, 92 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7324 (E.D.N.Y. 2003)
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23412
827.
Followed by:
Lomtevas v. New York State, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22313 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22313
828.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino, 290 F. Supp. 2d 265, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20434, 31 Media L. Rep.
(BNA) 2537 (D. Conn. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
Distinguished by:
290 F. Supp. 2d 265 p.273
Cited by:
290 F. Supp. 2d 265 p.271
829.
Followed by:
Grand River Enters. Six Nations, Ltd. v. Pryor, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16995 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 29, 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16995
830.
Cited by:
Kendall v. INS, 261 F. Supp. 2d 296, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7139 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)
261 F. Supp. 2d 296 p.302
831.
Distinguished by, Explained by, Cited by:
Int'l Fid. Ins. Co. v. City of New York, 263 F. Supp. 2d 619, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8322 (E.D.N.Y. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
263 F. Supp. 2d 619 p.633
Explained by:
Page 123
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
263 F. Supp. 2d 619 p.633
Cited by:
263 F. Supp. 2d 619 p.629
832.
Followed by:
Levich v. Liberty Cent. Sch. Dist., 258 F. Supp. 2d 339, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7125 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
258 F. Supp. 2d 339 p.342
833.
Followed by:
Roe v. Johnson, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25881 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25881
834.
Cited by:
W. R. v. Conn. Dep't of Children & Families, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5128 (D. Conn. Mar. 24, 2003)
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5128
835.
Distinguished by:
Abrahams v. DiBlasi, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6893 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 28, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6893
836.
Cited by:
Spargo v. N.Y. State Comm'n on Judicial Conduct, 244 F. Supp. 2d 72, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2364
(N.D.N.Y 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
244 F. Supp. 2d 72 p.82
837.
Cited by:
Alleyne v. City of New York, 244 F. Supp. 2d 214, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 568 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
244 F. Supp. 2d 214 p.216
838.
Explained by:
Norton v. Town of Islip, 239 F. Supp. 2d 264, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3 (E.D.N.Y. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
239 F. Supp. 2d 264 p.274
839.
Cited by:
Dow Jones & Co. v. Harrods, Ltd., 237 F. Supp. 2d 394, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19516 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN6
237 F. Supp. 2d 394 p.409
237 F. Supp. 2d 394 p.443
840.
Cited by:
Alleyne v. City of New York, 225 F. Supp. 2d 391, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18459 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN5
Page 124
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
225 F. Supp. 2d 391 p.393
841.
Followed by:
Arena v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 216 F. Supp. 2d 146, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15618 (E.D.N.Y. 2002)
216 F. Supp. 2d 146 p.154
842.
Followed by:
Brooks v. N.Y. State Supreme Court, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19914 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19914
843.
Followed by:
Terminix Int'l Co., L.P. v. Rocque, 210 F. Supp. 2d 97, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13603, 54 Env't Rep. Cas.
(BNA) 1884 (D. Conn. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
210 F. Supp. 2d 97 p.98
844.
Cited by:
Karmel v. City of New York, 200 F. Supp. 2d 361, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8056, 88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas.
(BNA) 1194 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
200 F. Supp. 2d 361 p.363
845.
Cited by:
Harris v. N.Y. State Dep't of Health, 202 F. Supp. 2d 143, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7179 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
202 F. Supp. 2d 143 p.153
846.
Cited by:
Am. Booksellers Found. v. Dean, 202 F. Supp. 2d 300, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8901, 30 Media L. Rep.
(BNA) 2121 (D. Vt. 2002)
202 F. Supp. 2d 300 p.311
847.
Cited by:
Nicholson v. Williams, 203 F. Supp. 2d 153, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4820 (E.D.N.Y. 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
203 F. Supp. 2d 153 p.229
203 F. Supp. 2d 153 p.231
848.
Followed by, Cited by:
Rubin v. Corning-Painted Post Area Sch. Dist., 190 F. Supp. 2d 541, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1184
(W.D.N.Y. 2002)
Followed by:
190 F. Supp. 2d 541 p.544
Cited by:
190 F. Supp. 2d 541 p.543
Page 125
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
849.
Followed by:
Hayes v. N.Y. Atty. Griev. Comm., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18607 (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18607
850.
Followed by, Cited by:
Pathways, Inc. v. Dunne, 172 F. Supp. 2d 357, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17345 (D. Conn. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3, HN5
Followed by:
172 F. Supp. 2d 357 p.364
Cited by:
172 F. Supp. 2d 357 p.360
851.
Followed by:
Whitely v. Comsat Corp., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16114 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 24, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16114
852.
Cited by:
Porter v. New York, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14746 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 20, 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14746
853.
Cited by:
Tyber v. Adams, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24444 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 18, 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24444
854.
Distinguished by:
Tremper v. Ulster County Dep't of Prob., 160 F. Supp. 2d 352, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12641 (N.D.N.Y
2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
160 F. Supp. 2d 352 p.360
855.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Cited by:
Russo v. City of Hartford, 158 F. Supp. 2d 214, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14297 (D. Conn. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
158 F. Supp. 2d 214 p.230
Followed by:
158 F. Supp. 2d 214 p.229
Cited by:
158 F. Supp. 2d 214 p.228
856.
Cited by:
Cincotta v. N.Y. City Human Res. Admin., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11457 (S.D.N.Y. July 31, 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11457
Page 126
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
857.
Followed by:
Brown v. Damiani, 154 F. Supp. 2d 317, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14387 (D. Conn. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
154 F. Supp. 2d 317 p.321
858.
Cited by:
Tyber v. Adams, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24448 (S.D.N.Y. June 19, 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24448
859.
Cited by:
Camprubi-Soms v. Aranda, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11291 (S.D.N.Y. June 12, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11291
860.
Cited by:
W. 95 Hous. Corp. v. N.Y. City Dep't of Hous. Pres. & Dev., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7784 (S.D.N.Y. June
12, 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7784
861.
Cited by:
Sanchez v. Gazzillo, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7786 (E.D.N.Y. June 5, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7786
862.
Cited by:
Polygon Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc., 143 F. Supp. 2d 211, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7299 (D. Conn.
2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
143 F. Supp. 2d 211 p.213
863.
Cited by:
Van Patten v. City of Binghamton, 137 F. Supp. 2d 98, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4878 (N.D.N.Y 2001)
137 F. Supp. 2d 98 p.102
864.
Followed by:
Bologna v. Allstate Ins. Co., 138 F. Supp. 2d 310, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3203, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide
P10051, 2001-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P73253 (E.D.N.Y. 2001)
138 F. Supp. 2d 310 p.327
865.
Distinguished by:
Howard Opera House Assocs. v. Urban Outfitters, Inc., 131 F. Supp. 2d 559, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1686
(D. Vt. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
131 F. Supp. 2d 559 p.562
866.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Diamond "D" Constr. Corp. v. N.Y. DOL, 142 F. Supp. 2d 377, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14257 (W.D.N.Y.
2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Page 127
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Distinguished by:
142 F. Supp. 2d 377 p.398
Cited by:
142 F. Supp. 2d 377 p.397
867.
Distinguished by:
Krimstock v. Safir, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16444 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16444
868.
Distinguished by:
Local 621, S.E.I.U. v. City of New York, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14235, 166 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2552
(S.D.N.Y. Sept. 29, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14235
869.
Followed by:
Grieve v. Tamerin, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13576 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 20, 2000)
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13576
870.
Cited by:
Christopher v. Crim. Court, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20912 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 5, 2000)
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20912
871.
Followed by:
Vitranschart, Inc. v. Levy, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12609 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 29, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12609
872.
Followed by:
Grieve v. Tamerin, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12210 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2000)
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12210
873.
Cited by:
Elmasri v. England, 111 F. Supp. 2d 212, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11997 (E.D.N.Y. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
111 F. Supp. 2d 212 p.216
874.
Cited by:
Rivers v. McLeod, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10603 (E.D.N.Y. July 27, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10603
875.
Followed by:
People United for Children, Inc. v. City of New York, 108 F. Supp. 2d 275, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9832
(S.D.N.Y. 2000)
108 F. Supp. 2d 275 p.289
Page 128
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
876.
Cited by:
Diamond "D" Constr. Corp. v. New York State DOL Bureau of Pub. Works, 105 F. Supp. 2d 167, 2000 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 9140 (W.D.N.Y. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
105 F. Supp. 2d 167 p.175
105 F. Supp. 2d 167 p.176
877.
Cited by:
York Hunter Constr., Inc. v. Avalon Props., Inc., 104 F. Supp. 2d 211, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9530
(S.D.N.Y. 2000)
104 F. Supp. 2d 211 p.215
878.
Distinguished by:
Maher v. Monahan, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6898 (S.D.N.Y. May 16, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6898
879.
Followed by:
Hirschfeld v. Stone, 193 F.R.D. 175, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6306 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
193 F.R.D. 175 p.188
880.
Followed by:
Goldman v. Estate of Goldman, 97 F. Supp. 2d 370, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9385 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
97 F. Supp. 2d 370 p.375
881.
Cited by:
Ellis v. Little Flower Children's Servs., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5139 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2000)
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5139
882.
Cited by:
BD v. DeBuono, 193 F.R.D. 117, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2186, 46 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1052, 54
Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 208 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
193 F.R.D. 117 p.136
193 F.R.D. 117 p.137
883.
Cited by:
Omya, Inc. v. Vermont, 80 F. Supp. 2d 211, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 832 (D. Vt. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
80 F. Supp. 2d 211 p.215
884.
Followed by:
Merrill v. Muriel, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20474 (D. Conn. Jan. 4, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20474
885.
Distinguished by:
Page 129
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Meachem v. Wing, 77 F. Supp. 2d 431, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19051 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)
77 F. Supp. 2d 431 p.441
886.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Brooklyn Inst. of Arts & Scis v. City of New York & Rudolph W. Giuliani, 64 F. Supp. 2d 184, 1999 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 16709 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
64 F. Supp. 2d 184 p.193
Cited by:
64 F. Supp. 2d 184 p.192
887.
Cited by:
National Congress for Puerto Rican Rights by Perez v. City of New York, 75 F. Supp. 2d 154, 1999 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 16081 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
75 F. Supp. 2d 154 p.162
888.
Cited by:
Birmingham v. Ogden, 70 F. Supp. 2d 353, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16348 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
70 F. Supp. 2d 353 p.364
889.
Distinguished by:
Scheiner v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15028 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 27, 1999)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15028
890.
Distinguished by:
Mulligan v. Travis, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14606 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 20, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14606
891.
Followed by:
Phifer v. City of New York, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14436 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 15, 1999)
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14436
892.
Followed by, Cited by:
Selkin v. State Bd. for Prof'l Med. Conduct, 63 F. Supp. 2d 397, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18717 (S.D.N.Y.
1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
63 F. Supp. 2d 397 p.403
Cited by:
63 F. Supp. 2d 397 p.401
893.
Distinguished by:
Levin v. Tiber Holding Co., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13135 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 1999)
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13135
Page 130
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
894.
Cited by:
Brown v. Stone, 66 F. Supp. 2d 412, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12887 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
66 F. Supp. 2d 412 p.422
895.
Cited by:
Saunders v. Flanagan, 62 F. Supp. 2d 629, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18440 (D. Conn. 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
62 F. Supp. 2d 629 p.632
896.
Cited by:
Garcia v. Tamir, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11940 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 2, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11940
897.
Cited by:
Pollack v. Nash, 58 F. Supp. 2d 294, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11663 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)
58 F. Supp. 2d 294 p.305
898.
Cited by:
Murray v. Administration for Children's Servs., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7894 (S.D.N.Y. May 20, 1999)
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7894
899.
Cited by:
First Union Nat'l Bank v. Burke, 48 F. Supp. 2d 132, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6415 (D. Conn. 1999)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
48 F. Supp. 2d 132 p.140
900.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
American Charities for Reasonable Fundraising Regulation, Inc. v. Shiffrin, 46 F. Supp. 2d 143, 1999 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 6463 (D. Conn. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
46 F. Supp. 2d 143 p.156
Cited by:
46 F. Supp. 2d 143 p.154
901.
Distinguished by:
Doyle v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal (In re Doyle), 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3960
(S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3960
902.
Followed by:
Murray v. Administration for Children's Servs., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 689 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 1999)
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 689
Page 131
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
903.
Cited by:
New York Crim. Bar Ass'n v. Newton, 33 F. Supp. 2d 289, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)
33 F. Supp. 2d 289 p.291
904.
Followed by:
Olitt v. Vacco, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20441 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20441
905.
Followed by:
Olitt v. Vacco, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20107 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20107
906.
Cited by:
McKenna v. Cruz, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18352 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18352
907.
Distinguished by:
Langer v. New York State Office of Court Admin., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18652 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18652
908.
Cited by:
Holder v. New York, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16756 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16756
909.
Cited by:
Rosquist v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15808 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15808
910.
Cited by:
Tonken v. Loving & Weintraub Inc., 22 F. Supp. 2d 86, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14181 (S.D.N.Y. 1998)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
22 F. Supp. 2d 86 p.91
911.
Cited by:
Jones v. City Sch. Dist., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13039 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13039
912.
Followed by:
George v. McLeod, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14858 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14858
913.
Cited by:
Steed v. City of New York Human Resources Admin., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11899 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 3,
1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 132
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11899
914.
Followed by:
Warburton v. Goord, 14 F. Supp. 2d 289, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17469 (W.D.N.Y. 1998) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
14 F. Supp. 2d 289 p.296
915.
Cited by:
Singleton v. New York, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11842 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11842
916.
Cited by:
King ex rel. Skyler-Hawk v. Morgenthau, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10239 (S.D.N.Y. July 7, 1998) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
917.
Followed by:
Papeskov v. Brown, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8355 (S.D.N.Y. June 5, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8355
918.
Followed by:
Mackey v. Property Clerk of N.Y. City Police Dep't, 26 F. Supp. 2d 585, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8013
(S.D.N.Y. 1998)
26 F. Supp. 2d 585 p.592
919.
Cited by:
Lucas v. Planning Bd., 7 F. Supp. 2d 310, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7538 (S.D.N.Y. 1998)
7 F. Supp. 2d 310 p.319
920.
Cited by:
Estes-El v. Town of Indian Lake, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7163 (N.D.N.Y May 11, 1998) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7163
921.
Distinguished by:
Alvarez v. City of New York, 2 F. Supp. 2d 509, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5560 (S.D.N.Y. 1998)
2 F. Supp. 2d 509 p.516
922.
Cited by:
Sekor v. Capwell, 1 F. Supp. 2d 140, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4761 (D. Conn. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1 F. Supp. 2d 140 p.146
923.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Schlagler v. Phillips, 985 F. Supp. 419, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21203 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) LexisNexis
Page 133
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
985 F. Supp. 419 p.421
Cited by:
985 F. Supp. 419 p.420
924.
Cited by:
Ramos v. United States INS, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22240 (N.D.N.Y Dec. 9, 1997)
925.
Cited by:
Rapid Rubbish Removal v. Ripley, 988 F. Supp. 414, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20310, 46 Env't Rep. Cas.
(BNA) 1182 (D. Vt. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
988 F. Supp. 414 p.415
926.
Cited by:
Velez v. McGuire, 992 F. Supp. 125, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22592 (D. Conn. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
992 F. Supp. 125 p.127
927.
Cited by:
Goldman v. Walder, Sondak, & Brogan, P.A., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15692 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 8, 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
928.
Cited by:
Hirschfeld v. City of New York, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14942 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
929.
Cited by:
Sei Young Choi v. Young Jin Kim, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15630 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
930.
Cited by:
Arac v. New York, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14409 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 18, 1997)
931.
Cited by:
Ramos v. United States HUD, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14360 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 18, 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
932.
Cited by:
Ramos v. United States HUD, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13894 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 11, 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
933.
Cited by:
Thompson v. Vacco, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13042 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 28, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
934.
Cited by:
Corsini v. Ross, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13022 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 27, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
935.
Cited by:
Szoke v. Carter, 974 F. Supp. 360, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13033 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Page 134
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
974 F. Supp. 360 p.366
936.
Cited by:
L. Harbert, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13021 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 22, 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
937.
Cited by:
Burks v. Dence, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12707 (N.D.N.Y Aug. 20, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
938.
Cited by:
Fleet Bank, N.A. v. Burke, 990 F. Supp. 50, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22518 (D. Conn. 1997)
990 F. Supp. 50 p.53
939.
Cited by:
Hernandez v. United States Family Court, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11945 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
940.
Distinguished by:
Dittmer v. County of Suffolk, 975 F. Supp. 440, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12940 (E.D.N.Y. 1997)
975 F. Supp. 440 p.442
941.
Cited by:
American Libraries Ass'n v. Pataki, 969 F. Supp. 160, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8793, 25 Media L. Rep.
(BNA) 2217 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)
969 F. Supp. 160 p.168
942.
Cited by:
Martinez v. Scopetta, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8108 (S.D.N.Y. June 10, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
943.
Cited by:
Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Manshul Constr. Corp., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5730 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 28, 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
944.
Followed by, Cited by:
Wandyful Stadium v. Town of Hempstead, 959 F. Supp. 585, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4543 (E.D.N.Y. 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
959 F. Supp. 585 p.590
Cited by:
959 F. Supp. 585 p.588
945.
Cited by:
United States v. Sarivola, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3399 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
946.
Distinguished by:
Thaler v. Casella, 960 F. Supp. 691, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3231 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN9
960 F. Supp. 691 p.697
Page 135
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
947.
Cited by:
Sanger v. Reno, 966 F. Supp. 151, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7647 (E.D.N.Y. 1997)
966 F. Supp. 151 p.160
948.
Cited by:
Balduzzi v. City of Syracuse, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1317 (N.D.N.Y Feb. 4, 1997)
949.
Followed by:
Moran v. Connecticut Dep't of Pub. Health & Addition Servs., 954 F. Supp. 484, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
1159, 21 Am. Disabilities Dec. 897 (D. Conn. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
954 F. Supp. 484 p.487
950.
Cited by:
Miller v. Silbermann, 951 F. Supp. 485, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 500 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
951 F. Supp. 485 p.491
951.
Cited by:
DeSario v. Thomas, 963 F. Supp. 120, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13555, 53 Soc. Sec. Rep. Service 477 (D.
Conn. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
963 F. Supp. 120 p.126
952.
Cited by:
Natural Father & Mother of an Adopted Child v. Tolbert, 170 F.R.D. 107, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 284, 37
Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 437 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)
170 F.R.D. 107 p.108
953.
Cited by:
Eisenstein v. Supreme Court, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19550 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 31, 1996)
954.
Followed by, Cited by:
Philip Morris Inc. v. Blumenthal, 949 F. Supp. 93, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19426, 1997-2 Trade Cas. (CCH)
P71899 (D. Conn. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
949 F. Supp. 93 p.94
949 F. Supp. 93 p.97
Cited by:
949 F. Supp. 93 p.95
955.
Cited by:
Estes-El v. Town of Indian Lake, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16120 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
956.
Distinguished by:
Local 749, AFSCME v. Ment, 945 F. Supp. 30, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16275 (D. Conn. 1996)
945 F. Supp. 30 p.34
Page 136
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
957.
Cited by:
DeLoreto v. Ment, 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2590 (D. Conn. Oct. 30, 1996)
154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2590 p.2593
958.
Followed by, Cited by:
Toback v. City of Long Beach, 948 F. Supp. 167, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18592 (E.D.N.Y. 1996)
Followed by:
948 F. Supp. 167 p.169
948 F. Supp. 167 p.170
948 F. Supp. 167 p.173
948 F. Supp. 167 p.175
Cited by:
948 F. Supp. 167 p.172
959.
Cited by:
Hernandez v. United States Family Court, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13620 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 18, 1996)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
960.
Cited by:
Davidson v. Garry, 956 F. Supp. 265, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20382 (E.D.N.Y. 1996)
956 F. Supp. 265 p.269
961.
Cited by:
Toback v. City of Long Beach, 948 F. Supp. 167, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18608 (E.D.N.Y. 1996)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN9
962.
Cited by:
Fischmann v. VisionTel, 934 F. Supp. 115, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11598, 134 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58286
(S.D.N.Y. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
934 F. Supp. 115 p.117
963.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
DeLoreto v. Ment, 944 F. Supp. 1023, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16293, 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2590 (D. Conn.
1996)
Distinguished by:
944 F. Supp. 1023 p.1030
Cited by:
944 F. Supp. 1023 p.1027
944 F. Supp. 1023 p.1029
964.
Cited by:
Lawrence v. Cohn, 932 F. Supp. 564, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9785, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P99341, RICO
Bus. Disp. Guide P9091 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
932 F. Supp. 564 p.569
Page 137
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
965.
Cited by:
Tomko Elec. v. Connecticut Dep't of Labor, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12025 (D. Conn. July 12, 1996)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
966.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Marisol A. by Forbes v. Giuliani, 929 F. Supp. 662, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8420, 17 Am. Disabilities Dec.
114 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
929 F. Supp. 662 p.689
Cited by:
929 F. Supp. 662 p.688
967.
Cited by:
United States v. Nichols, 928 F. Supp. 302, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7541 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
928 F. Supp. 302 p.318
968.
Cited by:
Solkav Solartechnik v. Besicorp Group, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7243 (S.D.N.Y. May 28, 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
969.
Cited by:
Sheppard v. Coombe, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6914 (S.D.N.Y. May 20, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
970.
Cited by:
Agran v. City of New York, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6699 (S.D.N.Y. May 16, 1996)
971.
Cited by:
Jenkins v. Fields, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5852 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
972.
Cited by:
United States v. Collins, 921 F. Supp. 1028, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5016 (W.D.N.Y. 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
921 F. Supp. 1028 p.1033
973.
Followed by, Cited by:
Barker v. Ripley, 921 F. Supp. 1213, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5278 (D. Vt. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Followed by:
921 F. Supp. 1213 p.1218
Cited by:
921 F. Supp. 1213 p.1214
921 F. Supp. 1213 p.1216
974.
Followed by, Cited by:
Pinckney v. Board of Educ., 920 F. Supp. 393, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4115 (E.D.N.Y. 1996)
Followed by:
920 F. Supp. 393 p.397
Cited by:
Page 138
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
920 F. Supp. 393 p.396
975.
Distinguished by:
Ashton v. Cafero, 920 F. Supp. 35, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6459 (D. Conn. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
920 F. Supp. 35 p.37
976.
Cited by:
Ocasio v. Jacobson, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1602 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
977.
Cited by:
Gardner v. Arenz, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22295 (D. Vt. Jan. 22, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
978.
Cited by:
Hernandez v. New York City Law Dep't Corp. Counsel, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 587 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 22,
1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
979.
Cited by:
City of New York v. 1820-1838 Amsterdam Equities, 191 B.R. 18, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27 (S.D.N.Y.
1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
191 B.R. 18 p.21
980.
Cited by:
Faulcon v. Jordan, 911 F. Supp. 52, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19908 (N.D.N.Y 1995)
911 F. Supp. 52 p.53
981.
Cited by:
Berg v. Griset, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21235 (N.D.N.Y Nov. 22, 1995)
982.
Cited by:
Smith v. New York, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17045 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
983.
Cited by:
In re Williams, 188 B.R. 331, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16222 (E.D.N.Y. 1995)
188 B.R. 331 p.339
984.
Cited by:
Ferrari N. Am. v. Crown Auto Dealerships, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15356 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 1995)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
985.
Cited by:
Foulke by Foulke v. Foulke, 896 F. Supp. 158, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12613 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)
896 F. Supp. 158 p.161
986.
Cited by:
Herdman v. Town of Angelica, 163 F.R.D. 180, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12851 (W.D.N.Y. 1995)
163 F.R.D. 180 p.182
Page 139
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
987.
Cited by:
Gubitosi v. Kapica, 895 F. Supp. 58, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11848 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
895 F. Supp. 58 p.59
895 F. Supp. 58 p.60
988.
Cited by:
Fooks v. Coughlin, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10462 (E.D.N.Y. July 21, 1995)
989.
Cited by:
Brawer v. Carter, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9486 (S.D.N.Y. July 6, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
990.
Cited by:
Smith v. Gribetz, 887 F. Supp. 583, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7547 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
887 F. Supp. 583 p.586
991.
Distinguished by:
Bowen v. Doyle, 880 F. Supp. 99, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7794 (W.D.N.Y. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
880 F. Supp. 99 p.131
992.
Cited by:
Aetna Casualty & Sur. Co. v. DR Ins. Co., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1338 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 7, 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
993.
Cited by:
Davis v. Kelly, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 266 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 1995)
994.
Cited by:
Capitol Indem. Corp. v. Curiale, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 18642 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 1995)
1994 Bankr. LEXIS 18642
995.
Cited by:
Capitol Indem. Corp. v. Curiale, 871 F. Supp. 205, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18642 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
871 F. Supp. 205 p.208
996.
Distinguished by:
Cohen ex rel. Simon Cohen Real Estate & Management Co. v. Reed, 868 F. Supp. 489, 1994 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 16654 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
868 F. Supp. 489 p.498
997.
Cited by:
Stern v. Milford Bd. of Educ., 870 F. Supp. 30, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19775 (D. Conn. 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
870 F. Supp. 30 p.33
Page 140
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
998.
Cited by:
Travelers Indem. Co. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., 865 F. Supp. 1083, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15288
(S.D.N.Y. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
865 F. Supp. 1083 p.1089
999.
Cited by:
Collins v. Morsillo, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14133 (N.D.N.Y Sept. 17, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1000.
Cited by:
Fisher v. Painwebber Inc., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13229 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 1994)
1001.
Cited by:
Employers Ins. v. Trico Prods. Corp., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21250 (W.D.N.Y. Sept. 12, 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1002.
Cited by:
Campbell v. Greisberger, 865 F. Supp. 115, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13230, 3 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA)
1114, 5 Am. Disabilities Dec. 830 (W.D.N.Y. 1994)
865 F. Supp. 115 p.122
1003.
Distinguished by:
Farkas v. D'Oca, 857 F. Supp. 300, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9033, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide P8596 (S.D.N.Y.
1994)
857 F. Supp. 300 p.302
1004.
Followed by:
Levy v. Lerner, 853 F. Supp. 636, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7147 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
853 F. Supp. 636 p.641
1005.
Distinguished by:
Campos v. Coughlin, 854 F. Supp. 194, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5721 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)
854 F. Supp. 194 p.203
1006.
Cited by:
Hadges v. Yonkers Racing Corp., 845 F. Supp. 1037, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3211 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)
845 F. Supp. 1037 p.1040
1007.
Followed by:
Williams v. Lambert, 844 F. Supp. 963, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2291 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
844 F. Supp. 963 p.965
1008.
Cited by:
National Casualty Co. v. Jordache Enters., 848 F. Supp. 1112, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 141
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
848 F. Supp. 1112 p.1116
1009.
Distinguished by:
Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., 840 F. Supp. 211, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4319, 31
U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1499 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
840 F. Supp. 211 p.216
1010.
Cited by:
Greig v. Supreme Court, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17114 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1011.
Cited by:
Sachs v. Florida Educ. Ass'n, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15350 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 1, 1993)
1012.
Cited by:
Costle v. Fremont Indem. Co., 839 F. Supp. 265, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17768 (D. Vt. 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
839 F. Supp. 265 p.269
1013.
Distinguished by:
Mount Sinai Union Free Sch. Dist. v. Board of Educ., 836 F. Supp. 95, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14645
(E.D.N.Y. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
836 F. Supp. 95 p.99
1014.
Cited by:
Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Vermont Mut. Ins. Co., 835 F. Supp. 176, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15659 (D. Vt.
1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
835 F. Supp. 176 p.179
1015.
Cited by:
Ohta v. Muraski, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12693 (D. Conn. Aug. 19, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
1016.
Cited by:
Presnick v. Santoro, 832 F. Supp. 521, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11175 (D. Conn. 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
832 F. Supp. 521 p.529
1017.
Cited by:
Fariello v. Rodriguez, 148 F.R.D. 670, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6407 (E.D.N.Y. 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
148 F.R.D. 670 p.674
1018.
Cited by:
Oxford House v. City of Albany, 819 F. Supp. 1168, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5061, 1 Am. Disabilities Dec.
893 (N.D.N.Y 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
819 F. Supp. 1168 p.1172
Page 142
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1019.
Cited by:
Duggan v. Kocsis, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4167 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
1020.
Cited by:
Greater N.Y. Metro. Food Council v. McGuire, 815 F. Supp. 706, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2776 (S.D.N.Y.
1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
815 F. Supp. 706 p.709
1021.
Followed by, Cited by:
Feerick v. Sudolnik, 816 F. Supp. 879, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1733 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
816 F. Supp. 879 p.884
Cited by:
816 F. Supp. 879 p.882
816 F. Supp. 879 p.883
1022.
Cited by:
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Home Sav. Bank, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1988 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 1993)
1023.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Thomas v. New York City, 814 F. Supp. 1139, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1408 (E.D.N.Y. 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
814 F. Supp. 1139 p.1150
Followed by:
814 F. Supp. 1139 p.1149
1024.
Cited by:
Torres v. Cuomo, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1165 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1025.
Cited by:
Westbrook v. District Attorney of Queens County, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 280 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 1993)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1026.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Wack, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21013 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 1992)
1027.
Cited by:
Colonial Penn Ins. Co. v. American Centennial Ins. Co., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17552 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16,
1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1028.
Cited by:
Toy Mfrs. of America, Inc. v. Blumenthal, 806 F. Supp. 336, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20871, CCH Prod.
Liab. Rep. P13439 (D. Conn. 1992)
806 F. Supp. 336 p.341
1029.
Cited by:
Page 143
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Billups v. Millet, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15651 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1030.
Cited by:
Baker v. Latham Sparrowbush Assoc., 808 F. Supp. 992, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13782 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
808 F. Supp. 992 p.1000
1031.
Cited by:
DeMarco v. Holy Cross High Sch., 797 F. Supp. 1142, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10677, 59 Empl. Prac. Dec.
(CCH) P41631, 59 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 557 (E.D.N.Y. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
797 F. Supp. 1142 p.1148
1032.
Cited by:
Carr v. Axelrod, 798 F. Supp. 168, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10582 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
798 F. Supp. 168 p.172
798 F. Supp. 168 p.174
1033.
Cited by:
Bryant v. New York City, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10215 (E.D.N.Y. June 30, 1992)
1034.
Cited by:
Middleton v. New York State, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9751 (E.D.N.Y. June 9, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1035.
Cited by:
Federal Ins. Co. v. Kingsbury Properties, Ltd., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7513 (S.D.N.Y. June 1, 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1036.
Cited by:
Puerto Rican Legal Defense & Educ. Fund, Inc. v. Gantt, 796 F. Supp. 677, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17495
(E.D.N.Y. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
796 F. Supp. 677 p.679
1037.
Cited by:
Prisco v. New York, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5273 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 22, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1038.
Distinguished by:
In re Petition of Smouha, 136 B.R. 921, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 546 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
136 B.R. 921 p.927
1039.
Cited by:
Koncelik v. East Hampton, 781 F. Supp. 152, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18342 (E.D.N.Y. 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
781 F. Supp. 152 p.155
1040.
Cited by:
Canny v. Ray, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17994 (N.D.N.Y Dec. 10, 1991)
Page 144
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1041.
Cited by:
Louis v. Perales, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17528 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 2, 1991)
1042.
Cited by:
King v. James, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17332 (N.D.N.Y Nov. 29, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1043.
Cited by:
Solomon v. Senkowski, 778 F. Supp. 197, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17126 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)
778 F. Supp. 197 p.199
1044.
Followed by:
Lawrence v. Cohn, 778 F. Supp. 678, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16385, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P96453
(S.D.N.Y. 1991)
778 F. Supp. 678 p.683
778 F. Supp. 678 p.684
1045.
Cited by:
Louis v. Perales, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11570 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 1991)
1046.
Cited by:
Davis v. New York, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10808 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 2, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1047.
Cited by:
C & A Carbone v. Clarkstown, 770 F. Supp. 848, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11187, 1991-2 Trade Cas. (CCH)
P69591 (S.D.N.Y. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
770 F. Supp. 848 p.853
1048.
Cited by:
Curiale v. Amberco Brokers, Ltd., 766 F. Supp. 171, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8125 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)
766 F. Supp. 171 p.176
1049.
Cited by:
Bagdan v. Sony Corp. of America, 767 F. Supp. 81, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9505 (D. Vt. 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
767 F. Supp. 81 p.82
1050.
Cited by:
In re General American Communications Corp., 130 B.R. 136, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18163 (S.D.N.Y.
1991)
130 B.R. 136 p.146
130 B.R. 136 p.147
1051.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Tsokalas v. Purtill, 756 F. Supp. 89, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4121, 18 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1737 (D. Conn.
1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Distinguished by:
756 F. Supp. 89 p.91
Page 145
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cited by:
756 F. Supp. 89 p.90
1052.
Cited by:
Great American Ins. Co. v. Ticor, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17477 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 27, 1990)
1053.
Cited by:
Gabelli v. Sikes Corp., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17015 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1054.
Cited by:
Carino v. Deerfield, 750 F. Supp. 1156, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15692 (N.D.N.Y 1990)
750 F. Supp. 1156 p.1167
1055.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Cheng v. Wheaton, 745 F. Supp. 819, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17456 (D. Conn. 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
Distinguished by:
745 F. Supp. 819 p.821
Cited by:
745 F. Supp. 819 p.820
1056.
Cited by:
Davis v. Phoenix, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11548 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 4, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1057.
Cited by:
Walton Ins. Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10490 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 1990)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1058.
Cited by:
Bridgeport Wrecking Co. v. O'Neill, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11569 (D. Conn. July 18, 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1059.
Cited by:
Woodner v. Eimicke, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8636 (S.D.N.Y. July 9, 1990)
1060.
Cited by:
Nick v. Abrams, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8081 (S.D.N.Y. June 29, 1990)
1061.
Followed by:
Westmarc Communications, Inc. v. Conn. Dep't of Public Utility Control, 807 F. Supp. 876, 1990 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 20080 (D. Conn. 1990)
807 F. Supp. 876 p.880
1062.
Cited by:
Eaddy v. Lungen, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7213 (S.D.N.Y. June 11, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1063.
Cited by:
North Haven Planning & Zoning Com. v. Upjohn Co., 753 F. Supp. 423, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18472 (D.
Conn. 1990)
Page 146
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
753 F. Supp. 423 p.427
1064.
Cited by:
Westmarc Communications, Inc. v. Conn. Dep't of Public Utility Control, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20084 (D.
Conn. May 4, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1065.
Cited by:
United States v. One 1987 White Subaru Four Door Sedan, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4788 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 24,
1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1066.
Followed by:
Sendlewski v. Southampton, 734 F. Supp. 586, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4274 (E.D.N.Y. 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN8
734 F. Supp. 586 p.589
734 F. Supp. 586 p.592
1067.
Distinguished by:
Hartford v. Chase, 733 F. Supp. 533, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3599, 17 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1643 (D.
Conn. 1990)
733 F. Supp. 533 p.536
1068.
Followed by:
Broadway 41st Street Realty Corp. v. New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 733 F. Supp. 735, 1990 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 3450 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
733 F. Supp. 735 p.738
733 F. Supp. 735 p.739
1069.
Followed by:
Neustein v. Orbach, 732 F. Supp. 333, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2785 (E.D.N.Y. 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
732 F. Supp. 333 p.341
1070.
Cited by:
Fried v. Appellate Div. of New York State Supreme Court, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1435 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 12,
1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1071.
Followed by:
Burgos v. Koehler, 727 F. Supp. 847, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)
727 F. Supp. 847 p.848
1072.
Cited by:
National Foods, Inc. v. Rubin, 727 F. Supp. 104, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15125 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)
727 F. Supp. 104 p.106
1073.
Cited by:
Rosendale v. Lankenau Kovner & Bickford, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14491 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 1989)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 147
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1074.
Explained by:
People by Abrams v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 728 F. Supp. 162, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13540, 1989-2
Trade Cas. (CCH) P68876 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)
728 F. Supp. 162 p.174
1075.
Cited by:
Fisher v. Haber, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12304 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1076.
Cited by:
Thomas v. Culbert, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11445 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 27, 1989)
1077.
Distinguished by:
Mehta v. Surles, 720 F. Supp. 324, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10290 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)
720 F. Supp. 324 p.329
1078.
Cited by:
Mason v. Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Appellate Div. of Supreme Court of State, First Judicial
Dep't, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9793 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 1989)
1079.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
McNeill v. New York City Housing Authority, 719 F. Supp. 233, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9585 (S.D.N.Y.
1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
719 F. Supp. 233 p.255
Cited by:
719 F. Supp. 233 p.256
1080.
Followed by:
Nick v. Abrams, 717 F. Supp. 1053, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8576 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
717 F. Supp. 1053 p.1055
717 F. Supp. 1053 p.1056
1081.
Cited by:
Consolidated Edison Co. v. New York State Dep't of Environmental Conservation, 726 F. Supp. 1404, 1989
U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8464, 31 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1146, 20 Envtl. L. Rep. 20747 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)
726 F. Supp. 1404 p.1408
1082.
Cited by:
Washington v. Sheinberg, 715 F. Supp. 1198, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8611 (E.D.N.Y. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
715 F. Supp. 1198 p.1200
1083.
Cited by:
Abdul-Hakeem v. Koehler, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8342 (S.D.N.Y. July 21, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1084.
Cited by:
Page 148
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Dobzeniecki v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp., 716 F. Supp. 87, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7836
(E.D.N.Y. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
716 F. Supp. 87 p.89
1085.
Followed by:
Reinhardt v. Commonwealth Dep't of Social Services, 715 F. Supp. 1253, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7256
(S.D.N.Y. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
715 F. Supp. 1253 p.1255
715 F. Supp. 1253 p.1258
1086.
Cited by:
Jones v. Deutsch, 715 F. Supp. 1237, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7202 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)
715 F. Supp. 1237 p.1242
1087.
Distinguished by:
Cruz v. Scully, 716 F. Supp. 766, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7144 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)
716 F. Supp. 766 p.766
1088.
Distinguished by:
Shaumyan v. O'Neill, 716 F. Supp. 65, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7142 (D. Conn. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
716 F. Supp. 65 p.67
1089.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Blum v. Koch, 716 F. Supp. 754, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7148 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)
Distinguished by:
716 F. Supp. 754 p.766
Followed by:
716 F. Supp. 754 p.765
1090.
Cited by:
Temple of The Lost Sheep, Inc. v. Abrams, 761 F. Supp. 237, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17380 (E.D.N.Y. 1989)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
761 F. Supp. 237 p.242
1091.
Cited by:
Corcoran v. Universal Reinsurance Corp., 713 F. Supp. 77, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4869 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1092.
Cited by:
Maidman v. State, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4965 (S.D.N.Y. May 3, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1093.
Cited by:
Simmonds v. Deutsch, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3516 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 22, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
1094.
Cited by:
Page 149
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
McLeod v. Crosson, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2796 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1095.
Cited by:
Thomas v. Beth Israel Hospital, Inc., 710 F. Supp. 935, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2759 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)
1096.
Distinguished by:
Cecos International, Inc. v. Jorling, 706 F. Supp. 1006, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1698, 29 Env't Rep. Cas.
(BNA) 1150, 19 Envtl. L. Rep. 20918 (N.D.N.Y 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
706 F. Supp. 1006 p.1012
1097.
Cited by:
Ohio Reinsurance Corp. v. Pacific Reinsurance Management Corp., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1708 (S.D.N.Y.
Feb. 23, 1989)
1098.
Cited by:
County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co., 710 F. Supp. 1387, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5643 (E.D.N.Y.
1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1099.
Cited by:
Hanlin Group, Inc. v. Power Authority of New York, 703 F. Supp. 305, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 399
(S.D.N.Y. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
703 F. Supp. 305 p.307
1100.
Cited by:
Kontokosta v. Greenport, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13584 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1101.
Cited by:
B.A.M. Brokerage Corp. v. New York, 700 F. Supp. 182, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12956 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
700 F. Supp. 182 p.184
1102.
Followed by:
Franza v. Abrams, 695 F. Supp. 747, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10706 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
695 F. Supp. 747 p.749
1103.
Followed by:
Blackwelder v. Safnauer, 689 F. Supp. 106, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5737 (N.D.N.Y 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
689 F. Supp. 106 p.115
1104.
Cited by:
Foster v. Murphy, 686 F. Supp. 471, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5348 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
686 F. Supp. 471 p.473
1105.
Cited by:
Jenkins v. Davis, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1667 (N.D.N.Y Mar. 7, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 150
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1106.
Cited by:
Connecticut Magazine, Div. of Arc Communications, Inc. v. Moraghan, 676 F. Supp. 38, 1987 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 12017, 14 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2127 (D. Conn. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN9
676 F. Supp. 38 p.40
1107.
Followed by:
Peterson v. Murante, 673 F. Supp. 669, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10797 (W.D.N.Y. 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
673 F. Supp. 669 p.671
1108.
Cited by:
Hauser v. Western Group Nurseries, Inc., 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9983 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 1987)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1109.
Followed by:
Donkor v. New York Human Resources Admin. Special Services for Children, 673 F. Supp. 1221, 1987 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 9651 (S.D.N.Y. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
673 F. Supp. 1221 p.1224
673 F. Supp. 1221 p.1227
1110.
Followed by, Cited by:
Damino v. O'Neill, 702 F. Supp. 949, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14900 (E.D.N.Y. 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
702 F. Supp. 949 p.953
Cited by:
702 F. Supp. 949 p.950
1111.
Cited by:
Brach's Meat Market, Inc. v. Abrams, 668 F. Supp. 275, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7839 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
668 F. Supp. 275 p.279
1112.
Followed by:
Crazy Eddie, Inc. v. Cotter, 666 F. Supp. 503, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6667 (S.D.N.Y. 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
666 F. Supp. 503 p.512
1113.
Cited by:
Ganoe v. Lummis, 662 F. Supp. 718, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16071 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)
662 F. Supp. 718 p.722
1114.
Cited by:
Ganoe v. Lummis, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4733 (S.D.N.Y. June 4, 1987)
1115.
Followed by:
Page 151
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Blake v. Lang, 669 F. Supp. 584, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3626 (S.D.N.Y. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
669 F. Supp. 584 p.588
669 F. Supp. 584 p.589
1116.
Followed by, Cited by:
Corcoran v. Ardra Ins. Co., 657 F. Supp. 1223, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2964 (S.D.N.Y. 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
657 F. Supp. 1223 p.1234
Cited by:
657 F. Supp. 1223 p.1229
1117.
Cited by:
Savastano v. Abrams, 658 F. Supp. 414, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1037 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)
658 F. Supp. 414 p.416
1118.
Cited by:
United States v. Covino, 652 F. Supp. 660, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 644 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)
652 F. Supp. 660 p.668
1119.
Distinguished by:
Society for Good Will to Retarded Children v. Cuomo, 652 F. Supp. 515, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 560
(E.D.N.Y. 1987)
652 F. Supp. 515 p.524
1120.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Gour v. Morse, 652 F. Supp. 1166, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1083 (D. Vt. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
652 F. Supp. 1166 p.1168
Cited by:
652 F. Supp. 1166 p.1167
1121.
Cited by:
United States v. White, 650 F. Supp. 904, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75, 59 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1227, 87-1 U.S.
Tax Cas. (CCH) P13710 (W.D.N.Y. 1987)
650 F. Supp. 904 p.910
1122.
Cited by:
SOCIETY FOR GOOD WILL TO RETARDED CHILDREN v. CUOMO, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16608
(E.D.N.Y. Dec. 11, 1986)
1123.
Cited by:
Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Gerace, 648 F. Supp. 1543, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16764 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 152
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1124.
Cited by:
Mumford Cove Ass'n v. Groton, 647 F. Supp. 671, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18371, 25 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA)
1437, 16 Envtl. L. Rep. 20911 (D. Conn. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
647 F. Supp. 671 p.689
1125.
Distinguished by:
Wilder v. Bernstein, 645 F. Supp. 1292, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19321 (S.D.N.Y. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
645 F. Supp. 1292 p.1339
1126.
Cited by:
Christ the King Regional High School v. Culvert, 644 F. Supp. 1490, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19676, 123
L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2528 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)
644 F. Supp. 1490 p.1491
1127.
Cited by:
Ash v. Richard J. Lynch & Co., 644 F. Supp. 315, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19928 (E.D.N.Y. 1986)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
644 F. Supp. 315 p.317
1128.
Cited by:
Barr v. Abrams, 641 F. Supp. 547, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21782 (S.D.N.Y. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
641 F. Supp. 547 p.554
1129.
Cited by:
Banerjee v. Roberts, 641 F. Supp. 1093, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21985 (D. Conn. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
641 F. Supp. 1093 p.1104
1130.
Cited by:
United States v. Masselli, 638 F. Supp. 206, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23707 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)
638 F. Supp. 206 p.209
1131.
Cited by:
SCHIAVONE CONSTR. CO. v. MEROLA, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23698 (S.D.N.Y. June 25, 1986)
1132.
Followed by:
Wilson v. De Bruyn, 633 F. Supp. 1222, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26232 (W.D.N.Y. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
633 F. Supp. 1222 p.1225
1133.
Cited by:
FOSTER v. MORGENTHAU, 633 F. Supp. 718, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26601, 58 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5278,
86-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9448 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)
1134.
Cited by:
Page 153
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
SILVERSTEIN v. BARNES, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26930 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 10, 1986)
1135.
Cited by:
L. Cohen & Co. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 629 F. Supp. 1419, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29496 (D. Conn.
1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
629 F. Supp. 1419 p.1421
1136.
Distinguished by:
Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil Co., 626 F. Supp. 250, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30601 (S.D.N.Y. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
626 F. Supp. 250 p.259
1137.
Cited by:
Wilson v. Uttaro, 623 F. Supp. 1158, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12759 (W.D.N.Y. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
623 F. Supp. 1158 p.1160
1138.
Distinguished by:
Housatonic Cable Vision Co. v. Department of Public Utility Control, 622 F. Supp. 798, 1985 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 13569 (D. Conn. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
622 F. Supp. 798 p.805
1139.
Cited by:
United States v. Yonkers Bd. of Education, 624 F. Supp. 1276, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13713 (S.D.N.Y.
1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
624 F. Supp. 1276 p.1525
1140.
Cited by:
CARVEL CORP. v. H. P. HOOD, INC., 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13924 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 1985)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1141.
Cited by:
Bagarozy v. Maginnis, 618 F. Supp. 1306, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15407 (S.D.N.Y. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
618 F. Supp. 1306 p.1310
1142.
Cited by:
RICHARDS "OF COURSE", INC. v. TOWN OF DEWITT, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16591 (N.D.N.Y Aug.
22, 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
1143.
Cited by:
Latzer v. Abrams, 615 F. Supp. 1226, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16754 (E.D.N.Y. 1985)
615 F. Supp. 1226 p.1229
1144.
Cited by:
BROOKHAVEN AGGREGATES v. WILLIAMS, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17576, 23 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA)
1928 (E.D.N.Y. July 24, 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Page 154
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1145.
Cited by:
Brookhaven Aggregates, Ltd. v. Williams, 23 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1927 (E.D.N.Y. July 24, 1985)
23 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1927 p.1931
1146.
Cited by:
Law Firm of Daniel P. Foster, P.C. v. Dearie, 613 F. Supp. 278, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17815 (E.D.N.Y.
1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
613 F. Supp. 278 p.280
1147.
Cited by:
Holt v. Continental Group, 631 F. Supp. 653, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19791, 41 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH)
P36424, 42 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 444 (D. Conn. 1985)
631 F. Supp. 653 p.657
1148.
Cited by:
Breads v. Ellis, 607 F. Supp. 1420, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20019 (W.D.N.Y. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
607 F. Supp. 1420 p.1421
1149.
Followed by:
Onondaga Landfill Systems, Inc. v. Williams, 624 F. Supp. 25, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23065, 22 Env't Rep.
Cas. (BNA) 1458 (N.D.N.Y 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
624 F. Supp. 25 p.30
1150.
Cited by:
Donovan v. Schiavone Constr. Co., 601 F. Supp. 574, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23384 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
601 F. Supp. 574 p.580
1151.
Cited by:
LUCAS v. SPIELMAN, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23577 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1152.
Cited by:
Canaday v. Koch, 598 F. Supp. 1139, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21183 (E.D.N.Y. 1984)
598 F. Supp. 1139 p.1149
1153.
Cited by:
ACKERMAN v. STATE BD. FOR PROFESSIONAL MED. CONDUCT, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21937
(S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1154.
Cited by:
Aillon v. Connecticut, 597 F. Supp. 158, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22455 (D. Conn. 1984) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
597 F. Supp. 158 p.162
1155.
Explained by:
Schiavone Constr. Co. v. New York City Transit Authority, 593 F. Supp. 1257, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
Page 155
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
23339 (S.D.N.Y. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
593 F. Supp. 1257 p.1259
593 F. Supp. 1257 p.1260
1156.
Followed by:
Richards v. New York, 597 F. Supp. 692, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24696 (E.D.N.Y. 1984) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
597 F. Supp. 692 p.694
1157.
Cited by:
Richards v. New York Appellate Div., Second Dep't, 597 F. Supp. 689, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24695
(E.D.N.Y. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
597 F. Supp. 689 p.690
1158.
Cited by:
Richards v. Giscome, 597 F. Supp. 40, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24694 (E.D.N.Y. 1984)
1159.
Distinguished by:
Wendell Terrace Apts. v. Scruggs-Leftwich, 588 F. Supp. 839, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16429 (E.D.N.Y.
1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
588 F. Supp. 839 p.841
1160.
Cited by:
Kearney v. Dalsheim, 586 F. Supp. 667, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16806 (S.D.N.Y. 1984)
586 F. Supp. 667 p.669
1161.
Cited by:
GLOBE AFFILIATES, INC. v. WEISBROD, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18161 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 1984)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1162.
Distinguished by:
Lake v. Speziale, 580 F. Supp. 1318, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19239 (D. Conn. 1984)
580 F. Supp. 1318 p.1328
1163.
Cited by:
O'SULLIVAN v. SAPORSTON, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19744 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 6, 1984) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1164.
Followed by, Cited by:
Northeast Mines, Inc. v. Smithtown, 584 F. Supp. 112, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19800 (E.D.N.Y. 1984)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
584 F. Supp. 112 p.114
Cited by:
584 F. Supp. 112 p.113
1165.
Cited by:
Page 156
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
KECHNIE v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10433 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 27, 1983)
1166.
Followed by, Cited by:
Youth International Party v. McGuire, 572 F. Supp. 1159, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12999 (S.D.N.Y. 1983)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
572 F. Supp. 1159 p.1163
Cited by:
572 F. Supp. 1159 p.1164
1167.
Cited by:
United States v. Fisher, 571 F. Supp. 1236, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13096 (S.D.N.Y. 1983)
571 F. Supp. 1236 p.1237
1168.
Followed by, Cited by:
Obeda v. Connecticut Bd. of Registration for Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors, 570 F. Supp. 1007,
1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14642 (D. Conn. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
570 F. Supp. 1007 p.1011
Cited by:
570 F. Supp. 1007 p.1014
1169.
Cited by:
Jennings v. Abrams, 565 F. Supp. 137, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16033 (S.D.N.Y. 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
565 F. Supp. 137 p.138
1170.
Followed by, Cited by:
McDonald v. Metro-North Commuter R. Div. of Metropolitan Transit Authority, 565 F. Supp. 37, 1983 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 16604 (S.D.N.Y. 1983)
Followed by:
565 F. Supp. 37 p.40
Cited by:
565 F. Supp. 37 p.39
1171.
Cited by:
VOGEL v. PERALES, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17032 (S.D.N.Y. May 11, 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
1172.
Cited by:
TURNER v. NICHOLAS, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18298 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
1173.
Explained by:
Trans World Corp. v. Odyssey Partners, 561 F. Supp. 1311, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18344, Fed. Sec. L.
Rep. (CCH) P99136 (S.D.N.Y. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
561 F. Supp. 1311 p.1313
Page 157
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1174.
Cited by:
BERRY ESTATES, INC. v. NEW YORK, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18814 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1175.
Cited by:
HAL ROACH STUDIOS, INC. v. RICHARD FEINER & CO., 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20315, Copy. L. Rep.
(CCH) P25484 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 1983)
1176.
Cited by:
CRESCENZI v. BERGAMASCO, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20314 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1177.
Cited by:
Board of Electric Light Comm'rs v. McCarren, 563 F. Supp. 374, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10132 (D. Vt.
1982)
563 F. Supp. 374 p.377
1178.
Cited by:
Shapiro v. Cooke, 552 F. Supp. 581, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17089 (N.D.N.Y 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
552 F. Supp. 581 p.585
1179.
Explained by:
Springfield v. McCarren, 549 F. Supp. 1134, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9757, Util. L. Rep. (CCH) P12670 (D.
Vt. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
549 F. Supp. 1134 p.1145
1180.
Cited by:
Flaherty v. Nadjari, 548 F. Supp. 1127, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15118 (E.D.N.Y. 1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
548 F. Supp. 1127 p.1129
1181.
Cited by:
MacRae v. Motto, 543 F. Supp. 1007, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13825 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
543 F. Supp. 1007 p.1009
1182.
Explained by:
Scharaga v. New York, 543 F. Supp. 313, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13294 (S.D.N.Y. 1982)
543 F. Supp. 313 p.315
1183.
Cited by:
GOODSON v. LEVY, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13841 (S.D.N.Y. June 23, 1982)
1184.
Cited by:
PALEY v. AIKMAN, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13376 (S.D.N.Y. May 17, 1982)
1185.
Cited by:
Page 158
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Silver v. Woolf, 538 F. Supp. 881, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12315 (D. Conn. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN9
538 F. Supp. 881 p.884
1186.
Cited by:
York v. Ward, 538 F. Supp. 315, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13450 (E.D.N.Y. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6, HN8
538 F. Supp. 315 p.317
1187.
Cited by:
Cohen v. Board of Education, 536 F. Supp. 486, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11578 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN9
536 F. Supp. 486 p.497
1188.
Cited by:
Fruchtman v. New York State Bd. of Law Examiners, 534 F. Supp. 692, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11132
(S.D.N.Y. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
534 F. Supp. 692 p.695
1189.
Followed by:
Playtime Games, Inc. v. New York, Dep't of Bldgs., 535 F. Supp. 1069, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11755
(E.D.N.Y. 1982)
535 F. Supp. 1069 p.1071
1190.
Cited by:
Commission on Independent Colleges & Universities v. New York Temporary State Com. on Regulation of
Lobbying, 534 F. Supp. 489, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9337 (N.D.N.Y 1982)
534 F. Supp. 489 p.497
1191.
Cited by:
L-Jo Amusements v. City of New Yrok, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11610 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 1982)
1192.
Cited by:
Etheridge v. Bantum, 532 F. Supp. 719, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10828 (S.D.N.Y. 1982)
532 F. Supp. 719 p.720
1193.
Distinguished by:
Bryant v. Comm'r of Soc. Servs., 530 F. Supp. 1175, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10453 (S.D.N.Y. 1982)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
530 F. Supp. 1175 p.1182
1194.
Cited by:
America's Best Family Showplace Corp. v. New York Dep't of Bldgs., 530 F. Supp. 607, 1982 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 11554 (E.D.N.Y. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
530 F. Supp. 607 p.610
Page 159
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1195.
Followed by:
Howard v. Koch, 575 F. Supp. 1299, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17607 (E.D.N.Y. 1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
575 F. Supp. 1299 p.1304
1196.
Cited by:
KOPP v. KOPP, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16292 (N.D.N.Y Dec. 17, 1981)
1197.
Cited by:
GARRETT v. CERBONE, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15683 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 30, 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
1198.
Followed by, Cited by:
Price v. Rust, 527 F. Supp. 569, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18087 (D. Conn. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
527 F. Supp. 569 p.575
Cited by:
527 F. Supp. 569 p.570
527 F. Supp. 569 p.571
1199.
Cited by:
SAMAD ALI v. ALTMAN, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14607 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 14, 1981)
1200.
Cited by:
Jackson v. Dillon, 518 F. Supp. 618, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13454 (E.D.N.Y. 1981)
518 F. Supp. 618 p.620
1201.
Cited by:
JONES v. COUGHLIN, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12726 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 29, 1981)
1202.
Cited by:
SILVERMAN v. PARKING VIOLATIONS BUR. OF NEW YORK, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12466 (S.D.N.Y.
Apr. 8, 1981)
1203.
Followed by:
Matos v. Quealy, 524 F. Supp. 15, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11056 (S.D.N.Y. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
524 F. Supp. 15 p.17
1204.
Explained by:
Calkins v. Blum, 511 F. Supp. 1073, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11010 (N.D.N.Y 1981)
511 F. Supp. 1073 p.1087
1205.
Cited by:
Markel v. Blum, 509 F. Supp. 942, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11008 (N.D.N.Y 1981)
509 F. Supp. 942 p.948
Page 160
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1206.
Explained by:
Leigh v. McGuire, 507 F. Supp. 458, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10349 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)
507 F. Supp. 458 p.460
507 F. Supp. 458 p.462
1207.
Explained by:
Bell v. New York, 506 F. Supp. 590, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10471 (S.D.N.Y. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
506 F. Supp. 590 p.591
1208.
Cited by:
Wool v. Hogan, 505 F. Supp. 928, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10343 (D. Vt. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
505 F. Supp. 928 p.934
1209.
Cited by:
Barcia v. Sitkin, 89 F.R.D. 382, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10972 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)
89 F.R.D. 382 p.384
1210.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Heisse v. Vermont, 519 F. Supp. 36, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16899 (D. Vt. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN9
Distinguished by:
519 F. Supp. 36 p.45
Cited by:
519 F. Supp. 36 p.44
1211.
Cited by:
ERAMO v. ERAMO, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15712 (N.D.N.Y Dec. 30, 1980)
1212.
Cited by:
NEW YORK ASSN. OF APT. REFERRAL AGENTS, INC. v. PATERSON, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13356
(S.D.N.Y. Aug. 28, 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1213.
Cited by:
McCRACKEN v. UNITED STATES, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13669 (D. Conn. June 5, 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
1214.
Cited by:
BROWN v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTH., 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11840 (S.D.N.Y. June 4, 1980)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1215.
Cited by:
Angelilli v. Murphy, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9761 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
1216.
Cited by:
Doe v. Russotti, 503 F. Supp. 942, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14772 (S.D.N.Y. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
503 F. Supp. 942 p.944
Page 161
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1217.
Distinguished by:
Moore v. Ross, 502 F. Supp. 543, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15175 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)
502 F. Supp. 543 p.550
1218.
Followed by, Cited by:
Williams v. O'Neill, 500 F. Supp. 913, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16164 (D. Conn. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
500 F. Supp. 913 p.914
Cited by:
500 F. Supp. 913 p.916
1219.
Cited by:
Hoetzer v. County of Erie, 497 F. Supp. 1207, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13491 (W.D.N.Y. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
497 F. Supp. 1207 p.1210
1220.
Explained by, Cited by:
International Longshoremen's Asso. v. Waterfront Com. of New York Harbor, 495 F. Supp. 1101, 1980 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 9193 (S.D.N.Y. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Explained by:
495 F. Supp. 1101 p.1109
495 F. Supp. 1101 p.1110
Cited by:
495 F. Supp. 1101 p.1111
1221.
Distinguished by:
Cheeseman v. Carey, 485 F. Supp. 203, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10538, 104 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2206
(S.D.N.Y. 1980)
485 F. Supp. 203 p.216
1222.
Cited by:
MOKONE v. WEST, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8900 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 29, 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
1223.
Cited by:
Tual v. Tual, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9938 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 10, 1979)
1224.
Cited by:
BROWN v. KRASNOW, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9937 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 10, 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1225.
Cited by:
Aristides Matsis v. Carey, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11538 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1226.
Cited by:
Page 162
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
FISHER ex rel. PELLON v. GRAY, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13133 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 10, 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1227.
Cited by:
Natco Theatres, Inc. v. Ratner, 463 F. Supp. 1124, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15121, 4 Media L. Rep. (BNA)
1961 (S.D.N.Y. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
463 F. Supp. 1124 p.1127
1228.
Cited by:
New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. Roslyn Estates, 498 F. Supp. 922, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
10154 (E.D.N.Y. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
498 F. Supp. 922 p.926
1229.
Followed by:
Coast Holding Corp. v. McGuire, 482 F. Supp. 408, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9376 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
482 F. Supp. 408 p.411
482 F. Supp. 408 p.412
1230.
Distinguished by:
Tepper v. Galloway, 481 F. Supp. 1211, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7823, 104 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2143
(E.D.N.Y. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
481 F. Supp. 1211 p.1216
1231.
Followed by:
Holy Spirit Asso. for Unification of World Christianity v. New Castle, 480 F. Supp. 1212, 1979 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 8253 (S.D.N.Y. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
480 F. Supp. 1212 p.1217
1232.
Cited by:
Westchester Women's Health Organization, Inc. v. Whalen, 475 F. Supp. 734, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11568
(S.D.N.Y. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
475 F. Supp. 734 p.737
475 F. Supp. 734 p.738
1233.
Followed by:
Mathias v. Lennon, 474 F. Supp. 949, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10387 (S.D.N.Y. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
474 F. Supp. 949 p.956
1234.
Cited by:
Hempstead General Hospital v. Whalen, 474 F. Supp. 398, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10601 (E.D.N.Y. 1979)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
474 F. Supp. 398 p.405
1235.
Explained by:
Brennick v. Hynes, 471 F. Supp. 863, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12537 (N.D.N.Y 1979) LexisNexis
Page 163
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN6, HN9
471 F. Supp. 863 p.867
1236.
Distinguished by:
Weiss v. Willow Tree Civic Asso., 467 F. Supp. 803, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14550 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)
467 F. Supp. 803 p.808
1237.
Cited by:
GRANT v. Manhattan New York, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15033 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)
1238.
Cited by:
PEREZ v. ROSS, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14349 (S.D.N.Y. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
1239.
Cited by:
Jackson v. Ward, 458 F. Supp. 546, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15566, 4 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1435
(W.D.N.Y. 1978)
458 F. Supp. 546 p.562
1240.
Cited by:
BAYSIDE GARDENS NURSING HOME v. WHALEN v.. OCEANVIEW NURSING HOME, 1978 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 20283 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 1, 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1241.
Cited by:
EAGLE v. KOCH, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13964 (S.D.N.Y. July 1, 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1242.
Cited by:
United Federation of Teachers Welfare Fund v. Kramarsky, 451 F. Supp. 333, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
17522, 23 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1482 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
451 F. Supp. 333 p.338
1243.
Cited by:
BOARD OF EDUC. OF NEW YORK v. CALIFANO, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17757 (S.D.N.Y. May 15,
1978) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1244.
Followed by:
Holland v. Rubin, 460 F. Supp. 1051, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14393 (E.D.N.Y. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
460 F. Supp. 1051 p.1053
1245.
Cited by:
Alma Soc. v. Mellon, 459 F. Supp. 912, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14590 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
459 F. Supp. 912 p.914
1246.
Cited by:
Cartledge v. Miller, 457 F. Supp. 1146, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15717 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
457 F. Supp. 1146 p.1152
457 F. Supp. 1146 p.1153
Page 164
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1247.
Cited by:
Zellen v. Second New Haven Bank, 454 F. Supp. 1359, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16133 (D. Conn. 1978)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
454 F. Supp. 1359 p.1363
1248.
Distinguished by:
City Partners, Ltd. v. Jamaica Sav. Bank, 454 F. Supp. 1269, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16610 (E.D.N.Y.
1978) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
454 F. Supp. 1269 p.1271
454 F. Supp. 1269 p.1272
1249.
Followed by:
Olitt v. Murphy, 453 F. Supp. 354, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17621 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)
453 F. Supp. 354 p.356
453 F. Supp. 354 p.357
1250.
Followed by:
Aristocrat Health Club, Inc. v. Chaucer, 451 F. Supp. 210, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17872 (D. Conn. 1978)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
451 F. Supp. 210 p.213
451 F. Supp. 210 p.214
451 F. Supp. 210 p.217
1251.
Cited by:
Lee v. Kolb, 449 F. Supp. 1368, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18039 (W.D.N.Y. 1978)
449 F. Supp. 1368 p.1373
1252.
Cited by:
Olitt v. Murphy, 449 F. Supp. 322, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18574 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
449 F. Supp. 322 p.323
449 F. Supp. 322 p.324
1253.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Carbone v. Manson, 447 F. Supp. 611, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19725 (D. Conn. 1978)
447 F. Supp. 611 p.619
1254.
Followed by:
Rogers v. Kingston, 446 F. Supp. 229, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19114 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
446 F. Supp. 229 p.230
446 F. Supp. 229 p.231
1255.
Cited by:
Schachter v. Whalen, 445 F. Supp. 1376, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19206 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) LexisNexis
Page 165
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN9
445 F. Supp. 1376 p.1379
1256.
Distinguished by:
Williams v. Sclafani, 444 F. Supp. 906, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19979 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
444 F. Supp. 906 p.917
1257.
Cited by:
Dowtin v. New York, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20049, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P8208 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1258.
Cited by:
PICKETT v. ADOLPH, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16898 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)
1259.
Cited by:
STARRS v. BOCK, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7028 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1260.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
St. Martin's Press, Inc. v. Carey, 440 F. Supp. 1196, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12728, 3 Media L. Rep. (BNA)
1598 (S.D.N.Y. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Distinguished by:
440 F. Supp. 1196 p.1206
Cited by:
440 F. Supp. 1196 p.1200
1261.
Cited by:
SOPHISTICATED HEALTH SPA, INC. v. BAUMGARTEN, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13936 (S.D.N.Y. Sept.
19, 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1262.
Cited by:
Black Jack Distributors, Inc. v. Beame, 433 F. Supp. 1297, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15312, 3 Media L. Rep.
(BNA) 1641 (S.D.N.Y. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
433 F. Supp. 1297 p.1303
1263.
Cited by:
Dutchess Sanitation, Inc. v. Plattekill, 433 F. Supp. 580, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15327, 10 Env't Rep. Cas.
(BNA) 1584 (S.D.N.Y. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
433 F. Supp. 580 p.583
1264.
Cited by:
TRAFALGAR HOSP. v. NEW YORK, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13126 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 1977) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
1265.
Followed by:
Merrick v. Merrick, 441 F. Supp. 143, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12922 (S.D.N.Y. 1977)
441 F. Supp. 143 p.147
Page 166
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1266.
Cited by:
Civil Service Employees Asso. v. Helsby, 439 F. Supp. 1272, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12980, 96 L.R.R.M.
(BNA) 3112 (S.D.N.Y. 1977)
439 F. Supp. 1272 p.1276
1267.
Distinguished by:
Show-World Center, Inc. v. Walsh, 438 F. Supp. 642, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15227 (S.D.N.Y. 1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
438 F. Supp. 642 p.649
438 F. Supp. 642 p.650
1268.
Followed by, Cited by:
Boe v. Colello, 438 F. Supp. 145, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14165 (S.D.N.Y. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN4
Followed by:
438 F. Supp. 145 p.150
Cited by:
438 F. Supp. 145 p.153
1269.
Distinguished by:
Barchi v. Sarafan, 436 F. Supp. 775, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14395 (S.D.N.Y. 1977)
436 F. Supp. 775 p.779
1270.
Distinguished by:
Buffalo Teachers Federation, Inc. v. Helsby, 435 F. Supp. 1098, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14721, 95
L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3251 (S.D.N.Y. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
435 F. Supp. 1098 p.1101
1271.
Followed by:
Salem Inn, Inc. v. Frank, 433 F. Supp. 183, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15586 (E.D.N.Y. 1977) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
433 F. Supp. 183 p.186
1272.
Distinguished by:
Jeter v. Kerr, 429 F. Supp. 435, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16602 (S.D.N.Y. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
429 F. Supp. 435 p.438
1273.
Cited by:
DeGregory v. Giesing, 427 F. Supp. 910, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17129, 95 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2517, 82 Lab.
Cas. (CCH) P55101 (D. Conn. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
427 F. Supp. 910 p.911
1274.
Followed by, Cited by:
Lang v. Berger, 427 F. Supp. 204, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17469 (S.D.N.Y. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Page 167
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Followed by:
427 F. Supp. 204 p.215
Cited by:
427 F. Supp. 204 p.209
1275.
Explained by:
Orazio v. North Hempstead, 426 F. Supp. 1144, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17338 (E.D.N.Y. 1977)
426 F. Supp. 1144 p.1147
1276.
Explained by:
NLRB v. Comm. of Interns & Residents, 426 F. Supp. 438, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17604, 94 L.R.R.M.
(BNA) 2739, 81 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P13060 (S.D.N.Y. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
426 F. Supp. 438 p.445
1277.
Distinguished by:
International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. New York Port Authority, 425 F. Supp. 681, 1977 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 17903, 23 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 260 (S.D.N.Y. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
425 F. Supp. 681 p.684
425 F. Supp. 681 p.688
1278.
Distinguished by:
Briere v. Agway, Inc., 425 F. Supp. 654, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17962 (D. Vt. 1977) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3, HN5
425 F. Supp. 654 p.657
425 F. Supp. 654 p.658
1279.
Cited by:
PHOENIX HEALTH SPA, INC. v. WALSH, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13390 (S.D.N.Y. 1977)
1280.
Cited by:
GIGANTE v. KEENAN, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13267 (S.D.N.Y. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1281.
Distinguished by:
Cicero v. Olgiati, 426 F. Supp. 1213, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12133 (S.D.N.Y. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
426 F. Supp. 1213 p.1218
1282.
Cited by:
Shelton v. Smith, 422 F. Supp. 649, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13685 (S.D.N.Y. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
422 F. Supp. 649 p.651
1283.
Followed by:
Tedesco v. O'Sullivan, 420 F. Supp. 194, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13399 (D. Conn. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
420 F. Supp. 194 p.196
Page 168
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1284.
Cited by:
Sreter v. Hynes, 419 F. Supp. 546, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13559 (E.D.N.Y. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
419 F. Supp. 546 p.548
1285.
Followed by, Cited by:
Notey v. Hynes, 418 F. Supp. 1320, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13461 (E.D.N.Y. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
418 F. Supp. 1320 p.1326
Cited by:
418 F. Supp. 1320 p.1327
1286.
Cited by:
Cristina v. Department of State, 417 F. Supp. 1012, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13650 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
417 F. Supp. 1012 p.1016
1287.
Cited by:
De Maria v. Jones, 416 F. Supp. 291, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15287 (S.D.N.Y. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
416 F. Supp. 291 p.295
1288.
Cited by:
Gras v. Stevens, 415 F. Supp. 1148, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15224 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)
415 F. Supp. 1148 p.1151
1289.
Cited by:
New York v. Taylor, 415 F. Supp. 107, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15437 (S.D.N.Y. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
415 F. Supp. 107 p.108
1290.
Followed by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Doe v. Maher, 414 F. Supp. 1368, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14822 (D. Conn. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
414 F. Supp. 1368 p.1372
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
414 F. Supp. 1368 p.1382
Cited by:
414 F. Supp. 1368 p.1371
1291.
Followed by:
Kahn v. Shainswit, 414 F. Supp. 1064, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14829 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)
Page 169
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
414 F. Supp. 1064 p.1066
1292.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Silverman v. Browning, 414 F. Supp. 80, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15310 (D. Conn. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
414 F. Supp. 80 p.88
1293.
Cited by:
De Genna v. Grasso, 413 F. Supp. 427, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17113 (D. Conn. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
413 F. Supp. 427 p.430
1294.
Distinguished by:
Cicero v. Olgiati, 410 F. Supp. 1080, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16092, 22 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 230
(S.D.N.Y. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
410 F. Supp. 1080 p.1089
1295.
Distinguished by:
Vail v. Quinlan, 406 F. Supp. 951, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17304 (S.D.N.Y. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
406 F. Supp. 951 p.958
1296.
Followed by, Explained by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Mildner v. Gulotta, 405 F. Supp. 182, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15799 (E.D.N.Y. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
405 F. Supp. 182 p.196
Explained by:
405 F. Supp. 182 p.199
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
405 F. Supp. 182 p.207
1297.
Cited by:
Aknin v. Phillips, 404 F. Supp. 1150, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15403 (S.D.N.Y. 1975)
404 F. Supp. 1150 p.1153
1298.
Followed by:
Luongo v. Wenzel, 404 F. Supp. 874, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15088 (E.D.N.Y. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
404 F. Supp. 874 p.877
404 F. Supp. 874 p.878
1299.
Distinguished by:
Bergman v. Stein, 404 F. Supp. 287, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15212 (S.D.N.Y. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Page 170
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
404 F. Supp. 287 p.293
1300.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Scranton v. New York, 402 F. Supp. 1010, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15422 (S.D.N.Y.
1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
402 F. Supp. 1010 p.1013
1301.
Distinguished by:
Cobb v. Beame, 402 F. Supp. 19, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15947 (S.D.N.Y. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
402 F. Supp. 19 p.22
1302.
Followed by:
Kaufman v. O'Hagan, 401 F. Supp. 792, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16332 (S.D.N.Y. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
401 F. Supp. 792 p.793
1303.
Cited by:
Glucksman v. Birns, 398 F. Supp. 1343, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16695 (S.D.N.Y. 1975)
398 F. Supp. 1343 p.1353
1304.
Distinguished by:
Population Services International v. Wilson, 398 F. Supp. 321, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11608 (S.D.N.Y.
1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
398 F. Supp. 321 p.340
1305.
Cited by:
Merco Properties, Inc. v. Guggenheimer, 395 F. Supp. 1322, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12083 (S.D.N.Y.
1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
395 F. Supp. 1322 p.1326
1306.
Distinguished by:
Owens v. Housing Authority of Stamford, 394 F. Supp. 1267, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12147 (D. Conn. 1975)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
394 F. Supp. 1267 p.1269
394 F. Supp. 1267 p.1270
1307.
Cited by:
Coe v. Frank, 391 F. Supp. 492, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13058 (E.D.N.Y. 1975)
391 F. Supp. 492 p.496
1308.
Cited by:
New Haven Tenants' Representative Council, Inc. v. Housing Authority of New Haven, 390 F. Supp. 831,
1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14004 (D. Conn. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
390 F. Supp. 831 p.832
Page 171
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1309.
Cited by:
Universal Gypsum of Georgia, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co., 390 F. Supp. 824, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
13656 (S.D.N.Y. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1310.
Explained by:
Vail v. Quinlan, 387 F. Supp. 630, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14384 (S.D.N.Y. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
387 F. Supp. 630 p.636
387 F. Supp. 630 p.637
1311.
Cited by:
Reitzer v. Kuh, 387 F. Supp. 274, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14547 (S.D.N.Y. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
387 F. Supp. 274 p.275
1312.
Cited by:
Schero v. Merrola, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7777, 1974 Trade Cas. (CCH) P75166 (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 1974)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
1313.
Cited by:
Abbit v. Bernier, 387 F. Supp. 57, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11419 (D. Conn. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
387 F. Supp. 57 p.59
1314.
Cited by:
In re Bogart, 386 F. Supp. 126, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11844 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)
386 F. Supp. 126 p.131
1315.
Cited by:
Dacajaweih v. Lefkowitz, 384 F. Supp. 671, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5806 (W.D.N.Y. 1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
384 F. Supp. 671 p.672
384 F. Supp. 671 p.673
1316.
Cited by:
Cornelius v. Benevolent Protective Order of Elks, 382 F. Supp. 1182, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7303 (D.
Conn. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
382 F. Supp. 1182 p.1193
1317.
Distinguished by:
227 Book Center, Inc. v. Codd, 381 F. Supp. 1111, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8097 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)
381 F. Supp. 1111 p.1117
1318.
Cited by:
Salem Inn, Inc. v. Frank, 381 F. Supp. 859, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6825 (E.D.N.Y. 1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
381 F. Supp. 859 p.862
Page 172
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1319.
Cited by:
Cooper v. Meskill, 376 F. Supp. 731, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8240 (D. Conn. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
376 F. Supp. 731 p.732
1320.
Followed by:
Fowler v. Vincent, 366 F. Supp. 1224, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11001 (S.D.N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
366 F. Supp. 1224 p.1228
1321.
Cited by:
Wallace v. Kern, 392 F. Supp. 834, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13687 (E.D.N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
392 F. Supp. 834 p.848
1322.
Cited by:
Wallace v. McDonald, 369 F. Supp. 180, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14759 (E.D.N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
369 F. Supp. 180 p.186
1323.
Cited by:
Fitzgerald v. Cawley, 368 F. Supp. 677, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10688 (S.D.N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
368 F. Supp. 677 p.680
1324.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Blouin v. Dembitz, 367 F. Supp. 415, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14247 (S.D.N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
367 F. Supp. 415 p.421
Cited by:
367 F. Supp. 415 p.422
1325.
Cited by:
Salem Inn, Inc. v. Frank, 364 F. Supp. 478, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12004, 6 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P8943
(E.D.N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
364 F. Supp. 478 p.480
364 F. Supp. 478 p.481
364 F. Supp. 478 p.482
1326.
Followed by, Cited by:
Thistlethwaite v. New York, 362 F. Supp. 88, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12551 (S.D.N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
362 F. Supp. 88 p.94
Page 173
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cited by:
362 F. Supp. 88 p.92
362 F. Supp. 88 p.93
1327.
Distinguished by:
Rego Trading Corp. v. Birns, 361 F. Supp. 1341, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13423 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)
361 F. Supp. 1341 p.1343
1328.
Explained by:
Lecci v. Cahn, 360 F. Supp. 759, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13180 (E.D.N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
360 F. Supp. 759 p.762
1329.
Followed by:
Horodner v. Cahn, 360 F. Supp. 602, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13157 (E.D.N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
360 F. Supp. 602 p.603
360 F. Supp. 602 p.605
1330.
Cited by:
414 Theatre Corp. v. Murphy, 360 F. Supp. 34, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12952 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)
360 F. Supp. 34 p.35
1331.
Cited by:
Brown v. Murphy, 355 F. Supp. 416, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15171 (S.D.N.Y. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN3, HN5, HN6
355 F. Supp. 416 p.417
1332.
Cited by:
Caramico v. Romney, 390 F. Supp. 210, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11271 (E.D.N.Y. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
390 F. Supp. 210 p.215
1333.
Distinguished by:
Boraas v. Belle Terre, 367 F. Supp. 136, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11903 (E.D.N.Y. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
367 F. Supp. 136 p.140
1334.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Silverman v. Browning, 359 F. Supp. 173, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10697 (D. Conn. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
359 F. Supp. 173 p.181
1335.
Followed by:
Turner v. Baxley, 354 F. Supp. 963, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10492 (D. Vt. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 174
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN5, HN6
354 F. Supp. 963 p.970
354 F. Supp. 963 p.971
1336.
Distinguished by:
Avon 42nd Street Corp. v. Myerson, 352 F. Supp. 994, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10663 (S.D.N.Y. 1972)
352 F. Supp. 994 p.997
1337.
Cited by:
Russell v. Monroe, 351 F. Supp. 115, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11214 (W.D.N.Y. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
351 F. Supp. 115 p.117
351 F. Supp. 115 p.118
1338.
Followed by:
1487 Amusement Corp. v. Redlich, 350 F. Supp. 822, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11268 (S.D.N.Y. 1972)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
350 F. Supp. 822 p.827
350 F. Supp. 822 p.828
1339.
Cited by:
Ajello v. Schaffer, 349 F. Supp. 1168, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11897 (D. Conn. 1972)
349 F. Supp. 1168 p.1172
1340.
Cited by:
Halstead, Fauss & Potter, Inc. v. Murphy, 348 F. Supp. 380, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12699 (S.D.N.Y. 1972)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
348 F. Supp. 380 p.382
1341.
Cited by:
Vali Books, Inc. v. Murphy, 343 F. Supp. 841, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13673 (S.D.N.Y. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
343 F. Supp. 841 p.844
1342.
Cited by:
Star Distributors, Ltd. v. Hogan, 337 F. Supp. 1362, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15176 (S.D.N.Y. 1972)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
337 F. Supp. 1362 p.1365
1343.
Cited by:
Lido East Theatre Corp. v. Murphy, 337 F. Supp. 1345, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15093 (S.D.N.Y. 1972)
337 F. Supp. 1345 p.1349
1344.
Cited by:
Ungar v. Isaias, 336 F. Supp. 1233, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15419 (S.D.N.Y. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Page 175
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
336 F. Supp. 1233 p.1234
1345.
Cited by:
G. I. Distributors, Inc. v. Murphy, 336 F. Supp. 1036, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15486 (S.D.N.Y. 1972)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
336 F. Supp. 1036 p.1038
1346.
Cited by:
Mod Amusement Co. v. Murphy, 335 F. Supp. 1267, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15661 (S.D.N.Y. 1972)
335 F. Supp. 1267 p.1268
1347.
Cited by:
Farkas v. Barry, 335 F. Supp. 681, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15685 (E.D.N.Y. 1972)
335 F. Supp. 681 p.683
1348.
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Thoms v. Smith, 334 F. Supp. 1203, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10864 (D. Conn. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Distinguished by:
334 F. Supp. 1203 p.1205
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
334 F. Supp. 1203 p.1215
334 F. Supp. 1203 p.1216
1349.
Cited by:
Puglia v. Cotter, 333 F. Supp. 940, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13283 (D. Conn. 1971)
333 F. Supp. 940 p.941
1350.
Cited by:
Miller v. Rockefeller, 327 F. Supp. 542, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14295 (S.D.N.Y. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
327 F. Supp. 542 p.549
1351.
Distinguished by:
Anderson v. Vaughn, 327 F. Supp. 101, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13237 (D. Conn. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
327 F. Supp. 101 p.102
1352.
Cited by:
Bond v. Dentzer, 325 F. Supp. 1343, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13718 (N.D.N.Y 1971)
325 F. Supp. 1343 p.1346
1353.
Followed by:
Hendricks v. Hogan, 324 F. Supp. 1277, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14043 (S.D.N.Y. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6, HN7
Page 176
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
324 F. Supp. 1277 p.1281
324 F. Supp. 1277 p.1282
1354.
Cited by:
Salvaggio v. Cotter, 324 F. Supp. 681, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14162 (D. Conn. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
324 F. Supp. 681 p.688
2ND CIRCUIT - U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURTS
1355.
Cited by:
Dennison v. Davis (In re Dennison), 321 B.R. 378, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 512 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2005)
321 B.R. 378 p.383
1356.
Followed by:
Pickett v. Quinn (In re Pickett), 321 B.R. 663, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 206 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
321 B.R. 663 p.669
1357.
Cited by:
In re General Am. Communs. Corp., 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2985 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Nov. 26, 1990)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1358.
Cited by:
In re Verrazano Holding Corp., 86 B.R. 755, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 940, 17 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1162,
Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P72371 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
86 B.R. 755 p.763
1359.
Cited by:
In re Cancel, 82 B.R. 674, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 162, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P72199, 18 Collier Bankr. Cas.
2d (MB) 386 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 1988)
82 B.R. 674 p.677
1360.
Cited by:
In re Double TRL, Inc., 65 B.R. 993, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 5094, 15 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 190 (Bankr.
E.D.N.Y. 1986)
65 B.R. 993 p.1002
1361.
Followed by:
In re HBG Servicenter, Inc., 45 B.R. 668, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6929, 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 740, Bankr.
L. Rep. (CCH) P70208, 11 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 1199 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
45 B.R. 668 p.672
1362.
Cited by:
In re Mead, 41 B.R. 838, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5074, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P69995 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1984)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 177
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
41 B.R. 838 p.841
1363.
Cited by:
In re Pellegrino, 42 B.R. 129, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5316, 11 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 334 (Bankr. D.
Conn. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
42 B.R. 129 p.134
1364.
Cited by:
In re Parr, 4 B.R. 646, 1980 Bankr. LEXIS 4977, 22 Collier Bankr. Cas. (MB) 964 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1980)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4 B.R. 646 p.648
3RD CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
1365.
Cited by:
Getson v. N.J., 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 25777 (3d Cir. N.J. Nov. 23, 2009)
1366.
Cited by:
Wilson v. Jacobs, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23726 (3d Cir. N.J. Oct. 27, 2009)
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23726
1367.
Followed by:
TCIF REO CIT, LLC v. Gray, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21233 (3d Cir. Pa. Sept. 25, 2009)
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21233
1368.
Followed by:
Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Ass'n of the United Methodist Church v. Vespa-Papaleo, 2009 U.S. App.
LEXIS 15741 (3d Cir. N.J. July 15, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN7
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15741
1369.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Kendall v. Russell, 572 F.3d 126, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15390 (3d Cir. 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
572 F.3d 126 p.131
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
572 F.3d 126 p.140
Cited by:
572 F.3d 126 p.130
1370.
Cited by:
Koynok v. Lloyd, 328 Fed. Appx. 133, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11298 (3d Cir. Pa. 2009)
328 Fed. Appx. 133 p.135
1371.
Cited by:
Page 178
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Akuma-Eze v. Natal, 312 Fed. Appx. 502, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 3483 (3d Cir. N.J. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
312 Fed. Appx. 502 p.503
1372.
Followed by:
Cooley v. DiVecchio, 307 Fed. Appx. 611, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2459 (3d Cir. Pa. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
307 Fed. Appx. 611 p.614
1373.
Distinguished by:
Matusow v. Trans-County Title Agency, LLC, 545 F.3d 241, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21584 (3d Cir. N.J.
2008)
545 F.3d 241 p.242
1374.
Cited by:
Calhoun v. Young, 288 Fed. Appx. 47, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16592 (3d Cir. N.J. 2008)
288 Fed. Appx. 47 p.50
1375.
Followed by:
Levine v. New Jersey, 285 Fed. Appx. 970, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16436 (3d Cir. N.J. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
285 Fed. Appx. 970 p.971
1376.
Followed by:
Gray v. Pagano, 287 Fed. Appx. 155, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16235 (3d Cir. Pa. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
287 Fed. Appx. 155 p.158
1377.
Cited by:
D.T.B. v. Dangler, 280 Fed. Appx. 151, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 10906 (3d Cir. N.J. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
280 Fed. Appx. 151 p.155
1378.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
White v. Pennsylvania, 262 Fed. Appx. 359, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 2019 (3d Cir. Pa. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
262 Fed. Appx. 359 p.360
Cited by:
262 Fed. Appx. 359 p.359
1379.
Cited by:
Kehres v. Pennsylvania, 262 Fed. Appx. 466, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 1893 (3d Cir. Pa. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
262 Fed. Appx. 466 p.469
Page 179
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1380.
Followed by:
Tinsley v. Adams, 248 Fed. Appx. 309, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22842 (3d Cir. Pa. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
248 Fed. Appx. 309 p.311
1381.
Followed by:
Ray v. New Jersey, 219 Fed. Appx. 121, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5250 (3d Cir. N.J. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
219 Fed. Appx. 121 p.124
1382.
Cited by:
Dutton v. Court of Common Pleas of Phila. Domestic Rels. Div., 215 Fed. Appx. 161, 2007 U.S. App.
LEXIS 2643 (3d Cir. Pa. 2007)
215 Fed. Appx. 161 p.162
1383.
Followed by:
Brooks-Mccollum v. Delaware, 213 Fed. Appx. 92, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 580 (3d Cir. Del. 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
213 Fed. Appx. 92 p.94
1384.
Followed by:
Carroway v. New Jersey, 202 Fed. Appx. 564, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 25969 (3d Cir. N.J. 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
202 Fed. Appx. 564 p.566
1385.
Followed by:
In re Johnson, 196 Fed. Appx. 112, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20886 (3d Cir. N.J. 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
196 Fed. Appx. 112 p.114
1386.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Taliaferro v. Darby Twp. Zoning Bd., 458 F.3d 181, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20534 (3d Cir. Pa. 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
458 F.3d 181 p.192
Cited by:
458 F.3d 181 p.187
1387.
Cited by:
Turner v. Crawford Square Apts. III, L.P., 449 F.3d 542, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 13408 (3d Cir. Pa. 2006)
449 F.3d 542 p.546
1388.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Tucker v. Ann Klein Forensic Ctr., 174 Fed. Appx. 695, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 8740 (3d Cir. N.J. 2006)
Distinguished by:
Page 180
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
174 Fed. Appx. 695 p.698
Cited by:
174 Fed. Appx. 695 p.696
1389.
Cited by:
Hawkins v. Supreme Court, 174 Fed. Appx. 683, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 7950 (3d Cir. N.J. 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
174 Fed. Appx. 683 p.684
1390.
Distinguished by:
Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. United States, 442 F.3d 177, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 7203, 2006 A.M.C. 722, 2006-1
Trade Cas. (CCH) P75172 (3d Cir. Pa. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
442 F.3d 177 p.185
1391.
Cited by:
IFC Interconsult, AG v. Safeguard Int'l Partners, LLC, 438 F.3d 298, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 3369 (3d Cir.
Pa. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
438 F.3d 298 p.305
1392.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Malay. Int'l Shipping Corp. v. Sinochem Int'l Co., 436 F.3d 349, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2902, 2006 A.M.C.
383 (3d Cir. Pa. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
436 F.3d 349 p.368
1393.
Followed by:
Prevost v. Twp. of Hazlet, 159 Fed. Appx. 396, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 28013 (3d Cir. N.J. 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
159 Fed. Appx. 396 p.397
1394.
Cited by:
In re Thompson, 418 F.3d 362, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16810, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P80346 (3d Cir. Pa.
2005)
418 F.3d 362 p.365
1395.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Cited by:
Yang v. Tsui, 416 F.3d 199, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15943 (3d Cir. Pa. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
416 F.3d 199 p.204
Followed by:
416 F.3d 199 p.201
Cited by:
416 F.3d 199 p.200
1396.
Cited by:
Page 181
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Hess v. Kunkle, 142 Fed. Appx. 578, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15334 (3d Cir. Pa. 2005)
142 Fed. Appx. 578 p.579
1397.
Cited by:
Untracht v. Weimann, 141 Fed. Appx. 46, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13334 (3d Cir. N.J. 2005)
141 Fed. Appx. 46 p.48
1398.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Cited by:
Addiction Specialists, Inc. v. Twp. of Hampton, 411 F.3d 399, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11136, 12 Accom.
Disabilities Dec. (CCH) P12-011, 16 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1464 (3d Cir. Pa. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
411 F.3d 399 p.414
Followed by:
411 F.3d 399 p.408
Cited by:
411 F.3d 399 p.403
1399.
Followed by, Cited by:
Peay v. Massiah-Jackson, 133 Fed. Appx. 31, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 9830 (3d Cir. Pa. 2005)
Followed by:
133 Fed. Appx. 31 p.33
Cited by:
133 Fed. Appx. 31 p.32
1400.
Cited by:
McAllister v. Allegheny County Family Div., 128 Fed. Appx. 901, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6772 (3d Cir. Pa.
2005)
128 Fed. Appx. 901 p.902
1401.
Cited by:
Wyatt v. Keating, 130 Fed. Appx. 511, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6110 (3d Cir. Pa. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
130 Fed. Appx. 511 p.514
1402.
Followed by:
McDaniels v. N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs., 144 Fed. Appx. 213, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5180 (3d Cir.
N.J. 2005)
144 Fed. Appx. 213 p.214
1403.
Cited by:
Walker v. Horn, 385 F.3d 321, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20379, 65 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 517 (3d Cir. Pa.
2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
385 F.3d 321 p.331
Page 182
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1404.
Followed in Concurring Opinion at, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Hi Tech Trans, LLC v. New Jersey, 382 F.3d 295, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18591 (3d Cir. N.J. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed in Concurring Opinion at:
382 F.3d 295 p.310
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
382 F.3d 295 p.311
Cited by:
382 F.3d 295 p.297
382 F.3d 295 p.305
1405.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Marran v. Marran, 376 F.3d 143, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 14608 (3d Cir. Pa. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN9
Distinguished by:
376 F.3d 143 p.155
Cited by:
376 F.3d 143 p.154
1406.
Followed by, Cited by:
Lui v. Comm'n on Adult Entm't Establishments, 369 F.3d 319, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10354 (3d Cir. Del.
2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
369 F.3d 319 p.326
Cited by:
369 F.3d 319 p.320
369 F.3d 319 p.325
1407.
Distinguished by:
In re Diet Drugs (Phentermine/Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine) Prods. Liab. Litig., 369 F.3d 293, 2004 U.S.
App. LEXIS 10231, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P17005 (3d Cir. Pa. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
369 F.3d 293 p.307
1408.
Cited by:
Bresko v. John, 87 Fed. Appx. 800, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1338 (3d Cir. Pa. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
87 Fed. Appx. 800 p.801
1409.
Cited by:
Camiolo v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 334 F.3d 345, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13258 (3d Cir. Pa. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
334 F.3d 345 p.354
1410.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Page 183
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
MacNamara v. Hess, 67 Fed. Appx. 139, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11532 (3d Cir. Pa. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
67 Fed. Appx. 139 p.145
Cited by:
67 Fed. Appx. 139 p.144
1411.
Cited by:
Timoney v. Upper Merion Twp., 66 Fed. Appx. 403, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10584 (3d Cir. Pa. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
66 Fed. Appx. 403 p.405
1412.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Dreher v. Pinchak, 61 Fed. Appx. 800, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3859 (3d Cir. N.J. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
61 Fed. Appx. 800 p.807
1413.
Followed by, Cited by:
Anthony v. Council, 316 F.3d 412, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 936 (3d Cir. N.J. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Followed by:
316 F.3d 412 p.418
Cited by:
316 F.3d 412 p.415
1414.
Cited by:
Chadwick v. Janecka, 312 F.3d 597, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 25263 (3d Cir. Pa. 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
312 F.3d 597 p.601
1415.
