U.S. Motor Efficiency Regulation Update
April 23, 2015
The Associa+on of Electrical and Medical Imaging Equipment Manufacturers The Impact of the Integral Horsepower
Amended Rule (1 – 500 HP Motor)
Rob Boteler
Chairman NEMA Energy Committee
John Malinowski
Past Chairman NEMA Motor & Generator Section
1 The Associa+on of Electrical and Medical Imaging Equipment Manufacturers Outline
•  History of Efficiency Regulations
•  Integral Horsepower Amended Motor Rule
•  Motor regulation a logical progression
2 EASA 2015
1
U.S. Motor Efficiency Regulation Update
April 23, 2015
The Associa+on of Electrical and Medical Imaging Equipment Manufacturers Motor Efficiency Regulations
Energy Policy Act of 1992
!  Effective October 1997
!  General Purpose 1 – 200 HP at MG 1, table 12-11 Energy Efficient
Energy Policy Act of 2005
!  Raised purchases for government to table 12-12 Premium Efficient
[by executive order from president]
Energy Independence & Security Act of 2007
!  Effective December 2010
!  General Purpose 1-200 HP EPAct motors to table 12-12 Premium
Efficient
!  Other 1-200 HP motors at table 12-11 Energy Efficient
!  201 – 500 HP motors at 12-11 Energy Efficient
3 The Associa+on of Electrical and Medical Imaging Equipment Manufacturers Motor Coalition Formed in 2010
•  Determine the greatest energy savings potential and
improve enforcement
•  Agreement on action plan to achieve
•  Legislation?
•  Regulation?
•  Product definitions –
!  Electrical and mechanical considerations
•  Testing issues mechanical adoptions
•  Metrics – nominal efficiency at 100% load
•  MEPS – Minimum efficiency levels
•  Timing of implementation
EASA 2015
4 2
U.S. Motor Efficiency Regulation Update
April 23, 2015
The Associa+on of Electrical and Medical Imaging Equipment Manufacturers The Motor Coalition Members
•  American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy
•  Alliance to Save Energy
•  Appliance Standards Awareness Project
•  Earthjustice
•  Natural Resources Defense Council
•  Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships
•  Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
•  National Electrical Manufactures Association
•  Pacific Gas and Electric
•  Others signed letters of support
5 The Associa+on of Electrical and Medical Imaging Equipment Manufacturers 2010-11 Motor Coalition Strategy
•  Determine and document a plan to improve the efficiency of the
greatest number of units providing the greatest savings impact
while reducing potential enforcement issues while maintaining
full product utility for American industry
•  Deliver a plan to DOE as a platform for a consensus
recommendation that can be acted upon within the least amount
of time delivering large net benefits.
•  Move to a final rule with the least delay to deliver results that
save greatest energy as quickly as possible
6 EASA 2015
3
U.S. Motor Efficiency Regulation Update
April 23, 2015
The Associa+on of Electrical and Medical Imaging Equipment Manufacturers EISA 2007 required a Final IHP Rule by December 19th 2012
Motors must meet 7 standard DOE criteria
Energy Policy & Conserva+on Act of 1975 Factors DOE Analysis 1. Economic impact on consumers and manufacturers Life-­‐cycle cost analysis Manufacturer impact analysis 2. Life=me opera=ng cost savings compared to increased cost for the product Life-­‐cycle cost analysis 3. Total projected savings Na=onal impact analysis 4. Impact on u=lity or performance Engineering analysis Screening analysis 5. Impact of any lessening of compe==on Manufacturer impact analysis 6. Need for na=onal energy conserva=on Na=onal impact analysis 7. Other factors the Secretary considers relevant Environmental assessment U=lity impact analysis 7 Employment impact analysis The Associa+on of Electrical and Medical Imaging Equipment Manufacturers AMENDED INTEGRAL HP RULE
th
Published May 29 2014 DOE amends motor efficiency regulations
8 EASA 2015
4
U.S. Motor Efficiency Regulation Update
April 23, 2015
Integral HP Motor Final Rule
•  Replaces Energy Independence & Security Act of 2007
•  Takes effect 24 months after Final Rule (June 1, 2016)
•  Almost all motors will be covered at Premium Efficiency
levels NEMA MG 1, Table 12-12 or Part 20, Table B (IE3)
•  Simplifies enforcement and compliance
•  Improved definitions and testing guidelines
9
Compare Integral Rule to EISA
Motor Type EISA New Integral HP Rule 1-­‐200 HP Subtype I Premium Efficient NEMA MG 1, Table 12-­‐12 Premium Efficient NEMA MG 1, Table 12-­‐12 1-­‐200 HP Subtype II Energy Efficient NEMA MG 1, Table 12-­‐11 Premium Efficient NEMA MG 1, Table 12-­‐12 201-­‐500 HP Energy Efficient NEMA MG 1, Table 12-­‐11 Premium Efficient NEMA MG 1, Table 12-­‐12 & 20-­‐B 56 Frame Enclosed Exempt Premium Efficient NEMA MG 1, Table 12-­‐12 Custom Configura=ons Exempt Premium Efficient NEMA MG 1, Table 12-­‐12 1-­‐200 HP Fire Pump Motors Energy Efficient NEMA MG 1, Table 12-­‐11 Energy Efficient NEMA MG 1, Table 12-­‐11 10 EASA 2015
5
U.S. Motor Efficiency Regulation Update
April 23, 2015
The Associa+on of Electrical and Medical Imaging Equipment Manufacturers Motors covered under IHP Final Rule
The motors regulated under expanded scope meet the following
nine characteristics:
1.
