Fallacies A fallacy is an error in reasoning. It is a weak argument. To be more specific, a fallacy is an "argument" in which the premises given for the conclusion do not provide the needed degree of support. By becoming aware of the most common fallacies, you can hopefully avoid them in your own speech. Evidential Fallacies Slippery Slope Arguing that one bad thing will result in many others. The Slippery Slope is a fallacy in which a person asserts that some event must inevitably follow from another without any argument for the inevitability of the event in question. In most cases, there are a series of steps or gradations between one event and the one in question and no reason is given as to why the intervening steps or gradations will simply be bypassed. Also know as Camel’s Nose. If you let the camel put his nose in the tent, next thing you know his whole body will be in there. 1. If we pass laws against fully-automatic weapons, then it won't be long before we pass laws on all weapons, and then we will begin to restrict other rights, and finally we will end up living in a communist state. Thus, we should not ban fully-automatic weapons. 2. You should never gamble. Once you start gambling, you find it hard to stop. Soon you are spending all your money on gambling, and eventually you will turn to crime to support your earnings. 3. If I make an exception for you, then I have to make an exception for everyone. 4. We have to stop the tuition increase! The next thing you know, they'll be charging $60,000 a semester! 5. The US shouldn't get involved militarily in other countries. Once the government sends in a few troops, it will then have to send in thousands to die. 6. You can never give anyone a break. If you do, they'll walk all over you. 7. We've got to stop them from banning pornography. Once they start banning one form of literature, they will never stop. Next thing you know, they will be burning all the books! 1 Evidential Fallacies Red Herring Distracting listeners with sensational, irrelevant material. “The name of this fallacy comes from the sport of fox hunting in which a dried, smoked herring, which is red in color, is dragged across the trail of the fox to throw the hounds off the scent. Thus, a "red herring" argument one which distracts the audience from the issue in question through the introduction of some irrelevancy.” An irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue. The basic idea is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument and to another topic. (fallacy files) Myth of the Mean Using an average to hide a problem 1. "We admit that this measure is popular. But we also urge you to note that there are so many bond issues on this ballot that the whole thing is getting ridiculous." 2. "Argument" for a tax cut: "You know, I've begun to think that there is some merit in the Republican's tax cut plan. I suggest that you come up with something like it, because If we Democrats are going to survive as a party, we have got to show that we are as tough-minded as the Republicans, since that is what the public wants." 1. The average depth of a stream in the mountain is six inches. (There are some really deep places in the stream and several shallow. Trusting this information could lead someone into ‘deep trouble’). 2. The average person makes 32,000 a year. (The reality is there are a few really rich people and many very poor. The mean is not reflective.) 3. This community does not need aid because "the average monthly income is well over $6,000." (In fact, high salaries skew the number and in reality many families are far below the poverty line. 2 Flawed Proofs Ad Hominem Attacking the person rather than the point There are three major forms of Attacking the Person: ad hominem (abusive): instead of attacking an assertion, the argument attacks the person who made the assertion. ad hominem (circumstantial): instead of attacking an assertion the author points to the relationship between the person making the assertion and the person's circumstances. ad hominem (tu quoque): this form of attack on the person notes that a person does not practice what he preaches. Poisoning the Well Poisoning the well may be considered a type of ad hominem attack. It involves trying to discredit what a person might later claim by presenting unfavorable information about the person. The intent is to bias listeners against the person in question and hence that they will reject any claims he might make. 1. You may argue that God doesn't exist, but you are just following a fad. (ad hominem abusive) 2. We should discount what Premier Klein says about taxation because he won't be hurt by the increase. (ad hominem circumstantial) 3. We should disregard Share B.C.'s argument because they are being funded by the logging industry. (ad hominem circumstantial) 4. You say I shouldn't drink, but you haven't been sober for more than a year. (ad hominem tu quoque) 5. "In order to maintain a civil debate, I will not mention my opponent's drinking problem." (ad hominem abusive) 6. Sometimes the attack is on intelligence. For example, "If you weren't so stupid you would have no problem seeing my point of view." Or, dismissing a comment with "Well, you're just smarter than the rest of us.” 7. We have a vice president who learns fast...so fast indeed that he invented the internet -- at the ripe old age of 12. Just last week, Vice-President Gore claimed, falsely, that children "can walk into any gun shop, any pawn shop, any gun show, anywhere in America and buy a handgun." Now I don’t know what Vice President Gore wasn’t inhaling, because the fact is, it’s been illegal for anyone under the age of 21 to go into a gun store and buy a handgun since 1968. But I suppose that in 1968, Al Gore was too busy inventing the Internet to know the current law! (Ad hominem abusive) (Political Disobedience by Charlton Heston) 8. These, they aren’t patriots. They are HATE-riots and they believe in the politics of HATE-riotism. (Michael Moore in Cambridge, Mass) 1. Don't listen to him, he's a scoundrel. 