Cited by:
Chadwick v. Janecka, 302 F.3d 107, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17172 (3d Cir. Pa. 2002)
302 F.3d 107 p.111
1416.
Cited by:
Torres v. Fauver, 292 F.3d 141, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 10032 (3d Cir. N.J. 2002)
292 F.3d 141 p.144
1417.
Cited by:
Bresko v. John, 31 Fed. Appx. 56, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 4174 (3d Cir. Pa. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN9
31 Fed. Appx. 56 p.58
1418.
Cited by:
Zahl v. Harper, 282 F.3d 204, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2905 (3d Cir. N.J. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 184
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN5
282 F.3d 204 p.208
1419.
Followed by:
Stewart v. Abraham, 275 F.3d 220, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 27339, 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1145 (3d
Cir. Pa. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
275 F.3d 220 p.225
1420.
Cited by:
Bass v. Butler, 258 F.3d 176, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 15395 (3d Cir. Pa. 2001)
258 F.3d 176 p.179
1421.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Chiropractic Am. v. LaVecchia, 180 F.3d 99, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7216 (3d Cir. N.J. 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
180 F.3d 99 p.110
Cited by:
180 F.3d 99 p.103
1422.
Cited by:
A.S. Goldmen & Co. v. New Jersey Bureau of Sec., 163 F.3d 780, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 147, Blue Sky L.
Rep. (CCH) P74175 (3d Cir. N.J. 1999)
163 F.3d 780 p.784
1423.
Cited by:
Frank Russell Co. v. Wellington Mgmt. Co., LLP, 154 F.3d 97, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 20170, Fed. Sec. L.
Rep. (CCH) P90270 (3d Cir. Pa. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
154 F.3d 97 p.99
1424.
Cited by:
Ferguson Elec. Co. v. Foley, 115 F.3d 237, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 16082, 21 Employee Benefits Cas.
(BNA) 1230, 135 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58345, 3 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1707 (3d Cir. Pa. 1997)
115 F.3d 237 p.239
1425.
Cited by:
Taylor v. Cisneros, 102 F.3d 1334, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31317 (3d Cir. N.J. 1996)
102 F.3d 1334 p.1337
1426.
Cited by:
Pic-A-State Pa. v. Reno, 76 F.3d 1294, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 2392 (3d Cir. Pa. 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
76 F.3d 1294 p.1298
76 F.3d 1294 p.1300
Page 185
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1427.
Cited by:
FOCUS v. Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, 75 F.3d 834, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1443 (3d Cir.
Pa. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
75 F.3d 834 p.837
1428.
Cited by:
NYLife Distribs. v. Adherence Group, 72 F.3d 371, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 36300 (3d Cir. N.J. 1995)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
72 F.3d 371 p.376
1429.
Cited by:
Mountain Top Condo. Ass'n v. Dave Stabbert Master Builder, 72 F.3d 361, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 35717,
33 V.I. 311, 33 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 382 (1995)
72 F.3d 361 p.370
1430.
Cited by:
Freehold Cogeneration Assocs., L.P. v. Board of Regulatory Comm'rs, 44 F.3d 1178, 1995 U.S. App.
LEXIS 278, Util. L. Rep. (CCH) P14028 (3d Cir. N.J. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
44 F.3d 1178 p.1187
1431.
Cited by:
Acierno v. New Castle County, 40 F.3d 645, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 31375 (3d Cir. Del. 1994)
40 F.3d 645 p.655
1432.
Cited by:
Trent v. Dial Medical, 33 F.3d 217, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21369 (3d Cir. Pa. 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
33 F.3d 217 p.223
1433.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
O'Neill v. City of Philadelphia, 32 F.3d 785, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20308 (3d Cir. Pa. 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
32 F.3d 785 p.796
Cited by:
32 F.3d 785 p.786
32 F.3d 785 p.789
1434.
Cited by:
Jordan v. Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien & Frankel, 20 F.3d 1250, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5974 (3d Cir. Pa.
1994)
20 F.3d 1250 p.1264
1435.
Cited by:
Marks v. Stinson, 19 F.3d 873, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4602 (3d Cir. Pa. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN9
Page 186
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
19 F.3d 873 p.881
1436.
Cited by:
Guarino v. Larsen, 11 F.3d 1151, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 31051 (3d Cir. Pa. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
11 F.3d 1151 p.1152
11 F.3d 1151 p.1157
1437.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Grode v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Ins. Co., 8 F.3d 953, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 27342 (3d Cir. Pa.
1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Distinguished by:
8 F.3d 953 p.961
Cited by:
8 F.3d 953 p.956
8 F.3d 953 p.957
1438.
Distinguished by:
Olde Discount Corp. v. Tupman, Ct. App. 3rd Dkt. No. 92-7557 (July 30, 1993)
Ct. App. 3rd Dkt. No. 92-7557
1439.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Olde Discount Corp. v. Tupman, 1 F.3d 202, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20072, Blue Sky L. Rep. (CCH)
P73849, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P97744 (3d Cir. Del. 1993)
Distinguished by:
1 F.3d 202 p.211
Cited by:
1 F.3d 202 p.204
1 F.3d 202 p.212
1440.
Cited by:
Tedford v. Hepting, 990 F.2d 745, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 6607 (3d Cir. Pa. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
990 F.2d 745 p.747
1441.
Cited by:
Dailey v. National Hockey League, 987 F.2d 172, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2507, 16 Employee Benefits Cas.
(BNA) 1609 (3d Cir. N.J. 1993)
987 F.2d 172 p.178
1442.
Followed by:
General Glass Indus. Corp. v. Monsour Medical Found., 973 F.2d 197, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 19011, 15
Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2233 (3d Cir. Pa. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
973 F.2d 197 p.204
Page 187
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1443.
Followed by:
Port Authority Police Benevolent Ass'n v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey Police Dep't, 973 F.2d
169, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17991 (3d Cir. N.J. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9
973 F.2d 169 p.171
973 F.2d 169 p.173
973 F.2d 169 p.176
1444.
Followed by:
Gwynedd Properties, Inc. v. Lower Gwynedd Township, 970 F.2d 1195, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15883 (3d
Cir. Pa. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
970 F.2d 1195 p.1196
1445.
Cited by:
1975 Salaried Retirement Plan for Eligible Employees of Crucible, Inc. v. Nobers, 968 F.2d 401, 1992 U.S.
App. LEXIS 15095, 15 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1971, 122 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10268 (3d Cir. Pa.
1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
968 F.2d 401 p.408
1446.
Explained by:
Evans v. Court of Common Pleas, 959 F.2d 1227, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 4654 (3d Cir. Pa. 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
959 F.2d 1227 p.1234
1447.
Cited by:
Richman Bros. Records, Inc. v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co., 953 F.2d 1431, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS
30230, 70 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 356 (3d Cir. N.J. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
953 F.2d 1431 p.1442
953 F.2d 1431 p.1443
1448.
Cited by:
United States v. Gilsenan, 949 F.2d 90, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26881, 34 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 635
(3d Cir. N.J. 1991)
949 F.2d 90 p.90
1449.
Cited by:
Hospital Council of Western Pennsylvania v. Pittsburgh, 949 F.2d 83, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26880 (3d
Cir. Pa. 1991)
949 F.2d 83 p.90
1450.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Winston v. Children & Youth Services, 948 F.2d 1380, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26510 (3d Cir. Pa. 1991)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
948 F.2d 1380 p.1397
Cited by:
948 F.2d 1380 p.1385
Page 188
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1451.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Ivy Club v. Edwards, 943 F.2d 270, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19215 (3d Cir. N.J. 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
943 F.2d 270 p.278
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
943 F.2d 270 p.284
Cited by:
943 F.2d 270 p.274
1452.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Salvation Army v. Department of Community Affairs, 919 F.2d 183, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19352 (3d Cir.
N.J. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN5
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
919 F.2d 183 p.203
Cited by:
919 F.2d 183 p.190
919 F.2d 183 p.192
1453.
Explained by:
Ayers v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 908 F.2d 1184, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12587 (3d Cir. Pa. 1990)
908 F.2d 1184 p.1195
1454.
Cited by:
Hughes v. Lipscher, 906 F.2d 961, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10881, 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40050 (3d
Cir. N.J. 1990)
906 F.2d 961 p.963
1455.
Distinguished by:
In re Highway Truck Drivers & Helpers Local Union #107, 888 F.2d 293, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16263,
19 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1666, 21 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 1133, 132 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2974 (3d Cir.
Pa. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
888 F.2d 293 p.299
1456.
Distinguished by:
Terra Nova Ins. Co. v. 900 Bar, Inc., 887 F.2d 1213, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15795, 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d
(Callaghan) 347 (3d Cir. Pa. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
887 F.2d 1213 p.1222
1457.
Cited by:
United States Steel Corp. Plan for Employee Ins. Ben. v. Musisko, 885 F.2d 1170, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS
14123, 11 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1719 (3d Cir. Pa. 1989)
885 F.2d 1170 p.1180
Page 189
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1458.
Followed by:
Schall v. Joyce, 885 F.2d 101, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13850 (3d Cir. Pa. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
885 F.2d 101 p.102
885 F.2d 101 p.106
1459.
Cited by:
McLaughlin v. Pernsley, 876 F.2d 308, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7391 (3d Cir. Pa. 1989)
1460.
Cited by:
Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Comm'r of Pennsylvania, 874 F.2d 926, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6182 (3d Cir.
Pa. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
1461.
Cited by:
In re Johnson-Allen, 871 F.2d 421, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3717, 19 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 280, Bankr. L.
Rep. (CCH) P72820, 20 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 966 (3d Cir. Pa. 1989)
871 F.2d 421 p.422
1462.
Cited by:
Fuller v. Diesslin, 868 F.2d 604, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2153 (3d Cir. N.J. 1989)
868 F.2d 604 p.606
1463.
Cited by:
Williams v. Hepting, 844 F.2d 138, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4989, 94 A.L.R. Fed. 879 (3d Cir. Pa. 1988)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
844 F.2d 138 p.144
1464.
Distinguished by:
Ingersoll-Rand Financial Corp. v. Callison, 844 F.2d 133, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4954, Fed. Sec. L. Rep.
(CCH) P93706 (3d Cir. N.J. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
844 F.2d 133 p.136
1465.
Distinguished by:
Sullivan v. Pittsburgh, 811 F.2d 171, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1279 (3d Cir. Pa. 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
811 F.2d 171 p.176
811 F.2d 171 p.177
811 F.2d 171 p.179
1466.
Distinguished by:
Suburban Trails, Inc. v. New Jersey Transit Corp., 800 F.2d 361, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 29836, 1986-2
Trade Cas. (CCH) P67285 (3d Cir. N.J. 1986)
800 F.2d 361 p.366
1467.
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Monaghan v. Deakins, 798 F.2d 632, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27612 (3d Cir. N.J. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
Page 190
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
798 F.2d 632 p.633
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
798 F.2d 632 p.639
1468.
Distinguished by:
United Services Auto. Asso. v. Muir, 792 F.2d 356, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25507 (3d Cir. Pa. 1986)
792 F.2d 356 p.360
1469.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Kentucky West Virginia Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Com., 791 F.2d 1111, 1986 U.S. App.
LEXIS 25502 (3d Cir. Pa. 1986)
Distinguished by:
791 F.2d 1111 p.1114
791 F.2d 1111 p.1116
Cited by:
791 F.2d 1111 p.1112
1470.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Georgevich v. Strauss, 772 F.2d 1078, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 22846 (3d Cir. Pa. 1985)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
772 F.2d 1078 p.1100
Cited by:
772 F.2d 1078 p.1092
1471.
Cited by:
Crane v. Fauver, 762 F.2d 325, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 31172 (3d Cir. N.J. 1985)
762 F.2d 325 p.328
1472.
Explained by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Harris v. Pernsley, 755 F.2d 338, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29494 (3d Cir. Pa. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Explained by:
755 F.2d 338 p.344
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
755 F.2d 338 p.348
1473.
Cited by:
Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air v. Pa., 755 F.2d 38, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 31387, 22
Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1393, 15 Envtl. L. Rep. 20202, 1 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 53 (3d Cir. Pa. 1985)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
755 F.2d 38 p.46
1474.
Cited by:
Professional Plan Examiners, Inc. v. Lefante, 750 F.2d 282, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15747, 40 Fed. R. Serv.
Page 191
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2d (Callaghan) 935, 102 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P66422, 1985-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P66422 (3d Cir. N.J. 1984)
750 F.2d 282 p.290
1475.
Explained by:
Coleman v. Stanziani, 735 F.2d 118, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21861, 39 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 372 (3d
Cir. Pa. 1984)
735 F.2d 118 p.119
1476.
Cited by:
United States v. Bazzano, 712 F.2d 826, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26625 (3d Cir. Pa. 1983)
712 F.2d 826 p.845
1477.
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Int'l Union Local 54 v. Danziger, 709 F.2d 815, 1983 U.S.
App. LEXIS 27004, 4 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1947, 113 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2868, 97 Lab. Cas.
(CCH) P10232 (3d Cir. N.J. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
709 F.2d 815 p.833
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
709 F.2d 815 p.834
Cited by:
709 F.2d 815 p.820
1478.
Followed by:
Coruzzi v. New Jersey, 705 F.2d 688, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28612 (3d Cir. N.J. 1983)
705 F.2d 688 p.690
1479.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Campbell v. United States Parole Com., 704 F.2d 106, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29201 (3d Cir. Pa. 1983)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
704 F.2d 106 p.116
1480.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Spartacus, Inc. v. McKees Rocks, 694 F.2d 947, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 23396 (3d Cir. Pa. 1982)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
694 F.2d 947 p.953
Cited by:
694 F.2d 947 p.949
1481.
Cited by:
In re Davis, 691 F.2d 176, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24637, 9 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1048, Bankr. L. Rep.
(CCH) P68885, 7 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 861 (3d Cir. Del. 1982)
691 F.2d 176 p.177
691 F.2d 176 p.178
Page 192
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1482.
Cited by:
In re Davis (3d Cir. Oct. 21, 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN9
1483.
Cited by:
Garden State Bar Ass'n v. Middlesex County Ethics Comm., 687 F.2d 801, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25812
(3d Cir. N.J. 1982)
687 F.2d 801 p.802
1484.
Cited by:
Davis v. United States Steel Supply, Div. of United States Steel Corp., 688 F.2d 166, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS
26033, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P33045, 29 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1202 (3d Cir. Pa. 1982)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
688 F.2d 166 p.174
1485.
Distinguished by:
Halderman v. Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp., 673 F.2d 647, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21430 (3d Cir. Pa.
1982)
673 F.2d 647 p.659
1486.
Cited by:
Halderman v. Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. (3d Cir. Feb. 26, 1982)
1487.
Cited by:
Artway v. Pallone, 672 F.2d 1168, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21717 (3d Cir. N.J. 1982)
672 F.2d 1168 p.1178
1488.
Distinguished by:
Heritage Farms, Inc. v. Solebury Township, 671 F.2d 743, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21903 (3d Cir. Pa. 1982)
671 F.2d 743 p.746
1489.
Followed by:
Bowman v. Wilson, 672 F.2d 1145, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21963 (3d Cir. Pa. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6, HN8
672 F.2d 1145 p.1156
1490.
Explained by:
Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 669 F.2d 112, 1982 U.S.
App. LEXIS 22797 (3d Cir. Pa. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
669 F.2d 112 p.113
1491.
Cited by:
Shirey v. Bensalem Township, 663 F.2d 472, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16080, 32 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan)
1246 (3d Cir. Pa. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
663 F.2d 472 p.474
Page 193
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1492.
Followed by:
Williams v. Red Bank Bd. of Educ., 662 F.2d 1008, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16582 (3d Cir. N.J. 1981)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
662 F.2d 1008 p.1010
662 F.2d 1008 p.1011
1493.
Cited by:
Davis v. Rendell, 659 F.2d 374, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 17702 (3d Cir. Pa. 1981)
659 F.2d 374 p.376
1494.
Explained by:
Phillips v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, 657 F.2d 554, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11045
(3d Cir. Pa. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
657 F.2d 554 p.562
1495.
Distinguished by:
In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 654 F.2d 268, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11811 (3d Cir. Pa. 1981) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
654 F.2d 268 p.279
1496.
Cited by:
Switlik v. Hardwicke Co., 651 F.2d 852, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12510, 31 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 993
(3d Cir. N.J. 1981)
651 F.2d 852 p.858
1497.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Garden State Bar Ass'n v. Middlesex County Ethics Comm., 651 F.2d 154, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 13357
(3d Cir. N.J. 1981)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
651 F.2d 154 p.158
Cited by:
651 F.2d 154 p.156
1498.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
New Jersey-Philadelphia Presbytery of Bible Presbyterian Church v. New Jersey State Bd. of Higher
Education, 654 F.2d 868, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14309 (3d Cir. N.J. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
654 F.2d 868 p.895
Cited by:
654 F.2d 868 p.877
654 F.2d 868 p.878
654 F.2d 868 p.881
1499.
Distinguished by:
Herz v. Degnan, 648 F.2d 201, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 13516 (3d Cir. N.J. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 194
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN5
648 F.2d 201 p.209
1500.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Garden State Bar Asso. v. Middlesex County Ethics Committee, 643 F.2d 119, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS
19893 (3d Cir. N.J. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
643 F.2d 119 p.121
Cited by:
643 F.2d 119 p.122
643 F.2d 119 p.124
643 F.2d 119 p.127
643 F.2d 119 p.128
643 F.2d 119 p.130
1501.
Cited by:
United States v. City of Philadelphia, 644 F.2d 187, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 11038 (3d Cir. Pa. 1980)
644 F.2d 187 p.200
1502.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Kennecott Corp. v. Smith, 637 F.2d 181, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 11332, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P97731
(3d Cir. N.J. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
637 F.2d 181 p.186
Cited by:
637 F.2d 181 p.183
1503.
Explained by:
McTeague v. Sosnowski, 617 F.2d 1016, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 19254 (3d Cir. Pa. 1980)
617 F.2d 1016 p.1018
1504.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Healey v. Catalyst Recovery of Pennsylvania, Inc., 616 F.2d 641, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 21008, Fed. Sec.
L. Rep. (CCH) P97268 (3d Cir. Pa. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
616 F.2d 641 p.660
1505.
Cited by:
McKay v. Heyison, 614 F.2d 899, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 20832, 28 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1158 (3d
Cir. Pa. 1980)
614 F.2d 899 p.903
1506.
Cited by:
Louise B. v. Coluatti, 606 F.2d 392, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 11514 (3d Cir. Pa. 1979)
606 F.2d 392 p.399
Page 195
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1507.
Distinguished by:
United States v. Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Bd., 584 F.2d 1273, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 9550, 8
Envtl. L. Rep. 20689 (3d Cir. Pa. 1978)
584 F.2d 1273 p.1276
1508.
Limited by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Johnson v. Kelly, 583 F.2d 1242, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 8715 (3d Cir. Pa. 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Limited by:
583 F.2d 1242 p.1249
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
583 F.2d 1242 p.1252
Cited by:
583 F.2d 1242 p.1244
583 F.2d 1242 p.1245
1509.
Limited by, Distinguished by, Explained by:
New Jersey Education Asso. v. Burke, 579 F.2d 764, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11364 (3d Cir. N.J. 1978)
Limited by:
579 F.2d 764 p.770
Distinguished by:
579 F.2d 764 p.766
Explained by:
579 F.2d 764 p.765
579 F.2d 764 p.768
1510.
Cited by:
In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 563 F.2d 577, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11663, 2 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC)
1081 (3d Cir. Pa. 1977)
563 F.2d 577 p.583
1511.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Ricketts v. Lightcap, 567 F.2d 1226, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5631 (3d Cir. Pa. 1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
567 F.2d 1226 p.1231
1512.
Cited by:
Gipson v. New Jersey, Supreme Court, 558 F.2d 701, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12396 (3d Cir. 1977)
558 F.2d 701 p.703
1513.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
New Jersey v. Chesimard, 555 F.2d 63, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 14385 (3d Cir. N.J. 1977) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3, HN5, HN6
Followed by:
555 F.2d 63 p.66
Page 196
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
555 F.2d 63 p.68
555 F.2d 63 p.69
555 F.2d 63 p.74
Cited by:
555 F.2d 63 p.64
1514.
Cited by:
Apple v. Greer, 554 F.2d 105, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13742 (3d Cir. N.J. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
554 F.2d 105 p.107
1515.
Cited by:
Lewis v. Hyland, 554 F.2d 93, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 14122 (3d Cir. N.J. 1977)
554 F.2d 93 p.95
1516.
Distinguished by:
In re Grand Jury Impaneled January 21, 1975, 541 F.2d 373, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7623, 1 Fed. R. Evid.
Serv. (CBC) 309 (3d Cir. N.J. 1976)
541 F.2d 373 p.378
1517.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Fisher v. Driber, 546 F.2d 18, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 5851 (3d Cir. N.J. 1976)
546 F.2d 18 p.22
1518.
Cited by:
West Penn Power Co. v. Train, 522 F.2d 302, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 13666, 7 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA)
2178, 5 Envtl. L. Rep. 20557 (3d Cir. Pa. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
522 F.2d 302 p.312
1519.
Cited by:
Jersey Cent. Power & Light Co. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 508 F.2d 687, 1975
U.S. App. LEXIS 16319, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P9923, 9 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 117 (3d Cir. N.J.
1975)
508 F.2d 687 p.700
1520.
Cited by:
In re Abrams, 521 F.2d 1094, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 13931 (3d Cir. N.J. 1975)
521 F.2d 1094 p.1105
1521.
Distinguished by:
United States ex rel. Webb v. Court of Common Pleas, 516 F.2d 1034, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14708 (3d
Cir. Pa. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
516 F.2d 1034 p.1039
Page 197
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1522.
Followed by, Cited by:
Moore v. De Young, 515 F.2d 437, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15258 (3d Cir. N.J. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
515 F.2d 437 p.439
Cited by:
515 F.2d 437 p.448
1523.
Cited by:
Goode v. Rizzo, 506 F.2d 542, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6249 (3d Cir. Pa. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
506 F.2d 542 p.546
1524.
Followed by, Explained by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Helfant v. Kugler, 500 F.2d 1188, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7751 (3d Cir. N.J. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
500 F.2d 1188 p.1189
500 F.2d 1188 p.1197
Explained by:
500 F.2d 1188 p.1189
500 F.2d 1188 p.1193
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
500 F.2d 1188 p.1198
1525.
Explained by:
Sedivy v. Richardson, 485 F.2d 1115, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7747 (3d Cir. N.J. 1973)
485 F.2d 1115 p.1121
485 F.2d 1115 p.1122
1526.
Followed by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Helfant v. Kugler, 484 F.2d 1277, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7963 (3d Cir. N.J. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
484 F.2d 1277 p.1282
484 F.2d 1277 p.1283
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
484 F.2d 1277 p.1283
1527.
Explained by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Roy v. Jones, 484 F.2d 96, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8155 (3d Cir. Pa. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
Explained by:
484 F.2d 96 p.99
484 F.2d 96 p.100
484 F.2d 96 p.102
Page 198
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
484 F.2d 96 p.103
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
484 F.2d 96 p.103
1528.
Cited by:
Thompson v. Groshens, 475 F.2d 127, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11293 (3d Cir. Pa. 1973)
475 F.2d 127 p.128
1529.
Distinguished by, Explained by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Conover v. Montemuro, 477 F.2d 1073, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6182 (3d Cir. Pa. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
477 F.2d 1073 p.1083
477 F.2d 1073 p.1090
Explained by:
477 F.2d 1073 p.1077
477 F.2d 1073 p.1080
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
477 F.2d 1073 p.1083
1530.
Cited by:
Carter v. Chief of Police, 468 F.2d 900, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7141 (3d Cir. N.J. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4
468 F.2d 900 p.900
1531.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Conley v. Dauer, 463 F.2d 63, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10044 (3d Cir. Pa. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
463 F.2d 63 p.67
Cited by:
463 F.2d 63 p.66
1532.
Cited by:
United States v. Kenny, 462 F.2d 1230, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9297 (3d Cir. N.J. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
462 F.2d 1230 p.1232
1533.
Cited by:
Oldroyd v. Kugler, 461 F.2d 535, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9225, 16 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 182 (3d
Cir. N.J. 1972)
461 F.2d 535 p.537
461 F.2d 535 p.539
Page 199
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1534.
Cited by:
Rialto Theatre Co. v. Wilmington, 460 F.2d 281, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9449 (3d Cir. Del. 1972)
460 F.2d 281 p.281
1535.
Followed by:
Hopson v. Asch, 457 F.2d 79, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10753 (3d Cir. N.J. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
457 F.2d 79 p.81
1536.
Cited by:
Spencer v. Kugler, 454 F.2d 839, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11664 (3d Cir. Pa. 1972)
454 F.2d 839 p.847
1537.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Birnbaum v. Dolan, 452 F.2d 1078, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6502 (3d Cir. N.J. 1971)
452 F.2d 1078 p.1079
1538.
Cited by:
In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 450 F.2d 199, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9922 (3d Cir. Pa. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
450 F.2d 199 p.215
1539.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
United States ex rel. Catena v. Elias, 449 F.2d 40, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8229 (3d Cir. N.J. 1971)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
449 F.2d 40 p.46
1540.
Harmonized by:
Lewis v. Kugler, 446 F.2d 1343, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8653 (3d Cir. N.J. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
446 F.2d 1343 p.1347
446 F.2d 1343 p.1348
446 F.2d 1343 p.1349
1541.
Followed by:
Hodsdon v. Stabler, 444 F.2d 533, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9223 (3d Cir. Del. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
444 F.2d 533 p.533
1542.
Followed by:
Rialto Theatre Co. v. Wilmington, 440 F.2d 1326, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10654 (3d Cir. Del. 1971)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
440 F.2d 1326 p.1327
3RD CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
Page 200
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1543.
Cited by:
Cradle of Liberty Council, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107932 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 18,
2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107932
1544.
Cited by:
Dye v. Fed. Home Loans Corp., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108654 (D. Del. Nov. 17, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108654
1545.
Cited by:
Gaskins v. Fines, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106150 (D.N.J. Nov. 13, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106150
1546.
Cited by:
State Trooper Fraternal Ass'n v. New Jersey, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106098 (D.N.J. Nov. 12, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106098
1547.
Cited by:
Mohoski v. Freeman, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102551 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 30, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102551
1548.
Cited by:
Deangelo Bros., Inc. v. Platte River Ins. Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101308 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 30, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101308
1549.
Cited by:
Leblanc v. County of Lancaster, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98220 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 21, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98220
1550.
Cited by:
Sable v. Velez, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96360 (D.N.J. Oct. 16, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96360
1551.
Followed by:
Dykeman v. New Jersey, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87992 (D.N.J. Sept. 24, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87992
1552.
Cited by:
Van Tassel v. Lawrence County Domestic Rels. Section, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86607 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 22,
2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86607
1553.
Followed by:
Page 201
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Vasilopoulos v. New Jersey, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84452 (D.N.J. Sept. 16, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84452
1554.
Followed by:
Downey v. Perrault, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84456 (D.N.J. Sept. 15, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84456
1555.
Cited by:
Koynok v. Lloyd, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83154 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 11, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83154
1556.
Cited by:
Gass v. NJ Div. of Youth & Family Servs., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79441 (D.N.J. Sept. 2, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79441
1557.
Cited by:
Santos v. New Jersey, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78090 (D.N.J. Aug. 31, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78090
1558.
Cited by:
Morris v. Commonwealth, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77016 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 26, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77016
1559.
Cited by:
Garlic v. NJ Div. of Youth & Family Servs., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76162 (D.N.J. Aug. 24, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76162
1560.
Cited by:
Vaughn v. Waters, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75183 (D.N.J. Aug. 24, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75183
1561.
Followed by:
Beard v. Borough of Duncansville, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74322 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 21, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74322
1562.
Followed by:
Van Tassel v. Lawrence Country Domestic Rels. Section, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73615 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 19,
2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73615
1563.
Cited by:
Page 202
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Avila v. New Jersey, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70692 (D.N.J. Aug. 10, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70692
1564.
Followed by:
Harbour v. Grahm, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70222 (D.N.J. Aug. 10, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70222
1565.
Cited by:
Tait v. City of Philadelphia, 639 F. Supp. 2d 582, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68621 (E.D. Pa. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4
639 F. Supp. 2d 582 p.590
1566.
Cited by:
Harbour v. Monmouth County Soc. Servs., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69041 (D.N.J. Aug. 5, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69041
1567.
Followed by:
Scott v. Galinski, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67645 (D.N.J. Aug. 4, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67645
1568.
Cited by:
King v. Monohan, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67185 (D.N.J. July 31, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67185
1569.
Followed by:
Williams v. Dewald, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67184 (D.N.J. July 30, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67184
1570.
Followed by:
Cremadelly v. Aristizabal, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66167 (D.N.J. July 29, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66167
1571.
Followed by:
Ellis v. Bj's Wholesale Club, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67651 (D.N.J. July 27, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67651
1572.
Followed by:
Faber v. Buczynski, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64960 (D.N.J. July 24, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64960
1573.
Followed by:
Kloss v. Pearce, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65484 (D.N.J. July 21, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 203
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65484
1574.
Followed by:
Tate v. New Jersey, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61139 (D.N.J. July 17, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61139
1575.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Scarpetowski, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60172 (D.N.J. July 15, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60172
1576.
Followed by:
Duffy v. Kent County Levy Court Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59000 (D. Del. July 9, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59000
1577.
Cited by:
Criss v. New Jersey, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55394 (D.N.J. June 30, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55394
1578.
Followed by:
TCIF REO CIT, LLC v. Gray, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55763 (E.D. Pa. June 26, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55763
1579.
Followed by:
El-Hewie v. Corzine, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53788 (D.N.J. June 24, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53788
1580.
Followed by:
Duffy v. Kent County Levy Court Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53214 (D. Del. June 24, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53214
1581.
Followed by:
Piskanin v. Doe, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51621 (E.D. Pa. June 15, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51621
1582.
Followed by:
DiPietro v. N.J. Family Support Payment Ctr., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48691 (D.N.J. June 10, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48691
1583.
Cited by:
Wilson v. Dows, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90488 (M.D. Pa. June 8, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90488
Page 204
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1584.
Cited by:
Diehl v. Connell, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46573 (D.N.J. June 3, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46573
1585.
Followed by:
Miller v. Ayres, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37562 (W.D. Pa. May 4, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37562
1586.
Cited by:
Foster v. Albino, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36355 (D.N.J. Apr. 28, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36355
1587.
Cited by:
Williams v. State Auto Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35511 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 24, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35511
1588.
Cited by:
Sedhom v. City of Trenton, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34401 (D.N.J. Apr. 22, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34401
1589.
Followed by:
Clegg v. Commonwealth, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32445 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32445
1590.
Cited by:
Ins. Co. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31433 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 14, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31433
1591.
Cited by:
Ott v. Herman, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31686 (D.N.J. Apr. 13, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31686
1592.
Followed by, Cited by:
Nat'l Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Lower Providence Twp., 608 F. Supp. 2d 637, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
31413 (E.D. Pa. 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
608 F. Supp. 2d 637 p.649
Cited by:
608 F. Supp. 2d 637 p.646
Page 205
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1593.
Cited by:
Miller v. Skumanick, 605 F. Supp. 2d 634, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27275 (M.D. Pa. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
605 F. Supp. 2d 634 p.642
1594.
Cited by:
Asbury Park Mun. Court v. Walker, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23786 (D.N.J. Mar. 24, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23786
1595.
Cited by:
Cress v. City of Ventnor, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22172 (D.N.J. Mar. 18, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22172
1596.
Cited by:
Jordan v. Edison City Police Dep't, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16836 (D.N.J. Mar. 4, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16836
1597.
Cited by:
Baker v. Wittevrongel, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14115 (D.N.J. Feb. 24, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14115
1598.
Cited by:
Binsack v. Lackawanna County Dist. Attorney's Office, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12777 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 19,
2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12777
1599.
Cited by:
Bey v. Conner, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10265 (D.N.J. Feb. 10, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10265
1600.
Followed by:
Garland v. Goodman, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8829 (D.N.J. Feb. 6, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8829
1601.
Followed by:
Avila v. State, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6409 (D.N.J. Jan. 28, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6409
1602.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Gordon v. E. Goshen Twp., 592 F. Supp. 2d 828, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2416 (E.D. Pa. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
592 F. Supp. 2d 828 p.842
Page 206
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cited by:
592 F. Supp. 2d 828 p.841
1603.
Followed by:
Gibson v. Middlesex County Office of the Pub. Defender, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2090 (D.N.J. Jan. 12,
2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2090
1604.
Followed by:
Active Disposal Serv. v. County of Somerset, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1357 (D.N.J. Jan. 8, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1357
1605.
Cited by:
Troche v. Pennsylvania, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1332 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 8, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1332
1606.
Cited by:
Williams v. Gov't of the V.I., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 513 (D.V.I. Jan. 6, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 513
1607.
Followed by:
Mitchell v. Rendell, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104478 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104478
1608.
Followed by:
Leer Elec., Inc. v. Pennsylvania, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103543 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 23, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103543
1609.
Cited by:
Harris v. Hershey Med. Ctr., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102514 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 18, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102514
1610.
Followed by:
Peppers v. Rectenwald, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102301 (D.N.J. Dec. 17, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102301
1611.
Followed by, Cited by:
Williams v. Gov't of the V.I., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99648, 50 V.I. 852 (2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
50 V.I. 852 p.860
Cited by:
50 V.I. 852 p.857
Page 207
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1612.
Cited by:
Sanes v. Milgram, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97818 (D.N.J. Dec. 3, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97818
1613.
Followed by:
Dykeman v. New Jersey, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97508 (D.N.J. Nov. 26, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97508
1614.
Cited by:
Pumphrey v. Pereksta, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97496 (D.N.J. Nov. 25, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97496
1615.
Cited by:
Purpura v. Buskin, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93685 (D.N.J. Nov. 18, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93685
1616.
Cited by:
Badger v. Callahan, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93211 (D.N.J. Nov. 14, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93211
1617.
Cited by:
Thomas v. Yassem, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92106 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 13, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92106
1618.
Cited by:
Santos v. Smith, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92117 (D.N.J. Nov. 10, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92117
1619.
Followed by:
Pierce v. Kaplan, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90717 (D.N.J. Nov. 7, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90717
1620.
Cited by:
Galvani v. Pennsylvania, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89150 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 4, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89150
1621.
Followed by:
Lazaridis v. Wehmer, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88544 (D. Del. Oct. 28, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88544
1622.
Followed by:
Peck v. Twp. of Manchester, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86237 (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 208
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86237
1623.
Followed by:
Eggleston v. O'Malley, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83493 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 20, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83493
1624.
Cited by:
Eggleston v. Kobal, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83478 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 20, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83478
1625.
Cited by:
New Horizon Inv. Corp. v. Mayor & Mun. Council of the Twp. of Belleville, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81536
(D.N.J. Oct. 14, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81536
1626.
Followed by:
Williams v. White, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80076 (D.N.J. Oct. 6, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80076
1627.
Followed by:
M&M Stone Co. v. Pennsylvania, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76050 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 29, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76050
1628.
Followed by:
Koynok v. Lloyd, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72475 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 22, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72475
1629.
Followed by:
Shipley v. New Castle County, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76156 (D. Del. Sept. 19, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76156
1630.
Followed by:
Briston v. Wholey, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76254 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 8, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76254
1631.
Followed by:
McKinney v. Passaic County, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71748 (D.N.J. Sept. 3, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71748
1632.
Cited by:
Page 209
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Wilson v. Maxwell, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66171 (D.N.J. Aug. 26, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66171
1633.
Cited by:
Mays v. Untig, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62177 (D.N.J. Aug. 11, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62177
1634.
Cited by:
James v. Superior Court, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60441 (D.N.J. Aug. 7, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60441
1635.
Followed by:
Kelly v. Swift, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61068 (D.N.J. Aug. 4, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61068
1636.
Followed by:
Getson v. New Jersey, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62161 (D.N.J. July 31, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62161
1637.
Cited by:
United States v. Hawkins, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75770 (D.N.J. July 30, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75770
1638.
Followed by:
Berry v. N.J. State Prison, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63621 (D.N.J. July 30, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63621
1639.
Cited by:
Caldwell v. Malagnaggi, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53869 (D.N.J. July 14, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53869
1640.
Followed by:
Gray v. Martinez, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109212 (E.D. Pa. July 10, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109212
1641.
Followed by:
Pappas v. Twp. of Galloway, 565 F. Supp. 2d 581, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49085 (D.N.J. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
565 F. Supp. 2d 581 p.587
1642.
Followed by:
Page 210
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Radmin v. Transunion, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50353 (D.N.J. June 26, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50353
1643.
Followed by:
Fakhouri v. Common Pleas Court, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46781 (M.D. Pa. June 16, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46781
1644.
Followed by:
Nichols v. Abraham, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47126 (E.D. Pa. June 13, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47126
1645.
Followed by:
Lauxmont Holdings v. County of York, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45932 (M.D. Pa. June 11, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45932
1646.
Followed by:
Edlin Ltd. v. City of Jersey City, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41118 (D.N.J. May 23, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41118
1647.
Cited by:
Garcia v. Munoz, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39096 (D.N.J. May 12, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39096
1648.
Cited by:
Green v. Court of Common Pleas, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37966 (E.D. Pa. May 8, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37966
1649.
Followed by:
Garcia v. City of North Bergen, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36393 (D.N.J. May 5, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36393
1650.
Cited by:
Amato v. Smith, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31205 (D.N.J. Apr. 15, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31205
1651.
Followed by:
Zahl v. N.J. Dep't of Law & Pub. Safety, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24022 (D.N.J. Mar. 26, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24022
1652.
Followed by:
PTK, LLC v. Borough of Fort Lee, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22934 (D.N.J. Mar. 24, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Page 211
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22934
1653.
Followed by:
Terry v. Town of Morristown, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22245 (D.N.J. Mar. 18, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22245
1654.
Followed by:
Beaver v. Burlington County Det. Ctr., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18978 (D.N.J. Mar. 11, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18978
1655.
Cited by:
Thompson v. Donohue, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18086 (D.N.J. Mar. 6, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18086
1656.
Cited by:
Jeffreys v. New Jersey, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15915 (D.N.J. Mar. 3, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15915
1657.
Followed by:
Pharo Naji Akhenaten v. N.J.Transit Rail Operations & Mercer County, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15624
(D.N.J. Feb. 28, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15624
1658.
Cited by:
Rankin v. Pennsylvania, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9929 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9929
1659.
Followed by:
Madera v. Ameriquest Mortg. Co. (In re Madera), 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11847 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11847
1660.
Cited by:
Murphy v. Labarre, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5503 (D.N.J. Jan. 23, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5503
1661.
Followed by, Cited by:
Kendall v. Russell, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3420, 49 V.I. 602 (2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
49 V.I. 602 p.616
Cited by:
49 V.I. 602 p.614
Page 212
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1662.
Followed by:
Penn v. Pennsylvania, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2056 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 10, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2056
1663.
Followed by:
Dillihay v. Atl. County Gov't, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2239 (D.N.J. Jan. 9, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2239
1664.
Followed by:
Torres v. Scudder, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93835 (D.N.J. Dec. 21, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93835
1665.
Cited by:
Kimberly-Clark Pa., LLC v. Del. County Reg'l Water Quality Control Auth., 527 F. Supp. 2d 430, 2007 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 93790 (E.D. Pa. 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
527 F. Supp. 2d 430 p.437
1666.
Distinguished by:
Ryerson v. New Jersey, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93058 (D.N.J. Dec. 18, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93058
1667.
Followed by:
66 E. Allendale, L.L.C. v. Borough of Saddle River, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92622 (D.N.J. Dec. 18, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92622
1668.
Cited by:
Barnes v. Plainsboro Twp. Police Dep't, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90850 (D.N.J. Dec. 10, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90850
1669.
Cited by:
Carley v. Tkach, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89717 (D.N.J. Dec. 5, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89717
1670.
Cited by:
Foster v. Taylor, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87426 (D.N.J. Nov. 26, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87426
1671.
Followed by:
Local 54 Patrolman's Benevolent Ass'n v. Fontoura, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85717 (D.N.J. Nov. 16, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 213
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85717
1672.
Followed by:
Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Ass'n of the United Methodist Church v. Vespa-Papaleo, 2007 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 82577 (D.N.J. Nov. 5, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82577
1673.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Whittaker v. County of Lawrence, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76251 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 15, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76251
Followed by:
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76251
1674.
Cited by:
Bangura v. City of Philadelphia, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76270 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 12, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76270
1675.
Followed by:
Borrero v. Cicchi, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75325 (D.N.J. Oct. 9, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75325
1676.
Cited by:
Gourdine v. Scarillo, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74956 (D.N.J. Oct. 9, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74956
1677.
Cited by:
Gourdine v. Pennington, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73870 (D.N.J. Oct. 1, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73870
1678.
Followed by:
Smith v. New Jersey, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71432 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 26, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71432
1679.
Followed by:
Moraca v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70391 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 24, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70391
1680.
Cited by:
Harrison Eagle, LLP v. Town of Harrison, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70382 (D.N.J. Sept. 21, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70382
Page 214
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1681.
Cited by:
Diggs v. Zucker, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65776 (D.N.J. Sept. 5, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65776
1682.
Followed by:
Ross v. City of Phila., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65313 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 4, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65313
1683.
Followed by:
Calhoun v. Young, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62876 (D.N.J. Aug. 27, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62876
1684.
Followed by:
Freeman v. Edens, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60463 (D.N.J. Aug. 17, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60463
1685.
Followed by:
Toscano v. Warren County Dep't of Human Servs., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54892 (D.N.J. July 30, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54892
1686.
Followed by:
Bey v. New Jersey, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52929 (D.N.J. July 20, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52929
1687.
Followed by:
Terry v. Town of Morristown, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51837 (D.N.J. July 17, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51837
1688.
Cited by:
Barnes v. Plainsboro Twp. Police Dep't, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48916 (D.N.J. July 5, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48916
1689.
Cited by:
Miller v. Brown, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46472 (D.N.J. June 26, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46472
1690.
Cited by:
Hayes v. New Jersey, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42164 (D.N.J. June 11, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42164
1691.
Followed by:
Page 215
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Rodriguez v. Camden County Corr. Facility, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42165 (D.N.J. June 8, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42165
1692.
Followed by:
Shipley v. Orndoff, 491 F. Supp. 2d 498, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41926 (D. Del. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
491 F. Supp. 2d 498 p.510
1693.
Cited by:
Buchanan v. Gay, 491 F. Supp. 2d 483, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42414 (D. Del. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
491 F. Supp. 2d 483 p.491
1694.
Cited by:
Barnes v. Mercer County Court House, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40742 (D.N.J. June 5, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40742
1695.
Followed by:
James v. Walls, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39519 (D.N.J. May 31, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39519
1696.
Followed by:
Catrambone v. Sydnor, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40734 (D.N.J. May 29, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40734
1697.
Followed by:
Setser v. Pennsylvania, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34328 (M.D. Pa. May 10, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34328
1698.
Cited by:
Allah v. Fontanez, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32989 (D.N.J. May 3, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32989
1699.
Cited by:
Piskanin v. Hammer, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35177 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 26, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35177
1700.
Cited by:
Hemlock Crossing, LLC v. Logan Twp., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29731 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29731
Page 216
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1701.
Cited by:
Tate v. Morris County Prosecutors Office, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28206 (D.N.J. Apr. 16, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28206
1702.
Cited by:
Tejada v. Hilbert, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28153 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28153
1703.
Cited by:
Hemlock Crossing, LLC v. Logan Twp., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26055 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 9, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26055
1704.
Followed by:
White v. James, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23625 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23625
1705.
Distinguished by:
Quest Land Dev. LLC v. Lower Heidelburg Twp., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19044 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 15, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19044
1706.
Followed by:
Watkins v. Blocker, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18149 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 14, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18149
1707.
Cited by:
Nash v. Rabner, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17227 (D.N.J. Mar. 12, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17227
1708.
Followed by:
Ryerson v. New Jersey, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16335 (D.N.J. Mar. 6, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16335
1709.
Followed by:
R.I., Inc. v. McCarthy, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15220 (D.N.J. Mar. 5, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15220
1710.
Followed by:
Williams v. Ronko Developers Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12152 (D.N.J. Feb. 22, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12152
1711.
Followed by:
Muldrow v. DeFazio, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9732 (D.N.J. Feb. 9, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 217
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9732
1712.
Followed by:
Philway v. McKnight, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9559 (D.N.J. Feb. 8, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9559
1713.
Cited by:
Keefe v. Corzine, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6868 (D.N.J. Jan. 31, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6868
1714.
Cited by:
Aetna, Inc. v. Jones, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5689 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 24, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5689
1715.
Followed by:
Burr v. Harvey, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5715 (D.N.J. Jan. 23, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5715
1716.
Followed by:
Goode v. Borough of Keansburg, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3354 (D.N.J. Jan. 17, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3354
1717.
Followed by:
Dixon v. Kuhn, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2663 (D.N.J. Jan. 12, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2663
1718.
Followed by:
Smith v. Jurman, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3356 (D.N.J. Jan. 11, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3356
1719.
Followed by:
Cortijo v. Alt, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5135 (D.N.J. Jan. 8, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5135
1720.
Followed by:
Zaklama v. City of Bayonne, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1194 (D.N.J. Jan. 5, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1194
1721.
Followed by:
Hayes v. Higginbottom, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238 (D.N.J. Jan. 3, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238
Page 218
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1722.
Followed by:
Hayes v. New Jersey, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210 (D.N.J. Jan. 3, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210
1723.
Cited by:
Frybarger v. N.J. Dep't of the Treasury, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93365 (D.N.J. Dec. 27, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93365
1724.
Cited by:
Sibdhannie v. Coffey, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92452 (D.N.J. Dec. 21, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92452
1725.
Cited by:
Mills v. Murphy, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92347 (D.N.J. Dec. 21, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92347
1726.
Followed by:
Carney v. Paramount Theater, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87819 (D.N.J. Dec. 5, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87819
1727.
Followed by:
Koynok v. Lloyd, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87544 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87544
1728.
Cited by:
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rios, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77041 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 23, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77041
1729.
Followed by:
Watkins v. AG of New Jersey, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73075 (D.N.J. Oct. 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73075
1730.
Cited by:
Humes v. Del. Court of Common Pleas, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68729 (D. Del. Sept. 25, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68729
1731.
Followed by:
Canales v. Moran, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67446 (D.N.J. Sept. 20, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67446
Page 219
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1732.
Cited by:
Hennessey v. Atl. County Dep't of Pub. Safety, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72754 (D.N.J. Sept. 18, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72754
1733.
Followed by:
Robinson v. Brown, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68091 (D.N.J. Sept. 12, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68091
1734.
Followed by:
McLean v. Baidwan, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65739 (D.N.J. Sept. 12, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65739
1735.
Cited by:
Glover v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68308 (D.N.J. Sept. 5, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68308
1736.
Followed by:
Lusick v. Kullar, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62902 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 5, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62902
1737.
Followed by:
Tinsley v. Giorla, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59935 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 22, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59935
1738.
Followed by:
Telepo v. N.J. Office of Pub. Defender, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60523 (D.N.J. Aug. 15, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60523
1739.
Cited by:
El Bey v. Grimm, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54490 (D.N.J. Aug. 7, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54490
1740.
Cited by:
Williams v. Wettick, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67867 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 3, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67867
1741.
Followed by:
Davis v. Shenkus, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56476 (D.N.J. Aug. 2, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56476
Page 220
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1742.
Cited by:
Crawley v. Schireson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48623 (E.D. Pa. July 14, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48623
1743.
Cited by:
Perry v. Manor Care, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47861 (E.D. Pa. July 13, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47861
1744.
Cited by:
World Wide St. Preachers' Fellowship v. Reed, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47635 (M.D. Pa. July 13, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47635
1745.
Followed by:
Endeavor House, Inc. v. City of S. Amboy, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43207 (D.N.J. June 27, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43207
1746.
Followed by:
Middleton v. Farley, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44185 (D.N.J. June 26, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44185
1747.
Followed by:
Lighthouse Christian Ctr., Inc. v. City of Reading, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52432 (E.D. Pa. June 19, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52432
1748.
Cited by:
Muhammad v. Bank of N.Y., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40561 (D. Del. June 14, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40561
1749.
Followed by:
Wright v. Borough of Buena, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38633 (D.N.J. June 12, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38633
1750.
Followed by:
Dillihay v. Donio, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34897 (D.N.J. May 31, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34897
1751.
Followed by:
Brandt v. Monroe, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32764 (D.N.J. May 22, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32764
Page 221
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1752.
Followed by:
Witherspoon v. Scott, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37538 (D.N.J. May 19, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37538
1753.
Distinguished by:
Brandt v. Nurenberg, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31349 (D.N.J. May 19, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31349
1754.
Followed by:
Carroway v. New Jersey, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30120 (D.N.J. May 17, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30120
1755.
Distinguished by:
Barrish v. Cappy, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19954 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 17, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19954
1756.
Cited by:
Steel Partners II, L.P. v. Aronson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21218, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P93850 (D.N.J.
Apr. 13, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21218
1757.
Followed by:
Shihadeh v. Fantuzzi, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20827 (D.N.J. Apr. 12, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20827
1758.
Followed by:
Blakeney v. Peterson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22150 (D.N.J. Apr. 7, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22150
1759.
Followed by:
Benjamin v. Altman, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22294 (D.N.J. Mar. 28, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22294
1760.
Followed by, Cited by:
Cade v. Newman, 422 F. Supp. 2d 463, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14557 (D.N.J. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
422 F. Supp. 2d 463 p.466
Cited by:
422 F. Supp. 2d 463 p.465
1761.
Cited by:
Odumosu v. Blanco, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14013 (D.N.J. Mar. 14, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 222
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14013
1762.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14008 (D.N.J. Mar. 13, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14008
1763.
Followed by:
Kemp v. Harvey, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8939 (D.N.J. Mar. 3, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8939
1764.
Cited by:
Williams v. Rivera, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10479 (D.N.J. Feb. 24, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10479
1765.
Followed by:
Holness v. Wilson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9351 (D.N.J. Feb. 21, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9351
1766.
Followed by:
Santos v. Vasquez, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24067 (D.N.J. Feb. 17, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24067
1767.
Distinguished by:
Mortgage Elec. Registration Sys. v. Alicea, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15097 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15097
1768.
Cited by:
Demby v. Campbell, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5441 (D.N.J. Feb. 6, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5441
1769.
Followed by:
George v. Lycoming County Drug Task Force, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6704 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6704
1770.
Cited by:
Tarpley v. New Jersey, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3598 (D.N.J. Jan. 31, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3598
1771.
Cited by:
Mitchell v. Harvey, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3560 (D.N.J. Jan. 25, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3560
1772.
Followed by:
Page 223
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Vorum v. Canton Township, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2308 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 23, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2308
1773.
Followed by:
Ray v. N.J., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2759 (D.N.J. Jan. 20, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2759
1774.
Followed by:
Bullock v. Luzerne County Children & Youth Servs., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3360 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3360
1775.
Cited by:
Fuentes v. N.J. Office of the Pub. Defenders, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1147 (D.N.J. Jan. 11, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1147
1776.
Cited by:
Foster v. N.J. DOT, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36439 (D.N.J. Dec. 27, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36439
1777.
Cited by:
832 Corp. v. Gloucester Twp., 404 F. Supp. 2d 614, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32860 (D.N.J. 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
404 F. Supp. 2d 614 p.628
1778.
Followed by:
Temple v. Spinelli, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28803 (D.N.J. Nov. 16, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28803
1779.
Followed by:
Sanders v. Susquehanna County Jail, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31092 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 8, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6, HN9
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31092
1780.
Followed by:
Wirtz v. Casino Control Comm'n, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25150 (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25150
1781.
Cited by:
Wilson v. Salem County Corr. Facility, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24542 (D.N.J. Oct. 13, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24542
Page 224
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1782.
Cited by:
Bath Unlimited, Inc. v. Ginarte, O'Dwyer, Winograd & Laracuente, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22654 (D.N.J.
Sept. 29, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22654
1783.
Followed by:
Wright v. Camden City Police Dep't, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22647 (D.N.J. Sept. 29, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN8
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22647
1784.
Followed by:
Warner v. Sweeney, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44340 (D.N.J. Sept. 12, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44340
1785.
Cited by:
New Horizon Inv. Corp. v. Mayor & Mun. Council of Belleville, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21665 (D.N.J. Sept.
9, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21665
1786.
Followed by:
Lindsey v. County of Middlesex, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36793 (D.N.J. Aug. 30, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36793
1787.
Followed by:
Gimenez v. Morgan Stanley D.W., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36586 (D.N.J. Aug. 25, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36586
1788.
Cited by:
Sosa v. Union County Narcotics Strike Force, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18428 (D.N.J. Aug. 22, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18428
1789.
Followed by:
Sanchez v. Gonzalez, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18149 (D.N.J. Aug. 16, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18149
1790.
Followed by:
Roberts v. McFeeley, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16019 (D.N.J. July 28, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16019
1791.
Followed by:
Thompson v. Dixon, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14931 (E.D. Pa. July 26, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14931
Page 225
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1792.
Cited by:
Huertas v. United States, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15361 (D.N.J. July 21, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15361
1793.
Followed by:
Matos v. Gorman, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32224 (D.N.J. June 24, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32224
1794.
Cited by:
Christopher v. Nestlerode, 373 F. Supp. 2d 503, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12712 (M.D. Pa. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
373 F. Supp. 2d 503 p.513
1795.
Followed by:
Eline v. Milore, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40764 (M.D. Pa. June 17, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40764
1796.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Collins v. Current C.E.O./President, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11458 (E.D. Pa. June 9,
2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11458
1797.
Followed by:
Nyema v. City of Trenton, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37773 (D.N.J. June 3, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37773
1798.
Followed by:
Hansen v. Caldwell's Diving Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28095 (D.N.J. June 1, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28095
1799.
Followed by:
Bankes v. Felice, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7879 (D.N.J. May 2, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7879
1800.
Cited by:
Allah v. Dalton, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45037 (D.N.J. Apr. 29, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45037
1801.
Cited by:
English v. Armstrong, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45038 (D.N.J. Apr. 26, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45038
1802.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Page 226
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
A.W. v. Jersey City Pub. Schs, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45622 (D.N.J. Apr. 21, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Distinguished by:
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45622
Followed by:
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45622
1803.
Followed by:
Surrick v. Killion, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6755 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 18, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6755
1804.
Followed by:
Taliaferro v. Darby Twp. Zoning Bd., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4717 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4717
1805.
Followed by:
Gallenthin Realty Dev., Inc. v. BP Prods. of N. Am., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2544 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 18, 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2544
1806.
Cited by:
Smith v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1815 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 4, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1815
1807.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Smolow v. Hafer, 353 F. Supp. 2d 561, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 987 (E.D. Pa. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Distinguished by:
353 F. Supp. 2d 561 p.572
Cited by:
353 F. Supp. 2d 561 p.566
1808.
Followed by:
Urbank v. New Jersey, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27590 (D.N.J. Dec. 29, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27590
1809.
Cited by:
Urbank v. New Jersey, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27591 (D.N.J. Dec. 8, 2004)
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27591
1810.
Followed by:
Scott v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17223 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 27, 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Page 227
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17223
1811.
Cited by:
Voicenet Communs., Inc. v. Pappert, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15283 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 5, 2004)
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15283
1812.
Followed by:
Lee v. Borough of Ridgefield Police Dep't, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14493 (D.N.J. July 20, 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14493
1813.
Cited by:
Voicenet Communs., Inc. v. Pappert, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15156 (E.D. Pa. July 15, 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15156
1814.
Cited by:
Potter v. New Jersey, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28902 (D.N.J. July 12, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28902
1815.
Followed by:
Med. Soc'y v. Mottola, 320 F. Supp. 2d 254, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10354 (D.N.J. 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
320 F. Supp. 2d 254 p.268
1816.
Cited by:
Antonelli v. New Jersey, 310 F. Supp. 2d 700, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5587, 93 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA)
1324 (D.N.J. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
310 F. Supp. 2d 700 p.711
1817.
Distinguished by:
Fid. Nat'l Info. Solutions, Inc. v. Sinclair, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6687 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6687
1818.
Cited by:
United States Aircraft Ins. Group v. Dwiggins, L.L.C., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 266 (D. Del. Jan. 5, 2004)
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 266
1819.
Cited by:
Proudfoot v. Rendell, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25165 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 25, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25165
1820.
Followed by:
Pierce v. Allegheny County Bd. of Elections, 324 F. Supp. 2d 684, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25569 (W.D. Pa.
Page 228
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
324 F. Supp. 2d 684 p.702
1821.
Cited by:
Chadwick v. Caulfield, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23269 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 20, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23269
1822.
Cited by:
Harper v. U.S. Penitentiary Lewisburg, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13702 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2003)
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13702
1823.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Assocs. in Obstetrics & Gynecology v. Upper Merion Twp., 270 F. Supp. 2d 633, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
17468 (E.D. Pa. 2003)
Distinguished by:
270 F. Supp. 2d 633 p.649
Followed by:
270 F. Supp. 2d 633 p.647
1824.
Cited by:
Cahn v. United States, 269 F. Supp. 2d 537, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10258 (D.N.J. 2003)
269 F. Supp. 2d 537 p.546
1825.
Followed by:
Marran v. Marran, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12234 (E.D. Pa. June 11, 2003)
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12234
1826.
Distinguished by:
Grimm v. Sweeney, 249 F. Supp. 2d 571, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5714 (E.D. Pa. 2003)
249 F. Supp. 2d 571 p.617
1827.
Cited by:
Lui v. Comm'n on Adult Entm't Establishments, 213 F.R.D. 166, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3459 (D. Del. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
213 F.R.D. 166 p.167
1828.
Cited by:
McCurdy v. Esmonde, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1349 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2003)
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1349
1829.
Followed by:
Forchion v. Intensive Supervised Parole, 240 F. Supp. 2d 302, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 901 (D.N.J. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
240 F. Supp. 2d 302 p.306
Page 229
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1830.
Cited by:
Flint v. A.P. DeSanno & Sons, 234 F. Supp. 2d 506, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22566 (E.D. Pa. 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
234 F. Supp. 2d 506 p.510
1831.
Cited by:
Holland Transp., Inc. v. Twp. of Upper Chichester, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23420 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 23, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23420
1832.
Cited by:
Bass v. Butler, 224 F. Supp. 2d 950, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18361 (E.D. Pa. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
224 F. Supp. 2d 950 p.960
1833.
Cited by:
Norwood Co. v. Bennett Composites, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14181 (E.D. Pa. July 23, 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14181
1834.
Cited by:
SEPTA v. Pa. PUC, 210 F. Supp. 2d 689, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12800 (E.D. Pa. 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
210 F. Supp. 2d 689 p.706
1835.
Distinguished by:
Francis v. Springfield Twp., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7697 (E.D. Pa. May 1, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7697
1836.
Cited by:
Chao v. Rothermel, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7430 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 25, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7430
1837.
Distinguished by:
Morrill v. Weaver, 224 F. Supp. 2d 882, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6919 (E.D. Pa. 2002)
224 F. Supp. 2d 882 p.895
1838.
Cited by:
Kemp v. Alston, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6655 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6655
1839.
Cited by:
Windsor Jewels of Pa., Inc. v. Bristol Twp., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12163 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 28, 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12163
Page 230
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1840.
Cited by:
Phila. City Council v. Schweiker, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5116 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 27, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5116
1841.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Cited by:
Grimm v. Borough of Norristown, 226 F. Supp. 2d 606, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3954 (E.D. Pa. 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
226 F. Supp. 2d 606 p.630
Followed by:
226 F. Supp. 2d 606 p.627
Cited by:
226 F. Supp. 2d 606 p.624
226 F. Supp. 2d 606 p.626
1842.
Cited by:
Chadwick v. Janecka, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10
1843.
Followed by:
Toll Bros., Inc. v. Twp. of Charlestown, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24225 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 28, 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24225
1844.
Distinguished by:
Cohen v. Twp. of Cheltenham, 174 F. Supp. 2d 307, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18779 (E.D. Pa. 2001)
174 F. Supp. 2d 307 p.317
1845.
Cited by:
Haefner v. Schuyler, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16507 (D. Del. Oct. 11, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16507
1846.
Cited by:
Rose v. County of Lehigh, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14403 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 14, 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14403
1847.
Cited by:
ROSE v. COUNTY OF LEHIGH, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15866 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 12, 2001)
1848.
Cited by:
Borkon v. First Union Nat'l Bank, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13937 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 7, 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13937
1849.
Cited by:
Page 231
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Schwarz v. Twp. of Honey Brook, 174 F. Supp. 2d 247, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11178 (E.D. Pa. 2001)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
174 F. Supp. 2d 247 p.249
1850.
Cited by:
First Health Group Corp. v. Nat'l Prescription Adm'rs, Inc., 155 F. Supp. 2d 194, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
11219 (M.D. Pa. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
155 F. Supp. 2d 194 p.235
1851.
Cited by:
Coles v. City of Phila., 145 F. Supp. 2d 646, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8012 (E.D. Pa. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
145 F. Supp. 2d 646 p.650
1852.
Cited by:
Keystone Outdoor Adver., Co. v. W. Whiteland Twp., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11612 (E.D. Pa. May 17,
2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11612
1853.
Followed by:
AMTRAK v. Pa. PUC, 159 F. Supp. 2d 28, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6082 (E.D. Pa. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
159 F. Supp. 2d 28 p.35
1854.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Chantilly Farms, Inc. v. West Pikeland Twp., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3328 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2001)
Distinguished by:
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3328
Followed by:
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3328
1855.
Distinguished by:
Howard v. Borough of Pottstown, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1814 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 16, 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1814
1856.
Cited by:
Capital Bonding Corp. v. New Jersey Supreme Court, 127 F. Supp. 2d 582, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 853
(D.N.J. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
127 F. Supp. 2d 582 p.590
1857.
Distinguished by:
Central Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Marello, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 281 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 281
Page 232
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1858.
Cited by:
Chadwick v. Janecka, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21732 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 8, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21732
1859.
Distinguished by:
Schmidt, Long & Assocs. v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17355 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 4,
2000)
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17355
1860.
Distinguished by:
Central Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Marello, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14405 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 4, 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14405
1861.
Followed by:
Steiert v. Mata Servs., 111 F. Supp. 2d 521, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13089 (D.N.J. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
111 F. Supp. 2d 521 p.525
1862.
Followed by, Cited by:
Gentlemen's Retreat, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia, 109 F. Supp. 2d 374, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11519 (E.D.
Pa. 2000)
Followed by:
109 F. Supp. 2d 374 p.379
Cited by:
109 F. Supp. 2d 374 p.377
1863.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania PUC, 107 F. Supp. 2d 653, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10805
(E.D. Pa. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
107 F. Supp. 2d 653 p.666
Cited by:
107 F. Supp. 2d 653 p.664
1864.
Distinguished by:
Stewart v. Abraham, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10298 (E.D. Pa. July 17, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6, HN8
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10298
1865.
Followed by:
Lueder v. New Jersey Bd. of Nursing, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12232 (D.N.J. July 11, 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12232
Page 233
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1866.
Cited by:
At&T Corp. v. Public Serv. Enters. of Pa., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4649 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 12, 2000)
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4649
1867.
Cited by:
Lucabaugh v. City of Reading, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1341 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 16, 2000)
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1341
1868.
Distinguished by:
Charlie H. v. Whitman, 83 F. Supp. 2d 476, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 774 (D.N.J. 2000)
83 F. Supp. 2d 476 p.514
1869.
Cited by:
New Hope Books, Inc. v. Farmer, 82 F. Supp. 2d 321, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146 (D.N.J. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4
82 F. Supp. 2d 321 p.322
82 F. Supp. 2d 321 p.324
1870.
Cited by:
Puricelli v. Houston, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16085 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 20, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16085
1871.
Cited by:
Gresham v. Intensive Supervision Program, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14954 (D.N.J. Sept. 27, 1999)
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14954
1872.
Cited by:
Geary v. County of Northampton, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8445 (E.D. Pa. May 5, 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8445
1873.
Followed by:
Nernberg v. City of Pittsburgh, 50 F. Supp. 2d 437, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7132 (W.D. Pa. 1999)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
50 F. Supp. 2d 437 p.440
1874.
Distinguished by:
Bass v. Butler, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6643 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 30, 1999)
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6643
1875.
Cited by:
Parker v. Shefsko, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5876 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 1999)
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5876
Page 234
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1876.
Cited by:
Mruz v. Caring, Inc., 39 F. Supp. 2d 495, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8793 (D.N.J. 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
39 F. Supp. 2d 495 p.501
1877.
Cited by:
Perlberger v. Perlberger, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1407, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide P9663 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 12,
1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1407
1878.
Cited by:
Planned Parenthood v. Verniero, 41 F. Supp. 2d 478, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21488 (D.N.J. 1998)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
41 F. Supp. 2d 478 p.488
1879.
Cited by:
Thomason v. Norman E. Lehrer, P.C., 183 F.R.D. 161, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19320 (D.N.J. 1998)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
183 F.R.D. 161 p.171
1880.
Cited by:
New Jersey v. City of Wildwood, 22 F. Supp. 2d 395, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23557 (D.N.J. 1998)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
22 F. Supp. 2d 395 p.400
1881.
Cited by:
Tazioly v. City of Philadelphia, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14603 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 10, 1998) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14603
1882.
Cited by:
Bonilla v. Vaughn, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12684 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12684
1883.
Distinguished by:
Perlberger v. Perlberger, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12481, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide P9560 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 13,
1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12481
1884.
Distinguished by:
Remed Recovery Care Ctrs. v. Township of Worcester, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11818 (E.D. Pa. July 29,
1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11818
1885.
Cited by:
Jackson v. Common Pleas Court, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9188 (E.D. Pa. June 24, 1998) LexisNexis
Page 235
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN6
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9188
1886.
Cited by:
Bryant v. New Jersey DOT, 1 F. Supp. 2d 426, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7354 (D.N.J. 1998)
1 F. Supp. 2d 426 p.435
1887.
Cited by:
Chadwick v. Andrews, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6123 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 30, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6123
1888.
Distinguished by:
Pleasant v. Evers, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5848 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 24, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5848
1889.
Cited by:
Peerless Heater Co. v. Chevron Chem. Co., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4032 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 27, 1998)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4032
1890.
Distinguished by:
Assisted Living Assocs. L.L.C. v. Moorestown Twp., 996 F. Supp. 409, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3480 (D.N.J.
1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
996 F. Supp. 409 p.431
1891.
Distinguished by:
C.H. v. Oliva, 990 F. Supp. 341, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21020 (D.N.J. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
990 F. Supp. 341 p.349
1892.
Cited by:
Nelson v. Pennsylvania, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19923 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 8, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
1893.
Cited by:
Schaffren v. Philadelphia Corp. for Aging, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17493 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 7, 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1894.
Cited by:
Talib v. Summers, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16752 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 29, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
1895.
Cited by:
Greist v. Norristown State Hosp., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16320 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 16, 1997)
1896.
Cited by:
Greist v. Norristown State Hosp., 4 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) P4-220 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 1, 1997)
4 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) P4-220
1897.
Cited by:
Page 236
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Barnes Found. v. Township of Lower Merion, 982 F. Supp. 970, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16688 (E.D. Pa.
1997)
982 F. Supp. 970 p.980
1898.
Cited by:
Ralston v. Zats, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13322 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 25, 1997)
1899.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Cited by:
W.K. by W.K. v. New Jersey Div. of Developmental Disabilities, 974 F. Supp. 791, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
12348 (D.N.J. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
974 F. Supp. 791 p.795
974 F. Supp. 791 p.796
Followed by:
974 F. Supp. 791 p.795
Cited by:
974 F. Supp. 791 p.794
1900.
Cited by:
Frattarelli v. Kelly, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10317 (E.D. Pa. July 10, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1901.
Cited by:
Kramer v. New Jersey Supreme Court, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9731 (D.N.J. July 1, 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1902.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Alan A. v. Verniero, 970 F. Supp. 1153, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10433 (D.N.J. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
970 F. Supp. 1153 p.1171
Cited by:
970 F. Supp. 1153 p.1169
1903.
Cited by:
Spencer v. Steinman, 968 F. Supp. 1011, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9381 (E.D. Pa. 1997)
968 F. Supp. 1011 p.1016
1904.
Cited by:
Graynle v. Chester Upland Sch. Dist., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8652 (E.D. Pa. June 16, 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1905.
Cited by:
Larsen v. Senate of Pennsylvania, 965 F. Supp. 607, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7631 (M.D. Pa. 1997)
965 F. Supp. 607 p.611
1906.
Cited by:
Michael M. v. Verniero, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12596 (D.N.J. May 29, 1997)
Page 237
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1907.
Cited by:
Kramm v. Silvestri, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2961 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 14, 1997)
1908.
Cited by:
Oliver v. Sid Bernstein, Ltd., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3276 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 11, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1909.
Followed by:
Powell v. Hoover, 956 F. Supp. 564, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2579 (M.D. Pa. 1997)
956 F. Supp. 564 p.569
1910.
Cited by:
Larsen v. Senate of the Commonwealth, 955 F. Supp. 1549, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2296 (M.D. Pa. 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
955 F. Supp. 1549 p.1559
1911.
Cited by:
Chadwick v. Hill, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 512 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 16, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1912.
Cited by:
Death Row Prisoners v. Ridge, 948 F. Supp. 1258, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15540 (E.D. Pa. 1996)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
948 F. Supp. 1258 p.1266
1913.
Cited by:
Shimano, Inc. v. Kennedy, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15217 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 10, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN8
1914.
Cited by:
Hill v. City of Philadelphia, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14323 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 27, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1915.
Cited by:
Bledsoe v. Fulton Bank, 940 F. Supp. 804, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14322 (E.D. Pa. 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
940 F. Supp. 804 p.809
1916.
Cited by:
Cardona v. GMC, 939 F. Supp. 351, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13860 (D.N.J. 1996)
939 F. Supp. 351 p.355
1917.
Cited by:
Schapiro v. Montgomery County, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9110 (E.D. Pa. July 1, 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
1918.
Cited by:
Barron v. Caterpillar, Inc., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9059 (E.D. Pa. June 24, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Page 238
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1919.
Followed by, Cited by:
Barnes Found. v. Township of Lower Merion, 927 F. Supp. 874, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7564 (E.D. Pa.
1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
927 F. Supp. 874 p.879
Cited by:
927 F. Supp. 874 p.878
1920.
Cited by:
Schapiro v. Montgomery County, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7392 (E.D. Pa. May 30, 1996)
1921.
Cited by:
Great W. Mortg. Corp. v. Peacock, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10041 (D.N.J. Apr. 9, 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1922.
Cited by:
Weitz v. Burton Photo Indus., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4323 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 9, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1923.
Cited by:
W.P. v. Poritz, 931 F. Supp. 1187, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9335, 35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 327
(D.N.J. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
931 F. Supp. 1187 p.1195
1924.
Cited by:
Acierno v. New Castle County, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5071 (D. Del. Mar. 8, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1925.
Cited by:
Regis Ins. Co. v. Doughboy Recreational, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1166 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 5, 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1926.
Cited by:
Jefferys v. New Jersey, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21360 (D.N.J. Jan. 29, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1927.
Cited by:
Lawrence J. Spielvogel, Inc. v. Township of Cheltenham, 905 F. Supp. 233, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17230
(E.D. Pa. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
905 F. Supp. 233 p.237
1928.
Cited by:
Albright by & Through Albright v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16800 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 7,
1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1929.
Followed by:
Krall v. Pennsylvania, 903 F. Supp. 858, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16493 (E.D. Pa. 1995)
903 F. Supp. 858 p.861
1930.
Cited by:
Tinson v. Pennsylvania, Dep't of Labor & Indus., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14414 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 1995)
Page 239
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1931.
Cited by:
Williams v. Gilkey, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14174 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 26, 1995)
1932.
Cited by:
Martin ex rel. Lauren v. School Dist., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13861 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 21, 1995)
1933.
Cited by:
Visionquest Nat'l v. West Bradford Township, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13498 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 15, 1995)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1934.
Cited by:
Weinstein v. Township of Franklin, 898 F. Supp. 271, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13399 (D.N.J. 1995)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
898 F. Supp. 271 p.274
1935.
Cited by:
Guilford v. City of Philadelphia, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12897 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 30, 1995)
1936.
Cited by:
Weinstein v. Pennsylvania, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11297 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 4, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1937.
Cited by:
Lapat v. Serber, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11789 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 1, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1938.
Cited by:
Currier v. Borough of Norristown, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10854 (E.D. Pa. July 28, 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1939.
Cited by:
Swint v. Reno, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9965 (E.D. Pa. July 11, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1940.
Cited by:
United States Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8073 (E.D. Pa. June 8,
1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1941.
Cited by:
Schapiro v. Montgomery County Court, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7910 (E.D. Pa. June 8, 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
1942.
Cited by:
Bayges v. Southeastern Pa. Transp. Auth., 887 F. Supp. 108, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7687 (E.D. Pa. 1995)
887 F. Supp. 108 p.109
1943.
Cited by:
Schapiro v. Schapiro, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7252 (E.D. Pa. May 22, 1995)
1944.
Distinguished by:
Balcor/Morristown Ltd. Pshp. v. Vector Whippany Assocs., 181 B.R. 781, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6148
(D.N.J. 1995)
181 B.R. 781 p.792
Page 240
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1945.
Cited by:
Musko v. McClandless, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5911, 4 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 625, 10 Am.
Disabilities Dec. 235 (E.D. Pa. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1946.
Followed by:
Musko v. McClandless, 4 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 625, 10 Am. Disabilities Dec. 235 (E.D. Pa. 1995)
4 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 625 p.627
1947.
Cited by:
Chadwick v. Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5130 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 13,
1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
1948.
Cited by:
Smith v. Holtz, 879 F. Supp. 435, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3721 (M.D. Pa. 1995)
879 F. Supp. 435 p.441
1949.
Cited by:
Doe by Davis v. City of Philadelphia, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3166 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 10, 1995)
1950.
Followed by, Cited by:
Kessler Inst. for Rehabilitation v. Mayor of Essex Fells, 876 F. Supp. 641, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1335, 8
Am. Disabilities Dec. 837 (D.N.J. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
876 F. Supp. 641 p.659
Cited by:
876 F. Supp. 641 p.658
1951.
Cited by:
Johnson v. New Jersey, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1466 (D.N.J. Jan. 31, 1995)
1952.
Cited by:
Fidtler v. Glazer, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1209 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 31, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
1953.
Cited by:
Colonial Penn Group v. US WATS, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12972 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 14, 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1954.
Cited by:
Currier v. Borough of Norristown, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10827 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 5, 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1955.
Cited by:
In re Bolar Pharmaceutical Co., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9236, 1994-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P70841 (E.D. Pa.
July 5, 1994)
1956.
Cited by:
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Castellett, 156 F.R.D. 89, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7861 (D.N.J. 1994)
156 F.R.D. 89 p.92
Page 241
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1957.
Cited by:
Chiropractic Alliance v. Parisi, 854 F. Supp. 299, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8125, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide
P8619 (D.N.J. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
854 F. Supp. 299 p.306
1958.
Followed by:
Bongiorno v. Lalomia, 851 F. Supp. 606, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5872 (D.N.J. 1994)
851 F. Supp. 606 p.608
1959.
Cited by:
Rappaport v. Norlar, Inc., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5754 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 29, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1960.
Cited by:
Triffin v. Nix, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5407 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 25, 1994)
1961.
Cited by:
Schapiro ex rel. Schapiro v. Commonwealth, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4217 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 7, 1994)
1962.
Cited by:
N.B.A. Credit Union v. Hargrove, 834 F. Supp. 845, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3677 (E.D. Pa. 1994)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
834 F. Supp. 845 p.851
1963.
Cited by:
Dunkel v. Dunkel, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2035 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 22, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1964.
Cited by:
Schapiro ex rel. Schapiro v. Pennsylvania, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1584 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 1994)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1965.
Cited by:
Acierno v. New Castle County, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1683 (D. Del. Feb. 11, 1994)
1966.
Cited by:
Marks v. Stinson, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1409 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 1994)
1967.
Cited by:
Motor Club of Am. v. Weatherford, 841 F. Supp. 610, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 521 (D.N.J. 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
841 F. Supp. 610 p.619
1968.
Cited by:
Marcus v. Township of Abington, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18156 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 23, 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1969.
Cited by:
Cunnane v. Montgomery County Dist. Attorney's Office, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18718 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 22,
1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
1970.
Cited by:
Page 242
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Weinstein v. Lasover, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16417 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 8, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1971.
Cited by:
Kot v. Toal, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15578 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1972.
Cited by:
Ernst v. Children & Youth Servs., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12173 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 3, 1993)
1973.
Cited by:
Coplin v. Sun Mee Hwang, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11614 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
1974.
Cited by:
Presbytery of N.J. of Orthodox Presbyterian Church v. Florio, 830 F. Supp. 241, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
11729, 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P42651, 62 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 995 (D.N.J. 1993)
830 F. Supp. 241 p.249
1975.
Cited by:
Presbytery of N.J. of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church v. Florio, 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P42651, 62
Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 995 (D.N.J. Aug. 10, 1993)
63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P42651
62 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 995 p.1000
1976.
Cited by:
Ruscavage v. Zuratt, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9961 (E.D. Pa. July 19, 1993)
1977.
Cited by:
Green v. Pennsylvania, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8735 (E.D. Pa. June 28, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1978.
Cited by:
Pennsylvania v. Tucker, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7656 (E.D. Pa. June 8, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
1979.
Cited by:
Asbestos Workers Local 14 v. Hargrove, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6954 (E.D. Pa. May 24, 1993)
1980.
Cited by:
McDaniels v. Flick, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6600 (E.D. Pa. May 20, 1993)
1981.
Cited by:
Louis W. Epstein Family Partnership v. KMart Corp., 828 F. Supp. 328, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6097 (E.D.
Pa. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
828 F. Supp. 328 p.337
1982.
Followed by:
Ruscavage v. Zuratt, 821 F. Supp. 1078, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5829 (E.D. Pa. 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
821 F. Supp. 1078 p.1082
821 F. Supp. 1078 p.1083
1983.
Cited by:
Page 243
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Guarino v. Larsen, 821 F. Supp. 1060, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5687 (E.D. Pa. 1993)
821 F. Supp. 1060 p.1063
821 F. Supp. 1060 p.1064
1984.
Cited by:
Pinkney v. Commonwealth, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5046 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
1985.
Followed by:
Baby Neal v. Casey, 821 F. Supp. 320, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4661, 1 Am. Disabilities Dec. 821, 27 Fed.
R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 961 (E.D. Pa. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
821 F. Supp. 320 p.331
821 F. Supp. 320 p.332
1986.
Distinguished by:
O'Neill v. City of Philadelphia, 817 F. Supp. 558, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4256 (E.D. Pa. 1993)
817 F. Supp. 558 p.562
1987.
Cited by:
International Ass'n of Heat & Frost Insulators & Asbestos Workers, Local 14 v. Hargrove, 126 Lab. Cas.
(CCH) P10862 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 24, 1993)
126 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10862
1988.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Independence Public Media, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Television Network Com., 813 F. Supp. 335, 1993
U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2945 (E.D. Pa. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
813 F. Supp. 335 p.338
Cited by:
813 F. Supp. 335 p.337
1989.
Cited by:
DeBlase v. Roth, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 777 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 25, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
1990.
Followed by:
Defeo v. Sill, 810 F. Supp. 648, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 351 (E.D. Pa. 1993)
810 F. Supp. 648 p.654
1991.
Cited by:
Bayges v. Southeastern Pa. Transp. Auth., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19517 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 16, 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1992.
Cited by:
Nelson v. Howard, 810 F. Supp. 161, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19251 (E.D. Pa. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
810 F. Supp. 161 p.163
Page 244
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1993.
Cited by:
Byrd v. Cubbage, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20010 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 8, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1994.
Followed by, Cited by:
American Inst. of Foot Medicine v. New Jersey State Bd. of Medical Examiners, 807 F. Supp. 1170, 1992
U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18647 (D.N.J. 1992)
Followed by:
807 F. Supp. 1170 p.1173
Cited by:
807 F. Supp. 1170 p.1174
1995.
Cited by:
Slaughter v. Pennsylvania, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19880 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
1996.
Cited by:
Byrd v. County of Philadelphia, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19621 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 1, 1992) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
1997.
Cited by:
Riffel v. Guarino, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17400 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 9, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
1998.
Distinguished by:
Olde Discount Corp. v. Tupman, 805 F. Supp. 1130, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20415 (D. Del. 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
805 F. Supp. 1130 p.1140
1999.
Cited by:
Sanders v. Hauck, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14400 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 16, 1992)
2000.
Followed by:
Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Preate, 797 F. Supp. 436, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12510, 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA)
3059, 123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P57101 (W.D. Pa. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN5
797 F. Supp. 436 p.439
2001.
Cited by:
Exxon Corp. v. Stewart, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22639 (D.N.J. June 30, 1992)
2002.
Cited by:
Byrd v. Reinhold, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7056 (E.D. Pa. May 19, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2003.
Cited by:
Stevenson v. Battle, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7198 (E.D. Pa. May 12, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2004.
Cited by:
Winward v. Punshon, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6460 (E.D. Pa. May 5, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2005.
Cited by:
Purdie v. Schoenberger, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5109 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2006.
Followed by:
Page 245
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Hartford Assoc. v. United States, 792 F. Supp. 358, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6393, 22 Envtl. L. Rep. 20881
(D.N.J. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
792 F. Supp. 358 p.363
2007.
Cited by:
Slawek v. White, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3627 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 24, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2008.
Cited by:
Hammond v. Creative Financial Planning Organization, Inc., 800 F. Supp. 1244, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
3357 (E.D. Pa. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
800 F. Supp. 1244 p.1249
2009.
Cited by:
Speller v. Greenlee, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1066 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 31, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2010.
Cited by:
Nelson v. Compagnie De Saint-Gobain, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18162, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P96530
(E.D. Pa. Dec. 26, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2011.
Cited by:
United States v. Barone, 781 F. Supp. 1072, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18309 (E.D. Pa. 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
781 F. Supp. 1072 p.1079
2012.
Cited by:
Gwynedd Properties, Inc. v. Lower Gwynedd Township, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18303 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 12,
1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2013.
Cited by:
Jones v. Mazurkiewicz, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17682 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2014.
Cited by:
Donato v. Southeast Delco School Dist., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17368 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 26, 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2015.
Cited by:
Winward v. Punshon, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16678 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2016.
Cited by:
Jones v. Mazurkiewicz, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16379 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 12, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
2017.
Cited by:
Bryn Mawr Trust Co. v. Boden, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15377 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 24, 1991)
2018.
Cited by:
Lashner v. Mutual Assurance Co., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15127 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 18, 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2019.
Cited by:
Clark v. Court of Common Pleas, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14695 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 11, 1991) LexisNexis
Page 246
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5
2020.
Followed by:
Oxford House-Evergreen v. Plainfield, 769 F. Supp. 1329, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10645 (D.N.J. 1991)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
769 F. Supp. 1329 p.1335
2021.
Cited by:
Avraham v. Zaffarano, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10373 (E.D. Pa. July 22, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2022.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Cited by:
Loftus v. Lawrence Park, 764 F. Supp. 354, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6624 (W.D. Pa. 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
764 F. Supp. 354 p.359
Followed by:
764 F. Supp. 354 p.356
Cited by:
764 F. Supp. 354 p.357
2023.
Cited by:
Kupersmit v. New Jersey, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6754 (E.D. Pa. May 15, 1991)
2024.
Cited by:
Triffin v. Pettit, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6100 (E.D. Pa. May 6, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2025.
Cited by:
J & A Realty v. Asbury Park, 763 F. Supp. 85, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5624 (D.N.J. 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
763 F. Supp. 85 p.89
2026.
Followed by:
Pokrandt v. Shields, 773 F. Supp. 758, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5341 (E.D. Pa. 1991)
773 F. Supp. 758 p.764
2027.
Distinguished by:
Trone v. Preate, 770 F. Supp. 994, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9985 (M.D. Pa. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
770 F. Supp. 994 p.997
2028.
Cited by:
Brightwell v. John Doe, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4029 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 28, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2029.
Cited by:
Montague v. Philadelphia, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3702 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 26, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2030.
Cited by:
Page 247
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cap v. Rapp, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1360 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 5, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2031.
Cited by:
Walton v. Youse, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2032.
Cited by:
Evans v. Court of Common Pleas, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17429 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2033.
Cited by:
Tillery v. Mesics, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16233 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 1990)
2034.
Cited by:
Norman v. Mellon Bank, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15909 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 26, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2035.
Cited by:
Sunderland Properties, Inc. v. County of Berks, 750 F. Supp. 704, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16145 (E.D. Pa.
1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
750 F. Supp. 704 p.707
750 F. Supp. 704 p.710
750 F. Supp. 704 p.711
2036.
Cited by:
Dunyan v. Attorney Gen's Office, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13583 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 11, 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
2037.
Cited by:
Hochman v. New Jersey Supreme Court, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11328 (D.N.J. Aug. 27, 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2038.
Cited by:
White v. Judicial Inquiry & Review Bd., 744 F. Supp. 658, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10511 (E.D. Pa. 1990)
744 F. Supp. 658 p.664
2039.
Cited by:
Oliver v. McCrudden, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7254 (E.D. Pa. June 13, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2040.
Distinguished by:
Telco Communications, Inc. v. Barry, 731 F. Supp. 670, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2407 (D.N.J. 1990)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
731 F. Supp. 670 p.674
731 F. Supp. 670 p.676
2041.
Followed by:
Murphy v. Garrett, 729 F. Supp. 461, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 966 (W.D. Pa. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
729 F. Supp. 461 p.467
2042.
Cited by:
Curley v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, 728 F. Supp. 1123, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15660 (D.N.J. 1989)
Page 248
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
728 F. Supp. 1123 p.1140
2043.
Cited by:
Mozitis v. Levy, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15063 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 12, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2044.
Distinguished by:
Klauder & Nunno Enterprises, Inc. v. Hereford Associates, Inc., 723 F. Supp. 336, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
12669 (E.D. Pa. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
723 F. Supp. 336 p.344
2045.
Cited by:
Delaware Valley Transplant Program v. Coye, 722 F. Supp. 1188, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12529 (D.N.J.
1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
722 F. Supp. 1188 p.1189
2046.
Cited by:
Scioli v. Coye, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12414 (D.N.J. Oct. 16, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2047.
Cited by:
Gantz v. White, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12203 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 12, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2048.
Distinguished by:
Hughes v. Lipscher, 720 F. Supp. 454, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10582 (D.N.J. 1989)
720 F. Supp. 454 p.457
2049.
Cited by:
North River Ins. Co. v. Middlesex Assurance Co., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16552 (D.N.J. Aug. 7, 1989)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2050.
Distinguished by:
Smith v. Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel Corp., 715 F. Supp. 715, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7343, 11
Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2003 (W.D. Pa. 1989)
715 F. Supp. 715 p.719
2051.
Followed by, Cited by:
Ayers v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 716 F. Supp. 855, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7187 (E.D. Pa. 1989)
Followed by:
716 F. Supp. 855 p.859
Cited by:
716 F. Supp. 855 p.860
2052.
Cited by:
Abbiss v. Delaware Dep't of Transp., 712 F. Supp. 1159, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6035 (D. Del. 1989)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
712 F. Supp. 1159 p.1163
Page 249
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2053.
Distinguished by:
Alessi v. Pa. Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 710 F. Supp. 127, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2912 (E.D. Pa. 1989)
710 F. Supp. 127 p.133
2054.
Cited by:
Pennwalt Corp. v. Centaur Partners, 710 F. Supp. 111, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2380 (E.D. Pa. 1989)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
710 F. Supp. 111 p.114
2055.
Cited by:
Millett v. Keller, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14136 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 12, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2056.
Distinguished by:
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Sterner, 700 F. Supp. 252, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12670 (E.D. Pa. 1988)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
700 F. Supp. 252 p.254
2057.
Cited by:
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Castagnola, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12710 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 10, 1988)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2058.
Distinguished by:
Van Meter v. Maplewood, 696 F. Supp. 1024, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11388, 65 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1153
(D.N.J. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
696 F. Supp. 1024 p.1026
2059.
Cited by:
Morris v. Pennsylvania, 694 F. Supp. 1196, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9881 (E.D. Pa. 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
694 F. Supp. 1196 p.1197
2060.
Cited by:
Davenport v. Pennsylvania, Dep't of Public Welfare, 89 B.R. 428, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7935, Bankr. L.
Rep. (CCH) P72618 (E.D. Pa. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
89 B.R. 428 p.429
2061.
Cited by:
Pennsylvania Dep't of Public Welfare v. Johnson-Allen, 88 B.R. 659, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7306, Bankr.
L. Rep. (CCH) P72602 (E.D. Pa. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9
88 B.R. 659 p.661
2062.
Cited by:
Chaplin v. Manfredi, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 850 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2063.
Cited by:
Lanning v. Court of Common Pleas, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 274 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Page 250
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2064.
Cited by:
Williams v. Owens, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 6, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2065.
Followed by, Explained by:
United Services Auto. Asso. v. Foster, 680 F. Supp. 712, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13269 (M.D. Pa. 1987)
Followed by:
680 F. Supp. 712 p.714
680 F. Supp. 712 p.715
Explained by:
680 F. Supp. 712 p.714
2066.
Cited by:
Gittelman v. McGinnis, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11265 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2067.
Explained by:
Pennsylvania Medical Soc. v. Marconis, 679 F. Supp. 452, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12948 (M.D. Pa. 1987)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
679 F. Supp. 452 p.454
2068.
Cited by:
Lumpkin v. Novac, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11023 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 24, 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2069.
Distinguished by:
Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Comm'r of Pennsylvania, 672 F. Supp. 841, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9713
(E.D. Pa. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
672 F. Supp. 841 p.848
2070.
Cited by:
Riley v. Kaye, 664 F. Supp. 926, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6886 (D.N.J. 1987)
664 F. Supp. 926 p.928
2071.
Cited by:
United States v. Premises Known as 880 Williams Place, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5958 (E.D. Pa. June 29,
1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2072.
Followed by:
Metropolitan Hospital v. Thornburgh, 667 F. Supp. 208, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4929 (E.D. Pa. 1987)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
667 F. Supp. 208 p.211
2073.
Cited by:
Northeast Women's Center, Inc. v. McMonagle, 665 F. Supp. 1147, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4854 (E.D. Pa.
1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
665 F. Supp. 1147 p.1152
665 F. Supp. 1147 p.1153
2074.
Distinguished by:
Centifanti v. Nix, 661 F. Supp. 993, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4548 (E.D. Pa. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 251
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN5, HN6
661 F. Supp. 993 p.994
2075.
Distinguished by:
McLaughlin v. Pernsley, 654 F. Supp. 1567, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1818 (E.D. Pa. 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
654 F. Supp. 1567 p.1569
2076.
Cited by:
Comer v. Philadelphia County, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1775 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 9, 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2077.
Cited by:
Purcell v. Philadelphia, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 850 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 6, 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2078.
Distinguished by:
Fink v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 651 F. Supp. 1238, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 388 (M.D. Pa. 1987)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
651 F. Supp. 1238 p.1241
651 F. Supp. 1238 p.1242
2079.
Followed by, Cited by:
Fink v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 646 F. Supp. 569, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18349 (M.D. Pa. 1986)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
646 F. Supp. 569 p.571
Cited by:
646 F. Supp. 569 p.572
2080.
Cited by:
Atlantic Fin. Fed. v. Am. Savings Bank, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19553 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 1986)
2081.
Cited by:
USX Corp. v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Labor & Industry, 643 F. Supp. 1567, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19613,
123 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2600 (M.D. Pa. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
643 F. Supp. 1567 p.1571
643 F. Supp. 1567 p.1572
2082.
Cited by:
Texaco, Inc. v. Melso, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21077, 1986-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P67283 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 2,
1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2083.
Cited by:
FONTAINE v. CITY OF CHESTER, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21240 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 25, 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2084.
Cited by:
Schuler v. Chambersburg, 641 F. Supp. 657, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21494 (M.D. Pa. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
Page 252
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
641 F. Supp. 657 p.660
2085.
Cited by:
PICCININI v. NATIONWIDE MUT. INS. CO., 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21633 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 12, 1986)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2086.
Cited by:
SINWELL v. MIKLICH, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21675 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 11, 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
2087.
Cited by:
THOMAS v. BRADLEY, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22658 (E.D. Pa. July 17, 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2088.
Cited by:
BROWN v. BIESTER, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23171 (E.D. Pa. July 5, 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2089.
Cited by:
LEWIS v. GALLAGHER, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23313 (E.D. Pa. July 2, 1986)
2090.
Cited by:
Tiger Inn v. Edwards, 636 F. Supp. 787, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24468 (D.N.J. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
636 F. Supp. 787 p.789
636 F. Supp. 787 p.790
2091.
Cited by:
FOY v. MURPHY, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25308 (E.D. Pa. May 20, 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2092.
Cited by:
FOY v. MURPHY, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26238 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 28, 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2093.
Cited by:
Centrella v. Barth, 633 F. Supp. 1016, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27085 (E.D. Pa. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
633 F. Supp. 1016 p.1020
2094.
Cited by:
Gniotek v. Philadelphia, 630 F. Supp. 827, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28452 (E.D. Pa. 1986)
630 F. Supp. 827 p.835
2095.