Is a single speed induction motor
2.
Is rated for continuous duty (MG 1) operation or for duty type S1 (IEC)
3.
Contains a squirrel-cage (MG 1) or cage (IEC) rotor
4.
Operated on polyphase alternating current (AC) 60-hertz sinusoidal line power
5.
Has 2-, 4-, 6-, or 8-pole configuration
6.
Is rated 600 volts or less
7.
Have a three or four digit NEMA frame size (or IEC metric equivalent), including those
designs between two consecutive NEMA frame sizes (or IEC metric equivalent) or an
enclosed 56 NEMA Frame size (or IEC metric equivalent).
8.
Has no more than 500 horsepower, but greater than or equal to 1 horsepower (or kilowatt
equivalent)
9.
Meets all the performance requirements of a NEMA design A, B or C electric motor or an
IEC design N or H electric motor.
11 The Associa+on of Electrical and Medical Imaging Equipment Manufacturers Enclosed Motors
2 Pole
NEMA MG1,
Table 12-12
4 Pole
6 Pole
8 Pole
HP
Nominal
Efficiency
Minimum
Efficiency
Nominal
Efficiency
Minimum
Efficiency
Nominal
Efficiency
Minimum
Efficiency
Nominal
Efficiency
Minimum
Efficiency
1
77.0
74.0
85.5
82.5
82.5
80.0
75.5
72.0
1.5
84.0
81.5
86.5
84.0
87.5
85.5
78.5
75.5
2
85.5
82.5
86.5
84.0
88.5
86.5
84.0
81.5
3
86.5
84.0
89.5
87.5
89.5
87.5
85.5
82.5
5
88.5
86.5
89.5
87.5
89.5
87.5
86.5
84.0
7.5
89.5
87.5
91.7
90.2
91.0
89.5
86.5
84.0
10
90.2
88.5
91.7
90.2
91.0
89.5
89.5
87.5
15
91.0
89.5
92.4
91.0
91.7
90.2
89.5
87.5
20
91.0
89.5
93.0
91.7
91.7
90.2
90.2
88.5
25
91.7
90.2
93.6
92.4
93.0
91.7
90.2
88.5
30
91.7
90.2
93.6
92.4
93.0
91.7
91.7
90.2
40
92.4
91.0
94.1
93.0
94.1
93.0
91.7
90.2
50
93.0
91.7
94.5
93.6
94.1
93.0
92.4
91.0
60
93.6
92.4
95.0
94.1
94.5
93.6
92.4
91.0
75
93.6
92.4
95.4
94.5
94.5
93.6
93.6
92.4
100
94.1
93.0
95.4
94.5
95.0
94.1
93.6
92.4
125
95.0
94.1
95.4
94.5
95.0
94.1
94.1
93.0
150
95.0
94.1
95.8
95.0
95.8
95.0
94.1
93.0
200
95.4
94.5
96.2
95.4
95.8
95.0
94.5
93.6
250
95.8
95.0
96.2
95.4
95.8
95.0
95.0
94.1
300
95.8
95.0
96.2
95.4
350
95.8
95.0
96.2
95.4
400
95.8
95.0
96.2
95.4
450
95.8
95.0
96.2
95.4
500
95.8
95.0
96.2
95.4
NEMA Premium® is
a registered trademark
licensed to motor manufacturers
agreeing to meet additional
testing and labeling requirements.
DOE regulations reference
NEMA MG1, Table 12-12
NEMA MG 1, Table 12-13
FULL-LOAD EFFICIENCIES FOR 60 HZ PREMIUM EFFICIENCY ELECTRIC MOTORS
RATED 5000 VOLTS OR LESS (FORM WOUND)
Open Motors
2 Pole
EASA 2015
4 Pole
6 Pole
8 Pole
HP
Nominal
Efficiency
Minimum
Efficiency
Nominal
Efficiency
Minimum
Efficiency
Nominal
Efficiency
Minimum
Efficiency
Nominal
Efficiency
Minimum
Efficiency
250
94.5
93.6
95.0
94.1
95.0
94.1
93.6
92.4
300
94.5
93.6
95.0
94.1
95.0
94.1
350
94.5
93.6
95.0
94.1
95.0
94.1
400
94.5
93.6
95.0
94.1
450
94.5
93.6
95.0
94.1
500
94.5
93.6
95.0
94.1
12 6
U.S. Motor Efficiency Regulation Update
April 23, 2015
The Associa+on of Electrical and Medical Imaging Equipment Manufacturers Motors added previously not covered by EISA
What additional designs are covered:
endplates or flanges
!
