On the Riemann Zeta Function at Even Integers

advertisement
Information Sciences and Computing
Volume 2014, Number 1, Article ID ISC251013, 03 pages
Available online at http://www.infoscicomp.com/
Research Article
On the Riemann Zeta Function at Even Integers
Z. Ahsana, P. Lam-Estradab and J. López-Bonillac
a
Department of Mathematics, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India
Departamento de Matemáticas, ESFM, Edif. 9, Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN)
c
ESIME-Zacatenco, IPN, Col. Lindavista, CP 07738, México DF
b
Corresponding author: J. López-Bonilla; E-mail: jlopezb@ipn.mx
Received 12 October 2013; Accepted 19 December 2013
Abstract: Without the explicit participation of Bernoulli polynomials ( ), Balanzario [1]
exhibits an elementary method to determine (2 ), n = 1, 2,… Here we show the connection
between his polynomials and the ( ).
Keywords: Riemann zeta function; Bernoulli polynomials.
1. Introduction
In [1] the principal aim is to calculate the Riemann zeta function [2, 3] at even
integers, with the following result:
(2 ) = −
(
)
(2 )
,
(1)
where
( )=
,
( )=
( )=
−
!
,
#( ) =
%
! !
−
!
( )=
,
( )=
+
#
"
# !
−
'
( )=(
( )=(
'
without constants of integration.
,
+
!
,
(2)
,…
!
=
These polynomials can be generated with
'
#
−
'
)* −
and the recurrence relations:
)* ,
'
,
(3)
Information Sciences and Computing
2
(2) =
Thus with (1) and (2) is easy to obtain that
+"
+
,
(4) =
+
-!
,
(6) =
, … , in harmony with the values reported in the literature [2, 3]. It would be
interesting to have a closed expression for (2 + 1) 041. In the next Section, we
show how to write (1) and (2) in terms of the polynomials and numbers of Bernoulli.
-
2. Balanzario’s polynomials
We have the Bernoulli polynomials [5]:
( )=
,
( )=
( )=
−2
+
( )=
−3
+
−
,
−
+
,
−
+
−
,
( )=
,
5
2
( )=
−
(4)
, ….
2
with the properties:
=
=0
7
4 (1)
,
=0 ,
6 = 2, 3, … ..
' (0)
, 8 = 1, 2, …. ;
=0
∀ ;.
(5)
Then the polynomials (2) can be written in terms of (4), for example,
( )=
0
( )=
# !
(2 ) − 4
03
( )+
(2 ) − 48
( )1 ,
( )1 , etc.
( )−7
(6)
therefore:
=
thus (1) gives
,
(2) =
+
#
=−
and
(4) =
+
-!
,
!
(7)
.
Besides, it is possible to prove that:
= − >?
'
where >?
>? =
@A
= (−1)
(
)!
>?
,
(8)
are the Faulhaber [6]–Bernoulli [7] numbers:
,
>? = >? =
!
,
with the Bernoulli-like polynomials [5]:
>? =
, … ..
(9)
Information Sciences and Computing
>? ( ) =
>? ( ) =
>? ( ) =
, >? ( ) =
!
(15
!
Then
(21
>?
(3
− 30
>? ( ) =
− 1) ,
>? ( ) =
+ 7) ,
− 105
=−
3
+ 147
,
!
(
(3
− ),
− 10
+7 ) ,
(10)
− 31) , ….
>?
=
#
# !
,
(11)
in accordance with (7) and (8). If into (1) we employ (8) appears the known relation
[2, 8]:
@A
(2 ) =
>? .
(
)!
The expressions (6) and (8) show the relationship between the polynomials of
Balanzario and Bernoulli.
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
E.P. Balanzario, Elementary method to evaluate the Riemann zeta function at even
integers, Miscelánea Matemática, 33(2001), 31-41.
E.C. Titchmarsh, The Theory of the Riemann Zeta Function, Clarendon Press,
Oxford, 1986.
C. Calderón, The Riemann zeta function, Rev. Real Acad. Ciencias, Zaragoza,
57(2002), 67-87.
E.L. Stark, The series ∑∞
'F ' D , E = 2, 3, 4, … . , once more, Math Mag., 47(1974),
197-202.
C. Lanczos, Discourse on Fourier Series, Oliver & Boyd, London, 1966.
J. Faulhaber, Academiae Algebrae, Ulm, Germany, 1631.
J. Bernoulli, Ars Conjectandi, Thurneysen, Basel, 1713 (The Art of Conjecturing,
Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2005.)
Z. Ahsan, P. Lam-Estrada, J. López-Bonilla and R. López-Vázquez, On the LaforgiaNatalini’s inequality for the Riemann zeta function, Transnational J. of Mathematical
Analysis and Applications, 1(1) (2013), 1-4.
Copyright © 2014 Z. Ahsan, P. Lam-Estrada and J. López-Bonilla. This is an open access
article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited.
Download