Cited by:
PALMAROZZA v. PLATT, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29191 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 19, 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
2096.
Cited by:
THOMAS v. PENNSYLVANIA, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29539 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 1986)
2097.
Cited by:
VEREEN v. NORRISTOWN AREA SCH. DIST., 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29645 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 5, 1986)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 253
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2098.
Cited by:
BUSHNELL v. HARDY, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29810 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 31, 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2099.
Cited by:
Kelley Drye & Warren v. Murray Industries, Inc., 623 F. Supp. 522, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12920 (D.N.J.
1985)
623 F. Supp. 522 p.528
2100.
Cited by:
THOMAS v. GOODE, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13672 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 21, 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2101.
Cited by:
CAMPBELL v. RENDELL, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13934 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2102.
Followed by:
Kentucky West Virginia Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Util. Comm'n, 620 F. Supp. 1458, 1985 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 14123 (M.D. Pa. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
620 F. Supp. 1458 p.1461
2103.
Distinguished by:
Brown v. Pornography Com. of Lower Southampton Township, 620 F. Supp. 1199, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
14746 (E.D. Pa. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
620 F. Supp. 1199 p.1206
2104.
Distinguished by:
Direct Satellite Communications, Inc. v. Board of Public Utilities, 615 F. Supp. 1558, 1985 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 16380 (D.N.J. 1985)
615 F. Supp. 1558 p.1565
2105.
Cited by:
Shipley v. First Federal Sav. & Loan Asso., 619 F. Supp. 421, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16494 (D. Del. 1985)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
619 F. Supp. 421 p.433
2106.
Distinguished by:
Doumani v. Casino Control Com., 614 F. Supp. 1465, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17123 (D.N.J. 1985)
614 F. Supp. 1465 p.1467
2107.
Cited by:
MCWHORTER v. MACABE, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17675 (E.D. Pa. July 22, 1985)
2108.
Cited by:
Pilgrim Medical Group v. New Jersey State Bd. of Medical Examiners, 613 F. Supp. 837, 1985 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 18068 (D.N.J. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
613 F. Supp. 837 p.845
Page 254
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2109.
Followed by:
Aims Enterprises, Inc. v. Muir, 609 F. Supp. 257, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19622 (M.D. Pa. 1985)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
609 F. Supp. 257 p.263
2110.
Followed by, Explained by:
Glen-Gery Corp. v. Lower Heidelberg Township, 608 F. Supp. 1002, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20416 (E.D.
Pa. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
608 F. Supp. 1002 p.1006
Explained by:
608 F. Supp. 1002 p.1004
2111.
Followed by, Cited by:
Wichert v. Walter, 606 F. Supp. 1516, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20522 (D.N.J. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
606 F. Supp. 1516 p.1519
606 F. Supp. 1516 p.1525
Cited by:
606 F. Supp. 1516 p.1520
606 F. Supp. 1516 p.1522
2112.
Cited by:
HUTCHINGS v. McCRUDDEN, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20894 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 10, 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2113.
Cited by:
CAMPBELL v. ZIMMERMAN, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22381 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 22, 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2114.
Cited by:
Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union Local 54 v. Read, 597 F. Supp. 1451,
1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21758 (D.N.J. 1984)
597 F. Supp. 1451 p.1455
2115.
Followed by:
Evanston Ins. Co. v. Merin, 598 F. Supp. 1290, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21902 (D.N.J. 1984)
598 F. Supp. 1290 p.1302
2116.
Followed by, Cited by:
Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union Local 54 v. Read, 597 F. Supp. 1431,
1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22212 (D.N.J. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
Followed by:
597 F. Supp. 1431 p.1438
Cited by:
Page 255
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
597 F. Supp. 1431 p.1437
2117.
Followed by:
Jehovah's Witnesses Assembly Halls, Inc. v. Jersey City, 597 F. Supp. 972, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22885
(D.N.J. 1984)
597 F. Supp. 972 p.979
2118.
Cited by:
Norfolk Southern Corp. v. Oberly, 594 F. Supp. 514, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23304 (D. Del. 1984)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
594 F. Supp. 514 p.522
594 F. Supp. 514 p.523
2119.
Distinguished by:
United States v. Pittsburgh, 589 F. Supp. 179, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16858 (W.D. Pa. 1984)
589 F. Supp. 179 p.184
2120.
Cited by:
Schwartz v. Judicial Retirement System, 584 F. Supp. 711, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17667 (D.N.J. 1984)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
584 F. Supp. 711 p.717
2121.
Cited by:
Roodveldt v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 585 F. Supp. 770, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19752
(E.D. Pa. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
585 F. Supp. 770 p.782
2122.
Followed by:
Williams v. Carros, 576 F. Supp. 545, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10631 (W.D. Pa. 1983)
576 F. Supp. 545 p.547
2123.
Cited by:
NEW JERSEY ASSN. OF TICKET BROKERS v. KIMMELMAN, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12248 (D.N.J. Oct.
28, 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2124.
Explained by, Cited by:
Coleman v. Stanziani, 570 F. Supp. 679, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13788 (E.D. Pa. 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
570 F. Supp. 679 p.684
Cited by:
570 F. Supp. 679 p.681
2125.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Gutstein v. McDermott, 554 F. Supp. 966, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20204, 1983-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P65396
(M.D. Pa. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Page 256
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Distinguished by:
554 F. Supp. 966 p.972
Cited by:
554 F. Supp. 966 p.971
2126.
Distinguished by:
Verdi v. Philadelphia, 553 F. Supp. 334, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16371 (E.D. Pa. 1982)
553 F. Supp. 334 p.340
2127.
Cited by:
Guenveur v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 551 F. Supp. 1044, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16160 (D. Del.
1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
551 F. Supp. 1044 p.1045
2128.
Followed by, Cited by:
Ciaffoni v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 550 F. Supp. 1246, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15738 (D. Pa. 1982)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
550 F. Supp. 1246 p.1248
Cited by:
550 F. Supp. 1246 p.1251
2129.
Cited by:
United States Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Com., 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17667, 3
Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1826, 34 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 962 (W.D. Pa. July 6, 1982)
2130.
Cited by:
Hodgin v. Roth, 536 F. Supp. 454, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11519 (E.D. Pa. 1982)
536 F. Supp. 454 p.459
2131.
Distinguished by:
Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union Local 54 v. Danzinger, 536 F. Supp. 317,
1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9363, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11761, 3 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1552, 96
Lab. Cas. (CCH) P14146 (D.N.J. 1982)
536 F. Supp. 317 p.325
2132.
Cited by:
Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union Local 54 v. Danzinger, 536 F. Supp. 317,
1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9363, 3 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1552, 96 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P14146 (D.N.J.
1982)
2133.
Followed by:
In re Davis, 18 B.R. 701, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11382, 6 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 672 (D. Del. 1982)
18 B.R. 701 p.703
2134.
Distinguished by:
Page 257
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Bally Mfg. Corp. v. Casino Control Com., 534 F. Supp. 1213, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9362 (D.N.J. 1982)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
534 F. Supp. 1213 p.1216
534 F. Supp. 1213 p.1218
2135.
Distinguished by:
Deck House, Inc. v. New Jersey State Bd. of Architects, 531 F. Supp. 633, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10633
(D.N.J. 1982)
531 F. Supp. 633 p.642
2136.
Distinguished by:
Southern New Jersey Newspapers, Inc. v. New Jersey Dep't of Transp., 542 F. Supp. 173, 1982 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 13096 (D.N.J. 1982)
542 F. Supp. 173 p.178
2137.
Cited by:
United States v. Western Electric Co., 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10646, 1982-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P64486
(D.N.J. Jan. 20, 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2138.
Followed by:
Davis v. Henderson, 535 F. Supp. 407, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11477 (E.D. Pa. 1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
535 F. Supp. 407 p.409
2139.
Explained by, Cited by:
Streich v. Pennsylvania Com. on Charitable Organizations, 523 F. Supp. 1377, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
15295 (M.D. Pa. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
523 F. Supp. 1377 p.1381
Cited by:
523 F. Supp. 1377 p.1380
2140.
Cited by:
Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp., 519 F. Supp. 1252, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15331 (D.N.J. 1981)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
519 F. Supp. 1252 p.1256
2141.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
United States v. Cargill, Inc., 508 F. Supp. 734, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18034, 15 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA)
1761, 11 Envtl. L. Rep. 20649 (D. Del. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
508 F. Supp. 734 p.747
Cited by:
508 F. Supp. 734 p.745
2142.
Distinguished by:
Page 258
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
New Jersey-Philadelphia Presbytery of Bible Presbyterian Church v. New Jersey State Bd. of Higher
Education, 514 F. Supp. 506, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13714 (D.N.J. 1981)
514 F. Supp. 506 p.508
2143.
Cited by:
Williams v. Red Bank Bd. of Education, 508 F. Supp. 989, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12150 (D.N.J. 1981)
508 F. Supp. 989 p.990
2144.
Explained by, Cited by:
Martrano v. Bridges, 514 F. Supp. 656, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16798 (M.D. Pa. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
Explained by:
514 F. Supp. 656 p.657
Cited by:
514 F. Supp. 656 p.659
2145.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Africa v. Anderson, 510 F. Supp. 28, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16689 (E.D. Pa. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
Distinguished by:
510 F. Supp. 28 p.34
Cited by:
510 F. Supp. 28 p.33
2146.
Explained by:
Heritage Farms v. Solebury Township, 507 F. Supp. 33, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16570 (E.D. Pa. 1980)
507 F. Supp. 33 p.35
2147.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Cited by:
Williams v. Red Bank Bd. of Educ., 502 F. Supp. 1366, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16374 (D.N.J. 1980)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Distinguished by:
502 F. Supp. 1366 p.1370
Followed by:
502 F. Supp. 1366 p.1369
Cited by:
502 F. Supp. 1366 p.1368
2148.
Explained by:
Adams v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 502 F. Supp. 1282, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16372 (M.D. Pa.
1980)
502 F. Supp. 1282 p.1284
2149.
Cited by:
Page 259
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Three Rivers Cablevision, Inc. v. Pittsburgh, 502 F. Supp. 1118, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9501 (W.D. Pa.
1980)
502 F. Supp. 1118 p.1122
2150.
Followed by, Cited by:
Humphreys v. Burke, 502 F. Supp. 449, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15125 (D.N.J. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Followed by:
502 F. Supp. 449 p.456
Cited by:
502 F. Supp. 449 p.455
2151.
Followed by:
Shirey v. Bensalem Township, 501 F. Supp. 1138, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15333 (E.D. Pa. 1980)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
501 F. Supp. 1138 p.1145
2152.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Merritt v. Hicks, 492 F. Supp. 99, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11366 (D.N.J. 1980)
492 F. Supp. 99 p.105
2153.
Cited by:
Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 489 F. Supp. 89, 1980 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 11299 (E.D. Pa. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
489 F. Supp. 89 p.91
2154.
Cited by:
Space Age Products, Inc. v. Gilliam, 488 F. Supp. 775, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11039 (D. Del. 1980)
488 F. Supp. 775 p.780
2155.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Schuman v. Muller, 484 F. Supp. 1334, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10245 (E.D. Pa. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
484 F. Supp. 1334 p.1335
Followed by:
484 F. Supp. 1334 p.1337
2156.
Explained by:
New Jersey-Philadelphia Presbytery of Bible Presbyterian Church v. New Jersey State Board of Higher
Education, 482 F. Supp. 968, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10755 (D.N.J. 1980)
482 F. Supp. 968 p.976
2157.
Followed by:
Record Museum v. Lawrence Township, 481 F. Supp. 768, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8057, 5 Fed. R. Evid.
Page 260
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Serv. (CBC) 973 (D.N.J. 1979)
481 F. Supp. 768 p.772
2158.
Cited by:
Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Com., 463 F. Supp. 120, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
15319, 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P9011, 18 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1350 (E.D. Pa. 1979)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
463 F. Supp. 120 p.127
2159.
Cited by:
Rosko v. Pagano, 466 F. Supp. 1364, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13789 (D.N.J. 1979)
466 F. Supp. 1364 p.1369
466 F. Supp. 1364 p.1371
2160.
Distinguished by:
McCormick v. Hirsch, 460 F. Supp. 1337, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14562, 99 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3342, 85 Lab.
Cas. (CCH) P11187 (M.D. Pa. 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
460 F. Supp. 1337 p.1349
2161.
Distinguished by:
Prochaska v. Fediaczko, 458 F. Supp. 778, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14926 (W.D. Pa. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
458 F. Supp. 778 p.780
2162.
Followed by:
United States ex rel. Frisbee v. Rapone, 449 F. Supp. 509, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18139 (E.D. Pa. 1978)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
449 F. Supp. 509 p.512
2163.
Distinguished by:
D'Iorio v. County of Delaware, 447 F. Supp. 229, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19457 (E.D. Pa. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
447 F. Supp. 229 p.234
2164.
Cited by:
Liberty Curtin Concerned Parents v. Keystone Cent. School Dist., 81 F.R.D. 590, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
6951 (M.D. Pa. 1978)
81 F.R.D. 590 p.596
2165.
Cited by:
McKay v. Heyison, 80 F.R.D. 694, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14032 (E.D. Pa. 1978)
80 F.R.D. 694 p.697
2166.
Cited by:
Environmental Aid, Inc. v. Goddard, 433 F. Supp. 906, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15816, 10 Env't Rep. Cas.
(BNA) 1238 (W.D. Pa. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 261
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
433 F. Supp. 906 p.911
2167.
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Greenspan v. Klein, 442 F. Supp. 860, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12191 (D.N.J. 1977)
Distinguished by:
442 F. Supp. 860 p.864
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
442 F. Supp. 860 p.862
442 F. Supp. 860 p.863
2168.
Cited by:
Garrett v. Hoffman, 441 F. Supp. 1151, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13166 (E.D. Pa. 1977)
441 F. Supp. 1151 p.1156
2169.
Cited by:
Blount v. Smith, 440 F. Supp. 528, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13100 (M.D. Pa. 1977)
440 F. Supp. 528 p.533
2170.
Cited by:
Clark v. Lutcher, 436 F. Supp. 1266, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14245 (M.D. Pa. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
436 F. Supp. 1266 p.1269
2171.
Followed by:
Johnson v. Kelly, 436 F. Supp. 155, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15037 (E.D. Pa. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
436 F. Supp. 155 p.158
436 F. Supp. 155 p.162
2172.
Distinguished by:
Santiago v. Philadelphia, 435 F. Supp. 136, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14901 (E.D. Pa. 1977) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
435 F. Supp. 136 p.145
2173.
Cited by:
Jones v. McElroy, 429 F. Supp. 848, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16650 (E.D. Pa. 1977)
429 F. Supp. 848 p.860
2174.
Cited by:
Bowman v. General Motors Corp., 427 F. Supp. 234, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17363 (E.D. Pa. 1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
427 F. Supp. 234 p.238
2175.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
In re Sears, 425 F. Supp. 1190, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18025 (D.N.J. 1977)
Page 262
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
425 F. Supp. 1190 p.1192
2176.
Distinguished by:
Goldy v. Beal, 429 F. Supp. 640, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14237, 23 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 762 (M.D.
Pa. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
429 F. Supp. 640 p.644
2177.
Cited by:
Wallace v. Hewitt, 428 F. Supp. 39, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12328 (M.D. Pa. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
428 F. Supp. 39 p.43
2178.
Distinguished by:
Winsett v. McGinnes, 425 F. Supp. 609, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11581 (D. Del. 1976)
425 F. Supp. 609 p.613
2179.
Cited by:
Lecates v. Justice of Peace Court No. 4, 423 F. Supp. 1379, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11676 (D. Del. 1976)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
423 F. Supp. 1379 p.1381
2180.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Bryant v. Shapp, 423 F. Supp. 471, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12318 (D. Del. 1976)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
423 F. Supp. 471 p.474
2181.
Cited by:
Fair Housing Council, Inc. v. Eastern Bergen County Multiple Listing Service, Inc., 422 F. Supp. 1071,
1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12182 (D.N.J. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
422 F. Supp. 1071 p.1079
2182.
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Rite Aid Corp. v. Board of Pharmacy, 421 F. Supp. 1161, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13245 (D.N.J. 1976)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
421 F. Supp. 1161 p.1166
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
421 F. Supp. 1161 p.1179
2183.
Cited by:
Sixth Camden Corp. v. Evesham, 420 F. Supp. 709, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13381 (D.N.J. 1976)
420 F. Supp. 709 p.728
2184.
Followed by:
Gipson v. Supreme Court of New Jersey, 416 F. Supp. 1129, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14008 (D.N.J. 1976)
Page 263
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
416 F. Supp. 1129 p.1131
2185.
Followed by, Cited by:
Matherly v. Lamb, 414 F. Supp. 364, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15024 (E.D. Pa. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
414 F. Supp. 364 p.366
414 F. Supp. 364 p.367
Cited by:
414 F. Supp. 364 p.368
414 F. Supp. 364 p.370
2186.
Cited by:
Coll v. Hyland, 411 F. Supp. 905, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15554 (D.N.J. 1976)
411 F. Supp. 905 p.908
2187.
Harmonized by:
Hallman v. Phillips, 409 F. Supp. 423, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17074 (E.D. Pa. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
409 F. Supp. 423 p.426
2188.
Cited by:
Powell v. Keve, 409 F. Supp. 228, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16977 (D. Del. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
409 F. Supp. 228 p.231
2189.
Cited by:
Marvasi v. Shorty, 70 F.R.D. 14, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17129 (E.D. Pa. 1976)
70 F.R.D. 14 p.20
2190.
Explained by:
Sorger v. Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority, 401 F. Supp. 348, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15989 (E.D. Pa.
1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
401 F. Supp. 348 p.353
2191.
Followed by:
Clark v. Zimmerman, 394 F. Supp. 1166, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12477 (M.D. Pa. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
394 F. Supp. 1166 p.1170
394 F. Supp. 1166 p.1172
2192.
Cited by:
Garrett v. Bamford, 394 F. Supp. 902, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12270 (E.D. Pa. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
394 F. Supp. 902 p.910
Page 264
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2193.
Distinguished by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Sole v. Grand Jurors of New Jersey, 393 F. Supp. 1322, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12517 (D.N.J. 1975)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN9
Distinguished by:
393 F. Supp. 1322 p.1327
393 F. Supp. 1322 p.1330
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
393 F. Supp. 1322 p.1332
Cited by:
393 F. Supp. 1322 p.1326
2194.
Distinguished by:
Hamar Theatres, Inc. v. Cryan, 393 F. Supp. 34, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13188 (D.N.J. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4, HN5, HN6
393 F. Supp. 34 p.38
393 F. Supp. 34 p.40
393 F. Supp. 34 p.44
2195.
Cited by:
Lovell v. Arnold, 391 F. Supp. 1047, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13386 (M.D. Pa. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
391 F. Supp. 1047 p.1049
2196.
Explained by:
Bykofsky v. Middletown, 389 F. Supp. 836, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13804 (M.D. Pa. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
389 F. Supp. 836 p.842
389 F. Supp. 836 p.844
389 F. Supp. 836 p.847
2197.
Distinguished by:
Resources for Human Development, Inc. v. Furber, 387 F. Supp. 11, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14236 (E.D.
Pa. 1975)
387 F. Supp. 11 p.15
2198.
Cited by:
Niemann v. Hewitt, 387 F. Supp. 926, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5960 (W.D. Pa. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
387 F. Supp. 926 p.930
2199.
Followed by:
Classic Distributors, Inc. v. Zimmerman, 387 F. Supp. 829, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6229 (M.D. Pa. 1974)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
387 F. Supp. 829 p.835
387 F. Supp. 829 p.836
Page 265
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2200.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
In re Abrams, 385 F. Supp. 1210, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11672 (D.N.J. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
385 F. Supp. 1210 p.1215
2201.
Followed by:
Delaware Chapter of Nat'l Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws (D.C.N.O.R.M.L.) v. Ford, 384 F.
Supp. 1241, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5865 (D. Del. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
384 F. Supp. 1241 p.1243
384 F. Supp. 1241 p.1244
2202.
Cited by:
Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Borough Council, Mayor, Manager & Director of Public Works, 381 F.
Supp. 228, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7247 (E.D. Pa. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
381 F. Supp. 228 p.234
2203.
Cited by:
Siegel v. Salisbury, 379 F. Supp. 317, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7511 (W.D. Pa. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6, HN8
379 F. Supp. 317 p.322
2204.
Cited by:
Killian v. Philadelphia, 377 F. Supp. 988, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7982 (E.D. Pa. 1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
377 F. Supp. 988 p.991
2205.
Cited by:
United States v. Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Bd., 377 F. Supp. 545, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8102
(M.D. Pa. 1974)
377 F. Supp. 545 p.555
2206.
Cited by:
Chesimard v. Kuhlthau, 370 F. Supp. 473, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12349 (D.N.J. 1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
370 F. Supp. 473 p.476
2207.
Followed by:
Henry v. Delaware, 368 F. Supp. 286, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10578 (D. Del. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
368 F. Supp. 286 p.288
2208.
Explained by:
Hamar Theatres, Inc. v. Cryan, 365 F. Supp. 1312, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12530 (D.N.J. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
365 F. Supp. 1312 p.1320
365 F. Supp. 1312 p.1321
Page 266
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2209.
Cited by:
Salvati v. Dale, 364 F. Supp. 691, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11612 (W.D. Pa. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
364 F. Supp. 691 p.704
2210.
Cited by:
Farber v. Rizzo, 363 F. Supp. 386, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13055 (E.D. Pa. 1973)
363 F. Supp. 386 p.397
2211.
Cited by:
Pennsylvania v. Bradshaw, 361 F. Supp. 405, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13030 (W.D. Pa. 1973)
361 F. Supp. 405 p.408
2212.
Cited by:
Milligan v. Braszo, 361 F. Supp. 353, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13135 (W.D. Pa. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
361 F. Supp. 353 p.355
2213.
Followed by:
Freeman & Bass, P. A. v. New Jersey Com. of Investigation, 359 F. Supp. 1053, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
14131 (D.N.J. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
359 F. Supp. 1053 p.1061
2214.
Cited by:
Cherbonnie v. Kugler, 359 F. Supp. 256, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13343 (D.N.J. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
359 F. Supp. 256 p.258
2215.
Cited by:
Council of Organizations on Philadelphia Police Accountability & Responsibility v. Rizzo, 357 F. Supp.
1289, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14534 (E.D. Pa. 1973)
357 F. Supp. 1289 p.1319
2216.
Cited by:
Wright v. Specter, 352 F. Supp. 317, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10672 (E.D. Pa. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
352 F. Supp. 317 p.319
2217.
Followed by:
Oldroyd v. Kugler, 352 F. Supp. 27, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10593 (D.N.J. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN4, HN5, HN6
352 F. Supp. 27 p.29
352 F. Supp. 27 p.31
Page 267
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2218.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Cine--Com Theatres Eastern States, Inc. v. Lordi, 351 F. Supp. 42, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11056 (D.N.J.
1972)
Distinguished by:
351 F. Supp. 42 p.48
Cited by:
351 F. Supp. 42 p.45
2219.
Cited by:
Roy v. Jones, 349 F. Supp. 315, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13205 (W.D. Pa. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
349 F. Supp. 315 p.324
2220.
Followed by:
Independent Tape Merchant's Asso. v. Creamer, 346 F. Supp. 456, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12642 (M.D. Pa.
1972) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
346 F. Supp. 456 p.459
346 F. Supp. 456 p.460
2221.
Distinguished by, Explained by, Cited by:
YWCA v. Kugler, 342 F. Supp. 1048, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14888 (D.N.J. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6, HN8
Distinguished by:
342 F. Supp. 1048 p.1060
Explained by:
342 F. Supp. 1048 p.1059
Cited by:
342 F. Supp. 1048 p.1058
2222.
Cited by:
Thompson v. Groshens, 342 F. Supp. 516, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14285 (E.D. Pa. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
342 F. Supp. 516 p.521
2223.
Cited by:
Burak v. Pennsylvania, 339 F. Supp. 534, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15002 (E.D. Pa. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
339 F. Supp. 534 p.536
339 F. Supp. 534 p.537
2224.
Cited by:
Non--Resident Taxpayers Asso. v. Philadelphia, 341 F. Supp. 1139, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10196 (D.N.J.
1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
341 F. Supp. 1139 p.1146
Page 268
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2225.
Explained by:
Burak v. Sprague, 335 F. Supp. 347, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10344 (E.D. Pa. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
335 F. Supp. 347 p.349
2226.
Cited by:
Kinecki v. District Attorney of Erie County, 334 F. Supp. 1195, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10409 (W.D. Pa.
1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
334 F. Supp. 1195 p.1196
334 F. Supp. 1195 p.1197
2227.
Cited by:
Housing Authority of Newark v. Henry, 334 F. Supp. 490, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10723 (D.N.J. 1971)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
334 F. Supp. 490 p.494
2228.
Followed by:
Karp v. Collins, 333 F. Supp. 15, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11663 (D.N.J. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN8
333 F. Supp. 15 p.16
2229.
Cited by:
Ryan v. Specter, 332 F. Supp. 26, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11872 (E.D. Pa. 1971)
332 F. Supp. 26 p.28
332 F. Supp. 26 p.29
2230.
Cited by:
Jones v. North Bergen, 331 F. Supp. 1281, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11429, 15 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan)
914 (D.N.J. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
331 F. Supp. 1281 p.1286
2231.
Distinguished by:
Corporation of Haverford College v. Reeher, 329 F. Supp. 1196, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12389 (E.D. Pa.
1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
329 F. Supp. 1196 p.1200
2232.
Cited by:
Conover v. Montemuro, 328 F. Supp. 994, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12479 (E.D. Pa. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
328 F. Supp. 994 p.995
2233.
Cited by:
Gebert v. Hoffman, 328 F. Supp. 574, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12975 (E.D. Pa. 1971)
328 F. Supp. 574 p.575
2234.
Cited by:
Page 269
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Abramovich v. Bionaz, 326 F. Supp. 142, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13540, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2835, 66 Lab.
Cas. (CCH) P11987 (W.D. Pa. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
326 F. Supp. 142 p.145
2235.
Cited by:
Dixon v. Attorney Gen. of Pennsylvania, 325 F. Supp. 966, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13964 (M.D. Pa. 1971)
325 F. Supp. 966 p.971
2236.
Followed by:
Lewis v. Kugler, 324 F. Supp. 1220, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14191 (D.N.J. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN4, HN5, HN7
324 F. Supp. 1220 p.1222
2237.
Followed by:
Lawrence v. Lordi, 324 F. Supp. 1092, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14190 (D.N.J. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
324 F. Supp. 1092 p.1093
2238.
Cited by:
Ascheim v. Quinlan, 324 F. Supp. 789, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14125 (W.D. Pa. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
324 F. Supp. 789 p.794
324 F. Supp. 789 p.795
324 F. Supp. 789 p.797
3RD CIRCUIT - U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURTS
2239.
Cited by:
Funches v. Household Fin. Consumer Disc. Co. (In re Funches), 381 B.R. 471, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 256
(Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
381 B.R. 471 p.485
2240.
Distinguished by:
Logan v. Credit Gen. Ins. Co. (In re PRS Ins. Group, Inc.), 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2553 (Bankr. D. Del. Dec.
19, 2005)
2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2553 p.4
2241.
Followed by:
Logan v. Credit Gen. Ins. Co. (In re PRS Ins. Group), 331 B.R. 580, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 1774, 45 Bankr.
Ct. Dec. (LRP) 94 (Bankr. D. Del. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
331 B.R. 580 p.589
2242.
Cited by:
In re Perrin, 233 B.R. 71, 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 740, 41 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 1572 (Bankr. D.N.J.
1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
233 B.R. 71 p.75
Page 270
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2243.
Cited by:
Mother African Union Methodist Church v. Conference of AUFCMP Church (In re Conference of African
Union First Colored Methodist Protestant Church), 184 B.R. 207, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 962 (Bankr. D. Del.
1995)
184 B.R. 207 p.218
2244.
Cited by:
In re Kennedy, 158 B.R. 589, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1296, 24 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1073, Bankr. L. Rep.
(CCH) P75437, 29 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 817 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1993)
158 B.R. 589 p.598
2245.
Cited by:
In re Quinn, 141 B.R. 44, 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 898, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P74655 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
141 B.R. 44 p.47
2246.
Cited by:
In re Ticket Plus, Inc., 103 B.R. 574, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1412 (Bankr. M.D. Pa. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
103 B.R. 574 p.577
2247.
Followed by:
In re Ropietski, 101 B.R. 437, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1048 (Bankr. M.D. Pa. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
101 B.R. 437 p.439
2248.
Cited by:
In re Todd Shipyards Corp., 92 B.R. 600, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 1759, 1988 A.M.C. 2028 (Bankr. D.N.J.
1988)
92 B.R. 600 p.603
2249.
Cited by:
In re Davenport, 83 B.R. 309, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 262, 17 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 453, Bankr. L. Rep.
(CCH) P72209 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
83 B.R. 309 p.313
2250.
Cited by:
In re Kohr, 82 B.R. 706, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 171, 18 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 421 (Bankr. M.D. Pa.
1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
82 B.R. 706 p.709
82 B.R. 706 p.711
2251.
Distinguished by:
In re Cherry, 78 B.R. 65, 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 1551, 16 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 645 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1987)
78 B.R. 65 p.72
Page 271
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2252.
Cited by:
In re Stephen Smith Home for Aged, Inc., 80 B.R. 678, 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 1464 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1987)
80 B.R. 678 p.683
2253.
Cited by:
In re Earle Indus., 72 B.R. 131, 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 464, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P71771 (Bankr. E.D. Pa.
1987)
72 B.R. 131 p.134
2254.
Cited by:
In re Clark, 69 B.R. 885, 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 143 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
69 B.R. 885 p.890
2255.
Cited by:
In re Johnson-Allen, 69 B.R. 461, 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 53, 15 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 638, Bankr. L. Rep.
(CCH) P71657, 16 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 174 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
69 B.R. 461 p.466
2256.
Cited by:
In re Fidelity America Financial Corp., 63 B.R. 995, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 5423 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1986)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
63 B.R. 995 p.997
63 B.R. 995 p.998
2257.
Cited by:
In re Nicholas, Inc., 55 B.R. 212, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 4939, 13 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1022, Bankr. L. Rep.
(CCH) P70984, 121 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2579, 103 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11690 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1985)
55 B.R. 212 p.217
2258.
Cited by:
In re Fidelity America Financial Corp., 53 B.R. 930, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 5126 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1985)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
53 B.R. 930 p.933
2259.
Followed by:
In re Oslager, 46 B.R. 58, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6962, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P70215, 11 Collier Bankr. Cas.
2d (MB) 1427 (Bankr. M.D. Pa. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
46 B.R. 58 p.62
4TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
2260.
Cited by:
Independence News, Inc. v. City of Charlotte, 568 F.3d 148, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11842 (4th Cir. N.C.
2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
568 F.3d 148 p.157
Page 272
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2261.
Cited by:
Virginia v. Reinhard, 568 F.3d 110, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11737, 21 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1743
(4th Cir. Va. 2009)
568 F.3d 110 p.115
2262.
Cited by:
Beam v. Tatum, 299 Fed. Appx. 243, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 23201 (4th Cir. N.C. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
299 Fed. Appx. 243 p.244
2263.
Followed by, Cited by:
Laurel Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Wilson, 519 F.3d 156, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 4650, 38 Envtl. L. Rep. 20062
(4th Cir. Md. 2008)
Followed by:
519 F.3d 156 p.167
Cited by:
519 F.3d 156 p.161
2264.
Cited by:
Long Term Care Partners, LLC v. United States, 516 F.3d 225, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 2512, 13 Accom.
Disabilities Dec. (CCH) P13-082, 20 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 289, 108 Fed. Equal Opp. Rep. 224 (4th
Cir. Md. 2008)
516 F.3d 225 p.232
2265.
Cited by:
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Tolson, 513 F.3d 119, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 450, 43 Comm. Reg. (P & F) 852 (4th Cir.
N.C. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
513 F.3d 119 p.124
2266.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Martin v. Stewart, 499 F.3d 360, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20719, 25 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 687 (2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
499 F.3d 360 p.372
Cited by:
499 F.3d 360 p.363
2267.
Cited by:
Smith v. Frye, 488 F.3d 263, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11632, 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P43056, 26 I.E.R.
Cas. (BNA) 106, 154 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P60411 (4th Cir. W. Va. 2007)
488 F.3d 263 p.273
2268.
Followed by, Cited by:
Life Partners., Inc. v. Morrison, 484 F.3d 284, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9913, 40 Employee Benefits Cas.
(BNA) 1971 (4th Cir. Va. 2007)
Page 273
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Followed by:
484 F.3d 284 p.301
Cited by:
484 F.3d 284 p.291
2269.
Cited by:
Blankenship v. Manchin, 471 F.3d 523, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31339 (4th Cir. W. Va. 2006)
471 F.3d 523 p.527
2270.
Cited by:
Great Am. Ins. Co. v. Gross, 468 F.3d 199, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 26920 (4th Cir. Va. 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
468 F.3d 199 p.206
2271.
Followed by:
Nivens v. Gilchrist, 444 F.3d 237, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 8807 (4th Cir. N.C. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
444 F.3d 237 p.239
2272.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Thomas v. Butler, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 19419 (4th Cir. Md. Sept. 8, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 19419
Followed by:
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 19419
2273.
Cited by:
Chase Brexton Health Servs. v. Md., 411 F.3d 457, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10717 (4th Cir. Md. 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
411 F.3d 457 p.462
2274.
Followed by, Cited by:
Moore v. City of Asheville, 396 F.3d 385, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1237 (4th Cir. N.C. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
396 F.3d 385 p.388
396 F.3d 385 p.390
Cited by:
396 F.3d 385 p.387
2275.
Cited by:
Harper v. PSC, 396 F.3d 348, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1157 (4th Cir. W. Va. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
396 F.3d 348 p.350
396 F.3d 348 p.351
Page 274
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2276.
Cited by:
Cordero v. Mecklenburg County Youth & Family Servs., 109 Fed. Appx. 525, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 19263
(4th Cir. N.C. 2004)
109 Fed. Appx. 525 p.526
2277.
Cited by:
Eller v. Virginia, 102 Fed. Appx. 792, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 14963 (4th Cir. Va. 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
102 Fed. Appx. 792 p.792
2278.
Cited by:
Denny's, Inc. v. Cake, 364 F.3d 521, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 7050, 32 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1769
(4th Cir. S.C. 2004)
364 F.3d 521 p.524
2279.
Distinguished by:
United States v. Burcham, 91 Fed. Appx. 820, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 379 (4th Cir. N.C. 2004)
91 Fed. Appx. 820 p.822
2280.
Cited by:
United States v. Bynum, 83 Fed. Appx. 533, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26079 (4th Cir. N.C. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
83 Fed. Appx. 533 p.534
2281.
Followed by, Cited by:
Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. McGraw, 71 Fed. Appx. 967, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16813 (4th Cir. W. Va. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
Followed by:
71 Fed. Appx. 967 p.970
Cited by:
71 Fed. Appx. 967 p.968
71 Fed. Appx. 967 p.969
2282.
Cited by:
Simonini v. Bell (In re Simonini), 69 Fed. Appx. 169, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13295 (4th Cir. N.C. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
69 Fed. Appx. 169 p.171
2283.
Followed by, Cited by:
Nivens v. Gilchrist, 319 F.3d 151, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2453 (4th Cir. N.C. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
319 F.3d 151 p.153
Cited by:
Page 275
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
319 F.3d 151 p.152
2284.
Cited by:
Hazbun Escaf v. Rodriguez, 52 Fed. Appx. 207, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 25292 (4th Cir. Va. 2002)
52 Fed. Appx. 207 p.208
2285.
Distinguished by:
Certa v. Harris, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22976 (4th Cir. Va. Oct. 26, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22976
2286.
Cited by:
Brewer v. Kimel, 256 F.3d 222, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 15693 (4th Cir. N.C. 2001)
256 F.3d 222 p.224
2287.
Cited by:
Freedman, Levy, Kroll & Simonds v. Mendelson, 11 Fed. Appx. 288, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11875 (4th
Cir. Va. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
11 Fed. Appx. 288 p.289
2288.
Cited by:
Alder v. James, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 31774 (4th Cir. Va. Dec. 13, 2000)
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 31774
2289.
Cited by:
United States v. Prescott, 221 F.3d 686, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18291 (4th Cir. Md. 2000)
221 F.3d 686 p.689
2290.
Cited by:
United States v. Nathan, 202 F.3d 230, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 684 (4th Cir. Va. 2000)
202 F.3d 230 p.233
2291.
Cited by:
Perry v. City of Norfolk, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 22768 (4th Cir. Va. Sept. 20, 1999)
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 22768
2292.
Followed by:
Shirley v. Drake, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7209 (4th Cir. Va. Apr. 12, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7209
2293.
Cited by:
Blakely v. Greenville County Judicial Sys., 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3779 (4th Cir. S.C. Mar. 10, 1999)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3779
Page 276
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2294.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Richmond Med. Ctr. for Women v. Gilmore, 183 F.3d 303, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 18547 (4th Cir. 1998)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
183 F.3d 303 p.304
2295.
Cited by:
Abril v. Virginia, 145 F.3d 182, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10281, 135 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P33686, 4 Wage &
Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1110 (4th Cir. Va. 1998)
145 F.3d 182 p.185
2296.
Cited by:
Front Royal & Warren County Indus. Park Corp. v. Town of Front Royal, 135 F.3d 275, 1998 U.S. App.
LEXIS 936 (4th Cir. Va. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
135 F.3d 275 p.283
2297.
Cited by:
In re Rourke, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 34006 (4th Cir. Dec. 2, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2298.
Cited by:
Berry v. South Carolina Dep't of Social Servs., 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22647 (4th Cir. S.C. Aug. 25, 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2299.
Cited by:
Jordahl v. Democratic Party, 122 F.3d 192, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 19245 (4th Cir. Va. 1997)
122 F.3d 192 p.195
2300.
Cited by:
Cook v. City of Charlotte, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33482 (4th Cir. N.C. Dec. 24, 1996)
2301.
Cited by:
Fuller v. Virginia, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 26237 (4th Cir. Va. Oct. 3, 1996)
2302.
Cited by:
Froeman v. Warden, Baltimore County Detention Center, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22620 (4th Cir. Md. Aug.
30, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2303.
Cited by:
American Tank Transp. v. First People's Community Fed. Credit Union, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11481 (4th
Cir. Md. May 20, 1996)
2304.
Distinguished by:
Mandel v. Allen, 81 F.3d 478, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8268 (4th Cir. Va. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
81 F.3d 478 p.479
2305.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Gilliam v. Foster, Ct. App. 4th Dkt. No. 95-2434b (Jan. 29, 1996)
Ct. App. 4th Dkt. No. 95-2434b
2306.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Page 277
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Gilliam v. Foster, 75 F.3d 881, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1148 (4th Cir. S.C. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
75 F.3d 881 p.905
Cited by:
75 F.3d 881 p.885
75 F.3d 881 p.903
2307.
Cited by:
Employers Resource Management Co. v. Shannon, 65 F.3d 1126, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26480, 19
Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1982, 95 TNT 195-8 (4th Cir. Va. 1995)
65 F.3d 1126 p.1134
2308.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Gilliam v. Foster, 63 F.3d 287, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21033 (4th Cir. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
63 F.3d 287 p.292
Cited by:
63 F.3d 287 p.289
2309.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Gilliam v. Foster, 61 F.3d 1070, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 20383 (4th Cir. S.C. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6, HN9
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
61 F.3d 1070 p.1084
61 F.3d 1070 p.1086
Cited by:
61 F.3d 1070 p.1074
61 F.3d 1070 p.1082
2310.
Cited by:
Carter v. Medlock, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34614 (4th Cir. S.C. Dec. 9, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2311.
Cited by:
Scheck v. Maryland, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30544 (4th Cir. Md. Nov. 2, 1994)
2312.
Cited by:
Martin Marietta Corp. v. Maryland Comm'n on Human Relations, 38 F.3d 1392, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS
29942, 3 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1429, 7 Am. Disabilities Dec. 36, 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2645 (4th
Cir. Md. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
38 F.3d 1392 p.1395
38 F.3d 1392 p.1396
2313.
Cited by:
Sugarloaf Citizens Ass'n v. Montgomery County, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21985 (4th Cir. Md. Aug. 17,
1994)
Page 278
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2314.
Cited by:
Virginia v. Kelly, 29 F.3d 145, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 17145 (4th Cir. Va. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
29 F.3d 145 p.148
2315.
Cited by:
Blackwell v. North Carolina, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 14403 (4th Cir. N.C. June 13, 1994)
2316.
Cited by:
Curry v. Randall, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11082 (4th Cir. N.C. May 19, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2317.
Cited by:
Thompson v. Virginia (In re Thompson), 16 F.3d 576, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 2492, 6 4th Cir. & D.C.
Bankr. Ct. Rep. 319, 150 A.L.R. Fed. 707 (4th Cir. Va. 1994)
16 F.3d 576 p.578
2318.
Followed by, Cited by:
Family Found. v. Brown, 9 F.3d 1075, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28782 (4th Cir. Va. 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
9 F.3d 1075 p.1078
Cited by:
9 F.3d 1075 p.1076
2319.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Richmond, F. & P. R.R. Co. v. Forst, 4 F.3d 244, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 17613, 93 TNT 173-10 (4th Cir.
Va. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
4 F.3d 244 p.251
Cited by:
4 F.3d 244 p.246
2320.
Cited by:
Brazell v. Boyd, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 7353 (4th Cir. S.C. Apr. 5, 1993)
2321.
Cited by:
2020C W. St., Inc. v. Ann Arundel County, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2141 (4th Cir. Md. Feb. 9, 1993)
2322.
Explained by:
Pomponio v. Fauquier County Board of Supervisors, Ct. App. 4th Dkt. No. 91-1107 (Aug. 3, 1992)
Ct. App. 4th Dkt. No. 91-1107
2323.
Cited by:
Pomponio v. Fauquier County Bd. of Supervisors, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17636 (4th Cir. Aug. 3, 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2324.
Explained by:
In re Showa Denko K.K., 953 F.2d 162, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 251 (4th Cir. S.C. 1992) LexisNexis
Page 279
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5
953 F.2d 162 p.166
2325.
Distinguished by:
Hazardous Waste Treatment Council v. South Carolina, 945 F.2d 781, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22154, 33
Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1729, 21 Envtl. L. Rep. 21494 (4th Cir. S.C. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
945 F.2d 781 p.789
2326.
Cited by:
Sofer v. North Carolina Hertford Police Dep't, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 12918 (4th Cir. N.C. June 21, 1991)
2327.
Cited by:
Kerpelman v. Grossman, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8275 (4th Cir. Md. May 3, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2328.
Cited by:
Fruhwirth v. Baltimore City Police Dep't, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8476 (4th Cir. Md. Apr. 25, 1991)
2329.
Distinguished by:
In re Application & Affidavit for a Search Warrant, 923 F.2d 324, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 13, 18 Media L.
Rep. (BNA) 1593 (4th Cir. Va. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
923 F.2d 324 p.328
2330.
Cited by:
In re Kunstler, 914 F.2d 505, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16442, 17 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1215 (4th Cir.
N.C. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
914 F.2d 505 p.517
2331.
Cited by:
Gordon v. Luksch, 887 F.2d 496, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15856 (4th Cir. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
887 F.2d 496 p.497
2332.
Followed by:
Cinema Blue of Charlotte, Inc. v. Gilchrist, 887 F.2d 49, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15182 (4th Cir. N.C. 1989)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
887 F.2d 49 p.52
2333.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Telco Communications, Inc. v. Carbaugh, 885 F.2d 1225, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14162 (4th Cir. Va. 1989)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
Followed by:
885 F.2d 1225 p.1227
885 F.2d 1225 p.1228
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
885 F.2d 1225 p.1235
Cited by:
Page 280
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
885 F.2d 1225 p.1229
2334.
Cited by:
National Capital Naturists v. Board of Supervisors, 878 F.2d 128, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8565 (4th Cir.
Va. 1989)
878 F.2d 128 p.132
2335.
Cited by:
Traverso v. Penn, 874 F.2d 209, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6412 (4th Cir. Va. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2336.
Cited by:
Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Sachs, 841 F.2d 90, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2733, 27 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA)
1318, 18 Envtl. L. Rep. 20831 (4th Cir. Md. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
841 F.2d 90 p.92
2337.
Cited by:
Davis v. USX Corp., 819 F.2d 1270, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7073, 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P37163, 43
Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1685, 8 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 74, 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1774 (4th Cir.
S.C. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
819 F.2d 1270 p.1275
2338.
Cited by:
Leonard v. Hammond, 804 F.2d 838, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33379 (4th Cir. N.C. 1986)
804 F.2d 838 p.839
2339.
Followed by, Cited by:
Suggs v. Brannon, 804 F.2d 274, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32977 (4th Cir. N.C. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN8
Followed by:
804 F.2d 274 p.278
Cited by:
804 F.2d 274 p.280
2340.
Followed by, Cited by:
Potomac Elec. Power Co. v. Sachs, 802 F.2d 1527, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32348, 25 Env't Rep. Cas.
(BNA) 1215, 17 Envtl. L. Rep. 20153 (4th Cir. Md. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
802 F.2d 1527 p.1530
Cited by:
802 F.2d 1527 p.1531
802 F.2d 1527 p.1532
2341.
Cited by:
Doe v. Duling, 782 F.2d 1202, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22121 (4th Cir. Va. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN4, HN6
Page 281
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
782 F.2d 1202 p.1205
782 F.2d 1202 p.1208
782 F.2d 1202 p.1209
2342.
Cited by:
Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Baltimore County, 774 F.2d 77, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23375 (4th Cir. Md. 1985)
774 F.2d 77 p.79
2343.
Cited by:
Ganey v. Barefoot, 749 F.2d 1124, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 16149 (4th Cir. N.C. 1984) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
749 F.2d 1124 p.1128
2344.
Cited by:
Promovision International Films, Ltd. v. Trapani, 744 F.2d 1063, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17954 (4th Cir.
Va. 1984)
744 F.2d 1063 p.1065
2345.
Cited by:
Lewis v. Blackburn, 734 F.2d 1000, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22389 (4th Cir. N.C. 1984)
2346.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Lee v. Winston, 717 F.2d 888, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16926 (4th Cir. Va. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
717 F.2d 888 p.902
2347.
Cited by:
Aluminum Co. of America v. Utilities Com. of North Carolina, 713 F.2d 1024, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS
25398, Util. L. Rep. (CCH) P12750 (4th Cir. N.C. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
713 F.2d 1024 p.1029
2348.
Cited by:
Educational Servs. v. Maryland State Bd. for Higher Educ., 710 F.2d 170, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26446
(4th Cir. Md. 1983)
710 F.2d 170 p.172
2349.
Cited by:
Kelser v. Anne Arundel County Dep't of Social Services, 679 F.2d 1092, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18630 (4th
Cir. Md. 1982)
679 F.2d 1092 p.1093
2350.
Followed by:
Craig v. Barney, 678 F.2d 1200, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19076 (4th Cir. Va. 1982)
678 F.2d 1200 p.1201
2351.
Cited by:
Page 282
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, etc. v. Rocky Mount, 672 F.2d 376, 1982 U.S. App.
LEXIS 21512, 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3114, 93 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P13271 (4th Cir. N.C. 1982)
672 F.2d 376 p.379
2352.
Cited by:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, etc. v. Rocky Mount (4th Cir. Feb. 24, 1982)
2353.
Cited by:
Cox v. Planning Dist. I Community Mental Health etc., 669 F.2d 940, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 22070 (4th
Cir. Va. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
669 F.2d 940 p.942
2354.
Cited by:
Cassidy v. Virginia Carolina Veneer Corp., 652 F.2d 380, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12133, 26 Empl. Prac.
Dec. (CCH) P31908, 30 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1049 (4th Cir. Va. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
652 F.2d 380 p.382
2355.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Simopoulos v. Virginia State Bd. of Medicine, 644 F.2d 321, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 19073 (4th Cir. Va.
1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN9
Followed by:
644 F.2d 321 p.321
644 F.2d 321 p.329
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
644 F.2d 321 p.331
Cited by:
644 F.2d 321 p.324
644 F.2d 321 p.327
2356.
Cited by:
United States v. Burroughs, 564 F.2d 1111, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 10988 (4th Cir. S.C. 1977)
564 F.2d 1111 p.1115
2357.
Followed by:
American Civil Liberties Union v. Bozardt, 539 F.2d 340, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12496 (4th Cir. S.C.
1976) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
539 F.2d 340 p.342
2358.
Cited by:
Moorefield v. Maggie Valley, 538 F.2d 324, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 8046 (4th Cir. N.C. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2359.
Cited by:
Sumey v. Martinsville, 529 F.2d 517, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12643 (4th Cir. Va. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2360.
Explained by:
Page 283
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Timmerman v. Brown, 528 F.2d 811, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11447 (4th Cir. S.C. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
528 F.2d 811 p.812
528 F.2d 811 p.814
2361.
Cited by:
Hogge v. Johnson, 526 F.2d 833, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 13061, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P10367 (4th
Cir. Va. 1975)
526 F.2d 833 p.834
2362.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
McCray v. Burrell, 516 F.2d 357, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15213 (4th Cir. Md. 1975)
516 F.2d 357 p.376
2363.
Explained by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Age of Majority Educational Corp. v. Preller, 512 F.2d 1241, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15818 (4th Cir. Md.
1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Explained by:
512 F.2d 1241 p.1242
512 F.2d 1241 p.1243
512 F.2d 1241 p.1244
512 F.2d 1241 p.1245
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
512 F.2d 1241 p.1246
2364.
Cited by:
Keblaitis v. Several Unknown Agents in Criminal Investigation Div. etc., 506 F.2d 1397, 1974 U.S. App.
LEXIS 6366 (4th Cir. N.C. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2365.
Followed by:
Moye v. Raleigh, 503 F.2d 631, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6675 (4th Cir. N.C. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
503 F.2d 631 p.633
503 F.2d 631 p.634
2366.
Cited by:
Simmons v. County of Fairfax, 490 F.2d 1407, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10372 (4th Cir. Va. 1974)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2367.
Explained by:
Joseph v. Blair, 482 F.2d 575, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8587, 6 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P8747, 6 Fair Empl.
Prac. Cas. (BNA) 257 (4th Cir. Va. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
482 F.2d 575 p.576
2368.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Joseph v. Blair, 488 F.2d 403, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7729 (4th Cir. 1973)
488 F.2d 403 p.405
Page 284
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2369.
Cited by:
Greenmount Sales, Inc. v. Davila, 479 F.2d 591, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9786 (4th Cir. Va. 1973)
479 F.2d 591 p.592
2370.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Fowler v. Alexander, 478 F.2d 694, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10058 (4th Cir. N.C. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
478 F.2d 694 p.698
Cited by:
478 F.2d 694 p.697
2371.
Cited by:
Lynch v. Snepp, 472 F.2d 769, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11990 (4th Cir. N.C. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
472 F.2d 769 p.771
472 F.2d 769 p.772
472 F.2d 769 p.775
2372.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Donohoe v. Duling, 465 F.2d 196, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8112 (4th Cir. Va. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN8
465 F.2d 196 p.205
2373.
Followed by:
Manns v. Koontz, 451 F.2d 1344, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6850 (4th Cir. Va. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
451 F.2d 1344 p.1345
2374.
Cited by:
Crawford v. Courtney, 451 F.2d 489, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6936 (4th Cir. W. Va. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
451 F.2d 489 p.491
2375.
Cited by:
Sword v. Fox, 446 F.2d 1091, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9169 (4th Cir. Va. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
446 F.2d 1091 p.1094
4TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
2376.
Cited by:
Williams v. Maskelony, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104213 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104213
2377.
Cited by:
Page 285
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cave v. Royster, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106739 (D.S.C. Oct. 23, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106739
2378.
Cited by:
Williams v. Sheriff's Dep't, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96989 (E.D. Va. Oct. 20, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96989
2379.
Cited by:
Westfall v. West Virginia, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98480 (N.D. W. Va. Oct. 14, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98480
2380.
Cited by:
Grate v. Hembree, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96189 (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96189
2381.
Cited by:
Gilbert v. N.C. State Bar, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92967 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92967
2382.
Cited by:
Duncan v. Cook, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82109 (D.S.C. Sept. 9, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82109
2383.
Cited by:
Gethers v. Doran, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82106 (D.S.C. Sept. 8, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82106
2384.
Followed by:
Hattersley v. South Carolina, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90379 (D.S.C. Sept. 1, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90379
2385.
Distinguished by:
Field v. McMaster, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88028 (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88028
2386.
Cited by:
Wambach v. Cheeks, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76018 (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76018
2387.
Cited by:
Bradley v. Florence City Police Dep't, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95558 (D.S.C. Aug. 21, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Page 286
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95558
2388.
Cited by:
Washington v. Van Doran, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82857 (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82857
2389.
Cited by:
Wambach v. Cheeks, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76016 (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76016
2390.
Followed by:
Fuller v. John T. Mobley, P.A., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85205 (D.S.C. Aug. 11, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85205
2391.
Followed by:
Gore v. Thompson, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82660 (D.S.C. Aug. 11, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82660
2392.
Cited by:
James v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70964 (D. Md. Aug. 10, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN7
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70964
2393.
Followed by:
John Ngwa Fomuki v. York County Det. Ctr., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77975 (D.S.C. Aug. 7, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77975
2394.
Cited by:
Kirk v. Curran, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72623 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72623
2395.
Cited by:
Walker v. Hudson, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75069 (D.S.C. July 24, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75069
2396.
Cited by:
Kelly v. Canada, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63984 (D.S.C. July 24, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63984
2397.
Cited by:
S. Alliance for Clean Energy v. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56733 (W.D.N.C.
July 2, 2009)
Page 287
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56733
2398.
Followed by:
Greene v. Smith, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61259 (D.S.C. June 25, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61259
2399.
Cited by:
Nesmith v. South Carolina, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53591 (D.S.C. June 23, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53591
2400.
Cited by:
Cytec Indus. v. Powell, 630 F. Supp. 2d 680, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51926 (N.D. W. Va. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
630 F. Supp. 2d 680 p.684
2401.
Cited by:
VanDerHorst v. South Carolina, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45675 (D.S.C. May 27, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45675
2402.
Followed by:
Duncan v. Cook, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81980 (D.S.C. May 21, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81980
2403.
Explained by:
Argonaut Great Cent. Ins. Co. v. McDowell County, 626 F. Supp. 2d 554, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43996
(W.D.N.C. 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
626 F. Supp. 2d 554 p.564
2404.
Followed by:
Walker v. Coleman, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78226 (E.D.N.C. May 14, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78226
2405.
Followed by:
Kaplan v. CareFirst, Inc., 614 F. Supp. 2d 587, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41461 (D. Md. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
614 F. Supp. 2d 587 p.592
2406.
Cited by:
Miller v. Rock Hill Police Dep't, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36086 (D.S.C. Apr. 29, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36086
2407.
Followed by:
Dukes v. Municipality of Conway, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50019 (D.S.C. Apr. 27, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Page 288
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50019
2408.
Cited by:
Nelson v. Kitchen, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35887 (D.S.C. Apr. 27, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35887
2409.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
McCartney v. Cansler, 608 F. Supp. 2d 694, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31799 (E.D.N.C. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
608 F. Supp. 2d 694 p.704
Cited by:
608 F. Supp. 2d 694 p.703
2410.
Followed by:
Gray v. McLemore, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9985 (D.S.C. Feb. 2, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9985
2411.
Cited by:
Smith v. Edwards, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109081 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 23, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109081
2412.
Cited by:
Scott v. South Carolina, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91223 (D.S.C. Nov. 5, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91223
2413.
Followed by:
Reaching Hearts Int'l, Inc. v. Prince George's County, 584 F. Supp. 2d 766, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91113
(D. Md. 2008)
584 F. Supp. 2d 766 p.793
2414.
Followed by:
Lloyd v. Jordan, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107610 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107610
2415.
Cited by:
Stepheny v. Baker, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109303 (D.S.C. Oct. 7, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109303
2416.
Followed by:
Russell v. Myers, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76722 (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76722
2417.
Followed by:
Page 289
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Gray v. Lancaster County Sheriff's Dep't, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75934 (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75934
2418.
Followed by:
Bieber v. S.C. Comm'n on Lawyer Conduct, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73844 (D.S.C. Sept. 24, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73844
2419.
Followed by:
Motel 6 Operating, L.P. v. Gaston County, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81645 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81645
2420.
Followed by:
Dugas v. Hanover County Circuit Court, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67644 (E.D. Va. Sept. 4, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67644
2421.
Followed by:
Huff v. AG of Va., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65438 (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65438
2422.
Cited by:
Stover v. Powers, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50013 (D.S.C. June 30, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50013
2423.
Followed by:
Ward v. Simpers, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42172 (D. Md. May 29, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42172
2424.
Cited by:
Mills v. Greenville County, 586 F. Supp. 2d 480, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30724 (D.S.C. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
586 F. Supp. 2d 480 p.483
2425.
Followed by:
Broadnax v. Cannon, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31929 (D.S.C. Apr. 15, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31929
2426.
Followed by:
Minns v. Portsmouth Juvenile & Domestic Rels. Court, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23847 (E.D. Va. Mar. 25,
2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23847
2427.
Followed by, Cited by:
Page 290
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Va. Inst. of Autism v. Va. Dep't of Educ., 537 F. Supp. 2d 817, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17832 (E.D. Va.
2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
Followed by:
537 F. Supp. 2d 817 p.822
Cited by:
537 F. Supp. 2d 817 p.820
2428.
Followed by:
Mills v. Greenville County, 586 F. Supp. 2d 480, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107292 (D.S.C. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
586 F. Supp. 2d 480 p.489
2429.
Cited by:
Bishop v. Davis, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6806 (E.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6806
2430.
Followed by:
Briggman v. Commonwealth, 526 F. Supp. 2d 590, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93729 (W.D. Va. 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
526 F. Supp. 2d 590 p.604
2431.
Followed by:
Kolle v. Grigg, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89628 (D.S.C. Dec. 5, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89628
2432.
Cited by:
Littlejohn v. Creciven, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83208 (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83208
2433.
Cited by:
Peterson v. Jackson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83206 (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83206
2434.
Followed by:
Duncan v. Gilchrist, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85459 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85459
2435.
Cited by:
Littlejohn v. Creciven, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83214 (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83214
2436.
Cited by:
Penland v. City of Greer, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83933 (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83933
Page 291
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2437.
Followed by:
BlueHippo Funding, LLC v. McGraw, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98314 (S.D. W. Va. Oct. 25, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98314
2438.
Followed by:
Camastro v. City of Wheeling, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79007 (N.D. W. Va. Oct. 23, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79007
2439.
Followed by:
Smith v. Smith, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76087 (W.D. Va. Oct. 12, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76087
2440.
Followed by:
Kirk v. Gilchrist, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77602 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 9, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77602
2441.
Cited by:
Furtado v. Maryland, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98635 (D. Md. Oct. 4, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98635
2442.
Followed by:
Williams v. Lubin, 516 F. Supp. 2d 535, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72035 (D. Md. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
516 F. Supp. 2d 535 p.538
2443.
Cited by:
Massey Energy Co. v. Supreme Court of Appeals of W. Va., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70330 (S.D. W. Va.
Sept. 21, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70330
2444.
Cited by:
Motley v. Virginia, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68225 (E.D. Va. Sept. 14, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68225
2445.
Cited by:
Williams Rail Serv. LLC v. Stewart, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63590 (D.S.C. Aug. 27, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63590
2446.
Followed by:
Nelson v. Green, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60129 (W.D. Va. Aug. 16, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60129
Page 292
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2447.
Followed by:
Nelson v. Green, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57725 (W.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57725
2448.
Cited by:
Calkins v. Pacel Corp., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57380 (W.D. Va. Aug. 7, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57380
2449.
Followed by:
Koerber v. Leake, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55483 (E.D.N.C. July 27, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55483
2450.
Followed by, Cited by:
Beam v. Tatum, 492 F. Supp. 2d 535, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47108 (E.D.N.C. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
492 F. Supp. 2d 535 p.539
Cited by:
492 F. Supp. 2d 535 p.536
2451.
Cited by:
Whatley v. Wildeman, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43348 (D.S.C. June 14, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43348
2452.
Followed by:
Hall v. Watson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34899 (D.S.C. May 11, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34899
2453.
Cited by:
Allen v. Hudson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34521 (D.S.C. May 10, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34521
2454.
Followed by:
Davis v. Knipp, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32698 (D. Md. May 1, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32698
2455.
Followed by:
Baker v. Dellinger, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31673 (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31673
2456.
Followed by:
McPhail v. Raynor, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50663 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50663
Page 293
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2457.
Cited by:
Directv, Inc. v. Tolson, 498 F. Supp. 2d 784, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55774 (E.D.N.C. 2007)
498 F. Supp. 2d 784 p.790
2458.
Followed by:
Moreno v. Foley, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10908 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 13, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10908
2459.
Cited by:
Stewart v. Beaufort County, 481 F. Supp. 2d 483, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28115 (D.S.C. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
481 F. Supp. 2d 483 p.493
2460.
Followed by:
Laurel Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Philbrick, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1353 (D. Md. Jan. 3, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1353
2461.
Cited by:
Inman v. Klockner-Pentaplast of Am., Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93619, 39 Employee Benefits Cas.
(BNA) 2895 (W.D. Va. Dec. 28, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93619
2462.
Followed by:
Akl v. Swersky, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96899 (E.D. Va. Dec. 22, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96899
2463.
Cited by:
Short v. Charnock, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96330 (S.D. W. Va. Nov. 27, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96330
2464.
Followed by:
Rodgers v. Rodgers-Duvall (In re Rodgers), 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68558 (W.D. Va. Sept. 25, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68558
2465.
Cited by:
Int'l Acad. of Oral Med. & Toxicology v. N.C. State Bd. of Dental Exam'rs, 451 F. Supp. 2d 746, 2006 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 64190 (E.D.N.C. 2006)
451 F. Supp. 2d 746 p.749
2466.
Cited by:
Vanderhorst v. Farr, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59328 (D.S.C. Aug. 21, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59328
Page 294
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2467.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Goodhart v. Bd. of Visitors, 451 F. Supp. 2d 804, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52304 (W.D. Va. 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
451 F. Supp. 2d 804 p.810
Cited by:
451 F. Supp. 2d 804 p.806
2468.
Followed by:
Davis v. North Carolina, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51688 (W.D.N.C. July 13, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51688
2469.
Cited by:
James v. North Carolina, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42969 (W.D.N.C. June 19, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42969
2470.
Cited by:
Int'l Acad. of Oral Med. & Toxicology v. N.C. Bd. of Dental Exam'rs, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67103
(E.D.N.C. May 31, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67103
2471.
Cited by:
Bryan v. Bellsouth Telecomms., Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35650 (M.D.N.C. May 31, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35650
2472.
Cited by:
Woods v. Preston, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32803 (D.S.C. May 22, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32803
2473.
Cited by:
James v. North Carolina, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77460 (W.D.N.C. May 17, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77460
2474.
Followed by:
Williams v. Vlahos, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96341 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96341
2475.
Distinguished by:
Monroe v. City of Charlottesville, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20027 (W.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20027
Page 295
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2476.
Cited by:
Harper v. PSC, 427 F. Supp. 2d 707, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19527 (S.D. W. Va. 2006)
427 F. Supp. 2d 707 p.712
2477.
Cited by:
Bryant-Bunch v. Northampton County, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86322 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86322
2478.
Followed by:
Mills v. Mills, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17995 (D.S.C. Apr. 5, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17995
2479.
Followed by:
Robinson v. State, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24101 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 22, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24101
2480.
Cited by:
Medows v. South Carolina, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24213 (D.S.C. Feb. 28, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24213
2481.
Cited by:
Harper v. PSC, 416 F. Supp. 2d 456, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9054 (S.D. W. Va. 2006)
416 F. Supp. 2d 456 p.458
2482.
Cited by:
Wiley v. North Carolina, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9629 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9629
2483.
Cited by:
Harper v. PSC, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7392 (S.D. W. Va. Feb. 24, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7392
2484.
Cited by:
Byrd v. Chesterfield County, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45741 (D.S.C. Dec. 13, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45741
2485.
Distinguished by:
Chase v. City of Portsmouth, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29551 (E.D. Va. Nov. 16, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29551
2486.
Cited by:
Burton v. S.C. Dep't of Corr., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37937 (D.S.C. Nov. 15, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 296
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37937
2487.
Followed by:
Williams v. City of Richmond, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42754 (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42754
2488.
Followed by:
Brum v. West Virginia, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42355 (S.D. W. Va. June 16, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42355
2489.
Cited by:
17th St. Assocs., LLP v. Markel Int'l Ins. Co., 373 F. Supp. 2d 584, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11334 (E.D. Va.
2005)
373 F. Supp. 2d 584 p.593
2490.
Followed by, Harmonized by:
Lancaster v. Spartanburg County Bldg. Codes Dep't, 370 F. Supp. 2d 404, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9925
(D.S.C. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8, HN9
Followed by:
370 F. Supp. 2d 404 p.406
Harmonized by:
370 F. Supp. 2d 404 p.406
2491.
Cited by:
Crawley v. Ball, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10008 (W.D. Va. May 25, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10008
2492.
Cited by:
Martin v. Harford County Sheriff's Dep't, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27500 (D. Md. May 17, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27500
2493.
Cited by:
Hough v. Mozingo, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42430 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42430
2494.
Cited by:
Bd. of Educ. v. Smith, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6722 (D. Md. Apr. 20, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6722
2495.
Cited by:
Rivers v. Campbell, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39244 (D.S.C. Apr. 1, 2005)
Page 297
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39244
2496.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Va. ex rel. Kilgore v. Bulgartabac Holding Group, 360 F. Supp. 2d 791, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4108 (E.D.
Va. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
360 F. Supp. 2d 791 p.798
Cited by:
360 F. Supp. 2d 791 p.797
2497.
Cited by:
Poole v. Pass, 351 F. Supp. 2d 473, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251 (E.D. Va. 2005)
351 F. Supp. 2d 473 p.478
2498.
Cited by:
Hargrove v. Steiner, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30189 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 23, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30189
2499.
Followed by:
Stanley v. Smith, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25454 (W.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2004)
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25454
2500.
Followed by, Cited by:
Hill v. Courter, 344 F. Supp. 2d 484, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23007 (E.D. Va. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Followed by:
344 F. Supp. 2d 484 p.490
Cited by:
344 F. Supp. 2d 484 p.486
2501.
Cited by:
Gilchrist v. Hagan, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28616 (D.S.C. Oct. 7, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28616
2502.
Cited by:
Payman v. Lee County Cmty. Hosp., 338 F. Supp. 2d 679, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19998 (W.D. Va. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
338 F. Supp. 2d 679 p.683
2503.
Cited by:
Indian Creek Monument Sales v. Adkins, 301 F. Supp. 2d 555, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1923 (W.D. Va.
2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
301 F. Supp. 2d 555 p.561
Page 298
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2504.
Cited by:
Newman v. Bowen, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1090 (W.D. Va. Jan. 28, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1090
2505.
Followed by, Cited by:
Harper v. PSC, 291 F. Supp. 2d 443, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20897 (S.D. W. Va. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
291 F. Supp. 2d 443 p.454
Cited by:
291 F. Supp. 2d 443 p.448
2506.
Followed by, Explained by:
Moore v. City of Asheville, 290 F. Supp. 2d 664, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20496 (W.D.N.C. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
Followed by:
290 F. Supp. 2d 664 p.667
Explained by:
290 F. Supp. 2d 664 p.670
2507.
Cited by:
Rogers v. Swepston, 267 F. Supp. 2d 549, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10376 (S.D. W. Va. 2003)
267 F. Supp. 2d 549 p.553
2508.
Cited by:
Eastern Associated Coal Corp v. Munson, 266 F. Supp. 2d 479, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9689 (N.D. W. Va.
2003)
266 F. Supp. 2d 479 p.484
2509.
Followed by, Explained by, Cited by:
Colonial First Props., LLC v. Henrico County, 236 F. Supp. 2d 588, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24784 (E.D.
Va. 2002)
Followed by:
236 F. Supp. 2d 588 p.593
236 F. Supp. 2d 588 p.596
Explained by:
236 F. Supp. 2d 588 p.594
Cited by:
236 F. Supp. 2d 588 p.590
2510.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
In re Simonini, 282 B.R. 604, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15626, 49 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 164
(W.D.N.C. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN9
Distinguished by:
282 B.R. 604 p.614
Page 299
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Followed by:
282 B.R. 604 p.613
2511.
Followed by, Cited by:
Larsen v. Cigna Healthcare Mid-Atlantic, Inc., 224 F. Supp. 2d 998, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16158, 28
Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2534 (D. Md. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
224 F. Supp. 2d 998 p.1009
Cited by:
224 F. Supp. 2d 998 p.1006
2512.
Cited by:
Yoder v. Workman, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26628 (S.D. W. Va. July 31, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26628
2513.
Cited by:
Marshall v. Shockley, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27945 (D. Md. July 22, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27945
2514.
Cited by:
Helton v. Good, 208 F. Supp. 2d 597, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12436 (W.D.N.C. 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
208 F. Supp. 2d 597 p.602
2515.
Followed by:
Goleta Nat'l Bank v. Lingerfelt, 211 F. Supp. 2d 711, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19350 (E.D.N.C. 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
211 F. Supp. 2d 711 p.714
2516.
Cited by:
Hazbun Escaf v. Rodriquez, 200 F. Supp. 2d 603, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8330 (E.D. Va. 2002)
200 F. Supp. 2d 603 p.605
2517.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Hazbun Escaf v. Rodriquez, 191 F. Supp. 2d 685, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4855 (E.D. Va. 2002)
Distinguished by:
191 F. Supp. 2d 685 p.692
Cited by:
191 F. Supp. 2d 685 p.687
2518.
Cited by:
Am. Reliable Ins. Co. v. Stillwell, 212 F. Supp. 2d 621, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17370 (N.D. W. Va. 2002)
212 F. Supp. 2d 621 p.629
Page 300
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2519.
Followed by:
Friedland v. City of Charlotte, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17634 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17634
2520.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Cited by:
Colonial First Props., LLC v. Henrico County, 166 F. Supp. 2d 1070, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14869 (E.D.
Va. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN5, HN6, HN8
Distinguished by:
166 F. Supp. 2d 1070 p.1084
Followed by:
166 F. Supp. 2d 1070 p.1076
166 F. Supp. 2d 1070 p.1085
Cited by:
166 F. Supp. 2d 1070 p.1072
166 F. Supp. 2d 1070 p.1075
2521.
Cited by:
First Penn-Pacific Life Ins. Co. v. William R. Evans, Chtd., 162 F. Supp. 2d 423, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
14578 (D. Md. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
162 F. Supp. 2d 423 p.426
2522.
Cited by:
Club Ass'n of W. Va., Inc. v. Wise, 156 F. Supp. 2d 599, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13580 (S.D. W. Va. 2001)
156 F. Supp. 2d 599 p.616
2523.
Distinguished by:
Value Am., Inc. v. Kamena, 265 B.R. 717, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11406 (W.D. Va. 2001)
265 B.R. 717 p.721
2524.
Followed by, Cited by:
Londono-Rivera v. Virginia, 155 F. Supp. 2d 551, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7753 (E.D. Va. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
155 F. Supp. 2d 551 p.561
Cited by:
155 F. Supp. 2d 551 p.559
155 F. Supp. 2d 551 p.560
2525.
Cited by:
First Fin. Ins. Co. v. Crossroads Lounge, 140 F. Supp. 2d 686, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8991 (S.D. W. Va.
2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
140 F. Supp. 2d 686 p.688
Page 301
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2526.
Followed by:
Crawford v. Seidman, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2474 (D. Md. Feb. 13, 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2474
2527.
Cited by:
MacFadden v. City of Baltimore, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 984 (D. Md. Jan. 30, 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 984
2528.
Cited by:
Freedman v. Mendelson, 197 F.R.D. 276, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16433 (E.D. Va. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
197 F.R.D. 276 p.277
2529.
Cited by:
Prestera Ctr. for Mental Health Servs. v. Lawton, 111 F. Supp. 2d 768, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16166, 71
Soc. Sec. Rep. Service 118 (S.D. W. Va. 2000)
111 F. Supp. 2d 768 p.780
2530.
Cited by:
Kemler v. Poston, 108 F. Supp. 2d 529, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11584 (E.D. Va. 2000)
108 F. Supp. 2d 529 p.537
2531.
Distinguished by:
Universal Test Equip.,Inc. v. Heath, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20811 (W.D. Va. Apr. 6, 2000)
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20811
2532.
Cited by:
Simpson v. Macon County, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21297 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21297
2533.
Cited by:
Virginia Soc'y for Human Life, Inc. v. FEC, 83 F. Supp. 2d 668, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 643 (E.D. Va.
2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
83 F. Supp. 2d 668 p.673
2534.
Cited by:
Flanders Filters, Inc. v. Intel Corp., 93 F. Supp. 2d 669 (E.D.N.C. 2000)
93 F. Supp. 2d 669 p.671
2535.
Cited by:
Flanders Filters, Inc. v. Intel Corp., 93 F. Supp. 2d 669, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12192 (E.D.N.C. 2000)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12192
Page 302
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2536.
Cited by:
Dababnah v. West Virginia Bd. of Med., 47 F. Supp. 2d 734, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6986 (S.D. W. Va.
1999)
47 F. Supp. 2d 734 p.750
2537.
Cited by:
Vaughan v. Phillip Morris, Inc., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18490 (W.D. Va. Nov. 19, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18490
2538.
Cited by:
HCMF Corp. v. Gilmore, 26 F. Supp. 2d 873, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17840, 59 Soc. Sec. Rep. Service 398
(W.D. Va. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
26 F. Supp. 2d 873 p.877
2539.
Followed by:
Perry v. Bartlett, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15388 (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15388
2540.
Cited by:
Richmond Med. Ctr. for Women v. Gilmore, 11 F. Supp. 2d 795, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9773 (E.D. Va.
1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
11 F. Supp. 2d 795 p.828
2541.
Cited by:
MCI Telecomms. Corp. v. Virginia State Corp. Comm'n, 11 F. Supp. 2d 669, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9762
(E.D. Va. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
11 F. Supp. 2d 669 p.673
2542.
Distinguished by:
Skipper v. Hambleton Meadows Architectural Review Comm., 996 F. Supp. 478, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
2582 (D. Md. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
996 F. Supp. 478 p.481
2543.
Cited by:
Ambrose v. Hunt, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21940 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2544.
Cited by:
Perdue Farms v. Hook, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16567 (W.D. Va. Oct. 17, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2545.
Cited by:
McGhee v. Director, Dep't of Mental Health & Hygiene, 980 F. Supp. 155, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16167
(D. Md. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
980 F. Supp. 155 p.157
2546.
Cited by:
Luther v. Vanyur, 14 F. Supp. 2d 773, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22657 (E.D.N.C. 1997) LexisNexis
Page 303
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5
14 F. Supp. 2d 773 p.777
2547.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Valero Terrestrial Corp. v. McCoy, 36 F. Supp. 2d 724, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17418 (N.D. W. Va. 1997)
Distinguished by:
36 F. Supp. 2d 724 p.750
Cited by:
36 F. Supp. 2d 724 p.747
2548.
Followed by:
Hoover v. West Virginia HHS, 984 F. Supp. 978, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20621 (S.D. W. Va. 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
984 F. Supp. 978 p.979
2549.
Distinguished by:
Stuart Circle Parish v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 946 F. Supp. 1225, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18755 (E.D.
Va. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
946 F. Supp. 1225 p.1229
2550.
Cited by:
Omega World Travel v. TWA, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21434 (E.D. Va. Oct. 23, 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2551.
Cited by:
Jordahl v. Democratic Party, 947 F. Supp. 236, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16956 (W.D. Va. 1996)
947 F. Supp. 236 p.238
2552.
Cited by:
Crabtree v. Buchanan, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14626 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN9
2553.
Cited by:
Snap Prods. v. IQ Holdings, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10159 (M.D.N.C. May 23, 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN9
2554.
Cited by:
Gray v. Petoseed Co., 985 F. Supp. 625, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21736 (D.S.C. 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2555.
Cited by:
Special Programs v. Courter, 923 F. Supp. 851, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4966 (E.D. Va. 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
923 F. Supp. 851 p.853
2556.
Cited by:
Gray v. Petoseed Co., 985 F. Supp. 625, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21737 (D.S.C. 1996)
985 F. Supp. 625 p.634
Page 304
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2557.
Cited by:
Virginia Soc'y for Human Life v. Caldwell, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17826 (W.D. Va. Nov. 27, 1995)
2558.
Cited by:
Kropelnicki v. United States, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17914 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4
2559.
Cited by:
Virginia Soc'y for Human Life v. Caldwell, 906 F. Supp. 1071, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16299 (W.D. Va.
1995)
906 F. Supp. 1071 p.1074
2560.
Cited by:
Virginia Soc'y for Human Life v. Caldwell, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18764 (W.D. Va. Oct. 21, 1995)
2561.
Followed by:
Crawford v. Paris, 897 F. Supp. 928, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14147 (D. Md. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
897 F. Supp. 928 p.931
2562.
Followed by, Cited by:
Asquith v. City of Beaufort, 911 F. Supp. 974, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18985 (D.S.C. 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
911 F. Supp. 974 p.982
Cited by:
911 F. Supp. 974 p.979
2563.
Followed by, Cited by:
Murphy v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 896 F. Supp. 577, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11975 (E.D. Va. 1995)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
896 F. Supp. 577 p.582
Cited by:
896 F. Supp. 577 p.579
896 F. Supp. 577 p.580
2564.
Followed by, Cited by:
Fuller v. Bartlett, 894 F. Supp. 874, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10641 (D. Md. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
894 F. Supp. 874 p.876
Cited by:
894 F. Supp. 874 p.879
Page 305
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2565.
Cited by:
Banks v. North Carolina ex rel. North Carolina State Bar, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5037 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 10,
1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2566.
Followed by, Cited by:
Employers Resource Management Co. v. Shannon, 869 F. Supp. 398, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17699 (E.D.
Va. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN6
Followed by:
869 F. Supp. 398 p.404
869 F. Supp. 398 p.407
Cited by:
869 F. Supp. 398 p.401
2567.
Distinguished by:
Gleichauf v. Ginsberg, 859 F. Supp. 229, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10861, 30 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan)
944 (S.D. W. Va. 1994)
859 F. Supp. 229 p.232
2568.
Cited by:
Hoffman v. Hunt, 845 F. Supp. 340, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2316 (W.D.N.C. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN8
845 F. Supp. 340 p.349
845 F. Supp. 340 p.350
845 F. Supp. 340 p.352
2569.
Cited by:
Renn by & Through Renn v. Garrison, 845 F. Supp. 1127, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3080 (E.D.N.C. 1994)
845 F. Supp. 1127 p.1129
845 F. Supp. 1127 p.1133
845 F. Supp. 1127 p.1134
2570.
Followed by, Cited by:
National Home Ins. Co. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 838 F. Supp. 1104, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17150 (E.D. Va.
1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Followed by:
838 F. Supp. 1104 p.1118
Cited by:
838 F. Supp. 1104 p.1117
2571.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Graham v. County of Albemarle, 826 F. Supp. 167, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9713 (W.D. Va. 1993)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
826 F. Supp. 167 p.172
Cited by:
826 F. Supp. 167 p.169
Page 306
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2572.
Followed by, Cited by:
Martin Marietta Corp. Aero & Navel [Naval] Sys. v. Maryland Comm'n onHuman Relations, 1993 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 21163, 3 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1536 (D. Md. June 17, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Followed by:
3 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1536 p.1541
Cited by:
3 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1536 p.1537
2573.
Followed by:
Richmond, Fredericksburg, & Potomac R.R. Co. v. Forst, 797 F. Supp. 494, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13600
(E.D. Va. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
797 F. Supp. 494 p.496
2574.
Explained by:
Marylanders for Fair Representation v. Schaefer, 795 F. Supp. 747, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8979 (D. Md.
1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
795 F. Supp. 747 p.752
2575.
Cited by:
Alston v. Robinson, 791 F. Supp. 569, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4038 (D. Md. 1992)
791 F. Supp. 569 p.575
2576.
Followed by:
Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Levin, 792 F. Supp. 429, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8734 (D. Md. 1992) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
792 F. Supp. 429 p.432
2577.
Cited by:
United States v. Byars, 762 F. Supp. 1235, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5520 (E.D. Va. 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
762 F. Supp. 1235 p.1237
2578.
Cited by:
Williams v. Anderson, 753 F. Supp. 1306, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17705 (D. Md. 1990)
753 F. Supp. 1306 p.1308
2579.
Followed by:
Phillips v. Virginia Bd. of Medicine, 749 F. Supp. 715, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14833 (E.D. Va. 1990)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
749 F. Supp. 715 p.717
749 F. Supp. 715 p.719
749 F. Supp. 715 p.730
2580.
Followed by:
Page 307
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Chesapeake v. Sutton Enterprises, Inc., 138 F.R.D. 468, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19459 (E.D. Va. 1990)
138 F.R.D. 468 p.472
138 F.R.D. 468 p.473
2581.
Cited by:
Chesapeake v. Sutton Enterprises, Inc., 138 F.R.D. 468, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19460 (E.D. Va. 1990)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2582.
Followed by:
Kim-Stan, Inc. v. Department of Waste Management, 732 F. Supp. 646, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2383 (E.D.
Va. 1990)
732 F. Supp. 646 p.647
732 F. Supp. 646 p.648
2583.
Followed by:
Chesapeake B & M, Inc. v. Cassilly, 729 F. Supp. 1106, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1190 (D. Md. 1990)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
729 F. Supp. 1106 p.1108
2584.
Cited by:
Crider v. Taylor, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18104 (W.D. Va. Nov. 13, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2585.
Cited by:
Robeson Defense Committee v. Britt, 132 F.R.D. 650, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12184 (E.D.N.C. 1989)
132 F.R.D. 650 p.657
2586.
Distinguished by:
Perini Corp. v. Perini Constr., Inc., 715 F. Supp. 719, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8064, 12 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA)
1039 (D. Md. 1989)
715 F. Supp. 719 p.719
2587.
Cited by:
Cinema Blue of Charlotte, Inc. v. Gilchrist, 704 F. Supp. 631, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 819 (W.D.N.C. 1989)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
704 F. Supp. 631 p.634
2588.
Distinguished by:
L.J. v. Massinga, 699 F. Supp. 508, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12329 (D. Md. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
699 F. Supp. 508 p.537
2589.
Cited by:
Williams v. North, 685 F. Supp. 502, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3628 (D. Md. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
685 F. Supp. 502 p.503
685 F. Supp. 502 p.508
Page 308
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2590.
Cited by:
Brandenburg v. First Maryland Sav. & Loan, Inc., 660 F. Supp. 717, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3721 (D. Md.
1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
660 F. Supp. 717 p.730
2591.
Distinguished by:
Doe v. Rockingham County School Bd., 658 F. Supp. 403, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3250 (W.D. Va. 1987)
658 F. Supp. 403 p.410
2592.
Cited by:
Hartshorn v. Heydinger, 647 F. Supp. 73, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18152 (S.D. W. Va. 1986)
647 F. Supp. 73 p.75
2593.
Distinguished by:
United States v. Mauney, 642 F. Supp. 1097, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21008, 58 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5962, 862 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9743 (W.D.N.C. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
642 F. Supp. 1097 p.1099
642 F. Supp. 1097 p.1101
2594.
Harmonized by:
Tarantino v. North Carolina, 639 F. Supp. 661, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23042 (W.D.N.C. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
639 F. Supp. 661 p.665
639 F. Supp. 661 p.666
2595.
Cited by:
MADISON CABLEVISION, INC. v. CITY OF MORGANTON, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23222 (W.D.N.C.
July 3, 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2596.
Followed by:
Carter v. Maryland Com. on Medical Discipline, 639 F. Supp. 542, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23428 (D. Md.
1986)
639 F. Supp. 542 p.544
2597.
Cited by:
Austell v. Smith, 634 F. Supp. 326, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25860 (W.D.N.C. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
634 F. Supp. 326 p.331
2598.
Cited by:
Potomac Elec. Power Co. v. Sachs, 639 F. Supp. 856, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26657, 24 Env't Rep. Cas.
(BNA) 1200, 16 Envtl. L. Rep. 20651 (D. Md. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
639 F. Supp. 856 p.858
2599.
Followed by, Cited by:
Williams v. North, 638 F. Supp. 457, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28837 (D. Md. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Page 309
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Followed by:
638 F. Supp. 457 p.458
Cited by:
638 F. Supp. 457 p.459
2600.
Cited by:
Eldridge v. Bouchard, 620 F. Supp. 678, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14323 (W.D. Va. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
620 F. Supp. 678 p.681
2601.
Cited by:
Wilson v. Greenville, 620 F. Supp. 556, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14594 (D.S.C. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN7
620 F. Supp. 556 p.557
620 F. Supp. 556 p.558
2602.
Cited by:
Floyd v. Thornburg, 619 F. Supp. 756, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15257 (W.D.N.C. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3, HN4, HN6, HN8
619 F. Supp. 756 p.760
619 F. Supp. 756 p.761
619 F. Supp. 756 p.764
2603.
Cited by:
American Booksellers Asso. v. Strobel, 617 F. Supp. 699, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16141, 12 Media L. Rep.
(BNA) 1208 (E.D. Va. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
617 F. Supp. 699 p.704
2604.
Distinguished by:
Appalachian Power Co. v. Public Service Com., 614 F. Supp. 64, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22220 (S.D. W.
Va. 1985)
614 F. Supp. 64 p.70
2605.
Cited by:
Doe v. Duling, 603 F. Supp. 960, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22259 (E.D. Va. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN4
603 F. Supp. 960 p.964
2606.
Distinguished by:
McClelland v. Massinga, 600 F. Supp. 558, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20930, 57 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1055, 86-1
U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9463 (D. Md. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
600 F. Supp. 558 p.563
2607.
Explained by:
Stewart v. Hunt, 598 F. Supp. 1342, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21697 (E.D.N.C. 1984)
598 F. Supp. 1342 p.1348
Page 310
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2608.
Cited by:
Korotki v. Goughan, 597 F. Supp. 1365, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23191 (D. Md. 1984)
597 F. Supp. 1365 p.1370
2609.
Followed by:
Widdowson v. Taylor, 44 B.R. 548, 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 655, 11 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 1028 (D.
Md. 1984)
44 B.R. 548 p.549
2610.
Cited by:
In re Taylor, 44 B.R. 548, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23322, 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 655, 11 Collier Bankr.
Cas. 2d (MB) 1028 (D. Md. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2611.
Distinguished by:
Ad+Soil Services, Inc. v. Board of County Comm'rs, 596 F. Supp. 1139, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15573 (D.
Md. 1984)
596 F. Supp. 1139 p.1141
2612.
Followed by:
Croatan Books, Inc. v. Virginia, 574 F. Supp. 880, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11993 (E.D. Va. 1983)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
574 F. Supp. 880 p.889
2613.
Cited by:
In re Lare, 24 B.R. 959, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15993, 9 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1428 (D. Md. 1982)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
24 B.R. 959 p.961
2614.
Cited by:
Acord v. Parsons, 551 F. Supp. 115, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16750 (W.D. Va. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
551 F. Supp. 115 p.117
2615.
Cited by:
Lee v. Winston, 551 F. Supp. 247, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15739 (E.D. Va. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN3, HN5, HN6, HN8
2616.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Lee v. Winston, 551 F. Supp. 247, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15497, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15739 (E.D. Va.
1982)
Distinguished by:
551 F. Supp. 247 p.255
551 F. Supp. 247 p.256
Cited by:
551 F. Supp. 247 p.257
Page 311
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2617.
Cited by:
United Steelworkers of America v. Dalton, 544 F. Supp. 282, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9717 (E.D. Va. 1982)
544 F. Supp. 282 p.285
2618.
Cited by:
Contemporary Plumbing, Inc. v. North Carolina, 16 B.R. 479, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17448 (E.D.N.C.
1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
16 B.R. 479 p.481
2619.
Cited by:
Holsey v. Bass, 519 F. Supp. 395, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13569 (D. Md. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
519 F. Supp. 395 p.414
2620.
Cited by:
Sheppard v. Moore, 514 F. Supp. 1372, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12416 (M.D.N.C. 1981)
514 F. Supp. 1372 p.1373
2621.
Distinguished by:
Hughes v. Cristofane, 486 F. Supp. 541, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10435 (D. Md. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
486 F. Supp. 541 p.543
2622.
Followed by:
Dostert v. Neely, 498 F. Supp. 1144, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13548 (S.D. W. Va. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
498 F. Supp. 1144 p.1148
2623.
Distinguished by:
Chertkof v. Baltimore, 497 F. Supp. 1252, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13815 (D. Md. 1980)
497 F. Supp. 1252 p.1260
2624.
Followed by, Cited by:
Hanpar, Inc. v. Atkinson, 496 F. Supp. 112, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13180 (E.D. Va. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
496 F. Supp. 112 p.113
Cited by:
496 F. Supp. 112 p.114
2625.
Distinguished by:
Medley v. Ginsberg, 492 F. Supp. 1294, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11869 (S.D. W. Va. 1980)
492 F. Supp. 1294 p.1309
Page 312
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2626.
Distinguished by:
Highfield Water Co. v. Public Service Com., 488 F. Supp. 1176, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11375, 1980-81
Trade Cas. (CCH) P63808 (D. Md. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
488 F. Supp. 1176 p.1196
488 F. Supp. 1176 p.1198
2627.
Cited by:
United States v. Maryland, 488 F. Supp. 347, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9089 (D. Md. 1980)
488 F. Supp. 347 p.350
2628.
Distinguished by:
Hughes v. Cristofane, 486 F. Supp. 541, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10185 (D. Md. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
486 F. Supp. 541 p.547
2629.
Cited by:
Derrow v. Shields, 482 F. Supp. 1144, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10760 (W.D. Va. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
482 F. Supp. 1144 p.1146
2630.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Solomon, 484 F. Supp. 278, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10324 (D. Md. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
484 F. Supp. 278 p.282
484 F. Supp. 278 p.295
2631.
Explained by:
Ft. Eustis Books, Inc. v. Beale, 478 F. Supp. 1170, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8943 (E.D. Va. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
478 F. Supp. 1170 p.1174
2632.
Cited by:
Welch v. Board of Education, 477 F. Supp. 959, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10865 (D. Md. 1979)
477 F. Supp. 959 p.961
2633.
Distinguished by:
Fralin & Waldron, Inc. v. County of Henrico, 474 F. Supp. 1315, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10477 (E.D. Va.
1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
474 F. Supp. 1315 p.1318
2634.
Followed by:
Wall & Ochs, Inc. v. Hicks, 469 F. Supp. 873, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13171 (E.D.N.C. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
469 F. Supp. 873 p.877
2635.
Cited by:
Page 313
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Robertsen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 464 F. Supp. 876, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14505 (D.S.C. 1979)
464 F. Supp. 876 p.879
2636.
Cited by:
Kohler v. Hirst, 460 F. Supp. 412, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15115 (E.D. Va. 1978)
460 F. Supp. 412 p.419
2637.
Followed by:
Epps v. Levine, 457 F. Supp. 561, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16682 (D. Md. 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
457 F. Supp. 561 p.567
2638.
Cited by:
Kent Island Joint Venture v. Smith, 452 F. Supp. 455, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17314 (D. Md. 1978)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
452 F. Supp. 455 p.461
452 F. Supp. 455 p.463
2639.
Followed by:
Sparks v. Garrison, 446 F. Supp. 649, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19253 (M.D.N.C. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN9
446 F. Supp. 649 p.651
2640.
Distinguished by:
Tweel v. Frankel, 444 F. Supp. 1071, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20377 (S.D. W. Va. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
444 F. Supp. 1071 p.1075
2641.
Cited by:
Maurice v. Board of Directors, 450 F. Supp. 755, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13054 (E.D. Va. 1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
450 F. Supp. 755 p.759
2642.
Followed by:
Floyd v. Anders, 440 F. Supp. 535, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13102 (D.S.C. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN8
440 F. Supp. 535 p.537
2643.
Distinguished by:
Usher v. Waters Ins. & Realty Co., 438 F. Supp. 1215, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13470 (W.D.N.C. 1977)
438 F. Supp. 1215 p.1220
2644.
Distinguished by:
Surety Title Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Virginia State Bar, 431 F. Supp. 298, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16221, 1977-1
Trade Cas. (CCH) P61406 (E.D. Va. 1977)
431 F. Supp. 298 p.300
Page 314
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2645.
Followed by:
Spencer v. Spencer, 430 F. Supp. 683, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16118 (M.D.N.C. 1977) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
430 F. Supp. 683 p.686
430 F. Supp. 683 p.687
2646.
Cited by:
Grimes v. Miller, 429 F. Supp. 1350, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16432 (M.D.N.C. 1977)
429 F. Supp. 1350 p.1354
2647.
Distinguished by:
French v. Blackburn, 428 F. Supp. 1351, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16603 (M.D.N.C. 1977) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
428 F. Supp. 1351 p.1354
2648.
Cited by:
Summey v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 449 F. Supp. 132, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11749, 1978-2 Trade Cas.
(CCH) P62262 (D.S.C. 1976)
449 F. Supp. 132 p.139
2649.
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. American Bar Asso., 427 F. Supp. 506, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
11798 (E.D. Va. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
427 F. Supp. 506 p.513
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
427 F. Supp. 506 p.532
2650.
