Unit 3: Chapters 12, 13, 18, & 19 (Developers and Specialists) COLQ 2994 Honors Dr. Joseph A. Mayo Introduction: Fissioning of Psychology ►“Fission products of psychology”: no unifying theory by mid-20th century cluster of related, though diverse fields “era of the schools” gave way to over 50 areas of specialization Chapter 12: The Developmentalists ►History of developmental psychology: children = “miniature adults” until 17th century tabula rasa (John Locke) influence of Darwin’s evolutionary theory (mid-late 1800s) G. Stanley Hall (early 1900s): * “father of developmental psychology” * “ontogony recapitulates phylogeny” * questionnaire studies with adolescents 1 research-oriented and largely atheoretical by 1920s (Arnold Gesell) the rise of developmental theory: * Jean Piaget (1930s-60s): ~ cognitive development in children * Lawrence Kohlberg (late 1960s-80s): ~ moral development * life-span theories: ~ Erik Erikson’s (1950s) pioneering theory of personality development ~ Daniel Levinson’s contemporary view (all aspects of development; adaptation to changing realities) Modern-day developmental learning theory: Albert Bandura (1960s-80s): social-cognitive learning theory observational learning latent learning vicarious learning modeling & imitation ► Developmental psychology today: somewhat disorderly (but perhaps out of necessity) ►not a single dominant stage theory on some points, disagreement on others ►life-span developmental psychology more an approach than a theory ►agreement 2 Chapter 13: The Social Psychologists ►Social psychology (defined): no unifying concept, clear-cut identity, or generally accepted definition psychology sociology bridge ►History of social psychology: both recent and ancient area of inquiry Norman Triplett (1897): social loafing Muzafer Sherif (1930s): conformity Kurt Lewin (1890-1947): “father of social psychology” boldly imaginative experimental style - primary training center in U.S. (MIT, 1944) - field theory: - • mathematical terminology (e.g., vectors) • “life space” • present and future, ignoring past history • untestable & subjective (dualistic) • motivation lies at the core ► Social psychology after Lewin’s death: languished until WWII explosive expansion in 1960s ► “Closed cases”: Solomon Asch’s (1950s): conformity Leon Festinger’s (1950s): cognitive dissonance Stanley Milgram’s (1960s): obedience Philip Zimbardo’s (1970s): deindividuation Group dynamics: social facilitation vs. inhibition John Darley’s & Bibb Latane’s (1960s): bystander effect Psychology of prejudice 3 ►“Open inquiries”: attribution theory: first proposed by Fritz Heider (1958) displaced cognitive dissonance as leading topic by 1970s - absorbed into social cognition since 1980s - ►Value of social psychology: multicultural validity? validation of “middle-range” theories despite no unifying theory a true applied science Chapter 19: Psychology Today ►Portrait of a psychologist (traditional stereotypes vs. contemporary realities): Caucasian male doctoral-trained clinician ►Portrait of a science: knowledge not always cumulative (laterdisproved theories & no all-inclusive theory) “soft science” (many “unstable” ideas) many culture-bound principles much fragmentation without unifying theory (pros and cons) 4 ► Schism: American Psychological Association (1892) American Psychological Society (1988; renamed the Association for Psychological Science in 2006): academic & science-oriented psychologists who oppose including clinicians in their ranks ► Psychology and politics: psychological research seriously under-funded by federal government and private foundations potentially valuable research blocked by multiple approval constraints ► Status report (past through present): 1. mind-body problem: - objective-naturalistic cycle: * ancient Greek naturalism * contemporary behaviorism, neuroscience, & physiological psychology - subjective-dualistic cycle: * Wundtian psychology and much of prescientific psychology before him * contemporary cognitive psychology and humanistic psychology 2. nature-nurture debate: * interactionism remains the definitive conclusion ►The future of psychology: emergence as a unified science? absorption into those disciplines from which it had originally sprung (i.e., philosophy, natural sciences)? growth of an even more interdisciplinary foundation (e.g., political psychology, music therapy)? 5