3
3
3
3
3
1
2
2
1
is a model organism for Archaea, which affords researchers the beneficial quali$es such as (1) producing methane used as biogas and (2) manufacturing isoprenoids as precursors for high-‐value biochemicals. However, there are few gene$c tools available to metabolically engineer Archaea. Our goal is to develop some useful tools for synthe$c biology of Archaea. Building on our past
projects, which created and characterized an mCherry reporter system and a recombinant mutant making geraniol, our team is now working to (1) create, characterize and model a ribosome-‐binding site (RBS) library using the mCherry reporter system and (2) model geraniol produc$on of the recombinant
using flux balance analyses. Addi$onally, our team has ini$ated an Archaeal InterLab Study to further characterize the reproducibility of our mCherry reporter system.
Archaeal Ribosome Binding Site (RBS) Library
Development:
2
Inspired by the iGEM HQ
InterLab Measurement Study, we extended this type study into the realm of Archaea. We used mCherry extracts from our developed
transformants (
). Our goal was to determine if our mCherry quan$fica$on protocol was reproducible among many different labs. Collected data from par$cipa$ng teams
(
and data analysis
are shown in
.
Using the metabolic model for
that our
2014 team amended by adding geraniol metabolites and reac$ons, we discovered a significance in the CO
(
).
2
/NH
4 ra$o for the produc$on of geraniol via
Figure 6 . Flowchart depic$ng specific constraints tested, as well as their flux balance results
A con$nuing project for our iGEM Team, developing a library of varying transla$onal efficiency for Archaea, is a tool missing in Synthe$c Biology. Previously we characterized a na$ve and two theore$cal sequences
(
-‐2). This year we created a new part:
(
shows the representa$ve mutants from our library that have met standards of cul$va$on, screening, and sequencing.
(
Figure 1. The steps through which our transla$onal library development occurs. From L to R: anaerobic transforma$on, PCR and sequencing of mutant, mCherry extrac$on and matura$on, and collec$on of fluorescent data.
Random oligonucleo$des were cloned into the RBS upstream of the gene encoding mCherry in a methanocccal expression vector. Clones were picked and the oligonucleo$de iden$fied by PCR and sequencing. Fluorescence was then determined to evaluate mCherry expression (
). In addi$on, the measurement reproducibility was determined through the Archaeal InterLab Study.
P hmvA
RBS mCherry Reporter
C A G T T A G C G C T A T G
. Transcrip$on unit including promoter hmvA
), ribosome binding site (RBS), and mCherry reporter gene for Bba_K1635000. The fourth base in the RBS (designated in red) has a G to T transversion.
180
160
A
Figure 4. (L) Process overview for conduc$ng our Archaeal InterLab Study. (R) List of teams that par$cipated in our
Archaeal InterLab Study
UGA
MIT
Stony Brook
UCSF
Carnegie Mellon
Genspace
Columbia NYC
UGA
100%
MIT
83%
100%
Stony Brook
90%
70%
100%
Table 1.
Correla$on matrix of mCherry fluorescence data across 7 par$cipa$ng iGEM teams aeer removing individual outlier data (see below for the ESD test table).
UGA
MIT
UCSF
Carnegie Mellon
Genspace
Columbia NYC
2
Stony Brook
L1C8 L1C13 L1C15 L1C18
0.55
0.48
0.93
0.50
0.66
0.41
0.76
0.56
0.65
0.43
0.87
0.63
0.39
0.53
0.77
0.49
0.44
0.43
0.33
0.62
0.50
0.50
0.77
0.55
0.06
0.74
0.44
0.81
0.22
0.50
0.79
0.76
0.70
0.33
0.51
1.21
0.96
0.70
1.06
0.54
0.61
0.56
0.42
0.76
0.71
0.32
0.81
0.78
0.37
0.76
0.66
1.11
0.61
0.45
0.81
0.94
0.71
0.63
0.71
0.66
0.60
0.37
1.23
0.96
0.72
0.80
0.45
0.57
N.A.
1.08
1.08
0.63
0.56
0.93
0.10
0.45
0.57
0.65
0.45
0.50
0.63
0.50
0.90
0.58
Genspace
12C2
0.53
0.52
0.49
0.47
0.48
0.47
0.16
0.63
0.58
0.64
N.A.
N.A.
0.69
N.A.
N.A.
0.49
N.A.
N.A.
