Heart of Darkness
Analysis Question and Symposia Assignment
Directions:
Read the three sections of Heart of Darkness as scheduled. In addition to reading the section, you
should read all of the questions for that section and seriously think about a few of them. For each
section, you will be responsible for answering 2 questions. On the day that the reading of each section is
due, you will turn in TYPED answers in digital form to turnitin.com, and a hard copy to Mrs. Buesgen.
You must have a hard copy for yourself as well. You will be called upon to explain your question and
answer, with the purpose of generating class discussion, for at least one of the questions you turn in. If
someone who has the same question as you presents their answer, pay close attention! You will need to
to refute, support with further evidence, or qualify the other student’s response with illuminating
observations of your own. You will be graded on the quality of your written answers, your clarity in
explaining your perspective, your defense/explanation of opposition in response to others’ comments, and
your participation in the overall discussion.
These questions come from Cora Agatucci, Professor of English at Central Oregon Community College.
They are incredibly thorough and thoughtful. I have managed to change a few page number
PART ONE QUESTIONS
1.
Narrative Structure. In Heart of Darkness, we encounter a "frame narrative.” That is, the initial narrative frame-story,
told by a first narrator (never named) establishes the situation for and "frames" the telling of a second embedded (and the
main) story, told by a second and main narrator, Marlow. Who are the two narrators of the novel? Describe the situation
and characters on board the Nellie. How does Marlow differ from the other men, his audience, on board the Nellie? What
does the first unnamed narrator and the frame-story contribute to Heart of Darkness?
2.
Parallels & Foreshadowing. The unnamed first-person narrator prepares the way for Marlow's initial meditation "evok[ing]
the great spirit of the past upon the lower reaches of the Thames" river (1368). Marlow begins his story suddenly: "'And this
[England] also . . . has been one of the dark places of the earth'" (1368), "'when the Romans first came here nineteen
hundred years ago--the other day . . .'" (1369). In describing the Roman conquest of England (1369-1370), Marlow suggests
parallels to the main story of Heart of Darkness: what seems to be foreshadowed? How does Marlow define "conquerors"
and what kind of "idea" might redeem such conquest (1370)?
3.
Marlow's Story-telling. The unnamed Nellie narrator describes Marlow at various moments in the novel. What is Marlow
like? How do the others regard him? How does the unnamed narrator characterize Marlow's tales (1369)? Marlow suggests
that his audience must "'understand the effect'" on him to construct the meaning of this story--what the unnamed narrator
calls another of "Marlow's inconclusive experiences" (1370). Later Marlow says, "It seems to me I am trying to tell you a
dream,'" perhaps an "'impossible task'" (1385). What, then, is the nature of such story-telling? Where does its meaning
lie?
4.
Foreshadowing. Consider Marlow's account of what drew him out to Africa. What is suggested by his likening the Congo
River to a "snake" and himself to a foolish, charmed "bird"? Note the case of Fresleven, the river captain whom Marlow is
to replace; Marlow's comparison of the city of his employers to "a whited sepulchre" (73); the ominous atmosphere of the
Company's office with the two women knitting black wool and "guarding the door of Darkness" (74); the doctor ["alienist"
= early psychologist] who measures Marlow's head because he has a scientific interest in measuring "the mental changes of
individuals" who venture out to Africa in the Company's employ (76) What type of experience, what type of journey, do
these signs seem to predict?
5.
Notice Marlow's attitude toward "excellent" women like his aunt: Characterize Marlow's attitude toward women like
his aunt (77). Despite his protest that the Company is "run for profit," note that Marlow has been "represented"--like Kurtz
before him--as "an exceptional and gifted creature," "Something like an emissary of light" or "lower sort of apostle," and his
"excellent" aunt runs on about '''weaning those ignorant millions from their horrid ways.'" Afterwards he feels he is "an
imposter." Compare that "too beautiful" world such women live in, apt to fall apart at the first encounter with reality, to the
image of the blind-folded woman carrying a "lighted torch" depicted in Kurtz's painting (94) in the room of the young
aristocratic agent at Central Station.
6.
Europeans in Africa. Describe Marlow's first impressions of the European presence in Africa, captured in his observations
regarding the French steamer firing into the coast and regarding the Company's lower station (78-83). Contrast the
Europeans' naming of the Africans as "enemies" to Marlow's view of the Africans.
7.
Marlow’s Devils. Consider Marlow's description of the "devils" he has seen (82). What are the different types of "devils" he
describes? Why is he so appalled by the "flabby, pretending, weak-eyed devil of a rapacious and pitiless folly" that he sees
in most Europeans in Africa? What does he mean?
8.