Followed by:
Greene v. Virginia State Bar Asso., 411 F. Supp. 512, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15695 (E.D. Va. 1976)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
411 F. Supp. 512 p.516
411 F. Supp. 512 p.517
2651.
Distinguished by:
Seacoast Products, Inc. v. Douglas, 432 F. Supp. 1, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15406 (E.D. Va. 1975)
432 F. Supp. 1 p.2
2652.
Cited by:
Blount v. Mandel, 400 F. Supp. 1190, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16585 (D. Md. 1975)
400 F. Supp. 1190 p.1199
2653.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Schlesinger, 399 F. Supp. 679, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11348 (E.D.N.C. 1975)
Page 315
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
399 F. Supp. 679 p.680
2654.
Followed by, Explained by:
Brown v. Brannon, 399 F. Supp. 133, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11392 (M.D.N.C. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
399 F. Supp. 133 p.135
Explained by:
399 F. Supp. 133 p.146
2655.
Cited by:
Galloway v. Watts, 395 F. Supp. 729, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12570 (D. Md. 1975)
395 F. Supp. 729 p.731
2656.
Cited by:
Nelson v. Rogers, 389 F. Supp. 1148, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13722 (W.D. Va. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
389 F. Supp. 1148 p.1151
2657.
Distinguished by:
Hogge v. Hedrick, 391 F. Supp. 91, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11821 (E.D. Va. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
391 F. Supp. 91 p.95
391 F. Supp. 91 p.100
2658.
Distinguished by:
Fouke Co. v. Mandel, 386 F. Supp. 1341, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11737 (D. Md. 1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
386 F. Supp. 1341 p.1352
2659.
Cited by:
Keblaitis v. Several Unknown Agents in Criminal Investigation Div. etc., 385 F. Supp. 867, 1974 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 9351 (E.D.N.C. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
385 F. Supp. 867 p.870
2660.
Cited by:
Thacker v. Slayton, 375 F. Supp. 1332, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8468 (E.D. Va. 1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
375 F. Supp. 1332 p.1337
2661.
Cited by:
Washington v. Boslow, 375 F. Supp. 1298, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8486 (D. Md. 1974)
375 F. Supp. 1298 p.1299
2662.
Cited by:
Page 316
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Star v. Preller, 375 F. Supp. 1093, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8538 (D. Md. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
375 F. Supp. 1093 p.1094
2663.
Cited by:
White v. Arlen Realty & Development Corp., 374 F. Supp. 151, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8920 (D. Md. 1974)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
374 F. Supp. 151 p.157
2664.
Cited by:
Hensley v. Ranson, 373 F. Supp. 88, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9470 (E.D. Va. 1974)
373 F. Supp. 88 p.89
2665.
Cited by:
Whorley v. Brillhart, 373 F. Supp. 83, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9469 (E.D. Va. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
373 F. Supp. 83 p.85
2666.
Cited by:
Joseph v. House, 353 F. Supp. 367, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15400, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P8547, 5 Fair
Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 538, 17 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 59 (E.D. Va. 1973)
353 F. Supp. 367 p.373
2667.
Cited by:
Grenchik v. Mandel, 373 F. Supp. 1298, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13514 (D. Md. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
373 F. Supp. 1298 p.1300
2668.
Cited by:
Walker v. Dillard, 363 F. Supp. 921, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12106 (W.D. Va. 1973)
363 F. Supp. 921 p.925
2669.
Cited by:
Newton v. Burgin, 363 F. Supp. 782, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12200 (W.D.N.C. 1973)
363 F. Supp. 782 p.784
2670.
Cited by:
Cottrell v. Virginia Electric & Power Co., 363 F. Supp. 692, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12432 (E.D. Va. 1973)
363 F. Supp. 692 p.695
2671.
Explained by:
Fisher v. Federal Nat'l Mortg. Asso., 360 F. Supp. 207, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13043 (D. Md. 1973)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
360 F. Supp. 207 p.209
360 F. Supp. 207 p.210
Page 317
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2672.
Cited by:
Whorley v. Brilhart, 359 F. Supp. 539, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13526 (E.D. Va. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
359 F. Supp. 539 p.542
2673.
Explained by, Cited by:
Rakes v. Coleman, 359 F. Supp. 370, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13329 (E.D. Va. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6, HN8, HN9
Explained by:
359 F. Supp. 370 p.374
359 F. Supp. 370 p.376
359 F. Supp. 370 p.378
Cited by:
359 F. Supp. 370 p.372
2674.
Followed by:
Modern Social Education, Inc. v. Preller, 353 F. Supp. 173, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15407 (D. Md. 1973)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
353 F. Supp. 173 p.178
2675.
Cited by:
Star v. Preller, 352 F. Supp. 530, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11733 (D. Md. 1972)
352 F. Supp. 530 p.534
2676.
Cited by:
Lynch v. Snepp, 350 F. Supp. 1134, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11122 (W.D.N.C. 1972)
350 F. Supp. 1134 p.1139
2677.
Distinguished by:
Wood v. Moore, 350 F. Supp. 29, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11333 (W.D.N.C. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
350 F. Supp. 29 p.31
2678.
Followed by:
Greenmount Sales, Inc. v. Davila, 344 F. Supp. 860, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12922 (E.D. Va. 1972)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
344 F. Supp. 860 p.865
2679.
Followed by:
Fowler v. Alexander, 340 F. Supp. 168, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14553 (M.D.N.C. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
340 F. Supp. 168 p.172
340 F. Supp. 168 p.173
2680.
Cited by:
Holt v. Richmond, 334 F. Supp. 228, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10686 (E.D. Va. 1971)
Page 318
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
334 F. Supp. 228 p.237
2681.
Cited by:
Turco v. Allen, 334 F. Supp. 209, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10692 (D. Md. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
334 F. Supp. 209 p.216
2682.
Cited by:
Gilliard v. Craig, 331 F. Supp. 587, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12926 (W.D.N.C. 1971)
331 F. Supp. 587 p.594
2683.
Distinguished by:
C'Est Bon, Inc. v. North Carolina State Board of Alcoholic Control, 331 F. Supp. 82, 1971 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 11753 (W.D.N.C. 1971)
331 F. Supp. 82 p.84
2684.
Harmonized by:
Donohoe v. Duling, 330 F. Supp. 308, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11941 (E.D. Va. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
330 F. Supp. 308 p.310
2685.
Followed by:
Woodruff v. West Virginia Board of Regents, 328 F. Supp. 1023, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12411 (S.D. W.
Va. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8, HN9
328 F. Supp. 1023 p.1027
328 F. Supp. 1023 p.1029
328 F. Supp. 1023 p.1030
2686.
Followed by, Cited by:
Fuller v. Scott, 328 F. Supp. 842, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12786 (M.D.N.C. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
328 F. Supp. 842 p.843
Cited by:
328 F. Supp. 842 p.844
2687.
Cited by:
C'Est Bon, Inc. v. North Carolina State Board Alcoholic Control, 325 F. Supp. 404, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
14216 (W.D.N.C. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
325 F. Supp. 404 p.406
2688.
Cited by:
Hartsville Theatres, Inc. v. Fox, 324 F. Supp. 258, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14496 (D.S.C. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
324 F. Supp. 258 p.264
Page 319
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4TH CIRCUIT - U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURTS
2689.
Cited by:
Fort v. Florida Dep't of Revenue (In re Fort), 412 B.R. 840, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2334 (Bankr. W.D. Va.
2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
412 B.R. 840 p.855
2690.
Cited by:
LaRosa v. Estate of LaRosa (In re Estate of LaRosa), 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2896, 47 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP)
86 (Bankr. N.D. W. Va. Oct. 30, 2006)
2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2896
2691.
Cited by:
Coulter v. Aplin (In re Coulter), 305 B.R. 748, 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 1940 (Bankr. D.S.C. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
305 B.R. 748 p.753
305 B.R. 748 p.760
2692.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
In re Byrd, 256 B.R. 246 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2000)
Distinguished by:
256 B.R. 246 p.256
Cited by:
256 B.R. 246 p.250
2693.
Cited by:
In re Byrd, 256 B.R. 246, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 1664, 36 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 291 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2000)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2694.
Followed by:
Von Cannon v. Schwacke (In re Von Cannon), 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 2400 (Bankr. D.S.C. Sept. 3, 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1997 Bankr. LEXIS 2400 p.4
2695.
Followed by:
Starr v. Virginia, 147 B.R. 380, 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 2138, 4 4th Cir. & D.C. Bankr. Ct. Rep. 744 (Bankr.
E.D. Va. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
147 B.R. 380 p.382
2696.
Followed by:
In re Seidelman, 57 B.R. 149, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 6894, 14 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 1 (Bankr. D. Md.
1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN5, HN6
57 B.R. 149 p.153
2697.
Followed by:
In re Bratten, 55 B.R. 577, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 4863 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 320
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
55 B.R. 577 p.579
2698.
Followed by:
In re Salecki, 51 B.R. 364, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 5767 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
51 B.R. 364 p.366
2699.
Explained by:
In re Taylor, 16 B.R. 323, 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 2311, 8 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 692, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH)
P68526, 5 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 1201 (Bankr. D. Md. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
16 B.R. 323 p.326
5TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
2700.
Cited by:
Ramos v. Shrode, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 25267 (5th Cir. Tex. Nov. 17, 2009)
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 25267
2701.
Followed by:
Price v. Porter, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23993 (5th Cir. La. Nov. 2, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23993
2702.
Cited by:
RTM Media, L.L.C. v. City of Houston, 584 F.3d 220, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21611 (5th Cir. Tex. 2009)
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21611
2703.
Cited by:
Nationstar Mortg. LLC v. Knox, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19229 (5th Cir. Miss. Aug. 25, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19229
2704.
Cited by:
Dean v. Miss. Bd. of Bar Admissions, 326 Fed. Appx. 760, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 10071, 73 Fed. R. Serv.
3d (Callaghan) 684 (5th Cir. Miss. 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
326 Fed. Appx. 760 p.762
2705.
Cited by:
Foster v. City of El Paso, 308 Fed. Appx. 811, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 1594 (5th Cir. Tex. 2009)
308 Fed. Appx. 811 p.811
2706.
Cited by:
Malone v. Gallagher, 285 Fed. Appx. 152, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15467 (5th Cir. Tex. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
285 Fed. Appx. 152 p.153
Page 321
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2707.
Followed by:
Health Net, Inc. v. Wooley, 534 F.3d 487, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14326 (5th Cir. La. 2008)
534 F.3d 487 p.494
2708.
Followed by:
Kastner v. Tex. Bd. of Law Exam'rs, 278 Fed. Appx. 346, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 10416 (5th Cir. Tex.
2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
278 Fed. Appx. 346 p.349
2709.
Followed by:
Reyna v. Greenwell, 273 Fed. Appx. 397, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 8049 (5th Cir. Tex. 2008)
273 Fed. Appx. 397 p.398
2710.
Distinguished by:
Baum v. Blue Moon Ventures, LLC, 513 F.3d 181, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 91, 49 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 68
(5th Cir. Tex. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
513 F.3d 181 p.192
2711.
Cited by:
Vera v. Bd. of Judges, 260 Fed. Appx. 664, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 29592 (5th Cir. Tex. 2007)
260 Fed. Appx. 664 p.666
2712.
Followed by:
Cmty. Care Bossier, Inc. v. Foti, 228 Fed. Appx. 444, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9141 (5th Cir. La. 2007)
228 Fed. Appx. 444 p.445
2713.
Cited by:
Rowley v. Wilson, 200 Fed. Appx. 274, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20002 (5th Cir. La. 2006)
200 Fed. Appx. 274 p.275
2714.
Cited by:
Rehfuss v. City of Luling Police Dep't, 169 Fed. Appx. 257, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 4654 (5th Cir. Tex.
2006)
169 Fed. Appx. 257 p.258
2715.
Cited by:
Greene v. Harris County, 166 Fed. Appx. 736, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 3425 (5th Cir. Tex. 2006)
166 Fed. Appx. 736 p.736
2716.
Cited by:
Texas v. Tello, 142 Fed. Appx. 200, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13270 (5th Cir. Tex. 2005)
142 Fed. Appx. 200 p.201
2717.
Distinguished by:
Lawrence v. Davis, 127 Fed. Appx. 124, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4804 (5th Cir. La. 2005)
Page 322
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
127 Fed. Appx. 124 p.125
2718.
Followed by, Cited by:
Tex. Ass'n of Bus. v. Earle, 388 F.3d 515, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 21581 (5th Cir. Tex. 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
Followed by:
388 F.3d 515 p.518
388 F.3d 515 p.521
Cited by:
388 F.3d 515 p.516
2719.
Cited by:
Herron v. Patrolman # 1, 111 Fed. Appx. 710, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20457 (5th Cir. Tex. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
111 Fed. Appx. 710 p.713
2720.
Cited by:
Glatzer v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 108 Fed. Appx. 204, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 19520 (5th Cir. Tex. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
108 Fed. Appx. 204 p.205
2721.
Cited by:
Granger v. Slade, 90 Fed. Appx. 741, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 2336 (5th Cir. Miss. 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
90 Fed. Appx. 741 p.742
2722.
Cited by:
Cabello v. Lowe, 83 Fed. Appx. 624, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 25041 (5th Cir. Tex. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
83 Fed. Appx. 624 p.624
2723.
Followed by:
Lawrence v. McCarthy, 344 F.3d 467, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18139 (5th Cir. La. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN9
344 F.3d 467 p.470
2724.
Cited by:
Bauer v. Texas, 341 F.3d 352, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15202 (5th Cir. Tex. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
341 F.3d 352 p.357
2725.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Castellano v. Fragozo, 311 F.3d 689, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 23824 (5th Cir. Tex. 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
311 F.3d 689 p.718
Page 323
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2726.
Cited by:
Newby v. Enron Corp, 302 F.3d 295, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16024, Blue Sky L. Rep. (CCH) P74280, 2
A.L.R. Fed. 2d 593 (2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
302 F.3d 295 p.301
2727.
Cited by:
Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Unauthorized Practice of Law Comm., 283 F.3d 650, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS
2595 (5th Cir. Tex. 2002)
283 F.3d 650 p.652
2728.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Okpalobi v. Foster, 244 F.3d 405, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3782 (5th Cir. La. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN4
244 F.3d 405 p.434
2729.
Cited by:
Weekly v. Morrow, 204 F.3d 613, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3183 (5th Cir. La. 2000)
204 F.3d 613 p.614
2730.
Cited by:
Gammage v. West Jasper Sch. Bd. of Educ., 179 F.3d 952, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 14184, 6 Accom.
Disabilities Dec. (CCH) P6-222, 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 848 (5th Cir. Miss. 1999)
179 F.3d 952 p.954
2731.
Cited by:
Stringer v. Williams, 161 F.3d 259, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 28616 (5th Cir. Tex. 1998)
161 F.3d 259 p.261
2732.
Cited by:
Munich Am. Reinsurance Co. v. Crawford, 141 F.3d 585, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 11366 (5th Cir. Tex.
1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
141 F.3d 585 p.588
2733.
Cited by:
Sierra Club v. City of San Antonio, 112 F.3d 789, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 9346, 44 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA)
1982, 27 Envtl. L. Rep. 21051 (5th Cir. Tex. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
112 F.3d 789 p.793
2734.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 8547 (5th Cir. Tex. 1997)
110 F.3d 299 p.316
2735.
Cited by:
Wightman v. Texas Supreme Court, 84 F.3d 188, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13577 (5th Cir. Tex. 1996)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 324
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
84 F.3d 188 p.189
2736.
Cited by:
Alexander v. Ieyoub, 62 F.3d 709, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23756 (5th Cir. La. 1995)
62 F.3d 709 p.711
62 F.3d 709 p.713
2737.
Distinguished by:
Baran v. Port of Beaumont Navigation Dist., 57 F.3d 436, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15159 (5th Cir. Tex.
1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
57 F.3d 436 p.441
2738.
Cited by:
Alexander v. Ieyoub, 52 F.3d 554, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 12152 (5th Cir. La. 1995)
52 F.3d 554 p.556
2739.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Louisiana Debating & Literary Ass'n v. City of New Orleans, 42 F.3d 1483, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1496
(5th Cir. La. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
42 F.3d 1483 p.1490
Cited by:
42 F.3d 1483 p.1489
2740.
Cited by:
Musslewhite v. The State Bar, 32 F.3d 942, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26600 (5th Cir. Tex. 1994)
32 F.3d 942 p.947
2741.
Cited by:
Lewis v. Beddingfield, 20 F.3d 123, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8269 (5th Cir. Tex. 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
20 F.3d 123 p.125
2742.
Distinguished by:
Royal Ins. Co. v. Quinn-L Capital Corp., 3 F.3d 877, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 24772 (5th Cir. Tex. 1993)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3 F.3d 877 p.886
2743.
Explained by:
Word of Faith World Outreach Ctr. Church, Inc. v. Morales, 986 F.2d 962, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 6180
(5th Cir. Tex. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
986 F.2d 962 p.966
2744.
Distinguished by:
American Bank & Trust Co. v. Dent, 982 F.2d 917, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2020 (5th Cir. La. 1993)
Page 325
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
982 F.2d 917 p.919
2745.
Cited by:
Louisiana v. Sparks, 978 F.2d 226, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 31846, 24 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 411 (5th
Cir. La. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
978 F.2d 226 p.233
2746.
Followed by, Cited by:
Nobby Lobby, Inc. v. Dallas, 970 F.2d 82, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 20466, 23 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan)
980 (5th Cir. Tex. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Followed by:
970 F.2d 82 p.86
Cited by:
970 F.2d 82 p.84
2747.
Cited by:
Allen v. Louisiana State Bd. of Dentistry, 948 F.2d 946, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 29336 (5th Cir. La. 1991)
948 F.2d 946 p.948
2748.
Cited by:
Society of Separationists, Inc. v. Herman, 939 F.2d 1207, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19866 (5th Cir. Tex.
1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
939 F.2d 1207 p.1219
2749.
Followed by, Cited by:
In re Fussell, 928 F.2d 712, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 6046, 21 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 978, Bankr. L. Rep.
(CCH) P73924, 24 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 1695 (5th Cir. Tex. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Followed by:
928 F.2d 712 p.713
Cited by:
928 F.2d 712 p.715
2750.
Cited by:
New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc. v. Council of New Orleans, 911 F.2d 993, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 15292, 120
Pub. Util. Rep. 4th (PUR) 624, Util. L. Rep. (CCH) P13690 (5th Cir. La. 1990)
911 F.2d 993 p.997
2751.
Followed by:
Ballard v. Wilson, 856 F.2d 1568, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13991 (5th Cir. Tex. 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
856 F.2d 1568 p.1569
856 F.2d 1568 p.1570
2752.
Cited by:
Page 326
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
New Orleans Public Serv. v. Council of New Orleans, 850 F.2d 1069, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11217, Util.
L. Rep. (CCH) P13430 (5th Cir. La. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
850 F.2d 1069 p.1078
2753.
Cited by:
Howard Gault Co. v. Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc., 848 F.2d 544, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8934, 128
L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2890, 109 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P55908 (5th Cir. Tex. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN9
848 F.2d 544 p.553
848 F.2d 544 p.557
2754.
Cited by:
Evanston Ins. Co. v. Jimco, Inc., 844 F.2d 1185, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6429 (5th Cir. La. 1988)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
844 F.2d 1185 p.1189
2755.
Cited by:
Hand v. Gary, 838 F.2d 1420, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3079 (5th Cir. Tex. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
838 F.2d 1420 p.1424
2756.
Cited by:
Texas v. United States, 837 F.2d 184, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1666 (5th Cir. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
837 F.2d 184 p.186
2757.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Allen v. Louisiana State Bd. of Dentistry, 835 F.2d 100, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 36 (5th Cir. La. 1988)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
835 F.2d 100 p.104
Followed by:
835 F.2d 100 p.103
2758.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Texas Employers' Ins. Asso. v. Jackson, 820 F.2d 1406, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9585, 1988 A.M.C. 1202
(5th Cir. Tex. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
Followed by:
820 F.2d 1406 p.1420
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
820 F.2d 1406 p.1422
2759.
Cited by:
Umphlet v. Connick, 815 F.2d 1061, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5805 (5th Cir. La. 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
815 F.2d 1061 p.1062
Page 327
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2760.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Showery v. Samaniego, 814 F.2d 200, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 4730 (5th Cir. Tex. 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6, HN9
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
814 F.2d 200 p.205
Cited by:
814 F.2d 200 p.201
2761.
Distinguished by:
Thomas v. Texas State Bd. of Medical Examiners, 807 F.2d 453, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 828 (5th Cir. Tex.
1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
807 F.2d 453 p.454
2762.
Cited by:
McWilliams v. McWilliams, 804 F.2d 1400, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34180 (5th Cir. Tex. 1986)
804 F.2d 1400 p.1401
2763.
Cited by:
Davis v. Herring, 800 F.2d 513, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31243 (5th Cir. Miss. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
800 F.2d 513 p.516
2764.
Followed by:
New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. New Orleans, 798 F.2d 858, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 30761 (5th Cir. La.
1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
798 F.2d 858 p.862
798 F.2d 858 p.863
2765.
Cited by:
Bishop v. State Bar of Texas, 791 F.2d 435, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26026 (5th Cir. Tex. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
791 F.2d 435 p.436
2766.
Followed by:
Hensler v. District Four Grievance Committee of State Bar, 790 F.2d 390, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26027
(5th Cir. Tex. 1986)
790 F.2d 390 p.391
2767.
Cited by:
Eitel v. Holland, 787 F.2d 995, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24538 (5th Cir. Tex. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN9
787 F.2d 995 p.999
2768.
Followed by, Cited by:
Page 328
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Hefner v. Alexander, 779 F.2d 277, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 25139 (5th Cir. Tex. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
779 F.2d 277 p.278
779 F.2d 277 p.280
Cited by:
779 F.2d 277 p.279
2769.
Cited by:
Home Depot, Inc. v. Guste, 773 F.2d 616, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23565 (5th Cir. La. 1985)
773 F.2d 616 p.620
2770.
Cited by:
Trower v. Maple, 774 F.2d 673 (5th Cir. Tex. 1985)
774 F.2d 673 p.674
774 F.2d 673 p.675
2771.
Cited by:
Peyote Way Church of God, Inc. v. Smith, 742 F.2d 193, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18293 (5th Cir. Tex. 1984)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
742 F.2d 193 p.198
742 F.2d 193 p.199
2772.
Distinguished by:
Bishop v. State Bar of Texas, 736 F.2d 292, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20494 (5th Cir. Tex. 1984) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
736 F.2d 292 p.293
2773.
Cited by:
Wheeler v. Cosden Oil & Chem. Co., 734 F.2d 254, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21387, 79 A.L.R. Fed. 883 (5th
Cir. Tex. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
734 F.2d 254 p.258
2774.
Followed by, Cited by:
De Spain v. Johnston, 731 F.2d 1171, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22560 (5th Cir. Tex. 1984) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN7
Followed by:
731 F.2d 1171 p.1174
Cited by:
731 F.2d 1171 p.1180
2775.
Cited by:
McDonald v. Burrows, 731 F.2d 294, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22742 (5th Cir. Tex. 1984) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
731 F.2d 294 p.298
Page 329
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2776.
Cited by:
McGee v. Estelle, 722 F.2d 1206, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26367 (5th Cir. Tex. 1984) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
722 F.2d 1206 p.1211
2777.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Pietzsch v. Mattox, 719 F.2d 129, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15355 (5th Cir. Tex. 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
719 F.2d 129 p.134
2778.
Cited by:
United Home Rentals, Inc. v. Texas Real Estate Com., 716 F.2d 324, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16331 (5th Cir.
Tex. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
716 F.2d 324 p.331
2779.
Explained by, Cited by:
KVUE, Inc. v. Moore, 709 F.2d 922, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25737, 9 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2334, 54 Rad.
Reg. 2d (P & F) 224, Util. L. Rep. (CCH) P12743 (5th Cir. Tex. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN5
Explained by:
709 F.2d 922 p.928
Cited by:
709 F.2d 922 p.931
2780.
Distinguished by:
Texas v. Wellington Resources Corp., 706 F.2d 533, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 27446, 10 Bankr. Ct. Dec.
(LRP) 973, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P69279, 8 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 984, 10 Collier Bankr. Cas. (MB)
973 (5th Cir. Tex. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
706 F.2d 533 p.536
2781.
Cited by:
EEOC v. Neches Butane Products Co., 704 F.2d 144, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28687, 31 Empl. Prac. Dec.
(CCH) P33582, 31 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1099, 36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 880 (5th Cir. Tex.
1983)
704 F.2d 144 p.150
2782.
Distinguished by:
Rhoades v. Penfold, 694 F.2d 1043, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 27795 (5th Cir. Tex. 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
694 F.2d 1043 p.1047
2783.
Cited by:
Felder v. Estelle, 693 F.2d 549, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 23322 (5th Cir. Tex. 1982)
693 F.2d 549 p.553
2784.
Cited by:
Page 330
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Felder v. Estelle (5th Cir. Dec. 14, 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2785.
Followed by:
Smith v. Hightower, 693 F.2d 359, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 23896 (5th Cir. Tex. 1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
693 F.2d 359 p.361
2786.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Wilcox v. Miller, 691 F.2d 739, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24072 (5th Cir. Tex. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
Distinguished by:
691 F.2d 739 p.741
Cited by:
691 F.2d 739 p.740
2787.
Cited by:
International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Houston, 689 F.2d 541, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24753
(5th Cir. Tex. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
689 F.2d 541 p.552
2788.
Cited by:
Robinson v. Wade, 686 F.2d 298, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25506 (5th Cir. Tex. 1982)
686 F.2d 298 p.302
2789.
Followed by, Cited by:
Women's Community Health Center, Inc. v. Texas Health Facilities Com., 685 F.2d 974, 1982 U.S. App.
LEXIS 25626 (5th Cir. Tex. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
685 F.2d 974 p.982
Cited by:
685 F.2d 974 p.978
2790.
Cited by:
Carter v. Estelle, 677 F.2d 427, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18817 (5th Cir. Tex. 1982)
677 F.2d 427 p.442
2791.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
O'Hair v. White, 675 F.2d 680, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19321 (5th Cir. Tex. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6, HN9
Followed by:
675 F.2d 680 p.686
675 F.2d 680 p.695
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
675 F.2d 680 p.701
Page 331
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2792.
Cited by:
Howell v. State Bar of Texas, 674 F.2d 1027, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19586 (5th Cir. Tex. 1982)
674 F.2d 1027 p.1028
2793.
Explained by:
Jureczki v. Seabrook, 668 F.2d 851, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21437, 33 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1328
(5th Cir. Tex. 1982)
668 F.2d 851 p.853
2794.
Cited by:
Jureczki v. Seabrook (5th Cir. Feb. 26, 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2795.
Cited by:
Beckerman v. Tupelo, 664 F.2d 502, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14949 (5th Cir. Miss. 1981)
664 F.2d 502 p.507
2796.
Cited by:
In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 659 F.2d 1332, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16488, 1981-2
Trade Cas. (CCH) P64340 (5th Cir. Tex. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
659 F.2d 1332 p.1334
2797.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
United States v. Composite State Bd. of Medical Examiners, etc., 656 F.2d 131, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS
17755 (5th Cir. Ga. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
656 F.2d 131 p.137
Followed by:
656 F.2d 131 p.134
656 F.2d 131 p.136
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
656 F.2d 131 p.139
2798.
Followed by:
Escobedo v. Estelle, 655 F.2d 613, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 17936 (5th Cir. Tex. 1981)
655 F.2d 613 p.617
2799.
Followed by, Cited by:
Gresham Park Community Organization v. Howell, 652 F.2d 1227, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18616 (5th Cir.
Ga. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
652 F.2d 1227 p.1233
Cited by:
652 F.2d 1227 p.1232
2800.
Explained by:
Page 332
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Spiegel v. Houston, 636 F.2d 997, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 20325, 6 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2544 (5th Cir.
Tex. 1981)
636 F.2d 997 p.1000
2801.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Patsy v. Florida International University, 634 F.2d 900, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 20781, 25 Empl. Prac. Dec.
(CCH) P31526, 24 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1373 (5th Cir. Fla. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
634 F.2d 900 p.923
Cited by:
634 F.2d 900 p.903
2802.
Followed by, Cited by:
Red Bluff Drive-In, Inc. v. Vance, 648 F.2d 1020, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12062 (5th Cir. Tex. 1981)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
648 F.2d 1020 p.1032
Cited by:
648 F.2d 1020 p.1035
2803.
Cited by:
Foley v. The Alabama State Bar, 648 F.2d 355, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12138, 1981-1 Trade Cas. (CCH)
P64099 (5th Cir. Ala. 1981)
648 F.2d 355 p.360
2804.
Followed by, Cited by:
Robinson v. Stovall, 646 F.2d 1087, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12570 (5th Cir. Miss. 1981) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
Followed by:
646 F.2d 1087 p.1090
Cited by:
646 F.2d 1087 p.1088
2805.
Cited by:
Tarter v. Hury, 646 F.2d 1010, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12733 (5th Cir. Tex. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
646 F.2d 1010 p.1013
2806.
Distinguished by:
Chancery Clerk of Chickasaw County v. Wallace, 646 F.2d 151, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18851 (5th Cir.
Miss. 1981)
646 F.2d 151 p.155
2807.
Followed by, Cited by:
O'Hair v. Hill, 641 F.2d 307, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14669 (5th Cir. Tex. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 333
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
641 F.2d 307 p.311
Cited by:
641 F.2d 307 p.310
2808.
Cited by:
Davis v. Page, 640 F.2d 599, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18962 (5th Cir. Fla. 1981)
640 F.2d 599 p.601
2809.
Followed by:
Fitzgerald v. Peek, 636 F.2d 943, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 21016 (5th Cir. Ga. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
636 F.2d 943 p.944
2810.
Distinguished by:
Keyes v. Lauga, 635 F.2d 330, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 20693, 30 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1437 (5th
Cir. La. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
635 F.2d 330 p.334
2811.
Cited by:
Baker v. Metcalfe, 633 F.2d 1198, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 21131 (5th Cir. Tex. 1981) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
633 F.2d 1198 p.1200
2812.
Explained by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Septum, Inc. v. Keller, 614 F.2d 456, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 19309, 6 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1116 (5th Cir.
Ga. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN5, HN6
Explained by:
614 F.2d 456 p.460
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
614 F.2d 456 p.462
Cited by:
614 F.2d 456 p.458
2813.
Explained by:
Ziegler v. Ziegler, 632 F.2d 535, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 11547 (5th Cir. La. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN3
632 F.2d 535 p.537
2814.
Explained by:
Reeves v. McConn, 631 F.2d 377, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 12002 (5th Cir. Tex. 1980)
631 F.2d 377 p.381
Page 334
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2815.
Explained by:
Ibarra v. Bexar County Hospital Dist., 624 F.2d 44, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14801 (5th Cir. Tex. 1980)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
624 F.2d 44 p.46
2816.
Distinguished by:
Ciudadanos Unidos de San Juan v. Hidalgo County Grand Jury Comm'rs, 622 F.2d 807, 1980 U.S. App.
LEXIS 15229 (5th Cir. Tex. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
622 F.2d 807 p.830
2817.
Distinguished by:
Let's Help Florida v. McCrary, 621 F.2d 195, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 15804 (5th Cir. Fla. 1980)
621 F.2d 195 p.199
2818.
Cited by:
High Ol' Times, Inc. v. Busbee, 621 F.2d 135, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 15894 (5th Cir. Ga. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4
621 F.2d 135 p.139
2819.
Cited by:
Palmer v. Jackson, 617 F.2d 424, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17434 (5th Cir. Tex. 1980)
617 F.2d 424 p.428
2820.
Cited by:
International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness v. Eaves, 601 F.2d 809, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 12154 (5th
Cir. Ga. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN5, HN9
601 F.2d 809 p.817
601 F.2d 809 p.821
2821.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Adams, George, Lee, Schulte & Ward, P. A. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 597 F.2d 570, 1979 U.S. App.
LEXIS 13747 (5th Cir. Fla. 1979)
597 F.2d 570 p.577
2822.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Henry v. First Nat'l Bank, 595 F.2d 291, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 14550 (5th Cir. Miss. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
595 F.2d 291 p.300
Cited by:
595 F.2d 291 p.297
2823.
Explained by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Wilson v. Thompson, 593 F.2d 1375, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 15032 (5th Cir. Ga. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Explained by:
Page 335
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
593 F.2d 1375 p.1377
593 F.2d 1375 p.1380
593 F.2d 1375 p.1381
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
593 F.2d 1375 p.1390
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
593 F.2d 1375 p.1389
2824.
Cited by:
Universal Amusement Co. v. Vance, 587 F.2d 159, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 6934, 4 Media L. Rep. (BNA)
1929 (5th Cir. Tex. 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes HN1
587 F.2d 159 p.163
2825.
Cited by:
Lerma v. Estelle, 585 F.2d 1297, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 7155 (5th Cir. Tex. 1978)
585 F.2d 1297 p.1298
2826.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Bundy v. Rudd, 581 F.2d 1126, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 8694 (5th Cir. Fla. 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
Distinguished by:
581 F.2d 1126 p.1130
Followed by:
581 F.2d 1126 p.1129
2827.
Distinguished by:
Johnson v. American Credit Co., 581 F.2d 526, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 8564 (5th Cir. Ga. 1978)
581 F.2d 526 p.530
2828.
Cited by:
Gibson v. Jackson, 578 F.2d 1045, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 9393 (5th Cir. Ga. 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
578 F.2d 1045 p.1048
2829.
Cited by:
Pollard v. Cockrell, 578 F.2d 1002, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 9400 (5th Cir. Tex. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
578 F.2d 1002 p.1009
2830.
Cited by:
Spinkellink v. Wainwright, 578 F.2d 582, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 9443 (5th Cir. Fla. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
578 F.2d 582 p.606
Page 336
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2831.
Cited by:
Braniff International, Inc. v. Florida Public Service Com., 576 F.2d 1100, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10032
(5th Cir. Fla. 1978)
576 F.2d 1100 p.1105
2832.
Distinguished by:
Slavin v. Curry, 574 F.2d 1256, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10737 (5th Cir. Tex. 1978)
574 F.2d 1256 p.1263
2833.
Distinguished by, Explained by, Cited by:
Ealy v. Littlejohn, 569 F.2d 219, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12266 (5th Cir. Miss. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3, HN8, HN9
Distinguished by:
569 F.2d 219 p.233
Explained by:
569 F.2d 219 p.224
Cited by:
569 F.2d 219 p.227
569 F.2d 219 p.231
2834.
Cited by:
Concerned Citizens of Vicksburg v. Sills, 567 F.2d 646, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12649 (5th Cir. Miss. 1978)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN4, HN5
567 F.2d 646 p.648
2835.
Distinguished by:
Leonard v. Columbus, 551 F.2d 974, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13478, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P7566 (5th
Cir. 1977)
551 F.2d 974 p.978
2836.
Cited by:
Leonard v. Columbus, 565 F.2d 957, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11044 (5th Cir. Ga. 1977) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
565 F.2d 957 p.957
2837.
Distinguished by:
Morial v. Judiciary Com. of Louisiana, 565 F.2d 295, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5650 (5th Cir. La. 1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
565 F.2d 295 p.299
2838.
Explained by:
Universal Amusement Co. v. Vance, 559 F.2d 1286, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11370 (5th Cir. Tex. 1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN1, HN5
559 F.2d 1286 p.1289
Page 337
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2839.
Cited by:
Evans v. Maggio, 557 F.2d 430, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12026 (5th Cir. La. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
557 F.2d 430 p.433
2840.
Followed by:
Beecher v. Baxley, 549 F.2d 974, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 14064 (5th Cir. Ala. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
549 F.2d 974 p.976
2841.
Cited by:
Meltzer v. Board of Public Instruction, 548 F.2d 559, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 14349 (5th Cir. Fla. 1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
548 F.2d 559 p.565
2842.
Followed by:
Kolski v. Watkins, 544 F.2d 762, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 10725 (5th Cir. Fla. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
544 F.2d 762 p.763
544 F.2d 762 p.764
544 F.2d 762 p.765
2843.
Followed by, Cited by:
Familias Unidas v. Briscoe, 544 F.2d 182, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 5801 (5th Cir. Tex. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN8
Followed by:
544 F.2d 182 p.186
Cited by:
544 F.2d 182 p.187
2844.
Cited by:
United States v. Louisiana, 543 F.2d 1125, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 5866 (5th Cir. La. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
543 F.2d 1125 p.1127
2845.
Distinguished by:
Brown v. Liberty Loan Corp., 539 F.2d 1355, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6787 (5th Cir. Fla. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
539 F.2d 1355 p.1362
2846.
Distinguished by:
Williams v. Rubiera, 539 F.2d 470, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6925 (5th Cir. Fla. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
539 F.2d 470 p.473
539 F.2d 470 p.476
Page 338
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2847.
Cited by:
Jagnandan v. Giles, 538 F.2d 1166, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7037 (5th Cir. 1976)
538 F.2d 1166 p.1171
2848.
Cited by:
Tatzel v. Hanlon, 530 F.2d 1205, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 11541 (5th Cir. Fla. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
530 F.2d 1205 p.1206
2849.
Explained by:
Miller v. Granados, 529 F.2d 393, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12193, 1976-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P60789 (5th
Cir. Fla. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
529 F.2d 393 p.395
2850.
Cited by:
Fulford v. Klein, 529 F.2d 377, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12191 (5th Cir. La. 1976)
529 F.2d 377 p.381
2851.
Explained by:
Costello v. Wainwright, 525 F.2d 1239, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 13348 (5th Cir. Fla. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
525 F.2d 1239 p.1245
2852.
Explained by:
MTM, Inc. v. Baxley, 523 F.2d 1255, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11799 (5th Cir. Ala. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6, HN9
523 F.2d 1255 p.1257
2853.
Cited by:
Fontaine v. Walls, 515 F.2d 884, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 13731 (5th Cir. Tex. 1975)
515 F.2d 884 p.884
2854.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Glenn v. Askew, 513 F.2d 61, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14599 (5th Cir. Fla. 1975)
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
513 F.2d 61 p.65
Cited by:
513 F.2d 61 p.63
2855.
Cited by:
Bowles v. Blue Lake Development Corp., 504 F.2d 1094, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 5932 (5th Cir. Fla. 1974)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
504 F.2d 1094 p.1095
2856.
Cited by:
Page 339
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Jones v. Wade, 504 F.2d 428, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6010 (5th Cir. Tex. 1974)
504 F.2d 428 p.428
2857.
Cited by:
Gardner v. Luckey, 500 F.2d 712, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6848 (5th Cir. Fla. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
500 F.2d 712 p.714
2858.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Gray Line Motor Tours, Inc. v. New Orleans, 498 F.2d 293, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7315 (5th Cir. La.
1974) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
498 F.2d 293 p.301
2859.
Cited by:
Wright v. Florida, 495 F.2d 1086, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8148 (5th Cir. Fla. 1974)
495 F.2d 1086 p.1089
2860.
Cited by:
International Tape Mfrs. Asso. v. Gerstein, 494 F.2d 25, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8657, 182 U.S.P.Q. (BNA)
7 (5th Cir. Fla. 1974)
494 F.2d 25 p.28
2861.
Cited by:
Tooten v. Shevin, 493 F.2d 173, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8991 (5th Cir. Fla. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
493 F.2d 173 p.177
2862.
Cited by:
Miami Health Studios, Inc. v. Miami Beach, 491 F.2d 98, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 9639 (5th Cir. Fla. 1974)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
491 F.2d 98 p.101
2863.
Followed by:
Joiner v. Dallas, 488 F.2d 519, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10512 (5th Cir. Tex. 1974)
488 F.2d 519 p.520
2864.
Cited by:
GORNTO v. MacDOUGALL, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9138 (5th Cir. June 27, 1973)
2865.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Fain v. Duff, 488 F.2d 218, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6603 (5th Cir. Fla. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
488 F.2d 218 p.228
2866.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Pugh v. Rainwater, 483 F.2d 778, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8327 (5th Cir. Fla. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Page 340
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Distinguished by:
483 F.2d 778 p.781
Cited by:
483 F.2d 778 p.782
2867.
Cited by:
American Radio Asso. v. Mobile S.S. Asso., 483 F.2d 1, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8233, 84 L.R.R.M. (BNA)
2047, 72 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P13903 (5th Cir. Ala. 1973)
483 F.2d 1 p.7
2868.
Distinguished by:
Polk v. State Bar of Texas, 480 F.2d 998, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9296 (5th Cir. Tex. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
480 F.2d 998 p.999
480 F.2d 998 p.1002
2869.
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Jones v. Wade, 479 F.2d 1176, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9691 (5th Cir. Tex. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
479 F.2d 1176 p.1178
479 F.2d 1176 p.1180
479 F.2d 1176 p.1181
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
479 F.2d 1176 p.1183
479 F.2d 1176 p.1184
2870.
Explained by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Petersen v. Talisman Sugar Corp., 478 F.2d 73, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10128, 84 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2061,
72 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P13960 (5th Cir. Fla. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
478 F.2d 73 p.78
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
478 F.2d 73 p.87
2871.
Followed by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Duke v. Texas, 477 F.2d 244, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10364 (5th Cir. Tex. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
477 F.2d 244 p.248
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
477 F.2d 244 p.254
2872.
Cited by:
Eastin v. New Orleans, 475 F.2d 191, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11247 (5th Cir. La. 1973)
Page 341
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
475 F.2d 191 p.192
2873.
Explained by:
Community Action Group v. Columbus, 473 F.2d 966, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11811 (5th Cir. Ga. 1973)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
473 F.2d 966 p.973
2874.
Explained by:
Morgan v. Wofford, 472 F.2d 822, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11966 (5th Cir. Ga. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
472 F.2d 822 p.826
2875.
Cited by:
United States v. Dickinson, 465 F.2d 496, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7812, 1 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1338 (5th
Cir. La. 1972)
465 F.2d 496 p.500
2876.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
United States v. Buras, 475 F.2d 1370, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6129 (5th Cir. La. 1972)
475 F.2d 1370 p.1375
2877.
Followed by:
Milner v. Burson, 470 F.2d 870, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6411 (5th Cir. Ga. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN3, HN5
470 F.2d 870 p.873
470 F.2d 870 p.874
2878.
Followed by:
Eames v. Pitcher, 468 F.2d 905, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6978 (5th Cir. La. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
468 F.2d 905 p.906
2879.
Cited by:
80 Drive-In, Inc. v. Baxley, 468 F.2d 611, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7287 (5th Cir. Ala. 1972)
468 F.2d 611 p.612
2880.
Followed by:
Shaw v. Garrison, 467 F.2d 113, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8147 (5th Cir. La. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6, HN8
467 F.2d 113 p.114
467 F.2d 113 p.119
2881.
Followed by:
Palaio v. McAuliffe, 466 F.2d 1230, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7457 (5th Cir. Ga. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
466 F.2d 1230 p.1232
Page 342
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
466 F.2d 1230 p.1233
2882.
Cited by:
Thevis v. Seibels, 464 F.2d 613, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8268 (5th Cir. Ala. 1972)
464 F.2d 613 p.613
2883.
Explained by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Becker v. Thompson, 463 F.2d 1338, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8314 (5th Cir. Ga. 1972)
Explained by:
463 F.2d 1338 p.1338
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
463 F.2d 1338 p.1339
2884.
Followed by:
Reed v. Giarrusso, 462 F.2d 706, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8790 (5th Cir. La. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN4, HN6, HN9
462 F.2d 706 p.707
462 F.2d 706 p.711
2885.
Followed by:
Hunt v. Rodriguez, 462 F.2d 659, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8655 (5th Cir. Tex. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
462 F.2d 659 p.661
462 F.2d 659 p.663
2886.
Cited by:
Stewart v. Dameron, 460 F.2d 278, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9241 (5th Cir. La. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN8
460 F.2d 278 p.279
2887.
Cited by:
Alga, Inc. v. Crosland, 459 F.2d 1038, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9524 (5th Cir. Ala. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
459 F.2d 1038 p.1038
2888.
Cited by:
Thomie v. Dennard, 459 F.2d 1037, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9523 (5th Cir. Ga. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
459 F.2d 1037 p.1037
2889.
Followed by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Becker v. Thompson, 459 F.2d 919, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9771 (5th Cir. Ga. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
459 F.2d 919 p.921
459 F.2d 919 p.923
Page 343
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
459 F.2d 919 p.923
2890.
Cited by:
Cooley v. Endictor, 458 F.2d 513, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10319 (5th Cir. Ga. 1972)
458 F.2d 513 p.513
2891.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Perkins v. Mississippi, 455 F.2d 7, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11823 (5th Cir. Miss. 1972)
455 F.2d 7 p.33
455 F.2d 7 p.34
455 F.2d 7 p.35
2892.
Cited by:
Georgia v. Loveless, 454 F.2d 1209, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11490 (5th Cir. Ga. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
454 F.2d 1209 p.1209
2893.
Cited by:
McDowell v. Texas, 465 F.2d 1342, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10350 (5th Cir. Tex. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
465 F.2d 1342 p.1346
2894.
Cited by:
Bryant v. Morgan, 451 F.2d 354, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7160 (5th Cir. Ala. 1971)
451 F.2d 354 p.355
2895.
Followed by:
Musick v. Jonsson, 449 F.2d 201, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7885 (5th Cir. Tex. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
449 F.2d 201 p.203
2896.
Cited by:
Hobbs v. Thompson, 448 F.2d 456, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8026 (5th Cir. Ga. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
448 F.2d 456 p.458
448 F.2d 456 p.465
2897.
Cited by:
National Education Asso. v. Lee County Board of Public Instruction, 448 F.2d 451, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS
8035, 78 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2264, 66 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P52633 (5th Cir. Fla. 1971)
448 F.2d 451 p.452
2898.
Followed by:
Stewart v. Dameron, 448 F.2d 396, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8024 (5th Cir. La. 1971)
Page 344
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
448 F.2d 396 p.397
2899.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Le Flore v. Robinson, 446 F.2d 715, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9295 (5th Cir. Ala. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
446 F.2d 715 p.716
2900.
Cited by:
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Howze, 445 F.2d 586, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9432 (5th
Cir. La. 1971)
445 F.2d 586 p.587
2901.
Followed by:
Duncan v. Perez, 445 F.2d 557, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9605 (5th Cir. La. 1971)
445 F.2d 557 p.558
2902.
Cited by:
Henry v. First Nat'l Bank, 444 F.2d 1300, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9351 (5th Cir. Miss. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
444 F.2d 1300 p.1310
2903.
Followed by:
Hudson v. Wanick, 444 F.2d 218, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9498 (5th Cir. Fla. 1971)
444 F.2d 218 p.218
2904.
Cited by:
Boyd v. Bowman, 443 F.2d 848, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10150, 1971 Auto. Cas. 2d (CCH) P6998 (5th Cir.
Fla. 1971)
443 F.2d 848 p.850
2905.
Followed by:
Livingston v. Garmire, 442 F.2d 1322, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10293 (5th Cir. Fla. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3, HN5, HN6
442 F.2d 1322 p.1322
442 F.2d 1322 p.1324
2906.
Cited by:
Jackson v. Dobbs, 442 F.2d 928, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11035 (5th Cir. Ga. 1971)
442 F.2d 928 p.928
2907.
Cited by:
Gordon v. Landrieu, 442 F.2d 926, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11310 (5th Cir. La. 1971)
442 F.2d 926 p.926
2908.
Cited by:
Page 345
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Coleman v. Yokum, 442 F.2d 351, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10489 (5th Cir. La. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
442 F.2d 351 p.353
2909.
Followed by:
Wright v. Montgomery, 441 F.2d 1169, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10151 (5th Cir. Ala. 1971)
441 F.2d 1169 p.1169
2910.
Followed by:
Star--Satellite, Inc. v. Rosetti, 441 F.2d 650, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10438 (5th Cir. Miss. 1971)
441 F.2d 650 p.651
2911.
Cited by:
United States v. Navarro, 441 F.2d 409, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10621 (5th Cir. Tex. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
441 F.2d 409 p.412
2912.
Followed by:
Peoples v. Birmingham, 440 F.2d 1352, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10838 (5th Cir. Ala. 1971)
440 F.2d 1352 p.1353
2913.
Followed by:
Thevis v. Moore, 440 F.2d 1350, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10947 (5th Cir. Ala. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
440 F.2d 1350 p.1350
2914.
Cited by:
Gornto v. Thomas, 439 F.2d 1406, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11335 (5th Cir. Ga. 1971)
439 F.2d 1406 p.1407
2915.
Followed by:
Buie v. Pigott, 439 F.2d 153, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11435 (5th Cir. Miss. 1971)
439 F.2d 153 p.153
5TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
2916.
Cited by:
Zeno v. Wilder, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109036 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 23, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109036
2917.
Cited by:
Rehfuss v. Guadalupe County, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105235 (W.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105235
2918.
Cited by:
Page 346
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Green v. Thomas, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100341 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 27, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100341
2919.
Cited by:
Reyes v. Tibbe, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95666 (W.D. Tex. Oct. 14, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95666
2920.
Cited by:
Chism Elec., Inc. v. Meacham, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94318 (N.D. Miss. Oct. 9, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94318
2921.
Cited by:
Smith v. Tisdale, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91238 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91238
2922.
Followed by:
Dorward v. Ramirez, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77710 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6, HN8
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77710
2923.
Followed by:
Moore v. Prentiss County, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71631 (N.D. Miss. Aug. 13, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71631
2924.
Cited by:
Childs v. City of Helotes Mun. Court, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67044 (W.D. Tex. July 10, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67044
2925.
Followed by:
Price v. Porter, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74426 (W.D. La. Mar. 31, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74426
2926.
Distinguished by:
Hampton v. Tunica County Bd. of Supervisors, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26707 (N.D. Miss. Mar. 31, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26707
2927.
Followed by:
Searls v. Louisiana, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23638 (E.D. La. Jan. 21, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23638
2928.
Cited by:
Burns v. Thorne, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3056 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2009)
Page 347
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3056
2929.
Cited by:
Ramos v. Shrode, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96721 (W.D. Tex. Nov. 20, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96721
2930.
Followed by:
Michael v. Davis, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88064 (S.D. Miss. Oct. 27, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88064
2931.
Cited by:
RTM Media, L.L.C. v. City of Houston, 578 F. Supp. 2d 875, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75490 (S.D. Tex.
2008)
578 F. Supp. 2d 875 p.885
2932.
Cited by:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Knox, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71499 (N.D. Miss. Sept. 19, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71499
2933.
Cited by:
Bernegger v. Haney, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70740 (N.D. Miss. Sept. 18, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70740
2934.
Followed by:
Freeman v. State, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67717 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 2, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67717
2935.
Cited by:
Ryon v. Burkhalter, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51487 (M.D. La. July 7, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51487
2936.
Followed by:
Washington v. Thomas, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47355 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47355
2937.
Cited by:
Joseph v. Arlington Police Dep't, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52721 (N.D. Tex. June 13, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2938.
Followed by:
Joseph v. Arlington Police Dep't, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47718 (N.D. Tex. June 13, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47718
Page 348
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2939.
Followed by:
Foster v. City of El Paso, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38962 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 30, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38962
2940.
Followed by:
Scott v. Livingston Parish Sch. Bd., 548 F. Supp. 2d 265, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20640 (M.D. La. 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
548 F. Supp. 2d 265 p.267
2941.
Cited by:
Volvo Trucks North Am., Inc. v. Crescent Ford Truck Sales, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13015 (E.D. La.
Feb. 20, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13015
2942.
Cited by:
Shabazz v. Berry, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6286 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6286
2943.
Cited by:
Malone v. Gallagher, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2960 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 15, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2960
2944.
Followed by:
Etheridge v. Woods, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85235 (S.D. Miss. Nov. 14, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85235
2945.
Followed by:
Dresser v. Ingolia, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83118 (E.D. La. Nov. 8, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83118
2946.
Cited by:
Poche v. Harrington, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74401 (W.D. La. Oct. 3, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74401
2947.
Followed by, Cited by:
Dean v. Mozingo, 521 F. Supp. 2d 541, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72312 (S.D. Miss. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
521 F. Supp. 2d 541 p.550
Cited by:
521 F. Supp. 2d 541 p.549
Page 349
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2948.
Cited by:
RTM Media, L.L.C. v. City of Houston, 518 F. Supp. 2d 866, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71388 (S.D. Tex.
2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
518 F. Supp. 2d 866 p.870
2949.
Followed by:
Poche v. Harrington, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76531 (W.D. La. Aug. 29, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76531
2950.
Followed by:
Townson v. Crain Bros., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60571 (E.D. La. Aug. 17, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60571
2951.
Followed by:
Kastner v. Tex. Bd. of Law Examiners, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98499 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98499
2952.
Cited by:
Devillier v. Calcasieu Parish Sheriff's Dep't, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72135 (W.D. La. Aug. 6, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72135
2953.
Followed by:
Allen v. Francis, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55959 (E.D. La. July 31, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55959
2954.
Cited by:
Rodriguez v. Quarterman, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43524 (S.D. Tex. June 15, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43524
2955.
Cited by:
Touchet v. City of Natchitoches, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43383 (W.D. La. May 14, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43383
2956.
Cited by:
Chapa v. Perez, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52682 (S.D. Tex. May 9, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52682
2957.
Followed by:
Byrd v. L.C.S. Corr. Servs., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57286 (W.D. La. Apr. 27, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57286
Page 350
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2958.
Cited by:
G2, Inc. v. Midwest Gaming, Inc., 485 F. Supp. 2d 757, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36042 (W.D. Tex. 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
485 F. Supp. 2d 757 p.766
2959.
Followed by:
Reyna v. Greenwell, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25181 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 4, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25181
2960.
Cited by:
Kenner Acquisitions, LLC v. Bellsouth Telecomms., Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13317 (E.D. La. Feb. 26,
2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13317
2961.
Cited by:
Few v. Rivera, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15859 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 23, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15859
2962.
Distinguished by:
Symetra Life Ins. Co. v. Rapid Settlements Ltd., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1985 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 10, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1985
2963.
Cited by:
Reyna v. 319th Dist. Court, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94106 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 29, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94106
2964.
Cited by:
Whitney Nat'l Bank v. Air Ambulance by B&C Flight Mgmt., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91575 (S.D. Tex. Dec.
19, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91575
2965.
Cited by:
Farber v. La. State Bd. of Med. Examiners, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88278 (E.D. La. Dec. 5, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88278
2966.
Followed by:
Howell v. Southwestern Bell Tel., L.P., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88201 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 5, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88201
2967.
Cited by:
Reyna v. 319<th> Dist. Court, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94703 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 8, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN9
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94703
Page 351
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2968.
Followed by:
Moore v. Louisiana, 459 F. Supp. 2d 504, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80217 (M.D. La. 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
459 F. Supp. 2d 504 p.508
2969.
Followed by:
Few v. Peca, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77255 (W.D. Tex. Oct. 19, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77255
2970.
Cited by:
Knight v. 24th Judicial Dist. Court Section A, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95305 (E.D. La. Oct. 16, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95305
2971.
Followed by:
Ayala v. Meraz, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73849 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 27, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73849
2972.
Cited by:
Duke v. Cartlidge, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69599 (S.D. Miss. Sept. 25, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69599
2973.
Cited by:
Hampton v. Winston County, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63683 (N.D. Miss. Sept. 5, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63683
2974.
Followed by:
Emplrs Res. Mgmt. Co. v. Tex. Dep't of Ins., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62706, 39 Employee Benefits Cas.
(BNA) 2208 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62706
2975.
Distinguished by:
Rice v. Witt, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46031 (S.D. Tex. July 7, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46031
2976.
Cited by:
President v. Duplichan, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65747 (W.D. La. June 14, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65747
2977.
Cited by:
Hayes v. Thomas, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37779 (S.D. Tex. June 8, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37779
Page 352
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2978.
Cited by:
Jelks v. Duer, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33658 (S.D. Tex. May 17, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33658
2979.
Followed by:
Lovejoy v. Texas, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24479 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 28, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24479
2980.
Cited by:
Few v. Peca, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96541 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96541
2981.
Followed by:
Patrick v. Louisiana, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45188 (W.D. La. Dec. 21, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45188
2982.
Cited by:
United States v. Jackson, 389 F. Supp. 2d 753, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21892 (W.D. Tex. 2005)
389 F. Supp. 2d 753 p.755
2983.
Followed by:
Tex. v. Tello, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17774 (N.D. Tex. June 24, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17774
2984.
Cited by:
Floyd v. Amite County Sch. Dist., 376 F. Supp. 2d 693, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13161 (S.D. Miss. 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
376 F. Supp. 2d 693 p.695
2985.
Cited by:
Dantzler v. Tangipahoa Parish Sch. Bd., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12394 (E.D. La. June 17, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12394
2986.
Followed by:
Terrell v. City of Rowlett, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10100 (N.D. Tex. May 25, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6, HN9
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10100
2987.
Cited by:
Pruett v. Harris County Bail Bond Bd., 400 F. Supp. 2d 967, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28747 (S.D. Tex.
2005)
400 F. Supp. 2d 967 p.973
2988.
Followed by:
Owen v. Dretke, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8990 (N.D. Tex. May 13, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 353
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8990
2989.
Followed by:
Farmer v. Richardson, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6521 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 14, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6521
2990.
Followed by:
Wightman-Cervantes v. Texas, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5702 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 6, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5702
2991.
Followed by:
Fisher v. Moore, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 863 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 863
2992.
Distinguished by:
Emplrs Mut. Cas. Co. v. Maya, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24811 (N.D. Tex. Dec. 9, 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24811
2993.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Cited by:
Olivia Y. v. Barbour, 351 F. Supp. 2d 543, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26323 (S.D. Miss. 2004)
Distinguished by:
351 F. Supp. 2d 543 p.565
Followed by:
351 F. Supp. 2d 543 p.570
Cited by:
351 F. Supp. 2d 543 p.556
2994.
Cited by:
Guimbellot v. Rowell, 356 F. Supp. 2d 644, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27098 (E.D. La. 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
356 F. Supp. 2d 644 p.651
2995.
Cited by:
Farber v. La. State Bd. of Med. Examiners, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19018 (E.D. La. Sept. 20, 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19018
2996.
Cited by:
Simmang v. Tex. Bd. of Law Exam'rs , 346 F. Supp. 2d 874, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27243 (W.D. Tex.
2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2997.
Followed by:
Ackors v. Borger Police Dep't, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9329 (N.D. Tex. May 25, 2004) LexisNexis
Page 354
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9329
2998.
Cited by:
Woodward v. Sentry Select Ins. Co., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6659 (E.D. La. Apr. 14, 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6659
2999.
Followed by:
Lawrence v. Davis, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5736 (E.D. La. Apr. 1, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5736
3000.
Cited by:
Toga Soc'y, Inc. v. Lee, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16635 (E.D. La. Mar. 26, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16635
3001.
Followed by:
Hollywood Park Humane Soc'y v. Town of Hollywood Park, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3957 (W.D. Tex. Mar.
10, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3957
3002.
Followed by:
Lawrence v. McCarthy, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16729 (E.D. La. Sept. 5, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16729
3003.
Followed by:
Snook v. City of Mo. City, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27256 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27256
3004.
Distinguished by:
Becker-Jiba Water Supply Corp. v. City of Kaufman, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10334 (N.D. Tex. June 18,
2003)
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10334
3005.
Followed by:
Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. Gavel, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3820 (E.D. La. Mar. 11, 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3820
3006.
Cited by:
Vogt v. Bd. of Commnrs., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23556 (E.D. La. Dec. 4, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23556
Page 355
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3007.
Distinguished by:
Watershed Software Group, LLC v. Camping Cos., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21985 (E.D. La. Nov. 7, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21985
3008.
Followed by, Cited by:
Burdine v. Huffman, 229 F. Supp. 2d 704, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20600 (S.D. Tex. 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
229 F. Supp. 2d 704 p.710
Cited by:
229 F. Supp. 2d 704 p.707
3009.
Cited by:
Montes v. Cornyn, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20020 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 20, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20020
3010.
Cited by:
Dale v. Family Guar. Life Ins. Co., 205 F. Supp. 2d 620, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11555 (S.D. Miss. 2002)
205 F. Supp. 2d 620 p.621
3011.
Followed by:
Johnson v. Whatley, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27623 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 5, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27623
3012.
Cited by:
Sims v. Cannizzaro, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12424 (E.D. La. Mar. 14, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12424
3013.
Followed by:
Strait Shooters, Inc. v. St. Tammany Parish, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19670 (E.D. La. Nov. 20, 2001)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19670
3014.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Jordan v. Reis, 169 F. Supp. 2d 664, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16440, 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 119
(S.D. Tex. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
169 F. Supp. 2d 664 p.670
Cited by:
169 F. Supp. 2d 664 p.668
3015.
Cited by:
United States v. Coleman, 162 F. Supp. 2d 582, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18833 (N.D. Tex. 2001)
162 F. Supp. 2d 582 p.589
Page 356
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3016.
Cited by:
Lee v. Louisiana, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1314 (E.D. La. Jan. 29, 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1314
3017.
Followed by:
Chalmers v. Carter, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3723 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 16, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3723
3018.
Distinguished by:
ACLU Found. of La. v. Crawford, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17270 (E.D. La. Nov. 21, 2000)
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17270
3019.
Explained by:
Casket Royale, Inc. v. Mississippi, 124 F. Supp. 2d 434, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18775 (S.D. Miss. 2000)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
124 F. Supp. 2d 434 p.437
3020.
Cited by:
Rees v. Smith, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13228 (E.D. La. Sept. 5, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3021.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Torries v. Hebert, 111 F. Supp. 2d 806, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18442 (W.D. La. 2000)
Distinguished by:
111 F. Supp. 2d 806 p.817
Followed by:
111 F. Supp. 2d 806 p.815
3022.
Cited by:
Steward v. Sherman, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16477 (E.D. La. Aug. 22, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16477
3023.
Cited by:
Fox v. Reed, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3318 (E.D. La. Mar. 15, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN8
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3318
3024.
Cited by:
Dallas v. City of Okolona, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19547 (N.D. Miss. Dec. 7, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN4
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19547
3025.
Cited by:
American Home Assur. Co. v. Roxco, Ltd., 81 F. Supp. 2d 674, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20788 (S.D. Miss.
1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
81 F. Supp. 2d 674 p.678
Page 357
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3026.
Cited by:
Advocacy Ctr. v. Stalder, 128 F. Supp. 2d 358, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22596 (M.D. La. 1999)
128 F. Supp. 2d 358 p.367
3027.
Cited by:
Johnson v. New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Found., Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7038 (E.D. La. May 10,
1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7038
3028.
Cited by:
La Casa Castro, S.A. de C.V. v. Latin Am. Energy Dev., Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6041 (E.D. La. Apr.
21, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6041
3029.
Cited by:
Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. City of New Orleans ex rel. Department of Pub. Utils., 29 F. Supp. 2d 339, 1998
U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19296 (E.D. La. 1998)
29 F. Supp. 2d 339 p.341
3030.
Cited by:
Prestage Farms v. Board of Supervisors, 23 F. Supp. 2d 663, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16335 (N.D. Miss.
1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
23 F. Supp. 2d 663 p.665
3031.
Cited by:
Carmax Auto Superstores v. Texas, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13446 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 19, 1998) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13446
3032.
Cited by:
KSJ Dev. Co. v. Lambert, 223 B.R. 677, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10408 (E.D. La. 1998)
223 B.R. 677 p.680
3033.
Followed by:
Buchanon v. City of Lancaster, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9973 (N.D. Tex. June 26, 1998) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9973
3034.
Cited by:
N.W. Enters., Inc. v. City of Houston, 27 F. Supp. 2d 754, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11884 (S.D. Tex. 1998)
27 F. Supp. 2d 754 p.784
3035.
Distinguished by:
Boydstun v. Reed, 218 B.R. 840, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5016 (N.D. Miss. 1998)
218 B.R. 840 p.841
Page 358
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3036.
Distinguished by:
United States ex rel. Garibaldi v. Orleans Parish Sch. Bd., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3344 (E.D. La. Mar. 12,
1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3344
3037.
Cited by:
Weber v. Floridi, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13731 (E.D. La. Sept. 2, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
3038.
Cited by:
Rogers v. Morales, 975 F. Supp. 856, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13504 (N.D. Tex. 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
975 F. Supp. 856 p.857
3039.
Followed by, Cited by:
Geotes v. Mississippi Bd. of Veterinary Med., 986 F. Supp. 1028, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19484 (S.D. Miss.
1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
986 F. Supp. 1028 p.1031
Cited by:
986 F. Supp. 1028 p.1029
986 F. Supp. 1028 p.1035
3040.
Cited by:
New York Life Ins. Co. v. Deshotel, 946 F. Supp. 454, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18166 (E.D. La. 1996)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
946 F. Supp. 454 p.465
3041.
Cited by:
May v. Kennard Indep. Sch. Dist., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14596 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 1, 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3042.
Cited by:
H.R. Mgmt. Co. v. Zurich Ins. Co., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22417 (N.D. Tex. June 21, 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3043.
Cited by:
Lenhart v. Thomas, 944 F. Supp. 525, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19709, 24 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2497 (S.D.
Tex. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
944 F. Supp. 525 p.527
3044.
Cited by:
United States v. Bailey, 902 F. Supp. 727, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15833 (W.D. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
902 F. Supp. 727 p.728
3045.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Page 359
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Hunt v. City of Longview, 932 F. Supp. 828, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21088 (E.D. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
932 F. Supp. 828 p.835
Cited by:
932 F. Supp. 828 p.833
3046.
Cited by:
Saacks v. City of New Orleans, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11489 (E.D. La. Aug. 8, 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
3047.
Cited by:
Duchow v. United States, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10261 (E.D. La. July 18, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
3048.
Cited by:
Schwartz v. Welch, 890 F. Supp. 565, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8698 (S.D. Miss. 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
890 F. Supp. 565 p.571
3049.
Followed by, Cited by:
Globe Glass & Mirror Co. v. Brown, 888 F. Supp. 768, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8843 (E.D. La. 1995)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
888 F. Supp. 768 p.771
Cited by:
888 F. Supp. 768 p.770
3050.
Cited by:
Hurst v. Regis Low, Ltd., 878 F. Supp. 981, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2976 (S.D. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
878 F. Supp. 981 p.984
3051.
Cited by:
R.O.C.C.O.L. v. United States Army Corps of Eng'rs, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21558 (N.D. Miss. Feb. 28,
1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3052.
Cited by:
Louisiana Debating & Literary Ass'n v. City of New Orleans, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12842 (E.D. La. Sept.
13, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
3053.
Followed by:
Tilton v. Smith, 827 F. Supp. 404, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10186 (N.D. Tex. 1993)
827 F. Supp. 404 p.406
827 F. Supp. 404 p.407
3054.
Cited by:
Carr v. Moses, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7733 (E.D. La. May 28, 1993)
Page 360
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3055.
Cited by:
Farmer v. Sherrod, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5526 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6, HN9
3056.
Cited by:
In re Prudential-Bache Energy Income Partnerships Sec. Litig., 815 F. Supp. 177, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
2073 (E.D. La. 1993)
815 F. Supp. 177 p.183
3057.
Harmonized by, Cited by:
Jernigan v. Mississippi, 812 F. Supp. 688, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1896 (S.D. Miss. 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Harmonized by:
812 F. Supp. 688 p.691
Cited by:
812 F. Supp. 688 p.692
3058.
Cited by:
John Doe v. Louisiana Supreme Court, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18803 (E.D. La. Dec. 7, 1992)
3059.
Cited by:
Carr v. Guste, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16973 (E.D. La. Oct. 30, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3060.
Cited by:
Keene Corp. v. Hannah, 800 F. Supp. 490, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14444 (W.D. Tex. 1992)
800 F. Supp. 490 p.495
3061.
Cited by:
Jackson v. Lakeland Lounge, 800 F. Supp. 455, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12245 (S.D. Miss. 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
800 F. Supp. 455 p.458
3062.
Cited by:
Vonderhaar v. St. Tammany, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9538 (E.D. La. June 22, 1992)
3063.
Cited by:
Target Container Co. v. Par Industries, Inc., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9226 (N.D. Miss. June 12, 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3064.
Cited by:
Texas v. Synchronal Corp., 800 F. Supp. 1456, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14467 (W.D. Tex. 1992) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
800 F. Supp. 1456 p.1461
3065.
Followed by:
United Kingdom Mut. S.S. Assurance Ass'n v. Giannouleas, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7091, 1992 A.M.C.
2342 (E.D. La. 1992)
1992 A.M.C. 2342 p.2346
Page 361
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3066.
Followed by:
Smith v. Travis County Educ. Dist., 791 F. Supp. 1170, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6310 (W.D. Tex. 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
791 F. Supp. 1170 p.1186
791 F. Supp. 1170 p.1189
3067.
Cited by:
Word of Faith World Outreach Center Church, Inc. v. Morales, 787 F. Supp. 689, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
3317 (W.D. Tex. 1992)
787 F. Supp. 689 p.693
3068.
Followed by:
Republican Party of Adams County v. Adams County Election Com., 775 F. Supp. 978, 1991 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 15410 (S.D. Miss. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
775 F. Supp. 978 p.983
3069.
Cited by:
In re Taxable Mun. Bond Sec. Litig., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13449 (E.D. La. Sept. 3, 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3070.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Nobby Lobby, Inc. v. Dallas, 767 F. Supp. 801, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9458 (N.D. Tex. 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
767 F. Supp. 801 p.805
Cited by:
767 F. Supp. 801 p.804
767 F. Supp. 801 p.806
3071.
Distinguished by:
Nissan Motor Corp. v. Royal Nissan, Inc., 757 F. Supp. 736, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2848 (E.D. La. 1991)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
757 F. Supp. 736 p.739
3072.
Cited by:
L.R. v. Richards, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17068 (E.D. La. Dec. 10, 1990)
3073.
Cited by:
Allemand v. La-Tex Gulf Drilling, Inc., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10353 (E.D. La. Aug. 9, 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3074.
Cited by:
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Sellards, 731 F. Supp. 1300, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2623 (N.D. Tex. 1990)
731 F. Supp. 1300 p.1302
3075.
Cited by:
Page 362
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Winfield v. Renfro, 718 F. Supp. 613, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10344 (S.D. Tex. 1989)
718 F. Supp. 613 p.614
3076.
Cited by:
Allen v. Koon, 720 F. Supp. 570, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10627 (E.D. La. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
720 F. Supp. 570 p.571
3077.
Cited by:
Sterling v. Reed, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6317 (E.D. La. May 25, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3078.
Cited by:
Brown v. New Orleans, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5241 (E.D. La. May 10, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
3079.
Followed by:
Rogers v. Janzen, 711 F. Supp. 306, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3200 (E.D. La. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
711 F. Supp. 306 p.308
3080.
Cited by:
Bi-Ti Enterprises, Inc. v. Bardin, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12315 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 22, 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
3081.
Cited by:
Nixon v. United States, 703 F. Supp. 538, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15316 (S.D. Miss. 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
703 F. Supp. 538 p.569
3082.
Cited by:
An Attorney v. Mississippi State Bar, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15372 (S.D. Miss. Dec. 14, 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3083.
Cited by:
Gales v. Louisiana, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14341 (E.D. La. Dec. 9, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
3084.
Cited by:
United States v. Rainbow Family, 695 F. Supp. 314, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11297 (E.D. Tex. 1988)
695 F. Supp. 314 p.325
3085.
Cited by:
SEAFARMS, INC. v. GREATER LAFOURCHE PORT COMMN., 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16590 (E.D. La.
Dec. 11, 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3086.
Distinguished by:
Bossetta-Goodman v. Datacom Systems Corp., 644 F. Supp. 354, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19654 (E.D. La.
1986)
644 F. Supp. 354 p.358
3087.
Cited by:
Page 363
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Nash v. Texas, 632 F. Supp. 951, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29074, 121 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3140, 106 Lab. Cas.
(CCH) P55748 (E.D. Tex. 1986)
632 F. Supp. 951 p.964
3088.
Cited by:
K v. Complaints Committee of Mississippi State Bar, 618 F. Supp. 307, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15811 (S.D.
Miss. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
618 F. Supp. 307 p.313
3089.
Distinguished by:
Bear Creek Water Asso. v. Canton, 606 F. Supp. 247, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21964 (S.D. Miss. 1985)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
606 F. Supp. 247 p.250
3090.
Distinguished by:
Langley v. Ryder, 602 F. Supp. 335, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22648 (W.D. La. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
602 F. Supp. 335 p.338
3091.
Cited by:
Henry v. First Nat'l Bank, 603 F. Supp. 658, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21933 (N.D. Miss. 1984) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
603 F. Supp. 658 p.666
3092.
Cited by:
United States v. Savoie, 594 F. Supp. 678, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22968, 55 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1228, 85-1
U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9182 (W.D. La. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
594 F. Supp. 678 p.681
3093.
Cited by:
GONZALEZ DE GARCIA v. COUNTY OF STARR, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15468 (S.D. Tex. June 28, 1984)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
3094.
Distinguished by:
Home Depot v. Louisiana, 589 F. Supp. 1258, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16036 (E.D. La. 1984) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
589 F. Supp. 1258 p.1262
3095.
Cited by:
COLON v. TEXAS, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12131 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 1983)
3096.
Cited by:
Goldstein v. Allain, 568 F. Supp. 1377, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15319, 9 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2209 (N.D.
Miss. 1983)
568 F. Supp. 1377 p.1383
3097.
Cited by:
Page 364
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
United States v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16337, 19 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1462 (W.D.
Tex. June 10, 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
19 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1462 p.1463
3098.
Cited by:
Stern v. Tarrant County Hospital Dist., 565 F. Supp. 1440, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16460 (N.D. Tex. 1983)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
565 F. Supp. 1440 p.1444
3099.
Cited by:
Peyote Way Church of God, Inc. v. Smith, 556 F. Supp. 632, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19470 (N.D. Tex.
1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
556 F. Supp. 632 p.634
3100.
Cited by:
Poe v. Humble, 554 F. Supp. 233, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20291 (S.D. Tex. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN4
554 F. Supp. 233 p.236
554 F. Supp. 233 p.237
554 F. Supp. 233 p.238
3101.
Explained by:
Baker v. Wade, 553 F. Supp. 1121, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16466 (N.D. Tex. 1982)
553 F. Supp. 1121 p.1136
553 F. Supp. 1121 p.1146
3102.
Distinguished by:
Fulcher v. Texas Bd. of Public Accountancy, 532 F. Supp. 683, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10979 (S.D. Tex.
1982)
532 F. Supp. 683 p.684
3103.
Cited by:
Dixon v. McMullen, 527 F. Supp. 711, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17202 (N.D. Tex. 1981)
527 F. Supp. 711 p.716
3104.
Cited by:
Atkins v. Clements, 529 F. Supp. 735, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17348 (N.D. Tex. 1981)
529 F. Supp. 735 p.739
3105.
Cited by:
Morris v. Brown, 521 F. Supp. 444, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14374 (M.D. La. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
521 F. Supp. 444 p.445
3106.
Cited by:
Pizzolato v. Perez, 524 F. Supp. 914, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15580 (E.D. La. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 365
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN6
524 F. Supp. 914 p.920
524 F. Supp. 914 p.921
3107.
Cited by:
Texas Supporters of Workers World Party Presidential Candidates v. Strake, 511 F. Supp. 149, 1981 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 11617 (S.D. Tex. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
511 F. Supp. 149 p.154
3108.
Followed by:
Rasmussen v. White, 502 F. Supp. 237, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15149 (E.D. Tex. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
502 F. Supp. 237 p.238
3109.
Followed by, Cited by:
Davila v. Texas, 489 F. Supp. 803, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12886 (S.D. Tex. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Followed by:
489 F. Supp. 803 p.807
489 F. Supp. 803 p.808
Cited by:
489 F. Supp. 803 p.806
3110.
Distinguished by:
Bossier City Medical Suite, Inc. v. Bossier City, 483 F. Supp. 633, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10985 (W.D. La.
1980)
483 F. Supp. 633 p.641
3111.
Cited by:
Rutledge v. Liability Ins. Industry, 487 F. Supp. 5, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11871, 5 Media L. Rep. (BNA)
1153 (W.D. La. 1979)
487 F. Supp. 5 p.8
3112.
Followed by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Corpus Christi Peoples' Baptist Church, Inc. v. Texas Dep't of Human Resources, 481 F. Supp. 1101, 1979
U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8439, 28 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1028 (S.D. Tex. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Followed by:
481 F. Supp. 1101 p.1106
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
481 F. Supp. 1101 p.1112
3113.
Distinguished by:
Urdiales v. Canales, 475 F. Supp. 622, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10209 (S.D. Tex. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
475 F. Supp. 622 p.625
Page 366
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3114.
Followed by:
Brown v. Jones, 473 F. Supp. 439, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13692 (N.D. Tex. 1979)
473 F. Supp. 439 p.443
3115.
Followed by, Cited by:
Robinson v. Stovall, 473 F. Supp. 135, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11592 (N.D. Miss. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN9
Followed by:
473 F. Supp. 135 p.145
Cited by:
473 F. Supp. 135 p.137
3116.
Explained by:
Ellwest Stereo Theaters, Inc. v. Byrd, 472 F. Supp. 702, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11854 (N.D. Tex. 1979)
472 F. Supp. 702 p.704
3117.
Cited by:
Fernandes v. Limmer, 465 F. Supp. 493, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14770 (N.D. Tex. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
465 F. Supp. 493 p.497
3118.
Cited by:
ROUSSEL v. BOREN, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14515 (E.D. La. Nov. 6, 1978)
3119.
Cited by:
M P I, Inc. v. McCullough, 463 F. Supp. 887, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7247 (N.D. Miss. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
463 F. Supp. 887 p.893
3120.
Followed by, Cited by:
Jarvis v. Knowlton, 459 F. Supp. 687, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15007 (N.D. Tex. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
Followed by:
459 F. Supp. 687 p.689
Cited by:
459 F. Supp. 687 p.693
459 F. Supp. 687 p.694
3121.
Cited by:
Harper v. Lindsay, 454 F. Supp. 597, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17474 (S.D. Tex. 1978)
454 F. Supp. 597 p.600
3122.
Followed by, Cited by:
LaBauve v. La. Wildlife & Fisheries Comm'n, 444 F. Supp. 1370, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20329 (E.D. La.
Page 367
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
1978) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
444 F. Supp. 1370 p.1385
Cited by:
444 F. Supp. 1370 p.1375
3123.
Followed by:
Graham v. Hill, 444 F. Supp. 584, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19862 (W.D. Tex. 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
444 F. Supp. 584 p.588
3124.
Cited by:
King v. East, 451 F. Supp. 453, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12790 (N.D. Miss. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
451 F. Supp. 453 p.455
3125.
Distinguished by, Harmonized by, Cited by:
Sims v. State Dep't of Public Welfare, 438 F. Supp. 1179, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13535 (S.D. Tex. 1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Distinguished by:
438 F. Supp. 1179 p.1187
Harmonized by:
438 F. Supp. 1179 p.1186
Cited by:
438 F. Supp. 1179 p.1183
438 F. Supp. 1179 p.1188
3126.
Cited by:
Morial v. Judiciary Com. of Louisiana, 438 F. Supp. 599, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17110 (E.D. La. 1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN7
438 F. Supp. 599 p.608
3127.
Followed by:
Kew v. Senter, 416 F. Supp. 1101, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14135 (N.D. Tex. 1976)
416 F. Supp. 1101 p.1103
3128.
Distinguished by:
Dardar v. Louisiana Wildlife & Fisheries Com., 413 F. Supp. 937, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16639 (E.D. La.
1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
413 F. Supp. 937 p.941
3129.
Explained by, Cited by:
Universal Amusement Co. v. Vance, 404 F. Supp. 33, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11590 (S.D. Tex. 1975)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Explained by:
Page 368
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
404 F. Supp. 33 p.47
Cited by:
404 F. Supp. 33 p.38
404 F. Supp. 33 p.57
3130.
Cited by:
Zink v. Estelle, 403 F. Supp. 656, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15547 (S.D. Tex. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
403 F. Supp. 656 p.659
3131.
Followed by:
McKenzie v. Butler, 398 F. Supp. 1319, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11314 (W.D. Tex. 1975)
398 F. Supp. 1319 p.1322
3132.
Distinguished by:
Southwest Airlines Co. v. Texas International Airlines, Inc., 396 F. Supp. 678, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
12046 (N.D. Tex. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
396 F. Supp. 678 p.684
3133.
Cited by:
Louisiana ex rel. Purkey v. Ciolino, 393 F. Supp. 102, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12813 (E.D. La. 1975)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
393 F. Supp. 102 p.111
3134.
Cited by:
Shaw v. Garrison, 391 F. Supp. 1353, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13537 (E.D. La. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
391 F. Supp. 1353 p.1358
3135.
Distinguished by:
International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness School etc. v. Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport Board, 391
F. Supp. 606, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13253 (N.D. Tex. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
391 F. Supp. 606 p.608
391 F. Supp. 606 p.609
3136.
Distinguished by:
Joiner v. Dallas, 380 F. Supp. 754, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7116 (N.D. Tex. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
380 F. Supp. 754 p.758
380 F. Supp. 754 p.759
3137.
Cited by:
Bradford v. Wade, 376 F. Supp. 45, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8596 (N.D. Tex. 1974)
376 F. Supp. 45 p.46
Page 369
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3138.
Cited by:
Atchley v. Greenhill, 373 F. Supp. 512, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9001 (S.D. Tex. 1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
373 F. Supp. 512 p.515
3139.
Followed by, Cited by:
Harrington v. Arceneaux, 367 F. Supp. 1268, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14375 (W.D. La. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
367 F. Supp. 1268 p.1270
367 F. Supp. 1268 p.1272
Cited by:
367 F. Supp. 1268 p.1271
3140.
Cited by:
McKinnon v. Garrison, 367 F. Supp. 924, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10926 (E.D. La. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
3141.
Cited by:
Waters v. Schlesinger, 366 F. Supp. 460, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11140 (N.D. Tex. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
366 F. Supp. 460 p.462
3142.
Followed by:
Southland Theaters, Inc. v. Butler, 364 F. Supp. 494, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11673 (W.D. Tex. 1973)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
364 F. Supp. 494 p.496
3143.
Cited by:
Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 358 F. Supp. 327, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15288
(N.D. Tex. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
358 F. Supp. 327 p.329
358 F. Supp. 327 p.330
3144.
Explained by:
Ellis v. Dyson, 358 F. Supp. 262, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10664 (N.D. Tex. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6, HN7
358 F. Supp. 262 p.265
3145.
Cited by:
Lamar v. Texas, 356 F. Supp. 42, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14742 (S.D. Tex. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
356 F. Supp. 42 p.44
3146.
Explained by, Cited by:
Mortillaro v. Louisiana, 356 F. Supp. 521, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12368 (E.D. La. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Page 370
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Explained by:
356 F. Supp. 521 p.528
356 F. Supp. 521 p.529
356 F. Supp. 521 p.530
Cited by:
356 F. Supp. 521 p.526
3147.
Explained by:
United States v. Texas, 356 F. Supp. 469, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12114 (E.D. Tex. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
356 F. Supp. 469 p.471
3148.
Followed by:
Sims v. Dial, 350 F. Supp. 747, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11857 (W.D. Tex. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
350 F. Supp. 747 p.750
350 F. Supp. 747 p.751
3149.
Cited by:
Southland Theatres, Inc. v. Butler, 350 F. Supp. 743, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11856 (W.D. Tex. 1972)
350 F. Supp. 743 p.745
3150.
Cited by:
Ferdinand v. Garrison, 348 F. Supp. 1254, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12039 (E.D. La. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6, HN8
348 F. Supp. 1254 p.1257
3151.
Cited by:
McGuire v. Roebuck, 347 F. Supp. 1111, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12360 (E.D. Tex. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
347 F. Supp. 1111 p.1118
347 F. Supp. 1111 p.1125
3152.
Followed by:
Medrano v. Allee, 347 F. Supp. 605, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13070, 80 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3016, 69 Lab. Cas.
(CCH) P12904 (S.D. Tex. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8
347 F. Supp. 605 p.610
347 F. Supp. 605 p.611
347 F. Supp. 605 p.618
347 F. Supp. 605 p.619
347 F. Supp. 605 p.620
3153.
Followed by:
Payton v. Vance, 347 F. Supp. 594, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12145 (S.D. Tex. 1972)
347 F. Supp. 594 p.596
Page 371
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3154.
Explained by:
Melancon v. McKeithen, 345 F. Supp. 1025, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14862 (E.D. La. 1972)
345 F. Supp. 1025 p.1031
3155.
Cited by:
Eames v. Pitcher, 344 F. Supp. 207, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13078 (M.D. La. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
344 F. Supp. 207 p.209
3156.
Cited by:
Dubois v. Louisiana, 339 F. Supp. 685, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14629 (E.D. La. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3, HN5
339 F. Supp. 685 p.687
339 F. Supp. 685 p.689
3157.
Followed by:
Egner v. Texas City Independent School Dist., 338 F. Supp. 931, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15147 (S.D. Tex.
1972) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
338 F. Supp. 931 p.937
338 F. Supp. 931 p.941
3158.
Cited by:
Jones v. Wade, 338 F. Supp. 441, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15314 (N.D. Tex. 1972)
338 F. Supp. 441 p.443
3159.
Cited by:
Medrano v. Allee, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10868, 86 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2303 (S.D. Tex. 1972)
3160.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
S. v. D., 335 F. Supp. 804, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11000 (N.D. Tex. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
335 F. Supp. 804 p.809
3161.
Cited by:
Louisiana v. London, 335 F. Supp. 585, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10172 (E.D. La. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
335 F. Supp. 585 p.589
3162.
Followed by:
Louisiana v. Perkins, 335 F. Supp. 366, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10171 (E.D. La. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
335 F. Supp. 366 p.369
3163.
Cited by:
Harris v. Louisiana State Supreme Court, 334 F. Supp. 1289, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10959 (E.D. La. 1971)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN7
334 F. Supp. 1289 p.1299
Page 372
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3164.
Distinguished by:
Scott v. Frey, 330 F. Supp. 365, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12601 (E.D. La. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
330 F. Supp. 365 p.368
3165.
Followed by:
Dawson v. Vance, 329 F. Supp. 1320, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12239 (S.D. Tex. 1971)
329 F. Supp. 1320 p.1321
3166.
Followed by:
United States ex rel. Cummings v. Bracken, 329 F. Supp. 384, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12361 (S.D. Tex.
1971)
329 F. Supp. 384 p.385
3167.
Followed by:
Shaw v. Garrison, 328 F. Supp. 390, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13079 (E.D. La. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN3, HN5, HN6
328 F. Supp. 390 p.392
328 F. Supp. 390 p.393
3168.
Distinguished by:
Duke v. Texas, 327 F. Supp. 1218, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13119 (E.D. Tex. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
327 F. Supp. 1218 p.1232
327 F. Supp. 1218 p.1233
327 F. Supp. 1218 p.1235
3169.
Distinguished by:
Park 'n Fly of Texas, Inc. v. Houston, 327 F. Supp. 910, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13276 (S.D. Tex. 1971)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN5, HN6
327 F. Supp. 910 p.918
327 F. Supp. 910 p.919
3170.
Followed by:
Montgomery County Board of Education v. Shelton, 327 F. Supp. 811, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13266 (N.D.
Miss. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
327 F. Supp. 811 p.814
3171.
Cited by:
Montgomery v. Short, 327 F. Supp. 726, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14309 (S.D. Tex. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
327 F. Supp. 726 p.728
3172.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Hearn v. Short, 327 F. Supp. 33, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13725 (S.D. Tex. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Page 373
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
327 F. Supp. 33 p.36
327 F. Supp. 33 p.69
Cited by:
327 F. Supp. 33 p.35
3173.
Cited by:
Press v. Pasadena Independent School Dist., 326 F. Supp. 550, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14357 (S.D. Tex.
1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
326 F. Supp. 550 p.554
326 F. Supp. 550 p.565
3174.
Cited by:
Hander v. San Jacinto Junior College, 325 F. Supp. 1019, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13813 (S.D. Tex. 1971)
325 F. Supp. 1019 p.1022
5TH CIRCUIT - U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURTS
3175.
Cited by:
Lozano v. Swift Energy Co. (In re Wright), 231 B.R. 597, 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 301, 13 Tex. Bankr. Ct. Rep.
261, 41 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 971 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
231 B.R. 597 p.600
3176.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
In re Super Van, 161 B.R. 184, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1721, 8 Tex. Bankr. Ct. Rep. 152, 24 Bankr. Ct. Dec.
(LRP) 1513 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
161 B.R. 184 p.191
Cited by:
161 B.R. 184 p.186
3177.
Cited by:
Fedders N. Am., Inc. v. Branded Prods., 154 B.R. 936, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 763, 28 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d
(MB) 1682 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
154 B.R. 936 p.940
3178.
Cited by:
In re Fairchild Aircraft Corp., 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 1770, 4 Tex. Bankr. Ct. Rep. 308 (Bankr. W.D. Tex.
1990)
3179.
Cited by:
In re Kolton, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 1331, 4 Tex. Bankr. Ct. Rep. 244 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
3180.
Cited by:
In re Turboff, 93 B.R. 521, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 2512 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
93 B.R. 521 p.523
Page 374
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3181.
Followed by:
In re Little Giant Mobile Homes, Inc., 60 B.R. 194, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 6301 (Bankr. W.D. La. 1986)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
60 B.R. 194 p.195
3182.
Explained by:
In re First Texas Petroleum, Inc., 52 B.R. 322, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 5455, 88 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6232
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
52 B.R. 322 p.324
6TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
3183.
Followed by:
Danner v. Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility of the Tenn. Supreme Court, 327 Fed. Appx. 577, 2009 U.S. App.
LEXIS 10575, 2009 FED App. 346N (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Tenn. 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
327 Fed. Appx. 577 p.578
3184.
Cited by:
Fieger v. Mich. Supreme Court, 553 F.3d 955, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 910, 2009 FED App. 20P (6th Cir.)
(6th Cir. Mich. 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
553 F.3d 955 p.970
3185.
Cited by:
Clark v. Adams, 300 Fed. Appx. 344, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 23158, 2008 FED App. 684N (6th Cir.) (6th
Cir. Ky. 2008)
300 Fed. Appx. 344 p.347
3186.
Followed by, Cited by:
Michel v. City of Akron, 278 Fed. Appx. 477, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 10599, 2008 FED App. 259N (6th
Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio 2008)
Followed by:
278 Fed. Appx. 477 p.479
Cited by:
278 Fed. Appx. 477 p.478
3187.
Followed by, Cited by:
Fieger v. Cox, 524 F.3d 770, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9685, 2008 FED App. 172P (6th Cir.), 70 Fed. R. Serv.
3d (Callaghan) 716 (6th Cir. Mich. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
524 F.3d 770 p.776
Cited by:
524 F.3d 770 p.774
3188.
Followed by, Cited by:
Page 375
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Danner v. Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility of the Tenn. Supreme Court, 277 Fed. Appx. 575, 2008 U.S. App.
LEXIS 10025, 2008 FED App. 243N (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Tenn. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
277 Fed. Appx. 575 p.579
Cited by:
277 Fed. Appx. 575 p.576
3189.
Followed by:
Morrison v. Bd. of Educ., 521 F.3d 602, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 7533, 2008 FED App. 146A (6th Cir.) (6th
Cir. Ky. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
521 F.3d 602 p.609
3190.
Followed by:
O'Neill v. Coughlan, 511 F.3d 638, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 327, 2008 FED App. 9P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio
2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
511 F.3d 638 p.639
3191.
Cited by:
Eidson v. Tenn. Dep't of Children's Servs., 510 F.3d 631, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 29400, 2007 FED App.
497P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Tenn. 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
510 F.3d 631 p.638
3192.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Powers v. Hamilton County Pub. Defender Comm'n, 501 F.3d 592, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20607, 2007
FED App. 347P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
501 F.3d 592 p.606
Cited by:
501 F.3d 592 p.605
3193.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Leatherworks P'ship v. Boccia, 246 Fed. Appx. 311, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20692, 2007 FED App. 614N
(6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
246 Fed. Appx. 311 p.317
Cited by:
246 Fed. Appx. 311 p.315
3194.
Distinguished by:
Bowling v. Haeberline, 246 Fed. Appx. 303, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19670, 2007 FED App. 585N (6th Cir.)
(6th Cir. Ky. 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
246 Fed. Appx. 303 p.308
3195.
Followed by, Cited by:
Am. Family Prepaid Legal Corp. v. Columbus Bar Ass'n, 498 F.3d 328, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 16813, 2007
Page 376
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
FED App. 265P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
498 F.3d 328 p.332
Cited by:
498 F.3d 328 p.330
3196.
Followed by:
Squire v. Coughlan, 469 F.3d 551, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 29190, 2006 FED App. 440P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir.
Ohio 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
469 F.3d 551 p.555
3197.
Cited by:
Bates v. Twp. of Van Buren, 459 F.3d 731, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 21303, 2006 FED App. 306P (6th Cir.)
(6th Cir. Mich. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
459 F.3d 731 p.733
3198.
Cited by:
Donkers v. Simon, 173 Fed. Appx. 451, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 8852, 2006 FED App. 244N (6th Cir.), 2006
FED App. 0244N (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Mich. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
173 Fed. Appx. 451 p.453
3199.
Cited by:
Galluzzo v. Champaign County Court of Common Pleas, 168 Fed. Appx. 21, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2689,
2006 FED App. 78N (6th Cir.), 2006 FED App. 0078N (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio 2006)
168 Fed. Appx. 21 p.23
3200.
