Carlson, Fall ‘08
Essay #2: Stasis
You’ll remember from our discussion in class that most problems
are difficult to solve because people argue from many different
positions. As a result, arguments seem to shift from one notion
to the next.
Stasis theory is based upon the idea that an
argument that “doesn’t move” can be solved.
In order to do
this, we must first ask four questions:
o Fact: Did/does it happen?
o Definition: What happened? How do we define it?
o Value: Is it good/bad?
o Policy: What should we do?
As you ask these questions, the point at which individuals
disagree will become clear: Are they arguing over occurrence,
definitions, values, or policies? This essay is your chance to
apply stasis theory. Although there will be no rough draft for
this assignment, I highly suggest talking to me during my office
hours.
This assignment has several steps:
1. Select a controversial topic that has many conflicting
positions (you may not use our example in class or your
topic from essay 1; find something new).
2. In the introduction, provide a synthesis of the argument
that walks the reader through the stasis questions.
Your
intro will conclude with the primary question of stasis
(the point where people begin to disagree).
3. Craft a thesis which divides the point of stasis into
several categories.
4. Argue your points using specific evidence citing exterior
facts and resources.
5. Conclude with the impact(s) of your argument.
Answer the
question: so what?
Essays will be graded upon three categories:
Clarity: Is there anything in your writing that prevents
the reader from understanding you?
Cogency: Are your arguments rational?
Are your reasons
appropriate to the topic? Are they fully developed?
Construction: Are the quotations properly introduced and
cited? Did you follow the directions?
Your
response
should
be
well-crafted,
thought-provoking,
carefully proofread for grammatical and structural errors, and
approx. 750 words (12pt Times font with 1-inch margins). Due:
11/14/08