Europeans in the [Belgian] Congo. Consider the Europeans that Marlow meets at the Company's stations: (a) the
Company's chief accountant (84-85: why does Marlow respect him?),
(b) the manager (89-91: why is such a man in command?),
(c) the "faithless pilgrims" (91): why does Marlow call them that?),
(d) the "manager's spy" (92): what kind of "devil" is this "papier-mache Mephistopheles" [95]?;
(e) the "sordid buccaneers" of the Eldorado Exploring Expedition (101). How does Marlow assess these men and their
motives for coming to and remaining in Africa?
9.
African Wilderness as Setting & Character: How does Marlow describe the setting: the Congo jungle--the "wilderness"
(e.g., see pp. 1384, 1387)? [Consider how Conrad's representation of the physical nature differs from that of the Romantics.]
10. Marlow & Kurtz. Long before he meets Kurtz, Marlow hears from others that Kurtz is extraordinary, "remarkable." On
what evidence do these claims seem to be based? By the end of Part I, Marlow develops a strong curiosity about Kurtz:
why?
11. Marlow’s Attitude toward Lies. Marlow sometimes leaps ahead of his story, as when he says that he would not have
fought for Kurtz, "but I went for him near enough to lie" (97). Why does Marlow "flashforward" in this way at times in his
narrative? What is Marlow's attitude toward lies (96)? What is the consequence of his allowing the "young fool" to
overestimate Marlow's "influence in Europe" (97)? Here we are returned to the "narrative present" of the narrative frame:
how does the unnamed Nellie narrator feel at this point in Marlow's narrative (97-98)?
12. Marlow, Work and Rivets. Analyze Marlow's statements about his "work": why is he so intent upon wanting "rivets" (98101)? Given his surroundings, the example of the other Europeans around him, his admission that he doesn't really like work
(99)--why do you think Marlow now turns so avidly to the "battered, twisted, ruined, tin-pot steamboat" (99)?
PART TWO QUESTIONS
13. Marlow, unobserved, overhears a conversation about Kurtz between the manager and his nephew (pp. 102-105), and states,
"...I seemed to see Kurtz for the first time," turning his [Kurtz's] back on headquarters and home, "setting his face towards
the depths of the wilderness..." (103). Marlow wonders at Kurtz's motive in turning back to the Inner Station instead of
returning home as he had intended. A bit later Marlow begins to supply an answer: "Everything belonged to him--but that
was a trifle. The thing was to know what he belonged to, how many powers of darkness claimed him for their own" (126).
What do you think had called Kurtz back to his Inner Station in the "heart of darkness"?
14. As Marlow progresses on his journey upriver, he grows increasingly "excited at the prospect of meeting Kurtz" (105); and
when he thinks Kurtz might die before Marlow gets to him, Marlow confesses "extreme disappointment": he had looked
forward to "a talk with Kurtz" (123)--why? What do you think is the source of Marlow's fascination with Kurtz? Why does
Marlow feel that to miss Kurtz would be to miss "my destiny in life" (124)?
15. Marlow observes: "Going up the river was like travelling back to the earliest beginnings of the world," a past remembered
"in the shape of an unrestful and noisy dream," amid this "strange" African "silence, a "stillness" without "peace"--the
"stillness of an implacable force brooding over an inscrutable intention. It looked at you with a vengeful aspect" (106). They
"crawled toward Kurtz" and "penetrated deeper and deeper into the heart of darkness" (108); emphasis mine--note this title
allusion). "We were wanderers on a prehistoric earth"--an atavistic journey into the human past--"We could have fancied
ourselves the first of men taking possession of an accursed inheritance, to be subdued at the cost of profound anguish and of
excessive toil" (108). What is this "accursed inheritance" that Marlow envisions? Kurtz has travelled up this river before
Marlow--what has happened to Kurtz?
16. Twenty "cannibals" travel with Marlow upriver (107). Aware of the Africans onshore, their headman advises Marlow to
"'Catch 'im. Give 'im to us" so they can "Eat 'im'" (114). Marlow then realizes that his African crewmen "must be very
hungry" (115), and meditates on the "devilry of lingering starvation, its exasperating torment,...its...ferocity" . Yet these big
powerful Africans "didn't go for us [the white men on board]" and Marlow is dazzled by the fact of their "Restraint!". What
is the source of such "restraint" that earns Marlows grudging admiration? Compare to Marlow's later judgment that his dead
helmsman, "just like Kurtz," "had no restraint": what is their common deficiency?
17. Describe Marlow's attitude toward black Africans. In particular, consider the attitudes expressed on 108-109. Why does he
say that "the worst of it" is suspecting "their not being inhuman"? Why is the thought of "remote kinship" judged "Ugly" by
Marlow? What is their "terrible frankness"--"truth stripped of its cloak of time"? What does Marlow mean when he says:
"The mind of man is capable of anything--because everything is in it, all the past as well as all the future"? What does it take
to prove that one is "as much of a man as these [Africans] on shore"?(109).