Cited by:
Cincinnati Sch. Dist. v. Bd. of Educ., 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22497, 2005 FED App. 850N (6th Cir.), 2005
FED App. 0850N (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22497
3201.
Cited by:
Laney Brentwood Homes, LLC v. Town of Collierville, 144 Fed. Appx. 506, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16639,
2005 FED App. 0673N (6th Cir.), 2005 FED App. 673N (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Tenn. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
144 Fed. Appx. 506 p.511
3202.
Followed by, Explained by, Cited by:
Citizens for a Strong Ohio v. Marsh, 123 Fed. Appx. 630, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 67 (6th Cir. Ohio 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
123 Fed. Appx. 630 p.634
Explained by:
123 Fed. Appx. 630 p.633
Cited by:
Page 377
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
123 Fed. Appx. 630 p.631
3203.
Cited by:
Exec. Arts Studio, Inc. v. City of Grand Rapids, 391 F.3d 783, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25448, 2004 FED
App. 425P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Mich. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
391 F.3d 783 p.788
3204.
Cited by:
Bates v. Van Buren Twp., 122 Fed. Appx. 803, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25090 (6th Cir. Mich. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
122 Fed. Appx. 803 p.805
3205.
Followed by:
Hall v. The Beast, 116 Fed. Appx. 557, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25093 (6th Cir. 2004)
116 Fed. Appx. 557 p.558
3206.
Followed by:
Gonnella v. Johnson, 115 Fed. Appx. 770, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 19287 (6th Cir. Tenn. 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
115 Fed. Appx. 770 p.771
3207.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Summers v. Leis, 368 F.3d 881, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10027, 2004 FED App. 148P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir.
Ohio 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
368 F.3d 881 p.890
3208.
Cited by:
Chippewa Trading Co. v. Cox, 365 F.3d 538, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 7442, 2004 FED App. 110P (6th Cir.)
(6th Cir. Mich. 2004)
365 F.3d 538 p.545
3209.
Distinguished by:
Shackleford v. Gutermuth, 93 Fed. Appx. 804, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 6025 (6th Cir. Ky. 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
93 Fed. Appx. 804 p.804
3210.
Cited by:
Cochran v. Mun. Court of Barberton, 91 Fed. Appx. 365, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26196 (6th Cir. Ohio
2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
91 Fed. Appx. 365 p.366
3211.
Cited by:
McDonald v. Tenn., 79 Fed. Appx. 793, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 22314 (6th Cir. Tenn. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
79 Fed. Appx. 793 p.794
Page 378
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3212.
Cited by:
Doscher v. Menifee Circuit Court, 75 Fed. Appx. 996, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 19821 (6th Cir. Ky. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
75 Fed. Appx. 996 p.997
3213.
Followed by:
Leveye v. Metro. Pub. Defender's Office, 73 Fed. Appx. 792, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16079 (6th Cir. Tenn.
2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
73 Fed. Appx. 792 p.794
3214.
Followed by:
Gorenc v. City of Westland, 72 Fed. Appx. 336, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15578 (6th Cir. Mich. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
72 Fed. Appx. 336 p.338
3215.
Followed by, Cited by:
Loch v. Watkins, 337 F.3d 574, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14330, 2003 FED App. 234P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir.
Mich. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
337 F.3d 574 p.578
Cited by:
337 F.3d 574 p.577
3216.
Cited by:
Crim v. Thompson, 69 Fed. Appx. 276, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12793 (6th Cir. Tenn. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
69 Fed. Appx. 276 p.278
3217.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Tesmer v. Granholm, 333 F.3d 683, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11880, 2003 FED App. 202P (6th Cir.), 55 Fed.
R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1355 (6th Cir. Mich. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
333 F.3d 683 p.704
Cited by:
333 F.3d 683 p.688
333 F.3d 683 p.690
3218.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Explained by:
Habich v. City of Dearborn, 331 F.3d 524, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11290, 2003 FED App. 182P (6th Cir.)
(6th Cir. Mich. 2003)
Distinguished by:
331 F.3d 524 p.530
Followed by:
331 F.3d 524 p.530
Page 379
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Explained by:
331 F.3d 524 p.530
3219.
Followed by:
Garter Belt v. Van Buren Twp., 66 Fed. Appx. 612, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11107 (6th Cir. Mich. 2003)
66 Fed. Appx. 612 p.614
3220.
Followed by:
Furr-Barry v. Underwood, 59 Fed. Appx. 796, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 4798 (6th Cir. Tenn. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
59 Fed. Appx. 796 p.797
3221.
Followed by:
Fuller v. Jolly, 41 Fed. Appx. 821, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16236 (6th Cir. Tenn. 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
41 Fed. Appx. 821 p.822
3222.
Cited by:
Moniz v. Costello, 41 Fed. Appx. 782, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15395 (6th Cir. Mich. 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
41 Fed. Appx. 782 p.783
3223.
Followed by:
Tesmer v. Granholm, 295 F.3d 536, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 13148, 2002 FED App. 220P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir.
Mich. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
295 F.3d 536 p.540
295 F.3d 536 p.543
3224.
Followed by:
Branham v. Adair, 39 Fed. Appx. 229, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 12783 (6th Cir. Mich. 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
39 Fed. Appx. 229 p.230
3225.
Followed by:
Miskowski v. Peppler, 36 Fed. Appx. 556, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 11970 (6th Cir. Mich. 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
36 Fed. Appx. 556 p.557
3226.
Cited by:
Tri-Corp Mgmt. Co. v. Praznik, 33 Fed. Appx. 742, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 6199 (6th Cir. Ohio 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
33 Fed. Appx. 742 p.750
3227.
Followed by, Cited by:
Armco, Inc. v. USW, AFL-CIO, Local 169, 280 F.3d 669, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1824, 2002 FED App. 51P
(6th Cir.), 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2401, 145 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11252 (6th Cir. Ohio 2002) LexisNexis
Page 380
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
280 F.3d 669 p.682
Cited by:
280 F.3d 669 p.672
280 F.3d 669 p.681
3228.
Cited by:
Bailey v. Columbus Bar Ass'n, 25 Fed. Appx. 225, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24479 (6th Cir. Ohio 2001)
25 Fed. Appx. 225 p.227
3229.
Cited by:
Tindall v. Wayne County Friend of the Court, 269 F.3d 533, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21877, 2001 FED App.
369P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Mich. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
269 F.3d 533 p.538
3230.
Followed by, Cited by:
Ken-N.K., Inc. v. Vernon Twp., 18 Fed. Appx. 319, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19453 (6th Cir. Mich. 2001)
Followed by:
18 Fed. Appx. 319 p.325
Cited by:
18 Fed. Appx. 319 p.323
3231.
Followed by, Cited by:
Meyers v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, 23 Fed. Appx. 201, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18116 (6th
Cir. Ohio 2001)
Followed by:
23 Fed. Appx. 201 p.205
Cited by:
23 Fed. Appx. 201 p.202
3232.
Cited by:
Camall Co. v. Steadfast Ins. Co. (In re Camall Co.), 16 Fed. Appx. 403, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 17243 (6th
Cir. Mich. 2001)
16 Fed. Appx. 403 p.409
3233.
Cited by:
Grendell v. Ohio Supreme Court, 252 F.3d 828, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11593, 2001 FED App. 186P (6th
Cir.), 2001 FED App. 0186P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
252 F.3d 828 p.834
3234.
Followed by:
Wong-Opasi v. Haynes, 8 Fed. Appx. 340, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 4481 (6th Cir. Tenn. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
8 Fed. Appx. 340 p.342
Page 381
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3235.
Followed by:
Bodell v. McDonald, 4 Fed. Appx. 276, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2493 (6th Cir. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
4 Fed. Appx. 276 p.279
3236.
Followed by:
Bunting v. Gray, 2 Fed. Appx. 443, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 1142 (6th Cir. Mich. 2001)
2 Fed. Appx. 443 p.446
3237.
Followed by:
Evans v. Yarbrough, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 33384 (6th Cir. Ohio Dec. 13, 2000)
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 33384
3238.
Cited by:
Brown v. Ohio Disciplinary Counsel, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23662 (6th Cir. Ohio Sept. 18, 2000)
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23662
3239.
Cited by:
Mummert v. Lytten, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19209 (6th Cir. Ohio Aug. 7, 2000)
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19209
3240.
Cited by:
NGS Am., Inc. v. Jefferson, 218 F.3d 519, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15521, 2000 FED App. 0216P (6th Cir.),
2000 FED App. 216P (6th Cir.), 24 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1971 (6th Cir. Mich. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
218 F.3d 519 p.523
3241.
Followed by:
Mackenzie v. Green, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15583 (6th Cir. Ky. June 27, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15583
3242.
Cited by:
Louisville Country Club v. Kentucky Comm'n on Human Rights, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15726 (6th Cir. Ky.
June 26, 2000)
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15726
3243.
Followed by:
GTE North, Inc. v. Strand, 209 F.3d 909, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 7024, 2000 FED App. 0141P (6th Cir.),
2000 FED App. 141P (6th Cir.), 31 Comm. Reg. (P & F) 367 (6th Cir. Mich. 2000)
209 F.3d 909 p.920
3244.
Followed by:
Cooper v. Parrish, 203 F.3d 937, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1718, 2000 FED App. 0047P (6th Cir.), 2000 FED
Page 382
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
App. 47P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Tenn. 2000)
203 F.3d 937 p.954
3245.
Followed by:
Lutz v. Calme, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 29766 (6th Cir. Ky. Nov. 9, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 29766
3246.
Cited by:
Walker v. Minton, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 15624 (6th Cir. Ky. July 7, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 15624
3247.
Followed by:
Jancuk v. Donofrio, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8735 (6th Cir. Ohio May 4, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8735
3248.
Followed by:
Robinson v. Criminal Court Clerk, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8353 (6th Cir. Tenn. Apr. 26, 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8353
3249.
Distinguished by:
Louisville Country Club v. Watts, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7828 (6th Cir. Ky. Apr. 16, 1999)
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7828
3250.
Followed by:
Associated Gen. Contrs. of Am. v. City of Columbus, 172 F.3d 411, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 5319, 1999 FED
App. 0114P (6th Cir.), 1999 FED App. 114P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
172 F.3d 411 p.416
3251.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Brown v. Tidwell, 169 F.3d 330, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2502, 1999 FED App. 0058P (6th Cir.), 1999 FED
App. 58P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Tenn. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
169 F.3d 330 p.332
Cited by:
169 F.3d 330 p.331
3252.
Cited by:
Cagney v. Manning, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 9503 (6th Cir. Mich. May 7, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 9503
3253.
Distinguished by:
Gottfried v. Medical Planning Servs., 142 F.3d 326, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7483, 1998 FED App. 113P
(6th Cir.), 1998 FED App. 0113P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 383
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
142 F.3d 326 p.329
3254.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Carroll v. City of Mount Clemens, 139 F.3d 1072, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5262, 1998 FED App. 88P (6th
Cir.), 1998 FED App. 0088P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Mich. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8,
HN9
Followed by:
139 F.3d 1072 p.1075
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
139 F.3d 1072 p.1077
Cited by:
139 F.3d 1072 p.1073
3255.
Cited by:
Davidson v. Eblen, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 2136 (6th Cir. Tenn. Feb. 10, 1998)
3256.
Cited by:
Slyman v. City of Willoughby, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 955 (6th Cir. Ohio Jan. 16, 1998)
3257.
Cited by:
Northern Ky. Right to Life Comm. v. Kentucky Registry of Election Fin., 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 495 (6th
Cir. Ky. Jan. 7, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3258.
Cited by:
Haley v. Ferguson, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 35519 (6th Cir. Ohio Dec. 12, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
3259.
Cited by:
NRA of Am. v. Magaw, 132 F.3d 272, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 32955, 1997 FED App. 345P (6th Cir.), 1997
FED App. 0345P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Mich. 1997)
132 F.3d 272 p.294
3260.
Cited by:
Fieger v. Thomas, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 27919 (6th Cir. Mich. Oct. 6, 1997)
3261.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Turner, 125 F.3d 324, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23551, 1997 FED App. 270P (6th Cir.), 1997 FED
App. 0270P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Tenn. 1997)
125 F.3d 324 p.332
3262.
Cited by:
Patmon v. Thomas, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13235 (6th Cir. Mich. June 4, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
3263.
Cited by:
MacDonald v. Gaskin, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 12025 (6th Cir. Mich. May 20, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
3264.
Cited by:
Page 384
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Harper v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Supreme Court of Ohio, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10610 (6th Cir.
Ohio May 2, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
3265.
Cited by:
GTE Mobilnet v. Johnson, 111 F.3d 469, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 7646, 1997 FED App. 137P (6th Cir.),
1997 FED App. 0137P (6th Cir.), 7 Comm. Reg. (P & F) 700 (6th Cir. Ohio 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
111 F.3d 469 p.472
111 F.3d 469 p.481
3266.
Followed by, Cited by:
Hayse v. Wethington, 110 F.3d 18, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 6423, 1997 FED App. 113P (6th Cir.), 1997 FED
App. 0113P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ky. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
110 F.3d 18 p.20
Cited by:
110 F.3d 18 p.19
3267.
Cited by:
Wheat v. Jessamine Journal Newspaper, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22597 (6th Cir. Aug. 20, 1996)
3268.
Cited by:
McKinney v. Kentucky State Bd. of Examiners & Registration of Architects, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22492
(6th Cir. Ky. Aug. 7, 1996)
3269.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Children's Healthcare is a Legal Duty v. Deters, 92 F.3d 1412, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19208, 1996 FED
App. 253P (6th Cir.), 1996 FED App. 0253P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
92 F.3d 1412 p.1421
3270.
Cited by:
Butler v. Hosking, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22560 (6th Cir. Tenn. Aug. 1, 1996)
3271.
Cited by:
Guess v. Hocking County Childrens Servs. Bd., 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22452 (6th Cir. Aug. 1, 1996)
3272.
Cited by:
Harvin v. Stephens, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19121 (6th Cir. Mich. July 2, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
3273.
Cited by:
Alabama ex rel. Governor v. Engler, 85 F.3d 1205, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 14161, 1996 FED App. 0164P
(6th Cir.), 1996 FED App. 164P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Mich. 1996)
85 F.3d 1205 p.1208
3274.
Cited by:
Fieger v. Thomas, 74 F.3d 740, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1748, 1996 FED App. 0044P (6th Cir.), 1996 FED
App. 44P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Mich. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
74 F.3d 740 p.742
74 F.3d 740 p.750
Page 385
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3275.
Cited by:
Worrall ex rel. Worrall v. Irwin, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 36913 (6th Cir. Sept. 26, 1995)
3276.
Cited by:
Long v. Chapleau, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 36067 (6th Cir. Ky. Sept. 22, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3277.
Cited by:
Boyd v. Michigan Supreme Court, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 36181 (6th Cir. Mich. Sept. 8, 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3278.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Brindley v. McCullen, 61 F.3d 507, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 20816, 1995 FED App. 240P (6th Cir.), 1995
FED App. 0240P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Mich. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
61 F.3d 507 p.510
Cited by:
61 F.3d 507 p.508
3279.
Cited by:
Beeman v. Stafford, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22541 (6th Cir. Ohio Aug. 1, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
3280.
Cited by:
Coalition for Health Concern v. LWD, Inc., 60 F.3d 1188, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19911, 1995 FED App.
222P (6th Cir.), 1995 FED App. 0222P (6th Cir.), 41 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1748, 25 Envtl. L. Rep. 21408
(6th Cir. Ky. 1995)
60 F.3d 1188 p.1193
3281.
Cited by:
Coalition for Health Concern v. LWD Inc., 41 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1748 (6th Cir. Ky. July 27, 1995)
41 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1748 p.1753
3282.
Cited by:
Schilling v. White, 58 F.3d 1081, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16423, 1995 FED App. 0199P (6th Cir.), 1995
FED App. 199P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
58 F.3d 1081 p.1084
3283.
Cited by:
Millington Homes Investors v. City of Millington, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17530 (6th Cir. Tenn. July 3,
1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3284.
Cited by:
Mercer v. Fayette Circuit Court, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9051 (6th Cir. Ky. Apr. 13, 1995)
3285.
Cited by:
Abdullah v. Harrington, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6448 (6th Cir. Tenn. Mar. 28, 1995)
3286.
Cited by:
Page 386
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Arlans Agency v. Gossett, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1175 (6th Cir. Mich. Jan. 19, 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
3287.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Kelm v. Hyatt, 44 F.3d 415, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 815, 1995 FED App. 0025P (6th Cir.), 1995 FED App.
25P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
44 F.3d 415 p.419
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
44 F.3d 415 p.422
Cited by:
44 F.3d 415 p.418
3288.
Cited by:
Hardenberg v. Virginia, 42 F.3d 986, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34331, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P76222, 32
Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 520 (6th Cir. Ohio 1994)
42 F.3d 986 p.988
3289.
Cited by:
Hardenberg v. Virginia, DMV (In re Hardenberg), 42 F.3d 986, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34331, 1994 FED
App. 0406P (6th Cir.), 1994 FED App. 406P (6th Cir.), Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P76222, 32 Collier Bankr.
Cas. 2d (MB) 520 (6th Cir. Ohio 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
3290.
Cited by:
Scott v. Hall, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 22583 (6th Cir. Mich. Aug. 17, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3291.
Cited by:
Cohn v. Bracy, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 16917 (6th Cir. Tenn. July 6, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3292.
Cited by:
Wallace v. Hayse, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11284 (6th Cir. Ky. May 16, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3293.
Cited by:
G & V Lounge v. Michigan Liquor Control Comm'n, 23 F.3d 1071, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10610, 1994
FED App. 0146P (6th Cir.), 1994 FED App. 146P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Mich. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
23 F.3d 1071 p.1077
3294.
Followed by, Cited by:
Mann v. Conlin, 22 F.3d 100, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7433, 1994 FED App. 0122P (6th Cir.), 1994 FED
App. 122P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Mich. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
22 F.3d 100 p.101
Cited by:
22 F.3d 100 p.105
3295.
Cited by:
Baskin v. Bath Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 15 F.3d 569, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1660, 1994 FED App.
Page 387
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
0030P (6th Cir.), 1994 FED App. 30P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio 1994)
15 F.3d 569 p.571
3296.
Cited by:
Nguyen v. Michigan, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19627 (6th Cir. Mich. July 27, 1993)
3297.
Cited by:
Logsdon v. Cowherd, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11697 (6th Cir. May 18, 1993)
3298.
Cited by:
Levine v. Torvik, 986 F.2d 1506, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 3213 (6th Cir. Ohio 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
986 F.2d 1506 p.1518
3299.
Followed by:
Berger v. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n, 983 F.2d 718, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 220, 1993-1 Trade Cas.
(CCH) P70106 (6th Cir. Ohio 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
983 F.2d 718 p.722
3300.
Cited by:
Bennett v. Faulkner, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 25961 (6th Cir. Mich. Oct. 7, 1992)
3301.
Cited by:
Randles v. Gregart, 965 F.2d 90, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 11860 (6th Cir. Mich. 1992)
965 F.2d 90 p.91
3302.
Cited by:
Mayfield v. Francks, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 7421 (6th Cir. Apr. 10, 1992)
3303.
Cited by:
Stockler v. Detroit, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 15502 (6th Cir. July 8, 1991)
3304.
Cited by:
Dyck v. McReynolds, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4167 (6th Cir. Mar. 7, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3305.
Distinguished by:
Norfolk & W. R. Co. v. Public Utilities Com., 926 F.2d 567, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 3122 (6th Cir. Ohio
1991)
926 F.2d 567 p.572
3306.
Followed by:
Federal Express Corp. v. Tennessee Public Service Com., 925 F.2d 962, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2261 (6th
Cir. Tenn. 1991)
925 F.2d 962 p.965
925 F.2d 962 p.969
3307.
Followed by:
Sun Refining & Marketing Co. v. Brennan, 921 F.2d 635, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21580, 14 O.S.H. Cas.
(BNA) 1941 (6th Cir. Ohio 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Page 388
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
921 F.2d 635 p.637
921 F.2d 635 p.639
3308.
Cited by:
Alltel Tenn. v. Tennessee Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 913 F.2d 305, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 15727, 68 Rad. Reg. 2d
(P & F) 160, Util. L. Rep. (CCH) P13687 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1990)
913 F.2d 305 p.307
3309.
Followed by:
Foster v. Kassulke, 898 F.2d 1144, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 4216 (6th Cir. Ky. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
898 F.2d 1144 p.1145
898 F.2d 1144 p.1147
3310.
Cited by:
Justice v. Ohio, 889 F.2d 1087, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17570 (6th Cir. Ohio 1989)
3311.
Followed by:
Nilsson v. Ruppert, Bronson & Chicarelli Co., 888 F.2d 452, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16231 (6th Cir. Ohio
1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
888 F.2d 452 p.454
3312.
Cited by:
Michigan Consol. Gas Co. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 887 F.2d 1295, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS
15321, 105 Pub. Util. Rep. 4th (PUR) 526, Util. L. Rep. (CCH) P13586 (6th Cir. Mich. 1989)
887 F.2d 1295 p.1302
3313.
Cited by:
Hulvey v. Hulvey, 886 F.2d 1316, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15016 (6th Cir. Mich. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3314.
Followed by:
CSXT, Inc. v. Pitz, 883 F.2d 468, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12458 (6th Cir. Mich. 1989)
883 F.2d 468 p.474
3315.
Cited by:
Hughes v. Southworth, 875 F.2d 864, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7635 (6th Cir. Mich. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3316.
Cited by:
Stewart v. Rogersville, 870 F.2d 658, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3475 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3317.
Followed by:
Litteral v. Bach, 869 F.2d 297, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2800 (6th Cir. Ky. 1989)
869 F.2d 297 p.298
869 F.2d 297 p.299
Page 389
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3318.
Cited by:
Phillip Diniaco & Sons, Inc. v. Max J. Colvin & Sons Trucking, Inc., 865 F.2d 1269, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS
17526 (6th Cir. Ohio 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3319.
Cited by:
Cotton v. Mansour, 863 F.2d 1241, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16358 (6th Cir. Mich. 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
863 F.2d 1241 p.1249
3320.
Explained by:
Davis v. Crush, 862 F.2d 84, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15650, 12 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 926 (6th Cir.
Ohio 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
862 F.2d 84 p.86
862 F.2d 84 p.91
3321.
Cited by:
Turner v. Tennessee, 858 F.2d 1201, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13913 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
858 F.2d 1201 p.1205
3322.
Followed by, Cited by:
Watts v. Burkhart, 854 F.2d 839, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11071 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
854 F.2d 839 p.844
Cited by:
854 F.2d 839 p.841
3323.
Cited by:
Stimpson v. Stanton, 848 F.2d 194, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7791 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
3324.
Followed by, Cited by:
Feaster v. Miksch, 846 F.2d 21, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 5743 (6th Cir. Ohio 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Followed by:
846 F.2d 21 p.22
Cited by:
846 F.2d 21 p.24
3325.
Cited by:
Steelman v. Mason, 843 F.2d 1392, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4593 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3326.
Cited by:
Hunter v. SMS, Inc., 843 F.2d 1391, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4394 (6th Cir. Mich. 1988)
3327.
Cited by:
Page 390
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Ballard v. Stanton, 833 F.2d 593, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 17708 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
833 F.2d 593 p.594
3328.
Cited by:
Drumm v. Cabinet for Human Resources, 831 F.2d 1063, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 14301 (6th Cir. Ky. 1987)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3329.
Cited by:
Planned Parenthood Asso. v. Cincinnati, 822 F.2d 1390, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8322 (6th Cir. Ohio 1987)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
822 F.2d 1390 p.1395
3330.
Cited by:
Kelley v. Ohio, 818 F.2d 866, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6521 (6th Cir. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
3331.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Parker v. Kentucky, Bd. of Dentistry, 818 F.2d 504, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5783 (6th Cir. Ky. 1987)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
818 F.2d 504 p.505
Followed by:
818 F.2d 504 p.507
3332.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Carras v. Williams, 807 F.2d 1286, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34738 (6th Cir. Mich. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
807 F.2d 1286 p.1290
Cited by:
807 F.2d 1286 p.1287
3333.
Cited by:
Crafton v. Alexander, 810 F.2d 200, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33345 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
3334.
Cited by:
Shelly v. Quinnell, 805 F.2d 1036, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31669 (6th Cir. Mich. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
3335.
Cited by:
Dayton Christian Sch., Inc. v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm'n, 802 F.2d 457, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31436 (6th
Cir. Ohio 1986)
3336.
Followed by, Cited by:
Zalman v. Armstrong, 802 F.2d 199, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31458 (6th Cir. Ky. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3, HN5, HN6
Followed by:
Page 391
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
802 F.2d 199 p.200
Cited by:
802 F.2d 199 p.201
802 F.2d 199 p.202
3337.
Cited by:
Hampton v. Scott, 803 F.2d 719, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31199 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1986)
3338.
Cited by:
Jones v. Shankland, 800 F.2d 77, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 29195 (6th Cir. Ohio 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
800 F.2d 77 p.82
3339.
Cited by:
Williams v. Stanton, 798 F.2d 471, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27877 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3340.
Cited by:
NEW YORK TIMES CO. v. CITY OF LAKEWOOD, 791 F.2d 934, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 19078 (6th Cir.
1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
3341.
Cited by:
Michigan State Chamber of Commerce v. Austin, 788 F.2d 1178, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24500 (6th Cir.
Mich. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN6
788 F.2d 1178 p.1184
3342.
Cited by:
American Elec. Power Co. v. Kentucky Public Service Comm'n, 787 F.2d 588, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS
19442 (6th Cir. Ky. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3343.
Cited by:
Kelly v. Weltman, Weinberg & Assoc. Co., 787 F.2d 590, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 19602 (6th Cir. Ohio
1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3344.
Cited by:
Lesher v. Lavrich, 784 F.2d 193, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22337 (6th Cir. Ohio 1986)
784 F.2d 193 p.194
3345.
Cited by:
RAKAUSKAS v. GARGIULO, 780 F.2d 1022, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 13909 LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3346.
Cited by:
SPENCER v. BLUEGRASS INS. AGENCY, 774 F.2d 1164, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14061 (6th Cir. 1985)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
3347.
Cited by:
SAVAGE v. FRANKLIN CO. WELFARE DEPT., 767 F.2d 921, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14321 (6th Cir.
1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3348.
Cited by:
Page 392
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
JEFFRIES v. McCARTIE, 765 F.2d 145, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14453 LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3349.
Distinguished by:
Traughber v. Beauchane, 760 F.2d 673, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30995 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
760 F.2d 673 p.674
760 F.2d 673 p.676
760 F.2d 673 p.682
3350.
Cited by:
Hadley v. Werner, 753 F.2d 514, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27994 (6th Cir. Mich. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
753 F.2d 514 p.516
3351.
Cited by:
HARMON v. SWAGGERT, 754 F.2d 374, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 13426 (6th Cir. 1984)
3352.
Cited by:
Hutchison v. Marshall, 744 F.2d 44, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18142 (6th Cir. Ohio 1984) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
744 F.2d 44 p.48
3353.
Followed by:
Crawley v. Hamilton County Comm'rs, 744 F.2d 28, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18415 (6th Cir. Ohio 1984)
744 F.2d 28 p.30
3354.
Cited by:
GRAVEDONI v. CITY OF NEGAUNEE, 745 F.2d 56, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 13928 (6th Cir. 1984)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
3355.
Cited by:
Shakur v. Shriver, 740 F.2d 969, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 14151 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1984) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3356.
Cited by:
Executive Art Studio v. Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit Court, 740 F.2d 967, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 14147
(6th Cir. Mich. 1984)
3357.
Cited by:
Security Trust Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 738 F.2d 440, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 14189
(6th Cir. Tenn. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3358.
Cited by:
Pakulski v. Hickey, 731 F.2d 382, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23564 (6th Cir. Ohio 1984)
731 F.2d 382 p.391
3359.
Cited by:
BOYAS EXCAVATING, INC. v. CITY OF INDEPENDENCE, 729 F.2d 1460, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 14698
(6th Cir. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 393
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3360.
Followed by:
Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Baerwaldt, 726 F.2d 296, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25784 (6th Cir. Mich. 1984)
726 F.2d 296 p.299
3361.
Cited by:
Berndt v. Tenn., 727 F.2d 1108, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 14743 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1984)
3362.
Cited by:
MacDONALD v. COTE, 725 F.2d 684, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 12315 (6th Cir. 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3363.
Distinguished by:
Ada-Cascade Watch Co. v. Cascade Resource Recovery, Inc., 720 F.2d 897, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15584,
19 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 2105, 14 Envtl. L. Rep. 20016 (6th Cir. Mich. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6, HN9
720 F.2d 897 p.902
3364.
Cited by:
OHIO v. SLANCO, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 12606 (6th Cir. Sept. 6, 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3365.
Explained by:
American Motors Sales Corp. v. Runke, 708 F.2d 202, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28110 (6th Cir. Ky. 1983)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
708 F.2d 202 p.204
3366.
Distinguished by:
United States v. Anderson County, 705 F.2d 184, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28690, 30 Cont. Cas. Fed. (CCH)
P71060 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1983)
705 F.2d 184 p.185
3367.
Cited by:
DURHAM v. MORROW, 709 F.2d 1501, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 13442 (6th Cir. 1983)
3368.
Followed by:
Palmer v. Schneider, 699 F.2d 322, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30768 (6th Cir. Ohio 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
699 F.2d 322 p.324
3369.
Cited by:
CLARK v. OVERTON, 708 F.2d 722, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 11344 (6th Cir. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
3370.
Cited by:
LARSON v. FRANKLIN CTY. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, 705 F.2d 455, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 11688
(6th Cir. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
3371.
Followed by, Cited by:
Martin-Marietta Corp. v. Bendix Corp., 690 F.2d 558, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25422, Fed. Sec. L. Rep.
(CCH) P98822 (6th Cir. Mich. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN9
Followed by:
Page 394
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
690 F.2d 558 p.564
Cited by:
690 F.2d 558 p.563
3372.
Followed by, Cited by:
WXYZ, Inc. v. Hand, 658 F.2d 420, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18383, 7 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1817 (6th Cir.
Mich. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
658 F.2d 420 p.423
Cited by:
658 F.2d 420 p.422
3373.
Cited by:
HUBBARD v. KENTUCKY REGISTRY OF ELECTION FIN., 663 F.2d 1070, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11027
(6th Cir. 1981)
3374.
Followed by, Cited by:
J.P. v. Desanti, 653 F.2d 1080, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11411 (6th Cir. Ohio 1981)
Followed by:
653 F.2d 1080 p.1081
653 F.2d 1080 p.1083
Cited by:
653 F.2d 1080 p.1082
3375.
Cited by:
Newsom v. Vanderbilt University, 653 F.2d 1100, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12697 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1981)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
653 F.2d 1100 p.1107
3376.
Cited by:
NEWSOM v. VANDERBILT UNIV., 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12690 (6th Cir. June 2, 1981) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3377.
Distinguished by:
Northwood Apartments v. La Valley, 649 F.2d 401, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 13279 (6th Cir. Mich. 1981)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
649 F.2d 401 p.407
3378.
Cited by:
Jolicoeur v. Revell, 642 F.2d 451, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 11000 (6th Cir. Ky. 1980)
3379.
Cited by:
General Motors Corp. v. Buha, 623 F.2d 455, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 16620, 2 Employee Benefits Cas.
(BNA) 2375 (6th Cir. Mich. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
623 F.2d 455 p.459
Page 395
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3380.
Cited by:
Record Revolution No. 6 v. Parma, 638 F.2d 916, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 11628 (6th Cir. Ohio 1980)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
638 F.2d 916 p.925
3381.
Explained by, Cited by:
Hanna v. Toner, 630 F.2d 442, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14419 (6th Cir. Ohio 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
Explained by:
630 F.2d 442 p.444
Cited by:
630 F.2d 442 p.445
3382.
Followed by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Parker v. Turner, 626 F.2d 1, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 15991 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN8, HN9
Followed by:
626 F.2d 1 p.2
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
626 F.2d 1 p.10
Cited by:
626 F.2d 1 p.6
3383.
Cited by:
Kasap v. Moritz, 613 F.2d 138, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 21716 (6th Cir. Ohio 1980)
613 F.2d 138 p.139
3384.
Cited by:
United States v. Ohio, 614 F.2d 101, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9361, 16 Ohio Op. 3d 234, 27 Cont. Cas. Fed.
(CCH) P80061 (6th Cir. Ohio 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3385.
Cited by:
DEMPSEY v. RADAK, 601 F.2d 588, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13454 (6th Cir. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
3386.
Cited by:
Kenner v. Morris, 600 F.2d 22, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 15898 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1979)
600 F.2d 22 p.24
3387.
Cited by:
Gully v. Kunzman, 592 F.2d 283, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 17500 (6th Cir. Ky. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
592 F.2d 283 p.288
3388.
Followed by:
Huynh Thi Anh v. Levi, 586 F.2d 625, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 8286 (6th Cir. Mich. 1978) LexisNexis
Page 396
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5
586 F.2d 625 p.633
3389.
Distinguished by:
Flynt v. Leis, 574 F.2d 874, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11714 (6th Cir. Ohio 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
574 F.2d 874 p.875
3390.
Followed by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. Kiroff, 549 F.2d 1052, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 10266 (6th Cir. Ohio 1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN5, HN6
Followed by:
549 F.2d 1052 p.1054
549 F.2d 1052 p.1057
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
549 F.2d 1052 p.1063
3391.
Explained by:
Louisville Area Inter-Faith Committee for United Farm Workers v. Nottingham Liquors, Ltd., 542 F.2d 652,
1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6875, 93 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2600, 79 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11762 (6th Cir. Ky. 1976)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
542 F.2d 652 p.653
542 F.2d 652 p.654
3392.
Cited by:
Forest Hills Utility Co. v. Heath, 539 F.2d 592, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7850 (6th Cir. Ohio 1976)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
539 F.2d 592 p.595
539 F.2d 592 p.596
3393.
Cited by:
Littleton v. Fisher, 530 F.2d 691, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12847 (6th Cir. Ohio 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
530 F.2d 691 p.693
3394.
Cited by:
Lambert v. Turner, 525 F.2d 1101, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11839 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
525 F.2d 1101 p.1103
3395.
Cited by:
Muskegon Theatres, Inc. v. Muskegon, 507 F.2d 199, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 5782 (6th Cir. Mich. 1974)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
507 F.2d 199 p.205
3396.
Cited by:
Page 397
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cox v. Turley, 506 F.2d 1347, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 5935 (6th Cir. Ky. 1974)
506 F.2d 1347 p.1356
3397.
Cited by:
International News Distributors, Inc. v. Shriver, 488 F.2d 1350, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6385 (6th Cir.
Tenn. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
488 F.2d 1350 p.1352
3398.
Cited by:
Armour & Co. v. Ball, 468 F.2d 76, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7190 (6th Cir. Mich. 1972)
468 F.2d 76 p.78
3399.
Explained by:
Gay v. Board of Registration Comm'rs, 466 F.2d 879, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7729 (6th Cir. Ky. 1972)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
466 F.2d 879 p.883
466 F.2d 879 p.885
3400.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Morgan v. Rhodes, 456 F.2d 608, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11280, 62 Ohio Op. 2d 217 (6th Cir. Ohio 1972)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
456 F.2d 608 p.622
3401.
Cited by:
American News Co. v. Ladas, 454 F.2d 1237, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11528 (6th Cir. Mich. 1972)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
454 F.2d 1237 p.1238
454 F.2d 1237 p.1239
3402.
Cited by:
Hammond v. Brown, 450 F.2d 480, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7467, 64 Ohio Op. 2d 255 (6th Cir. Ohio 1971)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
450 F.2d 480 p.481
3403.
Cited by:
King v. Jones, 450 F.2d 478, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7466 (6th Cir. Ohio 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
450 F.2d 478 p.479
3404.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Scott v. Hill, 449 F.2d 634, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7706 (6th Cir. Ky. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
Followed by:
449 F.2d 634 p.640
449 F.2d 634 p.641
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Page 398
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
449 F.2d 634 p.641
449 F.2d 634 p.642
6TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
3405.
Cited by:
Irvin v. City of Clarksville Police Dep't, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106158 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 13, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106158
3406.
Cited by:
Kolley v. Adult Prot. Servs., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96292 ( E.D. Mich. Oct. 16, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96292
3407.
Cited by:
Baxter v. Daughtery, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92882 (E.D. Ky. Sept. 30, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92882
3408.
Cited by:
Stapleton v. Butler County Comm'rs, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89480 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 10, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89480
3409.
Cited by:
Walker v. O'Brien, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76940 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 26, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76940
3410.
Followed by:
Petrey v. Bartlett, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76134 (E.D. Ky. Aug. 26, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76134
3411.
Cited by:
Minor v. McCloud, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76098 (E.D. Ky. Aug. 26, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76098
3412.
Cited by:
Horacek v. Seaman, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82451 ( E.D. Mich. Aug. 20, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82451
3413.
Followed by:
Keenan v. Bagley, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81553 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 18, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81553
3414.
Followed by:
Page 399
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5455 Clarkins Drive, Inc. v. Poole, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80456 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 17, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80456
3415.
Followed by:
Flessner v. Stone, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72269 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 7, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72269
3416.
Followed by:
Hamilton v. City of Louisville, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69369 (W.D. Ky. Aug. 7, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69369
3417.
Cited by:
Robinson v. Michigan, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84814 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 4, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84814
3418.
Followed by:
Rayner v. City of Louisville Metro, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65931 (W.D. Ky. July 29, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65931
3419.
Followed by:
Wiley v. Chauvin, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63782 (W.D. Ky. July 23, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63782
3420.
Cited by:
Fentress v. Gassaway, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63282 (M.D. Tenn. July 22, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63282
3421.
Cited by:
Wynkoop v. Linderman, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60567 (W.D. Mich. July 15, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60567
3422.
Followed by:
White v. Brand, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59676 (E.D. Tenn. July 13, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59676
3423.
Followed by, Explained by:
Boussum v. Collins, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57754 (S.D. Ohio July 8, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
Followed by:
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57754
Page 400
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Explained by:
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57754
3424.
Followed by:
Wideman v. Montano, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57598 (W.D. Ky. July 7, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57598
3425.
Cited by:
Lowe v. Ballou, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56631 (E.D. Ky. July 1, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56631
3426.
Followed by:
Rondigo, LLC v. Twp. of Richmond, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71721 ( E.D. Mich. June 24, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71721
3427.
Cited by:
Boussum v. Collins, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47793 (S.D. Ohio June 1, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47793
3428.
Cited by:
Bryson v. Blackwelder, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44660 (E.D. Tenn. May 28, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44660
3429.
Cited by:
Cook v. Lamberth, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41760 (M.D. Tenn. May 15, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41760
3430.
Cited by:
G.B. v. Rogers, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44055 (S.D. Ohio May 11, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44055
3431.
Followed by:
Tillman v. Patrick, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36566 (E.D. Ky. Apr. 28, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36566
3432.
Cited by:
Vanblarcom v. Pulley, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31778 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 14, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31778
3433.
Followed by:
Watkins v. Howerton, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31228 (E.D. Ky. Apr. 13, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31228
Page 401
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3434.
Followed by:
Lewis v. N. Am. Specialty Ins. Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29406 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 7, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29406
3435.
Followed by:
Smith v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Gov't, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28273 (E.D. Ky. Mar. 30, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28273
3436.
Followed by:
Flinn v. Corbitt, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24232 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 23, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24232
3437.
Cited by:
Devlin v. Kalm, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21809 ( E.D. Mich. Mar. 18, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21809
3438.
Followed by:
Whittiker v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 605 F. Supp. 2d 914, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21289 (N.D. Ohio
2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
605 F. Supp. 2d 914 p.922
3439.
Followed by:
Ealy v. Rankin, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19573 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 12, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19573
3440.
Followed by:
Morris v. City of Shepherdsville, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16894 (W.D. Ky. Mar. 4, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16894
3441.
Cited by:
Faller v. AG of Ky. Ky. Bureau of Investigation, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16409 (W.D. Ky. Mar. 2, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16409
3442.
Followed by:
Ryan v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15359 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 27, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15359
3443.
Followed by:
Webb v. Strode, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13249 (W.D. Ky. Feb. 19, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13249
Page 402
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3444.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Keith v. City of Shepherdsville, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11576 (W.D. Ky. Feb. 13, 2009)
Distinguished by:
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11576
Followed by:
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11576
3445.
Cited by:
Clark v. Murphy, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30227 ( E.D. Mich. Feb. 10, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30227
3446.
Followed by:
Jones v. State, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10903 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 10, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10903
3447.
Cited by:
Brooks v. Butzbaugh, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8810 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 6, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8810
3448.
Followed by:
Van Wulfen v. County of Montmorency, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8749 ( E.D. Mich. Feb. 6, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8749
3449.
Followed by, Cited by:
Am. Express Travel Related Servs. v. Kentucky, 597 F. Supp. 2d 717, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5645 (E.D.
Ky. 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
597 F. Supp. 2d 717 p.722
Cited by:
597 F. Supp. 2d 717 p.721
3450.
Cited by:
Whittiker v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 605 F. Supp. 2d 914, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52075 (N.D. Ohio
2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
605 F. Supp. 2d 914 p.940
3451.
Followed by:
Dumas v. Hilbrecht, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4722 (W.D. Ky. Jan. 21, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4722
3452.
Followed by:
Johnson v. Catalano, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6664 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 12, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6664
Page 403
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3453.
Distinguished by:
Kerper-Snyder v. Multi-County Juvenile Attention Sys., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5360 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 12,
2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5360
3454.
Cited by:
Flinn v. Tennessee, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1793 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 9, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1793
3455.
Cited by:
Huff v. Sullivan County Jail, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102571 (E.D. Tenn. Dec. 18, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102571
3456.
Followed by:
Columbus Rehab. & Subacute Inst. v. Franklin County Dep't of Job & Family Servs., 2008 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 102093 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 17, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102093
3457.
Followed by, Cited by:
Smith v. Encore Credit Corp., 623 F. Supp. 2d 910, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99413 (N.D. Ohio 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
623 F. Supp. 2d 910 p.918
Cited by:
623 F. Supp. 2d 910 p.914
3458.
Followed by:
Smith v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Gov't, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97657 (E.D. Ky. Dec. 2, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97657
3459.
Followed by:
Roark v. Smith, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90551 (E.D. Ky. Nov. 6, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90551
3460.
Cited by:
Dyer v. State, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111715 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 24, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111715
3461.
Followed by:
Skidmore v. Hensley, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82180 (E.D. Ky. Oct. 15, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82180
Page 404
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3462.
Followed by:
Mischler v. Lambert, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71559 (W.D. Ky. Sept. 19, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71559
3463.
Followed by:
Eaton v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Gov't, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69859 (E.D. Ky. Sept. 12, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN9
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69859
3464.
Followed by:
Camp v. City of Charlevoix, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67888 (W.D. Mich. Sept. 8, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67888
3465.
Followed by:
Crenshaw v. City of Cincinnati, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76953 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 29, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76953
3466.
Followed by:
Cromer v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Gov't, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65374 (E.D. Ky. Aug. 25, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65374
3467.
Followed by:
Chong Su v. Curee, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64365 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 20, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64365
3468.
Followed by:
Danner v. Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility of the Tenn. Supreme Court, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60038 (M.D.
Tenn. Aug. 4, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60038
3469.
Followed by:
U.S. Diamond & Gold v. Julius Klein Diamonds LLC, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57825 (S.D. Ohio July 29,
2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57825
3470.
Followed by:
Jenkins v. Moyer, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78759 (S.D. Ohio July 28, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78759
3471.
Distinguished by:
Carter v. Carter, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107684 ( E.D. Mich. July 22, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107684
Page 405
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3472.
Cited by:
Dickson v. Sevier County Sheriff's Dep't, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58293 (E.D. Tenn. July 18, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58293
3473.
Followed by:
Flanery v. Lynhart, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55543 (E.D. Ky. July 18, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55543
3474.
Followed by:
Butler v. Tennessee, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52967 (W.D. Tenn. July 10, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52967
3475.
Cited by:
Wellman v. Nat'l City Mortg. Co., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44067 (S.D. Ohio June 4, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44067
3476.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Crenshaw v. Cincinnati Police Dep't, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81858 (S.D. Ohio May 20, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81858
Followed by:
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81858
3477.
Cited by:
Muhammad v. Paruk, 553 F. Supp. 2d 893, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39965 ( E.D. Mich. 2008)
553 F. Supp. 2d 893 p.897
3478.
Cited by:
Borden v. Raley, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38376 (W.D. Ky. May 12, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38376
3479.
Cited by:
Belle v. First Franklin, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38262 ( E.D. Mich. May 12, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38262
3480.
Followed by:
Townsend v. Neithercut, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32017 ( E.D. Mich. Apr. 18, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32017
Page 406
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3481.
Followed by:
Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Columbus, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25084 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 28, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25084
3482.
Cited by:
Dudley v. Michalak, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21470 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 19, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21470
3483.
Followed by:
Lake v. Granholm, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20759 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 17, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20759
3484.
Cited by:
Kantner Ingredients, Inc. v. All Am. Dairy Prods., 535 F. Supp. 2d 880, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15048 (N.D.
Ohio 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
535 F. Supp. 2d 880 p.883
3485.
Followed by:
Nash v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12884 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 21, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12884
3486.
Cited by:
Baker v. Warinner, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13350 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 20, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13350
3487.
Followed by:
Colson v. Negrin, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12722 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 14, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12722
3488.
Cited by:
Novak v. Wash. Mut. Bank, FA, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11228 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 14, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11228
3489.
Cited by:
Robb v. Ishee, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15711 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 13, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15711
3490.
Cited by:
State v. McDonald, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11218 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 12, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11218
3491.
Cited by:
Page 407
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Doyle v. Schumann, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9804 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 11, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9804
3492.
Followed by:
Nettles-Nickerson v. Fischer, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9647 ( E.D. Mich. Feb. 11, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9647
3493.
Cited by:
Jones v. Gambrel, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8865 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 6, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8865
3494.
Followed by:
In re Scott, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7853 ( E.D. Mich. Feb. 4, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7853
3495.
Cited by:
Mowen v. Clermont County, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10074 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10074
3496.
Followed by:
RPD Long Beach v. Tranter-Hare Inv. Bldg. Corp., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6739 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6739
3497.
Cited by:
Lucas v. Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4335 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 22, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4335
3498.
Followed by:
Church Mut. Ins. Co. v. Consumers Energy Co., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 2, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22
3499.
Cited by:
Kircher v. Charter Twp. of Ypsilanti, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94033 ( E.D. Mich. Dec. 21, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94033
3500.
Cited by:
Kircher v. Township of Ypsilanti, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93690 ( E.D. Mich. Dec. 21, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93690
3501.
Cited by:
Page 408
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Huff v. Kingsport City Police Dep't, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89228 (E.D. Tenn. Dec. 4, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89228
3502.
Followed by:
Paris v. State, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86513 ( E.D. Mich. Nov. 26, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86513
3503.
Followed by, Cited by:
Marathon Petroleum Co. LLC v. Stumbo, 528 F. Supp. 2d 639, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85817 (E.D. Ky.
2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
528 F. Supp. 2d 639 p.645
Cited by:
528 F. Supp. 2d 639 p.644
3504.
Followed by:
Ashenhurst v. 27th Dist. Court, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80473 ( E.D. Mich. Oct. 31, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80473
3505.
Cited by:
Am. Family Prepaid Legal Corp. v. Columbus Bar Ass'n, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82429 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 30,
2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82429
3506.
Followed by:
Dung V. Ha v. Weber, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82880 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 25, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82880
3507.
Cited by:
Sturtevant v. Nye, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79107 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 23, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79107
3508.
Cited by:
Draughn v. Lambeas, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76770 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 16, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76770
3509.
Followed by:
Hanna v. N. Cent. Corr. Inst., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76306 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 9, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76306
3510.
Cited by:
Browder v. Motley, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75142 (E.D. Ky. Oct. 8, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 409
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75142
3511.
Cited by:
Word v. Kentucky, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73345 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 1, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73345
3512.
Cited by:
Fieger v. Ferry, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71274 ( E.D. Mich. Sept. 26, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71274
3513.
Cited by:
Oliver v. Bank First, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67035 (N.D. Ohio Sept. 11, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67035
3514.
Followed by:
Fields v. Doe, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65074 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 4, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65074
3515.
Followed by:
Fieger v. Mich. Supreme Court, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64973 ( E.D. Mich. Sept. 4, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64973
3516.
Followed by:
Gray v. Kentucky, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63036 (E.D. Ky. Aug. 27, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63036
3517.
Followed by:
King v. Dann, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62664 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 24, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62664
3518.
Followed by:
Peacock v. PACE Int'l Union Pension Fund Plan, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62471, 42 Employee Benefits
Cas. (BNA) 1696 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 23, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62471
3519.
Followed by:
Mosby v. Baity, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61571 (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 15, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61571
3520.
Cited by:
Dovell v. Guernsey Bank, 373 B.R. 533, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59358 (S.D. Ohio 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
373 B.R. 533 p.538
Page 410
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3521.
Cited by:
Bell v. Jones, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59969 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 14, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59969
3522.
Followed by:
Cheatham v. Kilbane-Koch, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59121 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 13, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59121
3523.
Followed by:
Coopman v. Campbell County Det. Ctr., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58972 (E.D. Ky. Aug. 10, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58972
3524.
Followed by:
Barksdale v. Cuyahoga County, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58620 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 10, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58620
3525.
Cited by:
Dovell v. The Guernsey Bank, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58312 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 9, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58312
3526.
Followed by:
Richardson v. Ky. Dep't of Pub. Advocacy, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54119 (E.D. Ky. July 26, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54119
3527.
Cited by:
Perry v. Wilson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53893 (N.D. Ohio July 25, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53893
3528.
Followed by:
Sims v. Becker, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54300 (W.D. Mich. July 24, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54300
3529.
Followed by:
Maroney v. Taylor, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53762 (E.D. Tenn. July 23, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53762
3530.
Followed by:
Lockhart v. Stuart, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53758 (E.D. Tenn. July 23, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 411
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53758
3531.
Cited by:
Green v. Haynes, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97222 (M.D. Tenn. July 13, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97222
3532.
Cited by:
Humphress v. Kentucky Taylor County Dist. Court, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51758 (W.D. Ky. July 13, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51758
3533.
Cited by:
Smith v. ABN AMRO Mortg. Group, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49708 (S.D. Ohio July 10, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49708
3534.
Cited by:
Kovacic v. Cuyahoga County Dep't of Children & Family Servs., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50046 (N.D. Ohio
July 9, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50046
3535.
Followed by:
Salyers v. Commonwealth, Fayette Circuit Court Div. Eight, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49215 (E.D. Ky. July
6, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49215
3536.
Cited by:
Rayner v. Campbell, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48787 (W.D. Ky. July 3, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48787
3537.
Followed by:
Croney v. Fletcher, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46344 (E.D. Ky. June 26, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46344
3538.
Followed by:
Green v. Kingsport Police Dep't, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43925 (E.D. Tenn. June 15, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43925
3539.
Followed by:
Sims v. Becker, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56748 (W.D. Mich. June 13, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56748
3540.
Cited by:
Page 412
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Mix v. City of Hazel Park, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42206 ( E.D. Mich. June 11, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42206
3541.
Cited by:
Thornton v. Kentucky, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41344 (W.D. Ky. June 5, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41344
3542.
Followed by:
Beaumont v. Morris, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39497 (W.D. Ky. May 29, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39497
3543.
Followed by:
Physician Servs., P.S.C. v. Birdwhistle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38859 (E.D. Ky. May 29, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN9
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38859
3544.
Followed by:
Fogarty v. Commonwealth, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36037 (E.D. Ky. May 16, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36037
3545.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Bredesen, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33897 (M.D. Tenn. May 8, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33897
3546.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Air Evac EMS, Inc. v. Robinson, 486 F. Supp. 2d 713, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33330 (M.D. Tenn. 2007)
Distinguished by:
486 F. Supp. 2d 713 p.719
Cited by:
486 F. Supp. 2d 713 p.715
3547.
Followed by:
Michel v. City of Akron, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33452 (N.D. Ohio May 7, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33452
3548.
Cited by:
Billock v. Wyandot County Children's Servs., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32704 (N.D. Ohio May 3, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32704
3549.
Followed by:
Kircher v. Charter Twp. of Ypsilanti, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32560 ( E.D. Mich. May 3, 2007) LexisNexis
Page 413
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32560
3550.
Cited by:
An African-Descendent v. United States Fed. Gov't, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33222 (M.D. Tenn. May 2,
2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33222
3551.
Followed by:
Barnett v. Clark, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30610 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 25, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30610
3552.
Cited by:
Ortiz v. Karnes, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28321 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 17, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28321
3553.
Cited by:
Dwayne B. v. Granholm, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28265 ( E.D. Mich. Apr. 17, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28265
3554.
Cited by:
Copeland v. City of Akron, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26538 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 10, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26538
3555.
Cited by:
Gruttadauria v. Fazio, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26394 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 9, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26394
3556.
Cited by:
Smith v. Palasades Collection, LLC, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28348 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 3, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28348
3557.
Followed by:
Driving Sch. Ass'n of Ohio v. Shipley, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23644 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 30, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23644
3558.
Cited by:
Jackim v. City of Brooklyn, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20355 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 22, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20355
Page 414
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3559.
Followed by:
Hooters of Troy, Inc. v. City of Troy, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15969 ( E.D. Mich. Mar. 7, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15969
3560.
Cited by:
Eidson v. Tenn. Dep't of Children's Servs., 477 F. Supp. 2d 923, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15923 (E.D. Tenn.
2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
477 F. Supp. 2d 923 p.925
3561.
Cited by:
Hann v. Michigan, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25904 ( E.D. Mich. Mar. 2, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25904
3562.
Followed by:
Woosley v. City of Paris, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9917 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 13, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9917
3563.
Followed by:
Danner v. Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10900 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 12, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10900
3564.
Followed by:
McLynas v. Tennessee, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7477 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 2, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7477
3565.
Distinguished by:
O'Neill v. Coughlan, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5760 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 26, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5760
3566.
Cited by:
Word v. Gilford, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5516 (W.D. Ky. Jan. 25, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5516
3567.
Cited by:
Harajli v. Naser, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15297 ( E.D. Mich. Jan. 18, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15297
3568.
Followed by:
Gilbert v. Johnson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3790 (E.D. Ky. Jan. 18, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3790
3569.
Followed by:
Jeffers v. Bd. of Comm'rs, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3123 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 16, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 415
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3123
3570.
Followed by:
Rishton v. Sullivan County, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2040 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 4, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2040
3571.
Cited by:
Smith v. Williamson County Pub. Defender's Office, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 630 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 4, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 630
3572.
Followed by:
Grider v. Irvin, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92199 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 19, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92199
3573.
Followed by:
Jackim v. City of Brooklyn, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91052 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 18, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91052
3574.
Cited by:
In re Haney, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93136 (E.D. Tenn. Dec. 14, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93136
3575.
Cited by:
Fieger v. Cox, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88845 ( E.D. Mich. Dec. 8, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88845
3576.
Followed by:
Ortiz v. Karnes, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87616 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 4, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87616
3577.
Followed by:
Jackim v. City of Brooklyn, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84829 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 21, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84829
3578.
Followed by:
Krueger v. Gilligan, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83959 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 17, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83959
3579.
Cited by:
Dickson v. Twp. of Novesta, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83752 ( E.D. Mich. Nov. 6, 2006) LexisNexis
Page 416
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83752
3580.
Followed by:
Gill v. Dep't of Corr., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79969 (E.D. Ky. Nov. 1, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79969
3581.
Followed by:
Grider v. Irvin, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79561 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 31, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79561
3582.
Followed by:
Grider v. Irvin, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78641 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 27, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78641
3583.
Followed by:
Johnson v. State, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76220 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 17, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76220
3584.
Distinguished by:
Wedgewood Ltd. P'ship I v. Twp. of Liberty, 456 F. Supp. 2d 904, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74353 (S.D. Ohio
2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
456 F. Supp. 2d 904 p.930
3585.
Followed by, Explained by:
Kircher v. City of Ypsilanti, 458 F. Supp. 2d 439, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77755 ( E.D. Mich. 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
458 F. Supp. 2d 439 p.451
Explained by:
458 F. Supp. 2d 439 p.450
3586.
Cited by:
Carey v. Wolnitzek, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73869 (E.D. Ky. Oct. 10, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73869
3587.
Followed by:
Allman v. Stilson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74124 (E.D. Ky. Oct. 6, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74124
3588.
Followed by:
Rickels v. Cupp, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72412 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 4, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72412
Page 417
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3589.
Followed by:
Watterson v. Milligan, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72183 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72183
3590.
Followed by:
Allman v. Stilson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65656 (E.D. Ky. Sept. 13, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65656
3591.
Followed by:
Johnson v. Ohio Bd. of Nursing, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67542 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 12, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67542
3592.
Followed by:
Massey v. Edmonson County Soc. Servs. Bureau, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64128 (W.D. Ky. Sept. 6, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64128
3593.
Cited by:
Moore v. Trott & Trott, P.C., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82152 ( E.D. Mich. Aug. 31, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82152
3594.
Cited by:
Martin v. Henry, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54986 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 8, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54986
3595.
Cited by:
Fieger v. Mich. Supreme Court, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48266 ( E.D. Mich. July 17, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN8
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48266
3596.
Cited by:
Lipford v. Ware, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44342 (N.D. Ohio June 29, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44342
3597.
Followed by, Cited by:
O'Neill v. Coughlan, 436 F. Supp. 2d 905, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40028 (N.D. Ohio 2006)
Followed by:
436 F. Supp. 2d 905 p.908
Cited by:
436 F. Supp. 2d 905 p.906
3598.
Distinguished by:
Dimitroff v. State, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38724 (W.D. Mich. June 12, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN9
Page 418
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38724
3599.
Followed by:
Skidmore v. Johnson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38756 (E.D. Ky. June 9, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38756
3600.
Cited by:
Starcher v. Edwardsburg Police Dep't, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38372 (W.D. Mich. June 9, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38372
3601.
Distinguished by:
UEI, Inc. v. Quality Fabricated Metals, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35985 (W.D. Mich. June 1, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35985
3602.
Cited by:
Bullock v. Humpry, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33621 (E.D. Tenn. May 22, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33621
3603.
Followed by:
Am. Family Prepaid Legal Corp. v. Columbus Bar Ass'n, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27437 (S.D. Ohio May 9,
2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27437
3604.
Cited by:
Reeves v. Ratliff, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27960 (E.D. Ky. May 5, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27960
3605.
Followed by:
Roberts v. Roane County Circuit Court, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26494 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 28, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26494
3606.
Cited by:
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Woods, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68570 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 20, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68570
3607.
Cited by:
Myers v. Tennessee, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24171 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 20, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24171
3608.
Followed by:
Odom v. Jensen, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15879 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 419
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15879
3609.
Cited by:
Horton v. Elyria Police, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6493 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 21, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6493
3610.
Distinguished by:
Marshall v. Green County, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5671 (W.D. Ky. Feb. 13, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5671
3611.
Followed by:
BB & T Ins. Servs. v. Ohio Dep't of Ins., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8374 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 9, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN9
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8374
3612.
Followed by:
Faller v. Rogers, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5096 (W.D. Ky. Feb. 8, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5096
3613.
Cited by:
E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Esber Bev. Co., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3244 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 30, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3244
3614.
Followed by:
Lawrence v. 48th Dist. Court, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2679 ( E.D. Mich. Jan. 12, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2679
3615.
Cited by:
Pittman v. Cuyahoga County Dep't of Children & Family Servs., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 331 (N.D. Ohio
Jan. 6, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 331
3616.
Cited by:
Marshall v. Bowles, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33776 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 15, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33776
3617.
Cited by:
David V. v. Bd. of Trs., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33547 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 6, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33547
3618.
Cited by:
Maxwell v. Phillips, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31428 (W.D. Tenn. Nov. 22, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 420
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31428
3619.
Cited by:
Coston v. Petro, 398 F. Supp. 2d 878, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38424 (S.D. Ohio 2005)
398 F. Supp. 2d 878 p.887
3620.
Followed by:
Peebles v. Univ. of Dayton, 412 F. Supp. 2d 814, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40623 (S.D. Ohio 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
412 F. Supp. 2d 814 p.816
3621.
Followed by:
Wilkerson v. Hardesty, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24860 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 25, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24860
3622.
Cited by:
Hedrick v. Coleman, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25302 ( E.D. Mich. Oct. 19, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25302
3623.
Followed by:
Fischer v. Kenton County Judicial Sys., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18776 (E.D. Ky. Aug. 31, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18776
3624.
Cited by:
Salinas v. Bishop, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34813 (E.D. Ky. Aug. 29, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34813
3625.
Followed by:
Lighthouse Cmty. Church of God v. City of Southfield, 382 F. Supp. 2d 937, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17255 (
E.D. Mich. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
382 F. Supp. 2d 937 p.938
3626.
Cited by:
Forgy v. Stumbo, 378 F. Supp. 2d 774, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14968 (E.D. Ky. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4
378 F. Supp. 2d 774 p.777
3627.
Cited by:
Cooper v. Granholm, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35029 ( E.D. Mich. July 15, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35029
Page 421
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3628.
Followed by:
JABR, Inc. v. Hart County Judge Exec., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14225 (W.D. Ky. July 15, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14225
3629.
Followed by, Cited by:
Milgrom v. Burstein, 374 F. Supp. 2d 523, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16325 (E.D. Ky. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN9
Followed by:
374 F. Supp. 2d 523 p.531
Cited by:
374 F. Supp. 2d 523 p.529
3630.
Followed by:
Pinkney v. Ohio, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12257 (N.D. Ohio June 23, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12257
3631.
Followed by:
Bailey v. Moyer, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12248 (S.D. Ohio June 23, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12248
3632.
Cited by:
O.K. Indus. v. City of Flint, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45271 ( E.D. Mich. June 21, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45271
3633.
Followed by:
Cooperwood v. McDonald, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45417 (W.D. Mich. June 13, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45417
3634.
Cited by:
Superior Bev. Co. v. Schieffelin & Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39612 (N.D. Ohio May 31, 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39612
3635.
Followed by:
Sharlow v. Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39944 (W.D. Tenn. May 18, 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39944
3636.
Cited by:
United States v. Gray, 382 F. Supp. 2d 898, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22174 ( E.D. Mich. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
382 F. Supp. 2d 898 p.901
Page 422
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3637.
Followed by:
Borkowski v. Fremont Inv. & Loan, 368 F. Supp. 2d 822, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12905 (N.D. Ohio 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
368 F. Supp. 2d 822 p.828
3638.
Followed by:
Young v. Herald, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38002 (E.D. Ky. May 5, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38002
3639.
Cited by:
Kawecki v. County of Macomb, 367 F. Supp. 2d 1137, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9106 ( E.D. Mich. 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
367 F. Supp. 2d 1137 p.1139
3640.
Cited by:
Holden v. County of Saginaw, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9109 ( E.D. Mich. Apr. 19, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9109
3641.
Cited by:
Holden v. County of Saginaw, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9107 ( E.D. Mich. Feb. 25, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9107
3642.
Followed by:
Coles v. Granville, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 893 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 24, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 893
3643.
Cited by:
Ky. Power Co. v. Huelsmann, 352 F. Supp. 2d 777, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1339 (E.D. Ky. 2005)
352 F. Supp. 2d 777 p.780
3644.
Cited by:
Sentinel Trust Co. v. Lavender, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27259 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 13, 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27259
3645.
Followed by:
Smith v. Oakland County Circuit Court, 344 F. Supp. 2d 1030, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22853 ( E.D. Mich.
2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
344 F. Supp. 2d 1030 p.1068
3646.
Cited by:
Family Trust Found., Inc. v. Wolnitzek, 345 F. Supp. 2d 672, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24458 (E.D. Ky. 2004)
Page 423
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
345 F. Supp. 2d 672 p.689
3647.
Followed by:
Blankenship v. Blackwell, 341 F. Supp. 2d 911, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21002, 59 Fed. R. Serv. 3d
(Callaghan) 1150 (S.D. Ohio 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
341 F. Supp. 2d 911 p.918
3648.
Cited by:
Monongahela Power Co. v. Schriber, 322 F. Supp. 2d 902, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11739 (S.D. Ohio 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
322 F. Supp. 2d 902 p.914
3649.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Albarado v. Ky. Racing Comm'n, 496 F. Supp. 2d 795, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30566 (W.D. Ky. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
496 F. Supp. 2d 795 p.801
Cited by:
496 F. Supp. 2d 795 p.800
3650.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
James v. Stengel, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4118 (W.D. Ky. Mar. 16, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4118
Followed by:
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4118
3651.
Cited by:
Clovelly Corp. v. City of Traverse City, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1458 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 26, 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1458
3652.
Followed by:
Ky. Power Co. v. Huelsman, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24415 (E.D. Ky. Dec. 18, 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24415
3653.
Cited by:
Williams v. 36th Judicial Court, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27327 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 10, 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27327
3654.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Crowe, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24291 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 25, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 424
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24291
3655.
Cited by:
Calhoun Realty Inc. v. City of Cincinnati, 311 F. Supp. 2d 640, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25070 (S.D. Ohio
2003)
311 F. Supp. 2d 640 p.641
3656.
Cited by:
BJS No. 2 v. Troy Police Dep't, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27475 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 20, 2003)
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27475
3657.
Followed by:
Schubring v. Mich. Atty. Discipline Bd., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13836 ( E.D. Mich. July 29, 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13836
3658.
Cited by:
Tingley v. City of Grand Rapids, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11629 (W.D. Mich. June 13, 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11629
3659.
Distinguished by:
Women's Med. Prof'l Corp. v. Baird, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15873 (S.D. Ohio June 11, 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN8
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15873
3660.
Cited by:
Thomas v. State, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25984 ( E.D. Mich. May 20, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25984
3661.
Cited by:
Lawrence v. Chabot, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17894 (W.D. Mich. May 7, 2003)
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17894
3662.
Cited by:
Chippewa Trading Co. v. Granholm, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10790 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 28, 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10790
3663.
Cited by:
Berryman v. Garrett, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2009 ( E.D. Mich. Jan. 28, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2009
3664.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Explained by:
Page 425
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Intimate Ideas, Inc. v. City of Grand Rapids, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25248 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 14, 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25248
Followed by:
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25248
Explained by:
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25248
3665.
Cited by:
Callahan v. Callahan, 247 F. Supp. 2d 935, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25804 (S.D. Ohio 2002)
247 F. Supp. 2d 935 p.945
3666.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Thrower v. Jividen, 232 F. Supp. 2d 793, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22669 (N.D. Ohio 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
232 F. Supp. 2d 793 p.796
Cited by:
232 F. Supp. 2d 793 p.795
3667.
Followed by:
Butterfield v. Steiner, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19057 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 5, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19057
3668.
Cited by:
Bookfriends, Inc. v. Taft, 223 F. Supp. 2d 932, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18373 (S.D. Ohio 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4, HN6
223 F. Supp. 2d 932 p.941
3669.
Followed by:
Brockriede v. Mich., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14932 ( E.D. Mich. July 16, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14932
3670.
Distinguished by:
Deja Vu of Ky., Inc. v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Gov't, 194 F. Supp. 2d 606, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
9052 (E.D. Ky. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
194 F. Supp. 2d 606 p.611
3671.
Distinguished by:
Szabo v. CGU Int'l Ins., 199 F. Supp. 2d 715, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7707 (S.D. Ohio 2002)
199 F. Supp. 2d 715 p.719
Page 426
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3672.
Followed by:
Houthoofd v. Tuscola County Rd. Comm'n, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26636 ( E.D. Mich. Jan. 4, 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26636
3673.
Followed by:
Fid. & Guar. Ins. Underwriters, Inc. v. Nocero, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24020 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 13, 2001)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24020
3674.
Cited by:
Evans v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, 184 F. Supp. 2d 707, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24766
(S.D. Ohio 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24766
3675.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Exec. Art Studio, Inc. v. City of Grand Rapids, 179 F. Supp. 2d 755, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22139 (W.D.
Mich. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
179 F. Supp. 2d 755 p.758
Cited by:
179 F. Supp. 2d 755 p.757
3676.
Cited by:
Tindall v. Wayne County Friend of Court, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16532 ( E.D. Mich. Sept. 28, 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16532
3677.
Cited by:
Lander v. Montgomery County Bd. of Comm'rs, 159 F. Supp. 2d 1044, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14604 (S.D.
Ohio 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
159 F. Supp. 2d 1044 p.1062
3678.
Distinguished by:
Hamby v. Menke, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25360 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 13, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN9
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25360
3679.
Followed by:
Loch v. Watkins, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6756 ( E.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6756
3680.
Distinguished by:
Int'l Union, UAW v. Winters, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4560 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 30, 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4560
Page 427
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3681.
Cited by:
Knology, Inc. v. Insight Communs. Co., L.P., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6067, 2001-2 Trade Cas. (CCH)
P73375 (W.D. Ky. Mar. 20, 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6067
3682.
Followed by:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Ohio Elections Comm'n, 135 F. Supp. 2d 857, 2001 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 3670 (S.D. Ohio 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8, HN9
135 F. Supp. 2d 857 p.864
3683.
Distinguished by:
Bariteau v. Krane, 206 F.R.D. 129, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11976 (W.D. Ky. 2001)
206 F.R.D. 129 p.131
3684.
Followed by:
United States v. Chambers, 126 F. Supp. 2d 1052, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19004 ( E.D. Mich. 2000)
126 F. Supp. 2d 1052 p.1054
3685.
Cited by:
Brian A. by Brooks v. Sundquist, 149 F. Supp. 2d 941, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18771 (M.D. Tenn. 2000)
149 F. Supp. 2d 941 p.957
3686.
Cited by:
BRIAN A. v. SUNDQUIST, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21070 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 24, 2000)
3687.
Cited by:
MICHIGAN BELL TEL. CO. v. ENGLER, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20876 ( E.D. Mich. Sept. 14, 2000)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3688.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Mich. Bell Tel. Co. v. Engler, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20875 ( E.D. Mich. Sept. 14, 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20875
Followed by:
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20875
3689.
Followed by, Cited by:
Russell v. Giles County, 105 F. Supp. 2d 841, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10711 (M.D. Tenn. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
Followed by:
105 F. Supp. 2d 841 p.847
Cited by:
105 F. Supp. 2d 841 p.844
Page 428
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3690.
Followed by:
Leach v. Manning, 105 F. Supp. 2d 707, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10014 ( E.D. Mich. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
105 F. Supp. 2d 707 p.713
3691.
Cited by:
Adams & Boyle, P.C. v. Tenn. Dep't of Health, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20198 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 14, 2000)
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20198
3692.
Followed by, Cited by:
Tesmer v. Granholm, 114 F. Supp. 2d 603, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16346 ( E.D. Mich. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
114 F. Supp. 2d 603 p.613
Cited by:
114 F. Supp. 2d 603 p.611
114 F. Supp. 2d 603 p.614
3693.
Followed by:
Bell v. Raby, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4430 ( E.D. Mich. Feb. 28, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4430
3694.
Followed by, Cited by:
Cockrel v. Shelby County Sch. Dist., 81 F. Supp. 2d 771, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 976 (E.D. Ky. 2000)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
81 F. Supp. 2d 771 p.776
Cited by:
81 F. Supp. 2d 771 p.773
3695.
Followed by:
Tindall v. Wayne County Friend of Court, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15928 ( E.D. Mich. Sept. 30, 1999)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15928
3696.
Cited by:
Southwest Williamson County Community Ass'n v. Slater, 67 F. Supp. 2d 875, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
15740, 49 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1997 (M.D. Tenn. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
67 F. Supp. 2d 875 p.885
3697.
Cited by:
Community Ins. Co. v. Rowe, 85 F. Supp. 2d 800, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21056 (S.D. Ohio 1999)
85 F. Supp. 2d 800 p.807
3698.
Followed by, Cited by:
Page 429
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Seiler v. Charter Twp., 53 F. Supp. 2d 957, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9482 ( E.D. Mich. 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
53 F. Supp. 2d 957 p.965
Cited by:
53 F. Supp. 2d 957 p.964
3699.
Cited by:
Borg-Warner Protective Servs. Corp. v. Tevis, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6020 ( E.D. Mich. Apr. 7, 1999)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6020
3700.
Distinguished by:
J.L. Spoons, Inc. v. Brown, 40 F. Supp. 2d 902, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3040 (N.D. Ohio 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
40 F. Supp. 2d 902 p.907
3701.
Cited by:
Grimm v. Shroyer, 35 F. Supp. 2d 966, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1704 (E.D. Ky. 1999)
35 F. Supp. 2d 966 p.968
3702.
Distinguished by:
North Am. Natural Resources v. Michigan PSC, 41 F. Supp. 2d 736, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21142 (W.D.
Mich. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
41 F. Supp. 2d 736 p.743
3703.
Cited by:
Patmon v. Michigan Supreme Court, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20042 ( E.D. Mich. Nov. 19, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20042
3704.
Distinguished by:
Associated Gen. Contrs. of Ohio, Inc. v. Drabik, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22043 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 1998)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22043
3705.
Cited by:
Cooper v. Parrish, 20 F. Supp. 2d 1204, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14223 (W.D. Tenn. 1998)
20 F. Supp. 2d 1204 p.1208
3706.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Michigan Bell Tel. Co. v. MFS Intelenet, Inc., 16 F. Supp. 2d 817, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11198 (W.D.
Mich. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
16 F. Supp. 2d 817 p.827
Cited by:
Page 430
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
16 F. Supp. 2d 817 p.822
3707.
Cited by:
Verbis v. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 18 F. Supp. 2d 770, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8050 (W.D. Mich. 1998)
18 F. Supp. 2d 770 p.773
3708.
Followed by, Cited by:
Kish v. Michigan State Bd. of Law Examiners, 999 F. Supp. 958, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4437, 18 Immigr.
Cas. Rep. A3-153 ( E.D. Mich. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
999 F. Supp. 958 p.965
999 F. Supp. 958 p.966
Cited by:
999 F. Supp. 958 p.960
3709.
Distinguished by:
Iams Co. v. L.A. Pet Foods, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6584 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 26, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6584
3710.
Cited by:
Bush v. Donkersloot, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19441 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 17, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
3711.
Cited by:
Caughorn v. Phillips, 981 F. Supp. 1085, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17947 (E.D. Tenn. 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
981 F. Supp. 1085 p.1088
3712.
Cited by:
Danis Clarkco Landfill Co. v. Trustees of German Twp., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21080 (S.D. Ohio July 30,
1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3713.
Cited by:
Community Treatment Ctrs. v. City of Westland, 970 F. Supp. 1197, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10446 ( E.D.
Mich. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
970 F. Supp. 1197 p.1216
970 F. Supp. 1197 p.1221
3714.
Cited by:
Brown v. Mueller, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12102 ( E.D. Mich. June 24, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
3715.
Followed by:
Hartfield v. East Grand Rapids Pub. Sch., 960 F. Supp. 1259, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4541 (W.D. Mich.
1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
960 F. Supp. 1259 p.1267
Page 431
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3716.
Cited by:
Adams Outdoor Adver. v. Village of Vicksburg, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2552 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 3, 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3717.
Followed by, Cited by:
Kevorkian v. Thompson, 947 F. Supp. 1152, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152 ( E.D. Mich. 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
Followed by:
947 F. Supp. 1152 p.1163
Cited by:
947 F. Supp. 1152 p.1159
947 F. Supp. 1152 p.1161
947 F. Supp. 1152 p.1162
947 F. Supp. 1152 p.1164
3718.
Cited by:
Livingston v. Michigan, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18860 (W.D. Mich. Nov. 22, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
3719.
Followed by:
Carroll v. City of Mt. Clemens, 945 F. Supp. 1071, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16733 ( E.D. Mich. 1996)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
945 F. Supp. 1071 p.1073
3720.
Cited by:
Witzke v. Brickley, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19880 (W.D. Mich. Nov. 6, 1996)
3721.
Distinguished by:
News Herald v. Ruyle, 949 F. Supp. 519, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19088, 24 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2436
(N.D. Ohio 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
949 F. Supp. 519 p.521
3722.
Cited by:
Lillard v. Burson, 933 F. Supp. 698, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16381 (W.D. Tenn. 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
933 F. Supp. 698 p.702
3723.
Cited by:
Gies v. Flack, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22527 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 24, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3724.
Cited by:
Hodari v. Attorney Griev. Comm'n, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6631 ( E.D. Mich. Apr. 22, 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3725.
Cited by:
Muzquiz v. Southworth, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6138 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 28, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
3726.
Cited by:
Page 432
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Odyssey of T.C. v. Blair Township, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4803 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 22, 1996)
3727.
Cited by:
Delene v. Harmes, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2987 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 14, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
3728.
Cited by:
Alexander v. Margolis, 921 F. Supp. 482, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17611, 13 Am. Disabilities Dec. 1017
(W.D. Mich. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
921 F. Supp. 482 p.484
3729.
Cited by:
NRA of Am. v. Magaw, 898 F. Supp. 477, 909 F. Supp. 490, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12054 ( E.D. Mich.
1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN8, HN9
909 F. Supp. 490 p.495
3730.
Followed by:
Nowicki v. Bruff, 896 F. Supp. 707, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11263 ( E.D. Mich. 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN9
896 F. Supp. 707 p.708
3731.
Followed by:
Ortman v. Thomas, 894 F. Supp. 1104, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11268 ( E.D. Mich. 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
894 F. Supp. 1104 p.1111
3732.
Followed by:
Jaguar Cars v. Cottrell, 896 F. Supp. 691, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12567 (E.D. Ky. 1995)
896 F. Supp. 691 p.693
3733.
Followed by:
Ropoleski v. Rairigh, 886 F. Supp. 1356, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6964 (W.D. Mich. 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
886 F. Supp. 1356 p.1360
3734.
Cited by:
Detroit Edison Co. v. Strand, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7262 (W.D. Mich. May 5, 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3735.
Cited by:
Konicov v. Lozanov Learning Sys., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4345 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 3, 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3736.
Cited by:
Jones v. Landgraf, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4214 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 3, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3737.
Cited by:
Fieger v. Thomas, 872 F. Supp. 377, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18084 ( E.D. Mich. 1994)
872 F. Supp. 377 p.379
872 F. Supp. 377 p.380
Page 433
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3738.
Cited by:
Schafer v. Buhl, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16349 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 21, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3739.
Cited by:
Brooks v. Deters, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12315 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 25, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3740.
Followed by, Cited by:
Worrall ex rel. Worrall v. Irwin, 890 F. Supp. 696, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20618 (S.D. Ohio 1994)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
890 F. Supp. 696 p.708
Cited by:
890 F. Supp. 696 p.706
3741.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Turner, 855 F. Supp. 228, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8187 (W.D. Tenn. 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3742.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Turner, 855 F. Supp. 228 (W.D. Tenn. 1994)
855 F. Supp. 228 p.230
3743.
Cited by:
Federal Armored Servs. v. Michigan Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1861 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 28,
1994)
3744.
Cited by:
United States v. Hunter, 843 F. Supp. 235, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 862 ( E.D. Mich. 1994)
843 F. Supp. 235 p.243
3745.
Distinguished by:
Summit County Crisis Pregnancy Ctr. v. Fisher, 830 F. Supp. 1029, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16476 (N.D.
Ohio 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
830 F. Supp. 1029 p.1031
3746.
Cited by:
American Nat'l Fire Ins. Co. v. Finneytown Contracting, 825 F. Supp. 188, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8517
(S.D. Ohio 1993)
825 F. Supp. 188 p.190
3747.
Cited by:
Manhattan Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Northwestern Regional Airport Comm'n, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6858
(W.D. Mich. Mar. 25, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3748.
Followed by:
Todd v. Home Ins. Co., 809 F. Supp. 30, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19703 ( E.D. Mich. 1992) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Page 434
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
809 F. Supp. 30 p.30
3749.
Cited by:
Nadeau v. Charter Township of Clinton, 827 F. Supp. 435, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21987 ( E.D. Mich.
1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
827 F. Supp. 435 p.437
827 F. Supp. 435 p.438
3750.
Cited by:
Dubuc v. Green Oak Township, 810 F. Supp. 867, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20279 ( E.D. Mich. 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
810 F. Supp. 867 p.870
3751.
Distinguished by:
Owensboro Nat'l Bank v. Moore, 803 F. Supp. 24, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14622 (E.D. Ky. 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
803 F. Supp. 24 p.29
3752.
Distinguished by:
Karakas v. McKeown, 783 F. Supp. 1028, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1745 ( E.D. Mich. 1992) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
783 F. Supp. 1028 p.1031
3753.
Followed by:
Berger v. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n, 775 F. Supp. 1096, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15201, 1992-1 Trade
Cas. (CCH) P69714 (N.D. Ohio 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
775 F. Supp. 1096 p.1098
3754.
Cited by:
National Solid Waste Management Ass'n v. Voinovich, 763 F. Supp. 244, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5858, 33
Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1124, 21 Envtl. L. Rep. 21268 (S.D. Ohio 1991)
763 F. Supp. 244 p.255
3755.
Cited by:
National Solid Wastes Management Assoc. v. Ohio, 33 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1124 (S.D. Ohio May 1,
1991)
33 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1124 p.1132
3756.
Cited by:
Con-Way Southern Express, Inc. v. Hewlett, 758 F. Supp. 464, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3095 (M.D. Tenn.
1991)
758 F. Supp. 464 p.465
3757.
Distinguished by:
Howard v. Allard, 122 B.R. 696, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2956 (W.D. Ky. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Page 435
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
122 B.R. 696 p.700
3758.
Followed by:
Prak v. Gregart, 749 F. Supp. 825, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14725 (W.D. Mich. 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
749 F. Supp. 825 p.826
3759.
Followed by:
Federal Express Corp. v. Tennessee Public Service Com., 738 F. Supp. 1140, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7551
(M.D. Tenn. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
738 F. Supp. 1140 p.1142
3760.
Cited by:
Martin v. Marowelli, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2399 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 5, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
3761.
Cited by:
Fitzgerald v. Lile, 732 F. Supp. 784, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2789 (N.D. Ohio 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
732 F. Supp. 784 p.786
3762.
Distinguished by:
Video Store, Inc. v. Holcomb, 729 F. Supp. 579, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1018 (S.D. Ohio 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
729 F. Supp. 579 p.580
3763.
Cited by:
United States v. Air Pollution Control Bd. of Tennessee Dep't of Health & Environment, 1990 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 8343, 31 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1492 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 17, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
31 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1492 p.1494
3764.
Cited by:
In re Air Crash Disaster at Detroit Metro. Airport, 737 F. Supp. 399, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16768 ( E.D.
Mich. 1989)
737 F. Supp. 399 p.404
3765.
Distinguished by:
Cook v. Barry, 718 F. Supp. 632, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8658 (S.D. Ohio 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
718 F. Supp. 632 p.637
3766.
Followed by:
Clonlara, Inc. v. Runkel, 722 F. Supp. 1442, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16260 ( E.D. Mich. 1989)
722 F. Supp. 1442 p.1452
3767.
Cited by:
Page 436
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Clonlara, Inc. v. Runkel, 722 F. Supp. 1442, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16276 ( E.D. Mich. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
3768.
Cited by:
Randles v. Gregart, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17810 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 26, 1989)
3769.
Cited by:
Continental Cablevision of Michigan, Inc. v. Edward Rose Realty, Inc., 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18088
(W.D. Mich. Aug. 26, 1988)
3770.
Cited by:
Little Traverse Bay Bands of Ottawa Indians v. Michigan, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18272 (W.D. Mich. Mar.
21, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
3771.
Cited by:
Heitmanis v. Austin, 677 F. Supp. 1347, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 590 ( E.D. Mich. 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
677 F. Supp. 1347 p.1354
3772.
Cited by:
General Am. Transp. Corp. v. Limbach, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13362 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 28, 1987)
3773.
Cited by:
Glover v. Portland, 675 F. Supp. 398, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11652 (M.D. Tenn. 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
675 F. Supp. 398 p.401
3774.
Cited by:
Auto Club Ins. Asso. v. Mutual Sav. & Loan Asso., 672 F. Supp. 997, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10403, 9
Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1033 ( E.D. Mich. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
672 F. Supp. 997 p.1001
3775.
Cited by:
McKinstry v. Genesee County Circuit, 669 F. Supp. 801, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8505 ( E.D. Mich. 1987)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
669 F. Supp. 801 p.805
3776.
Followed by, Cited by:
Kelly v. Lopeman, 680 F. Supp. 1101, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13120, Unemployment Ins. Rep. (CCH)
P21898 (S.D. Ohio 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
680 F. Supp. 1101 p.1107
Cited by:
680 F. Supp. 1101 p.1103
3777.
Distinguished by:
Tucker v. Callahan, 663 F. Supp. 375, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5934 (M.D. Tenn. 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
663 F. Supp. 375 p.377
Page 437
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3778.
Cited by:
Cottrell v. Lopeman, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13510 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 2, 1987)
3779.
Cited by:
Shelton v. United States Steel Corp., 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12738 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 1987)
3780.
Distinguished by:
Michigan Injured Workers v. Blanchard, 647 F. Supp. 571, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19471 (W.D. Mich.
1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
647 F. Supp. 571 p.575
3781.
Cited by:
Davis v. Crush, 646 F. Supp. 1192, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21584 (S.D. Ohio 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
646 F. Supp. 1192 p.1193
3782.
Distinguished by:
Bannum, Inc. v. Memphis, 666 F. Supp. 1091, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23479 (W.D. Tenn. 1986)
666 F. Supp. 1091 p.1096
3783.
Cited by:
Kimsey v. Gora, 772 F.2d 907, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14201 (S.D. Ohio 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
3784.
Followed by:
Cobb v. Green, 611 F. Supp. 873, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18655 (W.D. Mich. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
611 F. Supp. 873 p.873
3785.
Cited by:
Schneble v. United States, 614 F. Supp. 78, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21825 (S.D. Ohio 1985)
614 F. Supp. 78 p.82
3786.
Cited by:
AMERICAN ELEC. POWER CO. v. KENTUCKY PSC, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23377 (E.D. Ky. Jan. 16,
1985)
3787.
Distinguished by:
Bennett v. Lopeman, 598 F. Supp. 774, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21540 (N.D. Ohio 1984) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
598 F. Supp. 774 p.782
3788.
Cited by:
Stoller v. Baldwin-United Corp., 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23505, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P91678 (S.D.
Ohio Sept. 19, 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3789.
Distinguished by:
Page 438
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
ANR Pipeline Co. v. Michigan Public Service Com., 608 F. Supp. 43, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23747 (W.D.
Mich. 1984)
608 F. Supp. 43 p.48
608 F. Supp. 43 p.49
3790.
Cited by:
Ohio ex rel. Ney v. PJC, Inc., 592 F. Supp. 28, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23992 (S.D. Ohio 1984)
592 F. Supp. 28 p.30
3791.
Followed by:
In re Farrell, 43 B.R. 115, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24078, 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 403, Bankr. L. Rep.
(CCH) P70027, 11 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 355 (M.D. Tenn. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
43 B.R. 115 p.117
3792.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Zurz, 596 F. Supp. 39, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16306 (N.D. Ohio 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
596 F. Supp. 39 p.44
3793.
Distinguished by:
Accident Fund v. Baerwaldt, 579 F. Supp. 729, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19833 (W.D. Mich. 1984)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
579 F. Supp. 729 p.731
3794.
Explained by:
Philman's, Inc. v. City of West Carrollton, 577 F. Supp. 1380, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10320 (S.D. Ohio
1983)
577 F. Supp. 1380 p.1383
3795.
Followed by:
Balderaz v. Porter, 578 F. Supp. 1491, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10830 (S.D. Ohio 1983)
578 F. Supp. 1491 p.1493
3796.
Distinguished by:
Brewer v. Bristol, 577 F. Supp. 519, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10931 (E.D. Tenn. 1983)
577 F. Supp. 519 p.524
3797.
Cited by:
First Baptist Church v. Ohio, 591 F. Supp. 676, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12448 (S.D. Ohio 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
591 F. Supp. 676 p.677
3798.
Explained by, Cited by:
Tolbert v. Memphis, 568 F. Supp. 1285, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16655 (W.D. Tenn. 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
Page 439
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
568 F. Supp. 1285 p.1288
Cited by:
568 F. Supp. 1285 p.1289
3799.
Followed by, Cited by:
Cook v. Franklin County Municipal Court, 596 F. Supp. 490, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17351 (S.D. Ohio
1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
Followed by:
596 F. Supp. 490 p.491
596 F. Supp. 490 p.503
Cited by:
596 F. Supp. 490 p.498
3800.
Cited by:
Cobb v. Green, 574 F. Supp. 256, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17831 (W.D. Mich. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
574 F. Supp. 256 p.259
3801.
Cited by:
Siereveld v. Conn, 557 F. Supp. 1178, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19039 (E.D. Ky. 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
557 F. Supp. 1178 p.1181
3802.
Cited by:
United States v. Anderson County, 547 F. Supp. 18, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9674 (E.D. Tenn. 1982)
547 F. Supp. 18 p.19
3803.
Followed by:
De Wyse v. Smith, 535 F. Supp. 952, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12906 (W.D. Mich. 1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
535 F. Supp. 952 p.953
535 F. Supp. 952 p.955
3804.
Cited by:
Beacon Journal Pub. Co. v. Unger, 532 F. Supp. 55, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10570, 8 Media L. Rep. (BNA)
1338 (N.D. Ohio 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
532 F. Supp. 55 p.58
3805.
Cited by:
Eastover Mining Co. v. Andrus, 12 Envtl. L. Rep. 20923 (E.D. Ky. 1982)
12 Envtl. L. Rep. 20923 p.20924
3806.
Cited by:
Klotz v. Underwood, 563 F. Supp. 335, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9963 (E.D. Tenn. 1982)
563 F. Supp. 335 p.341
Page 440
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3807.
Distinguished by:
Reynolds v. Dayton, 533 F. Supp. 136, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9317, 33 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1014
(S.D. Ohio 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
533 F. Supp. 136 p.140
3808.
Explained by:
Mastin v. Fellerhoff, 526 F. Supp. 969, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17112 (S.D. Ohio 1981) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
526 F. Supp. 969 p.970
3809.
Cited by:
Thompson v. Board of Educ., 519 F. Supp. 1373, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14034, 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas.
(BNA) 404 (W.D. Mich. 1981)
519 F. Supp. 1373 p.1381
3810.
Cited by:
CLR Corp. v. Henline, 520 F. Supp. 760, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15465 (W.D. Mich. 1981) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
520 F. Supp. 760 p.762
3811.
Explained by, Cited by:
Danish News Co. v. Ann Arbor, 517 F. Supp. 86, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13065 ( E.D. Mich. 1981)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
517 F. Supp. 86 p.89
Cited by:
517 F. Supp. 86 p.90
3812.
Cited by:
Schofs v. Warden, FCI, Lexington, 509 F. Supp. 78, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12261 (E.D. Ky. 1981)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
509 F. Supp. 78 p.82
3813.
Followed by:
Hutchison v. Casey, 507 F. Supp. 521, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10663 (S.D. Ohio 1981) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
507 F. Supp. 521 p.523
3814.
Cited by:
DAYTON FOP, CAPT. JOHN C. POST LODGE NO. 44 v. CITY OF DAYTON, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
14384 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 10, 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3815.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
United States v. Michigan, 508 F. Supp. 480, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14768 (W.D. Mich. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Page 441
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Distinguished by:
508 F. Supp. 480 p.481
508 F. Supp. 480 p.489
Cited by:
508 F. Supp. 480 p.488
508 F. Supp. 480 p.490
3816.
Cited by:
United States v. Michigan, 505 F. Supp. 467, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17715 (W.D. Mich. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
505 F. Supp. 467 p.485
3817.
Explained by:
Neebuhr v. Bayer, 502 F. Supp. 1216, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15336 (N.D. Ohio 1980)
502 F. Supp. 1216 p.1218
3818.
Distinguished by:
Delk v. Atkinson, 498 F. Supp. 1282, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13944 (M.D. Tenn. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
498 F. Supp. 1282 p.1287
3819.
Distinguished by:
Durham v. Brock, 498 F. Supp. 213, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13525 (M.D. Tenn. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
498 F. Supp. 213 p.218
3820.
Explained by, Cited by:
Ward v. Hekman, 497 F. Supp. 454, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15541 (W.D. Mich. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
497 F. Supp. 454 p.458
Cited by:
497 F. Supp. 454 p.459
3821.
Distinguished by:
Farrington v. Adjutant General of Michigan, 492 F. Supp. 1362, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14030 (W.D. Mich.
1980)
492 F. Supp. 1362 p.1366
3822.
Explained by:
Greene v. Sinclair, 491 F. Supp. 19, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13333 (W.D. Mich. 1980)
491 F. Supp. 19 p.20
3823.
Cited by:
United States v. Nelson, 486 F. Supp. 464, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12056 (W.D. Mich. 1980)
Page 442
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
486 F. Supp. 464 p.478
3824.
Cited by:
Carroll Hubbard for Governor Committee v. Kentucky Registry of Election Finance, 477 F. Supp. 184, 1979
U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9425 (W.D. Ky. 1979)
477 F. Supp. 184 p.187
3825.
Followed by:
Rucker v. Wilson, 475 F. Supp. 1164, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9870 ( E.D. Mich. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
475 F. Supp. 1164 p.1165
3826.
Cited by:
Scott v. United States, 475 F. Supp. 20, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11606 (W.D. Tenn. 1979)
475 F. Supp. 20 p.22
3827.
