Memo To: From: CC: Date: Re: 2007 Curriculum Working Group Martin Sullivan Sandy Love, Mark Roberts, Lubna Nasir, David Logue 28-06-06 2006-06-27 meeting NOTES Outcomes: Review of work to date: Intercalated Masters by Research would form an option alongside the intercalated BSc Final Year Will commence in term 3 of whatever academic year structure the University decide, but would run for 8 weeks to allow the core to be delivered. The impact of this on SA final year to be flagged as an issue to TJA. (I discussed this with Jim after the meeting and he is not averse to the proposal). LA wish to bring this change in as early as possible. Therefore CICI & CAS will have to visit their lecture structure and load to see if this is achievable ahead of the timescale for the 2007 course, which would be (2011-2012). Final year exam (Pre-registration): Discussion threw up a number conflicting issues eg logistics of tracking, having strands LA/SA that did not match assessments SA/EQ/Food. The need to address the student number issue with regard to overall organisation and Lanark. It was noted that this is an exit examination and must be able to demonstrate omnicompetence, and provide confidence to the public. Following discussion on Day 2 after consulting Jim Anderson, it is proposed that Final Year will have a single OSCE-based examination composed of 3 independent assessments weighted as follows: Eq [25], Food Animal Health & Production [25], SA [50]. Each assessment must be passed to allow graduation. Students failing an assessment/s in June will be allowed to carry passed assessment/s as provisional passes to Sept resit. Students failing in September will be expected to repeat the whole of final year. The argument being that only studying the failed assessment/s will lead to skill loss in the passed assessments, which would have implication for Day1 competencies (RCVS & AVMA). Thus a student failing an assessment in June will immediately be timetabled into the new final year on the assumption that they are repeating final year unless the outstanding assessments are cleared in Sept. The carry forward of the Public Health SDLA will be depend on what form it takes, if group work no carry forward. Logistics: we would have to stop teaching new final year in week 25 for one week to allow for the pre-registration examination. Advantages: objective, defensible, reduced examination load for staff & students, allows us to cope with larger final year numbers, able to map to AVMA clinical & RCVS Day1 competencies Examinations: In line with University policy, it was agreed to broaden instruments of assessment, but also to reduce the length of examinations. Other Examinations: For years 1-4, in each year a course would have a degree examination and 1 class written examination, the latter contributing to the degree grade). The timing of the class examination will depend the new academic year. However, a number of other assessments will contribute to the degree result. The degree examination would have the following assessments contribute to the final grade 106755128 End of year written Class written examination Report (modified essay) Practical (up to year & course) SDLA (up to year & course) 100 25 25 25-100 25-50 End of year written degree examinations MCQ (90mins): it was agreed that it would consist of 100 questions. T/F would have negative marking. However, there is evidence that many subjects to do not lend themselves to this method of examination, because the knowledge is not black and white. Some discussion as to whether these should be abandoned. It was agreed that negative marking is not well received by students and comes across as punitive, that the effect of abolishing negative marking and raising the pass mark be looked into. MS to model the impact of applying different pass marks on the 4th Yr CAS MCQ examinations over the last 3 years. It is assumed that MCQ examinations are likely to be delivered from computers in the future. (attached file 4th Yr CAS MCQ.xls) Short Questions (90 mins): It was agreed that this paper would consist of 9 questions. Pass/Fail Orals; There was considerable discussion over these in terms of objectivity, validity and defensibility as students are not all asked the same set of questions. It was argued they had a pastoral role in identifying borderline students. Agreed proposal: P/F orals for students in band E only in years 1-3. Distinction Orals: would be abolished. All students obtaining the secondary banding equivalent to 75% or over would be automatically awarded a distinction. Essays: following discussion it was agreed that the examination room essay should be abandoned. As Essays should be reflective rather than regurgitation of material, it was felt that the length of time students have for this method is too short. The essay would retained as an examination tool but in a different format ( See below) Class examinations would be composed of 50 MCQ (45mins) and 4 short Questions (40mins). The exact timing of the class examinations would be dependent on the chosen academic year, eg in the Edinburgh model