November 2015 WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 1 of 67 Contents Introduction 3 Leadership and engagement standards 5 1. Risk profile and prioritisation 5 2. Vision and goals 8 3. Resourcing and competence 13 4. Senior leaders’ commitment 18 5. Communication and issue resolution 21 6. Worker engagement and empowerment 27 7. Performance measurement 31 8. Review and continual improvement 35 9. Reintegration of employees 38 Risk awareness and management standards 41 10. Risk identification 41 11. Risk assessment 46 12. Risk controls 50 13. Risk control effectiveness 57 14. Risk management review 61 15. Emergency management 64 Published November 2015 WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 2 of 67 Introduction The proposed Safety Star Rating Scheme (SSRS) is an injury prevention initiative that aims to help lift the performance of health and safety in New Zealand businesses. It is not a compliance audit. Instead it focuses on how your business effectively implements good health and safety practice through a behaviour based assessment. The SSRS has two assessment stages: An online self-assessment. An on-site assessment by qualified and independent Assessors. The SSRS is comprised of fifteen Standards, organised into two core concepts: leadership and worker engagement, and risk awareness and risk management. The Standards have been developed with industry from globally-accepted good health and safety practice. Summary of SSRS Standards Each Standard consists of one or more indicators that businesses will be assessed against. Both the self-assessment and on-site assessment process measures your business against the Standards. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 3 of 67 Purpose This guide introduces the SSRS Standards and explains the key concepts behind them. It also provides guidance on good health and safety practice, against each Standards. Businesses are not the same. There is no ‘one size fits all’ approach to health and safety, which is why this guide doesn’t prescribe the only way to meet the SSRS Standards. Each business will demonstrate good safety and health practice in its own way. The guide is not a specific risk management document. Specific risks may have legal and other compliance requirements. You can find guidance on the specifics of these controls through regulators and other bodies. How to use this guide The guide is a tool to support your business to improve its health and safety. It is not compulsory for you to use it. However, it contains useful information about: The SSRS Standards and their indicators Why the Standards are important What good practice can look like Where you can find out more guidance on good health and safety practice, from New Zealand and overseas. More information about the SSRS If you need to find more information about the SSRS, please look at http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe/about/what-we-do/the-safety-star-rating-scheme or contact us on safetystar@worksafe.govt.nz WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 4 of 67 Standard 1: Senior leaders understand the business’s risk profile, and prioritise their actions as a result. 1.1 Senior leaders understand the business’s risk profile. 1.2 Senior leaders prioritise their health and safety actions as a result of the business’s risk profile. Purpose Your risk profile helps your business identify areas of risk, including how much disruption each risk would cause in your operations. Your risk profile helps you identify and understand the risks within your operation so you can prioritise how risks are controlled and managed. Effective leaders know: The risks faced by their organisation Which risks are most important (considering both likelihood and consequence) How to control identified risks. Guidance Your risk profile examines the nature of each risk, the level of disruption and cost associated with each risk, and the effectiveness of the control measures you have put in place. It is your starting point for determining the greatest health and safety issues for your organisation, both in the short or long-term. Your risk profile will be determined by a range of factors such as what your business does, where your workplace is located, the composition of your workforce, who is present in the workplace, and how the business changes from day to day during operations. Risk profiling may include thinking about your wider business risks where they can impact on the health and safety of people. Wider business risks could include events such as power cuts, compromised business systems, loss of key suppliers, impact of loss of supply lines, asset damage, and so on. In some businesses the risks may be tangible and immediate safety or health-related risks (acute harm). Other risks may have long-term (chronic) effects, which might become apparent long after the cause. Your risk profile is one of your key business tools for identifying and driving continual improvement in your business processes. Identified risk areas in the risk profile become the areas that your WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 5 of 67 business allocates management resources such as personnel, time, and money to control, monitor and review. The outcome of risk profiling will be that more serious risks are prioritised in your management processes, with less serious risks given a lower priority. Your risk profile is constructed from your risk assessment processes. Your risk profile clearly identifies: What the business’s risk priorities are How senior leaders are made aware of the more serious risks in the risk profile Who “owns” the risk (normally a very senior leader, Board member, group of very senior leaders, or a safety champion) What are the worst possible credible outcomes of each risk What emergencies could arise from each risk, and whether plans are in place to manage the consequences of emergency situations The controls you have in place and who is responsible for implementing and monitoring the risk controls How often the controls and risks need to be reviewed How other businesses could impact on your risks (for example, a nearby business with an ammonia plant) How often your risk profile is reviewed, and what criteria would trigger a review; for example: changes in your business (such as new plant or processes, or changes in personnel), economic cycles, critical events or emergency situations, annual reviews. You can record your risk profile in a number of ways, depending on the size and complexity of your business. You may find an Excel spreadsheet or Word document may be sufficient, or you may wish to use a specific health and safety software solution. The most important thing is to ensure that leaders in your business know and understand the profile, and their role in controlling risk. People The risk management will involve managers, workers’ representatives, and workers (including contractors) that are affected by the risk. Putting together the overall risk profile may be done by your health and safety advisor or manager, in consultation with managers, workers’ representatives, and workers. Reference For information about managing health and safety, you may find the following national and international resources useful. Note: guidance material is being developed all the time. Please keep checking WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators for more guidance. The UK core guidance on health and safety management for leaders, owners and line managers is HSG65 Managing for health and safety: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/hsg65.pdf Further information on risk profiling can be found at the Health and Safety Executive (UK) website: http://www.hse.gov.uk/managing/risk-profiling.htm WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 6 of 67 The Health and Safety Executive (UK) guide to leading health and safety at work can be found at http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg417.pdf The Olympic Delivery Authority has a good publication on risk profiling: http://learninglegacy.independent.gov.uk/publications/risk-profiling.php WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 7 of 67 Standard 2: The business (with workers and representatives) develops a health and safety vision and goals. 2.1 The business (with workers and representatives) develops a health and safety vision and goals. 2.2 The business (with workers and representatives) implements effective processes to achieve the health and safety objectives linked to its risk profile. 2.3 The business (with workers and representatives) develops health and safety performance measures, including leading indicators. 2.4 Everyone in the business understands and can engage with the shared vision for health and safety. Purpose Having a shared vision about where your business wants to go, and setting measurable objectives that will help your business achieve your vision are important because you will all be working together to achieve a common goal. A shared vision is more likely to be effectively implemented. Guidance Vision and goals A business vision is a simple, succinct statement of where you see your organisation in the longer term. Health and safety goals are part of this because they clearly identify how health and safety will contribute to your business’s activities. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 8 of 67 Effective processes Your business should have systematic processes that clearly identify how you are planning to manage health and safety risks. The SSRS does not focus on health and safety documentation. The focus on how your business is managing risk in practice. Documentation can support the implementation of your risk controls, but should not be put in place just for the purposes of the SSRS assessment. Smaller, low risk businesses may have less documentation but still have effective risk controls implemented. Key indicators that health and safety processes are fit for purpose are: WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 9 of 67 If you have written documentation for health and safety in place, it is important that everyone understands its importance and why it’s needed. Where people need to use documents, such as procedures or task analyses, they should be easy to understand and follow, clearly identifying the safe, healthy way to carry out the task using pictures and diagrams where possible. This will encourage and empower your workers to participate with risk controls. Health and safety documents (with the exception of private medical information) should be easily accessible to all workers that need to access them. Objectives Specific and measurable objectives support the achievement of your business vision. Effective objectives: Deliver your business vision in a measurable way Are clearly linked to your risk profile Identify risks to both the health and the safety of your workers Implement your business plans for risk management processes, how the risk controls are monitored for effectiveness, and how you plan to engage your workers and workers’ representatives in the process When developing objectives, choose SMART ones: Meaning Example/explanation S Specific The objective is very specific, so it is clear what is expected M Measurable Can the objective be measured? A Achievable Can you really achieve the objective with the resources you have allocated to this process? R Realistic Is it realistic? Does it make sense? T Time bound Is there a clear timeframe? When should the objective be completed by? An example of a SMART objective is: 100% of all elected health and safety representatives at ABC Company will have completed Stage 1 training by 30 September of the current year. Having SMART objectives make it really easy to identify whether you have achieved them, and to plan the resources you need in order to complete them. Lead and lag indicators The kinds of indicators used to measure performance are often called lead and lag indicators. They are tailored to your business context (for example, composition of your workforce) and risk profile. They measure: Performance against objectives and activities in the health and safety plan Performance of everyday risk management activities that align with the risk profile, effectiveness of controls, problem areas, and potential issues (for example, as a result of change) Behaviours that are likely to improve health and safety, such as reporting and engagement with workers WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 10 of 67 Successful implementation and completion of actions from the outcomes of investigations, issues being raised, disputes and disagreements, suggestions and so on Illnesses and harm identified by health monitoring. A range of leading and lagging indicators are used to get a wider picture of business performance. Effective monitoring can alert you to any problems, hopefully before any serious incidents occur. Poor monitoring might tell you that something is wrong but may not help you understand why, or what to do about it. The absence of an event does not mean that the risk is being appropriately managed. This is particularly true for risks that have serious consequences. Lead indicators are safety and health activities that you do proactively as part of risk management and are linked to your vision/goals, plans and objectives. Lead indicators include: Number of workers have been trained in role-specific competencies in a specific period Number of safety inspections carried out by management and workers or workers’ representatives, and the level of compliance with risk controls Number of risk assessments carried out Number of contractors have completed contractor accreditation processes Percentage of agreed actions closed out on time Amount of preventative, planned, or other maintenance carried out Number of near miss reports made and investigated Number of observations or safety tours that identified areas for improvement How health monitoring data has been used to inform risk management processes. Lead indicators help your business establish a baseline to drive your continuous improvement in health and safety. Each lead indicator you use should have a SMART measure attached to it, to make it clear if you are achieving it. Lag indicators measure how your business has performed in the past. For example: Accident statistics: how many injuries, the severity of injuries, how many accidents, incidents you have had (includes frequency and severity), lost workdays The number of ACC claims How long it took to complete corrective actions from events Over-exposure to noise or chemicals identified from health monitoring. Lag indicators are “after the fact” measures of risk management, such as accident and ill health statistics for risks. Numbers alone are not a good measure. Analysis of the underlying root causes, trends and factors will show you much more about how your business is keeping everyone healthy and safe. Root cause analyses or investigations can be used to drive your continual improvement. For example, if the lagging indicator shows a reduction in injuries, the business may become complacent, when in fact there are numerous risk factors present in the workplace that will contribute to future injuries, or the level of reporting has dropped away and you have poorer data to base decisions on. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 11 of 67 People The business vision and health and safety goals must be developed with workers and their representatives. By giving them a genuine opportunity to be involved everyone at all levels will understand the role they play. Workers and workers’ representatives should be involved when the business is setting performance lead and lag indicators. Reference For information about managing health and safety, you may find the following national and international resources useful. Note: guidance material is being developed all the time. Please keep checking WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators for more guidance. The Health and Safety Executive (UK) guide to leading health and safety at work, including more information on indicators, can be found at http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg417.pdf The NZ Institute of Directors published guidance documents that identify what good health and safety governance looks like, including more information on indicators: http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe/information-guidance/all-guidance-items/directorsguidelines-on-their-responsibilities ACC provides some suggestions on setting goals and objectives and working out what steps you need to take to make your improvement strategies happen: http://www.acc.co.nz/preventing-injuries/at-work/health-and-safety-in-theworkplace/health-and-safety-improvement-cycle/PI00068 WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 12 of 67 Standard 3: The business allocates resources to achieve its health and safety objectives. 3.1 The business plans and allocates sufficient resources that achieve its health and safety objectives. 3.2 The business defines health and safety roles and responsibilities. 3.3 Everyone is competent to perform their role. 3.4 The business considers the health and safety performance of contractors when making procurement decisions. 3.5 The business resources worker engagement and participation. Purpose Allocating sufficient resources (time, personnel, money, and so on) to health and safety ensures that the controls identified as required for critical risk management are adequately put in place, maintained, monitored and reviewed. When resources for safety management are not planned for appropriately, risk controls weaken and the workers and the business are exposed to risk. Guidance Resources Resources that may be required for health and safety can include: Resource Example Budget Money to fund equipment, develop training, pay for cover while staff are being trained, pay for updated risk controls, pay for monitoring of risk controls Time Allocated time for people to carry out the health and safety aspects of their role, and to cover the regular work of those people Facilities To carry out safety activities, including access to computers, training equipment and rooms Personnel The right people available to undertake health and safety tasks Other Access to information, training, equipment and so on WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 13 of 67 Financial resources The business should identify its health and safety priorities for the period, and budget for both maintenance of risk controls, and continual improvement. Time resources Time resources include allocating time for staff to attend required training, perform health and safety activities, and identify and manage risk. People Health and safety roles and responsibilities Everyone in the business has health and safety roles and responsibilities that will apply to their dayto-day role, and some workers and managers may also have specific responsibilities for specialist health and safety roles, such as health and safety representatives, Permit Issuer or Receiver, or emergency wardens. Health and safety objectives are linked to roles. Health and safety roles and responsibilities should be: Specific Clear, specific requirements of each person so that people know what is required of them (you may need to consider literacy and other special information needs such as ease of access to information) Reasonable Able to be completed by the person within their usual work times Jointly developed Consult your workers as to what are reasonable health and safety requirements, although the business has the ability to identify what is acceptable and what is not Interactive Where possible, assign the responsibilities in ways that people will engage with them Communicated Ensure that all the workers understand what is required of them (think about literacy, numeracy, and those workers who are not there all the time, such as shift, casual staff, or contracted workers) You need to plan how you’re going to retain health and safety knowledge in the business, especially if a key person leaves. This will include: Methods to transfer knowledge to others, for example through mentoring or training A place to store knowledge, for example electronic or written documents A process to add to the health and safety knowledge in your business How to improve access to knowledge, for example using an intranet or a list of people who have knowledge and what knowledge they have. Competency Everyone has the sufficient competency to do their role. Competency means that they have the skills, knowledge, information (training), and experience to carry out their role safely and without risks to their health in the short and long term. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 14 of 67 A Training Needs Assessment process can help your business identify what competency is needed by each person to carry out their work without putting their health and safety at risk. This means your business can plan the training that is needed by each person, so that risk controls remain in place and are reinforced by the training. Choose your training methods to take into account the needs of people, such as their ability to access training, literacy and numeracy needs, specific work skills required, and so on. For example: Competency issue Example Training and competency Workers are trained in the safety processes relevant to the risks they are exposed to in their role Your workers (including contractors) are competent to do the work they are required to do Leaders, managers and directors need to be competent to carry out due diligence on health and safety, including knowing when they need to access competent health and safety advice Risks Everyone is provided with information on the risks they are exposed to, and what the controls and monitoring are for those risks Inductions Inductions are carried out for new workers and workers that are transferred from other areas of the business Health and safety representatives receive appropriate training about how they contribute to the safety and health of their colleagues Health and safety representatives should also be trained to a recognised, external (gazetted) standard by an approved external provider Training Needs Assessments are appropriate for those workers with specific needs Support is provided for new workers, workers with English as a second language or impaired literacy, and other vulnerable groups such as older or younger workers Training for health and safety representatives Managing diversity Keeping current Training is updated when work processes change Refresher training is considered a ‘given’ for all workers exposed to risk, and is planned for and fully resourced To assist in your understanding of what competencies are needed, you can seek competent health and safety advice where appropriate. Training plans should include provision for covering workers involved in training if they have critical roles or if the training is going to take a substantial amount of time. To check that the training provided is adequate, your business should plan to: 1. Check that training has been understood and is being followed 2. Review training at specific times, for example, when a worker is engaged or when there is change in the workplace 3. Record the training and competencies of each person in the workplace. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 15 of 67 Workers Everyone in your business will have specific health and safety competencies in their role, because of their: Role in business The CEO and Board will need training on leadership, legislation, and health and safety due diligence processes Supervisors will need training on how to enable agreed processes, manage feedback, and identify unsafe behaviour Operational staff need to know how to complete their tasks safely and what emergency processes are in place if something goes wrong Assigned job First aider, health and safety representative, emergency warden, dogman, rigger, Permit Issuer or Receiver, or other specific health and safety role Contractors and procurement Your business needs to manage health and safety issues when procuring contractors and suppliers. The checks you do on the contractors you engage should enable you to be confident that they will do the work in a safe and healthy way. Think about what potential issues risks could be introduced by contractors, such as chemicals, dust, noise, and so on. This thinking could be included in a prequalification process, so that competent contractors are engaged. Clearly set out your health and safety expectations early in the procurement process (such as in the procurement documents or the briefing) so that contractors are clear what your expectations are. Ideally, expectations are set in multiple ways, so the importance of health and safety is not lost. Your expectations should be clear and very specific: for example, what risks the contractor’s workers are exposed to, what risks will the contractor processes introduce, and what expectations you have of the contractor’s workers when they are on your premises. Contractor and supplier selection and engagement considers each contractor’s health and safety management and performance, and includes enquiries into risk management and accident rates, safety checks and certification done on plant, competency of staff, how they assess the competence of their own contractors and so on. The competence of contractors (and their workers) and suppliers is assessed as part of procurement of contracting service. Reference For information about managing health and safety, you may find the following national and international resources useful. Note: guidance material is being developed all the time. Please keep checking WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators for more guidance. The UK core guidance on health and safety management for leaders, owners and line managers is HSG65 Managing for health and safety: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/hsg65.pdf WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 16 of 67 Information on the health and safety management of contractors (MBIE): http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe/information-guidance/all-guidance-items/aprincipals-guide-to-contracting-to-meet-the-health-and-safety-in-employment-act-19921/guide-contracting.pdf The NZ Institute of Directors published guidance documents that identify what good health and safety governance looks like, including more information on indicators: http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe/information-guidance/all-guidance-items/directorsguidelines-on-their-responsibilities What constitutes ‘competent health and safety advice’ will vary depending on the circumstances. The Health and Safety Association of New Zealand (HASANZ) has links to member organisations that can offer you competent advice for your