NEMA Design A motors from 201-500 HP
!
Electric motors with moisture-resistant
windings, sealed or encapsulated windings
!
Partial electric motors including
gearmotors
!
Totally-enclosed non-ventilated (TENV)
electric motors
!
Electric motors with non-standard base or
mounting feet
!
Immersible electric motors
!
!
Integral or non-integral brake electric
motors
Footless motors (C-face or D-flange less
base)
!
Electric motors with special shafts
!
U-frame motors
!
Close-coupled pump motors
!
Design C motors
!
56J Jet pump motors (Enclosed)
!
IEC 100 frame, NEMA 66 frame
!
Vertical hollow shaft electric motors
Electric motors with non-standard
!
Vertical medium and high thrust solid shaft
electric motors
!
Electric motors with sleeve bearings
!
Electric motors with thrust bearings
!
Pre-NEMA frame motors
!
Arbor saw motors
!
13 The Associa+on of Electrical and Medical Imaging Equipment Manufacturers Motors not covered under IHP final rule
Exempt Motors:
!  Single phase ODP motors (may be
covered by Small Motor Rule)
!  Single phase Enclosed motors
!  DC motors
!  Two digit frames (42 – 48) (may be
covered by Small Motor Rule)
!  56 frame ODP (may be covered by
Small Motor Rule)
!  Multi-speed motors
!  Medium voltage motors
!  TEAO or Open Air-over motors
!  Submersible motors
!  Water-cooled motors
!  Intermittent duty motors (S2-S8)
!  Stator-rotor sets
!  Design D motors
!  Motors designed for Inverter Power
(MG 1, Part 31) with no line start
!  Synchronous AC motors
!  Permanent magnet rotor AC motors
!  Servo motors
14 EASA 2015
7
U.S. Motor Efficiency Regulation Update
April 23, 2015
Partial (3/4 Motor) vs. Stator-Rotor Set
•  Partial motors usually have the drive endplate missing and used as
part of a gear motor, pump or compressor.
!  A partial motor may have an endplate installed and tested before
shipment.
•  A stator and rotor may or may not have a shaft or frame casting.
!  They are transformed into a motor down stream by someone other than
the component manufacturer.
!  That transforming company becomes the motor manufacturer for DOE
compliance.
15
Impact to OEMs and End Users
Form, Fit, Function
! Previously unregulated motors may be larger size
! Premium motors have less slip – higher speed
! Some designs may be Design A – higher inrush current
! Some designs in larger NEMA frame
16
EASA 2015
8
U.S. Motor Efficiency Regulation Update
April 23, 2015
The Associa+on of Electrical and Medical Imaging Equipment Manufacturers Impact to OEMs and End Users
!  Life Cycle Value
!  More material – additional cost for premium efficiency
!  Motor cost 2% - 97% for electricity
!  Can continue to buy and use motors built before
June 1, 2016
!  Remember the regulation is point of manufacture, not
the end user
!  Significantly adds embedded motors as covered
products
17 The Associa+on of Electrical and Medical Imaging Equipment Manufacturers Progression of Active Material Required to
Increase Efficiency
Lowest level
NEMA Premium
IE 3
Epact 92
IE2
18 EASA 2015
9
U.S. Motor Efficiency Regulation Update
April 23, 2015
Affect of Expanded Product Scope
Millions of units per year
Type 1 and 2
Total 5.6 million motors sold in
USA typical year
`
Motor rule amendment adds nearly 4
million motors in four new categories
Partial &
Gearmotor
Definite &
Special
Imported
motors or
component
56 Frame
Andrew deLaski The Associa+on of Electrical and Medical Imaging Equipment Manufacturers Amended rule conclusions
•  Expands the definition of covered product adding over 4
million units per year to be regulated
•  Reduces non-covered motors to a small number
•  Saves more energy than any rule ever issued by DOE
•  Reduces confusion for enforcement agencies
•  Allows distributors and resellers to “work through” existing
inventories of current product
•  Continues to use NEMA standards and table 12-12 as
minimum performance levels protecting end user and OEM
product utility
•  Takes affect June 1st 2016
•  Continues to use NEMA standards, IEEE and CSA test
methods
20 EASA 2015
10