the last week of first term, other models mid-January. Practical Examinations style would be selected by course from Laboratory based: this may take the form of workbooks, steeplechases etc OSCE: With the expectation that OSCEs will be a mode of assessment in years1-5, it is probable that as many different OSCEs are timetabled to run sequentially, so week 25 likely to be devoted to OSCE by staff and students. Data handling: e.g. epidemiological, herd records etc This assessment must be passed to pass the degree examination Modified/Open Report This would take the form of paper critique, problem solving report etc. These would be individual submissions and would be expect to be of a high quality fully referenced and submitted electronically. Questions should be structured in such a way as to encourage research of material, reflection and discourage plagiarism. Page 2 d:\106755128.doc Student Directed Learning Assignment (incs current library project, SelfDLA, CLA) Year course area/s covered submission 1st Biomedical Sciences science and ethics report & presentation nd Clinical Sciences AP lambing report rd 3 Pathological Sciences bioterrorism simulation report & presentation 4th Clinical Sciences SA clinical case research report & presentation 5th Clinical Sciences PH public health report & ? 2 This would be considered a form of extended piece of coursework Curriculum Hours: Lectures: An upper limit of 200 hours per year for lectures was established as working figure, which would approximate to 2 lectures per day. We agreed on the breakdown of the number of lectures per course per year. It was also accepted that CAS, the course that emerged from Surg/Repro I&II and CIC2 had already instigated a significant cut and that there would only room for minor tinkering and reduction in numbers e.g. Nutrition when merged with Animal Husbandry. The effect of this would be that the burden for lecture loss would fall to content currently in AHusb and CIC, with delivery of other aspects being transferred to one of the other 2 courses. Other All other methods of instruction were lumped together (with Self study excluded) and it was agreed that a rough ration of 1:1 with lectures was a good starting point. (attached file 2007-Teaching hours-student.xls) Methods of Instruction to include Lecture, Tutorials, Practicals, SDLA, Experiential Learning. Areas to be protected from reduction in hours Public Health Areas to be expanded as distinct and identifiable threads Communication Skills (Vicki Dale/ Pam Johnson) Biosecurity (Kathyrn Ellis) Areas to be introduced as distinct and identifiable threads Information skills (Maureen McGovern) Population Medicine aka Research & Analytical skills [biostatistics, research methods, epidemiology, analysis] Louise Matthews1, David Eckersall) Bioterrorism (Paul Everest) Business management (might this be an optional module run on a wed pm) MS to seek advice Organisation and Administration of 2007 curriculum Learning & Teaching committee Associate Dean, 5 Course Leaders (inc 1 Masters CL), Educational Technologist, TU Administrator Board of Studies Regulatory and oversight role Associate Dean and 3 course co-ordinators Page 3 d:\106755128.doc Each course to be lead by a Course Leader responsible for strategy and development For each year a course will have a dedicated Course Co-ordinator. The co-ordinator will be responsible for day-today management of the course in that year e.g. timetabling, examinations, classes etc Support for introduction of 2007 Curriculum Following discussion it was agreed that an additional administrative assistant (1FTE) would be required for 3 years to bed the new curriculum down (remembering that the old course will continue and repeat students will have to be offered the old examination). The administrative assistant must have excellent IT skills. It was agreed that an educational technologist would be essential in supporting the development of learning materials and tools, given the thrust toward more student centred learning. As there will inevitably be double teaching it was recognised that additional teaching staff would be required over and above the obvious temporary increase in demonstrators (x2 in terms of cost) drawn from the post-graduate and post-doctoral pool. We identified 2 options Option 1: employ term time university teachers for 3 years. Number = 4 (1BS, 1PS, 2CS). Second CS starting in year 2. Major disadvantage recruitment Option 2: create 6 part-time (2 years) MVM scholarships, preferably all vets. They will support teaching during term time and research outwith. Major advantage: Faculty gets increased PG numbers. The stipend would probably have to be set at Registrar level. The distribution and projects would be decided by the Course Leaders. (attached file 2007 curriculum-costs.xls) Next Step: It was agreed that this memo should be presented to FMG, and that agreement on resource commitment was essential before any further progress possible. Also agreed to circulate memo to current Learning & Teaching Committee. 1 Suggestion for names only Page 4 d:\106755128.doc