2. Before turning the floor over to my opponent, I ask you to remember that those who oppose my plans do not have the best wishes of the university at heart. 3. You are told, prior to meeting him, that your friend's boyfriend is a decadent wastrel. When you meet him, everything you hear him say is tainted. 3 Flawed Proofs Begging the question Assuming as decided what has actually not been proved. Aka Circular Reasoning 1. 2. Since I'm not lying, it follows that I'm telling the truth. 3. "Marijuana is illegal in every state in the nation. And we all know that you shouldn't violate the law. Since smoking pot is illegal, you shouldn't smoke pot. And since you shouldn't smoke pot, it is the duty of the government to stop people from smoking it, which is why marijuana is illegal!" 4. The fact that we believe pornography should be legal means that it is a valid form of free expression. And since it's free expression, it shouldn't be banned," 5. No sane person would consider suicide, because it’s insane to want to take your own life. 4 Defective Argument Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Assuming because one event follows another, it was caused by it. The name in Latin means "after this therefore because of this". Faulty Analogy Comparing things that are dissimilar in some important way 1. "Most rapists read pornography when they were teenagers; obviously, pornography causes violence toward women." The conclusion is invalid, because there can be a correlation between two phenomena without one causing the other. 2. I had been doing pretty poorly this season. Then my girlfriend gave me this neon laces for my spikes and I won my next three races. Those laces must be good luck...if I keep on wearing them I can't help but win! 3. Bill purchases a new PowerMac and it works fine for months. He then buys and installs a new piece of software. The next time he starts up his Mac, it freezes. Bill concludes that the software must be the cause of the freeze. 4. The Republicans pass a new tax reform law that benefits wealthy Americans. Shortly thereafter the economy takes a nosedive. The Democrats claim that the tax reform caused the economic woes and they push to get rid of it. Jane gets a rather large wart on her finger. Based on a story her father told her, she cuts a potato in half, rubs it on the wart and then buries it under the light of a full moon. Over the next month her wart shrinks and eventually vanishes. Jane writes her father to tell him how right he was about the cure. 1. Employees are like nails. Just as nails must be hit in the head in order to make them work, so must employees. 2. Government is like business, so just as business must be sensitive primarily to the bottom line, so also must government. (But the objectives of government and business are completely different, so probably they will have to meet different criteria.) 3. "Minds, like rivers, can be broad. The broader the river, the shallower it is. Therefore, the broader the mind, the shallower it is." 4. "We have pure food and drug laws; why can't we have laws to keep movie-makers from giving us filth?" 5 Defective Argument Non sequitur Reasoning in which principles and observations are unrelated to each other or to the conclusion drawn. Literally means “it does not follow” Hasty generalization Drawing conclusions bases on insufficient or nonrepresentative observations The size of the sample is too small to support the conclusion People often commit Hasty Generalizations because of bias or prejudice. For example, someone who is a sexist might conclude that all women are unfit to fly jet fighters because one woman crashed one. People also commonly commit Hasty Generalizations because of laziness or sloppiness. It is very easy to simply leap to a conclusion and much harder to gather an adequate sample and draw a justified conclusion. Thus, avoiding this fallacy requires minimizing the influence of bias and taking care to select a sample that is large enough. (Nizkor Project) 1. If we legalize marijuana, the next thing you know we'll legalize heroin, LSD, and crack cocaine. 2. If the mill were polluting the river then we would see an increase in fish deaths. And fish deaths have increased. Thus, the mill is polluting the river. 3. From Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich on why men are more suited than women to traditional military combat roles: “If combat means living in a ditch, females have biological problems staying in a ditch for 30 days because they get infections…(Moreover,) males are biologically driven to go out and hunt for giraffes.” Rep. Pat Schroeder responded: “I have been working in a male culture for a very long time, and I haven’t met the first one who wants to go out a hunt a giraffe.” 4. "Bill lives in a large building, so his apartment must be large." 1. Fred, the Australian, stole my wallet. Thus, all Australians are thieves. (Of course, we shouldn't judge all Australians on the basis of one example.) 2. I asked six of my friends what they thought of the new spending restraints and they agreed it is a good idea. The new restraints are therefore generally popular 3. Smith, who is from England, decides to attend graduate school at Ohio State University. He has never been to the US before. The day after he arrives, he is walking back from an orientation session and sees two white (albino) squirrels chasing each other around a tree. In his next letter home, he tells his family that American squirrels are white. 