18. Examine Marlow's attitude toward the African "fireman" (109-110) and the "helmsman" (119-120). consider the scene of the
helmsman's death. Why does Marlow miss "my late helmsman awfully"? What is the helmsman's "claim of distant kinship
[to Marlow] affirmed in a supreme moment"?
19. Why does Marlow consider Towson's An Inquiry into some Points of Seamanship "an extraordinary find" (1392)? Marlow
judges it "luminous with another than a professional light"--why...especially in the midst of all this madness? Later we learn
that this book belonged to the "harlequin" Russian (1403-1404). Describe the Russian. What seems to be his relationship to
Kurtz?
20. Marlow admits that there is "an appeal to me in this fiendish row [the "wild and passionate uproar" of the Africans
onshore]....Very well; I hear;...but I have a voice, too, and for good or evil mine is the speech that cannot be silenced" (109).
A bit later Marlow argues with himself about "whether or no I would talk openly with Kurtz," but doubts seriously whether
it would matter: "my speech or my silence ...would be a mere futility," for "The essentials of this affair lay deep under the
surface, beyond my reach, and beyond my power of meddling" (112). Still, Marlow wants to talk to Kurtz and he must tell
his [Marlow's own? Kurtz's] story of Heart of Darkness: why?
21. Consider the theme of voice(s): Marlow makes what he calls "the strange discovery" that Kurtz "presented himself as a
voice" (123). The Russian says, "'You don't talk with that man--you listen to him" (132). Consider Kurtz's pamphlet for the
"International Society for the Suppression of Savage Customs"--Kurtz's 17-pages of "eloquence" and its "luminous and
terrifying" postcription: "Exterminate the brutes!" (1401)--as examples of what Kurtz has to say. Also, look at the segment
beginning “Now I think of it...” and ending “even the girl herself, now” on 125.
22. In what sense has "All Europe contributed to the making of Kurtz" (1401)? And why does Marlow feel the need to try to
"account to myself for--for--Mr. Kurtz--for the shade of Mr. Kurtz" (1400-1401)?
23. "The approach to this Kurtz grubbing for ivory in the wretched bush was beset by as many dangers as though he had been an
enchanted princess sleeping in a fabulous castle" (117). Does this comparison seem ironic, accurate, or both? Is Marlow on a
kind of quest? Does his journey bear any parallels from literature?
24. Marlow's boat is attacked by Kurtz's natives, we learn, because "'They don't want him to go'" (1404). And at one point
Marlow sees "a face amongst the leaves...looking at me very fierce and steady;" (1397)--Kurtz's African woman. Note how
she will be compared to Kurtz's European fiancee, the "Intended." Marlow believes that men must help keep European
women like Kurtz's fiancee and Marlow's aunt "in that beautiful world of their own, lest ours get worse" (1400). This
statement follows Marlow's proclamation: "I laid the ghost of his [Kurtz's] gifts at last with a lie" (1400). Consider the
relationships among these statements to Marlow's notion of a redeeming "idea," his earlier statements regarding "lies," and
their implications for Marlow's actions in the final scene (the interview with the Intended) in Part III.
25. Consider the characteristic ways that Marlow describes the African jungle setting--the "wilderness"--in Part II: e.g., pp.
1393, 1400. What part does the African "wilderness" play in this novel?
PART III
26. What is the function of the Russian in the novel? What motivates him? What is his relationship to Kurtz? Why does Marlow
consider the Russian "bewildering," "an insoluable problem" (1404)? What do we and Marlow learn about Kurtz from the
Russian? What was Kurtz doing in the "heart of darkness"?
27. What do the "heads on the stakes" reveal (1406)? How do you interpret Marlow's response to this "savage sight": he says,
"pure, uncomplicated savagery was a positive relief"--from what?--"being something that had a right to exist--obviously--in
the sunshine" (1407)? Why does Marlow scoff at the description of the heads belonging to "Rebels!" (1407)? The heads,
Marlow decides, "only showed that Mr. Kurtz lacked restraint..." (1406). What is the "deficiency" that Marlow perceives in
Kurtz--the lack of "restraint" that left Kurtz vulnerable to "the wilderness [which] had found him out early, and had taken on
him a terrible vengeance for the fantastic invasion" (1406)?
28. When Kurtz finally appears in the story (1407 & following), does he confirm the advance accounts that we have had of him?
Marlow describes Kurtz repeatedly as "a voice"--again (see Part II. question #21), what is the significance of this
description? What other terms used to describe Kurtz seem to you particularly important?
29. The African woman, "a wild and gorgeous apparition," appears on p. 1408. Note how she is described, the gesture she
makes more than once (e.g. pp. 1409, 1414), Marlow's associations between her and the "wilderness itself" (1409). What is
her significance? Compare/contrast her to Kurtz's European "Intended."