risks: http://www.hasanz.org.nz/ The Olympic Delivery Authority has good information on safety in procurement: http://learninglegacy.independent.gov.uk/publications/health-and-safety-in-theprocurement-process.php WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 17 of 67 Standard 4: Senior leaders demonstrate their commitment to health and safety. Purpose What your business does and how it behaves is driven by your senior leaders. Senior leaders establish the tone and direction of risk management and understanding. Their example and decisions affect the health and safety outcomes throughout your business. Senior leaders’ commitment is translated into actions that promote and implement health and safety effectively. High expectations, tangible support and good practice from your senior leaders encourage similar behaviours in other managers and workers at all levels of your business. Guidance State of knowledge Effective senior leaders know how your business is performing. They understand the risk profile of your organisation. They recognise the gaps between how risks are currently managed, and how they want them to be managed. Their understanding is informed by: Senior leaders’ understanding of internal and external information is demonstrated in various ways. For example: Board minutes show health and safety is regularly discussed, priorities are set, and mandates are given for significant safety and health issues A Board member champions the health and safety portfolio WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 18 of 67 You may engage external health and safety experts to advise the Board The Board considers progress towards safety and health objectives. Your senior leaders should be extending the same due diligence requirements for health and safety risks as they do for all other identified business risks. Effective senior leaders: Know What the state of health and safety is in your business What good health and safety practice looks like in your business, how to get there, stay there, and continually improve Desire Understand To lead the business to good health and safety practices The steps needed to take to move the business from its current position to a model of good health and safety practices Their role and that they are ultimately accountable for health and safety Demonstrate Active commitment through their actions Ensure Others understand their roles and are accountable to senior management A clear plan is in place for actions that need to occur for the senior leaders to achieve your business’s health and safety goals. Leading by example Effective senior leaders lead by example. You demonstrate your interest and commitment through your actions by: Visibly supporting engagement with workers: speaking at meetings, sending out messages, instructing managers, and listening to workers Being visible – walking around and talking to workers about health and safety, or taking small numbers of workers on regular safety walk rounds Challenging unsafe behaviour and recognising good safety and health behaviour Modelling safe behaviour, such as always wearing the required PPE and attending health and safety training Talking to workers – then listening to their concerns and feedback Acting rapidly on suggestions or shortcomings, so that workers appreciate that the senior leaders are serious about safety Not compromising on health and safety even when pressure comes on, such as when deadlines are imminent or work falls behind schedule Displaying consistent behaviour with other leaders in the business Recognising/giving feedback to people who are performing well, such as seeing someone doing something safely or in a healthy way and rewarding them for it immediately Asking workers at all levels (including supervisors) about health and safety if you are in the workplace, for example, “What risks do they work with? How do you manage risk? Have you got what you need to do your role safely? What do they think you could do better?” Workers can see senior leaders’ commitment to health and safety through what they say and do. People Senior leaders are those that can influence the direction of a business. For example: WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 19 of 67 Board members Directors Officers of a PCBU (Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking) Site or senior managers The chief financial officer. Reference For information about managing health and safety, you may find the following national and international resources useful. Note: guidance material is being developed all the time. Please keep checking WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators for more guidance. The NZ Institute of Directors published guidance documents that identify what good health and safety governance looks like, including more information on indicators: http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe/information-guidance/all-guidance-items/directorsguidelines-on-their-responsibilities WorkSafe New Zealand has a safety culture snapshot on their website that helps you assess your business’s safety culture: http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe/toolsresources/health-and-safety-workplace-kit/safety-culture-snapshot WorkSafe New Zealand has some information on management commitment to safety on their website: http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe/tools-resources/health-and-safetyworkplace-kit/safety-culture-snapshot/safety-briefings/managements-leadershipcommitment-to-safety The Canterbury Rebuild Charter has guidance notes for health and safety leadership: http://safetycharter.org.nz/industry/improving-your-charter-performance/leadership/ The NZ Business Leaders’ Health and Safety Forum has some good information on leadership: http://www.zeroharm.org.nz/leadership/ SafeWork Australia has good information on leadership: http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/swa/australian-strategy/actionareas/pages/leadership-and-culture The Health and Safety Executive (UK) has an excellent publication INDG417 Leading Health and Safety at Work: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg417.pdf ACC provides some information for senior leaders on how to demonstrate their commitment: http://www.acc.co.nz/preventing-injuries/at-work/health-and-safety-in-theworkplace/health-and-safety-improvement-cycle/PI00066 WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 20 of 67 Standard 5: The business (with workers and representatives) communicates on health and safety matters 5.1 The content and delivery of health and safety communication meets the needs of the workplace. 5.2 The business (with workers and representatives) checks that health and safety communication is received and understood. 5.3 The business (with workers and representatives) has effective mechanisms for requesting, receiving and responding to feedback. 5.4 The business (with workers and representatives) gives positive reinforcement for safe practice and performance. 5.5 The business (with workers and representatives) effectively resolves disagreements or issues in a timely way Purpose Effective two-way communication is at the heart of effectively managing health and safety. It lets your workers, their representatives and you as a business have an ongoing conversation about improving health and safety. Talking, listening and co-operating with each other can help: Communication allows workers to be more engaged and understand their role in improving health and safety. Everyone will move in the same direction towards the same goals with effective communication. Poor communication can create confusion that can lead to apathy and poor health and safety outcomes. Guidance Communication forms Communication can be in the form of feedback on particular proposals or changes, suggestions for improvement, and identifying unsafe practices and other information. Even disputes and disagreements are a form of communication. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 21 of 67 Effective communication The elements of effective communication are: Encourage feedback even when it may be a message that is hard for the business to hear or to accept. Ask for feedback directly and always acknowledge feedback. Actively listen to your workers when they give you feedback and take account of that feedback Action feedback: when you receive suggestions or issues are raised, always ensure that the person receives feedback, even if the answer is “sorry and these are the reasons why”. The fact that the worker’s views are acknowledged and treated seriously is usually more important than agreeing with them. Publicise responses to workers’ suggestions. Communication that meets the needs of the workforce When your business is choosing what communication methods to use, think about the following: Issue Question you need to consider Example Reach Can all your workers be reached by this method? Email might reach office-based workers with a computer, but may not reach workers in a warehouse Understanding Will all your workers understand the communication? Some of your workers have English as a second language or low literacy Encouraging free and open communication What methods will encourage your workers to participate in health and safety? Information sharing What information needs to be shared? How do you share it in time to allow meaningful feedback? Some people may feel uncomfortable speaking up in a large group, or openly disagreeing with those in authority Providing information with only a few days to respond may make people feel that “the decision is already made” and that their thoughts and opinions don’t count WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 22 of 67 If you have workers who have problems understanding English, or have low literacy levels, it may be more difficult to get them involved. There are a number of ways you can help communication with them to encourage their involvement. The aim is to achieve the same standard of understanding and involvement for everyone. Provide written information in simple, plain English with pictures to help make difficult concepts more easily understood Get key information translated into the language spoken by your workers, and have someone who speaks both languages check that the translation is clear, accurate, and easily understood Use qualified translators to help communication with your workers, or you may have a worker that is fluent in English and the non-English language who can translate. Workers who act as translators may need training for this role. Use pictures and internationally understood pictorial signs Where information has to be in English, use clear and simple materials, and allow more time for those with English as a second language or low literacy to absorb the information. Most of the time one communication method is unlikely to be enough. Use a range of methods to suit your audiences: Make sure the methods you use are practical, and ensure communication is regular and ongoing. Is communication understood? You need assurance that the communication methods you’re using are getting the right messages to the right people in an appropriate timeframe and are being effective. Are the methods you are using appropriate for your workers? Look for evidence of changed behaviour as a result of communication: for example, if you have trained staff on a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), observe them to identify whether they have understood the training and are following the SOP. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 23 of 67 Getting feedback Your business needs to develop appropriate ways to get feedback on communication. For feedback on SOPs, you could observe the safe behaviour of your workers. Feedback on training could be verbal or by observation of how your workers are doing their job. It is a good idea to ask your workers about how useful any training they’ve received was to their work. Your business could use innovative feedback methods, including technology such as apps and smart technology, or computer kiosks for those that do not have regular computer access. Workers’ representatives can get feedback from their colleagues to pass on. Positive feedback to workers Positive feedback on effective safe and healthy practice and performance is bedded into effective businesses. Positive feedback comes from anyone in the business: managers to workers, workers to their peers, workers to managers, and so on. Remember that the most effective feedback is positive and immediate: the quicker you recognise effective behaviour, the more likely you are to get further good behaviour. Recognise and communicate achievements not only directly to the deserving individual, but publicly as well. Encourage and reward people for: Providing essential safety-related information Identifying unsafe or unhealthy behaviour Raising issues Making suggestions or recommendations to improve your workplace. Raising issues or risks can be uncomfortable or threatening for people. Make a point of publicly recognising workers who constructively raise issues to encourage that behaviour. Praise can be given: Informally and spontaneously, such as seeing and praising behaviour Formally, such as certificates, awards, rewards, being recognised in meeting minutes, communications/newsletters/bulletins, and emails. Not acting on communication from workers If you don’t act on feedback from workers, make sure you explain why and discuss it. It is important for your business to respond to feedback, even if the business cannot action the recommendation. This means that people are more likely to understand the reasons behind the decision, and will continue to provide feedback. If the communication was a written recommendation from a health and safety representative or committee, you are required to explain to them why you are not following their recommendation. This communication should be in writing. Where there are actions consider the following: Resolve actions in a timely way Communicate actions to people in a timely way using an appropriate method WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 24 of 67 Resource actions Assign responsibilities to undertake actions and hold people accountable for completing them Follow up actions Report on the actions. Once the actions are complete they should be monitored to make sure they are effective. Anything you learnt from the situation should be integrated into existing processes to improve the process. Issue resolution The goal of dispute and issue resolution is to solve problems and maintain healthy working relationships. When an issue surfaces, address it immediately so everyone can move forward. A dispute or disagreement will generally be about an unresolved situation or an issue that has not been resolved to the worker’s or business’s satisfaction. For example, an issue could include a difference in opinion on whether something is a potential risk to health and safety or whether a particular control measure is adequate. Other issues may involve the means by which workers are consulted or participate in health and safety decisions. For effective dispute or disagreement resolution there would generally be: An established, just, and clearly defined process to resolve the disagreement before the disagreement becomes significant The opportunity for workers and their representatives have input into that process A process where the issue can be swiftly resolved. A typical process would include the following steps: WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 25 of 67 People Open communication applies to everyone at all levels of a business. Managers should communicate their vision and objectives, as well as those of your business. Routinely discussing the business vision can improve your worker’s engagement with the business, and their personal accountability for achieving success. Good communication requires good people skills. Your business cannot assume ‘everything is okay’ because no-one has said otherwise. Reference For information about managing health and safety, you may find the following national and international resources useful. Note: guidance material is being developed all the time. Please keep checking WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators for more guidance. The Health and Safety Executive (UK) has some good guidance on ways to involve your workers in health and safety in HSG263 Involving your workforce in health and safety: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/books/hsg263.htm ACC highlights some ways health and safety messages can be communicated efficiently and accurately: http://www.acc.co.nz/preventing-injuries/at-work/health-and-safety-in-theworkplace/health-and-safety-improvement-cycle/PI00067 The London Olympic Delivery Authority used visual standards to provide simple communication tools: http://learninglegacy.independent.gov.uk/publications/benefits-ofusing-visual-standards.php The London Olympic Delivery Authority had some innovative ways of using awards to change behaviour: http://learninglegacy.independent.gov.uk/publications/using-an-awards-processto-change-behaviour-and-performa.php WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 26 of 67 Standard: 6: The business engages and empowers workers and representatives. 6.1 The business actively engages and empowers workers and representatives in health and safety. 6.2 The diversity of the workforce is represented on health and safety matters. 6.3 Workers and representatives are involved in health and safety activities. 6.4 The business’s workers and representatives are engaged in decision-making processes that impact on their health and safety Purpose Effective businesses actively engage and empower people in health and safety. Managers hear from those most closely involved in working with risks. Workers know that their concerns and understanding of their work risks will be taken seriously. Guidance Actively engaging and empowering workers and their representatives People, who feel valued and contribute to decision-making, play a big part in high-performing workplaces. Effective health and safety behaviour cannot just be dictated from the boardroom. Effective senior leaders collaborate with workers to effectively manage health and safety. Workplaces where workers contribute to decision making about health and safety are safer and healthier. Empowering your workforce, giving them the right skills, and getting them involved in making decisions shows them that you take their wellbeing seriously. They can raise concerns and offer solutions. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 27 of 67 Representing diversity You need to think about the diversity of your workforce and the complexities of your work environment. You may have responsibilities to engage with them all. In particular consider how you’re going to engage with the following people and work patterns: Vulnerable groups Older and younger workers New or expectant mothers Workers with English as a second language, or low levels of literacy or numeracy New workers, or workers on transfer from other parts of the business Workers with underlying health issues that may put them at increased risk Other businesses affected by your work Where there are two or more businesses whose work activity can affect each other Non-standard work patterns Contractors and sub-contractors Temporary or casual workers Night-shift workers Maintenance staff Offsite and lone workers Workers on loan or seconded from another business If you share your workplace with another business or your work might impact on their work, consider how your work affects others and how their work affects you. The business should talk to each other about the risk controls that are in place in both workplaces, and you both understand the controls and the requirements placed on both businesses by those risks. Participation arrangements, such as committees, are required to reflect the diversity of the workforce including gender, ethnicity, socio-economic status, and employment and engagement arrangements. Engaging workers and representatives in decision-making Workers and their representatives should be involved as individuals or groups in a number of situations. For example: WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 28 of 67 Significant changes can include: Changes to hours of work or shift work rosters Development of a new product Plans for a new project Changes to required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Introduction of a new system or process New machinery or substances (or changes) Revised timing and completion deadlines. Business restructuring. Workers and their representatives are part of: Incident and accident investigations Risk identification, assessment and management Task analysis Development of Standard Operating Procedures Monitoring activities such as inspections, tours, assessments and so on. Health and safety audits Identifying worker participation processes Identifying facilities for workers’ welfare, such as access to toilets, bathrooms, kitchen and eating facilities away from the risks of the work processes. Engagement with workers and representatives Engagement on health and safety is an interactive process between you and your workers and their representatives: WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 29 of 67 The key to effective engagement is to allow sufficient time for the process, make sure that everybody is involved, and listen and take account of what your workers have to say. People Ensure the health and safety committee members are partners, working together to address strategic matters, and day to day matters are resolved elsewhere. Reference For information about managing health and safety, you may find the following national and international resources useful. Note: guidance material is being developed all the time. Please keep checking WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators for more guidance. The Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment (MBIE) issued some guidance on getting staff involved in safety for the mining, quarrying and tunnelling industries, but the guidelines have good ideas for all industries: http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe/informationguidance/all-guidance-items/people-come-first/people-come-first.pdf The Health and Safety Executive (UK) has some good guidance on ways to empower your workers in health and safety in HSG263 Involving your workforce in health and safety: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/books/hsg263.htm WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 30 of 67 Standard: 7: The business (with workers and representatives) measures health and safety performance. 7.1 The business (with workers and representatives) effectively measures health and safety performance against its objectives. 7.2 The business effectively measures the performance of individuals against their health and safety responsibilities. 7.3 The business (with workers and representatives) measures the health and safety performance of contractors. Purpose It is difficult to improve how your business manages health and safety unless you know how you are performing. Health and safety performance measurement is critical to identifying problems before they cause harm, and knowing what steps to take when issues do arise. Guidance Measuring performance You measure the performance of the business and your workers (including your contractors). Some examples of ways of measuring performance are below. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 31 of 67 Measuring against objectives When you set health and safety objectives, you need to know if you have achieved those objectives. Setting measures identifies how close the business has come to achieving its vision and objectives. Indicator types The kinds of indicators used are often called lead and lag indicators. They are tailored to your business context (for example composition of your workforce) and risk profile. They measure: Performance against objectives and activities in the health and safety plan Performance of everyday risk management activities that align with the risk profile, effectiveness of controls, problem areas, potential issues (for example as a result of change) Behaviours that are likely to improve health and safety, such as reporting and engagement with workers The successful implementation and completion of actions: actions could come from the outcomes of investigations, issues being raised, disputes, suggestions etc. Illnesses and harm identified by health monitoring. A range of leading and lagging indicators are used to get a wider picture of business performance. Effective monitoring can alert you to any problems, hopefully before any serious incidents occur. Poor monitoring might tell you that something is wrong but may not help you understand why, or what to do about it. The absence of an event does not mean that the risk is being appropriately managed. This is particularly true for risks that have serious consequences. Lead indicators are safety and health activities that you do proactively as part of risk management and are linked to your vision/goals, plans and objectives. Lead indicators include: Number of workers have been trained in role-specific competencies in a specific period Number of safety inspections carried out by management and workers or workers’ representatives, and the level of compliance with risk controls Number of risk assessments carried out Number of contractors have completed contractor accreditation processes Percentage of agreed actions closed out on time Amount of preventative, planned, or other maintenance carried out Number of near miss reports made and investigated Number of observations or safety tours that identified areas for improvement How health monitoring data has been used to inform risk management processes Lead indicators help your business establish a baseline to drive your continuous improvement in health and safety. Each lead indicator you use should have a SMART measure attached to it, to make it clear if you are achieving it. Lag indicators measure how your business has performed in the past. For example: Accident statistics: how many injuries, the severity of injuries, how many accidents, incidents you have had (includes frequency and severity), lost workdays The number of ACC claims How long it took to complete corrective actions from events WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 32 of 67 Over-exposure to noise or chemicals identified from health monitoring. Lag indicators are “after the fact” measures of risk management, such as accident and ill health statistics for risks. Numbers alone are not a good measure. Analysis of the underlying root causes, trends and factors will show you much more about how your business is keeping everyone healthy and safe. Root cause analyses or investigations can be used to drive your continual improvement. For example, if the lagging indicator shows a reduction in injuries, the business may become complacent, when in fact there are numerous risk factors present in the workplace that will contribute to future injuries, or the level of reporting has dropped away and you have poorer data to base decisions on. Monitoring Monitoring should be ongoing and improvements should be made when issues are identified. Monitoring covers: People Workers, managers, contractors, and senior leaders of a business are all involved in measuring performance. Reference For information about managing health and safety, you may find the following national and international resources useful. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 33 of 67 Note: guidance material is being developed all the time. Please keep checking WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators for more guidance. The MBIE principal’s guide to contracting has some good information about indicators and benchmarking that are aimed at the contracting environment, but are relevant within all businesses: http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe/information-guidance/all-guidance-items/aprincipals-guide-to-contracting-to-meet-the-health-and-safety-in-employment-act-19921/guide-contracting.pdf The UK guidance on health and safety management for leaders, owners and line managers is HSG65 Managing for health and safety has some good examples of performance management: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/hsg65.pdf The Business Leaders’ Health and Safety Forum has an online benchmarking tool that may be useful: http://www.zeroharm.org.nz/our-work/benchmarking/ WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 34 of 67 Standard: 8: The business (with workers and representatives) reviews and continually improves its health and safety performance. 8.1 The business (with workers and representatives) reviews its health and safety performance, and adjusts objectives and plans as a result. 8.2 The business (with workers and representatives) responds quickly and proportionately to change, failures and critical events. 8.3 The business (with workers and representatives) explores new ideas and ways of working to improve health and safety. 8.4 The business (with workers and representatives) applies learning across the business. Reviewing your business’s health and safety performance will enable your business to continually improve how you manage health and safety. You will know: whether your performance is improving or not whether your objectives are being achieved where you need to focus your efforts in future so you can reset your objectives and goals. Reviewing your performance means that you can plan to improve what you have done in the past, find new and innovative ways to manage risk, and send workers home safe at the end of their work day or shift. Guidance Reviewing performance and adjusting objectives As you review your business’s performance, sometimes you will identify that an objective needs to be changed due to changes in business circumstances. If this happens, it is important to make sure that the risk is still adequately controlled. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 35 of 67 You may have identified that a large machinery guarding project was required, and set a completion date for the objective of six months. During the installation of guards it was identified that one machine was more difficult to guard than expected due to its location in the plant, and would take longer than the allocated time to complete the work. The business may then revise the six months’ completion date for the objective to allow for the more difficult installation and installed some temporary controls, although the intent to make the machinery safe has not changed. Responding to change, failures, and critical events Your business needs to be agile in responding to change within your business environment (inside and outside the business). Change can introduce new health and safety risks, such as new equipment, new work patterns, or new environmental risks (dust, noise, chemicals, and so on). If you have an equipment or process failure, you will need to react in a timely way to control the increased risks caused by equipment and processes operating in non-standard ways. Managing failures in your business involves you using risk assessment processes to ensure that people are not exposed to increased risks caused by the equipment failure. Critical events such as emergency situations or major equipment malfunctions can expose people to higher levels of risk, as any risk controls in place have usually been compromised by what’s gone wrong. You will need to have robust emergency processes that control critical events as quickly and safely as possible. Exploring new ideas and ways of working One of the key signs that you’re responsive to health and safety concerns is keeping up-to-date on innovations and new technology in your industry, and others that have similar processes to you, that may help you to better control or manage your risks, or make it easier for your workers and representatives to be involved in health and safety management. Applying what you have learnt across your business When you have learnt something from a critical event or a change, it is important to ensure that the lessons you have learnt are shared across the business, especially if your business is complex or located across multiple sites. For example, you identified during an investigation into a critical failure that there is a design fault in a piece of key equipment used on every site in your business, which has been brought to the manufacturer’s attention to be fixed. It is important that the whole business is told about the fault, so that all of these pieces of equipment are fixed on all of your sites, not just some of them. People Ultimate accountability for managing health and safety rests with your business leaders. However everyone is accountable for managing health and safety risk within their own roles. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 36 of 67 Reference For information about managing health and safety, you may find the following national and international resources useful. Note: guidance material is being developed all the time. Please keep checking WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators for more guidance. The NZ Institute of Directors published guidance documents that identify what good health and safety governance looks like, including more information on reviewing and continuous improvement: http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe/information-guidance/all-guidanceitems/directors-guidelines-on-their-responsibilities The Business Leaders’ Health and Safety Forum has a page with good links for health and safety management in high hazard businesses: http://www.zeroharm.org.nz/assets/docs/events/2012/process-safety-seminar/links-to-usefulmaterial.pdf ACC provides guidance on what and how to review your H&S systems: http://www.acc.co.nz/preventing-injuries/at-work/health-and-safety-in-the-workplace/healthand-safety-improvement-cycle/PI00069 WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 37 of 67 Standard: 9. The business reintegrates injured and ill employees. 9.1 The business reintegrates injured and ill employees into the workforce in a timely and sustainable way with support from employee representatives. Purpose Injuries and illnesses have a ripple effect on everyone involved. The injured or ill person and their families and friends may have physical pain, distress, detachment, loss of income, loss of networks and friends, and so on. There may also be major impact on your business, such as: Lost productivity Damage to your business reputation Lowered worker morale Worker presenteeism, that is workers being less productive because they are at work when they are sick or struggling with chronic conditions Increased staff turnover Increased bottom line costs from investigations, legal costs, and cover for injured or ill staff members It is important to your business, and to the recovery of your injured or ill staff members, that the business has processes in place to facilitate their return. Guidance Effective health and safety practice identifies that graduated return to work should be offered to all injured and ill employees, regardless of the cause of the illness or where the injury happened. As an employer, it is your responsibility to provide this support in an effective way so that returning workers do not put themselves or others at risk. Processes that form part of a graduated return to work programme include: Provision of return to work duties (sometimes called ‘light’ or ‘alternative’ duties) Appropriate equipment to support their injury or illness WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 38 of 67 Flexible working conditions, such as modified start or finish times where possible as advised by the employee’s medical team. The goal of graduated return to work is to return the employee back to work. Returning the employee to their role is the most desirable outcome and the one you and your employee should be aiming for. Only if it is not possible should other options such as retraining and redeployment to another role be considered. If this happens the work should be meaningful. Sometimes it is not possible to reintegrate an employee. This might be because: They do not want to return to work The nature of their injury/illness and their skills means a return is not possible. Try to avoid making hasty decisions, and encourage the employee to do the same. Exhaust all the options and be absolutely clear why a return to work is not appropriate. Planning for return to work Early contact Graduated return to work should start early. Get in touch with your employees early in their illness or injury, and then stay in touch at regular intervals. This is the first step in their reintegration back to the workplace. Consider who is best placed to have initial contact with the employee. Usually this would be their line manager but for some situations such as stress you might want to think about whether another person might be more appropriate. Where line managers have responsibility for contacting the employee, they may need some guidance on how to approach the return to work process. Return to work assessment Inform your planning with a return to work assessment of the employee’s condition and their job. This will inform you how their condition might affect and be affected by their job. Incorporate regular reviews, so the plan can be adapted as things change. Casual reviews may be needed if something changes or the plan is not working, for example, if the worker’s injury or illness gets worse. People The employer, the injured or ill employee, their representatives and medical team, and any identified support people. Reference For information about managing health and safety, you may find the following national and international resources useful. Note: guidance material is being developed all the time. Please keep checking WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators for more guidance. The ACC website Managing Employee Injuries has useful information and links on good practice and injury management, and how ACC can help: http://www.acc.co.nz/for-business/smallmedium-and-large-business/managing-employee-injuries/index.htm WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 39 of 67 ACC Injury management / back on the job guide for industry: http://www.acc.co.nz/forbusiness/small-medium-and-large-business/managing-employee-injuries/injury-managementguide-for-industry/index.htm WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 40 of 67 Standard: 10. The business (with workers and representatives) identifies risks. 10.1 The business (with workers and representatives) effectively identifies risks to health and safety. 10.2 The business (with workers and representatives) effectively identifies risks arising from the activities of other parties. Purpose You cannot control your business’s risks if you don’t know what they are. Risk identification is the first step in the risk management process. Once you have identified and assessed your risks, you can think about how you’re going to manage those risks. Guidance What is risk identification? Risk identification considers how harm might be caused and what can harm people (workers, visitors and other people such as your clients or customers) in your workplace. You should think about the risks from within your business, risks that may be introduced by other work done within your business (such as work done by contractors), and risks from other activities that could affect you, such as businesses nearby. When you are looking for risks in your business, think about the full range of exposure from low level to serious or catastrophic. Any risk that could cause notifiable injuries or illnesses, or notifiable events such as unplanned explosions, should be classed as a risk for your risk profile. The outcome doesn’t need to have happened in your business for it to be a risk. For example, just because no-one has been hurt on an unguarded piece of equipment in your business doesn’t mean that the equipment does not pose a risk. You learn from the experience of other businesses that have had serious events, and consider the most credible serious outcome when you’re deciding how risky a situation is. When you identify your risks, you need to think about risks to both the safety of people, and the risks to their health in both the short and long term. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 41 of 67 Areas of risk Some examples Physical Risks from your plant, equipment and structures Pressure vessels Work at height, confined spaces and so on Falling objects Slippery surfaces Chemical Hazardous substances at your workplace Chemical storage and use Occupational environment Noise Dust Fumes and steams Extremes of temperature (very hot and very cold) Vibration Weather Ergonomic Difficult access to work areas Requirements to over-reach Manual handling Work area setup (all work areas, not just computer workstations) Interaction of people with machinery and equipment Location of switches and shaping of handles How work processes are arranged Non-routine operations Changes to plant and processes Psychosocial Stress Violence Threats Fatigue Bullying Sleep deprivation Shiftwork Work practices, such as productivity incentives that drive unsafe behaviour Biological Bacteria and viruses Insects Birds Exposure to animal or human bodily fluids or body parts Radiation X-rays Caesium 137 Cobalt UV radiation (from sun or other UV emitters) Activity Driving Routine and non-routine maintenance Cleaning Installing and removing structures, plant and equipment WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 42 of 67 How to identify risks Good practice is to use more than one method to identify risks. This means that you’re more likely to identify a wider range of risk areas. Remember in each of these methods, you should apply information put out by regulators and from other businesses to help you identify your risks. There are many ways of identifying risks in your business. Good practice will use as many of the following methods as possible. Internal and external sources of risk Risks can arise from your own business processes, and from other businesses nearby that may affect you. Businesses are required under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 to communicate and WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 43 of 67 consult and co-ordinate with each other about risks that could have wider implications for other businesses. Super Kitchens shares a narrow driveway with ABC Logistics that has deliveries made in large truck and trailer units. Super Kitchens has identified that the deliveries are a risk to the visitors and staff coming to their showroom. They consult and communicate with ABC Logistics about managing the risks associated with the mobile plant movements from forklifts and trucks at ABC Logistics. After the discussions, ABC Logistics and Super Kitchens together created a clearly-marked safe walkway for pedestrians with barriers to keep them isolated from the mobile plant movements. Super Kitchens put up a sign advising showroom visitors to use the path because of the risks of forklift and truck movements. . This information sharing applies to all businesses that could affect others, including office buildings where two or more organisations are sharing the building. People Risk identification considers who might be harmed and how they might be harmed, and it is best done in a group, including workers and workers’ representatives. Involve all types of workers in your risk identification process, not just those that are easy to work with. In particular consider the risks to the following groups, and consider how you can engage with these workers. Workers with requirements New and young workers Workers with English as a second language New or expectant mothers Workers with disabilities, injuries or illnesses Shiftworkers Lone workers Contractors Mobile workers Those who are not at work all the time Lone workers Mobile workers Casual workers Seasonal workers Visitors Temporary workers Contractors and sub-contractors Shared workplaces or risks Workplaces that are close together, or where or when their risks may overlap or impact on each other WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 44 of 67 Ask your workers if there is anyone else that needs to be included in risk identification processes. Reference For information about managing health and safety, you may find the following national and international resources useful. Note: guidance material is being developed all the time. Please keep checking WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators for more guidance. The Health and Safety Executive (UK) has a helpful publication called INDG163 Risk assessment: a brief guide to controlling risks in the workplace that has some excellent guidance on risk identification: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg163.pdf The MBIE document Guidance for a hazard management system for mines contains some useful general risk identification advice as well as specific information for mining: http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe/information-guidance/all-guidance-items/hazardmanagement-system-for-mines/hazard-management-system-for-mines.pdf WorkSafe Victoria (Australia) has a useful tool for risk identification and control for the mining industry, but it can be used more widely: http://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/forms-andpublications/forms-and-publications/risk-control-self-assessment-tool ACC’s Discomfort, Pain, and Injury (DPI) toolkit assists businesses to manage the risks of strain and sprain injuries, and includes a useful injury cost calculator: http://www.acc.co.nz/preventing-injuries/at-work/workplace-health-issues/pi00082 The Olympic Delivery Authority’s Learning Legacy contains information on combining occupational health with safety: http://learninglegacy.independent.gov.uk/publications/occupational-health-the-combinedapproach-of-both-clinic.php WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 45 of 67 Standard 11: The business (with workers and representatives) assesses risks. 11.1 The business (with workers and representatives) uses an effective assessment process appropriate to the risk. 11.2 The business (with workers and representatives) reviews risk assessments associated with significant change. Purpose Risk assessment is where you consider how bad the outcome could be (consequence) and how likely it is that a particular event could occur (likelihood). It is not uncommon to underestimate the level of risk of a given activity, which is why it is important to consider the information provided from groups such as regulators and your industry in New Zealand and overseas. Just because a particular event hasn’t happened in your business doesn’t mean it isn’t a risk. Guidance Assessing the risk is linked with identifying the controls that are required to manage that risk to an acceptable level. When you assess the risk, you need to consider the context of the operation. A large hole in the ground in the middle of a footpath on a busy street is a higher risk than a similar hole out in the middle of a backcountry mountain range. This is due to the likelihood that someone could fall in. It would be appropriate to fill in the hole (eliminating the risk) in the footpath, with fencing around the hole until the concrete sets (engineering control). In the case of the hole in the backcountry, appropriate controls may be to warn trampers that the ground is uneven and to be adequately equipped. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 46 of 67 How risk assessment is done Your risk assessment methodology should be sophisticated enough for the level of risk faced by your business. There is no one way to do it. The things you need to think about are: who is exposed to the risk how likely is it that they will be exposed what is the worst credible outcome. The key question once you’ve identified and assessed the risk is: what steps or controls do you need to stop this event happening (eliminate) or to minimise the consequences for people, plant, and equipment? Some businesses use a risk matrix to help them prioritise the level of risk. There are a number of different types of risk matrices. A simple example is shown below: Likelihood risk will occur Consequence (outcome) of risk Low Moderate Severe Unlikely Low risk Low risk Moderate risk Moderately likely Low risk Moderate risk High risk Moderate risk High risk High risk Very likely Using external information External information should be used as part of risk assessment. Managing risks associated with changes in your business Health and safety should be embedded into your change management business process. Risk assessments should be reviewed before any significant change in your business operations, WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 47 of 67 equipment or processes. You need to plan to allow enough time and resources to control the risks before the change process fully begins. The impacts of change on health and safety should be thought about in two parts: The purpose of risk assessment during change is to: Identify potential issues or risk that could arise before the change begins Identify potential issues or risks arising during the change Identify potential issues or risks arising once the change is complete Potential flow on impacts to other areas not directly affected by the change, such as if you overhaul machinery. Examples of change risks: Change risk Examples During the change Temporary premises may have different risks and controls Maintenance may affect downstream work Stress from restructuring or changing business practices After the change New equipment may have different risks and require changed controls New equipment or processes may affect downstream work or workplace layout More capability (workers, equipment, time, resources) may be required Direct and indirect effects Maintenance of equipment may impact the workers that are using the equipment Workers and representatives should be involved early in planning changes, in discussions and decisions on procurement and design, and at the appropriate stage of the change process. A key part of considering health and safety when you’re changing your business is to identify what new risk controls should be put in place and which existing ones are no longer required or need to be updated (see the section on controlling risks). You will need to identify which of your risk assessments need to be updated before, during and after the change process, and identify any updated or new controls for those risks. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 48 of 67 People Workers and their representatives should be involved in your risk assessment processes. They are in the workplace and are more likely to notice things that are not obvious to you. They are also more likely to have a good idea about what works and what does not. Reference For information about managing health and safety, you may find the following national and international resources useful. Note: guidance material is being developed all the time. Please keep checking WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators for more guidance. The UK core guidance on health and safety management for leaders, owners and line managers is HSG65 Managing for health and safety: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/hsg65.pdf The UK guidance INDG163 Risk Assessment contains some excellent information on the risk management process: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg163.pdf ACC’s Discomfort, Pain, and Injury toolkit includes HabitAtWork, an online tool for helping businesses manage strain and sprain risks: http://www.habitatwork.co.nz/ WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 49 of 67 Standard 12: The business (with workers and representatives) applies risk controls. 12.1 The business (with workers and representatives) effectively applies a hierarchy of risk control. 12.2 The business (with workers and representatives) considers applicable standards when implementing risk controls. 12.3 The business (with workers and representatives) effectively manages risk associated with suppliers and contractors. 12.4 The business (with workers and representatives) cooperates with other relevant parties when managing risks. Purpose Once you have assessed the risks, it is important that you put in effective controls to eliminate or minimise the risks as far as reasonably practicable. These controls are intended to protect your workers and others who may be affected by your work activities from being harmed at work. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 50 of 67 Guidance Hierarchy of risk control Risks should be reduced to the lowest reasonably practicable level by putting controls in place that reduce the likelihood of the event occurring. This is what is meant by a ‘hierarchy of control’. You are required to work from Level 1 do what is reasonably practicable to eliminate risk first, then do what is reasonably practicable to use Level 2 controls, and if that is ineffective, supplement them with Level 3 controls. Level 3 controls on their own are generally ineffective as they rely on people to comply with the controls. The best way to control risk is to get rid of the risk all together: eliminate them. Some examples of elimination are redesigning the job or equipment, or putting in a new process, tool, machine or substance so that the risk is removed or eliminated. You do what is reasonably practicable to create a safe place for people to work, rather than relying on controls that make a safe person. Where this is not reasonably practicable, minimise the risk that remains: level 2 controls create a safer and healthier work environment for workers than just using level 3 controls. Level 3 controls support the higher-level controls. Where good practice guidelines or guides exist, follow them. Many controls are already well documented. If there is a documented control, you need to do what is reasonably practicable to make sure the control is suitable and put in place. If the control is not suitable, you need to clearly identify in your risk assessment process why it is not, and what alternatives you’re going to use instead. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 51 of 67 MakeIt Manufacturing guarded all of their process equipment for when it is in use, making a safe work area for their workers. The maintenance engineers at MakeIt plan their maintenance tasks using a safe system of work for when they have to remove the guarding to repair and maintain equipment. They have also installed inching buttons so they can safely check that their repairs are effective. When the operators at MakeIt are cleaning the machines, they are all fully isolated using personal locks so that there is no way the machinery can be started until everyone has finished. If you can’t eliminate the risk, think about controls to minimise risk. The list below sets out the order to follow when planning to minimise risks you have identified in your workplace: WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 52 of 67 A note about PPE: You should only use PPE as a control for risk exposure after all the previous measures have been tried and found ineffective in controlling the risks to a reasonably practicable level. For example, where you cannot eliminate the risk of dust created during your work process, use specific ventilation to reduce dust levels (engineering control). If ventilation cannot fully control the risk of dust exposure, you could use task rotation to reduce a worker’s exposure. If that control is ineffective, respiratory protective equipment (RPE) may be required, and all controls should be recorded in the SOP. Remember, PPE does not control the risk, and it is a control of last resort, because it requires workers to wear and maintain it properly. If necessary, PPE should be selected and fitted by a competent person to ensure that the worker is fully protected. Workers must be trained on how to use it properly, and you must clean, store and maintain it in good condition. Non-use of PPE should be treated as a breach of workers’ employment conditions and treated as a disciplinary matter. What to think about when selecting controls When selecting possible controls in your risk assessment, you will have considered: Question to consider Examples Will the control you choose introduce any new risks? Downstream risks, such as the introduction of a forklift to reduce manual handling could introduce more serious mobile plant risks Are the introduced risks better or worse than the original risk? The mobile plant risks introduced by the forklift could need traffic management planning and physical separation of workers from mobile plant Will your new control change or modify an existing risk control to make it less effective? Introduction of new equipment may make it harder to reach existing equipment for operation or maintenance How user-friendly is the control? The new control could make it harder for workers to do their job and so they find ways around it: for example, introducing controlled access areas making it harder for workers to get to their workplaces, meaning they go around the barriers or prop controlled doors open Is the control proportionate to the risk? Issuing a full hazmat suit to protect workers against controls might be an overreaction What actions do you need to plan or schedule to reinforce the controls? You may need to plan training, meetings, toolbox or prestart talks, poster campaigns and so on, to help workers understand why the new controls are in place Involving and consulting workers in selecting risk controls should answer a lot of these questions. Residual risk Once you have controlled the risk, you are often left with ‘residual’ or ’leftover’ risk: for example, once you have erected barriers around a frangible (breakable) skylight to protect workers on the roof from falling through it, the residual risk might be that someone falls over the temporary barrier and falls through the skylight. The likelihood of this happening is very low, and so you can decide that you are comfortable with the degree of ‘residual risk’. However, if the controls around the WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 53 of 67 skylight were simply instructions to be careful around the skylight, the residual risk is significantly higher due to weak controls, and therefore unacceptable. Further controls will be required. Applicable standards You are not left on your own when trying to identify appropriate controls for the risks you’ve identified. There is a lot of guidance produced that you can look at to help you choose controls for your risks. Good guidance is available from a number of places. Some examples are given below: Contractors Controlling the risks introduced by using contractors includes using administrative controls such as checking competence, which could include a formal contractor prequalification. The contractor’s activities will need to be assessed and managed. You cannot only rely on the contractor to manage the risks of their activities. Risk controls should be agreed between you and your contractors, and actively monitored and reviewed by both contractor and principal. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 54 of 67 You need to be confident that you have undertaken sufficiently detailed assessments so that you are confident that the activities your contractors are engaged in are not putting your workers at risk, and that your activities and premises are not exposing your contractors to risk either. Co-operating with other relevant parties Risk controls need to take into account other relevant parties that may affect your risks. For example, if you share a building with another business and you were planning renovations that would create a lot of dust and noise, you are required to consult with other businesses in the building to ensure that the risks of dust and noise are managed so that they do not affect the activities of other businesses. People The following people should be involved in selecting risk controls: Group Reason Workers and representatives More likely to observe the risk and how controls work in practice Suppliers May have new or innovative ways to control known industry risks Contractors Affected by the risk and its controls Other relevant parties May be affected by your risk controls Reference For information about managing health and safety, you may find the following national and international resources useful. Note: guidance material is being developed all the time. Please keep checking WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators for more guidance. The UK core guidance on health and safety management for leaders, owners and line managers is HSG65 Managing for health and safety: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/hsg65.pdf The UK guidance INDG163 Risk Assessment contains some excellent information on the risk management process: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg163.pdf WorkSafe New Zealand has a large number of resources available on their website www.business.govt.nz/worksafe under the information and guidance menu Guidance sorted by risk type can be found on WorkSafe New Zealand’s website here: http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe/information-guidance/guidance-by-hazard-type and on the Health and Safety Executive (UK) website here: http://www.hse.gov.uk/guidance/topics.htm Industry-specific guidance can be found on the Health and Safety Executive (UK) website at http://www.hse.gov.uk/guidance/industries.htm and on WorkSafe New Zealand’s website: http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe/information-guidance/guidance-by-industry ACC’s guide How to work safely in risky situations has some clear, simple advice on how to work safely around significant risk areas: http://www.acc.co.nz/PRD_EXT_CSMP/groups/external_ip/documents/publications_promot ion/pi00353.pdf WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 55 of 67 WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 56 of 67 Standard 13. The business (with workers and representatives) checks that risk controls are in place and are effective, and takes any corrective actions 13.1 The business (with workers and representatives) checks that risk controls are in place and are effective 13.2 The business (with workers and representatives) takes corrective action, where required Purpose Having risk controls in place in your business does not mean they will always continue to be effective, or that they were effective in the first place. You will need to check or monitor how effectively you are controlling your identified risks. This process can reassure you and your workers and workers’ representatives. It can also help identify weaknesses in your controls and any corrective actions needed to fix the weaknesses. Guidance Checking or monitoring your risks and their controls involves knowing what the controls were designed to be, and checking that they are still in place and still controlling the risk as they were intended to do. Controls do not always remain in place. For example, you may have erected a barrier to protect workers from a piece of equipment. Over time, people have forgotten why the barrier was there, and found it made it hard to move around the workplace, so it was removed. Remember that controls also include behaviour and administrative controls such as Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and your business processes. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 57 of 67 Some types of risk monitoring or checking include: One form of monitoring is health surveillance. This is where you use medical testing of your employees to confirm that your risk controls are effective. During routine blood lead level testing, a worker at a metal recycling plant was identified to have an elevated blood lead level. An investigation was carried out: the worker was wearing all required PPE, washing hands before eating and after going to the toilet, and following all procedural controls. However, it was identified that the worker smoked rollyour-own cigarettes, and didn’t wash their hands before rolling the cigarette or smoking it. The worker was stood down until their blood lead level was within safe levels, and they were retrained and supervised in their practice around lead. Any health surveillance testing must be done with the employees’ informed consent, as the testing is medical and subject to all the requirements of the Health Information Privacy Code and the Privacy Act 1993. When you’re using health surveillance as a monitoring measure, it is important to establish a baseline when your employee begins work with you, test their exposure at least annually, and have an exit test when they leave you. This means that you have tracked their exposure to the risk the whole time they are working with you, and if there are any long-term consequences to their exposure, you have clear records of their exposure and health. When you put a health surveillance programme in place, you also need to establish what your processes are if one of your employees returns a test that shows they have been exposed to the risk. You will also need clear processes for critical event testing. For example, if there is an explosion on WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 58 of 67 your site, you will need all of the employees that were exposed to the explosion to have audiometry and spirometry (hearing and lung function) testing immediately after the explosion. You may also need testing for chemical exposure, depending on the nature of the explosion and on an ongoing basis, to confirm and monitor any damage caused by the event. Your health surveillance programme should feed back into your overall risk management processes. If you have noticed from your health surveillance that a certain group of your workers has been exposed to the risk, you need to go and check why that group is showing exposure, including whether the controls on that risk are effective and are being fully implemented. If the controls are fully implemented, then you will need to reassess the risk and apply more robust controls. Important note: health surveillance is not a risk control in itself. It is a monitoring method to check risk controls are working and must be used to inform overall risk management without compromising the privacy of the employees involved. Occupational environment monitoring You carry out occupational environment monitoring, such as noise surveys, dust fall testing, chemical fume tests, vibration or radiation testing, asbestos testing, heavy metals testing, and so on, to ensure that the controls for the environmental risks are working adequately. Much of the environmental testing may require the assistance of experts such as occupational hygienists or occupational health nurses. Maintaining risk controls in good working order Another form of monitoring is planned or preventative maintenance on the risk controls and the equipment they’re protecting, to ensure that the equipment is always working at optimum efficiency. This reduces the likelihood of unplanned interventions such as fixing breakdowns (which introduces risk). Corrective action When you identify that a risk control is not working, you need to put corrective actions in place to control the risk, and then identify why the risk control is not working the way it was intended to. What actions are appropriate for you to take will depend on the level of the risk. If the risk is likely to cause immediate serious injury or damage to plant or equipment, the most effective control may be to stop the process until more permanent risk controls are found. People Workers, contractors, representatives, senior and line managers are all involved in risk monitoring. Your workers and their representatives are key people to help your business identify whether the risk controls you have in place are effective. Reference For information about managing health and safety, you may find the following national and international resources useful. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 59 of 67 Note: guidance material is being developed all the time. Please keep checking WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators for more guidance. The UK core guidance on health and safety management for leaders, owners and line managers is HSG65 Managing for health and safety: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/hsg65.pdf The UK guidance INDG163 Risk Assessment contains some excellent information on the risk management process: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg163.pdf WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 60 of 67 Standard 14: The business (with workers and representatives) periodically reviews the effectiveness of its risk management activity. Purpose Reviewing risk controls and overall risk management processes allows you to assess whether all the work you have put into identifying, assessing, controlling, and monitoring your risks is making a difference and keeping your workers safe at work. Guidance Good risk reviewing gives you an opportunity for continual improvement to make your workplace safer. Using your risk profile, ask yourself some questions about each risk: Risk reviews are informed by your business’s monitoring processes that you have carried out on the risks. You will find it helpful to plan a structured process for your risk review. Identify the risks you’re planning to consider (you may find it helpful to divide your risk profile into several sections and review different sections on a planned basis, to spread the review work out) and identify who needs to be part of the process. You will also need to identify how you’re planning on capturing any changes and corrective actions. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 61 of 67 Collect your data and keep asking yourself if there are any reasonably practicable steps that you can apply that will control the risk more effectively, that is controls that are higher up the hierarchy of control. There are many ways you can review risks. One useful way is to get a group of people together, including a diverse group of representatives and workers from around your business, to discuss: Whether your risks are adequately controlled What has changed about the risks since your last review Whether you need external advice on technical issues What your risk and accident/non-injury reporting has identified What new guidance or information has come out from regulators or industries What information your suppliers can provide about new or more effective ways of controlling your risks. Once you’ve gathered your information you need to take your risk profile into your business to see if what is recorded there is what actually happens in practice. Internal and external experts may be very useful in this process. Once you have reviewed your risk profile, set some SMART objectives to measure whether the new version of your risk profile is making a difference to your losses: personal, business, equipment, reputational and so on. How often should risk reviews be done? How often you review risks will depend on how serious the risk is, how often workers are exposed to it, and how often the work area changes. At the very least, risks should be reviewed each year to make sure that any changes in your operations are taken into account in the way you manage risk. If your risk monitoring and data analysis (accidents, reporting, health surveillance etc.) show that your risk controls are ineffective, you will need to review your risk, how you manage it, and its controls more frequently. Changes to guidance and regulation If there are changes published in guidance material from regulators or industry, or changes in the regulatory framework (new regulations and legislation), you will need to review your risk profile to ensure that you’re still complying with good practice and any legal changes. Review outcomes You should expect corrective actions or recommendations to come from review or audit processes. You can look at those actions as your opportunities for continual improvement in the ways you keep your workers safe and healthy. Remember to assign those actions and track them to completion. Sharing what you learn One of the most valuable things you can do is to share what you have learned about risk within your business, showing workers how the risk management process is helping to keep them safe and healthy, so they can enjoy their work and go home safe to their families. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 62 of 67 It is also valuable to share what you have learnt through your risk management processes with your industry peers. People Workers, representatives, senior and line managers, contractors, suppliers of plant and equipment, and other external experts may be helpful in risk management reviews. Reference For information about managing health and safety, you may find the following national and international resources useful. Note: guidance material is being developed all the time. Please keep checking WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators for more guidance. The UK core guidance on health and safety management for leaders, owners and line managers is HSG65 Managing for health and safety: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/hsg65.pdf The UK guidance INDG163 Risk Assessment contains some excellent information on the risk management process: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg163.pdf WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 63 of 67 Standard 15. The business (with workers and representatives) is prepared for, and can respond to, emergencies. 15.1 The business (with workers and representatives) identifies foreseeable emergencies relevant to its work locations. 15.2 The business (with workers and representatives) is prepared for emergency response and recovery. 15.3 The business (with workers and representatives) regularly practices and reviews its emergency processes. Purpose You need to know what could go wrong in your business and have plans in place to mitigate any emergency situation so that you can return to “business as usual” as soon as possible. Guidance Identifying your credible emergency situations Your risk identification will help you identify credible emergency situations in your workplace. Fire is an obvious credible emergency for all businesses caused by internal or external reasons, but you need to think more widely than just fire. For example, if you have a forward-facing complaints office dealing with members of the public, one of your credible emergency situations may be violence or hostage-taking. High risk activities such as those covered by Permits to Work will all have associated credible emergency situations, including suspended rescue for work at heights, unconscious rescue for confined space entry, trench collapse for excavations, and so on. Medical events and workplace accidents are also credible emergencies that need you to put plans in place about how you can mitigate the outcomes. Businesses based in New Zealand need to consider natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods and landslides as part of your list of credible emergencies. Depending on where your business is located, you may also need to consider the impact of volcanic eruption and/or ash fall, geothermal eruption, tsunami, and sudden land collapses, extreme weather events like tornadoes, hurricanes and drought, and so on. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 64 of 67 Credible business emergencies may also include power cuts, loss of your key suppliers, equipment or data loss, or loss of key personnel. Plan how you’re going to control those risks. Effects of other operations When you are identifying your credible emergency situations, remember to consider the businesses and activities that could affect you. For example, if you are in the flightpath of an airfield or airport, an aircraft crash may be a credible emergency. If you are near a busy road, a vehicle crash could affect your access or equipment. If there is an operation using chemicals nearby, consider how their chemical leak or spill could affect your workers and visitors. Preparing for emergencies Once you have identified your credible emergencies, put a plan in place to control or mitigate the effects of each emergency situation. Each plan will need to identify: WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 65 of 67 These questions will help you identify the resourcing and planning you need to put in place for each emergency situation. Equipment capability When you’re resourcing your emergency planning, remember that some equipment needs to be regularly checked to make sure it is still working effectively. Items such as emergency eyewash and shower stations, first aid kits, fire extinguishers, and process control emergency shutoffs need to be checked regularly to make sure they are still in place and effective. When you’re planning for civil defence emergencies, think about how you’re going to rescue and help people if they are trapped for a long time. People capability Emergency response is something that needs to be practised, because it is something that only happens occasionally. When you’re planning for emergency response, identify what roles are required to be filled and plan training for those people. For example, if you’re planning to use a full CIMS (Co-ordinated Incident Management System) process for complex emergency responses, how are you planning to train people to fulfil the CIMS roles and ensure that everyone in your business knows who is responsible? Who are your emergency wardens, first aiders, chemical responders, and so on, and how will they keep their skills up-to-date? Practicing and reviewing emergency procedures The Fire Safety and Evacuation of Buildings Regulations 2006 requires you to practice your fire evacuation processes not less than every six months. This timeframe may be shorter depending on what other legislative requirements you have (for example, if you are an educational institution). Your emergency preparedness also requires you to practise all other emergency plans you have in place to ensure that they will be effective when required. For example, if there was a flood, have you practised how you would evacuate people from your premises safely? If there was a volcanic eruption, do you have enough face masks to protect your people, and can you seal entry points to prevent ash damaging your equipment? Some businesses will have very specific credible emergency situations. For example, companies that use confined space entry will need to practise how they would carry out an unconscious rescue of a person who has entered the confined space. Once you have had a drill of any kind, you need to check that the plans you had in place mitigated and controlled the emergency. People Workers, representatives, senior managers, line managers and supervisors, trained emergency responders such as emergency wardens or chemical handlers, health and safety professionals, emergency management professionals may all be involved in identifying credible emergencies and identifying and practicing appropriate plans. WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 66 of 67 Reference For information about managing health and safety, you may find the following national and international resources useful. Note: guidance material is being developed all the time. Please keep checking WorkSafe New Zealand and other regulators for more guidance. Guidance on emergency procedures for workplaces from WorkSafe New Zealand: http://www.business.govt.nz/worksafe/information-guidance/all-guidanceitems/emergency-procedures Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management has information on managing natural disaster situations: www.civildefence.govt.nz/resources The NZ Fire Service has a lot of good guidance on managing fires: http://fire.org.nz/Business-Fire-Safety/Pages/Business-Fire-Safety.html The Health and Safety Executive (UK) has a page with useful information on emergency procedures: http://www.hse.gov.uk/toolbox/managing/emergency.htm The Health and Safety Executive (UK) has a guide for high-hazard facilities covered under their COMAH (Control of Major Accident Hazard) Regulations: http://www.hse.gov.uk/comah/guidance/on-site-emergency-planning.pdf WORKSAFE NZ-29804595 Page 67 of 67