BULLETIN OF THE GREEK MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 53, 2007 (147–149) Formulae for the kth Prime Number Panayiotis G. Tsangaris Received 28/03/2006 Accepted 10/06/2006 Introduction In which prime which this note we first prove an explicit formula for the kth prime (Theorem 1), improves a previous result of S. Regimbal [2]. Then we determine the smallest which is greater than a given natural number (Theorem 2), using a method extends a previous idea of R. Ernvall [1]. Theorem 1. Let k be a natural number. Then 1 m, ¯ ¯ pk = ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ m=2 m P ¯ ¯ 1 1 + ¯k − [√m] 1 √ ¯ [P n] P [m/d] ¯ ¯ [ m/d ] n=2 [ [n/d] ¯ ¯ n/d ] d=1 d=1 k2 X where [ ] is the integral part function. Proof. The proof of Theorem has its origin to Regimbal’s proof. We have: · ¸ ½ [n/d] 1 if d|n = 0 if d - n. n/d Let √ [ n] · X [n/d] ¸ f (n) = . n/d d=1 Mathematics subject classification: 11A51 147 148 Panayiotis G. Tsangaris A natural number n > 1 is composite if and only if it has a divisor d such that √ 1 < d 5 [ n]. Therefore ½ 1 if n is a prime f (n) = 0 if n is composite. We also define the function h by h(0) = h(1) = 0 and h(n) = [1/f (n)] for n > 1. Then h is the characteristic function for the set of all prime numbers. Let π(m) be the number of primes 5 m. Then π(m) = m X h(n). n=2 Also ½ h(m)π(m) = π(m), 0, if n is a if m is If k is a natural number, then ¸ ½ · 1 1, = 0, 1+ | k − h(m)π(m) | prime composite. if k = h(m)π(m) if k = 6 h(m)π(m). Therefore · ¸ ½ 1 m, if m is the kth prime m= 0, otherwise. 1+ | k − h(m)π(m) | J. Rosser and L. Schoenfeld [2] have proved that pk < k(log + log log k) for k > 5. Hence, pk < k 2 for k = 3. Consequently pk = k2 · X m=2 ¸ 1 m, 1+ | k − h(m)π(m) | which proves the Theorem. Theorem 2. (The Smallest Prime Greater than a Given Positive Integer) Let m be a natural number with m = 2. Let p1 , p2 , . . . , pk be the primes not exceeding m. µ ¶ Let ∞ P 2m ak a1 s s c = /p1 · · · pk , where ai = ([2m/pi ] − 2[m/pi ]) for each i = 1, 2, . . . , k, m s=1 P (or let c = (2m)!/pb11 · · · pbkk , where bi = [2m/psi ] for each i = 15s5[(log 2m)/(log pi )] 1, 2, . . . , k). Let t = cc /(cc , c!). Let r be the height of c in t, i.e. cr |t but cr+1 - t. Then, the smallest prime greater than m is equal to the natural number c/(t/cr , c). 149 Formulae for the kth Prime Number Consequently, if p1 , p2 , . . . , pk , . . . is the sequence of all primes, then pk+1 = c/(t/cr , c), where c, t, r etc are defined as above, by putting m = pk . Proof. Let q1 , . . . , qn be all possible prime numbers in increasing order such that m < qi < 2m for any i = 1, 2, . . . , n. It is easily seen that c = q1 q2 · · · qn . Let ai be the height of qi in c!. Then ai = ∞ X [c/qis ] s=1 < ∞ X c/qis < c. (1) s=1 Also, the following hold true: [c/qi+1 ] = c/qi+1 < c/qi = [c/qi ] s [c/qi+1 ] 5 [c/qis ] for for 15i5n−1 s = 2, 3, . . . . (2) (3) From (1), (2) and (3) we obtain: c > a1 > a2 > · · · > an > 0. Hence (cc , c!) = q1a1 · · · qnan . Thus t = q1e1 · · · qnen , where ei = c − ai and consequently: 0 < e1 < · · · < en . Moreover, cr kt implies r = e1 . Therefore t/cr = q2e2 −e1 · · · qnen −e1 and (t/cr , c) = q2 . . . qn , where c/(t/cr , c) = q1 . Finally, pk+1 = c/(t/cr , c), which ends the proof. References [1] R. Ernvall, A formula for the least Prime greater than a given integer, Elem., Math. 30(1975), pp. 13–14. [2] S. Regimbal, An Explicit Formula for the kth Prime Number, Math. Mag. 48(1975), pp. 230–232. [3] J.B. Rosser and L. Schoenfeld, Approximate formulas for some functions of prime numbers, Illinois J. Math. 6(1972), pp. 64–94. ¦ Panayiotis G. Tsangaris Department of Mathematics, Athens University, 15784 Panepistimiopolis, Athens, GREECE ptsangaris@math.uoa.gr