Cited by:
Allied Artists Pictures Corp. v. Rhodes, 473 F. Supp. 560, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11540, 17 Ohio Op. 3d
208 (S.D. Ohio 1979)
473 F. Supp. 560 p.571
3828.
Cited by:
Echols v. Voisine, 472 F. Supp. 796, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11561 ( E.D. Mich. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
472 F. Supp. 796 p.798
3829.
Cited by:
Huron Valley Hospital, Inc. v. Pontiac, 466 F. Supp. 1301, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14043, 1979-1 Trade
Cas. (CCH) P62520 ( E.D. Mich. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
466 F. Supp. 1301 p.1308
3830.
Followed by, Cited by:
Movie World, Inc. v. Sloane, 458 F. Supp. 863, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19596 (W.D. Ky. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
Followed by:
458 F. Supp. 863 p.865
Cited by:
458 F. Supp. 863 p.866
3831.
Cited by:
Rock v. East Tennessee Bonding Co., 450 F. Supp. 321, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20057 (E.D. Tenn. 1978)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
450 F. Supp. 321 p.322
3832.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Page 443
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Sovereign News Co. v. Falke, 448 F. Supp. 306, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13211, 3 Media L. Rep. (BNA)
1337 (N.D. Ohio 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
448 F. Supp. 306 p.368
448 F. Supp. 306 p.371
Followed by:
448 F. Supp. 306 p.313
448 F. Supp. 306 p.329
448 F. Supp. 306 p.330
448 F. Supp. 306 p.331
3833.
Cited by:
Amusement Devices Asso. v. Ohio, 443 F. Supp. 1040, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14818, 10 Ohio Op. 3d 235
(S.D. Ohio 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
443 F. Supp. 1040 p.1053
3834.
Cited by:
Del Rio v. Kavanagh, 441 F. Supp. 220, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12788 ( E.D. Mich. 1977)
441 F. Supp. 220 p.222
3835.
Distinguished by:
International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Evans, 440 F. Supp. 414, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
14299 (S.D. Ohio 1977)
440 F. Supp. 414 p.419
3836.
Cited by:
Standard Oil Co. v. Federal Energy Administration, 440 F. Supp. 328, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14873, 4
Energy Mgmt. (CCH) P26079 (N.D. Ohio 1977)
440 F. Supp. 328 p.368
3837.
Followed by:
Flynt v. Leis, 434 F. Supp. 481, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15101, 10 Ohio Op. 3d 39 (S.D. Ohio 1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
434 F. Supp. 481 p.485
3838.
Cited by:
McNea v. Garey, 434 F. Supp. 95, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12972 (N.D. Ohio 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
434 F. Supp. 95 p.105
3839.
Cited by:
American Meat Institute v. Ball, 424 F. Supp. 758, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12110 (W.D. Mich. 1976)
424 F. Supp. 758 p.760
3840.
Cited by:
Cinema Associates, Ltd. v. Oakwood, 417 F. Supp. 146, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14497 (S.D. Ohio 1976)
Page 444
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
417 F. Supp. 146 p.150
3841.
Followed by, Cited by:
Hearing Aid Asso. v. Bullock, 413 F. Supp. 1032, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16212 (E.D. Ky. 1976)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN5, HN6
Followed by:
413 F. Supp. 1032 p.1036
Cited by:
413 F. Supp. 1032 p.1035
3842.
Harmonized by:
Hodory v. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services, 408 F. Supp. 1016, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16300 (N.D.
Ohio 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
408 F. Supp. 1016 p.1019
3843.
Cited by:
Llewelyn v. Oakland County Prosecutor's Office, 402 F. Supp. 1379, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15736 ( E.D.
Mich. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
3844.
Cited by:
Vold v. Marathon Oil Co., 407 F. Supp. 1011, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11556 (W.D. Ky. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
407 F. Supp. 1011 p.1019
3845.
Cited by:
Volunteer Abortion Clinic v. Webster, 403 F. Supp. 411, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15898 (E.D. Tenn. 1975)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
403 F. Supp. 411 p.412
3846.
Followed by, Cited by:
Llewelyn v. Oakland County Prosecutor's Office, 402 F. Supp. 1379, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15370, 1975
U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15736 ( E.D. Mich. 1975)
Followed by:
402 F. Supp. 1379 p.1385
Cited by:
402 F. Supp. 1379 p.1383
3847.
Followed by:
Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. Kiroff, 399 F. Supp. 409, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16371 (N.D. Ohio 1975)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
399 F. Supp. 409 p.413
3848.
Cited by:
Birkenshaw v. Haley, 409 F. Supp. 13, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8812 ( E.D. Mich. 1974)
409 F. Supp. 13 p.16
Page 445
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3849.
Cited by:
Shore v. Saxbe, 395 F. Supp. 1396, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12005 (E.D. Tenn. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
395 F. Supp. 1396 p.1396
3850.
Cited by:
Cudnik v. Kreiger, 392 F. Supp. 305, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7598 (N.D. Ohio 1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
392 F. Supp. 305 p.309
3851.
Cited by:
Garaci v. Memphis, 379 F. Supp. 1393, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8913 (W.D. Tenn. 1974)
379 F. Supp. 1393 p.1396
379 F. Supp. 1393 p.1397
3852.
Distinguished by:
United Artists Corp. v. Gladwell, 373 F. Supp. 247, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9600, 39 Ohio Misc. 119, 68
Ohio Op. 2d 295 (N.D. Ohio 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
373 F. Supp. 247 p.250
3853.
Cited by:
Hartsell v. Knoxville, 375 F. Supp. 340, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11569 (E.D. Tenn. 1973)
375 F. Supp. 340 p.342
3854.
Cited by:
Lopez v. Williams, 372 F. Supp. 1279, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11941 (S.D. Ohio 1973)
372 F. Supp. 1279 p.1296
3855.
Followed by:
Airways Theater, Inc. v. Canale, 366 F. Supp. 343, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11012 (W.D. Tenn. 1973)
366 F. Supp. 343 p.345
3856.
Followed by:
Kister v. Ohio Board of Regents, 365 F. Supp. 27, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12260 (S.D. Ohio 1973)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN5
365 F. Supp. 27 p.33
365 F. Supp. 27 p.34
3857.
Cited by:
Martin Mitchell Enterprises, Inc. v. Corrigan, 364 F. Supp. 448, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15106, 34 Ohio
Misc. 49, 63 Ohio Op. 2d 214 (N.D. Ohio 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
364 F. Supp. 448 p.451
3858.
Cited by:
Page 446
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 374 F. Supp. 846, 1972 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 11459 (E.D. Tenn. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
374 F. Supp. 846 p.847
3859.
Cited by:
Marks v. Newport, 344 F. Supp. 675, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12914 (E.D. Ky. 1972)
344 F. Supp. 675 p.676
3860.
Cited by:
Mitchell Family Planning, Inc. v. Royal Oak, 335 F. Supp. 738, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15702 ( E.D. Mich.
1972) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
335 F. Supp. 738 p.740
335 F. Supp. 738 p.741
3861.
Explained by:
Cloud v. Dietz, 342 F. Supp. 1146, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11930 (E.D. Ky. 1971)
342 F. Supp. 1146 p.1149
3862.
Cited by:
Peto v. Cook, 339 F. Supp. 1300, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10508, 29 Ohio Misc. 85, 58 Ohio Op. 2d 217
(S.D. Ohio 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
339 F. Supp. 1300 p.1302
3863.
Cited by:
Armour & Co. v. Ball, 337 F. Supp. 938, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10805 (W.D. Mich. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
337 F. Supp. 938 p.941
337 F. Supp. 938 p.943
6TH CIRCUIT - U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURTS
3864.
Followed by:
Pogue v. Estate of Roberts (In re Pogue), 357 B.R. 756, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 3427 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
357 B.R. 756 p.759
3865.
Distinguished by:
In re Caravona, 347 B.R. 259, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 1784 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2006)
347 B.R. 259 p.266
3866.
Cited by:
Osting v. Blockberger (In re Osting), 337 B.R. 297, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2730 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
337 B.R. 297 p.300
3867.
Distinguished by:
Page 447
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Dovell v. Guernsey Bank (In re Dovell), 311 B.R. 492, 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 865 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2004)
311 B.R. 492 p.494
3868.
Cited by:
Carlisle County Fiscal Court v. Maxwell (In re Maxwell), 229 B.R. 400, 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1749 (Bankr.
W.D. Ky. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
229 B.R. 400 p.402
3869.
Cited by:
In re McMullen, 189 B.R. 402, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1673 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
189 B.R. 402 p.404
3870.
Cited by:
Miller v. Cumis Ins. Soc'y (In re Lacefield), 167 B.R. 89, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 679, 25 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP)
953 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 1994)
167 B.R. 89 p.90
3871.
Cited by:
In re Plus Gold, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 320 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Feb. 4, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3872.
Followed by:
Winkler v. Rickert, 151 B.R. 807, 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 2286 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1992) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
151 B.R. 807 p.811
3873.
Cited by:
In re Gilliam, 67 B.R. 83, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 5036, 15 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 213, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH)
P71570 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
67 B.R. 83 p.87
3874.
Cited by:
In re De Lorean Motor Co., 49 B.R. 900, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6030, 13 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 60, Bankr. L.
Rep. (CCH) P70587, 13 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 339 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
49 B.R. 900 p.909
3875.
Cited by:
In re McRae Fire Protection, Inc., 49 B.R. 773, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6184, 13 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 57
(Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1985)
49 B.R. 773 p.778
3876.
Followed by:
In re Goree, 45 B.R. 704, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6908, 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 746, 12 Collier Bankr. Cas.
2d (MB) 71 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 1985)
45 B.R. 704 p.705
Page 448
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3877.
Cited by:
In re Brown, 39 B.R. 820, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5753, 11 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1048, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH)
P69864, 10 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 1098 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
39 B.R. 820 p.826
3878.
Cited by:
In re Padgett, 37 B.R. 280, 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 5143, 11 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 739 (Bankr. W.D. Ky.
1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
37 B.R. 280 p.282
3879.
Cited by:
In re Wilson, 30 B.R. 91, 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 6395, 10 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 828, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH)
P69233 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
30 B.R. 91 p.96
3880.
Cited by:
In re Manier, 16 B.R. 911, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 5062, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P68670 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn.
1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
3881.
Cited by:
In re Whitaker, 16 B.R. 917, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 5068, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P68669, 5 Collier Bankr.
Cas. 2d (MB) 1566 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1982)
16 B.R. 917 p.922
7TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
3882.
Cited by:
Olsson v. O'Malley, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24610 (7th Cir. Ill. Nov. 9, 2009)
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24610
3883.
Followed by, Cited by:
Olsson v. Curran, 328 Fed. Appx. 334, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 9991 (7th Cir. Ill. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
328 Fed. Appx. 334 p.335
Cited by:
328 Fed. Appx. 334 p.334
3884.
Cited by:
Idris v. City of Chi., 552 F.3d 564, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 42 (7th Cir. Ill. 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
552 F.3d 564 p.565
3885.
Cited by:
In re LimitNone, LLC, 551 F.3d 572, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26955, 89 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1309 (7th Cir.
Ill. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 449
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
551 F.3d 572 p.577
3886.
Cited by:
Ben-Yisrayl v. Buss, 540 F.3d 542, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 18531 (7th Cir. Ind. 2008)
540 F.3d 542 p.545
3887.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Vill. of DePue v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 537 F.3d 775, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 17110, 67 Env't Rep. Cas.
(BNA) 1353, 38 Envtl. L. Rep. 20209 (7th Cir. Ill. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
537 F.3d 775 p.784
Cited by:
537 F.3d 775 p.783
3888.
Followed by, Cited by:
Taylor v. Marion County Circuit Court No. 1, 284 Fed. Appx. 354, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14436 (7th Cir.
Ind. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
284 Fed. Appx. 354 p.357
Cited by:
284 Fed. Appx. 354 p.356
3889.
Cited by:
Gen. Auto Serv. Station v. City of Chicago, 526 F.3d 991, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 10520 (7th Cir. Ill. 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
526 F.3d 991 p.998
3890.
Followed by:
Stroman Realty, Inc. v. Martinez, 505 F.3d 658, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 23732 (7th Cir. Ill. 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
505 F.3d 658 p.662
3891.
Followed by, Cited by:
FreeEats.com, Inc. v. Indiana, 502 F.3d 590, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 21823 (7th Cir. Ind. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
502 F.3d 590 p.596
Cited by:
502 F.3d 590 p.593
3892.
Cited by:
Forty One News, Inc. v. County of Lake, 491 F.3d 662, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15252 (7th Cir. Ill. 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
491 F.3d 662 p.664
Page 450
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3893.
Cited by:
Leichenauer v. Tazewell County, 221 Fed. Appx. 461, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8106 (7th Cir. Ill. 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
221 Fed. Appx. 461 p.462
3894.
Cited by:
Parejko v. Dunn County Circuit Court, 209 Fed. Appx. 545, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31224 (7th Cir. Wis.
2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
209 Fed. Appx. 545 p.546
3895.
Cited by:
Jenkins v. Martin, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 24835 (7th Cir. Ill. Oct. 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 24835
3896.
Cited by:
Kathrein v. McGrath, 166 Fed. Appx. 858, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 3044 (7th Cir. Ill. 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
166 Fed. Appx. 858 p.860
3897.
Cited by:
520 S. Mich. Ave. Assocs. Ltd. v. Devine, 433 F.3d 961, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 514, 178 L.R.R.M. (BNA)
2833 (7th Cir. Ill. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
433 F.3d 961 p.963
3898.
Cited by:
Cady v. S. Suburban College, 152 Fed. Appx. 531, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23150 (7th Cir. Ill. 2005)
152 Fed. Appx. 531 p.533
3899.
Cited by:
Jaskolski v. Daniels, 427 F.3d 456, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22727 (7th Cir. Ind. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
427 F.3d 456 p.460
3900.
Cited by:
Jackson v. City of Chicago, 149 Fed. Appx. 494, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 19690 (7th Cir. Ill. 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
149 Fed. Appx. 494 p.495
3901.
Cited by:
Simpson v. Rowan, 125 Fed. Appx. 720, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3483 (7th Cir. Ill. 2005)
125 Fed. Appx. 720 p.722
3902.
Explained by, Cited by:
Suster v. Jefferson-Moore, 118 Fed. Appx. 87, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24883 (7th Cir. Wis. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
Page 451
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Explained by:
118 Fed. Appx. 87 p.89
Cited by:
118 Fed. Appx. 87 p.88
3903.
Followed by:
Ben-Yisrayl v. Davis, 114 Fed. Appx. 760, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 23522 (7th Cir. Ind. 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
114 Fed. Appx. 760 p.761
3904.
Cited by:
Nader v. Keith, 385 F.3d 729, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 19804 (7th Cir. Ill. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
385 F.3d 729 p.731
3905.
Cited by:
Lawson v. Hill, 368 F.3d 955, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10158 (7th Cir. Ind. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
368 F.3d 955 p.960
3906.
Cited by:
Knickmeier v. Office of Lawyer Regulation, 99 Fed. Appx. 68, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8793 (7th Cir. Wis.
2004)
99 Fed. Appx. 68 p.69
3907.
Cited by:
Mother & Father v. Cassidy, 338 F.3d 704, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15051, 56 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan)
542 (7th Cir. Ill. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
338 F.3d 704 p.711
3908.
Cited by:
Potts v. Brown, 66 Fed. Appx. 635, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8588 (7th Cir. Ill. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
66 Fed. Appx. 635 p.636
3909.
Cited by:
Hartmarx Corp. v. Abboud, 326 F.3d 862, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 6727, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P92402
(7th Cir. Ill. 2003)
326 F.3d 862 p.872
3910.
Cited by:
Timbuktu v. Koch, 62 Fed. Appx. 676, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 5971 (7th Cir. Wis. 2003)
62 Fed. Appx. 676 p.678
3911.
Cited by:
Page 452
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Lee v. Bernard, 62 Fed. Appx. 670, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 5983 (7th Cir. Ill. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
62 Fed. Appx. 670 p.671
3912.
Cited by:
General Auto Serv. Station LLC v. City of Chicago, 319 F.3d 902, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2213 (7th Cir. Ill.
2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
319 F.3d 902 p.904
3913.
Cited by:
In re Mann, 311 F.3d 788, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 27408, 54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 154 (7th Cir.
2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
311 F.3d 788 p.794
3914.
Cited by:
Nelson v. La Crosse County Dist. Atty. (In re Nelson), 301 F.3d 820, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17611, 40
Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 5, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P78711, 49 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 101 (7th Cir. Wis.
2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
301 F.3d 820 p.824
3915.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Bouvagnet v. Bouvagnet, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17661 (7th Cir. Ill. July 26, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Distinguished by:
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17661
Followed by:
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17661
3916.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Explained by:
Bouvagnet v. Bouvagnet, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15079 (7th Cir. Ill. July 26, 2002)
Distinguished by:
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15079
Followed by:
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15079
Explained by:
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15079
3917.
Cited by:
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Menards, Inc., 285 F.3d 630, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 6225, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep.
P16318 (7th Cir. Ill. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
285 F.3d 630 p.638
3918.
Followed by:
Green v. Benden, 281 F.3d 661, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2620, 18 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 589 (7th Cir. Ill. 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
Page 453
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
281 F.3d 661 p.666
3919.
Cited by:
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. McCarty, 270 F.3d 536, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 23728 (7th Cir. Ind.
2001)
270 F.3d 536 p.537
3920.
Cited by:
Mann v. Brown, 18 Fed. Appx. 399, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19829 (7th Cir. Ill. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
18 Fed. Appx. 399 p.403
3921.
Cited by:
Edwards v. Ill. Bd. of Admissions , 261 F.3d 723, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18908, 9 Accom. Disabilities Dec.
(CCH) P9-111, 12 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 237 (7th Cir. Ill. 2001)
261 F.3d 723 p.727
3922.
Cited by:
Drake-Thomson v. City of Chicago, 5 Fed. Appx. 539, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 4260 (7th Cir. Ill. 2001)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5 Fed. Appx. 539 p.540
3923.
Followed by:
Bassey v. Illinois, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18081 (7th Cir. Ill. July 21, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18081
3924.
Followed by:
Clark v. Henninger, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 16238 (7th Cir. Ill. July 11, 2000)
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 16238
3925.
Cited by:
Higgins v. Mississippi, 217 F.3d 951, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15330 (7th Cir. Ill. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
217 F.3d 951 p.954
3926.
Cited by:
Chambers v. Habitat Co., 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14703 (7th Cir. Ill. June 7, 2000)
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14703
3927.
Cited by:
Ramsden v. AgriBank, FCB, 214 F.3d 865, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 12097 (7th Cir. Wis. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
214 F.3d 865 p.871
3928.
Cited by:
Page 454
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. Branson, 212 F.3d 995, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 9869 (7th Cir. Ill. 2000)
212 F.3d 995 p.997
3929.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Gray-Bey v. United States, 201 F.3d 866, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 881 (7th Cir. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
201 F.3d 866 p.874
Cited by:
201 F.3d 866 p.868
3930.
Cited by:
Sarlund v. Anderson, 205 F.3d 973, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2907, 176 A.L.R. Fed. 727 (7th Cir. Wis. 2000)
205 F.3d 973 p.975
3931.
Cited by:
Hope Clinic v. Ryan, 195 F.3d 857, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 26925 (7th Cir. Ill. 1999)
195 F.3d 857 p.869
3932.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Hearne v. Board of Educ., 185 F.3d 770, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 16367, 84 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA)
1422 (7th Cir. Ill. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
185 F.3d 770 p.779
Cited by:
185 F.3d 770 p.777
3933.
Cited by:
Lavey v. City of Two Rivers, 171 F.3d 1110, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 5618 (7th Cir. Wis. 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
171 F.3d 1110 p.1113
3934.
Followed by, Cited by:
Crenshaw v. Supreme Court, 170 F.3d 725, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4133 (7th Cir. Ind. 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
Followed by:
170 F.3d 725 p.727
Cited by:
170 F.3d 725 p.729
3935.
Cited by:
RTC Commer. Assets Trust 1995-NP3-1 v. Phoenix Bond & Indem. Co., 169 F.3d 448, 1999 U.S. App.
LEXIS 2458 (7th Cir. Ill. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
169 F.3d 448 p.452
Page 455
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3936.
Cited by:
David B. v. McDonald, 156 F.3d 780, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 24429 (7th Cir. Ill. 1998)
156 F.3d 780 p.784
3937.
Cited by:
International College of Surgeons v. City of Chicago, 153 F.3d 356, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 18182 (7th Cir.
Ill. 1998)
153 F.3d 356 p.360
3938.
Cited by:
Majors v. Engelbrecht, 149 F.3d 709, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 16910 (7th Cir. Ind. 1998) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
149 F.3d 709 p.711
3939.
Cited by:
Commodity Trend Serv. v. CFTC, 149 F.3d 679, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 16411, Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH)
P27357 (7th Cir. Ill. 1998)
149 F.3d 679 p.687
3940.
Cited by:
Wisconsin Right to Life v. Paradise, 138 F.3d 1183, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 4660 (7th Cir. Wis. 1998)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
138 F.3d 1183 p.1187
3941.
Followed by, Cited by:
Indiana v. Haws, 131 F.3d 1205, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 34825 (7th Cir. Ind. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Followed by:
131 F.3d 1205 p.1210
Cited by:
131 F.3d 1205 p.1208
3942.
Cited by:
Kozel v. Robinson, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 30215 (7th Cir. Ill. Oct. 28, 1997)
3943.
Cited by:
Skolnick v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Comm'n., 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 27924 (7th Cir. Ill. Oct.
7, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3944.
Explained by:
United States v. $506,231 in United States Currency, 125 F.3d 442, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23216 (7th Cir.
Ill. 1997)
125 F.3d 442 p.451
3945.
Cited by:
Ryan v. Lanigan, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 21054 (7th Cir. Ill. Aug. 5, 1997)
Page 456
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3946.
Cited by:
Barichello v. McDonald, 98 F.3d 948, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27109 (7th Cir. Ill. 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
98 F.3d 948 p.950
3947.
Cited by:
Young v. Murphy, 90 F.3d 1225, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18164 (7th Cir. Ill. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
90 F.3d 1225 p.1232
3948.
Followed by, Cited by:
Simpson v. Rowan, 73 F.3d 134, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 37373 (7th Cir. Ill. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN9
Followed by:
73 F.3d 134 p.137
Cited by:
73 F.3d 134 p.135
3949.
Cited by:
Goodluck v. City of Chicago, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 34000 (7th Cir. Ill. Nov. 14, 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3, HN5
3950.
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Time Warner Cable v. Doyle, 66 F.3d 867, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27314 (7th Cir. Wis. 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
66 F.3d 867 p.874
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
66 F.3d 867 p.883
3951.
Cited by:
Rogers v. Desiderio, 58 F.3d 299, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15141 (7th Cir. Ill. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
58 F.3d 299 p.300
3952.
Cited by:
Eaglin v. Welborn, 57 F.3d 496, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14273 (7th Cir. Ill. 1995)
57 F.3d 496 p.499
3953.
Cited by:
ACORN v. Edgar, 56 F.3d 791, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 13697 (7th Cir. Ill. 1995)
56 F.3d 791 p.797
3954.
Cited by:
Nowicki v. Cooper, 56 F.3d 782, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 13511 (7th Cir. Wis. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 457
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN5
56 F.3d 782 p.784
3955.
Cited by:
Nelson v. Murphy, Ct. App. 7th Dkt. No. 94-1764 (Mar. 13, 1995)
Ct. App. 7th Dkt. No. 94-1764
3956.
Cited by:
Nelson v. Murphy, 44 F.3d 497, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4839 (7th Cir. 1995)
3957.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Verdone v. Wisconsin, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4700 (7th Cir. Wis. Mar. 6, 1995)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3958.
Cited by:
Allen v. Allen, 48 F.3d 259, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 3071 (7th Cir. Ill. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
48 F.3d 259 p.261
3959.
Distinguished by:
Hoover v. Wagner, 47 F.3d 845, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2144 (7th Cir. Wis. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
47 F.3d 845 p.848
3960.
Followed by, Cited by:
Nelson v. Murphy, 44 F.3d 497, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 116 (7th Cir. Ill. 1995)
Followed by:
44 F.3d 497 p.503
Cited by:
44 F.3d 497 p.501
3961.
Cited by:
Trust & Inv. Advisers v. Hogsett, 43 F.3d 290, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35977 (7th Cir. Ind. 1994)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
43 F.3d 290 p.292
43 F.3d 290 p.294
3962.
Cited by:
United States v. Delaporte, 42 F.3d 1118, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35980 (7th Cir. Ind. 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
42 F.3d 1118 p.1120
3963.
Cited by:
Jones v. Takaki, 38 F.3d 321, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 29149, 30 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 927 (7th Cir.
Ill. 1994)
38 F.3d 321 p.323
Page 458
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3964.
Cited by:
Wijas v. Nelson, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6890 (7th Cir. Ill. Apr. 5, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3965.
Cited by:
Allendale Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bull Data Sys., 10 F.3d 425, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 29006 (7th Cir. Ill. 1993)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
10 F.3d 425 p.432
3966.
Cited by:
Philips Medical Sys. Int'l B.V. v. Bruetman, 8 F.3d 600, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28397, 27 Fed. R. Serv. 3d
(Callaghan) 1566, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide P8419 (7th Cir. Ill. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
8 F.3d 600 p.604
3967.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Schmidling v. City of Chicago, 1 F.3d 494, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18818 (7th Cir. Ill. 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4, HN5, HN6
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
1 F.3d 494 p.501
Cited by:
1 F.3d 494 p.495
1 F.3d 494 p.500
3968.
Followed by:
Arkebauer v. Kiley, 985 F.2d 1351, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2024 (7th Cir. Ill. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
985 F.2d 1351 p.1355
985 F.2d 1351 p.1357
3969.
Cited by:
Leaf v. Supreme Court of Wisconsin, 979 F.2d 589, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29818 (7th Cir. Wis. 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
979 F.2d 589 p.594
3970.
Cited by:
United States v. Caputo, 978 F.2d 972, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28089 (7th Cir. Ill. 1992)
978 F.2d 972 p.976
3971.
Cited by:
Collins v. Sposeep, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 27917 (7th Cir. Oct. 23, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3972.
Cited by:
Holman v. Lotter, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 20158 (7th Cir. Wis. Aug. 20, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
3973.
Cited by:
Turner v. Chicago Housing Authority, 969 F.2d 461, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17362 (7th Cir. Ill. 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
969 F.2d 461 p.462
Page 459
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3974.
Cited by:
Morris B. Chapman & Assoc., Ltd. v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Com., 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS
13409 (7th Cir. Ill. June 3, 1992)
3975.
Cited by:
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Moran, 959 F.2d 634, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5254 (7th Cir. Ill. 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
959 F.2d 634 p.635
3976.
Cited by:
Moy v. Cowen, 958 F.2d 168, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1959, 22 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 15 (7th Cir. Ill.
1992)
958 F.2d 168 p.169
3977.
Cited by:
Pearson v. Thompson, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1814 (7th Cir. Ill. Feb. 13, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
3978.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Greening v. Moran, 953 F.2d 301, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 170, 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1372 (7th
Cir. Ill. 1992)
Distinguished by:
953 F.2d 301 p.303
Cited by:
953 F.2d 301 p.304
3979.
Cited by:
Fortino v. Quasar Co., 950 F.2d 389, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28520, 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P41117,
57 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 712, 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 127 (7th Cir. Ill. 1991)
950 F.2d 389 p.391
3980.
Cited by:
Storment v. O'Malley, 938 F.2d 86, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 16730 (7th Cir. Ill. 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
938 F.2d 86 p.88
3981.
Cited by:
Heldstab v. Milwaukee, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 20500 (7th Cir. Nov. 20, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
3982.
Cited by:
Kerr-McGee Chem. Corp. v. West Chicago, 914 F.2d 820, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16632, 32 Env't Rep.
Cas. (BNA) 1095, 20 Envtl. L. Rep. 21369 (7th Cir. Ill. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
914 F.2d 820 p.824
3983.
Cited by:
Thomas v. Indiana, 910 F.2d 1413, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 14119 (7th Cir. Ind. 1990)
Page 460
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
910 F.2d 1413 p.1415
3984.
Cited by:
Somerset House, Inc. v. Turnock, 900 F.2d 1012, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 5875 (7th Cir. Ill. 1990)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
900 F.2d 1012 p.1017
3985.
Distinguished by:
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Tristano, 898 F.2d 1302, 1990 U.S. App.
LEXIS 5193 (7th Cir. Ill. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
898 F.2d 1302 p.1303
3986.
Distinguished by:
Alleghany Corp. v. Haase, 896 F.2d 1046, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2480 (7th Cir. Wis. 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
896 F.2d 1046 p.1048
3987.
Followed by:
Mannheim Video, Inc. v. County of Cook, 884 F.2d 1043, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14197, 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d
(Callaghan) 178 (7th Cir. Ill. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
884 F.2d 1043 p.1044
3988.
Cited by:
Thomas v. Fielder, 884 F.2d 990, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13735 (7th Cir. Wis. 1989)
884 F.2d 990 p.992
884 F.2d 990 p.993
3989.
Cited by:
American Paper Inst., Inc. v. United States EPA, 890 F.2d 869, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14980, 30 Env't
Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1313, 30 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1714, 20 Envtl. L. Rep. 20482 (7th Cir. 1989)
890 F.2d 869 p.875
3990.
Followed by:
Schultz v. Frisby, 877 F.2d 6, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8606, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56113 (7th Cir. Wis.
1989)
877 F.2d 6 p.8
3991.
Cited by:
Falls v. Dyer, 875 F.2d 146, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7367 (7th Cir. Ind. 1989)
875 F.2d 146 p.147
3992.
Followed by:
Pincham v. Illinois Judicial Inquiry Bd., 872 F.2d 1341, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5925 (7th Cir. Ill. 1989)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
872 F.2d 1341 p.1342
872 F.2d 1341 p.1350
Page 461
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
3993.
Among conflicting authorities noted in:
Viens v. Daniels, 871 F.2d 1328, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4494 (7th Cir. Ill. 1989)
3994.
Distinguished by:
Bethune Plaza, Inc. v. Lumpkin, 863 F.2d 525, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17172, 12 Fed. R. Serv. 3d
(Callaghan) 1400 (7th Cir. Ill. 1988)
863 F.2d 525 p.528
3995.
Cited by:
Horn v. Chicago, 860 F.2d 700, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14422 (7th Cir. Ill. 1988)
860 F.2d 700 p.702
3996.
Cited by:
Crowley Cutlery Co. v. United States, 849 F.2d 273, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7980 (7th Cir. Ill. 1988)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
849 F.2d 273 p.279
3997.
Cited by:
Derrickson v. Danville, 845 F.2d 715, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 5844 (7th Cir. Ill. 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
845 F.2d 715 p.717
3998.
Cited by:
Curtis v. Thompson, 840 F.2d 1291, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2180 (7th Cir. Ill. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
840 F.2d 1291 p.1295
3999.
Explained by, Cited by:
Hickey v. Duffy, 827 F.2d 234, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11301, 8 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 974 (7th Cir.
Ill. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
827 F.2d 234 p.244
Cited by:
827 F.2d 234 p.238
4000.
Cited by:
Moses v. County of Kenosha, 826 F.2d 708, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10990, 8 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan)
958 (7th Cir. Wis. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
826 F.2d 708 p.709
4001.
Cited by:
Jacobson v. Northbrook Municipal Corp., 824 F.2d 567, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9786 (7th Cir. Ill. 1987)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
824 F.2d 567 p.569
Page 462
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4002.
Cited by:
Andree v. Ashland County, 818 F.2d 1306, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6290 (7th Cir. Wis. 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
818 F.2d 1306 p.1313
4003.
Cited by:
Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp. v. Hartigan, 816 F.2d 1177, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 4690, 25 Env't Rep. Cas.
(BNA) 1892, 17 Envtl. L. Rep. 20745 (7th Cir. Ill. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
816 F.2d 1177 p.1182
4004.
Cited by:
Crump v. Lane, 807 F.2d 1394, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 35051 (7th Cir. Ill. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
807 F.2d 1394 p.1400
4005.
Explained by:
Collins v. County of Kendall, 807 F.2d 95, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34634 (7th Cir. Ill. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
807 F.2d 95 p.96
807 F.2d 95 p.97
4006.
Cited by:
Palmer v. Chicago, 806 F.2d 1316, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34620 (7th Cir. Ill. 1986)
806 F.2d 1316 p.1317
4007.
Followed by:
Brunken v. Lance, 807 F.2d 1325, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 28953 (7th Cir. Ill. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
807 F.2d 1325 p.1330
4008.
Followed by, Cited by:
Brunken v. Lance, 799 F.2d 337 (7th Cir. Ill. 1986)
Followed by:
799 F.2d 337 p.342
Cited by:
799 F.2d 337 p.341
4009.
Cited by:
Barrera v. Young, 794 F.2d 1264, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26889 (7th Cir. Wis. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
794 F.2d 1264 p.1269
4010.
Distinguished by:
Lynk v. La Porte Superior Court No. 2, 789 F.2d 554, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24686 (7th Cir. Ind. 1986)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 463
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
789 F.2d 554 p.558
4011.
Cited by:
National Metalcrafters, Div. of Keystone Consol. Industries v. McNeil, 784 F.2d 817, 1986 U.S. App.
LEXIS 22594, 7 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1198, 4 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 291, 121 L.R.R.M.
(BNA) 2819, 104 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11863, 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 899 (7th Cir. Ill. 1986)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
784 F.2d 817 p.821
4012.
Cited by:
McIntyre v. Fallahay, 766 F.2d 1078, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20276 (7th Cir. Ind. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
766 F.2d 1078 p.1082
4013.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Palmer v. Chicago, 755 F.2d 560, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29491 (7th Cir. Ill. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
755 F.2d 560 p.582
Cited by:
755 F.2d 560 p.573
4014.
Explained by:
In re Special March 1981 Grand Jury, 753 F.2d 575, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28677 (7th Cir. Ill. 1985)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
753 F.2d 575 p.581
4015.
Explained by:
W.C.M. Window Co. v. Bernardi, 730 F.2d 486, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24446, 100 Lab. Cas. (CCH)
P55457 (7th Cir. Ill. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
730 F.2d 486 p.490
4016.
Explained by, Cited by:
Sequoia Books, Inc. v. McDonald, 725 F.2d 1091, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26658 (7th Cir. Ill. 1984)
Explained by:
725 F.2d 1091 p.1095
Cited by:
725 F.2d 1091 p.1094
4017.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Waldron v. McAtee, 723 F.2d 1348, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14249 (7th Cir. Ind. 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
723 F.2d 1348 p.1356
Cited by:
Page 464
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
723 F.2d 1348 p.1353
4018.
Cited by:
Capitol Indem. Corp. v. Keller, 717 F.2d 324, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 24823 (7th Cir. Ill. 1983)
717 F.2d 324 p.329
4019.
Distinguished by:
Board of Education v. Bosworth, 713 F.2d 1316, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25233 (7th Cir. Ill. 1983)
713 F.2d 1316 p.1320
4020.
Cited by:
Ciotti v. County of Cook, 712 F.2d 312, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25748 (7th Cir. Ill. 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
712 F.2d 312 p.312
4021.
Cited by:
J.N.S., Inc. v. Indiana, 712 F.2d 303, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25780 (7th Cir. Ind. 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4
712 F.2d 303 p.306
4022.
Cited by:
Illinois ex rel. Barra v. Archer Daniels Midland Co., 704 F.2d 935, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29119, 114
L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2957, 96 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P14194 (7th Cir. Ill. 1983)
704 F.2d 935 p.940
4023.
Cited by:
Evans v. City of Chicago, 689 F.2d 1286, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25311, 34 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan)
1635 (7th Cir. Ill. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
689 F.2d 1286 p.1293
4024.
Cited by:
United Church of Medical Center v. Medical Center Com., 689 F.2d 693, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25388
(7th Cir. Ill. 1982)
689 F.2d 693 p.697
4025.
Followed by:
Sekerez v. Supreme Court of Indiana, 685 F.2d 202, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16745 (7th Cir. Ind. 1982)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
685 F.2d 202 p.205
4026.
Distinguished by:
Illinois v. General Electric Co., 683 F.2d 206, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 17497, 18 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA)
1254, 12 Envtl. L. Rep. 20793 (7th Cir. Ill. 1982)
683 F.2d 206 p.212
Page 465
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4027.
Cited by:
Illinois v. General Electric Co. (7th Cir. July 13, 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4028.
Followed by:
United States ex rel. Stevens v. Circuit Court of Milwaukee County, etc., 675 F.2d 946, 1982 U.S. App.
LEXIS 19953 (7th Cir. Wis. 1982)
675 F.2d 946 p.947
4029.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Stevens v. Circuit Court of Milwaukee County, etc. (7th Cir. Apr. 20, 1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4030.
Distinguished by:
Ryan v. State Bd. of Elections, 661 F.2d 1130, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 17138 (7th Cir. Ill. 1981)
661 F.2d 1130 p.1135
4031.
Cited by:
Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. v. Hoffman Estates, 639 F.2d 373, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 21097 (7th Cir.
Ill. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
639 F.2d 373 p.380
4032.
Followed by:
Dommer v. Crawford, 638 F.2d 1031, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 10943 (7th Cir. Ind. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
638 F.2d 1031 p.1037
4033.
Explained by:
City Investing Co. v. Simcox, 633 F.2d 56, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 13054, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P97661
(7th Cir. Ind. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
633 F.2d 56 p.59
4034.
Distinguished by:
Bickham v. Lashof, 620 F.2d 1238, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 18119 (7th Cir. Ill. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
620 F.2d 1238 p.1241
620 F.2d 1238 p.1242
4035.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Parish v. Elrod, 589 F.2d 327, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 17850 (7th Cir. Ill. 1979)
589 F.2d 327 p.329
4036.
Distinguished by:
Chicago-Midwest Meat Ass'n v. Evanston, 589 F.2d 278, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 7048 (7th Cir. Ill. 1978)
589 F.2d 278 p.281
4037.
Cited by:
In re Special April 1977 Grand Jury, 581 F.2d 589, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10228 (7th Cir. Ill. 1978)
Page 466
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
581 F.2d 589 p.593
4038.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
United States v. Chicago, 549 F.2d 415, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 10593, 13 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P11380,
14 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 462, 40 A.L.R. Fed. 421 (7th Cir. Ill. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
549 F.2d 415 p.449
4039.
Cited by:
Bonnet v. Trustees of Schools, 563 F.2d 831, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11403, 24 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan)
64 (7th Cir. Ill. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
563 F.2d 831 p.834
4040.
Cited by:
United States v. Kuehn, 562 F.2d 427, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11517 (7th Cir. Ill. 1977) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
562 F.2d 427 p.431
562 F.2d 427 p.432
4041.
Explained by:
Drollinger v. Milligan, 552 F.2d 1220, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13998 (7th Cir. Ind. 1977) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6, HN9
552 F.2d 1220 p.1226
4042.
Followed by:
United States v. Craig, 528 F.2d 773, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 13513, 2 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 1074 (7th
Cir. Ill. 1976)
528 F.2d 773 p.779
4043.
Followed by:
Dema v. Illinois, 546 F.2d 224, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 5742 (7th Cir. Ill. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
546 F.2d 224 p.225
4044.
Distinguished by:
United States ex rel. Morgan v. Sielaff, 546 F.2d 218, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6141 (7th Cir. Ill. 1976)
546 F.2d 218 p.222
4045.
Cited by:
Foster v. Zeeko, 540 F.2d 1310, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7515 (7th Cir. Ill. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
540 F.2d 1310 p.1312
540 F.2d 1310 p.1320
4046.
Harmonized by:
Grandco Corp. v. Rochford, 536 F.2d 197, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 8660 (7th Cir. Ill. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
Page 467
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
536 F.2d 197 p.201
536 F.2d 197 p.202
536 F.2d 197 p.203
4047.
Cited by:
White v. Fleming, 522 F.2d 730, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 13525, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P10313, 11 Fair
Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 619 (7th Cir. Wis. 1975)
522 F.2d 730 p.731
4048.
Cited by:
Ahrensfeld v. Stephens, 528 F.2d 193, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11331 (7th Cir. Ill. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
528 F.2d 193 p.196
4049.
Cited by:
Rhodes v. Chicago, 516 F.2d 1373, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14933 (7th Cir. Ill. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
516 F.2d 1373 p.1375
4050.
Cited by:
Horvath v. Chicago, 510 F.2d 594, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14654 (7th Cir. Ill. 1975)
510 F.2d 594 p.594
4051.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Holiday Magic, Inc. v. Warren, 497 F.2d 687, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8556 (7th Cir. Wis. 1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3
497 F.2d 687 p.698
4052.
Cited by:
Barancik v. Investors Funding Corp., 489 F.2d 933, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7224, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH)
P94208 (7th Cir. Ill. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
489 F.2d 933 p.937
4053.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Littleton v. Berbling, 468 F.2d 389, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7265, 16 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 798 (7th
Cir. Ill. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
468 F.2d 389 p.408
Followed by:
468 F.2d 389 p.412
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
468 F.2d 389 p.417
4054.
Distinguished by:
Devlin v. Sosbe, 465 F.2d 169, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8156 (7th Cir. Ind. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 468
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN5
465 F.2d 169 p.171
4055.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Cousins v. Wigoda, 463 F.2d 603, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8705 (7th Cir. Ill. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
463 F.2d 603 p.610
Cited by:
463 F.2d 603 p.606
4056.
Cited by:
In re Oliver, 452 F.2d 111, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7322 (7th Cir. Ill. 1971)
452 F.2d 111 p.113
4057.
Cited by:
Files v. Rockford, 440 F.2d 811, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11491, 14 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1642 (7th
Cir. Ill. 1971)
440 F.2d 811 p.816
7TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
4058.
Cited by:
Price v. Superintendent, Miami Corr. Facility, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104705 (N.D. Ind. Nov. 9, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104705
4059.
Cited by:
Bailey v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103516 (W.D. Wis. Nov. 5, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103516
4060.
Cited by:
Vinson v. Stefantos, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103677 (N.D. Ind. Nov. 2, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103677
4061.
Cited by:
Dixie v. Avery, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91970 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 2, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91970
4062.
Distinguished by:
Rockies Express Pipeline LLC v. Ind. State Natural Res. Comm'n, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87750 (S.D. Ind.
Sept. 23, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87750
4063.
Cited by:
Trevino v. Tittle, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88191 (N.D. Ind. Sept. 22, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 469
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88191
4064.
Cited by:
Naylor v. Vill. of Ashland, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84977 (C.D. Ill. Sept. 16, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84977
4065.
Distinguished by:
Fonseca v. Nelson, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82521 (S.D. Ill. Sept. 10, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82521
4066.
Cited by:
Moore v. Schwartz, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78202 (W.D. Wis. Aug. 27, 2009)
4067.
Cited by:
Hunt v. Thomas, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74536 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 20, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74536
4068.
Cited by:
Davalos v. Porter County, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64127 (N.D. Ind. July 24, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64127
4069.
Cited by:
Ivy v. City of Chicago, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60299 (N.D. Ill. July 14, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60299
4070.
Cited by:
Mattson v. Lasalle Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62863 (E.D. Wis. July 7, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62863
4071.
Followed by:
Nommensen v. Lundquist, 630 F. Supp. 2d 994, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60756 (E.D. Wis. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
630 F. Supp. 2d 994 p.995
4072.
Followed by:
Smith v. Ill., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44610 (N.D. Ill. May 27, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44610
4073.
Followed by:
Dirig v. Surbeck, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40208 (N.D. Ind. May 11, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40208
Page 470
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4074.
Cited by:
Maldonado v. Chippewa Circuit Court, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33182 (W.D. Wis. Apr. 17, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33182
4075.
Followed by:
Vaughn v. Props, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21392 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 16, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21392
4076.
Followed by:
Bilderback v. Lindholm, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28683 (W.D. Wis. Mar. 6, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28683
4077.
Followed by:
Lynch v. Nolan, 598 F. Supp. 2d 900, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14239 (C.D. Ill. 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
598 F. Supp. 2d 900 p.903
4078.
Cited by:
Smith v. Andy Mohr-Buick, Pontiac, GMC, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13422 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 20, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13422
4079.
Followed by:
Shelley v. Lechleitner, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4515 (W.D. Wis. Jan. 21, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4515
4080.
Cited by:
Grant v. Robinson, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2203 (W.D. Wis. Jan. 9, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2203
4081.
Followed by:
Davis v. Spoden, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 305 (W.D. Wis. Jan. 5, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 305
4082.
Cited by:
Godwin v. Jenkins, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94487 (W.D. Wis. Nov. 17, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94487
4083.
Followed by:
Smith v. Illinois, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94301 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 17, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94301
4084.
Cited by:
Page 471
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Puckett v. Dep't of Children & Servs., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91145 (C.D. Ill. Nov. 10, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91145
4085.
Cited by:
Martin v. Ross, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89084 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 30, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89084
4086.
Followed by:
Teusch v. City of Fort Wayne, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84820 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 20, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84820
4087.
Distinguished by:
United States v. Fong, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80689, 102 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6622, 2008-2 U.S. Tax Cas.
(CCH) P50614 (N.D. Ind. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80689
4088.
Cited by:
Gilbert v. Ill. State Bd. of Educ., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72874 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 24, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72874
4089.
Followed by:
Maduko v. Illinois, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85074 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 17, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85074
4090.
Distinguished by:
Cooney v. Rossiter, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81426 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 20, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81426
4091.
Followed by:
Pender v. Vanhollen, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109338 (E.D. Wis. July 11, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN8
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109338
4092.
Followed by:
Campus Invs., Inc. v. Lake County Stormwater Mgmt. Comm'n, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52062 (N.D. Ill. July
8, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52062
4093.
Followed by:
Fuery v. City of Chicago, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47680 (N.D. Ill. June 18, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47680
4094.
Followed by:
Page 472
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Gordon v. Van Hollen, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45795 (W.D. Wis. June 11, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45795
4095.
Followed by:
Welling v. Clamme, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45706 (N.D. Ind. June 5, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45706
4096.
Followed by:
Spencer v. Wisconsin, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27767 (W.D. Wis. Apr. 2, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27767
4097.
Cited by:
Bedree v. Pers. Representative of Estate of Lebamoff, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23808 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 25,
2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23808
4098.
Followed by:
Fulton v. Zalatoris, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20648 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 12, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20648
4099.
Followed by:
Wisconsin v. Chapman, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17160 (W.D. Wis. Mar. 3, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17160
4100.
Followed by:
Palacios v. City of Chicago, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13985 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13985
4101.
Followed by:
Taylor v. Hammond Police Dep't, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91783 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 12, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91783
4102.
Followed by:
Kincaid v. Brown, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88069 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 30, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88069
4103.
Cited by:
Staten v. McGirt, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83329 (S.D. Ill. Nov. 7, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83329
Page 473
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4104.
Followed by:
Shelton v. Madigan, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82949 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 6, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82949
4105.
Cited by:
Stephens v. Sluss, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82172 (N.D. Ind. Nov. 5, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82172
4106.
Cited by:
Shelton v. Madigan, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79788 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 29, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79788
4107.
Cited by:
Tayr Kilaab Al Ghashiyah v. Wis. Dep't of Corr., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72407 (E.D. Wis. Sept. 27, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72407
4108.
Cited by:
Bean v. People, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60695 (S.D. Ill. Aug. 17, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60695
4109.
Cited by:
Taylor v. Marion County Circuit No. 1, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52258 (S.D. Ind. July 16, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52258
4110.
Cited by:
Lopez v. Pollard, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48799 (E.D. Wis. July 5, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48799
4111.
Cited by:
Christensen v. Ehlenfeldt, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43780 (W.D. Wis. June 14, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43780
4112.
Cited by:
Williams v. Bd. of Sch. Trs., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41383 (S.D. Ind. June 5, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41383
4113.
Followed by, Cited by:
Mason v. County of Cook, 488 F. Supp. 2d 761, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36511 (N.D. Ill. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
488 F. Supp. 2d 761 p.765
Cited by:
Page 474
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
488 F. Supp. 2d 761 p.763
4114.
Cited by:
Harris v. State, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36310 (S.D. Ind. May 15, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36310
4115.
Cited by:
Lieberenz v. Superintendent, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36304 (N.D. Ind. May 14, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36304
4116.
Followed by:
Union Pac. R.R. v. Chi. Transit Auth., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29639 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 20, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29639
4117.
Cited by:
Rangel v. Reynolds, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29598 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 18, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29598
4118.
Cited by:
Beary Landscaping, Inc. v. Ludwig, 479 F. Supp. 2d 857, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23431 (N.D. Ill. 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
479 F. Supp. 2d 857 p.865
4119.
Cited by:
Duke v. Monahan, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19275 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 14, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19275
4120.
Followed by:
Locke v. Bissonette, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12805 (W.D. Wis. Feb. 20, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12805
4121.
Distinguished by:
N.B. v. Wausau Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11057 (W.D. Wis. Feb. 15, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11057
4122.
Cited by:
Harland v. County of Marion, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8121 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 2, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8121
4123.
Cited by:
El v. United States Dep't of Agric. Rural Hous. Serv., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7563 (W.D. Wis. Jan. 31,
2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 475
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7563
4124.
Followed by:
Carrillo v. Chambers, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5431 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 22, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5431
4125.
Cited by:
Tracy v. Waldo, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92592 (W.D. Wis. Dec. 19, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92592
4126.
Cited by:
Eagle Marine Indus. v. Conagra Foods, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90441 (S.D. Ill. Dec. 14, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90441
4127.
Cited by:
Calmese v. Fleishauer, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84917 (W.D. Wis. Nov. 17, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84917
4128.
Cited by:
Hamilton v. Am. Corrective Counseling Servs., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83361 (N.D. Ind. Nov. 14, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83361
4129.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Harder v. Vill. of Forest Park, 466 F. Supp. 2d 1000, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82909 (N.D. Ill. 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
466 F. Supp. 2d 1000 p.1006
Cited by:
466 F. Supp. 2d 1000 p.1004
4130.
Distinguished by:
Wessels v. NII-JII Entm't, LLC, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82599 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 9, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82599
4131.
Cited by:
Burks-Bey v. Tippecanoe County Jail, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82262 (N.D. Ind. Nov. 8, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82262
4132.
Cited by:
FreeEats.com, Inc. v. Indiana ex. rel. Carter, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77534 (S.D. Ind. Oct. 24, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77534
Page 476
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4133.
Cited by:
Neville v. Schwartz, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65503 (S.D. Ill. Sept. 14, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65503
4134.
Followed by:
Gay v. Bell, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60599 (C.D. Ill. Aug. 25, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60599
4135.
Followed by:
Haessly v. Grams, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58438 (E.D. Wis. Aug. 18, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58438
4136.
Followed by, Cited by:
Stroman Realty, Inc. v. Grillo, 438 F. Supp. 2d 929, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50887 (N.D. Ill. 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
Followed by:
438 F. Supp. 2d 929 p.935
Cited by:
438 F. Supp. 2d 929 p.931
4137.
Followed by:
Brown v. Consol. City of Indianapolis, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41531 (S.D. Ind. June 20, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41531
4138.
Distinguished by:
Menges v. Blagojevich, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37770, 98 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 589 (C.D. Ill. June
8, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37770
4139.
Followed by:
Am. Legion-Post 330 v. Heath, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34318 (S.D. Ind. May 24, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34318
4140.
Cited by:
General Auto Serv. Station v. City of Chicago, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36321 (N.D. Ill. May 23, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36321
4141.
Cited by:
Goshert Enters. v. Silveus Ins. Group, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29356 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 28, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29356
Page 477
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4142.
Followed by:
Pembina Nation Little Shell Band of N. Am. ex rel. Wesselman v. White, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23308 (S.D.
Ill. Apr. 25, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23308
4143.
Cited by:
Rutherford v. Merck & Co., 428 F. Supp. 2d 842, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22087 (S.D. Ill. 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
428 F. Supp. 2d 842 p.854
4144.
Cited by:
Gibson v. Walker, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21005 (S.D. Ill. Apr. 19, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21005
4145.
Cited by:
Brown v. Econo Lodge Motel, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18896 (W.D. Wis. Mar. 31, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18896
4146.
Cited by:
Mannix v. Machnik, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21642 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 24, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21642
4147.
Followed by:
Dabbs v. Tazewell County, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24399 (C.D. Ill. Mar. 20, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24399
4148.
Followed by:
Henke-Clarson Funeral Serv., LLC v. Jackson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9515 (W.D. Wis. Mar. 8, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9515
4149.
Cited by:
Pastorcik v. Starke County Judicial Sys., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12638 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 6, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12638
4150.
Cited by:
Mannix v. Machnik, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8868 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8868
4151.
Cited by:
Leichenauer v. Tazewell County, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9696 (C.D. Ill. Feb. 15, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9696
Page 478
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4152.
Cited by:
Stefko v. Bratcher, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8141 (S.D. Ill. Feb. 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8141
4153.
Followed by:
Kathrein v. City of Evanston, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2036 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 18, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2036
4154.
Followed by:
Parejko v. Dunn County Circuit Court, 408 F. Supp. 2d 704, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1060 (W.D. Wis. 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
408 F. Supp. 2d 704 p.706
4155.
Cited by:
Nail v. Olmstead, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2953 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 10, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2953
4156.
Cited by:
LaSalle Bank, N.A. v. City of Oakbrook Terrace, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1337 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 9, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1337
4157.
Cited by:
Turner v. County of Cook, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31212 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 2, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31212
4158.
Cited by:
Phillips v. Schwartz, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30898 (S.D. Ill. Nov. 29, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30898
4159.
Cited by:
Clarry v. Hatch, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31469 (S.D. Ill. Nov. 28, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31469
4160.
Cited by:
Briggs v. Dixon, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30421 (S.D. Ill. Nov. 21, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30421
4161.
Cited by:
Otrompke v. Anderson et. al., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28486 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 7, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28486
4162.
Distinguished by:
Page 479
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cobbs v. Sheahan, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26041 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 26, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26041
4163.
Followed by:
Emerald Casino, Inc. v. Jaffe, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24261 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 17, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN9
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24261
4164.
Cited by:
Redwood v. Dobson, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44610 (C.D. Ill. Oct. 12, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44610
4165.
Followed by:
Lewis v. Family & Soc. Servs. Admin., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23445 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 11, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23445
4166.
Cited by:
Kathrein v. City of Evanston, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19601 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 7, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19601
4167.
Followed by:
Koranda v. City of Chi. & As-Yet Unknown Chi. Officials, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16222 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 2,
2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16222
4168.
Distinguished by:
Effingham Retail 27, Inc. v. Vill. of Montrose, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15693 (S.D. Ill. July 26, 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15693
4169.
Distinguished by, Explained by:
Sheppard v. Welch, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15451 (S.D. Ind. July 5, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15451
Explained by:
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15451
4170.
Cited by:
Lee-Kathrein v. McGrath, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12892 (N.D. Ill. June 9, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12892
4171.
Distinguished by:
Am. Nat'l Prop. & Cas. Co. v. Graham, 370 F. Supp. 2d 819, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10060 (E.D. Wis.
Page 480
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2005)
370 F. Supp. 2d 819 p.822
4172.
Cited by:
Otrompke v. Chairman of the Comm. on Character & Fitness, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9561 (N.D. Ill. May
12, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9561
4173.
Cited by:
Fox v. Office of the Sheriff, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7980 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 13, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6, HN9
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7980
4174.
Followed by:
Smith v. O'Bren, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6282 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 11, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6282
4175.
Cited by:
Walton v. Hillard, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9701 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 1, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9701
4176.
Followed by, Cited by:
Bembenek v. Donohoo, 355 F. Supp. 2d 942, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1998 (E.D. Wis. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
355 F. Supp. 2d 942 p.957
Cited by:
355 F. Supp. 2d 942 p.956
4177.
Cited by:
Soriano v. Town of Cicero, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25352 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 19, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6, HN9
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25352
4178.
Cited by:
Hunt v. Pepsico, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19964 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 4, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19964
4179.
Followed by:
Duke v. Affiliated Psychological Servs., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24991 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 28, 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24991
4180.
Cited by:
McDonald v. Brown, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18802 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 17, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Page 481
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18802
4181.
Followed by:
Robinson v. Lother, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17659 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 31, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6, HN9
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17659
4182.
Cited by:
Wis. Bell, Inc. v. Bridge, 334 F. Supp. 2d 1127, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17526 (W.D. Wis. 2004)
334 F. Supp. 2d 1127 p.1139
4183.
Distinguished by:
Nader v. Keith, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16660 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 23, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16660
4184.
Cited by:
Mt. Funding, Inc. v. Frontier Ins. Co., 329 F. Supp. 2d 994, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15721 (N.D. Ill. 2004)
329 F. Supp. 2d 994 p.997
4185.
Followed by:
Batchelor v. Vill. of Evergreen Park, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15470 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 4, 2004)
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15470
4186.
Followed by:
New Albany DVD, LLC v. City of New Albany, 350 F. Supp. 2d 789, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14239 (S.D.
Ind. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
350 F. Supp. 2d 789 p.792
4187.
Cited by:
City of New Albany v. New Albany DVD, LLC, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14240 (S.D. Ind. July 22, 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14240
4188.
Followed by:
Akel v. City of Chi. Mayor's License Comm'n, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13547 (N.D. Ill. July 20, 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13547
4189.
Distinguished by:
Solidarity Books Collective v. Thompson, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19579 (S.D. Ind. June 30, 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19579
4190.
Followed by:
Otrompke v. Chairman of the Comm. on Character & Fitness, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6367 (N.D. Ill. Apr.
Page 482
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
14, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6367
4191.
Cited by:
Nwoke v. Palmer, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6364 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 14, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6364
4192.
Followed by:
Golden Years Homestead, Inc. v. Buckland, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7715 (S.D. Ind. Mar. 30, 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7715
4193.
Cited by:
Simpson v. Rowan, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3812 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 9, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3812
4194.
Cited by:
Garner v. Dreyer, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5913 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 2, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5913
4195.
Distinguished by:
Rodriguez v. Ramsey, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1129 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 27, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1129
4196.
Followed by:
Seamon v. O'Brien, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23045 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 19, 2003)
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23045
4197.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Williams v. Maul, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21611 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 1, 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21611
4198.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Williams v. Maul, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21248 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 25, 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21248
4199.
Cited by:
Evans v. Morgan, 304 F. Supp. 2d 1100, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24610 (W.D. Wis. 2003)
304 F. Supp. 2d 1100 p.1108
4200.
Cited by:
Peterson v. United States, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15299 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 28, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Page 483
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15299
4201.
Cited by:
Jones v. City of Country Club Hills, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12012 (N.D. Ill. July 14, 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12012
4202.
Cited by:
Holten v. City of Genoa, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11601 (N.D. Ill. July 8, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11601
4203.
Distinguished by:
Mt. Funding, Inc. v. Frontier Ins. Co., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11274 (N.D. Ill. June 30, 2003)
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11274
4204.
Cited by:
Losey v. Frank, 268 F. Supp. 2d 1066, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10851 (E.D. Wis. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
268 F. Supp. 2d 1066 p.1070
4205.
Followed by:
Snell v. Pucinski, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9679 (N.D. Ill. June 4, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9679
4206.
Cited by:
Sharkeys, Inc. v. City of Waukesha, 265 F. Supp. 2d 984, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9249 (E.D. Wis. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
265 F. Supp. 2d 984 p.988
4207.
Cited by:
Butler v. City of Chi., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8372 (N.D. Ill. May 16, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6, HN8
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8372
4208.
Followed by:
Rothman v. City of Chicago, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8376, 14 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1070 (N.D. Ill.
May 14, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8376
4209.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Rodriguez v. Bowen, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6970 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 25, 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6970
4210.
Cited by:
Page 484
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Yasak v. Ret. Bd. of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund of Chi., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3080 (N.D. Ill.
Feb. 28, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3080
4211.
Cited by:
Baltzer v. Birkett, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2417 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 18, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2417
4212.
Cited by:
Peterson v. United States, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23411 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 4, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23411
4213.
Followed by, Explained by:
Wis. Realtors Ass'n v. Ponto, 229 F. Supp. 2d 889, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21405 (W.D. Wis. 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
Followed by:
229 F. Supp. 2d 889 p.892
Explained by:
229 F. Supp. 2d 889 p.891
4214.
Cited by:
Hudson v. Ace Cash Express, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19210 (S.D. Ind. Sept. 30, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19210
4215.
Cited by:
First Def. Legal Aid v. City of Chicago, 225 F. Supp. 2d 870, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16954 (N.D. Ill. 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
225 F. Supp. 2d 870 p.881
4216.
Cited by:
Williams v. Pucinski, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12764 (N.D. Ill. July 12, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12764
4217.
Followed by:
Adam v. Frantz, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27152 (W.D. Wis. May 10, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN9
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27152
4218.
Cited by:
Metro. Milwaukee Ass'n of Commerce v. Milwaukee County, 201 F. Supp. 2d 942, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
9060, 170 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2083 (E.D. Wis. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
201 F. Supp. 2d 942 p.949
4219.
Cited by:
Castillo v. Zuniga, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4261 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 14, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
Page 485
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4261
4220.
Cited by:
CIGNA Healthcare of St. Louis v. Kaiser, 181 F. Supp. 2d 914, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 581 (N.D. Ill. 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
181 F. Supp. 2d 914 p.924
4221.
Cited by:
Saban v. Illinois, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 2, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37
4222.
Cited by:
Arrington v. Elections Bd., 173 F. Supp. 2d 856, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19843 (E.D. Wis. 2001)
173 F. Supp. 2d 856 p.864
4223.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Sumner, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18849 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 14, 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18849
4224.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Francorp, Inc. v. Siebert, 210 F. Supp. 2d 961, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19019 (N.D. Ill. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
210 F. Supp. 2d 961 p.970
Cited by:
210 F. Supp. 2d 961 p.969
4225.
Cited by:
Cain v. Ryan, 171 F. Supp. 2d 813, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19245 (N.D. Ill. 2001)
171 F. Supp. 2d 813 p.823
4226.
Followed by:
Bouvagnet v. Bouvagnet, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17095 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 18, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17095
4227.
Cited by:
Terra Found. for the Arts v. Perkins, 151 F. Supp. 2d 931, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8895 (N.D. Ill. 2001)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
151 F. Supp. 2d 931 p.934
4228.
Distinguished by:
Nissan N. Am., Inc. v. Jim M'Lady Oldsmobile, Inc., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8679 (N.D. Ill. June 21, 2001)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8679
Page 486
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4229.
Followed by:
Lamar Whiteco Outdoor Corp. v. City of W. Chi., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5615 (N.D. Ill. May 1, 2001)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5615
4230.
Followed by:
Manos v. Caira, 162 F. Supp. 2d 979, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3752 (N.D. Ill. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN9
162 F. Supp. 2d 979 p.987
4231.
Followed by:
Residents of the New Ritz Hotel v. City of Chicago, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 470 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 18, 2001)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 470
4232.
Cited by:
Lacrosse County Dist. Atty. v. Nelson (In re Nelson), 258 B.R. 374, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4942, 37 Bankr.
Ct. Dec. (LRP) 132 (W.D. Wis. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
258 B.R. 374 p.376
4233.
Cited by:
Anders v. Fort Wayne Community Schs., 124 F. Supp. 2d 618, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18492 (N.D. Ind.
2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
124 F. Supp. 2d 618 p.628
4234.
Cited by:
Pickell v. Records Clerk, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18259 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 14, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18259
4235.
Cited by:
Ellis v. City of Chicago, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17827 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 30, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17827
4236.
Followed by, Cited by:
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. McCarty, 120 F. Supp. 2d 1155, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16682 (S.D.
Ind. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
120 F. Supp. 2d 1155 p.1159
Cited by:
120 F. Supp. 2d 1155 p.1165
4237.
Cited by:
Page 487
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Young v. Illinois State Bd. of Elections, 116 F. Supp. 2d 977, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15235 (N.D. Ill. 2000)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
116 F. Supp. 2d 977 p.980
4238.
Cited by:
Ringswald v. County of DuPage, 196 F.R.D. 509, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17437 (N.D. Ill. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
196 F.R.D. 509 p.512
4239.
Cited by:
Coleman v. County of Kane, 196 F.R.D. 505, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17438 (N.D. Ill. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
196 F.R.D. 505 p.508
4240.
Cited by:
Bottoms v. Illinois Dep't of Human Servs., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13785 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 11, 2000)
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13785
4241.
Followed by:
Olison v. Ryan, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13074 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 1, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13074
4242.
Cited by:
Minnick v. Anderson, 151 F. Supp. 2d 1015, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12573 (N.D. Ind. 2000)
151 F. Supp. 2d 1015 p.1037
4243.
Followed by:
Smith v. Bravo, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11437 (N.D. Ill. July 27, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11437
4244.
Cited by:
Thomas v. Klinkhamer, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9851 (N.D. Ill. July 10, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9851
4245.
Followed by:
Kennedy v. Du Page County, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6336 (N.D. Ill. May 9, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6336
4246.
Followed by:
Edwards v. Illinois Bd. of Admissions to the Bar, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5869 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 29, 2000)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5869
4247.
Cited by:
Page 488
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Carter ex rel M.C. v. Doyle, 95 F. Supp. 2d 851, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5884 (N.D. Ill. 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
95 F. Supp. 2d 851 p.855
95 F. Supp. 2d 851 p.856
4248.
Cited by:
Azizarab v. Illinois, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1560 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 3, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1560
4249.
Cited by:
Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. Branson, 82 F. Supp. 2d 844, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47 (N.D. Ill. 2000)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
82 F. Supp. 2d 844 p.853
4250.
Cited by:
United States v. Frese, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19823, 85 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 356 (C.D. Ill. 1999)
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19823
85 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 356 p.358
4251.
Followed by:
Wilson v. Kalelkar, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18670 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 30, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18670
4252.
Followed by:
Doe v. Cook County, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18191 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 18, 1999)
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18191
4253.
Followed by:
Schullo v. Town of Cicero, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16367 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 7, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16367
4254.
Distinguished by:
Ramsden v. AgriBank, FCB, 63 F. Supp. 2d 958, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13943 (W.D. Wis. 1999)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
63 F. Supp. 2d 958 p.965
4255.
Cited by:
Lockheart v. Chicago Police Dep't, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12937 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 16, 1999)
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12937
4256.
Followed by:
Boczar v. Kingen, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22080 (S.D. Ind. Aug. 12, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22080
Page 489
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4257.
Followed by:
Nudell v. Nevius, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12272 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 3, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12272
4258.
Cited by:
Sims v. Kernan, 72 F. Supp. 2d 944, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12795 (N.D. Ind. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
72 F. Supp. 2d 944 p.949
4259.
Cited by:
Special Souvenirs, Inc. v. Town of Wayne, 56 F. Supp. 2d 1062, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10539 (E.D. Wis.
1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
56 F. Supp. 2d 1062 p.1070
4260.
Cited by:
Torres v. Frias, 68 F. Supp. 2d 935, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10692 (N.D. Ill. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
68 F. Supp. 2d 935 p.939
4261.
Cited by:
TORRES v. FRIAS, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9484 (N.D. Ill. June 16, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4262.
Cited by:
Mural v. City of Chicago, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6186 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 15, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN9
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6186
4263.
Cited by:
Chambers v. Habitat Co., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6194 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 8, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6194
4264.
Cited by:
West Side Community Comm. Credit Union v. Illinois Dep't of Fin. Insts., 56 F. Supp. 2d 995, 1999 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 2119 (N.D. Ill. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
56 F. Supp. 2d 995 p.996
4265.
Cited by:
Ray v. O'Malley, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1952 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 22, 1999)
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1952
4266.
Cited by:
Cash Converters USA, Inc. v. Burns, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1836 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 16, 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1836
4267.
Cited by:
Page 490
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cooper v. Bombela, 34 F. Supp. 2d 693, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 992, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P45826
(N.D. Ill. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
34 F. Supp. 2d 693 p.696
4268.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Pelfresne v. Stephens, 35 F. Supp. 2d 1064, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1305, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide P9692
(N.D. Ill. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
35 F. Supp. 2d 1064 p.1072
Cited by:
35 F. Supp. 2d 1064 p.1068
4269.
Cited by:
Sims v. Kernan, 29 F. Supp. 2d 952, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19327 (N.D. Ind. 1998)
29 F. Supp. 2d 952 p.959
4270.
Cited by:
Finova Capital Corp. v. Ryan Helicopters U.S.A., Inc., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15874 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 30,
1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15874
4271.
Cited by:
Greer v. Amesqua, 22 F. Supp. 2d 916, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15898 (W.D. Wis. 1998) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
22 F. Supp. 2d 916 p.919
4272.
Distinguished by:
Morton College Bd. of Trustees v. Town of Cicero, 18 F. Supp. 2d 921, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13701 (N.D.
Ill. 1998)
18 F. Supp. 2d 921 p.924
4273.
Followed by:
Illinois Bell Tel. Co. v. Worldcom Techs., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13412 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 25, 1998)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13412
4274.
Distinguished by:
Lowery v. Schnorf, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9455 (N.D. Ill. June 17, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9455
4275.
Distinguished by:
Smith v. McDonald, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7621 (N.D. Ill. May 5, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7621
4276.
Distinguished by:
Page 491
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Wright by Wright v. Touhy, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4407 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 31, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4407
4277.
Cited by:
Pelfresne v. Village of Rosemont, 22 F. Supp. 2d 756, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2469, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide
P9499 (N.D. Ill. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
22 F. Supp. 2d 756 p.758
4278.
Followed by:
McGladdery v. Callum, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2240 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 18, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2240
4279.
Distinguished by:
Mora v. Genova, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2258 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 17, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2258
4280.
Followed by:
Hearne v. Board of Educ., 996 F. Supp. 773, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1053 (N.D. Ill. 1998) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
996 F. Supp. 773 p.777
4281.
Followed by:
Hearne v. Board of Educ., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2261 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 14, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2261
4282.
Followed by:
Mitts v. Marszewski, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 495 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 13, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 495
4283.
Cited by:
Daniels v. Sheahan, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20419 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 4, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4284.
Followed by, Cited by:
Wisconsin Mfrs. & Commerce v. Wisconsin Elections Bd., 978 F. Supp. 1200, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15363
(W.D. Wis. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
Followed by:
978 F. Supp. 1200 p.1207
Cited by:
978 F. Supp. 1200 p.1210
4285.
Cited by:
Gawrysh v. CNA Ins. Cos., 978 F. Supp. 790, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14302 (N.D. Ill. 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
978 F. Supp. 790 p.794
Page 492
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4286.
Followed by:
McCullough v. City of Chicago, 971 F. Supp. 1247, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11674 (N.D. Ill. 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
971 F. Supp. 1247 p.1253
4287.
Cited by:
Williams v. Maher, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11506 (N.D. Ill. July 25, 1997)
4288.
Cited by:
Pelfresne v. Village of Rosemont, 174 F.R.D. 72, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10209, 38 Fed. R. Serv. 3d
(Callaghan) 1285, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide P9318, 1997-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P71906 (N.D. Ill. 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
174 F.R.D. 72 p.74
174 F.R.D. 72 p.76
4289.
Followed by:
Discovery House v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis, 970 F. Supp. 655, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10294, 24
Am. Disabilities Dec. 1115 (S.D. Ind. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
970 F. Supp. 655 p.657
4290.
Cited by:
Olague v. Village of Bensenville, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8539 (N.D. Ill. June 11, 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4291.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
United States ex rel. Aleman v. Circuit Court, 967 F. Supp. 1022, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6834 (N.D. Ill.
1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
967 F. Supp. 1022 p.1026
Cited by:
967 F. Supp. 1022 p.1025
4292.
Distinguished by:
Wilbur v. Keybank Nat'l Ass'n, 962 F. Supp. 1122, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5213 (N.D. Ind. 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
962 F. Supp. 1122 p.1134
4293.
Cited by:
SSDD Enters. v. Village of Lansing, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4498 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 3, 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4294.
Cited by:
Van Breeman v. Zollar, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3112 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 13, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
4295.
Cited by:
Griffin v. Rodriguez, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2234 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 25, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4296.
Cited by:
Page 493
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Youngerman v. Headley, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1876 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 19, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN9
4297.
Followed by, Cited by:
Pelfresne v. Village of Rosemont, 952 F. Supp. 589, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1490, 1997-1 Trade Cas. (CCH)
P71848 (N.D. Ill. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
952 F. Supp. 589 p.592
Cited by:
952 F. Supp. 589 p.590
4298.
Cited by:
Blair v. Disotaur, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1072 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 30, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4299.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Tennison, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18625 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 13, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4300.
Cited by:
Jones v. Watkins, 945 F. Supp. 1143, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17244 (N.D. Ill. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
945 F. Supp. 1143 p.1148
4301.
Cited by:
Patterson v. Leyden, 947 F. Supp. 1211, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16395 (N.D. Ill. 1996)
947 F. Supp. 1211 p.1219
4302.
Cited by:
Williams v. Blume, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16519 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 4, 1996)
4303.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Brownsburg Area Patrons Affecting Change v. Baldwin, 943 F. Supp. 975, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15827
(S.D. Ind. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN7
Distinguished by:
943 F. Supp. 975 p.985
Cited by:
943 F. Supp. 975 p.978
943 F. Supp. 975 p.984
4304.
Cited by:
Patterson v. Broadway, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14493 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 1, 1996)
4305.
Cited by:
Living Word Outreach Full Gospel Church & Ministries v. City of Chicago Heights, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
13519 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 13, 1996)
4306.
Cited by:
Cleveland v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Comm'n, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13198 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 5,
1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 494
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4307.
Followed by, Cited by:
T.W. by & Through Enk v. Brophy, 954 F. Supp. 1306, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20566, 36 Fed. R. Serv. 3d
(Callaghan) 1336 (E.D. Wis. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
954 F. Supp. 1306 p.1312
Cited by:
954 F. Supp. 1306 p.1311
4308.
Cited by:
SSDD Enters. v. Village of Lansing, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6073 (N.D. Ill. May 2, 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4309.
Cited by:
Real Estate Mgmt. Sys. v. Village of Roscoe, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6590 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 30, 1996)
4310.
Followed by, Cited by:
Sterns v. Lundberg, 922 F. Supp. 164, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5223 (S.D. Ind. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Followed by:
922 F. Supp. 164 p.167
Cited by:
922 F. Supp. 164 p.166
4311.
Cited by:
Henderson v. Handy, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3874 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 26, 1996)
4312.
Cited by:
Sumpter v. Bolingbrook Police Dep't, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3699 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 26, 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4313.
Cited by:
Chavez v. Illinois State Police, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1540 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 9, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
4314.
Cited by:
Smith v. Staples, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 379 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 12, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
4315.
Cited by:
Cage v. Fairman, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18449 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 11, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4316.
Cited by:
Krempel v. Martin Oil Mktg., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18236 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 7, 1995)
4317.
Cited by:
Brazdo v. Illinois Dep't of Professional Regulation, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18282 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 4, 1995)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4318.
Cited by:
Ingram v. Jones, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18412 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 28, 1995)
4319.
Distinguished by:
Page 495
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
United States v. Hopper, 899 F. Supp. 389, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14554 (S.D. Ind. 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
899 F. Supp. 389 p.393
4320.
Followed by, Cited by:
Knecht v. Thompson, 896 F. Supp. 876, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12196 (E.D. Wis. 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
Followed by:
896 F. Supp. 876 p.878
Cited by:
896 F. Supp. 876 p.877
4321.
Cited by:
Tizes v. Curcio, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11368 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 9, 1995)
4322.
Followed by, Cited by:
American Deposit Corp. v. Schacht, 887 F. Supp. 1066, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7187 (N.D. Ill. 1995)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
887 F. Supp. 1066 p.1073
Cited by:
887 F. Supp. 1066 p.1072
4323.
Cited by:
Smith v. Kato, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5380 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 20, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4324.
Followed by, Cited by:
Offutt v. Kaplan, 884 F. Supp. 1179, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4882 (N.D. Ill. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Followed by:
884 F. Supp. 1179 p.1190
Cited by:
884 F. Supp. 1179 p.1184
4325.
Cited by:
Davis v. Rodriguez, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2311 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 24, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4326.
Cited by:
NBD Bank, N.A. v. Bennett, 874 F. Supp. 924, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19690 (S.D. Ind. 1994)
874 F. Supp. 924 p.925
4327.
Cited by:
Contreras v. City of Chicago, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17770 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 9, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN9
4328.
Cited by:
Wanke v. Lindmark, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16809 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 21, 1994)
Page 496
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4329.
Cited by:
Gomez by Hernandez v. Comerford, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16940 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 17, 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4330.
Cited by:
BBI Enters. v. City of Chicago, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16379 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 15, 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4331.
Cited by:
Vugrincic v. Zollar, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15759 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 24, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
4332.
Followed by:
Esmail v. Macrane, 862 F. Supp. 217, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12047 (N.D. Ill. 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
862 F. Supp. 217 p.221
4333.
Cited by:
BBI Enters. v. City of Chicago, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11156 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 9, 1994)
4334.
Cited by:
BBI Enters. v. City of Chicago, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9877 (N.D. Ill. July 18, 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4335.
Followed by:
Hudson v. Chicago Police Dep't, 860 F. Supp. 521, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9351 (N.D. Ill. 1994)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
860 F. Supp. 521 p.523
4336.
Distinguished by:
Methodist Hosp. v. Indiana Family & Social Servs. Admin., 860 F. Supp. 1309, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
9395, 45 Soc. Sec. Rep. Service 652 (N.D. Ind. 1994)
860 F. Supp. 1309 p.1320
4337.
Cited by:
Barichello v. McDonald, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8913 (N.D. Ill. June 29, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
4338.
Cited by:
Celestial Church of Christ v. City of Chicago, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8380 (N.D. Ill. June 21, 1994)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4339.
Distinguished by:
Lake County Rehabilitation Ctr. v. Shalala, 854 F. Supp. 1329, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8099, 45 Soc. Sec.
Rep. Service 22 (N.D. Ind. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
854 F. Supp. 1329 p.1336
4340.
Cited by:
Upfront Tavern & Grill v. City of Chicago, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6780 (N.D. Ill. May 19, 1994)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 497
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4341.
Cited by:
Jack & Lou's Inc. v. County of Cook, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3220 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 16, 1994)
4342.
Cited by:
Nelson v. Murphy, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2896 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 9, 1994)
4343.
Cited by:
Ellis v. Welch, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2692 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 7, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4344.
Cited by:
Triumvera Homeowners' Ass'n v. Continental Cablevision, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 488 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 13,
1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4345.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Starzenski v. City of Elkhart, 842 F. Supp. 1132, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1155 (N.D. Ind. 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
842 F. Supp. 1132 p.1139
Cited by:
842 F. Supp. 1132 p.1135
842 F. Supp. 1132 p.1136
4346.
Cited by:
Lucien v. Johnson, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17923 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 15, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
4347.
Cited by:
Cooper v. Casey, 837 F. Supp. 938, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16781 (N.D. Ill. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
837 F. Supp. 938 p.939
4348.
Cited by:
Ryan v. DuPage County Jury Comm'n, 837 F. Supp. 898, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15325 (N.D. Ill. 1993)
837 F. Supp. 898 p.900
4349.
Cited by:
LaBoy v. Zuley, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13864 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 29, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
4350.
Distinguished by:
Jones v. Takaki, 832 F. Supp. 1224, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13767 (N.D. Ill. 1993)
832 F. Supp. 1224 p.1226
4351.
Cited by:
Simpson v. Rowan, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11170 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 11, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4352.
Cited by:
United States v. Citizens Utils. Co., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10340 (N.D. Ill. July 27, 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4353.
Cited by:
Page 498
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Moran v. Illinois State Police, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7950 (N.D. Ill. June 11, 1993)
4354.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
United States v. Village of Palatine, 845 F. Supp. 540, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6619 (N.D. Ill. 1993)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN5
Distinguished by:
845 F. Supp. 540 p.543
Cited by:
845 F. Supp. 540 p.541
4355.
Cited by:
Wiggins v. Burge, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6594 (N.D. Ill. May 12, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
4356.
Followed by, Cited by:
Carbone v. Zollar, 845 F. Supp. 534, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6134 (N.D. Ill. 1993)
Followed by:
845 F. Supp. 534 p.536
Cited by:
845 F. Supp. 534 p.538
4357.
Followed by, Cited by:
Trust & Inv. Advisors v. Hogsett, 830 F. Supp. 463, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11507 (S.D. Ind. 1993)
Followed by:
830 F. Supp. 463 p.468
Cited by:
830 F. Supp. 463 p.465
4358.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Evans v. Evans, 818 F. Supp. 1215, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5000, 2 Am. Disabilities Dec. 158, 27 Fed. R.
Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 158 (N.D. Ind. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
818 F. Supp. 1215 p.1225
Cited by:
818 F. Supp. 1215 p.1224
4359.
Distinguished by:
Barker v. Wisconsin Ethics Bd., 815 F. Supp. 1216, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3373 (W.D. Wis. 1993)
815 F. Supp. 1216 p.1221
4360.
Cited by:
Jones v. Takaki, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1843 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 17, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4361.
Cited by:
People v. Hetzel, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17802 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 16, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4362.
Cited by:
Page 499
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Ellis v. State, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17131 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 3, 1992)
4363.
Cited by:
Gorsline v. Ottawa, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16464 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 28, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4364.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Forest County Potawatomi Community v. Doyle, 803 F. Supp. 1526, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14066 (W.D.
Wis. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Distinguished by:
803 F. Supp. 1526 p.1534
Cited by:
803 F. Supp. 1526 p.1537
4365.
Cited by:
Illinois Petroleum Co. v. Chicago, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13860 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 31, 1992) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4366.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Beres v. Village of Huntley, 824 F. Supp. 763, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11986 (N.D. Ill. 1992) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
824 F. Supp. 763 p.767
Cited by:
824 F. Supp. 763 p.765
824 F. Supp. 763 p.766
4367.
Cited by:
Buckley v. Illinois Judicial Inquiry Bd., 801 F. Supp. 83, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12595 (N.D. Ill. 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
801 F. Supp. 83 p.89
4368.
Cited by:
Lucas v. LaGrange, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5656 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 3, 1992)
4369.
Distinguished by:
Ft. Wayne Journal-Gazette v. Baker, 788 F. Supp. 379, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4163, 20 Media L. Rep.
(BNA) 1434 (N.D. Ind. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
788 F. Supp. 379 p.382
4370.
Cited by:
Buckley v. Illinois Judicial Inquiry Bd., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2093 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 24, 1992) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4371.
Cited by:
Dickerson v. Chicago, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1771 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 14, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4372.
Cited by:
Schmidling v. Chicago, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 561 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 15, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 500
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4373.
Cited by:
Phelps v. Klipfel, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18396 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 26, 1991)
4374.
Cited by:
Cooks v. Cronin, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18061 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 6, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4375.
Distinguished by:
Jackson v. Markham, 773 F. Supp. 105, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11625 (N.D. Ill. 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
773 F. Supp. 105 p.110
4376.
Cited by:
Betts v. O'Malley, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10953 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 2, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4377.
Cited by:
Taylor v. Partee, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9808 (N.D. Ill. July 17, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
4378.
Cited by:
Coghlan v. Chapman, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7682 (N.D. Ill. May 28, 1991)
4379.
Cited by:
Muhammad v. Leak, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3669 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 26, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4380.
Cited by:
In re Chicago, M. & St. P. & Pac. R.R., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3429 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 21, 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4381.
Cited by:
Schiro v. Clark, 754 F. Supp. 646, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17927 (N.D. Ind. 1990)
754 F. Supp. 646 p.662
4382.
Distinguished by:
Hinrichs v. Goodrich, 753 F. Supp. 261, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16857 (W.D. Wis. 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
753 F. Supp. 261 p.262
4383.
Cited by:
Arkebauer v. Kiley, 751 F. Supp. 783, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16315 (C.D. Ill. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6, HN9
751 F. Supp. 783 p.784
4384.
Followed by:
Sapir v. Chicago, 749 F. Supp. 187, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14553 (N.D. Ill. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
749 F. Supp. 187 p.189
4385.
Cited by:
LaBoy v. Zuley, 747 F. Supp. 1284, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13184 (N.D. Ill. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
747 F. Supp. 1284 p.1290
Page 501
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4386.
Distinguished by:
Black v. Cook County Officers Electoral Bd., 750 F. Supp. 901, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15567 (N.D. Ill.
1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
750 F. Supp. 901 p.902
4387.
Distinguished by:
General Ry. Signal Co. v. Corcoran, Unit of General Signal Corp., 748 F. Supp. 639, 1990 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 13112 (N.D. Ill. 1990)
748 F. Supp. 639 p.644
4388.
Followed by:
Zapata v. Hartigan, 749 F. Supp. 864, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12030 (N.D. Ill. 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
749 F. Supp. 864 p.866
749 F. Supp. 864 p.867
4389.
Distinguished by:
Paul v. Indiana Election Bd., 743 F. Supp. 616, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9249 (S.D. Ind. 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
743 F. Supp. 616 p.620
4390.
Distinguished by:
Roloff v. Bowen, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21002 (N.D. Ind. July 25, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21002
4391.
Cited by:
Harris Trust & Sav. Bank v. Olsen, 745 F. Supp. 503, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8980 (N.D. Ill. 1990)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
745 F. Supp. 503 p.506
4392.
Distinguished by:
Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Wisconsin, 743 F. Supp. 645, 1990 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 9218 (W.D. Wis. 1990)
743 F. Supp. 645 p.655
4393.
Cited by:
Chatfield v. Richards, 739 F. Supp. 1262, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8448 (N.D. Ind. 1990)
739 F. Supp. 1262 p.1265
4394.
Followed by:
Greening v. Moran, 739 F. Supp. 1244, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7961 (C.D. Ill. 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
739 F. Supp. 1244 p.1256
Page 502
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4395.
Cited by:
Strauss v. Drew, 739 F. Supp. 1231, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7434 (N.D. Ill. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
739 F. Supp. 1231 p.1233
739 F. Supp. 1231 p.1234
4396.
Cited by:
Mitchell v. Clayton, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6371 (N.D. Ill. May 25, 1990)
4397.
Followed by:
John E. Reid & Assoc., Inc. v. Illinois Human Rights Com., 740 F. Supp. 1314, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
6091, 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1189 (N.D. Ill. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
740 F. Supp. 1314 p.1318
4398.
Cited by:
RFMS, Inc. v. Village of Alsip Park Dist., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6368 (N.D. Ill. May 17, 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4399.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Su v. Casey, 737 F. Supp. 488, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5701 (N.D. Ill. 1990)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
737 F. Supp. 488 p.490
4400.
Cited by:
RFMS, Inc. v. Alsip Park Dist., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5547 (N.D. Ill. May 7, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
4401.
Cited by:
Midwest Dental Products Corp. v. Kinetic Instruments, Inc., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1956 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 23,
1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4402.
Cited by:
J.I.K. Realty Co. v. Steward, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15647 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 28, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
4403.
Cited by:
Markowski v. Edgar, 726 F. Supp. 1128, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16353 (N.D. Ill. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
726 F. Supp. 1128 p.1133
726 F. Supp. 1128 p.1134
4404.
Cited by:
Ross v. Chicago, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15015 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 13, 1989)
4405.
Cited by:
Crane v. Gasparini, 719 F. Supp. 746, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10797 (N.D. Ill. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
719 F. Supp. 746 p.749
4406.
Cited by:
Page 503
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Phillips Towing Service, Inc. v. Bushnell, 719 F. Supp. 1428, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9921 (N.D. Ill. 1989)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
719 F. Supp. 1428 p.1433
4407.
Cited by:
Clay v. Rockford, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9443 (N.D. Ill. June 30, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4408.
Cited by:
Dash v. Frech, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7771 (N.D. Ill. June 20, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
4409.
Cited by:
Waste Management of Illinois, Inc. v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation Dist., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5952
(N.D. Ill. May 19, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4410.
Cited by:
Petry v. Lawler, 718 F. Supp. 1396, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4481 (S.D. Ind. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
718 F. Supp. 1396 p.1397
4411.
Distinguished by:
Johnson v. Chicago, 712 F. Supp. 1311, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3471 (N.D. Ill. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
712 F. Supp. 1311 p.1317
4412.
Followed by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by:
Alleghany Corp. v. Haase, 708 F. Supp. 1507, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2286 (W.D. Wis. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN9
Followed by:
708 F. Supp. 1507 p.1510
708 F. Supp. 1507 p.1520
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
708 F. Supp. 1507 p.1526
708 F. Supp. 1507 p.1529
Cited by:
708 F. Supp. 1507 p.1511
708 F. Supp. 1507 p.1513
4413.
Cited by:
Newsome v. Circuit Court of Cook County, Criminal Div., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1713 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 21,
1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
4414.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Alleghany Corp. v. Eakin, 712 F. Supp. 716, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11005 (S.D. Ind. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
Distinguished by:
712 F. Supp. 716 p.718
712 F. Supp. 716 p.721
Cited by:
Page 504
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
712 F. Supp. 716 p.717
4415.
Cited by:
Suffha v. Selcke, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 953 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 26, 1989)
4416.
Cited by:
American Diversified Constr., Inc. v. Martin, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 433 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 18, 1989)
4417.
Cited by:
Alleghany Corp. v. Haase, 708 F. Supp. 1507, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15890 (W.D. Wis. 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
4418.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Thomas v. Fiedler, 700 F. Supp. 1527, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13675 (E.D. Wis. 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
700 F. Supp. 1527 p.1534
Cited by:
700 F. Supp. 1527 p.1535
4419.
Cited by:
Indiana Voluntary Firemen's Asso. v. Pearson, 700 F. Supp. 421, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13499 (S.D. Ind.
1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
700 F. Supp. 421 p.439
4420.
Cited by:
Flosi v. City of Rock Falls, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13943 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 23, 1988)
4421.
Followed by:
American Nat'l Bank v. Parkman, 702 F. Supp. 168, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11961 (N.D. Ill. 1988)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
702 F. Supp. 168 p.170
4422.
Cited by:
American Federation of State, etc. v. Tristano, 695 F. Supp. 410, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10829 (N.D. Ill.
1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
695 F. Supp. 410 p.410
695 F. Supp. 410 p.411
4423.
Cited by:
Fort v. Daley, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10173 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 2, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4424.
Cited by:
Harris v. De Robertis, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6827 (N.D. Ill. July 6, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
4425.
Cited by:
Caroth v. Fitzgerald, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6796 (N.D. Ill. July 1, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
4426.
Cited by:
Page 505
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cepela v. Chicago Heights, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4827 (N.D. Ill. May 19, 1988)
4427.
Cited by:
Midwest Constr. Co. v. Illinois Dep't of Labor, 684 F. Supp. 991, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4661, 112 Lab.
Cas. (CCH) P11251, 1988-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P68212 (N.D. Ill. 1988)
684 F. Supp. 991 p.993
4428.
Cited by:
Ogden Books, Inc. v. Downers Grove, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4660 (N.D. Ill. May 18, 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
4429.
Followed by, Cited by:
Pincham v. Illinois Judicial Inquiry Bd., 681 F. Supp. 1309, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2330 (N.D. Ill. 1988)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8, HN9
Followed by:
681 F. Supp. 1309 p.1317
681 F. Supp. 1309 p.1321
681 F. Supp. 1309 p.1323
Cited by:
681 F. Supp. 1309 p.1320
4430.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Johnson v. Cook County Officers Electoral Bd., 680 F. Supp. 1229, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1295 (N.D. Ill.
1988)
Distinguished by:
680 F. Supp. 1229 p.1232
Cited by:
680 F. Supp. 1229 p.1231
4431.
Cited by:
Bays v. Edgar, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1196 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 16, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4432.
Cited by:
Schaill v. Tippecanoe County School Corp., 679 F. Supp. 833, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 881 (N.D. Ind. 1988)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
679 F. Supp. 833 p.858
4433.
Cited by:
Sequoia Books, Inc. v. Randall, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11354 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 7, 1987)
4434.
Cited by:
Wrzesinski v. Martwick, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8170 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 2, 1987)
4435.
Followed by, Cited by:
Naked City, Inc. v. Aregood, 667 F. Supp. 1246, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7833 (N.D. Ind. 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
Followed by:
667 F. Supp. 1246 p.1256
Page 506
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cited by:
667 F. Supp. 1246 p.1255
4436.
Distinguished by:
West Allis Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bowen, 660 F. Supp. 936, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4363 (E.D. Wis.
1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
660 F. Supp. 936 p.940
4437.
Explained by, Cited by:
Munroe v. Lasch, 73 B.R. 909, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4101, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P71887 (E.D. Wis.
1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Explained by:
73 B.R. 909 p.914
73 B.R. 909 p.915
Cited by:
73 B.R. 909 p.913
4438.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Lemon v. Tucker, 664 F. Supp. 1143, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3914 (N.D. Ill. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
664 F. Supp. 1143 p.1144
664 F. Supp. 1143 p.1147
Cited by:
664 F. Supp. 1143 p.1148
4439.
Cited by:
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Smith, 664 F. Supp. 1228, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6111 (N.D. Ind. 1987)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
664 F. Supp. 1228 p.1234
4440.
Cited by:
Williams v. Schak, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3223 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 22, 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4441.
Cited by:
SR Industries Corp. v. International Asso. of Bridge, etc., Local No. 473, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2841 (N.D.
Ill. Apr. 7, 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4442.
Distinguished by:
Mustfov v. Rice, 663 F. Supp. 1255, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2513, 1988-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P67990 (N.D.
