REAL NUMBER SET IS UNCOUNTABLE We prove the

advertisement
REAL NUMBER SET IS UNCOUNTABLE
HAO LIU
We prove the real number set is uncountable mainly by making use
of the so-called Cantor Diagonalization Argument. Specifically we construct a real number in (0, 1) that cannot be represented by a supposed
bijective function f from N to (0, 1) by this argument. Genious this
method looks, we still have a couple of alternative approaches to show
the real number set is uncountable. The proof below is one of the few.
Note: We consider it trivial to prove the real number set is not finite.
Hence mainly we’ll concentrate on the non-denumerable proof.
Claim: The set of all real numbers is uncountable.
Proof. : We’ll show that R is not denumerable by contradiction.
Suppose that R is denumerable, i.e., there exists a bijective funtion
f : N → R.
Then consider the following two sequences defined in a recursive manner:
a1 = f (1)
b1 = f (min{i ∈ N | f (i) > a1 })
an+1 = f (min{i ∈ N | an < f (i) < bn })
bn+1 = f (min{i ∈ N | an+1 < f (i) < bn })
Notice that
(1)
∀n ∈ N, an < an+1 < bn+1 < bn .
Next we’ll show that ∀n, m ∈ N, an < bm .
Suppose ∃n, m ∈ N such that an ≥ bm . Then since ∀n ∈ N, an < bn ,
we have only two cases: n < m or n > m.
(i) Case 1: if n < m then by (1) we know am > an ≥ bm . A contradiction with am < bm .
(ii) Case 2: if n > m then by (1) we obtain that an ≥ bm > bn . A
contradiction with an < bn .
Date: November 25, 2009.
Key words and phrases. Real Number Set, Uncountable.
1
2
HAO LIU
Therefore
∀n, m ∈ N, an < bm .
(2)
Let c = sup{an | n ∈ N}. Since {an } is nonempty and bounded, it
has a supremum, and we denote it as c. Next we’ll show ∀n ∈ N, c < bn .
Suppose ∃n ∈ N such that c ≥ bn . Then by (1), we have bn+1 < bn ≤ c.
Then by the definition of supremum, ∃m ∈ N such that bn+1 < am < c.
This is a contradiction with (2).
Therefore we have
(3)
∀n, m ∈ N, an < c < bm .
Notice that c is a real number and since f is surjective, we know that
∃k ∈ N such that f (k) = c. Next we’ll show there exists a contradiction.
By the definition of an , we obtain ∀n ∈ N, ∃ln ∈ N such that an =
f (ln ). Then by the definition of an , we have
an = f (ln ) = f (min{i ∈ N | an−1 < f (i) < bn−1 }).
Since f is injective we have ln = min{i ∈ N | an−1 < f (i) < bn−1 }.
Also notice that an−1 < f (k) = c < bn−1 . Hence ln ≤ k.
By the similar argument, we note that an−1 < an+1 = f (ln+1 ) < bn−1 .
Then it follows that ln ≤ ln+1 . But since an = f (ln ) < an+1 = f (ln+1 )
and f is injective, therefore ln 6= ln+1 .
Thus we have
(4)
ln < ln+1 ≤ k, ∀n ∈ N
But since k < ∞, l1 ≥ 1 and ln+1 ≥ ln + 1, ∀n ∈ N, it follows that
∀n > k, ln ≥ ln−1 + 1
≥ ln−2 + 2
≥ · · · ≥ l1 + n − 1
≥n>k
A contradiction with (4).
Therefore we have reached an unavoidable contradiction. Hence R is
non-denumerable.
Download