30. The manager judges Kurtz's "method...unsound" (1409). What "method" and of doing what, does the manager have in mind?
Why does Marlow react the manager with such disgust?--he says, "...I had never breathed an atmosphere so vile" (1410).
What prompts Marlow to turn, instead, "mentally to Kurtz for relief"--and ultimately pronounce Kurtz "a remarkable man"
(1410)? Marlow observes that he has "at least a choice of nightmares" (1410): what "choice" does he mean? (See also pp.
1411, 1414, when Marlow repeats this expression and indicates that Kurtz is associated with Marlow's "choice.")
31. What is the source of Marlow's feeling of kinship with Kurtz? What leads him to call himself "Mr Kurtz's friend--in a way"
(1410), to confess that "I did not betray Mr. Kurtz--it was ordered I should never betray him" (1411), to take into his keeping
Kurtz's personal papers and his fiancee's photograph, and to remain "loyal" to Kurtz to the end?
32. Amid drum beats and "weird incantation" dying in the night, "a strange narcotic effect" coming over him, Marlow discovers
Kurtz missing. Then Marlow experiences "a sheer blank fright," an "overpowering" emotion induced by "moral shock...as if
something altogether monstrous, intolerable to thought and odious to the soul, had been thrust upon me unexpectedly"
(1411). The sensation lasts "the merest fraction of a second"; then Marlow follows Kurtz's trail into the darkness. What
"moral shock" has Marlow experienced, do you think?
33. When Marlow finds Kurtz, it is the "moment, when the foundations of our intimacy were being laid" (1412). Marlow tries
"to break the spell--the heavy, mute spell of the wilderness--that seemed to draw [Kurtz] to its pitiless breast"--and
understands what "had driven him out to the edge of the forest...towards...the throb of drums, the drone of weird
incantations;...beguiled his unlawful soul...beyond the bounds of permitted aspiration" (1412). What is driving Marlow into
this terrible "intimacy" with Kurtz? Here, in the heart of darkness, Marlow proclaims: "Soul! If anybody had ever struggled
with a soul, I am the man" (1413). Kurtz's soul, "Being along in the wilderness,...had looked into itself, and by heavens! I
tell you, it had gone mad. I had--for my sins, I suppose--to go through the ordeal of looking into it myself" (1413). Interpret
this moment of crisis--for Kurtz and for Marlow.
34. On board the boat, moved by the "brown current...swiftly out of the heart of darkness" (1414), that soul "that knew no
restraint, no faith, and no fear", still continues to struggle. What opposing forces do you believe struggle within Kurtz? What
"diabolic love and...unearthly hate of the mysteries it had penetrated" contend for "possession of that soul satiated with
primitive emotions, avid of lying fame, of sham distinction, of all the appearances of success and power"? Do you see any
correspondences with Faust?
35. To what do Kurtz's final words, "The horror! The horror!" refer? It is because of Kurtz's last words, finally, that Marlow
affirms, "Kurtz was a remarkable man". Why does Marlow call these words "an affirmation, a moral victory"? and why does
Marlow later lie to the Intended when she asks for Kurtz's final words?
36. When Marlow returns to Europe and "the sepulchral city," why does he find it so profoundly "irritating" and "offensive"?
37. Marlow goes to see Kurtz's Intended--whether out of "unconscious loyalty" or "ironic necessit[y]," he's not sure. Why do
you think he goes?
38. The final scene between Marlow and Kurtz's fiancee is charged throughout with verbal and dramatic irony: that is, when
the speaker's implicit meanings differ from what he says, and/or the readers share with the author or character knowledge of
which another character (i.e. the Intended) is ignorant. Identify some instances of such ironies in this final scene.
39. Revisit the opening section of Part I, from "when the Romans first came here" to "What redeems it is the idea only...an
unselfish belief in the idea--something you can set up, and bow down before, and offer a sacrifice to...". Consider the
parallels foreshadowing what you now know happens to Kurtz, and to Marlow, in the heart of darkness. Reconsider also
Marlow's allusion to a redeeming "idea"\ in relation to the Intended's "mature capacity for fidelity, for belief, for suffering",
"the faith that was in her,...that great and saving illusion" before which Marlow bows his head--and which Marlow preserves
by telling a lie.
40. The novel concludes by returning to the narrative frame, set aboard the Nellie: the tide is now turning; the unnamed narrator
observes that "the tranquil waterway [the Thames]" seems now "to lead into the heart of an immense darkness". Marlow is
described as sitting "apart...in the pose of a meditating Buddha": do you think Marlow has achieved some sort of
enlightenment? Now that you, too, have experienced Marlow's story, revisit and reinterpret the unnamed narrator's
description of where the meaning lies of one of Marlow's tales. What, for you, seem to be the meaning(s) of Heart of
Darkness?