0.58
0.55
0.54
UCSF Carnegie Mellon Genspace Columbia NYC
79%
81%
69%
66%
73%
68%
82%
94%
64%
100%
62%
91%
100%
61%
70%
69%
100%
73%
76%
63%
65%
100%
L2C15 L2C16 M3C1 L2C12 15C2
0.80
0.86
0.96
0.73
0.69
0.85
0.74
1.09
0.70
0.62
0.73
0.71
0.96
0.71
0.93
0.73
0.77
0.91
0.58
0.66
0.76
0.71
1.20
0.79
0.62
0.84
1.14
0.89
0.70
0.96
0.81
0.90
0.76
0.38
0.61
0.97
0.86
1.27
0.85
0.70
0.82
1.17
0.97
0.73
0.97
0.79
0.90
0.87
0.77
0.92
0.62
0.69
1.07
0.74
0.96
0.73
0.97
1.06
0.76
0.79
0.68
1.03
1.13
1.13
0.93
0.62
0.80
0.92
0.95
1.04
0.95
1.02
0.95
0.73
0.87
0.61
0.74
0.92
0.75
0.75
0.53
0.79
1.21
0.80
0.74
0.87
0.81
0.87
0.77
1.01
0.68
1.00
1.00
0.69
0.84
0.90
0.84
1.24
0.87
0.67
0.82
1.03
0.76
0.71
1.00
Significant outliers (p<0.05)
Significant outliers (p<0.05)
Table 2. ESD (Extreme Studen$zed Deviate) test to iden$fy individual outlier data obtained for each mutant colony.
The top row represents 10 mutant colonies, while each column represents triplicate mCherry fluorescence measurements from each team for the corresponding colony. Fluorescence values were standardized into percentage values rela$ve to colony M3C1, by making the average fluorescence values for this colony 1.0 or 100%. Both significant and possible outliers were removed in subsequent analysis. N.A., not available.
140
120
100
80
60
40
G
T
T
TA
G
C
T A
C
We used UTR Designer [1] to model our mutated RBS sequences in order to determine if their prokaryo$c transla$on predictor could be applied to methanogens, specifically our organism
. We inpuoed our sequence into the tool, and the model predicted the Gibbs free energy (∆G
UTR
) as well as a protein expression level
6
4
20
T
2 y = -0.655ln(x) + 11.243
R ² = 0.0086
0
0
. Point muta$on coverage of
transformants that met cul$va$on, screening, and s e q u e n c i n g s t a n d a r d s . T h e s e q u e n c e
“CAGGTAGCGCTATG” represents the sequence of the
“na$ve” (BBa_K1383000), with all other point mutants standardized to the na$ve’s fluorescence value.
-2
-4
-6 y = -1.788ln(x) + 20.501
R ² = 1
-8 Experimental Data
Theoretical Data
-10
1.E+03 1.E+05 1.E+07 1.E+09
Normalized Expression Level
Figure 5. (L): The forma$on of the transla$on ini$a$on complex for M. maripaludis . ∆G
UTR
: the Gibbs free energy for binding of the Shine-‐Dalgarno (SD) sequence to the untranslated region (UTR) of the mRNA. (R) Predicted ∆G versus normalized expression level for both their theore$cal values, and our experimental values.
UTR
Limi$ng Nitrogen: No change in geraniol produc$on or specific growth rate (
):
Table 3 : Reducing NH
4 specific growth rate*)
& maintaining CO
2
and observing change in geraniol produc$on: (with same
Excess Carbon: Increases geraniol produc$on and specific growth rate (
):
Table 4a: Increasing CO
2
& maintaining NH
4
and observing change in geraniol produc$on (with corresponding change in specific growth rate*). By increasing the amount of CO rate increased, but not the geraniol produc$on.
2
, the specific growth
Table 4b : Increasing CO
2
+ maintaining NH
4
and observing change in geraniol produc$on (with same specific growth rate*). By increasing the amount of CO there was an increase in geraniol produc$on.
2
and maintaining the specific growth rate,
• Crea$ng and selec$ng
mutants: Rebecca Buchanan (RB)
• Sequencing analysis of mutants: RB, Lucas Bougang and Anjana Kumar
• Fluorescence measurement: Hirel Patel, John Buchanan and RB
• UTR modeling: Lucas Bougang; Wiki: RB and all members above
• Archaeal Interlab and outreach: Steven Kodish and Akshay Chandora.
• Metabolic modeling: RB; Funding: Walter Asencios
• Mentors: Dr. Zhe Lyu and Narendran Sekar being essen$al to the quality and comple$on of our project
• Advisors: Dr. William Whitman advising us along the way and opening up his lab and $me to teach us; Dr. Yajun Yan allowing us to use fluorometer.
1
2
3
Reference: [1] Seo, Sang W. et al. Predic$ve design of mRNA transla$on ini$a$on region to control prokaryo$c transla$on efficiency. (2013) Metabolic Engineering . Vol. 15 pg. 67-‐74.