Ill. 1987)
663 F. Supp. 1255 p.1259
4443.
Cited by:
Lemon v. Tucker, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1614 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
4444.
Cited by:
Page 507
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
De Smet v. Snyder, 653 F. Supp. 797, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1140 (E.D. Wis. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
653 F. Supp. 797 p.808
4445.
Distinguished by:
Jordi v. Sauk Prairie School Bd., 651 F. Supp. 1566, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 648, 125 L.R.R.M. (BNA)
3468 (W.D. Wis. 1987)
651 F. Supp. 1566 p.1575
4446.
Distinguished by:
Oliver v. Ft. Wayne Education Asso., 651 F. Supp. 778, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16337, 125 L.R.R.M.
(BNA) 2182 (N.D. Ind. 1986)
651 F. Supp. 778 p.782
4447.
Cited by:
Cronson v. Clark, 645 F. Supp. 793, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19119 (C.D. Ill. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
645 F. Supp. 793 p.795
4448.
Cited by:
ANTONELLI v. SCRUGGS, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19353 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 7, 1986)
4449.
Cited by:
Saud Ben Abdul Aziz Ibn Saud v. Chi. Police Dep't, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20446 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 12, 1986)
4450.
Cited by:
MATTHEWS v. ROUND BARN MANOR ASSN., 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21997 (N.D. Ill. July 31, 1986)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4451.
Cited by:
HORN v. CITY OF CHICAGO DATACOM SYS. CORP., 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22300 (N.D. Ill. July 24,
1986)
4452.
Cited by:
MADDEN v. GLEN, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24682 (N.D. Ill. June 3, 1986)
4453.
Cited by:
SHAW v. VILLAGE OF MATTESON, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27643 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 26, 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4454.
Cited by:
Jones v. Chicago, 639 F. Supp. 146, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27781 (N.D. Ill. 1986)
639 F. Supp. 146 p.153
4455.
Cited by:
BENKENDORF v. VILLIAGE OF HAZEL CREST, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28898 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 25, 1986)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
4456.
Cited by:
SHAW v. VILLAGE OF MATTESON, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30278 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 17, 1986) LexisNexis
Page 508
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5, HN9
4457.
Followed by:
Smith v. Indiana, 622 F. Supp. 973, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13365 (N.D. Ind. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
622 F. Supp. 973 p.976
4458.
Distinguished by:
Glen Theatre, Inc. v. South Bend, 726 F. Supp. 728, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17451 (N.D. Ind. 1985)
726 F. Supp. 728 p.730
4459.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
A.T. v. County of Cook, 613 F. Supp. 775, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18267 (N.D. Ill. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
Distinguished by:
613 F. Supp. 775 p.778
Cited by:
613 F. Supp. 775 p.777
613 F. Supp. 775 p.780
4460.
Cited by:
In re Klawson, 50 B.R. 776, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18270, 13 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 537 (N.D. Ind. 1985)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
4461.
Followed by, Cited by:
Johns v. Klawson, 50 B.R. 776, 13 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 537 (N.D. Ind. 1985)
Followed by:
50 B.R. 776 p.779
Cited by:
50 B.R. 776 p.778
4462.
Distinguished by:
In re Sweeney, 49 B.R. 1008, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19221 (N.D. Ill. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
49 B.R. 1008 p.1009
4463.
Distinguished by:
Rouse v. Judges of Circuit Court, 609 F. Supp. 243, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19648 (N.D. Ill. 1985)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
609 F. Supp. 243 p.245
4464.
Cited by:
CHAPMAN v. ATTORNEY REGISTRATION, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22983 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 30, 1985)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4465.
Cited by:
Thompson v. Ashner, 601 F. Supp. 471, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23736, 226 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 251 (N.D. Ill.
1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 509
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
601 F. Supp. 471 p.473
4466.
Followed by:
Lego v. Illinois, 607 F. Supp. 881, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21095 (N.D. Ill. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
607 F. Supp. 881 p.882
4467.
Distinguished by:
Adams v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Com. of Supreme Court, 600 F. Supp. 390, 1984 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 21529 (N.D. Ill. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
600 F. Supp. 390 p.394
4468.
Cited by:
Reimnitz v. State's Attorney of Cook County, 596 F. Supp. 47, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14848 (N.D. Ill. 1984)
596 F. Supp. 47 p.62
4469.
Cited by:
Lucien v. Seidenfeld, 584 F. Supp. 1269, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16527 (N.D. Ill. 1984) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
584 F. Supp. 1269 p.1271
4470.
Cited by:
LINDSTROM v. ILLINOIS, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18253 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 26, 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
4471.
Cited by:
REIMNITZ v. CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK CTY., 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20343 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 17, 1984)
4472.
Distinguished by:
North American Van Lines, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 590 F. Supp. 311, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
20815 (N.D. Ind. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
590 F. Supp. 311 p.315
4473.
Explained by:
Eyler v. Babcox, 582 F. Supp. 981, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10651 (N.D. Ill. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
582 F. Supp. 981 p.984
4474.
Cited by:
MC GINLEY v. KILEY, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11391 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 23, 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
4475.
Cited by:
Citizens Action Coalition, Inc. v. Westfall, 582 F. Supp. 11, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11440 (S.D. Ind. 1983)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
582 F. Supp. 11 p.13
Page 510
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4476.
Cited by:
Coleman v. McLaren, 572 F. Supp. 178, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13068 (N.D. Ill. 1983)
572 F. Supp. 178 p.181
4477.
Followed by:
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Board of Directors of Wisconsin Ins. Sec. Fund, 572 F. Supp. 460, 1983 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 14028 (W.D. Wis. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
572 F. Supp. 460 p.467
4478.
Cited by:
NATIONAL ANTI-DRUG COALITION v. FAHNER, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14162 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 31, 1983)
4479.
Distinguished by:
Communist Workers Party v. East Chicago, 556 F. Supp. 47, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17058 (N.D. Ind.
1982)
556 F. Supp. 47 p.48
4480.
Followed by:
Van Drunen v. South Holland, 550 F. Supp. 258, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14356 (N.D. Ill. 1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
550 F. Supp. 258 p.260
4481.
Followed by:
Oak Park Trust & Sav. Bank v. Palos Park, 561 F. Supp. 534, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14825 (N.D. Ill.
1982)
561 F. Supp. 534 p.535
4482.
Cited by:
ZARKO SEKEREZ v. SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16509 (S.D. Ind. Dec. 23,
1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
4483.
Followed by:
Schiessle v. Stephens, 525 F. Supp. 763, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9927, 1982-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P64702
(N.D. Ill. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
525 F. Supp. 763 p.766
525 F. Supp. 763 p.767
4484.
Cited by:
Illinois v. Lever Bros. Co., 530 F. Supp. 293, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16975, 18 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1374
(N.D. Ill. 1981)
530 F. Supp. 293 p.294
4485.
Explained by:
Kit-Dal Cinema, Inc. v. Downers Grove, 534 F. Supp. 81, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17295 (N.D. Ill. 1981)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
534 F. Supp. 81 p.82
Page 511
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4486.
Cited by:
SABO v. VILLAGE OF ADDISON, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16681 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 28, 1981)
4487.
Cited by:
TAYLOR v. CAPESIUS, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14017 (N.D. Ill. July 15, 1981)
4488.
Distinguished by:
EEOC v. Levi Strauss & Co., 515 F. Supp. 640, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13139, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH)
P32392, 27 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 346 (N.D. Ill. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
515 F. Supp. 640 p.642
4489.
Cited by:
FIRST PENNSYLVANIA BANK N.A. v. COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS & CRAFTSMENS LEASING CORP.,
1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13325 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 8, 1981)
4490.
Cited by:
Taylor v. Miller, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14169 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 24, 1981)
4491.
Cited by:
HARRIS TRUST & SAV. BANK v. VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10686 (N.D. Ill.
Jan. 29, 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
4492.
Cited by:
RICE FOUND. v. TESCHNER, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13731 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 5, 1980)
4493.
Cited by:
MATESEVAC v. REILLY, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12930 (N.D. Ill. July 23, 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
4494.
Cited by:
Harl v. La Salle, 506 F. Supp. 1067, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16135 (N.D. Ill. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
506 F. Supp. 1067 p.1071
4495.
Distinguished by:
Chang v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 506 F. Supp. 975, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15012 (N.D. Ill.
1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
506 F. Supp. 975 p.980
4496.
Cited by:
McTavish v. Spiotto, 500 F. Supp. 703, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14481 (N.D. Ill. 1980)
500 F. Supp. 703 p.704
4497.
Explained by, Cited by:
Ziegman Productions, Inc. v. Milwaukee, 496 F. Supp. 965, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13693 (E.D. Wis. 1980)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Explained by:
496 F. Supp. 965 p.968
Cited by:
496 F. Supp. 965 p.969
Page 512
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4498.
Cited by:
Gary-Northwest Indiana Women's Services, Inc. v. Bowen, 496 F. Supp. 894, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15216
(N.D. Ind. 1980)
496 F. Supp. 894 p.896
4499.
Followed by:
Tepper v. State Bar of Wisconsin, 489 F. Supp. 115, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11275 (E.D. Wis. 1980)
489 F. Supp. 115 p.117
4500.
Cited by:
Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. v. Hoffman Estates, 485 F. Supp. 400, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10383 (N.D.
Ill. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
485 F. Supp. 400 p.408
4501.
Followed by, Cited by:
Seraphim v. Judicial Conduct Panel, 483 F. Supp. 295, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9981 (E.D. Wis. 1980)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
483 F. Supp. 295 p.297
483 F. Supp. 295 p.299
Cited by:
483 F. Supp. 295 p.296
4502.
Cited by:
OLLIVIER v. GLITZ, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8888 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 29, 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4503.
Cited by:
FOSTER v. O'GARDY, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11164 (N.D. Ill. July 9, 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
4504.
Followed by:
Marsico v. Elrod, 469 F. Supp. 825, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13948, 4 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2478 (N.D. Ill.
1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
469 F. Supp. 825 p.827
469 F. Supp. 825 p.828
469 F. Supp. 825 p.829
469 F. Supp. 825 p.831
4505.
Distinguished by:
Sawmill Products, Inc. v. Cicero, 477 F. Supp. 636, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9555, 53 A.L.R. Fed. 732 (N.D.
Ill. 1979)
477 F. Supp. 636 p.641
4506.
Cited by:
Front Runner Messenger Service, Inc. v. Ghini, 468 F. Supp. 305, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13564 (N.D. Ill.
1979) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
468 F. Supp. 305 p.308
Page 513
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4507.
Distinguished by:
Ktsanes v. Underwood, 467 F. Supp. 1002, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13501 (N.D. Ill. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
467 F. Supp. 1002 p.1006
4508.
Explained by, Cited by:
Collin v. Smith, 447 F. Supp. 676, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19404, 3 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1915 (N.D. Ill.
1978) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
447 F. Supp. 676 p.701
Cited by:
447 F. Supp. 676 p.681
4509.
Distinguished by:
Hernandez v. Finley, 471 F. Supp. 516, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16233 (N.D. Ill. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
471 F. Supp. 516 p.517
4510.
Cited by:
Noe v. County of Lake, 468 F. Supp. 50, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16461 (N.D. Ind. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
468 F. Supp. 50 p.53
468 F. Supp. 50 p.54
4511.
Explained by, Cited by:
Brown v. Scott, 462 F. Supp. 518, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15283 (N.D. Ill. 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN4, HN5
Explained by:
462 F. Supp. 518 p.520
Cited by:
462 F. Supp. 518 p.523
4512.
Cited by:
Castle News Co. v. Cahill, 461 F. Supp. 174, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14420 (E.D. Wis. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
461 F. Supp. 174 p.175
4513.
Distinguished by:
Wynn v. Scott, 449 F. Supp. 1302, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18431 (N.D. Ill. 1978)
449 F. Supp. 1302 p.1311
4514.
Cited by:
Zurek v. Woodbury, 446 F. Supp. 1149, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18959 (N.D. Ill. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
Page 514
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
446 F. Supp. 1149 p.1150
4515.
Followed by, Cited by:
Mudd v. Busse, 437 F. Supp. 505, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14109 (N.D. Ind. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
437 F. Supp. 505 p.509
Cited by:
437 F. Supp. 505 p.507
437 F. Supp. 505 p.517
4516.
Cited by:
Harris v. Harvey, 436 F. Supp. 143, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15180 (E.D. Wis. 1977)
436 F. Supp. 143 p.146
436 F. Supp. 143 p.147
4517.
Distinguished by:
Wisconsin Socialist Workers 1976 Campaign Committee v. McCann, 433 F. Supp. 540, 1977 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 15465 (E.D. Wis. 1977)
433 F. Supp. 540 p.546
4518.
Explained by:
Redhail v. Zablocki, 418 F. Supp. 1061, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13435, 23 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 803
(E.D. Wis. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
418 F. Supp. 1061 p.1064
418 F. Supp. 1061 p.1065
4519.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Eagle Books, Inc. v. Reinhard, 418 F. Supp. 345, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14847 (N.D. Ill. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
418 F. Supp. 345 p.350
Cited by:
418 F. Supp. 345 p.354
4520.
Explained by:
Graham v. Breier, 418 F. Supp. 73, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14313 (E.D. Wis. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
418 F. Supp. 73 p.77
4521.
Explained by, Harmonized by:
United States General, Inc. v. Arndt, 417 F. Supp. 1300, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13793 (E.D. Wis. 1976)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Explained by:
417 F. Supp. 1300 p.1308
Page 515
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Harmonized by:
417 F. Supp. 1300 p.1309
4522.
Explained by:
Clark v. Weeks, 414 F. Supp. 703, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16491 (N.D. Ill. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
414 F. Supp. 703 p.706
414 F. Supp. 703 p.707
4523.
Cited by:
De Luca v. Starck, 414 F. Supp. 18, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16228 (E.D. Wis. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
414 F. Supp. 18 p.19
4524.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Lessard v. Schmidt, 413 F. Supp. 1318, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14868 (E.D. Wis. 1976)
Distinguished by:
413 F. Supp. 1318 p.1321
Cited by:
413 F. Supp. 1318 p.1319
4525.
Cited by:
Shoresman v. Burgess, 412 F. Supp. 831, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15192 (E.D. Ill. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
412 F. Supp. 831 p.836
4526.
Cited by:
Urban v. Breier, 401 F. Supp. 706, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16710, 20 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1001
(E.D. Wis. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
4527.
Cited by:
GERKEN v. MERRIAM, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11728 (E.D. Wis. June 25, 1975)
4528.
Followed by:
Burdick v. Miech, 409 F. Supp. 982, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15021 (E.D. Wis. 1975)
409 F. Supp. 982 p.983
409 F. Supp. 982 p.985
4529.
Distinguished by:
Hernandez v. Danaher, 405 F. Supp. 757, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14705 (N.D. Ill. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
405 F. Supp. 757 p.759
405 F. Supp. 757 p.760
4530.
Cited by:
Do-Right Auto Sales v. Howlett, 401 F. Supp. 1035, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15964 (N.D. Ill. 1975)
401 F. Supp. 1035 p.1038
Page 516
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4531.
Cited by:
Robinson v. Leahy, 401 F. Supp. 1027, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15816 (N.D. Ill. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
401 F. Supp. 1027 p.1029
4532.
Distinguished by:
Urban v. Breier, 401 F. Supp. 706, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16096, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16710, 20 Fed. R.
Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1001 (E.D. Wis. 1975)
401 F. Supp. 706 p.710
4533.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
B. Coleman Corp. v. Walker, 400 F. Supp. 1355, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16228 (N.D. Ill. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
Distinguished by:
400 F. Supp. 1355 p.1357
Followed by:
400 F. Supp. 1355 p.1357
4534.
Cited by:
Maney v. Ratcliff, 399 F. Supp. 760, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16359 (E.D. Wis. 1975) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
399 F. Supp. 760 p.771
399 F. Supp. 760 p.772
4535.
Cited by:
Kidd v. Schmidt, 399 F. Supp. 301, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16562 (E.D. Wis. 1975)
399 F. Supp. 301 p.303
4536.
Explained by:
Lerner v. Wittig, 394 F. Supp. 866, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12449 (E.D. Wis. 1975)
394 F. Supp. 866 p.867
4537.
Distinguished by:
Mudd v. Busse, 68 F.R.D. 522, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16610 (N.D. Ind. 1975)
68 F.R.D. 522 p.532
4538.
Explained by:
Nihiser v. Sendak, 405 F. Supp. 482, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8222 (N.D. Ind. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6, HN8
405 F. Supp. 482 p.493
405 F. Supp. 482 p.494
4539.
Cited by:
Scoma v. Chicago Bd. of Education, 391 F. Supp. 452, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5797 (N.D. Ill. 1974)
Page 517
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
391 F. Supp. 452 p.459
4540.
Explained by, Cited by:
Palermo v. Sendak, 382 F. Supp. 1387, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6394 (N.D. Ind. 1974)
Explained by:
382 F. Supp. 1387 p.1390
Cited by:
382 F. Supp. 1387 p.1389
4541.
Followed by:
Smith v. McCann, 381 F. Supp. 1027, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7073 (E.D. Wis. 1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
381 F. Supp. 1027 p.1028
4542.
Cited by:
International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Conlisk, 374 F. Supp. 1010, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
10434 (N.D. Ill. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
374 F. Supp. 1010 p.1013
4543.
Followed by:
Foster v. Zeeko, 362 F. Supp. 295, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12569 (N.D. Ill. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
362 F. Supp. 295 p.297
4544.
Followed by:
Di Giorgio v. McCann, 360 F. Supp. 779, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13482 (E.D. Wis. 1973)
360 F. Supp. 779 p.780
4545.
Explained by:
Detco, Inc. v. Neelen, 356 F. Supp. 289, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14145 (E.D. Wis. 1973)
356 F. Supp. 289 p.290
4546.
Distinguished by:
Barrick Realty, Inc. v. Gary, 354 F. Supp. 126, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15321 (N.D. Ind. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
354 F. Supp. 126 p.129
354 F. Supp. 126 p.130
4547.
Distinguished by:
Lessard v. Schmidt, 349 F. Supp. 1078, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11526 (E.D. Wis. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3, HN5
349 F. Supp. 1078 p.1083
4548.
Explained by:
Page 518
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Detco, Inc. v. Breier, 349 F. Supp. 537, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11371 (E.D. Wis. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
349 F. Supp. 537 p.538
4549.
Distinguished by:
Misurelli v. Racine, 346 F. Supp. 43, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12495 (E.D. Wis. 1972)
346 F. Supp. 43 p.47
4550.
Cited by:
United States ex rel. Hudson v. Wollenzien, 345 F. Supp. 436, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13432 (E.D. Wis.
1972) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
345 F. Supp. 436 p.438
4551.
Explained by:
White v. Flemming, 344 F. Supp. 295, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12842 (E.D. Wis. 1972)
344 F. Supp. 295 p.297
4552.
Cited by:
Bruno v. Warren, 344 F. Supp. 97, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12689 (E.D. Wis. 1972)
344 F. Supp. 97 p.98
4553.
Cited by:
Unitarian Church West v. McConnell, 337 F. Supp. 1252, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15149 (E.D. Wis. 1972)
337 F. Supp. 1252 p.1256
4554.
Cited by:
Movies, Inc. v. Conlisk, 345 F. Supp. 780, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12528 (N.D. Ill. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
345 F. Supp. 780 p.782
4555.
Cited by:
Bruno v. Kenosha, 333 F. Supp. 726, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11137 (E.D. Wis. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
333 F. Supp. 726 p.730
4556.
Followed by:
Brown v. Ceci, 331 F. Supp. 718, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13888 (E.D. Wis. 1971)
331 F. Supp. 718 p.719
4557.
Distinguished by:
McCue v. Racine, 330 F. Supp. 466, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12264 (E.D. Wis. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
330 F. Supp. 466 p.467
4558.
Explained by, Cited by:
Page 519
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Kennan v. Warren, 328 F. Supp. 525, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13447 (W.D. Wis. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
328 F. Supp. 525 p.530
Cited by:
328 F. Supp. 525 p.533
4559.
Followed by:
Pederson v. Breier, 327 F. Supp. 1382, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13149 (E.D. Wis. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
327 F. Supp. 1382 p.1384
4560.
Cited by:
Corbett v. Bowman, 327 F. Supp. 1189, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13484 (E.D. Wis. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
327 F. Supp. 1189 p.1189
4561.
Followed by:
Schellenberger v. Breier, 327 F. Supp. 890, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13910 (E.D. Wis. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
327 F. Supp. 890 p.891
4562.
Followed by:
Marseo v. Cannon, 326 F. Supp. 1315, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13193 (E.D. Wis. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
326 F. Supp. 1315 p.1317
326 F. Supp. 1315 p.1318
4563.
Cited by:
Kennan v. Nichol, 326 F. Supp. 613, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13573 (W.D. Wis. 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
326 F. Supp. 613 p.615
4564.
Cited by:
Koehler v. Ogilvie, 53 F.R.D. 98, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12231, 15 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 714 (D. Ill.
1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
53 F.R.D. 98 p.105
7TH CIRCUIT - U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURTS
4565.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Slayton v. White (In re Slayton), 409 B.R. 897, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2148 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
409 B.R. 897 p.906
Followed by:
Page 520
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
409 B.R. 897 p.901
4566.
Followed by:
Berg v. Turow (In re Berg), 172 B.R. 894, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 1550 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
172 B.R. 894 p.896
4567.
Cited by:
In re Sims, 101 B.R. 52, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 883, 19 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 860, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH)
P72978 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
101 B.R. 52 p.53
4568.
Cited by:
Birk v. Simmons, 108 B.R. 657, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 2633 (Bankr. S.D. Ill. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
108 B.R. 657 p.660
4569.
Cited by:
In re Pankau, 65 B.R. 204, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 5274, 15 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 32 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1986)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
65 B.R. 204 p.209
4570.
Cited by:
In re Redenbaugh, 37 B.R. 383, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 6327, 10 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 323 (Bankr.
C.D. Ill. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
37 B.R. 383 p.386
4571.
Cited by:
In re SHEARER, 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 6675 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
8TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
4572.
Cited by:
Villarreal v. Galvin, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21842 (8th Cir. Neb. Oct. 5, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21842
4573.
Cited by:
Friends of Lake View Sch. Dist. Incorporation No. 25 v. Beebe, 578 F.3d 753, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19110
(8th Cir. Ark. 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
578 F.3d 753 p.757
4574.
Followed by, Cited by:
Zanders v. Swanson, 573 F.3d 591, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15834 (8th Cir. Minn. 2009)
Followed by:
573 F.3d 591 p.595
Page 521
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cited by:
573 F.3d 591 p.592
4575.
Followed by:
Eddings v. Missouri, 326 Fed. Appx. 982, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13126 (8th Cir. Mo. 2009)
326 Fed. Appx. 982 p.982
4576.
Cited by:
Jackson v. Fick, 300 Fed. Appx. 443, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 23813 (8th Cir. Mo. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
300 Fed. Appx. 443 p.444
4577.
Cited by:
Barzilay v. Barzilay, 536 F.3d 844, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16473 (8th Cir. Mo. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
536 F.3d 844 p.846
4578.
Followed by:
Ornes v. Edblad, 271 Fed. Appx. 545, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 7196 (8th Cir. Minn. 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
271 Fed. Appx. 545 p.545
4579.
Cited by:
Cormack v. Settle-Beshears, 474 F.3d 528, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 1398 (8th Cir. Ark. 2007)
474 F.3d 528 p.530
4580.
Cited by:
Moore v. Inman, 210 Fed. Appx. 550, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 25916 (8th Cir. Mo. 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
210 Fed. Appx. 550 p.551
4581.
Cited by:
Skokos v. Rhoades, 440 F.3d 957, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5962 (8th Cir. Ark. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
440 F.3d 957 p.963
4582.
Cited by:
Sanders v. Fayetteville City Police Dep't, 160 Fed. Appx. 542, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 27202 (8th Cir. Ark.
2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
160 Fed. Appx. 542 p.543
4583.
Cited by:
Mosby v. Ligon, 418 F.3d 927, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17332 (8th Cir. Ark. 2005)
418 F.3d 927 p.931
Page 522
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4584.
Followed by, Cited by:
Norwood v. Dickey, 409 F.3d 901, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 9960 (8th Cir. Ark. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Followed by:
409 F.3d 901 p.903
Cited by:
409 F.3d 901 p.902
4585.
Cited by:
Stilley v. Dickey, 117 Fed. Appx. 492, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 397 (8th Cir. Ark. 2005)
117 Fed. Appx. 492 p.493
4586.
Cited by:
Mills v. Laser, 109 Fed. Appx. 131, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18818 (8th Cir. Ark. 2004)
109 Fed. Appx. 131 p.131
4587.
Cited by:
Republican Party v. Klobuchar, 381 F.3d 785, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18103, 59 Fed. R. Serv. 3d
(Callaghan) 562 (8th Cir. Minn. 2004)
381 F.3d 785 p.787
4588.
Followed by:
Aaron v. Target Corp., 357 F.3d 768, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1537 (8th Cir. Mo. 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
357 F.3d 768 p.774
4589.
Cited by:
Skokos v. City of Fort Smith, 68 Fed. Appx. 765, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13890 (8th Cir. Ark. 2003)
68 Fed. Appx. 765 p.766
4590.
Cited by:
SOB, Inc. v. County of Benton, 317 F.3d 856, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 1054 (8th Cir. Minn. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
317 F.3d 856 p.866
4591.
Cited by:
Brock v. Joyce, 30 Fed. Appx. 674, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 4230 (8th Cir. Mo. 2002)
30 Fed. Appx. 674 p.674
4592.
Followed by, Cited by:
Cedar Rapids Cellular Tel., L.P. v. Miller, 280 F.3d 874, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2373 (8th Cir. Iowa 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Followed by:
280 F.3d 874 p.879
Cited by:
Page 523
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
280 F.3d 874 p.878
280 F.3d 874 p.881
4593.
Cited by:
Velek v. Arkansas, 19 Fed. Appx. 482, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21561 (8th Cir. Ark. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
19 Fed. Appx. 482 p.483
4594.
Cited by:
Silverman v. Silverman, 267 F.3d 788, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21421 (8th Cir. Minn. 2001)
267 F.3d 788 p.789
4595.
Cited by:
Crawford v. F. Hoffman La Roche Ltd., 267 F.3d 760, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21415, 2001-2 Trade Cas.
(CCH) P73456 (8th Cir. Ark. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
267 F.3d 760 p.764
4596.
Cited by:
In re BankAmerica Corp. Secs. Litig., 263 F.3d 795, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19035, 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d
(Callaghan) 1, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P91546 (8th Cir. Mo. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
263 F.3d 795 p.803
4597.
Cited by:
Missouri ex rel. Nixon v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc., 259 F.3d 949, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 17668
(8th Cir. Mo. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
259 F.3d 949 p.953
4598.
Cited by:
Entergy Ark., Inc. v. Nebraska, 210 F.3d 887, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6654, 50 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA)
1361, 30 Envtl. L. Rep. 20449 (8th Cir. Neb. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
210 F.3d 887 p.899
4599.
Cited by:
Harmon v. City of Kansas City, 197 F.3d 321, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 26366 (8th Cir. Mo. 1999)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN5
197 F.3d 321 p.325
4600.
Followed by:
Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Stroud, 179 F.3d 598, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 11356 (8th Cir. Ark. 1999)
179 F.3d 598 p.602
4601.
Followed by:
Night Clubs v. City of Fort Smith, 163 F.3d 475, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31182 (8th Cir. Ark. 1998)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
163 F.3d 475 p.477
Page 524
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4602.
Cited by:
Beavers v. Arkansas State Bd. of Dental Exam'rs, 151 F.3d 838, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 18156 (8th Cir.
Ark. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
151 F.3d 838 p.841
4603.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Missouri, 142 F.3d 1087, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7858 (8th Cir. Mo. 1998) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
142 F.3d 1087 p.1089
4604.
Cited by:
Planned Parenthood of Greater Iowa, Inc. v. Atchison, 126 F.3d 1042, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26932 (8th
Cir. Iowa 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
126 F.3d 1042 p.1044
126 F.3d 1042 p.1046
4605.
Cited by:
Baker Elec. v. Otter Tail Power Co. (In re Otter Tail Power Co.), 116 F.3d 1207, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS
14994 (8th Cir. N.D. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 14994
4606.
Cited by:
United States v. Crawford, 115 F.3d 1397, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 14992, 147 A.L.R. Fed. 681 (8th Cir.
Mo. 1997)
115 F.3d 1397 p.1401
4607.
Cited by:
Warmus v. Melahn, 110 F.3d 566, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 6278 (8th Cir. Mo. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
110 F.3d 566 p.567
4608.
Cited by:
SDDS, Inc. v. South Dakota (In re SDDS, Inc.), 97 F.3d 1030, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 26020, 27 Envtl. L.
Rep. 20290 (8th Cir. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
97 F.3d 1030 p.1041
4609.
Cited by:
Amerson v. Iowa, 94 F.3d 510, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 23184 (8th Cir. Iowa 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
94 F.3d 510 p.512
4610.
Cited by:
Paskon v. Bay, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17462 (8th Cir. Mo. July 17, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4611.
Cited by:
Simmons v. O'Brien, 77 F.3d 1093, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3883 (8th Cir. Mo. 1996) LexisNexis
Page 525
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5
77 F.3d 1093 p.1096
4612.
Distinguished by:
Kansas Pub. Emples. Retirement Sys. v. Reimer & Koger Assocs., 77 F.3d 1063, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS
3134 (8th Cir. Mo. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
77 F.3d 1063 p.1071
4613.
Followed by:
Fuller v. Ulland, 76 F.3d 957, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 2564 (8th Cir. Minn. 1996)
76 F.3d 957 p.958
4614.
Explained by:
Fond du Lac Band of Chippewa Indians v. Carlson, 68 F.3d 253, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29049 (8th Cir.
Minn. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
68 F.3d 253 p.256
4615.
Cited by:
Warmus v. Melahn, 62 F.3d 252, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 20823 (8th Cir. Mo. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
62 F.3d 252 p.253
4616.
Cited by:
International Ass'n of Entrepreneurs of Am. v. Angoff, 58 F.3d 1266, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16074, 95 TNT
133-52 (8th Cir. Mo. 1995)
58 F.3d 1266 p.1268
4617.
Cited by:
Federated Rural Elec. Ins. Corp. v. Arkansas Elec. Coops., 48 F.3d 294, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2873 (8th
Cir. Ark. 1995)
48 F.3d 294 p.298
4618.
Cited by:
Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A. v. Riney, 21 F.3d 793, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6536 (8th Cir. Ark. 1994)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
21 F.3d 793 p.797
4619.
Cited by:
Employers Ass'n v. United Steelworkers, 19 F.3d 405, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4810, 145 L.R.R.M. (BNA)
2788, 127 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11047 (8th Cir. Minn. 1994)
19 F.3d 405 p.408
4620.
Cited by:
Kirk Capital Corp. v. Bailey, 16 F.3d 1485, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3079, 28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan)
88 (8th Cir. Mo. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
16 F.3d 1485 p.1486
Page 526
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4621.
Cited by:
Lannan v. Maul, 979 F.2d 627, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28987 (8th Cir. Neb. 1992)
979 F.2d 627 p.630
4622.
Cited by:
Satter v. Leapley, 977 F.2d 1259, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 26524 (8th Cir. S.D. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
977 F.2d 1259 p.1261
4623.
Explained by:
Zar v. South Dakota Bd. of Examiners of Psychologists, 976 F.2d 459, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 25481 (8th
Cir. S.D. 1992)
976 F.2d 459 p.467
4624.
Cited by:
Daewoo Electronics Corp. v. Western Auto Supply Co., 975 F.2d 474, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 21160 (8th
Cir. Mo. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
975 F.2d 474 p.478
4625.
Cited by:
Kaiser v. Memorial Blood Center, Inc., 938 F.2d 90, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 13072 (8th Cir. Minn. 1991)
938 F.2d 90 p.90
4626.
Cited by:
Keene Corp. v. Cass, 908 F.2d 293, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11501 (8th Cir. Minn. 1990)
908 F.2d 293 p.297
4627.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Bressman v. Farrier, 900 F.2d 1305, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6139 (8th Cir. Iowa 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
900 F.2d 1305 p.1316
4628.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Alleghany Corp. v. Pomeroy, 898 F.2d 1314, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2778, 1990-1 Trade Cas. (CCH)
P69006 (8th Cir. N.D. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
898 F.2d 1314 p.1315
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
898 F.2d 1314 p.1320
4629.
Followed by:
Alleghany Corp. v. McCartney, 896 F.2d 1138, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2883 (8th Cir. Neb. 1990)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
896 F.2d 1138 p.1140
Page 527
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
896 F.2d 1138 p.1142
4630.
Followed by:
Postscript Enterprises, Inc. v. Peach, 878 F.2d 1114, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9988 (8th Cir. Mo. 1989)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN9
878 F.2d 1114 p.1114
878 F.2d 1114 p.1116
4631.
Cited by:
Anderson v. Schultz, 871 F.2d 762, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4501 (8th Cir. N.D. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN9
871 F.2d 762 p.764
871 F.2d 762 p.765
4632.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
United Food & Commercial Workers Int'l Union v. IBP, Inc., 857 F.2d 422, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12227,
129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2350, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56112 (8th Cir. Neb. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
857 F.2d 422 p.436
4633.
Followed by:
Mershon v. Kyser, 852 F.2d 335, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9826 (8th Cir. Mo. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
852 F.2d 335 p.336
852 F.2d 335 p.337
4634.
Cited by:
Lewellen v. Raff, 851 F.2d 1108, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10930 (8th Cir. Ark. 1988)
851 F.2d 1108 p.1109
4635.
Cited by:
Lewellen v. Raff, 843 F.2d 1103, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4161 (8th Cir. Ark. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6, HN9
843 F.2d 1103 p.1105
843 F.2d 1103 p.1109
4636.
Explained by:
Peery v. Brakke, 826 F.2d 740, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10626 (8th Cir. S.D. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
826 F.2d 740 p.745
4637.
Cited by:
Airlines Reporting Corp. v. Barry, 825 F.2d 1220, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10022 (8th Cir. Minn. 1987)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
825 F.2d 1220 p.1224
825 F.2d 1220 p.1225
Page 528
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4638.
Cited by:
Breeze v. Trickey, 824 F.2d 653, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9920 (8th Cir. Mo. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
824 F.2d 653 p.654
4639.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Offet v. Solem, 823 F.2d 1256, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8954 (8th Cir. S.D. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
823 F.2d 1256 p.1262
Cited by:
823 F.2d 1256 p.1257
4640.
Followed by:
Ronwin v. Dunham, 818 F.2d 675, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6173 (8th Cir. Iowa 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
818 F.2d 675 p.676
4641.
Distinguished by:
Middle South Energy, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service Com., 772 F.2d 404, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 22598,
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P92265 (8th Cir. Ark. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
772 F.2d 404 p.417
4642.
Distinguished by:
NLRB v. Superior Forwarding, Inc., 762 F.2d 695, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27391, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH)
P70559, 12 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 1258, 119 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2619, 103 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11509
(8th Cir. Ark. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
762 F.2d 695 p.698
4643.
Followed by:
In re Application of Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility Bd., 752 F.2d 352, 1985 U.S. App.
LEXIS 27887 (8th Cir. Minn. 1985)
752 F.2d 352 p.352
4644.
Cited by:
McCurry v. Tesch, 738 F.2d 271, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20952 (8th Cir. Neb. 1984)
738 F.2d 271 p.273
4645.
Cited by:
Luecke v. Mercantile Bank of Jonesboro, 720 F.2d 15, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15726 (8th Cir. Ark. 1983)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
720 F.2d 15 p.16
4646.
Cited by:
Miner v. Brackney, 719 F.2d 954, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15751 (8th Cir. Mo. 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Page 529
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
719 F.2d 954 p.956
4647.
Explained by:
United States Jaycees v. McClure, 709 F.2d 1560, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25323, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS
26989 (8th Cir. Minn. 1983)
709 F.2d 1560 p.1564
4648.
Cited by:
United States Jaycees v. McClure, 709 F.2d 1560, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26989 (8th Cir. 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4649.
Cited by:
Smith v. Bacon, 699 F.2d 434, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30626 (8th Cir. Mo. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
699 F.2d 434 p.437
4650.
Distinguished by:
National City Lines, Inc. v. LLC Corp., 687 F.2d 1122, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16542, Fed. Sec. L. Rep.
(CCH) P98778 (8th Cir. Mo. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
687 F.2d 1122 p.1126
4651.
Cited by:
Chambers v. Marsh, 675 F.2d 228, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20139 (8th Cir. Neb. 1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
675 F.2d 228 p.232
4652.
Cited by:
Boyer v. Riley, 675 F.2d 185, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20348 (8th Cir. Mo. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
675 F.2d 185 p.186
4653.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Kaylor v. Fields, 661 F.2d 1177, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16782 (8th Cir. Ark. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
661 F.2d 1177 p.1182
Followed by:
661 F.2d 1177 p.1181
4654.
Explained by, Cited by:
Womens Services, P. C. v. Douglas, 653 F.2d 355, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11426 (8th Cir. Neb. 1981)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8
Explained by:
653 F.2d 355 p.356
Cited by:
653 F.2d 355 p.357
Page 530
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
653 F.2d 355 p.358
4655.
Followed by, Cited by:
Central Ave. News, Inc. v. Minot, 651 F.2d 565, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12496, 7 Media L. Rep. (BNA)
1540 (8th Cir. N.D. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
651 F.2d 565 p.567
651 F.2d 565 p.568
651 F.2d 565 p.570
Cited by:
651 F.2d 565 p.566
4656.
Cited by:
R. v. Adams, 649 F.2d 625, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12703 (8th Cir. Iowa 1981)
649 F.2d 625 p.628
4657.
Explained by:
Hunt v. Roth, 648 F.2d 1148, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 13342 (8th Cir. Neb. 1981)
648 F.2d 1148 p.1154
4658.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Davis v. Muellar, 643 F.2d 521, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 19519 (8th Cir. N.D. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Followed by:
643 F.2d 521 p.525
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
643 F.2d 521 p.528
4659.
Followed by:
Coley v. Clinton, 635 F.2d 1364, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 11398, 30 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1219 (8th
Cir. Ark. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
635 F.2d 1364 p.1371
4660.
Distinguished by:
Walker v. Wegner, 624 F.2d 60, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 16039 (8th Cir. S.D. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
624 F.2d 60 p.61
624 F.2d 60 p.62
4661.
Cited by:
Bergstrom v. Bergstrom, 623 F.2d 517, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 16693 (8th Cir. N.D. 1980)
623 F.2d 517 p.519
4662.
Cited by:
McCurry v. Allen, 606 F.2d 795, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 11502 (8th Cir. Mo. 1979)
Page 531
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
606 F.2d 795 p.799
4663.
Cited by:
George v. Parratt, 602 F.2d 818, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13290 (8th Cir. Neb. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
602 F.2d 818 p.822
4664.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Woe v. Nebraska State Dep't of Public Welfare, 598 F.2d 1146, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 14433 (8th Cir. Neb.
1979)
598 F.2d 1146 p.1147
4665.
Followed by:
Caldwell v. Camp, 594 F.2d 705, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 16133 (8th Cir. Mo. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
594 F.2d 705 p.707
4666.
Cited by:
Stivers v. Minnesota, 575 F.2d 200, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11380 (8th Cir. Minn. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
575 F.2d 200 p.202
4667.
Cited by:
Ledwith v. Douglas, 568 F.2d 117, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 13034 (8th Cir. Neb. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
568 F.2d 117 p.119
4668.
Followed by, Cited by:
Munson v. Janklow, 563 F.2d 933, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11082 (8th Cir. S.D. 1977) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
563 F.2d 933 p.935
Cited by:
563 F.2d 933 p.934
4669.
Explained by:
Munson v. Gilliam, 543 F.2d 48, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6603 (8th Cir. Ark. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
543 F.2d 48 p.52
4670.
Explained by:
Sartin v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 535 F.2d 430, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 11493 (8th Cir. Minn. 1976)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
535 F.2d 430 p.433
535 F.2d 430 p.434
Page 532
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4671.
Followed by:
Williams v. Williams, 532 F.2d 120, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12087 (8th Cir. Mo. 1976)
532 F.2d 120 p.122
4672.
Cited by:
Bonner v. Circuit Court of St. Louis, 526 F.2d 1331, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11730 (8th Cir. Mo. 1975)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
526 F.2d 1331 p.1335
4673.
Followed by:
Goodrich v. Supreme Court of South Dakota, 511 F.2d 316, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15756 (8th Cir. S.D.
1975) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
511 F.2d 316 p.317
511 F.2d 316 p.318
4674.
Cited by:
Mattis v. Schnarr, 502 F.2d 588, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7113 (8th Cir. Mo. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
502 F.2d 588 p.591
4675.
Distinguished by:
Stradley v. Andersen, 456 F.2d 1063, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11038, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P7714 (8th
Cir. Neb. 1972)
456 F.2d 1063 p.1064
4676.
Cited by:
Flis v. Mansur, 452 F.2d 1093, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7145 (8th Cir. Minn. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
452 F.2d 1093 p.1094
4677.
Explained by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Morrissey v. Brewer, 443 F.2d 942, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10627 (8th Cir. Iowa 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Explained by:
443 F.2d 942 p.951
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
443 F.2d 942 p.964
4678.
Followed by:
Eve Productions, Inc. v. Shannon, 439 F.2d 1073, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11336 (8th Cir. Mo. 1971)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
439 F.2d 1073 p.1074
8TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
Page 533
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4679.
Cited by:
Great Lakes Commun. Corp. v. Iowa Utils. Bd., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107491 (N.D. Iowa Nov. 17, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107491
4680.
Cited by:
City of Clarkedale v. Lackey, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104458 (E.D. Ark. Oct. 16, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104458
4681.
Cited by:
Bonds v. Guntharp, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89323 (E.D. Ark. Sept. 16, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89323
4682.
Cited by:
Odom v. Kaizer, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74732 (D.N.D. Aug. 24, 2009)
4683.
Cited by:
Robinson v. Farishaw, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74263 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 21, 2009)
4684.
Followed by:
Gatlin v. Gibbons, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73275 (E.D. Ark. Aug. 11, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73275
4685.
Followed by:
West v. Koster, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70641 (E.D. Mo. July 30, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70641
4686.
Followed by:
Evans v. Bryant, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66306 (E.D. Mo. July 30, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66306
4687.
Cited by:
ACLU v. Tarek ibn Ziyad Acad., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62567 (D. Minn. July 21, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62567
4688.
Followed by:
Neujahr v. Steinke, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57078 (D. Neb. July 6, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57078
4689.
Followed by:
Tyler v. U.S. Bank, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56489 (D. Neb. July 1, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56489
4690.
Followed by:
Davis v. St. Louis County Court 21st Dist., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44290 (E.D. Mo. May 27, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44290
Page 534
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4691.
Followed by:
Johns v. Reid, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56353 (E.D. Ark. May 21, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56353
4692.
Cited by:
Peterson v. Arnold, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82738 (D. Minn. May 7, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82738
4693.
Cited by:
Bugg v. Boots, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36727 (W.D. Mo. Apr. 30, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36727
4694.
Cited by:
Forney v. Daily Times Newspaper, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34589 (D. Neb. Apr. 23, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34589
4695.
Followed by:
Solors v. Warta, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31842 (D. Minn. Apr. 14, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31842
4696.
Cited by:
Coordinated Estate Services v. Walding, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31324 (S.D. Iowa Apr. 7, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31324
4697.
Followed by:
Oglala Sioux Tribe v. C & W Enters., 607 F. Supp. 2d 1069, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29517 (D.S.D. 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
607 F. Supp. 2d 1069 p.1076
4698.
Cited by:
Bugg v. Boots, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27138 (W.D. Mo. Apr. 1, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27138
4699.
Distinguished by:
White Earth Band of Chippewa Indians v. County of Mahnomen, 605 F. Supp. 2d 1034, 2009 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 24005 (D. Minn. 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
605 F. Supp. 2d 1034 p.1044
4700.
Followed by:
Jones v. Winters, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28397 (E.D. Ark. Mar. 19, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28397
Page 535
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4701.
Cited by:
Clark v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13643 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 19, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13643
4702.
Followed by, Cited by:
Gillette v. Edison, 593 F. Supp. 2d 1063, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6567 (D.N.D. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
593 F. Supp. 2d 1063 p.1073
Cited by:
593 F. Supp. 2d 1063 p.1069
4703.
Followed by:
Tyler v. Prantz, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 861 (D. Neb. Jan. 7, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 861
4704.
Cited by:
Ventimiglia v. St. Louis C.O.G., Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 5, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90
4705.
Distinguished by:
Four Seasons Marina Rentals, Inc. v. City of Osage Beach, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104870 (W.D. Mo. Dec.
30, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104870
4706.
Cited by:
Heart v. Gregory County, S.D., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104998 (D.S.D. Dec. 26, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104998
4707.
Cited by:
Smith v. McGuinness, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100947 (D. Minn. Dec. 15, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100947
4708.
Cited by:
Reeves v. Warren County, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99426 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 9, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99426
4709.
Cited by:
Burdette v. Crawford County, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93281 (W.D. Ark. Nov. 17, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93281
4710.
Cited by:
Page 536
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Peterson v. Prosser, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84749 (N.D. Iowa Oct. 21, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84749
4711.
Followed by:
Adams v. Lancaster County Attorney's Office, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80892 (D. Neb. Oct. 8, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80892
4712.
Followed by:
Zanders v. Swanson, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67261 (D. Minn. Aug. 29, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67261
4713.
Cited by:
Holly v. Konieska, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62942 (D. Minn. Aug. 18, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62942
4714.
Cited by:
Doe v. Selig, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60288 (E.D. Ark. July 25, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60288
4715.
Followed by:
Peterson v. Prosser, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55684 (N.D. Iowa July 22, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55684
4716.
Cited by:
Uland v. City of Winsted, 570 F. Supp. 2d 1114, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90860 (D. Minn. 2008)
570 F. Supp. 2d 1114 p.1117
4717.
Cited by:
Grass v. Kettle, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62893 (W.D. Mo. June 25, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62893
4718.
Cited by:
Stewart v. City of Red Wing, 554 F. Supp. 2d 924, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35958 (D. Minn. 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
554 F. Supp. 2d 924 p.927
4719.
Cited by:
T.J. Mgmt. of Minneapolis, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30551 (D. Minn. Apr. 14,
2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30551
4720.
Distinguished by:
Sentinel Ins. Co. v. Haines, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19260 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 12, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Page 537
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19260
4721.
Cited by:
Vonage Holdings, Corp. v. Neb. PSC, 543 F. Supp. 2d 1062, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16735 (D. Neb. 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
543 F. Supp. 2d 1062 p.1069
4722.
Followed by:
Sudduth v. Dubache, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12118 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 19, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12118
4723.
Followed by:
West v. Banas, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 2, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153
4724.
Cited by:
Wingo v. St. Louis County, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91771 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 13, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91771
4725.
Cited by:
Pipes v. North Dakota, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95944 (D.N.D. Dec. 10, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95944
4726.
Cited by:
Beau v. Moore, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83659 (E.D. Ark. Nov. 1, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83659
4727.
Cited by:
Marshall v. Young, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84585 (E.D. Ark. Oct. 30, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84585
4728.
Cited by:
Parkhurst v. Tabor, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80725 (W.D. Ark. Oct. 30, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80725
4729.
Cited by:
Eades v. Missouri, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72164 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 27, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72164
4730.
Cited by:
Bowen v. Cheuvront, 516 F. Supp. 2d 1021, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71138 (D. Neb. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
516 F. Supp. 2d 1021 p.1027
Page 538
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4731.
Cited by:
Johnson v. State Supreme Court Justices, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70225 (W.D. Mo. Sept. 21, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70225
4732.
Cited by:
Desai v. US Bank, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62322 (D. Neb. Aug. 21, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62322
4733.
Cited by:
Zessin v. Moore, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59583 (D. Neb. Aug. 13, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59583
4734.
Followed by:
Cook v. Hinrichs, 500 F. Supp. 2d 1225, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58480 (D.S.D. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN8
500 F. Supp. 2d 1225 p.1227
4735.
Cited by:
Forrest City Adver. & Promotion Comm'n v. City of Forrest City, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56372 (E.D. Ark.
Aug. 1, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56372
4736.
Cited by:
Ballard v. Warren County Det. Facility, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55537 (E.D. Mo. July 31, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55537
4737.
Cited by:
Burks v. Bridgeford, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48768 (E.D. Ark. July 5, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48768
4738.
Cited by:
Weaver v. Long, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43301 (E.D. Ark. June 13, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43301
4739.
Followed by:
Brooks v. Little Rock Sch. Dist., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36382 (E.D. Ark. May 17, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36382
4740.
Followed by:
Page 539
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Harris v. Gadd, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27295 (E.D. Ark. Apr. 12, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27295
4741.
Followed by:
Odom v. Kaizer, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28465 (D.N.D. Apr. 5, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28465
4742.
Followed by:
Sparkman Learning Ctr. v. Ark. HHS, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20584 (W.D. Ark. Mar. 22, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20584
4743.
Followed by:
Schaar v. Missouri, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18801 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 16, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18801
4744.
Followed by:
Carson P. v. Heineman, 240 F.R.D. 456, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4172 (D. Neb. 2007)
240 F.R.D. 456 p.462
4745.
Cited by:
Jefferson v. Sokoloff, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4138 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 19, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4138
4746.
Cited by:
NPCR, Inc. v. Boyle, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88113 (D. Neb. Dec. 5, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88113
4747.
Followed by:
Fogle v. Blake, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86513 (E.D. Mo. Nov. 29, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86513
4748.
Followed by:
Bunch v. Williams, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82868 (W.D. Ark. Nov. 13, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82868
4749.
Followed by:
Griffin v. Atchley, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81925 (W.D. Ark. Nov. 6, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81925
4750.
Cited by:
Williams v. Gordan, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81037 (W.D. Ark. Nov. 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81037
Page 540
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4751.
Cited by:
Terminix Int'l Co., L.P. v. Crisel, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60234 (W.D. Ark. Aug. 23, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60234
4752.
Followed by, Cited by:
Foreman v. Heineman, 240 F.R.D. 456, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96082 (D. Neb. 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
240 F.R.D. 456 p.523
Cited by:
240 F.R.D. 456 p.522
4753.
Followed by:
Portsche v. Doyle, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57798 (D. Neb. Aug. 16, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN9
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57798
4754.
Followed by:
Olsen v. City of Lake Ozark, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55055 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 8, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55055
4755.
Cited by:
Dispensing Solutions, Inc. v. Jouett, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50797 (W.D. Ark. July 14, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50797
4756.
Followed by:
Livingston v. Seger, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46951 (E.D. Mo. July 12, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46951
4757.
Distinguished by:
Rosenbauer Am., LLC. v. Advantech Serv. & Parts, LLC, 437 F. Supp. 2d 1081, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
45866 (D.S.D. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
437 F. Supp. 2d 1081 p.1084
4758.
Cited by:
Lowder v. Helder, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48944 (W.D. Ark. June 16, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48944
4759.
Followed by:
Ward v. Adams, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38454 (E.D. Ark. June 9, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38454
4760.
Followed by, Cited by:
Page 541
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Ebiza, Inc. v. City of Davenport, 434 F. Supp. 2d 710, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36214 (S.D. Iowa 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
434 F. Supp. 2d 710 p.720
Cited by:
434 F. Supp. 2d 710 p.716
4761.
Followed by:
McCleary v. Torres, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35923 (E.D. Mo. June 1, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35923
4762.
Cited by:
Travis v. Russell, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35707 (E.D. Ark. June 1, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35707
4763.
Followed by:
Chambers v. Tucker, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31698 (E.D. Mo. May 19, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31698
4764.
Cited by:
Wolfe v. Mo. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30156 (W.D. Mo. May 17, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30156
4765.
Cited by:
Adcock v. Shaw, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31003 (E.D. Ark. May 12, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31003
4766.
Followed by:
McCullough v. Ligon, 430 F. Supp. 2d 846, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29892 (E.D. Ark. 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
430 F. Supp. 2d 846 p.851
4767.
Cited by:
Jones v. St. Louis Parking Violations Bureau, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30881 (E.D. Mo. May 8, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30881
4768.
Followed by:
OCMC, Inc. v. Norris, 428 F. Supp. 2d 930, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23917 (S.D. Iowa 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
428 F. Supp. 2d 930 p.931
4769.
Cited by:
Gossai v. Bruning, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26883 (D. Neb. Apr. 18, 2006)
Page 542
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26883
4770.
Cited by:
Hagens v. Slay, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1705 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 19, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1705
4771.
Cited by:
McDaniel v. Scego, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1588 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 18, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1588
4772.
Followed by:
McCullough v. Ligon, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39672 (E.D. Ark. Dec. 23, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39672
4773.
Cited by:
Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Carter Enters., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40477 (W.D. Mo. Dec. 6, 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40477
4774.
Cited by:
Carter v. Bickhaus, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22869 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 6, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22869
4775.
Cited by:
Moore v. Inman, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22566 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 5, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22566
4776.
Cited by:
Murry v. Mitchell, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35158 (E.D. Ark. Aug. 29, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35158
4777.
Cited by:
Bordock v. City of Springfield, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43787 (W.D. Mo. June 3, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43787
4778.
Cited by:
N.D. Family Alliance, Inc. v. Bader, 361 F. Supp. 2d 1021, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4474 (D.N.D. 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
361 F. Supp. 2d 1021 p.1034
4779.
Distinguished by:
Johnson v. Bd. of Police Comm'rs, 351 F. Supp. 2d 929, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27263 (E.D. Mo. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Page 543
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
351 F. Supp. 2d 929 p.933
4780.
Followed by:
Willis v. Centennial Mortg. & Funding, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18666 (D. Minn. Sept. 16, 2004)
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18666
4781.
Followed by:
Doe v. Miller, 216 F.R.D. 462, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12884 (S.D. Iowa 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
216 F.R.D. 462 p.465
4782.
Cited by:
Huss v. Rogerson, 271 F. Supp. 2d 1118, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11504 (S.D. Iowa 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
271 F. Supp. 2d 1118 p.1123
4783.
Cited by:
Aaron v. Target Corp., 269 F. Supp. 2d 1162, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11490 (E.D. Mo. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
269 F. Supp. 2d 1162 p.1170
4784.
Followed by:
Republican Party of Minn. v. Klobuchar, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9372 (D. Minn. June 2, 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9372
4785.
Followed by, Cited by:
Griffen v. Ark. Judicial Discipline & Disability Comm'n, 266 F. Supp. 2d 898, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9162
(E.D. Ark. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
266 F. Supp. 2d 898 p.906
Cited by:
266 F. Supp. 2d 898 p.905
4786.
Cited by:
Yeazizw v. City of Minneapolis, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21649 (D. Minn. Nov. 4, 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21649
4787.
Cited by:
Endeshaw v. Poston, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18671 (D. Minn. Sept. 23, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18671
4788.
Cited by:
Clay Reg'l Water v. City of Spirit Lake, 193 F. Supp. 2d 1129, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5823 (N.D. Iowa
Page 544
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
193 F. Supp. 2d 1129 p.1150
4789.
Cited by:
Silverman v. Silverman, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3000 (D. Minn. Feb. 21, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3000
4790.
Cited by:
Endeshaw v. Poston, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21608 (D. Minn. Feb. 6, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21608
4791.
Cited by:
Duvall v. Evans, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28061 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 9, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28061
4792.
Distinguished by:
Neumann v. AT&T Communs., Inc., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19039, 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1253
(D. Minn. Nov. 8, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19039
4793.
Followed by:
Endeshaw v. Poston, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24838 (D. Minn. June 8, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24838
4794.
Followed by, Explained by:
P.G. v. Ramsey County, 141 F. Supp. 2d 1220, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9610 (D. Minn. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
141 F. Supp. 2d 1220 p.1229
Explained by:
141 F. Supp. 2d 1220 p.1228
4795.
Followed by:
Velek v. Arkansas, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5096 (E.D. Ark. Mar. 22, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5096
4796.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Cited by:
Newell v. Rolling Hills Apts., 134 F. Supp. 2d 1026, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3598 (N.D. Iowa 2001)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
134 F. Supp. 2d 1026 p.1041
Followed by:
134 F. Supp. 2d 1026 p.1036
134 F. Supp. 2d 1026 p.1042
Page 545
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cited by:
134 F. Supp. 2d 1026 p.1031
134 F. Supp. 2d 1026 p.1034
4797.
Explained by:
Cedar Rapids Cellular Tel., L.P. v. Miller, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22624 (N.D. Iowa Sept. 15, 2000)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22624
4798.
Distinguished by:
South Dakota Farm Bureau, Inc. v. Hazeltine, 2000 DSD 43, 197 F.R.D. 673, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19419
(D.S.D. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
197 F.R.D. 673 p.676
4799.
Cited by:
Bauer v. Transitional Sch. Dist., 88 F. Supp. 2d 999, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3800 (E.D. Mo. 2000)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
88 F. Supp. 2d 999 p.1004
4800.
Cited by:
Entergy Ark., Inc. v. Nebraska, 46 F. Supp. 2d 977, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5454, 48 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA)
1653, 29 Envtl. L. Rep. 21277 (D. Neb. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
46 F. Supp. 2d 977 p.996
4801.
Distinguished by:
Bank One, N.A. v. Guttau, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14830 (S.D. Iowa July 24, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14830
4802.
Followed by:
Harmon v. City of Kansas City, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4757 (W.D. Mo. Apr. 2, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4757
4803.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
B.A.P., Inc. v. McCulloch, 994 F. Supp. 1131, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1669 (E.D. Mo. 1998) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
994 F. Supp. 1131 p.1137
Followed by:
994 F. Supp. 1131 p.1137
4804.
Cited by:
Abdullah Sayid Rajab Al-Rifai & Sons W.L.L. v. McDonnell Douglas Foreign Sales Corp., 988 F. Supp.
1285, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20587 (E.D. Mo. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
988 F. Supp. 1285 p.1290
Page 546
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4805.
Followed by:
Allnew v. City of Duluth, 983 F. Supp. 825, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17245 (D. Minn. 1997)
983 F. Supp. 825 p.834
4806.
Cited by:
Allnew v. City of Duluth, 983 F. Supp. 825, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17246 (D. Minn. 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6, HN9
4807.
Followed by, Cited by:
Neal v. Wilson, 920 F. Supp. 976, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4742 (E.D. Ark. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN8
Followed by:
920 F. Supp. 976 p.990
Cited by:
920 F. Supp. 976 p.986
4808.
Cited by:
Henderson v. Miller, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22496 (W.D. Ark. June 14, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22496
4809.
Cited by:
Moore v. United States, 875 F. Supp. 620, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19623 (D. Neb. 1994)
875 F. Supp. 620 p.623
4810.
Cited by:
Moore v. United States, 875 F. Supp. 620, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19643 (D. Neb. 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
4811.
Followed by:
Partin v. Arkansas State Bd. of Law Examiners, 863 F. Supp. 924, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18129 (E.D. Ark.
1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
863 F. Supp. 924 p.927
4812.
Followed by, Cited by:
Fuller v. Ulland, 858 F. Supp. 931, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10739 (D. Minn. 1994)
Followed by:
858 F. Supp. 931 p.934
Cited by:
858 F. Supp. 931 p.936
4813.
Cited by:
Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. Minnesota Dep't of Natural Resources, 853 F. Supp. 1118, 1994
U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6788 (D. Minn. 1994)
853 F. Supp. 1118 p.1124
853 F. Supp. 1118 p.1131
Page 547
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4814.
Cited by:
Pankey v. Webster, 816 F. Supp. 553, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3134 (W.D. Mo. 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
816 F. Supp. 553 p.561
4815.
Cited by:
Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe v. United States, 804 F. Supp. 1199, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15356 (D.S.D.
1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
804 F. Supp. 1199 p.1205
4816.
Cited by:
Beshear v. Butt, 773 F. Supp. 1229, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13528 (E.D. Ark. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
773 F. Supp. 1229 p.1232
4817.
Followed by:
Stephan v. Arkansas, 747 F. Supp. 1327, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13835 (E.D. Ark. 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
747 F. Supp. 1327 p.1329
4818.
Cited by:
Lambert v. Polk County, 723 F. Supp. 128, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12709, 16 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2414
(S.D. Iowa 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
723 F. Supp. 128 p.135
4819.
Cited by:
Wise v. Adams, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17701 (E.D. Mo. May 9, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4820.
Followed by:
Alexander v. Thornburgh, 713 F. Supp. 1278, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5011 (D. Minn. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
713 F. Supp. 1278 p.1287
4821.
Cited by:
Brown v. Joplin Globe, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3891 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 31, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
4822.
Cited by:
Rollins v. Reardon, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 490 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 12, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4823.
Cited by:
Mershon v. Kyser, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14302 (W.D. Mo. Dec. 7, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4824.
Cited by:
Wood v. Foote, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12770 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 5, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4825.
Cited by:
Alleghany Corp. v. McCartney, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16178 (D. Neb. Oct. 18, 1988) LexisNexis
Page 548
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5, HN6
4826.
Cited by:
Alleghany Corp. v. Pomeroy, 698 F. Supp. 809, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12477 (D.N.D. 1988) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
698 F. Supp. 809 p.811
4827.
Explained by:
Razorback Cab of Ft. Smith, Inc. v. Arkansas Dep't of Finance & Admin., 690 F. Supp. 790, 1988 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 8765 (E.D. Ark. 1988)
690 F. Supp. 790 p.791
4828.
Cited by:
McCrary v. Megerman, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7086 (W.D. Mo. July 11, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
4829.
Distinguished by:
Quinn v. Missouri, 681 F. Supp. 1422, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2173 (W.D. Mo. 1988)
681 F. Supp. 1422 p.1427
4830.
Cited by:
Hendrickson v. Griggs, 672 F. Supp. 1126, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3031 (N.D. Iowa 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
672 F. Supp. 1126 p.1131
4831.
Cited by:
Trucke v. Erlemeier, 657 F. Supp. 1382, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3079 (N.D. Iowa 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
657 F. Supp. 1382 p.1386
657 F. Supp. 1382 p.1390
4832.
Cited by:
Minneapolis Urban League, Inc. v. Minneapolis, 650 F. Supp. 303, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21429 (D. Minn.
1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
650 F. Supp. 303 p.306
4833.
Followed by:
Miner v. Baker, 638 F. Supp. 239, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23551 (E.D. Mo. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
638 F. Supp. 239 p.240
4834.
Distinguished by:
Heritage Pub. Co. v. Fishman, 634 F. Supp. 1489, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25238 (D. Minn. 1986)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
634 F. Supp. 1489 p.1496
4835.
Distinguished by:
Page 549
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Icahn v. Blunt, 612 F. Supp. 1400, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18621, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P92096 (W.D.
Mo. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
612 F. Supp. 1400 p.1403
4836.
Cited by:
MINOR v. HENNEPIN CTY. BUR. OF SOC. SERVS., 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19363 (D. Minn. May 30,
1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4837.
Cited by:
Swofford v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc., 604 F. Supp. 1128, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21553
(E.D. Ark. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
604 F. Supp. 1128 p.1129
4838.
Cited by:
Edudata Corp. v. Scientific Computers, Inc., 599 F. Supp. 1084, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23196 (D. Minn.
1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
599 F. Supp. 1084 p.1087
4839.
Followed by:
Shipman v. Missouri Div. of Family Services, 588 F. Supp. 1203, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15388 (E.D. Mo.
1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
588 F. Supp. 1203 p.1206
4840.
Cited by:
Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Gomez-Bethke, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18009, 18 Av. Cas. (CCH) P18036, 34
Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P34561, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P34561, 5 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA)
1374, 34 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 837 (D. Minn. Apr. 4, 1984)
4841.
Cited by:
Willis-Bey v. Brummer, 577 F. Supp. 881, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20566 (E.D. Mo. 1984)
577 F. Supp. 881 p.882
4842.
Explained by:
Allen v. Johnston, 575 F. Supp. 935, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11802 (S.D. Iowa 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
575 F. Supp. 935 p.937
4843.
Cited by:
Cox Cable Communications, Inc. v. Simpson, 569 F. Supp. 507, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14974 (D. Neb.
1983)
569 F. Supp. 507 p.511
4844.
Cited by:
Walden v. Wigen, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15064 (D.N.D. July 29, 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
4845.
Cited by:
Horsey v. Asher, 593 F. Supp. 441, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16165 (W.D. Mo. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Page 550
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
593 F. Supp. 441 p.447
4846.
Cited by:
Meadowbrook Women's Clinic, P.A. v. Minnesota, 557 F. Supp. 1172, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19041, 9
Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1325 (D. Minn. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
557 F. Supp. 1172 p.1175
4847.
Followed by:
Masingill v. Arkansas, 541 F. Supp. 714, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13066 (E.D. Ark. 1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6, HN9
541 F. Supp. 714 p.715
4848.
Cited by:
Gleghorn v. First Sec. Bank, 523 F. Supp. 359, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14774, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH)
P32391, 27 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 911 (E.D. Ark. 1981)
523 F. Supp. 359 p.361
4849.
Cited by:
Wammack v. Batesville, 522 F. Supp. 1006, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14662 (E.D. Ark. 1981)
522 F. Supp. 1006 p.1008
4850.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Empire, Inc. v. Ashcroft, 524 F. Supp. 898, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15066, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P98310
(W.D. Mo. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
524 F. Supp. 898 p.901
Cited by:
524 F. Supp. 898 p.900
4851.
Cited by:
Edwards v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 519 F. Supp. 484, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13624 (E.D. Ark. 1981)
519 F. Supp. 484 p.487
4852.
Cited by:
Seltzer v. Missouri, 517 F. Supp. 1253, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13303 (E.D. Mo. 1981) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
517 F. Supp. 1253 p.1254
4853.
Distinguished by:
Back Door Records v. Jacksonville, 515 F. Supp. 857, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12569 (E.D. Ark. 1981)
515 F. Supp. 857 p.858
4854.
Followed by:
Missouri P. R. Co. v. Tax Div. of Arkansas Public Com., 504 F. Supp. 907, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15890, 7
Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 1498 (E.D. Ark. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 551
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
504 F. Supp. 907 p.910
4855.
Cited by:
National Asso. of Property Owners v. United States, 499 F. Supp. 1223, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17379, 11
Envtl. L. Rep. 20124 (D. Minn. 1980)
499 F. Supp. 1223 p.1252
4856.
Cited by:
Winters v. Palumbo, 512 F. Supp. 7, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16550 (E.D. Mo. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
512 F. Supp. 7 p.10
4857.
Distinguished by:
Rapp v. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of Iowa State Bar Asso., 504 F. Supp. 1092, 1980
U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15840 (S.D. Iowa 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
504 F. Supp. 1092 p.1101
4858.
Distinguished by:
Wild Cinemas of Little Rock, Inc. v. Bentley, 499 F. Supp. 655, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14434 (E.D. Ark.
1980)
499 F. Supp. 655 p.658
4859.
Followed by:
Davis v. Muellar, 481 F. Supp. 888, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7765 (D.N.D. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6, HN8
481 F. Supp. 888 p.891
4860.
Followed by:
Fair Assessment in Real Estate Asso. v. McNary, 478 F. Supp. 1231, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8691 (E.D. Mo.
1979)
478 F. Supp. 1231 p.1234
4861.
Distinguished by:
Walker v. Wegner, 477 F. Supp. 648, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9495 (D.S.D. 1979) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN8
477 F. Supp. 648 p.651
4862.
Cited by:
Record Head, Inc. v. Olson, 476 F. Supp. 366, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9770 (D.N.D. 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6, HN8
476 F. Supp. 366 p.371
4863.
Distinguished by:
Valley Family Planning v. North Dakota, 475 F. Supp. 100, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10365 (D.N.D. 1979)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
475 F. Supp. 100 p.102
Page 552
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4864.
Cited by:
Conley v. White, 470 F. Supp. 1, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12764 (W.D. Mo. 1979)
470 F. Supp. 1 p.4
4865.
Followed by:
Orlando v. Wizel, 443 F. Supp. 744, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20323, 2 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 886 (W.D.
Ark. 1978)
443 F. Supp. 744 p.750
4866.
Cited by:
In re Porter, 462 F. Supp. 370, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6931, 4 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1131, 19 Collier
Bankr. Cas. (MB) 628 (E.D. Ark. 1978) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
462 F. Supp. 370 p.372
4867.
Followed by:
Caldwell v. Camp, 455 F. Supp. 270, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16380 (E.D. Mo. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
455 F. Supp. 270 p.271
4868.
Followed by:
United States ex rel. Tyler v. Hall, 444 F. Supp. 104, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20196 (E.D. Mo. 1978)
444 F. Supp. 104 p.106
4869.
Cited by:
TYLER v. CIRCUIT ATTY. FOR ST. LOUIS, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12726 (E.D. Mo. Nov. 28, 1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8
4870.
Harmonized by:
Tyler v. Circuit Attorney, Circuit Court, 434 F. Supp. 1137, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14783 (E.D. Mo. 1977)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
434 F. Supp. 1137 p.1138
4871.
Cited by:
Home Federal Sav. & Loan Asso. v. Insurance Dep't of Iowa, 428 F. Supp. 992, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
16849 (N.D. Iowa 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
428 F. Supp. 992 p.996
4872.
Cited by:
Parton v. Basinger, 427 F. Supp. 383, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17043 (W.D. Mo. 1977)
427 F. Supp. 383 p.385
4873.
Followed by:
Munson v. Janklow, 421 F. Supp. 544, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12661 (D.S.D. 1976) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6, HN7
421 F. Supp. 544 p.547
Page 553
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4874.
Followed by, Cited by:
Thibodeau v. Minnesota, 419 F. Supp. 87, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13308 (D. Minn. 1976)
Followed by:
419 F. Supp. 87 p.90
419 F. Supp. 87 p.91
Cited by:
419 F. Supp. 87 p.89
4875.
Cited by:
Hanson v. United States, 417 F. Supp. 30, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16544 (D. Minn. 1976) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
417 F. Supp. 30 p.34
4876.
Explained by:
Johnson v. McNary, 414 F. Supp. 684, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14947 (E.D. Mo. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
414 F. Supp. 684 p.686
4877.
Distinguished by:
Doremus v. Farrell, 407 F. Supp. 509, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14658 (D. Neb. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
407 F. Supp. 509 p.513
4878.
Followed by, Cited by:
Conners v. Riley, 395 F. Supp. 1244, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12357 (W.D. Ark. 1975) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4, HN5
Followed by:
395 F. Supp. 1244 p.1246
Cited by:
395 F. Supp. 1244 p.1247
4879.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
N. D. D., Inc. v. Faches, 385 F. Supp. 276, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11758 (N.D. Iowa 1974) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
385 F. Supp. 276 p.278
Cited by:
385 F. Supp. 276 p.277
4880.
Cited by:
Vietnam Veterans against War v. Benecke, 63 F.R.D. 675, 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7855 (D. Mo. 1974)
63 F.R.D. 675 p.681
63 F.R.D. 675 p.682
Page 554
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4881.
Cited by:
Axelson v. Summers, 369 F. Supp. 75, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10765 (E.D. Mo. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
369 F. Supp. 75 p.77
4882.
Harmonized by:
McCright v. Olson, 367 F. Supp. 937, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10614 (D.N.D. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
367 F. Supp. 937 p.941
367 F. Supp. 937 p.942
4883.
Cited by:
Burbridge Foundation, Inc. v. Reinholdt & Gardner, 363 F. Supp. 445, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11896 (W.D.
Ark. 1973) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5
363 F. Supp. 445 p.449
4884.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Century 21 Shows, Inc. v. Iowa, 346 F. Supp. 1050, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12348 (S.D. Iowa 1972)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
346 F. Supp. 1050 p.1056
Cited by:
346 F. Supp. 1050 p.1052
4885.
Cited by:
Lathrop v. Brewer, 340 F. Supp. 873, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14361 (S.D. Iowa 1972)
340 F. Supp. 873 p.878
4886.
Cited by:
Mini-Art Operating Co. v. Smith, 336 F. Supp. 638, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10255 (W.D. Ark. 1971)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
336 F. Supp. 638 p.643
4887.
Cited by:
Stradley v. Andersen, 334 F. Supp. 72, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12862, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P7713 (D.
Neb. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
334 F. Supp. 72 p.73
4888.
Cited by:
Papish v. Board of Curators, etc., 331 F. Supp. 1321, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13397 (W.D. Mo. 1971)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
331 F. Supp. 1321 p.1329
4889.
Cited by:
Kirk v. McMeen, 327 F. Supp. 125, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13137 (N.D. Iowa 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 555
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN6
327 F. Supp. 125 p.126
4890.
Cited by:
Moyer v. Nelson, 324 F. Supp. 1224, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14413 (S.D. Iowa 1971) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
324 F. Supp. 1224 p.1230
8TH CIRCUIT - U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURTS
4891.
Cited by:
Pearce v. E.L.W. Corp. (In re Pearce), 400 B.R. 126, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 91, 61 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d
(MB) 107 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa 2009)
400 B.R. 126 p.132
4892.
Among conflicting authorities noted in:
Evans v. Bank of Eureka Springs (In re Evans), 245 B.R. 852, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 241, 35 Bankr. Ct. Dec.
(LRP) 225, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P78142 (Bankr. W.D. Ark. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
245 B.R. 852 p.856
4893.
Cited by:
In re Pickering Estates, 204 B.R. 556, 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 35, 30 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 254 (Bankr. W.D.
Mo. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
204 B.R. 556 p.560
4894.
Cited by:
Miller & Miller Auctioneers v. Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Int'l, L.P. (In re Missouri Props.), 211 B.R. 914,
1996 Bankr. LEXIS 1866, 38 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 977 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1996) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
211 B.R. 914 p.923
4895.
Cited by:
Schake v. County of Buffalo, 154 B.R. 270, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 686 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
154 B.R. 270 p.273
4896.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
In re Brinkman, 123 B.R. 318, 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 65, 21 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 415 (Bankr. D. Minn.
1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
123 B.R. 318 p.321
Cited by:
123 B.R. 318 p.322
4897.
Cited by:
In re Brown, 105 B.R. 531, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1793 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 556
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
105 B.R. 531 p.534
4898.
Cited by:
In re Holiday Interval, Inc., 114 B.R. 177, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 2686 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
114 B.R. 177 p.182
4899.
Cited by:
Brown v. Vali-Chek, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1540 (Bankr. D.S.D. Sept. 12, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
4900.
Followed by:
In re Vik, 45 B.R. 64, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 4669, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P70137, 11 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d
(MB) 1336 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
45 B.R. 64 p.66
4901.
Cited by:
In re Guthrel, 43 B.R. 4, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5546 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
43 B.R. 4 p.5
4902.
Cited by:
In re Wagner, 18 B.R. 339, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 4570, 8 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1065, 6 Collier Bankr. Cas.
2d (MB) 317 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
18 B.R. 339 p.341
4903.
Cited by:
Chicago Eastern Corp. v. Beadle Cty. Irrigation Sys., 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 2530 (Bankr. D.S.D. Nov. 23,
1981) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
9TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
4904.
Cited by:
United States v. Hinkson, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24358 (9th Cir. Idaho Nov. 5, 2009)
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24358
4905.
Criticized by, Explained by:
Los Altos El Granada Investors v. City of Capitola, 583 F.3d 674, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 22044 (9th Cir.
Cal. 2009)
Criticized by:
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 22044
Explained by:
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 22044
4906.
Followed by:
Deere v. Superior Court, 330 Fed. Appx. 693, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17451 (9th Cir. Cal. 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
330 Fed. Appx. 693 p.694
Page 557
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4907.
Cited by:
Wisdom v. Nevada, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17046 (9th Cir. Nev. July 31, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17046
4908.
Cited by:
Kamm v. ITEX Corp., 568 F.3d 752, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12709 (9th Cir. Or. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
568 F.3d 752 p.756
4909.
Cited by:
Wright v. Volland, 331 Fed. Appx. 496, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11425 (9th Cir. Alaska 2009)
331 Fed. Appx. 496 p.497
4910.
Cited by:
Babinski v. Voss, 323 Fed. Appx. 617, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8740 (9th Cir. Cal. 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
323 Fed. Appx. 617 p.618
4911.
Followed by:
Mirch v. Beesely, 316 Fed. Appx. 643, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 4686, 2009-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P76514 (9th
Cir. Nev. 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
316 Fed. Appx. 643 p.644
4912.
Cited by:
Equity Lifestyle Props., Inc. v. County of San Luis Obispo, 548 F.3d 1184, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 24212
(9th Cir. Cal. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
548 F.3d 1184 p.1196
4913.
Followed by:
San Jose Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce Political Action Comm. v. City of San Jose, 546 F.3d 1087,
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21767 (9th Cir. Cal. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
546 F.3d 1087 p.1089
4914.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Potter v. Hughes, 546 F.3d 1051, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21306, 71 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1333 (9th
Cir. Cal. 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
546 F.3d 1051 p.1060
4915.
Cited by:
Herships v. Superior Court, 293 Fed. Appx. 473, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 20506 (9th Cir. Cal. 2008)
293 Fed. Appx. 473 p.474
4916.
Followed by:
Sanai v. Alexander, 283 Fed. Appx. 551, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13666 (9th Cir. Or. 2008) LexisNexis
Page 558
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5
283 Fed. Appx. 551 p.551
4917.
Cited by:
Animal Prot. & Rescue League v. California, 282 Fed. Appx. 637, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13127 (9th Cir.
Cal. 2008)
282 Fed. Appx. 637 p.638
4918.
Followed by:
Sanai v. Alexander, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 10300 (9th Cir. Or. May 6, 2008)
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 10300
4919.
Cited by:
Osborne v. Dist. Attorney's Office, 521 F.3d 1118, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 6911 (9th Cir. Alaska 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
521 F.3d 1118 p.1126
4920.
Cited by:
Lacy-Curry v. Alameda County Soc. Servs. Agency, 262 Fed. Appx. 9, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 30024 (9th
Cir. Cal. 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
262 Fed. Appx. 9 p.10
4921.
Followed by:
Young v. Trans Union, 260 Fed. Appx. 1, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 29054 (9th Cir. Cal. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
260 Fed. Appx. 1 p.3
4922.
Followed by:
Brumbaugh v. Cal. Superior Court, 259 Fed. Appx. 10, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 29061 (9th Cir. Cal. 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
259 Fed. Appx. 10 p.11
4923.
Cited by:
Orth v. Washoe County Sheriff's Dep't, 256 Fed. Appx. 126, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 27724 (9th Cir. Nev.
2007)
256 Fed. Appx. 126 p.127
4924.
Cited by:
Kay v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes, 504 F.3d 803, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22541, 42 Comm. Reg. (P & F)
901 (9th Cir. Cal. 2007)
504 F.3d 803 p.808
4925.
Cited by:
Equity Lifestyle Props. v. County of San Luis Obispo, 505 F.3d 860, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22142 (9th Cir.
Cal. 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
505 F.3d 860 p.872
Page 559
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4926.
Distinguished by, Distinguished in Depublished Concurring Opinion at, Cited in Concurring Opinion
at, Cited by:
AmerisourceBergen Corp. v. Roden, 495 F.3d 1143, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19179, 41 Employee Benefits
Cas. (BNA) 1706, 26 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 752 (9th Cir. Cal. 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
495 F.3d 1143 p.1150
Distinguished in Depublished Concurring Opinion at:
495 F.3d 1143 p.1154
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
495 F.3d 1143 p.1154
Cited by:
495 F.3d 1143 p.1147
4927.
Cited by:
United States v. Mayer, 503 F.3d 740, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22155 (9th Cir. Cal. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
503 F.3d 740 p.751
4928.
Cited by:
United States v. Mayer, 490 F.3d 1129, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 14469 (9th Cir. Cal. 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
490 F.3d 1129 p.1137
4929.
Followed by:
Wasson v. Riverside County, 234 Fed. Appx. 529, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 13958 (9th Cir. Cal. 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
234 Fed. Appx. 529 p.530
4930.
Cited by:
Agustin v. County of Alameda, 234 Fed. Appx. 521, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 13938 (9th Cir. Cal. 2007)
234 Fed. Appx. 521 p.522
4931.
Cited by:
United States v. Mayer, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 13022 (9th Cir. Cal. June 6, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN8
2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 13022
4932.
Cited by:
Homestead Ins. Co. v. Casden Co., 234 Fed. Appx. 434, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 10770 (9th Cir. Cal. 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
234 Fed. Appx. 434 p.435
4933.
Followed by:
Page 560
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Wilmshurst v. Brown, 231 Fed. Appx. 555, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 10733 (9th Cir. Cal. 2007)
231 Fed. Appx. 555 p.555
4934.
Cited by:
Smith v. County of Santa Clara, 223 Fed. Appx. 701, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5043 (9th Cir. Cal. 2007)
223 Fed. Appx. 701 p.702
4935.
Cited by:
Elwood v. Drescher, 456 F.3d 943, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18948 (9th Cir. Cal. 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
456 F.3d 943 p.945
4936.
Cited by:
Peterson v. Dahl, 192 Fed. Appx. 632, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18916 (9th Cir. Alaska 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
192 Fed. Appx. 632 p.633
4937.
Cited by:
Jou v. Schmidt, 203 Fed. Appx. 9, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16334 (9th Cir. Haw. 2006)
203 Fed. Appx. 9 p.10
4938.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Jones v. City of L.A., 444 F.3d 1118, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 9308 (9th Cir. Cal. 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
444 F.3d 1118 p.1148
4939.
Cited by:
Estate of Spirtos v. One San Bernardino County Superior Court Case Numbered SPR 02211, 443 F.3d 1172,
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 8968, 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 89, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P80484 (9th Cir. Cal.
2006)
443 F.3d 1172 p.1174
4940.
Cited by:
Calihan v. Superior Court, 158 Fed. Appx. 807, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 27584 (9th Cir. Cal. 2005)
158 Fed. Appx. 807 p.807
4941.
Cited by:
Rowell v. Clark County Pub. Defender Office, 157 Fed. Appx. 973, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 26023 (9th Cir.
Nev. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
157 Fed. Appx. 973 p.975
4942.
Cited by:
Wilbur v. Locke, 423 F.3d 1101, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 19471 (9th Cir. Wash. 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
423 F.3d 1101 p.1106
Page 561
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4943.
Cited by:
Owen v. Labor Ready, Inc., 146 Fed. Appx. 139, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17848 (9th Cir. Wash. 2005)
146 Fed. Appx. 139 p.142
4944.
Explained by:
M&A Gabaee v. Cmty. Redevelopment Agency of L.A., 419 F.3d 1036, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17359 (9th
Cir. Cal. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
419 F.3d 1036 p.1039
4945.
Followed by:
Sanai v. Sanai, 141 Fed. Appx. 677, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17785 (9th Cir. Wash. 2005)
141 Fed. Appx. 677 p.678
4946.
Followed by, Cited by:
AG of Guam v. Torres, 419 F.3d 1017, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17229 (9th Cir. Guam 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
Followed by:
419 F.3d 1017 p.1022
Cited by:
419 F.3d 1017 p.1018
4947.
Distinguished by:
Von Kennel Gaudin v. Remis, 415 F.3d 1028, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14441 (9th Cir. Haw. 2005)
415 F.3d 1028 p.1034
4948.
Followed by, Cited by:
Canatella v. State of California, 404 F.3d 1106, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5881 (9th Cir. Cal. 2005)
Followed by:
404 F.3d 1106 p.1112
Cited by:
404 F.3d 1106 p.1109
4949.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Gator.com Corp. v. L.L. Bean, Inc., 398 F.3d 1125, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2521, 73 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA)
1795 (9th Cir. Cal. 2005)
398 F.3d 1125 p.1137
4950.
Cited by:
Davenport v. Washington, 125 Fed. Appx. 770, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2318 (9th Cir. Wash. 2005)
125 Fed. Appx. 770 p.772
4951.
Followed by, Cited by:
Trenier v. County of L.A., 114 Fed. Appx. 945, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 26179 (9th Cir. Cal. 2004)
Followed by:
Page 562
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
114 Fed. Appx. 945 p.946
Cited by:
114 Fed. Appx. 945 p.945
4952.
Cited by:
Wolfe v. Strankman, 392 F.3d 358, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25776 (9th Cir. Cal. 2004)
392 F.3d 358 p.361
4953.
Cited by:
May Trucking Co. v. Or. DOT, 388 F.3d 1261, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 23768 (9th Cir. Or. 2004)
388 F.3d 1261 p.1265
4954.
Cited by:
Gilbertson v. Albright, 381 F.3d 965, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18734 (9th Cir. Or. 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
381 F.3d 965 p.968
4955.
Cited by:
Williams v. Cal. Dep't of Corr., 103 Fed. Appx. 641, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13425 (9th Cir. Cal. 2004)
103 Fed. Appx. 641 p.642
4956.
Followed by, Cited by:
Wynnyk v. Jackson County, 99 Fed. Appx. 134, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10686 (9th Cir. Or. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
99 Fed. Appx. 134 p.136
Cited by:
99 Fed. Appx. 134 p.134
4957.
Cited by:
Oregon v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1118, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10349 (9th Cir. Or. 2004)
368 F.3d 1118 p.1124
4958.
Cited by:
Green v. Hous. Auth., 99 Fed. Appx. 84, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8369 (9th Cir. Nev. 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
99 Fed. Appx. 84 p.85
4959.
Followed by:
Elwood v. Drescher, 90 Fed. Appx. 501, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 35 (9th Cir. Cal. 2004)
90 Fed. Appx. 501 p.503
4960.
Cited by:
Bator v. Freund, 83 Fed. Appx. 930, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 25355 (9th Cir. Nev. 2003)
Page 563
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
83 Fed. Appx. 930 p.931
4961.
Cited by:
Nunes v. Mueller, 350 F.3d 1045, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 24185, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 10277 (9th
Cir. Cal. 2003)
350 F.3d 1045 p.1056
4962.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Gilbertson v. Albright, 350 F.3d 1030, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 24183, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 10274
(9th Cir. Or. 2003)
Distinguished by:
350 F.3d 1030 p.1034
Cited by:
350 F.3d 1030 p.1031
4963.
Followed by:
Am. Consumer Publ. Ass'n v. Margosian, 349 F.3d 1122, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23442, 2003 Cal. Daily
Op. Service 9881 (9th Cir. Or. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
349 F.3d 1122 p.1124
4964.
Followed by:
Manning v. Alaska State Court Sys., 76 Fed. Appx. 790, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18447 (9th Cir. Alaska
2003)
76 Fed. Appx. 790 p.791
4965.
Cited by:
Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18110, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8004, 2003 D.A.R.
9949 (9th Cir. Or. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
341 F.3d 1148 p.1159
4966.
Cited by:
Green v. City of Tucson, 340 F.3d 891, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17042, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 7500,
2003 D.A.R. 9398 (9th Cir. Ariz. 2003)
340 F.3d 891 p.895
4967.
Cited by:
Barkclay v. County of Maricopa, 72 Fed. Appx. 701, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16946 (9th Cir. Ariz. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
72 Fed. Appx. 701 p.702
4968.
Cited by:
Watkins v. Stout, 73 Fed. Appx. 217, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15310 (9th Cir. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
73 Fed. Appx. 217 p.218
Page 564
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4969.
Followed by:
Blake v. Baca, 72 Fed. Appx. 585, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15315 (9th Cir. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN9
72 Fed. Appx. 585 p.585
4970.
Followed by:
Johannes v. Hunter, 71 Fed. Appx. 704, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15313 (9th Cir. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
71 Fed. Appx. 704 p.705
4971.
Cited by:
Lundahl v. Esplin, 70 Fed. Appx. 972, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15317 (9th Cir. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
70 Fed. Appx. 972 p.973
4972.
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
Dixon v. Wallowa County, 336 F.3d 1013, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14536, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service
6394, 2003 D.A.R. 8062 (9th Cir. Or. 2003)
336 F.3d 1013 p.1023
4973.
Cited by:
Wallis v. Mock, 68 Fed. Appx. 120, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12668 (9th Cir. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
68 Fed. Appx. 120 p.121
4974.
Followed by:
Baffert v. Cal. Horse Racing Bd., 332 F.3d 613, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11297, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service
4771, 2003 D.A.R. 6067 (9th Cir. Cal. 2003)
332 F.3d 613 p.616
4975.
Cited by:
Bittaker v. Woodford, 331 F.3d 715, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11298, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4773, 2003
D.A.R. 6078, 61 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 923 (9th Cir. Cal. 2003)
331 F.3d 715 p.725
4976.
Followed by, Cited by:
McElroy v. City of Corvallis, 67 Fed. Appx. 420, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11479 (9th Cir. Or. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
67 Fed. Appx. 420 p.422
Cited by:
67 Fed. Appx. 420 p.421
4977.
Cited by:
Howard v. City of Milton, 63 Fed. Appx. 978, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 9850 (9th Cir. Wash. 2003)
63 Fed. Appx. 978 p.978
Page 565
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4978.
Followed by:
Riedlinger v. Albright, 63 Fed. Appx. 379, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 9756 (9th Cir. Nev. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
63 Fed. Appx. 379 p.380
4979.
Cited by:
Gospel Missions of Am. v. City of L.A., 328 F.3d 548, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8540, 2003 D.A.R. 4896 (9th
Cir. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
328 F.3d 548 p.555
4980.
Cited by:
Meredith v. Oregon, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 7310, 2003 D.A.R. 4135 (9th Cir. Or. Apr. 18, 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 7310
4981.
Cited by:
Rivers v. Liu, 59 Fed. Appx. 229, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 5627 (9th Cir. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6, HN9
59 Fed. Appx. 229 p.229
4982.
Followed by, Cited by:
Meredith v. Oregon, 321 F.3d 807, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3564, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 1670, 2003
D.A.R. 2179 (9th Cir. Or. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
321 F.3d 807 p.817
Cited by:
321 F.3d 807 p.811
4983.
Followed by:
Outdoor Media Dimensions, Inc. v. Warner, 58 Fed. Appx. 293, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3200 (9th Cir. Or.
2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
58 Fed. Appx. 293 p.294
4984.
Cited by:
Porter v. Jones, 319 F.3d 483, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2058, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 1154, 2003
D.A.R. 1456 (9th Cir. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
319 F.3d 483 p.494
4985.
Cited by:
Tatarian v. Sweeney, 55 Fed. Appx. 475, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 1811 (9th Cir. Cal. 2003)
55 Fed. Appx. 475 p.476
4986.
Cited by:
Dean v. Parker, 45 Fed. Appx. 742, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18365 (9th Cir. Or. 2002)
Page 566
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
45 Fed. Appx. 742 p.743
4987.
Cited by:
Sammartano v. First Judicial Dist. Court, 303 F.3d 959, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17648, 2002 Cal. Daily Op.
Service 7782, 2002 D.A.R. 9819 (9th Cir. Nev. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
303 F.3d 959 p.964
4988.
Cited by:
Ford v. Cohn, 44 Fed. Appx. 145, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16329 (9th Cir. Cal. 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
44 Fed. Appx. 145 p.147
4989.
Cited by:
Page v. Demorales, 42 Fed. Appx. 930, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16290 (9th Cir. Cal. 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
42 Fed. Appx. 930 p.931
4990.
Cited by:
Andersen v. United States, 298 F.3d 804, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15253, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 6771,
2002 D.A.R. 8546, 90 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5454 (9th Cir. Cal. 2002)
298 F.3d 804 p.810
4991.
Followed by:
Cooks v. Etling, 43 Fed. Appx. 75, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15835 (9th Cir. Cal. 2002)
43 Fed. Appx. 75 p.75
4992.
Cited by:
Canatella v. California, 304 F.3d 843, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18476 (9th Cir. Cal. 2002)
304 F.3d 843 p.847
4993.
Followed by, Cited by:
Canatella v. California, 293 F.3d 1099, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 11275, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5195,
2002 D.A.R. 6579 (9th Cir. Cal. 2002)
Followed by:
293 F.3d 1099 p.1104
Cited by:
293 F.3d 1099 p.1102
4994.
Cited by:
Meredith v. Oregon, 33 Fed. Appx. 885, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7429 (9th Cir. Or. 2002)
33 Fed. Appx. 885 p.886
4995.
Cited by:
Davidson v. City of Bellflower, 31 Fed. Appx. 487, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3622 (9th Cir. Cal. 2002)
31 Fed. Appx. 487 p.487
Page 567
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
4996.
Followed by:
Torre v. Coos County, 31 Fed. Appx. 390, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2755 (9th Cir. Or. 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
31 Fed. Appx. 390 p.391
4997.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
United States v. Morros, 268 F.3d 695, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22342, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8835,
2001 D.A.R. 10981 (9th Cir. Nev. 2001)
Distinguished by:
268 F.3d 695 p.707
Cited by:
268 F.3d 695 p.703
4998.
Cited by:
Phillips v. Woodford, 267 F.3d 966, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22344, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8821, 2001
D.A.R. 10997 (9th Cir. Cal. 2001)
267 F.3d 966 p.971
4999.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Columbia Basin Apt. Ass'n v. City of Pasco, 268 F.3d 791, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20922, 2001 Cal. Daily
Op. Service 8415, 2001 D.A.R. 10387 (9th Cir. Wash. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
268 F.3d 791 p.800
268 F.3d 791 p.801
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
268 F.3d 791 p.808
Cited by:
268 F.3d 791 p.797
5000.
Cited by:
Hill v. Plummer, 27 Fed. Appx. 723, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20829 (9th Cir. Cal. 2001)
27 Fed. Appx. 723 p.724
5001.
Distinguished by, Explained by:
Montclair Parkowners Ass'n v. City of Montclair, 264 F.3d 829, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19660, 2001 Cal.
