IEP Critique Assignment: 10%
a. Students will be provided with sample IEP’s and the Standards for
Development, Program Planning and Implementation. In groups, you will
critique the sample IEP provided. As a GROUP, go through each of the
standards and answer the question, does this IEP meet the standard? If
yes, state yes. If no, state no and list the reason(s). This should be about
1-2 pages long. Each GROUP will submit 1 paper copy of the group’s
critique (next class) of the IEP stating whether the IEP met the Standards
for Development. Please attach the group response to a copy of the
sample IEP. For information on grading please read the IEP Group Mark
rubric. (Available on my website).
b. Each INDIVIDUAL member of the group will attach their individual
written response to the group response and sample IEP. The individual
response will consist of a score from 1 (low) to 5 (high) indicating the
overall assessment of the IEP and an explanation of the rationale for the
score. The score and the rationale should be based on the Ministry
guidelines for IEPs. This should be about 1page in length. Please refer to
the scoring rubric for the IEP Individual Work rubric for information on
grading.
IEP Critique Group Mark
Members of group:
_____________________________________________________________________
Criteria
Noncompliant
Neatness
Work is
Illegible.
Did not
identify or
describe the
whether the
Did IEP meet
IEP met the
the Standards
Standards for
for
Development.
Development?
Sentence
Structure
Grammar
and Spelling
Work has
more than
four spelling
errors and/or
grammatical
errors.
Pts.
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Work has
four
areas that are
sloppy.
Work has
Work has
Work is
one area that neatly done
three
areas that are is sloppy.
sloppy.
Identification
is vague and
lacks detail
and
evidence.
Identified
whether the
IEP met the
standards for
development
and/or
provides few
pieces of
evidence and
details.
Identified
whether the
IEP met the
standards
for
development
and/or
provided
some
evidence
and details
Clearly
identified
whether the
IEP met the
standards
for
development
and
provided
strong
evidence
and details
Work pays
little
attention to
proper
sentence
structure.
Work
contains
structural
weaknesses
and
grammatical
errors.
Sentence
structure is
generally
correct.
Some
awkward
sentences
do appear.
Sentence
structure is
correct
throughout
the entire
document.
Work has
three
spelling
errors and/or
grammatical
errors.
Presentation
has no more
than two
misspellings
and/or
grammatical
errors.
Document
has no more
than one
misspellings
and/or
grammatical
errors.
Document
has no
misspellings
or
grammatical
errors.
Group mark --->
____
____
____
____
__/16
IEP Critique Individual Work
Name: ______________________________
Criteria
Neatness
Noncompliant Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Work is
Illegible.
Work has
four
areas that are
sloppy.
Work has
three
areas that are
sloppy.
Work has
one area
that is
sloppy.
Work is
neatly done
Did not score
the IEP.
Identification
is vague and
lacks detail
and
evidence.
Identified the
score of the
IEP and/or
provides few
pieces of
evidence and
details.
Identified
the score of
the IEP
and/or
provided
some
evidence
and details
based on the
Ministry
guidelines
Clearly
identified
the score of
the IEP and
provided
strong
evidence
and details
based on the
Ministry
guidelines
Structure is
very weak
and gives the
reader the
impression
that little
time was
devoted to
the quality of
the
assignment
Some
attempt to
structure the
argument has
been made,
but has poor
connections
between IEP
and Ministry
guidelines.
Structure
developed
reasonably
well, but
lacks clear
connections
between
IEP and
Ministry
guidelines.
Structure of
work is
very well
developed
with clear
connections
between
IEP and
Ministry
guidelines.
Work pays
little
attention to
proper
sentence
structure.
Work
contains
structural
weaknesses
and
grammatical
errors.
Sentence
structure is
generally
correct.
Some
awkward
sentences
do appear.
Sentence
structure is
correct
throughout
the entire
document.
Work has
three
spelling
errors and/or
grammatical
errors.
Presentation
has no more
than two
misspellings
and/or
grammatical
errors.
Document
has no
more than
one
misspellings
and/or
grammatical
errors.
Document
has no
misspellings
or
grammatical
errors.
IEP score
There is a
total lack of
structure.
Organization
Terrible
sentence
structure.
Sentence
Structure
Grammar
and Spelling
Pts.
Work has
more than
four spelling
errors and/or
grammatical
errors.
Total---->
____
____
____
____
____
__/20