4. Sam is riding her bike in her home town in Maine, minding her own business. A station wagon comes up behind her and the driver starts beeping his horn and then tries to force her off the road. As he goes by, the driver yells "get on the sidewalk where you belong!" Sam sees that the car has Ohio plates and concludes that all Ohio drivers are jerks. 6 Persuasive Design Fallacy Either-or-thinking Also Called False Dilemma Framing choices so that listeners think they have only two options Strawman Belittling or trivializing arguments to refute them easily. The author attacks an argument which is different from, and usually weaker than, the opposition's best argument. Making a symbolic strawman from the opponent’s ideas and then knocking it down. This is the fallacy of refuting a caricatured or extreme version of somebody's argument, rather than the actual argument they've made. "Another well known, and much used, device is to misrepresent my position and attack things I have never said." Rachel Carson 1. Either you're for me or against me. America: love it or leave it. 2. Senator Jill: "We'll have to cut education funding this year." Senator Bill: "Why?" Senator Jill: "Well, either we cut the social programs or we live with a huge deficit and we can't live with the deficit." 1. "Senator Jones says that we should not fund the attack submarine program. I disagree entirely. I can't understand why he wants to leave us defenseless like that." 2. Bob: "Those of our people who are forced by circumstances beyond their control to rely on Social Security and government support such as Aid to Dependent Children, Food Stamps, etc. - these victims of an anarchistic economy are now faced with a second threat to their very existence: their already minimal benefits are now being reduced by inflation. If we are morally committed to supporting these people in the first place, then we must support them consistently: either we approve the proposed increase in Social Security and government support - or we simply turn our backs on those who are unable to help themselves." Dale’s straw man attack: "Bob represents naive liberals who only steal the taxpayer's hard-earned money - and throw it away on the idle. This is robbery - and I oppose it. 3. Sarah: It's not fair that when doing the same work and with the same qualifications, women are paid only $ .70 for every $1.00 that men are paid. Isn't it reasonable to expect that in equivalent jobs, with equivalent work experience and education, that your sex should have no impact on your salary? Allen’s Strawman attack: Of course not! Everyone knows that bosses go easier on women and what they do. Besides girls are physically smaller and weaker than men, so they need to be protected from the real world. 4. Frank: The NFL should follow the NCAA in banning the use of anabolic steroids among its players. Prolonged steroid use has proven to be harmful with such side-effects as liver dysfunction, cancer, heart ailments, and hormone imbalance. I hope that in the end the NFL will realize that the health of its athletes is the most important issue. Hunter’s Strawman Attack: Frank is nothing more than a purist who would have us go back to the days of leather helmets. Doesn't he realize that this is the year 2000? Sports technology has given athletes a chance to develop themselves to their maximum potential. He would deny them this opportunity? An athlete owes it to himself to be the best he can be. If he wants to compete, he'll have to use steroids because every other athlete does. 7 References A List Of Fallacious Arguments (n.d.). Retrieved February 20, 2008 from http://www.don-lindsayarchive.org/skeptic/arguments.html#hominem Fallacy Files (n.d.). Retrieved February 20, 2008 from http://www.fallacyfiles.org/redherrf.html Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate (n.d.). Retrieved February 20, 2008 from http://www.csun.edu/~dgw61315/fallacies.html#Non%20sequitur The Nizkor Project Fallacies. (n.d.). Retrieved February 20, 2008 from http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/index.html#index Osborn and Osborn, Public Speaking (7th edition) O’Hair, D. Stewart, R. & Rubenstein, H. (2004). A Speaker’s Guidebook Text and Reference Second Edition. Boston:Bedford. Rachel Carson Quote from a speech to the Women's National Press Club on December 5, 1962. Quoted on page 308 in Paul Brooks, Rachel Carson: The Writer at Work, Sierra Club Books, 1972-1989. Sprague, J. & Stuart, D. (005). A Speakers Handbook. Thomas Wadsworth: Australia. Steven’s guide to logical fallacies. (n.d.). Retrieved February 20, 2008 from http://www.onegoodmove.org/fallacy/toc.htm 8 So what makes a good argument? A Claim--- a statement that you are saying is true. It answers, “What are you trying to prove?” Evidence—supporting material that provides grounds for the belief. Could be examples, narratives, testimony, facts, or statistics. Evidence makes the claim more acceptable. Warrants—make the link between the calim and the evidence. They sho why the link between the claim and th evidence is “warranted” or justified. Claim Many herbal supplements contain powerful substances that may interact in harmful ways with over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription drugs. Evidence Warrant Serious side effects have occurred where people consumed prescription blood thinners such as warfarin (Coumadin) with herbal supplements such as St. John’s Wort, Kava, and valerian. Several leading medical journals have reposted cases documenting harmful interactions between a variety of supplements and medications. O’Hair, D. Stewart, R. & Rubenstein, H. (2004). A Speaker’s Guidebook Text and Reference Second Edition. Bedford: Boston. 9