Daily Op. Service 7826, 2001 D.A.R. 9667 (9th Cir. Cal. 2001)
Distinguished by:
264 F.3d 829 p.831
Explained by:
264 F.3d 829 p.831
5002.
Followed by:
Zimmermann v. Gregoire, 18 Fed. Appx. 599, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19903 (9th Cir. Wash. 2001)
Page 568
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
18 Fed. Appx. 599 p.601
5003.
Cited by:
United States v. Geiger, 263 F.3d 1034, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19409, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Service 7689,
2001 D.A.R. 9495, 57 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 935 (9th Cir. Alaska 2001)
263 F.3d 1034 p.1040
5004.
Cited by:
Bijan v. Schindler, 14 Fed. Appx. 893, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 16519 (9th Cir. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
14 Fed. Appx. 893 p.894
5005.
Distinguished by, Explained by, Cited by:
Green v. City of Tucson, 255 F.3d 1086, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 15401, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5735,
2001 D.A.R. 7062 (9th Cir. Ariz. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
255 F.3d 1086 p.1092
Explained by:
255 F.3d 1086 p.1099
Cited by:
255 F.3d 1086 p.1089
255 F.3d 1086 p.1094
5006.
Cited by:
Bryfogle v. Ariz. Bd. of Regents, 13 Fed. Appx. 538, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 14082 (9th Cir. Ariz. 2001)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
13 Fed. Appx. 538 p.539
5007.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Doe & Assocs. Law Offices v. Napolitano, 252 F.3d 1026, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11748, 2001 Cal. Daily
Op. Service 4598, 2001 D.A.R. 5669 (9th Cir. Ariz. 2001)
Distinguished by:
252 F.3d 1026 p.1030
Cited by:
252 F.3d 1026 p.1028
5008.
Distinguished by:
Doe & Assocs. Law Offices, P.C. v. Napolitano, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 7366, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Service
3156, 2001 D.A.R. 3927 (9th Cir. Ariz. Apr. 23, 2001)
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 7366
5009.
Cited by:
Gilchrist v. Ariz. Supreme Court, 10 Fed. Appx. 468, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 5322 (9th Cir. Ariz. 2001)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 569
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
10 Fed. Appx. 468 p.470
5010.
Followed by:
Knight v. Maleng, 2 Fed. Appx. 833, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 1475 (9th Cir. Wash. 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2 Fed. Appx. 833 p.834
5011.
Followed by:
Jane Zivney Interiors, Ltd. v. Register of Contrs., 1 Fed. Appx. 705, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 540 (9th Cir.
Ariz. 2001)
1 Fed. Appx. 705 p.705
5012.
Cited by:
Adam v. Hawaii, 235 F.3d 1160, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 33212, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 10078, 2000
D.A.R. 13495, 48 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 488 (9th Cir. Haw. 2000)
235 F.3d 1160 p.1161
5013.
Cited by:
Adam v. Hawaii, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 35216 (9th Cir. Haw. Dec. 20, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 35216
5014.
Cited by:
Anderson v. Calderon, 232 F.3d 1053, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 29341, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 9217,
2000 D.A.R. 12259 (9th Cir. Cal. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
232 F.3d 1053 p.1100
5015.
Followed by:
Bluford v. Sacramento Superior Court, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 29788 (9th Cir. Cal. Nov. 17, 2000)
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 29788
5016.
Cited by:
Nary v. Hennessey, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 24073 (9th Cir. Cal. Sept. 25, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN9
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 24073
5017.
Followed by:
Damascus v. California Dep't of Consumer Affairs, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 21473 (9th Cir. Cal. Aug. 17,
2000)
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 21473
5018.
Cited by:
Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights Comm'n, 220 F.3d 1134, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18696, 2000 Cal.
Daily Op. Service 6504, 2000 D.A.R. 8621 (9th Cir. Alaska 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
220 F.3d 1134 p.1140
Page 570
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5019.
Cited by:
Blair v. Oregon Appraiser Licensure & Certification Bd., 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18587 (9th Cir. Or. July
26, 2000)
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18587
5020.
Followed by:
Green v. City of Tucson, 217 F.3d 1081, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15610, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5471,
2000 D.A.R. 7297 (9th Cir. Ariz. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
217 F.3d 1081 p.1083
5021.
Followed by:
Bullock v. Town of Woodside, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 12814 (9th Cir. Cal. June 7, 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 12814
5022.
Followed by:
Santa Clara County Correctional Peace Officers' Ass'n v. Board of Supervisors, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS
12811 (9th Cir. Cal. June 7, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 12811
5023.
Cited by:
Gregerson v. Spicklemier, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 12766 (9th Cir. Idaho June 6, 2000)
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 12766
5024.
Cited by:
Montclair Parkowners Ass'n v. City of Montclair, 211 F.3d 1144, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 9050, 2000 Cal.
Daily Op. Service 3616, 2000 D.A.R. 4863, 30 Envtl. L. Rep. 20559 (9th Cir. Cal. 2000)
211 F.3d 1144 p.1145
5025.
Cited by:
Streater v. Paulson, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 9000 (9th Cir. Cal. May 4, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 9000
5026.
Cited by:
Elysia J. ex rel. Spencer v. Stewart, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8884 (9th Cir. Cal. May 2, 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8884
5027.
Cited by:
LSO, Ltd. v. Stroh, 205 F.3d 1146, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3379, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 1772, 2000
D.A.R. 2473, 2000 D.A.R. 2475 (9th Cir. Cal. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
205 F.3d 1146 p.1155
5028.
Followed by, Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
H.C. by Gordon v. Koppel, 203 F.3d 610, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1829, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 1128,
2000 D.A.R. 1641 (9th Cir. Cal. 2000)
Page 571
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Followed by:
203 F.3d 610 p.613
Cited in Concurring Opinion at:
203 F.3d 610 p.614
5029.
Followed by:
Gruntz v. County of Los Angeles (In re Gruntz), 202 F.3d 1074, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1325, 2000 Cal.
Daily Op. Service 909, 2000 D.A.R. 1337, 35 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 160, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P78102, 43
Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 921 (9th Cir. Cal. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
202 F.3d 1074 p.1084
5030.
Cited by:
Tamberella v. Nevada Empl. Sec. Div., 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1049 (9th Cir. Nev. Jan. 25, 2000)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1049
5031.
Followed by:
Spearman v. Desert Hosp., 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 924 (9th Cir. Cal. Jan. 21, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 924
5032.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Culinary Workers Union, Local 226 v. Del Papa, 200 F.3d 614, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 33813, 99 Cal.
Daily Op. Service 9993, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Service 12837, 99 D.A.R. 12837, 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2193,
139 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58815 (9th Cir. Nev. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN5
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
200 F.3d 614 p.622
Cited by:
200 F.3d 614 p.618
5033.
Followed by:
Pope v. Mitchell, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 30559 (9th Cir. Cal. Nov. 19, 1999)
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 30559
5034.
Cited by:
Canatella v. State Bar, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 30120 (9th Cir. Cal. Nov. 17, 1999)
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 30120
5035.
Cited by:
Sefeldeen v. Mueller, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 30104 (9th Cir. Cal. Nov. 17, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 30104
5036.
Cited by:
Communications Telesystems Int'l v. California Pub. Util., 196 F.3d 1011, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 28497,
Page 572
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
99 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8843, 99 D.A.R. 11309, 18 Comm. Reg. (P & F) 511 (9th Cir. Cal. 1999)
196 F.3d 1011 p.1014
5037.
Cited by:
Dixon v. Caulfield, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 28920 (9th Cir. Cal. Nov. 2, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 28920
5038.
Cited by:
Outdoor Media Dimensions, Inc. v. Crunican, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 28434 (9th Cir. Or. Nov. 1, 1999)
5039.
Cited by:
Brown v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs' Dep't, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 27929 (9th Cir. Cal. Oct. 25, 1999)
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 27929
5040.
Distinguished by:
Phillips v. State Bar Court of the State Bar, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 22882 (9th Cir. Cal. Sept. 16, 1999)
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 22882
5041.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Bell v. Hill, 190 F.3d 1089, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 21568, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Service 7435, 99 D.A.R. 9461
(9th Cir. Cal. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
190 F.3d 1089 p.1094
5042.
Followed by, Cited by:
Woodfeathers, Inc. v. Washington County, 180 F.3d 1017, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9682, 99 Cal. Daily Op.
Service 3737, 99 D.A.R. 4787, 29 Envtl. L. Rep. 21233 (9th Cir. Or. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
180 F.3d 1017 p.1020
Cited by:
180 F.3d 1017 p.1019
5043.
Cited by:
McDowell v. Calderon, 173 F.3d 1186, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 6247, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2545, 99
D.A.R. 3312 (9th Cir. Cal. 1999)
173 F.3d 1186 p.1191
5044.
Cited by:
Flowers v. Seki, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 6358 (9th Cir. Haw. Apr. 6, 1999)
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 6358
5045.
Cited by:
Joseph v. Director of the Circle K Corp., 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2314 (9th Cir. Ariz. Feb. 12, 1999)
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2314
5046.
Cited by:
Page 573
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Smith v. Zlaket, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31862 (9th Cir. Ariz. Dec. 17, 1998)
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31862
5047.
Cited by:
Edelbacher v. Calderon, 160 F.3d 582, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 28829, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8480, 98
D.A.R. 11789 (9th Cir. Cal. 1998)
160 F.3d 582 p.586
5048.
Followed by:
Deaton v. Riverside County, 162 F.3d 1168, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 27827 (9th Cir. Cal. 1998)
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 27827
5049.
Cited by:
Zubkis v. Vacco, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 27815 (9th Cir. Cal. Oct. 26, 1998)
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 27815
5050.
Cited by:
Kim v. LiCalsi, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 23944 (9th Cir. Cal. Sept. 22, 1998)
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 23944
5051.
Cited by:
Rodosh v. Jones, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 20891 (9th Cir. Nev. Aug. 21, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 20891
5052.
Cited by:
US West v. Nelson, 146 F.3d 718, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 12683, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4593, 98 D.A.R.
6539 (9th Cir. Wash. 1998)
146 F.3d 718 p.726
5053.
Cited by:
San Remo Hotel v. City & County of San Francisco, 145 F.3d 1095, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 11597, 98 Cal.
Daily Op. Service 4219, 98 D.A.R. 5827 (9th Cir. Cal. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
145 F.3d 1095 p.1103
5054.
Followed by:
Valentine v. United States, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10618, 81 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2352 (9th Cir. Cal. 1998)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10618
81 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2352 p.2353
5055.
Followed by:
Delta Dental Plan v. Mendoza, 139 F.3d 1289, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5979, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Service
2233, 98 D.A.R. 3098, 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2834 (9th Cir. Cal. 1998)
139 F.3d 1289 p.1291
Page 574
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5056.
Cited by:
Glock-Grueneich v. Superior Court, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 35752 (9th Cir. Cal. Dec. 17, 1997) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
5057.
Cited by:
Walker v. Santa Cruz County Attorney's Office, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 33621 (9th Cir. Ariz. Nov. 20, 1997)
5058.
Cited by:
Moran v. Moran, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 29957 (9th Cir. Ariz. Oct. 23, 1997)
5059.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Martinez v. Newport Beach City, 125 F.3d 777, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23656, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Service
7279, 97 D.A.R. 11739 (9th Cir. Cal. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
125 F.3d 777 p.781
Cited by:
125 F.3d 777 p.780
5060.
Cited by:
Dios La Iglesia De Laities De Sacred Holy Sacramento v. California, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23151 (9th
Cir. Cal. Aug. 29, 1997)
5061.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Acri v. Varian Assocs., Inc., Ct. App. 9th Dkt. No. 95-16666 (June 25, 1997)
Ct. App. 9th Dkt. No. 95-16666
5062.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Acri v. Varian Assocs., 114 F.3d 999, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13773, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4457, 97
D.A.R. 7408, 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P44799 (9th Cir. Cal. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
114 F.3d 999 p.1001
5063.
Cited by:
Mathis v. FDIC, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 5096 (9th Cir. Cal. Mar. 14, 1997)
5064.
Cited by:
Mockaitis v. Harcleroad, 104 F.3d 1522, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1274, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Service 602, 97
D.A.R. 957 (9th Cir. Or. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
104 F.3d 1522 p.1527
5065.
Cited by:
Bud Antle, Inc. v. Barbosa, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33687 (9th Cir. Cal. Dec. 24, 1996)
5066.
Cited by:
Farmer v. McDaniel, 98 F.3d 1548, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27922, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Service 7885, 96
D.A.R. 13088 (9th Cir. Nev. 1996)
98 F.3d 1548 p.1553
5067.
Cited by:
San Diego County Gun Rights Comm. v. Reno, 98 F.3d 1121, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27384, 96 Cal. Daily
Page 575
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Op. Service 7760, 96 D.A.R. 12811 (9th Cir. Cal. 1996)
98 F.3d 1121 p.1128
5068.
Cited by:
Smith v. Feldman, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 25753 (9th Cir. Ariz. Sept. 27, 1996)
5069.
Cited by:
Ojavan Investors v. California Coastal Comm'n, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24196 (9th Cir. Cal. Sept. 12,
1996)
5070.
Cited by:
Dencker v. Marren, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 21871 (9th Cir. Nev. Aug. 22, 1996)
5071.
Cited by:
Hess v. Lewis, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 21370 (9th Cir. Ariz. Aug. 16, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5072.
Distinguished by:
Citizens for a Better Env't v. Union Oil Co., Ct. App. 9th Dkt. No. 95-15139 (July 16, 1996)
Ct. App. 9th Dkt. No. 95-15139
5073.
Cited by:
Ortega v. Craig, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 16768 (9th Cir. Cal. June 19, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5074.
Cited by:
Flowers v. Seki, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15220 (9th Cir. Haw. June 7, 1996)
5075.
Distinguished by:
Citizens for a Better Env't v. Union Oil Co., 83 F.3d 1111, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11188, 42 Env't Rep.
Cas. (BNA) 1737, 26 Envtl. L. Rep. 21152 (9th Cir. Cal. 1996)
83 F.3d 1111 p.1119
5076.
Cited by:
Citizens for a Better Env't v. Union Oil Co., 83 F.3d 1111, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17437, 96 Cal. Daily Op.
Service 5247, 96 D.A.R. 8482, 42 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1737, 26 Envtl. L. Rep. 21152 (9th Cir. Cal.
1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5077.
Cited by:
Heckman v. County of Los Angeles, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 9728 (9th Cir. Cal. Apr. 12, 1996)
5078.
Distinguished by:
United Parcel Serv. v. California Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 77 F.3d 1178, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3196, 96 Cal.
Daily Op. Service 1284, 96 D.A.R. 2200 (9th Cir. Cal. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
77 F.3d 1178 p.1184
5079.
Cited by:
Griffiths v. Judicial Arbitration & Mediation Servs., 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3521 (9th Cir. Cal. Feb. 15,
1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
5080.
Cited by:
DeYoung v. O'Neal, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 2228 (9th Cir. Ariz. Jan. 26, 1996)
Page 576
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5081.
Cited by:
Novaplex, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 37382 (9th Cir. Cal. Dec. 28, 1995)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
5082.
Cited by:
Thompson v. Symington, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 38179 (9th Cir. Ariz. Dec. 27, 1995)
5083.
Cited by:
Acuna v. Justices of the Supreme Court, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 36294 (9th Cir. Cal. Nov. 22, 1995)
5084.
Cited by:
Gupton v. Justices of the Supreme Court, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 36286 (9th Cir. Cal. Nov. 22, 1995)
5085.
Cited by:
Hayward Exch. v. City of Oakland, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 34280 (9th Cir. Cal. Nov. 1, 1995) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
5086.
Cited by:
Burgess v. City & County of San Francisco, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27702 (9th Cir. Cal. Sept. 20, 1995)
5087.
Cited by:
Williams v. County of Riverside, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26713 (9th Cir. Cal. Sept. 15, 1995)
5088.
Cited by:
Schwartzmiller v. Roberts, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23770 (9th Cir. Or. Aug. 9, 1995)
5089.
Cited by:
Gregorio T. by & Through Jose T. v. Wilson, 59 F.3d 1002, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17044, 95 Cal. Daily
Op. Service 5463, 95 D.A.R. 9317 (9th Cir. Cal. 1995)
59 F.3d 1002 p.1004
5090.
Distinguished by:
Mullins v. Oregon, 57 F.3d 789, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14440, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4415, 95 D.A.R.
7585 (9th Cir. Or. 1995)
57 F.3d 789 p.793
5091.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Phillips v. Vasquez, 56 F.3d 1030, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 12695, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3912, 95
D.A.R. 6705 (9th Cir. Cal. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
56 F.3d 1030 p.1033
Cited by:
56 F.3d 1030 p.1032
56 F.3d 1030 p.1038
5092.
Followed by:
Agriesti v. MGM Grand Hotels, 53 F.3d 1000, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9424, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Service
3013, 95 D.A.R. 5267 (9th Cir. Nev. 1995)
53 F.3d 1000 p.1000
Page 577
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5093.
Cited by:
Hirsh v. Justices of the Supreme Court, 67 F.3d 708, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6475, 95 Cal. Daily Op.
Service 7070, 95 D.A.R. 12089 (9th Cir. Cal. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
67 F.3d 708 p.712
5094.
Distinguished by:
O'Neill v. United States, 50 F.3d 677, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4853, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Service 1903, 95
D.A.R. 3289, 40 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1586, 25 Envtl. L. Rep. 20873, 26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (CBC) 1
(9th Cir. Cal. 1995)
50 F.3d 677 p.688
5095.
Cited by:
Kleenwell Biohazard Waste & Gen. Ecology Consultants v. Nelson, 48 F.3d 391, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS
2331, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Service 1039, 95 D.A.R. 1854, 40 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1289, 25 Envtl. L. Rep.
20867 (9th Cir. Wash. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
48 F.3d 391 p.393
5096.
Cited by:
Garamendi v. Allstate Ins. Co., 47 F.3d 350, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1962, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Service 841,
95 D.A.R. 1541 (9th Cir. Cal. 1995)
47 F.3d 350 p.355
5097.
Cited by:
Marin v. Pederson, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2689 (9th Cir. Cal. Feb. 1, 1995)
5098.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Bud Antle, Inc. v. Barbosa, 45 F.3d 1261, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37651, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Service 384, 95
D.A.R. 703, 148 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2319 (9th Cir. Cal. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
45 F.3d 1261 p.1271
Cited by:
45 F.3d 1261 p.1264
5099.
Followed by:
Fort Belknap Indian Community v. Mazurek, 43 F.3d 428, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35177, 94 Cal. Daily Op.
Service 9529, 94 D.A.R. 17652 (9th Cir. Mont. 1994)
43 F.3d 428 p.430
5100.
Cited by:
Chapman v. Bay Mun. Court, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34559 (9th Cir. Cal. Nov. 22, 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
5101.
Cited by:
McGuire v. Kern County Superior Court, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30344 (9th Cir. Cal. Oct. 27, 1994)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5102.
Cited by:
Rowland v. Brady, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27299 (9th Cir. Wash. Sept. 27, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 578
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN5
5103.
Cited by:
Sycuan Band of Mission Indians v. Roache, 54 F.3d 535, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40776, 95 Cal. Daily Op.
Service 3207, 95 D.A.R. 5504 (9th Cir. Cal. 1994)
54 F.3d 535 p.537
5104.
Cited by:
Sycuan Band of Mission Indians v. Roache, 38 F.3d 402, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26831, 94 Cal. Daily Op.
Service 7315, 94 D.A.R. 13461 (9th Cir. Cal. 1994)
38 F.3d 402 p.405
5105.
Cited by:
Reed v. Arpaio, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27292 (9th Cir. Ariz. Sept. 22, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5106.
Cited by:
Bud Antle, Inc. v. Barbosa, 35 F.3d 1355, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24339, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 6954,
94 D.A.R. 12755, 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2285, 128 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11172 (9th Cir. Cal. 1994)
35 F.3d 1355 p.1357
5107.
Cited by:
Benavidez v. Eu, 34 F.3d 825, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23796, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 6683, 94 D.A.R.
12360, 29 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1225 (9th Cir. Cal. 1994)
34 F.3d 825 p.828
5108.
Cited by:
Exxon Corp. v. Heinze, 32 F.3d 1399, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21908, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 6273, 94
D.A.R. 11467, 131 Oil & Gas Rep. 447 (9th Cir. Alaska 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
32 F.3d 1399 p.1403
5109.
Followed by, Cited by:
Confederated Salish v. Simonich, 29 F.3d 1398, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 17268, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service
5425, 94 D.A.R. 9964 (9th Cir. Mont. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
29 F.3d 1398 p.1405
Cited by:
29 F.3d 1398 p.1400
5110.
Cited by:
Branson v. Haber, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10708 (9th Cir. Cal. May 13, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5111.
Cited by:
Nevada Entertainment Indus. v. City of Henderson, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11226 (9th Cir. Nev. May 4,
1994)
5112.
Cited by:
Fontana Water Co. v. City of Fontana, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11225 (9th Cir. Cal. May 4, 1994)
Page 579
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5113.
Cited by:
Wiener v. County of San Diego, 23 F.3d 263, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9319, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3078,
94 D.A.R. 5902 (9th Cir. Cal. 1994)
23 F.3d 263 p.265
5114.
Cited by:
Paxton v. Oxnard Police Dep't, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9516 (9th Cir. Cal. Apr. 22, 1994) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
5115.
Cited by:
Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7048, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service
2531, 94 D.A.R. 4863 (9th Cir. Cal. 1994)
21 F.3d 359 p.360
5116.
Followed by, Cited by:
Dubinka v. Judges of the Superior Court, 23 F.3d 218, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6817, 94 Cal. Daily Op.
Service 2476, 94 D.A.R. 4688 (9th Cir. Cal. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
23 F.3d 218 p.226
Cited by:
23 F.3d 218 p.219
23 F.3d 218 p.221
23 F.3d 218 p.222
23 F.3d 218 p.225
5117.
Followed by, Cited by:
Aiona v. Judiciary of Hawaii, 17 F.3d 1244, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3654, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 1607,
94 D.A.R. 2854 (9th Cir. Haw. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
17 F.3d 1244 p.1246
Cited by:
17 F.3d 1244 p.1248
5118.
Followed by:
Nevada Entertainment Indus. v. City of Henderson, 8 F.3d 1348, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28572, 93 Cal.
Daily Op. Service 8117, 93 D.A.R. 13869 (9th Cir. Nev. 1993)
8 F.3d 1348 p.1349
5119.
Cited by:
Canatella v. Arno, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28940 (9th Cir. Cal. Oct. 25, 1993)
5120.
Cited by:
Canatella v. Jamison, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26821 (9th Cir. Cal. Oct. 14, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
5121.
Cited by:
Burgess v. City of San Francisco, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23631 (9th Cir. Cal. Sept. 13, 1993) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Page 580
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5122.
Cited by:
Howard v. Roesch, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18379 (9th Cir. Cal. July 13, 1993)
5123.
Cited by:
In re JNC Cos., 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 17015 (9th Cir. Ariz. June 30, 1993)
5124.
Cited by:
Allen v. Fong, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 6044 (9th Cir. Or. Mar. 16, 1993)
5125.
Cited by:
Ellington v. Becker, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 32911 (9th Cir. Dec. 7, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
5126.
Cited by:
Hirsch v. District Court of Josephine County, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 27452 (9th Cir. Or. Oct. 21, 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5127.
Cited by:
Koohi v. United States, 976 F.2d 1328, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 25097, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8407, 92
D.A.R. 13864 (9th Cir. Cal. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
976 F.2d 1328 p.1332
5128.
Cited by:
Wood v. Hayward, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 20639 (9th Cir. Aug. 31, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5129.
Cited by:
Chamberlin v. White, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 18814 (9th Cir. Aug. 6, 1992)
5130.
Distinguished by:
American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. Thornburgh, 970 F.2d 501, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS
16186, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 6323, 92 D.A.R. 10032 (9th Cir. Cal. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
970 F.2d 501 p.507
970 F.2d 501 p.508
5131.
Cited by:
Stone v. San Francisco, 968 F.2d 850, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15374, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5528, 92
Cal. Daily Op. Service 6062, 92 D.A.R. 9544 (9th Cir. Cal. 1992)
5132.
Cited by:
Clark v. Lassen County Justice Court, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 16220 (9th Cir. July 6, 1992) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
5133.
Cited by:
Partington v. Gedan, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15090, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5942, 92 D.A.R. 9319 (9th
Cir. Cal. July 2, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
5134.
Cited by:
Stone v. San Francisco, 968 F.2d 850, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14436, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5528, 92
D.A.R. 8803 (9th Cir. Cal. 1992)
968 F.2d 850 p.860
5135.
Cited by:
Page 581
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Stone v. San Francisco, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 19513 (9th Cir. Cal. June 25, 1992)
5136.
Cited by:
Niebla v. County of San Diego, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15049 (9th Cir. June 23, 1992) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
5137.
Cited by:
Western Sys. v. Ulloa, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14240, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5389, 92 D.A.R. 8538 (9th
Cir. Guam June 23, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
5138.
Cited by:
Mannes v. Gillespie, 967 F.2d 1310, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14117, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5325, 92
D.A.R. 8449 (9th Cir. Cal. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
967 F.2d 1310 p.1312
5139.
Followed by:
Kenneally v. Lungren, 967 F.2d 329, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 13489, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5045, 92
D.A.R. 8076 (9th Cir. Cal. 1992)
967 F.2d 329 p.331
5140.
Cited by:
Lilburn v. Racicot, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14608 (9th Cir. June 15, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5141.
Cited by:
Gomez v. United States Dist. Court, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 7931, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3391, 92
D.A.R. 5330 (9th Cir. Apr. 20, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
5142.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Gomez v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist., 966 F.2d 460 (9th Cir. Cal. 1992)
966 F.2d 460 p.462
5143.
Cited by:
Gomez v. United States Dist. Court, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 7735, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3343, 92 Cal.
Daily Op. Service 3393, 92 D.A.R. 5221 (9th Cir. Cal. Apr. 19, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
5144.
Cited by:
Partington v. Gedan, 961 F.2d 852, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6616, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3168, 92
D.A.R. 5065, 22 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 580 (9th Cir. Haw. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
961 F.2d 852 p.856
961 F.2d 852 p.861
5145.
Cited by:
Lee v. Ventura County Sheriff's Dep't, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 7361 (9th Cir. Cal. Apr. 14, 1992)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
5146.
Cited by:
Boardman v. Estelle, 957 F.2d 1523, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 3811, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2079 (9th Cir.
Cal. 1992)
5147.
Distinguished by:
Western Sys. v. Ulloa, 958 F.2d 864, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 3365, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 1870, 92
Page 582
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
D.A.R. 2921 (9th Cir. Guam 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
958 F.2d 864 p.872
5148.
Cited by:
Jenkins v. Davidon, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 3681 (9th Cir. Mar. 2, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5149.
Cited by:
Myer v. County of Orange, 925 F.2d 1470, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2835 (9th Cir. 1992) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
5150.
Distinguished by:
Boardman v. Estelle, 957 F.2d 1523, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 99, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 289, 92 D.A.R.
357 (9th Cir. Cal. 1992)
957 F.2d 1523 p.1535
5151.
Cited by:
Anderson v. Willett, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 30538 (9th Cir. Dec. 19, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3,
HN5
5152.
Cited by:
Ledbetter v. Graham, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 30321 (9th Cir. Dec. 17, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5153.
Cited by:
Farrar v. Oregon, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 24716 (9th Cir. Oct. 10, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5154.
Cited by:
Miranda v. Oregon, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22012 (9th Cir. Sept. 13, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5155.
Cited by:
Harris v. Vasquez, 949 F.2d 1497, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 25600, 91 Cal. Daily Op. Service 6749, 91
D.A.R. 10572 (9th Cir. Cal. 1991)
949 F.2d 1497 p.1520
5156.
Cited by:
Tracy v. Hahn, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 18437 (9th Cir. Aug. 6, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN1, HN5
5157.
Cited by:
Beck v. Wheeler, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 18082 (9th Cir. Aug. 2, 1991)
5158.
Distinguished by:
American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. Thornburgh, 940 F.2d 445, 970 F.2d 501, 1991 U.S. App.
LEXIS 16100, 91 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5979, 91 D.A.R. 9040, 91 D.A.R. 9691 (9th Cir. Cal. 1991)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
940 F.2d 445 p.449
940 F.2d 445 p.450
5159.
Distinguished by:
Gartrell Constr. v. Aubry, 940 F.2d 437, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 15926, 91 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5928, 91
D.A.R. 9006, 37 Cont. Cas. Fed. (CCH) P76149, 131 A.L.R. Fed. 773 (9th Cir. Cal. 1991) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
940 F.2d 437 p.438
Page 583
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5160.
Cited by:
Tracy v. Hahn, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10752 (9th Cir. May 13, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN1, HN5
5161.
Cited by:
Gilbert v. County of Los Angeles, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10274 (9th Cir. Cal. May 9, 1991)
5162.
Cited by:
Schroll v. Plunkett, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10271 (9th Cir. May 9, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5163.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
Privitera v. California Bd. of Medical Quality Assurance, 926 F.2d 890, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2784, 91
Cal. Daily Op. Service 1365, 91 D.A.R. 2199 (9th Cir. Cal. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Distinguished by:
926 F.2d 890 p.892
926 F.2d 890 p.894
Followed by:
926 F.2d 890 p.892
926 F.2d 890 p.898
5164.
Cited by:
Frazier v. State Bar of California, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 512 (9th Cir. Jan. 14, 1991)
5165.
Distinguished by:
Pacific Merchant Shipping Ass'n v. Aubry, 918 F.2d 1409, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19857, 1991 A.M.C.
2797, 117 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P35430, 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 33 (9th Cir. Cal. 1990) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
918 F.2d 1409 p.1425
5166.
Cited by:
Harris v. Vasquez, 943 F.2d 930, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 25601 (9th Cir. Cal. 1990)
943 F.2d 930 p.953
5167.
Cited by:
Harris v. Vasquez, 913 F.2d 606, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 15266 (9th Cir. Cal. 1990)
913 F.2d 606 p.623
5168.
Distinguished by:
Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co., 890 F.2d 184, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS
17437, 67 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 151 (9th Cir. Cal. 1989)
890 F.2d 184 p.190
5169.
Distinguished by, Followed by, Cited by:
Lebbos v. Judges of Superior Court, 883 F.2d 810, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12778 (9th Cir. Cal. 1989)
Distinguished by:
883 F.2d 810 p.817
Followed by:
Page 584
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
883 F.2d 810 p.814
Cited by:
883 F.2d 810 p.813
5170.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Spain v. Rushen, 883 F.2d 712, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13139 (9th Cir. Cal. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
Followed by:
883 F.2d 712 p.716
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
883 F.2d 712 p.735
5171.
Cited by:
Davis v. Marsh, 876 F.2d 1446, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8406 (9th Cir. Cal. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN9
876 F.2d 1446 p.1449
5172.
Followed by, Cited by:
Standard Alaska Production Co. v. Schaible, 874 F.2d 624, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5353, 105 Oil & Gas
Rep. 465 (9th Cir. Alaska 1989)
Followed by:
874 F.2d 624 p.625
Cited by:
874 F.2d 624 p.628
5173.
Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Partington v. Gedan, 880 F.2d 116, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3002, 14 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1290 (9th
Cir. Haw. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
880 F.2d 116 p.120
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
880 F.2d 116 p.135
Cited by:
880 F.2d 116 p.117
5174.
Distinguished by:
Ripplinger v. Collins, 868 F.2d 1043, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2165 (9th Cir. Ariz. 1989) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
868 F.2d 1043 p.1049
5175.
Explained by:
Walnut Properties, Inc. v. Whittier, 861 F.2d 1102, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14962 (9th Cir. Cal. 1988)
861 F.2d 1102 p.1106
Page 585
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5176.
Cited by:
In re Heincy, 858 F.2d 548, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13510, 20 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 5 (9th Cir. Cal.
1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
858 F.2d 548 p.549
5177.
Cited by:
Project 80's v. Pocatello, 876 F.2d 711, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 19384 (9th Cir. Idaho 1988)
5178.
Distinguished by:
Project 80's, Inc. v. Pocatello, 857 F.2d 592, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12622 (9th Cir. Idaho 1988)
857 F.2d 592 p.594
5179.
Followed by:
Beltran v. California, 871 F.2d 777, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 19405, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56105 (9th Cir.
Cal. 1988)
871 F.2d 777 p.778
871 F.2d 777 p.781
871 F.2d 777 p.782
5180.
Followed by, Cited by:
Beltran v. California, 857 F.2d 542, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12272, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56105 (9th Cir.
Cal. 1988)
Followed by:
857 F.2d 542 p.546
Cited by:
857 F.2d 542 p.543
5181.
Cited by:
American International Underwriters, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co., 843 F.2d 1253, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS
4627 (9th Cir. Cal. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
843 F.2d 1253 p.1256
843 F.2d 1253 p.1257
5182.
Cited by:
IDK, Inc. v. County of Clark, 836 F.2d 1185, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 118 (9th Cir. Nev. 1988)
836 F.2d 1185 p.1189
5183.
Distinguished by:
Almodovar v. Reiner, 832 F.2d 1138, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15098 (9th Cir. Cal. 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
832 F.2d 1138 p.1141
5184.
Cited by:
MacKay v. Pfeil, 827 F.2d 540, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11969 (9th Cir. Alaska 1987) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
827 F.2d 540 p.545
Page 586
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5185.
Cited by:
Kitchens v. Bowen, 825 F.2d 1337, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11176 (9th Cir. Or. 1987)
825 F.2d 1337 p.1339
5186.
Followed by, Explained by:
World Famous Drinking Emporium, Inc. v. Tempe, 820 F.2d 1079, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8107 (9th Cir.
Ariz. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
820 F.2d 1079 p.1080
820 F.2d 1079 p.1082
Explained by:
820 F.2d 1079 p.1084
5187.
Followed by:
Polykoff v. Collins, 816 F.2d 1326, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6001, 14 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1065 (9th Cir.
Ariz. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
816 F.2d 1326 p.1331
816 F.2d 1326 p.1332
5188.
Cited by:
California v. Mesa, 813 F.2d 960, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 3843 (9th Cir. Cal. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
813 F.2d 960 p.966
5189.
Cited by:
Greater Los Angeles Council on Deafness v. Zolin, 812 F.2d 1103, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 3194 (9th Cir.
Cal. 1987)
812 F.2d 1103 p.1116
5190.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Punton v. Seattle, 805 F.2d 1378, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34545 (9th Cir. Wash. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
805 F.2d 1378 p.1383
5191.
Followed by:
Fresh International Corp. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd., 805 F.2d 1353, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS
34472, 105 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P55669 (9th Cir. Cal. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8, HN9
805 F.2d 1353 p.1354
805 F.2d 1353 p.1356
5192.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Board of Equalization, 795 F.2d 1442, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27484 (9th Cir.
Cal. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
795 F.2d 1442 p.1449
Page 587
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5193.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
In re Complaint of Paradise Holdings, Inc., 795 F.2d 756, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27448, 1987 A.M.C. 104
(9th Cir. Haw. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
795 F.2d 756 p.765
5194.
Cited by:
Darring v. Kincheloe, 783 F.2d 874, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22194 (9th Cir. Wash. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4
783 F.2d 874 p.877
5195.
Cited by:
Mann v. Tucson, Dep't of Police, 782 F.2d 790, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22125 (9th Cir. Ariz. 1986)
782 F.2d 790 p.795
5196.
Explained by:
Mann v. Jett, 781 F.2d 1448, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22113 (9th Cir. Ariz. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
781 F.2d 1448 p.1449
5197.
Distinguished by:
Martori Bros. Distributors v. James-Massengale, 781 F.2d 1349, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21262, 7
Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1086, 105 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P55607 (9th Cir. Cal. 1986) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
781 F.2d 1349 p.1353
5198.
Distinguished by:
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Long Beach, 772 F.2d 534, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23264 (9th Cir. Cal. 1985)
772 F.2d 534 p.541
5199.
Distinguished by:
McIntyre v. McIntyre, 771 F.2d 1316, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23157 (9th Cir. Wash. 1985) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
771 F.2d 1316 p.1319
5200.
Cited by:
Olagues v. Russoniello, 770 F.2d 791, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 22708 (9th Cir. Cal. 1985)
770 F.2d 791 p.797
770 F.2d 791 p.799
5201.
Cited by:
La Duke v. Nelson, 762 F.2d 1318, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 19963, 2 Immigr. Law & Proc. Rep. A2-334 (9th
Cir. Wash. 1985) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
762 F.2d 1318 p.1325
5202.
Explained by:
Page 588
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Adultworld Bookstore v. Fresno, 758 F.2d 1348, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30513 (9th Cir. Cal. 1985)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
758 F.2d 1348 p.1350
5203.
Distinguished by:
Playtime Theaters v. Renton, 748 F.2d 527, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 16405 (9th Cir. Wash. 1984)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
748 F.2d 527 p.530
5204.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Burrus v. Turnbo, 743 F.2d 693, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18908 (9th Cir. Cal. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Distinguished by:
743 F.2d 693 p.696
Cited by:
743 F.2d 693 p.699
5205.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Hoohuli v. Ariyoshi, 741 F.2d 1169, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19063, 39 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1375
(9th Cir. Haw. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
741 F.2d 1169 p.1183
5206.
Cited by:
Goldie's Bookstore, Inc. v. Superior Court of California, 739 F.2d 466, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19854 (9th
Cir. Cal. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
739 F.2d 466 p.468
739 F.2d 466 p.469
5207.
Cited by:
Landi v. Phelps, 740 F.2d 710, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20856 (9th Cir. Cal. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
740 F.2d 710 p.714
5208.
Cited by:
Champion International Corp. v. Brown, 731 F.2d 1406, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23129, 34 Empl. Prac.
Dec. (CCH) P34339, 5 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1385, 34 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1154 (9th
Cir. Mont. 1984) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
731 F.2d 1406 p.1407
5209.
Cited by:
WHITE MT. APACHE TRIBE v. WILLIAMS, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25725 (9th Cir. Feb. 7, 1984)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5210.
Cited by:
J-R Distribs. v. Eikenberry, 725 F.2d 482, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25768 (9th Cir. Wash. 1984)
725 F.2d 482 p.489
Page 589
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5211.
Distinguished by:
United States v. Adair, 723 F.2d 1394, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15280 (9th Cir. Or. 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
723 F.2d 1394 p.1402
5212.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Sheet Metal Workers' International Asso., Local No. 355, etc. v. NLRB, 716 F.2d 1249, 1983 U.S. App.
LEXIS 16572, 114 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2569, 99 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10494 (9th Cir. 1983) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
716 F.2d 1249 p.1266
5213.
Cited by:
Perry v. Rushen, 713 F.2d 1447, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 24504, 13 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 1630 (9th Cir.
Cal. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
713 F.2d 1447 p.1451
5214.
Distinguished by:
Silberkleit v. Kantrowitz, 713 F.2d 433, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 31464, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P99462
(9th Cir. Cal. 1983)
713 F.2d 433 p.435
5215.
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by:
Midkiff v. Tom, 702 F.2d 788, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29353, 13 Envtl. L. Rep. 20534 (9th Cir. Haw. 1983)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
702 F.2d 788 p.801
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
702 F.2d 788 p.810
Cited by:
702 F.2d 788 p.790
5216.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Stuart, 702 F.2d 193, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29398 (9th Cir. Or. 1983) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN4
702 F.2d 193 p.195
5217.
Distinguished by:
Miofsky v. Superior Court of California, 703 F.2d 332, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 27924 (9th Cir. Cal. 1983)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
703 F.2d 332 p.334
703 F.2d 332 p.337
5218.
Distinguished by:
United States v. Orr, 691 F.2d 431, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24581 (9th Cir. Or. 1982)
691 F.2d 431 p.431
Page 590
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5219.
Cited by:
Miller v. Washington State Bar Asso. (9th Cir. Oct. 19, 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5220.
Explained by:
Board of Trustees v. Reyes, 688 F.2d 671, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25393, 4 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA)
1758 (9th Cir. Cal. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
688 F.2d 671 p.675
5221.
Cited by:
Miller v. Washington State Bar Asso., 679 F.2d 1313, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18111 (9th Cir. Wash. 1982)
679 F.2d 1313 p.1316
5222.
Cited by:
Hinman v. McCarthy, 676 F.2d 343, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21809 (9th Cir. Cal. 1982) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
676 F.2d 343 p.347
5223.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Downs, 670 F.2d 813, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 22825, 1982-1 Trade Cas.
(CCH) P64460 (9th Cir. Ariz. 1982) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
Distinguished by:
670 F.2d 813 p.819
Cited by:
670 F.2d 813 p.820
670 F.2d 813 p.821
5224.
Followed by:
Flangas v. State Bar of Nevada, 655 F.2d 946, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12806 (9th Cir. Nev. 1981)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
655 F.2d 946 p.948
5225.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
H. v. Jamieson, 643 F.2d 1351, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 13700 (9th Cir. Ariz. 1981) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Distinguished by:
643 F.2d 1351 p.1354
Cited by:
643 F.2d 1351 p.1352
5226.
Cited by:
Lewis v. Younger, 653 F.2d 1258, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 13059, 1980-81 Trade Cas. (CCH) P63589 (9th
Cir. Cal. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
653 F.2d 1258 p.1260
Page 591
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5227.
Cited by:
Carden v. Montana, 626 F.2d 82, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 16443 (9th Cir. Mont. 1980)
626 F.2d 82 p.83
626 F.2d 82 p.84
5228.
Followed by:
Worldwide Church of God, Inc. v. California, 623 F.2d 613, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 15563 (9th Cir. Cal.
1980)
623 F.2d 613 p.615
623 F.2d 613 p.616
5229.
Cited by:
Lyons v. Los Angeles, 615 F.2d 1243, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 19137 (9th Cir. Cal. 1980) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
615 F.2d 1243 p.1247
5230.
Cited by:
Rosenthal v. Carr, 614 F.2d 1219, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 21046 (9th Cir. 1980) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
614 F.2d 1219 p.1220
5231.
Explained by:
Tovar v. Billmeyer, 609 F.2d 1291, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 10665 (9th Cir. Idaho 1979) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
609 F.2d 1291 p.1292
609 F.2d 1291 p.1294
5232.
Distinguished by:
United States v. Romero, 585 F.2d 391, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 9521 (9th Cir. Cal. 1978) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
585 F.2d 391 p.398
5233.
Followed by, Cited by:
Williams v. Washington, 554 F.2d 369, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13324 (9th Cir. Wash. 1977) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
554 F.2d 369 p.370
Cited by:
554 F.2d 369 p.371
5234.
Distinguished by:
Clifton v. Cox, 549 F.2d 722, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 14455 (9th Cir. Cal. 1977) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
549 F.2d 722 p.729
549 F.2d 722 p.730
Page 592
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5235.
Cited by:
Bradley v. Judges of Superior Court, 531 F.2d 413, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 13008 (9th Cir. Cal. 1976)
531 F.2d 413 p.415
5236.
Explained by, Cited by:
California Diversified Promotions, Inc. v. Musick, 505 F.2d 278, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6340, 19 Fed. R.
Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1188 (9th Cir. Cal. 1974)
Explained by:
505 F.2d 278 p.282
Cited by:
505 F.2d 278 p.280
5237.
Cited by:
Yarish v. Nelson, 502 F.2d 943, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6989 (9th Cir. Cal. 1974)
502 F.2d 943 p.943
5238.
Cited by:
Cleaver v. Wilcox, 499 F.2d 940, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8239 (9th Cir. Cal. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
499 F.2d 940 p.943
499 F.2d 940 p.944
5239.
Cited by:
Cadena v. Perasso, 498 F.2d 383, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8456 (9th Cir. Cal. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
498 F.2d 383 p.384
5240.
Cited by:
Clutchette v. Procunier, 497 F.2d 809, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8999 (9th Cir. Cal. 1974)
497 F.2d 809 p.814
5241.
Cited by:
Rincon Band of Mission Indians v. County of San Diego, 495 F.2d 1, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 9627 (9th Cir.
Cal. 1974) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
495 F.2d 1 p.6
495 F.2d 1 p.10
5242.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
United States v. Sacco, 491 F.2d 995, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10311 (9th Cir. Cal. 1974)
491 F.2d 995 p.1015
5243.
Followed by:
Henkel v. Bradshaw, 483 F.2d 1386, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8187 (9th Cir. Or. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
483 F.2d 1386 p.1388
483 F.2d 1386 p.1389
Page 593
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5244.
Distinguished by:
Anderson v. Nemetz, 474 F.2d 814, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 12042 (9th Cir. Ariz. 1973) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4, HN5, HN6
474 F.2d 814 p.817
474 F.2d 814 p.818
5245.
Followed by:
Rivera v. Freeman, 469 F.2d 1159, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6659 (9th Cir. Cal. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN3, HN5, HN6, HN8
469 F.2d 1159 p.1163
469 F.2d 1159 p.1164
5246.
Explained by:
Krahm v. Graham, 461 F.2d 703, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9653 (9th Cir. Ariz. 1972) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN3, HN5, HN6
461 F.2d 703 p.706
461 F.2d 703 p.707
461 F.2d 703 p.709
5247.
Followed by:
Padilla v. Ackerman, 460 F.2d 477, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9723 (9th Cir. Cal. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
460 F.2d 477 p.479
5248.
Cited by:
California v. Tolefree, 458 F.2d 494, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10010 (9th Cir. Cal. 1972)
458 F.2d 494 p.495
5249.
Followed by:
Drury v. Cox, 457 F.2d 764, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10899 (9th Cir. Ariz. 1972)
457 F.2d 764 p.764
5250.
Cited by:
Huckabay v. Woodmansee, 452 F.2d 1389, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11738 (9th Cir. 1972) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN8
452 F.2d 1389 p.1389
5251.
Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Chauncey v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 453 F.2d 389, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6464 (9th Cir. Nev. 1971)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
Distinguished by:
453 F.2d 389 p.390
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
453 F.2d 389 p.390
Page 594
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5252.
Cited by:
Sayles v. Graham, 449 F.2d 783, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7751 (9th Cir. Ariz. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
449 F.2d 783 p.784
5253.
Followed by:
Kinney v. Lenon, 447 F.2d 596, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8543 (9th Cir. Or. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
447 F.2d 596 p.600
447 F.2d 596 p.601
5254.
Cited by:
Phillips v. Osborne, 444 F.2d 778, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10206, 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2524, 65 Lab. Cas.
(CCH) P11760 (9th Cir. Wash. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
444 F.2d 778 p.781
444 F.2d 778 p.782
5255.
Cited in Dissenting Opinion at:
Locks v. Laird, 441 F.2d 479, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10644 (9th Cir. Cal. 1971) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6, HN8
441 F.2d 479 p.481
9TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
5256.
Cited by:
Abderrahim Saddas v. City of San Diego, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109208 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109208
5257.
Cited by:
Espinoza v. City of Imperial, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109203 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109203
5258.
Cited by:
Tomel v. Jenkins, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109037 (D. Haw. Nov. 19, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109037
5259.
Cited by:
Tomel v. Ross, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106975 (D. Haw. Nov. 13, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106975
5260.
Cited by:
Young v. Bishop Estate, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103915 (D. Haw. Nov. 6, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103915
5261.
Cited by:
Page 595
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Lake Luciana, LLC v. County of Napa, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102532 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102532
5262.
Cited by:
Indymac Venture, LLC v. Silver Creek Crossing, LLC, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107956 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 3,
2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107956
5263.
Cited by:
Carr v. Sacramento County Superior Court, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101010 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101010
5264.
Cited by:
Banks v. State, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104622 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 26, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104622
5265.
Cited by:
Boyd v. Emerald Queen Casino, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104616 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 26, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104616
5266.
Cited by:
Lynch v. Hartley, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98301 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98301
5267.
Cited by:
Ross v. Arpaio, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110322 (D. Ariz. Oct. 20, 2009)
5268.
Cited by:
Bradbury v. Eismann, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97816 (D. Idaho Oct. 20, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97816
5269.
Cited by:
Kaufman v. City & County of San Francisco, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101047 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN2
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101047
5270.
Cited by:
Seefeldt v. Solano County Custody Div., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100805 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100805
5271.
Cited by:
Raymond v. City & County of San Francisco, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96541 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96541
Page 596
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5272.
Cited by:
Janssen v. Hirsch (In re Creekside Vineyards, Inc.), 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96560 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96560
5273.
Cited by:
Steppe v. Brown, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95694 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95694
5274.
Cited by:
Crayton v. Hedgpeth, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100725 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100725
5275.
Cited by:
Harrison v. Capital Group Cos., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100049 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 9, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100049
5276.
Cited by:
Arizona v. Carroll, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98953 (D. Ariz. Oct. 5, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98953
5277.
Followed by:
O'Shell v. Mayberg, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87919 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 24, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87919
5278.
Cited by:
Tomel v. Hawaii, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107845 (D. Haw. Sept. 17, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107845
5279.
Cited by:
Saddas v. City of San Diego, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84608 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84608
5280.
Cited by:
Wallace v. Superior Court, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80557 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 3, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80557
5281.
Cited by:
Banks v. Washington, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86503 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 1, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
Page 597
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86503
5282.
Cited by:
Roberson v. Montana, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87194 (D. Mont. Aug. 31, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87194
5283.
Cited by:
Gedo v. Idaho, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78033 (D. Idaho Aug. 28, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78033
5284.
Followed by:
Lena v. Supreme Court of Cal., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81912 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81912
5285.
Followed by:
Lena v. Supreme Court of Cal., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81909 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81909
5286.
Cited by:
Lopez v. Ives, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75395 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75395
5287.
Cited by:
Buchanan v. Pinal County, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73678 (D. Ariz. Aug. 14, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73678
5288.
Cited by:
Coleman v. Washington, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84554 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 13, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84554
5289.
Followed by:
Coyotzi v. Countrywide Fin. Corp., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76124 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76124
5290.
Followed by:
Witherspoon v. Orange County Dep't of Soc. Servs., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76375 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 10,
2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76375
Page 598
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5291.
Cited by:
Williams v. County of Ventura, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110167 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110167
5292.
Cited by:
Hunter v. Spokane County Sheriff, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75052 (E.D. Wash. Aug. 7, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75052
5293.
Cited by:
Gomez v. Baca, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74117 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
5294.
Cited by:
Ching Yee Wong v. Napolitano, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68037 (D. Or. Aug. 5, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN4
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68037
5295.
Followed by:
McGill v. Marshall, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68490 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68490
5296.
Followed by:
Hester v. L.A. Sheriff Dep't, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74748 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74748
5297.
Cited by:
Trammell v. Warden, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68504 (C.D. Cal. July 31, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68504
5298.
Followed by:
Johnson v. Williams, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63742 (D. Or. July 24, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63742
5299.
Cited by:
Plummer v. State Bar of Ariz., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63501 (D. Ariz. July 23, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63501
5300.
Cited by:
Deloney v. Hensley, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61843 (E.D. Cal. July 17, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61843
5301.
Cited by:
Stevens v. Superior Court of Cal., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61284 (E.D. Cal. July 17, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61284
Page 599
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5302.
Followed by:
Jackson v. Plesser, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60848 (E.D. Cal. July 15, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60848
5303.
Followed by:
Padilla v. Tirrell, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60853 (E.D. Cal. July 14, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60853
5304.
Cited by:
Simeona v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59107 (D. Haw. July 10, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59107
5305.
Followed by:
Kupihea v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59023 (D. Haw. July 10, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59023
5306.
Cited by:
Seefeldt v. Cal. Forensic Med. Group, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64429 (E.D. Cal. July 9, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64429
5307.
Cited by:
Easley v. Jones, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63982 (E.D. Cal. July 9, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6,
HN8
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63982
5308.
Followed by:
Lil' Brown Smoke Shack v. Wasden, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58679 (D. Idaho July 7, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN9
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58679
5309.
Cited by:
Heat Surge, LLC v. Lee, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55613 (N.D. Cal. June 30, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55613
5310.
Followed by:
Stewart v. County of Los Angeles, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67528 (C.D. Cal. June 25, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67528
5311.
Followed by:
Devaughn v. Sniff, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58590 (C.D. Cal. June 18, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
Page 600
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58590
5312.
Followed by:
Devaughn v. Sniff, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58684 (C.D. Cal. June 17, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58684
5313.
Cited by:
Walker v. Felker, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50386 (E.D. Cal. June 15, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50386
5314.
Cited by:
Barra v. City of Kerman, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48083 (E.D. Cal. June 8, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48083
5315.
Followed by:
Serrato v. Baca, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70831 (C.D. Cal. June 4, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70831
5316.
Followed by:
Davies v. Doi, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46313 (D. Haw. June 2, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46313
5317.
Cited by:
Grant v. Smith, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49291 (N.D. Cal. May 26, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49291
5318.
Followed by:
Anderson v. Mangobas, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44432 (E.D. Cal. May 26, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44432
5319.
Followed by:
Keka v. Florendo, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43779 (D. Haw. May 22, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43779
5320.
Followed by:
Kay v. State Bar of Cal., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43400 (N.D. Cal. May 21, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43400
5321.
Cited by:
Mansanares v. Arpaio, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47448 (D. Ariz. May 19, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47448
Page 601
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5322.
Cited by:
Steppe v. Sheriff, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71897 (C.D. Cal. May 13, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71897
5323.
Cited by:
Battle v. Thoma, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39611 (E.D. Cal. May 11, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39611
5324.
Followed by:
Bowen v. Clay, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40363 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40363
5325.
Followed by:
Robinson v. Sniff, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36391 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36391
5326.
Cited by:
Brooks v. Glendale Police Dep't, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33739 (D. Ariz. Apr. 16, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33739
5327.
Cited by:
Wilson v. United States Bank NA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31644 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31644
5328.
Followed by:
Pellum v. Fresno County Child Protective Servs., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35217 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35217
5329.
Followed by:
D'Hollander v. San Francisco County Superior Court, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35077 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 9,
2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35077
5330.
Followed by:
Kay v. State Bar of Cal., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30191 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30191
5331.
Cited by:
Lowe v. Washoe County, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30072 (D. Nev. Mar. 24, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30072
Page 602
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5332.
Cited by:
World Wide Rush LLC v. City of L.A., 605 F. Supp. 2d 1088, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28547 (C.D. Cal. 2009)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
605 F. Supp. 2d 1088 p.1110
5333.
Followed by:
Mansanares v. Arpaio, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24143 (D. Ariz. Mar. 16, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24143
5334.
Cited by:
Smith v. Ahern, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22462 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22462
5335.
Distinguished by:
Sullivan v. Warden, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24405 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24405
5336.
Followed by:
Cal. County Superintendents of Schs. Educ. Ass'n v. Marzion, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20453 (N.D. Cal. Mar.
2, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20453
5337.
Cited by:
Jones v. Rosell, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19595 (D. Ariz. Mar. 2, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19595
5338.
Followed by:
Liggins v. People, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98448 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98448
5339.
Cited by:
Soho v. Or. DOJ, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11881 (D. Or. Feb. 17, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11881
5340.
Cited by:
Wright v. Pastor, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16504 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 13, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16504
5341.
Cited by:
Dolezal v. Berch, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13029 (D. Ariz. Feb. 4, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13029
5342.
Cited by:
Booker v. San Luis Superior Court, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12623 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2009) LexisNexis
Page 603
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12623
5343.
Cited by:
Robinson v. Sniff, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9840 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9840
5344.
Cited by:
Shehee v. Baca, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25718 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2009)
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25718
5345.
Cited by:
Taylor v. Fresno County Court House, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7520 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7520
5346.
Followed by:
Blount v. Sacramento Dist. Court, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2444 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2009) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2444
5347.
Followed by:
Dudley v. Maricopa County, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1825 (D. Ariz. Jan. 5, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1825
5348.
Cited by:
Jenkins v. City of Richmond, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 290 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 290
5349.
Cited by:
Soho v. Or. DOJ, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227 (D. Or. Jan. 5, 2009) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227
5350.
Cited by:
Wright v. Pastor, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106183 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 29, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106183
5351.
Followed by:
Rivas v. Cal. Franchise Tax Bd., 619 F. Supp. 2d 994, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105946 (E.D. Cal. 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
619 F. Supp. 2d 994 p.1005
5352.
Distinguished by:
Page 604
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Rotar v. Skaggs, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106042 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106042
5353.
Followed by:
Ganner v. Azarvand, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105907 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105907
5354.
Followed by:
Smith v. Ahern, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103074 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103074
5355.
Cited by:
Rhoden v. Mayberg, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103334 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103334
5356.
Cited by:
Lena v. Supreme Court of Cal., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103073 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103073
5357.
Followed by:
Orozco v. Ahlin, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108797 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108797
5358.
Followed by:
Nichols v. Stanislaus County Superior Court, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101900 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101900
5359.
Cited by:
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lee Invs. LLC, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99974 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99974
5360.
Cited by:
Schmidt v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins. Co., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96570 (D. Haw. Nov. 26, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96570
5361.
Cited by:
Sconiers v. Whitmore, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101962 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101962
Page 605
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5362.
Followed by:
Vegas v. CSP-Corcoran I, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98543 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98543
5363.
Cited by:
Soto v. Jordan, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95486 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95486
5364.
Followed by:
Coulter v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94529 (D. Nev. Nov. 19, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94529
5365.
Followed by:
Guadarrama v. Small, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92180 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92180
5366.
Followed by:
Cameron v. Ariz. Bd. of Regents, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93265 (D. Ariz. Nov. 6, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93265
5367.
Cited by:
Bhatia v. United States, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92784 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92784
5368.
Distinguished by:
Landry v. Tilton, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90768 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90768
5369.
Distinguished by:
Grabinski v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89324 (D. Ariz. Oct. 22, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89324
5370.
Followed by:
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation v. Thurston County Bd. of Equalization, 2008 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 88485 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 21, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88485
5371.
Followed by:
O'Shell v. Mayberg, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110049 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
Page 606
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110049
5372.
Followed by:
Devaughn v. Sniff, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109229 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109229
5373.
Followed by:
Coogler v. Van Etten, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79560 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79560
5374.
Followed by:
Gilbert v. Moore, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78987 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78987
5375.
Followed by:
Fordjour v. Mukasey, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86201 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 29, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86201
5376.
Followed by:
Pagtakhan v. Doe, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83016 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 29, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83016
5377.
Cited by:
Church of the Revelation v. Superior Court of Cal., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110461 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 26,
2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110461
5378.
Cited by:
Mays v. Penrod, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78306 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78306
5379.
Cited by:
Bell v. Multnomah County, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73817 (D. Or. Sept. 24, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73817
5380.
Followed by:
Torres v. Alameda County, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80720 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 23, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80720
5381.
Cited by:
Alls v. Curry, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111473 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 8, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111473
Page 607
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5382.
Cited by:
Quesada v. City of Antioch, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111136 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111136
5383.
Cited by:
Gilbert v. Moore, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74109 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74109
5384.
Cited by:
Goodspeed v. Placer County Sheriff, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74106 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74106
5385.
Cited by:
Yount v. Regent Univ., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66944 (D. Ariz. Aug. 22, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66944
5386.
Cited by:
Page v. Pierce County Fife Police Dep't, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86490 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 19, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86490
5387.
Cited by:
Page v. California, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72652 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72652
5388.
Cited by:
Lundy v. Colmenero, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61802 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61802
5389.
Cited by:
Grant v. Smith, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79765 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79765
5390.
Followed by:
Litmon v. Flores, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63981 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63981
5391.
Distinguished by:
Brown v. Cate, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59366 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59366
Page 608
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5392.
Cited by:
Farlough v. Dexter, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84445 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84445
5393.
Cited by:
Randell v. Cal. State Comp. Ins. Fund, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62319 (E.D. Cal. July 29, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62319
5394.
Followed by:
Devaughn v. Sniff, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109258 (C.D. Cal. July 24, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109258
5395.
Distinguished by:
Mori v. Baroni, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73571 (E.D. Cal. July 23, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73571
5396.
Followed by:
Webster v. Costello, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65644 (W.D. Wash. July 17, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65644
5397.
Cited by:
Thein v. Feather River Cmty. College, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108357 (E.D. Cal. July 15, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108357
5398.
Cited by:
Robinson v. Horn, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52895 (E.D. Cal. July 10, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52895
5399.
Cited by:
Wong v. Astrue, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111145 (N.D. Cal. July 9, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111145
5400.
Followed by:
Sabatasso v. Ahlin, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50831 (E.D. Cal. June 26, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50831
5401.
Cited by:
Reed v. Fitzgerald, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49789 (E.D. Cal. June 26, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49789
5402.
Cited by:
Page 609
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Clark v. El Dorado County, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49781 (E.D. Cal. June 26, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49781
5403.
Cited by:
Wilson v. Dep't of Corr., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48707 (E.D. Wash. June 23, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48707
5404.
Cited by:
Koopen v. Fairfield Police Dep't, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51000 (E.D. Cal. June 18, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51000
5405.
Cited by:
Heggem v. Steffener, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48462 (W.D. Wash. June 18, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48462
5406.
Followed by:
RE-Sources for Sustainable Cmtys. v. Bldg. Indus. Ass'n, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46108 (W.D. Wash. June
11, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46108
5407.
Followed by:
Acosta v. Solano County Pub. Defender, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41791 (E.D. Cal. May 28, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41791
5408.
Cited by:
Cummings v. Sacramento County Superior Court, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41797 (E.D. Cal. May 27, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41797
5409.
Followed by:
Burgeles v. Napolitano, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42252 (D. Ariz. May 21, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42252
5410.
Followed by:
Kwon v. Benedetti, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38818 (D. Nev. May 1, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38818
5411.
Cited by:
Nader v. Cronin, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36094 (D. Haw. May 1, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36094
Page 610
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5412.
Followed by:
Peyton v. Burdick, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32198 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2,
HN5, HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32198
5413.
Followed by:
Fuentes v. Tilton, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31605 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31605
5414.
Followed by:
Parlante v. Peterson, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20593 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20593
5415.
Cited by:
Woodfin Suite Hotels, LLC v. City of Emeryville, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20306 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20306
5416.
Cited by:
Beard v. Superior Court, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17238 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17238
5417.
Cited by:
Daniels v. Superior Court of Cal., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16867 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16867
5418.
Followed by:
Hicks v. Superior Court of Cal., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16858 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16858
5419.
Followed by:
MHC Fin. Ltd. P'ship Two v. City of Santee, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15988 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15988
5420.
Cited by:
Herships v. Santa Clara County Superior Court, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18811 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2008)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18811
5421.
Followed by:
Medley v. Arpaio, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17526 (D. Ariz. Feb. 19, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 611
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17526
5422.
Cited by:
Hicks v. Superior Court of Cal., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16163 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16163
5423.
Cited by:
Robinson v. Washington, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14552 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 19, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14552
5424.
Cited by:
Rhodes v. Sacramento Police Dep't, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12422 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12422
5425.
Followed by:
Patterson v. Arpaio, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15332 (D. Ariz. Feb. 13, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15332
5426.
Cited by:
Daniels v. Superior Court of Cal., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14405 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14405
5427.
Cited by:
Burgeis v. Scheiwek, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11392 (D. Or. Feb. 12, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11392
5428.
Distinguished by:
Nader v. Cronin, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9272 (D. Haw. Feb. 7, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9272
5429.
Cited by:
Dibel v. Jenny Craig, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9127 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9127
5430.
Followed by:
McClure v. Baker, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6970 (D. Or. Jan. 29, 2008)
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6970
5431.
Followed by:
Owens v. Santa Clara Police Dep't, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8912 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
Page 612
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8912
5432.
Cited by:
Kitchens v. Voss, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4450 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4450
5433.
Followed by:
Jones v. McClain, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17452 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17452
5434.
Followed by:
Beard v. Superior Court, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3037 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2008) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3037
5435.
Followed by:
Russell v. Kern County Superior Court, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6144 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2008) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6144
5436.
Cited by:
Rodriguez v. Idaho, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93928 (D. Idaho Dec. 20, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93928
5437.
Followed by:
Noel v. Sacramento County Superior Court, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93248 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93248
5438.
Followed by:
Olagues v. Schwarzenegger, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90892 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90892
5439.
Cited by:
Rhodes v. Sacramento Police Dep't, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89872 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89872
5440.
Cited by:
Moyle v. County of Contra Costa, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89509 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89509
Page 613
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5441.
Cited by:
Tanksley v. Kern County Superior Court, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89765 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89765
5442.
Followed by:
Mouzon v. McLain, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90225 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90225
5443.
Cited by:
Peterson v. Tirrell, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87738 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87738
5444.
Followed by:
Hagel v. Portland State Univ., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85140 (D. Or. Nov. 14, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85140
5445.
Cited by:
Myers v. City of Cheney, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83696 (E.D. Wash. Nov. 2, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83696
5446.
Cited by:
Rodriguez v. Superior Court, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81497 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81497
5447.
Followed by:
Peyton v. Spielman, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79370 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79370
5448.
Followed by:
Koch v. Tilton, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80865 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80865
5449.
Followed by:
Ambat v. City & County of San Francisco, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80853 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80853
5450.
Cited by:
Herships v. Superior Court of Cal., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81620 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81620
Page 614
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5451.
Cited by:
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock v. Campbell, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81659 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81659
5452.
Followed by:
General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC v. Suthers, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77301 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 9, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77301
5453.
Followed by:
Wanderer v. Nevada, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81190 (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81190
5454.
Cited by:
Rodriguez v. Superior Court, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74281 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74281
5455.
Cited by:
Harrington v. Ward, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73063 (D. Or. Sept. 27, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73063
5456.
Cited by:
Mobley v. Arizona, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71685 (D. Ariz. Sept. 24, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71685
5457.
Cited by:
Huey v. City & County of San Francisco, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73732 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 20, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73732
5458.
Followed by:
We Are America/Somos Am. Coalition v. Maricopa County Bd. of Supervisors, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
70689 (D. Ariz. Sept. 20, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70689
5459.
Cited by:
Pac. Ctr. for Children & Families v. N. Bend Sch. Dist., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69954 (D. Or. Sept. 19,
2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69954
5460.
Cited by:
Hale v. City of Tukwila, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69561 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 19, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69561
Page 615
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5461.
Cited by:
In re Feature Realty Litig., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67733 (E.D. Wash. Sept. 13, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67733
5462.
Cited by:
County of Santa Cruz v. Gonzales, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66414 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66414
5463.
Followed by:
Daniel v. Arizona, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63168 (D. Ariz. Aug. 21, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63168
5464.
Followed by:
Forty-Niner Lease v. DOT, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59370 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59370
5465.
Cited by:
Valencia v. Reyna, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59019 (D. Ariz. Aug. 10, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59019
5466.
Followed by:
Dibel v. Jenny Craig, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58573 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58573
5467.
Cited by:
Anderson v. Soukup, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58981 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 8, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58981
5468.
Cited by:
Beito v. Washington, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54701 (E.D. Wash. July 27, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54701
5469.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
In re NSA Telcoms. Records Litig., 633 F. Supp. 2d 892, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53456 (N.D. Cal. 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
633 F. Supp. 2d 892 p.902
Cited by:
633 F. Supp. 2d 892 p.901
Page 616
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5470.
Followed by:
Peyton v. Burdick, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56016 (E.D. Cal. July 20, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56016
5471.
Distinguished by:
Reed v. Clay, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51137 (E.D. Cal. July 13, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51137
5472.
Followed by:
Bell v. Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50902 (W.D. Wash. July 13, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50902
5473.
Cited by:
Giannini v. Schering-Plough Corp., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48392 (N.D. Cal. June 22, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48392
5474.
Followed by:
Woodfin Suite Hotels, LLC v. City of Emeryville, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44079 (N.D. Cal. June 7, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44079
5475.
Cited by:
Goldsmith v. Washington, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41865 (E.D. Wash. June 7, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41865
5476.
Cited by:
Yeager v. City of San Diego, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40381 (S.D. Cal. June 1, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40381
5477.
Cited by:
Williams v. Warden for Nevada, 489 F. Supp. 2d 1171, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38149 (D. Nev. 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
489 F. Supp. 2d 1171 p.1173
5478.
Cited by:
Dalluge v. State, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38240 (E.D. Wash. May 24, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38240
5479.
Followed by:
Billings v. City of Oakland, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40509 (N.D. Cal. May 23, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
Page 617
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40509
5480.
Cited by:
Washburn v. County of Sacramento, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37888 (E.D. Cal. May 23, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37888
5481.
Cited by:
Eaton v. Siemens, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37508 (E.D. Cal. May 23, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37508
5482.
Cited by:
Martineau v. Arellano, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37604 (D. Ariz. May 22, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37604
5483.
Cited by:
Comm. Concerning Cmty. Improvement v. City of Modesto, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39099 (E.D. Cal. May
16, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39099
5484.
Cited by:
Clark K. v. Guinn, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35232 (D. Nev. May 9, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35232
5485.
Followed by:
Woodfin Suite Hotels, LLC v. City of Emeryville, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35125 (N.D. Cal. May 2, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35125
5486.
Cited by:
Basie & Fritz v. Houston, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32246 (S.D. Cal. May 1, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32246
5487.
Cited by:
Whalen v. M/V Miluska, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32237 (S.D. Cal. May 1, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32237
5488.
Cited by:
Graff v. Solano County Sheriff's Dep't, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28731 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28731
5489.
Cited by:
White v. Harris, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28757 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28757
Page 618
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5490.
Cited by:
Lindell v. Washington, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24851 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 2, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24851
5491.
Distinguished by:
Best v. Hendrickson Appraisal Co., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22449 (S.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22449
5492.
Cited by:
Lindell v. Pierce County Jail, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20957 (W.D. Wash. Mar. 23, 2007) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20957
5493.
Cited by:
Rosenbalm v. Pearce, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24919 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24919
5494.
Cited by:
Rosenbalm v. Mendocino Superior Court, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24888 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24888
5495.
Cited by:
Gray v. Najera, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22022 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22022
5496.
Followed by:
General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC v. Suthers, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19231 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19231
5497.
Distinguished by:
Abend v. City of Oakland, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18783 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18783
5498.
Cited by:
Nab v. Contrs. State License Bd., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11914 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11914
5499.
Cited by:
Phelan v. Oregon, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10715 (D. Or. Feb. 8, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 619
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10715
5500.
Followed by:
Johnson v. Telew, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8621 (D. Or. Feb. 2, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8621
5501.
Cited by:
Washburn v. County of Sacramento, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6453 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6453
5502.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Evans, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8130 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8130
5503.
Cited by:
Washburn v. County of Sacramento, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5340 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5340
5504.
Cited by:
Coyle v. Harris-White, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4021 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4021
5505.
Cited by:
Perrault v. C.P.S., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3939 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2007) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3939
5506.
Cited by:
Hayes v. Ollison, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3295 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2007)
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3295
5507.
Cited by:
Tanksley v. Kern County Superior Court, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95712 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2007)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5508.
Cited by:
Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians v. County of Madera, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94522 (N.D.
Cal. Dec. 21, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94522
5509.
Cited by:
Johnson v. Superior Court of Cal., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93669 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93669
5510.
Followed by:
Page 620
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Stein v. Dir. of Corr., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90859 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN8
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90859
5511.
Cited by:
James v. City of Missoula, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89758 (D. Mont. Dec. 12, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89758
5512.
Followed by:
Eder v. Broddrick, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93233 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93233
5513.
Cited by:
Case v. Mont. State AG, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90624 (D. Mont. Dec. 6, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5, HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90624
5514.
Cited by:
Eder v. Broddrick, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86280 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86280
5515.
Cited by:
Matlink, Inc. v. Matlink, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83508 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83508
5516.
Followed by:
Liem Hieu Le v. City of Stockton, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81051 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81051
5517.
Followed by:
Nesselrode v. Flathead County, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80069 (D. Mont. Nov. 1, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80069
5518.
Followed by:
Stein v. Quinn, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78582 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 27, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78582
5519.
Cited by:
Gagan v. Estate of Sharar, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75835 (D. Ariz. Oct. 17, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75835
5520.
Cited by:
Williamson v. Basco, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74034 (D. Haw. Oct. 6, 2006)
Page 621
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74034
5521.
Followed by:
San Jose Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce Political Actioin Comm. v. City of San Jose, 2006 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 94337 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 20, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94337
5522.
Followed by:
Consol. Mgmt. Group, LCC v. Dufauchard, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71111 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 20, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71111
5523.
Followed by:
Metully v. Montana, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75746 (D. Mont. Sept. 7, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75746
5524.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Exec. Risk Indem., Inc. v. Pac. Educ. Servs., 451 F. Supp. 2d 1147, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61101 (D. Haw.
2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
451 F. Supp. 2d 1147 p.1156
Cited by:
451 F. Supp. 2d 1147 p.1155
5525.
Followed by:
Stein v. Quinn, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82384 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 22, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82384
5526.
Followed by:
Barberio v. City of Burien, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53767 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 3, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53767
5527.
Followed by:
Rotar v. Skaggs, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53238 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53238
5528.
Cited by:
Sims v. Huber, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53183 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 1, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53183
5529.
Cited by:
Wedel v. California, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52276 (E.D. Cal. July 17, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52276
Page 622
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5530.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Consejo de Desarrollo Economico de Mexicali v. United States, 438 F. Supp. 2d 1207, 2006 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 48182 (D. Nev. 2006)
Distinguished by:
438 F. Supp. 2d 1207 p.1230
Cited by:
438 F. Supp. 2d 1207 p.1229
5531.
Cited by:
Atterbury v. Grazaini, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40346 (E.D. Cal. June 15, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40346
5532.
Cited by:
Coulombe v. Jolly, 447 F. Supp. 2d 1117, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63483 (C.D. Cal. 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN4
447 F. Supp. 2d 1117 p.1122
5533.
Followed by:
Sutton v. Teets, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37016 (N.D. Cal. May 24, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37016
5534.
Cited by:
Satterwhite v. Pierce County Superior Court, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45560 (W.D. Wash. May 16, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45560
5535.
Distinguished by:
Washington v. Hall, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30585 (N.D. Cal. May 10, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30585
5536.
Followed by:
Kakwani v. Cal. Dep't of Alcohol & Drug Programs., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26156 (E.D. Cal. May 4,
2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26156
5537.
Cited by:
Mathews v. County of Butte, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25816 (E.D. Cal. May 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25816
5538.
Followed by:
Tanksley v. Tulare County Sheriff Dep't, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24807 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24807
Page 623
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5539.
Cited by:
Tanksley v. Bakersfield Lerdo Pretrial, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24527 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24527
5540.
Cited by:
Edmonton v. State, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23022 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23022
5541.
Followed by:
Wilson v. Vargo, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21318 (D. Or. Apr. 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21318
5542.
Distinguished by:
Stafford v. SSA, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20124 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20124
5543.
Followed by:
Gamble v. Kernan, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15109 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15109
5544.
Followed by:
Voychuk v. California, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11888 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11888
5545.
Followed by:
Boustred v. Cox, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14049 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14049
5546.
Followed by:
Diesel v. Cavalli, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14660 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14660
5547.
Cited by:
Appleton v. County of Sacramento, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9406 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9406
5548.
Followed by:
Hawkins v. San Mateo County Law Library, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18479 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18479
5549.
Cited by:
Page 624
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Cejas v. Blanas, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7581 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2006)
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7581
5550.
Followed by, Explained by:
Concord Cmtys., L.P. v. City of Concord, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9004 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2006)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9004
Explained by:
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9004
5551.
Cited by:
Hoyle v. Ada County Dist. Court, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25633 (D. Idaho Feb. 10, 2006) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25633
5552.
Cited by:
Appleton v. County of Sacramento, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35632 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35632
5553.
Cited by:
Lacy-Curry v. Alameda County Soc. Servs. Agency, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40395 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40395
5554.
Cited by:
Deniz Cinar Aydiner v. Giusto, 401 F. Supp. 2d 1129, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32661 (D. Or. 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
401 F. Supp. 2d 1129 p.1132
5555.
Followed by:
Penwell v. Cleary, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34446 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 29, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34446
5556.
Distinguished by:
MediterraneanCoins v. Ebay Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30876 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30876
5557.
Cited by:
Wofford v. Hayward, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29367 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29367
5558.
Distinguished by:
Oglesby v. County of Kern, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29363 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 625
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29363
5559.
Cited by:
Appleton v. County of Sacramento, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41410 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41410
5560.
Cited by:
McDowell v. Syren, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21286 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21286
5561.
Followed by:
Rosa v. California, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42411 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42411
5562.
Followed by:
Coleman v. Mayberg, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44142 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44142
5563.
Cited by:
Culbert v. Onley, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42350 (E.D. Cal. July 28, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42350
5564.
Cited by:
Los Altos El Granada Investors v. City of Capitola, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36804 (N.D. Cal. July 26, 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36804
5565.
Cited by:
Agee v. Adachi, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13295 (N.D. Cal. June 30, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13295
5566.
Cited by:
Moorehead v. Dist. Atty's Office, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13260 (N.D. Cal. June 28, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13260
5567.
Cited by:
Enfission, Inc. v. Leaver, 408 F. Supp. 2d 1093, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40289 (W.D. Wash. 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
408 F. Supp. 2d 1093 p.1095
5568.
Cited by:
Molski v. Hitching Post I Rest., Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39959 (C.D. Cal. May 24, 2005) LexisNexis
Page 626
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39959
5569.
Cited by:
Kriege v. DA Office of Santa Cruz, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10444 (N.D. Cal. May 20, 2005)
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10444
5570.
Followed by:
Holmes v. Contra Costa County Superior Court, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7205 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2005)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7205
5571.
Cited by:
Canatella v. Stovitz, 365 F. Supp. 2d 1064, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5976 (N.D. Cal. 2005)
365 F. Supp. 2d 1064 p.1069
5572.
Distinguished by:
Friends of the E. Lake Sammamish Trail v. City of Sammamish, 361 F. Supp. 2d 1260, 2005 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 8620 (W.D. Wash. 2005)
361 F. Supp. 2d 1260 p.1276
5573.
Followed by:
Langley v. Belleque, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4867 (D. Or. Feb. 8, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4867
5574.
Followed by:
AmerisourceBergen Corp. v. Roden, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45515 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2005) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45515
5575.
Cited by:
Foster v. Lake County Sheriff's Dep't, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26451 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2004)
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26451
5576.
Followed by:
Jou v. Chang, 350 F. Supp. 2d 862, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26165 (D. Haw. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
350 F. Supp. 2d 862 p.866
5577.
Followed by:
Sempra Energy Trading Corp. v. Brown, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24483 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24483
5578.
Cited by:
Page 627
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Harris v. Yates, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18556 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 1, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18556
5579.
Distinguished by, Explained by:
Lahey v. Contra Costa County Dep't of Children & Family Servs., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18292 (N.D. Cal.
Aug. 31, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18292
Explained by:
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18292
5580.
Cited by:
Tucker v. Casual Male Retail Group, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17822 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17822
5581.
Cited by:
Cook v. Horsley, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16850 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16850
5582.
Followed by:
Schillaci v. Peyton, 328 F. Supp. 2d 1103, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15527 (D. Haw. 2004) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
328 F. Supp. 2d 1103 p.1105
5583.
Followed by:
Cent. Valley Water Agency v. United States, 327 F. Supp. 2d 1180, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18997 (E.D. Cal.
2004)
327 F. Supp. 2d 1180 p.1219
5584.
Cited by:
El v. Opdyke, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11988 (N.D. Cal. June 22, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11988
5585.
Cited by:
Hawkins v. United States Circuit Court, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11983 (N.D. Cal. June 21, 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11983
5586.
Followed by:
Cent. Valley Water Agency v. United States, 327 F. Supp. 2d 1180, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14060 (E.D. Cal.
2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
327 F. Supp. 2d 1180 p.1214
5587.
Followed by:
Page 628
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
Peterson v. Andrus, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8630 (N.D. Cal. May 5, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8630
5588.
Cited by:
Chaffee v. Roger, 311 F. Supp. 2d 962, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6016 (D. Nev. 2004)
311 F. Supp. 2d 962 p.965
5589.
Followed by:
Peterson v. Contra Costa County Superior Court, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3232 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3232
5590.
Cited by:
Laurie Q. v. Contra Costa County, 304 F. Supp. 2d 1185, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2405 (N.D. Cal. 2004)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
304 F. Supp. 2d 1185 p.1192
5591.
Cited by:
Santos v. County of L.A. Dep't of Children & Family Servs., 299 F. Supp. 2d 1070, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
25009 (C.D. Cal. 2003)
299 F. Supp. 2d 1070 p.1077
5592.
Followed by, Cited by:
Roberts v. Dicarlo, 296 F. Supp. 2d 1182, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24681 (C.D. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
296 F. Supp. 2d 1182 p.1185
Cited by:
296 F. Supp. 2d 1182 p.1184
5593.
Cited by:
Harris v. Lewis, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18812 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18812
5594.
Cited by:
United States v. Molen, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23798, 93 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 710 (E.D. Cal. 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23798
5595.
Distinguished by, Followed by:
CFNR Operating Co. v. City of Am. Canyon, 282 F. Supp. 2d 1114, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16009 (N.D.
Cal. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
282 F. Supp. 2d 1114 p.1117
Followed by:
Page 629
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
282 F. Supp. 2d 1114 p.1117
5596.
Cited by:
Manufactured Home Cmtys., Inc. v. City of San Jose, 358 F. Supp. 2d 896, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26413
(N.D. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
358 F. Supp. 2d 896 p.904
5597.
Distinguished by:
Hale O Kaula Church v. Maui Planning Comm'n, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24510 (D. Haw. July 18, 2003)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24510
5598.
Cited by:
King v. Horsley, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12377 (N.D. Cal. July 16, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12377
5599.
Cited by:
Prindable v. Ass'n of Apt. Owners of 2987 Kalakaua, 304 F. Supp. 2d 1245, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23744
(D. Haw. 2003)
304 F. Supp. 2d 1245 p.1262
5600.
Followed by:
Milinich v. Babcock, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6805 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6805
5601.
Cited by:
Clancy v. Contra Costa County Pub. Defender's Office, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5852 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 8,
2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5852
5602.
Followed by:
King v. Horsley, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5479 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5479
5603.
Cited by:
Sullivan v. Rupf, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24966 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2003)
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24966
5604.
Cited by:
Cole v. Nakahara, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 329 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 329
5605.
Cited by:
Kaiwi v. Lake County Pub. Defender's Office, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24819 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 630
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24819
5606.
Followed by:
Burnett v. Kramer, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23290 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23290
5607.
Cited by:
Blake v. Herrea, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21862 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 11, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21862
5608.
Followed by:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Lockyer, 225 F. Supp. 2d 1199, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
19877, 170 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3185 (C.D. Cal. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
225 F. Supp. 2d 1199 p.1203
5609.
Cited by:
Mason v. Marin County, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16706 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 3, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16706
5610.
Cited by:
Cottonwood Christian Ctr. v. Cypress Redevelopment Agency, 218 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 2002 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 14379 (C.D. Cal. 2002)
218 F. Supp. 2d 1203 p.1218
5611.
Cited by:
Artichoke Joe's v. Norton, 216 F. Supp. 2d 1084, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14300 (E.D. Cal. 2002)
216 F. Supp. 2d 1084 p.1105
5612.
Followed by:
Caetano v. Santa Clara County, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13521 (N.D. Cal. July 19, 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13521
5613.
Followed by:
Underground Constr. Co. v. City & County of S.F., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12994 (N.D. Cal. July 15, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12994
5614.
Cited by:
Scruggs v. Brown, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12990 (N.D. Cal. July 10, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12990
5615.
Cited by:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Lockyer, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27946 (C.D. Cal. July 2,
2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Page 631
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27946
5616.
Cited by:
Woodard v. Plummer, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12085 (N.D. Cal. July 2, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12085
5617.
Explained by:
Gilliam v. Austin, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9555 (N.D. Cal. May 13, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9555
5618.
Followed by:
Easter v. Am. W. Fin., 202 F. Supp. 2d 1150, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10299 (W.D. Wash. 2002)
202 F. Supp. 2d 1150 p.1155
5619.
Cited by:
Cen v. Castro, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9314 (N.D. Cal. May 1, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9314
5620.
Cited by:
Fitzhugh v. Bd. of Prison Terms, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9488 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9488
5621.
Cited by:
Valencia v. Woodford, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7256 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7256
5622.
Cited by:
Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Watada, 199 F. Supp. 2d 1018, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7094 (D. Haw. 2002)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
199 F. Supp. 2d 1018 p.1030
5623.
Cited by:
Newdow v. Bush, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27758 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27758
5624.
Followed by:
Cerit v. Cerit (In re Cerit), 188 F. Supp. 2d 1239, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3679 (D. Haw. 2002) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
188 F. Supp. 2d 1239 p.1247
5625.
Followed by:
Hilger v. Mink, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7058 (D. Or. Jan. 25, 2002)
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7058
Page 632
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5626.
Followed by:
Gadda v. Ashcroft, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20857, 24 Immigr. Cas. Rep. A3-212 (N.D. Cal. 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20857
5627.
Followed by:
Frazer v. Superior Court, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18771 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18771
5628.
Followed by:
Hilger v. Mink, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23624 (D. Or. Oct. 18, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23624
5629.
Cited by:
Tinsley v. Hennessey, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16553 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16553
5630.
Cited by:
In re Foster, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12461 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12461
5631.
Followed by:
Anderson v. Superior Court of Cal., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12826 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2001)
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12826
5632.
Followed by, Explained by, Cited by:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Andraea Ptnrs, 180 F. Supp. 2d 1124, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22346 (D.
Haw. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
180 F. Supp. 2d 1124 p.1131
Explained by:
180 F. Supp. 2d 1124 p.1130
Cited by:
180 F. Supp. 2d 1124 p.1128
5633.
Distinguished by:
Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Lynch, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5500 (C.D. Cal. May 2, 2001) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5500
5634.
Cited by:
Alliance of Auto. Mfrs. v. Hull, 137 F. Supp. 2d 1165, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9831 (D. Ariz. 2001)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
137 F. Supp. 2d 1165 p.1169
Page 633
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5635.
Distinguished by:
Oregon Bureau of Labor & Indus. v. US West Communs., Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16300, 142 Lab. Cas.
(CCH) P10847 (D. Or. Oct. 31, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16300
5636.
Followed by:
Arisman v. California State Supreme Court, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15778 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2000)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15778
5637.
Followed by:
Grafe v. Feeney, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14317 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 27, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14317
5638.
Distinguished by:
United States v. Nevada, 123 F. Supp. 2d 1209, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15806 (D. Nev. 2000)
123 F. Supp. 2d 1209 p.1218
5639.
Cited by:
Gould v. County of Mendocino, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13558 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 5, 2000) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13558
5640.
Followed by:
Vigil v. Runnels, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13539 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 5, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13539
5641.
Distinguished by:
Bingham v. Hamilton, 100 F. Supp. 2d 1233, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8956 (E.D. Cal. 2000)
100 F. Supp. 2d 1233 p.1238
5642.
Followed by:
Sullivan v. Rupf, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2839 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2839
5643.
Cited by:
Burgie v. Contra Costa Sheriff's Dep't, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16877 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5, HN6
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16877
5644.
Cited by:
State Eng'r v. South Fork Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians, 66 F. Supp. 2d 1163,
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16623 (D. Nev. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9
66 F. Supp. 2d 1163 p.1174
Page 634
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5645.
Cited by:
Salazar v. Burresch, 47 F. Supp. 2d 1105, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7661 (C.D. Cal. 1999)
47 F. Supp. 2d 1105 p.1107
5646.
Cited by:
Armstrong v. Easterbrook, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5321 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5321
5647.
Cited by:
Diamond Game Enters. v. Howland, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4305 (D. Or. Mar. 23, 1999) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4305
5648.
Followed by, Cited by:
Dowden v. City of Sacramento, 40 F. Supp. 2d 1146, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2282 (E.D. Cal. 1999)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
40 F. Supp. 2d 1146 p.1148
Cited by:
40 F. Supp. 2d 1146 p.1149
5649.
Cited by:
Kettle v. California PUC, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1823 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 1999)
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1823
5650.
Cited by:
Lewis v. Agpalo, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 942 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 942
5651.
Followed by:
Bullock v. Town of Woodside, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19627 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 1998) LexisNexis
Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19627
5652.
Cited by:
Sullivan v. Wilson, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15846 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15846
5653.
Followed by:
Canatella v. California, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15296 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 29, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15296
Page 635
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5654.
Cited by:
Dannenberg v. Nakahara, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14988 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 22, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14988
5655.
Cited by:
Hysell v. Calderon, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14993 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 21, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14993
5656.
Cited by:
Farley v. Calderon, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11939 (N.D. Cal. July 30, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11939
5657.
Cited by:
Gonzalez v. California, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11551 (N.D. Cal. July 24, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11551
5658.
Followed by, Cited by:
Communications Telesystems Int'l v. California PUC, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1165, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9202, 98
D.A.R. 10505 (N.D. Cal. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6
Followed by:
14 F. Supp. 2d 1165 p.1174
Cited by:
14 F. Supp. 2d 1165 p.1167
5659.
Followed by:
Pope v. Mitchell, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8874 (N.D. Cal. June 4, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8874
5660.
Cited by:
Roberson v. Kennedy, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5914 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5914
5661.
Followed by:
Dixon v. State Bar Court of the State Bar, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4273 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 1998)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4273
5662.
Cited by:
League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Wilson, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3418 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 1998)
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3418
5663.
Cited by:
Flowers v. Seki, 45 F. Supp. 2d 794, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21835 (D. Haw. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes
Page 636
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
HN5
45 F. Supp. 2d 794 p.797
5664.
Cited by:
Hysell v. Marin County Superior Court, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18613 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5665.
Cited by:
League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Wilson, 997 F. Supp. 1244, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18776 (C.D. Cal.
1997)
997 F. Supp. 1244 p.1250
5666.
Cited by:
Hysell v. Marin County Superior Court, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16215 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5667.
Cited by:
Carter v. City of Richmond, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10058 (N.D. Cal. July 8, 1997)
5668.
Cited by:
Bonilla v. United States, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14127 (N.D. Cal. May 14, 1997)
5669.
Followed by, Cited by:
Cornwell v. California Bd. of Barbering & Cosmetology, 962 F. Supp. 1260, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6078,
97 D.A.R. 10409 (S.D. Cal. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Followed by:
962 F. Supp. 1260 p.1271
Cited by:
962 F. Supp. 1260 p.1267
5670.
Cited by:
Conant v. McCaffrey, 172 F.R.D. 681, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8749 (N.D. Cal. 1997)
172 F.R.D. 681 p.690
5671.
Cited by:
Easton v. Gianetti, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5526 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9
5672.
Cited by:
Dorsey v. Orloff, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2122 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5673.
Cited by:
Doucette v. City of Santa Monica, 955 F. Supp. 1192, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1207 (C.D. Cal. 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN4
955 F. Supp. 1192 p.1200
5674.
Cited by:
Root v. Schenk, 953 F. Supp. 1115, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5950, 97 D.A.R. 9611 (C.D. Cal. 1997)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
953 F. Supp. 1115 p.1117
Page 637
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
953 F. Supp. 1115 p.1120
5675.
Distinguished by, Cited by:
Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. Stach, 951 F. Supp. 1455, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 613, 62 Cal. Comp.
Cas. (MB) 1106, 97 D.A.R. 10384 (C.D. Cal. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
Distinguished by:
951 F. Supp. 1455 p.1469
Cited by:
951 F. Supp. 1455 p.1468
5676.
Cited by:
In re Daniels, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 395 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5677.
Followed by, Cited by:
Wu v. State Bar, 953 F. Supp. 315, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 617, 97 D.A.R. 1231 (C.D. Cal. 1997)
Followed by:
953 F. Supp. 315 p.322
Cited by:
953 F. Supp. 315 p.318
5678.
Cited by:
Rhodes v. Plummer, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18690 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5679.
Cited by:
Minden v. City of Monte Sereno, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21970 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 25, 1996)
5680.
Cited by:
Keith v. Volpe, 965 F. Supp. 1337, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21237 (C.D. Cal. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN6
965 F. Supp. 1337 p.1350
5681.
Cited by:
Smith v. United States, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12783 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes
HN5
5682.
Followed by, Cited by:
Mockaitis v. Harcleroad, 938 F. Supp. 1516, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12708 (D. Or. 1996)
Followed by:
938 F. Supp. 1516 p.1519
Cited by:
938 F. Supp. 1516 p.1518
5683.
Followed by:
Milliken & Michaels v. Houseworth, 942 F. Supp. 454, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18896 (D. Ariz. 1996)
LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
942 F. Supp. 454 p.455
Page 638
SHEPARD'SÆ - 401 U.S. 37 - 9926 Citing References
5684.
Followed by, Cited by:
Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. City & County of Honolulu, 952 F. Supp. 679, 1996 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 19831 (D. Haw. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN7
Followed by:
952 F. Supp. 679 p.682
Cited by:
952 F. Supp. 679 p.683
5685.
Cited by:
Womack v. Ramirez, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7398 (N.D. Cal. May 17, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
5686.
Cited by:
Detourney v. Lungren, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5379 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5,
HN6
5687.
Distinguished by:
In re Grand Jury Investigation of Targets (Possible Judicial Corruption), 918 F. Supp. 1374, 1996 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 2811 (S.D. Cal. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5
918 F. Supp. 1374 p.1383
5688.
Cited by:
Samuel v. Michaud, 980 F. Supp. 1381, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21666 (D. Idaho 1996)
980 F. Supp. 1381 p.1416
5689.
Distinguished by:
Space Age Fuels Inc.